Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout0374.094, . ~ ." July 21, 1994 1I0NORAllLll CITY COUNCil. P~10 Alto~ California APrrull'AL~ OF PROPOSED FOBMA.LA1'ilL CONTENT FOR NEW MISSION jJRlVEN BUDGELJlQC"UlttElfi Members of the Council: REPORT IN BRIEF This report pl:esents the Mission Driven Budgeting philosophy, process. and proposed document format, including GI diacus~:doll of tile use of r.lle docurnent to set priorities and make t:esource allocation decisit.,no. BACKGROUND Staff began exploring t~e concept of a "program~ budget in January 1993. The prinCiples and framework of ~lisBion Driven Budgeting (MOB) wore reviewed and refined by the Senior Management Group in March of that yeal.'. and the City Council gave its conceptual approval in June 19.93. Following Council approval, all City departments proceeded to develop an lomB structure, missions for services, and impact measures to define the success of activities. Department MDB struct~.Il.'es were submitted to Council for review and c~wnent between September 1993 and February 1994, Simultaneous to department devel0I>f.1ent of MDB str.'uctures, inter-departmental committees were formed to make recommendations on budget controls, savings ~nd incentives, crcss-departmental programs, allocated costs, timekeeping, capital projects, and budget presentation. Progress reports on the status of theBe committees were submitted to Council in september and December 1993 (CMRs 463:93 and 626:93). Staff indicated at that time that it would return in July 1994 with a prototype l·mB document for Council IS l"eview. CMR,'74,94 \ " , f· ~i r ' ". r:· ( i I I k f· , '" ---, " ,-:-' 1 .. , ; i I ) I ; 1 I I I I '" '". Aft previously revic .... ·cd with Council, MOl! i9 designed to reflect a nUlI\OOr of principles (CMR:626: 9)) including: The City has a mission ahd all the d6partm~nt missions ahould Hupport it and flow from it; Similarly, any other organiza­ tional divisions in departments should have missions which di"rcctly support the dQpartment, and thus the City mi.ssion. The document should undorstandably describe and portray City servlces and capture the coata of those services. The' Council, au well as City, depart~~nto. should be able to set prior.1ties "nd ma'ko resource allocation decisions eft~ctivoly. within and between depart~ent6. Thora must be a balance .between p.r.cviding more uaaiul info:t:ma­ tion to the Coun'ci 1 and Pllblic and the adminintrative burden of gi\th~ring and report.ing on that j,nformation. The MOD docur.\ent ohol,.ll<;l be a "living-manuscript that seta Dtalldal'de for pexfOl"'maHcc and reports on that pel"(ormance. There st,Quld be incentivcD fot' dcpartlT'!nt9 to be cl"eative and irulovativc J 89 well as efficient.; staff should be empowered at all levols of the organlzution to find the beat ways to aChieve IfliBsiofls. r.mB AS A TOOL FOR I'OUCI(MAKING AND PRIORITY SE1TLIIIG The City COuncil 6etD policy and direct.ion, allocates funde, prioritizes eervices, and generally loo)cs at the -big picture-. City departments arc' uorvicc delivery organizations, charged with ca..n:"'Iing out policy, hiring and deploying staff, buying materials and services, and doing their utOOBt to s~e t,hat citizens are served and public rrlOney 10 used efficiently. MOB builds 01\ this division ,of rp.~ponsibilities. It allows the City Council to decide on policy priorities and appropriate service provision levels, and City management and staff t~ determine how to get the work done. Hnhancing the accountability of departments and focusing attention on the' outcorr~e and performance of programs, rather than the input mix of supplies, materials and people, is key to the MDB concept. For example, MDB aosumea that citi::!;ena and the council want to focus on' the results and the cost of providing a Crime Suppression activity, and not on whether the input~ that go into delivering thttt activity are comprised of supplies or contract services. As a result of this focus on outcomes and perfot~ncej managers under CMR:)74: 94 2 L i I i i I , I I I MIlB will be given more flexibility to move IOOne)' between line itemo and encouraged to act more like business managers. Even with this change to a broader focus, the new MOB document 'IIo'ill contain more detail than in pr(!ViOUB budgets: 1) full caRt information at a much lower service level grouping than in the past, 2) groupings of City eervicea th.:;tt are more fneaning(u.l. and 3) staffing detail at a lower level. The challonge will be for Council to use this information to id~ntify and gtve dh:ection to staff regarding where service levelS ahould ~. increased or decreased, or where a new set'vice needs to be added. With this type of policy guidance, the City Manager I in conjuncti(,;)n with department heads a'nd Council·appointed off1C.frr9 f will <18019n staff and reaour<.:es to modify services to the levels desired by C(>uncil. Council and departmento need to agree on~ c:r.phasi'2;c. and utilize the measures of performance contained in /-WB. Without this effort;~ MDB will be a c06metic change, rather than a tool for it'i.p("ovil'lg the manner in which budgets are managed and oen'ices ar.e pl."ovided. Just as it does nnw, Council will have the opportunity to question staff and provide its ideas for priorities. Council may chElng~ the priorities and levels of service as it ~ ... ishes, Undor MDB. this process is facilitated, FOT instance. staff could prep~r~ responses to the following types of questionu regal.-d1ng the uParking Services-functional area ~n the Pol ice Departf":'.ent: What would be the impact on overall revenues and exp.enditl.n.-c9 if p1'llrking staffing Wel"e l;educed by one1 If Council were willing to accept a service level which resolved abandoned or stored vehiclf! LS81.1C'S within 15 working days (instcs.d of 10). could the City realize any aavillgo? What would be the cost of :resolving iSBueo within 5 ,",'orking days'! The budget dOCl\ment does not permit a ·one-for-ona-tradeoff between resource levelS and levels of servico delivery. These tradeoff decisions will still req'.Jire questions, follow-up and discuBsion. MDB will -make it easier. however, to identify and understand discrete services so that theoe discussions can be initiated. St.aff believes-it has reached a balance between providing more information to the Council and the publi-:-, and the administrative burden and cost of gathering and reporting on that information. CMR:374:94 3 > ,. \. j , t I .': '", ' PROTOTITE BUDGET DOCUMENT The final MDB budget document will be published in two separate volumes: 1) General and Other Funds and 2) Utility Funds. The former is organized by department and the latter by fund. Within each department and fund, the format and organization of the budget document is aignificantly different than in previous years. The proposed fom.at and changes are desr.ribed below in four sections: General Fund Budget Format, Utility Funds Budget Format. CrOSB~ Departmental Programs Format and Other-Budget Summaries and Information. All prototype examples and attachments are for illustrative purposes only. Financial information and objectives are not actual 1995~96 budget data. It is antiCipated that the MDB budget document will continue to evolye over time. Developing meaningful performance measureD, estimating staff time l and making reaOUl-ce allocation decieions to a new budget structure is a difficult task l especially since there is no histol.'ical data at the level displayed in the MDB docllment. Some performance measureB will require changes and refinement once actual tracking of the measures begtns" In addition, Council should expect to see tn t.he second yeal-of MDB. significant movements of jollars between department service areas and activitieu. TiLese changes will not be a reflection of service level changes, but will be due to the accumulation of mol-e accurate data. 'fhe budget revi{l_'.<l" process is outlined in Attachment A. The order of the public hearings and the commissions conducting hea:dngs are th~. same as at present~ however the format in which the budget i8 presented to them is being changed, This is due to the integration of Utility capital projects int.o t.he MOB dOCl~ment. General Fund Budget FOOD@t The MDB structure is hierarchical, At the lowest level are the major: activities l which makE'; up functio'nal areas, which in turn make up a department. .As its name implies, Mission Driven Budgeting has mission statements at each level, which relate to and flow [rom one to another, The department budget under MDB consists of three componentsl Department summary; Functiollal area overviews i and , • t-Iajor activity deta,il, CMR,374,94 . ,\ \ \ -.'.··~·l···.'······· . . .\ '1 f \ . ,". '. __ . ~ ,~!. ... )..,,~~,:ti::Sia~ Different types of information I financial and narrative, are provided in each of these areas. This format will allow the reader to review a departmental budget at the level of detail desired, from an overview of the department 8S a whole, to detailed funding ,"lind impact measures for any specific eepartmental major activity. Department with Mission Statement }'unc tiona I Ar(,s, will} Mfssion Statement ---l '-r-u-n-c"'tiC"o.ln,-:l-Ar-ea--' --r-un-ct[onal A, ru 1 \'o'iih with Mis.sion Mis.sion Statement Statement ------=:1 M'j'" M'j" I [M'J~J Acthily ActlV11) J Activity \lith "" 1111 v.;th Mission M 1~5ioo Mi'-SIOil SWtlllrol Sta:unrnl Statement -------- -M~-;J-Actil'ily ..... ith MLuion SWement [ M'j" Accivity \>O;t1! MissiCV1 Stal.«nrnt [ _1 __ _ Majol AcUyjly ""ith Mi$Sion • StalemtrlL Attachments Band C display the MDB prototype for the Finance and Police Departreent8. These Oeneral Fund departtl'Lcnts, administr&tive and line level, helped develop the HDB process. One functional area and the major activities that support that functional area are shown for both departments. In the final MDB dC'lcument, all functional areas will be shown with all related major activities displayed after each functional area, At thia point, it is anticipated that the General Fund budget will b3 comprised of 60 functional areas and 250 major activities, Oweral Pund Department Summary The department summary contains the following components: HisBion Sta.tement -This statement des.cribes the "reason" and purpose for the activities in the department. 