Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout0152.094. ' • ~ . 6 • • ""'" .,,' -" • 0 February 17, 1994 HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL Palo Alto: California HISTORIC RESOURCES BOARD RECOMMENDATION TO ADD THE TOWER WELL SIT!! AS A CATEGORY 2 (SIGNIFICANT) SQ1tuJ1NG TO THE HISTORIC BUILDING IW.JBNTORY Members of the Council: REPORT IN BRIRE This report 1) transmits the attached Historic Resources Board (HRBl recommendation to add the Tow~r Well site at 201 ~ma Street as a category 2 building on Palo Alto's Historic Building Inventory. and 2) discusses the effects of. the invento~ addition if the City Council approves the HRB reconme,ndation" On May 19~ ~993. the Tower well site was referred to tbe Historic Resources Board by th~ .Tower Well City proposal Evaluation Committee that was r~Bponsib~e for reviewins ccn~eptua1 proposals ~or reuse of the site. The HRB was asked by the committee to determine if it believed the Tower Well had hietoric merit or ~~ue. The Tower Well site is net currently on the Historic Inventory. On ~y 19~ 1393, tbe HR2, in discussing the Tower Well site. con~luded that tnis structure quite likely would qualify for inclusion on the HiBtoric Inventory, because the Tower effectively symbolized the first u~ility to be owned and operated by the Cit:;·. As a result, the HRB directed its chair to reqt:est that Council defer further rl!! .... iew. by the Bwuan Relations Commission and the Planning Commission of the conceptual proposals for the site until, the HRB could formerly consider the hi8toric merits of the site at a public hearing. CMR:152:94 -·o'f-0 • o o On AUgust 4, 1993, the KRB held a public hearir.g ~o consider adding the Tower Well site to the Historic Building In\tent.ory. In this discussion of the Tower Well's historic value. Board members noted that Palo Alto's original Historic Euilding Invent.ory, as 'Well as subsequent Inycntory additions, focused principally on architectural merit rather than on purely historic value. Therefore, structures such a.s the Tower Well, that have significant historic but not necessarily architectural value, may have been overlooked in the origillal Inventory or in subseq-..lp.:!lt Inventory addition~. Following ~he conclusion of the August 4, 1993 public hearing, the Historic Resources Board, on Aug~et 18, 1993, voted to recommend that ~he City Council designate the Tower Well site at A.lma and Hawthorne aa a Caeego:y 2 building on Palo Alto's Historic Building Inventory. Attached are ~) ERE minutes of 5/19/93. 8/4/93 and e/1S/9); 2) an ~~ transmittal of 5/23/93 to the City Council and Real Bstate Department re'i\lesting deferral of further review of concept~al proposals for the site, 3) a memo from HRB Chair~ Montgomery Anderson~ of 8/~2/9J, to t.he Board, 00 the historic significance of the site; 4) a draft Hiscoric Inventory description of the site; and 5) a HRB transmittal of 1/26/94 to the City Coun~il recommending counci~ designation of the site as a category 2 building on the Historic Builtiing I"vento~.J imCTS OF roSSlBI,S RXCLbSS1i'IQJION If the City Council approves the fiRE recommendation to designate the TOwer Well Bite as a categorf 2 building on the Historic :nventory~ the Category 2 classification would acknowledge the historic significance of this structure, which is the only remaining water tower in Palo Alto~ The designation also would result in the Tower serving as an effective symbol of Palo ~to/s first uti~ity operation. In addition, provisions in Palo ~to~s Kistoric Preservation Ordinance would place substantial limitations on demolition of this building, as well as add req~irements to mainta~ it above minimal standards required by the City' a Building Code. (See attached sections 16.'9.