Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2026-08-12 Planning & Transportation Commission Agenda PacketPLANNING AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Regular Meeting Wednesday, August 12, 2026 Council Chambers & Hybrid 6:00 PM   Planning and Transportation Commission meetings will be held as “hybrid” meetings with the option to attend by teleconference/video conference or in person. To maximize public safety while still maintaining transparency and public access, members of the public can choose to participate from home or attend in person. Information on how the public may observe and participate in the meeting is located at the end of the agenda. Masks are strongly encouraged if attending in person. The meeting will be broadcast on Cable TV Channel 76, live on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/c/cityofpaloalto, and streamed to Midpen Media Center https://midpenmedia.org. Commissioner names, biographies, and archived agendas and minutes are available at http://bit.ly/PaloAltoPTC. VIRTUAL PARTICIPATION CLICK HERE TO JOIN (https://cityofpaloalto.zoom.us/j/91641559499) Meeting ID: 916 4155 9499 Phone: 1(669)900-6833   PUBLIC COMMENTS General Public Comment for items not on the agenda will be accepted for up to three minutes or an amount of time determined by the Chair. In-person comments will be heard at the beginning of the agenda and remote comments will be heard at the end of the agenda. All requests to speak will be taken until 5 minutes after the staff’s presentation. Written public comments can be submitted in advance to Planning.Commission@PaloAlto.gov and will be provided to the Commission and available for inspection on the City’s website three days before the meeting. Please clearly indicate which agenda item you are referencing in your subject line. Spokespersons that are representing a group of five or more people who are identified as present at the meeting at the time of the spokesperson's presentation will be allowed up to ten (10) minutes at the discretion of the Chair, provided that the non-speaking members agree not to speak individually. The Chair may limit Public Comments to thirty (30) minutes for all combined speakers. The Chair may reduce the allowed time to speak for Study Sessions and Action Items to two (2) minutes or less to accommodate a larger number of speakers. PowerPoints, videos, or other media to be presented during public comment are accepted only by email to Planning.Commission@PaloAlto.gov at least 24 hours prior to the meeting. Once received, the Clerk will have them shared at public comment for the specified item. To uphold strong cybersecurity management practices, USB’s or other physical electronic storage devices are not accepted. Signs and symbolic materials less than 2 feet by 3 feet are permitted provided that: (1) sticks, posts, poles or similar/other type of handle objects are strictly prohibited; (2) the items do not create a facility, fire, or safety hazard; and (3) persons with such items remain seated when displaying them and must not raise the items above shoulder level, obstruct the view or passage of other attendees, or otherwise disturb the business of the meeting. CALL TO ORDER/ ROLL CALL   AGENDA CHANGES, ADDITIONS AND DELETIONS The Chair or Commission majority may modify the agenda order to improve meeting management.   IN-PERSON PUBLIC COMMENT Members of the public may speak to any item NOT on the agenda. 1-3 minutes depending on number of speakers. In-person comments will be heard at the beginning of the agenda and remote comments will be heard at the end of the agenda.   CITY OFFICIAL REPORTS   1.Director's Report, Meeting Schedule, and Assignments ACTION ITEMS Public Comment is Permitted. Applicants/Appellant Teams: Fifteen (15) minutes, plus three (3) minutes rebuttal. All others: Three (3) minutes per speaker. 2.PUBLIC HEARING/QUASI-JUDICIAL: 332 Forest Avenue [26PLN-00043]: Recommendation to forward a Planned Home Zone (PHZ) Application to the Architectural Review Board to Redevelop the Site with an Eight-Story, 82-Unit Multi-Family Residential Development. CEQA Status: An Exemption under CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 (Comprehensive Plan Consistency) is Currently Being Prepared. Zone District: Multiple Family (RM-40). 3.Review and Submit the Planning and Transportation Commission 2026-27 Work Plan to the City Council for Approval APPROVAL OF MINUTES Public Comment is Permitted. Three (3) minutes per speaker. 4.Approval of Planning & Transportation Commission Draft Summary Minutes of June 10, 2026 5.Approval of Planning & Transportation Commission Draft Summary Minutes of July 8, 2026 COMMISSIONER QUESTIONS, COMMENTS, ANNOUNCEMENTS OR FUTURE MEETINGS AND AGENDAS Members of the public may not speak to the item(s).   VIRTUAL PUBLIC COMMENT Members of the public may speak to any item NOT on the agenda. 1-3 minutes depending on number of speakers. In-person comments will be heard at the beginning of the agenda and remote comments will be heard at the end of the agenda.   ADJOURNMENT   OTHER INFORMATION The materials below are provided for informational purposes, not for action or discussion during this meeting’s agenda. Written public comments may be submitted in advance and will be provided to the Commission and availible for public inspection on the City’s website three days before the meeting.   A.Public Comment PUBLIC COMMENT INSTRUCTIONS Members of the Public may provide public comments to teleconference meetings via email, teleconference, or by phone. 1.Written public comments may be submitted by email to Planning.Commission@PaloAlto.gov. 2.Spoken public comments using a computer will be accepted through the teleconference meeting. To address the Commission, click on the link below to access a Zoom-based meeting. Please read the following instructions carefully. ◦You may download the Zoom client or connect to the meeting in- browser. If using your browser, make sure you are using a current, up-to-date browser: Chrome 30, Firefox 27, Microsoft Edge 12, Safari 7. Certain functionality may be disabled in older browsers including Internet Explorer. ◦You may be asked to enter an email address and name. We request that you identify yourself by name as this will be visible online and will be used to notify you that it is your turn to speak. ◦When you wish to speak on an Agenda Item, click on “raise hand.” The Clerk will activate and unmute speakers in turn. Speakers will be notified shortly before they are called to speak. ◦When called, please limit your remarks to the time limit allotted. A timer will be shown on the computer to help keep track of your comments. 3.Spoken public comments using a smart phone will be accepted through the teleconference meeting. To address the Commission, download the Zoom application onto your phone from the Apple App Store or Google Play Store and enter the Meeting ID below. Please follow the instructions above. 4.Spoken public comments using a phone use the telephone number listed below. When you wish to speak on an agenda item hit *9 on your phone so we know that you wish to speak. You will be asked to provide your first and last name before addressing the Commission. You will be advised how long you have to speak. When called please limit your remarks to the agenda item and time limit allotted. CLICK HERE TO JOIN Meeting ID: 916 4155 9499 Phone:1-669-900-6833 Americans with Disability Act (ADA) It is the policy of the City of Palo Alto to offer its public programs, services and meetings in a manner that is readily accessible to all. Persons with disabilities who require materials in an appropriate alternative format or who require auxiliary aids to access City meetings, programs, or services may contact the City’s ADA Coordinator at (650) 329-2550 (voice) or by emailing ada@PaloAlto.gov. Requests for assistance or accommodations must be submitted at least 24 hours in advance of the meeting, program, or service. Item No. 1. Page 1 of 2 Planning & Transportation Commission Staff Report From: Planning and Development Services Director Lead Department: Planning and Development Services Meeting Date: August 12, 2026 Report #: 2607-6579 TITLE Director's Report, Meeting Schedule, and Assignments RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning and Transportation Commission (PTC) review and comment as appropriate. BACKGROUND This document includes the following items: Upcoming PTC Agenda Items PTC Meeting Schedule PTC Representative to City Council (Rotational Assignments) Commissioners are encouraged to contact Samuel Tavera (Samuel.Tavera@PaloAlto.gov) to notify staff of any planned absences one month in advance, if possible, to ensure the availability of a PTC quorum. PTC Representative to City Council is a rotational assignment where the designated commissioner represents the PTC’s affirmative and dissenting perspectives to Council for quasijudicial and legislative matters. Representatives are encouraged to review the City Council agendas (https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/City-Hall/City-Council/Council-Agendas-Minutes) for the months of their respective assignments to verify if attendance is needed or contact staff. Prior PTC meetings are available online at https://midpenmedia.org/category/government/city- of-palo-alto/boards-and-commissions/planning-and-transportation-commission. UPCOMING PTC ITEMS August 26, 2026 Item 1 Item 1 Staff Report     Packet Pg. 5     Item No. 1. Page 2 of 2 Study Session on South of Forest Avenue (SOFA) Coordinated Area Plan Objective Design Standard Approach Zoning Code Amendment to ROLM(E) ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: 2026 PTC Schedule & Assignments AUTHOR/TITLE: Jennifer Armer, Assistant Director Item 1 Item 1 Staff Report     Packet Pg. 6     Planning & Transportation Commission 2026 Meeting Schedule 1 1 8 5 1 2026 Schedule Meeting Dates Time Location Status Planned Absences 1/14/2026 6:00 PM Hybrid Regular 1/28/2026 6:00 PM Hybrid Cancelled 2/11/2026 6:00 PM Hybrid Regular James 2/25/2026 6:00 PM Hybrid Regular Chang 3/11/2026 6:00 PM Hybrid Special James, Ji 3/25/2026 6:00 PM Hybrid Regular 4/8/2026 6:00 PM Hybrid Regular James, Templeton 4/29/2026 6:00 PM Hybrid Regular 5/13/2026 6:00 PM Hybrid Regular Hechtman 5/27/2026 6:00 PM Hybrid Regular 6/10/2026 6:00 PM Hybrid Regular Hechtman 6/24/2026 6:00 PM Hybrid Cancelled Chang 7/8/2026 6:00 PM Hybrid Regular James 7/29/2026 6:00 PM Hybrid Cancelled 8/12/2026 6:00 PM Hybrid Regular 8/26/2026 6:00 PM Hybrid Regular Templeton 9/9/2026 6:00 PM Hybrid Regular 9/30/2026 6:00 PM Hybrid Regular 10/14/2026 6:00 PM Hybrid Regular 10/28/2026 6:00 PM Hybrid Regular 11/11/2026 6:00 PM Hybrid Cancelled 11/18/2026 6:00 PM Hybrid Special Templeton 11/25/2026 6:00 PM Hybrid Cancelled 12/9/2026 6:00 PM Hybrid Regular 12/30/2026 6:00 PM Hybrid Cancelled 2026 Assignments - Council Representation (primary/backup) January February March April May June Bryna Chang Allen Akin Bart Hechtman Kevin Ji Todd James Forest Peterson Todd James Forest Peterson Cari Templeton Bryna Chang Allen Akin Bart Hechtman July August September October November December Council Cari Templeton Bryna Chang Allen Akin Bart Hechtman Kevin Ji Summer Break Kevin Ji Todd James Forest Peterson Cari Templeton Bryna Chang Item 1 Attachment A - 2026 PTC Schedule & Assignments     Packet Pg. 7     Item No. 2. Page 1 of 8 Planning & Transportation Commission Staff Report From: Planning and Development Services Director Lead Department: Planning and Development Services Meeting Date: August 12, 2026 Report #: 2606-6462 TITLE PUBLIC HEARING/QUASI-JUDICIAL: 332 Forest Avenue [26PLN-00043]: Recommendation to forward a Planned Home Zone (PHZ) Application to the Architectural Review Board to Redevelop the Site with an Eight-Story, 82-Unit Multi-Family Residential Development. CEQA Status: An Exemption under CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 (Comprehensive Plan Consistency) is Currently Being Prepared. Zone District: Multiple Family (RM-40). RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning and Transportation Commission (PTC) provide initial comments/feedback and consider forwarding the proposed project application to the Architectural Review Board (ARB) for review of the development plan. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The applicant proposes to rezone the subject properties from RM-40 to a new Planned Community/Home Zoning (PC/PHZ) and to demolish the existing two-story 16-unit residential building and redevelop the site with an 82-unit residential housing development. Council reviewed a prescreening application for this project on August 11, 2025, as detailed in this report. In accordance with Palo Alto Municipal Code (PAMC) Section 18.38.065(a), for a PC/PHZ rezoning the PTC must first review a conceptual plan, provide feedback, and recommend that the project be forwarded to the ARB for further formal review. The project will return to the PTC, following ARB review, for a formal recommendation to Council. BACKGROUND The proposed project, as depicted in the architectural plans included in Attachment F, consists of an approximately 105,371-square-foot, eight-story multifamily residential building with 82 dwelling units (30 one-bedroom, 41 two-bedroom, and 11 three-bedroom units) on a merged 31,398-square-foot (0.72-acre) site. The project includes three levels of parking, one of which is below grade, providing a total of 113 parking spaces, with parking garage access and the primary pedestrian entrance located on Forest Avenue. The project site is located less than Item 2 Item 2 Staff Report     Packet Pg. 8     Item No. 2. Page 2 of 8 one-half mile from the University Avenue Caltrain station. Across Forest Avenue, to the north of the property is Lanning Chateau/Staller Court, a five-story 85-unit apartment building. To the east, there is a two-story 19-unit condominium development. To the south, there is a four-story 30-unit condominium development. To the west of the property, there is a 40-unit apartment building, Casa Real, listed as a Category 4 Historic Resource on the City’s Historic Inventory. When completed in 1930, Casa Real was the only seven-story building in the City. Planned Community (PC/PHZ): The process for evaluating this type of application is set forth in PAMC Chapter 18.38. Planned Community is intended to accommodate all types of developments, including combinations of uses appropriately requiring flexibility under controlled conditions not otherwise attainable under other districts. The planned community district is particularly intended for unified, comprehensively planned developments that are of substantial public benefit and which conform with and enhance the policies and programs of the Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan. The application requires initial review by the PTC, followed by review by the ARB. Upon recommendation from the ARB, the draft ordinance for the project is presented along with the development plan to the PTC for recommendation to the City Council for final action. Item 2 Item 2 Staff Report     Packet Pg. 9     Item No. 2. Page 3 of 8 East: Seven-story 40-unit apartment building (RM-40) South: Four-story 30-unit condominium development (AMF) Special Setbacks:Not Applicable Aerial View of Property: Source: Google Satellite Maps Land Use Designation & Applicable Plans/Guidelines Comp. Plan Designation:SOFA 1 CAP Zoning Designation:Multiple Family (RM-40) Yes Yes Yes Baylands Master Plan/Guidelines (2008/2005) El Camino Real Guidelines (1976) Housing Development Project x Downtown Urban Design Guidelines (1993) South El Camino Real Guidelines (2002) Utilizes Chapter 18.24 - Objective Standards Individual Review Guidelines (2005) Within 150 feet of Residential Use or District Context-Based Design Criteria applicable SOFA Phase 1 (2000)SOFA Phase 2 (2003)x Within Airport Influence Area Prior City Reviews & Action City Council: Prescreening, August 11, 20251 1 August 11, 2025 City Council Staff Report, Agenda Item 2: https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/Portal/Meeting?meetingTemplateId=16173 Item 2 Item 2 Staff Report     Packet Pg. 10     Item No. 2. Page 4 of 8 Council held a prescreening on August 11, 2025, for the proposed rezoning of this property. The initial proposal included 82 rental units in an eight-story building. Overall Council expressed general support for the proposed use at this location. Feedback included considerations to improve building scale, massing, transitions, and compatibility with adjacent residential properties, as well as requests for clarification regarding shared open space, shared parking, tenant protections, and the evaluation of building’s historic significance. The applicant originally proposed on-site BMR units but now requests to satisfy the requirement with existing off-site deed-restricted units. This change was not presented during the City Council prescreening, so the Council did not have an opportunity to comment on it. ANALYSIS 3 The property is located within the boundaries of the South of Forest Area (SOFA) 1 Coordinated Area Plan (CAP).4 The Comprehensive Plan designation is SOFA 1 CAP. This CAP implements the City of Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan and provides more detailed programs and policies for the specifically defined SOFA 1 CAP. For the subject property, the SOFA 1 CAP simply designates the site as "RM-40." During the 1999-2006 Housing Element cycle, the City Council adopted SOFA 1 CAP as a planning tool to address a specific nine block area comprised of 19 acres. The policy framework for SOFA 1 CAP is for a walkable and livable neighborhood that is compatible with the surrounding area, transitioning from a low-density detached housing in the south-east to higher density closer to downtown. The SOFA 1 CAP also envisions a neighborhood that takes advantage of the opportunities presented by its close proximity to Downtown Palo Alto and the regional transit center at the University Avenue/Downtown train station. Some existing zoning designations remain in effect, e.g. RM-30, RM-40, R-2, and PF, which largely retain the current associated zoning designation and development standards. Maintaining housing on the site would align with Comprehensive Plan Policy B-6.2 that provides uses in SOFA 1 CAP should be maintained that complement the downtown business district. Further, promoting infill development with higher densities nearby transit corridors helps to reach the goals of energy conservation and integrating land use with transportation. 3 The Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan is available online: bit.ly/PACompPlan2030 4 The South of Forest Area (SOFA) 1 Coordinated Area Plan is available online: https://www.paloalto.gov/files/assets/public/v/1/planning-amp-development-services/file-migration/current planning/forms-and-guidelines/south-of-forest-coordinated-area-plan-phase-1.pdf Item 2 Item 2 Staff Report     Packet Pg. 11     Item No. 2. Page 5 of 8 in a net increase of 66 units which would count toward the City’s Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA). 