5 ~=~"'''1' ;,·."o.-.~.""· C"~~ •• ~. . - ----- ( . '." '" --.,;~'LJ."";.~ ... ....,~,c',.'.~.,- $ • • .... •• • c Fin:mce Dci1'artmcnt,' ,' .. . . -:-. '. . -. . T~ ~ .• il(, 1'r14.~ t& <lIy~fo-.u'I(iJ ~r(t$j u) r~ liIrwI" droIr.ufin.:mO.J injamu.rkm;.md .'0 f""-i.« rruJi'1 k'7\~f" 14 ~ p.Mit: • .M.-ul.m~m AM CIty ~rtmmlJ D"pat"went overy!... 'the department overview is a non­ technical deBCl.-iption of the major focus of the depol'\rtm(~nt for thf! coming fiscal year, including any major projects. rn addition, this section will highlight any large requests for adcJit ional resources or ~ny ·substantial movement of resources from one funct iOllal area to another that reflect a change in the department'G pl:iorities for the coming year. The deparlrr,ent overview is not intended to be a description of the Ollgoing activit.ies of the department nor a detailed accounting of the movement of funds from one activity to another. Similar department overviews were submitted to Council as staff reports. during Ute 1994-95 Budget. DEFAArM~Nr OVERVI~W Tht fin~nu IXpwt mt01·' {(\("IJJ in tht 199'>960 budcft )'ut" ~ ~ on imp1c rut (,I nioe. of Mluic.n Driv~n Su.dg.nio, !)."lDB). JoW3.,.ill rtquil""t the dt ... ·clopmeol of &lI «ntiIt'ly !l(W (b1l1 of lCCOUllt$ uxl rtpo.nl.n, ~ru(Wft. tH .. , ~ ill£xu.io-n ~~~. !ltll( hbor uponing 1lIJ:1 politioo ("ontrol *yJttl'l'U.,. i.nt.tV~ Q( (f(oJ.t &p.nmu.l pi"",,=,am lnd (tpitaJ PIV)«t trp<lnillg i!:lto tht -oPf taUnt ~f'C., dn-.~l'It (jof icnp.a<\ mtl.fUrt r(p<'t1.ing. mil iol'l of tM Mwtidp~ ('.0&, all d &PU1DlUUJ 1r~«IllIt lie.,.' rUl.lOdtJltnXtut«. Ttlllptmi 'OfJ new b~« dorurntnt torn1u must also ~ cnit:e.i l"hr ~tl Divilion ,,-ill ~ ... holly dtJjcatN 1-0 the proj«l • .(lJpponrd by tht ./t,(Cot1.nUng ao.-\Adminiltl"ltlon Diviu()O roWl£f EZJ«It $I:.u(_ Kif)' f~LQ(ial J)'nC:il:l ...-illaho ~ e-ompJttN.iLl 1995-1)'6, ioch .. -d.ing 'ftort$ invullory. le¥ell.~ roUtc­ ~ J'Utommoo. U1;d tht ialubce ollbe !Ie ... p.yroU f)'sttal to the :Koo~<jng 'Y"tm. The coaver­ si¢,o 01 th( "'«(oIJ.J.,tU1e ryltClll from the HP)G((l 10 Ute UNIX tl'l. ... UOIlQltllt will i1$O bt" Wl.dm-aktll. Mtr ~inu,(t PtpJrt~.at proj(ctt in 199'>% wclOO<: I~.td wponlibilit), tOt the Storm D.rai.cag,e .Fu.sd debt finl..O<iot> w,plrtnrow;e>n of amll~'lt pukin.r; in the ~nior c.cottr lot and oolltioucd roordin.atiotl 'II,ith thr Cbunbtr of CommU~-t Oil ~OO$ {or dolVtHOwn parking prmut (tt..!; reriu.' :l.I1d propoul of rt";Uoru to the proptlt)' truuftr tax (lrdiaanC"t, .I.I:Id wiRa.oce with. coordi.a;.ting lhe City J..h..nqt,'1 ru,p-.:o.nt< to lhe Huthu H~iu O.rr,tAiutiooal Review. CMR:374:94 L ,', I '.," .. , \ \ \ \ ..... , ... \, P'lnancial summary -'fh(l. d('partment f:i nane1al surl'J!'Iary ShONS expenditures by functional area for the proposed budget. the pt"eeent year's adjusted bu.dgetl and the previous year's actual expenditures. The 1995-96 "toE budget wJ11 have numbers only for the proposed budgct sim~el «t this point, there is no historical data in the neW" HOB utl"uctUl"c. Total department revenue and total full-time positions are also sllown in the financial .summary. Sample Depalrt!l'\e.r1.t PiMncioi!il ~'\l.I("'r'\uy R9110urC4I Level Changos -Thio scct~.on describes uignificant budget changes in positions o:r funding. Also, it resources are being shifted within the department, an explanation would be provided. RE$OURCE LEVEL CHANGES 1N dtpuun~ofl bo..>d(ct il~~, bl ~2'l,!))")i.n.t.h!: F..w:-.c;.!~." ~Mret ..... !K"~ 1,1"0'1 f;)(I~'" ~"",""<>f. ~"'~foptnl:inJ,,'Klm~ Ot},.jr~lIi11~'\4 .. -..Jf{"!'{IT.,M"I·N1).b"1;~tJlIturd'""t::»I"C x..."\lnU! ~ hurd M I 7'# e>l nrcri.fr,o;:( \OI'J&r tN )ID.! dtpwtr.".<!t~ ,;;or:;>.J( Funotional Area and Major Activity Listing .. The listing of functional areas and the major activities located in each area are included in the department summar~' pages to assist the reader in underotanding the department I 9 structure and to help the reader locate an al"ea of inlccest. CMR,374,94 7 FVNcnONAl AREAS AND MAJOR ACTlVlTlES Fln.utd)J Support Srrvi«'1 F~ SystmaSolrvi.:" I A«ounlill&: Ser...xH • FUun.:Ul Rtp.,'l1U ~t Ml1lagnnrnt Dtk bl\lmt( .1.Q\"tSUTH1l.l! &-:: BVo\.i"I • F~N loU«l AC<:\)OJntitl,· haJ Pr~<rtr ),1l<U£lro.tOI • J\:t( !>uir..I ~ Colltnr:'C Adrnlni$lHlm' $.tor" 6: Witl~ln, frnauci.aJ Planning, An.aJ}"sis tnd Rcpo.tt L-OOf"IUn,t F~ ~ lnd For~uu,s· CoM>.oJ~in, t...d Spro..l S<~ • RtH""'" ~~ r.'F4",c Aru!)1u. MOMOri.tl" 6'. r .... l~ir'l'. Ope,"itl, &nd C.,M.t! B~" ~d",pmt." • 8u&tot'l P'~~f'OfI"V>« R'f'OfU BiU.i.ag '" CoUC'Ctioos . rukin, Svpport' VWRY 8ll1int • Gu~ raj BilllJ1.1 $(. Cc>!lKti«u Printing 3(: Malling Services p~ Suvius • )"hili", ~r .. iw Sample FunctLonal Area and P.ajor Aethdty Listing General Fund Functional Area summary The functional area summdry pages are compl'ised of the following components: Mission Statement Key Plaue -This section lists major projects or plane fOl" the coming" fiscal year. These plans aX'e usually one-· time in nature and are not intended to be descript.ions of the ongoing activities of the fun{;tional area. Departments will report periodically during the year on theil' pl"ogress with l"egclrd to these key plans (see "Periodic Performance Reporting-). 1U5-H KEY PLANS o 1mp1~JN:l\Ldlltptr pl1kitl, ofJIiur.a ill IMdo'Wl'lIC'iI'n 0 distria on, OM-ynJ' trW buis:and r.-aNue eff«tin· ~. Sample Key plana CoII.wrt l« S iMOMIIl{fIOOL'lt lox9/1. lo/:lot»ufui..J t:.ui~ A .. :n il'IlhtlllUlI~#l'""ill of 1M 'O"U"~ _lit, I VfOOof lIld ... ~t r!lt«'u(lofi:l.« lht l{1(b.S .. "" k>t (0<'0U~. Financial Su.mmary -The financial summary sl1o'''''s a breakdown of total functional area expenditures by major activity. The total revenue and total full-time positions are also listed for the functional area, 8 // ,~, ,,_ , I \\j~jl~' .. 7] '<'. ->" "" ~.; ,' . _., ... :...:::.. WWORAetMTlES -----, p"i'Jng Enl~nt PMtdng Citation P~lrIg .r.d'Tl1u;ldng Abl1'Id<Jnfd Veh1cM Uo\ ~--f--7--~fi-:=..:~-oeEJ)---t---=--""'--_ "" 77,t15 tio\ Ko\ 69,1+4 NA ._-... Palkl"i! AcIllKliC«tlon "" NA 12.8,113 ------1-------1----'----;1------ TOTALEXPEHOfTUR£S $N4 INA S70M00 -------t- FUU naU!:$'OSITlOHS m ~ 8.D4 .. M-----~---t----f----- rorALRE.VEM.IE ... "" $N.o\ $920,OQo) SNA --------~-------------~------~----- sa~le Functional Ar~a Financial Summary G3neral Fund Major Aotivity Dot ail The detail for each major activity follows the related functional area summary pages. 'i'he detail contains: Mission Statement Major Aotivity Pinanoial Breakdown -The financial oreakdo~~ is by Salaries and Benefits, Mon-Salaril'!B, and Allocated Charges, a breakdown not seen at the department or functional area level. Categories, Buch as Supplies and 1>1ateriala or Contract Services. will no longer be shown. Total full-time positions are also listed at the major activity levtll. $115,GM INA 1.10 ~ sa~ple Major Activity Financial Breakdown CMR:374:94 9 ',. L i \ 71·-· I ;1 Service Level'Ch~ges -This section qualitatively describes any significant service level changes and their implication for customers. Any changes to impact measures a8 a result of resource changes will a180 be addressed in this section. 5'R-roe LEVEL CHANGE$ Fu.Mi", b.tJ kM .d&Jhf dw C«II'1nic.aol the I««m!ln"ylttm fll)Ql~ HP.J«.\:) IOthc UNIX t~";'ro~nl uld .. -ilI ~ truu."I(.ed prq;~,1.Dd rfp<)l1.iltj: "!"U:.lrt>n:l0 all. compytt. UW(l.. DcfII'\.fl'WIlU .. ill hJ\'~ the ,'Wityto ~ a.oJ f>NJ..xc <wIe>mi~ rrroru dirp:1,.u.C firu..o.ci..,J aM MOD: & .. Iv. llIIQal.ctd ~ru pro«:fJ .. ill ..uo.' (o&;\itx-.I ~ co ('(donn ~~ ~itiliit W p<Jbb: krYkt cO'J!mr. S~;r.plo ServIce Level C'luI.nges Impact Measures ~ Impact measures are listed for each major activity. Impact measures nre ~he quantifiable results that strive to rr.easure aucceSEJ for an activity. Impact measures, along with proposed key plans, are the means by which Council and the City Manager will hold departments accountable. They are Borne of the product for which the requested budget resources are being allocated. A lot of time and energy is being spent to assure that the impact measures are ~ppropri6.te, meaningful, quantifiable, and support the mission of the activity. Aside from the proposed target (budget) for the impact measure, information is pl"ovided on t.he prior year's impact mea8Ul'e ~rformance, the preDent yearls target, and -a.n eBtimate of the antiCipated present y~ar-end resul ts, AdjuBtments to impact measUreD will be reported to Council during the,year on a periodic basis. , ..... IloIPACT MEASURES __ -,A",CTU'.¥./.UI __ ~1. [&t<t9O'lri(1&~citAA~r:;lot& M . ~0\7.zt<3I'y'V~ ~ l .. 'orlil!,&y~w ~ dth.e (itatioa. ! lu;h;.r"r.~~tnMru.edlloOmort H4 'Ihu! IQrrror1~t},eoo F'"li,,:, r~~iofu isruN. "~"--~~-.-------------~~------------------ Sample l~ct Mea8ureo CMR, 374,94 10 L '." " StAffing Info~tioQ 'fhe new kOB docuownt provides staffing information at the department, functional al."e~~ and major activity levels. Unlike past budgetlJ, which eho\..'ed only burJgeteo: staffing, the MOB budget will display historical staff time allocations (starting in 1996- 91). The City is moving to a much more detailed timek~eping system to allow this to OCcur. In ltddition to the greatei" level of detail described above, staff propose9 adding a position detail sheet for each department (Attachments 0) and functional area (Attachment E). These eheets "1111 pt'ovido oupplcmental information on the use of employee reaoul"Co0!S, including the number of positions by classification for caet. major activity. Por the firet year~ these budgeted numbers are. eatim{\tQ-8 and not based on historical data. --.----------.----~---- 14 ~ Fr".~S~op::;.1 5+ ... .»> :&M .... w.~~~ f. "" r".,t'X.l~ F\t-"v.],A-,1.')"1-;', a. Rt;:¢<"',. 111i Bfu)I&~iOrIl 5.1\1 P"")I~ a M.l1J:!.~ Sew'~ &0.711 8~!f.ofr~A1"Mt IUIc<atId M"TlW4t1J1\>.o.'I ~) ~,rJ\ll'l()& .ro ~r-~AlIIIu!J~L 1.00 F--'~So:;ro:,ry :t.()) ~r -'-~--~--~---~-.-----~-----.--------------------_._--------_. Whenevor possible. eMployees will charge timo directly to a major activity. However, there .are instances where w::>rk is purely of an admin.tstt"ative nature and cannot be deaignated to a major activity. This administrative time will M shown in two ways: 1) adminiutrativo effort at the departmant level. and 2) adroinistrative effort at the functional area level. Administrative effort at the departlr,ent level will be displayed in the depal'tment position detail sheet 'Attachment D) and administrative effort at the functional area level will be displayed along with the major activity poait.ion iniorlnatioll. as shown in Attachment E. 11 '. ' /.' , '.