HomeMy WebLinkAbout0107.094\
~,
• • ,."'" ,', '~' . -15
January 13, 199~
HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL
Palo Alto, California
Members of the Council:
This report reqqests the Council's approval of tha attached
-Resolution Orderinq the summary Vacation of a Public Service
Easement for Ingress and Eqress· located on the north side of San
Franclsquito Creak, just east of aayshore Frontage Road, in E~st
Palo Alto~ San Hateo County~ California.
Bacll:qroup4
The ow~ers of three affected parcels and the county of San Mateo
have requested that tlle City vacate the twenty-five foot wide
easement -tor inqress and eqr-ess which runs alonq the northerly
portion of their properties (see Attachment Al ~ Thi~ easement was
granted tc the City on March 4, 1~46, as a part of the Execu~Qrts
Deed from Lawrence p~ Faber, which transferred title to the Faber
Tract in the Baylands to the City of Palo Alto. At that time. the
easement was provided for access to and froUl the Faber Tract;
apparently. it was never used after a major portion of the easement
vas quitclaimed by the City to the -Brentwood Company in 1955. The
remaining portion.. encumbering these three parcels, no IO!'1ger
accesses the Faber tract.
There are no City facilities located within this easement.
not been utilized by the City in over five years and it
necessary for any present or futUre public U$e. A fee of
has been paid by the ovner of one_of the parcels who plans
his property for a sroall multiple housing project.
Cl!Rn07: 94
,'''-.
It has
is not
$1,50.0
to use
· -
o
~iOD of the ~8ement
The attacbed Resolution will pert'lit the City to quitclaim its
interest in tee referenced easement. Under the provisions of the
C~lifornia streets and Highways Code, summary vacation of public
service easements which have not been used for fiv~ consecutive
years or more and which are no longer necessary for present o!'
future use by the holder of the easement, are permitted.
BnviroDaaptal Review
These projects are categorically exempt from the requiremen~s of
the California Environmental Quality Act; therefore, no
environmental impact assessment is necessary.
'tAff ,,~ommend.tion
staff recommetds that the Council adopt the attached "R~solution of
the Council of the City of Palo Alto Ordering the summary/Vacation
of the Public Service Easement for Ingress e.nd Egress l ,.
Respectfully Submitted#
Attachment A: Summary vacation Resolution
cc: Frank Onq
13J1 Schooner Street
Foster cjty, CA 94404
Roland Bresler
cour.ty of San Mateo
county Government Center
Redvood City, CA 94061
CMR:107:94 2
I '
,
LECO:ND
A TT AC HM£NT A
Recorded at no charge in
accordance with Streets &
Hi9hways Cod~ Section 8336 at
the Request of, and when
recorded Return to:
CITY OF PALO ALTO/REAL ESTATE
PO BOX 10250
PALO ALTO, CA 94303
A.P. NO.: 063-540-270/2BO/290
PROJECT NO.: CEV 9/23-92/6
PROJECT: EaseT!1ent Vaca"t,ion
East Pale Alto
SUM H A R Y V A C ~ T ION
RESOLUTION NO. __________ _
RESOLUT!ON OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALO ALTO ORDERING
THE SU~Y VACATION OF A PUBLIC SERVICE EASEMENT FOR INGRESS , EGRESS
AT PARCEL NUMBERS 06]-540-270, 063-540-280, 063-540-290
IN THE CITY OF EAST PALO ALTO
DDEAS, the public service ease1'T1ent fer ingress and egress located at parcel
nu~bers 063-540-270, 063-540-280, 063-540-290 in East Palo Alto~ has not been
utilized in over five (5) consecutive years and is not necessary for future
public use; and
WHEREAS, from all evidence submitted to the Council of the City of Palo Alto
it is found that the public service easement as described herein is not
necessary for p~esent or prospective public use for public service purposesj
and
WHEREAS, it is the intent of the Council of the City of Pala Alto to vacate
t,he public service E>asement, recorded April 15~ 1946 .. in vol. 12<59 of
Official Records at page J15, Reccrds of San Mateo countYr californiaj and
WEER.BAS, the Cc,uncil of the City of Palo Alto intends to vacate such public
service easement according to the procedures set forth in. the California
streets and. Highways Code Division 9 Part 3, Chapter 4 (Sect.ion 8333 e:t
seq ~ i ;
NOW, 'i'HEREFOREr the Council Df the City of Palo Alto does RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. This vacation is. .made under the authority of California Streets
and Highways Code Chapter 4 of Part 3 of Division 9, commencing at section
8330.
