Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout0111.094((D. • • ,1. "".- January 20, 1994 HONORABLE C1TY COUNCIL ~alo Alto. Califcrnia COMFREHENSlVE FLAN UPDATE -CONSULTANT AGREEMENT FOR PREPJL~TION OP TBCHNI~.L BACKGROLlID REPORTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT Members of the couccil: REPORT IN BRIEF This report and its attacl':ments reccm.'T1end approval of a consultant services agree~ent for preparation of GeDtechnical, Noise; and Air Quality Technical Backgrcund Repo£ts and Master Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR} for the update of the Comprehensive Plan~ BACKGROUND October 19. 1992 October 6, 1993 Noverr.ber 8. 1993 Ci.ty Council initiated revision of the Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan, including creation of a Comprehensive Plan Citizens Advisory Committee {CPAC), approval of a work program, schedule and budget of $507,000 to cover costs associated with revising the Comprehensive Plan. City Council endo~sed, as amended. the Comprehensive Plan ~community Visions, Ocals and Issues" document prepared by the Comprehensive Plan Citizens Advisory Committee (CPAC) during Phase I of the Comprehensive Plan update. City Council expanded the adopted Comprehensive Plan work program to include preparation of COffirrillnity Character/Design and Governance Elements; $185,000 of additional funding to cover costs associated with such Elements, and extension of the work schedule by three months. Upon completion of Phase I of the COr.'lprehensive plan, staff initiated selection of consultants to prepare the technical I :~ -" , - -.--~-"~"---~---- background reports and EIR in accordance with the approved work program and budget. A requeEit for proposals (RF'Pj was ,sent to seven fi rms on November 23~ 1993. Responses to the RF~s were received f=om four of the seven. firms. One fi.r-m did not respond dtOE! to the "extremely tight II budget. A six mewber consultant ~el~ction co~~ittee was formed to review the responses to the RFP and hold interviews. The: committee included Will BecketL and Sandy Eakins, the CPAC Co-chairs, and 8ern Beecham, representing the planning Commission on the CPAC. City staff on the committee included Nancy Lytle, Chief Planning Official; Doris Maez. Environmental Protection Coordinator; and Sarah Cheney~ Senior Pla~~er. Oral rnterviews were held on December 15, 1993. Aft.er the intervi~ws, the committee reccmmended the firm of Brady anj AEaociates, Inc. be awarded the contra.ct for the r~quired services, subject to a follow-up interview with Brady and Associates' proposed Project Manager~ who was ill ac the time of the interview~ The follow-up ~nterview waR held on December 20, 1.993, and the interview cammittt:.:: agreed to recommend that the Ci ty retain Brady and Associates fo .... · this work. Discussicn Brady and Associates, Inc. is a firm of Planners and Landscape Architects experienced in preparing both ComprehensiYe Pla...j.s and BIRs [or Comprehensive Plans. They have experience working with citizen committee base:d processe6 and have worked in Palo Alto in the past. The firm Brady and Associates wae favored over other firms for the following reasons: 1) They prepared the most well written~ comprehensible and complete response to the RFP; 2) They projected the most a,stute grasp of the nature of the project a.~d the sensitivities of the Community; 3) They presented an approach and style considered compatible with the established Citizens committee; 4) Their proposal included elements not specified in the RFP. but considered desirable and advantageous to the Comprehen­ sive Plan (Summary of Existing Conditions and Policy Consis­ tency Matrix prepared early for CPP.C use during PhaBe II); 1/20/93 Page .2 5) The substantial involvement of the firm's principal would be provided; and 6) They could accomplish the desired tasks within the identified budge'C and time frame. No budg-et ordinarlce: amendment is required for the tecr..nical consulting services to be provided in this contract. Ho-wever, a budget ordinance amendment ..... ill be need>:!d to cover the reproduction costs of the EIR. The cost of services orovided in the attached contract in the amQunt cf $95,150 is consistent with the budgec for t~ese Comprehensive Plan Revision tasks approved by the Council on October ~9, 1992. However, the four firms responding to the RFP each expressed Borne ccncerns over the limited amount budgeted for thi~ work. All of the firms excluded the l-equired printing of the ErR documents from their proposals. As a result printing coata of the EIR will have to be absorbed by the City. Printi.ng of :"he draft and final EIRs is expected to cost about. $15, DOD. The Comprehensive Plan budget fOl: reproduction costs is insufficient to cover this additional cost. Remaining portions of tbe Comprehensive Plan budget are already allocated for other specific technical or professional consclting services. This issue and several other potential additional Comprehensive Plan expenses will be included for council consideration in the 1994- 95 budget. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve and authorize the Mayor to execute the attached agreement for conEHlltant services with Brady and As9ocia~es, Inc. for preparation of Geotechnical, Noige~ and ~r Quality Technical Background Reports and prepa:t"ation of a Master Program Environmental Impact Report for the update ~f the Comprehensive Plan. Re8/l:~: c;;,:d, ~CHENEY ~ Senior Planner :; ~~~ CMR :111: 94 _. -.----...,.--- KENNETH R, SCHREIBER Director of Planning and Community Environment 1/20/93 Page 3 o Attachments: Agreement for Professional Cc:msult.ing Sernces, with attach."1"I_ents oc: Comprehensive Plan Citizens Advisory Committee Planninq Co~.iBeicn Brady and Associatee, Inc., lS28 Fourth StreeL, Berkeley, CA 94710 Illingworth and Rodkin, Inc., 85 Bolinas Road, Ill, Fairfax, CA 94930 Donald Ballanti, 1424 SCQtt Street, 81 Cerrito; CA 94530 William Cotton and Associates, Inc .• .330 Village Lane, Los Gatos, CA ~430S Habitat Restoration Group, 60Cl Butler Lane, Suite 1, Scotts Valley, CA 9506£ William Self Associates. P. O. Eox 21~2, Orinda, CA 94.563 C'MR.:lll:94 1/20/93 Page 4. : . A-G R II I J( JLIL1 1I11'1'1fK111 TIIlI eI'n 01' PALO ALTO ldID .82ADY ARD I.SSOCI:A.TBS I Die ~ -, .. -, POR PUPAU.'l'%OIl OP nCBliICAL BAaGR01lND A.tft) BlJVIIU9iI· iN f&1. DlPACT RBPOAT POR. THE UPDM"I! OP !'lUI PALO &Lro COIlPRXIIlmSrvlI PLAN THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of , 1994, by and between the CITY OF PALO ALTO, :a~mun~07i~c~i~pa~1'-~c~c~rpo~~r=a7tion of califoT.Dia~ hereina~ter referred to as wCITY," and BRADY AND ASSOCIATES, INC. {Taxpayer Identif1cation Number 94-3057913), a california corpcration~ with offices at 182$ Pourt.h Street, Berkeley, CA 94710, hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANTw; • I 1 • B S SIT Xl WHEREAS, CITY desires certain professional consultant services, hereinafter described; and WHEREAS. CITY desires to engage CQNStrLTANT to provi.de these services by reason ot its qualifications and experience for perfOrming such services. and CONSULTANT has offered to provide the required services on the ter.ms and in the manner set forth herein; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of their mutual covenants, the parties hereto agree as folloWB: SRC'rIQN 1. -DifINITIONS 1.1 on The term -CITY-shall mean the City Of Palo Alto, ca.lifo:rn.ia. ~.2 CITY WL~ER The term "City Manager-shall mean tbe duly appoin.t~d City Manager of the City of Palo Alto, California, or his or her designated representative. 3.. 3 CITY CLFRX: The term ~City Clerk-ehall mean the duly appointed City Clerk of the City of Palo Alt.o, California, or his cr her designated representative. 1.4 RISK M;NAGEE The term -Risk Manager W shall mean the duly appointed Risk Manager of the City of ~al0 ~to. Calitornia, or his or her designated representative. 1 I ! , o o 1.S PROJECT The tenn rprojeCi:" mea.ns the update of the Palo Al La Comprehensive Plan for which three maj or tasks are to be pertcrmed by CONSULTANT: (1) Preparation of Noise Seismic and Air ~Jality Technical Background Reports; (2) Assistance in preparing the Noise Element. Seismic Safety Section of the Safety Element. and Air Quality Section of the Conservation Element; and (3) PreparatiQn of a Master Program Environmental Impact Report (-EIR"}. 1.6 woRK PRODUCTS The term ·Work Products· s~~ll mean all work related co the preparation of the Campr~hensive Plan and EIR described in Exhibit -AI. entitled ·Scope of Servlces and Tirr..e Schedule", attached hereto and made a part hereof by this reference. SBCTION 2 -PROJECT QQQPPINATIQN 2.1 = The City Manager shall be the representative of CITY for all purposes under this Agreement. SARAH A. CHENEY is designated as the project Manager for the City Manager, and she shall supervise the progress and execution of this Agreement, and shall be assisted by NANCY LYTLE, the Chi$f Planning Ofti~ial. 2 .2 CQNSmTAN't' CONSULTA..-n' shall assign a single Project Director to have overall reBpOllsibility for the progress and executio~ of t.bis Agreement for CONSULTANT. DAVID RARLY hereby is deSignated as t.he .Project Direc:;tor for CONSULTANT. Should circurr:stances or conditions subsequent to the execution of this Agreement require a substitute Project Director for any reascn, the Proj~ct Director deaigeee B~~ll be subject to the prior written approval of the project Manager. S BGTION 3 -DUTI ES Of' CONSULTANT 3 • 1 BJ.S Ie SERVICES TO BE: FURNISHED CONSULTA..VI' shall perform each task and provide all specified services and work products as set forth in Exhibit A. 3.1.:1. CONSULTANT shall furnish CITY with every reasonable opportunity for CITY to a&ce~~ain that the services of CONSULTANT are being performed in accordance with the req~irements and intentions of this Agreement. 3.2 ADDITIONAL SERVICFS CONSULTANT ahall perform or obtain any aDd .... 11 of t.he following Additional Services. Dot included under the Bssic 2 i Services, if 80 a.uthorized in W!:"iting by CITY I and shall be paid as provide~ in Section 4 of this Agre~nt. 3.2.1 performing any other services that lTe-y be agreed upon by the parties subsequent to the exec'.ltior.. of this Agreement. :3 .2.2 Perfonning such other additional services as set forth in Exhibit A. 3.3 LAws TO BE OBSERVED CONSULTANT shall: 3.3.1 lCeep itself ft;.lly informed of all existing and future federal, state, and local laws, ordinancee, regulations, orders t and decrl!es which may affect those engaged 'Or amplcyed under this Ag:reement. a.c.y materials used in CONSULTANT's performance under this Agreement, or the perfoI."'!!'lance of the services under this Agreeme~t; 3. 3~:2. At all times observe and comply with, and cause all of its subconeultants and employees, if any, to observe and comply with, the laws. ordinances, regulations, orders and de crees menti oned above; and 3.3.3 IIrmecliately report to the Project Manager in writing llIly discrepa.c.cy or inconsistency it discovers in the laws, o~dinances, re~~lations. orders, and decrees ~~ncioned above in relation to any plans. drawings, specifications or provisions ot this Agreement ~ 3 ~4 REI.8!SR OF &SpoRTS AND INFORMATION Any repo~s. information, da~a or other material given to~ or prepared or assembled by. CONSULTANT or it.s subconsultants, it any. under this Agreement ehall be the property of CITY and shall not be made available to any individual or organization by CONSULTANT cr it.s subconsultants~ if any ~ without the prior writt.en approval of the City Manager. 3 ~ 5 COPliS Of REPORTS AND INFORMATION If CITY req~estB additional copies of reports, drawings, specifications or any other material which CONSULTANT is required to furnish in li:nited qu&.:ltities as part of the se%Vices UDder this Agreement., CONSULTANT shall provide such additional copies as are requested and CTTY shall compensate CONSULTANT for the costs of duplicating of such copies at CONSUL~~'s actual cost. 3.6 1M!, RBPORTS CONSULTAN"r shall provide CITY with copies of the final reports required under this Agreement. as set forth in Exhi~it A, upon completion and acceptance of the individual report by CITY. 3 • . , I t ~ J ! ./ ,'""'\ -o 3.7 QYALIFICATTQNS OF CONSULTANT CONSULTANT l."epreeents that it has the-expert.ise and professional qualifications to furnish the ser .... ices described under this Agreement. As evidence thereof. CONSULTANT warrants that. one or more members o~ employees of the firm are licensed by the State 0: california~ as required. and that the services to be provided under this Agreement will be performed by them or under t.heir supervieion~ Consultant shall furcish to the Project Manager for apprcr~l. prior to the exec~tion of this Agreement. a list of all firms or corporations to be employed as eubconsultant8. 