\ Hourly employee time will not be shown on position detail pagca, because" hourly employees are budgeted t'y dol13ro rather than by specific poaitions. Unlike regular c~loyee8, for which there is a Council-approved -Tp,ble of Organi'Zation,· there :is no such official pOsition contr()l ,roster: for hourly employees. Salary dollars for hourly employees, however ~ will be included in the salary figures for each major activ:lty. r----------.--~--------...,. IU...IOR ACTMTlts FTNinclall5f5ttm1 ~1us I." FIN.rIci3I $yIltrM """,,'1-1 .I. $(.F".-!~~t ',1D Su.btotlll fiE rorw,}orAetMty ACC:OilntIn; Sm-k ... 3.70 ControlA~Sp.K4~ .'" COr,{[~'II ~~Ss'«>I~I.le-M 1m Data E{My~Q( .. Finar'IciIrJ 1\nI.)"tt .1. ,....,...--. '''' Sl.f1A<~rlt .", Sttff $eo.et.try '28 $(. AooounIJIlt 11.., S ut>totaJ FTf lot MaJor Aeth~ FI~J RfS)«tI .05 ~.F~ '" Fnar.::iallv\a'I'-' 2' _.""""""" ., . --... .... -.00 St.A.c'C>~ 1.>< lubtobJ FTE 101 M4!}orAttivlt)' Func:tIoNIl AI"N Admlnbtndo.'l .41 _."""""'" .05 -."'-.... --", .", S'.F~IMf""l 6ample Functional Area Poslt{Qn Detail CMR:374:94 12 f/ i I TO display the differencee in presentation of the Utility Funds from the General Fund, a pz:ototype of the Gas Fund is provided as Attachment F. Highlighted below are the key differences between the General Fund and the Utility Funds budgets: Fund OVerview -For the Utility Funds, a Fund Overview is shown instead of a Department Overview. The Fund Overview includes info~~tion on the major plans for the fund for tho tiscal year. The Fund Overview includes infon~ation on rates and the status of the fund's reserves. fUND OVERVIEW K~y ut"a.s of CQn~otr,ulon tor the Gu Fund in )99$..95 include tb~ (oniinun.iC>Q of the a;:coelrr.aloed infr.,utnK1Wc prognm and ,h~ ut«.otion of a long term g:u traruponluon :agrctrucot with t~C Moj.liVc rolUlection :syn.em 10 the gu 'ymm. AnOtller olljor {<XVI will ~ 00 min.:.tniiing the con of wholnale gas purcblJu, which rC'frt-Hnt over 50% of the IOI,u O,PfrallQg budgtl. by (v.lhuung .he options tor 1.100& term £;..J t\lppl)'. Other PIOjt1. .. U wvol .. e grulci (us!omu O'JlCtacb. and tduC-.2" tional ar.tiviut1, mukrting ctJ«'u.;:h, pllllntd work ~tb Cit)' ' .. (ill ti('l, illeS cmpblli! oa trooQmk .u\'elopmull. A 6,~ pecctal rne increut U plopo",d. OM ntw ~ition iJ being a&kd and two inlp«1on hone btea C/)llycned (ro>m fong-Ierm temporal)' (0 peNlWl:eOI pru.itioru u pU1 {:II the Gu CAptul Pro­ gram. G~ Putdw~s an proj«ud to wcuau by $,2 miUiOIl. due 10 ~ pmje«t\i in(:(eas: La the wholCjale «»t oi &as. "flat propo-sN budg« will rtNlt in II. .,dtbdr.lwlll {rom the Rzle SubiliutiOD RutNt of $1.2 million. The projt1.."ttd (]oling bilance La the R.ue ~abUiutio!l RUCNC (or I 99 .. 9,S iI SS.6 milliOll, lI.,pplOI..i .. mlltely midwAY Oetw«n tbt muimv.m guidrtlne of $).8 million J.Jld the minimum bal lllce of $7 .. 6 ~Oll. Salcrple Fwld Overview Fund Financial S'\lJ:ZDUry -The Fund Financial Summary shows revenues I expenditures and net reserve funding. Revenues arc presented consistent with the revenue fonnat in the current budget: net eales, interest income and other revenueo. Bxpenses are shown by functional area, with additional informa,tion called out within the functional .areas that contain capital projects and commodity purchases. In add"ition l the equity transfel:, rent and debt service expenses are shown as specific line items. In the MOB hudget document. these items are not included in a specific functional areal but are budgeted at the fund level. 13 ,--.," \. C', ', .... i I 1 'j i I , ..... AJN'O£ InIIiIIIARV ACT'UAl.8 -_._---_._, NIISdn 1.0 ............ ...... ,.,""" "" .... .... , ...... AtUJ8lB) IIUlG<tT II« .... ... ------l----- TOTALn..NO~'iES "" ------j-----_._- I'.n»ru 1tI.JA!lfCDIflI Pl1'C1laJtt ""'" ~~f. SJ'ltrllUlm~I.(ctP) ~oa(rDuip" C$oIatttiotlSn-.f«:l (ClP) ""'" SJppol1 Scn'kulod 1U1ct 1)el(St.1i.::(' ElporillH "'" tqllkyTIUICtt --... --.. --.---------1- 10nlQ.\1 RJ-:.sDt\'ES -- TOT At ",U. n\IE f'O)frtO"B .... .... .... '" '" .... ..... .... .... INA ____ ._. _________ ._...l-._ Sample ~und Financial Summary .... .... ... .. .... ... .... ... .... - S&< --~----.. "" -----.-- '" - r----t_" -- P!!OFOSEI> BW<lE1" ,,~-...."" 11,... '~US3.sso -.----- 11,mACO 1,20'T,Itl 3,.400,111 142,431 ~ .... "" 642,41" • ' ... .,. ,...,,"" .. - '2(1,713,548 -.. $1,200,1" -'--- ... " Fund Reserves Summary ~ In addition to the financial summary, an overview of reserves is included for each fund. The Funds Resel"ve Summary includes the projected ending bal~ilce for the current fiscal year r changes to the reserve based on the proposed budget, and the projected ending balance for the uext fiscal year. The reserve minim)Jm and maximum guidelines are also shown. ~J'I;W R.tpb.u_t RAItSUbOtudoe Ruun GNS'Jppk_WSQWy AB7t2:~1 SAmple Reser'fol!s Surm.ary CMR1374:94 "~.' '. .' L·'· '" "., fROJOCIII) ~ .""1"" .... ',m •• on ." 510,609 14 "'...,.", """"""" ......Eo .. CUNGES jNJffi ctnlN: """"'"" """"'" ~-SJ.O 5SH "" (I,ll(I) 5,545 S3.'Nil·' ... <8J & l,on , ,.. 5(1,lOO) 19,409 -" , ,. / 'i r " " ~1 , ! 1 '-'." :'J~,'-,t,l,·,I~fr": . ;",.">;'-- \"-; ;-'~.,~'--.; -,,;, ' ':"\'-:-, ",,~',,:·:,-,,~,,~,,'6";?"-~;-~";;~'/~"\-"""""'" _' ~. '"'_'''''';''' Utility P\mdo Capital Improvm:tlent Projectl!l 'the Capital !mprov~ment Program (eIP) will be fully integ<ated into the Uti lity Funds I budgets. Unlike the ('--enel-al FUnd, capital projects are an integral· part of carrying out each Utility l<'Und'D miosion Qf sen'ice, Displaying capital projects ih the appropriate fWl.dB r functional at'cas allo\lm the reader to accesS both the operational and capital costs which drive the proposed utility rate, Within ench fun~t: ional area aection for the Utility Funds, the CIP budget 1s called out os a separate line item, both within the major activities where they are budgeted and in the functional area summary pages. A section at the end of the fund iti.cludes the project descriptions and a financial surrunary of tho-capital projects fOt' the fund. This is described in de:tai 1 later in this report iii the !:Capital Improvement Program--section. Cl'oAf)-dep-~}:tmental progl-arnB are activities that are spread among a mm,oor of departrr.entS"1 which are of Bpecial interest to the Council and the public. Attachment G illustrates the MOB P_l"ototjr-pe for the Pa'l'k:ing cro99-departtrlCntal program. Parking activities are conducted by· the Police~ Finance. Public Works. and Planning Dep.utment8 ~ Although the budgeted d6l1ar amount for these aqtivitioo is located in the departments, these activities have blJen 9L"Ouped for Coo;t-dination ar,d presentation purposes in the budget. The Cro&I3-Depa:::tnlental Program Bummory pages in the document contain the following sectione: Cro.e-DepArtmental ProgrlUU_ OV8J:'Viaw -The CroBs-Departmental Ovarview'is similar to the overview in the department summary pages. It is a non~technical description of the major focus for the program for the coming fiscal year, including any major projects. 1n addition. any requests for additional reso\u.'cea will be discussed. CMR:374: 9t 15 ' ... " , ' \ , , J , J , 1 CR\)S$.oEPARTMfHT"~ PROORMI OVERVIEW StaK will C(lotil'l~ 10 "''Of'' wi~'b lht Chw'!xt of Comlt)(t(c 00'1l10""n P.arkin: Sub(.>I'l.laliUN' OD 1 COmFl't!:U~ruL"C pt", II) adJItU rulLoc LA the &)\'"l:IW"O kHa. 1r.c1~J In the rbo .n: imp!.tIlKDtl­ tiOD of I ~!«ptt pul:.int orJ.i.~tr;(c t.od I'rl'tN C'duc.rUon procu.m, iropro'fcJ dirt-.-wcd 'i&;a*!ti im.pkQl(llot.~ of IUtfl.d .. UH "Ilrkint it:! ~ $eW!;!t Cuner lOt, CjlJ;lJ)(cd ulc1}' I...n<J U,blill, i.n.lhe Wdmu/Co'U}'tr Jlld L« Q «~u. ~ PWtWl of U!C 'cuit.i.1itr oIlO tJJjtiooll pultnl ~1ru«UIe. SuH is abo .-orkin, ,,'iLl, Ih-e Otunb<ICt"" p~ to ldjul't l\r pu.lllC pwni( (t'U to (fuMe 'l1: Oty 10 rt(Qyu'tl!t Co)JU »f ~4jP'~ri.nt ~4 crnillt~' pulli, to l~ lIni\'wil1 Avenue Puwl DiI1oo. Contributing Dopartmentc! . Contributing Oepartrr,enta: outlines the role that participating depa:rtr:-:ents play in the cr09S­ departmental pn.>gram. It also ~ndico)te8 the l()catiQn of the Cl.'osa.-depa:rtmentlll program funding ill the j ndi vidual depiu-t­ menta; for instance, the Planning Depal·tv.-~nt·o coots for the Parking C.roBD-Departrr;.ental Pn .. 'gl"am {l,ttachl!".ent G) are all includecl in their majol"" acti .... ity IOP~"lrking Banagement. 101 COlIrilJDUllWG OEPARTliEIfIS Police Dtpa.rtfn.c11t In. th;: ".,.",~ un .. "i'tAitol Sf(-N"H.~ tl.t Fcl>:1" f.\rp~t;.I'l rr-.i.ui,:..a U H'mL'''~f.I.rJ''J\( tM tt.c-l..., .... lUclt plrkNio, rftvlK~:>N 1M im>n ill 1,.01 ,ffo" 10 ( ... ~t ~b.! t.i..-,-41 m .H"",,"'.\ c4 ~.\o.....ch ... .,J 1'Nr><k ~ f"'J~« u!.-.y .i.hltIt~ Cilyof PI.\) .\ko. J,Cif.:.t ..... U" ... ;~ v,d",k ("ULil"oj ......r..-n:rt'f~.O' . .IIU(I' ~ i.".J:lo.:~ ~~"\'"dOOI ~~.riUl;""'" ~!~~ l..J J'.If\q ..... "'. ~~;" 'n.t11(~ Publk WO-rU Dcputme-nt IlItht~~'ff ... "PULbc.v..cJ,tt~Q..I,U.f"u"P;,!.t.c",,·Yflo~'f-,~-""'o-~dl.,,~(mJ,. rlUi.otn1aDQr,.,~c.oNp.W.a.bJ mW.. .. rl'r~ ... «(>t.o.:,t'l.t .... '~.~ ""~I u..J It« ~fW\(. iIII a.!lpu~p~1w. pliruUng D.putmmt Il'IlhtftU,.~r"""""')'·Pll~M~.M,· wfh .. ~~","""-·.-..i~dl()dr,rkso""'lf1l.lr-"f~UIdcH .. IItnd P""blic: F1~1 i...'l.1 m.u.Wttl.. kluxtt~ ~ oIt-~ ~_n, w U-...: itllo'".nI f"oIN..;. Finl.tlct Dtputmc at with.izI dot nu).:-l" ~',"iI,., ·&&1 .,.~ ("~"*-.. ' W F.. ... ~r ~rUV'""","M' a-~l'I Q 1<:> f'f("lo;(fJI rl1~J c.il:l"t;';'" p..!.1u'ou.n. u.J tkpoI;"l"I'><'e-t]' in. pl~ a«\U11,t a.."'">! WI fl",l/,r...t-.'; 10 , ... " .... .J.. '"r dt1~""l>( UlHio-tl.oe.&.:t.i-)Q lo toCtord&nc-e";oU:. kJl! rtq">lirt."tl.I.-.u.; uJ IO()lt(kol .lof ~IIUlI ~r~ puh~, isr.mx-t. Sa~le ContributJng ~partment3 Listing Key Ple.no 16 / I i Pinancial SUlIUUary -The Financial Summary lists tho total expenditures, bOt.h budget and actual, for the crOBB~ departmental program, by pal"tidlpating departments. It aloo presents the total revenue and total full-time employees by participating department. Other Budget Summ.w:ie1Jtnd Information u. U. '16 ... 