Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout0203.094March 2". 1994 THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL Palo Alto, California · _._-------,-.-,..... ... - Regional Wat.ex Quality Cont.rol Plant Waste ...... ater Reclan:,at.ion Program M~mbere of the Council: Report in Brief This is an informational report snmmari2ir..g the revieW' com~ents from the pubJic and responsible agencies to the Notice of Preparation (NOP} of the Environmental Impa::t Report {EIR) for the Wastewa~er Reclamation Program. An update on Program activities is also incl:.oded for Council' E information. No CO'..lncil action is required at this time. Staff will return to Council for approval on specific action items. Background The Wastewater Reclamation pre-design/ElF project was appruved by Council on October 25. 1993 (CMR: 545: 93). 1>.8 I;art of the EIR process r NOPs were sent to responsible agenc~es, interested agencies, environmental groups and local ccr:nf!l...inity groups. Notices were also sent to over 3.UOO residents, who will be most affected by the program. The issuar.ce of the NOP began a 30 day review period, during ~hich the public and the agencies were encouraged to s~it comments on the Program and the EIR. A public seoping meeting was also held on Januar).~ 12, 1.994 to solicit the public / s view on the program and the EIR. Approximately 2D people attended the meeting. The re .... ie.., period ended officially on January 26', 1994. Revi-aw comments were received from various agencies and the public. This report summarizes the review comments r-E"ceived to date. ,gast of the Reclaimed Water Project is) There are concerns about the cost of the reclaime.d 'IIlo..ter project (5J and the suggestion has been made to use existing abandoned pipes to reduce cost. Staff has been investigating the possihilit)' of using abandoned pipes wherever p';:.ssihle. Of those investigated, only one pipe is por::entially suitable; and it has a:i.ready been converted to storm drain service. Staff will continue tnis effort. Ground Water Impact Concerns ",ere expressed by an environmental group and the Santa Clara Valley Water District (SCVWD) , with regard t.c the potent ial impact of reclaimed water on gro,,-"nd water and on aquifers. The ground water impact -.. as identified in tile l''lOP as tbe major concern -1- .~--., ~-~kr ~:. - o to be addressed b:r" the EIR. As part of the Project, the consultant has included the servic"-!s of an expert in tha field to study the actual impact and mitigation measures. This concern will be addressed in the EIR as stated in the NOP. AQditional Reclaimed Water Users The cities of Menlo Park and East palo Alto both requested to be added to the reclaimed water use sites and have identified major reclaimed water projects and sites within those cities. Copie's of their letters are included as attachments to this repcrt. Both cities are located in San Mateo County. Officials of San Mateo County have re8po~ded positively to the two cities' requests and has also expressed interesc in using the reclaimed water from the RWQCP. although no specific project has been identified. Staff will issue an addendum to the NQP and will expand the Program and the scope of the EIR to cover this request. This effort will not impact the schedule of the Pre-design/EIR, and the additional consultant fee will be covered under the contingency for the project. Preliminary Inquiri.es from the City of Mguntain View 2fnd NASA AMES NASA AMES is planning support services for its proposed wind tunnel proj ec:t and h;as identified a maj or inC'rease in reclaimed wa.ter requirement. Concurrently, the City of Mountain View staff is revie .. ing its potential future and reclaimed water requirements, and has requested thac we review the cost and schedule requirements needed to accelerate Project B of the Reclamation Master Plan~ Project B will extend the reclaimed water main south of US Highway 101 to Mountain View and NASA. Their concept is that we include the study of Project B in the EIR at the same level of details as Project A (pipeline to Stanford University; ~ Staff ie revie~ng the most cost effective way, that will have the least schedule impact on the overall project. to meet this request. Staff will retu:nl to Counci 1 for direction and approval on this request when and if it is formally proFosed by the City of Mountain View. Respectfully submitted, ~~~ Manager Related CMR: 545,93 Control Plant GLENN S. ROBERTS Director cf Public Works Attachments: Letter from the City of Menlo Park Letter from the City of East Palo Alto CMR::?03 :94 -2 - -.