HomeMy WebLinkAbout0291.093-
Ma;y 13, 1993
HONORABLE CITY COmlCIL
Palo Alto, California
4
Award of Consultant Contx:a;ct for Preparat.ion _9J~,_ DtU"~£Y. Flan
for congestion ManagemFmt Program II1_te~ __ $.ectiQ..!l§.
Members of the Cou~cil!
REPORT rN BR I EP
This report describes ttle consultant selection procedure for the
preparation ot a city of Palo ~lto Defjcie~cy Plan for Congestion
Management Program intersections and recommends that the City
Council authorize the Mayor to execute an agreement for $25,000
with Patterson Associates for Phase One of this project~ This
contract was not previously identified as one that would be
reviewed by the Finance Corr~ittee or Policy and Services Committee.
With voter approval of PropOSitions 108 and Ill, congestion
Management Agencies rCMAs) vere created, and they have subsequently
developed congestion Management Programs (CMPs) . Shortly
thereafter, supplemental legislation was adopted that allowed a
jurisdiction to adopt a MDeficiency Plan" ~ as a 'Way to allow
additional project dev~lop:ment in areas with unacceptable traffic
levels of service. The Santa clara county CMA has adopted a level
of service. stand,3.!"d that defines acceptable: levels of service as
c-anging fro~ "A" through :tEl!. Le",,'el cf service nFl' is
unacceptable.
Currently, Palo Alto eMF intersection levels of s~rvice rangE from
"SQ to "F"', 'With 14Ft; measured at the Page Mill/Foothill
inter-section and on the Bayshore free\llay~ staff believes that a
Deficiency Plan sho:.J.ld be prepared for at least the Page
Mill/Foothill intersection, and possibl:r other CMP intersectior.s~
'The preparation ot a Deficiency Plan has been divided into two
phases~ ?h3se One is the agreement currently before Cou~cil and
the subject of this staff report. It consists of (a) an inventory
of the City I S existing facilities and se-rvices as they re] ate to
~he required Deficiency Plan actionSi (b) an assessment of new or
expanded city facilities and services .... hich are needed to meet the
Deficiency Plan requirements; and (c) an estimate of the costs to
provide these facilities~ Phase Tvo is the actual preparation of
the Deficiency Pia!".. Five consulting firms submitted proposals for
CMR, 291,93
___ Jo..o
".'-~-.,' 'r' . ,'. '.,-' -----,..,......,..--..
Phase One. A selection advisory committee reviewed the proposals
on the basis of consultant qualificat.ions to perform both Phase one
and Two. The committee selected Patterson Associates as the most
qualified firm/ for both Fha~a~s One and '1'" .. '0.
:Bl\CKGROUND
In June 1990, California voters approved Propositions lOS and 1l1,
that increased funding for California's transportation system~ and
required urb~nized ~ountles to create Congestio~ Management
Agencies (CM.L.s) that ""auld annually prepare a Congestion Management
Frogram (CMF). Shortly thereafter, supplemental legislation was
a::lopted that allowed a jurisdiction to adopt a "Deficiency Flann as
a -way to alIa","' additional project dev:elopment in areas ""ith
unacceptablE levels of service~ a~ long as there was an overall
plan to measu~ably improve the level of service of the
jurisdiction's CMP srstem. Fur-ther background information is
provided in attached L~:3J6:92 (Julr 7, 1992).
Deficiency Plan Actions and eMP Network
In November 1992, the CM.A. adopted the f~nal Hequil;_ements for
Deficiency Plan..§., -which requires that a Def) ciency Plan address all
the immediate action items listed on pages 2 -4 of the S~ope of
Services for this agreement (Attachment 2). other IIIdeferred"
Deficiency Plan actions are not on this list because the CMA does
not yet re.quire them tc be addressed in a Deficiency Plan.
A Deficiency Plan is required only if a city or county cannol:.
maintain the minimum acceptable CMP level of service standard on
the CMP network. For Palo Alto l the CMP net~ork includes Highway
101 (aayshore Freeway) I EI Camino Real, San Antonio Road, and Page
Mill/oregon and Foothill Expressways .
.Q1P Level of Sf::!rvice StanMT...:-:l
The: Santa Clara county Cl-"..A has adopted a level of service standard
for freeways and intersections on the CMP network that def ines
acceptable levels of service as ranqing from "10," through "E".
Level of service F is unacceptable, unless it is the baseline l€v€cl
of service. -Baseline" level of service is defined as that which
~as existing at the time the eMP network was adapted, including
traffic from all approved but unconstructed develop~ent projects.
The baseline and current 1'392 levels of service of CMP
intersecticns in Palo Alto are listed in Attachment 3.
DEFICIENCY PLAN FOR PALO ALTO
Two CMP facilities in Palo Alto currently exceed the eMP minimum
acceptable level of service: Bayshore Freeway and the Page
Mill/Foothill intersection (both have baseline and current levels
CMR: 291: 9) 5/13/92
page 2
----~L
-
--
-.
of service F). HOwever, freer .. ay lel,.·el of service violations do not
have to be addr.essed until after the eM-a. develcps in1provernent
actions 'Which can be implemented on a rE'gional basis. _~s a
mir:imuro., therefor~ I a [Ie! iciency Plan needs to b~ prepared for the
Page Mill jFoothill intersectlon. Even though, technically I a
D~ficiency Plan is not required fer level of service E (o!' b~tter)
conditions, level of service conditions can fluctuate considerablJ'"
from year to year. Fu.rthermore, a development project co..:.ld be
submitted to the city ioIhich could calJse a level of s2rvice .E to
worsen to F. under CMP regulations, Palo Alto could not approve a
development proposal that ... auld reduce a level ot' service E to F,
or that would reduce a leval of service F by one percent or more,
unless (a) ph}~sical improvements of su:ff icie!1t scale I,o,'ere
implemented to return the level of service to the previous
condition, or (bj a Deficiency Plan were in place.
In order to be prepared for future conditions, whether resulti~g
from individual development projects, cllT:'I1..:1ative background growth,
or the inherent variations of traffic volume measvre:rnel'.ts, staff
belie .. ~e~ that a Deficiency Plan should be prepared for the Page
Mill/Foothill intersection, as !Jell as possibly ot.her CMP
intersections. othe~ intersections ~ould include at least Foothill
Expressway / Arastradero Road, Oregon Expre.ss<vay /Middlef ield Road.
Page Mill Expressway /El camino Real, and Embarcadero/Galvez/ El
Ca!<Lino Real.
Phased A~:roach
primarily becausE: there are ye't no examples of an acceptable
completed Deficiency Plan, staff has taken a conservative approach
of dividing the preparation of a Deficiency PlaM into two phases.
In Phase one, a consultant ~ill (a) inventory the City's existing
faci 1 ities and services as they relate to the Deficiency Plan
actions listed on pages :2 -4 of the Scope of Services (Attachrlent
2); (b) assess "",-hich nm .. or expanded City facilities and se.rvices
are needed to meet tr~e Deficiency Plan requirements for eash action
on that list; and (e) estimate the cost.s far the City or private
developers to rrovide these facilities.
After the completion of PhaSl? One, staff ","'ill pursue Phase Two of
the Scope of Services--th~ actual preparation of a Deficiency Plan
for one or IT.ore eMP intersections. At that time, staff ""ill
determine whether a Deficiency plan should include only one, some;
or all of our eMF intersections. The S~ope of Services and the
consultant selection process were designed to allow the City tv
select a conSUltant based upon its qualifications for both Phase-,s
One and Two, but to contract initially only for Phase One. 'I'his
·was done to ensure continuity and consistency bet",'een the initial
work related to the assessment ~f the City's facilities required
for Deficiency Plan actions, and the subsequent preparation of the
Deficiency Plan. It was also done with the understanding that if
L
5/13/92
Page 3
-
{and only if) Council makes an affir1l1ative decision t~ proceed "lith
Phase TwO, 3nd subject to the discretion of the city's project
manager regarding the quality of the .... ·ork: and continued su.itability
of the selected consultant r the same consultant .... auld bE' invited to
negotiate for Pnase T\..Io ( .... 'ithout going thrvu.gh another consultant
sele-ction process). If staff ... ere unable to successfully negotiate
a satisfactory contract for Phase TVO j a general solicitation to
other consult~nts, consistent 'loIith the City's establis;hcd
consultant selection procedures, .... ·ould occur. In an)"' event, t3:
contract for Phase ~o ~ould go to the Council for its approval.
