HomeMy WebLinkAbout0269.095". ,-
-r:"
.-,~: .
City of Palo Alto
City Manager's Report
TO: HONORABLE CITY COUNC!L
FROM: CITY MANAGER
DATE: June I, 1995
DEPARTMENT: PI •• ningand
Commu.mity Elnironmeat
CMR:269:95
SUBJECT," Status o(Stanrord', Various Projeot Apl'licatioM in the Saud HiB
Rcsd Corridor
REOUEST
This reporI j; intended 10 pr",ide infocmatioo 10 the Council about the various awrications
re«ntly submitted by Sla:uord UnIVersity for proje<;;ts in tho Sand Hill Road corridor" N()
action is requested of the Council.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff is DOt maJcin"g recommendatio't' at this time. Re<;;ommend3tions WIll be provided in
S'Jbsequent reports.
POLK\, IMP! ICATIONS
Staff is oot analyzing poIky implications at fuis time. Analyses will be provided in
subsequent reports.
EXECIfIIYE SUMMARY
In the summer 0{ 1992, opplicatioos were received by tile City requesting: 1) approval of.
75V-unIt apart,ne!!tiIDwnhouse development ou the vacant land a100g S;;nd Hil! Road
generany!mown as Stanford West (Starf<l<d University, aW!lclmI):, and, 2) • senior housing
complex, includ"mg J88 condomilliums and • health care fa<:ility, at the site of the olll
Childrell', Hospital (Sand Hill Senior Par!!lers, applicant). In the fall of ;992, Stanford
University also submitted an application re""osting expansion of the Star.ford Shopping
Centerby 140,000 square fee! and various road circulation improvements in the Sand Hill
cocidor, including the extension of Sand Hill Road 10 EI Camino R.al. Shortly thereafter,
Page Ion
,
... -.'
-/" . ,
<
o
Stanf",d decided \0 implement a community outreach process \0 obtain input and
info<matioo "'garding the various pro~cts pOOr \0 Ille Ciiy initiating !he envi<onmental and
public wr.ew pro<<:ss. ..... a result of Ih<: community outreach, the awlications wen: ",vised
and resubmitted \0 the Ciiy in Nov.mb.:< 1994 (with Slanford oow ocling as applicant on ill
prop). Bciet1y, the r",,1.<ioru; ii1Cluded reduculg \he numbeI ofapanmenVtownhouse units
10 63(), changing the layOU! of I."" s<nior comple .. increasing \he soopping center expan.,ion
request \0 160,000 "'l""re feet >nd various chang'" to the prvposed road, pedestrian and
bicycle impcoveme"K A detailed description of the r.>".sed proJC\.'ts is attached.
Following !he submittal of the r",ised appL'<:ations, a scope of .. ark and cootract lOr the
Eovirorunental Impact Report (EIR) we", negotiated .... i<.h the prevlo<."lly sekcted environ
mental <oo,\J!taIit, I:IP Associates. The contract bas oow been signed and work is underway_
As • first step in preparing the ElR, City and ElP staff will be !wIding two public SC<lping
meetings. The purpose of the meetings is \0 outline tbe EJR process and ghe interested
persoos an opportunity to identifY environmental issues that may be of concern and should
be addressed in the ElR. It is not. public ooaring on the projects. Planning ikpar1ment staff
and the Em consultant "ill give I brief presentation, an;wer questions and accept wtitten
and verbal comments. The meetings are scooOOI." as kino .... :
TOCS<by, June n,1995 7:00p.m. Palo Alto Cily Hill Council Cba."bers
Thursday, June 15, 1995 7:00 p.m. Menlo Park City Han Cooncil Chambers
Interest.ed persons may attend ei1her me.ling-, the information presented at .""b meeting wili
be the same. A notice announcing the m«'!Lngs hIlS been published in the PaloMo Weekly
and also sent 10 !hose persons on the project mailing list.
A IOrmaJ Notice of Preparation of a.~ ElR "'os ruse sent 10 approximately 20 responstble and
inter<>'ted public agene"''' allowing !hese agenc;'" to comment 00 the em'ironmental issues
!bat the ErR should cover to address their concerns.
An Em and appIicatloo processing schedule is attached. This stoodul. is subject \0 <bange
as the !,<ocess proceeds and is refined. Release of the Draft EIR 10 the pubriC lOr review is
lKJ( expected Ul!tiI early 1996_ During the interim, there ,.iIl bKely 00 • preliminary review
by the Archltectucal Rev;"w Board, and planning staff ",iiI cootinue \0 wcrl: with Stanfu.."Il
10 respond 10 t'>e comments and concerns o!tbe "arious Ciiy dep~n:S.
