The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About0165.095• ---. --~ .~ . G City of Palo Alto City Manager's Report TO: ATn:NTION: HONOR.&.1ILE CITY CO{;'NClL PO(.ICY AND SER VICES COM~nTfEE FROM: CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT: PLANNING AGENDA DATE: Martl114,1995 CMR:16~:95 SV1IJECT: Approvo' or Dnft Scope of Work for Downtown Parking Structure Feuibmly Study REOUESI The Policy and SefVices C.ornmittee identified !be Downtown Parlcing Structure Feasibilily Study as a project for wbich it would like to mlew tl1e drall: scope of work, prior 10 the SI3rt of the COllSUi"tant selection process. RECOMMENDATIONS SIa1f recoounends thai the Committee approve the attached scope of wO<!c (Artachm.on! t) lOr use in hiring a coosultant to conduct the Oowntowll Parking Structure f easmilily Study. POLICY IMPLICA nONS The recommendation of this report is consistent with existing Comprehensive Plan Transpo<tarioo Policy I (): Reduce employee or commuter par!..;ng in residential neighborhoods. It is also consistent with recmnmendatioos from the Downto.m Study and the recently completed joint Chamber of CommercelCity of Palo Alto down!o'Wn multi-point parldng program. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Staff has prepared 3 draft scope of w~d 10 hire a coosultanl 10 conduct the Downtown Parlcing Structure Feasibility Study. It is ()(ganized into Iwo pbase s. Phase I fucuses 00 the feasibility and schematic design, while Phase 2 focuses on the final design, coostruction documents, and contract administraLion. Initially. the City will contract only ir Phase I. However, the conSIl1'tant seJe.."tion process WIll include an evaluation of the c:oosultan(s ability to provide services fix both Phases I and 2. Council will decide VrheIh« or 00110 proceed with Phase 2. If Council decides Ie> proce~d wiih Phase 2, and Page I of] subje<:t to the discretioo of the City's project manager regarding the Quality of woo.: and continued suitabili.ty of the selected firm. the consultant selected roc Phase I will be invited to oegoliale for Phase 2. Subsequently, a final COOtrad foc Phase 2 would go to CoonciI for its approval. S!a1f1uts fOnned a Project Study C<KJlIlIittee (PSC) 10 assist with coru:uItant selection, as well as to review and romment on the coosultanfs woo.: at .-arious stages of the scudy. The draft scope of woo.: bas been reviewed by the PSC and incorporates responses to their comments. The PSC consists of the following member.: Roxy Raw, Downtown business "wner Chop Keenan, Downtown business owner Geocgie Gleim, Downtown business owner Julie Maser, Architectural Review Board Member VICtor Ojakian. Planning Commission Member Jim Gilliland, Planning Department .rim Harrington, Department of Public Wods Ashok Aggarv.-al, TrilllSpOrtatioo Division FoDowing review and approval of the Scope of Services by the Policy and Services Committee, s!alf will proceed with the R eques! foc Proposals, evalua60n of respondents, selecti.:lIl of a ronsultant and negotiation of a cootract The final agreement with the . consultant selected to do the stL>dy will come before the fun Council roc re>iew and approval FISCAL IMPACT Funding, in the amount ofS80.000, fOr the [)o.,.n:a....TI Parking ~ture Feasibility Study is included in the 1994-95 Capital lmp.-oven:-ect Program. EN\'lRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Approval of a draft sc<lpC of wod: 10 retain a coosulta.ll is !l()( considered a projecl under California Envircrunenta! Quality Act; therefOre, 00 environmental assessment is required. CMPd6S,gs . , --;" -. ATIACHMENTS J. Draft Scope of Woric Prepared By: AshoIc: Aggarwal, City Traffic Engine.,.- DepartmelllBeadReOOv: tbwd/ .k~ KENNE1li R. SCHREIBER Direc!ar of Planning and CommuniI)' Environment City Manager Approval: cc: Project Study Committee Susan Frank. O!amber of Commerce CWll:165:95 ~Jof) :.::. .. ,. -;-!