HomeMy WebLinkAbout0419.095I ~
•
.'. -~.-
".-'
--~
o
City of Palo Alto
City Manager's Report
--------
TO: HONORABLE CITY COL'NCIL
FROM: CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT: Public Worb
AGENDA DATE: Septem~r 13, 1995 CMR:419:9S
SUBJECT, Approval or Allthority for Stafllo Expend IT 1995-96 Funds for
Santa Clara VoDey NonpoiDt SoIUtt PoDotion Cootrol Program
REOUEST
On April: i 6, 1990, Council approved an agreement between thirteen Santa Oan County cities,
\he Coonty, and lb. Santa Oara Valley WaII:r District (SCVWD) fer the implementation of lbe
Santa Oara Valley Nonpoinl Source Pollution Control (NPS) Program (CMR:255:0). The
puq>OSe of !be program is 10 control pollution from urban runoff in lbe Santa Oora Valley_ By
approw! of lhe agreement, !be City agreed 10 fund • propornonate share of the NPS Program
each year. . -
RECOMMENDATION
This report recommends !bat CoonciI authorize staff 10 expend funds in the amount of S99,587
to pay the City's proportlooale sbare of cost for the FY 1995-96 Santa Oara Valley NPS
Program.
POLICY IMPLICATIONS
This report docs no! contain any cbanges to existing polkies.
f,XtcUfJ\'E. SUMMARY
The Santa Oan Valley NPS Program cost-sharing agreement established a Management
Committee, comprised of a representative from each participating agency, to provide overall
direction and to review and recoounend an annual program budget fo< approval by an parties
to tlle agreement. On July 20, 1995, !be Management C"mmitte. adopted. recommended
scope of work and com:spooding budge! for fY 1995·96 (see attacbed letter from NPS
Program). Although the recoIll.i1lended lmIIual budget \OW, $2,775,150, lhe participating
agencies are being biJled only $2,452,885, due 10 canyover from the Program's FY 1994-95
budget and a decision to freeze the assessments at last year's level Palo Alto', proportionate
share, 4.06 percent of !be modified budget, is $99,587. The majority of the program budget is
hoe I 00
'.
. :
4
o
aDocate<l "'" professirual consulting =vices and program management by SCVViD staff. The
<:OOSUltmts and SCVWD management staff provide &echnical guidance for the development of
new ordinances, policies and best management practices \0 control nonpoint source pollution.
III addition, the budget funds the payment of various governmental fees, support for regional
ponution control efforts and the continuation of ongoing water quality monitoring.
The initial National Pollutant Discbarge Elimination System (NPDES) permit, issuodjointly
!o Santa a ...... VaDey agencies through the !lIPS Program for discharge <>f slorm water!o local
creeb and the Bay, expired in July 1995. Therefore, NPS Program an110cal agency staff
focused much of !heir etrorts during IT 1994-95 on the prepa.-ation of. new penni! applk.tion
and related s10mt water management plan (SWMP). The SWMP contains new control
measures 10 be implemented by mUDicipalities, residents, and businesses in an attempt !o reduce
storm water pollutiolL EJJorts focus on controlling specific pollutants, such as copper and other
metals, and on specific a<:l:ivitie., such as land development and munkipal maintenance and
construction practices. The program will continue I" emphasize implementation of best
management practices, public education and outreach, and local inspection and enforcement
programs as effective means !o impr= storm WlIler quality. On August 23, 1995, the Regional
Water Quality Cootrol Board adopted. new S-year NPDES permit for the Program, requiring
implementation of the control measures identified in the SViMP.
"SCAL IMPACT
This an1horization is an annnol activity required 10 expend previously budgeted funds. Funds
have been appropriated in the Storm Drainage Fund operating budget
f.NVIRQNMENTAL ASSESSMENT
There is DO environmental assessment required in conjunction v,ith this report
ATTACHMENT
(etter from Santa Qara Valley NPS Program
PREPARED BY: Geocge Bagdon, Assistant Director of Public Wods
DEPARTMEl'.'T HEAD RE\']EW: ..a ~ ~. __ ~ ____ _
. GLEl'.'N S. ROBERTS
Director of Public W 0<1ls
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:
CMJl:41,;9S ..... lof1
. . .
f .