7 The site is currently zoned RM-40 (medium density multi-family residential). Multi-family housing is identified as a permitted use in the RM-40 Zone District. The proposed project exceeds the standards under the RM-40 zone district and proposes to deviate from these standards in a manner consistent with the zoning ordinance through the PHZ rezoning process as set forth in PAMC Chapter 18.38. For projects proposing to rezone to PHZ, Council has the authority to set the parameters for most development standards, which would be reflected in the tailored ordinance for the new Planned Community District. However, for informational purposes, Attachment B compares the development standards under the current RM-40 zone district with the proposed project in order to assist the PTC in considerations of how these deviations relate to the proposed public benefits of the project. A 3.36:1 FAR where a maximum of 1:1 FAR is allowed in the RM-40 zone. A 85-foot height where a maximum of 40 feet is allowed in the RM-40 zone. The private open space meets the 50 square feet per unit average; however, the project proposes common open space be provided through a shared common space located on the adjacent parcel. Does not comply with the required side and rear daylight planes. Includes 113 parking spaces where no minimum parking is required [Assembly Bill (AB) 2097] and 134 would otherwise be required pursuant to PAMC Chapter 18.52. The building massing is not stepped back where it is more than 20 feet taller than the average height of an adjacent building. This step back standard starts within two vertical feet of the height of the adjacent building. The step back would be a minimum depth of six feet along both the façade on the primary building frontage and the facing façade of the adjacent building, and the step shall occur for a minimum of 70% of each façade length. This project proposes ground-level parking as well as a portion underground. In order to do so, it must also be lined with commercial or habitable uses with a minimum depth of 20 feet along the street frontage. The alternative is to fully underground the parking (PAMC Section 18.24.060(c)(7)). 7 The Palo Alto Zoning Code is available online: bit.ly/PAZoningCode Item 2 Item 2 Staff Report     Packet Pg. 12     Item No. 2. Page 6 of 8 It should be noted that the objective standards do not specifically apply to PHZ zone districts; therefore, these standards are used as a guidepost to inform the site planning and architectural design, considering aspects such as transitions between uses, massing, and privacy, but strict adherence to the standards is not required. Item 2 Item 2 Staff Report     Packet Pg. 13     Item No. 2. Page 7 of 8 options presented in the June 23, 2020, Council staff report,9 which contemplated on-site units as part of a redevelopment project. FISCAL/RESOURCE IMPACT Processing of this application has no fiscal impact as applicants are responsible for staff and consultant costs through applicable fees through the deposit-based cost recovery program. This project is also subject to Development Impact Fees currently estimated at $6,332,957.61, plus the Public Art and Transportation fees STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT Daily Post on July 30, 2024, which is 12 days in advance of the meeting. Postcard mailing occurred on July 28, 2024, which is 14 days in advance of the meeting. 9 June 23, 2020, Council staff report: https://www.paloalto.gov/files/assets/public/v/1/agendas-minutes reports/reports/city-manager-reports-cmrs/year-archive/2020/id-10715.pdf Item 2 Item 2 Staff Report     Packet Pg. 14     Item No. 2. Page 8 of 8 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The City, acting as the lead agency, is currently analyzing the project in accordance with the authority and criteria contained in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines, and the environmental regulations of the City. Specifically, the City is preparing an analysis of the project in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, which evaluates the project’s consistency with the Comprehensive Plan and the Comprehensive Plan EIR. The 15183 exemption allows for streamlining of infill projects where the previous adopted EIR for a Comprehensive Plan has been adopted and adequately addresses the impacts of the proposed project. Plan level technical reports are being prepared to confirm that the Comprehensive Plan EIR, including any mitigation that would be addressed as required through that EIR, would adequately address the impacts of the proposed project. In addition to the recommended action, the Planning and Transportation Commission may: 1. Continue the item to a date uncertain, to return to PTC before moving the project forward to the Architectural Review Board. Attachment A: Location Map Attachment B: Required Findings for PTC Approval Attachment C: Zoning Comparison Table Attachment D: Applicant’s Project Description Attachment E: Public Comments Attachment F: Project Plans Steven Switzer, Senior Planner (650) 329-2321 Steven.Switzer@PaloAlto.gov 11 Liaison & Contact Information Jennifer Armer, Assistant Director (650) 329-2191 Jennifer.Armer@PaloAlto.gov 11 Emails may be sent directly to the PTC using the following address: planning.commission@paloalto.gov Item 2 Item 2 Staff Report     Packet Pg. 15     6 Roth_Building Lanning Chateau Downtown_ Library Waverley Surgery_Center Williams _Property 50.0' 100.0' 50.0' 100.0' 50.0' 100.0' 50.0' 100.0' 50.0' 100.0' 50.0' 100.0' 50.0' 100.0' 50.0' 100.0' 50.0' 100.0' 50.0' 100.0' 50.0' 100.0' 50.0' 100.0' 50.0' 100.0' 50.0' 100.0' 170.0' 150.0'200.0' 100.0' 30.0' 50.0' 100.0' 25.0' 100.0'100.0' 25.0' 50.0' 150.0' 150.0' 125.0' 50.0' 150.0' 50.0' 150.0' 50.0' 150.0' 50.0' 150.0' 50.0' 50.0' 100.0' 50.0' 100.0' 200.0' 75.0' 25.0'112.5' 100.0' 37.5' 100.0' 100.0' 100.0' 100.0' 200.0' 200.0' 200.0' 200.0' 200.0' 200.0' 200.0' 200.0' 200.0' 200.0' 200.0' 200.0' 200.0' 200.0' 200.0' 200.0' 200.0' 200.0' 200.0' 75.0' 25.0'112.5' 75.0' 25.0'112.5' 75.0' 25.0'112.5' 75.0' 25.0'112.5' 75.0' 25.0'112.5' 75.0' 25.0'112.5' 75.0' 25.0'112.5' 100.0' 100.0' 100.0' 100.0' 100.0' 100.0' 100.0' 100.0' 100.0' 100.0' 100.0' 100.0' 100.0' 100.0' 100.0' 100.0' 100.0' 100.0' 100.0' 100.0' 100.0' 100.0' 100.0' 100.0' 100.0' 100.0' 100.0' 100.0' 100.0' 100.0' 100.0' 100.0' 37.5' 112.5' 37.5' 112.5' 37.5' 112.5' 37.5' 112.5' 50.0' 112.5' 50.0' 112.5' 75.0' 112.5' 75.0' 112.5' 37.5' 112.5' 37.5' 112.5' 137.5' 112.5' 12.5' 112.5'150.0' 225.0' 200.0' 150.0'200.0' 150.0' 150.0' 100.0' 150.0' 100.0' 230.0' 50.0' 30.0' 100.0' 200.0' 150.0' 150.0' 105.5' 150.0' 105.5' 200.0' 150.0'200.0' 150.0' 200.0' 150.0'200.0' 150.0' 200.0' 150.0'200.0' 150.0' 200.0' 150.0'200.0' 150.0' 200.0' 150.0'200.0' 150.0' 200.0' 150.0'200.0' 150.0' 200.0' 150.0'200.0' 150.0' 200.0' 150.0'200.0' 150.0' 200.0' 150.0'200.0' 150.0' 200.0' 150.0'200.0' 150.0' 200.0' 150.0'200.0' 150.0' 200.0' 150.0'200.0' 150.0' 200.0' 150.0'200.0' 150.0' 200.0' 150.0'200.0' 150.0' 200.0' 150.0'200.0' 150.0' 200.0' 150.0'200.0' 150.0' 200.0' 150.0'200.0' 150.0' 200.0' 150.0'200.0' 150.0' 200.0' 150.0'200.0' 150.0' 218.0' 150.0' 105.5' 50.0' 105.5' 50.0' 105.5' 50.0' 105.5' 50.0' 105.5' 50.0' 105.5' 50.0' 105.5' 50.0' 218.0' 100.0' 112.5' 50.0' 105.5' 150.0' 112.5'150.0' 112.5' 100.0' 112.5' 100.0' 112.5' 50.0' 112.5' 50.0' 112.5' 100.0' 112.5' 100.0' 112.5'50.0' 105.5' 50.0' 50.0' 218.0' 100.0' 112.5' 50.0' 105.5' 50.0' 218.0' 100.0' 112.5' 50.0' 105.5' 50.0' 218.0' 100.0' 112.5' 50.0' 105.5' 50.0' 218.0' 100.0' 112.5' 50.0' 105.5' 50.0' 218.0' 100.0' 112.5' 50.0' 105.5' 50.0' 218.0' 100.0' 112.5' 50.0' 105.5' 50.0' 218.0' 100.0' 112.5' 50.0' 105.5' 50.0' 218.0' 100.0' 112.5' 50.0' 105.5' 50.0' 218.0' 100.0' 112.5' 50.0' 105.5' 50.0' 218.0' 100.0' 112.5' 50.0' 105.5' 50.0' 218.0' 100.0' 112.5' 50.0' 105.5' 50.0' 218.0' 100.0' 112.5' 50.0' 105.5' 50.0' 218.0' 100.0' 112.5' 50.0' 105.5' 50.0' 218.0' 100.0' 112.5' 50.0' 105.5' 50.0' 218.0' 100.0' 112.5' 50.0' 105.5' 50.0' 218.0' 100.0' 112.5' 50.0' 105.5' 50.0' 218.0' 100.0' 112.5' 50.0' 105.5' 50.0' 218.0' 100.0' 112.5' 50.0' 105.5' 50.0' 218.0' 100.0' 112.5' 50.0' 105.5' 50.0' 218.0' 100.0' 112.5' 50.0' 105.5' 50.0' 218.0' 100.0' 112.5' 50.0' 105.5' 100.0' 100.0' 100.0' 100.0' 270.2' 210.0' 500.0' 100.0' 50.0' 100.0' 150.0' 250.0' 114.0' 110.0' 40.0'50.0' 100.0' 150.0' 250.0' 114.0' 110.0' 40.0'50.0' 100.0' 150.0' 250.0' 114.0' 110.0' 40.0'50.0' 100.0' 150.0' 250.0' 114.0' 110.0' 40.0'50.0' 100.0' 150.0' 250.0' 114.0' 110.0' 40.0'50.0' 100.0' 150.0' 250.0' 114.0' 110.0' 40.0'50.0' 100.0' 150.0' 250.0' 114.0' 110.0' 40.0'50.0' 100.0' 150.0' 250.0' 114.0' 110.0' 250.0' 110.0' 150.0' 37.5' 86.0' 110.0' 110.0' 86.0' 250.0' 114.0' 110.0' 40.0'50.0' 150.0' 250.0' 114.0' 110.0' 40.0' 40.0'50.0' 100.0' 150.0' 250.0' 114.0' 110.0' 40.0'50.0' 100.0' 150.0' 250.0' 114.0' 110.0' 40.0'50.0' 100.0' 150.0' 114.0' 40.0'50.0' 100.0' 150.0' 250.0' 114.0' 110.0' 40.0'50.0' 100.0' 150.0' 250.0' 114.0' 110.0' 40.0'50.0' 100.0' 150.0' 250.0' 114.0' 110.0' 40.0'50.0' 100.0' 150.0' 250.0' 114.0' 110.0' 40.0'50.0' 100.0' 150.0' 250.0' 114.0' 110.0' 40.0'50.0' 100.0' 150.0' 250.0' 114.0' 110.0' 40.0'50.0' 100.0' 150.0' 250.0' 114.0' 110.0' 40.0'50.0' 100.0' 150.0' 250.0' 114.0' 110.0' 40.0'50.0' 100.0' 150.0' 250.0' 114.0' 110.0' 40.0'50.0' 100.0' 150.0' 250.0' 114.0' 110.0' 40.0'50.0' 100.0' 150.0' 250.0' 114.0' 110.0' 40.0'50.0' 100.0' 150.0' 250.0' 114.0' 110.0' 40.0'50.0' 100.0' 150.0' 250.0' 114.0' 110.0' 40.0'50.0' 100.0' 150.0' 250.0' 114.0' 110.0' 40.0'50.0' 100.0' 150.0' 250.0' 114.0' 110.0' 40.0'50.0' 100.0' 150.0' 250.0' 114.0' 110.0' 40.0'50.0' 100.0' 150.0' 250.0' 114.0' 110.0' 40.0'50.0' 100.0' 250.0' 114.0' 