3 " 6 COMPLIANCE WI"Il! ADA CONSULTANT states that it is aware of the requirements of the federal Americans with Disabilities Act.. of 1990; and the Goveroment Code and the Health and Safety Code of tl"Je State of california, relating to access to public buildings and accommodations for disabled persons, and relating to facilities for disabled persons. CONSULTANT shall comply ~ith or enBu~e by its advice that compliance with such prOVisions will be effected pursUaDt to the terms of this Agreement. S RCTION • -COMPENSATION 4.1.1 Mp:inp.pn CompensAtion. In considerativn for the full perfor.mance of the Basic Services described in Section 3.1 ot this Agreement, CITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT a fee Dot to exceed Ninety-Pive Thousand ODe Hundred Fifty Dollars ($95,150). 4.1.2 ~Schedllie. The amount of CONSULTANT's coctpenaation shall be calculated as set forth in Exhibit -:8., entitled -Costs,-attached hereto and made a part hereof by this reference, on a time and materials basis, up to the maximum amount set forth in paragraph 4.1.1. The cost of the subconsultants services may be approved prior to tbe execution of this Agreement, provided that CONSULTAln' submits in advance to the Project. Manager a statement of projected costs for such B~cnsultants. 4.1.2: SubCoru;;ul~. Fees for subconsultants. hired directly by CONSULTA..~. shall be approved by CITY in advance of CONSULTANT's incurriD,g of such fees. Fees set fOI;th in Exhibit -B-shall be approved by CITY prior to the execution of the Agree:r..ent. . 4.1.4 For Additional Services. For CONSULTANT's Additional Services, as may be described in Section 3.2 of this Agreement, compensation shall be as prescrihed in accordance with CONSULTANT's hourly rates set forth io Rxhibit S, plus any other expenses to be agreed upon, in writing, before the perforuaoce of such services. 4 ---.~---- · ~, /' r. (.1.5 For Extra Wert ar cbanges. Payment for ext.ra work or changes in ,=he work net cauged. or initiated by CONSULTANT and authorized in w.l-H:ing by the Project Manager sha,ll De made within thirty (30) days of submission by CONSULTANT of a statement of itemized costs, in triplicate z covering such work. Prior to commencing such extra work or changes, CONSULTANT and CITY shall Agree u.pon an estimated nct·!;.o-exceed cost for such extra woxk. In no event shall CONSULTANT be paid for work which is made necessary as a result of CONSULTANTls errors or oversights. 4.2 PAYMRNT SCHBDULB 4.2.1 Fgr ksie Seprivee~ Payments for the Basic Services shall be made in progress payments in proportion to set-vices :>erformed in a.ccordance with Exhibit -A-or for services perfor.ned-for each completed phase of work. Final payment sha.ll be made by CITY after CQNSULTANT has s~tted all required re~Jrts and. other documents a!ld bas received a wt"itten acknowledgEIl'l.ent. and approval of completion cf the Work Program thereon from the Project Manager. 4.2.2 ~~~~~~~~~~ctiP~a~ymentB for Additior~l Services of T as 3.2 shall be ma.de as part of the monthly progress payments for services rendered. 4.2.3 Deductions. No deductions shall be made from CONSULTANTrs compensation on account of penalty, .liquidated damages, Qr other sums withheld from paymttnts to subcontractOT.B or subco~ltaDts. ".2.4 Pa.yment Upon SuepeD.!FioQ or l;bapdoprpent gf Proiects. If the Project is suspended for more tl-.an. three {3) months or abandoned r ill whole or in part. CONSULTANT shall be paid its compensa.tion for services perfouned prior to receipt of written notice from CITY of such scspension or abandonment, together with any applicable additional and reimbursable expenSEs then due. rf the Project is resumed after being suspended for more than ninety (90) days, any change in CONSm.,TANT' s compensation shall be subject to renegotiation and, if necessary, approval by the City Manager~ If this Agreement is suspended or terminated for fault of CONSUL­ TANT~ CITY shall be obligated to compensate CONSULTANT only for that portion of CONSULTANT's services which are of benefit to CITY, as such determination may be made by tbe City Manager in the 't'easonable exercise of her di6cretion~ 4.3 INVOICING AND VERIfICATIpN OF COSTS 4.3.1 CONSULTANT ahall submit invoices, in triplicate, on a =onthly basis within ten (10) daye after the first day of -each month following the month in which services were rendered. Such costs shall be identified accordiog to the Scope of Services tasks and pr~ses in sufficient detail ae to provide verification of the sums invoiced~ Invoices shall include a.ll 5 .• '. , .'. IX ... o applicable supporting documentation and shall group charges by t8sk l payroll coste billed r and other expenses. 4.3.2 CONSULTAN"l' shall maintain books and ~ecords supporting all reimbursable coats incurred in connection with the serJices rendered hereunder. CITY shall be granted access by CONSULTANT to such CONSULTANT' 8 books and records as are required to be kept hereunder during the regular business hours of CONSULTANT. 4.3.3 Invoices with all supporting docl..mI.entation as required hereunder shall be submi~tea to the Project Manager, Comprehensive Plan EIR Project l Department of Planning and Community Environment, City of Palo ~to, P. O. Box 10250, Palo A1to~ CA 94303. SRCTlQN 5 -DUTIES OF CITY CITY shall provide full information regarding its req~irements for the Work Products, shall examine documents submitted by CONSULTANT and shall render decisions pertaining thereto promptly, to avoid unreasonable delay in the progress of CONSULTANT's work~ and CITY shall furnish all such information as are in C1TY's tiles or are at its dispcsal, as may be set forth in Exhibit A. SBC"fION § -mRM 6 .1 TERM OF AGUJMniT' TIMS IS OF THE ESSKHCE The ter.m of this Agreement shall c~nce upon its execution by CITY. Following tbe receipt of a Notice to proceed, CONSULTANT shall commence work on initial tasks or phases of the Scope of Services in acco~ce with the time schedule set forch. in Exhibit A. Work OD subsequent tasks or phases shall proceed in accordance ¥ith the time sch~dule. The parties hereto agree that time is of the eesence of this Agreement. This Agreement shall expire en January 1~ 1997, ~ess sooner terminated by a party. 6 .2 TIME Of COMPLETION OF EACH PHASI 6.1.1 CONSULTMIT agrees to perform the tasks and phases of the Scope of services within the time schedule set forth in Exhibit ·A· provide~, however, that any change in the scope of services or other changes due to CITY's operating requirements I or in connection with other contractors' or consultants' operations, may require the parties~ agreement to a revised time 9chedule4 6.1.2 CITY agrees to use ordinarf diligence in the performance of any obligation it may expressly undertake to assist in the implementation of CONSULTANT's time schedule set forth in Exhibit ·A·. 6 ._-------- -, SHCl'rON 6 3 -CITY' S REVIEW AND APPROVAL Between each task and phase of work there shall exi.t a revie", and approval period by CITY. CITY sr.all use ordinary diligence in the completion of these tasks .. however, CONSULTANT acknowledges that the interrelated exchange of information among CITY: s ,,-arious departments rua.kes it impossible 'to set a specific time schedule. Normally. CITY's estimated period of review and approval will be furnished to CONSULTANT at the t~~ of stibmdssion of each phase of the work. SECTION 6,4 -EXTENSION OF TERM In the event that the services ca1.1ed for und.er this Agreement are not completed within the time specified above, the City Manager .r~ll have the option to extend the time for completion. S BeTleN 7 -rnnlfiES IN WORK. CITY may order maj or changes in the scope or character of 'Work,. and may either decrease or increase the amount of CONSUl.T­ ANT's services. In tbe event that auch changes are ordered, CONSULTANT shall be entitled to full compensation for all work. performed prior to receipt of CI~f~s notice of change in work. SICTlON e ~ TBRMINATION OR SUSPENSION Of' At;RRpsprt' 8.J. RIGR'I' TO SUSPEND OR TKRMINA,TE The City Manager may suspend this Agreement, in wbo~e or in part I or terminate this Agreement. with or wi thout cause ~ ~ giving fifteen (15) days' prior wzitten notice thereof to CONSULT~ ANT. Upon receipt of BUch notice, CONSULTANT shall iIrrnediately discontinue its performance under this Agreement. CONSULTANT may terminate this Agreement or suspend work on the project by giving thirty (30) days' prior written notice thereof to CITY~ but only in the event of substantial fail~re of performance by CITY or in the event CrTY abandons or indefinitely postpones the Project. B.2 PAXMRNT Open such suspension or termination by eIT't, CONSULTAL'n' shall be paid for all services actually rendered to CITY to the date of such suspension or termination; provided~ however~ if this Agreement is suepended or terminated for fault of CONSu"LTANT~ CITY shall be obligated to comp€IlSate CONSULTANT oiJ.ly for that portion Of CONSULTANT1s ser .... ices which are of benefit to CIT¥. as such deter.mination may be made by the City Manager in the reasonable exercise of her diecretion. 7 . -.,.- o o 8 . 3 RETVRN OF t1ATSRIALS Upon such suspension or terminatioD.. CONSULTANT shall turn over to the City Manager immediately any and all copies of BLudies, reports. sketches, drawings, photographs, maps, computations, and other data, whether or not completed .. prepared by CONSULTANT or its subconsultant.s, if any, or 9"iven to CONSULTANT or its sulX:or..sultants, if a.ny. in connection with this Agreemerlt. Such materials shall become the permanent property of CITY. SECTION 9 -INPEP5NpEN1 JUDGMENT Fail~re cf CITY to agree with CONSu~TANT'B independent findings. conclusions, or recommendations, if the same are called for under this Agreement. on tbe basis of differences in matters of judgment.. shall not be construed as fa:i..lure on the part of CONSULTANT to meet the requirements of this Agreement. ~ION 10 -ASSIGNMENT; PERSONAl, SSfiVICE~ ~SULTANTS AND EMPLOYEES 10.1 MSIGJSMB!IT Both parties shall give their personal attantion to the faithful perf,:::a:ma.nce of this Agreement and ehall not assign, transfer, COnveyf or ocherwise dispose of this Agreement or any right:, t.it.le or interest in or to the same or any part thereof without tbe prior vrittEm consent of the other party. and then only subject to such terms and cond.itions as the other party may require. A consent to one assignment shall not be deemed to be a consent to any subsequent assignments. Ally assignment without such approval shall be void and, at the option of the other party, shall terminate this Agreement and any license or privilege granted herein. This Agreement and any interest herein shall not be assignable by operation of law witbout the prior written conseot. of the other party. 10.2 PliRSONltL SERVICES It ii3 agreed that this Agreement is for the personal services of CONSULTANT and cannot be performed by any other person or organization. 10.3 SPBCONS!JIlT'AN'l'S' EMPLOYEES CONSULTANT Bhall be responsible for ~loying or engaging all persons necessary to perform the servl. ces of CONSULTANT hereunder. No stibconsultant of OONSVLTk~ will be recognized by CtTY as SUCh; rather, all subconsultants are deemed to ~ employees of CONSULTJ!..NT. and it agrees to be responsible for their performance~ CONSULTANT shall give i~s personal attention to the fulfillment of the provisions of this Agreement b:t all of its employees and aubcCDsultants, if ~Y. and shall keep the work under its control. If any employee or s\ll:)consultant of CONSULTANT fails or refuses to carr.! out the proV'isions of this Agreement. or appears MOl 10 IJ1I 00'J0S26 . ~-. • ,.=:-,," ~"""' ...... ---_\:-:>:< ~ / ::.---.-........ ...-.;..~.-.