HomeMy WebLinkAbout0260.094May 5, 1994
HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL
Palo hlt,o, California
Attention: }'inance Co'"":.1i ttp.e
Members of th~ council:
'I'his is an informational report and no Council action is necessary.
At the April 19 Special council Heeting on General Fund Budget
Issues, Council Merr,ber simitian asked staff to compa};"e General Fund
capital expenditures in the Proposed 1994-95 Capital Improvement
Program, as a percent of the operating budget, with historical
information on capital spending levels.
l\ve~~Q.j....n9.....Q!l
Q!lQ...i,tal ~XQ.enditures
~~Operi!t.i!lg
Budget. 1981.-82 thr...QJ!gh
19§~e_~
6.4%
~~QRosed 1994-95
Spending as
~LQPJlli~.ting
Budget
6.3%
General Fund capital spending ill the Proposed 1994-95 Budget, as a
percent of the operating budget, is approxil11ately equivalent today
to the average in 1981-82 through 1985-86. (The time frame for
1986-1993 is not used for comparison, because extensive budget
CMR:260:94
~fE~
:-~ ," "';' .
:::~.,.~~/~:f::,~ \ .. :;.:~-,:
":..' ;.:.::;1':",
,"." ' .. ;
. , ,/; ;,
•
, , .
I
I
",'":
1/
.• 0 ••
reductions during that time frame distort the numbers.) This fact
further substantiates .an earlier staff report dated September :1.9,
1993, titled "Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Infrastructure
Budget from 1,)81~92 through 1993-94 11 (attached). That report
conoluded that "overall budget doll.lrs devoted to public
infrastructure projocts have kept pace ~ith inflation and have not
declined over time.1I
This conclusion lTlay ba sorne~lhat counter intuitive, in that it
contradicts our belief that funding for infr.astructure has
decreased over time. However, keep in mind that the City added
utility user t~x dollars in 1986-87 to fUnd additional street and
sidewalk improvements. That increase helped to offset the effect
of inflation over time.
In addition, because the city shifted storm drainage and vehicle
replacement capital dollat"s to other fundin9 sources, namely, the
Stor~ Drainage utility and the Vehicle Replacment Internal Service
Fund, two benefits have a:r:isen. First j the capital budget is now
able to accommodate more projects than would have occurred if storm
drains alld vehicle replacement were sti 11 funded in the General
FUlld capital budget. In other v.'ords, the $4.2 million proposed for
the Genera l Fund CJP in 1994-95 can be "stretched furtheL'" than
.... ·ould h<lvO been the case if that $4.2 million had to fund st.orm
drainago and vehicle replacement. Second, as a utility funded
through rates, potentially more dollars can be spent on storm
drainage improvements than Would likely have occured if storm
dt'ains were still a General Fund re.sponsibility.
Having said this, the City now has more infrastructure to maintain
and n~placc. Since 1981-82', the city has taken over the operation
of the Cubberley School Site; has added Johnson Park, Byxbee Park
and acroage at Creer Park; and has upgraded the former Harbor site.
Currently, discussions arv underway to participate 1n maintaining
the palo'Alto Unifl~d School District's playing fields. Additional
infrastructure will require additional capital (and maintenance)
dollars over time.
FinallYr it is also worth noting that the real valuation of capital
spending is the condition of our infrastructure. The General Fund
does not have a comprellensive inventory of its infrastructure, nor
of its relative condition, nor a long-term plan to address
anticipated infrastructure obsolescence. Having a fixed asset
system will begin to address these concerns.
A co~prehensive capital plan, including actual conditions of
assets, CQuld be addressed only ""ith the focused application of
additional resources j in order to develop a specific Infrastructure
Management System. Such a system has been discussed by staff ot! a
preliminary basis as a potential future priority for development.
Due to existillq staff commitments, however, it cannot proceed until
after complet ion of the Hission Driven Budget and the
CHR:260:94 2
L
/l
\ ..
f
I .
i
i
\ .
....• \.
\ \1:
"'.:
~ ... :."'.' •. '
-.-->':;J . -.. ~ .
. -
'> '>
"';.
•••• -r ••
\ .
. ';,; ..
Organizational RQvlcw. Tha earliest possible date at which such a
proqra", could b. considered for initial funding would be in the
preparation of the 1995-97 budgot. with actual implementation
requiring a multi-year sch.dule.