FISCAl, IMYACI
Staff is not assessing fiscal impact at this time. Analysis will be pro\ided in later reports.
CMR.: 269:95 P.<!ge 2 of3
'. '
• . ,
> . " .)~ .. ' "\"
"-' ,
L'WIRONMEb'IAJ. AS,<;ISSMENT
A1 OOIed """V., an Environmental Impact Report is being prepared f<lf Ihe-..e proj«ts.
6,UACHMENTS
Atta<:bment I: Detailed Proje<:l Descriptjon
A!laeIlI1l<!It 2: EIR and Application Processlng Schedule
PREPARED BY: Lori Top!e)', Senior Planner
DEPARTMPNf f!EAI) RE'wlEW: tfMv4t:?¥.' x:..tk£:. ~
KENNETH R SCHR£lBER '
Dire,tor of Planning and
COO1lllunity Emirocment
CITY MANAGER APPROV At: ~\)~J ~~~r:.fj&~,,-,'f'--
FLEMING
CC: Archlt~nwa\ Review Boord
PIormlng Commissico
Page loO
..
• •
I
:~ . -." ..
,-,<
, ,--
-,
A 11 ACHMENT 1
STA."'FORD WEST APARTMENTS, STAMOR!) WEST SE!'o10R HOVSLNG
COMPLEX, SHOPPING CENTER EXP A."IS10N, SA.'ID HILL ROAD .... 1DE."IlSG
AND EXTENSION, A.'ID RELATED lMPROVE1\fE."'TS
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
A. Stanford West Apartments
The Stanford W..t Aportrnenl project is pr~~ fot • 4&.1 "'-'Te ';ae.n! ,lie located 00 the
nooh ,ide 0( Sand Hill Road immediately nortlleast of the Oak Creet Apartment ... The p<oject
~OIlSists of 630 rental .partmelll units oriented Iowards employees at Stanford University and
employees working 00 Stanford lands. Ptanning .wov'als required fc< this proje.. .. are: I)
Site aDd Design approval; 2) SobdMsion appro·"I; and 3) Variance 10 ,.,back requirements.
The applicant bas also requested the City enter into • Developmeru Agreemenl fc< the
proposed project.
B. Stanford West Senior Housing
The Stanford West Senior Housing proje<:! is proposed Oil the site 0( the old Cbild<ea'.
buspital, • 20.61 acre site Joc.ted 00 the nooh .ide of Sand Hm Road immediately oonbea..<t of
the prop<J5e<l Stanford W ... Apartmenl proje..'t. The proj<ct is propc5<d 10 consist 0( a kl<aI 0(
:l88 independent livioglccndominiu<ll units fc< senior c itizel!S, a 10 uoit .. sisted Ilvin@ Cacm!)"
and • 46 room skilled IlUfSing facilil-j. The elUsting bo5pital building., currelllly tm1pOra1ily
occupied by an assorImenl 0( hospital rel.reeI ..... , would be removed from the site. Planning
approvals required fc< .rill; project include: I) Change in Comprebensiv. Plan laDd use
designation from Pu!>lic Facili!)' 10 Multiple FlIIllly Re5identilll, 2) Zone cbange from Pub1i.::
Facility 10 Planned Community Zone. 3) Subdivision .woval, and 4) Var'"""", 10 beigbt and
.ideyard fencing regul.tions. The applic:an( bas also requested !be Cily enter into •
Development Agreement fur the project.
C. Stanfocd Sbcpplng Center Expansion
The Stanford Shopping Cenlee is III «isting, regional sbopping facility, w;m approximately
1.3 million square feet 0( retail space. This project involve< <be el<pall5ioo of !be elUsting
Stanfo<d Shopping Center in severa! separate locations. The propc5<d project would add
160,000 square feet 0( [lOW ret3.il5pDCe. The IMgest portion consists 0( 89,000 square feet 0(
retail space that ",ill be ad"JOin <be main body of tbe ~ruer near the «h;ting I. Magnin store.
Another majo< portion in'·oIv .. sec""" story additions 10 <be existing one-story bu~amgs.
