Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2026-03-24 Parks and Recreation Commission Summary Minutes1 MINUTES 2 PARKS & RECREATION Commission 3 Regular meeting 4 March 24, 2026 5 In-Person & Virtual Conference 6 Palo Alto, California 7 8 Commissioners Present:Chair Nellis Freeman, Vice Chair Bing Wei (Virtual); Commissioners 9 Vadim Axelrod, Yudy Deng, Shani Kleinhaus, and Roger Smith 10 Commissioners Absent: Commissioner Amanda Brown 11 Others Present: Councilmember Lythcott-Haims, Mitali Ganguly (consultant from 12 Raimi + Associates) 13 Staff Present: Sarah Robustelli, Ben Heistiein, Amanda Deml, Christine Paras, 14 Claire Raybould, Kristen O’Kane, Robert Cain, Alayna Cruz (clerk) 15 CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL 16 Chair Freeman called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. 17 The clerk called the roll and announced a quorum with 6 Commissioners present. 18 PUBLIC COMMENT 19 1. Lothrop S. (Zoom) provided public comment not related to an agenda item and shared their 20 views. 21 2. Christopher C. (Zoom) provided public comment not related to an agenda item and shared their 22 views. 23 3. Sathiyasangaree A. (Zoom) provided public comment not related to an agenda item and shared 24 their views. 25 4. Jason G. (Zoom) provided public comment not related to an agenda item and shared their views. 26 5. Rudolph H. (Zoom) provided public comment not related to an agenda item and shared their 27 views. 28 6. Houston S. (Zoom) provided public comment not related to an agenda item and shared their 29 views. 30 7. JaMondre B. (Zoom) provided public comment not related to an agenda item and shared their 31 views. 32 The PRC took a 7-minute break. 33 Chair Freeman reminded attendees of the City’s expectations for meetings, stating: “I just want to 34 remind everyone of the City's policy of inclusion and encourage respectful dialogue. The City of Palo 35 Alto is committed to a culture of belonging where all members of our diverse community feel 36 included, safe, and respected. We strongly reject the speakers' message of discrimination and hate. 37 We have allowed the speech only because the First Amendment of the Constitution requires us to 38 give everyone an equal chance to express their views.” 39 AGENDA CHANGES, ADDITIONS, AND DELETIONS 40 None. 41 APPROVAL OF MINUTES 42 Chair Freeman noted that minutes for the February 24 meeting are not yet available and will be 43 considered for approval at the next PRC meeting. 44 CITY OFFICIAL REPORTS 45 1. Council Liaison Report 46 Councilmember Lythcott-Haims, Council liaison to the PRC, reported that City Council adopted an 47 ordinance incorporating the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against 48 Women (CEDAW) into the City Charter, noting broad support and recognition of former women 49 elected officials, including Enid Pearson, the oldest living member of that group at 101 years of age. 50 Councilmember Lythcott-Haims reported that the City is conducting board and commission 51 interviews with appointments expected in approximately 1 month, noted adoption of a bird-safe 52 glass ordinance, and summarized recent approvals, including 145 townhomes on Geng Road with 19 53 below-market-rate units and 7 additional units at Palo Alto Commons. Councilmember Lythcott- 54 Haims previewed upcoming Council items, including consideration of a temporary trial closure of the 55 Churchill railroad crossing in April to address safety concerns. Planning was noted for the City’s first 56 Pride event on June 7 from 2 to 5 p.m., led by Director Kristen O’Kane. Councilmember Lythcott- 57 Haims reported that the Cubberley ad hoc committee has eliminated a parcel tax option and is 58 evaluating a potential sales tax measure, with current polling focused on voter support and ballot 59 language, and noted the importance of the PRC’s input on the project. 60 2. Department Report 61 62 Sarah Robustelli, Division Manager of Open Space, Parks, and Golf, recapped the first Discover Your 63 Path career exploration event, noting participation from City departments, community 64 organizations, and PAUSD, as well as activities including a panel discussion, information tables, 65 interviews, and a resumé workshop. Ms. Robustelli thanked Councilmember Lythcott-Haims for her 66 involvement and stated that staff plans to continue the event with expanded collaboration. Ms. 67 Robustelli highlighted upcoming community events, including the Around the World in a Day 68 Festival on March 28 at Lucie Stern Community Center, the Earth Day Festival on April 19 at the Palo 69 Alto Art Center, and the May Fete Parade on May 2. It was noted that Cubberley updates will be 70 presented later in the meeting and it was reiterated that appointments are now required for access 71 to Cubberley, with contact information available on the slide presented. An update on summer 72 camps was provided, reporting 289 camps offered with 3,217 campers enrolled to date, noting 73 cancellation of 21 skateboarding camps due to low enrollment, and that overall participation 74 remains strong with anticipated continued growth and adjustments based on community demand. It 75 was announced that due to unseasonably warm weather, the Mitchell Park water feature is open 7 76 days a week from 10 a.m. to 8:30 p.m. to provide a cooling amenity for the community. 