Respectfully Gub~ittad,
9tt-I~~h
(!JH STEELE
Budget H~nClger
-~.~£)
o rector 0 nance
Attachmant: CMR:489:93
CHR:260:94 3
,,';.
'"
_ ._~ ..... ,",,,_ • .," ,, __ ._~_,. ,~~,~ ,,'" ~~.~~.;:;~:"o,;";::::;i::';',>=-,,~_~ ~{"-;::~~~;;;:;~~.!.".,1;~"~~"_~
:
,
September 16, 1993
HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL
city of Palo Alto
Attention: Finance committee
Members of the Council.
This is an inforrn~tion81 report ~nd no Council action is nec{Jssary.
lUlpo;t in 'Briee
In an effort to address questions about the City's long-term
commi trnent to its capital infrastructure, staff has Analyzed tha
past thirteen years of capital bud90tS. Bud90ted capital expendi
tures have been oategorized to provide 10night into the levels anc\
trends for infrastructure and non-infrastructure spending.
Comparisons of real dollar capital budqets OV9r the p~st decade
reveal that public infrastructure projects as a ~holo have kept
pac~ with inflation. This is chiefiy a result of tho dedication of
utility users ta~ monics [04 htre~t8 ~nd aidewalko ~nd shl~tinq
storm drain projects to enterprise fundin9. OthGr infr8struqturo
categories, such as public bulldinqs and p.nrks facilities improvo
ments, that are dependent upon the General fund, havo eithor not
kept pace with inflation or experienced :inconsistent levels of
funding over the years~
Backgro.l.l.M
During recent budget hearings, as veIl as in reviewinq the Economic
Future Study I Ceuncil has expressed concern about long-term funding
for the City's infrastructure. "One of the: principal questions
frequently asked is whet.her the city, over timo, has devoted f()'wer
CMR: 489:93
,~~7"[~
_. . .... ;
,-~-(:::; l~~', -:-;~:'~~.:" \\ :~'~_'..;~
~~It}~"
!
I,
I
I
1
i
I
1-" ,
;,'.,
'I
I
J
I
I
!
•
": ,
. ,,",'
Capital Improvement program (CIP) dollars in this area. This
question leads to a mora comple~ one. Staff interprets council's
concern as not simply being over the ~bsolute level of the capital
infrastructure budget, but whether there is a backlog of infra
struoture improvements and whether that backlog is increasin9 or
decreasing over time: in other words, what is tho condition of our
bul1dingo, ro~ds, sidewalKs and parks? Is the cityls ~sic
infrastructure deteriorating, improving or being roaintained, and at
what level?
Categories of C§p,ita1 Expenditures
As'a first step in addressing council's questions on tho health of
the City's infraBtructure, staff examined budgeted capital expendi
tures over the last 13 years. Projects were divided into three
oategories:
Public Infrastructure: The tern lIinfrast:ructure ll has several
definitions. A project is defined as infrastructure in this
analysis if it is ct'lpital intensive (hi9h cost), has a long public
facility (geraerally 10 years or longer), and generates a public
service. This definition has been refined further to include the
acquisition, construction, and extension of the life of a physical
entity. Thus, this category includes public buildings, facilities
~nd building systems; streets and sidewalks; intersection, traffic
and biks lane improvements; parks, qol! and open space improvo
ments; and st.orm drains. Storm drains, noW' an enterprise fund
item, have been included in this analysis because they wero part of
the General Fund CIP in past years.
Examples of CIP projects included in this categOt'Y and other
categories are 11!Ited on pages J through 5 of the attachad
worksheet. Budget~d dollars displayed on the attached worKsheet
exclude rei~bursements from the Utilities.
Note t.hat some budqeted projeots for buildings, an infrastructure
category, may bo for reasons other than extending the useful life
of the capital aBSQt~ Such expenditures are not included in this
cateqory. An example would be 'proje,cts related to making fa"cili
ties accessible to citizens with disabilities. The purpose of
these projects is to p~~moto public access¥ not to extend the life
of the modified structures.
NOn-Iftfrastruature: This category includes projects for such items
as environ~ental and access improvements I communication and
informational systems, and miscellaneoUS projects. Examples of
these projects are provided on pages 4 through 5 of the attached
'WorKsheet.
CMR'489,93 2
·t'·· , ,
, .~
, I
"
\ .
. \
I , \: ' ',. \" .
'V
""l' .
