Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2023-06-20 Rail Agenda PacketRAIL COMMITTEE Regular Meeting Tuesday, June 20, 2023 Community Meeting Room & Hybrid 2:00 PM Pursuant to AB 361 Palo Alto City Council meetings will be held as “hybrid” meetings with the option to attend by teleconference/video conference or in person. To maximize public safety while still maintaining transparency and public access, members of the public can choose to participate from home or attend in person. Information on how the public may observe and participate in the meeting is located at the end of the agenda. Masks are strongly encouraged if attending in person. The meeting will be broadcast on Cable TV Channel 26, live on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/c/cityofpaloalto, and streamed to Midpen Media Center https://midpenmedia.org. VIRTUAL PARTICIPATION CLICK HERE TO JOIN (https://cityofpaloalto.zoom.us/j/86388142528) Meeting ID: 863 8814 2528    Phone: 1(669)900‐6833 PUBLIC COMMENTS Public comments will be accepted both in person and via Zoom for up to three minutes or an amount of time determined by the Chair. All requests to speak will be taken until 5 minutes after the staff’s presentation. Written public comments can be submitted in advance to city.council@CityofPaloAlto.org and will be provided to the Council and available for inspection on the City’s website. Please clearly indicate which agenda item you are referencing in your subject line. PowerPoints, videos, or other media to be presented during public comment are accepted only by email to city.clerk@CityofPaloAlto.org at least 24 hours prior to the meeting. Once received, the  Clerk will have them shared at public comment for the specified item. To uphold strong cybersecurity management practices, USB’s or other physical electronic storage devices are not accepted. CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMENT  Members of the public may speak to any item NOT on the agenda.  VERBAL UPDATE ON INTERAGENCY ACTIVITIES A.Caltrain B.VTA C.City Staff ACTION ITEMS 1.Discuss and recommend to Council: (1) Re‐inclusion of the Viaduct Alternative and/or Elimination of the Trench Alternative, in consideration for Churchill Avenue (viaduct only), Meadow Drive and Charleston Road Grade Crossings; and (2) Whether the Viaduct Alternative and/or Trench Alternative Should Be Included In the Scope Of Caltrain’s Technical Review And The City’s Updated Evaluation Criteria.   FUTURE MEETINGS AND AGENDAS Members of the public may not speak to the item(s) ADJOURNMENT PUBLIC COMMENT INSTRUCTIONS Members of the Public may provide public comments to teleconference meetings via email, teleconference, or by phone. 1. Written public comments may be submitted by email to city.council@cityofpaloalto.org. 2. For in person public comments please complete a speaker request card located on the table at the entrance to the Council Chambers and deliver it to the Clerk prior to discussion of the item. 3. Spoken public comments using a computer or smart phone will be accepted through the teleconference meeting. To address the Council, click on the link below to access a Zoom‐based meeting. Please read the following instructions carefully. You may download the Zoom client or connect to the meeting in‐ browser. If using your browser, make sure you are using a current, up‐to‐date browser: Chrome 30 , Firefox 27 , Microsoft Edge 12 , Safari 7 . Certain functionality may be disabled in older browsers including Internet Explorer. Or download the Zoom application onto your smart phone from the Apple App Store or Google Play Store and enter in the Meeting ID below. You may be asked to enter an email address and name. We request that you identify yourself by name as this will be visible online and will be used to notify you that it is your turn to speak. When you wish to speak on an Agenda Item, click on “raise hand.” The Clerk will activate and unmute speakers in turn. Speakers will be notified shortly before they are called to speak. When called, please limit your remarks to the time limit allotted. A timer will be shown on the computer to help keep track of your comments. 4. Spoken public comments using a phone use the telephone number listed below. When you wish to speak on an agenda item hit *9 on your phone so we know that you wish to speak. You will be asked to provide your first and last name before addressing the Council. You will be advised how long you have to speak. When called please limit your remarks to the agenda item and time limit allotted. CLICK HERE TO JOIN    Meeting ID: 863‐8814‐2528   Phone: 1‐669‐900‐6833 Americans with Disability Act (ADA) It is the policy of the City of Palo Alto to offer its public programs, services and meetings in a manner that is readily accessible to all. Persons with disabilities who require materials in an appropriate alternative format or who require auxiliary aids to access City meetings, programs, or services may contact the City’s ADA Coordinator at (650) 329‐2550 (voice) or by emailing ada@cityofpaloalto.org. Requests for assistance or accommodations must be submitted at least 24 hours in advance of the meeting, program, or service. RAIL COMMITTEERegular MeetingTuesday, June 20, 2023Community Meeting Room & Hybrid2:00 PMPursuant to AB 361 Palo Alto City Council meetings will be held as “hybrid” meetings with theoption to attend by teleconference/video conference or in person. To maximize public safetywhile still maintaining transparency and public access, members of the public can choose toparticipate from home or attend in person. Information on how the public may observe andparticipate in the meeting is located at the end of the agenda. Masks