HomeMy WebLinkAbout0335.093-
~'
, , . ' ~ ,"-e
.~>. ",,-, .. '
'. ;
.June: 10, 1993
HONORABLE CITY COv~CIL
Palo ~lto, California
8
Supplemental IDj'ornLation concf':rf\.in9....~lementation of ___ ~LG'_amino Way
Bike Lane Pro,ect
Msmbers of the Council:
REPORT IN BRIBF
The purpose of this report is to provide supplemental information
in response to issues raised by Counr::il discussion on May 17 ~
concerning the proposal to install bike lanes on El Camir,o way
between 'Iofest MeaOO\lT Drive anc the Los RoblesJEl camino Real
intersect jon.
BAC)l:GROUND
On Mer.day, May 17, the Palo Alto City Council considered the plan
to install bicycle lanes in the 4{100 block of El Cantina Way (see
CMR~295:93, 5/13/93). This project had been included in the 1992-
97 capital Improver.'1ent Program budget and ~'as scheduled for
implementation this spring. .At the meeting. some business and
property owners on El camino r,.",~y questioned the adequacy of the
public notice of the Council ~eeting. ar.d raised specific concerns
acout thE: proposed slimina.tion of on-str-eet parking between 7! 00
a.m. and 1:00 p.rn., on the .... 'est side of tr.:; street. Council \loted
to continue the item for four weeks and directe.d staff to (I} make
sure all notifi'-:-ation issues 'Were re.solved l (2) evalu,3.te and report
back on the possibility of special effective hours in the bike
lanes to provide protection to school children, (3) faci 1i tate a
meeting with all affected property o~ners to explore alternative
proposals, and (4) provide suggestiDns for technical and funding
aspects of viable alternatives. A reap of the E1 camino way
corridor is provided as Exhibit l~
ORIGINAL PLAN AND ALTERN~TIVES
In response to Council's direction and fer the purpos6s of further
discussion, staff has identified six al'ternatives in addit.5.on to
the Original Plan discussed in the Mal' 13 staff report. All seven
C'M.R:3J5:93
~--;----" .,,~ .. -.
L
i
":
•
.-'
-
plar.s, as described belo'w' dnr1 sho .... 'n In Ey.hibits 2-16 , ""'ere presented
at the ;~leeting with E1 Ca:r":i~o Way business and property owner:!:> O!""I
Ju-ne 1rd.
Qriginal Plan~ ~_§._'!L_$J_b:'. Lane. aQ We?_t ____ ~j. __ '-J.e. No Pa __ rkin_~: DC ?" __ , __ m __ ,~_
7 : 00 p. 1tL. ___ n_.uJ.'-nD DO)
The original proposal to ii15tall f~ll bike Janes on El camino Way
(as described in CMf<:295:9J) included ['"eterJtion ot the existing 13
foot ~ide bike lane on the east side of the street, ",,'here parking
is allowed. and installation ot a new 7 foot wide hike lane with
parking prohiDited f1"o1."1 7:00 a.I!'. to 7;00 p.m. This plan 'Nould
eliminate approximatsiy 16 on-street parking spaces.
Alternative J ___ : ____ ~.9 Bike Lane on _.\!.:@.? __ t ____ Side of £1 car,in9 ,!:!E_Y_,,-with
Park:i,.)l9... ___ Res-trictions 1:00 aI.TI:. to 9:00 a.!',\. and ;:""'; __ ';' __ 0 to 4:GO pm.
LH .. _QQQ.l-
This alternative would maintain the existing 40 toot curb to curb
width of the street and the existing lane striping pattern,
including a biY.e lane on the east side of the street; and ~'c.uld add
parking restrictions on the ~'e:st side of the strep.-t, during the
hours 'When elementary, middle, and senior high school student:::> are
commuting to and frOID school. The afternoon dismissal times for
the elementary and ~iddle schocls ar8 not consistent. Generally,
the J. L. Stanford Middle School dismissal is at 3:00 p.m., except
on Thursdays, ~he~ it is at 2:20 p.~., anc Juana Briones Ele~entary
School has an early dismissal every Wednesday 3t 1~30 p.m. In
order to accommQdate. 'trlEse Varying schech.:.les ano have the "west side
of the street clear of parked cars ... hen school chi ldren are
commuting, the parking prohibitions ¥'-:luld need to be in effect
almost the entire mid-afternoon from 1:30-4:00 p.m. This
alternative could be imposed seven days a week or Monday through
Friday only, wh2n stude!'1ts are commuting t"_o school.
