HomeMy WebLinkAbout0194.094March 17, 1994
HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL
palo Alto, califo~nia
speed Limi t~
Members of the Council:
Jll!PORT XII BRUF
14
This report recommends that the city Council adopt an ordinance
(Attachment 1) reaffirming the current posted speed limits on the
following six streets:
• oregon Expressway (Alma to Middlefield)
• Page Mill Expressway (~lma to Hanover)
• Sa,n Antonio Road (Alma to East Bayshore)
• Churchill Avenue (El Camino Real to Embarcadero)
• ArastrCidero Road (Foothill Expressway to the 'Westerly
city limit)
• East Eayshore Road (Embarcadero to northerly City 1 imit)
The engineering and traffic surveys for these six streets expired
on February 27, 1994. Adoption of the attached ordinance will
allow the Police Department t.o continue using radar for spolS.ed
enforcement. The affected street segments are illustrated in
Attachment 2.
BACltGROUllD
The California Vehicle Code (eVe) requires updating the engineering
and traffic surveys every five years, in order to reevaluate
current speeds and establish whether or not the Police Department
can continue to use radar for speed enforcement. Exempt from this
requirement are the 25 ~ph school zone speed limits, when children
are present, for which the Police Department can use radar ~ithout
speed surveys and council action~ Tha three ele!!',ents of
engineering and traffic surveys, as defined in eve Section 627,
are: (1) speed surveys. (2) road conditions, and (3) accident
records. The speed surveys provide the basis for de~ermining the
85th percentile speed (crit,ical speed). This is the speed at or
below which 85 percent of the traffic is trav~ling.
CMR:194:94
_\ .. ------~-------~-.-
The speeds are normally ~stablished at the fir~t five mile per ~our
increment below the 85th percentile speed. 'l'his all,:)ws the
majority of drivers to travel at a reasonable speed, bvt provide$
a means for e!tforcp.ment officers to control the upper group of
drivers 'Who may be reckless or travel at excessive 6peeds~ In
matching existing conditions with the traffic safety needs of the
community, ho~ever, policies and procedures contained in the
Caltrans Traffic Manual permit consideration of further reduction
in the speed limit of five miles per hour. The factors justifying
such a further reduction include a high number of accidents based
upon two years of records, and road~ay conditions such as
inadequate stopping distance, co~~ercial driveway characteristics,
super elevation, shoulder conditions, roadway design speed, and
pedestrians on road~ays without sidewalks~
AJIlILYSIS
The previous engineering and traffic surveys for these six streets
were conducted in 1989. These surveys expired on February 27,
1994. Ne~ engineering a~d traffic surveys were recently completed
to pe~it a reassessmen~ of the Existing speed lirnlts~ A
compar1son of the current spaed survey results with those conducted
in 1989, as shown in Table 1 below, indicates that the prevailing
speeds on the six streets have not substantially changed~
Table 1.
Street Segment 85~ 10 'tile ~5'.h "';'tile Net increase or
~1989 speed 1994 (Decrease)
Oregon E~pres~way. AJrr.a 40 57 41..5 0.93
tr.J Middlefield --~
Page MI..!! hpr.essway, 38,10 i 38.6 , 0.5
~t:' El Camino Real ---+-
p.age Mill E7.pressway, EI 42.50 4().1 {2.4J
Camioo Real to Hanover
Sa:l Antonio RUaG, Alma b H.35 409 (~.45)
Middlefield -------
San AnI')nlO Road, Middle-NA 38,S -
field llJ E. 8ayshore
--~--------------~-
Cburchill Avenue, EI 33.46 I 32.2 ( 1.26)
CamiI1l' Real to AJma
Churchill Avenue, A1ma to NA 28.S -
Embarc:.Jdero
Atast.-adero Road, Foothill 38.21 39.0 .79
Expres'iway tc Hillview
Anstradero RIJad, Hillvi~..",' 3&Ati 393 .84
to ~es(erly city limit
E. B..aY"hor~ RI);t.d, 35.85 35.8 {Q,05)
Embarcadero til northerl)'
cit} limit --
CHR:19<1:94 3/17/9.
Page 2
----.....
\
!
•
,
---' .-----".---.-~.
Based on the :5urve~:{ results siJmmarized in Table 2 and in Att.achment
3, the Council can reaffirm the c·ut'rent posted speed limit on all of
the s.treets.
Table 2.
I Current I Recom·
85th Poste.! I me.oded
';if 'tile Speed Speed
Sir"'" Segment Spee<l Limit limit Comments
0regmI ExI="""'Y, ... I~ I An analysi. (}f the speed sur'\'q data And
ta Middlefield 4LS 35 35 speed relatM ac~' idents r:-:affirm tb~
cun'l:nt pasttd hrni\ of 35 mpb.