14.4 . It is anticipated that much of the non-departmental in(onnation contained in the budget document, including financ;ial fHlmmarieB~ will be reformatt.ed. Attachment H lists all of the non­ departmental items in the 1994-95 budget. Described bolow are substantive changes that staff plano to make for the propo9cd 1995- 96 MDB budget. Budget Process, Guidelines, and T~olin~ -A new section will be added which outlines the budget process. describes the guidelines Council approved to build the budget, and scts forth the tim~line for the development of the budget. Using the Budget Doo~ent -This new section will describe the structure of the document and give an overview of MDB. It will also give a simple explanation regal"ding the structure and use of funds, General Fund OV6rview -In the 1994 -95 budget, a revenUe ov:erview t ... ae added for the first time. An expenditure overview will be incorporated into the MDB budget document, giving a consolidated fund ov~rvlew. Cl·\R,374 ,94 17 ; I. i i , . . :-.\ , ,<"\, ":'.', \ . \ . , . \.: '\ ... \ . ". , I ! , ! Utility Funds Overview -This section would be similar to the General Fund OVerview but would diacuss all of the Utility FUnds and include a broad discussion on rate and reserve impacts. PERIODIC PERFORMANCE REPORTING Staff plans to report back to the Council on progress made by the departmentB, both in achieving their key plans, and on any changes required in impact measures (Attachment I). Impact measu~e reporting will be exception·based. Impact measures will b~ reported and explained if changes in resources are required, if departments do not feel the impact measures are attainable, or if departments believe impact measures will be significantly exceeded. After some stability is achieved with the impact measures (prob~bly within two years after MDB is implemented), it is presumed that the only time departments will need to adjust 01' create ne\'" impact meaSUl."es will he if financiC\l reeourceo have changed~ if there ha~ been a significant change in priorities, or if a new program is created. Howeve:t', it can be expected that, for the first two years of MDB, significant "shuffling" of impact meaSl1res will occur, as departments assess the reality of their original estimates and projections, Aitet' MOB is successfully implementcd l the Finance Department plans to initiate a monitoring program for impact measures. This will include random " revie-,q9 " to verify that the impact measure reporting is accurate and reliable. While staff has been developing romB, the Hughes Heiss organization review has been underway. This review has dra,m attention to the use of benchmarking to evaluate Palo Alto in comparison to other cities with regards to staffin'g levels and efficiency at delivering services. Ideally, benchmarking would be incorpora'ted into MDB performance measures. 'To allow for meaningful comparisons with other citieB I however I comparable cities' data needs to be gathered. That data needs to be manipulat.ed and adjusted for City­ specific variations. For example, it is fairly atypical for a city to provide ,a large jOint service contract with a 9urrounding jurisdiction. as Palo Alto does for Stanford, To gather data on hundreds of impact meaSU1'es and to do the necessary analysis to make data comparable i8 not within the time constraints of staff's workplan fo:t' the near future. After MDB is fully implemented and successfully operational, staff will reassess ita ability to undertake benchmarking. CMR:3?4:94 18 \ .. ', " ',". ~,",", . ~~mL ,. \ . \ .. " 1 I ! I .(j CAPITAl. IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Staff's recorr~endation for integrating the CIP with the operating budget is based upon the MOB budget structure developed by departments, the scope of capital projects, and whether the mission advanced by the capital project is integrally related to the rnislJion of the reDponsible department. ~'lndin9 decisions about Utility Funds re~ult in rates charged to the ratepayers. Decisions on rate levels are made within the c<Jntext of what that rate is "buying, II including the level of operations and mainten~nce. the cost of purchasing utility commodities l and the cost of constructing and/or rehabilitating capital infA:astructure. Separating the capital budget for the UtIlity Funds is an artificial division. To spend leBs on updating' utility c.apital infrastructur<!: may result in the need to do more maintenance work. In either case, the cost will be borne in the rates charged to customel"S. Utility capital projects are therefore an indiviaible part of the "mission ll under MD8. For the Gas Fund to provide "cost effective gas service" to customers requires both oper~t.i.ng and capital budget elelnents. Staff recoIT~ends that Utility Fund capital projects be made a part of an overall Utility Fund MOB operating and capital budget presentation. By including the .capital and opcrar . .i.ng budget in the Utility funds' ,·,DB document, both the community and Council will have a complete and single picture of the proposed services obtained for the proposed rates charged. UnlIke Utility Fund projects~ General Fund projects may be initiated and implemented by one department or functional, area, but serve the mission of another department or functional area. In addition, it is possible that a General Fund project may serve. multiple missions I thus making it difficult to assign projects and expenditures to particular functional areas. For example l the capital project, "'Senior Center Seismic Retrofit II ~ is a project that will be managed by th~ Public Works Department, in cooperation with the Real Estate Division in the Finanr.:e Department" The programs and services offered at the Senior. Center facility ,illte).~face with at least two more departments~ the Community Servicea Department administ(:rs a City allocation for administration support; and the Planning Department administers a grant for subsidized home repair sezvices. As illustrated, General Fund capital projects do not fit as cleanly within MOB as do utility projects. Staff th(,:refore recommends that General Fund capital projects continue to be shown separately from individual department operating budgets. However, CIP pl"ojectG which are key prlrtB of the department· G mission will be highlighted in the 19 // j' :! i ! 'i ;1 Oene.ral Fund MDB Department. Ov.erview. Tho project, "Parks Facilities ImprovementGt~ for e~ample, would be li8t~d under the Functional Areat Park services. General .fo"und CIP project d€scriptiona and a financial 9u~~ary (similar to the current elP document) will be attached to the Gen,so('al Fund NOB document. As in the past, the publ ic and the Council can l-eference this document for the pUXp¢S6 and cost of ,a specific project. CONCLUSION Thel:'e 1~ much to be acc;>'''r,plished in order for etaff to Duccessfully implement MD9 for the 1995-96 fiscal year, The projects to be completed include implementation of a new payroll and timekeeping nyBte1:t, fj.nalization and ~t-cmBition to new depal"tment rIDB stt'llctu-rea. in-co:rporat iOtl 1)£ the organizational changeB resulting frolrl the Hughes Heiss review. redefillition of the pr<xess for all cost allocation8~ ilr.pletr:entation of <1. new financial account code structure, and the tr~nD,\t ion of all bUdget data to this new MDB account 9tructu,re, COI~pletion of e.l.ch of theBe projects is nace~8a~.-y for HDa implementation to pt'ocecd on schedule. The CIty Managel' liB1 he bringing fOl.-wal.'d in September 1994 final recoTtlP'_e71dat ions on chcmgea l'esul ting from the Ol"ganizational Review" It is expect.ed that Bome of these changes rT'.-<:'Y take longel:.­ to implement than one fiscal yea:t:. ThiB is due to anticipated reorgani2atio~ and staffing changes, aome of which could involve meet and confer iSSUOD, Due to the Hughee. Heiss review, the lack of nny historical data for tho creation of MDB budgetD, and the th"at·time .!mplementat.i.on of pel'-!Ol,1'11anCe measureR, the 1995-96 MDB budget will be a one~year do~ument. RECO~~ATIONS It ie critical .at this juncture that the Council provide staff with feedback on the key assumptions and recommendations highlighted in this report, o.1nce production of the MDB budget is alread}" well unqtn" way. Bspeci,ally ck.-itical are the iollowing: 1, Capital 1.mprovet4ant Prograa -lIDB integrates the Utility Funds capital improvement program with the operating budget presentation, so that. the components of the rate6 charged by the utiliti(HI are presented in a coherent~ easily urtd~rBtandable manner. In tho General Fund, however, capital projects mayor {MY not be an integt.'al part of any individual ·depal."tmenc's mission" Consequently. reporting for the General CMR,374 ,94 20 L -f.' \ oi!I ,>,~,,, :",',';.,.,,; '," ·'ii'f1 ··:;~~::(t{:~~ ~:'--;.'-' :~:.--L: .... LA· ..... ~ ... .f-~·., .~:.,. ~,·,·I·. ~ " , ~~I ~.I ~I ·,1 I r! I i ! .J 2. Fund capital improvement program wj 11 be aimila): to the: current format, with projects that are a key part of a department's mission called out in tho Department Overview. Presentation of B.x:pendit~ro Dotail MOB providea a significantly greater amount of expenditure a.nd l-evenue detail at the service level. The trado~o'ff for this is to' provide this information at it 80mewhat h.tgher level than the current major object category level (i .e., Contract Sot'vic('!sJ. Po):' General Fund departments. expenditures in MOB \:lill be ahotolJl ao salaries an~ benefits, non-8al~r.ieB, and allocated costs. The Utility FUnd. will prov!qe additional information on co<~ity purchases r capital improvement projects, !!quity transfera. rent. and debt service. 3. Full·t~ Bqyiv~lGnt Poeitioos -Total regular po9ition~ will show at each le\tel of service acti .... ity: major acti.vityz functional area, and departr:tent. In addition~ budgeteq positions will be shown for each mujo::r activity b)' job "title. 4. 