CONSULTANT SELECTION
Requests for proposa~s were sent to 21 transportation engineering
conslllting firms on February 12, 199). Prcp~sals were received
from the following five fir~s:
Wilbur smith Associates
ccs Plannin9 and Engineering
Fehr and Pe@rs Associates
Korve Engineering
Patterson Associates
A selection advisory cammi ttee was for:1lcd to revie'W the ""r itten
proposals and conduct oral interviews. The members of the
committee were:
Marvin Over'Way, chief Transportation official
John Carlson, Senior Engineer, public Works Department
Bernar-d Beecham, Chair, Planning Commission
Nancy Noe, Government Affairs Representative, }.lza Corporation
Carl Stoffel, Transportation Engineer, Tra~sportat.ion Division
After reviewing the written Pt-oposals~ the cCllnl!;ittee agreed to
invite four of the consultants (excluding Wilt'ur S!fJit.h) t.o ,=,ral
intervje....,s~ .. rhich were t,eld on March 241 1993. The committee :met
ilt\l!\ediately fo110 .... ing the inte.t"vie'Ws to o.iscuss t!le pres,entations.
Consultant selection was based on quality of the .... ~itten proposal
and oral presentation, relevant experience of firm, qualifications
and experience of individuals assigned to the projectl ability to
maintain close ... ·orking relationship 1tlith staff ~ and ability to
complete Phase One of the project for $25(000. Firms 'Were judged
on their qualifications and experience as they related to both
Phases One and ~wo of the project.
The selection advisory cc~ittee agreed that all four firms could
provide the required services satisfactorili~ but that both
Patterson Associates a~d Korve Engineering were superior in that
respect. Patterson Associates was ranked as first choice, with
Korve Engineering as s~cond. The c01Tunittee felt that Patterson
Associates, compared to the other firms l would devote more
CMR:291:93
.
5/13/92
Page 4-
, ..
t •
r' -.-
/:~:~ ,
_~~::::~'_.-_ ..... ~.~ .• " _ ... _ ....... "":it ....... ;.;;.o-,...,..,.,...-......... .
pri~cipal associa~e time to the project, be mere flexible, be able
to 'Jorx more closely with staff, -and had previous experier-,ce Io:ith
congestion :elanagement plans that ~'ould be valuable in Phase T\.'o of
the project.
Nei ther the Finance Commi ttA-e nor the Pol iC:r" and services cO~;I'i tte.e
indicated that this project ·#/·:l.S one for .. '~)ich they -..:anted +_0 review
tbe consultant selection procedures.
staff has negotiated the attach~d agre~ment with Patterson
Associates for Phase One of the Deficiency Plan project. Phase One
of ~;e scope of services includes the three tasks described on p~ge
5 of the Scope o~ Services--inventory of existing City facilities
as they relate to the required Deficiency Plan actions, assessment
o~ need for addi tior.al facilitiE':s, ar.d development of cost
estimatr!-s for the City or a pri vate de~.Jeloper to provide these
facilities.
Fee and Sch~9~
The total fee of $25,000 covers the cons'lltant services necessary
to complete the. three Phase one tasks. Work on Phase One is
sched'u.led to begin June 1 and be complet.ed by Oct.ober 1~ 199J.
Phase ~o would begin thereafter, and be completed in rnid-1994.
[ynding for Phases One and ~.Q
Funding for this project has been provided in the Transportation
Planning program of the Transportation Division's fiscal yeClr 1992-
93 budget. A SUr.l of $30,000 is available in this fiscal year
(1992-93), ~nd $20,000 has been allocated for follow-on work. in
1993-94, for a total of $50, 000. This amount. ... 'as based on a very
approximate estimate mad-a 'When very little was kno .... n about the
requirements for a Deficiency Plan, Ever. though the requirements
have been finalized. they leave considerable room for
interpretation, and there are still no exa:nples of a co!!',pleted
Deficiency Plan on Wo'hich to base an accuI"aba cost estimate for its
preparation. Staff now anticipates that full pe~formance of the
Scope of services (i.e., Phases One and Tl&ro), leading to tt.e
completion of the Det iciency Plan~ :nay requl r-e !11ore than the
$50,000 now allocated. Hence, staff has att~mpted to limit the fee
for the initial stage of the project (Phase One) to $25,000.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
This contract for Phase One does ['.ot constitute a project "Under the
california Envir-onmental Quali tj' Act, and no environmental
assessment is necesearY4 Environmental analysis will be conducted
under the contract for Phase Two of this project, 'When the actual
Deficiency Plan is prepared4
CMR:291:93 5/13/92
Page 5
.. :
'.'~ 1l;~¥~;~.~<-.
:}'1:" :~;<-~:' '~ ;
~~i~,,~~
RECOXMENDATION
Staff recommends that Council Authorize the Mayor to execute the
attached agreement for $25, 000 ,*"i th Patterson Associates for Prlase
One of the pre~aration of a Deficiency Plar..
Respectfully submitted,
~~..L-~ ,,--,,{ // i (., --::. /U·'i~'/u::--t-£Z ;r '.J c...-;f,Cc<.:I'*r CJo..RI, STOFFEL
Transportation Engineer
JU~
KENNETH R. SCHREIBER
Director of Flanning
and Cv~rr'.1mity E:nvironment
City Manager
Attachments! 1. CMR:336:92
.2. Consultan't Agreement and Scope of Services
3. Levels of Service for Palo }.lto eMP Intersections
CC: Architectural Revie\o' Boa.rd
Planning Commission
City of East Palo Alto {Alan Parker)
City of Menlo Park (Don de la Pena)
City of Mountain Vie~ (Walter Cohen)
Palo Alto Chdmber of Commerce (Susan Frank)
Santa Clara county {Leode Franklin)
Stanford Management Company (Diane Healy, Bill Phillips)
Stanford Research Park Tenants:
Affymax Research Institute (Alejandro Zaffaroni)
Alza {Nancy Noe}
Beckman Instruments (Roger Noveslt.:i)
Dialog (Roger Summit)
DNAX Research Institute {Dr. Aller. ~'aitzJ
Echelon (Ken LaVezzo)
!:.iectric Pc,' .. ·er Research Institute (Richard DeVanev)
Hewlett-Packard {G~ne Endicott, Dennis Raney) -
Kennan-Love~el1 (Charles Keenan)
Knight Frank (Robert Upton)
Lockheed (Stanley Weiss)
Syntex (G~ Bud Missicn)
Tab Products (Bob Denison)
Teledyne (Peter Mcr~tyre)
Varian (Carl C] em!:',)
Wall Street Journal (Richard Sears)
WatkinS-Johnson (Dr. W. Keith ,:ennedy)
WSJ Properties (Boyd Smith)
Xerox Palo Alto Research Center (Franklin Squires)
Stanford University (Andy Dot:t, Julia F"reiT:on, Phil Williams)
Hyatt Development Corporation (Dan A2ark)
CMR:291~93
5/13/92
Page 6
·'~5 .... ' <",:.
~.}
"";'::i~"" ".~, -
-"
July 7, 1992
HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL
Palo Alto, California
ATTftCHMENT 1
SANTA CLARA COUNTY {OIIGESTION ~J\N~GEMENT P,GENO: DRAFT DEFJCIENCY PLAN
GUIDELlNES
Peport in Brief
This is an informational staff r~port that transmits the Executive Summary of
Draft Deflc:ienr::y Pl an Guidel ine5 de ... ·elnped by the Santa CJ ara County
Congestion Mana9~mant AgEncy (CMA). Deficiency Plans are required under state
1aw and th~ Santa Clara Count~ CO~gestion Minagero~nt Program (eMP) adopted in
October 1991. Pa10 Alto will need to develop Deficiency Plans for area3
impactin~ traffic on Page Mill Road from fl Camino Real to Foothill Express"ay
(i.e., Stanford campus, Stanford Research ParK, properties a10ng El cami~o
Rea') and areas impacting traffic on th~ Bayshore Freeway from the San Mateo
County line to tn~ boundary with the City of Mou~tain view. O~er time
Def;ctency Plans will res!.J1t in additional regulation of land use.
