HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Report 2607-6522CITY OF PALO ALTO
CITY COUNCIL
Special Meeting
Monday, August 10, 2026
Council Chambers & Hybrid
5:30 PM
Agenda Item
6.Adopt a Resolution Making Required Findings in Support of Acceptance of Funding from
Vehicle Registration Fee-Intelligent Transportation Systems (VRF-ITS) Cycle 5 Grant
Program; and amendment of the FY 2027 Budget in the Capital Improvement Fund. CEQA
Status – Categorically Exempt (CEQA Guidelines section 15301b Existing Facilities). Public
Comment
City Council
Staff Report
From: City Manager
Report Type: CONSENT CALENDAR
Lead Department: Transportation
Meeting Date: August 10, 2026
Report #:2607-6522
TITLE
Adopt a Resolution Making Required Findings in Support of Acceptance of Funding from Vehicle
Registration Fee-Intelligent Transportation Systems (VRF-ITS) Cycle 5 Grant Program; and
amendment of the FY 2027 Budget in the Capital Improvement Fund. CEQA Status –
Categorically Exempt (CEQA Guidelines section 15301b Existing Facilities).
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that Council:
1. Adopt a Resolution making required findings in support of the City’s application and award
for VRF-ITS Cycle 5 funds in the amount of $500,000 for the Embarcadero Road Traffic
Signal Operations and ITS Upgrade Project.
2. Approve and Authorize the City Manager or their designee to execute a Funding Agreement
with the Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) to accept a $500,000 grant as part of the
2010 Measure B Vehicle Registration Fee (VRF) Countywide Program Cycle Five.
3. Amend the Fiscal Year Budget Appropriation for the Capital Improvement Fund (requires a
2/3 vote) to:
a. Increase the Traffic Signal and Intelligent Transportation Systems project (PL-05030)
in the amount of $500,000; and
b. Increase revenue from Other Agencies (2010 Measure B Vehicle Registration Fees
Cycle 5 in PL-05030) in the amount of $500,000.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Embarcadero Road between U.S. 101 and Palo Alto High School/Town & Country intersection
700 feet east of El Camino Real in Palo Alto is a residential arterial that serves both local and
regional traffic. This roadway segment consists of eight signalized intersections with aging
traffic signal hardware. This project will replace the older traffic signal cabinets, implement
video detection and accessible pedestrian signals, and implement Automated Traffic Signal
Performance Measures (ATSPM) to develop optimal signal operations. This VRF-ITS grant
award would provide $500,000 of the $697,000 project cost.
BACKGROUND
ANALYSIS
of as-built plans, and other costs in excess of a potential award amount would be considered as
part of the City’s contribution toward the total project costs. There is no local match
requirement associated with the VRF grant award.
FISCAL/RESOURCE IMPACT
STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
ATTACHMENTS
APPROVED BY:
May 19, 2026
Dear Ria Hutabarat Lo,
This letter confirms that, on May 7, 2026, the VTA Board of Directors approved the Vehicle
Registration Fee – Intelligent Transportation System Funds (VRF-ITS), Cycle 5 project list, as shown
in Table 1 below. Attachment A is the VTA Board-adopted memo and related materials, for your
reference.
Table 1: VRF-ITS Cycle 5 – Approved List of Projects
Project Name Agency Name Funding Amount
Campbell ITS Mobility and Safety
Improvements- Phase 1
Campbell $500,000
Stevens Creek Boulevard & De Anza Boulevard
Traffic Signal Synchronization Project
Cupertino $231,000
Grant Road Corridor Optimization with
Artificial Intelligence (AI) Detection
Mountain View $218,000
Embarcadero Road ITS Upgrade and
Optimization
Palo Alto $500,000
San José Arterial Management – Adaptive
Traffic Control System Deployment
San Jose $450,000
Mathilda Avenue/Sunnyvale-Saratoga Road
and Homestead Road Smart Corridor ITS
Upgrade
Sunnyvale $499,664
Santa Teresa & Tenth Traffic Signal Upgrades Gilroy $101,336
Next Steps
We will provide a draft Funding Agreement for your review shortly.
If you have any questions, you can contact me at 408-321-5804 or larissa.sanderfer@vta.org.