-: ,-; . ~:::-~~ "','f_ -~ . ---. -..... - -"' .. ~ Downtown Parking Strucl\lre Feasibility Study n •• ft Scope of \Vad, hi Marcil 19941l>e City Council _woved I comprebensive p ... king plan for do,.ntown Palo Aho. One of !be clements of the Paning Plan is consider.lion of. new parldng sInIcture, wi1hiB !he Universlty Avenue Farldng Assessment Distri.;, ",hicll is the sub~ of Ibis ~st for Proposals. Th<o pIIIp05e of this project is 10 investigate the overall feasibility of the development of a parlCng ~ 0< structures on ooe or more sites Ioc.le~ within the Parldng AssessmenI District in I1>e downtown area. and submit a reco~n<iation 10 the City Council. (Refer to 1l>e attaohed map for boundaries of the Parking Mscssmcnt DislIi<;l and I1>e existing public parting facilities.) The srudy will include elIDeepi"a! designs, ws! estimates, env'.ronmental issue., eccoomic impacts. and mixed usc concepts, wlrich, for example. would include inlegralion of the structure's first floor with retail and/or oilier uses on die same .ile. The fe .. ibility study is included in City's 1994-95 Capital Improvemenl Program. Subje<:llO!he study findings. Council win decide ",hether 10 proceed with the final design and construclioo of. parldng structure(s) including the fonnalion of. new parldng assessment district 10 finance such. project. Th<o cumnt parking deficiency, .. indicated in Ihe annual Downtown Monitoring Program report, is estimau:d to he 1,500 spaces. A signifICant number of downtoWJl patrons and employees inlrude into the adjoining neighborlloods north and wuth of Univ<rsiIy Avenue. The Cbamber of Commet·cc Do~town Marbting Committe. and propetty owners ha~ voiced serious concerns regaramg the parldng deficit The study wooId deter-..Jne the feasibility cf constructing a parking structure or structures downloWD 10 provide needed additional parki.'g. This Request for Proposals is org.ru:red into two phases. Phase I includes the C •• sibilily and schema6c design stages. Phase lI. if later authorized by !be CilY Council, wi!! inclnde the finaJ engineering design plans and specification., assessment <lislrkt fonnatioo, engineer'. repor1, and cOll5lruC!ioo contra-Ol managemenl Initially, the Cit)' ",ill contract ooly for Phase l However. the consultant seleclioo process will include an cvaIuaIion of the consnItan(. abilily to provide, or cause to be provided, services for both l'!lases 1 and 11 If Council decides to proceed with Phase n, and subject to the discretion of die City's l'toje<:t Manager regaralIlg the quality of wock a.'1d continued suitaMity ()f the selected finn, the consultanl selected for Phase I will be invited 10 negotiate for • fee to inclnde. bur no( be limited to, the services d.",nned in Phase 11 Draft Scope of Woric. 3110\195 Page I r . . ,"/:<,: "",." - ~. ,~;-;?,~ --, . ~ " 7' •. SNlPE Of Sf.R1r"IN'$ -PRASE I ~ Scope of SeMces for Ph..., I will iru:lude the following three majof tasks.. • Task I: Site Iteview II!ld Demand/Supply Analysis I,,\, CooununityiPSOLiaisOQ lB. Sit. Characteristics Review Ie. Parlclno! Needs An.1Y<i, • Task 2: Ahema.t.:Ves Development'EvaIuatiorl 2A. Designs C<>nceptsICO>ts 2B Financial II!ld Economic Analysis 2C. Enviroomental Assessment • Task 3: Devel<>p Recomrnendations'Report Ead of the majof tasIcs will cu1minate "'i1ll !he development 0( a !echnical report for "'~ by the City and !he Project Study C.ommiuee (PSC) The PSC will consist of eight members including one member of 1110 PJsnning Coounission. one member of the Architectural Review Board (ARB). three members 0( the oowntOWl> business community and three City st!Iff members. In !he case 0( Task 3, the technical report will be • draft final Parldng Structure Plan R~ for review. Based "PO<! the results of the Cit)··s "'~ and input from the PSC, • final plan report will be prepared for submittal 10 the Planning Ccmmission and City Council &olt 0( Ille tasks and sub-tasks is discussed in more detail in the following narrative. Tas); I: Site Review and Demand Supply AnaMis This task will lay the foondation for Ille successful development of the pJan by establishing contact with Ille various interest groups and individ"als who wish 10 provide input into the study process md by conducting b.,-ic data colJectioo and analysis relative \0 existiug and future par\dng conditions and the cbaract<ristks of the study sites. It will ¢<lnsisl ofthR:e spe<:i& sub-tasks. wruch are discussed below. lA. CommunitylPSClUaison -The representatives of the coosultant learn will attend one meeting with each of !he following groups: the PSC, l'arlting Subcommittee 0( th< Ownhet of Commerce. ndghbochood groups, and lbe genera! puNic. The City will ammge !he meetings