Background
In June 1990, Caiif~rnia voters approved Propositions lOa and III that
increased funding for California's trar.sportation system and required
urbanized cities and counties to create Congestion Ma~agement Agencies that
would annually prepare a Congestion Management Program (eMP). The objective
of the C-M.P re.quin~ment is. to tial(e juris.dictions work. cooperatilJely tosethal" an
transportation, land use anj air quality issues. Another objective is to
force lo(a.l jurisdictions to address pr-obhms on regional (e.g., t~e Bayshorc
Freeway) and subregfonal (e.g., Foott'1il1 expressway) roadways Hlat arf often
not under their direct c~ntro1. Part1cipation in tne CMA and acceptance of
the CMP is a requirement for cities and counties to receive new gas tax funds
generated by Proposition Ill.
The original legislation that ~ent intc Proposition 111 (~B47l, Katz) required
jurisdictions to maintain minimum traffic levels of service (le~el of ser~lce
E unless the r~Jdway was 21ready operating at Jevel of ser~ice F). Failure to
meet the level of service standard meant that jurisdictions could not approve
new land uses (e.g. building expansions, subdivisions. new development) that
impacted these locations. In response to strong pressuie, supp1emer"!tal
CMR:336:92
.)~;t:·t~:
-l<:"-;.
-
i
i
!
1 ,
-
.< .
~legislatiol'1 (A8179J, Katz) was adopted U:at p~ovided for' the deficiency plar.
"msochan'isi!1 as a way to a11o", additional development in in;pacted iI!"'e.as,
consister1t .,it'" an o'.'eral1 plan to "measurably impl"o'.'e the Tevel of s.ervice of
the system~ {j,e., tr.! CMP des1gnated roadway net~ork) and ~co~trjbvt~ to
significant impro'.'ement tr'l air' q~ality,"
Oave1opment of guidelines a!'1d ,Procedures for dair'lg a deficiency plan has b€en
left to each of the 30 congestion management agencies that serye California's
urba.niHd counties. Tr'ls Santa Clara. C(l1Jnty 0'104 staff and staff from numerous
Sar.-ta (1ara Court) jurisdictions tla'.'e 'l'Jorked ~;; c10se c00peratioM tc develop
Draft Oefic iency Pl an Guidel ir.es. It appears that the Santa (1 ara' County C~A
is the first agency to develop draft gUidelines; and most, if nat all, the
other CMAs hope to IjS~ our guidelines.
On Jul,. 2, the County CM released the Draft Guid~lines, except for Chapter 7,
Deficiency P1an Impl€mentatlon Standards, for public review and comment.
(orrments will be recehled at the .8.ugust 6 O'U; meeting, "'ltn the Guidel ines to
t,le considered for adoption at the September 3 CIotA ~eet1f1g. The implementation
Standar"ds will address the actiorls identjfied in Table 1~2 that are to be
incorporated into the ~pecific deficiency plans, The Standards wi11 be
reyiewed by the G~~;s Technical Advisory Commlttee on July 16 and most likely
will be relea5~d for public re~iew by t~e CMA on ~ugust 6.
Draft Guidelines
Attached is tn€ Executive Summary of the Drift Guldelines. The complete text
of the Draft Guidelines is a'.'ailable in the Pa10 Alto Department of Plii:ining
and (ofMIunity Environment. lhis staff report \liill not attempt to summarize
t~e Executtvf Summary and Tab1es )-2 and 2·2.
Tn reviewing the Sumary. it is important to emphasize tnat a deflciency plan:
Needs to show how physical impro'.'e-ments wi1l i~prove the o-.:erall
trar.spertatiol"1 lellei af service.
Needs to ir.corpo'!'"ate actions, acceptable to the Ba)' Area Air Qual ity
~anagement District, that contr1b~te to improved air quality ti.e.~ the
actions 1~ Tables J-2 and 2~Z). The guidelines require that all of the
actions tn lab1e ,-I w~ll be incorporated in a defic,ency plan. Acti~ns
from Table 2-2 can be substituted for Table 2-1 actions that are
lnfeasible tQ implement.
Needs to be prepared by the 10Cil jurisdiction for any part of the
Congestion Management Program network within its jurisdicticn that
Violates level of service standards {i.e., for Palo Alto, hjghways 101
and 280, rl Camino Real, Page Mi11/0regon j fcotnill E~pr€SSW6Y and San
AntoniO Read from 101 to Middlefield Rc~d},
Needs to be approved by the County OIA.
CMR:336:91 7/9/91
Page 2
:.-,'
, -" 5~:~: ,'.
"",,_~·._~~~~ctr:. •. · .. __ .. , __
-
Applies to de-'J~lopm'2'nt within the (ounty that i!np"cts a d~f~cler.t
'ocitiD~ (defined ~s a peak ~aur traffic increasE cf one percent or more
~f t~e total ca~acity cf the intersection or roadway segment),
inesp~cth·e of where the deilelopll",ent is heated (e.g., Pale A1to
de\l4!lopment could be subject to the C0l1GitiC.I!1S of a Mou'i1ta.;l"! View
d~f;ciency ~lanJ.
~eeds to be updated every three years follo~ing t~e C~A's develoDment of
a Subregional Facility D~ficiE'ncy PlaT1 Element Ii .f., an attempt to be
undertaken by the CMA to establish mechanisms for ne ..... development to
address so~e of the r..uTtij1Jri~dictional items fO:.Jf!d in Table 2-2).
AllPliq.bility of tfi£ Gu1de.ljr'l€s to Palo Alto
As noted befor'e, deficiency p1ans apply to especially congested locations on
the roadw.y network identified in the ado~ted CMP. Fer Palo A1to, t~e network
in~ludes Highways 101 and 2S0, ,oath,]l Expr~s5way, Page Mill/Oregan, f1
Camfno Real and Sao Antonio Road from 101 to Middlefield Road.
locat,on$ current1y operitin9 at l€~ei of ser~'c~ F include Highway 101
.lC;outhtHlund in the morning peak period and northbound in the afternoon peak
period and th~ Page Mjl1/Foot~ill intersection. Page MilllEI Camino ~eal is
it level of service E.
The Drift Guidelines enc.ourage preparation of areawide rather Han location
spec1fic deficiency plans. The Guidelines trigger pr€paration and comp1etion
of i deficiency plan:
Prior to approval of a development proposal that will impact i.rl aTreadj
deficient location (i.e., adding traffic equal to one percent of the
deficient locitions (apacity during toe peak period}i or
Prior to zpproval of a development proposal Hat will create a defident
lccatior.; or
Wit~in 12 months ifter adoption of the Sub yegional Facility Defici€~cy
Pi an E1 ement,
One or both of the first two t,..iggHS are ljj.'.~\)1 to occ.Ur' in the Stanford
R£s18irch Park/Stanford campus/El Camino Real area within the next yea!'" or twa.
There is somewhat leoss likelihood of a. near term action triggering a Highway
10) deficie~cy plan (the impact of deficiency pians a~rO$S Cour.ty boundaries
has not been resol\1ed and, as a previously approvea project. the University
Circle development Tn Eist Pale AHa does net fall under defider.cy plan
rol.,.)
The adopted 15192-93 City budget includes 530,000 in the Transport.a.tiM
Divisionr~ budget for consultant assistance in preparing a deficiency plan.
Staff intends to use these funds to assist in preparing a plan applicable to
development impacting the Page Mill/Foothill and Page MilllEI Camino Real
CMR,336:91
~L
7/9/91
Pag~ 3
-
~locations. ~ith release of the Draft Guidelines, staff will begin an owtreat~
. proces's to potentially .affec.ted property o..,ners a!1;j tenants and begin
prepar.tion of a request for proposal (RFP) for con:uTtant assistance {~
developing a Page Mill ccrridor dQfjci.~r'.cJl plan.