~ to be incompetent or to act in a disorderly or impr~per manner, the employee or subcoDsultant shall be discharged imrnedia~ely from the work under this Agreement on demand of the Project Manager. SpCTION 11 -NOTICES All notices hereunder shall be given in writing and mailed, postage prepaid, by certified mail, address~d as follows: To CITY: Copy to: Office of thE City Clerk Post Office Box 10250 Palo Alto, CA 94303 Sarah Cheney, Project Manager Planning & Commucity EDvi~onment Dept. P. O. Box 10250 Palo Alto, CA 94303 To CONSULTANT: Brady & Associates. Inc. Attention of the Project Director at the ad4ress of CONSULTANT recited above S IiiiCTION 12 -jJITRREST OF CCNSI.fl.TAN1' In acoeepting this Agreement, CONSULTANT covenants that it presently has no interest:., and shall not acquire any interest. direct or indirect, financial or otherwise~ which would conflict in any manner or degree with ~~e performance of the services hereunder. OONSOLT.ANT further covenants that~ in the performance of this Agreement, no subconsultant or person having such an interest sbal.l be employed. CONSULTANT certifies that no one who has or will have any financial interest: under this Agreement is an offic~4 ox employee of ClTY. It is expressly agreed that in the performance of the professional se.cvices required under this Agreement, CONSULTANT, and any of its suhconsultancs or employees, shall at all times be considered independent consultants ami not agentl!!!l or employee. of CITY. SECTION 13 -INDEMNITY CONSULTANT agrees to protect, indenmify. acd bold harmless CITY. its Council members, officers~ agents and employees from any and all demands, claims. or liability of any nature, incl-uding death or injury to any person~ property damage or any other loss, caused by or arising out of CONSULTANT'S, its officers', agents', subcoDBultants· or employees' negligent acts, errors, or amisaioDB, or willful misconduct, or conduct for which the law may tmpose strict liability on CONSULTANT in the performance of or failure 1;0 perform its or their obligations undEr ttds Agreement. SBCTION 14 • WORXERS' COMPENSATION CONSULTANT~ by executiLg this Agreement~ certifies that it is aware of the provisions of the Labor Code of the State of 9 .. , o California which require ~very employar to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the pr~~i8ions of that Code. and certi!ies that it will comply with such provi9ions before commencing the performance of the work of this Agreement. SECTION 15 . INSJRANCE CONSULTkVT~ at its Bole ccst and expense, shall obtain and maintain, in full force and effect throughout the entire term of this Agreement, the insurance coverage described in EY .. !.libit lie·. attached hereto and made a part hereof by t~~s reference, insuring not only CONSULTANT and its subconsultants. if anv, ~ut also~ with the exception of workers~ compensation, employer'S liability, and professional liability insurance, naming as additional insureds CITY. its Council members, officers, agents and employees, a...-.,.d each of them, concerning this Agreement ~d the project. All insurance coverage required hereunder shall be provided through carriers with a.~ A. M. Best &: Company rating of A:X or higher that are admitted to do business in the State of California. Any and all subconsultant8 of CONSULTANT under this Agree:r,ent shall obt.ain and maintain, in full force and effect througbout the term of this Agreement, identi~al insurance coverage. with CITY Daliled as additional insured under Buch policies as requi red. above. 15 . 2 WDENCE OF CO'lIiRl\Gil Certificates of such insurance, preferably OD the fo~ provided by CrTY. shall be filed with crrf concurrently with the execution of this Agreement. The certificates shall be subject to the approval of the Risk Manager and shall contain an endors~~ent stating that the insurance is primary coverage and will not be cancelled or altered by the insurer except after filing with the City Clerk thirty (30) days· prior written notice of such can-ce.llation or al teratioo. and that the City of Palo Alto is named as an additional insured except in policies of workers' compensation, employer's liability.. and professional liability insuraace~ Current certificates of such insurance shall be kept on file at all times during the te~ of this Agreement with the City Clerk. 15.3 NO LIMIT OF LlAaTL!ty The procuring of such required policy or policies of iJlSurance iSha!! not be coostrlJed to limit CCNSULTANT~s liability hereunder nor to fulfill the indemnification prOVision and requirements of this Agreement under Section 13 hereof. Notwi.thstanding said policy or policies of insurance, CONSULTANT shall be obligated for the full and total amount of any damage .. injury, or loes caused by the services performed under this AgreemeD.t~ including aftez the Agreement has terminated or expired. 10 • sHCTrON 16 ~ AUDITS CONSULTANT agrees to perrni t CIT¥ to audit" at. any reasonable time during the term of this Agre~~nt and for three (3) years tbereafter, CONSULTANT"e records pertaiaing to matters covered by this Agr~ement~ CONSULTANT further agrees t~ maintain such records tor at least t:hree (3) years after the tenn of this Agreement. SRCIIQN 17 ~ bGREKMKNT BINPTNG The tena~, cover~nts, and conditions of this Agre&~nt shall apply to. and shall bind, the heiz's .. successors, executors, administrators, assigns" a.nd Bubcons111tants of bot.h parties~ S RCTION ] 8 ~ WAIVERS The waiver by either party of any breach or viola.tion of any term.. covenant. or condition of this Agreement. or of any provisions of any ordinance or law. shall Dot be deemed to be a waiver of any other term. covenant. condition, ordinance. or law or cf any subsequent breach or violation of the same or of any other term, covenant. condition, ordiLaIlce, or la.... The subsequent acceptance by either party of any fee or other money which may become due hereunder shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any preceding breach or violat.ion by the other party of any term, covenant, or cooaition of this Agreement or of any applicable law or ordioance. SECTION 19 -COSTS AND ATTQRNEYS~ FEES The prevailing party in any action brought to enforce the terons of this Agreemf!nt or arising out of this Agreement may recover its reasonable coets and attorneys~ fees expended in cCilIlection with such an action from the other pa~ty. SBCTION 2 Q -NO p!PLIEp WAIVER No payment, partial payment~ acceptance~ or partial acceptance by CITY shall operate ae a waiver on the part of CITY of any of its rights under this Agreement~ SBCTION 21 -NrnmIBCBMNATION· PENALTY 21.1 DtJTX OF CONSULTAm' No discrimination shall be made in the employment. of persons Wlder this Agreement because of the age. race~ color, natIonal origin, ancestry, religion, dieability~ sexual preference or sex of auch person. If the value of this Agreement is, or may bel Five Thousand Dollars {$5.000) or more, CONSULTANT agrees to meet all requireraents of the Palo Alto Municipal Code pertaining to nondiscrimination in. employment, including complet:ing ~th.e ·Compliance Report--Nondiacrindnation Provisions of City of Palo 11 MOllO 1)'11 ClO10526 .. ----_.- ':", . o o Alt.o Cont::r:acts· on the form furniElh::!:d by CITY, attached hereto as !DL~ibit '0' and made a part hereof by this reference. CONSULTANT agrees that each agreement for services from independent pr~iders shall contain a provision substantially as follows: • Provider shall provide CONSUL'l'All'l' '\Io~i th a certificate ~tating that he (or she) is currently in complia.nce with all Federal anc State of California laws covering nondiscrimination in employment; that he (or she) will pursue an affirmative course of action as required by the Affinnative Action G~idelines of the City of Palo ~to; and that he (or she} will not discrirr.ir ... .a.te in the e:nplo}"rnent of any perso!l under this contract because of the age~ race, color, national crigin~ ancestry~ religion, dis~bility; sexual preference or sex of such person.- 21" 2 PEN.ALTX' FOR DISCR WNATTON If CONSULTANT is found in violation of the no~iscrimination provisions of the State of California Fair EmplO}~t Practices Act or similar provisions of federal law or executive order in the performance of this Agreement~ it shall thereby he found in material oreach of this Agreemer:t.. Thereupon~ CITY shall have the power to cancel or suspend this Agreement, in whole or io part, or-to deduct from the amount payable to CONSULTANT the sum of Twenty-Five Dollars ($25) for each person for each calendar day during which such person was discriminated against, as damages for breach of contract~ or both. Only a finding of the State of california Fair Employment practices CODmission or the equivalent. feder3.l agency or officer shall constitute evidence of a violation of contract under this eecti~u. If CONSULT~~ is found in violation of the nondiscrimination provisions of this Agreement or the applicable affirmative action guidelines pertaining to this Agreement~ CONSULTANT shall be found in material breach of this Aqreement. Thereupon; CITY shall have the power to cancel or susPend this Agreement ~ in whole or in part I or to deduct freer, the amount payable to CONSULTANT the sum of Two Hundred Fifty Dollars ($250) for each calendar day during which CONSULTANT is found to have been in such noncompliance as damages for breach o! contract~ or both~ 5 HCAIQN 2,2 -AGRBEMENT CONTAINS ALL UNDBRSTANDING£:.. This document represents the entire and integrated agreement between CITY and CONSl.l!.lTANT and supersedes all prior nEgotiatione~ representations, and agreements~ either written or oral. This documeDt may be amended only by written instrument, signed by both CITY and CONSULTANT. 12 ., : , ":"'-.. --" :' "" ~ ". 1_~ SECTION 23 -C.QVjlRNING Ll\W This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the Stat,e of ~lifornia... IN WITN!:SS WHB..UOF, the pa::-ties l" .. ereto have executed this Agreement the day and year first above written. AT'!'EST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO I'ORM: S&nior As$t. City Attorney APPROVED: Assistant City Manager Director of Finance RiBk Manager APPROVED AS TO COI'lTBNT: Director of Planning and ccmm.mi ty Environment Att.acbments: JDatrBrr • A· : EXHIBIT ·8·: BXBIBIT • C· : EXHIBIT ID·: CIT\" OF PAL'() ALTO Y..ayor ~:~~~~~~~~----ItS:~(~4;td~~:....+ __ _ SCOE>E OF SERVICES AND TIMR SCHlIDllLE COSTS INSURANCE NONDISCIUMINATION COMPLIANCE FORM 13 ., STATS OF CALIFORNIA ~w.A~ COUNTY OF ...7 ElY'r ..... BS. o :-:~<-, -tct - ... ,; .;~. On 3M II·""" \2. • 1991. before me," ~ . 9,o!lJi'm, a Notary Public in <ind for said County and StatJe. personally appeared ,she\\.o e,fnA !~ • personally known to Il".e to be the person whose name is scribed to the within instrument ~~d ackno'''''ledged to me that: he/she executed the same in his/her autborlzed c5pacity~ and that by his/her signature on the instrument. the eotity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument. IN WITNESS WHEREOF I I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. ,r-. ExllIb!t A Scopo at Soroca ud T'-Sdoed.1e Palo A.Uo Com,.. til 1ft Pilia ~ 1lII,.a Report • • • Port L WORK PROGRAM This _ OIltlln<$ the worI: program the Comullan. Ieam will follow 10 compicte the Palo Alto Compteb<mM: PIAu ("pIAu") Tedmical ElemeD" aDd Muter ErR. A 'UIIIIIW}' of the ~ Sc:ope of Work is shown in Tab!. 1. Consultant will ba>'e _oility for <OOrdinatin& the effort> of the """ultanl team. Background malcriaJs, ocbeduling. CiJy guid...,., IltcmaliYes, cumula~ a>oditioD asswnptions. scope revisiom. IUId other inromw~ ?"J! be cJiqemjDlled by Coosul .... ' in • timely nwmer. In oddi<ion, aU consultant liIldiDgs, """""""'!ioas, 0IId """"""'" wi1I be ooordinJted, _ 0IId edited by ComuItonl In IIdditiou to ocbeduled ~ ";!h the City. David Early. Project Direotor. shall communicate .. needed ., JqUIat .Dd frequent intervals .. i!h the City regarding the progr ... of the tee1>nkaJ reporli and M .. ter ErR 0IId major issues to be!ellOlYed. Mr. Early will 0100 be ruponsible for coordinating with the $ubcoosuJtanl team:, ensuring that deadlincs are met and that 'WOCk is :sound and tboruugh. Sbeila BraJy, Presidect,. will (;OQ.Su]( with the Project Manager and otber Oty reprcaeotalive$ on a rCg1Jiar basis, will be availabk: for conslll tation with the project manager al any time, aDd will review .aD -work products .submitted to the Qty. She will be actively inYo)ved in the l-isua! impact. land use and policy a:ssesa.meDIS, and revjcw of lne recommendations and firxfings or I be technical elements and Master ErR. EXHmrr~rE OF WORK PALO ALTO CO~ENS1""E ~l..AN EJrrl\o1RONMEHTAL [MjI"cr RE"CJRT o Table: 1 WORK SCOPE SUMMARY TASK A PROJECT MANAGEMENT COMPltF.HEKSJVE I"'J..AN I"JU..sE U TASK 8. 2- " 4" TASKC. L Z. '" TASK O. L Z. '- 4" '" "" ," a 9" lQ "" 12. 13. 1," TASltF. PROJECT INrJ1ATKJN Sian""!''''_ CiIy...,.,. o.a Gathering lad R~ InitiI!: Coat.-aa BACXOROUND TECHNICAL R£PORTS """"~Report AlI Ouolity ~ Report ___ R<pan DESCR!PtlON Of" SElilNG ..........-~ '-""" !Joe _ ..... T~._ "'"" Air a..Iry c-..--­~"'-a..Iry .. ""' ... &.--Satioy Public Scmc:a. ad Uliitie$ Opoo Spoo<"'-­ Vqetalioa aod Wildlife "'"""" R_ ~00aIirr-~ EXISIDIG SETIlNO SUMMARY IoIEMOIW<DUM OOMPltEKDlSt'YE PUN rliASE m TASZ. G. PRo,rr::-CT DESCRIP1lON TASC K SCOPING MF..E11NGS 2 EXH!B;i SCOPS OF WO"lK PALO ALTO COMPl<.EHEl'lSI'tE I"1..AN ENVIRON'MENI'AL ~I" .... cr REPORT Table Ic~ JANUARY 12, l\Xl4 'i'.