,
~"'",; '",.~~; '<."~."-""
>.'-;'',. :'"
IS! Santa Clara~lIey ,,"""P' Nonpoint sJ;!;lce
• Pollution Control Program
~ !-750 Al/naIkJt ~IIY' 5.&.'"I.JoSe, ell951l8
l'tl)D.0Pt.'f: ~8&(.am(Ie:n A .. t:7\~ 'S.a:II ~CA~I1()
(~927·0710 roM (408/268-7587
Angust 14, 1995
Mr. Joe Teresi
. Cily of Palo Alto
P.O. Box 1025()
Palo Alto, CA 94303
Dear Mr. Teresi:
iNVOICE
Subject: Invoice for FlSCaI Year 1994~9S Santa Cara 'laney Ncnpcln! Source
Pollution Olntrol Program
On July 20, 1995. the Santa Cl'".ra Var:ey Nonpvint Source Pollution Control Program
Managemenl Committee Ic!opted the fiscal year 199>96 Program Budget Accordingly. the
Iota! billing 10 the fifteen participating agencies ... ill be fo< $2,451,885.
In accordarv:e wifu the cost. allocation scbedu1e included in the partic"ipiiti.ng agencies·
agreement. the share fo< the Cily of Palo AnD is 599,587 whlcll is 4.06 % of the Iota! billing.
Prompt payment to 1ll< District wilhin 30 day. will ensure continued Program progress.
Please direct your payments 10 the SCVWD Accounting Division, and make cbecks payable
10 • SCVWD-NPS.·
I anticipate that the Santa Clara Valley W,IeI District s..""d of Direclon will approve the
various contracts fo< seMees in September of 1995. Attacbed is • copy of the Schedule of
Cost Sharing Propostions and the adopted Program Budget.
P'P;O(j~ rAlm~
Cam}'bt"1I.,. ClIpcrtJ"r)Q. t= AlWs,. 'Las AitOl5 MIlI!!.1.os GiI.~ Mi!~ ..,O-:~ 5eIUO, ~ V'./CW, r,tl", Aac,
ScI Jose. Sar1ta Clara. 5aJatoga. "Swmfiilk. Caurrt:,. af 5.mtio Clara. .md tN: SantiII Clara "\iaJIe.y 'II'iIteT Olsl11C1
o
Page 2
If you baVt an!, qul:$tiollS, please can"", 1ll (408) 921-O7l0.
Eoclosure
Santa Ctllt3 valli
Nonpoint Source
PoDution Control Program
?'-,
Pt "9' am I3<.KIg et
ec"t Sharlng Ass.ssments for FY 95-$6
4';¢·'&rmitte& PJopcrtiO'n~ ShlJ'~
C.mp»om 188%
CIJPI;i!rt1no 2.46%
t,Q$ Mos 1.53%
los Alto$. f-I«l't' 0.43%
las GatO-'5-1.14%
Mi1pt!;.o.s 275%
Monre Sfireno 014'\1,
Mountain Y>ew 3.S 1 'I<.
Fato Atto '.00%
Sat;U Clara !t:t'3%
Saratoga' US%
Sunnyvale 7.25%
Santa Clara Coun:ty 5.94%
Sub-unat 39.S1%
San .Jose 30.00%
. 'SCVWI) 30.0311
TOTAL '0000%
fY 95,$6
Asse$$r"'I2"1"'rt$
$1,45<.885
.5:45.114
$60.341
$39,001
110,547
H2,5BO
$61,45.
'3,434
$95,908
.99,581
1152,815
.39,001
"11,83'
'''5,101
'980,418
IJ3S.BEE
$73S,ENI
$2,452.885
.,
. , ..