and in~ite all Parling Assessment District property owners, business owners, nearby residents and community groups, and other parties with known interest in the plan development, 10 lbe public meeting. The purpose of •• clt meeting will be til explain the pian development process and solicit input regarurng issues. concerns, constraints, and other considerations whiclJ must be addressed by !be plan. Draft Scope of Work, 3114:95 Pa,fse :2 I I l 1B Sjte Clwacleristics -This analysis is fOf In of Ihe pubb<: parking facilities within tile Parlring Assessmenl Dislrict, <xcepl facilities identified as B, CC, Q •• nd WIC. The consuItanl,..;n collect from Ihe City the available mapping and plans rebUvtto various sites and will arWyzc and evaluate; I. Ac~ss 10 and egress from sHes. in addition to 1M site loyo,t {stru<:ture heigh! and deplh, tile number or parking .. ",Us, tile cirelli ation pattem, etc J, 2. The effect !he parking struer .... e will have on surrounding land use. paBlng supply and demand patterns, traffio patterns, residential areas, e"'.; 3. Coosttaints of spe<;ific s,te, (t. 8., s!recl capacity. aesthetic. of 1M structure, waler lobI. level, accessibilil}', construclabilit)' [average, difficult, "lJ diffICult, elC.!). Ie. PorIdng Needs Analysis -The pu'-pcse of this !aSk. is \'.) determine long and sbert term parl.ing supply, present and future demand, and the extent of parling supply defici<:n.,.,. on I block-by-b!ocl basis, as well as ",idan Ihe Par'<ing Assessmenl District. In addition. the consulunl will examine various types ofparling man~gement systems (special, paid attendant, free parking, <Ie.) and compare and e .... IDate anticipared ntI1izatioD rates under each Iype of system, for each site. The cousultanl will de!ennin< elcisling parking conditions in Ihe Parking Assessment District by preparing up-to-date inveruoOcs of land ases by type and square footage, public and private off-streel parking, and an on-street parling. on • b1ock-by-block basis. A w .. ..I<day survey (except Mondays or Friday;) of parlOng usage, including bourly <:hecks of parlcing accDmulation and turnover, .. 111 be conducted. A follow·up spo< check on a second day will be performed 10 conf>rnl survey fmdings. In addition, parlOng accumulation surveys will be conducted in the areas surrounding the Parking Assessment Di<lrictto ir.,lude the total area oounded by Lincoln Avenue on die south, Hawthorne Avenue on the north. Alma Street on the west and \Vebster Street on the east. These observanons will be wndu<:ted at 6:00 a.IlL ana 11:00 am. to determine the «tent of the spillover of demand trom tile i'arking Asse"ment District into the residential areas to tbe oo<th and SO<.'lh. and \0 determine Ihe inllueI>«! of cOlrunercial devtlopmenl in the South ofFor.sf Are. 00 parlcing in ilie Parking Assessment District (We believe the spillover into tile adjoining neighborhoods is due to the def",;t of parking within the Parking Assessment District, commercial district south of focest Avenue, and the Palo Alto Medical Foundation.) The existing data on parling supply, parking usage, and lan.;I uses, and otlIer relevant information, will be used 10 delennine b:ock-by-block preseol and future sbort-term and Iong-teon parking demand. Task I will result in three basic products which ,,111 be presenled in the Task 1 Report. The report will include; (I) a ... ritteR swrunary of all of the input received at the listed meetings, (2) • mitte. summary of the findings regard Illg Draft Scope of Won, 31H,I95 Page 3 ------------"----------------." -~-. ~. • r .-.1' c~. ""d COflS!raintsof developing parking slIU<>tun:(.) OIl .arious sites, and (3} • written summary and lechnkal documentation of !he assessment of existing and future parlcin@ needs in the PlIlring Assess=nt Dis!rict ren copies of the Task I Repo<1 will be submitted. The consultant will attend one meet'.ng with the PSC 10 review the Task I Jteport. Findings ftom Task I "ill show the location and ex!enl of me pading deficit. Based on this infornu.tion and the site charactcristi<:s anal)"is. the consultant will, initially. identify five sites for potential devclopmenlo( I parking structure, .. "HI prepare an evaluatioo for r~w by !be PSC. Subsequently, the consultant will develop two conceptuall'aridng _ plans (eJe.