Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout0568.093" , l i ~ • I) • • " .; ",.,' November 4, 1993 THE HONORABLE CITY CO"NCIL Pale Alto, California ,""> .' .-,> Approval of Authority for Staff to Expend F'f 1993-94 Funds for Santa clara Valley Nonpoint Source Program Members of the Co~~cil: Report in Brief This report recommends that Council aut.horize staff to exper.d funds in the amount of $71,069 to pay the city's proportionate share of cost fer the FY 1993-94 Santa Clara Valley Nonpoint Source (NPS) program, as provided for in the existing agreement between thirteen Santa Clara County cities, the County, and the Santa Clara Valley Water District {SCVWD). This authorization is ~~ ongoing annual activity required to expend previously budgeted funds. Funds have been appropriated in elP 47703, Stormwater Discharge rmprovements l and the Wastewater Treatment operating budget. BackqrOlwd On April 16~ 1990~ Council approved a five-year agreement between thirteen Santa Clara County cities r the County~ and the SCVWD for implementation of che Santa Clara Valley NPS program (CMR~25S:0). The purpose of the program is to control pollution from urban runoff in the Santa Clara Valley. By its approval of the agreement, the City agreed to fund a proportionate sh~re of the NPS program. The agreement established a Management Committee, comprised of a representative from each p~rticipating agency~ to provide overall program direction and to revie .... and recommend an a~~ual program budget for approval by the parties to the agreement. Discussion On August 19 k 19~3. the Management committee of che Santa Clara Valley NPS program adopted a recommended scope of work and corresponding budget for FY 1993-94 (see attached letter from NPS program) 4 Although the Management:. Committee recommended a FY 1993- 94 NPS program budget of $2 k 144.169, the participating agencies are being billed only $l,5Q4,169 due to a carryover from the program's IT 1992-93 budget and external revenue sources. Palo Alto's proportionate share, 4.06 percent of the modified budget.. is $61,069. -1- 5 ?he majori~y of the program budget is allocat~d for professional consulting services and program management by SCVWD staff. The program consultant will provide technical guidance for the development of new ordinances, policies and best management practices to control nonpoint source pollution. In addition, the budget funds the development of public information ma.terials, payment of various governmental fees and continuation of the ongoing water quality monitoring p~ogram. The NPS program has billed the Palo Altc Regional Water Quality Control Plant (RWQCP) an additional $~O,OOO to partially fund the development of a joint plan to reduce copper loads to the South Bay~ This activity falls within the scope of the 1990 agreement. The plan, which will be generated with the aid of a facilitator hired by the progra;r" lWill allocate the burde.n of reducing coppe-r discharges between the prc~raw and the three Sou~h Say wastewater treatment plants. The $10~DOO will be paid from the Was~ewat~r Treatment Fund on behalf of the RWQCP's partn€r cities. Therefore, Palo Al to's total FY 19.93 -94 contribution to the NPS program is $71,069. Recommendation Staff recommends that Council authorize staff to expend funds in the amount of $71,069 to pay the City's proportionate share of cost for the FY 1993-94 Santa Clara Valley Nonpoint Source Program, as provided in the e:X:ist:ing agreement between thirt.een Santa Clara County cities~ the County~ and the Santa Clara Valley Water­ District. Respectfully submitted, JOE TERESI GLENN S. ROBERTS Director of Public Works /1 ~ /~fl GEORGE 3AGDO Assistant Director of Public Works ~1\{.~, BERNARD M. STROJNY Assistant City Manager Attachment.: Letter from Santa Clara Valley Nonpoint Source Program Related Report: CMR.:568:93 -2- • Santa Clara Valley Nonpoint Source Pollution Control Program ~7~ !l1~~" r.:.o;~~~w~, Sao Jos.!: CA 9~1 i8 I4{lB) 26!J.2600 flU (40el 266-0li I October S, i993 Mr. Xx: Teresi city of Palo Alto P.O. Box 10250 Palo Alto, CA 94303 Dear Mr. Teresi: I!I.'VOICE ScQject: Invoice he Fiscal Year 1993-94 Santa Clara Valley Nonpoint Source Pollutioo CootroI Program <Al August 19, 1993, the Santa Clara Valley Nonpuint So<=: Pollution Control Program ManagmJent Committee adopted the fiscal year 1993-94 Program Budget. The toW budget is $2,144,169 of,wich $240,000 will be derived from external sources ar.d $400,000 will be <!