110.0' 40.0'50.0' 100.0' 150.0' 65.0' 150.0' 365 Bldg C 675 Bldg A 385 Bldg D 690 Bldg D 315 707 762 - 776 702- 730 332 345 360 650 756- 760 733-743 628 636 727 729 740-746 400 372 704 745 712 720 730 724 734 744 385 351 646 640 650 643 642 325 664 635 683 265741739 727 733 730 724270 661 350 300 737 375 Bldg C 654 434 436 GILMAN STREET FOREST AVENUE BRYANT STREET RAMONA STREET WAVERLEY STREET HOMER AVENUE PF RM-30 PF AMF RM-40DHS PC-2967 Lot G Lot E Heritage Park Williams Park This map is a product of the City of Palo Alto GIS This document is a graphic representation only of best available sources. Legend Project Site 0' 103' Attachment A Location Map 332-350 Forest Avenue CITY OF PALO ALTO I NCO R P O R A TE D CALI FORNIA P a l o A l t o T h e C i t y o f APRI L 1 6 189 4 The City of Palo Alto assumes no responsibility for any errors ©1989 to 2016 City of Palo Alto sswitze, 2026-07-02 16:11:37 (\\cc-maps\Encompass\Admin\Personal\Planning.mdb) Item 2 Attachment A - Location Map     Packet Pg. 16     Attachment B Findings for Approval The Planning and Transportation Commission will need to make the following Findings for Approval of a Planned Community Zone District when the project returns for a formal recommendation: (a) The site is so situated, and the use or uses proposed for the site are of such characteristics that the application of general districts or combining districts will not provide sufficient flexibility to allow the proposed development. (b) Development of the site under the provisions of the PC planned community district will result in public benefits not otherwise attainable by the application of the regulations of general districts or combining districts. In making the findings required by this section, the Planning and Transportation Commission and City Council, as appropriate, shall specifically cite the public benefits expected to result from the use of the planned community district. (c) The use or uses permitted, and the site development regulations applicable within the district shall be consistent with the Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan and shall be compatible with existing and potential uses on adjoining sites or within the general vicinity. Item 2 Attachment B - Findings for Approval     Packet Pg. 17     ATTACHMENT B 332 Forest Ave, 26PLN-00043 Table 1: COMPARISON WITH CHAPTER 18.13 (RM-40 DISTRICT), and Section 18.38.150 (PC District Special Requirements) Regulation Required Proposed Residential Project Minimum/Maximum Site Area, Width and Depth 8,500 square feet area, 70 foot width, 100 foot depth 31,398 square feet lot, 100 foot width, 300 foot depth Minimum Front Yard (2) 0-25 feet (1) 20 feet Rear Yard 10 feet 10 feet Interior Side Yard 10 feet, 6 feet for properties less than 70 feet wide 10 feet Street Side Yard 0-16 feet (2)N/A Setback from major roadways (1) [18.13.040(b)(1)(A)]0-25 feet (1)N/A Max. Building Height 40 feet, 35 feet for portions of a building within 50 feet of a more restrictive residential zone/use 85 Feet PC Special Requirements for Height 50 ft when within 150 feet of RM-30, no restriction otherwise.85 Feet Side Yard Daylight Plane (7)10 feet at interior side lot line then 45 degree angle Does Not Comply Rear Yard Daylight Plane (7)10 feet at rear setback line then 45 degree angle. None for lots > than 70 ft wide Does Not Comply PC Special Requirements for Daylight Plane daylight planes same as most restrictive abutting residential district (RM-30) Does Not Comply Max. Site Coverage 45%, plus 5% for covered patios (11,250 square feet)71% (22,374 square feet) Max. Total Floor Area Ratio (4)1.0:1 3.36:1 Max. Residential Density (3) 40 DU/AC 114 DU/AC Minimum Site Open Space 20% (5,000 square feet) 9,500 square feet Minimum Usable Open Space (5)100 square feet per unit (8,200 square feet)9,500 square feet Minimum Common Open Space 50 square feet per unit (4,100 square feet) 115 square feet per unit (9,500 square feet) Minimum Private Open Space 50 square feet per unit (4,100 square feet) 113 square feet per unit (9,200 square feet) Item 2 Attachment C - Zoning Comparison Table     Packet Pg. 18     (1) Minimum front setbacks shall be determined by the Architectural Review Board upon review pursuant to criteria set forth in Chapter 18.76 and the context-based criteria outlined in Section 18.13.060. Arterial roadways do not include residential arterials. (2) Minimum street side setbacks in the RM-40 zone may be from 0 to 16 feet and shall be determined by the Architectural Review Board upon review pursuant to criteria set forth in Chapter 18.76 and the context-based criteria outlined in Section 18.13.060. (3) Provided that, for any lot of 5,000 square feet or greater, two units are allowed, subject to compliance with all other development regulations. (4) Covered parking is not included as floor area in multi-family development, up to a maximum of 230 square feet per required parking space. Covered parking spaces in excess of required parking spaces count as floor area. (5) Subject to the limitations of Section 18.13.040(e). Usable open space is included as part of the minimum site open space; required usable open space in excess of the minimum required for common and private open space may be used as either common or private usable open space; landscaping may count towards total site open space after usable open space requirements are met. (6) Tandem parking is allowed for any unit requiring two parking spaces, provided that both spaces in tandem are intended for use by the same residential unit. For projects with more than four (4) units, not more than 25% of the required parking spaces shall be in a tandem configuration. (7) Each daylight plane applies specifically and separately to each property line according to the adjacent use. Table 2: CONFORMANCE WITH CHAPTER 18.52 (Off-Street Parking) for Multiple-Family Residential Type Required Proposed Vehicle Parking No minimum parking required per California Government Code Section 65863.2 (AB 2097). 113 spaces Bicycle Parking 1 space per unit (100% long term) 82 required 82 long term spaces 10 short term spaces Item 2 Attachment C - Zoning Comparison Table     Packet Pg. 19     560 Mission Street, Suite 1900 | San Francisco, CA 94105 | T 415.743.6900 | F 415.743.6910 -743-6979 Houston | Jacksonville | Los Angeles | Miami | Nashville | Newport Beach | New York | Orlando | Philadelphia | Portland February 17, 2027 SENT VIA EMAIL Jonathan Lait Planning Director Re: 332 & 350 Forest Avenue, Palo Alto Application Cover Letter Dear Jonathan: We write on behalf of Vittoria Management, Inc., (the “Applicant”) regarding the property located at 332 & 350 Forest Avenue (the “Property”) in Palo Alto (“City”). The Applicant is pleased to submit both (I) a SB 330 preliminary application and (II) a full development application for a Planned Housing Zone (“PHZ”) application and lot line adjustment for a new 82-unit residential community (“Project”) at the Property.1 The following provides legal background regarding the applications. In addition to the laws identified below, the Applicant further wishes to preserve rights to additional housing and other applicable laws, particularly those that apply to projects in close proximity to transit. (I) SB 330 Preliminary Application The Project’s SB 330 preliminary application provides all information required by law.2 SB 330 amended the PSA, including adding Section 65941.1, which created the preliminary application process for housing development projects. Specifically, Section 65941.1 provides that a preliminary application for a housing development project that meets the statutorily enumerated criteria is deemed complete upon submission. (Gov. Code §§ 65941.1, subd. (a), 65589.5, subd. 1 Pursuant to Gov. Code § 65941.1(a), the Project is a qualifying “housing development project” as defined in paragraph (3) of subdivision (b) of Section 65905.5. 2 Pursuant to the Housing Accountability Act, Gov. Code § 65589.5 (“HAA”), and the Permit Streamlining Act, Gov Code § 65920, et seq. (“PSA”), both as amended by the Housing Crisis of 2019, also known as “SB 330.” Stats. 2019, Ch. 654. Item 2 Attachment D - Applicant’s Project Description     Packet Pg. 20     Jonathan Lait February 17, 2027 Page 2 #532613324_v2 (h)(5).) A housing development project is then subject only to the “ordinances, policies, and standards in effect when the preliminary application is submitted” (§ 65589.5, subd. (o)).3 Certain statutory provisions enacted by SB 330, Gov. Code § 65589.5(o)(1), (o)(2)(A) & (o)(4) (hereinafter, the “Vesting Provision”), provide that a housing development project can only be made subject to “development impact fees, capacity or connection fees or charges, permit or processing fees, and other exactions” that were adopted and in effect at the time a preliminary application is submitted. We note that these provisions are applicable to projects that seek legislative amendments, such as this Project. The HAA applies generally to “housing development projects,” as defined. Gov. Code § 65589.5(h)(2). Some provisions within the HAA do apply more specifically to certain more limited species of “housing development projects.” Subdivision (d) of the HAA applies specifically to housing development projects “for very low, low-, or moderate-income households,” as defined. Gov. Code § 65589.5(h)(3). Subdivision (j) of the HAA governs the specific situation in which a “housing development project complies with applicable, objective general plan, zoning, and subdivision standards and criteria.” Gov. Code § 65589.5(j)(1). Both of those subdivisions were part of the HAA when the