Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout0430.091. , : I I ~i" .. <, • 0 "\'," ".:',:" october 3, 1991 THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL palo Alto, California Attention: policy and Services Committee REVIEW OF PE'NINSUL1t. __ ~'I!.~ INFORMATION AND REFERRAL SERVICE Members of the Council: Report. in Bri~:f This is an informational iteD t.-J the Pol icy and Ser-"ices committee .and no Council action is requested. The purpose of this report is t,o assess the effectiveness of the services provided by the Peninsula Area Information and Referral Service agency {PAAIRS). This agency formerly was known as Palo Alr.o Information and Referral service. The Human Services Div~sion held t~o focus group hearings last spring to obtain community input on the City Council's ·People in crisis" priority. Approximately 20 members of the community ~ere invited, all of vhom represented organizations that provided service in one of the three designated areas: I} Domestic Violence, 2) Teens at Risk, and/or 3) Homelessnes:3~ Many salient i ~ . ~s .:ere raised during tr.e hearings, 'Which ... ere sl:.ID1lIarized in a report by staff is.sued to the Human Relations Commission. One of the dominant tile!':les to el!lerqe involved the perceived lack of local information and referral services, and called into question the effectiveness of the City-sponsored PAAIRS age~cy. From those hearings three activities 'Were identified ",'hich the Hu:tlan Services Division and/or the Human Relations Commission .... ould undertake in the current fi seal year to address the "Feople In Crisis n priority: 1) Develop and organize meetings with human service providers, 2) Develop a homeless child care project, and 3) Explore organizing a p-.lblic information campaign to heighten the a\o'areness of services and resources available to people in crisis. CKR: 430: 91 ----.".----'---'-. • Page 2 The policy and Services COD~ittee~ in reference to the thir~ ite~, recommended that a review of PAAIRS be undertaken in light of the com.."'lIents ma.de at the focus group heC:irings. The council, an J'uly B, 1991, approved the reconmendation. MethodOlogy an~ Fin~ings The process of assessing the effectiveness of the information and referral agency PAAIRS was accomplished in four parts~ 1.} In-deeth follQw 9P discussior:s 'With _thee ___ agency representatJves who attend~d the spring focu~oup hearin~ Many agencies at the two public fe-rums stated that they 'Were unaware of what services 'Were available to the "'at risk population." A higher profile of FAAIRS services was mentior.ed as a major need by many particirants. Development of a Resource Hot Line \I'as 2ncouraged by more than one agency representative. These comments culled from the hearings formed the basis for contacting severdl nO:lprofit agencies in the area. Via telephone interviews, they ~ere asked to elaborate en their concerns and suggestions relating to PAAIRS, and the responses are summarized belov: a) Higher visibility of the services offered by PAAIRS is needed. It was felt that PAAIRS did not market themSElves aggressively enough in the community. There ~as an acknowledge~ent by some that this is much easier said than done. It was noted that most who use the se~~ice will be in crisis, and this population is not easily targeted. b) PAAIRS may be a duplication of E'xisting service5~ A fe ... · stated that they have their own mini information and referral program and people tend to go to a specific source for information, not to a generic I&R service (although it was noted that ~hese mini l&R's relate to the agencies' o~n area of expertise and seldom provide comprehensive services). c) PAAIRS needs to keep better documentation of services avail­ able in the community. Many mentioned that Pl~IRS staff needs to be more familiar ",ith types of ~ __ ervices of fe-red by organi­ zations so that they can ref~r people appropriately. d) Services need to be available at niqht~ veekends and holidays. Since many crises happen during non-business hours, tbere was surprise that no new phone technology ~as in place which would give 24 hour coverage. For example, a touch tone phone system that allO'. .. ,s a-:=cess based on the type of information desired is needed. An sao number .'as cited as a major need of the organization. CMR:430:91 , . ,-.-----,,--.. '~,---. · . e) f) q) For:nation of a public information call1paign high.1.ighting PAAIRS services4 A fe'll( agencl' representatives had never he~rd of PAAIRS4 Many organizations stated that they did not receive any referrals from PAArRS. (When these individual!:,; were asked if they performed communication audits with their clients to track how those clients found their service, most stated that no communication audit was performed) ~ Need for more networking, more roundtable discussjons to learn whatts trout there"', more qua!'teIly m.eetings among agencies and PAAIR$. There 'Was some skepticism that the Inter-County Coalition developed between PAAIRS and San Mateo I&R officials would be successful, but all gave high marks to the ne~ executive director of PAA-IRS for attempting this regional effort~ Outdated information~ PAAIRS needs to update its files more frequently, especially its ?alo ~lto Library System's computer file, in order to keep the information current. Al though the alJove conunents wel."e feedback which emanated from f?llowinq emerged: repeated