SontI Clara Valley
Noapoint Soor« ®
PoDulion COlllroi Program
FY 95-96 Program Budget o hgelofl
MIl1IiI6.UIUJIl ~ AJIopttd Bw!:d luI] 1. 1995
'EXPENDmiltES S1WMP REFU.E..I'\;:CE FY 9~96 Fi~9S'
~ frotram Cmttrraa &rvfas
Ia. (ieDc:ral Technical Suppoct (Speci3I Stud1~)· MET, MaN, 'O'MM 1150,()(X) $200,000
lb. 0eDe:ral Teclulk:aJ Support CFutu~ Years): -$600,000
2. 0Dg0fus Smnn'nttt Momtoring Sc:riict:! (1Cll) MON $200,000 $250,000
3. Sampllil& "'" Amly,a' MET. MON~ v..'h[;"t 5100,000 $100,000
4. Lop! Co<wd 1M_.It FocnI«) PM 530.000 l2O,OOO
S. Pal'Idng L<l< _ MON. PAA -S40.ooo
,. MIk lnformaCOD Sa-.de,glC PI.aa PIP -SJO.COO
J. Mi=11.meoos PM '10.000 $10,000
Subtotal. Program Co.ntract Suvices I 5<90,000 51,25G,000
~. Program Slaff~, &nLjfu, o..m-ad PM. RPT, MON, WMM. PIP I SI.072,()(X) S827,80S
fe· p,..f'~" ~ """ SvppIies PM. RPT I $4I,OC'() S3I3))()
:D. Program. F~a aM C~rati~ haieru
I. NPDES PermIt: Fee (Sir"i.CB) PM 510,000 SlQ,Q(X)
2. Bay h_ f'" (R"'QCB) PM,MON 530,000 5)<).000
~. RegiomI M;:miwrfug Plan F~ (RWQCB) PM,MON $l2},OOIJ $124,OSO .. BASMAA Dues and C~ti"e Prcjects' PM. MON S16O,000 $155,(00
S. Streamkeepc:rs. Impbn.e:mauon S'-'WOn to CCRS PIP ..... 'MM. ICm S65.Q()O S15.0c(}
5. Streaniliepen. Pilot Projea Sl."?port to CCRS P-'P. PM. lj,'M\oi. lGD 525,000 -
1 • .A..tviso Environroaltal E~rfo!l Cen!er (t,'SfV,.'SrCCJ;tS)' P1P S60,000 $lO,(l(X)
I. Water £nvlro~lli ReseardI FOlmdat1on Mcmknhip PM.,MON Sl.5,Q(X) 50
Sobwu!, F~ and Coopentive Proje.::'a I $4i8.ooo $344,Dsa
, ~"""""'" Wori p,,", Imp~
1. PVP Subco~ PM. PIP. RPT S'!04, I5() -
2. PM Subc::romllue PM, PAA, RPT $5.000 -
,. IND/Comm" JCfID SubcommIuee PM, IND, RPT $26.000 -
'-NDC Sub::ommrn..~ PM, NOC. OPT Il9,ooo -
5ubcow. Suh:ommitltt V,rOil: pt.,am I 5254.150
F, Resow FIINI I 5200.000 5100,000
G TOTAL NEW BlJDGET A U'1HOIUTY L $2,545,150 $2,752,885
H.. PrqjecuJ E1tatmboai C4lTJCl1'V [ram PrevJ~ClU3 FY
1. ~ Labs. lDc:. (Stormwater MonitoritJ&) MON $aO.())O SIO,OOCJ
2, MonisoD a. Foernc: (Legal Se.rvk~) PM S!C,.OOO $50,000
3. Pal'Idng L<l< BMl' Study (Wee} MON. PM S50,000 -
"--PAA Subcommi:~ Saw~ S1urry B!II!P Study PM,MON $60,000 -
S, PIP Progr4Dl PIP -.$t3I,00J
f. Mac<~ -$2{l,OOO
,~ Woodwanl-ay~ MON 530.000 $100,000
Sulxotol!. Projected: Carryover from P[~vlous FY I S2...'lIJ,OOO $311,000
Or..(£. PROJECTED Fl Br.Jl>GET A UTHORJTY I 52,115.'1.50 .53 ,OtlJ ,885
T. L:a!ii
• Noopoint Source
Pollution CooIrol i'Iognm o Page 2 of 2
