Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout0268.094I I I ! '} i " " to" > ." \ BUDG£f 94-95 Hay 12, 1994 THE HONORABLE CITV COUNCIL Palo Alto, California Members of the council: Attention: Finance Co~ittee ProposeC Police A9sist§nce in ¥aB~~to -Fiscal Yoar 199t~?S hRort I.. BriOl. In March .:1.992, Council approved the use of Palo Alto Police resources to pa~ticLpate in a Regional Enforcement Detail (tho REO 'l'eam) for six months to assist the East Palo Alto Police Department in attempts to r.educe the amount of violent crirn~ that had been occurring in the community. since then~ council has authorized the Police Department to exceed its staffing level by one 6erge~nt and two officer positions and extended Palo Alto's participation in tha RED Team until June 30, 1994. This report provides a summary of th& RED 'I'caro's success sinCE!! inception and describos the changes that have occurred in East Palo Alto's crime situation since the RED Te,am began working. Additionally, the report provides recommendations to continue law enforcement support for an additional 12 months' period, durinq which time staff would work 'with representatives from East palo Alto, Henlo Park and San Mateo Cou~ty to develop a specific phase­ out plan. Staff requests Council/s continued approval to exceed authorized staffing levels to backfill for officers assigned to East Palo Alt;o. Total cost for the 12-month continuation is approximately $267,840. Staff proposes to take this from the Budget Stabilization Reserve, since funding frou ongoir.q :revenue sources is not sufficient to cover the additional expenditures. DacltgrOl.lnd The Palo Alto Police Department's fornalized efforts to assist East Palo Alto began in July, 1989. At that time, East Palo Alto Police Chief Dan Nelson requested the assistance of several neiqhboring police agencies to address alarming increases in homicides, violent crime and drug sales. This multi-agency task force ",'as comprised of officers from palo Alto l Menlo Park, Redwood CitYI Atherton and CMR:268:9~ _, .0' .. ', " the california Hlqhway Patrol (CMP). This was a proactive effort to directly target 'pecific type. of cri~.. Up to that time, Palo Alto officers routin~ly responded to assist East Palo Alto police officers w.'hen called4 In Jamlary 1992, an unprecedented 11 shootings occurred in th.e span of 12 hours. Newly-apPointE'.d Police Chief Burnham Matthews requested emerqency assistance. from 6urrol.mdinq jurisdictions. Palo Alto city council authorized Palo Alto Police resources to be &ssigned to East Palo Alto for a six·'month. period as part of the newly-oreated Re.qional Enforcement Detail (RED) TE:am, consisting ot one sergeant and threE! officers. At that time, othor Team -participants included officers from East Palo Alto, Menlo Park, state Parole and the Federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Pirearms. Council authorized several subsequent extensions beyond that initial six-montl't period until June 30, 1994. Council also authori~ed the police Department to exceed its budgetod staffing levels by one sergeant and two officer positions until that date. It has been clear since the TeamJs inception that the purpose underlying its deployment has been auqmontation of the underataffe.d East Palo Alto Police Department. During its operational life, the TeamJs accomplishments have been remarkable. A brief summary of the RED TeamJs operational success is in order. The RED Team has had a decided impact on criminal activity in East Palo Alto and has significantly contributed to the overall crime reduction effort. Without question, the act~itional assistance of 18 San Matso county SheriffJs deputies and 14 California Highway Patrol officers this past year-has been the tut"ning point in East Palo Alto's drastic drop in