HomeMy WebLinkAbout0389.094....
~L • • • "<
o
July 28, 1994
CITY COUNCIL
Palo Alto i California
STANFORD USR PBRMIT ANNUAL REpoRT NQ. a
Members of the Council:
~Qrt in Brief
This is all informational report and no action is needed. This
report forwards for City Council information the anntlal .r-eport
required by Santa Clara County as a condition of approval of the
Stanford Un.i.versity General U.":>e Pe11nit.
Stanford University General Use Permit
The Stanford University General Use Penuit is a master USe permit
issued by Santa Clara County as a means of defining the type and
amount of additional development which may occur within the
unincorporated portion of the Stanford Campus, including the
Central Campus area (see Figure 1).
The, Use Permit allows for: 1) 2,100,300 square feet of new
aCudemic~ academic support and housing uses; and/or 2) an
increase in the, P.dj'l'l):ted Dartime Populat ion (average daytiiil,a
campus population) 'on the Campus up to 33,905 people; and
) construction of 1,200 additional new parking spaces.
The u,se pennit alSio established conditions necesEiaa:y to mitigate
potentially significant environmental impacts. The major
mitigation measures identified for the use permit include:
1) implementation of the University's Transportation Demand
Management (TOM) Program, with a goal of no "net n new cornrr~te
trips over those existing in July of 1989; 2) continuation of
existing housing programs ruld provision of housing on campus for
~aculty and staff, update of housing plans and pursuit of housing
projects off campusi and 3) training of personnel and building
upgrades for safe use of hazardous materials, and preparation of
Hazardous Materials Management Plans for all buildings where such
materials are stored.
CMR:389:94
. "
~I':._ ... ::~--~~~--... .,.
.. ", .
bc..:.1 c.-J.J .. ' 0","_
' .... ,"' C!l.l ...... 1. ulla...,
......... IC~'""'AtM. -_.
~~"""IC
'-too...._1IonI
~~,., ...
7/28/94
page 2
, -~-.
:.~ ~/:.'.~'·'
" , ., ... ': .
® 0
General Use Permit Annual Report
An a..'"1Ilual report was required (:is a condition of the amended use
pe~t, as a means of documenting building and population growth
and ccmpliani) with the housing. transportation and hazardous
materiala mdtigatico measures and other conditions of approval.
The info.rmation in Stanford University General Use Permit Annual
Report No. 5 {1992-1993) shows that Stanford is still in
compliance with all of the conditions established in the General
Use Permit.
160,690 square feet of floor area was identifie~ for 1992-93.
n~tI vuly Ut;i ... facility occupied. is the Housing aad Food Services
Maintenance Shop Expansion of 2.437 square feet. Construction in
1992-93 included the Center for Economic Policy Research building
(';5,000 square feet and counted in 1991-92), Thornton Engineering
Center :11,500 square feet), the Arrillaga Family Sports Center
(108,415 square feet) and the Psychiatry Building (45,000 square
feet) .
to'anzanita II, a 204 -bed undergraduate dorm, was completed in
Septemb~r of 1992, replacing 41 housing trailers and adding 81
net net'i beds. Seismic repairs are nearing completion for Cooksey
House, a historic structure damaged in the Loma Prieta
earthquake, and the building's 43 beds will be reoccupied in the
fall of 1994.
The adjusted daytime population was 31,4l9, up 1,074 from the
1991-199~ levels. TDM participation increased by 47 persons,
from 1~871 to 1,918. 'rhe daycime population of ·che.University is
still lower than the 1987 population base of 31.914 that triggers
mandatory TON. and the TOM participation counts are highI'>:': !::han
the 1987 base of 1,455.
Stanford also achieved a 30 percent recycling rate, exceeding its
1992·1993 goal ot :29· percent.
A copy of General 'Use Permit Annual Report No·. 5 is attached for
your reference.
Respectfully submitted,
~~,~
1(J!NNl!TH R. SCJiRI!IBER
Director of Planning and
Community Environment
., /'lO In ..
'I ""UI "'..-
Page 3
.. :-~ ..
'c_.,
_1. "' ,-",c.
l~Jjih:c""",_:, FjJ~ ~_~::'~;f~1;~~~~;~«<,: ~'c<':L~:ll:;':;;;""".liiiiiii~
o
At tachmen t , Stanford University Annual Report No. 5
< < cc, Planning Coamission
Architectural Roview Board
C~reh&nsive Plan Advisory CornnU.ttee
santa Clara County Department of Planning and Development
Stanford University (Andy Coe, Julia Fremon, CUrtis Feeney,
David Neuman. Tri.h M'llvey)
7/28/9'
Page 4.
March J, 19'14
Mr. Ransom B."lnon
Santa Cia;, CoUnty
STANFORD UNIVERSITY
PlA NNINC OfllC E
IJepartrnmI of Planning and Development
County Government Center, East Wing
70 Wcn Hedding SI.
San lose, CA 95110
Dear Ran"
RECEIVED
MAR 18199\
Enclosed is t11e fifth Annual Repon: on Stanford's Crencfa! Ust Pennil mitigations .!Jld
conditions. A one page e);;ecutivc: sumrr.a£y Pl"('('cdes the bod)' of the: docWTX"ilI. The repon
co ... ers the period from I September, 1992 through 31 August, 1993. In mos., respecIs. il
closely f0!lowS tr,e fOJTll3t or earlier l'I"{>OrtS. We na\'e Up.:Lied the rt:JXIrI on program space
vacaled due 10 damage resulung from ilieLonu Prieta ea.nhquake thai was induced la_~1
)'e.a.r at your:request. lnis infomunion is pres.enled in Table 3··F...anhq1Jake Da.naEe.
As you wiU note, Stanford r('maim below the growth projections in both lX'Pulations and
square footage as extrapolatro in 1998. We find tIlat ,he Gener-.1l Us< Penni! is worldng
weU, and believe thallhis Anrrual Report providrs the rt'<I.uired lnfonnation for )'our use-so
A conc.em was expressed at lhe Planning Commission meeting 1 ast ye&-. when o'Jr fourth
report was reviewed, concerning me Jength of lime from the end of the reponing rear
(Ausus! 3l) and tile submirtal date (Mmch 1 of tile following year), W< a~ tha, • reyi>ed
scl\edole is more appropriate, IIJld]lfQ\lO.l< thaI in ,he future" annual reportS "ill be
submilted to the Santa CIani County ~,of Planning by January 15th. Unless you
have commer.~ iI), the proposed change to the submittaj date fOl' the annual 'report, we will
proceed wj'.lI this reVision '0 the schedule.
Sincerely"
~1" "
Associate ~tor of Planni ng
i/~'Andy Cue
Larry Horton na,id Neuman
Ken Schreiber
launcH Waldo
•
Stanford University
Santa Clara County
General Use Permit
Annual Report tiS
1 Seplember, 1992 . 31 August, 1993
produced by:
Planning om .. 3111'J4
General lis. Permit Annual Repo;1 #S
1 September 1992 • 31 Augusl 1993
Table of Conlents
Executive Summary
I. General Con'·.hions
II.
A. Population.!Id Squa:e Footage
Table 1--Popul:uion
Table 2·-square Footage
Table 3·-Emhquake Damage Repon
B. Housing
C. T=spottation/Cin:ulation/Parldng
D. Hazardou..<) Malerials
Ii. Existing Conditions
F. Other
Specific Conditions
A. Construction
B. I -andscaping
C. Solid Waste Disposal
D. Hazardoos Waste
E. Archaeologi<allHistorical Resou=s
Page
1
3
4
5
6
9
10
17
18
19
21
22
23
25
."
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This is "'" filth Annual Repon "" the s .... 'lfon! Gmeral Use Penni' whi<ll covers the fiscal and
.acadea'Je year ~g September 1, 1992 and ending August 31. 1993. The key issues C(lveted
In "'" rq>Or1lt'i as folk>w;:
Popul.tlo.
The 1992-93 adjustI;dda)1irne populalion is 31,419, up 193 people (.6%) from the 1991-92 total
of31.266 This is the $«OOd period ~ which the University experienced pC'lSiti'le population
gmwch $b)C:c. J9f!7...g:g, with mis year's increase artribuable 10 a rise in die student population.