BxtraQr4inarY/one~~ima CIP projeots: This category includes one
time projacts fully funded by non-G~no:ra.l Fund sources. These are,
arguably, exceptional-projects that might skew the leval and trend
of budgoted capital expenc;tituros incl\ldad in the Public Infrastruc
ture categ~ry.
Thirt'tn-YlAr CAplSal frogram Tr~~
The worksheet on pages 1 through 2 of the attachment shows the
capital budget for the last 13 years, orqanized into the three
categories discussed above. It is important to note that funding
by category can vary considerably year to year, depending upon the
size ot one or more projects. Therofore, in addition to comparing
a "basa yearn to curre.nt year funding, it is instructive to track
fundinq over the 13~year period. In the right-hand colurnns of page
2 of the attachment, budgeted capital eHpenditures in 1981-82 are
compared to budgeted capital expenditures in 1992-93. Adjusting
for inflation, the following tentative conclusions appear:
o The overall total public infrastructure budget has
increased by 109 percent in real dollars from 1981-32
through 1992-93.
o
o
o
o
o
o
CMR'489'93
Public
capital
dollars
Buildings, Facilities and Building
projects have decreased by 73 percen~
from 1981··82 throuqh 1992-93.
Systems
in real
Streets and Sidewal~ CIP capital budgets have increased
hy 140 percent in real dollars from 1981-82 through 1991-
93.
Intersection, Traffic and Bike Lana Improvements capital
budgets have increased ~y 454 percent In real dollars
from 1983-84 through 1992-93 (this category did not have
a budget until 1933-84).
storm DrainagE'. capital budgets have increased by over
4000 percent in real dolldrs from 1982-83 through 1992-
93. (This category did not have a budget until 1982-83.)
Parks, Golf, Open Space and School Site Improvements
capital budgets have increased by 12 percent. in real
dollars fl"om 1981-82 throuqh 1992-93.
The City's non-infrastructure CIP project budgets have
increased" by 595 percent in real dollars from 1981-82
through 1992-91.
3
\
"
i', .
I'
r ,
I
I
I
I
!
... -n .
. {j. -."
.~ ..
I
Overall, the city has been able to keep pace with inflation for its
total infrastructure budget. This has basn accomplished through
'dedicat,ion of the utility users tax monies to fund street and
Bldewalk proj~ots, by shift.ing stQrrn drc'lina98 projects t.o enter
prise funding', and by the a'pplication of gas tax funds, federal
funds and traffic =itiqation fees for intersection l traffic and
bi~e lane improve~ont~.
fllbUS! Byilding,
fuMing for {"proysI'ents to public buildings, facilities, and
building syste.s ha:s decreased, when adjusted for inflation, since
1981-82. The t¥pe of projects In this category include roof
repail'B~ seismic improvo1!'lonta, major remodeling of huildings,
building system i~provo~entsl dam repairs, and building new
t~oillties. In the llIe.in l these p:cojects are supported by the
General FUnd.
The public and council havo expresslld concerns regarding the leval
of CIP fJ.mding for the City's parks and playgrounds. Within the
ctltsqor)' "Park.s, Golf I Open Space and School Sites, II fundillg detail
is provided fot" p~rk facility improvements over time. Funding for
J.nt.l"o!Iatructure improve7l:!~nts Buch as playqround equipment, park
dJilenitios such 8S benches And fences, and irrigation rcpair.s has
boen inconsistent !Since 1981-82. The 1993-94 park facIlity budqet
of $344,500 represent$ the highest level of funding for infrastruc
ture improvements over tho 13-year period. Prom 1981 through 1992-
93 the city has spant an average of $84,000 per year (adjusted for
inflation) on p~rk infrastructure improvements. The 1993-94
fundil'\9 of $344,500 for parks facility improvements reflects the
level of annual fundln9 n~cossary to implo~ent ~ajor components of
Community Services' Parks Master Plan (scheduled for the next five
years). As with pUblic builcHng projects, park projects have been
<tepondont upon-tho level of General Funds available for elP
p<ojects.
Non-totr&,truotuxa projeota
The City's non*'inh"astructure elP budget has increased significant
ly since 1981-82. This is a result of federal mandates, such as
the A.~9rlcans with Disabilities Act and environmental mandates,
such as underground tank removals. Projects such as' Police al1d
Fire communication systems have been added to the CIP budget. The
City has increased funding for management information systems, such
as Geographic Inform.ati,on Systems, Information Systems Development,
and Computer Aided Happing. There has also been an increase in a
variety of miscellaneous, non-infrastructure project.s, such as Art
CKR:489,93
L
_~ __ 'ln;."~;
I ,.
