HomeMy WebLinkAbout0181.094~·9£5.I. ).'~.' • •
.' , ',~
THE HONORABLE CITY COu~CIL
Palo Alto, california
Attention: Finance Committee
l1U=94 IllDYEldI 1I1!1Il!ClAL SlJMMAl!X1CAPI'l'AL IKPBOVEllENT PRDGRAIt
llDlfCIAL STATuS aIPoRT AND BOOOIT AM..ENDME1l1' ORDINANCB
Members of the Council:
."Port in Br;g
This report provides financial results for the first six months gr
FY199J-94 and updates projections for the full fiscal year for the
General Fund and the. Enterprise Funds. It contains a Budget
Amendment Ordinance 'With information on the associated budget
adjustment requests 4 The report also includes a summary of
selected -Capital Improvement Preject expenditures thr:>uqh December
1993.
This report is organized differently from those done in prior
years. The report format is condensed. using tables and g~aphs to
highlight key items of import~nce. These changes were made in an
effort to impr-ove the presentation of midyear financial
information.
Respectfully submitted, , ~·ec 1:: STEELE
~~,,)
MELISSA CAVALLC
~ii~ Assistant Finance Directo~
Director of Finance
CHR: 181: 94
1993-94 MIDYEAR FINANCIAL RESULTS
EXECUTIVI: SUMMARY
Bolstered by higher tax revenues, thr General Fund
should end the year with a net operating surplus of
SI.4 million, Contributing to dIe operating .s.urptus
are several slgnificant one-time revenue events
lotalling $1.1 !llillion. Without the~ one-ti,Tle
event:!, the General Fund would be ending the year
with • net surplus of only $.3
million. For the 1994-95
budget,. .. :>nnihlr surplus ~oold.
be ~ were it oot for one-
major revenue change. The-
T .. "
GENERAL FlJND SUMMARY
Tne budget adopted by CQuneil in June 1993
projec:ed a year..end deficit of $3 million. Due 10
several !arg.e one-time revenue receipts and
depMtmen! expenditun: ~vings., the fiscal year I:;
now projected 1.0 end with;;li net operating surplus of
51.4 millior:. As was mentioned in the "Executive
General Fund S UITJJr.a,y
.,,,,,,
""""
..... ..., ....... . "".
"'."'"
,..,.... .......... . ..... ", ..
SJ6.3\1O
Utilities equity transfer to the
Geoenl Fund is projected to
decrease by 10%, or $1.0
million. in 1994-95. As suc~
the General Fund budget for
1994--95, befcTe any changes
are (:oDsidered for new
programs, stands at a net
operating deficit of about S.7
million.
~""icc Feu 1114 Permb ..... 7$3 7$3
Ofl.<: r Rc:"e:gIl~1 9,121 9,l~ ~ ...
Tnuku fr01ll0tll:rFlIlIlU ~ ~ _ 11,396
(22lI)
m
The 6sW health of the Water
and Wastewater Funds, of
concern just two years ago. is
continuing to improve. The
Electric Fund reserves have
oominue<1 to grow de<Jpite the
customer rebate, and I rete
adjustmecot is being con
tem:plated for fu:i.ure )ears.
Customer sak:s are declining in
the Refuse Fund, .... ,lting from
T01l1 Rc .. e !l1Ie!
T_S __ "'~
SI!(arica UId &IIC"
A.II Olbcr Expellclilans
Cap-.J r...-pe 1Id:iDue1
tkMServa
rate: i!lcre3Sl::s recently implemented for source
reduction, recycling, and SMaRT statiQfl costs. The
Storm Drainage Fund is co:rnpleting its rIm phase
ofbond-funded capital improvements, and will need
to sen additional bonds. backed by .e. rate ir.cre8:.'i(
next year. i., orrlef" to continue its capital program.
The.remainder afthis report is divided itlto sections
on the General Fund. Entetprise Funds. 8 sectiou on
midyear budget &dj ustmcn.ts requested in I. Budget
Amendment Ordinance, Enterprise f'und
Summaries,. and a Capital Improvement Project
SunutlM}'.
~ ..
... "'" ~J(@ 70,(55 1,1-47
' .... ),OCQ '.Im
... '" """ n.4~ 1.147
.... Il4I 47,551 .47,!'1
' ..... 1'.1,960 19,4012 ."" 4,LIItl 4.166 ,.. 924 Yl.
1l.OI!) ---
Summary," without the one-time revenue events of
$1.! million, the General FLlDCi would be ending the
year ,,1th.& net rurptus of only S.3 million. 11.c one
time revenue: increa~ described in m ore detail
below, are: a one-time 'Teeter Plan'" payment of
SA rI1.illion from tfte COWlty, sever.:lllar~i: property
53Jes at the Stanford Researcb Park resu 1tmg in one
time documentary transfer tax payments of $.3
million, and a oon-~uf{ing supplemental motor
vehicle payment from the State of S.4 milhQn.
•
,
•
GENER"L FUND REVENUES
_Tax
Sales w.. is expected to come in at $ [4.3 nai1lion,
$..6 miHion t.tn-der budget The adopted b1Jdget
projected this category to grow 5% over Wt year
actual levels. Economic t«-Gvery has been slower
than projecwd and., in the first hatf of 1993·94, sales
tax growth has been flat. The City 'Would b.ave
realized more-of. decline bad a balf ce11t sales tax.,
worth approximau:ly S.A milhorl to PalQ Ah.o, not
been passed by voters.. 1n addition,. S,) rnLllioll in
back taxes from s major retsile1' were anticipated,
but will not be .received for at lea'rt another year.
Preliminary' estimates. for next fiscal year tndi<:.Qte ..
2% growth over 1993~94 reven.uc.
-,
. ....-.1
Tra.l.lietlt Oc:CQp1IPr}' Tu
A roouction in this. roe ~'enuC" categol)· was projected
as a result of the c-k,sure or the Hyan Palo Afro. Jt
appears., however, that tra\lC'lIen, have continu~ to
com(;. 1.0 Palo Aho, simply using other mote1.i and
helers;. This should result in increased rev~nues. of
SJ miHien over budget.
Otber Taxes .lId Fiat!!
Seve!"a.l factors have contributed to It. pos.itive
varian~ ofS.7 million over the adopted hldget.;
o Docameutary Trusfer Tu; This cate@ory
is proj«ted t(l oome in $.4 miniQn higher than
budget for two reasons_ First, ongoing property
sales are slight\:;,' higher than budget Second.