Sq ..... FOOIaj;-,
Additioo.! squan' fooage (173 ,HO) is teponed for 1992·93. This includes 118,915 net new
sq~ feet under ccrutnu::tioo The em!)' facility I.XXUpied in j 992·93 not previous] y counted was
a Hcusing and Food Services Maintenanc.e Shop E:\pansioil of 2,437 square feet
HouslnE
Manz.anl_'l; n undergradl.l3U: srudent housing. a 204 bed facility, was acti'.I3red and occupied in
Seplem~r, 1992-. It replaces 4 t uailers. providing 81 net rieW be4s. Cooksey House. an
historically \'a~able structU.rl: \'itJich was damaged by the Lorna Prieta earthquake, will be repaired
and It()COlp1¢d. restoring 43 beds in the fall of 1994. Addilional apartmenl and/ordonn:itory
housing for ~ students is aho in the planning stage.
TransfrOrtation DEI.,and M.anagem~nt
The counts (or-TDM participation show an increase of 47 riders from 1992·93. T'tlls increase
rcllecU more panj<;p.tion in "'" carpool, buspool and podestrian categories, A major bikeway
plalln.ing procc:ss was btgo.m in 1993 with ex:peaed capital improvements tQ begL"l impJemenwion:
in 1994, It Is <J<pO<tcd!hat this will fwther eIiIw1ce the TOM program,
Hazard.... Moler ....
The Unl.,...;,y Cwuaittte 011 Health and Safety "'"' fOW' times in 1992-93, The Comminee
..... t>eaIJip ~ • pvblic member. Mijor.,oocy issues considelOd by the committee were
be&lIh and JIf<ty progtamS; compliance with the Cal·OSHA Bloodbome Pa!h<>gen STandard;
~ md lmp __ of comp~&nee with the county's Toxic Of., Ordinance, and Cal·
Ef A Nzatdous W~ compliance issues.
I Scp4tmbcr 1m . ) I August 1993
t'"'L ,...." "(~')lItraf UsC' Pe-rmil Annual RepoI..::.;_)
Use I'trmll C..,dillons
I. Gtotral C..,dIUOIlS
A. PopoIlalioD tad
Square '.'bOU&<'
Toul ildditiooaJ <quare foocagc. fIX
p<eYioos )'Qr. """'Pied, under COfI·
$UUCIion, approved buI 001 built, ar>:l
uptOQIing.
1 Scpc.ombor 1992· II Au/I ... 1991
Compliance Status
PopulaUon
Toul No< Adjusted Daytime Population for
1992·93: 31,419.
Camp\I$ population tr-nds for the 1"'" five
)Un (19"88·89 tlvO\lgh 1992·93) indica'" ,he
following demogr>phic 1mIds:
I G_ral Campus: Sludents, raculty
iDd mIT have been Mable at -0.01% in the
five year pmod.
11 11"", Medical Center popul,tions have a
intreas<d a mod"" 1.7% since 1985. This
indudts!he opening of lhe I-"<ille Packard
Qiklren's Hospita.l1n 1990.
Jll Stanford Linear Acceterator
Center (StAC) has bor'....en slable at + .8%.
IV Vls!tors, \'endors, workers,
conrtrtH. tiC. have increased by 3.1%.
Incit"~ arc noted in thr.. numbers of
,nd<penden' workCTS 10 the campus (vendors.
construction Won.CTS). and a large drop in the
(l tImber of gel')tra) campus. vl sitors.
The Nel AdJusled Daytime Population
lias IDt~ I ... lhan l','I> (llS
ptrSOIIS) 'n the p.iLSt five yea ...
(See Table I, po.ge 3, for dew!.)
Square Footage
Addilional square foocagc in 1992·93:
Occupiod:
(Spin occupied nOl counted in
1991·92 repon.)
ConsIruction begun:
Still ullder construction:
Approved ., no, ,l.1Ited:
Total
2A37
1I8,915
41,775 o
160,690
(10 be counted against Use Permit threshold Qr 2.100.300.)
@>t~ral Use Permit Annual ReporO
I Seplembc< 1992 ·ll Au, ... 1993 . ·2·
Anticipated proj<cts ill 1993/94:
C<:nta ror lzitegro>:>;! Symms Expansioo
GaleS Coolpuler Sc;ooo:
Environmrntal Safe>y Focility Annex
HEPLAnnex a
E<:on/CEPR Addition
(See Table 2. page 4. for detail. See at<o
Table 3. Ne 5. ror IJ1 informational rqx>n
showing IJ1 OIXOWJling of progn.m 5J"'Ce
vac:alO:I du<o '" damol!" from tile Lorna Prieta
eanhqualte.) .
@ 0 .
Ceneral Vsmrmit Annual Repon 1992·1993 Table J .~ PopuJa!ion
t. GttMnJ Campus
A.S""'"
B,FOCI>lty
IL MtdItolC_ A._
B.Ficutty
c. Mcdic:al Scb)ol Staff
D. Slanfonllbpiral Stolt
E. Chll",,"'_ CH@S
ilL S,L.A.C.
A. Gradvate Stu.denll
B. Aca<km.ic C~J
C. Siaff
D. Visltins Schol.an
C!. Comraa,1'enom-.e1
F. TOW'Visitots
IV. Other
A. Emplo)'tt-S Q/ Ccmm'1 Activities:
iB. Oeoetal Vi.silOll
C.V_ , .,
D.~Wortcn:
E. lndepen6ent ("..c:mtn
Stanford U.r:tnrUty Dtrdme PoputaUQ,., 1."'W'J Fom:ast
:m
4)2
zsn
400
282
1988--89
2UI
142
:100
323
29S
258
II'
3 IS
,69
309
31.340 31.194 3O.70S
·3·
1990-91
!' .-,
General Us. pQiI Annual Reportl992.9J Table Q. Square Footage
I ~ 1992 ·31 AuaUSI Jm ·4.
. J.
" ..
General Use Permi~nual Report 1992·1~93 Table3 ~rthqUake Damage
Procn-spae.e stUf "KIlled ,dDt Co earthquake damagt
~.aldg
1:30
1·26()
1~J20
2·.500
3·200
5·300
7·10
'·20
).SQ
Afro AmcIi<on Studies
~Comer
0r0l0I)' Comer
T..",., Ub Sootll Wing
Gt-ooo Ubrary W""
KDoII
~·HRPN_
~. HRP Callnl
AMoomy
Net square feet
2.942
24.886
2).376
4,538
62.826
3.375
10,257
8.012
10.257
154.469
Tempo.rary bld&', il'1SUlled rn rtspOnst to earthquake damage
l·lOOT
J·22OT
'·655T
4-615T
5·9101'
)·9711'
7·9m
,·mT
7·9741'
7·97Sf
'·98IT
7·9811'
7·983T
!4.96OT
500 Ar .. Tlt~
Grern Lit."a..ry West &
M lin Qu ad cJas.."'Z"OOms
~)!og:)' Comer &
M lin Quad das.-srtX'Ims
Koo!I
Langu>g< Comer &
Bldgs 30. JOO
~Llon
Main Quad Ret.mSlruct'n
I Sq><ember 1992·31 August 1993 . S·
IRO
8.512
9.178
6.780
2.898 •
5,884
5.322
6.217
881
881
881
754
754
1.800
3.261
3.674
1.646 •
59.503
11.-.
G)Ot'ral Use Pe~rrAt Annual RepoQ
B, HonsiD,
I. Conlin"" 10 provide on,
campus housing for f>cuby.
cenain sWf, and """"'1$:10
the e,'II;tem f~bJc Yoithin, the
IinancW IIld land use
coasttoiJw of the U niversilJI
lind _ !he "",,>traints of
political &ppro\'1J.
2. Pursue housing projOCfs OUt~
side the Us< Penni t ar"" and
the Unh'milY's work ~ith
loc:aI jwisdictions to ma.<irrOu
!he ac<epUIbk densint. on all
siles.
3. Upda<e Stanford', housing
pls.ns.
I Sepoea.bcr 1992·31 Augu. \993
Fac.Illy/staff members hooS<d on campus
1992·93: 977 unils (no change from
1991·92 rtpOr1).