~60 and 16.49.080 of Palo Alto's Historic preserJ&tion Ordinance.) Nonetbeless~ the Kistoric preservation Ordinance'S definition of a Category ~ building ~d allow some exterior modifications. provided the original character of the building is retained. CMR.:1S2:94 1',\ .... \IlrtI.r.= '----_ .. _-- 2/17/94 Page :2 • -, · ,'~ ~-' -. - HIStoRIC RESQURCES BOARD RECOMMENDATiON The Bis~oric Resources Board recow.~nds that the City Council designate the Tower Well site, at the northeast corner of Alma and Hawthorne, as a Category 2 building or. Palo Alto's Historic Building Inventory. Respectfully submdtted. JrlfCial ~~ B~l!'tk:~JNY ~1nrrH R. SCHRE!BBR Director of Planning and Community Environment Assistant City Manager Attachments .. 1) HRB minutes of 5/19/93, 8/4/93, and 8/18/93 2) HRB transmittal to Council of 5/23/93 3) Memo from HRB Chair of 8/12/93 4) Draft Inventory Description S) HRB transmittal to Council of 1/26/94 6) Sections 16.49.050 and 16.49.080 of the Historic Preservation Ordinance CC~ Historic Resources Board Palo ~to Housing Corporation carrasco and Associates Palo Al to Child care Task Force CMR,152,94 1': \_I"bdo.",", 2/17/94 Page 3 ! • I i · ' .. - i(~ ; .... MINUTES _._-----_._-- May 19, 1993 ihe meeting was caJled to order at 8:15 A.M. Members Present: Linda Scott, Monty Anderson, Neil Heyden, Elizabeth rutas (arrived Clurina item 3), and john Baer Members No! Present: Jim Mc:Fallmd Mark Marcinl.k Starr Liaisoa: Georae Zimmerman I. REVIEW 01' MINUTES: Tbe lIIiIIutes for 3/3 and 5" "ere approved "jib the folJowing CXlfTec:Uons to the 5/3 minutes. Tbe vote onlbe 533 Bryant item was clarifjed to 3-1 wilb Scott opposed and tile vote CIII 100 Waverley Oaks was 4-0 vilb Andersoo DOt participatina. 2. 545 EMERSON: This applialion vas vithdrawn. 3. TOWER WELL SITE, ALMA AND HAWTHORNE; janet FreeJan .. Rea.! Estau staff joined Ibe Board for a discussloo 0{ the future ol this site turned over by Utilities. The site vas initially CODsidered [or n SRO complez but 1ft the direction ol Council a lX>mmittee was established to review alternatives. Last Ilel:ember this committee of RE and PIanniD& staff and an ORe member issued a Request For Conceptual Proposal. TlIree proposals have been received and reviewed by the committee. The Tover WeU Site is not currently on the inventory but the committee vanted to CODIuJt with the ro. The Board discussed tIla!, beyond the buildin8', ____________ City of P.lo Alto ___________ _ A IT ACHl'tENT 1 / o o· Page 2 minimal architectural significance, it may bave significant potential historkal value, given its role in Ibe inception 01 city owned utilitie •. Palo Alto·. city owoed utilities have contributed to its unique character. The cbalr designated)Ghn BIIer to draft a memo informin8 Ibe City Councillhat HRB has requested staff to put the prolK"al revi"" process 00 bold pending HRB·! consideration 01 formally reoogniz.ing the ,ite. MOTION; HRlI should initiate !be process 01 considering tbe Tower Well Site for inclusion on Ibe Inventory with Ibe intent to preS<'rve il. lU!SULTS: ~·O 1. lIRB PROJECTS FOR CTh"fENNIAL: A) Council Proclamation: be Board reviewed -.be "Where A s" list include<! in its padllle and decided to include an addit.~al clause defining a "Berita8e DistricL". Tile Board will review and vote on the tell r or & Council proclama1ion at iU nen meeting. S) sOcial BventlPlaqu.s;!be subcommittee 01 Baer and Scott has nOt yel mel wltb PAS!. They will return wltb an uJXl&te lUI d suaeruon;:--. S. COMMUNICATION: • LiDda Scott requested that staff ask Nancy LyUe to attend a fut!lre Board meeting to dilCUll criteria for new COIlstrUCl.ion in historic districts. • Elizabeth UtIaS provided the folJawing data as th. !