77 Ms. Robustelli reported completion of fencing repairs along the golf course on Embarcadero Way 78 near Hole 9, replacement of the windscreen at Hoover Park, and upcoming windscreen 79 replacements at Hopkins and Mitchell Park tennis courts. Work at Peers Park has been completed, 80 including relocation of a water fountain to a more accessible location. Updates were given on 81 progress on the Heritage Park capital project, including resurfacing of the central walkway, 82 landscape refresh, installation of an ADA-accessible water fountain and dog bowl station, and 83 repairs to the arbor and benches. Remaining work includes installation of a gate for restroom 84 access, a new waste receptacle, updated signage, and final improvements, with completion 85 anticipated this fiscal year. Staff is analyzing flood basin level trends at the Baylands sluice gate and 86 has submitted a permit application to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife for cleaning 87 and inspection. Ms. Robustelli concluded by noting public comments regarding the natural grass turf 88 pilot and reported that the project is moving forward. A related FY 2027 budget request will proceed 89 through the Finance Committee and City Council, with updates to be provided as progress 90 continues. 91 92 Chair Freeman thanked staff for the report and asked whether the May Fete Parade route and 93 expected attendance remain consistent. Ms. Robustelli confirmed that the route remains the same 94 and that attendance is typically strong, noting that weather is the primary variable. 95 96 Chair Freeman asked whether the number of summer camps offered is consistent with prior years 97 and inquired about skateboard camp offerings. Ms. Robustelli confirmed that skateboard camps 98 have been offered previously in Menlo Park and noted that lower enrollment this year was likely 99 due to the Redwood City location and associated travel distance. 100 101 Commissioner Smith commended staff for professionalism and responsiveness in completing the 102 Heritage Park project, noting positive feedback from members of the public. 103 104 Commissioner Kleinhaus asked about recent work at the Mitchell Park dog park. Ms. Robustelli 105 explained that the dog park was recently renovated and expanded and that planned turf 106 improvements were deferred due to wet weather conditions, with work to resume during more 107 suitable conditions. 108 109 Vice Chair Wei asked about attendance and participant demographics for the Discover Your Path 110 career event. Ms. Robustelli stated that attendance data was not immediately available and will be 111 provided at a later time, noting that outreach was broad. Vice Chair Wei expressed anticipation for 112 the Around the World in a Day Festival and noted plans to attend alongside the Youth Council 113 pickleball event. 114 115 Commissioner Axelrod commended staff efforts, requested consideration of adding dog water 116 stations at Peers Park, and asked about outreach for the Mitchell Park water feature and 117 adjustments to summer camp offerings following cancellation of skateboarding camps. Ms. 118 Robustelli confirmed that outreach for the water feature was conducted through City 119 communications and noted strong public response. It was stated that no replacement camps were 120 added, consistent with typical enrollment-based adjustments. Commissioner Axelrod suggested 121 potential use of Greer Park for future skateboarding camps. 122 123 Chair Freeman commended staff on improvements at Heritage Park, noting that the park has taken 124 on renewed vitality. 125 126 Commissioner Deng asked about the status of Cubberley staff operations and the transition to an 127 appointment-based system. Ms. Robustelli clarified that the office remains open but operates by 128 appointment only due to staffing reductions, noting that the change is ongoing and that staff will 129 not be relocated. 130 131 Commissioner Smith suggested reconsidering the appointment-only model at Cubberley, noting 132 potential impacts on public engagement during a time when support for the Cubberley renovation is 133 being sought. 134 135 Chair Freeman asked about participation in the upcoming Chili Cookoff in July. Ms. Robustelli 136 reported that 4 teams have registered to date, noted that early response is strong, and stated that 137 additional updates will be provided as the event approaches. 138 139 BUSINESS ITEMS 140 3. Ad Hoc Committee and Liaison Updates (Discussion) 141 Commissioner Axelrod, Open Space Preserves liaison, noted a review of the interpretive center 142 plans is scheduled for Thursday and stated that an update will be provided at a future meeting. 