Srudents houS«l "" campus 1992·93,
5,841
8~m
The Manzani .. 1l5<Udem housi.1g project
added 204 bo:d< and opemd in !he fall. of
1992. II r'<plac<d 41 nil." h<>using]23
.studenu for a net ir'h.l'east of 81 new bods.
The histl1ric Cooksey House (also mown as
Phi Psi), damaged by the u,ma Prie,.
card'lquake. will be replirtd and its: 4~ beds
re·oc<upiod in the fall of 1994
Stanford has made appticalion 10 the. Ciry of
Pa!o Alto for approval of a 7.so unit housing
project .. Stanfonl We .. as .. ell as fo< a
serjor housi,1g proje<l on an adjacent parcel.
The lalla' j s compri><d ofa 388
condominiums, 72 uniLS for auisted living,
and & 54 bed slciUod narung f,dllty.
The Faculty/Staff Housing Ofr.oce (l'ISHO) i,
respoosib:e for annually updating Stanford',
CJ<isting housing prognams .. ,,~U as fer
Owcloping • Ioog Ienn stnueg;c hoosing plan
for ll-.. Uni>ersiry. The Fa<wty!Staif
Hou$ing PIM ..... oompleuq on August 31,
1993. An in-<lq>lh I'rovostial review of !he
t' :_, "'mty housin, progr>1t\S resuI!ed in two
new 10M refinancing progrun$ and • minor
~"" of the c1igibiliry criteria for anothtr
level 0( su.ff.
In the ~ term. a significant vacancy rate of
for·saJe housing on campus remains. For
these reasons, the tilitin" housl:'lg stock is
decm:d ad«j""e for the cwmu population.
<>:
v,'
@tcral Use Permil Annual Repor(2)
4. Continue 1M functions pr0-
vided by tile l'ocultylSlaff
flousing Office, Stulford
~_! CanpanY. and
HOUsing and Di:ting Services.
5. MainIain and rontin ... devd
opmeI:: ofprognmu of fInan
clal assis!8nce fur aftOrdabI.
bowing fur eligible foculty
and stalI'.
I Sepcembet 1992· 31 August 1993
The FacultylSlaff Housing Office (FISHO) 0-. residenriaJ luseholds
and ~vers\lY spoo ..... ..sloan
and financial 'SS; stance ~ '0 help fac·
ulty and senior staff with the ~n.s. of.
home in the 1oc&J....... The om~ """"go'
125 on·:, ';np.u housin~ units ",nted '0
faculty. staff. and visiong scholars. In
addirion. Ibe <:lffi<:e is m>r1<tting 26 homes ••
Ryan Court ",hid> w= C<>mpk\..s in April.
1991. Si>< ..... of these I>oaJe> have hecn
sold, whU. the ,.., have been rented
.emporarily.
The ~ Real i!sIalo division of
~ord MaNg.."."t Company man.ges
gro'lJ1d leases fur the off<=pu' housing 00
Stanford land: Oak er..,k Apanrnonl"
SI3nli:mi Hills and Stanford Ctcel;
subdiyi~ions, and the hou'Sing on P .. JTti.ly
F8.I-m Road in Woo.1siJe.
Commercial Real E.ml< has act,d as the
principal impl,men,,,, of fae u lIyl. Iaff housing
programs, ellhet as the de\'e!oper or as. tM
LtWlager of the de"l'elopmen t proces.s.
Commercial Real ES!&I< has submiocd on
application for Slanford West,. majot
housing project on • portion of • 72 acne si Ie
located <in SlI>d Hill Rood.
The Office of Housing and Dini ng Services
(fonnerly named Housing and Food
Savi=l pr<l'fidc$ oper&tioo.t.l support for all
sruden1 housing on campus including:
facilities 1l1IllOf'IIltIl~m.tin~. tepain.
new facilities proposals. dining services and
conf.,.""" planning and cootdinuion.
Slanford has Ih= fiMn.."ial assi$Wx:e
progrtUm which may be applied to the
purchase of on-or off-campus bousing.
These progroms will continue. but do not
pre<:1ude the development of additional pro
gram(s) or modifications of .existing ones.
LaJhrop: a second ~ shaRd anpro-
ciation loan lVIil&bIe 10 eb 'ble
faculty and =1Ondcd to help ::ffset the
high C(;SI of hO\J,ing by providing >.dditionaJ
purchasing power. 26 loans were tnitiated in
1992/9..3..
·7·
®neral Use Permit Annual ReporQ
5. Maintain and continue dovel
~, of pr<JgnUnS of finan·
cial assistance (con,'d) .
6. Continue work to the goal of
providing housing affordable
to omplo)'<eS and students.
I Sep<embc< 1992 -31 August 1993
DPAP: a down paymen' assi!tance 1=
program clesigne4 to wisl quaJifiod
L,diYiduals with the I'!<l,,~ down pa,)'IICnt
to pun:hase • home. 4!llcians ""'"' imtlaled
in 1992/93.
HAP: a housing allowance program which
provides an illC<ll1lC sul.Jsidy to help offse, the
high "'s, of home ownmhip in this area. 50
saWy supplements were initillod in 1992/93
As a resuh of a Pm\lostial review. two new
refinancing pr<>gralIl' will be implemented ("
1993194:
LEM: a Umi ted &juity ~Iongage loan that
"finances all or pan of the obIig:;tions of •
cunenl Lathrop borrower who cannot
refinance with a ool'1"ttn¢rciallender due to the
loss of (',quit}' as a resutl of falling house
prices.
aPM: A Graduated Pa,mem Motig:;ge loan
that refinances all or pan of the obligations of
a current Lalhrop borrower who cannot
refinance with a conunerciallender due to
insufficient cash flow.
Two of the thr<e older stude,; houses on San
Juan Hill damaged by the Lorna Prieta
earthquake have been demolishod. The 3
acre site on which they sat will be su bdlvided
into lots and sold as prepaid leases to eligible
fact·!ty and staff. The lessee will be
responsible for ooilding hi$lbcr hou,", on the
si,e. The financing subsidies listed above
will increase their alfonlabilil)' for
iacull)'/st.aff. The 'hint house. Cooksey, is
oow schedulod for !<pairs and re-occupancy
as a studen, residence. It is schedulod to
open in the fal! of 1994.
Lantana and Casomo Halls. each providing
102 new beds. ""ve beer referred to
previously as Manzanita 11. 'These residences
opened in the fall of 1992. They !<placed 41
trailers and added a ne' of 81 new bods.
Each house has its own dining room locatOO
at the central Manzanita ParI< Dining
Commons.
,')'
' .. ':
wnerSiI Use Permit Annual RepOl'J?)
6. C<>ntinue worlnolhegoal of
providing housing (conl'd)
C. TnmsportationlClrculaUonl
Parking
I. Implcmeru the Transportation
Demand Monagemerll (roM)
program IIOCOIding to Exhibit
B of the Gen=! Use Pennit
2. Provide bike parking at new
and remOOeled buildings and
rea-eation facilities.
3. Repon on construction of
replAcement or new parking.
1 Sqwober 1992 . 31 Aug"" 199)
While th. Knoll slildent housing project,
intended to add 180 new studen' be<1s will
nol be buill at this lime; • new student
,"siden", facility of between 2()()'250 beds is
=tly being progro'll!Ded ins~.
Because previous traffic mhigatioos were in
pl= before adoptioo of the General Use
Penni" the Adjusted Daytime PopuJatioo
which 1riggers roM mitigations is 31,914.
Since the 199m3 population is 31,419,
an increase in the TOM participation is not yet
req uiml Stanford has proceeded nonethe
less <0 monitor roM peffonnance:
Dec. 87 Oct 92 Ocl93
IDM Cg~Dts Bil-~ C!JIIDlS CQmm
C"IlOOJ: 138 303 399
Vanpool: 0 35 23
Buspool 24 12 15
Transil & shunle 2.19 385 373
Bicycle 819(1) 986 (2) 878
Pedestrltn nul) £lQ (2) ill
Totals 1455 1931 (2) 1918
DOte I: First COUflItd Oc:1Cobet 90 and added. 10 base.