PropertyTu several large property sales in the Stanford
Property taxu are e~"'1ed to come in $.9 mililon Re.search Park have generated Q'oIer $,3 minion
above budget. When the budget was complet..-dlast in "".-time receipts fOT Ille City.
spring. decisions on Stzde revenue r-'------:R""eveu--ues-:-by-::SOc-urce'-----'------.
sbilts bad IKJ< been 6nolliud. The
City'Sproperty1ox l>I4e1assumO<l II ...
the fun Sl.; millioo shiftpn,posed $'I..,.
by the j!OVertKl(. By tbt lime !he
fuW S .... budget was passed, this "2M
shlfttotanedSl.2 minion, asa,'-mgs $IOW
0($.5 million.
In addition. since the budget 'II\'as
adopte<l, the City Iuo.s ·sold" its
ripltS to deliDqUent property taXes
to tbt County under the one-time
"Teetn Plan" ~vlStOns approved
h,Y CouDcil in November 1993
(CMR:569:93). This 1eSulted in
OD2~time ~enues of $..4 million.
-....
.....
--
The CoQnJy's preliminary estimate of prcperty tax
revenue to be allocated jo the City is $,9 million
bigb<r than !he midyear fO«CaSt cIUd above. The
County'. pnlimina...,.-estimate is 17% greater than
the amount of property taX recei\led for last f;s.::a)
year. Thi~ growth appean. unrealistic, particularly
since 8sscsse:d valuati.on growth was only
.approxi .. 1Udely 2%. WhHe such a growth rate woold
be: good llCW$., staff recommends waiting until the
County revises its projec;tions iII Ma.rcll of this year
bcfOfe assum ing 2ny additional increased revenues.
. ".
o MotDr '\I"ebk1'e 1D Lit1I To: Supph:memed
by a one-time payment from the State as an
ofhet to the ~roperty taX shift, tlais catego.--y is
projected to come in $.2 million over budget.
o Pukiol F"ma: Due to L'le implernentarion of
lin jn~bo1JsC" adjudicatioc proetss which
elnnir.ates finercductions whencitarioo bolders
are found liable., and more effcc.t!ve in-house
collection efforts, this category is projected to
rome in S.l million overbudg.et .
latf'rett lacome-
Interest income is expected to decrease by '9 pen;.ent,
or S.2 million,. resulting from a COTlti-tued det::li."le in
interest rates..
Utili.y Eq.uty y...,..r.,
The Utility tlquity tramfer 10 the General fund
represents about 14% of the Generat Fund's tatal
budget. Each :reM, the equity twlsfer is adjusted
for two majcr factors: 1) ~e asset base of the
Electric, Watrr, and Gas Funds; 2) the fair rat"! of
return that is assc.se<l agaU!st the asset bose. Bec4use
interest rates have continued to dedine, agencies that
reg'.llme puh[ic utilities. such 8S the Califurnta Public
Utilities Commission, he.ve lo-.ere:d tbe fair rate of
return they anow regulated uti tities to charge rate
payers. The City bases ru rate of mum on these
agencies, and. will therefore recommend a 1994-95
bvdset to the CoUlh..--il thar: includes a SI.Q million
reduction in the equity tncsfers 1D the General Fund.
No c.haage is being recommended for the Cum"nt
year.
GENERAL FUND EXPUIDITURES
AU departments ere projected to end the yearwithin
budget. ]0 prior years., departments Nve typically
returned between $.5 and 51.5 million in sa ..... ings 10
reserves at year end. It is dffficuitlo predict precise
s.avings for this year, as thai depends on staff
vac.aa~ies, the level of liabIlity and workei"'s
General Fund Expenditures
1u!l.oirI .... n
PtbticWl)Th
r-:m. .. "' ...
.oj
.:\" .. 1 a •• lltl
,::..Ifl "lIM
.'" 51"'"
ti.'I'1 ." '" ...
!.~ lM 14.5j
10.(101 !lliI
I;!.! I ''''
"'" .~,
a.tlllt: ",..
Strlo404 ." . ..
" .. I:,!lo
135i
D'"
-(SI>O:'i)
roJOj
,00»
(001
~~~--2.lE
compensation "laims the City receives.,. as well as
the economy and its influence Oil bKis for materials
and servi«s. For these reesoD:5, .. cOllsefntive
cstirnue of $.5 million in sa'Iowgs is projected.
GENFJtAL .<JNI) RESERVES
The-projected General Fund surplus of.$ j.4 million
{inc I LX.Iing one-time events.) will result in Increases
to the Budget StabtlizatioQ Reset'te (BSR) of S.i
mi II iCon, IlOd increases to the Re~l"\Ies for Streets
and Sidewalks. S!cre~ lnven!ury, and Notes.
Genera..! Fund Reser .. es
M;d)'r , ..
IS. million'!) AdJ Prcj 1":-0111
10< III LI a"'&tt l.dll:~1 Prior
"L"'Il 93 1,. '31,,, \· .. ,,1
RotltrYt.:
BudgelSeila:lDO:l SIU Sll t SI1.3 "" A.BiQ2 .. .. ..
S'u:e&'Silk~5 •• " " 'J
Em:rfle~.-:iu , " " 50
Rupp ... F.I1a.usC " 52 5.2
1 "VCII~ry.t Nolu Rt~ __ ,_, __ ,_, __ '_.6 ~
Total F· ... d B .. l.-lliu ua.4 flU 51' .• 51.4
Rt'-cdvabTe of $.7 million. The Gene-ral Furod
Reserve Policy approved by Council (CMRA87:9J)
pro"idesfora BSR range of between 10 and 30'%of
GeneTaI Fund operating expenditures. The project«!
endin.g balance for the BSR t.s $ 12.3 million., which
is 18% of operating expenditures,. falling within the
target range.
ENTERPRlSE FUNDS
Water Fuad
The Water Fund remains OIl. b"L..tget in both re\-·enue
and purchases. E,,'cn with a rAa rate decrease, the
res.erves will 'be funded by $1.9 million, as
anticipated. Tbe en<1ing balance of we Rate
Stabilization Resen'''!: (RSR) is projected to be S5..2
million, about hal fway between th~ minimum and
the target reser-vc leve!.
