HomeMy WebLinkAbout0455.091I
~ ~ . " ~'" ,., .' ,
October 10, 19~1
•
THE HotIOP,ABLE CITY COUNCIL
Palo Alto, California
. -----~ .. '-.-
4
,R"e"g .... i o",!,n".Cll,""",-,W!J.~tb-"eJ,r_:.Qu""."-l"-~i:,t,,y,-~C,,o,,:!n,,:tk-':r"o"l,:":"-,P,"l",a"-Wn ... t~-=---,A",m",e n d me n~__ No.. 2 t 0
consultant Agreement No~ C-0014794
Me~bers of the Council:
Report in Bri~f
This report requests that Council approve and authorize the Mayor
to execute Amendment No. 2 to consultant a::ree!!1ent No. C-0014794
vith James M. Montgomery Consulting Engineer5 1 Inc. for $210 1 000 to
perform additional work to "eet regulatory requirements. Funds are
available in the current year's operating budget for the Palo Alto
Regional Water Quality Control Plant (RWQCP).
Backgyound
Consultant 2!greement No. C-0014794 ... .:.5 established early in FY
.1990-91 t.o condll.ct a number of e~vironmental studies and t.asks
required by the R~gional Water Quality Control Board (Reaional
Board) 4 The agreement was established for one year wi th the
possibility af two additional years, depending upon the City's
needs and budqet4 The initial agreement in the a~ount of $141,443
'Was modified by Council (Amendment N04 1) on December 17, 1990,
increasing the first year's authorized amotJ[lt to $310,443. The
purpose of ~endment No. 2 currently b~ing proposed is to establish
the authorized amount for the second year of the agreement.
Discus~iQ.D.
The FY 1991-92 environmental study needs of the RWQCP. which have
been clearly identified to date, are less than the preceding fiscal
year4 More studies may be required in December 1991 when a new
discharge permit is iss-ued. HO\\'e;:ver, it is necessary to proceed
immediately with currently identified tasks. The key tasks are:
l.
20
J 0 .. Toxicity Identification
Permit Reissuance support
Metals Source Identification
Site Specific Limits Development
Total
-1-
CMR:45~,: 91
$105,000
40,000
35,000
JO~OOO
$210,DOo
, .
I.
-0_-
ReCOmmendation
statf recommends that council approve and authorize the Mayor to
execute the attached Amerdment No. 2 to consultant agreement
No. C-0014794 lko"ith James M. Montgomery Consulting Engineers, Inc.
in the amount of $210,000 for additional environmental study needs.
Respectfully submitted,
PHILIP BaBEL
Manaqer, Environmental Co~pliance Division
C~tJ£{~~-<--
DAVID G. ADAMS
Director of PUDlic Works
/1t\~~WJ.!Jf
.ilINt FLEMING .
Assistant City Manaqer
Attachm2nt: Amendment No. 2
Related CMRg: 521:0; 611!O
-2-
CMR:4S5:91
t 'f !e*(l '"" ...
•
,
," .
/
AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO CONTRACT NO. C0014794
BETWrER THE CITY OF PALO ALTO AND
JAMES M • .KON:GOKERY, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, rNC.
This .Amend!D.ent No~ .2 to Contract No. CD014794 is made and
entered into this __ day of , 1991, by dnd
bet~een the City of Palo Alto, a municipal co~oration of the State
of California ("CITY-) and ·James M. Montgomery, Consulting
Engineers, Inc., a california cons 1Jlting engi~ee.ring corporation,
with offices at 355 Lennon Lane, Walnut Creek, CA 94598 (Taxpayer
Identification Number 95-1878805] (J1 CO!'l'SU'LTANT lI ) ..
RECIT"-L§
WHEP~S, CITY and CONSULTANT entered i~to co~tract No.
CCO~4794 ("the CONTRACT") for the provision of consulting
engineering servi.::es to conduct environoental studies for the
Regional Water Quality control Plant; and
WHEREAS, CITY and CONSULTANT entered into Amendment No.