Several .maIler additions will be located ne;;.r the intersection of El Carnioo R<:aI and Quarry
Road (9,000 ~ feet), .':ros. from the IlooaId McDonald House (5,000 S<!U2re feet), and
on either side of Arboretum Road Deal' SW on ODe side and oear Neirnan-Marcus on me other
side (21,000 square feet)_ The pt"oject also in<ludes !he construction of • new. !Our level
paddng stru<:ture (a' grade plus ltoree above grade levels lOWing 34 feet in height)
1
.. --; -~-. -
•
. -. -~ -:.
o
acoommodating 928 cars,' D<W four !eve[ parking structure accommodating 2,O'M cars that
repIaces an etisting. SlI13l1c:r parking stnJctUre, and \'ariotls circulation i.'nprovemeots
described below_
To .110", the sI1cpping «mer ."Pansioa, the 'pplicanl bas applied for a Municipal Code
Zooi:lg Ordi."""",, text cbange. Curteruly, the oo:linaItce rmuts DeW dew10prncnt at the
.bopping ceDlOr 10 6',000 square feet. App<c,inurely 15,000 square feet of this .nmoC'd
~lopmeIll has been osC'd, Je"""g the center tbe abUjJy '" expand by DO more th.an 50.000
additional square feet. TIle applicant is requesting that the ",,!inanee language be revised 10
Ilmit additional development area 10 160,000 square feet. 110.000 more th.an they cool<! now
build. TIle applicaIll has also request<:d the Cily enter in'Q a Development Agret:ment for tbe
proposed project.
D. Son<l Hill Road WJdeoing, Extension and RelalC'd ImprovomeOlS
The proposed project involves tbe <xrensi"n and .. ide.ing of Sand Hut R"ad and retated
tran.<pO<tatioo improvem<nts, as detailed below.
>
• W!denir>.g of Sand Hill Road frOOl 2 lanes 10 4 Lanes be, ... ",," Santa Cruz
"""me in Menlo PaIl< and Arne,.rum Road;
• Extension of Sand Hili R!lad in • 4 Ianc configuration frcm tbe existing
Arbcretum Roa~ 10 EI Camioo Real. The new intersection II EI Camino Real
will allow all IOOvemeats except the IhrOl:Sh movements between Sand Htl!
Road and Alma StreetlPal<> Alto A v= and !he left ru", from Alma Street 10
EI CamiIto Real. southbound.
· Coos:ruction of • new 2 lane roadway from Sand Hill Road 10 Qo.talT)f Road
(behind tbe existing Nordstrom store and referred 10 as ·YIneyard Lu.e,;
• Widening and improvemeGl of Quarry Read from Arboretum Rood 10 FJ
Camino Real. TIle Quarry Roadl EI Camino Real intersection will be improved
10 allow left turns onto EI Camino Real;
-Exrension of Stockfarm Read from Campus dri •• '" S&nd Hill Read; and
· Yarious reialed intersection. traffic signal. and entryway improvements and
chang ...
A Comprehenshe Plan Am<ndmeDl will be nec .. sary because. pottion of tbe road extension
is proposed 10 be constr\JCled in illl area 0011' designaled as 'Streamside Ope. Spac<.· Other
apprGvaIs whick ,.,iD likely be necessary include annexatio. 10 amend county Icily funits (due
'" road configuration changes), tlCW public dedkations and .bandoomenrs of exi>-ting
2
"", "
_, r '.
•
;'
", ,,,"
----"
, •
A poroon of !be project area ties within !be jurisdictions of Menlo Park and Santa Claro
Ccunty, r<q'Jiring fuNre action by those jurisdictions as responsible ageacies.
PROJECT ALTERNATIVES TO BE EVALUATED IN THE ElR
The ElR win evaluate a 10tal of~ use alternatives~ and .. L."'otaI 0( 13 alternative
wnfi~tioos for portions of the roadw., sy<tem in !be vicinity, as show. in atll!<:hed Tables
I and 2.
Specifically in regMd 10 !be Jower deru;iIy land use alternatives, for those analyses which are
oot rel.ted '" !he transpO<I3tioD analysis, !he ErR wiU assess the impa<:ts of each development
propo<al (Stanford West APartmeDts, Sta.'lford West Senior Housing and Stanford Shopping
Qnle<eJ<jlOllSioo) at !he follow'.ng levels: lOO~, 75~ and 50% of"'" pror,.osed developme",.