143 144 Chair Freeman provided an update on the Park Dedication ad hoc, noting that a prior Ventura Park 145 dedication and naming request has been added to the workplan and is under further review. Sarah 146 Robustelli, Division Manager of Open Space, Parks, and Golf, reported that staff has met with Palo 147 Alto Community Childcare and that the organization is supportive of moving forward, with next 148 steps to be brought forward as the process continues. 149 150 Chair Freeman, reporting for the Golf ad hoc, noted that the City has extended its facility use 151 agreement with First Tee–Silicon Valley through February 2029 to support youth programming and 152 ongoing discussions regarding long-term improvements. Ms. Robustelli noted her involvement in 153 the agreement and stated that related long-term planning, including the second deck study, will be 154 presented to the PRC in May. Chair Freeman relayed an update from Lam Do, noting that mild 155 weather conditions have supported strong golf course conditions, with turf remaining green and 156 winter growth aiding recovery of divots. 157 158 Chair Freeman reported renewed interest in advancing a skate park project, noting that a new 159 sponsor is exploring fundraising opportunities with Friends of Palo Alto Parks. Ms. Robustelli 160 provided an update on current skate park maintenance, stating that resurfacing of the historic bowl 161 is planned in coordination with the skate community, with updates to be provided in future 162 departmental reports. 163 164 4. Cubberley Project: Receive Results of Community Poll #2 and #3; Recommendation to City 165 Council on Adoption of the Cubberley Conceptual Master Plan. CEQA Status: A Draft Initial 166 Study Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) Report Was Circulated for a 30-day Public 167 Review Beginning on March 2, 2026, and Ending on April 1, 2026 168 169 Amanda Deml, Assistant Director for Community Services, presented an update on the Cubberley 170 Community Center Project, including results from Polls #2 and #3, the final Conceptual Master Plan, 171 and CEQA documentation. Poll #2 identified consistent priorities of upgrading infrastructure and 172 meeting safety standards, with general satisfaction for existing programs and support for funding 173 through parcel or sales tax. Poll #3 indicated increased support for facility updates and funding 174 measures, with priorities including infrastructure maintenance, preservation of trees, and provision 175 of safe spaces for youth. A fourth community poll was released on March 19 and will close on March 176 28, which will test ballot language and potential funding strategies, with results anticipated to be 177 reviewed by City Council on April 20. The final draft of the Cubberley Conceptual Master Plan was 178 described as a long-term, phased framework to guide future development and minimize program 179 disruption. Staff is exploring a range of funding sources, including development fees, grants, 180 philanthropy, a potential ballot measure, and community partnerships. 181 182 Ms. Deml presented Phase 1 of the Cubberley Conceptual Master Plan, describing a flexible, phased 183 approach that includes new and renovated facilities across the existing City-owned site and a 184 potential additional 7 acres from PAUSD. Ms. Deml noted that Phase 1 would enable full site 185 programming while maintaining operations during construction and would include a recreation and 186 wellness center with gymnasiums, a community pool, event and educational spaces, performing arts 187 improvements, and outdoor amenities such as natural play areas, gardens, and an amphitheater. 188 Phases 2 and 3 of the Cubberley Conceptual Master Plan were outlined as part of the long-term 189 vision. Phase 2 includes visual arts and technology facilities and Phase 3 completes the community 190 services area. Full-site planning supports comprehensive CEQA analysis and future flexibility as 191 funding becomes available. The Phase 1 walking and parking plan emphasizes pedestrian and bicycle 192 safety while maintaining vehicle access and key improvements would include enhanced access 193 points, additional drop-off areas, and expanded parking totaling 640 spaces. The plan reflects 194 extensive stakeholder input. It was noted that major event scheduling and potential off-site parking 195 will be important to manage demand. 196 197 Ms. Deml reported that the City has released a draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 198 (IS/MND) for the Cubberley Conceptual Master Plan for a 30-day public review period, identifying 199 potential environmental impacts and mitigation measures, and noted that impacts were determined 200 to be "less than significant with mitigation incorporated" in the areas of air quality, geology and 201 soils, hazards and hazardous materials, noise, and transportation. Ms. Deml concluded by 202 emphasizing that the Cubberley Conceptual Master Plan reflects a shared, long-term vision to 203 revitalize the site through a flexible, phased approach, balancing historic preservation, fiscal 204 responsibility, and evolving community needs. Staff believes the plan successfully advances City 205 Council’s vision for an inclusive, multi-generational community space. Next steps were outlined, 206 including presentation of the Cubberley Conceptual Master Plan and finalized CEQA document to 207 City Council on April 20, 2026, and a recommendation that the PRC consider the draft IS/MND and 208 forward a recommendation for adoption of the conceptual master plan. 209 210 Chair Freeman acknowledged the extensive work by staff, ad hoc groups, partner commissions, and 211 the community in developing the Cubberley Conceptual Master Plan and invited clarifying questions 212 from the Commission. 