HomeMy WebLinkAbout0505.092I
!
I
~, , ,--'
.':, '.
November 12, 1992
THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL
P~lo Alto, California
7
Approval of Authoritll for staff to Expend ~y 1992-93 Funds fol'
Santa Clara Valley Nonpoint sourcemmProqram
Members of the Council:
Report in Brief
This report recommends that council authorize staff to expend funds
in the amount of $80,388 to pay L~e city'S proportionate share of
cost for the FY 1992-93 Santa Clar~ Valley Nonpoint Source (NPS)
Program, as provided for in the existing agreement between 13 Santa
Clara County cities, the coun~y, and the Santa Clara Valley Water
District (SCVWD). Funds have been appropriated in CIP 47703, storm
Water Discharge Improvements.
Backaround
On April 16, 1990, Council approved a five-year agreement between
13 Santa Clara County cities, the county, and the SCVWD for
implementation of the Santa clara Valley NPS Program (CMR:255:0).
The. purpose of the program is to control pollution from urban
runoff in the Santa ClarFl Valle}:"4 By its approval of the
agreement, the City agreed to fund a proportionate share of the
Program 4 The. agreement established a Management Committee,
comprised of a representative from each participating agency, to
provide overall progra.m di.rection and to review and recommend an
annual Program budget for apprcval by all parties to the agreement.
On June IB, 1992, the Management com.mitte~ c-f the Santa Clara
valley NPS Program adopted a recommended scope of work and
corresponding budget for FY 1992-93 (see attached letter from NPS
Program) ~ Al though the ManageI"lent Committee recommended a Fl' 1992-
93 program. bud.get of $2,140,000 I the participating agencies are
being billed only $1.980~OOO due to a carryover of $160,000 from
the program's FY 1991-92 budget. Palo Alto's proportionate share
(4.06t) of the hilling is $BO~3BB.
The majority of the Program budget is allocated for professional
consulting services and program managemenc hy SCVWD staff. The
Program consultant ~ill provide technical guidance for the
development of new ordinances~ policies l and best management
practices to control nonpoint source pollution. In addition I the
Program budget funds the development of public information
-1-
CMR:505:92
•
;
o o
materials, payment of various governmental fees~ and continuation
of the ongoing water ~~ality monito~inq program.
Recom;neodativTI
staf~ recomQends that Council authorize staff to expend funds in
the amount of $80 1 388 to pay the City's proportionate share of cost
fo~ the FY 1992-93 Santa Clara Valley Nonpoint Source Pr~am, as
provided in the existing ~qreelDent bet .. "een 13 Santa Clara COlJnt:{
cities, the County, and the Sant~ Clara Valley Water District.
Respectfully submitted,
A /-'
I l.i.~.-I . ~.,Y' )~'<"~fU~
GEORGE BAGDON
Assistant Director of Public Works
f1 M I() 11 ~~~
DAVID G. ADAMS
Director of Pllblic Works
Interim City Manager
Attacbment: Letter from Santa Clara Valley Nonpoint Source
Program
Related Reports: r:MR:255:0
-2-
CMR: 505: 92
------~-
~" ..
. ,,-",,' :-~:,'.:;'>,~
" --.~
~c-' __ •
--fJ
•
Santa Clara Valley
Nonpoint Source
Pollution Control Program
':'7:50 "-'Jmad,'I' (,.,r'·~""'Jy. 5an Jo~~ C.!\ C!:'i-ll8
(4081 :':6~2()OO f.>,' '.4lJ61 ;>60--0 .. :,' I
October 26, 199,
Mr. Ioe Teresi
City of Palo Aho
P.O. Box 10250
F-.tIo Alto~ California 94303
Dear Mr. Teresi:
IN\'OICE
Subject: Invoice for Fiscal Year 1992·93 Santa Clara \/'alley Nonpoint Source PoHution Control
Program
On June 18, 1992, the Santa Clara Valley Non:>aint Source Pallution Control Program
Management Committee adopted the Fiscal Year 1992--93 Program Budget. The total budgel
is $2,140,000.
On October 15. 1992, the Manag.emer.t CommIttee fir.aiized the iiCCOUntLlg of FiSocaf Year
1991-92 program ex~nditure-". bast:'d upon 8udget Suhcommlltee re ... ,lew, which resulted in a
carryover of $!60,OOO to be J.ppiled to ellpenses in :he Hscal Year 1992-93 pro.gram.
Acwrdingly, the iQtal billing to the fifteen participating agencies l,Ir,.'i!l be for $J ,980,000.
In ac{:orciance wlln tte allo..:ation schedule included in the participating agencies' agre.ement,
the share for the Cay of Palo Alto is $80,388 which is 4.06% of the total budget. Payment
to the. District within ]0 days \o\,.'iIl c:nsure continued program progress.