Staff origin.1l1y p:-op-')sed these pa.rking restrictions in the context
of 0 modified Original Plan, lO;ith a.n on-street bike lane on the
.... est side of El Camino Hay. Suctl a biJ.':c lane would be operat iona 1
and free of cars tor only up to 4 1/2 hours a d~y. Staff concluded
that installing such a li)f',ited use bike la!'l€ would ~10t be
consistent with generally accepted design criteria for marked bi%e
lanes and could be misleading ~nd confusing to both bicyclists and
drivers.
While this alternative could be implemented for tl'1'l: least cost, it
could require substantial signi:lge and regular enforceTTlent to ensure
success; dnd it " • .'ould nClt res ... lt in any change from present
co.:c:-.iti'-'ns for cyclists traveling outside the effective hours ':If
t::he parking i: e . .c;trictions.
CMR:335:93
"L
6/10/93
page .2
"
-
alternative 2A: W~der). ___ -I..l ______ !2amin·::; ~3'i·~~~_S_ .~n ____ bo· __ t;::st Side ~
Install a fUll Btk-=:. Lan~ with rarkir...LQ.n..._W_~SL Side ($84.300)
In order to provide a standard 12 foot wide bike lane and retain
all 16 on-street parking spaces on the west side of El Cami~o Way,
it ..... c'..ll..l be necsssary to ··.:iden t.he road by 4 feet. Dncer this
alternative I all the widening would occur on the ~Qst side of the
street l '""ithin the existing right-of-· .. 'ay. The street .;auld be
restriped to provide two 12 foot bike lanes and two 10 foot traffic
lanes. A 4 foot landscaped strip and a 5 foct sidewalk ~ould be
:-etained behind the new curb and gutter. All 16 existing Oil-stre.et
parking spaces .'"Quld be retained~
Alternati v~:----.J£t~~l1 _____ E" Camino Way by 2 feet _9_n 80th Sides of the
Street ang rl1§ __ tall Bike LMre with pa,xkin_gm on West Side $V30.00.9J
This :aclternative ",,'ould have the sa~e result as 1o.1ternative 2.1;"
except the widening \IIould be taken from both sides of the stree:ti
and a full landscaped strip (5 feet wide; " .. 'QuId be retained on both
sides of the str~et. This alternative would be twice as costly as
Alternative 21\, \IIith the sa1'l1e resul"ts in terms of retention of
on-street parking spaces.
Alternat:i, .... e 2J~: Widen El camino Way ~m West Side. Install,. Pl~n:t;._§l."'!:
Illi:lI,ds in F.Qadway ($61,909.1
Another approach \IIQuld be to widen the street on the west side by
S feat, thereby eliminating the lands~aped strip, but retain the
existing trees in planter islands in the street, between bays of
parallel parking. The concept would be similar to the layout of
parking and trees on university Avenue. Under this s=enario, it
would be possible to retain approxi~ately 11 of the 16 existing
parking spaces on the west side of the blecK. The result ... ·ould be
an asymmetrical street design: tnere would be no landscape b\,;.ffer
between the curb and existing 5 foot side",-'alk on the ;,Jest side of
the stre.et, .... 'hile the existing landscaf'ing and sid~"",·alk. on the
east side w,oould not change.
J..lte.:r_D~t.i-".le 3: DC'Jelop off-street. parking lot on !.or@er Gas
station site (+$)21.009.1.._
This site, 4073 El Camino Way. is an 8,000 square foot triangular
shaped lot, with frontage on beth El camino Real and El Camino Way.