WIIhlo !be impact .nalysis each site 1IIill be addressed, and within the cfJSCU;OOD of each site,
,!he impacts of !he alternative levels of deveiopmelll will be COllSidered. The asses.smelll of
impact.. of a1"''''''tive levels of dev'iopmelll on cae. site ",ill be independent of !he !evel of
<levelopmenl at each of the other propcsed project si!<S (m • "modular" rub;"o).
For those analyses whick are related 10 !he tri!nSportation analysis (Transportation, Ai< Quar1<y
and Noise), !be following alternatIves will be evaluated. However,!be ..... """'" of impocts
0( Ibese aIternative levels of developmeDl will not be independeDl o(!he level of development
on die oIher sites (!hey will be evaluated as a "bundle").
A. 50~ Developmellt
C. Housing ... itb Limited Sheppi.,,!! Ce!lter Expansion
D. No Housing
3
-:-
'.' ---./
. ,--'
;-"::--" .' . ,
,', t
,
"~.
"
'.
"
. I
. ~
-!.
t
~ ~
•
, .;
/'"
i
tl
,'},
,f'~" ',',I '
-lV,
.,~~ltJ~[?!~~~it~f~L~~,
SllIItbrd'.w ... ,:;, I 630 Unit! I No developmen.
<~,,----"~ ,'-,"-':",,>,;-
SonlOl' HOUllnCj , 388 UnI" Vacant
's',' ,
Srlnfo.d /' 160.000 .q, n. No expML'Iion
~lngC.nler t!:xpansion
Sand Hili Xo.d:,:
..... wnprJoo A>: ProJ)OS<ld 4.la". No ex'ension or
,-:}-, exteMlon and widening
, ;:~~ wi(lenlng4
:,:,"0lp(1On B NOI "'pplicable No. Applicable
"
TABLE I
SAND IIILL ROAD I'RO,ll!crs EIII
I\ECOMMI!NDIID UNO USE AL TIIRNA TIV&~
(TI\ ... NSPORT ... nON. RIlLATEJ) AN ... LYSI!S ONLy)'
, .' "t .r,':Alt. :IA'~?' , ,: AJt.-3B ': • AlL 3C . .:, ,. ' ~ ··:~;W';::;:'0
A1L:)JI c' h/ '1tecIaoo6", '" "',RedIItOtI • " Ilouolnl'''' ,,5 , , • ,y,,'::All.:4,,',
NO PlOjeoi/; I ;; iDfluiI,,$O~, • hdlJr/'16'1; , 1.1l1li .... sse. ,":All. 31> .: ':', :,Al,.".oti.tJ,
No Adm • , 1, • ':'DO.,." ..... !' ,'" DnoIoj>_t', Ilrp....' 11'. HouoJ... "'II'auIfDc'SI ...
I 800·900 Units I 31' UnI,. 1482 Units I 630 Urn .. No ToBe
Ocvl!lopment O<",mlned
Medicai reuse 194 Unll8 ~91 Uni .. t::'~ 40,000 f!lq, ft, SO.OOO sq. ft. 120.000 .q. ft. 40.000 sq. ft.
o,t:pansion o:w;pansion eX~IUltlIQn ex-panslon
Vac,nt To Be
Ilo!.nnlned -160.000 "l. IT. NO! "'pplicable
expansion
No ~xlenRton or Propo,1!\l 4·I .. e I Propo .. d ~·I"'" I NOI "'pplicable Propooed I NO! Applicable
widening eXfenIJion .nd \6xtension (U'ld
wldoning' w'dening'
4·_
extension aM
widening'
Not Appltcabll!l Umited mitigation I Limited I Llmlled
knprovements miUgation I mitigation
Llnliltld ! Not Applicable
mitigation
improvements I Improvements improvemen.t.'II
III Non.U'In!f~·ntatlon .. rela~d lUlalyse. will COlUllder 73& 8111! 50% alternatives tor each Pl'Ojtlc~ in a "modular" rashlon.
The componenrs or lhil'll altetnative deSCribe die 50% allumative!! to be Uled in die "modulat" analysis.
'The eomponenll or fhill J.ltc1'nativt'< describe Ihe 7'% Illterl'Jativelil 10 bo UMld in the "modulllt" analyl'llis.
l\Oadwly and inlo_U .. conllg.mtlo ... for !he .. IMd uSC oIlemali"" ...... p!Qpose<I by Sranlord,
SOUl\CIl: IlIP .... 8001 ..... 1994
"
V
< , ''""'"'''''''''''~~i~~)~: ,', ,;;'" "<'i\;')~ ,;.;",",::'7i;:('(:\',;',',>}\V'i";
~
,
, "
" j;'
I ".',
" '.