5. Priority oetting· MOB is intended to be used bj' the Council to set pr.iorities for se:rvice provision. While the reoour.ces devoted to services are sho~' in detail, this information wIll not enable the Council, "at tile table," to iI<ld or delete staff poBitions or dollars and directly adjuot service levels. If the Council wishes to adjust service levels· upward or downward, or to add new set'vicos or delete aorvic99. Btaff will be able to respond with the l'eSourco aojustl1Hmta quickly, and be able to report on the conaeQ\lp.nces to in:pact rr.easure targets, so that Council ,can set prioritica for services. Periodic Performanoe Reporting '~ Tho· fO<.:UB of-MOB io qual ity and quantity of service provision rathe~ than line-item expenditure detail. MOB ia a -living document~, and Council will receive periodic reports on accomplishment of k~y plana and attainll"lent of impact measures. These reports will be exception-based. It can be expected that, for the first two yearn of MOB, significant "shuffling'll of irrlPact measures will occur, as department.s aD8eSB th~ reality of their original estimates. 6. Incorporation of Organizational Review Rocommend.tiona -The City Manager will be bringing forward final recommendationo on CMR:374:94 21 I L .. " .. -,"-,' oxganizational changes in September 1994. It is expected that some of these changes may take longer to implement than one fiscal year. 7. Ona-year 1995-96 Budget ~ Due to the Organizational Review, the lack of any historical data for the creation of MOB budgets, and the fil'st-time-implementation of performance measures, the 1995-96 MDB budget will be a one-year document, Respectfully submitted, MICHAEL FRANK . se;;!:!r Financial Falyst --CO Ii _cc~J ILY~~ .o.~ ... ~~.~=;U ATTACHMENTS: A. 'MOB BU,dget Process B. J!hlance Depart-ment Prototype C. Folice Department Prototype D. Employee Department Position Detail B. Employee Major Activity position Detail F. Gas Fund Prototype G. Parking cross-Departmental P.l·ogra.m prototype H. Other Budget Summaries List I. Performance Reporting Prototype Related Staff Reports: CMR:374:94 CMR:463:93 CMR:626:93 22 I I I -... :,' '.: /'i;;::~-: : ;', -" Attachment A l\1DB Budget Process .' " j City Manager Proposed Geoenll Fnnd& Non-Utility Funds' Badget (opel1lttng and capital) C.pitat Improvement Prognun To Planning Comrnission M.no" 1995 [ 'FinAn« Committee Hearings Ma)' 1995 ety Manager Proposed' Ulillty Funds' Budget (operating wld capital) Utility FWlds' Budg't To the Utilities Adviwzy OJrnmissioa (\lAC) April 1995 --1---' -F-inance---Commi~tec Propo,oo:! Budget To Full CQWlcil lWlel995 Adopted General & Non-Utility Funtl~' Budget (operating and ca~irRI) '.""'.',_. " ·L· ... , ,.; . . ,'., ',: i Adopted Utility Funds' Budget (operating And capital) " --': .. ..:...; ... ~--: Attachment B Finance Department Prototype All prototype e.,ample< 811d oUachm,nls 8'" for lliuSiralh'C pnrpnses olllt. Flnanclallnform.llon alld obJetl"·..,. .... nol .ctual 1995-96 budget data. ',., i I I 1 1 I ·1 i , , ! I j \-, > • $ '.-.Finance Depai'tment .', . , . . J' ---. To responsibly manage the City's financi4i fNourcn,' to rf'p<m time/y. a({'Ur.tltfi,.um~t! ilJ/(Jrmdlil),,;.'md to provide tjliaUty service to the public, deroicm·maNen (mil O-ry dep.HTmffll~ DEPARTMENT OVERVIEW The Fmance Dep.utment's focus in thr 1995--96 budget ye-.u will be on impl~nle{ltatjon of Mi»ion Driven Budgetillg (MOB). MOB will req\Jire the devefopment of an rfnirelr new (hut of ilOC¢Uf\U and reporting structure, new cost allocation melhodo!ogy, neW hoor reporting wd position oontrol systems, integration of cross dC"partmem program anel Cd'pil~1 projt<.'1 reponing inlo the o~r.lting budget, developm~nt of imp:aa. measure reporting, revision of the Murucip~J Code, and depanmenu] training on the new fim.nci-aJ struct\.lres. T emplate_5 for a ne'Vro' budget dOCUmCIll (ormat must .also be created. The B\Jdget Diyision will be wtJolly dcdic;urd ~o 'he project, ~upported by the AC(ounting: and Administration Divlsion management5taff. Key nn-anc{ai sy.stems will aho be completed in 1995-96. inchlding store5 invtntor)'. revenue (011(:­ dons automation, and the interf<iCl! of the new payroll S)'5tem 10 the aCoCOunting .s)'.stt"m_ The convtr­ sion of the: accounting system from ctJr. HP3COO to the UNIX enviroI1ment will aho bt undertaken. Other Finance Department projects in 1~9.s-96 include: lead responsibility (or thr Storm Dra.inage Fund debt financing,imp!ementation of anendaut puklngin Ihe Senior Ulltu lot wd <:ontin\Jed coordination wilh the Ch-..moor of Commerce on options for downtown puking permit (e"'e$j ftvie-w and proposal of revisionsto Ihe property trafl.s(ertax ordinancej and usis!ance with coordimling the City Manager's response to the Hughe.s Heiss Organiutioflal Review, FUNCTIONAlAR£I\S Flnancloil.' Support Stl'YlCH A.lel Mltllgemenl ffnantlal Plijnnlns , Analysis and Ra,ports Billing & CollocUono P~nU n9 & Malll n9 So .. I, .. -------- TOTAlDEPARTMENTEXPENOITURES -------.-----.. -- $4,33$,118 TOTAL FUll TIME POSITIONS I2.7S I~. A[}JUSTEO 8UOGET $4,a12,400 62.76 1-PROPOSE{) EIOOGET ---------_ .... _--1-. __ .. __ ._._.----_ ...... -.---- TOTAL DEPARTMENT REVENUE 11.&60,502 $1,930,6$1 $1,930,681 RESOURCE LEVEL CHANGES During tbefint yeuofMDD, thisse('tioll will remain bllllk with. tht txcqxion of any n.ewfunding or resoorc(:S t~l~ uc rtqllerted. Followiog Ihe fint y~.lf tbis SC\.'1ion wt11 des.:rib.e signif1('.).nt budt.et ck4ngC) i fj POlll ions or funding_ Also, if It$()lHce$ were beingsbifted within tht dtpanmrot, an expl:uution would bt pro\'idtd. 'O--C-_'. 0 I I I .. ',. .-'", ," :. . -'.' . : -'-. . . . -. " ." Fip.ai1ce Department, .COlltiilued·· . .. ,.', . ~ . ". '. ... . FUNCTIONAL AREAS AND MAJOR ACTIVITIES Financial Support Servicu FinanWi S)'$tcms Scroict$ • Acooundng Scrvi<:e$ I FlniLOcW R.eporu A_Management Debt 1ssw.n~ • lnvestmt'nLS &. Baokiag I Fixed Asscu Acoounti ng • RC1.l Pro~l1y M.tnlgtment • Purch lStfl3 to: Contract Administration' Storts & Wucbo\L'llng Financial Planning-tAnaly.sis and Reports Long.Range Financial Planning and Foroo.ming. Coruulting and S~ia.l Studi¢$" RtvU1U.r a!1I1 E."(~llditurc An~~i$. M(mi ttiring, &. Fo rccuting I Optr<il tng and Ctpit~ Budget Dewlopm~nt I Budgec PerlormUict RcpoJU Billing IX Collections Puking Support. Ulility Bllling I ('~lle,.n BlUing &: Collections Printing & Mailing Services Printing ScrvlCes I Mtiling $erviu; i ! i 1 ., ___ ' -•• -0' _ ". ':'FN~:;'·"~'-' . ~ , . .'-:-~':, . F_S"wo<ISefvi<m I\$$ol M.~nt ,. Finance Department Summllry of Regular Positions by Functional Area 14.e4 2O.6i B.o4ll 11.79 6.20 Fino"""" Planning. Analfsl •. & R8po!\$ 8iIiI~ & CoIIect«,. .Prlnting i!. MoHing S,M0c3 Subfolal for FuncUonll Areas A~at&d AdmIn ~tr;tkm .30 [}:(ooor, Finaoce .10 Sefll¢f Flnaocia1NW/81 1.00 E>:ec<.rtive &<te\aly 2.01) Su1Jto~ I 62.1~ TOTAL OEPARTMEI/T POSmONS .\ ',i \., . " DU··\RT\II':\:T: Fill.llKe lkl'a"!ll1cnl' , '. 'Fl':\:C H():\:AL ARt:A: Fill.1Iki.ll SlIl'p" .. 1 Scn'ices " . . . . ~ . . To /mxt$...' and rtrorr! ihe findtl&1. trlfnJd<1iom of the Q't)' in ct ljmtiy dnd 4ccurate matlner and 10 <ktlfltJjJ Phd mainl4ln fir~uJ(i41 ~'H('ms ;', Qrdtr,o prClvidt pertinmt information to all usm. 1995·98 KEY PLANS o To <k\tclop tOO lrun dcfutmc .... ll in .. .Q.('1f du.1l of :KroUtHllO Ik-..:om!i».hle lbt Mi.$1iol1 Drinn 8w1g«. it", (MDa) (!)tmll t:.od npol\iDt RqULW:ne.1t ... IMJOR ACnvm~S flll.n,ctll Sytltmj S.,rvk" Ac:t-wnt.ing StNkH fll1.ilOcl., Report. TOTALEXPfNl>t"lURfS fULl 11M!; pas ITIONS TOTAl fUVlONVE BUDGET CHAllGf $I\.&. NA NA NA ;:." ,.,' 1.00 .10 1.10 3.70 2.85 1.00 .2~ .10 1.00 .06 2.28 11.23 .05 .05 .25 .15 .06 .60 1.3$ .41 .05 .45 .05 .116 Financial Support Services Functional Area Regular Positions by Major Activity M1\JOF!Acnvm~s . FinaneLl1 SYltellUil SelVf.cH FJnanoiat Systems Moly.t Sr. FJnanoiat M.~st S ublotal FTE lor Ma)or Acllvlty Acco lmUng Serv~ C«1lt01 Ao:oonl Spe<iali$1 C«1lrot A«ounl Speciais~ lead Dala folly Operator Finanelal Analyst M.oagor, Aw.xinting Staff Acoouot..lnl Slaff 8ecfelal)' Sr. Accountant Subtofal FTE for MIJor Ac.Uvtty Flmmcl,al Reporta Director. Fina nee Financial Analysl Managec. Accounling Staff Aocountanl Sioff Seo<elal)' Sr. Acoountant Su blot.lt FTE lor Major AcU,]ty FuncUo nal Area Admin" tntion Menage', Accounting Manager, Bu<!gel SIa" SecretaI)' Sr. Finanolal Maly" SubtoLl! ._--------.------------_._-----------._----_._--- 14.64 TOTAL F UllCnONAL AREA posmol/s , I 1 7b 11'14 n.tgt.mJ IMPfOr' Ihf FJfh(HCt DtpttrtmnJJ'S infomutlcn lY$rh1l/, i1Id"ajng f)'1Ufn nujn ~ ~md J«oelcpm('tlJ. mk'rtxllmpu/n'lIliliZAtion, rwmh md~gt1IJtnJtJ1ld f«lmiuJ tr .. jll;/1g. SllIrfn and 8enefita: Non.sllal'l8tl AII_I.d ChI'll" 1_ AClVALS -------t------------------t--- T01A!. EXPfNOITUR£S ~Ull TIME POSmONS SERVICE lEVEL CHANGES SNA. "" Punding h.u b«n added fO/the oo.nvmioll of tbe &.I:COunting,symm from the HPJCOO (0 the UNIX ~c\Vironm<l'It 1.!ld will provide enh.tnc.td programming and reporting Clpahiliti.es 10 all compufu \J$tC'S. Dtp.utmuHS will hue t~~ al:>ililY to ckstgc. a;td produce cwtomiud report! displaying fina ndal md .MDB d.t~ An l.\lIOm~loNI (O)I/foctioru procm will aHo~' coUeQions: staif to pc'rfOlOl multiple capabifi Iln at tl'e public Stcvke COUD te r. 11'>4-..<15 ..AQ,J. B~J!._. NA NIl 1994-$5 __ ~SLBUD. "" NIl · ; :l':_~-. i .. I I .1 " ! i j J i To pro<tJJfmatriJ ~t.tC i'l4 limti, "nd "C14U.U m4ntUT~", prr>tJidtjilfAncW injOtmffWn 4nd "tlA/yliJ/01' NSI in dmsion·ffJ4king., IIIlI kwlso/Cit;; m..:Jn.cgm-omr, ~nJ tos"f'POYJ I4Hr ftC'M.1O fin4n<.iaJ dal4. and Non-S.lIrJea Allooa~ ChI rg .. TOT.u. EXPfHMURES FULL nMe POSInONS SERVICE LEVeL CHANGES $NA NA S8U,758 11.23 During 1M rltSt )'~U ofMDB,thls$¢ctlon will remain bl~k witb theextqltion of any nt"flfu nding that is requmed. PoUowing the Hm yeu, this S«1ion will q,u:tIiutivdY cYscribe! igllific.tnt rt$Ource changes;o terms of tho: service implkttloD: f~r ruottomtiS. Any danges to impao;1: measures as a [~ult of rerource ch~gts will ~$O b<-addressed heft. IMPACT MEASURES f i--Topro;:;;:;ceaJiCfdlSinbu-te'IOO% of flea] mOlllhly fio~l1c1al reports foruch fund Iype by the 151b ooe odu day 01 the following month. 2 To pay 90% of imoices within 30 dJ.Y$ of 10 .... 01<:.: j dHe. I J. To u:hie-.'e an ave~C mL;r;lction ra:ing of 4 l (hlgbtrt ming btlng S) on various accounting _ I_~irlg d,l.5.~..!l!: _________ . ____ mm_. -',. NA '! 19u.96 PROP,j!i,[I1. 100 90 4 " ,' .. · .; ') To (/~ c.uh jisiAJ~r pU/ ,~rr;ptkf~ rtrords i" rompli4n~f.&'ith Gtnn-tdly A((tpUJ A «OIffl,jNg PriNNp/n(GMPJ; to fu.;ililAutbt.nnSMIfin41KW ~w/I'l<l~ T«OrJ.I; k! pnp.sre theComp77hmsftlt ANTT~ FlrWldaJ Rtport.artd o:lxratnn.c/ fi1J41UW tlfJdstJlrinilM rrpom on IIlrNuly#USu. 1993-84 1_ ACruALS ADJ. BUDDEr s ... rIfi tn<i" Ben.rn;-­ P!on-S'larIH AI_Chug .. -$NA-...... -.