DOlt 2: Corroc:ltd
Haas Center
Stanford Auxiliary Libnuy II
Wilbur Modulars
Cowell SHC
TresidderStodenl Union
T=an Engineering
Manzanita II
Total add1 bike spaces
40 spaces
8SJ'OCes
24 'P""""
16 spaces
20 spaces
100 spaces
200 spaces
408 spaces
For the period between Sept I, 1992 and
Aug. 31, 1993, there was a net d=eoSe of
16 paricing spaces. Thai decrease was a
result of ~e following e\'tnts in Table 1:
-9·
. '
:., .
@ne-ral USE' Permlt Annua~ RepoQ
), Repon on """',,"crion of
repI*Cement or new
padting( conI)
D. Haza rdous MalerlaJ.
TABLE I
Ei;~ Dale
CocmU$sary Lo< Expansion· 4/93
Ecoo Bldg· brgin oonSl (I) 11192
!'sy<1rialry Bldg LeI 7m
ToLol
I !Tlf'J!t£t
29
<252> mz
44Z
!tOte1: ~im.alC:ly 1SO ~r.s will ~tum whtn t<Alctins is _ (n:port for 93-94)
W. also COIl sttucted additional new parldng
ouuide· the use pmnil orea '" serve projects
in the Medical Con.er, as shown in Table 2
TABLE. 2
~Ewm~~I~~~o=~rr<,~pm~e'---~436 Activ"le Parkin~ SIroC m (2)12!92
Occupy FPP Chnic (3) 1m2 u.
Tolal 509
DOle 1: 10( KCOO1moo.llts 786; nee 436 new spaces.
n«t J: ~d to) 83 t:c.i$ling spaces (Of a LoLa! of 156
Earthquake Parking Impacts (rernaiI1
unchanged from tast y.ear's report)
EYeC!
Wilbur mod Wars
Roble modulacs
F..ncina rep.a.in
Musewn~pa~
Main Q\-.d ,.pairs
Total
Datt;
12/89
12/89
10/89
10/89
WO
ImPa£!
<153>
<21>
<15>
<22>
~
<237>
The Uni vorsiry Commhtee on Heal til and
S alery mel four timo, in 1992·93,
The genenI charge '" the Cornminte is '" """is< the ~I on the adequacy of
Slanfonl',1teaI1h and safery progtamS,
policies and organizAtion; '" recommend
-. priorities and strategies 10 promote
good beallh and safery on campus; and 10
review and :ecommend to the: Presidtnt
University·wide policies on health and safety
maIlerS !elated '" the use of hazardous
bioiogi<:aJ, chemical and physical agents
wb.ich are ""I addttssed by adminis.<nttive
panels.
·1(1.
.. " '.',', «(i
rf.:?\ ,<"'-"\ \$fJhf:ral Use Permll Annual RcpO-• ...i:".i
I. AnyatOoos taken by the
Uruversil)'-wide Ct'!TlJ1litt~
on Health and SafeI)' (cont'd).
I Septembc< 1992· 31 Augusl 1993
The Coouniaee is~ ofraCll)I)'
lUWtbeas. a ~"'"Udent. Rprtsentarives from lhe
Dean of R..oarth. E.,vi""""",tal Health .. 'XI
SafelY (El!&S),!he Gcnc:raI Coon .. I, Public
A ffalrs, Planning and Manageme, ~ and •
mem be> of the c<mmunil)'.
In 1992·93 the Cor.wiaee consid<rW the
(oUo .... i ng major policy iS$Ue"
olmight of health and safety ~ms
Md i".,.. .t SLAe and SSRL;
~ghl of health and safel)' progtams
and i.s.sues u the University;
devclop!ll<J>t tnd impl<mentation o{ a
progrun (0( rompl)"ng .... illl the CaI
OSHA Bloodbo",. P>lhogen Stan<Wd;
a new initiative II') proIDl'\ie Ihe
Unh'crsil)"S r njury and W(\t$$
Prtvcntioo Program; and
development Mel implementation of a
program (or complying "ith the Santa
Clara Count)' Toxic Gas OrdiIHUlCC.
The Commi= also spenl • con~derab!e
lJDr:)U.1t of time reviewtnglJ-re on·going ('-a}4
EPA hu.udous wastt eruol"C(mem action.
!S.SUCl c.onsidm.d j ncl uded future opetati ng
option:;. for the Univcrsily's pennIucd
huan;\oos " .. '" facililY .il(! poosible
fiill1lci>l tnd operatioo i"","", of the
enfotee:rnent a..-cioo on me Univtnl ty
commun il)' .. t.rg >,
In addition the Committee t...ro and
coosid<rW many repon and Wormation
items including ... pons on lhe O>'er>ll $talUs
of heallh and safe()' programs at S tonIord and
at SLAe, camp'" r .... safely, Stanford's
involvement in ajoint univers:1~·.indusny
wamng group on air qualily issues fot fume.
hoOOs, waste waler compliance, and a
proposal for incleasing low-level radioactive
"' ..... storage capacil)' at the Enviro.1lTlC>ttal
Safety Facilily.
·11-
"
, , . '. i
"
... ~ ..
r
I ~
(Jeneral Use l'.ermll Annual Kcpon
@ In completing iLS flffh /1;.1110 oonurullc¢
believes, the above issUC.$ nocYloith5tanding I
thai lb. sofe!)' systems .t Stanford ¢ootin~ 10
satisf.crori!y ickntity aruj. solve health and
safety relate<! problems on campus.
2. Eslabll$h and mointain an on·
going risk assessmenl proce·
durc f01 neW and .xisting
r=, Proceduro$ should
be bnpleinentcd withi!l ~ yeon
of ~ adoption of Ibe General
UsePemtiL
3. Develop. hazardous wute
tnanagement plan inClllding •
waste mi.nimif.arlo~ element
and ~n on·gom If irnplemen:a·
tion protess within 2 ),e .... of
the adoption of the aeneral
U,. PtlallL
I S,,"_ 1m· 31 August 1993
The University eon,mues to utiliz<. Ih. risk
osswn=t procedure developed during
1989·91. This pmc ... utilizes d:cisioo
analysis tecbniq .... commonly US<d in
business and industry. De<:UIon a.wysis
techniques allow the Unlvmily 10
SYS'l'matico lJy evalualC the = and beIIeflls
of the rW; manogemem options it flCe1. The
proeess add:essc$ DO'" and exist!J>g r.ciUIy
rW; as~nlS as ~ of III over-Jl risk I>I1II,_ SII'aIqy. Durinl the topeniDi
period Ihi.s process ",as utilized to evahwe.
v";el)' of new an<Iexlmng facilities issue$.
Th .... are llm:e ~$ of wast ... hieh may be
considol'!(\ h.t=dou.s: Chronc.a!,
Radiological. and Biological. Ther. are
program. for each of these area.!.
The Unlve"i!)", Chemical WasttProgram
(CWP) is re.<poosible for ccUecling and
dispo'illg of was .. chctnic/lls genetat"j by
Univcrsity and Medical CCt\,.,. JaboralCt'.es, .bop, and studios. The prognm alse _\;1
all Uniform Haz.InloUi W&SIC Maruf .... for
....... materials &hipped from the campu •.
Was, .. ",c picked up Ii:om indMdual
geneming ,j«$ by CWP IeChnical pc"""",.1
or by quallfled COrItt1Ct personnel. The
"' ..... are ua.nsponcd i.: dcdk2led vehicles
to the Univeni\y', En,~ Safei)'
FociUly (ESP) wh .... they are proporcd for
sbipment to off·s! .. \lCIWltIed =nnen~
storage .nd disposal facilities. Hawdow
_ thAt a:e $hipped off·~ art packJ\lod.
marked. labeled arid monifesl<d in
IO¢OfdaD<e with appUcaIlk local •• taIC and
federal ,"",WIens. Only ~ baz·
I!%d<>us wlSle haulers arc alIo~ to ttanSpOl't
hauldous wastes from Sun(oro 10 off·site
t:reaU1leL\t. s!orage and di:spo5.3l facilities..
·12·
~neraJ Use Pernlif Annual Rep4)
3. Develop" huardoo ........
_ntplan (coot'd)
I Sqxemb« 1992. 31 August 1993
'TIle waste minimization dement of the
hawdous waste manag.",..,t pion has been
devoloped as r<quirtd by the Hau.nl"".
Waste Soun:e Reduction and Management
Act (SBI4).