crime. Uonetheless, the 24 mcnths of RED Team work have produced some very noteworthy statistics. Prom its inception date, on April 1, 1992, the RED Team has made over 1,000 arrests. Many·of thes~ have been for violent felonies involvIng weapons of every description. In fact', the Team has seir.ed 87 hand9uno, 55 rifles and shotquns and 9 daggers. Additionally, th~ RED Team has recovered 5S stolen vehicles and seized drugs of all types with a value exceeding $156,000. statistics alone, however, do not tell the 'Whole story_ Before additional la~ enforcement assistance arrived, the RED Team imparted a strong sense of reassurance to a beleaguered community. That reassurancl;! extended beyond the East Palo Alto city boundaries to the. surrounding neighborhoods in Palo Alto and Menlo Park, Which had been plagued nightly by continual gunfire and the threat of falling bullets. Fortunately, the criminal climate in East Palo Alto has improved drastically. CMR:268:94 2 i I , , -" ... . ' :.' ,:,:,:,,_.,. " ' . 1 ...... i \, ".'., cyrrlDt ~ri.1G'1 C11.~ During-'19512, c"ln unprecGdented level ot violence was GKperienced in east Palo Alto. End-ot-year figures proved East Palo Alto the lurder capital (por capita) of the country. The RP.o Team orrivod in April of that year, tollowad one year later by operation Safe Street. and the addition ot 32 officers from the Sheriff's Office and tho CHP. Th. combined effort. ot all agenci •• resulted In a aiqnlficant reduction in violent off.n.... Only one y.ar after e.cquiait1on of the murder capital status, violent crime has tr'l'nded do ... ~n..,"'rd at a noticeable rate. A compo rison of violent crit2G ehtist1co for 1992 <lncl 1993 shown below clearly d.picts this tr"nd. l1lUlII till l.ill .t.J:lIAlliilI Hoaicido. 42 6 -86' R.P*' 1,z 13 -19% Robbery with firearm 162 86 -47t ... n robbery 271 195 -2at ~oGaultB with firearm 158 120 -2U ~ *- This dacrease in violent crime, co~bined with staffing from other ngencieB and Bupplement&l funding from a variety of sources, has fostered a new stabilization and a crime rate more consiGtent 'With that of othor cities of oiml1ar size in urban settings. In tact, excluding the REO Tea~, currant combined staffing in East Palo Alto on an officer-per-thousand population basis exceeds that of almost till other cities in tho state. Baot Palo Alto Police are now able to redireot enforc:eUient efforts toward a more proactive, as opposed to a reactive, approach. 'l'his is evident in newly instituted cODAunlty policin9 effort., bolst.red inveotlgative capability and enhancod evidence handling and processing capacities. BEp 'op c-Q.t §wp,mary Since the forAlation of the RED Team, expenditur~s for salary, overtime, and equipment totalled approximately $826,708 for Palo Al1:o. T~e breakdown of el<penditur •• by year is detailed in Exhibit .... It should be noted that the cost. for fisoal year 1991-92 reflect only the three-month participation from April through JUne, and for tiscal year 1993-94, the costs have been projected through the and of the year. ~po,e4 Aa.!atanol tor J~~~~ At the Tr!~Cities/County meeting on April 6, 1994, East Palo Alto City Man~qer Jerry Groomes requested that: CHR.26S:94 3 \ L I, e i I, I , ! ',\. \ '\ \ , \ .. " \ .. ·~l.' .. ··· \.,,' ., The current levol of law enforce»ant support from Palo Alto, Menlo P.ftrk and San Katel) county continuo for one YOBr. Tho chief low enforcenent offlclale frCA ~8t Palo Alto, Palo IIlto and Kenlo park identify the "oat effective uses or theil' statts. A speoHio iAplnented June, .1997. phaae-out plan be developed which vill b. over the threo~year period between July, 1995 and city Honagel' Oroo .... 