ElHtrk Fund
Revenue" from Electric Fund sa [es is projected to be
$1.8 million below budget due to a minor decrease:
in consumption levels. Power purchases for the fir.;t
six mont.is of the year are .$3.2 million lower than
budget due to seve-raJ factors. The largest savings is
,
i
-, .,'-..
due 1.0 denumd optimi2ation. Because Northe-TT;
California Pow<r M.socilliiQ;;:] (NCPA) hlld !!cces:;;
to cheaper pct\\"C1' from Calaveras due to beavy rain ...
the City wss abtf; ro 'I'e..iuce PI)we. purchases of more
expensive power from Westt.:m. Second, Pa.!o Alto
customer d1:mand for crectr[ciry was less tha~
f~ in part d~ to the sluggish eccnom.y and
its impact aD large industria.! customers. For the
total year. purchases are JYojectOO to be $6.3 million
belowthc adopted budget. Th.e savings in pt.LT'CMscS
are somewhat offset by lower projected sale:;. The
RSR Is npc:cted lO end the yur at $25,4 mi lIion.,
$2.& mtmOU above the ~get reserve level. Stafi is
evaluating several options 10 keep reserves ""'ithin
target levels. including consideration of a rate
adjustment for 1995·%_
GuF.Old
The-Gas FWld is projected to end the year 00 bOJdgc,t
The end",! RSR balance 5hould be $6.1 million,
-"ximotely S.4 million belowthe maximum Ievel_
Wutewater D>lledioa FODd
Hfg.'ler custOmer sales will resillt in addition .... !
fUnding to ~ of S.B m mi~n over budgeted
fanding by year end. The ending RSR ba1ancc
shouJd be $S.l million, just below the maximum
level
"
._-----_ ....
Wastl!water Trt1ltment Fund
NQ change is anticipafed in Wastewtler Treatmenl
at tilLs time. The year-end R.SR is e)(peclcd to ~
$30.3 mi.t\icn, just onr the m,,: .. imum 1e'Vet
Storm Drainage FUBd
Capital projects funded by 3 19l}2 bond issue are
nearu:,g completion. As a resutt,. this fund is expected
to deplete its re~r/es by next fall. Additional bvnd
fu:lding atld a rate-increase will be requiT'Cd in 1994-
9510 continue capital improvements. StaffwiJI be
present.ing options for future funding at a stuc.4y
session in hun:h.
RerUKFand
Budgeted expenditures n;!ve increased Ibis year, as
garbage is now being I:raI1sportr.d to the Sunn)"t'aJe
SMaRT station. Rates were increased 3(r'.4 to fund
SMaRT stallOD cmJtS, as wen as increased costs to
fund additional efforts for reeycliog and source
reduction. Year·to-date sales are 7% be Tow budget,.
whicb indicates that cw:tomers in all classes b,,'e
respc.nded w the rate increases and begun to constl'VC
mote. This is good news for source reduction efforts,.
but is of conccm fer ongoing cost recovery efforts.
The year-end RSR is projected to be $1 ,6 million,
just at the rn inimum level.
Rat;, Stabili2ation Re.erve Balances
$25M
SlOM
SlSM
SlOM
Water Gas
'_Projected
--I_large!
I
!~
WW Coil WW r ... , StolID Dnin R<fuse
Art8('nmrnl 1
Requested Adju'tmrnts: 10 Ibe-Budget
The following are expJanations of requested char.ges to the 1993-94 bu.dget. Formal adoption
of these clwtge5 is reqlJested by approval of the attached Budget Amendment Ordinance in
Attachmentl.
Geaeral Fund Adjustmenb
Congestion Managem ant Fees
The City pays fees to the Congestion
Management Agency (CMA) for regional
ttaffic planning efIons Budgeted dues in
the Transportation DiviSIon owed to CM-I\.
this fiscal year need to be reduced by
543,000. As these funds are reimbursable
from gas tax funds., gas tax reimbursement>
also need 10 be reduced for this fiscal yeu.
Contributions from Enterprise Funds
The ] 993·94 budget was put together with
reimbun;ements for the Manager of
Economic Resources positiO;l~ which is
10000~ed in the City Manager's office~ coming
from the Enterprise Funds. It is more
efficient to charge 250/. of the Manager of
Economic Resources saI3.i)' directiy tQ the
Enterprise F'Wlds. This 'NiH require the
elimination of the budgeted transfers
between the E.1.terprise: Funds a."d the
General Fund. This wlll have no impact on
reserves.
Stanford Reimbursement for Fire Services
A recalculation of Fir.;: Department
expenditwes midyear has resulted in the
need to .reduce the amO'JJlt bi lied to S lanford
University by $40,000 for Fire Services.
1
Elec.tric Usage: by City Departments
Wben staff brought revised electric rebate
figures. to Counc.il vLa 3. budget amendment
ordinance earlier thIS year, the amount of the
rebate tbat would apply to Public Works and
CommUI1lt)' ServLcEs W&5 overestimated.
Therefore, an additional $17,000 needs to be
pu1 in the Public Works' electric usag~
budget, and an additional S20,OOO should be
put in Community Services' budget.
Smrm Drainage-Malntenance
The Storm Drainage Fund pays for
maimenance services it receives from
General Fund Public Wcrks crews. When
the 1993·94 budget was put together, an
estimate for leasing maintenance equipment
was included in the Public Works budget.
Those funds ",,'ill not be needed Ihis year, for
a savings of 53&,500.
Parking Permit Revenue Fund
An analysis of General Fund actual
expenditures for operation snd maintenance
of the University Avenue and California
Avenue Parking Districts has resulted in the
need to increase the amount traJ1Srerred from
the Parking Permit Reven\le Fund to the
General Fund by SIOO,OOO.
, .
City Attorney Res~dence Loan
On November 30. 1992, Council passed
Resolution No. 7158 amending Resolution
No. 1129 adopting salari~ for Council
Appointed Officers. The resolution provided
for the City Attorney to obtain a mortgage
loan on his residenct;., to be pUTch~d in the
Cily of Palo AHo. The incumbent exercised
this option on September 17. 1993. The
loan balance win be $540,000 at June )0,
1994. The attached budget ordinance
includes an appropriation from the Budget
Stabilization Reserve fer the loan. for '\o1,-hich
funds will be re-::orded as "Reserved for
Notes Receivable-in the City's General
Fund.
lD(eroaJ Servirt FUDd Adj ustmea IJ!
One of the interdepartmental services in the
budget is environmentai disposal services
provided by Public Works for Ci ty
departmCflts Pvblic Works picks up
c:hemicals. an d materials that can cause
environmental darnage~ and disposes of those
materials !n a safe manner. The services for
picking up and disposing of photocopy
chemicals (such as toner) for the City Print
Shop have flot been .as eJrte:lsive as
budgeted. The attached budget amend men r
ordinance reduces the chuge 10 the Print
Shop have not been as extensive as
budgeted. The attached budget amendment
ordinance redu(:e5 the charge to the Print
Shop by $6,500.