Legislature enacted SB 330. If the Legislature had wanted the Vesting Provision to apply only to those more limited species of “housing development project,” the Legislature could have added the Vesting Provision to either of those subdivisions. But when enacting the Vesting Provision in SB 330, the Legislature chose to place them in their own separate and new subdivision of the HAA: subdivision (o). Nowhere within subdivision (o) is there any reference to the more limited categories of “housing development project” described in subdivisions (d) or (j). Subdivision (o) only uses the term “housing development project” to define the type of project to which it applies. The same is true with respect to the revisions SB 330 made to the PSA, which is where the requirements of a “preliminary application” are defined. Here, again, the law refers only to the term “housing development project,” without providing any further limitation on its scope. Gov. Code § 65941.1(a). This Project is a “housing development project” as defined by Gov. Code § 65589.5 and is therefore subject to the Vesting Provision through the submittal of the SB 330 preliminary application. Because the City does not have its own SB 330 application form, the Applicant has used the California Department of Housing and Community Development’s eligibility form. To the extent the City has any comments regarding the sufficiency of the preliminary application, we trust that the City will inform us within 30 days. 3 See also California Office of Attorney General, Legal Alert OG-2025-04, 11/14/25. Item 2 Attachment D - Applicant’s Project Description     Packet Pg. 21     Jonathan Lait February 17, 2027 Page 3 #532613324_v2 (II) Full application To preserve the vesting offered by a preliminary application, SB 330 requires applicants to submit a corresponding full development application “within 180 calendar days after submitting a preliminary application with all of the information required.”4 The law does not require any waiting period between applicants’ submission of these documents, so long the subsequent development application is received “within 180 calendar days.”5 Accordingly, the Applicant chooses to satisfy this requirement by submitting both applications concurrently. Under the Permit Streamlining Act, as an application for a development permit, the City has 30 days to review the full application for completeness under the Permit Streamlining Act. Gov. Code § 65943(a). Thank you for your attention to this matter, we look forward to working with the City on bringing this Project to fruition. Sincerely yours, HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP Chelsea Maclean CC: Albert Yang 4 Gov. Code § 65941.1(e). 5 Id. Item 2 Attachment D - Applicant’s Project Description     Packet Pg. 22     Development Statement February 19, 2026 Project Summary As a local family with deep roots in Palo Alto spanning nearly 50 years, the Giovannotto family is proud to introduce Forest Commons, a thoughtfully designed 82-unit residential community proposed at 332 and 350 Forest Avenue in Downtown Palo Alto. Located just steps away from University Avenue and within one-half mile of the University Avenue Caltrain Station, this 100% housing project presents a rare opportunity to deliver a meaningful number of new residences in the Downtown area, within a pleasant walk to robust and highly regarded retail and services. An amazing location for families, the project features family-friendly unit types paired with safe, easy access to neighborhood schools — Addison Elementary, Greene Middle School, Palo Alto High School — and Stanford University by short walk or bike ride. Sustainable transportation is a natural fit for this location, and recognizing this, the project has been designed to both accommodate and encourage bicycle commuting. 82 onsite bicycle parking spaces are provided, located in a convenient, covered and easily accessible bicycle parking area. Exceptional for an infill location, the project also includes a generous onsite car parking ratio of 1.2 spaces per unit, which exceeds City standards. Architect Rob Steinberg, a Palo Alto resident, has designed a building that draws from the character of Downtown and nearby landmark buildings, especially the architecturally significant ‘Casa Real’ sister building at 360 Forest Avenue. The design aligns with existing datum lines and maintains an 84-foot building height (plus parapet), achieving housing density within the existing Downtown language. The project will be constructed with a Type III wood structure over a Type I concrete podium. The outdoor spaces are large and of high quality, promoting wellness through carefully considered landscaping and natural design. Existing and Planned Use The project includes two parcels: (i) 332 Forest Avenue (APN 120‑16‑038), approximately 15,000 square feet; and (ii) 350 Forest Avenue (APN 120‑16‑070), approximately 10,000 square feet. The existing building at 332 Forest Avenue contains just 16 dated residential units, is not historically designated, and occupies a mere 27% of the lot. The 350 Forest Avenue site is primarily a gravel lot, with some low-quality miscellaneous storage structures and no residential units. Together, the combination of these two vastly underutilized parcels represents a ready-to-deliver opportunity for housing creation within Palo Alto’s Downtown area. The proposed project would demolish the existing structures on both lots and would develop a new residential building with 82 apartment units and 101 car parking spaces. This application seeks a Planned Housing Zone (PHZ) application for this 100% housing development. Item 2 Attachment D - Applicant’s Project Description     Packet Pg. 23     Addressing The Need for Housing Palo Alto's Housing Element calls for increased housing density near major transit hubs as a top priority, and identifies the Downtown area as its most transit-served location. Unfortunately, viable sites for new housing in the Downtown are extremely scarce due to small parcel sizes, historic designations, and existing high‑intensity uses. So strong are the headwinds, that despite the City’s extensive efforts to identify potential housing opportunities in the Downtown, Palo Alto’s Housing Element identifies just four potential viable housing sites within RM‑40 zoning. Forest Commons will serve as an exemplary demonstration of Palo Alto’s commitment to achieving its Downtown housing goals. Palo Alto’s goal is 346 new housing units within a half-mile radius of both Caltrain Stations. This project, by itself, will deliver nearly one-quarter of that total housing goal for the Downtown area. Feedback from the City Council A prescreening of the project was held before the Palo Alto City Council on August 11, 2025. The project received enthusiastic, unanimous support from Councilmembers as a model of the kind of beneficial development they hope to see in Downtown Palo Alto: significant housing density, close proximity to major transit, that fits well within its context. Summary of Major Project Benefits • Meaningful Housing Creation in the Ideal Location: Delivers 82 new residential units in the Downtown area, delivering nearly one‑quarter of Palo Alto’s housing goal within a half‑mile of major transit stations. • Transit‑Oriented Infill Development: Located within walking distance of University Avenue amenities and Caltrain, promoting sustainable lifestyles centered on walking and bicycling. • Abundant Onsite Bicycle and Car Parking: Provides 82 covered, convenient and easily accessible onsite bicycle parking spaces, and a generous onsite car parking ratio of 1.2 spaces per unit, which exceeds City standards. • Family-Friendly Housing Units Near Schools: Offers a diverse range of units that accommodate varying household needs, with close proximity to local elementary, middle, and high schools. • Delivers More Below-Market Rate Units than the City Base Standard: The PHZ requirement of 20% exceeds the City’s base standard of 15%. • Supports Downtown Retail and Services: Residents who are able to walk or bike to nearby retail and services will shop locally, directly supporting and sustaining Downtown businesses. • Harmonizes with Surrounding Downtown Character: Respects and complements the existing built-up Downtown architectural context. Item 2 Attachment D - Applicant’s Project Description     Packet Pg. 24     • Elevates Community Sustainability and Energy Efficiency: Incorporates environmentally responsible design and energy-efficient building systems. We are eager to collaborate with the city to deliver this vital housing project, enriching Palo Alto’s vibrancy and forward-thinking residential leadership. Item 2 Attachment D - Applicant’s Project Description     Packet Pg. 25     From:Switzer, Steven To:"Fred Kohler" Subject:RE: 332 Forest Date:Wednesday, August 5, 2026 5:59:00 PM Attachments:image001.png image002.png Hi Fred, The City's review of the recently submitted SB 330 preliminary applications is limited to determining whether they are complete. Since no formal action is made on these preliminary applications, the planning analysis is limited at this stage. The City has 30 days to make a completeness determination, and that review is still underway. If the applicant submits a complete formal application, it will undergo the City's standard development review process, including review by the appropriate boards and commissions, and City Council where required. As an update, the planned rezone project is scheduled to go before the Planning and Transportation Commission on August 12, 2026. If you have comments on those project plans, please feel free to send them to Planning.Commission@PaloAlto.gov and copy me as well. You can view the project materials here: https://www.paloalto.