213 214 Commissioner Kleinhaus questioned why a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared instead of 215 an Environmental Impact Report (EIR). Claire Raybould, Manager of Current Planning, explained that 216 the Initial Study determined all potential impacts could be mitigated to less-than-significant levels 217 and, therefore, an EIR was not required. 218 219 Commissioner Kleinhaus sought clarification on why the plan does not include architectural or 220 detailed landscape design. Ms. Deml explained that the plan is conceptual and focused on site 221 layout, noting that architectural and detailed landscape design will occur in future phases with 222 community input, and that the plan includes general priorities such as native plantings and tree 223 preservation based on prior analysis and community feedback. 224 225 Commissioner Kleinhaus asked about the proportion of permeable green space within the Phase 1 226 outdoor area. Ms. Deml stated that the identified 390,000 square feet is believed to represent green 227 space and indicated that staff will confirm the breakdown of permeable versus non-permeable 228 areas. 229 230 Commissioner Kleinhaus inquired about the potential impacts of using park development impact 231 fees for Cubberley on other park projects. Ms. Deml responded that staff is evaluating the issue, 232 noting that funding eligibility is partly geographically based and that allocations would be assessed 233 citywide based on need. 234 235 Vice Chair Wei inquired about the capacity of the proposed amphitheater and the scale of outdoor 236 performing arts space and sought clarification on funding gaps and how the Commission could 237 assist. Ms. Deml responded that the amphitheater is designed as a flexible, multipurpose space 238 prioritizing open green area. Phase 1 costs were noted as currently estimated between $300M and 239 $400M. Commissioners were encouraged to share potential funding opportunities and support 240 outreach efforts as planning advances. 241 242 Chair Freeman sought confirmation that adoption of the Conceptual Master Plan establishes a 243 phased framework and does not commit the City to full buildout. Ms. Deml confirmed that adoption 244 does not obligate the City to fully fund the project. 245 246 Item 4 Public Comment 247 248 1. Marc G., representing the Friends of the Palo Alto Recreation and Wellness Center, expressed 249 support for the Cubberley Conceptual Master Plan, acknowledged staff efforts, and stated that 250 the organization is interested in pursuing fundraising opportunities to support development of 251 the project and expand community services. 252 253 2. Penny E. (Zoom) expressed support for the Cubberley Conceptual Master Plan and thanked staff 254 and the Commission. Concerns were raised about public understanding of the project’s need 255 given anticipated population growth, urging improved community outreach. The commenter 256 requested confirmation of a safe bicycle and pedestrian route at the north entrance abutting 257 the Charleston Shopping Center and raised concerns about potential lighting of tennis courts 258 near residential areas. 259 260 Chair Freeman thanked members of the public for their input and invited comments from the 261 Commission. 262 263 Commissioner Axelrod questioned whether the fourth public survey is the final planned survey and 264 sought clarification on the extent to which the master plan may still be modified. Ms. Deml 265 confirmed that the current survey is the final one and stated that the plan is a final draft conceptual 266 framework that remains subject to potential changes, noting that significant modifications could 267 affect the CEQA analysis and that prior commissions recommended approval with considerations for 268 City Council. 269 270 Commissioner Axelrod inquired whether planned playground and youth activity elements are being 271 coordinated with the nearby Magical Bridge Playground. Ms. Deml confirmed coordination efforts 272 and noted that the plan includes community-informed concepts such as natural play areas and 273 outdoor classrooms, with specific equipment to be determined in future design phases. 274 275 Commissioner Axelrod asked about potential impacts of construction on ongoing programs and 276 services during phased implementation. Ms. Deml acknowledged that construction will create 277 disruptions and explained that staff will implement mitigation strategies, including relocating 278 programs, using temporary facilities, and adjusting operations where feasible to maintain continuity 279 while addressing safety and noise constraints. 