Page. Mill Expres.sway. AJlJlIj. The ~ survq data ilion\:: reaffirms the
~. EI Camioo Red 38_~ 35 35 current po~too ~ hrrul ",r 35 mph. -
p.ce Mill E:c.pressway, EI All an"IY~I:;' of 11<! speed Sllf'.'ey data. and
Camino Rear to Hanover 4(U 35 35 .. ~ rda!eO accidents r't<iffltm the
CUTJl;!ll1 posted limit of 35 mph.
San Aaloo.lo Road. Alma to An 3n8.1)'sis of the speed S\lf'o'ey data and
Middlefield 40.9 35 ';5 speed relaled au:idtmts ~ft'irm tile
curren! posted timit of 35 mpb.
SaD Antonio Road, Mlddie-Tht": :;.~ :;uryq data alone N"4Iffim:zs the
field to E. Bay&bore 3S.8 I 3S 35 ;::UfTeot posted '§pee.d limit "f 35 mph.
Churchill A venUl". E1 An a.nalJsi~ or tht; spotd survey data and
C.amino Real to ALma 32,:2 2S 2S ~ relat«l .iiCCide:Dts rc.affil'ID the
CUl'Tetll po&td IUlUt of 25 mph.
CburchiU Aveoue, .lJma l..:l The :speed SIIof'/c:y data alone reaffirms tlkl
Embuoad<ro ";IS 8 2S 2S ctJl'TeOl posIOO speed limit of 25 mpb.
Ara.sIn.dero Road, FooChill Tbe ~ su.."V",y da~ .looe ~.affi.n:ru; the
Ex~y to HiUyj~ 39 J5 3S current postt'(!' spoeJ limi~ of 3S mph.
Arastradero R('OiOd. Hlllview I The ~ survey .!.au alone reaffinns ilie
to westerly cit), (uwt 39.:! 3S 3S rUITI:nt posted ~PC:eJ Iimi! of 35 mpb.
E. &ysZl·.>fe Ro,ad,
r
The "pa-..cl SUI'''''e}' d.i.u. ahtle i"t2ffinr.s the
Embarcadero to nortilerly 3-'.8 35 35 -c-urr~ t poo;.teci speed Limil of 35 mph.
ci!! limit
With Council appro-val, the Pol ice Department 'Will be able to use radar
for enforcement of the posted speed limits on these six st~eets.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSKENT
Reaffirming posted speed limits is not
California Environm~ntal Quality Act.
required.
CMR:19.(:94.
considered a project under the
No environmental asseSSThent is
3/17i90
Page 3
--~'--_1IIiIII
o
RECOMKEBDA'l'IOJl
staff re::::ommends that council adopt the attached Ordinance (Attachment
1) reaffirming t.he posted speed limits on six streets, 'based upon
engineering' and traffic survey results.
Pespect.tully slJbmi tted.
ASHOR AGGARWAL
City Traffic Enqineer
BERNARD M. STROJNV
Assistant City Manager
Attachments:
KENNETH R. SCHREIBER
Director of Planning
and Community Environment
l~ Ordinance re-""ising Chapter 10.56 of the Palo Alto Municipal code
2 ~ Map sho .... ing streets where sta.ff requests approval of speed
surveys
3 _ Summary of engineering and traffic sur .... eys. including recommended
speed limits
DC: City School Traffic safety com~ittee
Palo Alto Bicycle Advisory committee
Masoud Akbarzadeh~ Santa Clara County
CMR:194:94 3/17/94
Page 4
"
ATIACHMENT 1
ORD IN.IINCE NO.
ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THECITY OF PALO ALTO
AMENDING CHAPTER 10.56 OF TIlE PALO ALTO MtJNrCl~AL
CODE TO ESTABLISH AND CHANGE SPECIAL SPEED ZONES
FOR. CERTAIN STREETS OR PORTIONS OF STREETS
The Council of the City of Palo Alto does ORDAIN as
follows:
~~IQN 1. Section 10.56.010 of th~ Palo Alto MUnicipal
Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
10.55.010 St.ate twenty· five mph pr1ma facie speed
ltmit juatified. It is deter.mined that the state twenty~
five mph pr~ facie speed limit for business or residence
districts is justified, as required by stat'S law~ with
respect to the following streets or portions of at_reets by
engineering and traffic surveys conducted by the city and
completed on the dates shown below:
S tree t or Par tion Thereof Af f ec ted
Churchill Avenue from Embarcadero
Road to B1 Camino Real . . •
Colorado Aven~e from Middlefield
Road to Louis Road . . • . .
University Avenue from Middlefield
Road to easterly city limit
Embarcadero Road from ~ma Street
underpass to El camino Real
Welch Road from Quarry Road to
Pasteur Dr1 ve . . . . . . .