Sincerely,
Larissa Sanderfer
Transportation Planner III
CC: Rafael Rius
Date:April 30, 2026
Current Meeting:May 7, 2026
Board Meeting:May 7, 2026
BOARD MEMORANDUM
TO:Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority
Board of Directors
THROUGH:General Manager/CEO, Carolyn M. Gonot
FROM:Chief Engineering & Prog Delivery Officer, Casey Emoto
SUBJECT:Vehicle Registration Fee - Intelligent Transportation System Funds -Cycle 5:
Project Selections
Policy-Related Action: No Government Code Section 84308 Applies: No
ACTION ITEM
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the recommended list of projects to receive$2.5 million in funding from the Vehicle
Registration Feefor Intelligent TransportationSystems (VRF-ITS)-Cycle 5 competitivegrant
program.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
x Thepurpose of this item is to seek approval from the Santa Clara Valley
Transportation Authority (VTA)Board of Directors(Board) on the recommended list
of projectsto receive funding from the VRF-ITS-Cycle5 competitive grant
program.
x Therecommendedlist of projects forfunding award was evaluated by a committee
composed of volunteer local agencystafffrom thecitiesofCampbell,Mountain
View, San Jose, andSunnyvale.
x Thecommitteeevaluatedthe grant submissions based on scoring criteriaapproved
by the VTA Board at its October2, 2025 meeting.
STRATEGIC PLAN/GOALS:
The award of VRF-ITS funds align with VTA's goal to create and support an integrated
multimodal transportation system that serves all Santa Clara County residents efficiently. In
addition, this action advances the goal to pursue, develop, and implement new technologies on
Santa Clara County's transportation system.
7.12
BY:
DATE:
SSAANTAA
C
L
A
R
A
VAALLEY T R A N S PORTATTION
A
U
T
H
OO
RITTYY
CA L I F O R NIA
N
A
H
OO
R
APPROVED ACCEPTED ADOPTED AMENDED DEFERRED REVIEWED
^ĂŶƚĂůĂƌĂsĂůůĞLJdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƟŽŶƵƚŚŽƌŝƚLJ
ŽĂƌĚŽĨŝƌĞĐƚŽƌƐ
ůĂŝŶĞ&͘ĂůƚĂŽ͕ŽĂƌĚ^ĞĐƌĞƚĂƌLJ
5/7/2026
Page 2 of 5
FISCAL IMPACT:
The requested action in this memorandum would result in awarding funds to projects from the
VRF-ITS grant program funds totaling $2.5 million that were allocated to the program by the
VTA Board at its October 2, 2025 meeting.
BACKGROUND:
The source of funding for this grant program is the 2010 Measure B VRF Program that levies a
$10 annual vehicle registration fee on motor vehicles owned/registered by Santa Clara County
residents. The fees collected must be used to pay for programs and projects that have a
relationship or benefit to owners of motor vehicles paying the fee; and the programs and projects
must be consistent with the regional transportation plan. The VTA Board adopted an
expenditure plan that divides these funds with 80 percent proportionally directed back to Santa
Clara County local agencies based on population, 15 percent directed to countywide programs,
and five percent for VTA’s administration of the funds. The eligible countywide programs are
environmental mitigations, local match for grants and ITS projects.
Since the inception of the VRF program, the countywide program has had four three-year
funding cycles and is now on its fifth cycle. The VTA Board approved at its October 2, 2025
meeting an allocation of $2.5 million to fund the fifth cycle of VRF-ITS projects. The
competitive grant process was developed through the VTA’s ITS Working Group (ITSWG), a
working group of VTA’s Technical Advisory Committee (TAC). VTA staff along with a subset
of the ITSWG composed of volunteer staff from the cities of Campbell, Mountain View, San
Jose, and Sunnyvale developed the project selection criteria. The scoring criteria were also
approved by the VTA Board at its October 2, 2025 meeting. The following sections provide a
summary of the scoring criteria.