Waste gencnuing proc= have been
evaluated in laboratories producing large
volumes of waste 10 determine options for
source Rduction a.1!)(f waste minimization.
Stanford's SB 14 plan has been developed
and Is in the beginning .stages of
implC!OOltalion. Training is conducted on •
tOguIir bam which inclwles methods for
mirumizing waste in research laboratories,
studios and suppon and maintonance shops.
A pUOt chemical rtdisttibulioo sySletn has
been implemented '" redistribute unwanted,
but usable, chemicals to potential users.
No disposal of chemical wastes occurs at
Stanford and there is no intention 10 conduct
this practice in the future. However,
StaJ11Qro is exploring the economic and
opcr1Id()!J3] feasi bility of implementing
scv=.I snl.lllaboratory scale .... tm<nt
and/or recovery PTOCeSS('.$ to reduce the ~"J:ta1
amount of chemical waste that is shipped off
site.
A pilOllaboratory sea' 'So~venl reclamation
program has boen operational since 1991.
Sol_IS are "",!aimed at the Environmental
Safety Facility and reiUrncd 10 on-campus
generators for rouse. Feasibility studies Of!
low vol ""'" acidIbose neutralization studies
kave also been initiAted. Implementation of
these programs will be dependenl on tile final
TIered Permitting rcgula~OflS which may be
!IlOdified by tile stale 10 fonnally allow bench
rop waste tn:aanml in individtllll reseacoh
Iabotatories. Stanford will apply to modify
existing W&SIC """"""",I pennits or obcain
new pennits as oecesstuy if and when such
.... tmenl an<!/Or recov<ry JlrOC<:sses are
incorporated as on· going activities.
Thm "'" two impediments to expanding the
rec1amatjon/recycling program beyond this
scale:
·13-
-@neral Usc Permil Annual RcporQ
3, Develop a hawdoos waSle
Inarn1gement plan (cont'd)
1 Sepo.nbc< 1992· >1 A""",I993
Wastes are extremely variable in compo
sition due to the diverse Iype~ of research
activities conducted at Stanford, and
Because mucn of the research is
conducted on an extremely small scale,
wastes are generated in very small
quantities.
Given these two factors, along with the
Rgula:ory pc:mUtting constraints. it is
difficult to develop treatment and reoovery
processes that can be pnI<tically, effici.,,~y,
and cosl-effectiveJy utilized on a significant
pa=ltage of chemical waste generated al
SWlford.
The inventory portion of the chemic;u wa.~te
tracking system has been c.ompleted and is in
use. Furtl!<r developmenl of tile database
will allow tracking of all waste shipments,
The system "hill help identify and monitor
waste Strea.m5 thai may bt;: candidates for the
waste minimization program and wilt be a
key dement of the hazardous waste
m..tnagement plan under devetopmenL
Rsdiological was«" "" managed IYj Ihe
Health Physics division (.of;.he Environmental
Health and Safety Depanment All
radiological =rial, = ll1ICked from "",ipl
10 disposal,
Sranf<>rd minimize, the volumes of
radioactive waste by storing dry and
biological waste containing radioisotopes
wUh IBdioactive haIf·li ves les, than 90 days
untillhe radioacti'li!y is InUlsformed to levels
indistinguishable fr';'" background. The
non-radioactive i~ ai"'e then incinerated to
reduce the volumes of materials discharge<!
ro a sanitary lal dfill.
~ ~) ~b"l1eral Use P~rmll Annual Repo .Lj
3. Devclop. huaJOOus was'"
~I plan «001<1)
As. ~.ation, these &shes are analyze<! to
ens= thaI r.odioacIivity i. below levels
"""",11«1 in drinldn8 "'llCr. Dty and
bioiogicaJ wastes containing tric wn and
CMboo·14 are also incinenled The
pat'CO~ 0(,...... pictcd up this year thaI
will be incinemed an: abool 95% of the dry was"" and aboul 98% ol the biological
w ...... This siprlticaAtly red ..... clio
amo .. "" olndiOlClMo ......., wbicIl needs
<mtSp<>n in the COIllrDI1IIity. E1fec<ive
J&mI>ly I, 1993, WuhlngtOll $WC and
N¢vada do noI petmit disposal of low level
~ waso:s. This will incn:ase the
volume: of on-sile stor'Ige WIll I a si.te is
availahlt. A pro1on8e<! lack of disposal sioes
has. in addition to \t)...""1"e.ISeS in the total
... 'ohmiC of low-te-.'el radloacti\'e waste,
contribute<! to Stutfon:l's nero to develop
addlrionaJ on-silt storage.
The vol WIltS of medical and biologie>1
W8.~le·s generared on the Stanford Campus,
including the Stanford Medical C<:n,er, are
proP;led 10 incre.1se less than fivt per cem
,U1Jlually for tl'-,¢ fon:seeable tiHure. This grow. p,oj«tJon is ba:«d on known plans
for faci.luy expansions. on patienl care
~!UUS projections and on anticipa!t<l new
=h programs.
Plea.« note th ... the issue of whether medical·,
biologic>.l· and dca.,'ed Iow·level radiological
........ will coo tin .. 10 be incireratI:d on-sile
11 the F.cvitonmt:ntal Safety Facility is
cumonIly .odor ",view by the University and
the pcrarors of Ihose waste streams. An
option under con_ would be 10 have
dJcse WISIe screams managed by off·site
Yaldors. This would constiru",. chang<' 10
the Universiry'$ h.!l_~.!S m.attri..lds
h1l! .. ,.."."t ~Ian. aJIhOIlgh probably 00( 10
the WISIe roimmization eJemect Please ref ...
10 Section 4.d below for. fuller dlscussion of
this mallet .
• }S-
.~
·'
" . ;,
@neral Use Ptrmit Annual RepoO
3, Develop. Murdoos waste
managemenl plan «00,(1)
4. Treat waste orHite inc!uding:
incineration of bier wastes and
=tr8li2Cd ro!1lrol of h oz·
ardous wastes. reduce waslCS
at the source. minimize poten.
tial (or w><ic exposures from
tnnsponalion of bazan:lous
wastes through proper pack
aging. If on-site trea Imem
becomes infeasible for any
reason. report on ttanspon of
wastes off site.
I S_bu 1992·31 August 1993
The gtn<mors of medical and biologk>.l
was'es are cwrently eval""lil1g possible
way,\ to mirrimlzc the a.'TIOtii':S of waste
.-.quiring, by law, di~ by Incinerati","
Sume of these a1lC1'1W1\'e< L",lode: rno<e
stringem waste =am segregatioo at the
poin t of generation to ensure the
biohaz.ardoos waste ~au.m does IlOC i.nclude
general muse; ~ educatiOOaJ
progruus for bioI\awOOu.s materials
generaJOrS 00 proper waste manogemen' and
minimization ccdmique>; wben: possible •
.sing r<CyclobIe labontory mueriAls ond/Or
biohozardoos ....... conwner. imlead of
dispolable ones; and local treaUnet11 by
al,ernative, permined methods. such as SlUm
sterilization. Sucll mea5w<-s"", being
evaluated aocooling to <h<ir enl'ironmental
soundness, theiI orerariooal practicalilles and
their overall cffecrwt!"leS$ in mirJ.mi zing the
<llnOUnI'S of medi('tli and bioh>gic-al waste
g(:1ir.:rated mat will require pnx.esslng by
illcitaarion.
'!be Emwmncntal Safety Faciljry sLatted the
incineration ofX'.raoions in 1981. All
hazardous was.toes are ol.lJ\aged ct:n[I31)y by
the Environrr<nTai Health and SafelY
J)epanrnept
The Medical and Biological Wasle program
includes rollection and incineration of
bkthuardous wastes whic1'l are g(neraled b)'
lh< S tanf<>rd Univorsi!)' MedJc.aJ Ceo .... ,
Stanforo Uni.mil}' Hospital. Lucille S>.lter
P>clwd Children', Hospil.ll, and Unlvern!),
.ffililued n:se.trch faciliues.
AVProximaldy 930 Tons w= incinenI<d
fromS~ 1.1992 iOAugusl31. 1993.
The inct<ast. of 321 tons from the laS!
reponing period Is llTsely the resulT of
lnaea$ed operational dficiency.