280 281 Commissioner Axelrod inquired whether any pre-Phase 1 improvements are planned in response to 282 public interest in near-term upgrades. Ms. Deml explained that current efforts focus on ongoing 283 maintenance and temporary repairs to keep facilities operational, noting that future improvements 284 will depend on polling outcomes and funding decisions, with only critical repairs addressed as 285 needed in the interim. 286 287 Vice Chair Wei requested clarification on the timeline for project phases, assuming potential ballot 288 approval. Ms. Deml explained that timelines are preliminary, noting that property acquisition could 289 occur in 2027, with construction beginning no sooner than 2030 and Phase 1 estimated to take 290 approximately 2 years, while some partner-led components could advance earlier. 291 292 Commissioner Smith expressed concern about limited participation in the first 2 polls relative to the 293 City’s population and asked whether response levels are typical according to the consultant. Ms. 294 Deml clarified that polling participants are selected through targeted outreach to a statistically 295 significant sample of registered voters and noted that staff continues to consider strategies to 296 increase broader community engagement. Commissioner Smith expressed support for the project 297 and interest in its long-term realization. 298 299 Commissioner Kleinhaus emphasized the importance of landscape context, tree preservation, and 300 visual clarity in the plan, noting that the absence of architectural and site renderings may contribute 301 to limited public enthusiasm. Concerns were raised regarding the adequacy of CEQA analysis given 302 the plan’s evolving nature, as well as potential impacts related to tennis court lighting, circulation, 303 and proximity to adjacent residential areas. Ms. Deml clarified that lighting of the tennis courts is 304 not included in the current plan and would require additional review and community input if 305 proposed in the future. 306 307 Chair Freeman requested clarification on what a minimum Phase 1 scenario could entail if funding is 308 below projections and whether partner-led funding could accelerate implementation. Ms. Deml 309 explained that Phase 1 can be implemented in subphases as funding becomes available and noted 310 that land acquisition is a key prerequisite for development on PAUSD property, while some 311 components on City-owned land could advance independently. 312 313 Chair Freeman asked how ballot language is being aligned with voter preferences for basic repairs 314 and safety improvements to Cubberley. Ms. Deml explained that these preferences have informed 315 current ballot language testing, noting that Poll #4 is evaluating a sales tax option reflecting those 316 priorities following elimination of the parcel tax option. Chair Freeman asked how Poll #4 reflects 317 adjustments based on prior polling and how future funding measures are being aligned with voter 318 priorities. Ms. Deml explained that each poll has informed subsequent questions and ballot 319 language refinements. Christine Paras, Assistant Director of Administrative Services, added that 320 polling is used iteratively to gauge support and refine messaging based on voter priorities. 321 322 Chair Freeman inquired about strategies to increase voter awareness and engagement, including 323 use of conceptual materials at past events and future outreach efforts. Ms. Deml described ongoing 324 activation and marketing efforts, including events and programming at Cubberley to draw new 325 visitors, such as ArtLift grant-funded activities. Additional ideas from Commissioners were invited to 326 build community interest and participation. 327 328 Commissioner Deng asked about the role of Concordia Consulting Group in the Cubberley 329 Conceptual Master Plan. Ms. Deml confirmed that Concordia supported development of the plan 330 and remains under contract, noting that their role is concluding as the project transitions to final 331 stages following CEQA analysis. 332 333 Commissioner Deng suggested broader outreach to all registered voters regarding a potential ballot 334 measure. Ms. Deml indicated uncertainty regarding staff access to that approach. Ms. Paras noted 335 that outreach is typically conducted through open public engagement efforts and stated that staff 336 will consider the suggestion for future polling. 337 Chair Freeman reiterated that the Commission’s role is to evaluate whether the Cubberley 338 Conceptual Master Plan provides a sound, flexible, and community-informed framework, and 339 expressed support for advancing the plan to City Council. Ms. Deml invited Councilmember Lythcott- 340 Haims to provide additional remarks. 