-atioo and layout) wilh architectural ske:ches, for three (3) .ites and prepare an evaluatioo 0( .,;ell of !he six """""PI< using triteri. soch as: costs, aesthetics. Iraffi<: c~ulatioo. and enviromneotal impact<, among other.. The end product will be • <:oo>pletc matrix of infonnatioo about •• ch ahem.live whlch ",ill aIlew the identification of!be "",,!erred coocepl fur each sile. This task consists 0( three sul>-tasks is follows. 2A. Schematic Design ecnceW and Costs -The consultant will prepare a series of preliminary conceptual .kelChes. idcntifyir.g basic options fo< five sil"" fur review by !be PSC. These sketches shaI1 include a minimum of three CO.lC.ptual plans for eocR site: (I} a siogk dect S\l~lure (2). multi·level structure (above and below grOO1ld) with ground flooccommercial. and (3). multi-level structure Cabove and below sround) without ground floor commercial (below ground may be llinited 10 tv.'" levels) The five sites win be selected based on parking def..:;"ncy, site characteristic S, efficieo<;y of pro..;ding pading, .nd !he degree 10 which parking dema."HI would be met " Following submittal of the evatu.lion end review by the PSC, fue consultanl will synt1Jesize Ibe above-mentioned conceptual pi ... ,. and prepare, in more deoo1, (we> schematic de';gn concepts pel site for • minimum of three sites. The consultant will &!so prepOR parking circulation and layout plans fo< each palmg Ieve~ and frontal I!Jld side elevations for .""" of the coocepts fur each~,f the three sit<5. These plans will include an architec~Jr8l sketch 0< 3D compnteI ",odd. of eacl! concep( accOlately depicting the overa!! appearance, heigh~ bulk. and e"tenor slyle of eaell OPtion. wiLl, respect 10 its adj.ccnr slIuctures or streetscapes. The comjla~bility 10 existing cIowntmn bwldings is • 'key .lemen! 0( the design concepts (refer to the Downtown Vrl>an Design Guide is a source foc do\Wtcwn design issues). The con.ultant "ill prepare I budge! level constructioo cost estimate for eaen concept. Costs will be based epcn various comtrucrioo categories which are requiIed, and DOl on S'.andardlzed, per space, unit cost "a/ues, Estim.tes of opeIating and m.inten~ costs will also be prepared. The COilSultant will also evaluate each concepl in tenDs of circulation and parking conver.ience. pede>lrian acee55, sec",ity. bicycle storage DIal! Scope ofWorl<, 311419S Page 4 • l~ \S.~ provi:OOr!s, disable:! _ess, number of net new spaces provided. potential parking occopancy Qor.g!.hort-tem>.), cost per ne ... · spate, tlooc area per space, operating costs. mBDagement/wntrot opMns and irnpli~'Mns regarding usage, and overall ease <>f q>eration and maintenance. 2B. Fjponcialand Economic An~j -The consultant will prepare I finantiol and economic analysis of the alternali ve. for """h of the three sites. A cost analysis will be coaducted for .ad. option. identifying IO!aI development costs, j,.c!uding design fees, construction management. admlnistration, and financing COSL', and determining !he size oftbe bond issue required \0 cover those costs. nus analysis "'ill include detcnninatioo of overall <t""omit r •• siNlity of eaclt of the concepts in terms or the amount of the additional assessmenl required for each of the parcels in tile Parking Assessment District \0 provide til. needed bonding capacity, as ~ell as an assessment of impliCllliom regarding !he benefits that ",ill be derived from th. project and its necessary assessmentS. A further analysis will be done to .stim.te !be bonding capacity of the present Universily Avenue PaOOng Assessment Distr>:t. The consultant will prepare e;tim3t~s of revenue using both !he existing ree structure and potential altern.ti ve fec concepts, \0 inwstigate the ecooomic feasibilil)' ofusing various parking systems (special pennits, ti<:ket dispenser, paid attendanJ parking. elC.) in operating the parking sttucture.s al each site. A costrrncome statemenl ",ill mea be prepared for ead. option identifying opero.ling and mamtenonce costs, revenues, debe senlke costs, and the net annnal income {swplus or deficit}. 