Staff has developed a potent i <3.1 parking 101:. layout ..... hich would
yJeld 17 parking spaces. The property line actIJallj' extends to the
middle of the former vist.a Avenue r ight-of--,.,ay; " •• hich WdS abandcn€_d
by the City in 1968. If this 20 foot wide area we~e used, an
additional 2 parking spaces could be provided. HO'.,;e\rer, the Vista
right-ot-way is currently used as parking for 6 vehicles, so the
larger parking lot configuration • ... 'Quld. res'-llt in a net gain of only
13 parking spaces.
CMP.:335:93
L
6/10/93
Page 3
..
I
~
-
:r .. ·· 1 .
Staff has cont.acted th'2: property o\>"ncr Ij,""r'.o indicatBd that the.
property is currently under leas~ tr.rough Dece~bE'r 1994, when the
clean-up of the site will be cCClplete. Tbe property rr,ay be put up
tor sale ~t that time. Bill Fellnan of the Real Estate Division
has estimated the value of the property to be ;321,000 to $361,000
based on a cost of $40-$45 per square foct Ca rate comparable to
the purchase price of a vacant 12,DOO sq. ft. parcel in ~he 4200
block of Middlefield Road tor an a:jto,"!1obile lube facility). The
redevelopment potential and value of this E1 Camino Way property
may be furthl:r limited by its Um.l$'.:lal shape, narro'W "Width, and
set:oack require!=:ents. Ever, the reuse of the site for a ga~ station
facilit.y ,*ould require a canditi')nal use permit under the
Neighborhood COr.tJ.Llercial District (eN) zOT1ing, as .. 'ell as site and
design r-evie'W,
The cost to develop parking on this site wOiJld be far greater (over
$17/000 per space) than any other alternatiVe discussed herein.
Alternative ~n~ ___ pevelop a P.?rkinomnJLa..Yn on Public Properl;y on El
Camino 'WaY0n Conjunction w.tthmnOriginal Plar. ($31n ... l>J2Ql
For discussion purposes, staff developed a conceptual plan for a
parking bay in the public landscape a:-ea immediately north of 4073
El Camino -""ay. Appro:o.:irnately 11 diagonal parking spaces could be
accommodated in this area. Under this sca~ario, the parking bay
'Would partially replace the 16 parking spaces that lolould be lost b~t
installing a seven foot ""-'ide bike lane, "ir.rith pa.rking rnstrictions,
on the west side of the street.
~he Caltra~s design criteria for bike lanes address only the design
standards for bike lanes 'l.,'}tJ"'j parallel parking. Bike lanes
adjacent to diagonal parking are uncommon_ There are two examples
of signed bike routes (streEts m,lrked as bike routes, without
marked bik.e lanes) ,.,.ith diagonal parking, in Palo Alto: ~r~ant
Street and California Avenue... 'f,rnile thet"e are differing OpH'.lOn.S
among bicyclists about ~he relative safety of riding an streets
wi th para llel ver:s-us diagonal parking I staff is concerned in
particular about di agonal parking en .£1 CCl.l"ino Way, .... 'hich is a
school commute -2orridor for elementary ard :middle school children.
Young riders Inay be less visible to drivers backing out of diagon;ll
spaces~ and the students 1'j,ay not. be as capi:ble of )\.i.dging and
reacting to vehicle movements in and out of the spaces as adult
c:,rcl ists.
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION
In February, staff sent a letter a.ddressed t,~ residents and
property owners in the 4000 block of E1 Camino i-\aYr advising them
of the. Bike L9.ne Imprav~rnent Project. Staff utilized the Utilities
Department mailing 11 st for "resident. and owner t,. W"n i Ie stat f
noticed same discrepancies in the ~ailing labels at the tice, and
CMR:335:93 6/10/93
Page .;
~
i
! , ,
-
~ndea'Jored to m.."ll<e correct ions, severa 1 proper-ty m.,rn~rs and
businasses did not receiv~ the mailing. St~fr is now aware that
U.is mailing list extends onlj:' to thos~ resideon':s and p:-Gf;?erty
owners \"ho are billed by the Utilities Departl":'.ent, al1d sOr.'.e street
addresses may not bt:' flllly covered.