Scoring Criteria:
Proposed projects will be evaluated based on six criteria: Mobility & Operations, Resilience &
Reliability, CostǦeffectiveness, Responsiveness, Identified Community Need, and Project
Readiness.
xMobility & Operations: Measure the improvement of the movement of people and
goods and enhance corridor performance, including traffic signal operations.
xResilience & Reliability: Evaluate how the project strengthens the consistency and
dependability of the County’s transportation network, including improvements in travel
times, traffic flow, and system performance.
xCostǦeffectiveness: Assess how efficiently project funds are used and prioritize projects
that deliver substantial benefits relative to their cost.
xResponsiveness: Project alignment with the goals and priorities identified in the current
funding guidelines, Valley Transportation Plan (VTP), and VTA’s Transportation
Technology Strategic Plan (TTSP), as well as the clarity and feasibility of the proposed
approach.
xIdentified Community Need: Documentation of community transportation need
identified in an adopted plan or study, and how clearly the benefits are described.
xProject Readiness: Evaluate project readiness for implementation, require no
7.12
Page 3 of 5
environmental clearance, and ability to implement within two years. A detailed scope of
work and schedule (including a Gantt chart) are required for maximum points.
Total possible points for each criteria are listed in Exhibit A.
Exhibit A: VRF-ITS Funding Cycle 5: Scoring Areas
Criteria Maximum Possible Points
Total Points:
Attachment A provides additional details on the scoring criteria.
DISCUSSION:
On October 16, 2025, VTA staff issued a call for projects for the VRF-ITS Cycle 5 with an end
date of January 16, 2026. Staff received 16 project proposals that were evaluated by a selection
committee comprised of volunteer local agency staff using the Board approved criteria.
Members of the selection committee did not score projects from their own agency. The following
are the seven projects recommended for funding:
7.12
Page 4 of 5
Table 1: VRF -ITS Cycle 5 - Recommended List of Projects
Project Name Agency
Name
Project Description Funding
Amount
- Phase 1
Ġ Arterial Management Ͳ
Adaptive Traffic Control System
Deployment
City of San
Jose
City of
Sunnyvale
Install video detection
equipment and procure and
implement adaptive traffic
control system.
$499,664
Santa Teresa & Tenth Traffic Signal
Upgrades
City of
Gilroy
* City of Gilroy Santa Teresa & Tenth Traffic Signal Upgrades Project recommended to receive
partial funding after fully funding the other 6 projects.
Attachment B provides a summary of the grant submissions and overall scores of each.
7.12
Page 5 of 5
ALTERNATIVES:
The VTA Board could choose to not award the VRF-ITS funds as recommended by staff. This
would delay the implementation of the recommended ITS projects.
CLIMATE IMPACT:
The funding awarded to projects through this program involve improving mobility and traffic
operations that could lead to reductions in greenhouse gas emissions.
ADVISORY COMMITTEE DISCUSSION/RECOMMENDATION:
The Technical Advisory Committee considered this item as part of its April 2026 Consent
Agenda and recommended Board approval without comment.
STANDING COMMITTEE DISCUSSION/RECOMMENDATION:
The Mobility Management & Capital Programs Committee, meeting as a committee of the whole
in April 2026, considered this item on its regular agenda. Committee members asked whether
debriefs were provided to unsuccessful applicants, what regional goals the awarded projects
support, and whether cost variability would continue. Staff confirmed that debriefs were
provided, that the funded projects align with the Transportation Technology Strategic Plan’s
focus on interoperability and improved traffic management, and that cost variability is expected
to persist due to economic uncertainty. The Committee requested that this item be forwarded to
the Board of Directors' consent agenda for May 7, 2026.
Prepared by: David Kobayashi, Traffic Engineer
Memo No. 9923
ATTACHMENTS:
x Attachment A_Scoring Criteria Memo (PDF)
x Attachment B_Scoring Summary (PDF)
x 4.16.26_MMCP_VRF-ITS Cycle 5 (PDF)
7.12
Attachment A
Scoring Criteria Memo Excerpt for the Vehicle Registration Fee Intelligent Transportation
Systems (VRF-ITS) Cycle 5 Competitive grant program.
7.12.a
This page left intentionally blank
7.12.a
3331 N. First Street Administration 408-321-5555
San Jose, CA 95134-1927 Customer Service 408-321-2300
Solutions that move you
5
Scoring Areas
Submitted project proposals will be scored on how well the proposal meets each of the scoring
areas shown in Table 2. The total maximum points for any project proposal shall be 100 points.