.1
in Public Places, Printing Services. equipment up<Jradeg,
Service Center security i~prove~QntG, and fire station
nodifications.
COlJclusiOll
Hunicipol
dormitory
overall, capital budqet dolIAt'S. devot~d to public infrastructure
projec..:ts 'have kept pace with inflation and he-ve not decl in,lld over
ti~B. This is' a consequence, howevor, of dedication of the utility
ulSere tax: monies to fund atreet and sido'Walk projects and the
shifting or etom drain. projects to enterpri.e (undlnej. other
project categories, .. ore delX'ndent upon th .. ovallobillty or Canarol
FUnd financinq, such as laprovoments to public buildlngo ~nd park
infrastruoture, have experienced declines in real dollar terns or
inconsistent funding ~ver tl~Q. Non-i~rrastructute projects have
experienced, stoady qrovth baG-ad on, r.egullltory changes, enhanced
public safety systeulfJJ and tha el'!lorgcnce of new COJl\putor technoloqy
to increase productivity and satisfy tho denan~ for ~Qrc infor~a
tIon.
Respoctfully submitted,
\J\. t .... "J·.\.-, ....
JO'E SACCIO
senior Financi~l Analyst
~J? .
----~ ltLLL'-O
E r,y HARJU so '~-----~i ;:: 0[/ lryfnce
J FLEI! IG ~
C Y Hanager f/
CHR:489:9J 5
/1
I
I
<: ..
, .
Co~fliQ,\ 01 CiP .."" K~~t I~I I,\>..., I "'-.1~. ,.$.t .... ~'o~15
I, f'IJIUC IIffMSTRUCfVftE Il~OOET 18:Q:J:U J.i.OU,! US..'!.." lU.t~ ll.l!Ull. I!FU"1. lUl-lQ lUf.f1 J_~
M>h O~, $tr~ •• f.ctit., fluS#J.;I $yt~ 1,»8,000 1.125.000 1,4111.000 U$,OOO "".000 ',''2.00(1 "11,'00 417.~) 435,000
6''"tJIOd SJoH.wllC'!J
-UUl TUI 01 co-rtl rloOd lllfJ I~.OO() 2,OJ:/.,'00 2,()lt,00<>
-&,"1 ~\'tmtI'It rund~" T.~) 500.000 1>00,000 ""''''''' 100,('000\) 100.<X>O ..... 00 )OO,<:oXt 661pX'! ... -
SutI10ttl S",.K aM 6I6t"''', 600,000 000,_ WO,,,,,", '0¢,.OCo) J;)').c.¢O 1.o1e..ooo "H:!Op60' ~ • .cQJ.('Iw)() J,1"...ooo
1n'$1~loo. T(.!'flc.m M., l_ ~O\'t(Mna Nr)
>0_
\4$.(01) ",00<)
In''''I-&("Hon. T,.dr.'(: ....,., 93:" l .. -.e !mptcvlmeou ton (UOlCS) "'.000 "0.000 II'!I,OOO 1J4,00.."<) .a6-,~ &8-',('00
M10Iall-n!e'uc:tiol'l, Tl.fflQ IVId 8i1l. l.4nt ~0¥_"'1e ... «» rilO.()')O "",000 Hv.(loX) n~,ooo JI5,O'""" UUi('o()
Ston-n Dr.lhs
.a.eMf" (lJno:l "0,000 00,000 3~S.("') lOO.OO) lSS_<X'IO t<o,.")b:>')
-5IComl 0 .. .., Sl.tlrU"'ld .115·,000
S>Jbkl" Scow", Or.,," 41),(100 9(),OOO 39$.1)('() l{»);000> J:!S.OOO ""'/)00 4115,r;.oo
Parle F"K5t.,. 'IOf'Iol'$n>3r'lI' 15.000 10.('OJ lolS,QIX) ".000 3-87,(1().)
