Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout0250.093- ,- ,,~. . , ~, .' -" . ~ ,', .', '.' April 15, 1993 HONORABLE CITY (OUNe i L Paio Alto, Californid UPDATE -PROPOSED STANFORD WEST AiID SAliD HiLL ROAD/ST'.NFORD SHOPPiNG CENJER PROJECTS Members of the Council: Report t~LM_Lel This report is for ~nformat;on onljj no act10n by City CounciT is required. Stanford University. the project applicant, wil1 be initiating a community outreach program for the two abol,le ref2rE-'lced development applications. This will neces~itate some changes in the EiR process and ti~el;ne. as described in this report. Ois_£~_s i on Stanford Ma~agement Company presented a letter to the Clty (ouncil, dated April 6, 1993 ,attached), explaining their desire to ·engag~ in a program of effecti .... e community outreach" for the proposed Stanford 1J~st and Sand 1-1,;11 Road/Stanford Shopping Center projects. This community outreacn program is now being finalized by Stanford, \lith the details to be prese!lt~d to the City by the end of this month. City staff is supportive of Stanford's efforts to fllrm111ate a community outreach program, and believes such a program can be done in conju~ction with the EIR process, although the E1R process must be changed s1ightly from that originally envisioned. Although the details of the changed EIR process have not yet been flnal1zed, there are several notable items that sho~ld be mentioned. J. The public Seoping Meetings previously scheduled for late April have been postponed to an undetermined date. 2. The EIRs ... n1 likely be published in three 'iolumes, with the firs.t being an "Existing Condltions" report describing tne Existing condit;or1s in and ~round the Sand Hill Ccorridor (i.e., traffic c.,unts, cree" conditions, noise levels). lhis report ~ill not contain any analysis or informatiQn about potential "impacts of the projects. The report \1(111 bE' published after Stanford's co~~unity outreach is underway. and could provide useful information for discussion. The second volume, "Impacts and M\tigations4 ~ill be completed after Stanford has fini~hed with CMR:250:93 .. --.----~~--------------------... ~~ .. ... : "-i::. their outreach and descri~tions of Bach pre eet (if re.,ised) are available. The first and ~econd vallimes wi 1 comprise the Draft ElR. which wi'l be circulated for public review n accordance with CEQA. The third \iC'lume ... ·ill (ontain th~ -Responses to Comments". Follo'Wing a Request for Propasals and interv1eloV precess, tr1'll'ironmental !mpact Planning (EIP} ASS0ciates was selected to prepare the two ErRs. Staff is currently finalizing the $COP2 of ~ork and contractual arrangem@nts ~ith EIP. When Stanford provides the details of their public outreach program to the City Council. staff will prepare another informational rEport describing: 1) details of the re~ised ErR proce~s; 2) EIR process timeline; and 3) the relationship between the EIR process and Stanford's outreach program. Respectfully submitted, A~: J<>./cy /t11;ud ;f: . .!'/uukr LORI TOPLE! Seni or Pl anner 1~ ~~~'~"-r Ci ty Ma!lager.' KENNETH R. SCHREIBER Director of P1anning and Community Environment Attachment: letter to Mayor McCollin from Stanforj Management Company, dated April 6, 1993 cc: Planning Corr~ission Comprehensive Pian Advisory Committee Stanford Management Company CMR;250;93 Il :\cm.\ .. , ."Icrd ,upd 4/l5/93 Page 2 ......... ;;: .. ";. T ..I, ~, F r I ~. i) '·,1...\, '",' ~ l: [ " ! t " I .,' " " j, "-. " April 6. 1993 Ms. Jean McCo"'TI Mayor City of !'aID Alto 250 Hamilton Avenue Palo Alto, CA 943()1 Re: Sand Hill Roadr'SUnford 5hopt'tng; Ce:1ter Expansion/Star,fo~d \Vest Dear Mayor McCown: I ~U T fn June 1991, appliC2tions for development or the n·acre Stanford \\-~est .si.te were submitted to the City; ;!nd in Oc',ober 1992, a project application was submitted on the Sand Hill Road extension and improvement, accompanied by a p:oposed 140,000 sf expansion of the Stou1ford Shopping Center in tbe area to be vacate<! by luootctum Road. The Sand Hill RoadlStanford ShoppirJg Center application also proposed that the City comribute $2. 15 million !o the 59.1 milli on esti mated cost for Sand Hill Road. Since the t!me of these applications. we have appeared before the Council twice to discuss the Sand Hill Road and SWlford Shopping Cent:!!" project. On December 7 I 1992, we Council held a join .. study ~s.sjon v.lth the Pianning Commission .at which David Neuman a.'ld I made presernations and ans·)..'ered questions about th~s prcject and other Staniord prfljects as well. On February 1. 1993. l~e. Sand Hill Road/Stanford Shopping Center proje(t was piaced on the Cot:ncil's agenda. and tlle Council agreed th.t tlli' project should proceed through the formal ElR processing and that the City should pursue furtJ1er negotiations as 10 the appropriate level of the City'S financial support jor tt.e cost of liie road. It was also understood t11at such negotiations would include w.e future status aI1d terms of the El Camino Park lease. At the February I Council Meeting and by our letter of the sarne d,,<, Andy Dcty and I assured the Council tiJa'~ iU the projectS (i.e., including Stanford Wt",st) proceeded, Stanford would engage in a program of effective community outreach which would not only actively engage our nelghbors in both Palo Alto and Menlo ,. , . . \Ih. Jean McCown, .... byor Apnl 6, 1993 Page .2 Park. but also be complementary to, and suppomvt of, th::. formal EIR proce:;s. We have been working diligently over the last eight wee.ks to craft the best possible ?!ogram and have consulted extensive!y with many cammuruty members from Palo Alto and Menlo Park. Before Ule end of this month. we .... ·ill send you another ietter which describes in detail the elements. reso':.lICeS and timeline for a suggested community oucre.ach program. "-'hile we realiu ~'w effective community outreach may likcly airer or delay the presently scheduled EIR process, we concur -with tr.e maI!y members of the community who feel that public outreach and input wiL".! Ies?OCt to the Sand HHl RouiIStanford Shopping Center and Stanford Wes( projecu are essential. Sincerely. William T. Phillips Managing Director Real Estate cc: Palo Alto Clty Council, June Fl:rning:, Ken Schreiber .......... _ ........... -