--~- TOTALEXP~R£9 FULL llM~ POSmON9 SERVICE LEVEL CHANGES NIl NIl 110\ HA r·· 1_- PROP.BUO. 5106,103 9,Q97 11,610 $121',310 US BUDDEr C1lANGE ._-.tijA- NIl NA ---- $NIl NA Pwin; tbe riM )'ru-of MOB, thi! ~io!l will It'1TU.in blUl 'k with t be t');":~lio!l of 1.Ily nO' funding t hn is requestt'd. Folh)~;n, ~k tim )'r-u, ,bit J«tto!1 "ill qua.litati\'tl>· ckKri~ signifi(,.lm re$OlJr..:e changes in terms of che .service Unprirn~D!()f <'U$lomW. My dnnges to impm mUi\.Im as;l r~utt 01 resource chang.es will aL~ be :addressed here, 1993-94 IMPACT MEASURES ..... ......... .. ACl\IALS 1: Yo ObUJ:;;-U;~~d}t-Q~'inion'rQ'r tI;rCil)'·i·l.rul~r--N,\ -~. fi!U!'l(w stuerntiHS ""jib 00 ~~ti~,t qualifiC.,IlipM. 2. To h,.;-t CA}X re-wy (or plJbliCllion by No-H'mb« 1$. , ' 199$-96 l'f:!OP~!lUO. Yes y., 100 Attachment C Police Department Prototype AU prototype e •• mples and a!lachm,nls .... for IIlUl1niU,. purposes only. financial lnronll.Uon and obje<II,", are nol acluol J995-% budget data. , \ I I • .,. " ' c . P?1ice Department . .. :." : . '. '. DEPARTMENT OVERVIEW The Police Department's focus in tbe next budg.et year will Ix Ihe continued ('mpll;)'s.~s on Probi('"m Solving PolLcing. Problem Solving Policing r('.$ol ... e~ iuues through cre,nive, nan·'lndill0I1.11 rnNOS involving officers, residents, commuruty groups, and bU5lnes.1 owners, OVtr [he nexl ),(";1,,-. the department will continue to focus on reducing yomh c-dm.e problems; iSStlNo unique to (ne busines.s districts, Barron Park. Addison, and Ventura neighborhoods; and also Jmptenv.nl .-he <Ampuler Aided Problem Solving (CAPS) program on a ci,yv.'ide b1S;', Techllology continues to play an jmpolta'~t role in provi&lng quick, uS.lbll:: infolmation (0 polic( offir.ers, To this end, 3 mobile computing ~d a Computer Aided O;~p~tclr (CAD) s}'stem wal be purchased, inslaHed, and tested in Ihis fiSC;l1 year. ACltng a~ a prototype department J the Police v.'iII pta)' a s.ignificanl rolt in :he developmmt of Mi5+ sian Driven Budgeting (MDB) with Ihe Finance Depanmcm. Additiomlly,lhe Poltc~ Department will examine the orgoUli7..ational struct\Jre and consider changes. u it telale.1 to MD.B and results from the Hughes) Heiss Organizalional Review. FUNCTIONAl. AREAS Fund'manta' Response to Clrla fOl Servre. Critical rneldent Resolution InvesUgatJons and OIs~ltlon8 Communfty Pollc rn 9. EducallonlCr1'mit Supp!Htlon TAffle Servlcn parf(lng SGl"Ylcn A nrmal Sa rIIlc" Sp&elal SlIents Conttlcled Ritglo rI a 1 SI!! rvlCK InfonnaUon Man ag amant PaTlonn,' Sele<:tlon B'nd OSIl,lopmenl TOTAL DEPARTMENT EXPEN DITURES ---_ ..... __ ._--.-- TOTALr-ULL TIME POSITIONS --_._-----_._-- TOTAL DEPARTMEm' REVENUE RESOURCE LEVEL CHANGES I_Sf ACruALS $16,8>3.252 187.50 $4,993,_ 135,000 2J U6.000 3,"7,l",Ooo. 1.013,000 iOO,OOO '.019,000 ~3,OOO 1.:s.21IOOO I,Q82,OQO a3lI,ooo During the ftnt yr-uof MDB. this stl;1ion will urn lln bl u.k wlln thH)[l'~PI ion of any fl~W ru nding or (tfOUr(t$: ,hAl arc !eq~~C'd, }'ollowing the first ye-.ar dtis S«tion will descri ~ sign ifi('-.tlll bwitel changes in .;(Is;:ion~ or (unding.. A "50, if r~ources were being shifted within tboe deputm~m. an e.'(plln uion would bt pro\idtd. L ~l· ,~ .•. .! , "'\~"-: ", &: ~ ':"'~'.'.'~"' • . , . . .. \ . . . . . , I~olice'D~partment; ,conti'tmed " ' . . \' . , .' . '. . FUNCTIONAL AREAS AND MAJOR ACTIVITIES Fundamental Respon.e to R.quests for Servi« 9·1·1 'and Dispatching Seroices for Palo Alto Polic~. Emergt:ncy Retporuc to Requests tor $e.. ...... ice I Non·Emertency R($!X'rut$ to ~'querts (or Service I Muni Co& Enf.:>rctmell\ I Roetiollal Ass;,uJlce Resporue I Traffic Acddtot R"P<'''''' Critical Incident Resolution Disaster Containm~.1t 'Civil Disturh1llce Response I emu Rcsotl.aion 'MutuJl Aid Auisunce Investigations and Disposition:; [nvestigatioru. Offender JdentifiCltion, Appteb;truion, Prmt\."'\.ItioJ1, and Invt.nig,llion Resolution' Prop.myl Evidence Community Pollcing, F..ducation/Crtme Suppres5ion Youth. Services I Crime Suppn-ssion' Community Poti..::inglEdu(,.Hion" Bicycle Theft/Rr-.:overy Progr.un Traffic Services TrafHe Enforcement I &hool Safely I DUJ Suppression I Traffic C'.om,pla.illl Resolution Parking Servh::e.s Parking Eofomm~nl 'Parking Cituion Pro«'SSing and Tucking t Abandoned VthicleAbuement" Parking Adjl.ldkatio[l Animal Services Pet Adoptioll and Reined Owner Strvices I Animal Cue tAnim.J Rl!lated Heallh 1llld S.uety' Pet Recovu)' I Overpopulation Control and D~ Preveotioll Spc<ial Event City SP'Ol1$Oted Evrnt'>. Non.ot)' Sporuoted Events .. Stanford Sporuoud Events Ccntracted Regional Services Stanford Uoiv~rsity 9·1·1 and Disp1tching Services. w! PilQ Alto Asiim.Qce. Jlegional Anim.J $ervius Information Management D.lta PtQCffiing and Storage • In(l)tm.:ltion Disptrs-AJ, Compulel SySUJl.\S Development Personnel s..lection and Development Penonnei Re.:ords Mm~mtnl· RecruilmentIHtring' Cit'L2en Compla.lot Process. Mlndnory Tr.uning I Non­ M1ndatory Training 'Legal CompliUlce/So<fery. Ht4lth Resource ~l\'ices. Vol>lmar Program • \ ..' .' , ,:.-.~ .. lill'!] . . ,. Police Department Summary of Regular Positions by Functional Area FUNCTJONALAREAS 43.25 Fuooamomal Rosponse to Calls !or SONice 1.20 CriIic8Ilocidenl Resolulion 20.79 In_ligallon. and Oi$posilioos 3().73 Community PoOcIng, EducotionlCrime Suppression 16.13 Tratr.>s.mc.. 8.94 Pa.1Qr,g Sorvl:es 9.02 AIlrnaISeMoos 1.89 Special Events 11.76 COO!n>c!ed Regk>naJ Selvioes 9. 59 In~_ M.""9"ment 6.65 ~I Se'.ecOOn aM Development $69.00 Subiotal ror FunctlonllAreal A Ilooat&d Admln!alratron .2'0 Assistant Pollee Ch}e/ .40 Executive AssJs.tanl .3Q ExO¢llti'1'8 Soo'elaty .20 Police Cap!aln .00 Pol"" Chiel 2.50 Subtotal -----._. __ .. _-----_. __ . __ .--- UUO TOTALOEPARlMENTPOSmONS L .. _--. __ ... _ .. _----- \ ~ .' '., . . ~ ~ , . DU'ART;\![l'\T: Pulice 1> ... ·I';1rilllcllt· , '. . ' rL':';CnOX,\L\HL\: P.lI·king Scnit'l:S J " ' , , To ~gt, ~)fQr(f "rnJ 'ttwh>re wbidt j'drking regulations and issuN in an effort to /aciJittlle the 'im<lym.~""'1 cf ",hid".mi provide for public "yety within lhe City of Palo Aho, 1995·96 KEY PLANG " t"J ImptU'Ut~1 ';!~r pui.in, or~JUn(i' irt the do .. 'nll)'iln dirui~ on -I Ollt-)'«t u'ill NJ~j u.J N,jUJ.\.c' e({~"t;w· ."" ct COIlo~tft Lot S Lr:no Ul aU("lldUJt lot on II: one-yut [rial Nsit. As$ul ill the-mmotKrmem (If Ibe contrn1 with a \'uuior and evJ!~le .("fle(1iwnffl of tbe menduliloc OOr.('otpl. M.O.JORAC nWrtES P'riUnQ Enro~m'r.1 P,n;!ng (;lfiUon Pi();;'i't-,Ing .end Tracklfl1) Ablr.(iootd VttMtJe Al»!temtht Pa'1ting AdJudleoU()n TOTAlEXPf~RfS FUll 'NMS POSITION S ---------.-.-----~--.. r~YAl REVENUE 1<nH4 ACllJAlS , 1~ r 1_ ADJlIS1ED t PROPOSED 8JJOOET 8JJOOET .. --~--.---.--.-.--.. -~------------.- VIA $423,1S65 No'. 77,618 NA NA 128,873 1700,OOQ ------',--' ---_.------._---" ------------------ j-NA NA 8,N ..--------------- VIA VIA U20,QOO .~----- .... BUOGer CHANGE NA Parking Services Functional Area Regular Positions by Major Activity A\4JORAcnvmEs ~arklng En forcel'11-tnl .50 CO!Mwn'lty Service Office< 4.50 P,f1OOg Enfo«o",.,,1 Office< .25 Police Ue~eMnl .24 PoIiceAg.ntlO1f\c<, .13 Slaff5e<f.lary .40 SupeMw. Police Se<Vices 6.02 S u biOla I FTE lor Ma)or A ctMty Pa.rklng C!taUon Proc ... lng and Trtcklilg .12 raoong En 10;",,,,,..,1 Office< .05 P~Ue!Jt.anaf'11 .06 Staff Seo:.(t>tary .02 S'Jpo<viso<. Police Services .25 SU"btoLaI FTE for Major AC!tvtty Abandonlld Vehicle Abatemtll! .44 Coovnunity So""", Offioer .12 Paoong En Io«:emenl Office< .15 Police Ueut.enafll .19 Staff 5e<felar)- .02 SupeMsol. Police SeNices .92· S ublot.tl FTf 10' M.to, Aotlvity P.ri<Ing Ao) udloollon .04 CO!Mwn'Ity Service OI!\co, .12 PaOOng Enlo«:ernetll Offioer .05 Polloe tJeutenanl .03 Staff Se<:celary .55 Supo<viso<. PoIiceSeNices .79 Subtotal FTE 10' Mo)ol AoVvity Functional Area Admlnlltl1t1on .15 Asslstanl Chief of PO:~ .02 Coovn'Jnity Servic<l Officer .72 Par1<ing Enfo«omenl Office< .06 Slaff Se<:celary .01 Supervisor. Police Services .96 Subtotal U4 TOTAL FUIICTIONAL AREA POsmolis ( :, To tnforct ",nd rn~t!t i.oehide purling inJm. ------_. 1993-94 1_ 1_ BUooer Acn'ALS ~~, B UD<lTI.. p=~~-CIiIlNGf SalariM lind Benentl --$N,<. $HA -lNA- h'Dn-s.III r1H ~ NIl 11,105 NIl All_ted Ch.rg .. ~ ... NIl 1011.916 NA ------ TOTAL EXPeNDITURES INA $/!A. $423.~ $NA r'ULL TIMe POSITIONS ~ NA 6,02 NIl SERVICE lEVEL CHANGES During Ihe fLnt yw-ofMDB,lhis st\."ti.:J.!l will rtm:a.in b!an~ with the C'xc>l'ption of;lIly new f\lnding ,nA;1 Is r~\.lCS'N" Following the first ytM", this section will qu.ditati,,~y describe ,i&nificl!lt resource ChUlj;.t$ in ttrm! of the str"\'~ imp!ica.tion (or custOlDtts. Any changt$ to imp.l,:t roe-.uures as :I ,~uh of rt$O;J ret dllntC$ 1\Iill.also bt .l&:lressd nUt. 19~ 19&4-95 1994-95 1S~96 IMPACT MEASURES AC]VALS T"Aduev"e a X% com:pilin"u"ute""orm"uka:r:YehIcl~--NA­ for parkiDg time limits witb in d~jgn~lo!"d ,l~r __ "'W,§lIC·_ NA . .!'l'T .!WD, NA p R ()PXIl'~ [1'1 puking zones. 2. Resolve ove-might parking issues within 5 working NA NA. NA S ruys of rt<"cipi of Ihe complain t" j 3. Achieve 190% comp!iUlce r,Itt' of newl), NA NA NA 90 Ldcn\lf~Jubitu~....£lfe_~~~.' _____ --'--_ .. "i%\Joit·,\CTfVITY: P.1rki'lj\ Ci!,{jo,i I'r~c<,,~ing 'at III 'rr"dii,ig,. _ "" .. :. -' .-.~ ._;, .:: . " . . . . ' '. .. _. , . Safarles and B8I1t'~-­ Non..&lul8s All_ted ChorgH 1993-94 1894-9$ ACTVALB ADJ, BUOOeT -'-~-----iHA'- NA NA NA N4 ,­PROP.BUD. $1"4,696-- 42,769 20,1&3 BUDGET CHANGe ---~.--. NIl NIl TOTALEXPENDITlJRE.S INA INA sn.61B $NA F_U_LL_Tl_M_E_P_O_S_ITI_O_N_9 ____ ~ ___ ~ ___________ NA _ ____1 ... .w~_5 ____ ~----NA ____ ~ SERVice LEVEL CHANGES During the fll$t year of:MOB, tbi$ S«1 ion willftmain blank wit b tbe u::("tplion of an)' new h.. cding thu i.s re-qlmtt>.i" FQUowing tbe Hm year, this S«tion will qua.liuliv~ly demi~ significint resoul"(e danges in tunu of the $<to'ice­ impiic:ation for custQmel'$, Any dung~' to impact. measures as. a rtsul L of rfSOur«-chlJlges ",ill alro be 2ddrtSStd h~r.e-" IMPACT MEASURES i~Enterm"OfaITparkingcTtitiolU into IKe automated systems wit hin I working day of thoe­ is:ruance of the citation" 2. Achi~e:ll parking cit,1.lL<m error l'.lte or no more tbUl 10 errors p-:r 1,000 pukin,& citatioru mueJ. 1993-114 __ A~!yAlB_ NA NA 1954-95 _At?,!,.BU Q. NA 1994-95 1_ ESTi!UD~.