are strongly encouraged ifattending in person. The meeting will be broadcast on Cable TV Channel 26, live onYouTube https://www.youtube.com/c/cityofpaloalto, and streamed to Midpen MediaCenter https://midpenmedia.org.VIRTUAL PARTICIPATION CLICK HERE TO JOIN (https://cityofpaloalto.zoom.us/j/86388142528)Meeting ID: 863 8814 2528    Phone: 1(669)900‐6833PUBLIC COMMENTSPublic comments will be accepted both in person and via Zoom for up to three minutes or anamount of time determined by the Chair. All requests to speak will be taken until 5 minutesafter the staff’s presentation. Written public comments can be submitted in advance tocity.council@CityofPaloAlto.org and will be provided to the Council and available for inspectionon the City’s website. Please clearly indicate which agenda item you are referencing in yoursubject line. PowerPoints, videos, or other media to be presented during public comment are accepted only by email to city.clerk@CityofPaloAlto.org at least 24 hours prior to the meeting. Once received, the  Clerk will have them shared at public comment for the specified item. To uphold strong cybersecurity management practices, USB’s or other physical electronic storage devices are not accepted. CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMENT  Members of the public may speak to any item NOT on the agenda.  VERBAL UPDATE ON INTERAGENCY ACTIVITIES A.Caltrain B.VTA C.City Staff ACTION ITEMS 1.Discuss and recommend to Council: (1) Re‐inclusion of the Viaduct Alternative and/or Elimination of the Trench Alternative, in consideration for Churchill Avenue (viaduct only), Meadow Drive and Charleston Road Grade Crossings; and (2) Whether the Viaduct Alternative and/or Trench Alternative Should Be Included In the Scope Of Caltrain’s Technical Review And The City’s Updated Evaluation Criteria.   FUTURE MEETINGS AND AGENDAS Members of the public may not speak to the item(s) ADJOURNMENT PUBLIC COMMENT INSTRUCTIONS Members of the Public may provide public comments to teleconference meetings via email, teleconference, or by phone. 1. Written public comments may be submitted by email to city.council@cityofpaloalto.org. 2. For in person public comments please complete a speaker request card located on the table at the entrance to the Council Chambers and deliver it to the Clerk prior to discussion of the item. 3. Spoken public comments using a computer or smart phone will be accepted through the teleconference meeting. To address the Council, click on the link below to access a Zoom‐based meeting. Please read the following instructions carefully. You may download the Zoom client or connect to the meeting in‐ browser. If using your browser, make sure you are using a current, up‐to‐date browser: Chrome 30 , Firefox 27 , Microsoft Edge 12 , Safari 7 . Certain functionality may be disabled in older browsers including Internet Explorer. Or download the Zoom application onto your smart phone from the Apple App Store or Google Play Store and enter in the Meeting ID below. You may be asked to enter an email address and name. We request that you identify yourself by name as this will be visible online and will be used to notify you that it is your turn to speak. When you wish to speak on an Agenda Item, click on “raise hand.” The Clerk will activate and unmute speakers in turn. Speakers will be notified shortly before they are called to speak. When called, please limit your remarks to the time limit allotted. A timer will be shown on the computer to help keep track of your comments. 4. Spoken public comments using a phone use the telephone number listed below. When you wish to speak on an agenda item hit *9 on your phone so we know that you wish to speak. You will be asked to provide your first and last name before addressing the Council. You will be advised how long you have to speak. When called please limit your remarks to the agenda item and time limit allotted. CLICK HERE TO JOIN    Meeting ID: 863‐8814‐2528   Phone: 1‐669‐900‐6833 Americans with Disability Act (ADA) It is the policy of the City of Palo Alto to offer its public programs, services and meetings in a manner that is readily accessible to all. Persons with disabilities who require materials in an appropriate alternative format or who require auxiliary aids to access City meetings, programs, or services may contact the City’s ADA Coordinator at (650) 329‐2550 (voice) or by emailing ada@cityofpaloalto.org. Requests for assistance or accommodations must be submitted at least 24 hours in advance of the meeting, program, or service. RAIL COMMITTEERegular MeetingTuesday, June 20, 2023Community Meeting Room & Hybrid2:00 PMPursuant to AB 361 Palo Alto City Council meetings will be held as “hybrid” meetings with theoption to attend by teleconference/video conference or in person. To maximize public safetywhile still maintaining transparency and public access, members of the public can choose toparticipate from home or attend in person. Information on how the public may observe andparticipate in the meeting is located at the end of the agenda. Masks are strongly encouraged ifattending in person. The meeting will be broadcast on Cable TV Channel 26, live onYouTube https://www.youtube.com/c/cityofpaloalto, and streamed to Midpen MediaCenter https://midpenmedia.org.VIRTUAL PARTICIPATION CLICK HERE TO JOIN (https://cityofpaloalto.zoom.us/j/86388142528)Meeting ID: 863 8814 2528    Phone: 1(669)900‐6833PUBLIC COMMENTSPublic comments will be accepted both in person and via Zoom for up to three minutes or anamount of time determined by the Chair. All requests to speak will be taken until 5 minutesafter the staff’s presentation. Written public comments can be submitted in advance