>est means to COiltact her dlllinlller leave: EIizalletb l[itll!, 12~9 E1 Camino· 180, Menlo Part, CA. 9402~; by pbone 8S~"8072. • Mooty Aodenon asked staff to insure that IB8Gda items 00 IllU! Goals and Criteria For New Construction In Historic DiS'.ricts be moved up to insU1'e their consideration. Neil Heyden will nO! be able to attend !be 612 meeting. jolin S-is respOO,ible far goodies for the 6/2 meeting· The meeting adjourned at 10: 12 A.M. ,--. :., 4,1993 MINUTES Chainna..'1 Anderson called the meeting to order ii.[ 8:05 a.m. Members Present; Monty Anderson, Chairman Elizab om J( itt3s, V ice-Cn ,j rperson Linda Scon, S<"etary lim McFall John B,er(Arrived 8: 1 0) Members not Pr-esen! : Neil Hayden ~ark ~arc!nik Staff Liaison: eo""dl Liaison: Gemge Zimm~rman Lani. Whoder L Review of Minule';; 2. Motion: Appro". minutes for April 21, 1993 3!ld June 2, 1993. Approved 4-0 63ll Ramorul Street Charks Ho!DulIl presented a proposal to install 1 internally illuminated mer.' cases at the front of for Blue ChaII: eare 0" Ibe «llun",. a' either side of the ~ The applicant also asked for support for the reuse of 2 existing spot ligbt:. on either side of Ibe restJIunnt sign for illumination. The board concluded the columns were not wide enough to mount the menu boards and did not want III see • ."C6erl ele<:trioal conduit as a means to li,II' tbem. Motion: Th. Board recommends the menu boards b. moun led 00 the outer piers of the building :ather than Ibe columns. Approved 4-\ ( Baer) Motion: The Board recommends the proposed lighting for the sign at the entry Dol be approved and L~at the applicant .rudy other ,,,iurions. Approved 4-1 (Kinas) Jim Mcfall will attend the ARB bearing on tbis project Tower Wen Site I John B= asked Lie Board !o consider adding this site to the historic invento<y as a Category 2 .tructlUe. AlthQugh this slnJcltJre cannot be said to be an important architectural work it servict~ as a symbolic reminder ______________ Cil)' or Palo Alto ______________ _ -.,. .. ---_. o of the cities unique'! history resulting in t.~e control and ownership of the city utilities. A category 2 d~signatian would .give the structure some protection from. demolition. In regard 10 the pr-ese-nr applications which ha"te been recehfed fOT use of this site Jim McFa.lI asked for clarification on the Board's review of them. There would be a ~t!bsequcn~ meeting with the B.ppJican~ to review the proposals. The bOArd concluded designation of the ,ite was import.ant and appointed a subcommittee consisting of Mooty Anderson and John Haec t(J draw up ! written d<scription and a narrative for the next meeting. 4. HRB Projects for th, Palo Alto Ceotenni,l: The Board endorsed the IODS term r~ognition of the Hopkins Tract The designation requires no regulation and promotes voluntary CODSen"atioil. Jim McFall recommended Ih. wording descnoilig the boundary east of Middlefield Road be improved for the centenni,L M otio.: The S"",d endorsed the Proclamation as presented. 5·0 5. Lighting Slandards for SOFA: Mike Beeland of the Utilities Department attended to answer board member questiOllJ regarding the olDYent UDdergrOWlding project iD til. SOFA and the PrDfessorville area. The HRB was Dot consulted as to the appropriateness 01 the desi8D of the light standard whicb is to b. used. Mr. Beeland recognized that this was probably • mislake, but offered no remedy if the board was not in ogreement wi th the .election. The standMd was approved by the ARD. The same standard wiU be used for both the commercial and rolail areas as well as the "",ideDtiBl. Board member Scott commented a different selection for the resideDtial than the commercial would probably been appropriate 10 differentiate the areas both functioDally and eslbedcally. Member Scott r"""mmen~ed the board begin • study to establish standards for street improvements in the Profes,orville area. The board agreed the public area is an importBl!l part of !he historic district. 