BD.giDeering aDd
Traffic Survey
Completion Date
September 24~ 1990
September 24, 1990
September 24, 199D
Sept~~er 24, 1950
SECTION 2. Section 10.56.020 of the palo Alto MuniCipal
Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
10.S6.020 State speed limit decr<!4Bed (thirty-five
=ph). It is dete~ned and justified upon the basis of
engineering and traffic surveys conducted by the city, as
required by state law. and completed on the dates shown
below, that the maximum speed limit applicable under state
law is more th2D is reasonable or safe upon the following
streets or portiOfl-s of streets, and that the following
speed lir.l.its would facilitate the orderly movement of
vehicular traffic and are reasonable and safe, and it is
declared that the prima faci~ speed limit shall be as set
forth in tnese sections, except for school zcnes, on these
streets or parts of streets designated in this section when
signs are erected giving notice thereof:
1
'.
o
35 MPH DBCI.ARED PRIMA FACIE SPBED LIMIT
Street or Portion Thereof ~tected
Arastradero Road from Foothill
Expressway to city limit west
of Deer Creek Road • • • . . .
Oregon Expressway from Middlefield
Road to Alma St~eet .. . . .
Oregon Expressway fram Middlefield
Road to U.S. 101 .•.••••
Sand Hill Road from Arboretum Street
to Pas t eu r Drive . . . . . . . .
Sand Hill Road from Pasteur Drive to
westerly city lLmit . . _ . •
Page ~ll ExpreasYaY from Hanover
Street to Foothill Bxpr~ssway
Hillview Avenue from Foothill
Expressway to Arastradero Road
Engineering and
Traffic survey
Compl.et1on Date
F~:f I:la:f} ,i!j,~" 1989
ilarcl:l".."!;l" 191).
September 24, 1990
September 24. 1990
September 24~ 1990
September 24, 1990
Sept~ber 24, 1990
SECTlor13. Section 10.56.030 of the Palo Alto M'..micipal
Code is hereby arr~nded to read as follows:
10.56.030 State 8peed limit increased. It is
determined and justified upon the basis of engineering and
traffic surveys conduct.ed by the city, as required by state
law, and completed on the dates ehown below, that a speed
greater than that provided by state law would facilitate
the orderly mov~~nt of traffic and would be reasonable and
safe upon the following streets or portions of streets., and
it is declared that the prima facie speed limit shall be as
set forth in this section, except for B~hool zones, on the
streets or parts of streets designated in this section when
signs are erected giving ~otice thereof:
3S MPH DECLARED PRlllA FACIE SPEED LIMIT
Str .. t or Portion There.of Affect=!<!
East Bayshore Road from Embarcader-o
Road to northerly city limi~ .
Page Mill Expressway from Alma Street
to Hanover Street
San Antonio Road from Bast Bayshore
Road to Alma Street ....
Alma Street from Embarcadero Road to
Oregon Expressway
2
Engineering and
"rr ... f f ic survey
completion Date
~!i!=lja~ 2'7, 1989
Mar~ :a, 1994
FeeEua~) ~7, 199G
Mar.,);; .21., .L~94
September 24, 1990
~ma Street from Oregon Expressway to
Meadow Drive
~ma Stree~ from Meadow Drive to San
Antonio Road
sept.arber 24, 19"90
September 24, 1990
SScrIQN 4. The Council finds that this is not a project
for the purposes of the California EnvironmeDtal Quality Act.
SECtION ~.
comm&ncement of the
adoption.
INTRO!)UCED:
?ASSw:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTENTIONS:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
This ordinance
thirty-first
shall be
day after
APPROVED:
Mayor
City Manager
Senior Asst. City Attorney
AP PROVSO AS TO CONTENT:
effective
the date
on
of
the
its
Chief Transportation Official
Chief of Police
3
Directcr of Plazm.ing and
Community Environment
•
r--'--------~ .. '-----. A'lTACHMENT 2 ....
\
A'ITACHMENT 3
CITY OF PALO ALTO
TRANSPORTATION DIVISION
Summar~ Qf "lin2in~[in~ and :l'I:affl~" SYmy~
includin2 R~mended Speed Limit.s.
Sp.""l Umll To",1 NIlIIIWrv( Appl'll". "' .... fiike [.....,
B)lh Cl.ltrtnl Indluliuq ,99219' ":1:'-:' I T .... it S.rUl $~mt"l II Pore_ntil. P",I«I "lIln 8.'iiil NUIIl""."f S,,", .... Wilhlq c~. ) RIIaIINIl-nded 199m) Widll\t s, ... SII'MI Ro.., ... Sp..t tMnit ' .... S~I..dnil r~",cnili. "'""iIlenli n.I.ted ('HI,) 5e,mlfll. .')f'mI A.ccidonto 5~,""'nt
0 •• 0. "J<lIro:.w oy .) II I Th ...... ,Yn'.)' 010111 .ad v.. h'.~ .. lIIItb.r IIf IIf'"Id
(A~M • Middl.n~:d) 4U Jl " " " II "'(lnc ,~un~ V" ..,[1i00i .. dd"" .. () I 11111 of 4.1 Of ns of rt.t 2·~_r
H Q~;f ... ..,0.1""11 .,re lpud r<!"~} rAffi ..... m., ~ur"-... f>OIlDc/
II'"' .... liI,,11 q( H ",ph ,.,I.ic-h ... n = ......... nd.