Enterprise Fund Adjuslmentl
Electric Fund
Electric sales are less than budget,. as are
power purchases. Ii is recommended that
sales revenue be redtH.:ed by S1.8 minion,
2
J
power purchases be reduced by $6 8 milliDn,
and debt service50 expense:; be reduced by
$,2 m:Jlion
Refuse Fwd
A new revenue cate-gol)'. Refuse FU.,ild
compost S4les. needs to be added to the
budget Refuse expects to gen~rate about
S20,OOO in sales or compost this year.
With the 30% refuse rate increase this year
to pay for the new SMaRT station operating
costs, customers have lowered their disposal
of refuse, and refuse sales have dechned. It
1s recommended that sales re\'enue be
reduced $,7 mi I Eon.
In addition, the Refuse Fund sets aside funds
each year for a "Landfill Closure and Post~
Closure Care" Res.crve to comply with State
and accounting requaements The amount
set as.i de has been re:::aicul ated bas.ed on new
esti mates of 1 an.dfi tI capacity and a l'!ew
projection of when the !411dfLll will reach
capac.; ty. The fec-ent fecal cularion has
re~'Ulted in the need to fund :m additional
$49,000, for a Iclal of $89,000, during 1993·
94.
Wastewater Collection FUi,.d
Wastewater sales are higher than budgeted
It is recommeTlded that $.5 million be added
10 Wastewater Sale:! revenue. and S.3 millton
tD Other Revenue.
Storm Drainage Fund
An e.rror in the budget was discovered, and
IiJ1 addirio!',.tl S 19,000 is needed for vehicle
repairs in the Storm Drainage Fund
.--.---~--.. ...... -..
""'-'. '?t~"
:~
Capital Projects Chanles
General Fund Capita! Projects
The scope of Project 19011, Records
Mmagement. snould be changed. No
funding. change is n~ded. 1993-94 work
would ir.-elude funding for Fire Departm~nt
needs, and for a cit}'wlde ·Work Flew
Module .. rather t.l:!an funding for Plannillg
Department l'lee~s, as was originaily
budgeted. See the project description
Attachment 10.
Other Funds Capi tal Proj eets
The source of funding for the "Califomia
Avenue Parking St:nJcture-(proje<j" 192i3)
needs: to be changed. Th i 5 proj eel. fLL.,ded
from oo(jd proceed!:, is c:tigibJe to ~
:$51,000 in mitigation fees. It is
recommended that lite project be increased
by SSg,COO, offset by mitigation fees The
extra funding woutd be used to reimburse
the General Fund for engineering salaries
spent in managing this project.
Gun Limit Adjustment
Exhibit C shov..-s revised' Gann Limit
calcuTatJons for both 199:2·93 and 1993-94
As part of its .utnual audi! of the City's
financial reports, the City's ex.temal auditors
requested that the City rec.a!culate the Gann
Limit, going back to the inception of the
Limit Staff dIscovered adjustments to the
City'S Gann calculation that need to be
approved by COllfl.cil. The appropriations
limit is calculated each year, and is revised
based on State per capita income cbanges
and County population changes. Staff
discovered th31 incorrect pop~lation and
income factors were used in cilcuJating the
1992·93 Gann Limit, 'Nhich is approved by
3
Ccuncll as ~art of the budget adoption
process,
Correcting for those adjustments ripples
through to the 1993-94 limit as well,
compounded by the fact that two years of
factors were-impacLed, The n~t result of that
adjustment for 1993-94 is that 'he appropri.
attons limit shol..r:td be revised downward by
$2.7 milli"n. Howe',er~ even 'With the
revised limitation, tho! City is still under this
appcopnl!tions l!mit by $70 million for
1993-94
Municipal Fee S.chedule Changes
Non-Resident Fees for Classes
It is requested that the non-resident fee
charged fer Recreation classes be incii~ased
from $5.00 to 57.00. Overall class fees have
increased in virtually every plogr.arr'~ during
recent y~ars, \While non~residenl fees have
remained static (or years. This means that
con-resider.t fees as a percentage 'Of total
class fee-hive decreased in r~al terms. This
proposed change is consi~ienl with Council
direction on cost rec.overy, and is less than
some surrounding communities, where extra
charges of up to 25% of tolai class fees are
often assessed.
ATTACRIIENT 2
ORDINANCE NO, _______ _
ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALO ALTO
JlMENDING THE BUDGET f'OR FISCAL YEAR 199)-9'
TO ADJUST BUDGETED REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
IN ACCORDANCE WITH RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE MIOYEAR REPORT
)
/'
WHEPXAS. pursuant to the provisions of Section ~2 of Article
III of the Charter of the City of Palo Alto. the Council on Sune
21, 1993, did adop~ a budget for fiscal year 1993-94; and
lI'HEREAS ,atter reviewinq the current budgeted revenues and
expenditures for fiscal year 1993-94. adjustments to the budget are
recommended to more acourately reflect year-end projections; and
WlrEttEJ.~S, -che Appropriations Limit needs to be revised to
reflect ~ore accurate population and per capita income factors; and
WHEREAS, the Recreation, Open space and Sciences Division of
the Community services Department, is p~oposing fee changes to the
1993-94 Municipal Fee Schedu1e;
NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City or Palo Alto does
ORDAIN as follows:
SEGT!.ON 1. The sum of Si..,.. Hundred Twenty Four Thousand, Seven
Hundred Fifty Four Dollars ($624,754J is hereby added to the Budget
stabilization Reserve in the General FUnd to reflect all changes as
displayed in Exhibit -A", Which is attached to this orainance and
incorporated herein by this refe~ence.
SECTION 2. The sum of Five Hundred and Forty Thousand Dcllars
($540,000) is hereby added to the Reserve for Notes Receivable to
reflect all ch&r.ges as displayed in Exhibit ~A", which is attached
to this ordinance and incorporated herein by this reference.
gerroN 3. T"n& Gum of F<orty Three Thousand ($41,OOO) is
hereby added to the fund balance in the Street Improvement Fund and
Operating Transfers Out are correspondingly reduced.
SECTION 4. The sum of One Hundred Thousand dollars {SlOO,OOO)
is hereby reduced from the fund balance in the Special District
Fund and Operating Transfers Out are correspondingly increased.
SECTION 5. The sum of Fifty Eight Thousand dollars ($58,000J
is hereby reduced from the fund balance in the Traffic Mitigation
Fund and Operating Tran3ters Out are correspondingly increased.
-.'-,
SECTION'!!. The sum c,f Fifty Eight Thousand (\Ollars (~58,OOO)
is hersby added to operati~g Transfers Ill. in the Capital
Improvement Fund and the operating Transfers Out are
correspondingly increased.