-!'RQ~B_UQ'l _NA. __ . __ NA_ . __ :. J \ \ -, , ""'1 . . ~ .. ..J " MM6Ji .\(~IH·nY' Ah"01d;",«r\'ehJ(I~\'b"t~"'CI\t . .' ~ .' ." -, .. ' . -. Sara"" and 8tnef1tl Non-SlllrioJ AII_ttd Chi'll" $NA $$1,624 NA 190 NIl le,161 --. Ao.: .. ,~~[T--t-~~-D-'- ----------. --- TOTAl EXPENOrnJRES fU LL n.<tIE POSmONS SERVICE LEVEL CHANGES $NA NA $NA $69,944 NIl .92 BUDGET CHANGE ---SIlA-- NA NA Duringthe rLm yeuofMDB. thi! se.,. ... ti()A will rema.in. blank with tbeexuptlon of my new funding thilt is requewed. Following the rlm )'NJ', this: S«'1ion will quaJjUlivdy dtser'lbe ~igoiftcant resour« ch.a.ngo:s in temu of the service i mpliCldon for (vstomert.. Any chang" to imp.lct meUuftoS u ~ r<:sul! of r«our~ .-:h wgt$ will aho be a;ddresud here. 1S9J-!14 1994-95 1994-95 1995.$6 IMPACT MEASURES ACTUAlS I ':;::~::.~'=.=:;::~ ~.. "'-AD.!, au D •. ___ EST. BIJ.D. __ PROl' ,J!!JD. NA NA 90 ~ R" .. olve 9\1"% of ill siored whide imlcs within 10 NA workda)'S. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- NA NA 90 ___ ..J -------------. len-&( 1994-95 1_ BUDGET ACTlJAlS ADJ. BUDGET PROP. BUD. CHANGE -------------.. S8lartH Jnd B&n.flte; $,'0\ fAA----$e5,201 $NA Hon-5allrl .. NA NA 30,211 NA Allocoltd ell.ru" NA NA 33,481 NA --------------- TOTAL EXPENDrruRES INA $NA $128,873 $NA FULl nME POSInONS NA NA .19 NA SERVICE LEVEL CHANGES !AI rir.g fbe first year of MnD. dtis $t'C1ion will rem,jn blink Wil h the f'ICet:plion of any new funding that is requ~led. FQlI()wing the flfSt )'tar, trus section ",ill qualitativety describe $ig.tlificaal rt'SOur« ci:",ng;¢i in terlllS of the Sfrvice implication (or cu.rtomen;. Any changes to impa.."t measures as a rtSWt of rt:SOun;e cbange~ will also be ukJrtssed here. 199:1-94 1994-85 IMPAc:T MEASURES ._ .. _._ .. ____ A"-I111,kS_...M!,!,..BJiQ.... 1. Complete initiu investig:nions on aU C'<)ntesltd NA NA puking ciutions ftcdved by the Police lnpUI men! within 20 working days. 2 Provide fuuJ. d.i.sPOSilions of all CODtested pcuking P¥A NA ciulio ns within S working days of tbe adjudi~ILon -~ng. ---------------- ",' 1_ pROP. BUD. 20 • l\ \ /' . .".' .\ , \. r ~] .. . '. , j , ;1 ! :' ..•. ,. Attachment D Employee Department Position Detail All protot)'pe examples and allachments Are Cor ilIustl"ati\'e purpGScs onlj'. ~lnanel.llnronn.tion and objectives are not aclua1199S·96 budget dala, · . · . fUNCTIOAAlAREAS Finance Department Summary of Regular Positions by Functional Area lH4 FK\8IlO1a1 SuppoO So<-. 2(1.64 ...... 1 Manag<t_1 8A8 Finan<:iaI p~. Mal1tJ>. & Re;>o<to lU9 Biil!o'>g&~ 5.211 PooOOg & Mot<.~ so"""'" 6O.7a Subtotal for Fu~Uoo..1 Are" A 110<.1«1 Admln!>t,.II.," .3() ~. fioa<1oo .10 senior fiNlK4i Ana.y.1 1.00 EXecvt"6~e18f)' :tOO SUi>loltl 61.76 TOTAL DEPARn.I£NT POSITIONS \'" Attachment E Employee Major Activity Position Detail All prototype examples and attachm.n1. are for lIIuSlr.Hve purposes onl),. F"mandallnformalion and obje<lives aN! nol actual 1995-96 budget dot •• ·-,.,--,,~.-.-" .. , " Financial Support Services Funct iona\ Area Regular Positions by Major Activity FInanc'a' Systems Sa~lcet: 1.00 FIr\4neial Systems Ana~.1 .10 Sf, Financial Anatysl 1,10 Sublolal FTE for Ma,or ActMty Ae-c.ounUng ServlCH 3.70 Coo Itol Acoou nl Specialist 2.85 Control Accounl Speda1ist. lead 1.00 Data Enlly Operal", . 25 Financial Analyst .10 Manager, AoooonUng 1.00 Slaff Acoounlant .05 Slaff5ecfelal)' 228 Sr. Accountanl 11.23 Subt.!>1 FTE for ~1.'or AcllvHy FJnanc'al Reporia .OS Director, Finance .OS Financial Anatysl :25 Manager, Accounting .15 StaffAccounlant .05 SbffSeCfeIal)' .80 Sr. Aocounta nt 1.35 S u ololal FTE forMa,o, Activity Functlona' Are! Admlntatratlon .41 ManOOO', Accounting .05 Manager, Budget .45 Staff~lary .05 Sr. Financial Analysl .96 Subl<>la I ----------_ ..... 14.64 TOTAl FUNCnONAL AREA POSITIONS ---•.. _-.. _ ..... _-.- ... ~ .....•.......... .. ...•... . Attachment F Utilities Gas Fund Prototype AU prototype examples and allaohmenls are ror illustrative purposes only. F1nanciallnfonn,tion and objectives are not .o[u,11995.96 budget data. , '~ I I I \ (6 .. l . . ..' Utilitic~ D~partmeilt -Gas Fund' ' , . . "'.-' .' . . ~ . To a(qHirt find pro-vidt qu,lfliry ccsl-t/ftdj vt municipal gas utifiats to our cUJtomrn. FUND OVERVIEW Key aieu or (:0 ncc-nl ration ror the Ga.5 Fund in J995·96 indud~ the cominu21Lon of the accelerated lnftistructure program and the t.x«lltion of a long ,erm g6S Iransportation agreemenc WLlh the . MO;l\'e oonntction sy~tm to tn~ gas sysl('m. Another major forus will be on minimizing the cost of ""holes:aJe gu pu"h;tJ.t;S, 9,·hkh rrprC'$('ni O,,'U SO% of the total opcra,ing budgetJ by evaluating the optiolU for a long ~~frn g~ StJpply. Oth~r projf<1S involve greater cwtomer outreach and educa­ dow :a«iv,iILa, mUK~1ing rc'S('"arch, phnneJ work wllh City I~dli[jes, 1Ild emphasis on economic de,'cloprnent, A 6.3 percem ute inC(C' ..... ~ i.s propoJ.('d. One new p<'sition is l>emg .ldded and 1\"10 inspectors have ~<"n ronwfud (fom long-term (empotilry to pumaMIH positions a.s put of the Gas Capital Pro­ gCi1JlI. C~ Purchi-stl ;g.re pr(;;.e<:ttd lo incre-~ot<:' by S.2 million. due to a projected incre2~ in the ~hol(sJJe ('ost of gu_ The pt .. ~sed bud'g.c-t wi.11 re.$ull in a withdr.,J;w.I.] from fhe R,He Stabilization Reserve of $1.2 million. The projmcd d()~il1t b.tlwce inlhe R;lM SubHiucion Reserve for 1994--95 is $5.6 millio/l, appro:x[. m,ucly mich,,-,y btlw«n lltt. maxinwm guiddine or Sl.8 million and the minimum balanc.e of $7.6 millloI1. 1994-96 1_ 1993-$4 Atl,!,USTEO PROPOSE!) FIiNDSUMWI1V ACTUALS BUIXlET BUDGET ---,---, ' ,'"-"',,',---"-'----, "--,, r-"'--'''-------'-------~- NUS.~ l,.r,1f'f't$IISlt<tmt OOcrlA~t ---------....,.---~------.--------~ ResQa ret ~lIl1tj;(nH fit P-Ijrdu,lt;t 00" Oblrllxltlo~S)'Utm S)\1C'm.Jlrnprm,tontal-(Cfr) euU(lmff 1)c6!iB'& C(lI)D((-(t6b Stn:lttt (CIP) OtlIer S-~wortStrY'.r«S~ RItts 1XblSml«,E"""", IItoI F..qultyfuMfa' SNA SNA $18,88MOO NA NA 600,000 NA NA 97,:150 SNA , $1&,583,35(l -----,,---~',-----,- SNA SNA ----'---,- ~ W\ 11,621.000 1,2117.892 3,400,17.9 142,431 2,06S,02l) 642,486 o 145,528 1 1653,0...."0 UO,783,~ -- $1 1200)196 48.12 "', ), -' r ... ~: " . • -' • j , Utilities Departn:tent -Gas Fut1d~ -eontinued .'. . . , I99S-%RESERVES($OOO} Emtl'JtnC)' Vla.nt Rtp!a<t lOtti' Rllfe SlAlbtuz.Uoil RMne GuSupplc .. ",IsISupply AB70lRCH"n't TOTALRfSEKVES 1'R00£CfEIJ ~ RIoUNO: r--~----' $!l64 6.'~ l,on 15S 510,609 '--________ .J.... __ RESOURCE LEVEL CHANGES PROPOSED OtAN<;.S SJO (J,llQ) G o ${I.ICIOI 1'R0JtCIU> RE'imVE ~'>'G G\.I!DWNE RUANe>: RA.'IGE ~S~I --l--;;;~ ~'-I $3.791-',583 )'on 153 . S9 • .fW DUllngtb.e ftnt YC'U(lfMDB, this U(twn 11111 (Up-Un bhnk ,ith the t:J: .. '(~~o;'J <>1.,)" IUt.' fud:ot; 01 f($O\lf(C$I~lll ue n'Q1Jcsted. Following the IIrn ytU chis $('rt~n ,.~II &!.-:ribt ~i,g, .. ifK..1_hl b.ud'i.';-J, (hlflt~ in iY.'I:\:~:U or tundir.~_ Alro, a rt$Ol.lrc.es 'V.rue b<-ing ,hi(too within th~ &plftm~""I. 1n Uprlr.~tk?n ""()uld ~ pr,,,,tJe,l FUNCTIONAL AREAS AND MAJOR ACTIVIllES ReJour~ Managen1ent Muket A~mmt ltId }'o[t(';lSting Ugislalive l11d RegulatQry AruJ)'lu • Distnbution System Pl~rtIling and "n.tlr~il I Suppty Resollltu • O(n\lnd RHOlfr~ t R(:'SUlch.1~ D<:~·tktpmet1t • CUfLonm ~tisfl('lK.n S}"5tem ImprO'(eruellls • Optnl i.oru.aJld },hi C\llllUl<t • CWlomu' Dffitn &. U'>ni\{{\i<lll Strv)(t:l Support Services and Rat« Customer Services • Mfler Re;adjng I JUt('6 100 Rt)<rYC'S .). . Gasl'und Summary of Regular Positions by Functional Area FONcnoNALAREM 7.35 Reoource Mall8g$lT\enl '31.93 Distribution $yolom 7.30 Support Services and R,I8. 46.68 Subtotal for Functional Arelltli Allocaled Admlnlltratfon .2:2 Director orUtil1ties .22 Administrator, UtHities .22 Exewtive Secremry .22 Utiiroes.P-..ccoontin!l Technician .22 Supervisor Utilrnes Cornpu(e,r Selvices .22 umilie. Sisiem Support reclmiCian .22 $enklr Programmer Ana~it't 1.54 S.blolal .'._-------~----~------~.-----.---------------~------.-- 48.12 TOTALDfPARTMEHTPDSmONS i ; -! I I ! ; ',', \ ,;.-. ,--'. ~ ',' -," ' . ~ .:. 'FeND:'G~,_ . _ - - . .' --. . ~ , , . FL'NCTIONAL AREc\:-DistriL;lIlinn SvsfCIlI -'. . , .:".' . To plan, engineer, operatl? maintain and coiutruct impro~'emcnrs to the GOof DiStribution System ('101 will provide our customers wllh safe, uonomic, and reliable service. 1995-96 KEY PLANS (] Design 1,000 I[~car feel ofmairlreplaC(Ol.oots ror in· boose coru .. trualoo and 15,000 linear reel ofm!in rcplat:¢met1ts rot cootract coowuction as pm of the ae«leratro [nfi'a.stnlcture Program. Cl Coovertan 2.dditiooat 57 v.:hicfes frOIn gasolir.eto oompre-ssw natural gas. o Modifyregulation equipment &ld controls to impro ... 'e safety al Gas R«dviDg Stations"2 and #-1. o Upgra.1e regulators a: Gas Statio!l.sl Md 11 in order fo ;e.(hie~·c cOllfonnity ofrcgu!alions for greafera<;;<:illacy andptrfOfm!itCC'. MAJORACTMneS Sytlltm Improvemente Ope:n1Uons and Malntenal'iclt CUltom&r Oaslgn & ConnecUon ServlCil8 rOTAL EXPENDII1JR£S FU LL TI ME POSITIONS 1993-94 ACllJALS o Pri)vide ~rety and lec-hn jea] training for scdion empfQy· US to keep employees irlfonnM on l1le la!t..!t regulatfoo$ from California lXcupational Safety-and Hea.lthAct M'd Department orTrac~portt.tiorl. 1:1 Evaluale lrcnch less techno!<lgy 10 delermine if applicable for our openlli()n, as well as 10 S«' iflC'cltnologywouki be be-lleficial for u.;.e byCityc/etYs. 19S4-9S ADJUSTED DUDGET NA 1995-$6 PROPOSED IlUOOET $;1,400,1111 2.065,020 142,431 $5,607,630 BUDGET CHANGE , . I "."~.'. c.· •. ·.·· .• . "--',_::' .• ,;:' . ,--'.' 11 '1 I i : .¥ '/ I~' ' .. "l'ii('i;:,,(,L~ . ~.>,;; ,~,;;;.~c..,.' Distribution System Functional Area Regular Positions by Major Activity Sf&16m lmprovtme nt 1m E"'J'- .~o Stoff s=.\aty 1.51) SoI1ior Engiooof 2 00 €"II~ Toctmician .68 Inspec!or. PWIWGW .~ Clllell~ .1l8 HeaY)'~ij:mool ()pe<a1Q( .oW ~mw ~.t\2 ut.~ in>lalle< R'I»'"' _ 70 lJbttl.e-s 1m tal\.e( Rspaifer·Asslstant .54 U~OO& Inst;t!!e( Repai{ef·lead 1 .... t SlJbtot.l FTE 'or M.Jor AeU\'lty Op<tl1Uonl and Malnt.nanc.e .20 A$.$~WII Di:ooO( 01 O~rationslEngineerhlg .50 Eng,- .23 Engine&1ng Ma~·'."'G··I''1 .51) SoI1Ior Er>,jlooof .10 Sla~ Sor.i.1aly tOO C&:hod" TC<IWcIan .2S Coo<diMlorWGW PlOjoc(s .38 Field _ Po""" WGW 3.00 G.as System fohop and Field Repai~rson 1.01 Hoavy cquJpmer.. O~""IQ( .3:1 Mgt. U1iI<ty Oper,tion' ,93 M&ctll\fll¢8] U~ Rep.ltret' .38 $vpoMsc<Sl>opeod FIeIdWGW .00 SvpeM-sotW3W , .