Nearly ill of the actions in Table 2-1 are either part of City development
r~gulatlcns an~ proc~dures or have bee~ {or are being) imple~ent~d by t~e
Cfty. Actions that are most likely to result in additional requirements ~nd
expenses indude improving ;:Jedestrial! facilities (Action .8..7) wr,ich .. "dl
probably require fll1in~ in some of the gaps in the Stanf(lrd Research Piirk's
s1dewa1k system; e.xpanding transit sen'ice bj' prov;din-8 ,i.e., req~ire
property developers and/or tenants to pro~idel shuttle servIce for larage new
developments (Action B.IO); and providing (; .e., requiring participation in
the County Commuter Network) trans~ortation dem-im:l managemeht act;\lit~(>s for
large mU~lti~tenant deve10pmpnts Oktion D.13}. Traffic flow improvements
(Actl0~ E.J7) will foc~s primarily on intersection improvements approved in
the Citywide land Use and Transportaticn Study.
Conclusion
City staff have been intensi'llely involved i~ de .... eloping t.~e Drift Guidelines
and will continue to be i","'ol'll"ed in application, mor:itaring a~d eventua1
refinement of tne Guidelines based on experience. Tne Guidelines are a
reasonable effort to meet the intent of state law. The Immediate
Implemtntatior. Actions (Table 2-1) that ire reQulred to bp. in deficiency pians
are generally actions that are already part of the City's development
regulations and capital project planning. City staff does not have
recommended changes fo~ the Draft G~ideline~.
fn 1992-93 i major effort will be undertaken to de\lelop a Page Mill Corridor
Oeficiency Plan~ Subsequently. starf~ in cooperation and consultation wlt~
adjacent jurisdictions, will develop a deficiency plan for the Hignway ]01
area.
Respectfully submitted.
KENNETH R. SCHREIBER
Director of P1anning and
Community Environment
Attachments: Executive Summary
Tabl. I-I
Tabl. 1-1
c<.: Architectural Peview Board
Phnning Corrmissiol1
City of East Palo Alto (Alan Parker)
CMR:336:91
·:L-.
-.
---------. -----~~ -<,,--
7/9/91
Page 4
~--~--~----~--~------,
>"
City of !'tenl", Park. {Don de la Pena)
Cil~ of Mountain ~iew (Walter Cohen)
Pilo AHo Chamber of COIMle-ree (SusJn Frank)
Sahti Clara Count~ (Leode Franklin)
Stanfor~ ~anagement Companj (Diane Healey, Bill Phillips)
Stanford Research ParK Ten2nts:
Affyma.x Research Institute {A1ejdrdro Zaffaroni)
All. (Nancy Noe)
Beckmar. Instruments (Roger ~oves~i)
Dialog (~oger Summit)
DNA.>:. Researc.h Iros. t itute {Dr. .Do n en Wa j tz}
Echelon (Ken LaVelzo)
Electric POWH Research Institute (Richard DeVz.ney)
Hewlett-Packard {Gen~ Endicott , Denn~s Raney}
Keenan·lovEwel1 (C~arles Keenan)
Knight Frank (Robert Upton)
Lockheed (St.nl.y Weiss)
Syntex (G. Bud Missio~1
Tab PrQd~lcts (Bob Deni sen)
Teledyne (Peter McIntyre)
Varian (Carl Clemm)
W.ll Street Journal (Richard Sear.)
Watkins-Johnson (Or. W. Keith Kennedy)
WSJ Properties (Boyd Smith)
Xerox Palo Alto Research Center (Franklin Squires)
Stanford Ur.iversity (Andy Ooty, Julia Fremon. Phil Williams)
Hyatt Development Corporation (Dan Azark)
CMR:33S:92 7/9/91
Page 5
o AGREEMENT ATTACHMENT
BY THIS AGREEMENT MAOF. A/ .. m l:"H[,'""D Ir.;·<>~r. 1'"1-« __ _________ C'" .;.f
"!3'1 "N'C'8ErN:E;' 'fH~_ CITY OF PALO ALTO ",_I':I=\':.',"'/o.,O'!'""I'::",<':';:'!"h~".: C·':.:..'~ CITY .... ~D
i~jAMEf! Ii _.E_~_t.t..e.I.sJ:m_..A:i.s-~..u...e.s_ _ ___ _ ________ . ___ _
, .... C'OR .. %' 99J Sake.r l.i"a-'l. SI,!.ite. ~."~ ___________ .:<:IT'i, __ ~~~~ __ ~ __ (j _____ _
• CONTRACTOR S.tA,L P"'Q";Dt: 0'" ;:1""\",<;," THE ~O~~'::,W N':;' :r':'~I'''c,; '>F.;::'.:C::' ~,r .. C: -~,!" ~"'·;_";'':''l S 5"'fC'';: E:: '~, ::: .. "",,.,:-A. ___ _
JlTI,I;.CI-IEeJ-\ERF(C Io.N(l !"CG>t?DRATE~',..jEF\~i'" EI" Tl-\I~ I'Ii::\'U::,L~;:::f
Contract<::>r shall perform the serdc~s de$crib-.ecl only i.-: Phas0 One of Exhibit: A
• EXHIBITS T~E F,XeO'.'I'I"::':; A.n )C"'E.:· EX,>-I19Ir:s HERd3', A~::: j",11.8~ P .. ~H cr r~:s >\(;;R[['(::',:
A. Scope of S€rvices C. Certificate of Insurance
B. Fee Schedule
• TERMS TKE SERViCE'S t,NC,::'R MJ,H:RI,~LS FlIR"~S",EG UM)E~ T.."S A.C.PE:f'M~'.· 51-1' ~ C::,H'.iE~(;E 'J'" -A2.r..il...J:.~.1.9.1l
AND SO{..\.LL BE C-Cf.IPL~Tc D 8EF,0:~f ... ~ t ('J l:J,gL.L._ .. J 9.!t) ...... ___ .. __
• COMPENSATION FOR THE-PJLJ. PER=OPJ.I/.NCt" or Tri'S A,~<'E"-~=~''''
IE erfV Sf'.ALl PAY CONT~'\'::TQR
$25.000 -pay.s;.bl~ o CQNTR.".CTQfI SHALL p<\y c:n
monthly upon subrr:issil:u of
services provided
• PAYMENT RECORD l:"i:.Pi":;i,~n'l USE F:"iE~S~. sm'
• CITY ACCOUNT NUMBER:
• GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS ARE IN'CL"DED cn~ BOfH SIDE'S OF T"'S DOCUMENT
J
j
THIS AGREEME~T SH;\L, EI~:C:O),lE t:FF::CT,~'E LJPCN ITS ,c..PP:;::J'i:,L M~D E,~£':LiTIDN E", CITI' Ii, ".'!T~iESS T,...ERE)" T-E' PAPT:3 H~'~ [~~':~.lT5~ f!-I'S
AGllUMENT THE 0/1;1' . liON'!",,\. J<tm '~~,;:l1'!RS'i v.RlrT'tN AUt',,'[
HOLD NAflMtE"$t;. CDN7IiACTO~ a ~~~~S 1[1 Inc ~"';'~ ''f, C:oft;~J J"C ~o::;,: ha'rr;,tS~ C,~', ;:~ c .. ~"" ,~~C:5 ~"~ ~,::; 2' ~"--: " C' C:~'-" 'J ;;~ ",
a~\, ~a1u'e ,nc:ud;na 1I.':~~Qjll ;1e~Lil, ~a' ~e,: ~'i ')'.Jr s;~C ,J~;~; :iJl'Fi,c,,~r::," <; I:, ,:," ~H', "~~ "5 ~" ":0
,"T1';':-::'fld~L1, ,::r cC"~a~c: r~' \I'~':h IMe I • .'; c pc S~: 'J'.;,::: I,a J, 'I~,. c~ ,,'::'" -~,I,: ": F 'r ~~~ :,~~:,'T'"":! :-"d' .'~ :~
E1I:TlRE A(iREEMEHT I~'~ d~'<~"T:f 'i' ;~~ .. ::'".~ . .I,:t.l:..:ll~:~::.';'.l;;:r; .. J~ .. ~~ ,.e "~.~ .. "";;'.o,,::,: ","", "; -"-'. , ", l; '~, -'-" ,;,:. '~<,~
a~u :;,o',f (ll 'it",t t-r,.,;i:l"',~'" -,,~en:;\~ C' "~P:"";'S elf ;"-','~'~'~' I;' ,-,::~,\,::s ... ",:;', ~3~,::":' f 5.~'~~' C)' :~', r) ',:"",' ;, P",~, -;:"'!.~,c'·' '~:'~"", ",-,~, '"", ':,
~'<f,lrJ:,a:j(J(1;' a,',0 u,,~, r::~;~ ~'. I.'r,~~ ~r ,~~ J',,' ,:,~, ~'E ~cr.re:I" ~~~ ~rr, J,
• PROJECT MANAGER <\~c R"",R"::;E~TATIVE" ;:O~(;,TY
~,~).rr ~.!ll.l.~\2J . .f.~1_
DE"T ~ Jr.a:"sport.~t.i.~ ___ D __ ~:-:.;".'§.J2..!!. __ ._ .. __
? O. 80)1: 1025C
PAcO fo,L TO, CA 94:O~::;
T ~;fl"phc,"~ i15 .. lJ..2J.~2..l.iL
• lNVOICrNG SE:. ... c. A:.l ~,'.'~)I':~ES to ThE: ".Ir~, AfH, PRCJ:r:r:T "'1',I,,~'::;e:q
• aTY OF PALO ALTO APPROVALS: 'ROuT" FOR ",:t,NA',,<l[S ,.CI~:j".) I,:: T::, "i.,IW'f;:S Ii, ,',F'"'~;D\",~L e:J~::s B",-C'-,
-
':;'0' of P.ALO AlTO: IIIR> 111182:
o
PART III
SCOPE OF PROJECT and
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
--_ ..... ----------
. '-'.