~l L 2- '­.. 5. 6. 7. "­•• 111 IDENTIF1CATION OF IMPACTS AND MITlGA nON MEASURES _ Coonlication 11. 12. 13. 14. TASK 1. TASE It. L 1. .. .. 5- o. TASJ< L. 1. 2-.. TASlC W. L 2- '- TASK N. LooO u.e Popu---. ~ .... N'*< Air <MI<y ""'*""' ... --""""" ---Quatity J'ubtic IIJIi &WdlrQlE:QtII S&kty Pubic SetYi;a; _ UIii;D ""'" Spooo ... -..... vqetaUoa IUd Wik& 00lunII .......... v .... o.-y ... llaip> AL'IER.NA11VES ANALYStS Cl!QA a:JN<llISIONS Grownb Jr,1 4 a....-~ u __ ""'"'" Sbcrl Tam LIIca ~ U:q: Term Produa:!Wy spa.-~~ "'-'" _l<al .. be""""" DRAFT IoIASTEP. FlR PREl'AAA noN .Admii:jaJlllNe 'Dn:t ..... E1R ~Da6m1l """'" lkn>c Drd ....... FlR fINAL WASTER EIR PREl'AAAnoN ~ .. ~ AdzilinbUIItIw:: Ha8I w..cz.. EIR __ EIR MrIlGA110N MONITORING PROGRAM COMPREHENSIVE PIAN PHASE n TASK II. PROJECT INITIATION 1be ,tan-up period Villi im."OM:: meeting wi~b Oly staff, gathering and reviewing mforrnation and contacting ioterestcd partit:;S. The Notice of Preparatioa will be oomplcted by the City. 3 , EXl-II&rr ~COf'E or WORt.:: I"AL.O ALTO COMPREHF..N'SI'VE PLA.'" ENVlRONMENTAL rM1"A.CT REPORT An initiBl Jtart·up sessLon will be held with Oty .starr to identify concerru and issues.., revie"-* in..~tjOl1 needoi and discuss expectation!' for the e!lvironmen:al pror.c&S ,00 producls. The &t.a n-up session v.il.l be beld at the City at a time requctod by t})I: Projecl Manager, prcMded that lueb a lime can be reasonably acoommodated by the eo",.ltaDL Co1l5tJ.h.ant', ItafT wm drive and photograph Palo Alto to identify existing. oonditiOM. Each OODSultant team iDCII'Ibtr "",ill conduct the oecessarj field wori:: 10 ruDy document the relevant is.sua. Existing data and anaI)oa .pplicable 10 the plAnniog .rea w;U be conec:ted and evaluated. Comultant wiD p~ .. list or doc:umentl in our current library applicable 10 the pmj«IlO ...m duplication. Data gathering w1ll include EIRs on ocher projocIs am! 8!IY odditiocal pi ... or "udies wbicb moy pr<Mde existing CODditions infonnatioo on the area. In addition to EIRs.. plam and Ie<hoi<aI n:p<lns, !be followin& ioConn.atioa w1ll be avBll.bIe from the City: • Qus.li1y copies ol the two original base m'p' and the maps from .be Plan. The quality 0[ graphics ill the EIR w1ll depend 00 the quality ol !be base maps provided. AI:riaI pboloL Topograpbk: ""'P' 81 • teUOOabie ocaIe. EDstiDg lAnd we ioConnatioo. Existing land use deoignatioa m,p'­ Public 5Crvices infarmlitioo. Drainage and Dood pIAn map'- Traffic information for tile No Project and No OJange 1.0 Existing Conditions altemativc:s. l..ist and map of unrcinfOrt:ed masonry buildings in Palo Aho. 4. Wliol eo.1acts Consultant wiD contact resporu.ible or potentiany affected agencies, groups and indMduab to identify iuu:es reg;'!Idi.og the tecbnical elements: and fhe Plan. In 4 D E.XHIBrr~SCO"E OF WORK PALO ALTO CO~.pR.£l4ENSrvE PL'\l"II ENVlRONMEl'ITAl IMPACT REPORT JANUARY 12, lQ9.4 addition to t..'te City':'! Planning, Public Works, Transr.lOrtation Division, Utilities., Police, F .... re and Recreation starr. "'"e ';11 contact olru:r agencies. with potential environmental ooncems including adjl~nt cities, the Regional Water Quality Control. Board. the Bay Area Air Quality Management District, the Santa Oara VaDey Water Dis.ericu. and the Joc.al school dis.tricu.. and any other agencies. TASK C BACKGROUND TEClINICAL REPORTS ConsuItal!lt will provide teehnkal btlckground reports for Phase H Policy and Prognm de>oeklpment 00 the foTIowing topla: Nome, Air Quality and Seismic fbz:ards. 1he toc:hn:k:at background reports 'WiU be liiuft1dent in format and content to form th;:: basis lor the tochnk:aI elements in the Plan as wen as the Existinz Setting sections ill the Maoter ErR. 1. Noise L Noise MeasU1"Fm!mt ntingworth and Rodkio will make DOile mcasurcmc::qt& ., IS reprelo:U.IIlrve locations alone the major highways., primary uteriaIs. the ntilrood and olher key lites to quantify current no;'" IcYcb and to provide the DOO<SSI'Y iDConnationlo calibrate the u.mc noise pre<fictio!l IIIOdeI. foe Palo Alto. Measuremenls wiD be tUen at the sites ,.1>.ere _""iDg was done in 1\187 for the Citywide Land Use and Transportation SIUdy EIR. Tbese measure_Is wiD provide inConnadoo OD aoy chang .. in noise levels at these Ioc:atiom (for ....... p\c, behlnd the ~tly oonstruc:ed 00UDdw0lJ 00 I6ghwoy 101). Tbese meaauremect> wiIJ be 5upplemeDtcd by .......uemcnls that IUinporIh " Rodkin, the ICOUliticaI cnginee<ing <ubcomuI!anl, ha _tly completed aIoog the Willoo< Rood corridor, pi", 'i1)' odditiooal ..,., meuuremeu .. agreed upon with !be City. Tbese measure"""," .ha~ be 51lIficien: to quantify =t and projected community noise. levels as required: by California State: taw (Govemmcnt Code Section 6S3(2) and guidelines prepared by the Stole ~ 0( Noise ControL b. Noise Coel.lion;. Government Code SectioD 6S302{f) ""lWres th., the NOise Element lbow noise IeYels. £or all major noise sources in tenns of either the community noise equivaleDt level (eNEL) Of day/nigbt average ooisc level (L".). Using the traffic volumes proYidc:l by the transportatioD """,ullant (Cambridge S)~tem.ati<s, Icc.) correlated with (he noise measurements oonducted in Task. C l.a.. above, the ~tion of notse contours akmg the major highwaY'> prima.'J arte:riats and the railroM1 will be ~culated for existing conditioll$. The rt:$~lts of these calculations will be shown both tabuIar!y and mapped on tfte City's GIS base maps.. a .. described beklw. Th~ 5 •. ' "'-. EXHIBIT ~OPiO OF WORK PALO ALTO COMPRFJ-IENS1VE PlAN EN'VlRONMEN"TAL lMPACT REPORT o -~" . 2~" -:: "", •• --",",', . _/":,' :'''::'\'',,-- ',f.' -' ';':_'-.' ,~. JA.N UAct Y 12. 1994 cakulalioru. shan be S\l!TlCic.n1l0 quantify CUfTCllt and projC'.Ct~ communi!), DQise Jevcls as required by CalifOrni3 St.at-e Law (Governmenl Code Section 65302) and guidelin~ prepared by the Stale Offace of Noise Con trol. e. Noise Contour Maps. Norse c.ontour maps will be drawn for c:Usfiag oondilions mapped 01) the Citfl GIS ~ maps. Hlingworth &:. Rodkin,. Inc. ...-ill draw the noise coclOUTlii on reprodUClbJe base maps from whicb the aty could digi:.i:ze the amtours. d. Evaluats Noise Conditions. lllingwortb &ad Rodkin, subconsultanl, 'Will Kk:ntify the noise scale thai is most appropriatl:: (or usc in the Noise Eemeot; identify majo< JK>ise IOUrces; and provide a brief descrip.ion of IWUIDPWm. methodology, IJld noise: measurement results; define ac::ccptabte stau:1ards. fOt land usa. iDcIucfmg lrtdoo! rtOO O\A.tdoor use areas m accordance with Title 24 oC the California Code of Regulaticns (the California Bui!<!ing Code) """ U,S" DepllItJDellt of Ha",,,,, ami Urbon Development requirc:men .. ; identify and prioritbe Daise scmiUYe ~ .identify areas requiring noise mitigation; and identify feasible alternative mitipt10n measures,. level of noise auenuatioa provided by each, and rero<lllllC<lded implementation m=" e. PrCJHI'£ Policies and Guidelines. Draft policies and ooUe and land l6e oompatibilily guidelines ..ru be prcpare<llO< considera.ion for inclusioo in !be Noise EIomcot oC the Pial>. Aleaa wilb significao. noise problems ... ilI be higblighu.! and po.eutW .pproacbeo Ie improvins the noise CDVirorunen • ..ru be praerued A critique oC !be cdstin, Noise Element and the City'. JK>ise amlrol programs and reaJmmeoded alternative approacbc in the noise bad<groUDd report ..ru be provided t Noise Bac!;ppund R~ A noise bacl<grouod report, containing the above infu:matic" .oo descnbing the _tic..., methodology and ~, res"lI. will be prepa:cd. go Noise Element Dlinroorth and Roo.ric wilJ assist City ltaff in preparing the Noise Element of the Plan in accordance with St..1te req:uiremcnts ror such Blome",," The Noise EieIlleIl' sban be based OIl ,he Noise Bacl<ground Report and poIicieo developed during Phase II of tbe Plan Update, 011<1 ,h<1" iocJudc cristing noise conditions and projected nQise conditions under the Plan. 1. AIr Qaall'1 a. .Existi~, Condititlrls. The tasks req\Jirecj to comple te this portion or the bacJcg:round report are; 6 EJO-ll.a SCOfE:. OF 'WORK JANUARY 120 1W4 PALO ALTO COWP-EHENSIVE p~ ENVIRONMENTAl IMPACT REPORT Prepare a discuuion of the local and regiunal meteorological innaences on air quality in Pate AJto and the region in gener.L Summarize oisting air qlJality standard'i a:ld regulations !hat may affoct land use planning, 5ummari2.e the natllfe of importtnt pollutanls and theIr poter.tu.1 c-fTecti. on humal'l. bealth and welfare. Document t:listing majcr sources of air poDU.titJD in Pale Aim, incl:ading JJ'JObik .IOU.JTI::CIi, stationary IOUJ'Ca. and 50urta of toxic air pollutants.. Identify serWllve recepton for air poUullmts such as bospita!s and <X><lV1Il=t home.. n..ai!le the currect regional planning efforts '0 achleve 'be State and federal ambknt air quafity ... cd",d in ,be Bay Area, .cd d_ hew these progra.-m might inllw:moe: rbe Plan. Summarize pasl and presenl .oif quality based upon the monitoring DeIWOdc maint&inc:d by the Bay Area Ail QuaIi!y Mooagemec' District. \hing cia .. from the BAAQMD moniloriDg network, BAAQMD .an.Jysis oi Bay Area l>ackgroond levels, and cia .. ,.,baed duriDg !be 1985-1986 .. udy 0{ CIIIbO!1Il1<lC101ide IeYeIs within Palo Al!c, prepare COIlto .... of baokp"oomd k:>cla of caroon ~ wi'hin Palo Alto. Prepare _ faaon to .na.. use 0{ !be baclcground IeYeIs in future yean. b. Plan Mq Qoioe:&. The occe:uary steps in ptoYiOmg thk informalion an:: Idealify _ting goals. pollc:ia ,cd action >latcmenlS ooctaine<l within the: lacd usc, circulation or othc:f _IS 0{ the: Plan that will bcnc:!it oir quality, and de.aibe bow thc:y will reduc:c: emissions Provide • lia 0{ poficic:>, pia: and ....,., "''''mcolS appropriate: foc """'""""tloo for incl>.>oioo in the: Plan. 1bc:se coaJs and pollc:ia >haD e:over a number of differing scates., refio::ting the differing soles of air quafity il$ues (IocoJ. aty~, regional, global). Provide a wri'tc:l dh<:ussion acd analysis 0{ the: appropriateness and rea»'bIlil} 0{ each measure if adopted as pan 0{ the Plan. Provide Iccl>nicaJ assistanc<: to City .",IT in preparing the Air Quality section of Ute Clmetvition Element of the Plan. Cons.ultant will emphasize developing practicat air qllaliry mitigation measures that will. help improYe air quality, that can be required tbrougb tbe project review process., a ad that arc-appropriate to the scale of devdoplDCfit anticipatc:d under the Plan. 7 EX}IIa.rT ~i"E OF WORt::: P'ALO ALTO COMPREHE!tSIVE PlAN ENVlRON'MENT"J...1Mf'AC! REPORT 3. Seismk Haurcls I. GeqlogiclScismic Hazards Mam;. o {1) Data Compila1ion. F~rtinerJ t geologk maps and doc ull'.ents will be com piled end 'CV3luated by W.:.lliam Conon and Associates prior 1.0 mrut into the City" GIS system.. In addidon to m3tenal provided by the at)!, publicly svailable maps and repcru fro", the U.s. Geological Survey .nd California DiYis.ior.s of Mines .md Geology pertaining 10 local and regiol1a.] geoiogi< amditiom .nd hazard> will be oompiled and r<Mewed. (2) Mli;p Preparation. .o\fter the evaluation, specjfic inCortnation will be selected by William Colto~ and Associ! tcs ror mapping. GIS mapping is not i.nclt:ded in this scope cl setViccs. Maps ... m be prepared 00 iingle abed Qty b3se maps depicting the: fonowing information, some of whicb may be combined on a single sheet Geologic and Soil< ConditiollS. l<><al and Regional Earthquake Faults. Alquis'.PrioIo Special Study ZcDC$. ulDds .ubjealO Soil Fallure (mduding liquefaction, .ubsideocc, landslides. eIc-). Lands with High Seismic: Rislo'Geotogic Consuain' Map. Consolidated Risk Map. b. Draft Gsplr£hnical ~od Repor! !DGBR). (1) Descriptio. 0( Geoioejc GondiooM. lnclud~ in the DGBR .,.JI be • written dacriptioo of the pagic COndiliom in Pata Alto, iDcluding • description and _, 0( an:as potenlillDy affected by hazards such os: stope insU!bilitJ. surface faclt ruplUre. :seismic grou.nd shaking. tsunami, seicbe, bay front dike failure, dam failure, excessive cfO$tcn and ~mentation, and contaminated soU and ground Wlter. Geologic and geotechnical hazards will be dtsclJ$$Cd in the 'Wrilten text aDd iJOf1Iaycd on maps. (2) Seisrr.ic Hnanh EyaTvaticn. Fo! eacb major haz.ard. Gitcria WIll be provided by William ColtOD and J\ssociales for th(". es.tablis.hmcot of acceptable and unao:;.c.ptable risk.. MitLgation alternatives will be KlentifllCd for the City to evaluate with TC!ipect £0 current and future residc:r.l'i., and may .inetude further study. buikfing rode modifications., impfO'.-ement of publLc infrastructure, and recommended' land usc: alternatives. 8 EXHIR~ SCOPE OF ,,",ORK PALO ALTO CO,..trREHE~ISM PI.J.N ENVlROtlMENTAL [N¥AC!' REI"ORT J,t..NUARY 12. .. 