6. HRB tasb for balance of 1993: Continued to next meeting. 7. CommuDications George Zimmerman reported there was as ~el no action on the CLG Grant funds from the slate. Meeting was adjourned at 10:30 a.m. ~---,..- -:..-:---.-. " MINUTES Augusl 18, 1993 The meeting ""as catled [0 order at 8:06 A.M. Members Present: Linda Scott, Monty Anderson, Neli Heyden, John B.er l1l'rived during item 2 and deparled during Item 61, Jim McFall, and Marl.: Marcinii: (dep med d u ring ite m 8' Members Not Present: Elizabeth unas Staff Liaison; George Ii :!Imer m an Council Liaison: Larue Wheeler I. REVIEW OF MINUTES: There were no minutes aVllilable for review. 2, TOWER WELL SITE: The Board provided comments and suggested changes to the draft phvs'",l and histori<:al significance Inventory description. MOTION: Request tbat the City Co~nc!l de$ignate the Tower WeU Site at Alma and Hawthorne a category II building on the City s Historic Structure Inventory because of its llistorical significance as described in the accompanying description IESULrs: 5-0-1 with MarciniJ;. abstaining. 3.535 BRYAJI,j fBYXBEE HOUSE) John Baer did nOl participate because of a l'otentiaJ conflict. 0{ interest Tbe Board condycted a Public Hearing to considerins reQassification 0{ tile bouse from a category IV \0 a category II on the Inventory, Jim Baer informed the Board 0{ plans \0 preserve tht b~ilding. The CllfTent buildmg would beoome a two Unil residential strUClure. joining the current structure on tbe site would be a complimentary four unit apartmenl oom;::ol. fhis oompleI ______________ City of P3ioAlto ______________ _ -.. • . " ~-riIA ..souRCES ' Bo\RD 1 __ _ r..y 23, 1993 TO; Members of th.e Palo Alto City Council Palo Alto Real [state Dep.rtment Tne purpose of this letter !s to notify tne City 'ouneil and City Staff that the Historic Resources Board is requesting that staff place a temporary hold O~ all efforts to dispose of the Tower Well Site located on the corn~r of Alma and Hawtnorne Street in Downtown Palo Alto. Our request for this hold is based Dn the fol1cw1ng cQnsiderations: I) As of Wednesday, May 19th, the HRB initiated efforts tu determine whether the Tower We" should be classified as a hlstoric strutture and placed on tke Cityl$ Historic Inventory. Our investigation will co~sider both the physical e1ements of the structure as well as t"e sYBioolic value it may represent to the C.onmunHy. l. Wedr.esday, May 19th, was the first presentation to HRB about the Tower Well. At the time of this preliminary HRB discussion, Requests for Conceptual PrDposa's l~FCPJ for the use of tne site .already had bi!er. distributed to '"terestea p~rties and subsequent conceptual proposals reviewed by an evaluation <ommittee consisting cf repre$entiti~es from the Plann.ing Co:rmission, Human Relatiolls COlTInission and staff. This RFCP process pre~iously was appro~ed by Council. However, since the HRB n~ver had consider&d this site is an addition to the Inventory, the Soard feels that efforts to pC5sib1y preserve the structure would be t~warted u~less the Board has the opportunity to consider adding the site to the Inventory and preserving U,e structure. ThiS interest and concern to preserve the site is further heightened bj the language found in the fir.t paragraph of the RFCP: -The we') facilities, including a 79·fo~t high re1nforced concrete tower. remain ~n the site. B~yer/Tenant will be r~sponsi~lt for removdl of well facilities and equipment.