341 342 Councilmember Lythcott-Haims addressed polling methodology, noting that results are based on a 343 representative sample of likely voters, and explained the shift from a parcel tax to a sales tax due to 344 lower approval thresholds and polling outcomes. Councilmember Lythcott-Haims stated that City 345 Council will consider whether to advance a ballot measure in June and noted anticipated community 346 outreach efforts. Additional partnership opportunities were highlighted, including interest from 347 multiple organizations, and it was emphasized that land acquisition remains the primary priority 348 before advancing further project details. 349 350 Chair Freeman invited a motion to recommend that City Council adopt the Cubberley Conceptual 351 Master Plan. Commissioner Smith made the motion and Vice Chair Wei seconded. Chair Freeman 352 then called for any final discussion prior to the vote. 353 354 Commissioner Kleinhaus acknowledged the extensive work on the plan but stated discomfort 355 recommending adoption to City Council without clearer visualization of design elements, citing 356 community feedback favoring more modest improvements and preservation of trees and open 357 space, and indicated an intent to abstain from supporting the motion. 358 359 MOTION: Commissioner Smith moved, seconded by Vice Chair Wei, to recommend that Council 360 adopt the Cubberley Conceptual Master Plan. 361 362 MOTION PASSED: 5-0-1-1 (Kleinhaus abstain, Brown absent) 363 364 The PRC took an 8-minute break. 365 366 5.San Antonio Road Area Plan Land Use and Transportation Alternatives Study Session. 367 CEQA Status: Exempt under CEQA Guidelines Section 15262 (Discussion) 368 369 Robert Cain, Principal Planner for the Department of Planning and Development Services, 370 introduced the San Antonio Road Area Plan (SARAP), noting a focus on parkland and outdoor space, 371 and stated that staff is seeking input from the Commission and other advisory bodies ahead of a City 372 Council study session in April and future policy discussions later in the year. The goals of the San 373 Antonio Road Area Plan are improving livability, mobility, safety, sustainability, and economic 374 vitality. The plan will establish design concepts, zoning and development standards, and 375 implementation strategies including potential funding approaches. The San Antonio Road Area Plan 376 boundary was described, noting it encompasses approximately 275 acres along San Antonio Road 377 from Alma Street to the Baylands, includes key corridors and adjacent neighborhoods, and consists 378 of a mix of industrial, commercial, and residential uses in proximity to major transportation and 379 open space areas The project timeline was outlined, noting a 3-year planning process currently in 380 the alternatives phase, with policy discussions to return to the Commission later this year, 381 environmental review and draft plan development next year, and anticipated City Council adoption 382 in early 2028. The planning approach was described, noting subdivision of the area into smaller 383 neighborhoods to support walkability, residential infill, and neighborhood-serving open space and 384 amenities, along with improvements to transportation, pedestrian and bicycle safety, and 385 streetscape character. Mr. Cain identified key areas of anticipated change and noted opportunities 386 to incorporate new park and outdoor spaces within those areas. 387 388 Mr. Cain described the outdoor space strategy, noting existing park assets but identifying gaps in 389 access near U.S. 101, and explained that new park space will rely on partnerships with private 390 development due to lack of publicly owned land, with opportunities identified in larger 391 redevelopment sites and parcel consolidation areas. Community outreach indicated strong support 392 for small neighborhood parks, mini parks, and pedestrian-oriented paseos. PRC input was invited on 393 preferred types of outdoor spaces. Key areas were identified of anticipated development and staff 394 will seek City Council input on building heights and densities, with potential for 4,000 to 7,000 new 395 residential units, significantly exceeding current capacity identified in the Housing Element. The 396 Maxar subarea was described as a key redevelopment opportunity, noting potential for mixed 397 residential uses, mid-block pedestrian and bicycle connections, and incorporation of neighborhood 398 parks, with options for either larger or multiple smaller park spaces. Feedback was invited on park 399 configurations and supporting amenities such as retail and dining. The CTI subarea was 400 characterized as a potential redevelopment opportunity through parcel consolidation, noting the 401 potential to incorporate new park or outdoor space. Staff will seek City Council direction on 402 appropriate levels of housing and office development, balancing funding opportunities for amenities 403 with existing land use conditions. Mr. Cain outlined proposed mobility improvements, including 404 enhanced connections between Palo Alto and Mountain View, new mid-block pedestrian and bicycle 405 crossings, and coordination with planned upgrades to the San Antonio/101 interchange to improve 406 multimodal access, including a potential grade-separated connection. 