tocity.council@CityofPaloAlto.org and will be provided to the Council and available for inspectionon the City’s website. Please clearly indicate which agenda item you are referencing in yoursubject line.PowerPoints, videos, or other media to be presented during public comment are accepted onlyby email to city.clerk@CityofPaloAlto.org at least 24 hours prior to the meeting. Once received,the  Clerk will have them shared at public comment for the specified item. To uphold strongcybersecurity management practices, USB’s or other physical electronic storage devices are notaccepted.CALL TO ORDERPUBLIC COMMENT Members of the public may speak to any item NOT on the agenda. VERBAL UPDATE ON INTERAGENCY ACTIVITIESA.CaltrainB.VTAC.City StaffACTION ITEMS1.Discuss and recommend to Council: (1) Re‐inclusion of the Viaduct Alternative and/orElimination of the Trench Alternative, in consideration for Churchill Avenue (viaductonly), Meadow Drive and Charleston Road Grade Crossings; and (2) Whether the ViaductAlternative and/or Trench Alternative Should Be Included In the Scope Of Caltrain’sTechnical Review And The City’s Updated Evaluation Criteria.  FUTURE MEETINGS AND AGENDASMembers of the public may not speak to the item(s) ADJOURNMENT PUBLIC COMMENT INSTRUCTIONS Members of the Public may provide public comments to teleconference meetings via email, teleconference, or by phone. 1. Written public comments may be submitted by email to city.council@cityofpaloalto.org. 2. For in person public comments please complete a speaker request card located on the table at the entrance to the Council Chambers and deliver it to the Clerk prior to discussion of the item. 3. Spoken public comments using a computer or smart phone will be accepted through the teleconference meeting. To address the Council, click on the link below to access a Zoom‐based meeting. Please read the following instructions carefully. You may download the Zoom client or connect to the meeting in‐ browser. If using your browser, make sure you are using a current, up‐to‐date browser: Chrome 30 , Firefox 27 , Microsoft Edge 12 , Safari 7 . Certain functionality may be disabled in older browsers including Internet Explorer. Or download the Zoom application onto your smart phone from the Apple App Store or Google Play Store and enter in the Meeting ID below. You may be asked to enter an email address and name. We request that you identify yourself by name as this will be visible online and will be used to notify you that it is your turn to speak. When you wish to speak on an Agenda Item, click on “raise hand.” The Clerk will activate and unmute speakers in turn. Speakers will be notified shortly before they are called to speak. When called, please limit your remarks to the time limit allotted. A timer will be shown on the computer to help keep track of your comments. 4. Spoken public comments using a phone use the telephone number listed below. When you wish to speak on an agenda item hit *9 on your phone so we know that you wish to speak. You will be asked to provide your first and last name before addressing the Council. You will be advised how long you have to speak. When called please limit your remarks to the agenda item and time limit allotted. CLICK HERE TO JOIN    Meeting ID: 863‐8814‐2528   Phone: 1‐669‐900‐6833 Americans with Disability Act (ADA) It is the policy of the City of Palo Alto to offer its public programs, services and meetings in a manner that is readily accessible to all. Persons with disabilities who require materials in an appropriate alternative format or who require auxiliary aids to access City meetings, programs, or services may contact the City’s ADA Coordinator at (650) 329‐2550 (voice) or by emailing ada@cityofpaloalto.org. Requests for assistance or accommodations must be submitted at least 24 hours in advance of the meeting, program, or service. Item No. 1.Page 1 of 4 2 3 4 8 Rail Committee Staff Report From: Philip Kamhi, Chief Transportation Official Meeting Date: June 20, 2023 Report #: 2305-1546 TITLE Discuss and recommend to Council: (1) Whether to Re-include the Viaduct Alternative and/or Eliminate the Trench Alternative for Churchill Avenue (viaduct only), Meadow Drive and Charleston Road Grade Crossings; and (2) Whether the Viaduct Alternative and/or Trench Alternative Should Be Included In the Scope Of Caltrain’s Technical Review And The City’s Updated Evaluation Criteria. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Staff recommend that the Rail Committee discuss and decide whether to recommend that the City Council: •Re-include the Viaduct Alternative in ongoing consideration, and whether to eliminate the Trench Alternative. •Submit the viaduct alternative and/or the trench alternative for further study by Caltrain and City staff. The viaduct alternative was eliminated from further consideration by the City Council, but community members expressed concerns about bicycle and pedestrian connectivity and requested to reconsider Viaduct Alternative. The Council approved further study on the trench alternative, but recent discussion in the Rail Committee has leaned toward pausing further analysis of the trench alternative, mainly due to its high cost and feasibility challenges with respect to accommodating and addressing the four tracking needs of Caltrain. BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION After receiving the final report from Expanded Community Advisory Panel (XCAP) on March 23, 2021 (CMR 11797)1, Staff presented a detailed review of Meadow Drive and Charleston Road 1 Item 1, Study Session https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/Public/CompiledDocument?meetingTemplateId=3487&compileOutputType= 1 Item 1 Staff Report        Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 1  Packet Pg. 4 of 16  Item No. 1.Page 2 of 4 2 3 4 8 crossing alternatives on August 23, 2021 (CMR 13435)2 and presented details on Churchill Avenue crossing alternatives for grade separation on November 1 & 29, 2021 (CMR 13543)3 & (CMR 13746)4. At these meetings, the Council eliminated the Viaduct Alternative and selected the Partial Underpass Alternative as a preferred alternative for Churchill Avenue with Closure Alternative as backup. For Meadow Drive and Charleston Road crossing, the Council narrowed the alternatives in consideration to three alternatives, namely Hybrid, Trench, and Underpass, and also eliminated the Viaduct Alternative. The City Council also directed staff to perform additional studies. These studies included work to refine Underpass alternatives with input from PAUSD, PABAC, and Stanford to address current shortcomings and to conduct additional outreach to these stakeholders. On May 23, 2022 (CMR 14341)5 the City Council authorized an amendment with the consultant to perform these additional tasks. Staff with the support of the City’s consultant scheduled separate meetings with the stakeholders to seek their input and feedback on partial underpass alternatives. Staff and Consultant attended several stakeholders’ meetings and made presentations with a detailed review of the alternatives to seek feedback and comments from Stanford staff, PABAC, PAUSD Staff, CSTSC and local design engineers involved in the original design of underpass alternatives. Viaduct Alternative Two Rail Committee study sessions were conducted on October 19, 2022 (CMR 14813)6 and November 18, 2022 (CMR 14904)7 to seek additional community feedback and Rail Committee’s review. During these study sessions and other Rail Committee meetings, the members of PABAC, PAUSD, and the community members expressed concerns about bicycle 2 Item 6, Action Items https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/Public/CompiledDocument?meetingTemplateId=3343&compileOutputType= 1 3 Item 15, Action Items https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/Public/CompiledDocument?meetingTemplateId=3277&compileOutputType= 1 4 Item 11, Action Items https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/Public/CompiledDocument?meetingTemplateId=3241&compileOutputType= 1 5 Item 11, Consent Items https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/Public/CompiledDocument?meetingTemplateId=12257&compileOutputType =1 6 Item 2, Study Session https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/Public/CompiledDocument?meetingTemplateId=8985&compileOutputType= 1 7 Item 2, Study Session https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/Public/CompiledDocument?meetingTemplateId=8998&compileOutputType= 1 Item 1 Staff Report        Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 2  Packet Pg. 5 of 16  Item No. 1.Page 3 of 4 2 3 4 8 and pedestrian connectivity and requested to reconsider Viaduct Alternative for Rail Committee’s review, evaluation, and recommendation to Council. In addition, on March 29, 2023 (Staff Report 2302-1010)8, and April 26, 2023 (Staff Report 2303-1199)9 , the Rail Committee reviewed the evaluation criteria, which led to a recommendation with additional measures to be included in the Council Adopted Evaluation Criteria. The revised Evaluation Criteria was unanimously approved by the Rail Committee and recommended to the City Council for approval. At the time of writing of this report, the approval of evaluation criteria is scheduled on June 12, 2023 City Council meeting. The additional measures in the evaluation criteria include reviewing impacts such as connectedness, corridor travel times, pedestrian and bicycle circulation during and after construction, traffic inducement, sustainability, sea-level rise, utility relocation, long-term maintenance costs, and visual and privacy considerations along the corridor. As a result of these additional measures, there was interest from the Rail Committee in revisiting other alternatives in consideration. Attachments for Viaduct Alternatives at these crossings are included in this report for reference and consultation. Attachment A provides the plan, profile, and renderings; and Attachment B provides fact sheet for the Viaduct at Churchill Avenue crossing. Attachment C provide the plan, profile, and renderings; and Attachment D provides fact sheet for Viaduct at Meadow Drive and Charleston Road crossings. Trench Alternative The Meadow Drive and Charleston Road crossing currently have three alternatives under consideration: Hybrid, Trench, and Underpass. On August 23, 2021, the Council conducted a detailed review of the alternatives at Meadow Drive and Charleston Road and directed the staff to perform a peer review of the cost estimate for the Trench Alternative. The Rail Committee has leaned toward pausing further analysis of the trench alternative, mainly due to its high cost and its feasibility challenges in accommodating and addressing the four tracking needs of Caltrain. Caltrain is currently conducting the Corridor Crossing Study, which will provide insights into the limits of the four tracking passing segments along the Caltrain corridor and other technical constraints raised by the City of Palo Alto. However, they have indicated a strong need for the four-tracking segment north of Mountain View Caltrain Station, which will likely impact these crossings in Palo Alto. 8 Item 1, Action Items https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/meetings/ItemWithTemplateType?id=1610&meetingTemplateType=2 9 Item 2, Action Items https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/Public/CompiledDocument?meetingTemplateId=11352&compileOutputType =1 Item 1 Staff Report        Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 3  Packet Pg. 6 of 16  Item No. 1.Page 4 of 4 2 3 4 8 Recommendation on Including Viaduct and Trench Alternatives in Caltrain and Updated Evaluation Criteria The City Council recently approved an agreement with Caltrain on May 22, 2023 (CMR 2304- 1237)10 to review the alternatives being considered for the three crossings at Churchill Avenue, Meadow Drive, and Charleston Road. As Caltrain staff proceeds with their technical review, the staff aims to ensure that their assessment aligns with the Council’s selection of the alternatives. Also, Consultant support will be needed to review additional measures included in the Council Adopted Evaluation Criteria and to address comments received through Caltrain’s review. RESOURCE IMPACT The resources required for performing additional work depends upon the alternatives in consideration. Both Caltrain and City staff will likely require additional resources depending upon the final scope of work. The scope of work in the existing contract with AECOM Consultants and Caltrain Service Agreement does not cover the additional work that will be required resulting from inclusion of viaduct alternative. As a result, amendments to the existing agreements and/or procurement of a new consultant may be required ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The proposed action is part of a planning study for a possible future action, which has not been approved, adopted, or funded and is therefore exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15262. The future decision to approve the construction of any one of the identified potential alternatives would be subject to CEQA and require the preparation of an environmental analysis. Environmental review and design for the grade separation project will be performed in the subsequent steps of the project development. STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT The Rail Committee meetings are open to the public and therefore provide the community with opportunities to provide comments to the rail committee and City. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: Churchill Avenue – Viaduct, Plan Profiles and Renderings Attachment B: Churchill Avenue, Fact Sheets Viaduct Attachment C: Meadow-Charleston – Viaduct, Plan Profiles and Renderings Attachment D: Meadow-Charleston – Fact Sheets Viaduct 10 Item 6, Consent Items https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/Public/CompiledDocument?meetingTemplateId=12656&compileOutputType =1 Item 1 Staff Report        Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 4  Packet Pg. 7 of 16  E m b a rca d ero R d K in g s le y A v e K e ll o g g A v e C h u rc h ill A v e Alma St Mariposa Ave C h u rc h ill A v e C o le rid g e A v e L o w e ll A v e T e n n y s o n A v e S e a le A v e R in c o n a d a A v e S a n ta R it a A v e Park Blvd S o . C a lfio rn ia A v e N C a li fo rn ia A v e High St Alma St C o lo ra d o A v e O reg o n E xp ressw ay E v e re tt A v e Alma St O re g o n E x p re s s w a y CASTILLEJA AVE U n iv e rs it y A v e P a lm D r O x fo rd A v e L y tt o n A v e F o re s t A v e C h a n n in g A v e A d d is o n A v e L in c o ln A v e M e lv il l e A v e Emerson St Q u a rr y R d W a s h in g to n A v e H o m e r A v e CONSTRUCTION ENVELOPE 14.39' 13.58' 72+0072+00 75+00 80+00 85+00 90+00 95+00 100+00 105+00 110+00 115+00 120+00 125+00 130+00 135+00 140+00 145+00 150+00 155+00 160+00 165+00 168+39 EXISTING TRACKS AT VIADUCT NEW MAINLINE TRACKS (TEMPORARY) NEW SHOOFLY TRACKS CONSTRUCTION BEGIN NEW TRACK CONSTRUCTION END NEW TRACK CONSTRUCTION BEGIN NEW VIADUCT CONSTRUCTION END NEW VIADUCT STATION CALIFORNIA AVE CALTRAIN STATION UNIVERSITY AVE CALTRAIN 1.00% 160 120 140 -40 -20 100 20 0 40 80 60 145+00 150+00140+00130+00 135+0075+0070+00 80+00 90+0085+00 125+00 170+0095+00 165+00155+00 160+00115+00 120+00110+00100+00 105+00 160 140 -20 0 -40 120 40 20 60 100 80 CONSTRUCTION BEGIN NEW VIADUCT CONSTRUCTION END NEW VIADUCT OREGON EXPRESSWAY 2 0 .5 ' -0.81% -1.60% -0.25% ELEV. 66.50 TOP OF RAIL VIADUCTRETAINED FILL RETAINED FILL EMBARCADERO RD CHURCHILL AVE STATION PLATFORM PALO ALTO CALTRAIN STATION PLATFORM CALIFORNIA AVE CALTRAIN 15.5' CLEARANCE E L E V A T I O N (F T ) DISTANCE (FT) HOMER AVE TYP 500' 4 8 . 5 ' 2 1 '1 2 ' 1 4 ' *VERTICAL SCALE SHOWS A 10X EXAGGERATION 0 HORIZONTAL SCALE 200 200 400 0 VERTICAL SCALE 20 20 40 PRELIMINARY FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY NOVEMBER 2019 Churchill Viaduct - Railroad Plan and Profile Right Of Way Caltrain LandmarkAcquisition (Full Take) Permanent Property Acquisition (Partial Take) Temporary Property LEGEND: Ground Level Existing LEGEND: Track Existing Track Profile New Mainline Track Alignment at Viaduct New Mainline Track Track (Shoofly) Proposed Temporary ELEVATION VIEW (PROFILE) AERIAL VIEW (PLAN) TO SAN JOSETO SAN FRANCISCO Trader Joe's High school Palo Alto Ray Fields Peers Park Item 1 Attachment A - Churchill Avenue - Viaduct, Plan Profiles and Renderings        Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 5  Packet Pg. 8 of 16  PRELIMINARY FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY (Roadway At Grade, Railroad Fully Elevated) Churchill Viaduct Railroad Grade Separation Renderings (Backyard View of Typical Property West of Tracks) Churchill Viaduct - Looking East (Rinconada Avenue/Alma Street Intersection) Churchill Viaduct - Looking North (Street View - Churchill Avenue) Churchill Viaduct - Looking West (Street View - Churchill Avenue) Churchill Viaduct - Looking Southwest (Churchill Avenue/Alma Street Intersection) Churchill