<rived ftum FY 92-93 uncnrumbered canJover. A""orilingly. the toW billing to the fifteen participating ag<ncies WIll be fcc $1,504,169. In accordance with the cost allocation schedule included in tie participating ogene;"" ~ the share for the City of Palo Alto is $6 UJ69 \wuch is 4.06% of the total budget. Please add an additiooal $10,000 to cover the City of Palo lI.lto's portion of the o.:.;t of devdoping a joinl"P01W-Program" Plan to reduce c,,!,!,<," loads to the South Bay, bringiDg the Oty'. total iDvoke to 571,069. Please dirw your payments to the SCVWD Acrounting Dnision, and make che>::ks payable to "SCVWD·NPS." Prompt paymerd to the District within 30 days will ensure continued progrnm progress. The Santa Clara Valley Water District BoonJ of Director.; authorized the District's continuing participation in the program and approved the various contracts for servi= at their Septembet 7, 1993 meeting. Attached is a copy of the Schedule of Cost Sharing Proportions and the adopted Progrnm Budget rROGfV.M rNmOrArfT'S: campbell. C~no, UJ$ .o\lt($, Los AIto5. Nil~, l.os Gatos. l'1ilp~a5. Monte 5t':uno, MolJnt.aiOl Vie .. ', rotlo Alt'.I, s.n Jose. Sant. CWa. ~. S.,.mn)"o~e.. County 0( 5.ilnt.il C.1;lr.l, <End tM San~ Oarol Valley W .. er Ol.s(riCl • If you have any questiOPs, please call me at (4Q8) 927'()71O. Sinct:rely. lCuJJtV~ Keith w. Whi!maI1 Program Manager San!a Clara VallO)· Nonpoint Source Pollution Control Program Santa Clara Valley ~ ~ Pglor2 Nonpomt Source ,'Y 93 94 Propooed Program Budget Pollution Control Program EXPENDJTUJill) " Ccnlrec{.5'et>iI= l Ge-neraJ rechnical SupporL (food.ard-Clyde) 2 St"rrnwater Worlilcri nil tKllweLi~ Labs, trl~ I 3 Sampling k ball"" (Coord _/ SCYfD) 4. Stre.Jm BiolOlh:ai Surveys (Coord. wi SO'!lD) S. {.egaJ C:;U roseJ {Won-lson a: rorrst~r) 1i .5'f4ff S,lnles. BeoeIi/s. _'" ftero No, Pas. I. Program Va., :liger-Penn 2. As:slstanl Procrarn ~anager-Perm. 3. Assistant Civi: £l1gineer-Conlr ,t 'atE't' Qu'ltity Spttlatisl-Perm 5. Records ~!lll.lssl-Porm (COB) 6, Public Info. Rep. -Contr c ~ mtI SUpplies 1, Postage 1. ?nnii.g/Ehi~licating 3. Phof.l~ aoo Number 4 Baoks/PubJlcaiions 5 Renlals 6. t /,,,,,, 8m! Cfl9bi6ufJOos 1. NPDES Pernnt Fee (SfRCB) 2 Bay Protection F~ l'S'iRCB) 3. Regional Monitoring Plan f~es 4 !lASIIAA r ... (Inei 1100 K Reg Ad,] 5. Aquatie Habilat fnstjtute (Gen Supt) 6 SlrNJIlkeepers.. Support. lo eCRS i'.f~- ,7 IIJ!'At I'J' §:J-IJI fJ{!fJCl'? C iJJcumo.red ff t,?-§:J c.myr;vrY I loodward-ellde 2. Kinll !.'{ic l..Jbs. Illc 3. Wornson l Forresler 4 _ Pl.P Program TOTAL EXPEliOITURl:S' Hours [SOO J600 1800 900 1800 1000 • See Page 2 of Z fill de-1.aJl of IT 92-93 ~uryover. external rl!venue, f1 9:;-94 Proposed BudgeL 1531,000 1100.000 .100,000 $40.000 $30.000 Jtern Ci,ls-l 1161.328 1122.916 154.9{)0 $;5.58, 163.504 $46.116 $3.000 15.000 11.000 12.000 11Z.OOO $10.000 130.000 III 0.000 $1 55.0l1') 115.000 $15.000 12.144.169 $4Q5-30 I 1139 080 lol.C39 IJ53.()'J[: Sanla Clara Valley Nonpoint Source Pollution ConLro! Program REVENUE ,I £rW7J4i ~w .56un:es Pg 2 or 2 fY 93~ 94 Proposed $am Budget A" FoPA See 1041bi Granl-Parking Lot Study 5185.000" B" Cost Reeo",) F .. , & S.I, of ~.tI, $5.000 ContnbuLions for Joint NPS-POTf Copp.!'r RE:"~\.JC'lion Plan L City of San Jose S20,000 2 Cily of SlJrmy .... ale $iO.OOO 3 Cit)' of Pal{) Alto $:0 OOQ l" S('I"IID .10"000 ~~~=::::::=:l Ii '4f77"""r I>r>m n ~-!IJ a UI1t"'nC'umbereod rY 92-93 Carry(J.\'cr b E.ncumbered IT 92-S3 Carr)'o'icr 1, '« ooo.,ard -Clyd;: 2 Kinnetic L.abs. Inc 3. Morrison l Fom''sh:r 4" PIP ~ram 5. Miscellaneous lli .' :. , ' $400"000 .10;30 I 1139.080 $37.03S $153.000 $)L500 Co-Permiltee Campbell CJpertino Los AltOs los AltOs Hills los Gatos Mi!pi!as Monte $efeno Mountain VIeW PaloMo santa Ciafa Sa""- Suooyvale Santa CIar.I CourTly ~ San Jose SCVWD TOTAL '; . !·c TABLE 3.2-2 Santa Clara Valley Nonpoint Sou'ce .' , Schedule of Cost Sharing Proportions. .' : .. ;.. .,' "";; ':l,~,j, .. .;:· .. Pcojected (1) FY93-94 Acrual Proportional Share Assessments FY 92-93 $1,504,169 Mseull\ef1tS. 188 % S2~,278 $37.224 '}.46 % 537.003 $48,708 1.59 % $,2'3.,9'16 $31,482 0.43 % S..4S8 $8,514 1.74 % 126,173 ~34.452 2.75 % "'",365 $54,450 0.14 % $2,106 $2.772 3.91 % $58.813 $77.418 4.06 % .61,069 560,38l! 6.23 % $93,710 $123,35" 1.59 % 523,916 531.482 7.25 % $109.052 $143,550 5.94 % $89.348 $111,612 39.97 % $601,216 $791.4<lE 30.00 % $451.251 $594.000 30.03 % $451.702 5594,594 100.00 % $1,504,169 $1,980,000 NOTES: (1) FY 93-94 assessments based vpon &-9-93 p",posed NPS budget