1994 A qualibatrve evalualion or unrei~ro~d masonry structlire\, as wen as me85UJ"C1 Lo mitigate damace associated with pctenlial £ai1ure of theso: structures. in future earthquake; will be provided. (3) RegulR!icn:; and Mitinlior. 01:' Seismic: Haumls. A summary of the State of California's regulations pertaining to seismic hazards, evaluation of geotecltnical aspects of tile: City's emergency fC$ponse plan, and review 0( the OOY'I current gootcchnical =iew onIinan= .nd pmccss will be prtMded Baed on uu. review, and lbe gcologk and ptechnieal database, recommended modiflCaOOm In the Oty'l existing and proposed seismic hazards mitigation 1IIC!I5Ule5, including lbe development review proceu. will be prOYidcd. (4) Iechnic8l Comultillilion. Technical support roc the evaIuZllioo 0( evacuation mutes, peak water supply, road dirnensjoo criteria {minimum widlhs md clearaocea;), and infrastructure improvemenLs associated with sc'ismie safety issues will be provided. e. FiP.l Qmterlmical Ba!;kgmund ROllO!! (FG!lB). After review by the aty Iliff, the gcolecImiaJ ... bromultant wiD prepare • FGBR that iDcoq>orates COGIlIICDts and modir"",Uons that may arise from discussioa .,jib !be aty. The I'UBR will [nclucle !edInkoI information provided by Ooy .tBff addressing OIbor Safety Element issues (e.g., flood hazards). cI. Plan Ggnsyltation. Willi ... Gg""" and Asoociates will advise Oty stBff as Ilaff prepares !be ~ Sarety Seo:tion of tbe Plan. William Cotton and Asaociates will =iew!be -.. and provide "'UCStiocs for modifications TASK D. DESCRIPTION OF SE:l"IThGS Consultant will summarize existing condiarms in Palo Aho ror use in the planning prooeas. Thi> Tts!; will (","1\ in !be Phase U Tecbniea1 Me~tlm.. The Exii;~ng Setting information will also be used lIS lbe existing setting sectioD 0[ the Master ErR One camera-rc-&dy copy of the Tecbnica.l Memocandum will be submilted 10 the City fOf reproduction and distnbution. 9 ._-,---.,-, "1' '. EXHIB;T A~Oi'E OF WORK PALO ALTO COMrREHE.,,"SI'VE PLA. ... ENVIRONMENTAL rMi'ACr REPORT 1. latergoWTDllltDta.1 Coon:!iaation · ',' o C.oos.u1tant will descn"be key elements of pla.,s and policy documenu of State, regkm~ and adjacent Jurisdictions, ir.c[udi ng the Santa Qara Coun ty General Plan, RcgiooaJ Tr.uls and Palh Plan, City TranspoClation PhIl)."), San Francisco Bay Plm. aod the general plans for the cities and tOWT.s of Menlo Park, East Pakl Alto, Mountain Vte'N. Los. AJtos, Los Al~ Hills a!1d Pmlola Yaney. 2. LueS Use Consulla::u will descn"be the existing land use dOiignation.s. from lhe 19fOl--1995 Comprebensive Plan. Existing !aDd use patterns in Polo Allo ... ill be described. Acfjaceof jurisdictions wall be CODtacted to idcntiry proposed dC"Veklpments.. All known projects. (10 the boriz.oo in Palo Alto and adj.acel'l_t commlJn,ties witl be d .... cribed. The eJditiag population, employmect and hous.lng chnacteris:tics in Palo Alto will be d<&aibcd by the Com.lta., based upon information provided by the City, iIK:Inding tbe 1990 Hoosing Element Consultant will show numbers of existing and projected boosing .oilS by type and affordability. and existing and projected populatioo by household Ilze al"ld inccme. Buildoul projections will be <Xlmpared to the ABAG projections from tbe 1990 census. D3'0 will be IUllllI\&tized in tables and graphics. Consuitant w-JI wori: "With City Transportation Division .staff to develop acceptable formats and to alSCUSS critical issues. BiliCd upoo informatioll provided by City Transportation Diviskm staff, existing cin::ubtion, parking aDd' tr.tffic condltior..l, including traffic volumes, ir.terleCtioil capacities and levels or &elVice, will be desaibed CIty ltart' will provide this information in a fcnnal thot can be ~ as a draft Coupler in the TedmDca1 Memorandum. S. Noise Based ('10 information prepared by il!inp'O:th snd Rod1cin, acoustical el!gineering 5ubconsutta nts. in Task C, Comu 1 tant Will characterize current noi-;c: conditions, iocluding major noise sources. 10 ~ EXHlBltiI-SCOPE OF WORK PALO Al.TO COMPREHENSIVE PlAN ENVtRONMENlAl_ l1oIPAC"! REJ"ORT '-Air Quan 1.1 · '~-' , --' f JANUARY tl. I~ Based upon ir.(onnaHotl in the Air Qu2Ht) Background Report from Task C, Consultant ,.ill describe iocaJ and regktft!ll climate, meteorology and topograpby as they affect air poU\Jtion. Consultant ~i!i d'laracleriz.e lbe climate and meteorology of the Palo Allo Mea, his.toricaJ air quality data and current efforu 10 attain State and federal alr Ql.Iality :stlmdards; document existing major sources. of air poDutioo including mobile sources, statiooary sources and sources of toxic: poHu!allls; identify sensitive r~lOrs :such i&:S bospitak, oouvaI<s<eol 00""" and oensilive =ps; describe the 1991 &y Area Ckal1 Air PIon. and bow it migM influence the Plan; describe the 000- attainment ,tatus cC Ihe study area WIde: State and federal lcgislatioD; and identify any air-<j.Li8lity relaled constraints in legislalion a:)J~ming DOD­ atWnment planning: and ttanspxta60n planning. Population and employment projections for the study area will be: compared tu those used in preparation of the 1991 Bay A",. Ckan Air 1'fan. lIoseci on the ~tecbnicaI Background Report from Task C, geology and seismic hazards of Palo AI", will b< described, including bllZlUds pr=nted by unreU!f6lCC<IlIIOSOJUY buiJdinss. The ~ selting "ill include identi6ca1ion of oIope ."'bill,! aDd seMUc bazacds .. in8 topographic. soil and roult mapL Emezgcm:y .... pomc plans and S"'tc regulatiom regarding >cimtic _willbc_ The h)'drologieal selling will deocribc major wal'!<o1mCO, lIoocling patterns and groundwater basim in Palo All<>. The typeo and locatio .... of ensling groundwater c:cntam!naticm. will also be described in relatioll to proposed Iaad ut.es and responsible !gencics for O"o--enecing clean-up activities will be summari=!. ,. I'Ioblk oad EaYlroame .... 1 Sorely The locations of geologic a::ld other natulaf b.wuds arCiiS.., fire bazards., haz.a~ matertal:s 5itc:s and areas of higb ·bazard chemiCI'I usage wiD be identified by Consultant Potentiat impi!Cts. on existing land uses wJ1l be discussed. II " . I $ EXHIB:T A:. SCOPE OF WORK. PALO ALTO COMl'REliENSIVE !'(~ E~Om,t.E..!l(TAl... IMPACT REPORT /' 10, P10blk ~ aDd Ulilitieo o JANUARY l~ 1994 Public 5et'Vices and utilities wiD be described by Consultant in terms of existing capacity and plans for expansion Ot" improvements, Consulr..ant wi!! address water~ gas and electric supply and distribution, .'aStewater ccLleclion and treatment., &ehook, bospitab. fire protection, police services. storm drainage, Kilid wa:;.te disposal, lJbraries., para and recreation. 11, 0_ Spoce oDd ROCi .. tioII Booed "" infocmatioo provided b)-the CIy, existing par.., open 'P""" aDd =tioo _ within Palo Alto ";]1 be oumm,rized b)-Consultalll 12. Vq:ctatloa oDd Wildlife ExistiJlg biological reports cfcsaibin.! lbe biologkal rosau"", wi'hin Palo Alto will be prc::rvided by the aty for revic:w. Based on this information, Coosuitanl will SUlDIIIJJl'i:ze tbe cxistit!g ~ge".aticn and wildHfe in P ala Alto. Review and summary of existing ~t3tion shaD indude ~tudia prepared for the Palo Alto !Iay\mdt, foothill .. udico, major Ern's, IDd background biological c!.m from the p1'e'Iious ComprcheDSiw: Plan. Available exis'ing =pped biologjcol data oDd aerial pIlotognIpba, .. 1MiIabIe, wiI\ also be reviewed aDd ~ by Habitat Re5toraIioll Group. Habitat Rc.IOration Group, subooasuJlaDts, will .... is' 'he eonsultan' by querying <be California Na,ura1 DrY=i1y Ca .. base (CNDDB) for infonoatioo ~ <be preseoce of rare, _ ond eodangered species. The C&Iifumia Natlvo Plant Sociely'. Im=IOrJ of Rare aDd Endangered Plan .. will abo be ~ The do" from tbeoe aistiog report. will be used 10 eoIabIi:;b <be cdrting COJldltions for lbe enWoomenlal documcnl 'The Ir, mea.t wiG focus on identification of polentia! or blown biologically semiI::M: atea5 [Lc.. hAbital rot rare: 200! endangered species, botanical unique areas, promineIItimajor wetlands, and riparian eorridots). A wetlands dclioeation as per US. Army Corps of Engineers cri'eria will no! be cooducted; it i: anticipated that.some, btu DOl an 'W'Cliands will be identi6cd during this reoon.~nce-Iever work.. A narrative report will be prepared de$c:nbing tile vegetatton and WIldlife resources withic Pi'" AlIO. The n.a.rr:a.tive ';\Illi identify .species which are of particular c:onccm, such as Fedel'''~ Stale and IocaDy unique species. and tileir !ubi .. ". 12 EXH18rr~Sct)f'E OF WnRIC. PALO ALTO COMPREHENSIVE PUI.X f,ll.'ViKONMENT AL IN'',J'ACT REPORT 13. Cullunf Resoa.~ William Self A,.Uodales.. subc:onsultant. will consult with th~ California Archaeological IJ'I\'Cnlory. Northwest Information Center at Sonoma Stale Un.=versity 10 OO~lJCt I rec.ord search of the Plan area within Pale Alto. AIl ~ cultural resource surveys, known ~tOric oc prehistoric s.ites. and listed or eligible National Register of His.toric Paces properties within Ihe area of the record search will be identified. c..opia of applicable site records and survey reports vl'ill be made as de.tern;ined DCC:CS&ary. and prc\'iolJ:!i surveys and lite Iocaliom wiU be plotted on USGS quod .beers or plans provide<! by .he City. State and Local bistoric: site iment.ories will also be reviewed to identify the pn:sence of ImY Itsted bistor.c Siles in the project .ndntty. Literature on tbe history, preniito<y and ethnography of !he are. will abo be coIISulled. A brief Cultural Resource Ass=menl Report will indud •• description of the prop:! and • discussion of !he rea.l .. of the record ... re~_ A short dcsc:ription of the prehislOry, biolOlY, Ind •• hnognophy of the Palo Alto area 'WiLl be presented. TabJ.c:a of known sites and pr"e\li.ous archaeological "'~'e)'S will be ~, upon _ remm"""""'lioos .. ill be based regarding ...... of poIcotiai ~ sensitivity wilbio Palo Alto. Any mop{sj depicting archaeological .. Ie Iocadons mIlS' be considered ronfidential and not ro. public diotributioo due '" !be potential ro. Y8IldaIism of "gnir"",n' cul.uraI properties. Consul...". will abo de.cribe sites of hiiOoricaI SInJ<tu"" and hislOrical dinricts (i.e., Profe.soMlle) base<I upon !he Ci'Y" biolorit:aI inven.OlY, and will discuss !he eIrectiYen= of ctistiDg Ci.y ordinances and review procedures intende<i to p<="< these cultural rao= 14. "'IsoaJ QU!Illty ADd Ilesip Aulysls The vilual setting 0( Palo AI", ,.,11 be deKnbcd by the eoosultant. County and Stale SCC!lic oonidors and roads eligible ror ICCtllC corridor designation ....m be kIeotified. Signilic>nt views of Palo Alto from majo< ga,,, .... ys, publle places and uavei corridors will be C'<>1Iluated in terms ()[' value (character. un)queness and duration) and vulnerability, Speci:lt visual attnoutes of P.alo Alto. S\.lcb as the Baylaods and viCW$ of the foothills, Wa11 be identified. !3 EXHIBIT A:~E OF WOII: K: PALO ALTO COMPREKENSM I"t..A1'oI ENVIRONMENTAL rMJ'AC..-'T REJJORT JANUARY 12, 19'W TASK Eo EXISTI."IG SETTING SUMMARY MEMORANDUM Co[Uullanl will prepare .. brier .summa!) of the techn tal bac:qrol.lnc! :rep.nts described: in Task: C (noise. air qoal:ly, and .1OOlech~icaT). plus randings of the existing coooiLioIl5 analyses (Ta.1k D}. The memorandum 'l1li11 i.denlLf) implications of the anaJysc:s. for Draft rlan policies and (or the EIR G.W:SSmenl The memorandum will emphasize use of graph.ics. maps.,. and tables ~o LTI'"..aoc: a report <hat is ea3j' 10 ,ead and ",ar be useful for policy maid!>&-One reproducoble ropy of the EmU", Setting Swnmary Memonoodum will be submitted to the City. TASK F. POLI~' CONSISTENCY MATiUX Cocsl.lltanl will devise a policy ronslstency matrix thai win be used 10 evaluate the intemal consistency of the Plan dudog Task L The droft matm .. ill be .ubmitted 10 the City during PIwe D for "'" by Lhe Cili2en5' ~ Committee in its creation and evaJua-oou of Plan policies. COMPREHENSIVE PIAN PHASE W TASK G. PROJECT DESCRII'OON Coos-.1ltant will receiYc lbe visioo, goals. poIicie>, program>, ~ ~ 10 Lhe laDd USC map. axn __ industrial bolldou. pmjecIioos, IlId housing bllildout projections for Lhe Piau from Lhe Cily .. the basis for preparing Lhe Em project clesaiptioa. Comultaol will __ dooumen .. and dere!op • p:ojea clesaipllon for Lhe PI.n EIR. The proj«t cbc:ripIiatl will iDclude cbaracterislico of the pM.ing area aod propoocd PIo. poIlcieL 'The description of the planning area will include Iocalional ~ jurisdictional aull:ority, over.JI deveIopmen' cbaracteristico, and tqioooJ and subregional selting. The 21)10 lim.frame for .he Plan and Lhe eumulal;'" and buUd<lut a.&.S:.wmptlons at years 2000 and 20W will be e.'qlIained. Teds.Aica.l models wed foc projeaing Ira!!;';, Iili qUality and noise condilioQs will be described. 