· .:tglllb:t~.oold o 3. Finally, _e iijree with the declaration m~de by the Mayor at tne State of t~. City Add'·." ..... tn.t the City shoul d not· reach for easy budgetary salutions through the ·fisca11zation of valued properties.-The demolition of the Tower Well may repr~sent such a s~enario which will provide l1ttle ec~nomfc benefit while taking from ~s all 3 valued Si~bol of our heritag •. ~e request that this h~1d Qn the process be put into effect immediat~ly so tnot ... tlngs sened.led w,th the Human Rel.tions commission on June lOth and wfth t~e Pl~nning Commission on June 30th ire delayed until late summer when presumably the HRB will have completed its efforts in determining Whether the Tower Well structure and site snou1d be preserved. Yours truly, . .~ ~ ~L Kontgoaery Anderson, Chair Historic ResDurces Board . " .. . r ',,,, . 81_::1"~" 1'=':: August 12.1993 Dear Board Members; The foUow'.ng is the description 10 aocompcmy the Inventory form for !he Towet Well site. Please review and be prepared to cam.nen! and word smt!h at OUI nex1 meeting. Physlca] DescI1pt!on: This tower was construa!ed of reinforced concrete. It is 30' In diameter and rises to a height 01 18 leel It has a co:p<;ICity of 155.000 gallons and sils on a site rneasurtnq 75' x 115 1/'1. A square one sto:y pump house pIOj$C1$ out fiorn the lower ixD;e. The extanor walls are sccred creuting a tuStiOated base which t!nnly ancholS the Iall lower structwe. A pair 01 docn With dIagcaal wood pc:rttem adorn th& opening 01 the pump hou8e faclnQ Alma Street S!gnlticonoo: The Tower Well was cons!ruG1ed in 1910 and CIbcmdorl$d by the City In 1987. The water Company was the first ut1l!ty pwchcIsed by the City shortly after 1ncapc:lrcrlion In 1893. Previously wuler tor the town hod been pwch.:Ised from Jooes Water Comp:my whlch :provl<:led an unreliable suWly at otten exorbitant rates. Palo Alto became one of the first cities in the country 10 ~ their own utilities. The water oomPCUly was tremendously success!Ul. fueling City coHen; ctuling the 1o\lI\ding' yean;. The wateI assured Palo Alto of a cheap and abundant supply of water. en5JJring pra>pertty and fire pro1ectior\ 10 a City bWlt c! wood. Many of the City Park.&' enjoyed by c:I'dzerls today con. be attdbutec! 10 this stabIli2ad wuler suwly. The Tower Well stands CIS (I symbol 01 !he C!ty's S'.JCCe5SIul beginnings and forward thinklng Ioonding fathers. Slncerely. An.~CIiMENT 3 .. . ., .. I: HISTORIC RESOURces INVENTORY IOE.NTIF.j~TION Tower W'el1 Site •. ~mm~r~~:~ __ ~~~~!!~~~~ ___________________________________ __ 2. Hinoric Mme, R al1O'WTl: ___ !T.Qo~w.!.'!.r_lI~e~l!..lUS.!.i tE:'~· ______________ ..:.. __________ -:-___ -:--____ _ 3.. StrHt 01 hlrJl .cIqr~st. . ....;s~o~u~t;!;h~e~a~s..:t:...'::c:::o:..rn:.:e:.r~o:,f,..,::.A:.:l~ma::....:S:.:t::r..:'..:'.;t:..· .:~..;.:n.:a;:wt.:.h_o".r __ n-,-' ' ______________ _ Citv: __ ....::.pa::.l:.:o::...oA:.:.l.::t:::o.~~C::A:... _____ 211"; 94301 County: Santa Clip"a C1' t f P 10' "to 'dd""'. 250 tlami 1 tor. Ave. "-~~nt D'M'Itr, if known: y 0 a " • .... , , City: ___ P~a!!.l!)o"_'A:!.l~t~O:....._....,-~------ZI P;,.--____ Owr.ership i:J". f'~b"ric: [] 6. Prtsem Use :Sea 1 ed WI! 1.1 & \'acarit Water T0ill1tTgi." .. 1 ~u"'ldpa1 water , .. ~1l ilrod StQl"'§Oe TQ'~er OcfIer pest U$H:.~._.:N~o::ne::..._...:.. __ ,,-~ ___ ~:-____ ~ __ ....:. _____________ _ Ot:SCFI; "T ION ~'e-;'~ d.tscn-t.e. ~1:e pment !)hYJicaf .ppea~ cf thlt ,Tte ocr f1;nl~u~, ,';,d .de~ti~e; 0111'1')1 m,;j~ .rtffiltkms Trom iu orisiNl condition: . • ~ ." ~ ." This. tower l\.as constructed of ,reinfo,~ced concrete. It is 30 I in diameter and rises to a 'height of 78 feet. It has a capacay of 15,5.000 ga1ions and Sits on a s.ite ~asurfng 75 1 , 115i J • A sGuare one story pump house projects out from the tower base. The ext~rior walls are scored creating a rusticated base ~nich firmly anchors the tall tower strutture. A pair of dQors with ~:a90nal wood pattern adorn the opening of·the pUmp hOUSE faCing Alma Street. 