HomeMy WebLinkAbout0203.094March 2". 1994
THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL
Palo Alto, California
· _._-------,-.-,..... ... -
Regional Wat.ex Quality Cont.rol Plant Waste ...... ater Reclan:,at.ion Program
M~mbere of the Council:
Report in Brief
This is an informational report snmmari2ir..g the revieW' com~ents
from the pubJic and responsible agencies to the Notice of
Preparation (NOP} of the Environmental Impa::t Report {EIR) for the
Wastewa~er Reclamation Program. An update on Program activities is
also incl:.oded for Council' E information. No CO'..lncil action is
required at this time. Staff will return to Council for approval
on specific action items.
Background
The Wastewater Reclamation pre-design/ElF project was appruved by
Council on October 25. 1993 (CMR: 545: 93). 1>.8 I;art of the EIR
process r NOPs were sent to responsible agenc~es, interested
agencies, environmental groups and local ccr:nf!l...inity groups. Notices
were also sent to over 3.UOO residents, who will be most affected
by the program. The issuar.ce of the NOP began a 30 day review
period, during ~hich the public and the agencies were encouraged to
s~it comments on the Program and the EIR.
A public seoping meeting was also held on Januar).~ 12, 1.994 to
solicit the public / s view on the program and the EIR.
Approximately 2D people attended the meeting.
The re .... ie.., period ended officially on January 26', 1994. Revi-aw
comments were received from various agencies and the public. This
report summarizes the review comments r-E"ceived to date.
,gast of the Reclaimed Water Project is)
There are concerns about the cost of the reclaime.d 'IIlo..ter project (5J
and the suggestion has been made to use existing abandoned pipes to
reduce cost. Staff has been investigating the possihilit)' of using
abandoned pipes wherever p';:.ssihle. Of those investigated, only one
pipe is por::entially suitable; and it has a:i.ready been converted to
storm drain service. Staff will continue tnis effort.
Ground Water Impact
Concerns ",ere expressed by an environmental group and the Santa
Clara Valley Water District (SCVWD) , with regard t.c the potent ial
impact of reclaimed water on gro,,-"nd water and on aquifers. The
ground water impact -.. as identified in tile l''lOP as tbe major concern
-1-
.~--.,
~-~kr
~:. -
o
to be addressed b:r" the EIR. As part of the Project, the consultant
has included the servic"-!s of an expert in tha field to study the
actual impact and mitigation measures. This concern will be
addressed in the EIR as stated in the NOP.
AQditional Reclaimed Water Users
The cities of Menlo Park and East palo Alto both requested to be
added to the reclaimed water use sites and have identified major
reclaimed water projects and sites within those cities. Copie's of
their letters are included as attachments to this repcrt. Both
cities are located in San Mateo County. Officials of San Mateo
County have re8po~ded positively to the two cities' requests and
has also expressed interesc in using the reclaimed water from the
RWQCP. although no specific project has been identified. Staff
will issue an addendum to the NQP and will expand the Program and
the scope of the EIR to cover this request. This effort will not
impact the schedule of the Pre-design/EIR, and the additional
consultant fee will be covered under the contingency for the
project.
Preliminary Inquiri.es from the City of Mguntain View 2fnd NASA AMES
NASA AMES is planning support services for its proposed wind tunnel
proj ec:t and h;as identified a maj or inC'rease in reclaimed wa.ter
requirement. Concurrently, the City of Mountain View staff is
revie .. ing its potential future and reclaimed water requirements,
and has requested thac we review the cost and schedule requirements
needed to accelerate Project B of the Reclamation Master Plan~
Project B will extend the reclaimed water main south of US Highway
101 to Mountain View and NASA.
Their concept is that we include the study of Project B in the EIR
at the same level of details as Project A (pipeline to Stanford
University; ~ Staff ie revie~ng the most cost effective way, that
will have the least schedule impact on the overall project. to meet
this request. Staff will retu:nl to Counci 1 for direction and
approval on this request when and if it is formally proFosed by the
City of Mountain View.
Respectfully submitted,
~~~
Manager
Related CMR: 545,93
Control Plant
GLENN S. ROBERTS
Director cf Public Works
Attachments: Letter from the City of Menlo Park
Letter from the City of East Palo Alto
CMR::?03 :94 -2 -
-...... • :
c......tH 1Il..lOHEa
~\'tlf'lP!'lOTBI
-"~ -Doo1IIl.1.. s.oeur..