After the initial notifica ...... io~, H3l 'Lesser, operatvr of the Hal of
London shop, told staff (Ken Schreiber) that he was the business
representative on this issue. The attached May 10, 1993 lEtter
{Attachment A) was sent to Nr. Lesse_r~ ' ... ·ith copies to the three
other businesses located on this section of the east side of El
Camino Way. In response to his request, staff hand delivered a
copy of the May 13. 1993 staff report to Mr. Lesser-on tht!
afternoon of M"'I.}:' 13.
Subsequent to the May 17 council ~eetinq, staft compil~d a ~ore
comprehensive distribution list: comprised of both the Utilities
IDailing lis't. ar.d the list of properti' Q',mers frot'. trle county
Assessor's tax roles. The combined mailing li~t ~as uSEd for the
meeting notice for the community meeting held on June 3. Ir.
addition. copies of thi$ staff rep,Qrt were hand carried to all
businesses in the 4000 block of El cdmino Hay.
RESULTS OF MEETING WITH BUSINESS AND PROPSt.TY OWNERS
A meeting was held on ThursdaYt June] at ~litchell ParK Community
Center Mlith interested residents~ business owners, and prop:erty
owners along El Camino Way. The meeting ,-,as attended by three
1lIembers of the public. t .... 'o business owners and one property o-.,;ner.
Staff also received CO"!11:Ments prior to the rleeting from the OWller of
thE: Palo Alto Corr,mons~
At the meeting~ staff presented the alte!-natives described above.
except that Alternative 1 'l.ias presented as a "bike lane" with
parki ng restr ictions du.r ing school commute rlours / ",bicb staff has
since revised as previously describ.;d. The at1:endees expressed
support for Alternatives 1, 2A, and 2C, insofar as each offered a
balance betlo,'EoE:n the parking needs 0: the businesses and the safety
of bicyclist.s. Concerns ",'ere expressed about t.he potential impact
of additional parking on El Camino W3Y frem the new Jacobs Court
develop~ent and the future redevelopment of the gas station site~
There ~as little support fer Alternatives 2B a~d 3/ due to their
higher costs when compared to other alternatives '.i'ith similar
parking benefits. Alternativ'!::,; 'W.'a5 considered 1255 de_sirable,
since it concentrated the parking at the nort~ end of the block.
In response to concerns expressed about the impact of the occupancy
of the Jacobs Cour,\: condcmin.:Lurr. development, staff revie""ed the
parking provided for that project. The parking on that &ite meets
the full requirements of the zoni~g ordinance: 2 parking spaces
for each of the 19 units and six additional que:st parking spaces
(equal to JJ% of all the units).
CMR;335:9J
-"'"
6/10/9]
Page 5
\ .
i
\~ ~.
~. 'I ;. ~
, ___ 1
-
BICYCLE COUN'I'S
A 12 hour bicycle count (7:00 a.m. to 7:00 ~.rn.) was ccnducted at
the intersection c,f E1 camino '~'ay 2nd I-,est Meado' .. · Drive on
Wednesd .. ~y June 2. ;.. total of 432 bicyclists .... 'ere observed
traveling through the interse~tion ~urlng this period. Of thes~r
312 bicyclists entered or exited the ~ooo bloc~ af E1 Camino Way.
Complete count data is provided on J..ttacnrr,e:Jt B.
CURR~NT PARKING PATTERNS eN EL C~~INO WA~
There a~e approximately 16 parking spaces on the west side of EI
Camino Way and 2") spaces on the e,)'st side ::-t El Camino way in the
study area. Staff has C'!onducted rando;n obsE=rvatians in the area on
weekdays and weekends. The results of these surveys are summarized
in the following table.