SECT rON 7. The sum of Twenty Six Thousand Seven ~undred Forty
Six Dollars ($26,746) is hereby added to Salaries in Utilities
Administration and Allocated Charges are correspondingly reduced.
SECTION 8, The sum of Five Million TWo Hundred Sixty Two
Thousand Fifty Five Dollars ($5,262,055) is hereby added to the
Rate stabilization Reserve in the Electric Fund to reflect all
changes as displayed in Exhibit "BII, .... hich is attached to this
ordinance and incorporated herein by this reference.
SECTION 9. The sum of Eight Hundred Twenty Thousand Dollars
($820,000) is hereby added to the Rate stabilization Reserve in the
wastewater Collection Fund to reflect all changes as displayed in
Exhibit "B".
SECTION 10. The sum of Eighteen Thousand six Hundred Twenty
Dollars ($18,620) is hereby reduced from the Rate Stabilization
Reserve in the Storm Drainage Fund to refl"!ct all changes as
di~played in Exhibit "8".
SECTION 11. The sum of Seven Hundred Thirty Six Thousand Ten
Dollars ($736,010) is hereby reduced from the Rate Stabilization
Reserve in the Refuse Fund to reflect all changes as displayed in
Exhibit liS".
~~. The sun o~ Six Thousand Five Hundred Seventeen
Dollars ($6~517J is hereby reduced in the Printing services
Internal service Fund, and the Reserve A.llocation for Retained
Earnings in the Printinq Services is hereby increased as displayed
in Exhibit "Bft.
SECTIOtLll. 'rhe Appropriation Limitatior. adopted. by Council
is hereby reduced frol':l $52,998 /513 to $50,293,433, a $2,705,080
decrease, .e:s shown in Exhibit "c ll ,
SECTION 14. community services Department fees in the 19503-94
MuniCipal Fee Schedule ~ill be modified to include the fee changes
shown in Exhibit ~D".
SECTION t~. As specified in section 2.:8.080(a) of the Palo
Alto Municipal Code, a two-thirds vote of the City Council is
required to adopt this ordinance.
SECTION 16. The Council of the city of Palo Alto hereby finds
that the enactment of the ordinance is not a project under-the
California Environmental Quality Act and r therefore, no
environmental impact assessment is nc~essary.
gcrml'l ____ u·
Municipal Code,
fJdopt.ion.
As provided in section 2.04.375 of the Palo Alto
this ordinance shall become effective upon
INTRODUCEO AND PASSED~
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTENTIONS:
ABSENT:
ATl'EST: APPRovED:
City Clark Mayo:r
APPROVED AS TO FOP~:
Sr. Asst. city Attorney
APPROVED:
C.ity Manage:r
Director of Finance
-"-.~-.. ~~~~~i":""';,-l~, -. ---,~-
, !4¥~i;·
'~f~i
,
\
'f
~BilID
EXHIBIT A
1~93-94 MICYEAR AC,1USTMENTS
GOVERNMENTAL FUNCS
~... Adj.,,,, IC>f>io<t~C=:: --------~-
l-_Cl"ft _____ L __ E~---------f--
I""'EMJ£ ,
'002_
' ........
I,0020000G '' .. """"",
..,...."
00771560
001.000cO
D02S124.IJ
002.:3:0 "",..,.,
0025121(1
EXPENDfTURES
oo2823:n:
00:21i4l!2C
0025;:31,',
CV28J;!1[
" .. 111i ,."e; "'. "., '20' 1261
u;o~
19:t!
2C21
2016
ZIJ.Ct
3UI9
J51C
396~
)96 •
C-r.;;rl~" ,', ",oo.e-r.
(j~Z.:l(j~~ :;~_
i r" ... ,.
il4'DODDc :lH
..... 1'J~C •. :;...
I
I Proplfty Taz:
'541," Tax '",.....-m Occll?A'nor;:y Tu
'Ooc:!lmtntary Trlnaf« Tu
I Mo!Of V.mitll! Til
,PIr1iil"l9 \lioWiofl.
Suntord Fae ~~~ ~nI
IT'ltt'fe-C. EII","I'I9'
GerW1'r11 Fund Servic ... Provlded to E"n!prpri"'!'
OpI!rillin.g Tr~Mfer FrOin GoIIII T,~ ~ul'H:l
ep.t'nlirrg Tf~rl,rf"r""orn ",l1I:log D'iotricl Wo,'.
ap... ... t,"g Tf<l",rer From C.lIp!"al ProJKl
OI~lI!r C{jntr .. ~-! ServICe,
Leo1~'''ur!:h.iS<!: VIl't1~~ "'~Ci!'<;''1-()''~.
Electr~ Sale. \e Cit)' Oo:p.ilrtr> .. "
EI-e<:.tflc S .. I·u t,~ Cr!~ ~P..lrU'l"'''
"'.-.'
+
1
.'
\, ,
~=-~E::~=~~::E~-==~l
, , i,1
I U2:,DOCI !
U3,ooo :
4C,tlOO
~il,Otll'l
26.1«,
.. ~ ~nn
~' IhFl
.', .. :;'.lC
:21113,tIOO
400,'011 ,
200,000
101 ~oo
~3 "O~
~r ~':),J
• •
"
.1 ;j
J
'-I
f!
r
I ,
--
~~. ~~--""t~~' '. ~
<.-
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
F~-':!Y-~. j -"..cr.pu ... ---T"""1t I ---------F-r
1
-... 1~""""F'QlftTmJlcllhllpBorl .. ,lOti
....... ...t ~T"""'te-""'Fund ....... r
112" """ I~ Inn MIbg;IfJofI FwndI ...... 1 11213 ... .,.... .... ~~ .. .tot,
£N'I'£RPIUSE FUND
F.x:HllurB
15193-94 MIOYEAR AOJUSTHENTS
PROPRIETARY ruNDS
~r-:""~~~,:~· ~ty~.= ... ~Cb~c!...~"'~·~-ft====~ .. ~·~cri~-~~-~ti~.~~-.. --.~.-...... -_-~T,_~ ... ""'= ..... O::i~ rC ..... t I -j
~~.-; '=--=-~:--:.t~
., ..
171Z
1714 .... .... ... -
"1% _ "" -" .. _ 1711
_ "12 _ .. -.. --
a:Ii&aI..on t ' •• -
.. -...
..--1 ---
)
_.-............. -.!DII:It ......
r-
I=-=-~Ccw"""'idw
"'1BIdrIc""~
1_ .. -
I
s.-. ...... r....,
CIIIM· C •• aaGill -.-s.IM. PWIk F ..... ---,Nlltrt I • coe..ceanCplnll'ioll
I
1a....1RSR
I
1 .......... --
1 1-......
