Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout0305.093, ' . , ~. " " - May 20 J 1993 HONOR.:r...BLE CIT! COUNCIL P~lo Alt~, Califo~nia WILLIAMS PROPE.B.,::''i L . "351 ROMER AVENUE -_STATUS OF AWARD OF Q.?_'rJuON TO LEASE Members of the Council: Report in Brief This is an inforrnation31 report and no Council action is required. This report is to update COUncil on the status of the award of the option to lea5e for the Willia::':l!~ property at. ~51 Homer Aven ... .le. In AUgu5t 1989, the City was notified that Rhona Wil1ia:ms had willea her property, located at 351 Horner Avenue t to the City of Palo Alto. On January 13, 1992, Council accepted the Williams property and improvements located at 351 Horner, and directed staff to prepare a Request for Proposals (RFP) for an option to lease the site. On April 13, 1992, council approved the RFP package and directed staff to solicit p~oposa1s. On July 14, 1992, proposals were received fro<Tl the Peninsula conservatio!"', Center Trust Fund (PCC} and the Lace Museum. On October 5, 1992 Council took the follo~ing actions: 1) Indicated a preference for the pee proposal pro',;ided t:bat within 90 days, the PCC revise its plans to better conform to the Historic Resources Repot't a."ld t'etain the historic integri­ ty of the structure and garden. :2) If the revised plans do not satisfy the council Carla i tions, the Council will consider the award of the option to the Lace Museum. CMR:30S:93 I I I I I 3 ) 4) , The PCC's plan ..... iI1 be subject to review by t.he Historic Resources Board (HRB) prior to its revie .... ' by the City Council. Directed staff ,to negoti.'!te 'Jith the pee the te,ll:::>wir.g items: a) Tr.e rent to be paid by the pee; b) The peers liability for tank removal a~d cle3nup cost; and c) The pee's share 0 f security maintenance option period. the cost and responsibility for and care of the propel:'ty duri:.g the On November 9, 1992, Council approved a motioI"' ..... hich set the PCC's rent and liability for undet"-:;round tank r>.:-moval and clean up costs and .... hich approved the ti.rr,ing provision that the Trust fund submit revised plans within 60 days of November 9, 19~2 and that staff make every effort to return to Council "'ithin 120 da:;s after T.eceipt of the revised plans. The pee submitted its revised plans on January 15, 1993. The pl~ns were reviewed by the Historic ReSuurces Board at its rr,eetings on February 2, 3, 17, and March 9, 1593. During February and March, staff conducted negotiations with the PCC concerning the timing of the tank removal and the PCC's share of the costs and re~ponsibili­ ty for security and maintenance of the property during the option period. In April the pce notified staff that it had received notice that its current montn-to-month lease would terffiinate June 15, 1993, and due to the time and resources ~eeded for its search for new space, it .... ould be delayed in providing staff '»lith information required prior to ret·ur!".ing to Counei 1 with t'he revised proposal. The pce 'wro'ill be unable to provide th~ n~cessarj'" information in time for staff to return to the COllnci 1 ""ithin the 120 days time period directed by council (May 2;', 1993) _ Ths pee expe.cts to have inforrr.ation to staff no later than June 1, 1993, and staff will retur-n to Counci 1 at the earl iest possible date following receipt of the ~ecessary information trem ~ce. CMR; 305~ 93 o JANET FREELANr.; Seni~r Fina"'l:cial Analyst ~~, I ... /,?; [I 1.J ,c.~) EM'tL{\fuMso~ _ ~rec'tor of ,.fiAance ! \ I/{ .. ~ I ,. E rL MWG T! i ty Manager-V Related staff rcports~ C/lo1'.R:336~ 91 Cioffi: 103 ~ 92 CMR:188:92 CMR:208:92 CMR! 435: 92 CMR!49J:92 CC: Peninsula Conservation Center Trust Fund The Lace Museum Historic Resources Board Sarah and Mark Segal Margaret and John Toor CMR:305:93 3 •