1
o
SECTION 2. The twenty-five {25,) foot public s~l:vic£ easement located at
pa.rcel numbers 063-54!J-2i'O~ 063-540-28D, 063-540-290 in East Palo Alto is
hereby vacated. The easement is not'e particularly ,-::escribed in Exhibit A and
shcr.'n in Exhibit B, ... ,'hich Exhibits are attached her-eto and incorporated
herein by this reference.
SECTION 3. Tha Council finds that the easement has not been utilized in over
five (5) consecutive years and is not necessary for future public use.
SECTION 4. This Council tinds that this project. is catEgorically exempt from
the requirements of the California EnvironMental Quality Act and no
envir"onmen't.al itnpact assessment is necessary.
SEC7IQNji. The City Clerk, acting through the Real Property Manager, shall
cause a certified copy of this resolution attested by the City Clerk under
seal to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of Sa:'lta Clara.
SECTION 6. From and after the date of recordation of this resolution, this
easement shall be ~on5idered vacated.
INTROOUCED AND PASSED:
AYES,
NOES:
ABSENT
ABSTENTIONS:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM;
~-,--o---,--:----:-~.,.--~,---_.Senior Assistant City Attorney
2
.~PPROVED:
Ci '"-y Manager
Director of ufl-;l'i"t::-l"-· .,.."s-----
_ ... _.=-=::-:-:c:--.
Real Property Ma~ag~r
Director of Finance
-.j..
A.P. NO. 6)-540-270
PREPARED BY: J. D. KIEHL
CHECKED BY: J. BCURQVIN
APPROVED BY: J. REMLEY
DATE: JANUARY 6/ 1994
~ DESCRIPTION
EASE.~ENT VACATION
P,~CEL 1
A portion of the pulgas Rancho and a portion of S~drnp and
overflo~ed Lands Survey No. 24 and a yortion of Lot 2 of section
31, Tm!On'Ship 5 South, Ranqe 2 West, H.O.B. 5: M. described as a
whole as follows:
Being a strip of land 25 feet wide, the centerline thereof
desc~ibed as follows;
Beginning at a point on the Northeasterly line ot U.S. Highway No.
101 alternate, Section D., Route 68, District 4 in San Mateo County
California commonly known as the Bayshore Highway which said Point
of Beginning is North 53-45' West (called North 53" 39' west on
the plans tor said Highway) along said Highway line a distance of
95.43 fest from its intersection wi~~ the dividing line between San
Mateo and Santa Clara counties:
THENCE North 50· 28' OOft East 431.69 feet;
THENCE North 56" 42' 30" East 69.62 feet;
THENCE North 64· 16' 30 n East 85.62 feet;
THENCE South 73-50' OON East 19.43 feet to the terminus of said
easement, said termin~s lying on the mo~t westerly line of Lot 22,
in Block 30, as said Lot and Block are shown on map entitled ~Palo
Alto Gardens !-!ap No. 3 11 , recorded June 22, 1951 in ' ..... oh .. me 33 of
Maps at page 33 in the office of ths County Recorder San Mateo.
county, state of California.
Said easem~nt is shown on attached map -EXHIBIT B-and ~ade a part
hereof.
containing 15689 square feet more or less.
JDK: jdk
E4111293.DWG
63540270
"EXHIBIT A-
END OF LEGAL DESCRIP'I'lON
J
~ 'I
I