o
PART !II--REQUEST 1'Q1!E'HRPOSALS
SCOPE OF SERVICES
CiTY OF PALO ALTO DEFICIENCY PLAN
rOR CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM INTERSECTIONS
BACKGROUNQ
As ma.,dated by State llf California (A.B 471 and AB 1791), the Santa Cla~ County Congestion
MIL1.agemept Ag~ncy has developed ~1,!iremc:;rtt5 for Deficiency Pla~'.i (November l8, i992),
hereinafter referred to ~ the RequireJD_ents, with which the Ci2y of Palo Alto, and other cities
in Santa Clara County, must comply. This document is altached to this Request for Proposals.
Palo Alto must develop a Deficiency Plan for each Congestion Management Program (eMP)
intersection or roadway segment that operates al level of ~r\'ice ~F". A~ptable level of
service is defined as "A" thiOugh "E". A Deficiency Plan should aho be prt':pared for a eMP
intersection or roadway segment that is approaching level of service ~F·. In this way, the City
can be prepa..11XJ' if traftic from a proposed ne\lr,' develcpment project, or other sources, is forecast
to cause the level of service of the mtersection or road'.,\,'ay segment to reach nF-. At this time,
Palo Alto wishes to address the CMP network exclus.ive of Route 101 (Bayshore Freeway).
Route 101 '.\lin be addres~d after additional wnrk is undertaken by the Cong-=stion Managemenl
Agency'. A list of Palo Alto'~ eMP intersections, and their levels of service, is. attached.
OBJECTIVES
As a first step i.." developing a Ddiciency Plan, the City wi:.hes 10 invent0r)' its exisling facilities
and servlces as they relate to the actions in the "Imme .. :ilatc Tmplementalion Action Us,", which
are des.cribed in detail in Chapter 7 of the lL~Jl.iJements, Tht" Cily tr.en 'J,,'ishes to a.'>se.s.~ which
!lew or expan,ded Cit}, facilities and services, and tJleir a5stlCiared costs, 4Te needed to meet ~he
implementation standard for each action included in mal list. This constitutes Phase One of this
Scope of Services.
The City then wi.';,hes to prepare a single DefIciency Plan for deikient eMP intersections (not
including Route 101), con,;t.ituting Phase Two of ll-Jis Scope of Services. The information
produced. in Phase One constitutes a large pa."1. of the input for Phase Two. Not all of the data
produced in Phase One will be lised in the Deficiency Plan; some wiil I:>c used fOf other City
programs, such as the revision to the Comprehensive Plan.
DESCRIPTiON Q£JMMEOIAlItMPLEMENTATIQN_AcTIQN~
Congestion Managt!mer.r Program immediate implementatiO!l action.~ are li~ted belDW. For ead
action, there i~ 0) a brief description of the acti0n, (Ii) a statement of the geogl"<1_phical area(s)
in which the Phase Or.e inventory and needs asse.,<;.mer.t is to be conducted, aJhj (iii).a statement
of the standard that the City has adopled for i!l1plementation of the aclioo. The info:-matlC'!l in
the followmg list should oc used in conjunction wi,h that provided in Chaprfr 7 of the
Require,ment.s..
ACTION A-2, BICYCLE STORAGE FACILmES AT TRANSIT CH.'TERS
Pt5ctiptinn: Add bicycle storage facllites at trans-it centers .
.. "reas gfln\'entOl',)' and. __ ~@s AS$(ssment: California and University Avenue CalTrain SlC.lions
and County Transit Page Mill/El Camino Real Park and Ride Lot.
City's Implemen:taIiQfI Standard: Inst:±lI bicycle lockers, improved bicycle racks, and equipm~nt
storage lockers as described in the Rgw,iremems,
ACTION A-3: IMPROVED ROADSIDE BICYCLE FACIL!TES
The Cit)' will conduct the inventory and needs asressmenr for this Action. The City \Nil1 provide
this information to the Consultarit for integratior. into Pha'i€' One of the Scope of Services., and
for prepa..ratioll of the Deficiency Plan in Phase Two.
ACTION A-4: IMPROVED PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION
D~).CripJion: Improve pub tic sidewalks and pathways 'o\'ithin empioyme!"l! and mixed uS(' centers.
Areas of InventoO' a.1d N~t:'1;!L~_~sesS!Tl~nt: All ar(;4S zoned for commerc!.!J and.:or indu~tnal
use (I....and lhe Areas 1-9 sho~T. on atta:;he.d maps). plus appropriate ccmtiguQus. areas, if any,
nO{ included in ~'d Use Areas 1-9.
Cit)"s fmplementatioo. . .,S_tandard: Con'Struc! sidewalks as s.tated in the R~C;-JTlentli (i.e.,
between adjoining us.:s and transit stops), and construct all missing sidewa:k elements along
public streets. Add all reasonable signage indicating pedestrian mutes to transit stops., shopping
areas, and other destinations. Add pedestria.'1 ph.a:;es and actuation of traffiC signals. wherever
not provided.
gen/dpscope.!
February 9, 1993
Page :2
..
o .--"
ACTION B-3: SHUTl1.E SERVIC£ TO RAIL TRANSlT STA nONS
Dt;;cription: Provide new shuttle service to rail sta~iOflS and other locations., nr a!isist in
financing existing sen.'lces.
Areas cf Inv\:D..t20'mn'},!"ld Nerd'> As;.e'SJmenr All aTeJS zoned for commer..::ia] and/or indus-trial
use (Land Use Areas 1-9) .
.city..:.s,Lrn.pJ~entatj011 Standard: The initial feasibility study shall be cO:Jducled irl e.ach Land
Use Area in which there are 750 employees or more, al'ld shall be conductej as described 11'1 sub
item I in the Reqqirements. These initia! studies shall be basic ill nature. includIng only
minimum necessary data gatheri..,.,g a."d analysis for specific areas. Tne other detailed feasibility
studies described in subitems 2 and 3 of the Reguiremenls shall nO[ be ciJl1sideroo in this Scope
of Services,
AcnON 8-8: TRANSIT STOP IMPROVEMENTS
Description; Improve transit MOpS. 10 encol.!.rage transit use and to improve traftlc flaw.
Area.::-of lnventoQlm<UldmNeeds Asses...;ment: All of p.uo Alto.
City'S fmptement.<ltion Standard: E .... aluate and implement improvements as specified in the
Requirements, but only at those transit stops sef'.'Ing multipl~ routes or a minImum number of
boardings and alightings per day to be determined jointly by Ihe Ciiy, Santa Cla..-a County
Transit Districl, and San Mal.eo County Trans.~t District. In addition. the t,pe of impro .. ,ements
shall be limited to those desired by the two transit districts.
ACTION E-2: PUBLiC lNFORMAnON TDM PROGRAMS
p~S{:.r~:
alternatives.