riNk I)II~~ w-,-,s-on &O!;l Grotl Pri.l 10,000 J':i,OOJo ~~,OOO 4S-O,OQO 1)).000 0 e-s-o,OOO
~'CQ.urn 80,000 1 Je,()I)O lSO,(OO IOO.OCoO 10,('1(]() 10.('0()()
Olh'ft SpK., '1'...:111 Halbo-r. S..., flao-=hQUito Ct-.. lI: 1305,000 .. 0.000 l5-0,C-OO :l;lO.Qo..')() 400.000-
s.;:~ Si'!e AtqU$1t1M.l M'd lmpto\'otrNnU l-4IJ.OOO )'15.000 l.t15,OO) lIO.OOO e.SS,-('('IO
SuI:l10U4 Parke, Ootl. O~4" ~ .. ~ ~tJ le5.000 315,000 118,000 1,4'0.(1().") 1~,(lXl 2ro.C<xl H>5,OOO t,l H,.QCoO 1,Ur,('OOO
To~ I'\IMc fI1fltUlveM. B~t UXll.OOO I."O.~ Z,UI.OOO ,),1U,(\.,'\G J.ne.wo '.~u..O¢O ,u .. ,s~ ..... '('10,'00 1,2»,000
1981·tt2 8.&u VI.., I",f\!o!f-d b,. C?'I 2,O:t~,Ol(l; 2.102',OJ6 ~.)I1,~U l.UI .• ll 2 • .ur.l,' .J.U.',20$ .2.U'.2HII Z ... '4.6M
~hlll\oC4l ... (" .. n ~1 1M hole Yin rnflalid In,Ole) nuf.4 t,Ul,:JU II,'" .U4.1tt tllP,lOtl 1,.'1.1.4 '.fU ........
II. N~ 8rRVCTUflE ell> 8!JOOlr
ffl\'iror.nenhl ~""m!'rll. "$).000 19:5.000 liel.ooo
A<x:lIou ImpfcverJ'lert[1 " Amw\:.lM wl1h Di~"""~. Ac. >5.00> "o,000
CotM-,unJcolt>:on~ 28,000 61.000 IU.OOO 211,000 ",QOO !U.ooo 4',3010
Mtn~~ am I'uW<: II1lounalJon S) I"ml 65,000 ..,.= 45$.000 3SlJO;» U5.000 joU.600 "''-UII.OOO
New \fINe-Ie. 81,«(10 6UOO .,-L.o;htll9lnlllrr-9f"~'...-n.MI' 90.000 .&0,000
"'t(~A-l)/otct. 00.000 J 11,QtX1 ,~,OOO SV.QOO 15.0C'¢ U1.-SOO IM.,OOO l-3I.ooo .. e1,(!(jo()
Te'lelHon-fnfl ... ttI,;or<,,iIe ~IP 8....".1 1og,1)OO 3J.3,OOO 145,000 ~$'.ooo I,3J MOO $1l!1,eoo nuoo 611.$10 !.Ul1.900
III, EX1I'lIOfdbrylOl'It-Tm. CIP F'ro.ltC1'
.... .eqo.bitlQ,l 01 Ke',I1OM 101 l&x-.d ~1rJbJtud, 1,:.\.16,(100)0 <0_
• Srnct Itt EM (Star.ford Ro!lrroburudJ 000,000
ITT Marsh fllMr-oQo1rn6M (C6IJI~ Con .. rv. R.Ombo..IJ.-.II
c ... roml-l Aonnu. P.fIfr;Irog ~ruelo .. 1f8 t&-x\d &ImbuJMdI
M.Jfor trsI .... ".c;t~ «'T1pJovllMnl,.p.tgt M<f
'fotellbft .. ,oJtn.ttyAA1t:rn,. (;j P "'*)Io-\t 1.32-5.000 00.000 000_
GUM To'" ~f"I'lIUcM" Hon--lrll, •.• blrDoOld "'o,",ctt 2.\12,000 2 ,,'JIM,OOO 3,138.000 4,0431.000 3.M!!;,OOO 6,185.~ UM,oOC<I 5.010,~'O 1,038,600
I.
"'I"(:'nt.~. .... 1'II11o,»M}xI...-l'" P~l'Of6 I InF~1roiI CtI~nr~ t. Pl.J6UC fl'lFRASTftUCTlJf.t: 8UOOET Ht9i!_jj. li$.l,".Sl lUH.3. illHL I~Ql·_&lloJJlU.1!_~ JQUH.lUii.Z.:U .~
~ Bu.1JIngt. S~M", F .. eIItl4l. 811~ S\,*l.nw 845,00.) J 10.000 1,100,000 ~O.OOO ·13,~" -72'.$0"
SIIHIII ~ tkl"III.a!h
·\JUT Ttl( Ot" OeOlf" fl,lt\$ {Of} 1,000,000 1,000..000 1,000,000 '.000.000 .stIN' ~r.Y"~1 ru1<l ~tI lu; 6(15,000 300.000 1~5.000 800."'"