I 107_ 1
II .= .... .. I I,:,
~I ~h' ..--t-~. __ .
I • ...,,,.,., ,_.no 1 -~
_~L '" ,
...,....---
..
.,.,....,.~
;.;..:.:~.;....'-'
;2,*';~"'':'/c .
--
'.'
EXHIllfTC
APPROPRIAOONS UMTT ... T1ON COMPLIANCE 19f1-ltM -Rovlsod 2J101M
($ In Millions)
Lea: Oebi Ser'iice TllInsactioM
CapIaI Outiay
Non-Proeeede at Taxes
~ of Approprlallo<l Umit:
1982-93 4ppopiO_ UmiI;
_ Ciani County
PopdaIon ChMge
Per c.pto Income Change:
Combined
Funds
7427
1.10
U2
25.33
'3.32
5029
U7
48,138,507
1.7"1
2.72
(1.0272). (1.71 + 100.00)1100 I $48,138,507. $50,2.113,433
Gltneral
Fu~cf
6Ull
23.68
40.82
Capital Dobt Sp.cL1!
Projom Sorvk. Revenue
6.4<1 2.50 0.87
1.10
3.12 1.40
0.80 0.85
2.48 0.00 0.02
?,:
Exhibit 0
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMEIIo'T
Recreation, Open Space and Sciences Division
Attac:bmen t 3
WATER FUND SUMMARY
(5000'0)
MIDYEAR
ADJUSTED PROJECTED
ACTUAL BUOOET BUDGET
1992-93 1993-9L 1993-94 DIFFERENCE
REVEl'o'UES
Sal .. 514,029 S14,723 $14,723
Other Revenue 349 388 388
Tala! Revenu. 14,378 15,111 lS,1l1 0
Plus Ene=lbranceslReapp 1,9\8 I,S!4 1,8\4
TOTAL SOURCE OF FUl'IDS 16J9!i lUll lUZ5 !)
EXPENDITlJRJ:8
Utility Pun:bases 4,172 3,7'lO 3,790
Other Opeming Expenditures 3,403 4,370 4,310
Transfer to Other FWlds 2,209 2,404 2,404
Debt Servi<e Q 0 0
Capital Expenditures 3,021 4,473 4,473
TOTAL USE OF FUNDS u.sn u.m.z 1~.ID.1 Q
NET TO (FROM) RESERVES $V~ ru~ SusB ~
RESERVES
Rate Stabiliz;aliO" 3,368 5,220 5,220 0
Other Reserve S4S 581 581 0
TOTAL 3,913 5,801 5,801 0
FY 93-94 AppIove<\ RSR web
Minimum 4,814 4,814
Target 1,221 7,221
Maximum 9,629 9,629
",;'-' -..
~~~:.~------......:..:.....-
AII3chment ..
ELECTRIC FUND SUMMARY
($000'.)
MIDYEAR
ADJUSTED PROJECTED
ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET
.952-93 ]993·94 1993·94 DIFFERENCE
REVENUES
Sal .. $63,731 S66,229 S64,~21 (SI,808)
OthetRevenue 5,%8 6,672 6,672
Non-Operaring Revenue 10,000 10,000
Total Revenue 69,699 82,90l 81,093 (1,808)
Plus E."ICUltIbranceslReapp 5,854 9,734 9,734
TOTAL SOURCE OF FUNDS Ll.lli 22.ill. 2OJ21 (1.808)
EXPENDITURES
Utility Purchases 27,693 38,071 31,233 (6,838)
Other Operating Expenditures 18,353 lJ.501 lJ,SO!
Transier to Otber Funds 8,890 9,595 9,595
Debt Service 8 8,512 .,280 (232)
Capital ExpenDitures 12,829 14,006 14,006
Noa-Opcrnting Expendituro 36,269 36,269
TOTAL USE OF FUNDS 67773 119.954 ~ (7070'
NE'f TO (FROM) RESERVES $7780 CRU19j ill2 om $5262
RESERVES
Rat. Stabilization 45,065 20,102 25,364 5,202
Other Reserve 24,793 22,437 22,437 0
TOTAL 69,858 42,539 47,801 5,262
FY 93·94 Approved RSR Leveis
Minimum 15,050 15,050
Target 22,575 22,575
fvI'.a.'Cimum 30,099 30,099
· .:>
Attachm el1l .5
GAS FUND SUMMARY
($000',)
l>!IDYEAR
ADJUSTED PROJECTED
ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET
1992-93 1993-94 1993·94 _. DIFFERENCE
REVENUES
Sales S17,603 S11,912 S17,932
Other Revenue 1,048 883 885
Total Revenue 18,65 I 18,817 18,817 0
Plus Eucumbranc:esiReapp 1,258 1,907 1,907
TOTAL SOURCE OF FUNDS 19.9Ql1 29.lli 22.1Z4
EXl'ENDITIJRES
Utilily Purchases 9,858 11,350 11,350
Other Opeming Expenditures 3,529 4.075 4,075
Transfer to Other Funds 2,006 1,958 1,958
Debt Service 25 271 27i
Capital Expenditures 3,930 4,928 4,928
TOTAL USE OF FUNDS l2.ill 22.ll2 ll.m !!
NET TO (FROM) RESERVES $561 (l).8S~} (ll.illj S!!
RESERVES
Rate Stabilization 8,619 6,717 6,717 0
Oilier R.,;erve 4,277 4,321 4,321 0
TOTAL 12,896 11,038 11,038 0
FY 93-94 Approved RSR Level,
Minimum 3,576 3,576
Jorge! 5,364 5,164
Moximum 7,152 7,152
Attacbment 6:
WASTEWATER COLLECTION FUIIl]) SUMMARY
($(){)Q'.}
MIDYeAR
ADnISTED PROJECTED
ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET
1992-93 1993-94 1993-94 DIFFERENCE
~ ------
REVEN1JES
Sal .. 58,384 59,194 59,694 5500
Other Revenue 203 180 500 320
Total Revenue 8,587 9,374 10,194 820
PIw EncumbranceslReapp 710 62i 627
TOTAL SOURCE OF FUNDS U21 1Q ('}1 .!M.2l Vrl
EXPENDITURES
Utility Purchases 3,457 4,573 4,573
Other Ope:ating Expen<frtures 1,636 1,78$ 1,785
TraNfe< to 00", Funds 128 121 121
Debt Service liZ 320 320
Capital Expenditures 1,863 2,166 2,166
TOTAL USE OF FUNDS 7266 ~5 ~ Q
NET TO (t'ROIII) RESERVES t2.Qll il.QlJi Sl.llQ $820
RESERVES
lWe Stabilization 3,208 4,237 5,057 820
Other Reserve 322 329 329 0
TOTAL 3,530 4,566 5,3S6 820
FY 93-94 Approved RSR Levels
MiJ,jmum 2 .. 635 2,635
Targe! 3,953 3,953
.t--faximum 5,270 5,270
i ,
Attach menl 7
WASTEWATER TREAtMENT HJND SUMMARY
(SOOO'I)
M1D\'EAR
ADJUSTED PROJECTED
ACllJAI. BUDGET BUDGET
1992-93 _ 1993-94 ___ . 1993-=~4
REVENlJES
Soles $.5,691 SI2,007 $12,007
<>the!' Revenue 3,861 442 442
Total Revenue 9,552 12,449 12,449
P!usEncu~p 2,000 1,674 1,674
TOTAL SOURCE OF FUNDS ~ Kill l4.U1
EXPENDITURES
Utility Purchase> 0 0 0
Other Operating Expenditure. 8,826 8,964 8,964
Transfer 10 Other Funds 37 15 15
Debt Service 553 2,386 2,386
Capital Expenditures 2,059 1,773 1,773
TOTAL USE OF FL'NDS !till U.1ll u.m
Nl:TTO (FROM) RESERVES rn il1~5 .1m.