Provide public i.nformation on availability a.'1d benefit') of tran.s-portation
Areas of InventoQ' angm_N~.s Asse~.smenL: All areas zoned for commercial and/or industrial
use (Land Use Areas 1-9).
Citis Implementa.ti.9JJmS.tandard: Distribute matenal that is r~dily av2.ilable from other agencie'S
or the CIty (do not prepare new material). Dis.tribute only to libraries.
gcn/dpscope.l
February 9, 1993
.Page 3
-'
o
ACTION F-2 rEAK PERIOD PARKING AND DEUVERY RF~~TFJCTI0NS
Description: Res.trict curbside parking an~ dcl..l>'enes. <turing reak periods. in order to improve
traffIC now.
Areas of Inv~ntory and NeeQL!!,_~ssmen!: All of Palo Alto.
Ctty·s rmplementa!iQiL£an~; EvaJu<'lte restrictio!is only on CMP arterials (the full length
within t'1e City), and on other Cily arterials lbut only 'IJ,;thiI1 4()] feet or ar'teria]/a..rterial
l!1le rsectiom), attd implement restrictions if ntX"'ded atld feasible.
ACTION F-3: TRAFFIC SIGNAL TIMiNG AND Sr.-lCHRONIZATION
T\esrription: Oprimize traffic signal timing and synct:ronizztion.
Areas of InventoXl'.-<!Dd Needs As~ssmern: All of Palo Alto.
Citv"s ImplementatIon Standard: Evaluate all CMP a."ld City arterials, If !"leeded, improve
individual timing and synchronize or intercormc(;1 signals..
ACTION F-4: URBAN AREA TRAFl'IC FLOW IMPROVEMENTS
.I&K..ri~: Make ph)''Sical roadw'aY improvements to improve traffic flow.
Areas of Inventnry and Necds..As~: All of Palo Al'.o.
!:.iti:1..1mpJem ent?tion Standard: Evaluate itnd make improvements only on eMF arterials.
Consider additional turn lants even if additional right of way is required. Consider HOV lanes
and reversible lanes. only where minimal effort would be req~ire.:! to implement (e.g. s.igning .i1ld
striping changes only).
ACTIONS G-I -G-8: SITE DESIGN GUIDELINES
The Cit)' will take re.s.ponsibilit)" to ir,corpora~ the5e guidelines in t11e Zoning Ordinance. The
Consultant is not required to conduct an Lnventm)" or needs as.s.essme"t for these guidelines.
H(n,~'e .... er. the Consu!:ant should include a brief dl!JCu5'5ion of the Site Design Guidelines as part
of Phase One of t11e Scope of Services. The ~ite J)e<;ign Guidelines also need to be included HI
the Deficiency Plan which ic; to be pronded in Phase Two of the Scope t',f Sef\'i.::es
genldpscope.1
February 12. j 993
Page 4
.'""\
....... i
SCOPE OF SERVICES--PHA5E~~:JIIIVHJLORY AND NEEDS AS~SSMENLEQn
IMMEDI."TE IMPlEMENTATJOlLA;;IIQ}§
L For each action listed abo\'~; perform an iJ1Ventory of existing faciJities and ser'o'iccs in
the geographical area(s) s~cifle.d, commem.Ufat2 with the City's lmplementatior.
SlJlfldard.
H. For each actiCln, based upon the above inve:ntory, determine which additional facilities
and services are reqilhed to meet Lie en)"!:. Implementation S~dard in the spedfie>..1
geographical are.a{s).
III For each a.etion, develop a cost estimo.te for a conti3ctCor or consultant to implement the
action according to the City's lmplemcnlation Standard, taking into 2ccount ti'1e inter.t,
timing and approV'ottl criteria stated in the Requirements,
A. The cveralt cost estimate fDr each action shan be disaggregated imo a \epardte
estimate for e4ch separate element of the. action in each distinct geogr-.:l.phica1 area.
Cost estimates should be based on the assumption that sub-elements of an action
may be implemented by different paJ1:jes in different locations at different time'>,
For eu.\11ple, for Action A-2. a toW cost estima!e wfJutd be provided to insWl
all bicycle facilities at aJ1 three transit centers., pIllS nine separate estimates for
installation of each type o( faciliry (bicycle lockers, racks, storage lockers) at
eacb of the three transi!. (".entErs,.
B. The cost estimates shall include costs for an tasks and materials required for
imp!emeIltation, im..luding, but not hmited to:
genfdpscope.l
I. Feasibility studies.
2. Preparation of oetaiic-;() implementation specif:cations., inciuding conceptual
des.ign, design cevelopment, archite<:tu~ 5er.!ices, attendance at City
meetings, and fln.aJ engineering.
3. Provision of labor .:I.r.d mareriais.
4 Purchase of right-of-way.
5. Demulition costs.
6. Utilities work, inc1adin,g rehx:ation
7. Project inspection and testing.
8. Construction ma.'rJagement.
9. Fee;.
10. Project contingency.
February 12. 1993 Page 5
UJ>tY.' C<)m'p:e~ot1 of Phase One (If this. Scope of Services, the City ..... ill deLide whether or not
to Pl1Xeed with Phase r·wo. At such time, and at the d:scretiun of t..'1e City's project manager,
the CCflsultant selected to cOfllplete Phase One will be invited to perform and negotiate fllf a fee
to indude, but not be lImited [C', the PhalOe Two tasks descrilx-.cl be~o'U,.
SCOPE OF SEAVI(;;_s.::EHASE TWO: PREPARATION OF DEFICIEHCY PLAN
r. Prepare.a Deficiency PlaII acr:orJing to tho'! RN'I,ljremen!s, w~ich inciudes the following
major elements: (For details, refer 10 the Reqyirements: sample Deficiency Plan,
Secti.1n. 3.3; t~hnical requiTemen'!5, Section 6; and sample outline, Table 6--1 on page
44.)
A. I.l1lrW~M.D. The primaI)' tasks include:
1. Review and suggest allY needed modifications to the quan:itative analysis
which the City used to defme a'1d justify the boundaries of the Deficiency
Plan area. Based upon the City's ex.isting traffic model developed for the
Citywide Land Use and Transportation Study, the City has tentatively
seleclCd Land Use Areas 1 -9 as the Deficiency Plan implementation
area, ¥rifhin which area new development projects Vr{ill be rC'Guired to
implemen! Ddi.ciency Plan actions. This Deficiency Plan area
e:1compasses af! commercia! a.'ld industrial zones. in Palo Alto. The
Deficiency Plan will address expe-eted deficiencies at the following eMP
illtersections:
Diegon Express".NaylMiddlefield R(Jad
Foothill Ex presswa yl Arastradero Road
Foothill Expressway/Page Mill Expressway
Fj Camino RI3aI-"PO!.ge Mill Expn;:s:,;way
El CaJTlin~) Real/Embarcadero Road
2. [mure that the .-.election of the Deficien,,'Y Plat1 area, and the supporting
methodology, salisfies the requirements of nexus, as stated in California
Government Code Section 66000, and as clarified in Section 1.4 of the
Requirements..
3. De ... cribe projected future transportation conditions at the above
intersections, based on development projections. The CMA requires that
gen/dpscope .1
February 12, 1993
Page 6
B.
o .~.
trctT1C project10m be cons] !>tent with the C MA' s couptY\olIide tramportation
model. The City's nl.'.ting traffic model developed for lhe Citywide Land
Use and Transportation Srudy mG.)' or may not be s'Jitable for these
projections.
Anruvsis oJ Deficiencies.
1. Provide a quantitative analysis of the degree to which the 1cl,:el of senice
standard is beir.g e,-ceeded by existing cOI1aiticms and by projected future
development.
c. ~nnir.atjQn of Phyc;ica] Im...PI..Q~.
1. .For the deficient eMP intersections listed above, describe the physical
impro .... ements and their cost that wOlild be necessa.ry to maintain Lr,e eMP
level of service standard, if the improvements could be impiemented.
D. Action List. For each immediate acti~m, reform Lr,e fonowing mks:
I. Describe the action.
2. State the cost. to implement and sustain the action
3. To the greatest degree fe.asihle, prO\·ide a quantitative analysis showing
that implementation of the action will lead to ail Improvement in te ... ·cl of
service at tile deficient eMP intcr3eCtions.
