HomeMy WebLinkAbout0447.091• I
>
--.. ~
October 17 I 199.1
THE HONoRABLE CITY COUNCIL
Palo ~ltc, California
Attention: Finance committee
ECONOMIC OOTLOOJ: COKMli"'l"E'!' MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 20, 199.1
Members of the council:
This is an informational report; no council action is necessary.
~rt in Brief"
The Economic Outlook Committee (EOC) was formed in 1988 by the
Finance Director to provide insight on issues in the local economy
tl1at might affect the city's budget" and to create a fo:'"UlIl far
business leaders to provide feedback on City s€:!"wices. The EOC is
comprised ot City staff members and business leaders from the local
communi tYa The Committee meets quarterly to discllss topics of
economic concern to local government and businesses. Attached are
minutes of the latest EOC meeting. The Finance Committee has
requested that minutes from EOC meetings be aqendized as an
informational item, as a part of the Committee's priority of
economic outreach. Topics covered at the September meet.ing
included economic resou'["c~s planning overvie\i, Stanford Shopping
Center uPdate , and political trends and economic development.
R~espect(f!UllY SUbm~:ed,
-..-'! (--' ..-> .' -... -~-L C,-V t..,../
~ Y HARRISON --I
Di,r. ctor O.'fr ,7'MCe
,! Iq; /~/~
/ JtJNE FLEMING / I
f A,ssistant city If'anager
1..-".
CMR:447::il
I r ,
-------...
ECONOXIC OUTLOOK COMMITTEE XI NOTES
September 20, 19~1
Attendees: David Longbine, Edie Dorosin, Charles Keenan, Andy
Doty, Ray Sly, Marcel Cohen, Andy Coe~ Walter Freeman, Diane
Healey, George Zimmerma~, Emily Harrison, Carol Jansen, Mike Cobb.
EconomIc Resources Plannin.,g. OVe.;-viev
Emi ly introduced Carol Jansen, Chief Planning Official for the
Ci ty, 'W:t'4V is investigating economic resources planning in Palo
Alto. In talking w-ith members of the cOIlU!lunity and business
leaders, there 'Was consensus that traditional "economic develop
mentK is wholly unsuitable tor Palo Alto. Ms. Jansen identified
the main issue for the 1990'S as being the fact that dollars are
being taken away from the city. community reaction in Palo Alto
indicates that the area ot traditional economic development is
mc~tly seen as incompatible with the City'S goals.
Ms. Jansen is heading up the ne~ in-house committee. Department
re~resentatives from the City ~ill consider long-term scenarios to
help give a framework to decision-making in the budget process.
This fits \tI'ell -w-ith the Finance COIn1!'littee's current project on
defining appropriate service levels. An information report will be
presented to the City council in October outlining plans and goals
for economic resources plar.ninq. Ken Schreiber 'Will be presentil'l,g
his and Ms. Harrison's Stanford Researc~ Park Study to the Policy
and Services committee in Cctobe~, as well. Carol hopes to go to
Council in January 1992 with an action plan. George Zimmerman's
Land Use Revenue Ana lysis Project 'Will go to the Planning Com
mission and then to council d~ring that same time p~riod.
Ms. Jansen sought input from the group as to how-best she could
solicit input from the members of the c01!U!lunity. Chop Kee?J.an
suggested Carol might learn more about Stanford Research Park and
the businesses located there by attending a forum the Chamber of
Commerce instituted where subjects of mutual interest. to businesses
in the Park are discussed.
8.tanford. Bhopping cent~.:t;.~.c!J&te
David Longbine spoke regarding Stanford Shopping CeI'1_ter's $3.24
million contribution in sales taxes to Palo Alto's economy last
year. He stated that the Center's goal is to increase sales, the
t.otal volume of which 'Was $350 million last year. He explained the
importance of the t.enant mix in leasing wit.h respect to the
CMR:447:91 1
,.
-----..,
communi ty's high income character, as la'ell as a ... ·arefll:.SS of the
needs of a ~ell-educated clientele. The retail industry u~es sales
per square foot (psf) as a measurement of success. The Center
currentlj averages $440 psf for small shops and about $24Q pst for
department stores, .... hile the national average is $185 psf. An
attempt will be made to increase sales both by adjusting th~ tenant
.mix and by -repositioning-in ter:ns of ma:=-ket strategY4 The
follo'Wing marketing areas with percentagE'.s of total sales were
p~esented from a market penetration analysis by the Center:
Palo Alto, Menlo Park, Atherton, Woodside~
portol~, Los Altos, north Mt. Viev
Redwood City to San Mateo
South Mountain View to Saratoga
The rest of the Bay Area
Outside of the Bay Area
34\
15\
12%
18\
100%
From 1987, the center lost 5 percent in its primary market area.
Mr. Longbine stated that Palo Alto's 12 percent retail sales growth
between 1987 and 1990 is extre~ely lo~ considering a State retail
sales growth of 29 percent, Santa Clara County's growth of 25
percent, and San Mateo County's 22 percent. The Center's sales
qre~ 16 percent, confirming that Palo Alto and the Center's growth
lagged Significantly.
Mr. Longbine showed a sales productivity chart which is used to
identify 'ltieak performers in the 'Center by colors "'hot" (red,
orange) for good performers, "'cool-(blue, green) for weaker
performers. The distribution of reds in all areas of the center
indicates there are no .jeak areas. Attempts are and ... .'111 be made
to recapture leases in the blue areas.