Viaduct on Viaduct Structure - Looking Southwest (Embarcadero Road/Alma Street Intersection) Churchill Viaduct on Retained Fill and New Bridge over Embarcadero - Looking Southwest Item 1 Attachment A - Churchill Avenue - Viaduct, Plan Profiles and Renderings        Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 6  Packet Pg. 9 of 16  August 4, 2020 1 of 2 RAIL FACT SHEETS Churchill Viaduct About the Viaduct For the viaduct alternative, the railroad tracks will be elevated on a structure over Churchill Avenue. The new electrified railroad tracks will be built at the same location as the existing railroad tracks and will begin rising near Homer Avenue, remain elevated over Churchill Avenue, and return to the existing track elevation near the California Avenue Station. Stanford game day station will be eliminated. The roadway at Churchill Avenue will remain at its existing grade and have a similar configuration to what exists today. This will require expanding the width of the road through the underpass of the railroad to accommodate the new column supporting the railroad structure. By the numbers •Railroad track is designed for 110 mph. •Churchill Avenue is designed for 25 mph. •Maximum grade on railroad is 1.6%. •Travel lane widths are 10-12 feet. •Bike lane widths are 5-6 feet. •Construction period is approximately 2 years. Engineering Challenges •A non-standard grade of 1.6% will be required on the tracks. Caltrain’s preferred maximum grade is 1%. Cost Breakdown Roadway & Railroad Items $55M to $73M Structure Items $115M to $152M Right-of-way & Utilities $16M to $20M Support Costs $60M to $80M Escalation to 2025 dollars $54M to $75M TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $300M to $400M Preliminary and subject to change. Maintenance costs and relocation of fiber optic lines not included. Neighborhood Considerations •During construction, Alma Street and Churchill Avenue will be closed intermittently at night and on weekends. •During construction, Alma Street will be reduced to two lanes and right turn lanes on Alma Street at Churchill Avenue will be removed. •Vertical clearance of the railroad over Churchill Avenue will be 15.5 feet. •The railroad tracks will be approximately 20 feet above the existing street at Churchill Avenue. •With grade separations at Churchill Avenue the traffic at nearby intersections is expected to improve. •Stanford game day station will be eliminated. Proposed Viaduct Aerial View - Looking South Chuchill Avenue Intersection Proposed Backyard View - Looking East Typical Property West of Tracks Proposed Ground Level View - Looking East Churchill Avenue Intersection Viaduct with linear park and lighting - Germany For more Rail Fact Sheets visit: https://connectingpaloalto.com/ fact sheets/ Item 1 Attachment B - Churchill Avenue, Fact Sheets Viaduct        Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 7  Packet Pg. 10 of 16  New Permanent Track Existing Track Temporary Track (Shoofly) Viaduct Track Profile Existing Ground Level Caltrain Right-of-Way Station Platform Roadway Bridge Groundwater DISTANCE (ft) 500 FT. (TYP)Viaduct StructureRetained Fill Retained Fill TE N N E S S E E L N ALMA ST UN I V E R S I T Y A V E EM B A R C A D E R O R D CA L I F O R N I A A V E OR E G O N E X P Y -0.81%-0.81%1.0%1.0% -1.6%-1.6% -0.25%-0.25% California Ave California Ave Station PlatformStation Platform Oregon ExpyOregon Expy Ch u r c h i l l A v e Churchill AveChurchill AveEmbarcadero RdEmbarcadero RdHomer AveHomer Ave LEGEND Ver t i c a l Horizontal 10 1 Approximate GroundwaterApproximate Groundwater ElevationElevation Viaduct Track ProfileViaduct Track Profile Viaduct StructureViaduct Structure Stanford Game Day Station Stanford Game Day Station (will be eliminated)(will be eliminated) RailroadRailroad BridgeBridge 2 of 2August 4, 2020 • Churchill Viaduct Fact Sheets • For more renderings, plans and animations visit: https://connectingpaloalto.com/renderings-plans-and-animations/ TRACKTRACKCCLL TRACKTRACKCCLL TRACKTRACKCCLL TRACKTRACKCCLL 6' SOUND BARRIER6' SOUND BARRIER CONCRETE COLUMNCONCRETE COLUMN CONCRETE BOX GIRDERCONCRETE BOX GIRDER ALMA STREETALMA STREETEXISTING GROUNDEXISTING GROUND EXISTING CALTRAIN TRACKSEXISTING CALTRAIN TRACKS FENCEFENCE K–RAILK–RAILEXISTING BACKYARD FENCE EXISTING BACKYARD FENCE PERMANENT TRACKPERMANENT TRACK TEMPORARY SHOOFLY TRACK TEMPORARY SHOOFLY TRACK EXAMPLE SECTION CHURCHILL VIADUCT – OPTION 1 AERIAL GUIDEWAY OVERHEAD CONTACT SYSTEM 30 FT. HIGH MAX OVERHEAD CONTACT SYSTEM 30 FT. HIGH MAX 20 FT. MAX 20 FT. MAX 28.5 FT.28.5 FT.38 FT.38 FT.47 FT.47 FT. VARIES 2-25 FT.VARIES 2-25 FT. CALTRAIN ROW LIMIT CALTRAIN ROW LIMIT 2.5 FT.2.5 FT. Example Section - Viaduct - Looking NorthConcept Plan and Profile Evaluation with City Council-Adopted Criteria Finance with feasible funding sources (Order of magnitude cost) The viaduct would require substantial local funding resources significantly above the closure alternative. Reduce rail noise and vibration Train horn noise and warning bells will be eliminated with the replacement of the at-grade crossings with grade separations. Utilizing EMU trains instead of diesel engines will also reduce noise. There would be significant reduction in vibration levels at nearby receptors. Minimize visual changes along the corridor Railroad tracks will be approximately 20 feet above grade. Landscaping with trees will be incorporated for screening where feasible. Maintain access to neighborhoods, parks, and schools along the corridor, while reducing regional traffic on neighborhood streets No diversion of regional traffic with construction of a grade separations. Minimize right-of-way acquisition (Private property only) No acquisition of private