407 408 Mr. Cain highlighted potential land use alternatives, including residential-only and mixed-use 409 scenarios, noting that increased office development could support community benefits such as 410 parks and affordable housing while requiring consideration of the jobs-housing balance. The PRC's 411 input was requested on the size, type, location, and character of outdoor spaces. Four concepts 412 were outlined: (1) a larger park or plaza along East Charleston; (2) a smaller internal park with 413 additional dispersed parks; (3) a single consolidated interior park; and (4) a network of paseos and 414 expanded pedestrian spaces in lieu of a centralized park. Mobility alternatives discussed focused on 415 pedestrian-first design, low-stress bicycle routes, improved first- and last-mile connections, and 416 strategies for parking, demand management, and smart corridor technology. Mr. Cain explained 417 that the plan evaluates streets and intersections in smaller segments. It was emphasized that the 418 existing San Antonio Road median and trees are intended to remain largely unchanged, with most 419 options having minimal tree impacts, while some alternatives may shift curbs to accommodate 420 bicycle and pedestrian improvements and require replanting. Mr. Cain emphasized efforts to 421 increase tree canopy, improve intersection safety, incorporate green stormwater infrastructure, and 422 strengthen connections to Caltrain and transit in coordination with VTA. 423 Chair Freeman thanked staff for the report and acknowledged the level of detail and outreach. It 424 was clarified that the PRC’s focus is on outdoor space strategy, community-serving uses, and 425 connectivity, and that the item is for input only at this stage. Commissioners were then invited to 426 ask clarifying questions. 427 428 Commissioner Kleinhaus inquired about the use of transfer of development rights as a potential 429 tool. Mr. Cain explained that the City’s current program is limited and not being considered for this 430 area. Commissioner Kleinhaus noted its successful use in Mountain View and suggested it as a 431 potential option to explore. 432 433 Commissioner Axelrod sought clarification on the balance between developing underutilized parcels 434 and rezoning. Mr. Cain clarified that the focus is on underutilized sites rather than vacant land, 435 noted that rezonings and policy changes have increased housing capacity in the area, and explained 436 that the plan will help define appropriate limits for future development while individual projects 437 would still be initiated by private developers. 438 439 Chair Freeman requested clarification on how incentives for higher-value uses such as office 440 development would translate into open space outcomes. Mr. Cain explained that existing tools 441 include parkland dedication requirements or in-lieu fees based on project size and noted that 442 additional incentives under consideration could allow increased development in exchange for 443 providing publicly accessible open space or other community benefits, with specific tools to be 444 determined in future policy discussions. 445 446 Chair Freeman raised concern about the functionality of smaller parks and how to ensure they are 447 usable rather than symbolic. Mr. Cain noted that effectiveness depends on programming. Sarah 448 Robustelli, Division Manager of Open Space, Parks, and Golf, added that design will be shaped 449 through community engagement during later phases. Chair Freeman reiterated that since staff is 450 seeking Commission input on park size, this would be preliminary feedback from his perspective. 451 452 Vice Chair Wei referenced Johnson Park, a park near her home, as an example and inquired about 453 the process for gathering community input on park size and types. Mr. Cain explained that feedback 454 was collected through a community workshop and online survey using preference rankings, noting 455 that it was not a statistically representative poll. Ms. Robustelli clarified that Johnson Park is 456 approximately 2.5 acres. 457 458 Item 5 Public Comment 459 1. Penny E. (Zoom), a member of the SARAP community advisory group (CAG) but speaking as an 460 individual, raised concerns about the scale of proposed housing growth in the SARAP area and 461 the lack of identified funding for supporting infrastructure and community facilities. The 462 adequacy and configuration of proposed park space was questioned and concern was expressed 463 about park placement near major roadways. The commenter encouraged stronger integration 464 of Cubberley and broader community connections into the plan and requested clarification on 465 the timeline for a traffic study and its implications for land use decisions. 466 2. John P. (Zoom) expressed concerns about traffic impacts associated with proposed housing 467 growth in the San Antonio Road Area Plan and questioned whether mobility alternatives 468 adequately address existing vehicle traffic, suggesting potential use of Montrose Avenue as an 469 alternative bicycle route. Appreciation was expressed for staff efforts and for prioritizing tree 470 canopy. 