~
I CrTYOf i 1C1 L.AUREl STREET I YE""1..0 PAAK, C'" 9-W~"5 I (4'5) ese·3..1BC / fAX (415) 325-7935
1Il,",IIltl)TOU,a
~
!MENL~ \J'ARK
february 9, 1994
Kr~ William Mik~
Man~Qer, Water ~uality Control Plant
Public Works Department
City of Pa'o Alto
P, O. Box 10250
Palo Alto, CA 94303
Re: Wa~water Reclamation Program
Dear Mr. Miks:
What would it take to expand the initial study and [nvironment~l
Impact Report to include Menlo Park?
The City is very ser'ous about providing reclaimed water to OUT
custOMers and is Tooking for Pala Alto to provide the .ain trunk
lin.es.
ff you would like to discuss this further, please give ~~ a tall
at 858,3420_
Sincerely,
~ino
Director of Engineering Services
RN/DId
1576E
•
o
City of East Palo Alto
Jaruwy 12, 1994
Ms. !his)' star!:
City of Palo AI",
Palo Alte RogioaaI W ..... Quality Coouol Plant
250 I Embarcadero Way
Palo Mo, CalifcnUa 9430.3
Rc-: CornJ1lent on Initial: S!Ud).' for the Propo3Cd Palo Alto Wa.~·arer Reclamation Program
Ms StMIo
Upon re\-iewift8 the Initial Smdy .and T e.:ru-licaJ Memorandum provided fa the Ci~' of East Palo
Alto by your dep ...... ttlienr, r noticed that rhe project occ;criprions for [f,c: Wastev.'3.Cer Reclamation
Program in each were slightly different ill regards to potential reuse sites \\-j&..ill the City of East
Palo Alto. A}tbough the Project Description for Project C includes an "addition of a 14-(nch
pipcIine extended to East Palo Alto to serve me V.S. 10 INniversrty A .... enue fnterc-hange and
v.'hatever additiona1 reuse sit~t be identi fled in the a~ ... the Project Descriptioo in the
TechnicaJ Memcrandu..--n makes reference to Figure Two in the Memorandum that geographically
locates "'Most Feasible Reuse Sites," none of\1orucb are-in the City of East Palo ."Jto (tbe
~ge is earr"",,' p"'pert)').
k is Utis Division' s drsire thai East ?ala Alto be: incTud:d as :nuch as possible as a recipient of
reclaimed ",,~.uer To this end, it is the Pubhc Works Div;sior,'s conu:rn that enviro:unental
documents related to the Projoct do DOt explicitly specify potential sile.s L"l Ea~ Paio Alto 3.5 da
those: document; rlenote specifi..; sites in S1.i rrolJnding cities
] contacted you 00 January 6, 1994, to d.l.Ji.fy the Projea Descriptions. At that. time, )'00 !ndica.ted
that the East Palo Aito Public Works Divisi.on should p;n--.rIdc a list of an}· sites within the City of
Cast PaID AJro that should be added ro !hI! list of '··Most Feasible Reu...~ Sites" The' table helo.,.;
outlines potentio.! reuse sites in Ea..q Palo Atto that tile PlaruUng Director and I C<lnslder "feasible'"'
(due to their prO/um.it) to tfle U.S. 101 Corridor route proposed by Project C} and estimated
recln.imed wa.sle\iI.-ater derr.and for each (see also attached map).
2415 Uni~ersfly A", Essr PtJio Alta CalifDlf'lia 9430J Tel: 415185J~J'CO Fax: 415-' 85J-J1,5
------------.~-.~.-
P!QSYM1 Site:
BeD St=! P .. 1<
lack FatTen Pad:
Dr. MartiL Luther IGn!I. 1r. Pari< P_ Medians 011 Roadways
Total AmwaI Estimoted Need
Proposed
Sit:
Areal>c.-J
U
6.02
3.73
1.00
• baso:-d OIl 1.9 r.cn (eet: pet)'Car per IlQ'e
Annual
Est..in'.atcd Water
~~
16.53
11.46
1082
2.9ll
47.71
The East Palo Alto Public Works Divisioo would ... ery much Wee to play an o:..ct.ive role in the
planning oftbc Wa.st:e'tNa.ter Reclamatioo Program. lfyou need ar.y addJti"na.r ir.forrnation from
this Division. please do not hesitate to contact me at (415) 1153-3189 or Da'wid Miller, the Interim
DirectM ofPI>nning an.l ""bloc Works, at (415) 853-3105. Tbanl you.
CITY OF EAST PALO ALTO
Community Development Dep;utmcnt
Public Works Divisioo
cc: Da:l'id Miller, Interim Director of Planning and Public Works
William Howard, Director of Comn.Llnity Develop~t
Jerome Groomes, City Manager
--.
. " . .:.--.:" " ____ -..-;L_ ... ~. __ _
, ' , '
SUGGESTED
"FEASIBLE REUSE SITES""
IN EAST PALO ALTO
/ ," ~ .. '
.. ~
1 .
1
4
I