properties will be required. Minimize disruption and duration of construction Extended lane reductions at Alma Street (one lane in each direction) will be required. Construction would last for approximately 2 years. Facilitate movement across the corridor for all modes of transportation Churchill Avenue will be grade separated from the railroad for all modes and will remain open. Viaduct provides opportunities for additional crossings for all modes. Reduce delay and congestion for vehicular traffic at rail crossings With construction of the grade separation, the railroad crossing gates and warning lights at Churchill Avenue will be removed. Thus, the traffic will not be interrupted by railroad crossing gates. Provide clear, safe routes for pedestrians and cyclists crossing the rail corridor, separate from vehicles Pedestrians/cyclists will be separated from train traffic only. Bike lanes will be added to Churchill intersections. Additional pedestrian/cyclist separations routes can be explore on the next phase of design. Support continued rail operations and Caltrain service improvements A temporary railroad track will be required. Stanford game day station will be eliminated due to grade issues. Item 1 Attachment B - Churchill Avenue, Fact Sheets Viaduct        Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 8  Packet Pg. 11 of 16  L O M A V E R D E A V E E L V E R A N O A V E C H A R L E S T O N R D Alma St Park Blvd Park Blvd EMERSON ST M E A D O W D R L ID E R O D R T E N N N E S E E L N F E R N E A V E LUNDY LANE G R E E N M E A D O W W A Y FERNE CT BEN LOMOND DR LEGEND: 0 GRAPHIC SCALE 100 100 200 CHARLESTON RD Landmark Creek Right Of Way Caltrain Ground Level Existing PRELIMINARY FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY NOVEMBER 28, 2018 C u r t n e r A v e V e n t u r a A v e B A R R O N C R E E K A D O B E C R E E K 2 0 . 5 ' MEADOW DR 2 0 . 5 ' 0 20 40 60 80 MEADOW DR 0 20 40 60 80 E L E V A T I O N ( f t ) 120+00 125+00 130+00 135+00 140+00 145+00 150+00 155+00 160+00 165+00 170+00 175+00 180+00115+00110+00105+00 Tracks Existing Profile Viaduct Track AERIAL VIEW (PLAN) ELEVATION VIEW (PROFILE) Bridge Track New Permanent Groundwater Meadow Drive and Charleston Road - Plan and Profile - Viaduct Outlet Grocery Robles Park 0.086% Barron Creek 0.3% -1.4% Adobe Creek -0.031%1.0% CALTRAIN RIGHT OF WAY (WEST) CALTRAIN RIGHT OF WAY (EAST) DURING CONSTRUCTIONCONSTRUCTION BEGIN CONSTRUCTION END ELEV 61.80 TOP OF RAIL ELEV 55.45 TOP OF RAIL EXISTING TRACKS TO REMAIN OPERATIONAL AND REMOVED AT END OF CONSTRUCTION ROADWAY ROADWAY VIADUCT PROFILE TRACKS ON VIADUCT PROPOSED NEW APPROXIMATE GROUNDWATER ELEVATION Church Methodist United St Andrew's CITY LIMIT PALO ALTO Item 1 Attachment C - Meadow-Charleston - Viaduct, Plan Profiles and Renderings        Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 9  Packet Pg. 12 of 16  PRELIMINARY FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY (Roadway At Grade, Railroad Fully Elevated) Walnut Creek BART Station Viaduct Railroad Grade Separation Examples BART Viaduct, El Cerrito, CA BART Viaduct at distance, El Cerrito, CA Link Light Rail, East Marginal Way, Seattle, WA Item 1 Attachment C - Meadow-Charleston - Viaduct, Plan Profiles and Renderings        Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 10  Packet Pg. 13 of 16  (Roadway At Grade, Railroad Fully Elevated) (Typical Between Meadow Dr & Charleston Rd) Example Section - Viaduct - Looking North (Typical End Sections) Example Section - Retained Fill - Looking North (Typical Between Meadow Dr and Charleston Rd) Track Level View - Looking North Typical Property West of Tracks Backyard View - Looking East Meadow Drive Intersection Proposed Viaduct Solution Overview - Looking South West Charleston Road Intersection Ground Level View - Looking South West Viaduct Railroad Grade Separation Sections & Renderings PRELIMINARY FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Item 1 Attachment C - Meadow-Charleston - Viaduct, Plan Profiles and Renderings        Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 11  Packet Pg. 14 of 16  August 4, 2020 1 of 2 Meadow-Charleston Viaduct RAIL FACT SHEETS About the Viaduct For the viaduct alternative, the railroad tracks will be elevated on a structure over Meadow Drive and Charleston Road. The new electrified railroad tracks will be built between the existing railroad tracks and Alma Street (east side) and will begin rising north of Loma Verde Avenue, remain elevated over Meadow Drive and Charleston Road, and return to the existing elevation south of Ferne Avenue. The roadways at Meadow Drive and Charleston Road will remain at their existing grade and have a similar configuration to what exists today, with the addition of Class II buffered bike lanes on Charleston Road. This addition will require expanding the width of the road to maintain bike lanes through the underpass of the railroad and to accommodate the new column supporting the railroad structure. By the numbers •Railroad track is designed for 110 mph. •Meadow Drive and Charleston Road are designed for 25 mph. •Maximum grade on railroad is 1.4%. •Maximum grade on roadway is 5%. •Travel lane widths are 10-12 feet. •Bike lane widths are 5-6 feet. •Construction period is approximately 2 years. Engineering Challenges •A non-standard grade of 1.4% will be required on the tracks. Caltrain’s preferred grade maximum is 1%. For more Rail Fact Sheets visit: https://connectingpaloalto.com/ fact sheets/ Cost Breakdown Roadway & Railroad Items $72M to $90M Structure Items $155M to $194M Right-of-way & Utilities $18M to $22M Support Costs $80M to $100M Escalation to 2025 dollars $75M to $94M TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $400M to $500M Preliminary and subject to change. Maintenance costs and relocation of fiber optic lines not included. Neighborhood Considerations •During construction, Meadow Drive and Charleston Road will be closed intermittently at night and on weekends. •During construction, Alma Street will have narrow lanes for the portions north of Meadow Drive and south of Charleston Road. •Vertical clearance of the railroad over Meadow Drive and Charleston Road will be 15.5 feet. •The railroad tracks will be approximately 20 feet above the existing street between Meadow Drive and Charleston Road. •With grade separations at Meadow Drive and Charleston Road the traffic at nearby intersections is expected to improve. Proposed Viaduct Aerial View - Looking South Meadow Drive Intersection Proposed Backyard View - Looking East Typical Property West of Tracks Proposed Ground Level View - Looking East Charleston Road Intersection Caulfield to Dandenong Viaduct - Australia Item 1 Attachment D - Meadow- Charleston - Fact Sheets Viaduct        Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 12  Packet Pg. 15 of 16  New Permanent Track Existing Track Viaduct Track ProfileExisting Ground LevelCaltrain Right-of-Way Creek BridgeRoadway Groundwater DISTANCE (ft)500 FT. (TYP)Viaduct StructureRetained Fill Retained Fill LO M A V E R D E A V E EMERSON ST ALMA ST LUNDY LANE BEN LOMOND DR FERNE CT FE R N E A V E CH A R L E S T O N R D PARK BLVD 0.09%0.09% Approximate GroundwaterApproximate Groundwater ElevationElevation Barron CreekBarron Creek Adobe CreekAdobe Creek Viaduct Track ProfileViaduct Track Profile Meadow DrMeadow Dr Charleston RdCharleston Rd 1.0%1.0% Top of Rail Top of Rail Elev. 61.80Elev. 61.80 0.3%0.3%-1.4%-1.4% -0.03%-0.03% PARK BLVD EL V E R A N O A V E Ba r r o n C r e e k Ba r r o n C r e e k Ado b e C r e e k Ado b e C r e e k M E A D O W D R LID E R O D R LEGEND Ver t i c a l Horizontal 10 1 Viaduct StructureViaduct Structure 2 of 2August 4, 2020 • Meadow-Charleston Viaduct Fact Sheets •For more renderings, plans and animations visit: https://connectingpaloalto.com/renderings-plans-and-animations/ EXISTING TRACK EXISTING TRACK EXISTING TRACK EXISTING TRACK CCLL CCLL TRACKTRACKCCLL TRACKTRACKCCLL PERMANENT TRACKPERMANENT TRACK EXISTING TRACKS (TO REMAIN OPEN DURING CONSTRUCTION) EXISTING TRACKS (TO REMAIN OPEN DURING CONSTRUCTION) ALMA STREETALMA STREET EXISTING GROUND EXISTING GROUND 8' EXISTING FENCE 8' EXISTING FENCE 6' SOUND WALL BARRIER 6' SOUND WALL BARRIER CONCRETE BOX GIRDERCONCRETE BOX GIRDER CABLE DUCTCABLE DUCT CONCRETE COLUMNCONCRETE COLUMN EXAMPLE SECTION –VIADUCT ALTERNATIVE OVERHEAD CONTACT SYSTEM 30 FT. HIGH MAX OVERHEAD CONTACT SYSTEM 30 FT. HIGH MAX OVERHEAD CONTACT SYSTEM 30 FT. HIGH MAX OVERHEAD CONTACT SYSTEM 30 FT. HIGH MAX 18 FT.18 FT. 100 FT. CALTRAIN RIGHT-OF-WAY100 FT. CALTRAIN RIGHT-OF-WAY 20 FT. MAX20 FT. MAX 20 FT. TO NEAREST HOME 20 FT. TO NEAREST HOME ALMA STREET (WIDTH REDUCED 1 FT.) ALMA STREET (WIDTH REDUCED 1 FT.) EXISTING BACKYARD FENCE EXISTING BACKYARD FENCE Evaluation with City Council-Adopted Criteria Finance with feasible funding sources (Order of magnitude cost) The viaduct would require substantial local funding resources more than the hybrid alternative, but less than the trench and tunnel alternatives. Reduce rail noise and vibration Train horn noise and warning bells will be eliminated with the replacement of the at-grade crossings with grade separations. Utilizing EMU trains instead of diesel engines will also reduce noise. Six-foot high parapet sound barriers will help reduce propulsion and wheel/rail noise. There would be significant reduction to vibration levels at nearby receptors. Minimize visual changes along the corridor Railroad tracks will be approximately 20 feet above grade. Landscaping with trees will be incorporated for screening where feasible. Maintain access to neighborhoods, parks, and schools along the corridor, while reducing regional traffic on neighborhood streets No diversion of regional traffic with construction of grade separations. Minimize right-of-way acquisition (Private property only) No acquisition of private properties is required. Minimize disruption and duration of construction The viaduct will have minimal road closures (nights/weekends only). Construction would last for approximately 2 years. Facilitate movement across the corridor for all modes of transportation Meadow Drive and Charleston Road will be grade separated from the railroad for all modes and will remain open. Viaduct provides opportunities for additional crossings for all modes. Reduce delay and congestion for vehicular traffic at rail crossings With construction of the grade separation, the railroad crossing gates and warning lights at Meadow Drive and Charleston Road will be removed. Thus, the traffic will not be interrupted by the railroad crossing gates. Provide clear, safe routes for pedestrians and cyclists crossing the rail corridor, separate from vehicles Pedestrians/cyclists will be separated from train traffic only. Bike lanes will be added to Meadow Drive and Charleston Road intersections. Additional pedestrian/ cyclist separations routes can be explore on the next phase of design. Support continued rail operations and Caltrain service improvements New railroad tracks can be built without a temporary track, and a crossover track located north of the San Antonio Caltrain Station will be relocated.Example Section - Viaduct - Looking North (Typical Between Meadow Drive & Charleston Road) Concept Plan and Profile Item 1 Attachment D - Meadow- Charleston - Fact Sheets Viaduct        Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 13  Packet Pg. 16 of 16