2C. EnvirorunenlBl Assessment -The <:OIlsultBf'.t WIl1 condUCI ~ traffl" and pmjng analYsis oflhe alternatives on .aell of the three sites, i.'lCluding the imp>eu on nearby intersections ,bring peak tralftc hours (000. and pm peak hours) and the impacts an incre3se in parking will have on overan traffic patterns, patterns of pedestrian circulation, and bicycle and transit use. This ",'ill be ~oDdU<:ted based on .V8l1.ble Jata and information. The potential for reduced spillover parking in nearby neigbbochoods will be examined. Fotential environment>! effects, such as noise, air quality. ligJo.t and glare, eIc .• will be identified. This asse<sment WIll be prepared using the City's standard fonD. Ekven copies of the Task 2 Report will be submitted. and will inclu<le th~ following: (I) schematic plans and a:chiteclural skeltt.cs foc llIe minimum two a1lernati yes on each of the three sites; (2) c<>it estimates and a frnanciaJ analysis foc each alternative indi<:ating \he required additional assessments fn< eacH parcel and g<!Ileral fiscal impacts; and (3) I written and matrix summary of the parling. trw",. environmental. and othe, impacts of the various conc.epts, .. ilh overan conclusions about each coocepl This report will be reviewed by the PSC. Planning Commission, and ARB. The consuItanl will also prepare foc (mc!uding presentation exhibits) and attend Iwo meetings with the PSC and one meeting each with the Planning Commission and ARB. Draft Scope of Won. 3il4l95 Page 5 '" <-. / ·' , J. Task 3' Dtyeloo RecommendationsIReDO<t Task 3 mvolves !he foonal development and documentation of the Parlcing Structure Plan. Specifically, the conscltant ..m prepare a recommended parking stru<ture plan b"",d upon !he r,,,lll!s clll1e previous tasks and the inJlllts recei,ed from the Cily sWI; rsc, ARB. and the Planning Crounission. The plan will des=1>e the projects 10 be built 00 eacll of!he three sire., their COSIS, implementation timing. ability 10 address the parnng need (present and I\rture). and financing requirements, if any and a recommendati<m. A draft final rq>O!1 will be prtpMed. This report will fuDy document the plan and its development 1M initial onlpUl oflhis task will be eleven (11) «>pies of. draft oftb. Parlcing :>truerur. Plan Rq>ort. The consultant will anend ODe meeting with the Psc, and one .. jth !he ARB or Planning Coounission, 10 receive ,,,,d discuss comments on the draft, and will thea prepore and submit .leven (11) copies of • Final Report. The consultant will also attend one City Council meeting. Upon completion of Phase I work, Council will decide .. he!her to proceed with Phase [I wmk. At suc. time, and at !he discretion of the City's Project Manager. the c.onsultant (or !he new lead COIl>--ultant cOOseo from !lie Pbase I sub-consultants) .. I--':Ied fo< the Phase I """" sbaII be invited 10 negotiate for • fee 10 include. bUI nOl be limited 10 the following: Tosk I: Desi"" Develop""'n!· Preparation of doe,unents consisting of dra",ing., cos! estimates, and orher data 10 fix and descn1>e the size and character of the entire project. including. written mue engineering analysis applied 10 the design of the projecl 10 achieve !he lowest costibenefil r.tio over the life cycle of the fa<ilily. including soils report and ARB, Planning CommisSXJlI. and Cily Council review. (The design and architecture will be importanl issues I !his stage.) Task 2: C.onstruction Docwnen!s • Preparation (,( working drav.ings. specifications, • refined cost estimate and an other documents required for the ~ of lh< entire project. incrud"llIS f>£eparation of the Engineer's RepG<t and providing input into the 'Financial Report Rdevanllo Preparation and Selling of Govcrnme»t Bonds 10 Financial Markets'. This task will also include modifying the computer prognuu Co< the Parking Assessment District 10 implement the new district . Task.>: Canstruction A4JnirustratWn -The (;oosu!tant ",ill work with the City throughout the construction of !he projecl pro.iding senic .. that include periodic site visits. attendance at weekly construction meetings. prepaIation of meeting materials and interpretation of technical requirements; revie", laboratOf)' test results, contractor submittal., cbange orders. tiel<! orders, extra work autllorization .me! paymenl invoices; prepare supplementary skek:hes; assist with cbange orders; and preparation of final record drawings. Page 6 . ,(-; -~ .. " , .' , J , I. FiMl Record Drawings foc ~ parlOng (.cili~, 2. Downto ...... Land Use and Transportation Study J. 19S6 aerlaI maps, II a scale of 1'=IOO' • .