,I
:
)
~ .
.,
~Ir ,
,
" 1:-,
,
" " ~
, ,
. '~-. , . f,',.
•
.'
,:"~~'>'
,
.. ,"
TAlILEl
SANI' lULl. ROAD I'ROJIIC1'S Elil
RECOMMEND!!/) SI'IICIAL 1I0ADWAY CONSll'ltRATIONS
.• .Jl • '.".11-' '='_'.J':T~'::!,
lii=jrn,~J;,fl~i;m,~l!~~ 'l~tt:~i~I~~1~~~~~~'t7t'r'~[~~~;~'f:f~~1~~;'" (1'J:' '~'~~;it'!I{S~\.<' ~~n~-it ~ii!: Mt 5 ·1iI .... ~_,
:.'J ::i~i:.!::_ rr.~_:i"+'! :,~~S",_' lU).< --;;
,{
I,.'
i
'" , II c..... ','I N JIIIlPOOOd
R_od'
HID"""
Rlght"n!
ROsh'''''tl
{.,l" ,',.
Saod Hili . 1 AI pro"","" I A. pro_d
1I0000/0.k
A1fhW
Sf~A!;r.1'Ih I ,.. p"'!'O'Od AJJ ",.,.,..,d
II ....
,,'
R .... AI propooed AI """ .... d
IU pttll1n""d
All proptllll'!I
All Prol.)~tJ
All pl'Qpllst'd
NO'JI;h!I'I.I~
No widenin.
No
OOf)nection 10
SflRd HiD
Rood
AI propl)lK'Id
AJJ propooed
AI"""", .. d
A& I"'lI'l'Od
...to(SP
CJOOI<INo
imptOWrnOI'I(
• Weal of S}II
C .... k
,.. pn>poood
A&pro_d
! As pIOpO .. d
h,pro~d
N~
"'_d
with Alma
clooum
All propoldd
As~aed
AJJpropooed
,.. I>'\iPOIIOd
.. way
lnter*tion
witt.
dltough ..
nKmimanl
10 Illma
,.. propooed
A.~
A&rro.-d
Right.in!
Right out
A& JIIIlPOOOd
"'''''-
Poll
IntenlectiOn
AJJ PIQpC>OOd I ,.. """",",d 1 AJJ propooed
i
AI propo .. d I A. Pf<lIl""d A& propooed
A&~IN~INJIIIlPOOOdINJIIIlPOOOd
I
M....-IN~IA&JIIIlPOOOdINJIIIlPOOOd
0"" A"nue I ,.. propooed I N pro"""", I ,.. propooed
.1 .....
M pn.)JXIlJCd No
S:lOCkfarm
Rood
Connrc:ti(ln
A>~ AI pIOpOIed
AI pml')O!d 1 ,.. pn>poIOd
2·laBe road
and .in&le
Jell (urn .....
,.. propooed
TDM 1 '" propooed I'" propooed AI """"",d 1 AI propo!IJd 1 AI (JIOpOIIed 1 A. ""'-I 1 A. propooed 1 "" propooed 1 AI propoood 1 '" _oed I AI propooed 1 A..,..,.,..., 1 Agpoui ..
" ",_I
,J,"" i.~~i
NoIe; • ThOIll: Spoeial ROPJdwa)' Ctlftlddera!tonll will IIIl IUIIII)'md 81 the !iO% dO'l(llopfNIftt Ievfli 11'1 addition 10 the propoted projecl.
SOVRCII, RlP NlIOClates, 1994
~.\
~. ~lIl ....
~ ." • 1''.''!\''IIIW~n;fl''\'!i''~''~~~~~~''''!t~i!N:~~''.,"; ~ :; ,/:' ': r:. \~:, ~;' :;~H,(, ',. :,1:, ':t: " ~~~:~~'ri~;:{.':~~:~:.·j:}('~~\*~:j~~)~~'~';\'~\~:~0~¥~~*~~~i~j:;~!.1~%;;:~':;':"::'~~~;I'~!A~:.f
",; ":~,~.~i;t<~{i:"I" :~,~~-,~~:, ~~"~~I*~;l:;k~~;·\~~;-i;~~·;}·~i;\~~~~l~fwl~¥4.('i~~i~,~~';;'!~}~;b: l~:' , -, ,: /"-"! ;~, -.', "," '.',,," :e'."t', _'~_.\~,';-~~" ','i' /::"":',1.(;\i-\;J;'C~\~< ",,-,~, ;'~-,: :~.,:\'~,t';r!/'), ,': 1_~' ",.:'!" ( .',', 1...i""""""'',!!'ff.i
M-...