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Current- Planning/Projects/332-Forest-Avenue Please let me know if you have any questions. STEVEN SWITZER Senior Historic Planner Planning and Development Services Department 650-329-2321 | Steven.Switzer@PaloAlto.gov www.PaloAlto.gov From: Fred Kohler <kohler70@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, July 27, 2026 3:29 PM Item 2 Attachment E - Public Comments     Packet Pg. 26     &nbsp; To: Switzer, Steven <Steven.Switzer@paloalto.gov> Subject: Re: 332 Forest CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. Hi Steven, I have a couple questions related to the recently filed preliminary applications for SB79 projects: 1) Will the planning department be reviewing the preliminary applications and preparing an analysis? 2) Once the applications are complete, has the city established a process for the involv i This message needs your attention This is a personal email address. Mark Safe Report CGBANNERINDICATOR Hi Steven, I have a couple questions related to the recently filed preliminary applications for SB79 projects: 1) Will the planning department be reviewing the preliminary applications and preparing an analysis? 2) Once the applications are complete, has the city established a process for the involvement of the various boards and commissions as well as City Council before any final approvals are issued? Thank you, Fred Kohler On Thu, Mar 12, 2026 at 11:23 AM Switzer, Steven <Steven.Switzer@paloalto.gov> wrote: Hi Fred, The property owner just filed a formal application for the redevelopment pf 332 Forest Avenue. We are still in the early stages of review and haven’t determined yet if the application is complete. Once we determine the application is complete, we will then kick off the environmental analysis It is hard to give a date for any public hearing. What I can offer is that it will likely take a few months before we go to any public hearing. Powered by Mimecast Item 2 Attachment E - Public Comments     Packet Pg. 27     Follow the link to view the Planned Community (PC/PHZ) Process Flowchart(PDF, 475KB). Steven Switzer Senior Historic Planner Planning and Development Services Department 650-329-2321 | Steven.Switzer@PaloAlto.gov www.PaloAlto.gov From: Fred Kohler <kohler70@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2026 1:33 PM To: Switzer, Steven <Steven.Switzer@paloalto.gov> Cc: kohler70@gmail.com Subject: 332 Forest CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. Steven, I am Fred Kohler, living at 315 Homer. I am also a member of the Weatherly HOA board. We are tracking the progress of the 332 Forest project, adjacent to our property. We attended the Council prescreening last August. Now that the plans have been filed, would you provide us with the expected timeline for Planning Department review and consideration by the Architectural Review Board and the Planning and Transportation Commission? Also, could you advise us of the legal requirements that govern this timeline? We appreciate your assistance in this matter. Fred Kohler Item 2 Attachment E - Public Comments     Packet Pg. 28     From:Switzer, Steven To:"Alexander Joseph Almeida" Cc:"Ariana Eileen Afshari" Subject:RE: Inquiry re: 332 Forest Ave / Record 26PLN-00043 Date:Wednesday, August 5, 2026 5:53:00 PM Attachments:image001.png image002.png Hi Alexander, I wanted to provide a quick update that the project is scheduled to go before the Planning and Transportation Commission on August 12, 2026. If you have any comments on the project plans, please feel free to send them to Planning.Commission@PaloAlto.gov and copy me as well. You can also view the project materials and additional information on the project webpage: https://www.paloalto.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Current- Planning/Projects/332-Forest-Avenue Please let me know if you have any questions. STEVEN SWITZER Senior Historic Planner Planning and Development Services Department 650-329-2321 | Steven.Switzer@PaloAlto.gov www.PaloAlto.gov From: Switzer, Steven Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2026 11:10 AM To: 'Alexander Joseph Almeida' <aja10499@gmail.com> Cc: Ariana Eileen Afshari <afshariariana@gmail.com> Subject: RE: Inquiry re: 332 Forest Ave / Record 26PLN-00043 Hi Alexander, Item 2 Attachment E - Public Comments     Packet Pg. 29     &nbsp; Thanks for your patience while I was out of the office. The planning project (26PLN-00043) is still under review. The current application has yet to be determined to be complete since the applicant did not provide all of the necessary information. This means it will be sometime before the item is scheduled for a public hearing. That likely will not occur until later in fall of this year. As for the notification to existing tenants, that would be governed by our Chapter 9.68 RENTAL HOUSING STABILIZATION. This chapter includes the items the landlord would need to provide to existing tenants. STEVEN SWITZER Senior Historic Planner Planning and Development Services Department 650-329-2321 | Steven.Switzer@PaloAlto.gov www.PaloAlto.gov From: Alexander Joseph Almeida <aja10499@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2026 11:59 AM To: Switzer, Steven <Steven.Switzer@paloalto.gov> Cc: Ariana Eileen Afshari <afshariariana@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Inquiry re: 332 Forest Ave / Record 26PLN-00043 CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. Hi Steven, I know that you were out of office for a while and I wanted to get this to the top of your inbox in case you missed it. All the best. On Thu, Apr 30, 2026 at 7:59AM Alexander Joseph Almeida <aja10499@gmail.com> wrote: Hi Steven, I'm a current tenant at 332 Forest Ave and recentl i This message needs your attention This is a personal email address. Mark Safe Report CGBANNERINDICATOR Hi Steven, Powered by Mimecast Item 2 Attachment E - Public Comments     Packet Pg. 30     I know that you were out of office for a while and I wanted to get this to the top of your inbox in case you missed it. All the best. On Thu, Apr 30, 2026 at 7:59 AM Alexander Joseph Almeida <aja10499@gmail.com> wrote: Hi Steven, I'm a current tenant at 332 Forest Ave and recently learned through Palo Alto Permit View about the entitlement application under review at our address (Record 26PLN-00043), as well as the prior prescreening (Record 25PLN-00130). Would you be able to share: 1. The current procedural status of 26PLN-00043 and what review steps remain. 2. Whether any Planning Commission or City Council hearings have been scheduled, or an approximate timeline for when they might be. 3. Confirmation of the noticing requirements for this type of application — specifically, when current tenants at the project site would receive formal written notice. I appreciate your time. Best, -- Alexander J. Almeida (332 Forest, Apt 10) -- Alexander J. Almeida Item 2 Attachment E - Public Comments     Packet Pg. 31     From:Switzer, Steven To:Scott Ellison Subject:RE: 332 Forest Avenue Project Questions Date:Wednesday, August 5, 2026 5:53:00 PM Attachments:image001.png image002.png Hi Scott, I wanted to provide a quick update that the project is scheduled to go before the Planning and Transportation Commission on August 12, 2026. If you have any comments on the project plans, please feel free to send them to Planning.Commission@PaloAlto.gov and copy me as well. You can also view the project materials and additional information on the project webpage: https://www.paloalto.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Current- Planning/Projects/332-Forest-Avenue Please let me know if you have any questions. STEVEN SWITZER Senior Historic Planner Planning and Development Services Department 650-329-2321 | Steven.Switzer@PaloAlto.gov www.PaloAlto.gov From: Switzer, Steven Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2026 11:20 AM To: 'Scott Ellison' <scottalexellison@gmail.com> Subject: RE: 332 Forest Avenue Project Questions Hi Scott, The first project was a pre-screening item, which involved the review of a conceptual development proposal. No formal decision was made on the project; rather, it provided an Item 2 Attachment E - Public Comments     Packet Pg. 32     &nbsp; opportunity for the City Council to offer preliminary feedback to the applicant. The staff report for that item, which includes the information you are requesting, can be found at the following link: https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/Portal/Meeting?meetingTemplateId=16173 Since that time, the property owner has submitted a formal development application (26PLN- 00043), which is currently under review by City staff. This application represents the actual project for which the applicant is seeking approval. At this point, we anticipate that the project will be scheduled for its first public hearing before the Planning Commission this fall, likely in August or September. STEVEN SWITZER Senior Historic Planner Planning and Development Services Department 650-329-2321 | Steven.Switzer@PaloAlto.gov www.PaloAlto.gov From: Scott Ellison <scottalexellison@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2026 11:31 AM To: Switzer, Steven <Steven.Switzer@paloalto.gov> Subject: 332 Forest Avenue Project Questions CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. Hi Steven, I live at 315 Homer Avenue in the Weatherly at University Park condominiums, and I would like to be added to the "interested parties" list regarding the development project proposal at 332 and 350 Forest Avenue. Although I tried to do so on my own on the City of Palo Alto Develo i This message needs your attention This is a personal email address. This is their first email to your company. Mark Safe Report CGBANNERINDICATOR Hi Steven, Powered by Mimecast Item 2 Attachment E - Public Comments     Packet Pg. 33     I live at 315 Homer Avenue in the Weatherly at University Park condominiums, and I would like to be added to the "interested parties" list regarding the development project proposal at 332 and 350 Forest Avenue. Although I tried to do so on my own on the City of Palo Alto Development website, I was not able to do so. I also have a few questions with which I am hoping that you can help me: 1. How can I obtain a copy of the City's preliminary analysis of 332 Forest Avenue from the August 11, 2025 City Council meeting? I attended the meeting and I recall that you may have presented the preliminary analysis. 