-48 Utiti'ties rnsteUer Repa ~r .20 U~ Irl$!a~ Repairer AsSistsn t 1. to UtiUtits 100laoUe-r Repair&( L~ 1.00 EquipmeiliOpera"" 13.71 SublolJl f11; tor Major A.1IY1Iy CUlwm&rDHlgl'1and Connection Servlcea .60 tJblity Engineering Estimator .30 Hea'..y €qulpmonl Operator .15 Supervi>or I'-.I3W .80 Utilflies Installer Repairer .20 U~iltie.s Installer Repairer·Lead 2.~ Sublolol FTc tor Malo, A.livfly· Functiona' AreB Admlnl$(raUon .10 Assistant Director of Opera tion!IiEnglneerinlJ .10 Engineering Manager-mW .51 Superviso/\\'3W .10 Supervisor Shop and Ffekl WOW .25 Coordlnalor WGW Projects .'13 SIa~S='lary 1.29 Subtolol ~-------~-~-----------. ----------------------------------- 3U3 TOTAL FUNCnONAL AREA POSmONS L To g\Jlhu and ~ g<lJ rt:Jow(.U arJ Jrr.'s..'~ /(} inti' Ihtt M«iJ of (Itt J({/Jif)'. pecpl~. b:,owuC$. Mol Mi'MlMJ of 1h.J elf)'. \ 1_ 1_ 1_ Si"'Ii ... tld aen.fHo --+' _AQ1Jj}~ _____ -"D.!.llt'r~ET!.-j--!'il!%e~~'~- BlJOGET CHANGe ---INA-- Hon-$ol. rI90 POol POol j ,1;W,180 POol Allocaltd ChI'll" "'" N.\ -4$2,61. POol -----'" ._--_ .. _-----~ ~--~ ---~ -.. ----------- TOTAL EXPEHOmJR£S ~ iw. $3,400,179 FUll TIME posmONS HA HA 14.81 SERVICE LE\illL CHANGES Dvtia, the fiNt )'t-ole of MV:S,lbu J('(twn ",-ill rrmt3nNMk "·idllhf~J:.<~iQn of Lny Ct,,-fundinx Ih.u Ls rC<juesttd. Follo"in, the flm )'C'U,Ih.i, s.ecUo~ "I,:m quililltiwly ~ti~ li.r.nifK.Ult It$OU:(~ cfun&es in It{fIU .. ~f tht stl'ficoe implk;l:tK.D for C1J.S,orotn... 1\0)" c-hmtcs to Lmp~, mt-i-\'\Jrt1 .u I f~\!h of tCWIJfCt dung.t$ .... ;JI :lho be-;a&dH$..~ t:er~. (MPACT MEASURES r~--Rq;fl(i~.----~@TintU!«t--ordefidt-;;t-ii~-~~-n-f'.ti fl.",,!! ,'tH.l.I pill of Ibt' lnfr~uu'(1.urt Rrrl~~m~1\1 Prova.m. 1. Design rodOOruHUC1 jmp;o~ tmt~'\lII)Ont.&U $!ll;OIl r.nd :aw.....:h.~«1 f.giJilm (0 U;t.UKt 4M dlJtribu,:tof'l of gu 1(0 .~!,!l O'Jt (,\H:omN &nuo.b __ ~"~~~ ?:~ ___ .. T._ ... _" II1$HI ",C'VAlS. HA Nil To opHMt. MOiNa';", G1Id 'q>Jir rht g.lf dl..l/,jb ~riofl S)"fltIN to M11U1l la/t. rillable. c1nd r.Qitiml rkl,,'U)' <1 tll1 I') i.1W rIJUMl~n 1~~-sl __ ~l;CTUA!,L __ Solin.. In<! llii1.me---~ Hon-$olorl9o "'" AII""altdCh.'lI" HA TOTAL EXPfN DfIljRf$ FULL TIME POSmON6 SERVICE LEVEL CHANGES $-'lA HA 1~-$S ADJ. BUOOET --ji{A--.-- Nil 1'1'. iw. Nil 1 _ PROP. BUD. -l"I;ool,2aij-- l58,9~S 104,615 U.OU,02(l 1MB $HA HA During th~ first: )·t~tof MOB. thi$ $¢..~ion will (tm,.ill blL-'l.k ..,j:th d-,. of'(c<'l'>'ioo of My aew fundln& that is r~utsttd. FclJowiog, Ibe flJ1.1 '1~u.lbil s... .... '1totl 'it·al qulliutiwly det.<:nht signifk:,utl ft$OU{~"(' cnangn in ttrmt of Inc su ... icc implictlion (or £uuemus Any dutJg.cs 10 impJet fnrJS\lceI U ,I1C1ult 01 rfiour~ changes 1Vill also bt addcesstd here. 1993-&4 1_ 1994-$$ 1_ IMPACT MEASURES f l" Pow J~ Of21TFt«":;fo:;pUtin("£i·t-cr~-"-"-··­ Tl'1lUpOnilon 5pQI tru:pb."tioru. ... "ilh a p<-r(t\."1 ~re to indK-ncwmplilO« ~ilb a.\l ,tJcnJ r~latioru:. _!-C~L5 _~_DJ~\!Q, ---J;~-1f!U-Q-. --Pli0';T BU-l L Pro.miydy munu..in 'he gas dauibIJ tion $)"$1 tm by limiting 95~ of CU$(omcr Sfcvicc .disruptloM due '0 to m.1in line gu k1\; ttpJoirs to four kours __ ~~.-'_6$. ________ . ______ . _______ _ "'" I __________ ~_ J ;- "'l, \ .:.-.. .-'---"~'.' . rO ga/W and ~ ga..r raOWUl and 1eT)·kuIO muJ Ihi nuds of 1M ~1r/j{y, pt(op/t. bl&JiI:e.$stl, and WfiM;Mf t>/ ,ht CffY· 1t9U4 1_ 1_ ACTIJALS ADJ.BUPGrfT BUOOIIT cw.NOe PR.Qf,!I!-'O,._ 8J:larl-n Ind Btneflta l/lA--' INA $U,OOO -·--W~-·-- Non.sllirtes IJA NA MOO NA Alloo.ItOd C~. rgH IIA NA &3,431 NA -------------~----.----------------- TOTAL EXPENDITURES INA $No\ $147,43t $NA FULL TIME POSmONS IIA NA 2.05 NA SERVICE LEVEL CHANGES I)o.iring: the ftnt year of MOB, thls section will umlin blank ",il~ tht tx(tpiiiJIt of llIy [',C'''' fundin, ll:Jlt is m'Ju'mod. FoUowinl; tbe rm! year, tbis S«'tion will ~U.uitall'id)' k-rik Jit,<1ifKt!ll.rti-~/('C dUllI;(S in Itrm.' o( 1M F-t(l'i.c< impl.ic.ation (orcustomtN.. Any chm$:oNlo i.mp..1ct me-.mr~ a$ a rtru.lt of Iesour('C du.nft1 .. i.lltho ~ l,-\.itl'$~ h-tr~. lP94-9-~ I~H" 1_ !MPACT MEASURES l C~i;;;::;E: a:tt~~,u:~!~;~~ 'i~m~rl" receiving.compte-rtd application:lIld p!.tn ws (or new stl"VlCC, .. !lOJi!\I'p~--.!STil~-D,.· . P:R9F~{'t!1) l 2. lruuJ! 95% of appro~'td new CU!tomer stryiC-t$ NA L wilrun.5 c.a.!endu da), .. $ from th. '.do. leon t .. h' rocc:ipt the Cwtomtr rt(:eives (rom Re\'tIlue _CoU~"1iollS followin,~[mtnl:~ ___________________________________ .. __ ~ ___ . ______ . __ . __ _ I / Attachment G Parking Cross··Departmental Program Prototype All prototype examples and altachmenls are for illuslrath'e purpose,1; only. Finandal infonnaliol1 and objetti",es are not actual 1995·96 bud,get data. " \ : . ,. // " 'r I I ' .. ' ~ \ .:\. • • • , ~-• ~ ~ • • < • \ • • ,00 • ~ Parking Program . . . , .' . . , • \ ~ '.' J I -. . ~ .... To support the pLmning. design, jmplnnenldtiQn, enforcement, majmenan~e and TNo/urion of moton"zed vehicle PO' rking isJUes. CROSS·DEPARTMENTAL PROGRAM OVERVIEW Staff will continue to work with the Chambtr of Commerce Downtown Parking Subcommittee on a comprehemLve plan to addre-M parking in the downtown area. Included in the plan are; implementa· 110n of a :sleeper puking ordinance -and related education program; improved directional :signagej imprementation of attendant parking in the Senior Center 10tj ent,omced s-afcty and lighting in the Webster/Cowper and Lot Q garage.5j and pursuit of the feasibility of an additional parking :structure. SuJf i$ also working wilh the Chamber on a proposal to adjust the parking permit fees to enable the City to roco\'('r the cons of administering and maintaining parking in the University Avenue Parking Distril."t. CONTRIBUTING DEPARTMENTS PoJice Department In l~e fUD(lionll iUU, "Parking ~n'ices.· the Polke Dep-utment's mlilion is to mUl:&gt. enforce Uld res.ol ... e vehicle fuking tt"g\l1.uioru.uld .issues in an effort: to f~dlit:ite the timely movement of vebidcs and plO ... j~ for pubti( suety wilh..ifl tbeCilY of Palo Aha, ,.,hjor activities indulk: puking enforcement. cilalion issuance and truking. ,,1:a.adon~ vchidc ab.uemcnt, cLt'llion ,wjudicalion ~d puking Ipz.ce utilization reseuch. Public Work, Department In tbe functional uu, 'Puking Lot Ma.inltnUlCe;" 1M-Public Works Department's miscsion is to provide timely ouinuJl1Jl~ P foznms to, lep,jr and In llnta..in p,-Vemtnl, ooncrtte, signing, strip in" $w«"pint and I ree mwlten~ce in all public puking lots. Phnning Department In I he m3j.Jl' activit)," P.11lciog MilIla&cmeot," I he PUnning Deputmem'$ missioo is to dev.-Jop an nunage on-and off· .st(tfl public puking in a ffi}A.Qerthat balances toe needs ofbusLnC$.$C$, CUSlomelS, and the gcnrral public. Finance Department Within th~ ttU}ormivity. "Billing. and Colleniom: the Finitl(e Deputment'J mission i.s to process puk1.og ci.tilltion P.lYffitCts,. and &pos.;r money ina prompt. ;"CC\Jute;Utd saft nu.fln~t; to provide (or <klinquent cit:al ion colJeo.:tion in aC«)rda:ll~ with legal requirtmenu; wd to. oversee the City l-!a.ll permit puking isiulnce. 1995-98 KEY PLANS (] Implement at ttllduillot ~rvice in parking lot S (Stnior Cuttrlol). o In ooopulting with Ine ChWl~ r of Commerce Downtown!' nking Subro .... minOt. implemc-nl the new sl~r pUking ordinan<:e . • "<;; •• -, L . , (] Comp!etethe (easibititysludy for th¢downtown puking structure, induding invcstigating 'he po~ibil· ity of a mu 1t~ple-lC>t $()Iut~()!l. , /\ ".', ! .\\ . .. \ ., \ ;, I" \ , . -~ .' -.' .' " .",' .. ' Parking Program, .continued . ... . , . . ;' ,. 'f. I L ( , 1'", \1 .~ .~'" 'I.,';::;".,J_\;..,\,i",i ,-.: "-~' __ '-• ,. __ • __ ~_.~" __ "_'-_0 j Attachment II Other' Budget Summaries List All protolype .xampl .. and allachm.nts .... ror liIusl",lh', purposes only. Flnand.1 Inromlation and objttlhes are nol O<luoI1995·96 budg.1 dol •. Other Budget SummarIes List 1. Transmittal Letter OVERVIEW 2. Budget Guidelines CMRs GRNERAL FUIID 3. General Fund Financial Summary 4.. General Fund Reserve Changes and e"l.etnc::ss 5. Revenues Overview UTILITY FUIIDS 6.. UtJlity Funds Financial Summaries 7. Reserve Changes and Balances CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND a. CIP Overview 9. Financial Sumlt,ary 10. CIP Projects Detail INTERlIAL SERVICE AND ALL OTHER FUNDS 11. Overview 12. Financial Summaries STAFFING 13. Table of Organization -Regular Positions Historically by Division 14. Staf~.in9 Report by Program MISCELLANEOUS 15. Utility User Tax 16. Gann Limit C~lculation 17. General Budget Information 18.. Gloss&ry of 'I'erms '. 1'1 Attachment I Performance Reporting Prototype All pro1oty~ c..1<amples and aUachm~n{s are for iHustrative purposes only. Finane;al l.ofonn,lIon and objecllves are nol aclua11995-96 budget data. .. PERFORMANCE MEASURE REPORTS Firsl Quart.rl99S.96 FINANCE DEPARTMENT I FUNCTIONALAREA:A~.I_~_la_._._g_.ru_._._I ______ . _____________________ . ____ --J lm.26..K£¥ I'/,AN5 o To iUUC' $toon oi'1.tns.g( rn~nu¢ boods to'..aUtng. S6 rnillim o To c~llrk,e ","fifteD prOCcdUIts (0( rued IS-KI.a.:,,;.o>unC· log_ a 1.., rLnd !i.'13Cc(pUbk t(\WI1 (Of the William'S Propo!rtYCit HI HootttAnmiol'. PROGRFSS C1 Prepar«i Request for Propo.sll for fmancia) advisor; inlt1'Viewod 4 fUTII 5.Md rerommeooed coCowlcil chal Mtfrill L)T\Ch Securities be retained. CJ W(lrk will begin in sc~-ond qUlVtel, o Prepartd pcocC'dures for 4!S(:t acqu isition and coordj· Tlaled imp!(lnC'!ltalion with Purchasing and Bl.ldgtt Divisioos. o Received COllJ'C il approv~1 on a pr!Xe~ for s.oliciti'lg Requests for Propos.al. ensuring a balanc~ b«:t\"reen tile piiorilicsof historic preservaLion and community bc:nefit. 'j~,~\jojtAetl~:il'\'~' S~n~;~& \\·t,~~.J~(~~·"'i'r:~; ~. . ~ :','~ ~ ~ < :.' ,1 • -.!. :'I. : \ I • • , , ' . ' '. ".' -lMPACTMEASlIRES QTRI 1995-96 1995-96 ACIVAL'l BUDGET ESllMATID ~:-~~~~j':~::~~~·~i~~-~_~~P;o\'e ~_~~:~~:::~?~~=:-_~~=~~~fO--_=:_=~=_ s _~= IO~J The .Jbo~·e imp..(:Il'1l{uun:: b improving d',Je 10 a r:ew computersy~em wMth 8110110'} quicker .reordering!o velldON, thtttb}' ~m&(UrOOve,. . . -. . .' \1 \JOlt \ClI-\ n \; bht'-'ohitl'nh :11111 n.Illt..IIlJ!. "" ,-.' -, , ~ --. . -, ~ aOO~'( tmPl« mta\.u!t i~ dll1llirlg due 10 an iI1crt.ase in (om~nsating balaJle<:!-to [0 percenl to C<lVf'~ .significant cash p3)'r.Hilt!reqllired fOl1..1.J ilityCOOl;""l1ooiiy purdlAs.ts. L