P"I' MOi f..j.Ir .... _II.\'
I-I ih.Jpeod. 1UrviS)' d.III,"".,.., ~r.""'Ih~ o; ...... nl,...kIII I iA~nA t;IC .... ino Hul) 18.6 " " 2.' " II NotJ" Nune V. _pad IUnit or J~ mpt\, .. ·hleh ... ff 1'ft"1I1nInUILI1 "
rOM' ~WI Il ... p,.,.. .. ,,} ! I I Th, .,.. INNOY II ... """ Ik blah numbu ,r .p~od
1[1 C ....... (I Reol • nAA"Vet) 1 "fJI " " I " " " Non_ Bilcft 1..10/1« V .. mllu.:l tceiJ_ (27 .... I"f "II Of 68~ of Ule 2,)'H. " .ec..t~n ....... r~ ,rc-I ... 1"'-1) r.rr."" Ih~ ~1I1"'''' ..... Dd
ope":,' wnl. or H ..... , ""'"00""-'-l1'~omm~1kl.o
'U.II An' .. "!,, Road II I I I'n .. IP"0.4 1\lnr~)' d.u, rIU1d dwI !rolf,,, lIumOt; ... f .pCCIJ
IAII .... MitkU.fiAldJ 40,1} " '" " " " N_. N~ Vm I.l,tal ..--.:iclu.oa (" ""I of n or .,. o-f tl... }.)-ar " ",,~~ ... II ,...,n lpear ... 1IIAd) ow(hrm Ibt CUmuli P""aI
Ip ...... limi. of ~~ mph ... "'''''' .... rr ru"lY'mrwll
SA .. AIl'"II!., 51.".<1 I
(Middl.r..kI -1':. ~~.I"'rr) JM.8 H " .. n Il N_ .... (01'1. y .. ~ ,~ I ..... IIY d .... 1"I'e .... ffi ..... tit" C"rf~'" pu.t.d I "" ..... "IfI,' ,,( H n'pII, ... t\l~h ... rr ,-,:cOIIIlm' .. b, "
Clilirotilll Annut ''1.10 Th. opud fll ..... r dl" IrI'ld 1M "it'" nwub .. or.paoI
(£.1 Cimino Rul . Aim.) ln " " " " " 1\1." Ilihl .. ,.. .. No,,~ ",1I11d Kd-l ..... \11 "'" IIr 17 or 6S'.l of \hr, 2·} " IliA" ~i.I .. ,CI Win _paid ,,,'''Il0.l1 ,..ffinn 'OK C\lrfdt" p<>Ilcd ,!i,,,,,,,", "I'_orl lifIll' of 1~ "'I'h, ... ·hi~h .... IT rooomn",nd,
t:bu",lIill "'nau, TI ... f'CCId I..,"")' ...... 1_., _m ..... tA~ ~\I.rc'" p...ud I (Emb.n:aderll . Alml) )U " " • , " N"~ B,bl .. "", N"lId "I'~1Id limit of n "'ph, wt,1~h ... ff =OIlVnrftdl "
A,urad,n> Mnt .. 1 llib Lot, .. Th~ ~"" III .... tl' d ... ,I"" •. l~ml1Dl' Ih. <I1,,,,nt po."'" I {FOiIu,,1i -H\U~ie'<tJ 39,0 " " , , " "O~ Yu " ond J'AItr. lpeal hmi. of H In"",. "''''I~h raIofT r~~"Inm~oo..
Au.w.t.llluI> k"." BIII.~ Lan.1 lla~ ""endlwrvty du •• 1"fIC. ,ft.lTtnno "' .. ~lIrlehl poollrd I (HiJlvilo,,· -wated) City Lilnill} .\9.J " " , , " NllnJ In<t hth V~ al'M'llllnll of } ~ m"b, ... "'Ieh ...rr Iwcwnmcndl "
'Eout !!.oJ_Dn! Rllowl I Th~ .,....,.. III ..... }· Iklo .1_., ,.,.,ffi,... ",p '"rrenl potUO ! (f ... nbltr~tdfm . no"""ri) CII)' LllDill) lH " " " • 1011) ~on. No"" NOlie " .... ed Ii.lli. of'~ mph, ... hkh ... rr <t~omrn.noI. I ,I",
March 17, 1994
" 1 ---'~--'---,'''''/.'''.'''.j ".c -~~.--:--.~ -,
, "