E. ActiOi1 Plan.
1. Describe how each immediate action will be implemented, in..::1\Jding wbo
will implement it. how it wili be funded. and when it will be
implemer.ff'd. Tne consultant will \olIork wilh the Crty to de\'elop a
minim'.Jm 51z£ threshold in each LtEld Use Area aoove which new
developments will participate in implementation of Deficiency Plan
actions.
2. For each action, convert the implementation cost to a fee per square foot
of projected. n~~" development above the ffi!nimum threshold in the
Deficiency Plan area. (The Cify wHl provide the starting estlmates of the
square footage of ne-w development.)
genidpscope.l
February 12, 1993
Page 7
-
o
r.
1. Describe how the City wi.1t monitor !.he s.tatus of t..""e impkment.ation of
Deficiency PIaI'. 8ctions.
G. Env:ronmenlAL.A1!.?J.J:ili Prepare an En\'ironmen~ As.sessment for the
Deficiency Pl<:.n, tt'! conformance with CEQA rc:glllalirms.
IT Work with representatives of Stanford University to obtain tr.eir input af'.d cooperdt10Tl
in Deficiency P]a.'1 prepar,l.(ion a:1d impiementation.
WORK LOCATlQN
It is eJ.pected tha.t the perfonnanr::e of man,. of the tasks i"n Phases One. and Two of !.h~s Scope
of Services will require cons;[derable discussion afld interpretation by the City and the C0!'1SUha.'1t
and, therefore, regular communiccti .. :m between the two partks. The City. ti'lerefme, desires. that
as much as possible cfthe C(lnsl>ltaflt's work on m;:s contract be performed in the City's offices.
SCHEDULE AND RESQljRCES
Phase One afthis Scope of Services. should be cC'mpleled by September 30. J993. Phase Two,
if pursued, should De completed by January 15, 1994. While the actual cos.t of perfnrming the
required servi<:es i~ to be determined throug.h the prapos.al selection atl.d negotiatiQr: PiOCC'iS, the
total amounr of the COntrdcr for Phase One services may not exceed $25,000.
PROPOSAL G\llQELlNES
A suggested format for tbe Consulta .. 't's respcnsc to this Request for Protx='sals i5 outline<:.i below.
This format is intended to facilitate the Sell":Ction Ad'.'is.ory CommIttee's revit'''-of L~e consultant
responses. CODsultanlc;. are requested, but not required, to folio· ..... ' these guidelines.
1. p_roi';e\ Statement. Prepare. a brief. general stnemem indicat;'ng lte COrlS;JlLar,(s 0" eraU
unat:rst.anding of t..'":e na~:Jre of the project ~.nd tJie ser,rires to be provided.
2. Prpoosed Work Prc~!A.!D. Identify specifrc major tasks and related work elements to
accomplish the -proposed services. InClude for e.ach work element: (a) a sf.."'llement of
OBJECTIVE, indicating the purpose of the task; (b) a statement D~ PROCEDURE,
indicating how the work will be accnmplished; (c) a statement of OUTPUT, inchcating
wh.at information and products are to be provided; a.nd (d) a statement of RESOURCES,
indicating perS(ln-days. and doilar costS estimat~ to complete the work.
genillpscope,l
February' 12, 1993
Page 8
-' ..... '
o
J_ Schedule. Prepare a work. schedule indicaiing totacl time and staging for each work
element.
4, ~~..Y!~\!!J1.!.11.W., Present a summary of the es.timates 'Of person-days and dollars for
each work element.
5. S!iffiru.. Identify ~JX!Cific ind;\'iduals prQP')~ (or this p:Ojecl, inc-!uolng: (a) their
project responsihilities; tb) thclr spcrific nperience related to the responsibllities on this
project, (c) the estimated level of effon (persn,,-day'S), and (d) pc'r~llal resumes.,
6. Rr:fere1!_~. Identify three references (name, address, and telephone number) for recent,
similar consulting work.
~_~LUATION OF PROPOS,",LS
The criteria to be used by the Selection Advisory Committee to evaiuate responses to t,'le
Request for Proposals and to select consultants for or-.J in~erviews ijJ~l'Jdes.:
1. Completeness of response to. the Request for Pro]h.'sa]s.
2. Composition and eX))ertise of the Consultant, including spet'!fic individuals who will
perform the work and the time to be spent by each.
3. Re'liIJonslvencss to time requirements and demonstrated means to acrompilsh necessary
int(.rrelationship between consultant and City staff eifort.<;.
4, Demonstrated recent experience reflecting type of work, quality of work, and abiHty to
complete work within budget and schedule.
5. Demonstrated experience and skill in respondi~g 10 community and special inl:eres:
concern,:;.
6. Estimate of ;equired' resourcE's. including prop.:)sed fee. relative to tl-je. se"i\'lCes to be
provided and projected Palo Alto staff time in assisting Consultant. Pmk<;.sional fees are
for budget and re\-iew purposes. Actual fee is to be det-ermined d'J.r1r.g negotiations.
gen/dp>cope.l
February 12, 1993
Page 9
•
o
PRE,SUBMIUAL MEET:NQ
,,,\ sjngle pre-submittal meeting is scheduled for \Vednesday. February 24, from 10:00 a.m. 10
1'2:00 p.m., in t1Ie Council Conference Room. Fin,( F1oor, CiV1C eenlef, ~50 HamlHon Avenue,
Palo Alto, California. The meeting i.~ for the benefit of ali consultants IQ wham a ReqlJest for
Proposals has been .~IH liflcl whQ wish to attend. The purpose 'Of the meeting is not to consider
in any way the qualificJitions of the consL!irams.. Attendartce 2t the pre·submittal meeting is
optional and 'Will [lot in itseif be considered in the consultant e,'.alualillD and :ielC'ction proces~.
~UBMIUAl Of PROPQ~
Ten ... opi~s of Lie complete proposal are to be delivered to the Director of Purcha~ing. 250
Hamilton Avenue, Palo Aito, Cahfornia 94301, b)' 3:(1) p.m .. Tuesday, h-larch 9, 1993.
Attachments: (,,~t-""'"""'-~.lc t-o ~-;..-....,,~~
J. Requirements [or Deflcieoc)' Plam. No ..... ember IS, 1992, Santa Clara County Congestion
Management Agency
2. List of CMP intersections
3. Map f'Or each Land Use Area 1-9
genldp'wpe.1
February 12. 1993
lage 10
o EO,nt-IetT "6"
Patterson AsSOCiates
HOURLY RATE SCHEDULE
Principal
Senioc As.sociate
Seninr EngineerlPlanner
A~oc~te Engineer/Planner
Assist.aI.Lt Engineer/Planner
Senicr Technicia.n
Wordpl'ocessiDg
Dr2ftingICADD
To;;brjcian
Junior Technician
Expert WiUless rates available upon ["(!.(jucs1
DIRECT EXPENSES
! 12.1.00
90.00
75.00
65.00
55.00
55.00
5U.OO
SO.OO
40.00
30.00
The aoc,..,-e rates include standard Q\!erhead items, Tnvcl costb are ~med at tv.'e'ltv-Gve and 1 Q CCTIU;
peT nu1e. Plotting expenses are billed at $2.00 per square tOOL A.ll ou15ide scr-.i:~ and e'1lt::rtScs arl!
bIlled at cost, plus teo percent for handling.
l'AYMENT SCHEDULE
Invoices are du.e and payable upon receiPL In\roire5 paid aller thin)' days ",ilJ t< subj~·(."t i'J a scparalc
billing of one and oce-half percent per month of the unpaid balan,~. Late chargCl. arc no~ included
in any agreement (or maximum cbarge;_
EFFECllVE IAN UAR Y, 1993
',"', --_ ... . .: ..
~' ;"-,' ,
OiEALO ,.OfiCH • "$0(',
P.Q, .... n.n
Cd: r ..,l1li, CA, .... 04-217.
Att": ,JClNATH .... WOIIttriIloc.