9. Condition: (check fine) b. Good 0 d. Otw-~o;'lt2d 0 e. No 1orI&e~ in exi!ter.ce 0 10. Is the feature L AJteroed? 0 b, Ur.arClrtd' [JI 11. Surroun.dlr.~: ICheelr. rTlCl!1i than ant H n~uatyl II. Open bod 0 b. Scatttred buildings 0 c. Oensely btJnHJp 0 d. RU·ldmliat rn e. Cornml!fdJI [!] 1. I~u:nrial 0 . a· Cthrr 0 '------ 12. Thtn!lto:S::lf: .. NOr'~\:no~ 0 b. Frn~UIi'~tIQpmer.t 0 c. Zoni nit 0 d. Pubii!; Worlc l prcjK1: 0 It. V;J"d.i:ism 0 f. Oth~ ~ Pcterjt;~e 13. 0...14 of oodo<ed pt""'",""'14. :::_":'-'-___ _ AITACHMENT 4 , , I 1 i i ~ ... ~ NOTE: 1M f4f1Dwing (lfM?S 14-t9/ .,.1a"tlVCfllfa only, 14. P'rinu,.., Ulta'riUf buitdin" mated.l: •. Stane 0 b, etick ,0 r. Other l!I Reinforced Concrete Tower c. s .. = 0 d. ,""obe 0 •. Wood 0 15. hlh. stl\u=~rl!: .t. On lu crigiMI $1.1 rn b. ~i" 0 Ie. YW'cliniti.alCCr.'l'llucti:on ~ T1'11sd'at.lis: a. F .... '"tUI1 0 b. Estimated [[I _JR~l-~C~h .• ~-!~ti~n~:~S-!."~.d~S~O~n~s~.JC~;~v~;~l~En~g[j~"~ee~r~s __ ~ ______ ~ ____________ __ 11. Ard'liwctl,"'ncwn}: 1'0. ::! la. BLlM«(ifllnown):. City of Palo .Alto 19, R~t&ted (U.t.Jfl!:$~ A. sarn 0 b. f"..ar:iagl! hou'!I! 0 C. CkJ~ 0 d. & ... :cl'($1 0 ,: WlndmlU 0 ' .. wuerto't'>'r.l~houR G h. Oth!!!" rn Pum!l House SIGNlf'ICA.r..IC€ e, Fonnal gardenlsJ U L No,," 0 20. Btlefty stlti~ tnd/or arthh.ecw.-.l' impcr12nct' lindud. !tates. ftlmb:. &."'011 petsoos ~.ted wiU1 Ihllt site' when It r'IOWl'.): . -. . The Tower Well was constnuct~d in 191C~ In 1987 t the City discontin~ed it's activ~ use. The Water Ccmpsny W1lS tne first utility purchased by the City shortly aft.er incorpQratfon in 1893. Previously water for tf,e town had bee~ purchased from Jones Water Company which prawided an unre1iable supply at often ex~rbitant rates. Palo Alto b2carr~ one of the first cfties in the country to purchase their own utilitjes~ The water company was tremendously successful. fueling tHy coffet-~ during the foundin9 years. The water assured Palo Alto of a cheap and abundan~ supply of water. ensuring prosperity and fire protection to • City built of wood.' Itlny of the City Parks enjoyed by citi,en, tad,x.- can be attributed to this stabilized' water supply_ The Tower Well stands CIS a symbol,' of tMe City's successful beginnings and forward thf~1ng founding fat~~ 21. M.ilin th.-ne Df tnt hll5tOJk resource: jCheck O!IIy one): .;1. Atd\iteoure U h. Att:s &0 Leis.! ra U c.. Ecor.omie/lnd'VS;rial 0 d. ExplomionJ'S.llnlenmt 0 It. GonmmOl1l 0 t Military 0 I-.Rengion .0 h.. SocidIEc!~tiol'l 00 Symbol of ear:-ly CHy OWTl':!rs'hip ·and oper-ation water company. :22. So-urCl"t: liit OO¢r~ doc:uml!nu.. III.':I"A'.(S. pvs:;.~ h~iews" .1'1d their _cbtl:S: of its 23. Dill! form pr-epvl'd.___ ByJI".-rM'l: ___ ~ ______ ~ ______ ~_~ ___________ __ . ..,d"", "--_____________________ OtY __________________ ZLP, __ Pf1ont:: (State l'20nlyl I January 26.1994 le!:ter to City Counc:il RE: Tower WeDs Si1e Dear Counc:il Members; The Historic Resources Board is very Interested in having Council 0CI!lSIder all optiOns for the p:eservatiOn of tba Tower WeD site. The HRB strongly belleves IhaIIts cu1Iura1 significance 10 the City ci. Palo Alto Is SUCh tlla! the structure and the site shoulQ be jXeserved. '!be Board held a pul:)I1c meeting In August and afterword the Board suppaled the idea thai the structure and si1e be clesignated a Category n afferlng it some p:oIec:tion from demo1itiorL The ctta::h9d 1:laclcgrcR.L'ld infcrmaiian gives yo'.l tt glimpse of why we feellhis sINc!we is WOOh jXeseMng. SinceIely. A ITACHMENT 5 · . BI.J1l.DlNG REGVLA nONS 1649.O&J The: rel.ationship of the bullding. in ony and appropriateness. wi th its inclu®lg neiJhboIllood SUUctll'." (C) A . M>Y i!Ilel<s!ed p':')' may BpJ:<al In I!!e city !be decision of the .. 