EL CAlnNo hAY
PARKING U'IJLIZ.ZL..TION SURVEl' ~D-A~Y-I-T-I-M-E-. ========~==IFw;'E;'s=r';;;s""I~D~E~ 1 EP.ST S I DE
(16 SPACES) (23 SPAoC~E~S~I ____ ~ ~~~.O~N~D~A~Y ______________ ~3~:~D~O~P~M~' _____ r-______ ~3 __ -+' ____ ~9 ______ _i
i!-'TC;UC;E,oS:.:D:.:A:;Y'__ ____ ....:1c;:~3_0,_"P:.:M'___+__----7----j_ -----1 0
TUESDAY 3:30 PH _.;::3 _____ +-1 ______ .;::9 ____ _
i!-'T~H~L~~S~D~A:.:Y ____ _=l~C:.:::.:.~O_:.;~:.;M_~.-----c:l~--.-+II---__
"EDNES . .:D"A:.;Y,-' ____ ....:1:.:2c;:..:1:.:5c...:P.:.:." _-+1 ___ . __ ....:6'___---l 10
1L:0"i>."'T"lJR:.,.:D::A:,.: . .:Y __ ---"-3 ; 0 0 -4 : 3 0 PM 1-7 -3 -14
I
.1 ---
·~S~u~~D~;~.Y~==~~3~:~0~C~-~4~:;:3~O~P~"~,=~·~~=~O~-~2_-_--.-=_·_=-r-~·===5~-~1=O=-=-=~_~
The 23 park.ing space'.:> on the: east side ;Jf the street appe.:'lr to be
sufficient to handle the typical parking de~and in the area. The
heaviest parking perioC: observe'~ w'as on one Satu:-cay c.fter:-toon,
~hen 21 vehiclF~ ~ere pa:-ked on ~he 40DO block of El Cd~ino Way.
CQunt~ taken earlier in the day typL:ally sho\,' 10-12 \rehicles
parked on thE: street. However, O~ occasion, such as when special
events oc~ur at any of the businesses in the area, the demand may
overflov onto 'the ,,",'est side of t.he street ,:..r to adjacent streets.
CMR: 335; 93 6/10/93
Page 6
-
.---~.----------.------------.
o
In additior. to on-street pa~}dng s;:,oces. there are lJO parking
spaces located on the varicus privat~ properties in the '000 block
of El C3.minc Way~ and 44 s"p~ce5 in ttH~ ne-'w multi-family resider.t.ial
development on Jacocs Court. r-
fl C3~ino
4037-41
4043-45
4075
4085
4111
4113
subtotal
-I
Address
420-461 Jacobs COUlt I ___ L Total
CONCLUSION
130
"
173-174
Staff continue.s to support itapletr:;entation of the Original Plan .as
the best and most appropriate bike lane plan for the area. A Qike
lane .hiGh is in effect fram 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m .• ould
accommodate student~ commuter, and recreational bicyclists of all
abilities during the period when the most bicycle traffic occurs.
Staff does not feel that actual parking patter-ns in the area
confirm that there is an existing parking problem 'f,,'hich cannot be
accommodated by the available parking spaces Oil the east side of
the street.
If the current parking sit~a~ion is perceived to be a problem that
requires retaining parking on the ~est side of the street, staff
would reca~~end that Council direct staft to pursue Alter~3tive 2A
or 2C.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that Council (1) authorize staff to proceed with
the implementation of tJ}e original Plan for bike lane improvF.ments
on El Camino Way, as described in this report, and (2) direct staff
to prepare a Resolution ~odifyjng the on-street parking restric
tions to establish a "No Parking between 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m."
tone on the .... 'est side of El Carnine Way, bet'ween t-.'est Meado'w Drive
a~d £1 camino Real, at Los Robl~s Avenue,
C~.?:335: 93 6/10/93
Page 7
·-
Respectfully submitted,
.t -. /~;J:,./~~
GAYLi LIKENS
S~nior Planner
City Manager
Attachments: Exhibit~ 1 - 6
'/ -/ .,' I ./ 1'--",-"""" .£--/,,../,_r,/¥:~ lit-~~/j!-" /. .<,i-fo.-o-d¥7
K r~!'n,r ETH R. S CHR E' I BE.'R
Director of Planning and
Cc~nu~ity E~vironnent
A. May 10, 1993 lette~ to Mr. Hal Lesser
B. Bicycle Court Sh~et
CC! Ha 1 Lasser
Sill Bocook
Phil Bolin
Yogi Morgar
Kayo 10
Joan Burke
Palo Alto Bicycle Advisory Conmitte~
4000 block El camino Way mailing list
Barron Park Association (Will Beckett)
city/School ~raffic Safety Cc~mittee
Meadow/Charleston School corridor Study Advisory co~mittee
CMR:335:93 6/10/93
Page S
•
• 0
L
f
f
f
b-
P
'-p
-Jp -iT
P
117
-,
iii () tr-
) !'f)
L
or-
-~o
EXHiBrT 1
f
•
>-b80p (
« o9 0 v ~ 9LOp
LO.-p
SL.ot?