­..... • : c......tH 1Il..lOHEa ~\'tlf'lP!'lOTBI -"~ -Doo1IIl.1.. s.oeur.. ~ I CrTYOf i 1C1 L.AUREl STREET I YE""1..0 PAAK, C'" 9-W~"5 I (4'5) ese·3..1BC / fAX (415) 325-7935 1Il,",IIltl)TOU,a ~ !MENL~ \J'ARK february 9, 1994 Kr~ William Mik~ Man~Qer, Water ~uality Control Plant Public Works Department City of Pa'o Alto P, O. Box 10250 Palo Alto, CA 94303 Re: Wa~water Reclamation Program Dear Mr. Miks: What would it take to expand the initial study and [nvironment~l Impact Report to include Menlo Park? The City is very ser'ous about providing reclaimed water to OUT custOMers and is Tooking for Pala Alto to provide the .ain trunk lin.es. ff you would like to discuss this further, please give ~~ a tall at 858,3420_ Sincerely, ~ino Director of Engineering Services RN/DId 1576E • o City of East Palo Alto Jaruwy 12, 1994 Ms. !his)' star!: City of Palo AI", Palo Alte RogioaaI W ..... Quality Coouol Plant 250 I Embarcadero Way Palo Mo, CalifcnUa 9430.3 Rc-: CornJ1lent on Initial: S!Ud).' for the Propo3Cd Palo Alto Wa.~·arer Reclamation Program Ms StMIo Upon re\-iewift8 the Initial Smdy .and T e.:ru-licaJ Memorandum provided fa the Ci~' of East Palo Alto by your dep ...... ttlienr, r noticed that rhe project occ;criprions for [f,c: Wastev.'3.Cer Reclamation Program in each were slightly different ill regards to potential reuse sites \\-j&..ill the City of East Palo Alto. A}tbough the Project Description for Project C includes an "addition of a 14-(nch pipcIine extended to East Palo Alto to serve me V.S. 10 INniversrty A .... enue fnterc-hange and v.'hatever additiona1 reuse sit~t be identi fled in the a~ ... the Project Descriptioo in the TechnicaJ Memcrandu..--n makes reference to Figure Two in the Memorandum that geographically locates "'Most Feasible Reuse Sites," none of\1orucb are-in the City of East Palo ."Jto (tbe ~ge is earr"",,' p"'pert)'). k is Utis Division' s drsire thai East ?ala Alto be: incTud:d as :nuch as possible as a recipient of reclaimed ",,~.uer To this end, it is the Pubhc Works Div;sior,'s conu:rn that enviro:unental documents related to the Projoct do DOt explicitly specify potential sile.s L"l Ea~ Paio Alto 3.5 da those: document; rlenote specifi..; sites in S1.i rrolJnding cities ] contacted you 00 January 6, 1994, to d.l.Ji.fy the Projea Descriptions. At that. time, )'00 !ndica.ted that the East Palo Aito Public Works Divisi.on should p;n--.rIdc a list of an}· sites within the City of Cast PaID AJro that should be added ro !hI! list of '··Most Feasible Reu...~ Sites" The' table helo.,.; outlines potentio.! reuse sites in Ea..q Palo Atto that tile PlaruUng Director and I C<lnslder "feasible'"' (due to their prO/um.it) to tfle U.S. 101 Corridor route proposed by Project C} and estimated recln.imed wa.sle\iI.-ater derr.and for each (see also attached map). 2415 Uni~ersfly A", Essr PtJio Alta CalifDlf'lia 9430J Tel: 415185J~J'CO Fax: 415-' 85J-J1,5 ------------.~-.~.- P!QSYM1 Site: BeD St=! P .. 1< lack FatTen Pad: Dr. MartiL Luther IGn!I. 1r. Pari< P_ Medians 011 Roadways Total AmwaI Estimoted Need Proposed Sit: Areal>c.-J U 6.02 3.73 1.00 • baso:-d OIl 1.9 r.cn (eet: pet)'Car per IlQ'e Annual Est..in'.atcd Water ~~ 16.53 11.46 1082 2.9ll 47.71 The East Palo Alto Public Works Divisioo would ... ery much Wee to play an o:..ct.ive role in the planning oftbc Wa.st:e'tNa.ter Reclamatioo Program. lfyou need ar.y addJti"na.r ir.forrnation from this Division. please do not hesitate to contact me at (415) 1153-3189 or Da'wid Miller, the Interim DirectM ofPI>nning an.l ""bloc Works, at (415) 853-3105. Tbanl you. CITY OF EAST PALO ALTO Community Development Dep;utmcnt Public Works Divisioo cc: Da:l'id Miller, Interim Director of Planning and Public Works William Howard, Director of Comn.Llnity Develop~t Jerome Groomes, City Manager --. . " . .:.--.:" " ____ -..-;L_ ... ~. __ _ , ' , ' SUGGESTED "FEASIBLE REUSE SITES"" IN EAST PALO ALTO / ," ~ .. ' .. ~ 1 . 1 4 I