'Chi- tccrural re'licw boan:1 ~ approval of an appli.c.uicn tor I bu permit to alter la~ exterior of my bi.5tDric: . the oownU)'A-'D ma, or a significaru sttu...'"tm'e Ii: he~ in the city or in. historic distria. Sucb be pro«ssed in acamImc<.n1h Se<lion 16. . (O:tI. 3721 II (part). 1986) If,42,%Q DemaUtloD at srCDHicant buDd.iDp In. the dDwtl.tt)WD area. (a) P'emlil IUld 1iodiDis· No permit Wll be iSS'.Jed to _ '" C>IlSe ID be demolJsh<d all or "'1 pan of I ~ buildiIlg L. IIlc doWI>­ lDwn.area unless: (1) Tbo city cooncil _ tha: under tbf bi!Wn.; desigDll!oo. IlIl:i!!g inlO aoc:ouo! the _ man.. _!be vahle oftmlSf<nble de· velopment riIbIJ, mI tbf """ oCrehabGiWion ID meet Ihe ..... ..,. ~f Ihe boiiIdlni code or oIher city. sw. D< _ laws, the pmpezty ... tains no as~rAA o:onomic IS; or (2) Tbo cl:ief bulIdlz>i ollicial or the fire chief, after oonp;l~rion. 10 d!e extatt fusible. .nlflthe I!epanmetIi of pIamI!Da mI """"'unity cuvironment. defermioes1bat III imminent Wety. __ mllbIr demolltioo or Ihe building is !he only f ... ible mWlS ID lIOC1m Ihe public safelY. or (3) '!be cityCll<l!lCil"""" __ <lemo1l- ti~. of the bWldirlf .nIi DOt ha> •• siSnilicanl effect em tbe _om"'" of Ihe purposes of tbi.s dl.apt<t'. (b) Appljcalion fir. pemW 10 <Iemolish. An app~03Iio. Ii>< • pemUl to demoIisb any signi/i­ Cint buiI4ing in 1I!e downtown .... Wll """,ply wilh Cbapa:r 16.04 of1l!e Polo AlIO Municlpol C<>de.1n odlIioOf! to Ihe CO!'OiOII!S spec;fied under O'I.8ptcr 16.04, any Ipp.licalion for I pennit to demolish a significaru building in the dowruown a~. Oll the grounds sped fied in Section 16.49.060{aXI). Wll conuin any 'ppropri&'" and rdcvant economic lnformation which v.'ill enable the coWlcil til =1:, Ihe necessary detcnni· nation (c) Review of awlica:ion. (I) Historic l<SOWU, bean!. Appli<:ations which a.~ accepted as complete for a perntillO demolish a significmt building in the downlOWD area on th-e grounds 5~dfled in SectioD l5.49.060{aXI) or (3) .hal: be pl.ced 00 the ...,.,. of Ihe hi""ric '""'" «<5 bean: fo r "".arlng and recommendation IT the histone RSOurces board dDe3 !lOt act 00 Ihe app!i<:ation .n_thirty days of refemllO it, Ihe :it)' <OUIJci! may pnx:eed 'Witbout I reccmme:nd£tion from She historic re­ """"'" boud. (2) City C.'<>\l:lcil hu.'ing and decision. M>y appli<:ation for permillO domollsb • sigulfianr buil<!lng in the downlD'Oln 11'<& on Ihe ilOunds lpedfiod in 5«:tion l6.49.01!O{'XI) or (3) shall be _ bylhe city _ Noll", shall be si- by mailed noli'" 10 oil 0Mle!S of propeUy imIDe­ dimly adjacenllO Ihe propmy that is tbe subject oftbe oppIicat!OIl. BOd by jlIlbliulloo at leas: ODe< in a loc:alDCWSpOpOr of senonl cimllaIiOll. The ~ shall baY< Ihe bom!", or .... blWlini that Ihe~. lOt forth in Se<lioo 16.49.060(aXl) or (3) bas b<= met Tbo COUDCil may ;;pprove, dIs· approve or IpplO'Ye Ihe Ipplitatioc with c:ondi­ tiOllS, mlWll mall: liDdlng> r<l1!ing its decisioo 10 Ihe ot:mdanls set fotCl in Secti .. 16.49.060(1). The decision of the coWlcil Wll be· render«! .n<bin IbiUy days from Ihe dm of !be cmlclusion oflhe beuing. (d) Permit tD mOlle I signifio:a.rJ building In the c!ovmtown an:a or in.. historic district In rt:­ viewing an appDc:ation for a pcnnitlO demolish a tfgni ficant buUding in the 4ownto'WD .area. or in a historic district on Ihe JI'IlUIld5 specified In Sec­ lion 16.49.06O(aXl) or (3).1he bi5tndc resoun:a board may decide _ Ihe bWldini may be mewed _ destroying its hi.!loric d. Il<Iliu:ctcr.II in· tzgrity and imporl3D<%, aod =y ",rom."OO 10 the city council tiW the demDlilion permit be denied. but Illa' • permi' In r<locate be processed. pm.uaJU 10 Olap<cr 16.32 of this cod,. L'!hat 16105 ATIACHMENT 6 -. , ----.