The incinerator continued kJ be ope:ratOd on a
double· shift basi. (16-18 hOUtS/day, 6
days/wee¥_) duri ng the reporting period.
ContinoM off-site tr~ and dispo$aI
has «mained and will coolil1ue 10 remain •
nooessity due iO the.-.quired scbodul<d
maintenance off·line periods and for
unschedu!ed operational downtime.
·16-
.. : .
. ,"
'~ner.al Use Permit Annual RepJiJ)
4. Treat waste on~si~e (coo'c)
I Sep«mbtr 1992 -31 A,_ 1993
,Thcdrn:ir1eraror is cesign~ fO process 800
poullds per hoW". The system has bew ,es,ed
by :he California Air ResolUtes Board and
extremely row erni5.o;;ions "''eTC reponed,
Emissions are well below all perm;ned
requirements.
In !he fall of 1993. University and Medical
Center users of the incinerator reviewed the
vperational. and ",,,..,ffeci,,,,n,,.. of
i_tor oper.uions. The study showed
thO!; whlI. :he incineraror is being op<:n..a ..
• bigh level of efficiency. al,emaove di.spoW
technok>gies now exist off·site svd! that it
I:!la)' nO[ be cost-effective to continue to
incinerate mediea1-biological-and most 101"
level radiologiea1 WasIeS on-site. Alternate
means for disposing of these waste sttea.rns
are now bein g considered U)' the aifOC1M
parties. as. are various operating scenarios for
the incinerator. A fin at de-eigjon on Ii'.ese
matters is e.'I(pected by the spring/sum~ner of
1994.
RadiolOgiCal wastes are managed c-entnilly at
the Environmental Safety Facility. From
September 1.1992 ",August 31.1993.2609
cubic fee' of dry waste and S09 pounds
mixed biologicaV radiologic.! wasteS wen
collected.
Approximately 111 tons of bi ological wa.<; te
were transp:mcd off-site for incine:ratioi.l
d1Jring 1992-93 due to routine and non
routin:-(i. C., unexpected) maintenance
downdme. or peaks in waste generation. All
materials traruported are tracked from poin'
of genetation to final d<'..strlKtion whdher
incinerated on·site. or off~sire. During tM
same period, 57 fifty-fivegaUon drums of
liquid low level radiologico1 wastes ~
dispQs<d off-site in acccnlance with all local.
stare and fede:oI storage, transportation and
disposal ""Iuirements. 298 tons of chemiea1
wasteS were disposed off site in 1992·93.
1
'"
,.,~ L
~ i .
~ntr.al Use Permil Annual RepoO
E, Additional Conditions
Set liP a multi·jurisdictioo group
to addre>s existiI1g traffic pr0b
lems of volume, safely & noise
on lunipero Sem. Blyd. (lSB),
and Slanfonl Aye.
If traffic mmgations m lrigptd
which aIfec! ISB or S"'"f .....
Avo., Slanford, with the partid·
pIlion of the mu!ii·jurisdiclion
:;a:,~.:;:t"'1e the miligalions aDd 'if modifications or
al:emarl.". ..... prefer.oble.
F, Olher
Include a building suntmaI)'
which covetS comptiance willl
Specific Conditions highlighted ill
Section II.
I 5<pIembtt 1992· 31 A usus< 1993
The Muhl'jurisdicrionai Traffic Advisory
Group (MT AG) that operated from
September !989 until Mareh 1991 has been
supplanted by IWO mechanisms:
a formal w~ relationship between
the Ex=uive Director of lIle Stanford
Campus Residenrial Leaseholdors
(SCRL) and lIle Universily's designaled
liaison off",er and other line =gers,
with COlma! notification and consultation
n;qWremen1S~ and
Stanford 'offices and iSB residents (through
SCRL) are working logelller 10 review a
potential widoning of lIle Page MillJFoothili
intersection propos«! by the City of Palo
Alto. and Palo Alto Qffidals have expre ssed
willingne:~s to consult wilh JS B reside,] ts and
oL'1ers on potential impacts of the projecl as it
is doYeloped.
BuUdings occupied 19')2·93:
HOUSing & Focx1 Services Maintenance
Shop Expansion
Haas Public Service Center
Stanford Auxiliary Library Expansion
Manzanita II U ndorgraduate Housing
Green Earth Sciences Building
Under Construction:
Ec<>nomicsICentet for Economic Policy
Research
Thornton Engineering Center
ArrilIaga Family Spans Cen~"
Psychiatry Building
Sec. Section n for how sped fic conditions
applied to thes< projeclS.
·IS-
'.' .
8ntra' Use Permit Annual Repol.J
II. S~'~I/jc Conditions
A. Con.lr.cllon
1. Unpavod con=ctioo ,iles shall
be sprinkled with .... tel" or treated
in _ """"""'" oocep<abIe to
tho Cowdy as n<>eeI<:dto eliminate
d.., •.
2. Dust resulting from SIOOqriIcd
soil. sand ard othc:r such m.leri·
," ard from """I::; hauling
debris. soil, sand or other sIKh
nu.tem.l, shall be ron trolled.
3. Strt-efS sUfT'Qundjng co!"oSlnJction
sites shall be kepI rn,,, of duS!,
sand and other consb1.JCtion
dt.hris.
4. Sed.im.enl trdPS shall be cC>n~ ,"""ted at =., irodividual proj«;1
:sHe to prevent soil from leaving
lhe she. Ensure mat traps are
c\eaool regularly.
5. Sl<>:kpiled soil shaIJ have an
"angle of rq>oSe" thai reduw;
runoff, u.d shall be protected
from erosion by appropriate
means.
1 S""""bcr t992· 3t ""-t991
S«:tion 4. 10.5 of the general conditions of
Stanfottl':i contJacl with building contractors
,WJ:s "Owner (Stanford) will insist on rigid
control of dust. storage and waste disposal."
0Jnttact0rs II1e monitored by Stanford
ConSIIUctio;. Managm who mjuUe
additional dUS( protection as n<Oded.
See respon se 10 I.
See response 10 I.
The onl}' soil siored on campu S is the arnowlI
10 be used for backfiU. The re<t is hauled off
campus. There is a CUITe;":: s:~I:::;tile of ti.'..'il
ffOlll the fuel oil tank: proj«;t. Bast.'<I upoo
final mitigation requirements, the ooii will b.i;:
rcpfaced or :removed from the site. Soil from
the Parking Structure III project at the
Medical Center was also stoclq>iled; It is
anticipated that this soil will be removed in
1994. Soil was stockpiled from the
excavation for rhe Arrilliaga Family Sports
C<ntc:r as material for tho future development
of a ptaClice golf area on the westside of
campus. A grading permit is currently .mer
application and review.
Stanford also requires a storm water pollution
plan from contractors working on sites that
potentially may have discharge 10 the stonn
drain system. The plan includes prevl"ntion
and mitigation methods for control of soil and
sediment from these construction sit~.
See response 10 4.
·19-
--------
(lJeneral Usc fermil Annual JhPO
6. &caVAl«l so~. '"'<:<pI ror backliU
maIerial$, .s/o.all 00' be stomJ on
S IICford lan:ts unless. grading
penni, is oI>cainod from the
C""my.
7. Consttuction activities· shall be
scbe<Mcd 10 reduce disruptioo of
• -:if m j.J JT;SearCh or odter
activities.
9. Energy fJl..Ulag~m -romi>'tiaoc..c
with Californi.3 AdrniniStratil'e
('.ode Ti tie 24.
Note: The General Use Permit docs.
nO( require reporting on Condition 9
in t}·.eAnnual Repon.burit is
incJuOeC:. for i.nformation al ptupos.es...
I S~ 1992·31 August 199)
See response 10 4.
SeCtioo 10.2.9 of the SWldArd Conditions of
the construCtioo contract $WeS. "Con D'aC'tOf
shill e=else maximum <lton to avoid
disrupdoo with the aa.lemic enviroomenl
Tbi. shall include. at • minimum, using aU
feasible med>cxIs and strict discipline 10
minlml ze d&nger. ooise. vibn.tiori. r urnes.
dtlSl and other poll"';""."
See response 10 7.
