HomeMy WebLinkAbout0302.093_. ----.-------~------
~: ..... . ,
"~'. -:, ..
May 13, 199:)
THE: HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL
Palo Alto, California
REVI~ED CI~ PR~JECT OESCRIF~ION
Members of the Council:
BUOfn.T q3-94
The project description for lIpublic Euildings: Struct:..Jral
Improvements (18508) If on page 172 of the City Ma.nager! s Proposed
1993-94 Interim Budget contains conflicting information as to when
seismic ret.rofit work on the Senior Center will be performed.
construction ~ork will be performed in 1995-96. In addition; the
projected date for completion of all seismic retrofit work
identified i~ a 19B1 consultant report is changed from 1997-98 to
1998-99.
The attached pages replace pages 171 and 172 in the City Manager's
Proposed 1993-94 Interim Budget doeument.
Respectfully submitted,
\~ ~->~t~·,>c
JO'E SACCIO
senior Financial )~alyst
/--, (
,_ ( ./c'C ,_.< __ .\.j~."
ILY HARRISON/\
rector of FJnapc~
/ '-'-/~~,~ ~. JU E FLEMI~£7/ I
C' Y Manager I ,"
c '---.-••
Attachment
Related Staff Reports: CMR:278:9J
CHR:302:93
-... ; ...... !~IOI!;LII."'C,. ........... ____ .... M."" __ "_. --. ~
k.:.,
--
-
"~.
o
NEW
INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT
CITY FACJLTTIESlYATER MCKFLOW DEVICELl\;SBI,LATlO!'l; (]9~On
projf£t nescripliQDl The project provides for t~Je installation of lip to 30 backftow devices on
water servi'.:es to City fa<:ihtiEs and buildings to preven( contami[lat;oi1 of the City's water supp;y.
The project also includes building modifications when nece!>sCi;Y 10 accommodate a ba.::kflow
device.
PrQject Components: Design and construction will b"! acccmphs;,ed over a two year periN. The
first phase v.ill include Lie installation of up 10 50% of the devices with the remaining 50% to be
completed in the following year. Experience with the costs of instal!ing backflo~,' devices in the
first phase ~i.Il detamine funding for backtlaw de .... ice!> in tbe s.":cDnd year.
Pro;ectllt~lrlCatiQn; Tit!e 17 of the California Adminislrative Code and Utility RegulatiDn 21 ,D
reQuire) proper backflow protection against reverse flows of water. A survey of required
lnstallaDons has been completed for ail City facilities by thE' Crllss Cormeciio{l Control Uni: of tile
City's Utilities Department. The survey identifies all fJcilities which require installation or
repJacemL_lt of backflow devices.
Environmental:
Operating:
TelecommlJnications:
Categorically exempt from CEQA l;nder Section 15301.
None
None
C9rnprehen'i;j"e Plan __ ;_ Cor,sister!: V,:ilh the En\'iror.mental Resourct's sec~iDn of the Plan.
Fi nancl<iLA_ua 1\'5; is;
Source of Funding: General Fund
1993-94 S60,OOO
1994-95 TBD
1995·96
1996-97
171
_ . ,_. J~b!. iOO 03
-
o
REVISED
PUBLIC BUlLDII'GS PROJECT
PVBLle B!iILDI:'I'GS, STRl'CTILRAL 1'!PRQVEME1'(1~501!l
Project Description: Thi~ project inc'ud:~.s the seismic retrofit of Ci:y Buildings.. FaciEties
ide:-::tifled as reqlJiring: repairs are the Sen~('[ Cenlel, Children's Library .a..1d Junior MLJscum,
Severa] projects already completed' as part of this program include the ~'Iain Library. Cultural
Center, Ci .... ic Center, and Lucie Stern. Tne Senior CC.'1ter Cit 450 Bryant Street is currently being
designed M.d !Jt,e seismic retreHt ·"erk-will--te pelfeffflee Bl::lfifl.c fY 1~. This project was
revised 10 reschedule construclion fTCIm FY 1993-94 until FY 1995-96 in or-der to develop a
comprehensiverelocatlon p1all than adequately meets Ihe" needs of the Seni(1[ Center. In addition,
it is ne(es:;ary to spread funding over a two-ye.ar peril);j, gi"'~:l fmancial consl~aints. Associated
Senior Cent.er rell.:x:ation costs 2.re· budgeted in FY 199-.1-·95. T.he projeci scope includes slructuri:l]
reinforcement of Lie roof and second flol.)[, Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) access
improvements to restrooms, stairways, doors. 2.nd a counter; :a.r:d code compliance improvements
to the heating, vcntilati0n and lighting systems. The prcoject does not induce remodeling unless
required by the stn.lclural reirJon.-ement work, ADA guidelines or code regLilutions. Funding
through FY 1-99+-fl.& 1998-99 accomplishes a!i seismic retrofit 'oI,'ork identified in a 1981 consultant
report which assessed the physical condition of City-owned buildings. Additio!1al evaluation and
improvemems will be necessary beyond FY -i-99+-98 1998-99 as. building: conditions cha.nge.
PrQim .lustmcatirm: The structural adequacy of public buildings r.eeds Ie be in<;ured from a
safety and City liability standpoint.
Impact and Su.pRort An<1Tysis:
Environmental:
Opera:ing;
Telecommunications:
Categcrica'lly exempt
Pub!:c \Vorks (Fa';"jlltles Ma:lagerr,ent) . Wll! reduce st[l.Kt~ral
maintellance requjr-emel1is..
None
Com'p_reh~_o~h'e Plan: Consistent with Objectives of Safe!) SLlb~ection: Feduces potential for
injury and j·:)S5 of life and pessibilil)' of pmperty damage.
financial Analysis:
Source of Funding: General Fund
1993-94 0