0100 provided staff with intonation relating to tho city's long-term lav enforcemont needs, which yere baaad upon Bconoa1c d6velopment projoctionB~ It ~a8 Mr. Groomes' belief that tho City or g~8t PAlo Alto would require the same lovel of enforce-llont ftssistance. frOD nOighbor1nq communities until Juno, 1995. At that time, tho law enforce_ant conmit~ent by Palo Alto, Menlo Park Zlnd San tftlt.QQ county "ould be reducod consistent with the pre-aCjreed upon pha.se-out plan. According to Hr. Groomes, all Palo Alto and H'onlo Fad( police ofticerg would 110 lonq~r be needed by June, 1997. Eased upon the above request, the. Po) ice Chiefs for the three citios Met for the purpose of identifying the most beneficial use of laW' enforcement assistallcO fro:;;:! Palo Alto and Honlo Park. It lias Eaet P.alo Alto Acting Police ~'hief John sterling's belief that, while there are still considerable luprovements to be made, Eaot Palo Alto is out: of ttle ficr-isis mode. n Gi'len this situation, and, should Council authoriz4) use of Palo Alto's resources d~lrinq fisca.l year 1994~95, it 1s staft's intent to provide the sarne level of police assistance (one ssrqeent and thrs8 officers) during liscal yoar 1994-95. Palo Alto officers corrently <l!IsBiqned to the RED Iteam ",ill be ne.eded during-, the four .. week pe~iO<l 8ssoci.ellted 'With tho upcoming World CUp Soccer ~anos in June and July. Because staff feals it is i~port8nt to rotate the current RED Team officers back into the mainstream of Palo Alto's or9~nization, they would then return to their normally assigned positions within the Field service. Division. Pending council approval tor continued partioipation, replacement officora ,",ould be seleoted .from thOB{) personnel who volunteer tor the a~8iqnment and will be r088siqn~d in September, 1994. city Manager Groo~e8 has informed staff that a new Police Chief will be identified by July 1, 1994, staff will consult with the ne.w Eilst Palo Alto Polico Chie.f lind determine his/hor-specific needs durin9 fiscal year 1994~95. Filoal Xe~1'?'-95 costa Coots for continued law enforcenant It(J;rticipation through fisctll year 1994-95 clre estimated to be $2'6'1 j 840. Expenditures inolude sa:lary and benefits for three pOSitions, (pending Council approval CIIR:26B.94 4 L ., " to exceed budqated statfinq levels), overtime for officGr& and ar.y minimUlll staffing backfill situations, vehicl •• and equipment. Exhibit B details the pr~ject.d 1994-95 costs. R'gog·PCat.iops Staff ~eeo~4ndD that councilr 1) A\lthod,. continued pollce .. soi9t.n~. to tho Citr of East Palo Alto by providing ona sergeant and thr •• otC cerB tJl<ough June 30, 1995; and 2) AuthorizG the Police oepartllent to exceod staffing levels by one sergeant and two otfic6ra year 1994-95; and its bud .. _tod dudn .. fiscal 3) Direct staff to work in conjunction with repre8ent~tiye& or M&nl0 Park, San Mateo County and ~Bt Palo Alto in tho development or a phaso .. out plan and report back. to tho, CounciL 'l'~Hf/:' CHRIS DIJRI(IN Polics Chief Attachments: Exhibit A Exhibit B cc Menlo Park Police East Palo Alto Police California Highway Patrol San Mateo county Sheriff's DeparLrnent Crescent Park. Homeowners' Association CHR:268:94 5 ~~~t~~0:~01 .. ·· ... " .. ', ,~:;' ";' .',',' '\ , ,. ; ! L" t l-i· r , I I j .,." I I , ! " ~ . PALO MIlO POX,XCR D2I'AR'I'IIBU1' EAST PALO ALTO COSTS SALARIBS Reqular Salaries and Benefits Overtime Total Salary !fOI/-SI\Ll\lIY Equipment Vehicle 'l'O'l'lIL COSTS and Benefits • April through June 1Ul-92· lICTOllL $93,120 $8,226 $101,346 o $2,876 $104,222 .* Projections throuqh June 30~ 1994 1992-93 lICTUlIL $306,219 $78,073 $384,292 $2,449 $16,456 $403,198 " , • < $249, n3 $45,914 $295,287 $12,500 $11,502 $319,289 El<jU BIT to $640,652 $132,273 $180,925 $14,949 $30,834 $826,708 , . EXUIBIT :u ESTIMATED COSTS POR FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 SALARIES/BENEFITS OVERTIME EQUIPMENT/VEHICLES $232,340 10,000 25.500 $267,840