>fthe do ..... "IO"'" ore. 4. DownloWll LIrt>an Design Oui<k ,-... :-: -~. These documents arc cwrmtly aVaIlable foc inspection, and willl.ler be provided 10 ~ selected ronsulunt SCHEDlll AND 'fSOWKES Phase I is sclIedu!ed 10 0;:""," during the period of __ . Proposals should clearly dc:mons!nte how ",.1l1he required serW:6 can meet Ibis schedule. While the actual cost of ~ the requmd services is 10 be detelIllin<'d tJo.rough ~ proposal selection ane! JiegoliatiQll process. ~ IoIaI amounl of the contnet w. Phase I i. DO! expeoted 10 .xceed $7<1,000. A suggested lOnna! roc !he consultant's response 10 this Request foc Proposals is iner>ea1ed bel<lw. These guidelines are inIen<kd 10 f~ili= the I'l eject ~. Committee's re,"''''' of the c<msu!talII responses. ConsultanlS are requested. bUI Dof requmd. 10 fcllow these guidelines. I. l'rnje<:t Statement. Prepare a brief. general statement indicating the consultant', overall Wlderstand"mg of the nature of the project ..,..d the services 10 be provi<kd. 2. Proposed Wod Prooram. Identify specifIC major tasks and related work elements 10 accomplish the proposed services. !Delude fo< eae ..... ort element: (oJ a sta:ement of OBJECTIVE indicating its purpose. (b) • sta!emenl of PROCEDURE indicating how ~ wO<k will be accompli shed. ( e) • statement of OUTPtJI indicating whal information and products :ore 10 be provided. and (d) • slatomen! of RESOURCES. persoo-days and dollar costs. estimaled 10 coml'lere the wOO<. 3. Schedule. Prepare. wotk schedule indicating total time a,.d staging for each work element 4. Resource Summary. Present I summary of ~ estimates of pers-on-days and IOta! do!I ... costs foc each ",ool< element S. S!J!ffing. identify specific individuals proposed lOr wis project. including: (l) their proje<:t responsibilities, (b) their specific experience rel.ted ID the responsibilities on lliis project, (0) estimated level of e!'fOCl (perSO!)-days), and (d) personal resume.. . Draft Scope of Work. 1Il4/95 Page' -. -'f'..',< -,~"-.... " ",' , . 6. References. Identity Il>Re rrferences (nBIlle, address, and pbone) for recent, similar coos-.iliing ",ad. EV AUlATlON OF PROPOSALS The criteria to be used by 1M $eiection AdviSOl)' Committee to evalnate responses 10 1M RFP and to select coosu/tants fOf oral intemews, includes: I. Compleleness of response 10 RFP 2. Composition and expertise of 1M """sultan! te8II'~ including specific individual. wh<> will perfonn 1M work, and !lle time 10 be spenl by each. 3. 1tespon..<iveneu 10 time requirements and demonstrated means 10 accomplish neressary in!cr-relationship betweeR consultant and City staff efforts. 4. Domonstrated «ceot experience reflecting type of wodr. • quality of work, ODd ability 10 complete work within budget and ",bedule. S. Demonstrated ex;>erience and slcill iD responding to community ""d special ineereS! concerns. 6. Estimate of required resources, il,clu<f1ng Jlf'>PO"'d fee rd.ti ve to the servkes 10 be provided, and ",ojeC1ed Palo Aho slaff time in assisting consultants. Pre>ressiorull fees are for budgel and review purposes. AClual fee is 10 be determined during negG!iations. 1. Ability of lite coosutlanlleam 10 be qualified for both Ph ... r and Pbase II of 1M project. ConsuItanl team must i,,,,lu& • financial consultant who is familiar with 1M University Avenue Paddng Assessmen! Distric~ !be Assessmelil Fonnula, and the City's computerized program 10 calculate assessments. wlllclt ...... prepared by Angus McDonald and Associates. PllE-SUBMITIAL MEETING A single pre-submittal meeting is s.::bednled for _, 1:30 p.m., Council Conference Room. first floor, Civic Center, 2SO Hamillon Avenue, Palo Alto, C.1ifomia. The meeting is fo< !he benefit of all consultants 10 ",hom an RFP ",as sen~ and who wish 10 attend. The purpose of the meeting is not to consider in any w~ the qualifications of !he coosu.'lants. Attendance al Ibe ",.-submittal meeting is optional and will nor in itself he considered in the consultant evaluation and sekction process. SUBM!TfAL OF PROPQS,M Elev ... (II) copies of Ill. rompleeed proposal ore 10 he delivered 10 the Direclor of Purcltasing Service<, 250 Hamilton Avenue, Pall} Alto, C.lifOfDia, 9430 I, by 3:00 p.m., Draft Scope OCWOa, 3I14/9S , , Page I .f . ,