Table 2 - VRF-ITS Funding Cycle 5: Scoring Areas
Scoring Areas
Possible Points
Mobility & Operations 40
& Reliability 20
15
5
5
15
Total Points: 100
DESCRIPTION OF SCORING AREAS & SCORING OF PROJECTS
Submitted project proposals receiving the maximum score in that area will clearly describe how
the proposed project meets an identified user need(s) in these areas.
Mobility & Operations projects encompass the improved movement of people and goods and
the ability to get from one place to another using one or more modes of transport to meet daily
needs on a corridor. An operations project seeks to improve the efficiency and performance of a
group of traffic signals on a corridor, and this could be an identified significant daily need on a
corridor.
Resilience & Reliability scoring was introduced in this cycle of VRF-ITS funding to ensure that
proposed projects enhance the consistency and dependability of Santa Clara County's
transportation network. Over the past two decades, Santa Clara County has emerged as a major
employment hub, leading to a significant rise in traffic demand. Consequently, key arterial
roadways have become increasingly unreliable for motorists. This scoring criterion is designed to
incentivize project proponents to improve roadway reliability. Projects that earn the highest
7.12.a
3331 N. First Street Administration 408-321-5555
San Jose, CA 95134-1927 Customer Service 408-321-2300
Solutions that move you
6
scores in this category will demonstrate measurable benefits, such as reduced travel times,
improved traffic flow, or the integration of advanced traffic management systems over an
extended period of time, under various weather conditions.
Cost-effectiveness scoring was introduced in this cycle of VRF-ITS funding to ensure that
limited resources are directed toward projects that deliver the highest impact with the most
efficient use of funds. This criterion encourages project proponents to optimize their budgets and
pursue innovative, cost-conscious solutions that yield measurable transportation improvements.
Projects that demonstrate a strong return on investment by delivering substantial benefits relative
to their cost will be prioritized, as they exemplify fiscal responsibility and maximize the overall
value to the community.
Responsiveness scoring was introduced in this cycle of the VRF-ITS funding to assess how
effectively the applicant’s proposed project aligns with the specific goals and objectives outlined
in the funding guidelines in the latest VTP and TTSP. This criterion ensures that proposed
projects directly address this cycle’s priorities while also evaluating the clarity, feasibility, and
practicality of the applicant’s approach.
The identified community need scoring area was included in this cycle of VRF-ITS funds to
address identified community needs. This need must be identified in a transportation plan or
study. The objective of this scoring area is to encourage project proponents to deliver
transportation improvements that address challenges faced in their communities, such as limited
mobility, and air pollution. Submitted project must clearly describe how the community will
benefit from the proposed project will receive a maximum score.
The final scoring area is project readiness. As described in the general requirements, projects
must be substantially ready and not require any environmental clearance, including a completion
within two years after receiving these funds. Submitted projects will receive the maximum score
in this area if the project provides a sufficiently detailed scope of work and schedule, including
meeting the requirements. The project proponent must submit a detailed scope of work,
including Gantt chart showing the duration of each work tasks.
VTA as the grantor and its selection committee seeks a concise and cohesive application that
demonstrates how the project follows up on the recommendation from the TTSP and clearly
meets the immediate needs of the roadway users in the following areas: improves mobility and
operations, improves accessibility, enhances safety, and addresses the needs of EPCs.
The above listed are key considerations in the scoring of submissions, including an inclusion of a
realistic schedule for the project completion meeting the general requirements. Another final key
component in the consideration of the submissions is the inclusion of an approach to measure
performance and an evaluation how well the project meets the needs of the roadway users.
7.12.a
Attachment B
Scoring summary for the Vehicle Registration Fee Intelligent Transportation Systems (VRF-ITS)
Cycle 5 Competitive grant program.