W o99~
----o~ Pso-p-
-1 LirO? -oi;-o{,-~
£Oy I
::E (;o.p.-0::
c ___ _
-----
-
£L CAMI'iO irA Y BIKE LA~ES
ORICI:'iAL PIA>;
EXHIBIT 2
I ,
I
-------~
=
---~--~~-------
o EXHIBIT 3
:'-EL C.'\~JL~O \,\-'.-\ Y
ALTER.'1ATlYE BIKE LANE PLANS
1~L--;Ei-KNA--n v 6-___ :.1-' ~,~o 2-i ~8-U'\N& C~,~ V\iC~-:>7' -S~L:'c_ J
P,-'-\K..KINCr P~:i.-tLI--Sll-G':-0 l ?,G-4-.00p i''''\'
3' /
,
5' ,-, ,. , -=/-1/, ",
5 ,
,j
!?/ I ~ : '" < " ..J <' '"
.5' ':;)_ '2~,
5' ". ( ""'5/' .. '-1: ~ .~
'I!!'D6N D_ CANINO W"'i
.'1_'. ___ Q0_-.Y"J§:~-r .oS! ~S
.,. v
" " . "5f\,,~,: :0 ~'r. __ .. __ •
8' l-!~
)
\
,
/2C
J
!
10
,
IZ:
'/
<t'< 1 ~---;
_,--,-_",5,-' _ I '. ' '_~ .. ____ ~~_
~ ::~~~
,c~,;;_.:
_..----.
.-
\",l
~
~
EL CAMINO W"~ Y
ALTERSATIVE BIKE LA~E PL .... NS
\ b''=:', '~
C'-~:;
-~ ____ -'~'-, --:Jr -;---'" . .. .. ..
50 I. • L"-.A,"..,/ ~"--, ___ -=t_':.-__ :(" __
s'~ 0 (J--' ,
10 I
===~="~ ..
h------
~ <-
"Fe ~ -" '" ~~
~/
, (3 5 " :'":3 • :s I" S/'H
"
;,.
=--"'--'--_:"_""""
, T 0.-, 12 r:~I'~ ;-
r~1 ~ .... -,--, , ", :5' ....... 1 ~"
EXHIBIT 4
o EXHIBIT 5
EL CA~I~O WA-,'
ALTER-'\"A TIVE BIKE LA!'.'E PLA:-iS
,A"l-"If!:/-if';TI Vc "3: D£.uecJ Cl": _oF.?" -2±:'.e~" _Lr-'-''l. '" rg 0'-, ,
--t;;.'I1""(' ..... ~'("'" 0..0.5 -sta....-+-!on .'5r~~e. -
:.Ji ------
,~ ,,>./.1'<'1 ~--~
~. Ortvl!N~ ,
~ L.-" \
B \ \ \
-\ \ I 0 ~ \'\ \\' \\ l~\ \
, 1\
\ \ \ '\ ":::::::\ \ \ \ \ \ \" -~-'~_.. 1 \ \ ~ \ '--. ____________ .-------r ~ \
---------
, e 'ntsit' , '
i
--I
\
\
. ,
: .. :.
~--.
. .
o
ELCAMIl\OWAY
ALTER."ATIVE BIKE LA~E PLA],;S
EXHIBIT e
Akr,?R..t-JA-r\v~· 4-DeU~Oi:::----.Q_ 1?OJe-k.,!rc; i-:.Ct __ :'~"-J ys,f.