100 community involvement process in Cormulatin, lhe Plan wilt be docurnenled. Pak. Alto ~5 regional .setting and subregional seUln& will be described. This information Vo't"U be provided in narrative. tabular "Old I"'pNc formats. Consultant will submit the project descriPltoO: lo lhc City for verification prior to impiict assessment. 14 , .. ' EXHIBIT'SCOPE Of" ~ rAIn ALTO cowpRl';liUf'SJ\."[ PlAN ENVm.OWMENTJU.. fNf'ACT R .... 1"O~T The Projc<t Desaipiion will I>< f«POA'd prior 10 romp\el;on or the Dr.ft Plan i",,1t Once the Projcd Dacriptiotl is oompleicd and approYOd b)' the City, it will >erve .. the _ for Lbo I!IR. H tbc PIon io e!unJ«! .fter the ProjC<t Dacription is approved, this ocope cl W<l<I< Md II>< projecl budgel will need '0 I><~ The four all<:nllllNes Ca No Projeo ahemotive, , No Funher Development altemau.e, and two otbet alternatives) will be: ciefinc:d by Coruul"'n' during thitusk. TASK IL SCOPING MEl:T!NGS ComuItanl (Shcila Brody aod Dnid &tty) will portic:ipate in two 500pin, """"'" foc the I!IR. After the scoping sessions, Consuitanl will review the commen~ received to ideoti/jl any changco r<quited ic the oeope cl W<l<I< ond prcMde ... ,,,,mary for the Master EIR appendix that explains the dispooition o(!be iuues r&ised in the ocmmcDt&. TASK L IDENTIFICATION OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MFASURES Ali sOOrt-tccm, Iong-I<nn .nd cumulative impacts cllbe projcd ,hall be identified and analy=t in the impact ..,.;" .. 01 the I!IR. The relatl-.... ~ 0< magnitude 01 >ud! impllC!$, thme that are ~I and those thaI .,., Ie&&­ than-oignifican~ shall also I>< ideotilied. A l>rief descriptioo oIlbe ba.is 0( sucIt detmnirultion and S!udb or anaIyIls perionDCd 0< """"'" OOlIS\lltal to reach the oooclusions shall I>< included. Recommendations .haIIl>< made '" minimize aO IigDirx:ant impaClS, • feasible. 1bc: probable cIT~ and 0i1'j ...... of feasibility regordiog the mitigation measures &ball aI&o be di!.cussed. Arty signlicanl itnpacti coused by the migitation measures shaD also be d"*ICUS."Sed. If no mitiption.s. arc feasibie or if mitigations proposed will Dot lessen an impact 10 .... -Ihan-<ignificanl 1ew:k, sue!> impaot(l) !han I>< OOIc:d II impacU which cannot be rully mitigated. The Coosultanl 1iVill distinguish belween mcasUr'CI, already incorponted into !.he Plan. 1. [ate:rccn'cr:aIMSIal Coordiutloa B. ~ Consultant will analyze the implications of both regior..al plam. and general pIa .. of 0<1)""'01 cities .nd San .. aara Cuunly for the City. The r.:port will s\l.tnmariz.e how the Draft Plan compraes with the major poIiciei and 15 EXHIBIT A; ~"'E OF WORK PALO AL TO COM".REH~SIVE PL"\JIoI ENVlR'ONMFJiTAL (MPAcr REPORT o JANUARY l~ 19'1J!4 rcquiremeDu or the various jurisdiclions.as they rdate: to ahc: piarmc:d physlcaJ changes. 1bc: Draft: P!an goals. polic.ies .and programs will be checlcc:d against State General Plan requirements. Any cor.f!tcts or aleas or noncompliance will be identified as wen as options for C'e'$Otving Lhem.. A polky table will be prepared that sh""" tbe relationship between the Draft Plan and po!i<:icI and plans of other jurisdictions. h. Mitigation Me!b'Ufes. Miti,Ration measures will be recommended to mo<Iify the D<aft Plan if !!<>CC$$U). to resolve Ill)' conflicts 0< areas 0( ~ with regional paM and plans of adjoining communitie$. Mca:swa that will improve intergovernmental COr'!fHClS. or that will reduce poIi<y iIIoomP",lbility "';th neighbor .. , jun.dictions "';U be identified. 2. LudU .. a. ~. The emphltsio 0( thlt effon will he to kIev.1ily changes in land use UJtdu the Draft Plan, and the oompau1>iUty 0( the projected growth and _ oCthe Draft Plan "" aStlr.a land \lSeL The proposed land use plan will be compared to the .,.;,ting land use oonclitions to idenlily potential <iIlatp. incItoding any proposed revisiollS 10 densitios and land use intensities, and Ibeir impacts on aurrouncling...... Concise oonclusions will be made IepnIing the impaeu o(!he Draft PI.n 00 overall land use, de1oelopm,m' octiYitiea and trends. b. Mitigation Measures.. Some potentiBJ mitigation measures could be tmtsitionaJ densities. pbased ;mMsion of infrastructure, development c/usIering 10 protect oaturai resourees, and estabrt5hment 0( neighborhood proj«l review pr<>czdllza. L Impacts. The ISSC&Iimcnt of housing and populatioo changes 'WIll define the parameters 0( fulu'" population growth and document probable shifts in the population distnbution .;nd bousing density within the planning area Proposed JY.>licies will be reviewed for tileir potential ~ffecl on existing housing stock and condiaton. aDd Ibe· afiOrdability 0{ new housing in Palo Alto and surrounding cities.. The amounu of market rate and affordable housing that could be bailt under u.e Draft Flan ailemBlives will be compared to the Gty's adopaal Housin~ EJemecl and the: Comprehensive Housing .JUfordability 16 .-..... EXHlsr85COI"E OF WORK PALO ALTO COMl"REHENSiVE PtAN E~Y'lRONMEJolTAL l~l'Acr REJ'o:.JiXr JA. .... UARYI2,IY904 £;[ra!cgy (CHAS) objecti1o"'fS and to ABAG's, "raj:-share" determination for Palo Alto_ Th-. efIocu or proposed Plan poucie3 "" employmen. leveb and .he jobslbousiog ratio will be assessed. 'The assumptions ma.je (or the cumulative and bcikI-oUl years (2000 and 2010) w:ill be tnlllSlalOd into change L., empkrjtneal and housing demand b. Mitigation Measurei. Mitigation measures wiU be developed to provide:: consistc::ocy between housiog, employment and other policies in the Draft Plan. Mitigatioo measures could include pi'OV'U.ioos to encourage desired type5 of empkrjtnea. and bolAing. The T~tion "",tion will be prepaied pri.".n1y by City Transportation Division staff. with review lind editing by the ConsultanL L ~,Impacts d=nbed by City Transpottation Diviolon .t.oJT will be edited and incorpo:ated into the EIR. The Consultant will review thio Itte"DleDt tOr coosistcocy v.ith other City Em aoaJ-;scs. The ComuItant wiD a&o review the Draft Cin:ulation Element pIs, poIicl<s and procrams foe onnsillency v.ith the LaDd Use Element and other Pi&l1 EIemen'" b. MiU..OOg Measures. City Transportation Division stall" will p!OYide eo.-Itant with mitiJation measurts [or traffic:, porting .ne! cimlIation imp;oets. ComuItout will ronsul' with TramportaOOn Division .t.oJT '0 help 10 ~ mitigation measu...res that can be of IIJa.JOimum use to the City, and that can be n:adiIy applied os conditio", or approvoJ [or speci& projecls. Consul:at!t will provide mitigaOOn measures 10 JlfU"ide consisteD<)' between the various plan clemen ... a.. ~ Projected noise contours (rom traffic and other SOUfCel; will be calcu!ated based Of! the Plan traffIC and land use projections fO{" 2000 aDd 2010. Noise contour maps for bot.h years Will be produced. Federal and Slate noise standards.. and any conditions within Palo Alto that violate these 'landanls, will be described. The d<af, poiiclei wiD be evall1lllOil for COO5Utency with commuCiity noi.sc compatibLnty .standards. Consisl-ency of the pt"OpCJ$Cd po(icies ",ith Noise Element requirements in the State GeDeI'1lI Plan guidelines will be ciIed;<d. 17 .EXJi1BIT ~PE OF WORK rALO ALTO COMPREI-iENSr.'E PLAN :E.NVlRO~1\L IMPA.Cf REI'()RT o JANUARY 12., 1m Thb aMlysis wili be b~ in large part OD the tra.ffLc projections for the EIR. wbkb ."ill be completed by the Olf. traffic SlJbcoru.u:lt2nt under .It separa:.e contract. An)' changes to the tramc projections after they are s'Ubmttted 10 Consultant will result in the n.eed foe a contract and budget amendment. b. Mitigation Mea~mres. Mitigation m~ures rould Lnclude ordinance sections rcquir.ng coastruction noise abatement and soundwarls for traDSporta~ion impacts on sensLtNc USCIri. a. hnp3Cts. Growth accommodated b)' the Plan could affect air quality CD the local aDd rqioow sca1es. The-ooosuitani tea rn WIll assess the &ocal and regiooal air qaoality cfI'ecu 0( the Dnft Pion and the .ltemat ..... The 5teps. in preparing this portion of the impact .assessment will include: Predict future increues in stalioruuy sources within Palo Allo based upon hmd use projcctioJ:ll md per-acre emis.sJon (acton foc industria.! !and uses, and per·rcudem:e cmwioa factor.i for residential iJSQ., • Prnj<>ct fulure rqiooal emissions associ.tled wi~" growth within Palo Alto uti1iz.ing the URBEMJS.3 compute, program .00 inf""",tioo on fuhue _ trip ,"""",<ion. • Predict futl.tte year totJ:1 carbon monoxide ronccnttatioos using the CALINE-4 modcl predicUoas 0( local con<entn'ions 01 select«! won;l­ c:a&e intersections -within Palo Alto. This .""",is will he bas<.! in large paIl 0' the trailk projections rPl" the E!R, wilicb will be completed bj' the O'Y" lrailk $ul>comullon' under • separ.ite """""",,,-Any c!langca 10 the lrailk projoeticr.s after they are .ubmllled 10 Consultanl will fC$uit in the no.::d for • cont • .!lCt and budget amendment. b. 1".-fitigatiop Measures. Mitigli.tion ~ Will be developed using BAAQMD', • Air Q-.J.ality IIlld U!ban De~n~ • docurnen~ wilicb incll!des guicieli.aa Cor assessing the: effe:ts of gCDe1'B1 plar.s, !lnd the $tale', GeDcraJ Plan Guidelinet, 'Which Iddres.5 the natuIe and scope or lir quality elements. 1~ GeoIDgk aDd Sc:ismic Hannb a. Impacts. 'The feasibility of meas.UIC$ included in the Draft Plan and current City developmenl review pr~ to mitigate geologic hazards. and limit expos.ure or [he population win be evaluated. Key geologic concerns will 18 EXH rB~ ~C';)PE OF WGRK PALO Al.TO COMPREHENSIVE plJ,N ;a..'VIFOflMENTAL IMPAcr IlFPORi JA.NUAAY 12, l~ --------------------------------- rdate to $lOpe .Lability. er~ion. liqlJefiable wtls and iictjye raoUl tS. The Safety EJement will be evaluated in terms of cnmpJisiKC wilh ~ State GCfK:ral Plan GuideUnes. b. Milia.tion Measures Mitigation me.asUf'e$ .:ou ld include ordinance pr0vi5iom; designed to pfe\lenl erosion and sedimc::ntal:or.. and land use designations proposed: to avoid CXpasl."1.g large numbers of people 10 major gcolog;c __ L H~ oad Wstor Quality .. ~ The cffedNcness of land we policie> in the Draft PlOD to limit property damage and """""'" 0( populations to flood hazards, rcd""" impervious ,~ B!ld sodimeulaUon., assure a potable water IUpply and ~ groundwa~ recharge will be eva!!J3Ied. Potential impacts of deYelopmeDI of OYedying parecl> uncle< the Draft PIaD on groundwater supply will be diricus5ed. The feasibility 0( the Drafl PIon policies in suppoctingl facilities; clean-up activities and prevent further rootaminalion will be ewluated. b. Mitigation Mmmtl. Poiicy chaD8e5 or action plaDli to mitigate hydrology and _ter quaJlty impacu will be proposed. ... ~ Potentia! impadS 10 fulo", _pment 0( land .... pennittcd in potential daager area. uncle< the Draft Plan wilJ be identified. The ability 0( the Draft Plan an:! =, City 0O'<financ:.:s and policici 10 protect citizens and property from _ute to h8DIdous materials and other Iwardous 1itua00m wilJ be diV'...... Sites identified in !be Draft Plan for rutwe deYelopmeot, _ are kno!m to be coctantina.cd, or which are in close prosimity to bigh-bazard areas, will be evalua.ed Crom I program-level perspective for polcDtial bazords. h. Mitigation Me&:!!urcs. Policy cltangcs or action paM to mitigate impacts 0( bazanlouo areas will be proposed. 10_ Publk __ ad Utllilles II.. Impacts. This 3S.SeSSlflent win o.aminc (he demand for various 5efvices ,nd utililie:i imposed by 'be projttlcd population and employmenl growth urn!er the Draft Plan :and Lhe prcjt-'l a!tematives. and the: aIY'S abillty to meet tbe.e demands. 19 EXHlBIJ A; Q.PC Of WORl; PALO JlJ..TO COMPREHENSIVE !'LA."4 bNtRONMENrAL rMrACT RSPORT JANtJARY 12. I'J'H b. Mitigation Mwurq.. Mlli,gatton measures which could tru:!ude policies. aDdior procedllf'Ci. ens:.uing the In.lIilability ar:ld adequacy of ihe;e service.i and facilities prior to i:u:~ of development permi:s will be proposed. a. ~ The demand for. and avail,bility c~ open .pace and [c:.en:atiooa! activities under Draft Plan impJementatiao wilt be:: com~r~ ,.itb cDsting provisiOIlS for recreation a.."ld OpeD space.. POlC!1tial impacts of dt."Yeklpment uDder the Draft Plan OIl recrealicm and open space (e.g., k>s:s 0( open spa<:e and chaoS" in lJ>e) will be di=Jssed. b. Mitigation Measure&. Policy changes or Bction plans to milig"le impacu 00 open .pace and r=eaticn will be proposed. 