7.12.b
This page left intentionally blank
7.12.b
3URMHFW1DPH 7RWDO6FRUH )XQGLQJ5HFRPPHQGDWLRQ
&LW\RI6DQ-RVp$UWHULDO0DQDJHPHQW±$GDSWLYH7UDIILF
&RQWURO6\VWHP'HSOR\PHQW 5HFRPPHQGHG
&LW\RI6XQQ\YDOH0DWKLOGD$YHQXH6XQQ\YDOH6DUDWRJD5RDG
DQG+RPHVWHDG5RDG6PDUW&RUULGRU,768SJUDGH 5HFRPPHQGHG
&LW\RI&DPSEHOO&DPSEHOO,760RELOLW\DQG6DIHW\
,PSURYHPHQWV3KDVH 5HFRPPHQGHG
&LW\RI&XSHUWLQR6WHYHQV&UHHN%RXOHYDUG 'H$Q]D
%RXOHYDUG7UDIILF6LJQDO6\QFKURQL]DWLRQ3URMHFW 5HFRPPHQGHG
&LW\RI0RXQWDLQ9LHZ*UDQW5RDG&RUULGRU2SWLPL]DWLRQ
ZLWK$UWLILFLDO,QWHOOLJHQFH'HWHFWLRQ 5HFRPPHQGHG
&LW\RI3DOR$OWR(PEDUFDGHUR5RDG,768SJUDGHDQG
2SWLPL]DWLRQ 5HFRPPHQGHG
&LW\RI*LOUR\6DQWD7HUHVD 7HQWK7UDIILF6LJQDO8SJUDGHV 5HFRPPHQGHG
&LW\RI0LOSLWDV*UHDW0DOO3DUNZD\7UDIILF6LJQDO
0RGLILFDWLRQV 1RW5HFRPPHQGHG
&LW\RI0RUJDQ+LOO0RQWHUH\5RDG +DOH$YHQXH&RUULGRUV
&RQWUROOHU8SJUDGH3URMHFW 1RW5HFRPPHQGHG
&LW\RI6DUDWRJD&LW\ZLGH7UDIILF6LJQDO'HWHFWLRQ8SJUDGHV 1RW5HFRPPHQGHG
&LW\RI6DQ-RVp&RVW(IIHFWLYH(GJH$,$QDO\WLFVIRU'27
$SSOLFDWLRQV 1RW5HFRPPHQGHG
6DQWD&ODUD9DOOH\7UDQVSRUWDWLRQ$XWKRULW\7UDIILF
2SHUDWLRQV0RGHOLQJ7RRO 1RW5HFRPPHQGHG
&RXQW\RI6DQWD&ODUD6LJQDO7LPLQJ&RRUGLQDWLRQRQ&HQWUDO
2UHJRQDQG3DJH0LOO([SUHVVZD\V 1RW5HFRPPHQGHG
&RXQW\RI6DQWD&ODUD5HSODFHPHQWRI'DPDJHG)LEHU2SWLF
&DEOHVDW0XOWLSOH/RFDWLRQV 1RW5HFRPPHQGHG
&RXQW\RI6DQWD&ODUD&RXQW\ZLGH&ROOLVLRQ'DWDEDVHDQG
6DIHW\$QDO\VLV6RIWZDUH3URMHFW 1RW5HFRPPHQGHG
&LW\RI6DQ-RVp9LGHR'HWHFWLRQ8SJUDGHVDW%LF\FOHDQG
7UDQVLW,QWHUVHFWLRQV 1RW5HFRPPHQGHG
&LW\RI6DQ-RVp9LGHR'HWHFWLRQSURMHFWZDVZLWKGUDZQIURPFRQVLGHUDWLRQIRUIXQGLQJLQRUGHUWRDOORZIRUUHJLRQLPSDUWLDOLW\
95),76&\FOH&RPSHWLWLYH*UDQW6HOHFWLRQ&RPPLWWHH6FRULQJ6XPPDU\
7.12.b
From:herb
To:Council, City; Clerk, City
Subject:August 10, 2026 CityCouncil Meting, Item #6: Embarcadero Road Traffic Signals Operation
Date:Sunday, August 9, 2026 5:37:57 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links.
AUGUST 10, 2026 CITY COUNCIL MEETING
AGENDA ITEM #6
EMBARCADERO ROAD TRAFFIC SIGNALS OPERATION
[Embarcadero Road Improvements (Alma to Emerson)]
I urge you to continue this agenda item to a future meeting toprovide staff the opportunity to disclose the changes totraffic signal locations and signal timing for Embarcadero Roadthat includes the installation of new traffic signals onEmbarcadero Road at Emerson Street and High Street.
It required three public records requests to obtain the gradingcontract for the Alma Street to Emerson Street portion of theroad that indicated traffic signal installation but omittedanything about the traffic signals themselves.
Thank you.
Herb Borock