!1~-4III-SOII'
".tt,r.G'" ..... ~ I U ••
••• I.~.r W.y, Iwit. 2iD
s.,.. ... t... CAl '4404
-,,-
tJ!..l-f!!;~''''' IIIUI""l .~IILlW RPO",<40,<4
LL.J-....... Q ""' ..
l*lI~'!" 0)IjT?lC IOI'S ~,
R,.a1l14G'.tI
----'OIU530D~'
....... -~
Prehll'.FI.r "t-5DUt.
Lilbilify
-.~ tI!1fJi --''' .. .,..-
'.!'1lJI'
C
0
E
I
I
l/DSl/IZ) 7101113
1I0IJI1 7/1;1/U
I/i;i 1112 i
I "~~1I;3
, 125/13 1/:25/14 S'.(lOO,~ao por
c I. i •• i. 'ho
The city .1 '.1. ALti il PIf •• iII ••• dditi.nsl i"'I~H.d •• rupee I. ,e,..-rlll
li.brlil)'. llite li.bitity .,,4 warllu. ", ... ,."".1 i." i"nr'l'lc-e.
-
I_I' '",
City .f ,.1. AI~.
:tic H •• i Ih" Ave" ...
• . 0. lex 1D25D
'.1, Alh, CAl t<43C13
Sl10l'..D Afl'I Cl' n-E ABQlIE ['E:$:;lIeEC POlCES 8E "'"~'LC'OB'''J~'''''
E)(PIU,TON DUE "E~aol', HE 1Ss,;"r..c CCJ.,4>"""" WLL Er-a-"VOI< 10
hU.t. ,0 D"vSWQln£N~":E rOT>-f.:CE.ll:rFC.HEHOLCE:RN".l.Io.EDtorl-E:
lEI=(iij"i'""FAl.L'l:E TO 1.i4 ..... 'X..()o; PIoCICf SH"U_ t.4POSE NO QBtCATON OR
Dol' "NY I<lI'<!l.PO,,"l>£ OQt,oP"I\j'f, ITS loGe) .. ' sal< REPQESE!-" ArMS
I
I
.'
,
•
t ,
I •
-
o
PART 11 . SUPPLEMEfiOTS TO PROPOSAL FORMS SECTION 00410
CERTIFICA TION OF NONDISCRIMINA TIOl{
~rtiffc:ation of Nondiscrimination: As suppliers of goods or services to the City of
Pafo Alto, the firm and individuals fisted below certifies that they do not discriminate
in &mpioyment with regards to race, color, rallgion, national origin or ancestry~ or
disability; that they are in compHanee with all Federal, State and locat directives and
executive orders regarding nondiscrimination in employment; and that they agree to
demonstrate positively and aggressively the principle of equaJ opportunity in
emp loyme n~.
The Prvposer agrees specifically:
, ,0 To esta~lish or observe employment polic1es which affirmatively promot9
opportunities for minority persons at af! }ob levels .
.2.0 To communicate this policy to a1l persons concerned, includina an
employees, outside recrUiting services. especially these serving minority
commun-fties, and to the minority communities at large.
3.0 To take affirmative action steps to hire minority employees within the
organization.
4.0 To be knowledgeable oftl1e local, state, and rederallaws and regulations
concerning afTlrmatlvB action pondes and provide opportunities for
employees.
Firm: Pattersor. A:;::sociates
Presioent
Da~ ______ ~~ ______ ~~~~~ ____________ __
Please include any additional information available regarding equal opportunity
emplo~'ment programs now in effect wtthin your company.
At1":'L~bed
END OF SECTION
CITY of PAlO Ai. TO: Non-discr'lmil1atiol1 11 f92~ SECTION 004 10-1
-
o
Patterson Associates
AFflR.\[.o\TIVE ACIlOS roue\'
1."-'~WARY L992
EQUAL L\fPLOYMF.JIr.'T OPPOR~TI1:' POUCY
It is. Patters.on A.s.sociates' policy thlll aU appllcants fN em?{oym;:.nt shall be rzcruiled a::ld hired on the ~ls
of merit anc:! qualificatio[l5 without regard to racc, color. r~ligion. natiorw..l origin, age, sex, DC bandiC3f.
Flmher, an employees will be assigned. lIaruferrro, promOle.d, upgraded., compens.l:ed and termlnatej sOlely
on the NsUi oEment., ability, and length of service, aIld w:ithmu regard to race, rohlr, rcllgion. Ilalional origin,
age, sex. or h.an~;cap.
In the implementation of this pori")', it is our intention to a.<..5ure full employment opponunities. for D'.e~t-ers
of lItin0riry arH1 di."i.Sdvantaged grou.ps,.:wd to prrr.'!de a !ralIl~"Ork for miD:)rity--grOlJP recruiting., tJring and
upgrading 411 a!J. jo1:l1C'.tJ:i.
Patterson Associates posts, in conspi\."'Uous places avai~ble to empro;~ arId appIlC3Jl(s fcr employmem.
notices setting forth the provisiOns of this nondi.scriminatioa poriey. The firm states [n all s.olidtatioll5 (J!'
advertisements for employees, til",t aD qualilied appticao15 v-ill recerve cowideration for employment .. ithout
regard 10 race, color, religion, st"1.: or national origin.
To the extent possible Pa'tersoD. Assoctates complies w!th: The Fair Labor Standards Act of I r:J"39 (29 U.S.c..
201·219); The Wai.sh·Hea1ey public Conmas Act (-41 U.S.C 35-45); The a:.ntract Work HI)Uf:S Standanls
Act·Overtime Compensation (40 U.s.c. 32?-J30~ I...av.>s. Resuainlng the Use of Collvi ... 1l...abor. Utilizatioo of
SmaU Bus[n~ aDd Small Disadvantaged Bus~ess. Concerru (P:1buc Law 95.507);. Affi:rmattve Action for
Disahled Veterans an,j Veterans of the Vietnam Era Clause of TItle 41, CFR part 60, Subsection 250.4 and
the implementi.ng rules a,-,d rcg-Jlatiolli far the Department of Labor.
All Principals of tbt fum are re:spons.;."ble ror Ihe C:evelopmcfll and implementaHOIl of l1!e AffirrnatiYe AClj'.jD
Plan. The. Principato; .. re responsible for pro'l.;ding direction and as.sistance to ali pt:rwonel in admini-'t.!rin.s
specific affirmative actioo efforts.
10 i.:eeping v.ilh tlle above·sta\ed poUcy, Pal«:!"SOIl-As.soc-i..ates periodJcatJy analyzes.aIl persccmer acthitie.s to
ensure Ihat equal opponunJl)' acHo[! plan.; at<! being met
J
-
•
, r:i
J
f
ICMP Sv.sl("m Road,.,a
EI CaRlino Real (Route 82)
~";;'o Real (Ro"'. 82)
EI Camino Real (Route 82)
EI Camino Real (Route-82)
El Camino Real (RoUle 82)
f.1 Camino Real (Route 82)
Foothill Expre5.5way
lJage Mill/Oregon ~p~s;.way
POlige Mill/Or~on Expressw.:.y
Page Mill/Oregon Expressway"-
San Antoruo Road
S,IO Mtoruo Road
CMP Interse<"tlon lI ... eUne and 199Z Monitoring Traffic illS
Santa Clara County Congestion Management Program
Cross SUeet Loc:1lkm JuriM,liction ; B:J~Ii.ne l.os i l?91 Monitorinll: LOS
PALO ALTO
Alma ! Pa.lo Alto Stafe B B
Chorl."on Rd I P;Jlo Alto State D D
Emlntcadeto Rd Palo Alto State D D --Page Mill Rd/Oregon Expy Palo Alto Sr:;;t;te E D
Palm Dr Palo Alto Palo Aho N/A N/A -1 Univcrsiry Av Palo Alto Palo Alto NIh N/A
AI:I$lrndero Rd P3io Alto 5C ('.ounry E E ,
Poothill f.xpy , Polio Aha SC ('.uunry F P i .-<
H:moVer , Palo Alto SC County D , D I
~ I Middlefield Rd , f/310 Abo SC County E E -1 Charleston ltd + P>tlo Alto Palo Aha D D
4--i
Middlefield Rd ralo Alto Palo Alto D I D I -
.\
1)
...j
l>
(j
:I: s: rn
2
~
Co.)
,
I
j •
\ :
i ,j
l ..
..
"
, ,
"
,
.,
,..t -",'---
:!
-,:-~,