The 1992 marke-c:ing strategy loIill focus on the primary and secondary
north areas, and promote the high quality merchandise offered at
Stanford Shopping Center and its position as 11 in the Bay Area4
The strategy will include utilizing nev ideas such as gift
certificates, valet parking, increased community involvernen~. and
merchant motivation seminars4 The Center intends to take a
leadership role with dO\l{ntown Palo Alto, California Avenue and Town
and Country Shopping Center businesses in informing the customer
that more is offered here than any place in the Bay Area.
Sales increases this year have been good: 16\ in June and 12% in
July. The estimated sales for next year are $J70 ~illion, and $400
million in 1992-93 (depending on Emporium's status).
CMR:447:S1 2
I ,
I
!
--
.
-
When asked if a ·Lig box promo center" in East Palo Alto would hurt
the Center's sales l Mr4 L~ngbine stated that San Ant~nio Shopping
Cente~ ~ould probably be hurt more. Price Club and Costeo activity
is more harmful to the Centerl s business because those .companies
span all ir.come groups.
Georq~ Zimmerman wondered if the Center possibly was not emphasiz
ing diversity in tenant mix. Mr. Longbine did ~ot think so because
the Center is a bette~ quality, moderate cost center~ It deals in
goods for all income levels. The focus ~ill be to make the front
of the Center a -better qualityft statement (e.g. Ralph Lauren). To
expand growth, the tenant mix is being redefined and a program of
more aggressive marketing instituted. Carol Jansen asked the time
frame when the present strategy ~ould be accomplished and the space
!)roblem would be primary. David indicated that at the end of 1992,
all these programs will be in place and the Center ~ill be facing
"land lock". An important consideration in future revem.:e esti
mating is the status of the Emporium, as it does $27 million per
year in sales. !f Emporium leaves l it could be up to 5 years
before ano·ther anchor is obtained4 If the Emporium lease .. 'ere
recaptured, he would prefer to replace it with smaller stores that
generat~ more s~les per square foot.
George Zimmerman asked 'Why the sales growth ... 'as less than some of
the Cent~.&.·, s competitors', and David stated the fact that food
facilities had great significance and are the pri~ary reason for
increased salgs. Also, the maximum parking capacity of the Center
has almost been reached.
Ms. Harris-:m asked what the Center .. ould prefer the City's role to
be in the effort to increase sales. Mr. Longbine 1 isted as
possible items for a ~perfect 'World" scenario, the opportunity to
close Arboretum and to expand in that space, the addition of
parking decks, and the completion of Sand Hill for access. A ne~
anchor would need 150,000 to 2QO,OOO s.f. (250,nOO s.f. ideal). He
indicated a definite need for another anchor; only Cnion Square has
six anchors as the Center doe5 4 George Zimmerman clarified that
the strength of a good shopping center 'is in having good anchors
and commensurate smaller stores.
Poli tiea~J;.n4s and Eoono::ai_1C Oevelopment
Chop Keenan pointed out the significance of the fact that govern
ments are all without funds and are attempting to mandate their
shortfalls to other government agencies or private industrY4
Additionally~ regulatory agencies are in their ascendancy again,
and higher tax rates are being imposed. Ho~ever, Mr4 Keenan did
not think there would be double-digit inflation this year.
There is an inadequate supply of housing in northern California,
and transportation issues cause regionalism, .... hich may cause income
CMR:447:91 3
,
-,
redistribution~ Higher taxes and the Proposit~on 13 -attack"
(i.e., attempts by local governments to overturn Propositio~ 13)
will have a significant effect on econcmic trends in the future.
Tax policies ar.-:: increasingly more important in :business decisions.
Hr. Keenan gave a visual presentation showing results of a San Jose
Study regarding t.he possible developme.nt cf the Coyote. Va 11e1'.
Concerns of the San ~ose community ~ere identified i~ the fol]o~inq
a.reas:
Even t.hough residents believe things are going in the right
direction, there is concern about transportation systems and
housing availability relative to their jobs. It is generally knovn
and accepted that those two items are the greatest incentive for
companies to move fro~ the Bay Area~ There is little satisfaction
with the way government is dealing ~ith these issues.
Other areas of expressed concern included the need for affordable
sinqle family housing, better education, public transtrOrtation
systems, preservation of the environment (especially the hills and
open spaces). homelessne5s, and efficient government.
Mr~ Reenan stated that Palo Alto needs to focus on the present
business population and let them know that their location here is
appreciated. He stated further that concerns about air quality
will also change the way these companies can do business in the
future,
Mike Cobb summari~ed the presentation by pointing out that the poll
showed that people .,ant a lot: of change, but they are not ""tlling
to do what it takes to make the change. He pointed out further
that evoents happening in Sacramento right nolo/' :may make these
discoveries and strategies meaningless~
Next Meeting
The m.eeting adjourned at 12:10 p.m. The next 'meeting vill be
january lE, 10:00 a.~. to noon, Human Reso~rces Conference Room,
1st floor, City Hall. The agenda -will include Diane Healey
speakinq on the Stanford Research Park Master Plan and the Land Use
Reyenue Analysis Project by Gruen & Gruen.
CMR:447!91 •
•