RESERVES
Rate Stabilizalion 2,339 3,257 3,257
Other Reserve 1,228 1,295 1,295
TOTAL 3,567 4,552 4,552
FY 93-94 Approved RSR Level.
Minimum 1,605 1,605
Target 2,408 2,408
Minimum 3,210 3,210
..... . ,..)
DIFFERENCE ---
0
Q
l!
tQ
0
0
0
Anachm~at •
STORM DRAII'!AGE FUND SUMMARY
($000")
.WJ'.lSIED PROJECTED
ACTUAl BUDGET BUDGET
1992-93 1993-94 1993-94 J:)l!'F~CE ----------REVENUES
Saleo $1,597 51,656 51,656
OIl...-R.evenue 161 58 58
ToW R.evenue 1,75& 1,714 1,714 0
Plus Encumbrances.lReapp 1,198 1,216 1,216
TOTAL SOURCE OF FUNDS ~9.\6 2.2lQ 2.llil 0
EXPENDlTIJRES
Utility Purchases 0 0 0
Other Operating Expenditu .... 1,310 1.217 1,236 19
Tnmsfet to Other Funds 61 40 40
Debt Service 3'17 396 396
Capital Expendirures 3,876 2,798 2,798
TOTAL USE OF FUNDS 5.ill. till MlQ 12
NET TO (FROM) RESERVES (RQ6~) (1121) (S.U.4ll,) (lli).
RESERVES
Rate Stabilization 1.238 (283) (302) (19)
Otbor Reserve 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 1,238 (283) (302) (19)
IT 93-94 Approved RSR Levels
Mil'jmum SO SO
Target SO SO
Maximum S500 S500
-:-----.----~.
Atiatbrn.nt 9
REFUSE FUND SUMMARY
(SOOO's}
MIDYEAR
ADJUSTED PROJECTED
ACTUAL BliDGET BUDGET
1992-93 1993-~ __ .......J293-94 DIF'FERENq
REVENUES
~ $11,911 $16,638 $15,933 (5100)
Otbo< b-.. 2,%9 1,237 1,250 13
T otaIllov"""" 14,386 17,875 17,188 (637)
Pius fuo:umb,anc •• .lReapp 1,676 1,194 1,194
TOTAL SOURCE OF FUNI1S l§..M2. ~ 11.>6.
:EXPENDITURES
Utility Purclwe> 5,602 5,900 5,900
Otbo< ~ Expendiluno 5,717 8,267 8,316 49
T....rtt 10 Othe< Funds 2,898 3,085 3,085
Debt semc. 117 0 0
Copital Expenditures 283 267 267
TOTAL USE OF FUl'IDS ~11 l1.ill! 1U2£ 42
NnW (FROM) RESERVES SI.HS il.ill nJA (ffi§)
RESERVES
lWe SUbilil:ation 930 2,361 1,625 (736)
Qtbcr Reserve () 119 119 0
TOTAL 930 2,460 1,744 (736)
IT 93-94 Approved RSR Lev ...
Minimum $1.690 $1,690
Target S2.SJ5 52,535
Maximum $3,>80 $3,380
Attachment 16
REV~EDfTBRUARYl~
INFORMATION SYSTEMS PROJECT
RECORDS MANAGEMENT n9C1Il
..... . .J
Prpied; Dryript Inn: Creation of a records management symm for the collection, controlling.
incbing, protection, storage, security. and destruction of City documents and records. First
year fundi."'g lIro\i.ded a study of various options and systems available, and made recommenda
tions (or future implementation.
Prnh::d Components:
Programming $40,000
$95,000
S15,000
Hardware & S<>ftware
lnstallation of Site Prep
Pmiert JusirJgt!QI".!: A 1988 records retention study showed that departmen ts have a. varie-ty
of documentation and retention methods, and that the methods are inconsistent for the same or
similar types of documellts. A records managemenl system would protect Ille City from
poIaltialliability due to inadequale recordk"'1'ing, and would free up ..Juab!e space in C,ly Hall
for other uses. Fire and • workflow· module for use by all departments an the records
management system will be implemented in 1993-94.
Impact Ind Support AnaJys":
• Environmental:
• Operatir,g:
Not a proje<:l under CEQA.
On-going mainterlance of system would cost approximately $12.000
annually.
• Telecommunications: None
Cmnpn::hensive Plan: Consistent with Pla.n. Could assist in data or record retrieval.
fjrpndgl Analysis:
Source of Fl.Jnding: General FU:ld 'lw-ith ]8% reimbursement from Enterprise Funds for
workflow mooel in 1993~94.