by many, there was positive these telephone discussicns~ The a) PAAIRS provides a very important service to the community. Some stated that they refer r.o PAAIRS quite a bit and the agency seems to be u~atinq now in a timely manner. b} The landlord/tenant program is strong~ cJ Round table forums sponsored recently by PAAIRS have been good. Outreach seems to be improving. The transportation forum~ senior services presentation and the funding forum were cited as useful. d) The-P~~IRS newsletter received high mark.s by tr.any who stated that an improvement ~as needed and had been accomFlished. eJ Many respondents sa id that the new executive director has made some i~portant changes in the program. Most fe1t that the new executive director was very qualified to lead the agancy through the needed transitions. 2) A comprehensive review QJ __ the PAAIRS aua!'terJYHand end of th.e yea~l;eports to th __ ~_Sity of Palo .Alto __ ~_nd ______ conmarison o_L_~ccom- plishments to toe Contract' 5 "SC:9~ ______ of Serv ices" PAAIRS received $33,000 trom the city of Palo Alto Human Services Division contract budget process for the year 1990-91 and $12,000 from COIDlDunity Development BlOCK Grant (CnBG) funds for a total of $45,000. Under the agree~ent, PAAIRS provided general information CMR:430:91 Page 4 and referral regarding community hUlnCln services, dispute mediation services and special ized landlord/tenant information , and arranged for rental housing disput.e :nediation services. The contracted scope of services stated that PAArRS ... ·ould: a) provide information and referral to approximatEly 2,000 call­ ers, p'.lblish five newsletters to a mailing list of 350 co~u­ nit:r~ agencies, host four rOl.Jn.d table meetings, and produce a 1991-92 directory of services which 'Would be mailed to at least 25 agencies and stocked in the public library. b) with regard to the tenant/landL:rd counseling and informatio!l services funded by CDBG monies, provide approximately 2,000 c,allers with information about housing regulations and/or available alternatives for dispute resolution; and pr~vide increased visibility regarding its rental housing information program through public service announcements, ads in local publications, and increased speaking engagements. c) Provide initial needs assessments, inform callers about the mediation process, and accept between 75 and 100 cases for mediation under the guidelines developed for the mediation services compo~ent funded by City general fund monies; provide accurate records reqar:jing each mediation case, submit a monthly log of assigned cases to the Mediation Task Force and participate in mediation training ~orkshops. According to its final report submitted at the closure of the fiscal year 1990-91, PAAIRS provided 1,649 units of service in response to telephone requests (out of a contracted 2,000). PAAIRS did exceed its fourth quarter projection of 500 by 24 units. During this time frame, a Spanish-speaking resource specialist was hired and three volunteers were recruited to update its I&R data. PAATRS published five ne'Wsletters ar'.d initiated the inclusion of PAAIRS_NEWS. It met its goal of hostifi9 four round table discussions by holding an additio~al one in the fourth quarter. The a~ency also printed 6,000 copies of its 19~0-92 Directory of Services, distributed copies to over 100 agencies/individuals and submitted 500 copies to libraries. These figures represent an increase over what was mandated in PAAIRS' scope of services. With regard to the media~ion services component~ PAAIRS accepted 52 cases out of the expected 100. However~ it screeneC 175 potential cases this past year. PAAIRS r8sponded to 1,780 callers requesting information about rental housing regulations and practices, or 89% of the 2.000 proj ected total. PAAIRS staff participated in mediation training ~orkshops in January and February. CHR: 430: 91 • , . .. ~ ~ ... ".'-' ~~--... ,,-.. ~,~.-,,--, .. page 5 In addition to the contracted services listed abcve, PAAIRS developed a community outreach plan in order to publicize PAAIRS services~ These activities included presentations to six variou3 groups in the Palo Alto area, (e.g., police, high schoal students, the Board of Realtors, etc.), t~o display informaticn booths at the Main Library and the Child Care Task Force-sponsor'ed Parer.tForu::n event, development of a nMediation Workshop" for presentation purposes, and a networking session ~ith busi~ess o.ners sponsored by the Chamber of Commerce. J) TwQ meetings between the HumciTl Service Administrator and the PMIRS Executive PJrecs,9r Staff met with the ne .... executive directo!' of PAAIRS, Mary McQuaid, on two occasions (6/19 and 7/23) to revieW' some of the concerns previously described. She stated that it has been a somewhat difficult transition, not only because the previous executive director left before she was hired; but the resource specialist who had been with the agency for four years resigned shortly there-after. Since the Palo Alto office is a two-person operation, this resulted in a lack of continuity in relatior.ships 'With the community in general and ~ith community service agen~ies in particular. Mary McQuaid spcke of the need to increase the visibility of the age.ncy through a series of methods. Her round table I:leetings ..,ith nonprofit groups in the community had been sparsely attended for the most part, although some topics