:$Wlo!:.tl611Mt. 1M Sldt •• l. 1.~1J5.000 1.300,000 1,165,000 1.eoo,OOO 269.00" 1.39.60"
1.rIl.r"<:t~. T'll("1I: 11M ~a-l_ l'r'9«~""m4Inlt tofl 40,000
l'nt.rH<:!O)n, TnWc .... 1 9.\:4 Lin" Imp!()vemenll (Gil fund) , to.ooo 5<10 .... 315.000 3l4,00<1
Sublollo1 rM"'-;I01~. TIII~ ~ flA, LI~ J,~, .... menu 120,000 500,000 415,000 -3t4.ooo 730.00':11. 4U,11" lIil8:!<-e..l<U4 n t>f~ r".
O·«ml)rw.,
-<lC!04I1~ fuo1
-$INm 01""" Sutllund 1,79{).0()0) 935.000 2.8-10,000 1.245,000
~!olel6Iorm [)p~'k1 1,J9Q,OOO 935,000 2.e.40,OOO 1,24'i,()C:() 6~,OO!li fi:)O),OF" 19S1-S) ".+-1 fl ~I., .... !I!I
Park F..::litr '~!l\,<!m'!nl' 181.000 40,1')00 120,000 :J.C4,5<IO P.rIt Dotve~M f...I:*ns.on -."I<J GI&.e~ Parh) 390,000
GtXf COUll'" 50,OC~
Open ~k&. Y.t(:I" H;wb:x, SM fr~~u!,"''1(> Quit 1'130,000 2'6,000 158,000
Scho¢.! $,.'1~ Aeqo.i$lIiom .M'Id ~OI'''rTl6I)('' 150.000
Svblole19.,h, 001'1, O.i>'rl~;)OI .Q SMo-oI SH •• 1,25',000 385.000 276,000 3U,500 61.21" 11 611%
TOltl PvbJ,:, InI,nlrutlur, 8~ t ~,7n,(lOO 3,iHO,OOO 8.2'IIlI,lXlO 4,.63,600 213.'~" Iljl'.:n",
1991-,92 Batt VUI I"rtal~d by Cpj 2.'08.2&.2 2,114,193 3,002,446 3,On,6'O
DIfI.rettOe Ihl"""" 8~te111M au. VI.ulIl1'b1H 2,868,718 U8,004 S.29',~U I ,46<1,U 0
II. ,"ON '''''AASTftUCllJR! tiP BUD<lU
[,,"';'~n.t" 'mplCl~·elTlenl. 105,000 ... -keen ImpfOI'ClMnl'& An'le-llcwn w~h OIu.!:.le. Act '0.000 3~,OOO lSO.ooo 343,810 C~allon. 84,050 28:9.250 344.600 681,950 ""~emt~ VId f'I.obk rnlIXrPUolloo s-,o,l.m, 69(1,600 231,600 314,600 290,400 ,"W Ve!.lcl .. t:1 I ,0(1) 32,OOG It,OOO 76,000 LeMlcoGopr.g IIT'If<"O\'8m.!1f1U 30.000 M'~C8~~ Pr"""etl 198',000 376.000 215,OC<l 6 16,&00
TOIa! NoM'rof, .. lll.Iclu,. C1P 8iidg,t 1,354,55<) 1,028,%0 l,I36,100 1,922,410 942,28~ 69l;i..34%
In. [rtt.a.ohth.t.¥rIOn.,l"" ell' Pto}lct,
"I,cq' .... dlionof XeVllor.. LollBood R\l1rrlbuNe41
$.-wl' tA fiR 4Sl.-nl«c:I RHnbvtwdJ
ITT ,.~.." Eoh¥ocemtflol (C"'$la( Com&rv. RHr'lbtnM) 843.000
Ceiloml .. "I,Y8~ P.w1o;Iog SJ:rucIIK. r800d nln-o~ .. d) 1,&00,000
MI!I}Gf 1<'l1"'H<'t~ 1mp.'()~"""'l\ll·PIlllO M.t 1,000,000
Tow h;lr~~IO .... ·n-r. C-'P Pr<>jfcb lU3.ooo l,fJOO.ooo 11>00,000
o"nd Te-tel '''fr .. Il'~II'''., HM.J"rro, Ii E~lt.orcf, Pt<l}lC(' 8,014,650 4,8M,e!\.O 9,OU,~OO 1,4J1),t1O 32:1.18% 164,98"
page 3 of 5
Bxampl •• of projeots in Eaob CIP category
'p'Ublio Buildlnqs, Struc~~_t:AQ..UJ.t..ies and ~D'§
• Foothill and Arastradero Dam Repairs
• Children's and Community Theatre and cultural Center
Building and Auditorium Improvementa
• CorrQc~ structural Deficiencies in Lucie Stern Buildlnq
• Architectural and structural Investigation of Public
Assembly Buildings
• Kain Library Building Remodeling and Structural
Deficiency corroction
• Roof Repairs and Replacements at city Facilities