1993-94
1994-95
1995~96
19%-97
SISO,OOO Fire Depaltment and workflow module
SO
To Be Determined
To Be Dererm!no;
-'. -.-,-
I •
I A ITACHMENT II
! CApital ImpN'Ytment Proje<t Summ .... y
(Selet'led Projects (her 5100,0(0)
Mid Yur Review, I 99J..94
projed Adjuded EXl'Thru U·'9~ \'TD Budget
Pn>J<c! no. ____ ~lJmhu BuuJoP.t to-P_~e _____ fiIJD.t9~ Acc:uaJ .sat..nn
Publ" Bld& Struc1= Imp 185;)8 3):5 7,910 2.807,124 51.460 399,326
l~ :Material StOf*.ge 13604 "i75.0~J n0,57? 16 4.490
Fin Database Urgrade 18614 944,500 490,238 36,949 417.313
Arts In Public PIaoes 186n JJ 1.1 09 95,678 10,387 25,0«
Hal Mtrt! UG T ani.: Removal ISWJ 215,000 174,069 .. ,S 10 36,421
Greer P.vk DeveIoommt 18805 2,136,428 2,025,747 110.681
ReDov of lnigatlou' Sy.$l,. ]8806 390,000 290,495 [,i59 98,346
ln11. System Development 18812 1.2:59,040 1,141.920 21,421 9S,.'599
Geographic Info-Symmi )8822 7GS,OOO 344,,254 58,2% 302,450
MSC Sire Impro1l'lO'llmt 111908 380,000 291,338 40,978 41,684
Stern Or-Hu.tingNcntil. 18911 350,000 347,413 2,58i
Fire 5<ation Donn. Imp, 18916 605,000 JOj,666 2,875 294,459
Hrboo-lmprov<m<ot J8918 I S35,OOO 824,89] 303,043 407,064
Pbying Field Improvement 1&9]2 355,165 109,710 245,455-
Airport TaW.: Remcval 19i.1{11 770,000 193,210 iD.$43 566,247
R=doMor_ 19011 510.000 26>,052 2l,450 223,491
BuildOto' Code 1901g 641,000 '73,S}g 209.29] 363,889
To Im-=ig,atian &. Remo 19101 ]70,000 24.54~ 81)' 144,643
Anstradc:ro Lake! Dam 19!02 240.000 32,183 21,534 I 86,2IB
Playgrouqd FWlL &. Equip. 19103 205,000 169,8:4 35,186
PoUct Comm,CompLller Syst 19109 855,000 303,143 6,458 5450,]99
Wide Area Nttwurking ]9116 22S,QOO &9,000 136,OfXl
HP ]50 Persooal Computers 19]11 110,000 78,009 24,99i 7,000
Ci".ic: Ctr RemodtlJReloc. 19) 19 513,150 24,825 7.;00 480,825
c..J. A\o'e P.arbng Stl".~we 19211 ],~29,500 H57 ,008 31,242 j ,631.2SO
Azrv:r Di:sbAct CornplUUlCl: 1 93<J9 593,6:'0 47,275 546,345
MSC S«urity Imp=-193 J I 100,000 L.782 98,2L8
FtreIComrn Computer Syst 19312 ]OO,DS{) 31.l90 268,860
Ra<fio Rq>""""""" 1940) 1 0 1 ,(,,)() 12~S6 88 .....
Votcc Proce:<:sing Sy.dem 19404 lor.,(jIll; 100,000
RioonadI1 Pool Sik: lmprov 19406 4U( ... ,O<.JO 400,000
Civic Center Gange Improv 19410 200,000 200,000
Pari:: Backt10w Rep!. &. Irng 194[4 181.000 183,000
Pck Fadities !mprovemall /9415 I 72,OOC, 172,000 m Ea.an<nt l'urch=s 19417 412 ,Of~J 412,000
Tocal CftM:raJ Fund ProJeods ~ __ 1_,675.555 1 ! ,511 ,979 ___ 877.470 9,176,]06
SlReI: Main1enatlce 18610, ! 897 I On-goini! !.167,702
Silkwilk Repairs 18903 On-@.oini! 336.748
Minor ~tiOQ Imp 19072 !35,740 Il5,191 20..549
Major fnttrsectioa 1mP 19073 2.000.()(X) 656.304 61 1,343,635
Tratra.c Ccmrol Con.."lnlI::: 190i'J ]44,000 1J4,61J 29,389
Total Strwt Imp rovemenl Project, -------~-~~Q-88ti,I06 61 1,393.,273.
~'<:--.---
Pr'Cljtrl Aclju~ted Ey Thnll fllW \Tl) BlldCft
P~J.!"!_!!1_~ ____ Nliml»:r Blld'lri 10 nate 6IJII"l AC1Val B.lute
Byxbee pan. Dev.I""""", 8747 2,2R~,0C'() 2,214,9"11 5,971 1,112
l..bb.Facmties &: Studies 8&55 604,682 -4]9,8$4 164.~28
Gas SWiOD ImproVemellt 8919 63<;.302 141.979 I Oft,229 ]S4,094
Wiler Station Imp lI92] 23.:5,984 ) 110,7]7 5.195 116,952
~ Rd.12 KVFoed= '8937 1.175,000 842,557 45,809 286,634
Geographic !nf~ Sy31:ems 894,) 1,[40.1'0 504,]0] ~,OJ9 5]7,428
Hmseo Way 12 KV Addition 905] 797,rm 169,536 2L,672 5,192
EIec Third 60h UG Circu. 9054 909,990 ]45,09.:5 368,594 196,301
GIS WorbI:ations 9101 215,000 178,1]B ]6,862
DwtoPA UGdiMctill 9152 !,860,000 1,628,809 23 I.i 91
Wl3ttWatu Reclama!ioo 9)70 300,000 In,491 1.610 120,839
SIcmt Waf« QuoJ;ty lmf. 9)80 iOO,()()() 411,143 95,483 : 83.374
Golf Course Water RedAma <)220 250,o..)() 58,101 8,599 183,300
Natura! Gu VdUcJe Conv 92J{) 416,000 7,402 64,53. 344,064
Bw: Tie B:-eaJ,::e-r@ CuiorWo 92'SJ 150,000 86,820 56,292 6,"""
Datn PAUnder-gIV'Joo IV 9252 1,860,000 174,942 1.220,384 464,614
Ins:rum.& Alarm. Dist Cont 9260 450,000 182.0414 90,936 176,650
Civic Ceoto-Butld-Out 9]52 1,397..:500 105,201 69,801 1.222,496
SIred Light Impro .... emems 9354 260,000 2,140 47,16] 21O.69i
Utilities Billmg Sl'!tem 9]57 545,\XXJ 56.288 99,365 389,347
Wilt« Gas Storm Stall(;on Imp 9451 1,117 ,000 ),111,000
lIxiustrial Wtite: Lab Relocation 9454 PS,OOG 175,000
SaIKoW 17,477.208 8,510.869 ___ ~~08,Sl6 6..:557.523
WaIeI" Main Rep!acemcnt 8(j16 Ou-~ing 343,102
Gas Mzm Replacement SO:8 On+going 159,174
&orm Drainage lmp 8870 Oo~going 226,937
Ekctric. DislImpro\'err:ent 8928 On-going 659,467
Wastewater con S)'$. Rehab 9i73 On--going 546,400
Sub10taJ 4,943,~96
2