were drawing more participants than others a The fundraising forum drew fifty-two participants: while the ho:meless seminar and the stress management workshop drew only four each. With regard to the Peninsula Area Resources Directory, it was thought that distribution should be ~idened to reach more agencies and people in need. The PAAIRS director ale~ raised the issue staff menticned in regard to the referral function. As stated earlier, :many agencies at the public forums last spring stated that their clients ~ere not being referred to them by PAAIRS. Ho'W-ever, when staff quer';'ed the agency representatives as to how they tracked their clients' referral trail .. most agencies said they did not perform communication audits to learn how their clients ~ere made aware of its existence. Obviously, to ascertain whether cl ients utiliz.ed PAAIRS in their search.. they should be asked by the agencies contacted ho. they found out about the agencies' services. Until that is done, it is unfair to assu~e that PAAIRS is not referring clients to the appropriate source~ Mary McQu~id stated that, although the organization reached 89\ of its targeted goal for its tenant/landlord co~nseling and information program, the media outreach was SUbstandard. This \lias due to interim staffing problems~ She feels confi~ent that 'With the hiring of a Spanish-speaking resource speCialist, their outreach in this area. especially among the Hispanic population, .... i11 increase. She plans to CMR:430: 91 '" I I t I Paqe 6 develop a population. residences, -. public information ca~paig~ to target the Hispanic With 45' of the total population of the city renting its this service has enormous pote~tial. .Ks. McQuaid also .... as unhappy 'With the 1.::>w number of cl ients ..... ho utilized the mediation services com!?Qnent, (52 cases out of the Expected 100), but stated that ~any more clients vent through the intake process (123) and solved their dilemma without formal proceedings. She expects that mediation services ~ill increase this year and feels comfortable .ith the service remaining at the projected level; in addition, PAAIRS "wrill assist cl ie:1.ts to'Ward satisfactory resolution short of mediation. The PAAIRS executive director realizes that the services are very marketable to private businesses and wants to develop a serles of Brown Bag seminars earmarked for employees. Directory distribution and special program flyers citing PAAIRS ser~ic~s ~ill also be made available to corporations in the area. She noted that not much in this area had been attempted previously. Ms. McQuaid also ~ants to avoid duplication ot services 3nd hopes that the various round tables, quarterly meetings of human service agencies, and coalition meetings could be streamlined. The develop­ ment of PAAIRS Intercounty Coalition between San Mateo county and Santa Clara County will help in this area, she believes. Perhaps, PAAIRS could act as a c] earinghouse for these types of groups for consolidation purposes. With agenda plan.'1.ing centrali~ed in the PAAIRS office, d;;.plication could be minimized. The executive director wants to target the senior population for a s.eries on mediation outreach and is currentlr developing presen­ tations at Lytton Gardens, Stevenson House. and other locales. Comments from Senior Coordinating COUncil staff indicate that not much had been done previollsly but ne'" efforts have begun this year with which they are pleased, atld they hope for rr"ore collaboration in the future. Ft:.rthermore, Mary Mcquaid noted the following goals for improving PAAIRS services through tha upcoming year: a) continue to reach an 80% satiSfactory rate in the mediation services, b) Consol idate the Mountain View and Palo Al to offices into on~ Palo Alto location; c) "Get the basics in ordcrn, includ~ng wider distribution of the biannual Peninsula Area Directory: d) Maintain the PAArRS Board of Directors I e::fectiveness through additional seminars, retreats, advocacy techniques, etc. CMR:430:91 . . --''''-~- Pog. 7 4) .E..vall..lation of~ibr~_~~tem PAAIRS cor;QJd.t __ '§' __ l:;'~ PAAIRS has a file on t~e city's library computer that may be acce~s~d by mombers of the public ;as 'Well as a"gencies 'Who possess cornp'..lters. The valu~ of this resource is: that it is available at any time that the: libraries are open and can accept dial-in f;-om computers 24 hours a day.. Of course, it carmot be assumed that clients in crisis 'Will always possess the knolj;'ledge necessary t,o visit the litora't"Y and/or dial in to the computer and access the needed information. This activit}· represents the fore.frent of information and referral service-sJ ho,,",ever, because a new compute_riled directcry is being developed that 'Would tie in a listing of all Bay Area health and human service providers. O~her listings include an information file of hobby clubs I business clubs, communi~y groups and professional organizations operating in Alameda, Contra Costa, MarinI San Francisco and San MateC' counties. Listings for Santa Clara County i!lre nO\i being added. ~lrje service is called BAIRS (Bay Area Information Retrieval Systen) .. BArRS may very well revolutionize the information and referral system as we know it. CUrrently, there ere human service core centers located throughout the Bay }t.rea that perform services :lIr.J.ch like PAAIRS. However, as computers become the norm in households and libraries, the need for st.crefront. I&:R's to dispense referrals to clients in need May become dim,inished. To continue to o!fer a PAAIRS file tc the local population when there is a Bay Area-loride system in place could toe duplicative. The. PAAIRS file could be merged 'With the BArRS file and PAAIRS could be responsible for updating the PAAIRS segment of the BAIRS file down the road. BArRS has not yet reached the point where it is ready to offer its array of service~ to santa Cla~a County, but that time is drawing near. It ~ill be important to evaluate whether: I} reso~rce~ should be allocated to strengthen the PAAIRS computer File System~ 2) leave it as is~ or 3} merge the PAAIRS file ~ith the BArRS information. There are. problems ..... i th the database as it cu:.