12. V,,1iu1I and WIldlife L ~ Iropacts on wildlife and vegetative r~u:rces resulting from the aJlowabic: fun bu;1d-o"" as contained witbin the Land Use Element 0( the Droft Plan, will be as=ocd. Impac<li will 1101 oeceasa,,1y be si<e-specific. bvt based on proposed demityiland "'" dc&ign'ticns. Po<eo'ially abort-'erm, Iong­ tenD and cumulative impacts will be qlWlutativeiy described. Impac<li will be identified .. to Je.el oC &i~ h. :M::tigatioD Measurp. Genual programAevel mitigalicl[l UJea$ura £or sign;r...". impacts from tbe proposed Dtalt P1a~ will be ~ to rmu:e impacts to • lc:IS-than-signiflC8ll' bel. Plan policies will be c:vaIuated as 10 their probable effectiveoe:s.s in avoiding or reducing impacts 00 sensitiYe ['Q()llJI'CICL IT mitigations are not feasible or if mitigations do not redot:e the: impacts 10 • level oC !ess-tllan~~ such impactS will be no'ed. Mitigation masu"" may include use restri<:tionslaa:ess 10 sensitive r=urces, encouraging compatible U5e5 with and adjacent to sensitive rew~ establishing setbacbJnature prea:erves Cor the protect:C<1 of .sensitive resources and r>reicndangc:red species. a. ~ Impacu of i."llpiementatioo: of !he Drefl Plan upon cultural resources 'IAoill discussed. lhe feasibility of Drafl Plan perides in preserving these resources. will be evaluated. 20 ~ r:XH[.8~"E. OF WORK PALO ALTO COMPREHENSrvE. PL .... N !::NVIROI'fMENTAl. IMPACT REPORT JANUARY:l, ]S9c b. Mitigation Measu res. Policy c.hangCi or 3ction plans to mitigale:: tm pacts on recreation .... ill be pro~ Cullu.ral n:wurccs. cou ld include addiUoMI commuDity consuHation, educ;ational programs, or de .... elopment incentives; fOf' historic preservation. 14. VlsIlOl Q .... lty ..... Dosie" Aloo!ysls a. ~. Effects of potenliaJ development under the Draft Plan on vieM from.scenic: corridors and roads efigibl= to bc:oome scenic corridor's will be.........t. Fu'ure de.elopmeot and it! rela.ionship '0 Dra(. PlaD visuaJ and design poIicleo wilJ olso be dlscu>scd. The poten.ial (or Dew develop""'"' 10 adve!3cly affect scenic violas 0< =ult in vis"->llmpacts will be described. "The Draft Plan', cffectMmes:s in estabf~hing an overall urban design pian for Palo Alto will be __ The eo .. .munity Olaracter Elemen. will be reviewed for potential COf major chanp in the Palo Alto's. 'Iilulil ~ and wban funn, ouclt as increas<s in heigh' in the -'town whicb could affect rCildential neighborhoods; developmelll in commercial .areas which could intensify building and remove open space. cIuu!ge! in street and 3idewaJk configurations and .tree! """ plmting which eculd impact Deighborbood> or the downlDWn; and change> in oeighborbood character =ulting from ~L Emphasis in u,;, .... ~ will be on identifying potential envimomental impacts on __ areas 0( Polo Alto th.t may bave been <l'ICrlooI;ed by the Commuruty ~ E1emecL The analysis will _ "5alOOd-gues;" deoigo judgn=ts mode by the ""mmuDit)' adviso<y groups and design eoosullaDL b. Mitigation Measures. Mitigatioi1 mea&ura oould iocJude changes in lo<otioo 0( ~l 10 proI«t oeighborllooc!s; height red"ctioa> or <banI!<" in aIIowabie cblsities 10 a.oicI "inteosilicalion" 0( ~o ....... alid revisions 10 ordinance sections which regulate visual and design .quality. TASK J. ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS Consultant will compare the impacts of four altema tives to Ibe Draft Plan: No Project -The 1980-1995 C.,mprehensrn: PlaO -WIllIt physical conditions could result from contintled implementation of the current plan pohdCl and' progr.um? No Fill'ther Development -What wi!! happen if no funher devdoPmeDt were ailowed; ie. ~ than aRowed by the current Comprehensive Plan? 21 EXHIBIT ~E OF WaR)::. pM.Q Al.'JO COMPREHENSrvE I'1..AN F..NVLRONMENT.-\l.. IMPACT R.EPORT o JA}oIUAAY Il. 1914 TWo other altematr.-es that will be defined at the end of Phase 1I of 'he Plan update. Each alternative will be evaluated in tellllS of each environmental topic. The aly~' traffic and buildout projections Cor each of the alternatives wit! be used to assess impacts retatiYe La the plOp05ed pm.r-.cl. For most impacl facton;, the analysis will be comparatM: and ~ualita'iv<. ye' detailed enough to allow informed comparison ba&cd on benefits and draw-bacb of elICh.. The Consultant md its subalnsultliets wiD quantify DOise and air quaiity impacts for­ an al:temativc:&. if traffic mode! in£OnrIatLoD fer the altem.2tive,; is awl1able. Quantitative data on tra..*fic impacts of the .alternatives will also be included in the ana1yJ;is if us::b data is .... "Ii1able from the: City's Transportat[oD DMs.ioD stail: A DatT8tilr"e and tabular comparison of the atrematives ..,11 be: included. zmd an environmentally superior attematiYc will be identified. The alternatives analyW wiD. be Itruct ... rr.d to ciearly identify major differences in levels and types of impact.< TASK K. CEQA CONCLUSIONS Consultant will prepare R cssment conclusKms 10 meet CEQA requiremeots foe the followin& _'o:y fiDdinll" 1. growth indU<elllellL 2 cumulative impacts, which .. iii include a brief as5C$&ment of impacts of the Plan in rdatim 10 otherlocaJ and reg;ooaJ pt..... Since !he ErR will iueIf be an aoalj>si> of cumullltM: impacts of Pilln buildeu:, !his oectico will be qui'" brid 3. WllIYOidable ligni.fiean! elfttU. 4.. .5hort-term usa of the en-ironmcnl versus. long-term produ.ctr .... ty. S. sigoirlCaJlt irreversibJe changes. 6. imp&.-ts fC'urrd 00: to be SJ"gnwcant. nSK L DRAFr MASTER EIR PREPARATION 1. AdmiD.1stratM Dnrt Muter DR The informatKm developed in Tasb B through K wnl be refmed and organized into ao Administrative Draft Master EIR. Ten (10) copiC$ of the 22 • EXJ.jm~ SCOPE OF WORK PALO ALTO COIo,tl"!tEHENSIVE ~ E.HVIRONME. ... "I'\L NPAC't RE1'CRT JANUARY U .. 1990< .... ..dm..ini1lr.ative Drart Master EIR will be submLtted to City ,s.taf[ for reviC\l\' and comment,. iIS Ii~ifaed in the City's Req uat for Proposals. At the end of the Oty" review. Consc1ta.."I1 wiU meet wilh at.;: staff to discusl; comments on the Administrative DrafL 1. SeltluclMd Dna ElR T"", (2) copie> of • ScreencllC:d Draft EIR will be prepored, incorporaliJlg revjsions .and refinemcn ts to the Mminu.trati\fC Draft as n~ry based upon ltaff =ponsc. Any revisions to the Administrative DrlIft that an: requested b~t arc DOl v.iLbiD this scope t")C 'IIIlIOrk ~ilJ require a conlrac;' and budget amendmeDL 3. hb!k HoarlDc Drall EIR FoIlovomg ,tolE approva1 of the Screencheck DruL two (2) copie> of tbe Public Hearing Draft Maotcr EIR and • reproducible mas"'r copy with computcr di<b wiD be submitted. COMPREfW\lSIVE FIAN PHASE IV TASK M. FINAL MASTEP EIR PREPARATION _ing public reYiew and revioion of the Draft Plan and public rcv"_ of the Draft Master EIR, the """"ullIIIIt WIll revise the EIR, prepon: rapooses 10 COIIIIIICDts and prepare the Mitiptloo MODitoring Program, _ will comprise the Fmal Mao ..... ElR. I. __ to Co .......... Comu1tanl will formulaic rcspoose$ to .substantive comments on the Draft Maoter EIR iIlcIL'omg review period comments rea:ivc<I from 'he public, ComprebtnsiYe Plan Advi<ory Committee (CPAq. Planning Commission, City SIaff and other intere:s.tcd agencies.. Consultant wiD. :submit draft responses to aty staff for comments; and meet 'With staff to cflSCUSS rC5ponse1o before revising the Draft Maotcr ElR. The project budget includes a total of 60 hours of Consultant and subconsultaot time 10 respond to comments. and this budget is based on ~tiom regarding this ElR project. If the number of comments exceeds apectatioDS and cannot be responded to ... ithin the t~me budgeted, lhen a contract and budget amendment wilt be required ResponsC'S to comments on 23 , EXHtaIT ~PE OF WORk PALO A1. TO COMf'RE.H£NstvE plJ. JIi ENVIRONMENTAl tMPACT RUORT o lANl1AJlY 1~ 1!!l94 tra{f1lC issues 'Wi.ll be "WTit::.en by the Cify's traffic corlSuitant under a :sepa.rate CODt;"act aDd ~ not includOO in this sc.ope of work. ConsulLaOt will revise the Draft Mastel EiR to reOect the responses to oommcn~ and win tompDe an Administrative F'"ut~l Master EIR. Ten (10) copi<s of !be AdInbislr&Iivc Draf. Mas.er EIR .. ill be submiucd lu Cily ... fl foe review and COlDlDell~ ... pecifi;:d in the aly', Req"",' for PropooaJs. The Administrative Draft Muter EIR Vrilt be revised as necessary based OD City c:ommcnb to form a stand·alooe Final Maste:r ErR The F"mal Master EIR will amsisl of aD introductioo ouUiniilg the: EIR purpose and ooatents and the enviroo.meatal review plOCe$$ the revised Summary. the revUc:d Draft Master EIR, ropies of commcnls wilh ""PC""" following each let"" or tramcrip~ and the Mltiplioo Moniloring Program. T.., (2) copies of !be Final Master EIR will be dem.ercd '0 !be Oty. plus • 'eprocbK:I'ble lIIlISter ropy and oompute, Dosie copy. TASK N. MITIGATION MONnORiNG PROGRAM C=suilant will P"'{lOJ'e • Mitigation Moni.oring Program in oompfiancc with AB 3180. ComuItant will identify =po;1'ibllily foe implcmentinc and mollitorin& each mitigation lIlCa$=, oJong with mooiIoring Irigzen and reporting UequctlCJ, subject lu <ppmYal by aty staff. A d>cdIi!t will be prcpored Iistit1g _ iIcmo £or eacb of the a1tema,iYu. Monitoring will be dovetaiJec:! .. itb existing. process s~ as the devdopment projoct app;oval proc<:SS oncl servi<e providcn' planning p<=«. One copy of the Mitigation Morutoriag Program will be: 5ubmitted to aty stalT for review at the end of the public review pcriOO for tbe Draft Mas"', EIR. Part II. MEETINGS AND HEARINGS Consultant win attend two Pub!k Seeping sasions, eight scheduled two-hour :neetings with aty stalf. and fOOf public hearings. (t".A.'O before the Planning CoIlllD..is$ion. and t'W'O before the Cit, Council). Jningworth aDd Rodlcin, the ."'-coustK:al Engineering subconsultan t. is scheduled to attend two meetings wilh 24 EXHlBrr$ scorE OF 'WORK PALO Al.. TO COWI"RfHEN'SIYt: pl..AJ'ol ENVLRONMENTAL ~P,,,cr ~EPOFlT ...-. .. -' ' JANUARY 12, I"" .staff and two public hearings. Donald Baiianti and WLlUam Cotton and As>ociateo (Air Ooality and Gootechnical Engineering, respc<.ively) an: eacb ICbedWcd to al~ ODe meeting with SI aff al"'.d two plJblic hearings, onc before lbe Planning Commission (OEm) ond one before City Cmmeil (EIR). Me:etinp between consultant leam members and agenl), 513fIs as required to satisfactorily perform Tub A. B and I are. included in hours aUocaled to those tasks, cd are DOt billed or 5howu as meetin~ The ei&bt _uled .....unes with City staff will include ODe me;:ting in Task B with ~taJ Ilaff to identify fOCU:i issue3 and to establish cocrdinatiol1. Malletllo be discuaed 'Willmctude potentie.l environmcntal impacts., adequacy ol data. and oonUlcZ per10rt in each dep:artme~t responsible for providing infonnatior .. decis.ions sDd review of ElR do...-umcna.. It is likely that more than ooc: lIICdin& with lbe Tronsportation DM.ion will be held- David Early, Project Dir<cl0f, .. ill be """iIable throughout the EIR prepantion period to meet "ith City w.rfand !he project team to ",!her infarmation. review pr0gre&3. arriw: at 8 reasoQabk: r:!:nge of aJlcrnal.ha;. review preliminary fiDd.i:np. discuss stalI resPOJlSC$., and offer input into any fioaI project modificationL Sheila Brady will be available to <OIISult with City ,u.ff on majoc issues II!d project dirccLioD as needed, and will attend up to four meetings with staff. two public SOO!JinIsessions, II!d "'" public bcarinli>- Additional .....ones could be atteQdcd by any member of lbe consultaDt team IS ltD extra item In the scope aod budget. Pan UL rRODUcrs Consultant .... '11 submit the IODowin;&: produca 10 the City in preparatioD of the City of Palo Alto eomprehetlSM: Piau Technical Elements II!d EnviroolllCntal Im;>ad Report: A. Noise TecbIaot Repon 1. NOK Contour Map'. prepared on I bl5e map provided by City. 2 ili.n Noise Background Report -5 copie.. 3. Final Noise Background Report -5 ropies, one reproducible copy, one computer diU copy. 4. Cor::tn'bution to and re\iew of Noise Element 25 ·-r- EXHIQIT A.~on: OF WORK PALO ALTO CC»OREHENS~ 'I.AN ENVrR;OI\lMEN'T """ ~'."cr REPORT '0 B. Air' QaoU'1 Te,,,",""1 Report ~~' :-,~<.,. i. .... ",.- lANUAR'I .2. lll'P4 1. Air Quality Coalow' Map<, prepared on a base map provided by City 2. Draft ... .if Quelity Background Report. S copies. 3. FIDAl Air Quality Bacqround Repcn . S copies, one reproducible copy, OtIC computer em\ copy. ~. Contribution to and review of Air Quality section of Conservation ElemenL c. __ TocUkaI Report 1. ~ic Hazard Maps. prepared GO • base map' provided by City. 2. Draft Gooteclmkal Badgro."" Rcpon • S "Jpies, 3. Fmal Geotechnical Bacl:gruund Report. S copies, ODe reproducible copy, ooc computer disk ropy. 4. Cootribution 10 and review 0( Geotech:nicaVSei:smic Safety section of Safety ElemcnL 1. Pbase n Teclmical Summ4<)' . one camera.ready copy. 2. EUIlng Setting SUIIUIW)' Mem<xandum • nne """",,,,-ready copy. 3. POOcy Cooiistcocy Matrix • one cam .... -rcady ropy. -4. AmninistratiYt: Draf. MalIC< EIR • 10 oopies. S. Sm:encbeck Draft Malter ElR • 2 copies. 6. Draft Master EIR . 