SLlnfCHd Urli .... eriiiy (;cnunued iI's
oomrnitrnent~ .. use ener.gy more effideotly in
FY92·93. Effom ~\'cre focu$C.d in the
foUoowing areas: e:~pansioI1 of the campus
wide Ct"..nr:rali ~ ot!1<'tgy r.n.ar~gernem 2 .... 4
cootrol system (EM&CS), boUding
sch<duling. boilding energy retrofit proje<;!S.
u dLi ty mt{t:ri ng. p!.tns review for new
ronsb'UCtiOn and ca!np'J.$. putmc aWArene~s.
Expansion of the 1l:<1 &CS ena~les Stanford
to more precis.ely and efficienrJy ('00(1"01
steam and ohm"" water In campus boUdings.
This tighter cootrol also improves ""'upon!
oomfon.
The obili I)' 10 scl><d We e;,orgy delivery in
various building is AllOIher imponan!
fea1>lre of 1ho EM~Sjgnificant enc:gy
00$1$ ~ avoided by shutting down the
~ .. ating and air-<Xl<\ditiolling 'Y"en1S at nigh~
weekends and boIidays.
Building """iY retrofit projects Include
i:rlprovement.s to the existing lighting or air~
cornlitioning systems 10 increase effIciency
Illtd thcnby reduce energy """""",tion. An
oxampIe of. reuafu projea is the Center foc
In.,gmcd Systems (CIS) variable speed
drive proj<>:t. oompJeted in FY9O-91 that
reduces energy conSllm<d in th at bwlding by
over 23% or 2 rrullio.'l R'h per. year.
.21).
, .-,' I·. ,:'
"
.~ ..
~ " .0enua' lJse Pumi! Annual Rcpt~ '.'
9. Energy management (cont'd)
10. Enlarge Of modify existing stonn
dr>..i.1age f.:cmnes to acconUl)o-
date new cons [fUCtion nJ noff.
Any stann drainage j mprove
lTICms shall be planned in consu I·
tarion WltJl City of Palo Alto rep-
resentatives and. repl~sentative.s
from other affe,cre(l B:sencies.
Such consultation shall include
dlscussion of the pcssibiJity of
on-site I'elentiop, and gruund
water recharge of storm water,
where feasible.
B. Landscaping
i. Maintain <:W1"ent University she
I~ing 'tandards of placing
IUgh pnority on preservation of
existing ~ tree.; either pre.
selVed or featured in design of
new .... ildings.
2. Rqllaoe marure Ire" which are
lost as a result of new buUding
CCflSttUctioa with new plantings
of "Iuivalent loog tem1 quantity,
quality, and value based on lh<.
International Sociel)' of Arlloricu]·
ture Guidelines and subjecllO the
approval of Ibe Counl)'.
3, Landscape plans for new projects
shall emphasize drought loleran"
low maintenance species,
I s""""ba 1992 • J I AugUSl 1993
In order 10 111011 i,or more closely the Ctletg)'
consumption of Urtivmity buildings. as
weU as ... ck Ille prosItss of om ~,
projects, '''' are expanding our abilil)' 10
measure ac<.·ur.".ly eIeclri¢ity, steam, and
chilled water consumption.
In addition to [nceIin$lI1eCalifornia Ti~e 24
buildi1lg energy r<qwremtn .. for all new
construction and large mnodcl projects, each
tr.illding project is m;.wed 10 identify
additiooaJ ¢nagy saving , ..... gies IIw can be
L1corpotaled into !he projec1. There is also •
pubtic aWl!lel1ess program in place w!'Jen is
desigoed 10 ed...:ate!he cmlpUS community
abcu, non-,echnical m<<h<>is for Ttductng
campus energy consumptioo.
There was no ;1(.'uvily on.Phase Ul or I V of
the SlOrOl Drain projt'(:l du..";ng 1992·93,
wi:dch afe phase-s nOf: CCii.:iidered n~essary 8l
r...-'iis tilllC'. The oniy acriyi:y io the ma of
slO1TT1 drainage conslsled oi rourine
maintenance a.1d rcpaUs, and C('Iflfle(-ting of
downspouls and surface slooo Maim for
new building CCtls'l'.J{:oon as neeJ.ro.
AU 1992·93 building and road",,), projects
"'ere reviewed by landscape archil .. " in <he
SUtnford Planning Office fOO" compliance with
University landscape standanls. All projects
reviewed \\"efe in COClpliance.
Tree replacement r<quiremenlS are determined
d.mng !he review of !he landscape plans prior
10 tl".e conslrUctioo of. building. l...andscape
plans are part of the Coon ty Anohi tectural and
SiteApprova] proces.s.
Drought tolerant. low maintenance species
were emphasiU'J in landscape planS-..
.'
®nera! Use Permit Annual RepoO
4, Irrigation SYSIemS shall be
installed only a.ftc:r Te'.dew of
long-term need ond
appropriateness.
5, Mainrain ond ~ the Foothill
area's divenity of native vegeta·
tiOll types.
6. Minimize removal of oak trees.
Set bod: development fiom exist·
ing stands of oaks.
7. Cootin\le -regeneration of ex.isting
oak vegetation in the FoothiUs in
acrordance with the iIdonled
Vegetation Management i'l>n.
c. SoIi'A. Wasle DJsposal
1. S tanfotd shall SCI and meet an
annual goal for its recycling ~
_ to reduce the amount of
materia1 disposed of at landfills.
I Sepcanber 1992·31 AUgusll993
Irrigation systems are reviewed by landscape
<Lu,; ... ~i~ects in the Planning Office as. 'WeU as by
qualili~d, responsible penoonel in the
F""iliti.s Operations and Maintenance
Depanment 10 insure their appropriateness on
ev<ry new landscape proje<:t
We connnLic to pursue our comrnlttnent to
revegetation with three_ species of native
oaks. (See also nesponse to 7.)
Building and l&ndscape plans one reviewed by
the Planning Office to ntinimize the n:1IlOV&!
of oak trees. The staJY.1ani construction
""ntract (Section 10.2.1.3) sims that "The
contractor ~all take all roasooal>le
pn:e;wtiO!1S fer the safelY of, and ~all
provide aU rea..~ab!e protection to rrc.\"Cnl
damage, injW)F Of 10s.5 to: other property at
the 50ite or adjacent thcrelo. including treeS,
shrubs, lawn'S... not dC:)ignated fOf 1(IhOVa!.
retocation or replacemellt in the COUl'SC of
conSbUction." This is monitore-d by the
Stanford Constnlction Managl'r for ~ach
project.
Awroximately J ,000 acorns were planted in
the fall of 1992 in the Foochi Us as pan of the
oak re·vegetation and regeneration prognun.
Th. program al,o moni tars the success and
fallure of acorn growth due to dreuglu,
p~ation and vandaJi'Sm. Modifications are
made to the program accordingly.
The ",cyoUng goals and actulll recycled
'.IIOOWl1S for 1990-91 solid waste one as
follows,
1992·93 1992-93
00aJ Actual
Iw!J. Iw!J.
Total tons 5,048 5,000
Academic
areas: 2,865 2800
Paculcylstaff
& gIlld stud,
housing area: 2,183 2,200
·22·
@eneral Use PermH Annuo:.l Rep@
D. H ... rdou. Waste
I. Train pmonnellnvol Y<d with the
use and handling of hazarckJU$
matm.ls.
J S<pumbet 1992·31 AugusI 1993
Percentage of waste
str<= diverted to
~ling: 29.0% 30.0%
The r""yeling goal for 1993·94 is 30'11>.
As mentioned in last year's report,. Stanford
poliO)' "",uires lnining of employees in haz
ardws materWs handling. Schools, .
Departments and Principal Investigators
provide various levels of training Ihroughout
the Uni\lersity. In addition to in house staff
available to provide lnining, Ihe Envi
ronmental Health and Safety Depanm'n1 has
contracts in place with individuals involved
in training progromtk\le·!opment and
deUl/ery.
Stanford has alw de\,eloped and
implemented waste management and
P'li..nlmization tr"'..i.. ... i..'1g piOgrail1ii fOl campus
and Medical CXnterfacuily, staff, and
studems. Swveys are conducted annually to
determine chemical management and storage
practi~s. processes generating hazardous
chemical waste, and options for waste
minimization, and waste management By
in~g survey da", in the lnining
maJerial, laboratory pmonnel will receive
prac1icaJ, ruher than theoretical methods for
implementing source reduction and/or waste
minimization pn.grams. Survey infonnation
has been used to develop a Source Reduction
Plan, and a Hazardous Waste Manasemenl
Performance Report.