471 472 Chair Freeman thanked members of the public for their comments and returned the item to the 473 Commission for discussion. 474 475 Vice Chair Wei emphasized the importance of a traffic analysis to support safe access to open 476 spaces, particularly for pedestrians and cyclists, and noted the need for cohesive park design that 477 integrates play areas, seating, and green space within smaller parks. Vice Chair Wei expressed 478 appreciation for staff progress and prioritization of tree canopy and open space. 479 480 Commissioner Kleinhaus referenced parkland standards of 3 acres per 1,000 residents and 481 expressed concern that the proposed park space in the SARAP may be insufficient to serve 482 anticipated population growth, emphasizing the need for additional parkland to meet community 483 needs. 484 485 Commissioner Kleinhaus stated a preference not to include additional office development, 486 expressed concern about increased building heights and traffic, and supported keeping residential 487 development closer to the lower end of the proposed range. Comments supported bike lanes and 488 alternative mobility options but noted that driving will still occur. It was suggested that removing 489 some on-street parking along San Antonio Road could create space for trees and pedestrian use. 490 Commissioner Kleinhaus discussed park size, noting challenges with large and small parks, and 491 suggested a mix of each, emphasizing the importance of design, tree canopy, and ensuring that 492 parks function as usable spaces rather than linear or sidewalk-like areas. 493 494 Chair Freeman repeated his concerns about distributed mini parks becoming residual or 495 underutilized spaces, noting that usability should reflect population density and household 496 composition, and expressed a preference for larger parks located near population centers with 497 adequate space for play and activity. Mitali Ganguly, consultant from Raimi + Associates, clarified 498 that detailed design will occur in later phases with community input and noted that the area plan 499 will establish standards and tools to ensure smaller parks are functional and not leftover spaces. 500 501 Commissioner Axelrod noted that projected growth of 4,000 to 7,000 dwelling units could result in 502 over 10,000 new residents in this area and referenced parkland standards, indicating a need for 503 substantially more green space, including larger anchor parks within neighborhoods as well as 504 smaller parks. Commissioner Axelrod recommended locating parks away from major roadways, 505 particularly for safety, and emphasized the need to improve access to the San Antonio Caltrain 506 station, including parking and safer bicycle routes not located on San Antonio Road. 507 508 Vice Chair Wei agreed with applying the 3-acre parkland standard for this area. 509 Commissioner Deng stated appreciation for the intent to distribute outdoor spaces across parcels 510 and reiterated that the Commission would like to better understand how those spaces will be usable 511 and meaningfully accessible to the public. 512 513 Chair Freeman thanked staff for the presentation and noted the importance of shaping open space 514 in the SARAP area, stating that input from the CAG will be shared, and emphasized the need to 515 provide adequate open space for future users. Mr. Cain thanked the Commission for the 516 opportunity to present and for their comments and feedback. 517 518 COMMISSIONER QUESTIONS, COMMENTS, ANNOUNCEMENTS OR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS 519 Chair Freeman stated that the PRC workplan will be presented to City Council on April 6. Sarah 520 Robustelli, Division Manager of Open Space, Parks, and Golf, noted that multiple commissions will 521 be presenting workplans at that meeting. Chair Freeman added that the Council will consider 522 approval of the PRC workplan and that any updates will be reported at a future meeting. 523 524 Ms. Robustelli reviewed upcoming agenda items, noting the April 28 meeting will include 525 continuation of the tennis and pickleball discussion and informational updates on the Foothills 526 Improvement Plan and middle school athletics. May meeting items will include the second deck 527 study, park improvement ordinances for the Foothills Improvement Plan and the Arastradero Creek 528 pipeline, and a sluice gate update likely within the departmental report. 529 530 Commissioner Kleinhaus requested that the CEQA document for the Arastradero Creek pipeline 531 project be shared when available. Ms. Robustelli confirmed that it will be shared upon release. 532 533 Chair Freeman reminded Commissioners to meet with their ad hoc committees and liaisons and 534 provide updates at the next meeting, noting that the workplan timeline is approaching and that 535 updates will be important following City Council approval and to keep the PRC informed on ad hoc 536 and liaison activities. 537 538 ADJOURNMENT 539 The meeting was adjourned at 10:29 p.m.