The Santa Clara Valley \Valer District Board of Directors authorized the District's continiJing
particiyation in tht: program and an ex.tension of the contract for cvn:i.ulting services with
Woodward~Cli'dt' and others at their September i5, 1992 meeting. Attached is. a copy of the
Schedule of COS! Sharing Propo;-tions and the Program Budget.
Cilmpbt'IL 1 tJr.--·,~'''', Lo~ ,.,IIOS LOS ''''Ito_~ Hili., Los c..,,!()S r-hlr)it.l~ "10nj(, 5t'rc"o, Mountain '"~,,, f'JI(;. ,~IIO
Sa'"' Joy:, ~\r'-, j,Jra 'S<lrJ10S'l SUTlr'l.na!t'" (OUIlI} or S .. r,lil UJrJ a"d tne Sa"'!" Clar3 \',1!!<:.' ',I.<l-Ier Oi<,trtC1
~-.
Mr. Joe TeresI 2
If you have any queSlion" please ca:l me at (408) 927-0710.
Sincerely.
lJuL {uJ~:;",·/
Ke:\th W. Whitman
Program Manager
S'l....,ta Clara Vailey Nonpoif't Sr.1UTce Pollutiofl Control Program
EncloslJres
cc: Mr. Peler MilIlgarella
Woodward-CIJ'de Consultants
SIlO 12th Street, Suite 100
Oakland, Californi o 94607·4014
•
o
Ocr""", 26, 1992
,-
BIJVCti mw I'll BU{ WORKS tN61NfERING
A Co.'ltraC'/ .Y'l'l,~.
"Iood."ard CIJ'de
<: "~mlorjng Contracl {Xlii
3 i.eg,J Conlnc[ (Mo k fo)
4 Publk Information (sef item n
~ DJ,jPs (carpel cL R(':.;L::llJr,j~lS" e~c)
Tdtill (',"lllr,H:i S(,fvi('C's
Il('ll',
Suprr,L"mg [ngjnccr
k,~Ofl;;lo:' El1 birJ('('r
YI<J,tn ~'I"fily Sr('C']ahst
I~~ccr~.:: I.l.~mt AS:.l
Pubi:, Info Rep (50; E ,\nrc:1o)
Pril1tlT,~/~uphcalmg «
8nl~ Pholl!; NtJmbfCr, l~lSC
To~.al. Progrilm ~~Jn()gcmcn\
C Hf'PD~ Permit h>:>
IJ. &f !'/Vlce/1U1l J;~,
l' Af'TA
f' ll,(WM/:@
C .k~/aW.fl ..va,,:i7L::-:,;t:;" j)/A, .. 1'
/I. ALYl5'O f)flji it; (:;11,f'
~lblotiJl
ltesefW' /'una:
tOTAL'
rOlA:" {Tn,s C TII!{(J{JCh' //
Puhil, [nro Malena!.s ett
Puflk In(o Re-p, (5{):: E Ah,ens';
P!Jull" info Mn,lrl Asd
Budgeted'
Amo\.,lnl
t;S5000
$J5C.QOC'
'SO 000
11,0.000
___ ~: 12:),000
J',r:n C osl
ri4S.~OG
!IOO SOD
~46,OOO
116 >co
H'C' ItE'm J
h~oo
6. J OO __ ~IJ-,-n-,.o~'~~Q
900
\8QCI
!IOW:'
$30000
t') coo
1',1 GGO
i!S1.50G
I~ i ZOO
$'6800
2,70G $279500 -~-'--"'''-'
11.9000(J
$23:'.5CrIJ
o
SA.""'A CLARA VALLEY NONPOIlI.'T SOURCE PROGRAM
JURISDICTION
Campbell
Cupertino
Los A?tos
Los Altos Hills
Los Gatos
Milpil~
Monte Sereno
Mountain View
Palo Alto
Sanla Clara
Saratoga
Sunnyvale
Santa Clara County
$ubtolaf
San Jose
SCVWD
TOTAL
SCHEI)ULE OF COS! SIlAlUNG PROPORTIONS
FOR nSCAL-YEAR 1992-93
PROPORTIONAL SHI>.RE PROGRAM COST
1.83% 537,224
246% $ 48,708
1.59% S 31,482
0.43% S 8,514
\.74% $ 34,452
2.75% $ 54,450
0.14% $ 2,772
3.9: % 577,418
4.06% 5 80,388
6.23% SI23,354
1.59% 531,482
7.25% 5143,550
5.94% Si17,612
39.97%
30.00% $594.000
30.03% $594,594
100.00% 51,980,000
•