Envirornuental Health and Safety pewnn.1
specifically responsible for handling
hazanious wastes and emergency responses
ere trained by C<nified ind~I
professionals and by profes~onal EH&S
staffin =nlan~ WIth local, state. and
federal regulations. In 1992-1993
Environmental Health and Safety personnel
specificaUy responsible for "l"""-nng the
biologk:al was'" incincralor continued to
J«)Cjve on·going lnining in medical was'"
.n.
". '
!3teral Use Pnmil Annual Report)
I, Ttal .. pmonn.] (conrd)
4. C<:!c)pIr ",W, Fe4<:raI and Swe
re~ ~pnljni!u.=1!ous
was"'_=~
l SqRml)et 1m· 31 Augu,u 1993
'--.,' . . <
incinemion and in ",hted ttcltnicaland
reguJa:my is"",,' from professional EH&S
stlff and !rom oulSid~ teclutical
pmfos,]onals. Stanford's incineratOr
opera"'" I>'er. <he first in the .1aI. to fully
and successfully compI.te the S !aIe·mandated
c_lion program for medical "'"51.
i~ op .... "ors.
Rad.iol<>P:a11raining programs encourage
substitution of noo-r'adioacove '" bstances
whenever feasible and instnJel cxperimeote,,,
tQ keep ~s ittm. fl>aI may betome
contamiJutcd out of wmk areas.
Now ~ and medical facilities ar.
dooigDa! tQ m«l the builifulg cod.,
app:rorriatc 10 rne:ir usc.
Fony·six (46) f!azMtous M.!itcriaJs MAD·
ageme.'tl PI tJt, for campu, bulldl!t gs were
prep1l<d betw~o September I. 1992 and
August 31, 1993 and ."!>mine<! 10 tb. SMt3
Clan o':lUnty EnvirollTiY" ... lHal Resoun:es
A~ .. cy, DepllItmeitt of Environm<ntal
Hw<h, Hazardous Material, CompUal1co
Division.
StanfOl1l', Environmental Safet)' Facility is
openta! wi th ovmiiht by local, State and
from! ajOIICies, An opmuions plan and
~m of hawdous was'" handling am
avaiW>le "the Califrotia Environtn<:ntal
I'ro!tction Agency's (c.J-E.PA) Department
a!Toxic S~ Contlel. Region 2
office in Bcd<c:le)", Califomlo. The facility is
inspeaz:d on • regular ba$I$ by officials from
the Palo Al'" FIre Ilepanznenl. the County of
Santa CJm. Envin>nm;nt&l Reso=
Agency, ~t oiEnvirooment&l
lbldt, the tal-EPA Dcponmoru ofTwac
S"bswn. CooIIO~ and the CaUfomia
Department of Hulth s.mces Radiological
Health Branch, RecoI"l!i of these inspections
-are ava.llable at these agencies' offices ill Palo
Alto, S811 Jose and Bet'<~I.l', Califomill
resp«:tivc\y.
C"llncral U~'" Permit Annual Re-po()
4. Compl r with Federal and Slate
regulluions reprding hazaIdoos
wast/) management (coo't).
E. ArchaeoJogitallfUslorical
RESOUr-Ce-s
I. Coom)' policy for an;haeologkal
si'es shall be followed. If human
n:mains are enoountmd, work
shall slOp iJDJDedialely and the
CimpUs arehaeoIogist and Coun.y
Coroner shall bo ootified. Wi thin
10 days, !be County Engineor
will issue. p:nnlt setting fonll
the rolJditions for mnova! and/or
continued ...."., at the &ito.
Should any other pa!eontological
or ardlitecIur/' ~ be
found. SWlfCX<l', policies related '0 anifa<:lS should be foDowed.
2. Maintain the o:cllilCctuJ2l chan>c-
lOr of the campus by oJhering '0
design guidelines whiclt .,..
srated in a facilities desipl docu·
ment. SllCh standards insure that
new building. will further
enb&ne<o the archilCClUral ciwac.eo
of the campus and its various
regions.
I Septtmbe< 1992·31 August 1993
Stanford is =,ly ntgotiating a final
S<ttIemr:<!. with DTSC for alleged violations
of~, waSlO regulations ciCed at the
Env'.ronmenul Safety Facility and in campus
and Mcdlcal Cento< ~ ...... , '>v
CoonI)' Eltvi:onrooI1!a Health D<portmem
and Cal· EPA irup«:, IOrS in 1988, 1989 and
1992. 1= do:<! .t the Environmental
Safei)' facilil)' and in _ gencnwr arus
po:n>ined primarily ro _<Ie co".ai,,,,,
",."....,.,., and l.obeling. incloding alleged ~'Oi COn<IiDc:r ~ time Urmts.
S lanford ....,. the IIl<ged \'iot.<don$
seriowly and has expended a grut dW of
time and rosourteS to """* ",ith tbe ".unpus
IJ1d Medica!Cettter ~ and \\ith
CaI·EPA and the Santa Cb.ra County
H.u.a.-doo-; li"hJeriilJ~ Cr:-mp!i!..."X'.e D:i,,~;sion tv
~lari!~ and aJdres.s lfie i~$U(:$ r.used by the
agcir(;.es.
The SLlnford Archaoologisl re\;ewed aU siles
(or buifdjn~ projects pliCt' to (O,1SD'UCtiOf"l
and delermined tltat no .. ",h",ological
ft'·S.QlJrCes ~tte prt.SUll PO&E <:Oi'Jduclcd
exploratory lesti.ng aJ CA ·SCl.-<i28 00 the
Foothill ~w.~ in preparation (or the
StAnford Segment of Une 1091132
Replaccrntnl Projecl in NO'v"'eTJ1ber of 1992.
CWtwal materials v.'t;."(: recovered and the
StAnfCX<l Alc_giH ~ guidelines
for funher data rerovcri prior 10 proi«1
cOflStTUCtioo. No hUDlU ret'PliIins were
dlstutt>ed during thJ$ or any ott...-proi«1 in
1992·93. .
Sites and project design &Ui<klines reviewed
and approved bl' tbe Uni,"";1)' Commltt<e
on land and Btillding })eve lopment during
1992·93 included:
Hopljns h'1aritle Station Aquarium aM
UroralOry
Environmental Safety Facilil)' Annex
AD pnojocts were <X>r1sistCtlt with the
University's design guidelines, and are
O\'ers«t\ as to their completion in this regard
by the University Archil<CL
.15-
~neral Us~ PermH Annual RCPo@
3. The Stanford Historic Values
lndel< shall t.. coosuIted when
~g dcmoUlion or
remodeling of lxIildings with
historic interest
1 SqIItmbet 1992 • 31 AUiJlSll993
The Historic Values II1dex (HVl) group
focus. during the J 992·93 r.poning period,
was Of! some of Ihe smaller W<JOd·ftamcd
campus bIlildings which had ~ COflvcmd
from priva,. residences early in tile century
to serve as fratemhies. soror1lies, or
independent living groops for students. The
following "Row Houses" were visited anct
evalurutd by !he committee:
Betas (557 Mayfield)
CotuaJbae House (549~)
Delta Kappa Epsilon (592 Ma)iiekJ)
553 Mayfield
French House (610 MayC.eld)
Grove La.wen (572 Mayficl<J)
Grove Mayfield (584 M'),fi,ld)
Ham:(i~tjsk()ld HO'.J.S.e (592 A!\'w...do)
K.airos (58{) Ma)1kld)
Mittolruropa (620 Mayfield)
Muwcl<ma.Tau.RuVLaL'u'op (543 Usuell)
Phi SigmA Kappa (564 Mayfield)
Roth Houst 013 Santa Ynet)
Slavienskii Dam {650 Mayfield)
Theta Xi (717 Dolores)
OfthC!e ho~s, those at 543 Lasuen and
557 MayfLeld were refwbished during the
summer of 1993. ]1 is expeeled than an
additional four houses will undergo
refurbishing during the summer brea1c, 1994.