--------- 1 \6.49.070 PALO ALTO MUNICIPAL CODE C".asc, the time limits and notice requlrem.em.s of s<ction 16.49.070(c) shaIl a1so he applicable. (Crd. 372! t I (part). 1986) 6.49.070 Demolition Df' contributih, b Udings Ib the downtown aru lind sIe" rn can f bull dinp other than in the down .. to area.. (_ Applica!ion.oo morawrium. Any PO""" to demolish • COOIn1>lling buDding In the area or I significant building other do'IiI(lI<)WII'iban liIe OIl appIi<alioo for a demo . in..."nIance with !be proce<lweo by Ch>pter 16.04 of this codt. Will> the appIleal!! shaIl .. !:mit 0-"<: of the IhmI of !be buildinglitld iDfi!..".Iic· lIlU may he requited by !be • !II ~ with 1lIe reo demoliliolt pe:mit. A copy ef ~~~~i!s!WIheeor.--0< III ioIlmnsIiOl! _ in the nen toW>tiI The cblof buiIdina emcill may DOt lake action the appli<alian for .my days foIlowilli J=ipt • """P""" oppIlc:aticn. (b) RderralIO art: .!eCtIIr.II review _ or llistoricol ~ bo VwitI, tbe siny-dly morar:or;um. !be cblef ot'!idal shaIl refer Ihe application for. dmlo&b ., the IT- chi=:unl ~vie ... board, in case of all \>Oild. ings ocher than slng\e" and duple.< "';. dences, for ttvit.w and enc2itiOll. "The ar· chi_ ",view be.,1l shaIl die appli<lIIion to the historic resources beard reoommtQda.. tio'" on die llistoric:al and/Or .;p,m. c:aru% of !be buildilu! IIOd the lime for the mOlilIDriu:D.. A' danrnirioo applicmon for a si!tiJe.liuDl!y or duple.< shaD he n:f~ 10 the bisIorlc """"""" ..,;om. mendarinn (c) Comx:i1 action.. 'Ibt ~view _,die llistori, resources board, or III !mer, estblperson may n:catllIlW !hal Ibe t:.nd the: moralOrium. The council sbatli such • request and may extmldle sixty~y od for I periiJd up 10 one year. 11:: !be case 0 e~Ler.ded moratOrium, lhe council, upon !be .endation of 1.'11: historic ~ board. may requi lOpriate and t:aSOr.able public I"'.o~ce of the IV •. of rhe structu.--e be pro- vided ~y <he applicant. (Ord. 3721 tl (parV, 1986) 16.42.080 Malnfenanu of hist~ric structures [n the downtown Il'ea. The 'Owner, lessee or other p:tSOO legally in po~ion of II l"JstOrlc strua:ute in the down~ !Own an:a shall comply with all topplicabl< codes, laws and reguLuions gove.miJlJ: me maintenance of propeny. MditiozWly, it is !he inI<lII of Ibis 5eCIioo In P'!!"""" from deli.."... or lnadveztent r«g1ee! !he e,terior feanues of buildinp desig. ruled 1$ signifiCiilDC or contributory in Ibe down­ town ..... 2nd !he interiOr portions Ibereof wben suctl m~ IS DeCUSary In prevcm 4eleri· oration and.:.cay .r!be ._. AlII1ld! bu!ld­ "'" shaIll>e __ cd agalnst.u.:h deay &Cd doterior>Jion, and IhaII r=ain!me from J:rlICIW>! delCClS Ihr01:p prompt conectiolls of Illy of the foDowir4 clc!ods: (3) Facodis _ may faIllD4 injure memo bers of die PIlbIlt or property, (1)) Pc:=riarued Dr iDadequaIe f_oo, der.m .. or _rated floorinB or IIoor SlIp­ pons, dtteriorated waI!s or ocher venicll SUUC· lUr.Il"'ppom; . (e) Members of ceiEngs. IOofa. ceiling and mof ~ Of _ 110_ members which sag. split Dr bur...l::l(: du.e 10 defecti\le m:tteri_al or de:c.riorarior.; (<I) ~ori!>elfective_fing of exterior walls .. roofS. fcr.mduions or Ooofi. in­cludlna _ windows Dr doon;; Ce) Oefc:cdve or insu!!icicn! -.. proIec· tion for exterior wall awe""" iDcludllli lacI: of paint Dr ocher proIeCIive <Overing; (t) Any r.uJt or defect in:be buildiDI which rwden it _ properly w...mgb! 0< l'O'\lQUIally umafe. (On!. 372 I §I (paJt), 1986) 16106 • "'" QlLL -.-~