Q Public Build~n9s: Structural Improvements
• Foothills Fire }'acility
• Civic Conter Fire Sprinkler System
• Lucie stern Mechanic~l System Improvements
• HVM Energy conservation Retrofit
• Civic Center Energy Hlmagement System
• Rillconada Pool Renovation and Improvements
.. Civic Center Air Intake Nodification
• Heating end Ventilation systems at Lucie stern
• Cubberley Roof Repa.lrs
• California Avenue Underpass Improvements
• • • • •
• • • •
Renovation of Mitchell Park Tot Lot
Downtown Park North
Greer Park Develop~ant
Tennis and Basketball Court Resurfacings
RenoVation of Irrigatioh Systems and Installation of
Backflow Devices
Playground Furniture and Equipment Replacement
Baylands Reclaimed Water system
Parks Facilities Improvement3 and Repairs
Baylanrts Athletic center Circuit Replacement
• Maintenance Building Improvements
• Sorvice Yard and Storage pad Improvements
• Golf Cart Path Improvements
• Golf CourSQ Perimeter Fence and Driving Range Fence
Installation and Repair
• Water Reclamation
.. \
\
I.
•
Page 4 of 5
• Er'Osion Control on SAn Franclsquito Creek
• Ya.cht H~ibor-Restoration and Improvements
• Saylands Duck ~onQ Filtration system
• 8oronda-Lake Public Dock Replacement
• Foothills Park Picnio F~oility Replacement
Scb~~l sit_~quisit19n and InproVamants
• Ter~an School Site Development
• Surplus School site Purchase
• School Site Inprove~ents
H-a~al'dous H:a.terials storage • • • • •
Hazardous Haterials Underground Tank Removal
Airport 'J.'lInk Renoval and Cleanup
Tel"',:;: Investigation and Removal
Fuol storage Tank Upgrades
• Police Mobile Radio System U~Jrade
• Dispatch Console Roplacement
• Telephone system Heplacement
• HicrowavQ Radio system
• Police and Fire conmunications Computer
• P8X Software and lIa.rdwat'a IJpgrade
• VoiCE! P.t'oc:essing system
system
• Info:t.~r!l:ation systems Davelopment
• LIbrary Computet'i~ation
• FInancial Data Base Upgrade
• Co~p"ter Aided Mapping
• Ge09raphic lntormation Systems
~ Wide Area Net~orking
• Warehouse Inventory Control System
• Personal Co~putor Upgrades
• Payroll/Personnel system
Miscellaneo~_~~J&
• Clty Facilities Carpet Replacement and Painting
• Art in Public Places
• Facilities Haint.enance
, Replacement of Reproduction Equipment
• Garage Hoiso and Equipmont Overhaul
• Vehicular Washing Facility
\
1
'· .. :
I'
I
I
Page 5 of 5
• Communications Contor Re~odel
• Hearing I~p.ired Systoms
• civic center Conservation Lighting Improvements
• Fire Ste.tion Ovel'~\ead Do-or Modification
• Fira StatiQn" Dormitory Modifications
• Sign Replacement in Do~ntown Parkinq Lots
• Recorda K~naqement
• Evidence storage Expansion
• Computer Room and Finance Vault Remod~l
• Fire Appa~atu8 Hear.in9 Protoct.ion
• Ca~le T~levio1on Equipmont
• Printing Services Equipment UP9r~d&