M~nI c,_ AillJplu ..... " JolJ 2~ 1m
IREVENUE sv.'MP REFEREl'CE Pi 9>-% Pi 94-95
ft. ExumDJ ~ Sourcu
t. Projec2d Cog R~O\Iery fees a: Salt r.of M~erWs 55,000
_ ExJ<!ml hv=< Sou=> I IS,OOO -
Is. PTojecutI ~C~1'rom ~ FT
\, Genenl leclnUcalSappo'" $13'8,000
1. $torm'lllatu Mocitorlna: MON 150,000
3. ~ ~ Amly •• MON 554,000
4.. WPs.....p;,. ... P[I' SJO,DOO
S. MisCC"IIaneoUs Cooaact Sen.'k!:l PM SlO,OJO
6. SWf s..brlcs. ~fi.t:s:. Ovcrbcad PM S2OO,OOO
'1. heJ and: cOn.ttibutiom (BASM.AA :R:J, Adv. Campaign) p}.t MON SlOO,OCQ
I. 1.uer.-e F1J%l4 S89,CXXl
~. Itemur.u< BMP Printing p:~!. ND S3,7OO
Scllll:ltal. P;cjec'.ed Unerxumbc:red Carryover I !1,274.700 SJOO,noo
re. Profl~ E~red Carry<1'IIO Frqrc l'm'f~""IJ(: F1 L !BO,DOO ,S.31I ,000
PROJECTED REVENlJE REQUIRED FOR t 1lCOMING FY I :51.265.450 S1,452,8.'95
Co-permitl ... Assessments i $2 ,452 ,885 $2,452,885
NOTES ..
• tn:::1ude3 Bio!ogicaUEc:ologkalln\"tmori~ ofwatenbeds (\li'MM). Qumufication StiJdi~ {Jo.'fET-J.2. MET~2.1)"
BMP Tesiillg/DeveIopIDCDl ()ifETl.2) • .w:1 EvaJua.bO'li of Cootrd Measure Effei;;ri,,~nc:s! (MON-2.3).
:2" In FY 94--95, Co-petmittee ASla:nrr.enu included funding for a mu.'ti-year c:onlJilCt for consuTtaul~. AJ>.l
resuk (If dJc: Sman W3.Iel Mi:nagement PLan proa:1S, 1bese funds .are !KJW aGoeated It> sp<:~ studl~ d'escribe('f
lnNo~ I.
:3 Inck.aes Grab SAmprmg TO follow ~ 5ror.:nwatc:r MomtDrfug results 04"O~), Idtnrify Otha MetaIs Sources
{T~k. S,,1.Z}. P\mc E. Se~'l:f-~ (1'abk' 5.12). aM daD. CoUeciv"l. £01 'v;uen;bed c1a:sslik-moo. ~'Mt"'I).
" The Program projeor:d average 'bc.dget far cbC penni! period 1.995-2000 is ~pro.l'ln:l.a.!eTy $2,1 nullioo annually. It
9.'3S dete!'II1ined that: Co-pennictt IT 95-96 ~ eooJd be: frozeo z: Fi 94·95 kvers and ivcoid fluouatiouS
in Ihe as:scil::1I!eIlf!. from 0Ilt.: year!O die next.
S C1luimed:EYd of savice comiStr:m "12 preo.'iDu.!! years is SUi,ocxr. the PIP Sllb::omm1'nec ro;;ornmends
.$30.000 be-allocattd for ~ ~cl of ~ -set the PIP SoXommIttee ""mil: Plan and !he 4rafi s.:ope of
work rae Ibis. projea: (mdt1de4 ~ aJ] Appendix 10 '!Ie PIP SIlDcOIIUll1n.ee 'i,.'DrX Plan). C<:llS pro."ll'ks coordin.uion.
, BASMoI.A dues filt its 1weImc budge! are $60,000, and [Of Ib:. cooperw'e Regiona1 Advatisin& Cameaign
Cbc Program mare is SKKl.OOO (!he lo./herfuInj; C~gn is described ill 1f:e PrP SukoIl"..mlt!ee Work Plan).
:J FY 94-95 fi.aure$ from ibc: 8!"2L194 FY 94-9S A.4oiIted Program Budget
•