2. I noticed that there is a new planning number assigned to 332 Forest Avenue from its original filing and the second filing seems to show as a new application: why did the planning number change? 3. What is different between the two applications? Thank you in advance for your assistance. Best regards, Scott Ellison 315 Homer Avenue Unit 401 Palo Alto, CA 94301 Item 2 Attachment E - Public Comments     Packet Pg. 34     If you need assistance reviewing the above documents, please contact the Project Planner or call the Planner-on-Duty at 650-617-3117 or email planner@paloalto.gov Project Plans In order to reduce paper consumption, a limited number of hard copy project plans are provided to Commissioners for their review. The same plans are available to the public, at all hours of the day, via the following online resources. Directions to review Project plans and environmental documents online: 1. Go to: bit.ly/PApendingprojects 2. Scroll down to find “332 Forest Ave” and click the address link 3. On this project-specific webpage you will find a link to the project plans and other important information Direct Link to Project Webpage: https://www.paloalto.gov/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Current- Planning/Projects/332-Forest-Avenue Item 2 Attachment F - Project Plans     Packet Pg. 35     Item No. 3. Page 1 of 2 Planning & Transportation Commission Staff Report From: Planning and Development Services Director Lead Department: Planning and Development Services Meeting Date: August 12, 2026 Report #: 2607-6580 TITLE Review and Submit the Planning and Transportation Commission 2026-27 Work Plan to the City Council for Approval RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning and Transportation Commission (PTC) discuss the draft PTC 2026-27 Work Plan, including past accomplishments and future goals, suggest changes, and submit of the draft Work Plan to City Council for approval. BACKGROUND On July 8, 2026, the PTC received and discussed the Draft PTC 2026-27 Work Plan. After discussion the PTC voted unanimously to continue the item to the meeting on August 12, 2026, with additional goals on efficiency and Comprehensive Plan updates. The motion also included direction to staff to confirm there are no additional Council Priorities that should be considered for the PTC work plan. Staff prepared two new goals in response to the PTC motion, with consideration of draft language from Chair Chang and Commissioner Akin. Staff have reviewed the City Council’s Priorities and Objectives and added some relevant project under these Goals. No other additions were identified. Attachment A includes the additional Goal 8 and Goal 9 shown in track changes. The draft language originally provided by Chair Chang and Commissioner Akin is provided below for discussion purposes: Comprehensive Plan Updates Initiate process to update the Palo Alto comprehensive plan for Its next update beyond 2030. o Determine extent to which plan needs to be updated, timeline, and activities for completion Item 3 Item 3 Staff Report     Packet Pg. 36     Item No. 3. Page 2 of 2 o May include small updates that have been surfaced by the PTC such as modifying land use to reflect increased fire risk in the urban wild land, interface and more closely associating utility and other infrastructure maintenance and modernization with relevant comprehensive plan elements. Improve PTC Processes and Scope Investigate and implement improvements in Commission processes, including but not limited to technology use and communication with Staff and the public. Investigate and propose changes in Commission responsibilities in order to reduce Council workload and adapt to changes in State law. o Benefits: Faster applicant progress through PTC reviews, reduced load on Council and Staff. o Timeline: One year. o Resources Needed: Staff time. Council direction and approval for any substantive changes in responsibility. o Measure of Success: Reduction in average amount of time per project review or agenda item, in total over PTC and Council (for items involving PTC). o Mandated: No. o Council-Directed: No, but note that some potential changes would require Council direction and approval for implementation. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Adoption of the proposed work plan is exempt from CEQA in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15063(b) because it can be seen with certainty that adoption of the work plan would not have an environmental impact on the environment. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: Revised Draft PTC 2026-27 Work Plan AUTHOR/TITLE: Jennifer Armer, Assistant Director Item 3 Item 3 Staff Report     Packet Pg. 37     1 1 9 6 2 Planning and Transportation Commission (PTC) 2026-27 Work Plan Date Reviewed by PTC July 8, 2026 Staff Liaison: Jennifer Armer, Assistant Director, Planning and Development Services (PDS) Lead Department: Planning and Development Services (PDS); Office of Transportation (OOT) About the Commission The seven-member Planning & Transportation Commission adopted its 2025-26 work plan on July 8, 2026. The members and chairs are listed below. Members serve 4-year terms. See Planning & Transportation Commission (PTC) webpage link: http://www.paloalto.gov/gov/boards/ptc/default.asp Current Commissioners • Allen Akin • Bryna Chang (Chair) • Bart Hechtman • Todd James • Kevin Ji (Vice Chair) • Dr. Forest Olaf Peterson • Cari Templeton Mission Statement The Planning & Transportation Commission advises the City Council, Planning Director, and Chief Transportation Official on land use and transportation matters, including the Comprehensive Plan, zoning, transportation programs, and related matters. The Commission's primary responsibilities include: • Preparing and making recommendations to the City Council on the City's Comprehensive Plan and applying the Comprehensive Plan to proposed development, public facilities, and transportation in Palo Alto; • Considering and making recommendations to the City Council on zoning map and zoning ordinance changes; any changes to Title 18 of the Palo Alto Municipal Code must be reviewed by the PTC and the City Council; • Reviewing and making recommendations to the City Council on subdivisions and Site and Design Reviews, on appeals on variances and use permits; • Considering other policies and programs affecting development and land use in Palo Alto for final City Council action; • Reviewing and making recommendations on individual projects as described in the Municipal Code, and Open Space development; • Reviewing and making recommendations to the City Council on transportation, parking, and other related mobility issues; and Ensuring robust community engagement and dialogue regarding planning, land use, and transportation; and providing recommendations to the City Council regarding these matters and incorporating the public discussion. The PTC hearings provide a forum for public comment and public interaction. Item 3 Attachment A - Revised Draft PTC 2026-27 Work Plan     Packet Pg. 38     1 1 9 6 2 Prior Year Work Plan On February 2, 2026, the City Council accepted the July 9, 2025, PTC recommended 2025-26 Work Plan: https://www.paloalto.gov/files/assets/public/v/1/planning-amp-development-services/ptc/council-approved-ptc- 2025-26-work-plan.pdf Prior Year Accomplishments During the period of the PTC 2025-26 Work Plan: The PTC's transportation efforts included study sessions and/or recommendations on: Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Plan Update; Crescent Park Traffic Calming; South Palo Alto Bike/Ped Connectivity; SamTrans Grand Boulevard Initiative; and Palo Alto Link. The PTC's work on implementing the Comprehensive Plan, Housing Element, and Council Priorities included study sessions and/or recommendations on: Cubberley Conceptual Master Plan; Retail Code Amendments; Stream Corridor Protections; Bird Friendly Design Ordinance; Annual Review of Comprehensive Plan and Housing Element progress report; Housing Element Implementation including Program 6.5; Prohousing Designation application review; San Antonio Road Area Plan; Code Amendments for Special Setback, De Minimis Exceptions, and the “Shrink Wrap Rule”; and ADU regulations. The PTC's work on development projects included review and recommendations on four Tentative Maps; two Conditional Use Permits; two Site and Design applications; a Planned Community (PC) amendment; and three Planned Home Zone (PHZ) applications. PROJECT/GOAL 1: Area Planning: This goal carries forward the prior year goal for neighborhood planning approaches and overall effectiveness of various approaches to