-rently exists. The PAAIRS file is in need of regular updating. The Library system does not currently allow PAAIRS staff to dial in to amend the file because of comprehensive new software releases recently loaded onto the library's computer. This has been the case only for the last co~~le of weeks, bo~e.verl and library staff expects the problem to be ~orked out withi~ the next fel,{ "'eeks. EVen in the past under the old system. updates ~ere not done by fhAIRS in a timely ~anner~ Much of the information is outdated and ne .... information is non-e:x:istent. According to the PUIRS Executive. Oirector, there 'Was no languag~ in last y~ar's contract \..-ith the City which called for updating the library file. Staff has included that language in this year's contract. CMR:430:91 r .. • , L page 8 sti!!lff sought to deter:J:l.ine the level of usage of the PA.AIRS computer file.. The latest statistics available ace culled from th~ period July through December of 1989 and sho~ a strong usage factor, '3,~27 tot.,l searches; 3155 PAC's (Public Access Catalog) and dial-ups and 272 library and PAAIRS staff accesses). Unfortunately, due to the fact that several neW" releases of so!'t~are were installed in the library's computer system last month, many changes "Were made to the statistic31 programs. These changes resulted in PAAIRS being unable to dial into th~ system for update purposes and has also made track­ ing the number of requ2sts ft'om the current period impossible. The software vendor. oynix/ is ~orking on the problem and staff hopes to have comparative data regarding FAAIRS usage in early October. conolusion staff's review of the Peninsula Area Information and Referral Service has determined that the agency is performing the functions for which the City funds it. A related issue is that of the expectations that human service agencies have in regard to PAAIRS. A strong information and referral organization is an important supolement as each agency's marketing and outreach activities are limited by bUdget constraints. However, these agencies must recognize that those same constraints also bind the PAArRS organization. Obviously, there is validity in many of the perceptio~s that human service organizations shared regarding PUIRS services in the spring meetin<js and in subsequent conversations which staff conducted. Between the period when the prior executive director left and the new executive director came on board, service delivery fell through the cracks. A period of orientation after the new executive director came on hoard also resulted in diminished service levels. However I rapid impr;:)vement has been noted by most agency representat.i ves in recent months. As a result of this revie;.,' and evaluation, Staff and the PA.~IRS executive director have established the following goals~ 1) Cor.sclidate the two PAAIRS Offices (P~,lo Alto and Mountain View) into one Palo Alto main office. 2) Investigate the feasibility of installing a Resource Hot Line/ Crisis Line. ~ith a telephone number that. can be easily re~embered by the public. 3) Educate the human service nonprofit commu~ity on the avail­ ability of dialing into t.he PAAIRS Library File via computer access from any agency office. 4) Encourage community nonprofit agencies to perform communica­ tion audits to track ho .. their clients "Were referred to them. -~. - Page 9 5) Develop t public i:lf'orrnation campaign, hei9~tening the profile of PAAIRS t role in the comr.:unity. 6) Wbenever a person is receiving sUbsidized service via the city's Human Service General Fund support, the eligibl~ participant should be encour~ged to call or visit PAAIRS for information regardinq other resources available~ 7) PAAIRS should seek means to widen the distribution of its Peninsula Area Directory to every agency and household in Palo Alto. 8) PAAIRS staff needs to continue to become m~re familiar with the types of services offered by the v2Irious agencies ~.:l they can refer clients to the appropriat~ program~ 9) continue the strong outreach element that has been developed under the new Executive Director's tenure. Staff will continue to 'Work with PA..ZLIRS and l!'.oni tor progress toward accomplishment of the 90als~ Respectfully submitted, David Martin Ad l:a6.z~~n S~rvices e Fleming istant C~ty Ma .er Relat:ed CMR's: 281:91, May 16, Report on "People 2:20:91, April 4~ Plan to Implement in Crisis" Paul Thiltgen Di~ector, Community Services 1991, Human Relai:ions Commission in crisis" Priority .1991, Human Relations Commission the City Council Priority, People cc: HUman Relations Commission Mary McQuaid, Executive Director~ PAAIRS CMR:430:91 I