,--,"
,< .. _'
I' ' i: r , ,
~-,
L , ,
'i . ,
.' }
\! .... '> ,-
".
"
MAY 1995
1994 199~ 1996
N I) J P M A M J J A s 0 N D ! I p M A M J J A s 0 N D
I I
STANFORD WEST HOUSING I
I
SANDHILL ROAD EXTENSION I ;
SHOPPING CENTHR EXPANSION I
PALO ALTO RE:VlEW PROCESS I
ItII.5IJBMm'A.l, OP PLAN8 • I ,
Nfi'n<'E Oi" n£MlI.A"I'1rn. I
/,': ~ 1a; PI!lALlZE EIR !JCQPf!lr'6N't'aAcr ! .r.r"", ... cr. 'J7J,.q
"~I
,
i
"I~: ,ii',\
t.t' :' tt"
r
'-..'
Pl,laUe 5j~O .. 't.,o MP-rmfolOs I = i PlUU'AItE An"'l",ml'l'RA'MYH DkA~ EIR I
Pkl1LIMINAIiI''{ ClP.sI(lN '-EVl£W BY ARB I -I \
'!IUBMI!I!'iION 01' PINAL 8C'H(!MAtl(, PLAN!J ~: NO'n<'~ 01' (,OMPLeTE API"LlCA'l'ION I
~
ADMINIm.~nve DItA"," P.nt REVIEW (STAPP) !
COMPLmON OF OflAJPt J!llt ! -pUBLIC' COMMENT PERIOD ON DRA" EIJ. i~ 1.'1T PLANNING COMMISmoN IUlVlliW OP I DllJRlPROlflt"T-!
ARB R~VU!W Of' DRA'" I!Ift/pIlOJEl"I' i I
~ND I'l.Al'iNINO COMMITt$IQN U{VIEW OJ' i I DElftll'I'I.01l!CT·"
PkePARA'T10fll OP f1NAl.l!:lk I !
em ('o\JN('IL ItBVIF.W AND AC'tIO~ I ,
i NOTlCP. 01' r)J!'tp..RMlNA'l1()N ,
P1!'11A!. AJUt
. !
DHVJ!l.OP'MI!N'I' AOItMMBNT NI:ocmATBD fJ'rIn P.OCBBIIEO CONCmRE~l WI'rn AP'L/t'A"ONS
• lIi,..t tflvtew i. publkl ..... ing on O,aft EIIII, COl'loeptulI1 Aotion on "C i!" .... Chengll, ilnal (eoQrnmandlitlol'l. on IIU Othllf antitl.mentl,
•• Se\lt'n'\d Jeylew I. tINI ,eoommendetlon. on PC ZOM tl'll'lnglf end deVlIIlopment Igr •• "".l'It,
It/fltanfDfd2'tlnMIll,.. ,f'fIrv .. "",. ~n-'" . ' ... ---::>", ,.,~_."~,,j7,~~,~;,'h:,:~\;:~,~~,~~~t,":~~~j!~
I.,':
sr.;r>,~ ~~
.,.
~
.~ '''' ,.
" ~ o
". 3 ro
~
" I
I'"
, .. ,
k ,
I
, , '
"
'j I
'"
"
'.
.'
• o z
--
----
oflhe AmerO"'n Na!ionars!andarrts Institute (ANSf) and the Associ.ti,,"
C.,. lofoonar>or. and Image Man.gemen; (A1M)
Pj,«: ~'![~ly.!1lle, -~-.9~&s.
City St<tCe ;Zip
-' :'-:-:-~~;,~";.",,
'.-"
~ o
. /
IMAGE EVALUATION
TEST TARGET lMf-3)
~-.-l50mm __ ... _._. ___ m__ ~
F=-,---------6-. ----~-----------------·····-~~~~~:~ ..... 0011
APPUED IhWGE
l~E..~S~ET
~T'EJ'. N'!' 1..:;og
1EL r 7l &) -482--0500
FRX. f 71 f) CO&-Sge9
.-.