neighborhood planning including both land use and mobility. The staff and PTC will consider new neighborhoods that result from the 6th cycle Housing Element sites and demand for public facilities/services. This goal includes continued work on both the Downtown Housing Plan and the San Antonio Road Area Plan. Beneficial Impacts Timeline Resources Needed Measure Of Success State Mandated/ Local Law/ Council Approved Development policy recommendations and preferred alternatives for the new area plans enable City Council to provide direction to guide the City's future development. By June 2027 Staff time to research and prepare staff reports and conduct project coordination. Consultant budgets have already been allocated. Successful conversation and recommendations of policies and preferred alternatives to City Council, and initiation of environmental review. Yes – Council assigned. High Priority Lower Priority Council-Directed Policy Update Council directed work toward future area plans.N/A Yes Item 3 Attachment A - Revised Draft PTC 2026-27 Work Plan     Packet Pg. 39     1 1 9 6 2 Item 3 Attachment A - Revised Draft PTC 2026-27 Work Plan     Packet Pg. 40     1 1 9 6 2 PROJECT/GOAL 2: Housing Program Implementation: The Housing Element was adopted by City Council on April 15, 2024, and certified by California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) on August 20, 2024. PTC will continue work on Housing Element implementation programs as scheduled within the Housing Element. Beneficial Impacts Timeline Resources Needed Measure Of Success State Mandated/ Local Law/ Council Approved Complying with the requirements of the adopted Housing Element to encourage housing development and comply with State Law. PTC and Council review of a number of programs will proceed over the work plan year, as required by the Housing Element. Staff and consultant resources employed. Implementation of programs by target dates. Yes - State Mandated High Priority Lower Priority Council-Directed Policy Update Program 3.9 (incentivizing multi-family as an alternative to commercial development); Program 4.2 (short term rentals); Program 6.3 (SB 9 unit standards); and Program 6.5 (supporting innovative housing types). SOFA objective standards Yes PROJECT/GOAL 3: State Law Implementation – Laws with Prior Effective Dates and any new 2026 Laws to Become Effective in 2027: The State adopts new laws every year, some like Senate Bill (SB) 79, required quick action through an interim ordinance during the last fiscal year, that will then require consideration and recommendation from PTC of a permanent ordinance, others will require modifications to maintain consistency with State law and Housing Element goals. Beneficial Impacts Timeline Resources Needed Measure Of Success State Mandated/ Local Law/ Council Approved Provide clarity to property owners and potential developers. Ordinance Recommendation during 2026-27 work plan term. Staff and consultant assistance. Adoption of ordinance amendments. Yes - State High Priority Lower Priority Council-Directed Policy Update Implementing State laws and discuss policy considerations. N/A Possibly Item 3 Attachment A - Revised Draft PTC 2026-27 Work Plan     Packet Pg. 41     1 1 9 6 2 Item 3 Attachment A - Revised Draft PTC 2026-27 Work Plan     Packet Pg. 42     1 1 9 6 2 PROJECT/GOAL 4: Parking Programs: The PTC will receive periodic updates regarding options for improving the City’s parking programs. Updates may include parking program activities, recent parking data, and upcoming parking policy efforts and program changes. Beneficial Impacts Timeline Resources Needed Measure Of Success State Mandated/ Local Law/ Council Approved Improved parking operations. Ongoing.Staff resources.Feedback from PTC and continued engagement from the public. Yes High Priority Lower Priority Council-Directed Policy Update The staff work behind the project continues; proposed updates help advance the work. Additionally, the PTC welcomes opportunities to engage w/the public on this topic. This project represents a large body of ongoing work to manage parking supply and parking policy. Yes PROJECT/GOAL 5: Comprehensive Plan Policy Implementation: This includes changes in Title 18 and other Comp Plan policies that lead to Title 18 revisions. Beneficial Impacts Timeline Resources Needed Measure Of Success State Mandated/ Local Law/ Council Approved Comprehensive Plan policies and programs to completion. As directed by Council.Staff and consultant assistance – particularly when staff resources will be focused on implementation of the Housing Element. Adopted ordinances to amend Title 18. No High Priority Lower Priority Council-Directed Policy Update N/A N/A Yes – Comprehensive Plan Item 3 Attachment A - Revised Draft PTC 2026-27 Work Plan     Packet Pg. 43     1 1 9 6 2 Item 3 Attachment A - Revised Draft PTC 2026-27 Work Plan     Packet Pg. 44     1 1 9 6 2 PROJECT/GOAL 6: Title 18 Updates: Considering and making recommendations to the City Council on any changes to Title 18 of the Palo Alto Municipal Code as directed by City Council, for example updates to the City’s Wireless Communications Facilities Ordinance. Beneficial Impacts Timeline Resources Needed Measure Of Success State Mandated/ Local Law/ Council Approved Development of code recommendations to support City Council updates. As directed by Council.Staff and consultant resources would be identified based on specific projects. Wireless Ordinance update is currently unresourced. Adopted ordinances to amend Title 18. No High Priority Lower Priority Council-Directed Policy Update N/A N/A Yes PROJECT/GOAL 7: Project Review: The PTC will provide review as part of their regular ongoing responsibility for recommendations to City Council and staff on quasi-judicial development projects and transportation projects. Beneficial Impacts Timeline Resources Needed Measure Of Success State Mandated/ Local Law/ Council Approved Public review of planning and transportation projects. Ongoing.Staff resources.Feedback from PTC and continued engagement from the public. Yes High Priority Lower Priority Council-Directed Policy Update N/A N/A Yes Item 3 Attachment A - Revised Draft PTC 2026-27 Work Plan     Packet Pg. 45     1 1 9 6 2 Item 3 Attachment A - Revised Draft PTC 2026-27 Work Plan     Packet Pg. 46     1 1 9 6 2 PROJECT/GOAL 8: Comprehensive Plan Updates: The PTC will advise on updates of the Comprehensive Plan. This may include updates to individual Elements as required by State law and/or small updates that have been surfaced by the PTC. Beneficial Impacts Timeline Resources Needed Measure Of Success State Mandated/ Local Law/ Council Approved Improved consistency between the Comprehensive Plan and current City priorities, like reducing fire risk in the urban wildland interface. As directed by Council.Staff and consultant resources would be identified based on specific updates. These are currently unresourced. Determine extent to which plan needs to be updated, timeline, and activities for completion. Yes High Priority Lower Priority Council-Directed Policy Update Safety Element Natural Environment Element, Initiate Comprehensive Plan Update Yes PROJECT/GOAL 9: Improve PTC Processes and Scope: Investigate and implement improvements in PTC processes, including but not limited to technology use and communication with staff and the public. Beneficial Impacts Timeline Resources Needed Measure Of Success State Mandated/ Local Law/ Council Approved Faster applicant progress through PTC reviews, reduced load on Council and staff. As directed by Council.Staff resources and budget would be identified based on specific efforts. These are currently unresourced. Reduction in average amount of time per project review or agenda item, in total over PTC and Council (for items involving PTC). No High Priority Lower Priority Council-Directed Policy Update N/A N/A No Item 3 Attachment A - Revised Draft PTC 2026-27 Work Plan     Packet Pg. 47     Item No. 4. Page 1 of 1 Planning & Transportation Commission Staff Report From: Planning and Development Services Director Lead Department: Planning and Development Services Meeting Date: August 12, 2026 Report #: 2608-6607 TITLE Approval of Planning & Transportation Commission Draft Summary Minutes of June 10, 2026 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning & Transportation Commission (PTC) adopt the meeting minutes. BACKGROUND Draft summary minutes for the June 10, 2026, Planning & Transportation Commission (PTC) meeting were made available to the Commissioners prior to the August 12, 2026, meeting date. The draft PTC minutes can be viewed on the City’s website at https://bit.ly/PaloAltoPTC ATTACHMENTS None AUTHOR/TITLE: Samuel Tavera, Administrative Associate III Item 4 Item 4 Staff Report     Packet Pg. 48     Item No. 5. Page 1 of 1 Planning & Transportation Commission Staff Report From: Planning and Development Services Director Lead Department: Planning and Development Services Meeting Date: August 12, 2026 Report #: 2608-6608 TITLE Approval of Planning & Transportation Commission Draft Summary Minutes of July 8, 2026 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning & Transportation Commission (PTC) adopt the meeting minutes. BACKGROUND Draft summary minutes for the July 8, 2026, Planning & Transportation Commission (PTC) meeting were made available to the Commissioners prior to the August 12, 2026, meeting date. The draft PTC minutes can be viewed on the City’s website at https://bit.ly/PaloAltoPTC ATTACHMENTS None AUTHOR/TITLE: Samuel Tavera, Administrative Associate III Item 5 Item 5 Staff Report     Packet Pg. 49