O::'d~~+ Gl La",~., ~.~-.... Vo-i~q fh __ .{ar, jur,cfrCT]
. ::::; -
•
Cityg[)uoAlto
Department ofPlamIingar.d
G..-rmmunity tnvinmmi711
N
ATTACHMENT 1
May 10, 1993
Mr. Harold Lessey
Hal of London
Tcnspxtaticr.I)fo,i.sicr1 4045 E,1 camino Way
Palo Alt~, CA 94306
-
Dear Mr~ Lesse:c-:
I am writing as 0 rollow up to our previous conversation
and your subsequent correspondence to the City council
r-egar-ding the Bicycle Lane Improvement Project, which
involves the installation ot bixE lanes on £1 Camino Way
and Loma Verde Avenue.
I promised "'tc advise: YOll ...... hen ttl is subj ect would be
aqendized for city Council action. The city Council is
scheduled to co~sider tha Bike Lane Improvement Project,
includinq the proposed parking restrictio"s on the east
side of El Camino Way, at their meeting of Monday, May
17th. A staff report is being prepared and w-ill be
available on Thursday afternoon, May 13th. We ~ill send
yeu, and the other bUsiness owners referenced in your
letter, copies of the staff report and the agenda for the
Council meeting.
The staff report will ackno\o'ledge and disc\;.ss the issues of
bicycle usage and on-parking ycu have raised. If ycu have
an~l questions, please call me at 329-2135.
Sincerely,
A-Mt~fL~~",CA
Gayle", Likens -'
Senior Planner
cc: B. H. Bocook
l'og-i Morgdn
Phil Bolin
.BJ Hamiltrr. A ven~
P.Q Bo);l02..."{l
PalDAlto,C&.943a:l
.li15.329,b~
4:.s.m,~F.u::
-
~ROM
-tillE liGHT
I
7.00-8.00 0
8.00-9,00 0
'ii, 00-10. 00 _0_
10,00-11.00 0
11.00-12.00 0
12.00-13.00 0
13.00-14: C>Q 0
1~IOO"'1~100 ~
15100-16,00 0
16. 00-171 OI..~ 0
17.00-18.00 0
18.00-19.00 0
IOTA~ 0
ATTACHMENT 2
12 HOUR INTERSECTIOr< elKE STUO¥
THE NORTH
THRIl LEFT
2 3
C 5
r. 37
Q 1.
0 ~
I 3 , 7
l 5
L/ 21
L 12
10 'f
II is
12 5
41 IA3
LOCATION
NORTH!SOUrH_EA_';-_:1_1!£t;f!?_!-~~_xu.:,, __
~EST/EAST_l'/~~J'E'~~'~ _____________ _
O~TE._~~-Lf~ _______ WE"THERI _________ _
~EMAR~SI ____________________________ _
PECORDER: ____________________________ _
N W-t-E
FROI1 THE EAST FROM THE SOUTH FROIi THE WEST -----
R~T THRU LEFT RGHT THRU LEn R6HT THRU LEFT
4 S 6 7 a <j 10 11 12 -
't'I 3 13 2. / 0
II ) 5 II 0 0
'i 0 2 I 0 " 2 0 £) 3 0 0
2 0 S (. I 0
3 0 2 0 0 0
& ~ I S 0
/5 0 _'-L 'I 1 0
1.7 -'L 13 ~, I 0
(. 0 " 2 I 0
'I 0 " _3 " -2
't' 0 5 <t " 13~ 3' ,,0 6;1. "
,
TrafflC Data SeT~1ce
q
256 £. Hamilton A~e~ Suite K
Campbell, CA. ~~)Oe J
5"''''''''-''-'1 f-,c-l u
'5>
4-000 61 k. ~" Ca.", n" vJ«'1 '3 \ <-
.t; I co bi ~ bl C.CUVIi n.:.-' V'JZ\ .. ') 10~
v\.,· i2,,"'> t-" {V)e_~ d.,..;-.,.-' Dv 3 '1(.,
, .
r'
!
I
I
I
I
1-
I
\
•
'~,\ .
-'"