2 Copico. plus one reproducible ,,","Ie< ""py. one _Ie< disk copy. 7. Draft Rcs;>ome 10 CommeIIt1. 8. AdministnItiYt: Pinal Master ErR. including re,'iscd Draft MUle' ErR. rC$pOllSC$ to commer.ts,. fist of commeneoo., ...-erbatirn comments RMC'NCd. and an i.'Wfo. of c:ommcabi and responses, if the votume wammts ; •• 10 Copies. 9. Flnal Master EIR ·2 Copies, p!us. one reproducible master copy and computer cfisb. Reproducible IEUlSter copies of the MlSt'!!r DEIR and FErR will be $ubmitted as unbound camera rc;uiy copy, with computer gcsks. All Baclcgrm.1 Dd Report maps will be delivered as camera re-.ady arlY>'Ork, with . DXF computer files is an oplional task. 26 'f~ .EXHUJ~ SCOPE OF WORK PALO t\LTO COMrREHENSIVE i'1..AN ENVtAONMENT.~ :MPACT REPO~T ra!1lV. SOIEDULE PluI.se I: De.elo!Jmeat Dr c...o..lilalry Visloas, GoG.lI: and lssaes J"nuJU], 1993 . oaobu, 1993 (OJmp/<teJ Pbase fl, _p ...... otPollcy """ P_ OpU ••• October-1993 -NOV<f>IW 1994 I. Stsrt·up S<:oping Meetiog 2 Tectm;caJ MeeIiJlg 3. Draft Noise, Air and Geotcohnial BacJcground SUlIlD1lII)' Repons ~ Fin>l Noise, Ai, and Geotechnial Bacqrouad SummaI}' Reports .s~ Technical Swnmary. Existing Setting Summary Memorandum and Poli<:y Consistency Matrix .'.~ January 1994 Feb,,"'l' 1994 February 1994 March 1994 April 1994 ~ III: P __ or Drall c-.prd>eooslve PIa. ud Draft M8st<r Ea..u--atal ""pod \lqJort D=mb<r 1m -~ 1m I. Puhlic EIR Sooping Meeting #1 2 Public EIR Scoping Meeting #2 3. Administrative Draft Master EIR 1 ~ Sa-eeorbedc Draft _ EIR 5. Draft Moster EIR aDd Mitiptioc Morutorlng Program January 1995 January 1995 April 1, 1995 May IS, 1995 June IS, 1995 Pbase IV: ~ or Flu! Cotap<d<aslvo Plu ODd F"uoal _ EavIre1l_Io' ""JI'Id Repon SqJt<ml><T 1m . Dtumbu 1995 1. DrVt Rcspomc to Comments de AdministTali'Ye Final Mos"" ElR 2 $ueern:;becl;: Flnal Master ElR and Miligation Monitoring Program 3. FmaJ Master ErR October 1, 1995 NO\Iember I, 1995 Decembe, 1, 1995 I Assu~ tba1. Jkacfy and Asscxiatel ~ m:l:iYc all inrorma:ion for lhe profed descripticn. .. well as abe t:1Iffi:: ~ Dr JaoLJaty 15, lM. 27 ErJIlbltll COSTS • • • The Scope ol WO<lc described m E'xhibit A .baD Ix: completed ror ao amouot not 10 .,.,.,..s 595,\50. The ""'" are baed up"" !be following IUldetstanding' I. All ovaihble bacl:g.'Ouod inform.tiel!, =;>Ping ond data wiG Ix: provided 10 the consultanl team by the Oty in a. timely ma;}ncr. 2. The draft vioion, goals, porlcles, progtams, land .... and traffic projeotioDs for tile Comf<cl>ensive Plan will Ix: delivered 10 tOO """,ullant ...... UPOD iniliatioo of PI>a6e IlL 3. A<IdltionaI meeIi.op and consultatioo beyood those identified in this propoaI will be bilJed' on a timc~and-materiah basis. 4. Scope erpansions reqWod to respond 10 community mpu' will require """""'" modification. s. The scope ol ""'"' Jau .peeific limitatiooo regarding prepoI1ltien ol the DRft EIR {alia: IUbmission of tile Administntu-.-e Im:ft) JUld respc= to wmmcms.. If thcIe timitaUoDS Il'C cmeeded, • coctraet r:&Odlfication will Ix: required. • Q EXHl8rr~ PALO AlTO COMPRF:HEHSlVE .. tAN ENVIROfrfJ,(fJo,"T AL DlCP'Act R.£.p()RT Tabk 1 COST SUMMARY ...... """" ............... ""-.... '''''''''' .. _In<. IloooId_ Habitat ~ Group WiIIiIm SdI' ~ WiIiam Ccaca IDd AsIlXiIlcs TOTAL 2 ". J..r,.NUAAY 12, I~ r~ S:':I,s'X> S 11.QfiO So 10,000 54,000 S '.000 $1""" $ ~1.50 EXHII:IIT B: COSTS PALO .... L TO CQMPRE.HEN'iT\'E PUoN EJiVlRONMENTA.L 1MF'A.cr RF.rORT ('. lANlJARY 12. 1!fi9.1 Tllllbk2 COST ESTIMATE BY TASK, PRODUCT AND FIRM TlillllfProHct 1 • ...,. 1 ,aR I ..... " I !IRe;: .. Ir I eo",,, I T .... T_A:~~~IlP ... , t S 1,250 I St'''' I $ISO -T -I $l,9" "-'" I ',QOO ! ',000 1 11J5C -I -I - L ,.., ... T_J.: I"ro}td lD.Ili.I:w.a. Sblrt.U, Meed .. S 4:S0 - ---- -..,., :Dab! GtI~ VISII 1,000 -----' .... IAIt1aI: COI:Itacts 500 --- - -... '!uk C: Tecbk:aJ ~ -->1,000 S 1S~'" -.. --11",le AIr_ ',000 -1,JOC - --..... --500 -- --MSO ..... TMkD: DcscriJICIoa. 0( &Cttiaa: ..... """"""",,G , 1,000 -----...... ............... -~ ..., ---- -... ------- ---... Cealr,d: ..... ' flldGrs ------ HJ'II.roIoIY &: w.ter QqJb:y 200 -----... r.bIk_ 400 ------"""-'''------3,000 -., ... IIioqic-RuoweeI --.-%,500 --..... -SOl) -----... ~ ..... ------- Tak E: E:dstIaa :-.ctt~ SallllWll)l' Me.onaadIa .. Emtia&: Sdtift&: MCWKJ 1 51,000 ":1 ---I -t .,- Task F: Fvi'lq ~ Manu. PoIIq ... "" 1 5I,DOO1 -1 -1 -1 --I Ol,OOll T __ c: ~ DacripCiCNI _0-._ I ,,"0001 ":f --I -I -I Ii,OOO TIoIIk It: ............... ....... -I $ 750 -f --I --I t , .. EXHlBlT I: COSTS o PA!..O A:.-1O COMPREHENSIVE PIJ.N f .. uvlRONMEttT.AL lMPACf REPORT Tabl.e 1 eoa,UIl-.d T_ { ProdIIet ""R _U T ..... lmpsct.a. •• Mitipr:loo Meuu.ra '-" """"...,."C S l,OOO ..... _V 500 -.. ----500 Ceotert."' ,-~ ~ &r; W.1ft" QIII'!lt] "'" ...... ..,..,. 500 "*-'----1;;00 ........ /'""-"'" Trdk f Cirar.IadoIL T_J: ............. 54,000 I CEQ.< ""-"- TtiA:L: lhIt"""""'- MMIIr. Dn.."l M.mr DR S "'SO $ 1,001} S .... -""""-,,soo l)rd Mater £III: 900 Y_ M: f1aaI EDt Pftpentiolt AUIla. ...... i\tIaIter DR S .,000 H'" S 200 Stt--. a.dL n..!. 2,000 ".., _II:IR SOO -I """>IMP ...... >IMP Dind CoI:b Dired c..o.u S 1,643 ......... '-WO Certifldh c? ~ ,130 '-no« TOTAL S 51,440 1: 17,061) 'S 10,000 S ;,_ 4 :;" -~ I'll -_ .. ";-, .~ ,":.~-" ·-;r· , -.--'< - o lAIWAR Y 12, lW4 ''''''' HOOO ... SCIO ZOO .... 2,000 l,OOC ' .... ... 54._ - SlI,l5O ..... ... S 200 S ..... "... ... HOOO .... $1,640 ' .... ."" '''000 S 7,500 $~lse F.XHJ8r'IJCOSTS 'ALO ,,1.:1'0 COMPREHE..NSIYE. ~LAN &tV!RONIo(ENTAJ.. ""trACT REPORT ------------------------------ Table 3 ILLINGWORTU & RODKlN, INC. NOISE 1 NOISt BacqtouIXl TodInical Repon .. Mea&u."tments b. CskulRe ais<1l1Jl and ..... h.m: DOIiC: ~ t. l"kX map; ~ hand on reprc:d\lcible hue map.. 1:600 ICDI.!) "-lkaft poliCes and guideline:s e.. Prepare brad:grOLIDd report 1. Noise Elemml As.si:J.tano: 3. EIR~[ion Tobk4 DONALD BAU.ANTI AIR QUMlTY 1. Nt ()aaIOy Baotgooncl T_ Rqxn 2. Mca:i:Ip will! aty.wI l. E1R_ Tobie 5 HABITAT RESTORATION GROUP BIOLOGICAL RESOURCE'S .... ,- 1. Pett R~. BioIop::aJ Resouroes 2.. <:NODS oa.a Seud1 5 S 2.SOO I.'"'" 2.""" ''''''' ~ $ 11,940 '.680 1._ 117"" S7"SO 1,850 700 S 3.500 500 ~ EX})JBIT B:~ !'ALO ALTO COr.crRE!iENSlVE i'UUt4 F.NVlRONMENTAL ~P"cr ItEPORT JANUARY L~ 1994 ------------------ T .. ' ....... T.bllt 6 WlLLIAM SELF ASSOCIATES CULTIiRAI. RESOURCES 1. Daa COIeCCioft and anaI)'Sis or aistitla tood1I:iocr.s (iodudlng ~ Ai'CtIaeokJgICa Resources IJNetjIOl'y at Sooc:wna :!<m) Table 7 WILUAM corrON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. SEISMIC SAFE:IY L """'"' Salc<y lIa<qrouod T_....",.. .. fupo«~-"'" b. fupac: OtoCcmnica' Bacqrowtd Rt;Q1 2. 1!lR"- 6 s ',000 S 3,500 ',000 1.000 f , I I " 'i • A, . , 0, 0, f. '. G. H. • \ ... _\ r· INSURANCE !I....yUIRfMENTS • Long FQrm EXHIBIT "C· Insurance Aequtrements fOf Contractors CONTRACTOR! PROJECT MANAGER: COWTIIACT NAME: GENERAL TERMS AND INSTIlUCTIONS ~T1)TloILClnOlHC.O "'TO. A1 TMaII I0I.l DIf'DdII ~ CWl1_NC;"_TAM .. ~_l'1oIr"""'OF""; ~J'7\IIICT, el*1"IIAC:f0lW liMU ___ I'G'~" ~tI~ D4:_-.--a,IiNfJ.oc.-.o n.1.:n"'r.u __ noor..os..........,. AU. ~ ~,,~ IIWCItMID ~ M I'IMtYIDC fMICMMIt CNIJIeIII ...... I"I4.1O'1" ""'"NI'CI GII .... _ QIII ~ rw...T..., --"IID"'I~ ou I~" 'Itt! "iUI'''' ~ rt4(~n .".1I,IIoIftC! IIW'I''' ~..., WCIITID II"'" .u,tTMOO'IZI!D IICPIU!MilllrA-nvr OF 'noll tOOM'otoIIY ~~ ........-c1.1"1LS1 ~ TMrcnY, AIID ""","",1.-'10'" TMl!:nY~ CO'IT'IIIItT~ Ie ~ C~ "AnfooIe'I'l ~ RET\.JAN THE COMPLEiEO ~r.RCA TE TO THE CITY OF PALO ALTO, PURCHASING & CONTRACT ADMIN!S1'>IATlON. 250 HAMILTON AVENUE, PAlO ALTO 94301. TYJIE Of COVERAGE oOomprohon .... _ UoWfty, rNCLlJOtNG: • !'StSOMItJ. It' .. JURY • IAOAD FOPIM ".orerrv D ... ,... ... G~ • ILAIIk£T c:~C11JAL • ~_Aut_liab'fty: INa.UOfNG: • OWNED · """" • NON-OWNED o Piol k .. UoobIIty: INa.UDlNG: • EftROftI: AIIO ~ • MAi.1fU.C'1lCIE " ~ • HKUQ;!NT 1"fRFOIIlMAHC! REQUIAEWNT ilooc..V IN..o"\JAY ~OP'EAT'I' DAMAGE soon. y INJU~" I: PROPfJl TY D ... MA.lif COMStNEa loon. y lNJU .. y tEadI ~" .. I9QIL Y !frU!lR'f ,....,.? tt:too! ~0PEj;l7V pAM"'GIE aoDILY It~RY" I"RCPf;RTY DAMAGE COM8J~EO All DAMAGES ., .000.000 ",000,000 'l.DOC,OOD iii gop goo !..!....~ '1,OCO.OOO ",000.000 11,000,000 • r ,OOO.!JOCI $1.000.000 Tht City g( ,.....~. it. affic: ...... ~ ... ~oy ... ,.t -.-..d " .oditio"ll in9u.-.d. t::wl 0)l'Il.,. ... to wcwit".r111m'Md ~ CfIf'IIIrIG.t. s.-GO¥Wa9' _ to tt. orv of "4110 Allo. ,tc .. ..,., II, p~ 1;:0_ •• ~I otlNt ..-' Cltv"t ,mung ........ _ ........ II4hIw ~ oaoritod ~ 'the Citv b,.;ng .. c'" "-ull'-:. onI.,. . ~ ..... _ inwofvftI ....... pooWng, ncft1i,"",," dril'ing or 'lthrt ",nd~o.IfId _otk., the 1'OIiC'Y inoludh d'~~ of wi.n. ~ ~ "..... Oil' .m.r ......., pr~ Of any 1IPP8t1W' In OCIPWtItCdon !fMI." .... u-. Mla.-tM ~""n "" It. ~ wlwthe • ... ...., ... 'IfIiifU,.... f;II IN Oty., PaM Alto. WhIn 'IhIo wllNk ~ ~ "'-" '0 ..... ,,-.. lI':-oWHd In "1M amovnt.-lbo¥I. TIN ~ inoatudow • "S_4IbiItv ., --"'I~ pt"O~ o.ct .... ewr 1&,000 mom: '" ~ .... _ NltjRI to ~ ..... . It tIUOh ....... ~ OJ ~ ~ '!hot pooIriod of COY!II • ..-... ~I" MAil\, .. _en. ~r 1M to eff,ct b C.".~,. tMty OO~ d.yt....,;u.., ~ dO. ~ to tIw Ci~ of PIIIIo .... to; C<io"ncl ".,....,;rtNtif.n. P.C.IN IO.2S<l. '·4303 TN ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~_,.... • .cMIir)' 1WIdllf.-nIMi poroMdii"ll' m.v. __ t:tIl'IiI',q 101 t:o;onl' ..... • •• ~ w iftIHmnP.y t'-Cky. Tt. ~ ~ IIf'1Cl ... 1M ~ it:1UtI,;.c! to ao1I tIfnW t:lP W -poici .. d"Ian-"" ""ei~.ncI mI'~" or tM ptOVN::OM: c:-.cr 1m hpI1il'l. . .~ ." " • :-' .~ .. EXHlBrr "D" PART H -SUPPL.EMENTS TO FORMS SECTION 00410 (Rfl'l CERTIFICA rfON OF NONDISCRIMINA TfON Ctr!H!SI!lqn of Noodlsorfmlna!lon; As .uppnars of goods or ""vk:es to the CIty"f PcIo Afto. tne firm and Lnd!vfcluals listed beloys certifies that they do not dlscrLmInate In emp!oyment with legerda to age, r."". color. religion. netion~1 oo9ln. ancestry. claabnlty. or sexual pra f 8f8nce; thet they ere In compnan<:e with all Federal. State and local directives end executive ordore regarding nondiscrimination In employment; and that th<>v agree to demonst18ta positively and aQgresslvely the princIple of equal opportunity In employment. TIle Proposer 8grees apeciiic8ny; 1.0 To establish or observe employment policies which affIrmatlyely promote opportunit!es for mlno<ity persons at an Job level •. 2.0 To communicate this pancy to all pereons concerned, lncIudlog an emplovees. outolde recruitiog se rvlces, especially those servInG minority cornmun!ll9a. end to the minority c:ommunltlea 8t Iarg6. 3.0 To teka affirmative aC1lon BtepS to hlr. mlnorlty employe •• within the orllenlz1ltlon. 4.0 To be know1edgoable of the local. stete. and federallews and ~ulations concerniog affirmative action porocias lind provide opportunities for employees. Arm: Brady & Associates. Inc. Title of Officer Signing; ::.Bu"'·s"'i"'ne"s"s'-"'M."'""' .... ge"'r _______ _ Signatur. '-1[/';,) ~1 rdYh<: 08to ]/11(94 l'kIase include any additional Informatior. .".nable fegar1f1og equal opportunity employment programs now In effect within your company. See attached END OF SECTION SfCTlON 00410(RFO)-l o GRADV ANIl ASSOClA TES • • • Brady and Aaociatcs, Inc.. meets feden! IiIfftrnlative action requiremen~. The firm i:s I !mSn busiocss and • 100 percenl woman-owoed. 'The nrm's employment s.tandards ha-.:e beco designed to avcid ~tion with respect to race, creed. color, Dational origin. age. sex, ance:ruy. sexual orientation, or marital saUa. unrelated [0 job requirements... The flfUl',S commitment to affirmative action extet!do to all job applicants and empTo)<:es, and to all aspects of emp~Dt, including but not limited to recruitment, hiring. training. wignment., promotioo, wmpensution. layoff, bcDefita.. education and rermination. Brady and .Associates has .. goal 10 increase m~nolity '!'mployment in the firm to 30 percent, the proportion of minorities io the WO[k force in the SJ:n Francisco SMSA Brady and J\.ss(x:-jates will achieve thiI goal by activeiy .ret:ruiling minoritle5 for available positions a t the Unfvc:n:ity of California at .BerkeJey; through advertisements in newspapers in rommunitic:s Voritll 8 large minority population. such IS the Oakland Tnbune; by supporting the Black Environmental Design Student AssociotiOll at U.C Berkeley; and by WOt'king wilb minority-owned job placement firms. Our objc:ct:jYC is to hire cne minority {Of eve:y two openinp until our goal of 30 percent is. mel We ontlcijoale acbievin, Ibis goal by the end of the -. Brady aod Aooociata, Inc. is Iis<.ed ... minority finn with the: Cities of Oakland. RkblllOnd and BedeIey, and ;, certified as a """"",,-owned firm (OBE) by Caltrans. ". "