1 to the CONTRACT to modify the scope of work and compensation with
respect to Phase II of the CONTRACT. and
WHEREAS, the parties wish to provide for a ne~ scope of
services· and additional compensation for a Phase III of the
CONTRACT;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the follo'ioling cove
nants, terms and conditions, the parties agr~e:
SECTION 1. A new paragraph 4.1.3 is hereby added to
section 4.1 of the CONTRACT to read~ as follows:
"4. L.3 Phase_.lJJ: ___ 9f Basic S~rvices. Under Pha::ie III
of the Basic Services, CONSULTANT shall perfo~ the folloving
tasks described in Exhibit "A". as amended: A Toxicity
Identification Evaluatio:-l (TIE) shall be perfermed as required
by the Regional Watar Quality Centrol Board. Selected aquatic
organisms 'Will be subjected to the treated 'Wastewater froll! the
Regional water Quality Control Plant (P.WQCPJ) to determine
wcat constituents are affecting the organisms. The testing
results 'Will be set forth in \oTitten conclusions 'Which .-ill be
presente~ to the city. CONSULTk~T shall proceed with Phase
III of the Basic Services; after the execution of Aloendment No.
2 to the CONTRACT and upon receipt of a Notice to Proceed
under Phase III from the PROJECT MANAGER.~
1
Wt 1'1' .... _ii!P'd+-_~-'
•
~ECTIQli....2.. Paragraph 641. J of the CONTRACT is hereby
amendc9 to read l as follo~s:
"6.1.3 In consideration of the full perfOrIilance of
Phases II and III of the Basic Services described in section
4.1. of the CONTRACT, CIT'i agrees to pay CONSULTAJ.:T a tee not
to exceed one hundred eighteen thousand five hundred fifty
nine dollars ($118,559) for Phase II of B~sic services and one
hundred fifteen thousand dollars ($115,000) tor Phase III of
Basic services.n
SECTION 3. Paragraph 6.1.4 of the CONTRACT is hereby
3In€'.nded to rea:::!., as f0110-"5:
"6.1.4 The amcu:J.t of CONSULTANT's compensation for
Phases II and III of the Basic Services shall be calculated as
set forth in Exhibit uB~, as amended, up to the maximum amount
set forth in paragraph 6.1.3.-
SECTIOS 4. Paragraph 5.1.6 ~f the CONTRACT is hereby
amended to read, as follows:
-6.1.6 For Additional Services. For CONSULTANT IS
additional services, as described in Section 4.2 of this
Agreement, compensation shall be as prescribed in Ey.Jlibit nSn,
as amended, but not to exceed fifty-nine thousand fOllr hundred
fifty-one doll~rs ($59,451J for the first year of the term of
this Agreement and not to exceed ninety-five thousand dollars
(~g5,OOO) for the second year of the tenn of this Agreement.'"
SECTION 5. Section 7.2 of the CONTRACT is hereby
amended t~ r~ad, as follows:
"7.2 TIME IS OF THE ESS~NCE
It is understood and agre~d that time is of the
essence of this AqreemerJt, and that, .!ollc .... ing execution of
the applic.able Am.endments to the Cc;ntra~t and receipt of the
Notices to Proceed for P·nases I, II and II, respectively,
CONSULTANT shall commence "Work on the initial and subsequent
tasks under the Phases I, II and III of the Basic Services,
respectively. in acccrdance with the time schedule set forth
in E~~ibit -An, as amended.-
SECTIOJl~. Exhibit A is hereby a:rnended to read in
accordance ~ith the attached -Exhibit ~A~ as amended.-
SEcTION 1... Exhibit B is hereby ame.nded to read in
accordance with the attached ~Exhibit nB" as amended.-
SECTION 8. Excet?t, as herein mcdifie:d, all other
terms, conditions ana proy~s~ons of, a~d the exhibits and
amendme.nts to, the CONTRACT shall remain in full fo"rce and effect.
2
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this
Amendment No.2 to contract No. C00147Sl4 on the date first above
written.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Assistant City Attorney
APPROVED:
City Manager
Director of Finance
Director of ~~lic Works
Manager r Environmental
Compliance Division
9109"'.J rya 001'0113
3
CITY OF PALO ALTO
Mayor
JAMES 1'1 .. MONTGOMERY, COnSULTING
E~G INEERS, INC ..
By:
N~me:
Title:
Ott1&.~
An'1 t::. -fi{Vy-e ( I
EXHIBIT A, AS AME:\DED
SCOPE OF PROJECT
"
,/
rHASE III OF THE
BASIC SERVICES
TASK 7 -TOXICITY IDENTIHCATION EVALCATION STUDY
The Palo Alto Rr::gionaJ \\/:uc[ QurrLillj Cont:ol Plant (?AR\VQ(.'P) is required by [he SJIl FrJnci.s~~o
Bay Regional Watl.'[ Qu:i.lit)' Conuor B0ard (Regional Bo;.td,l unda its Cl.Jrrent l\'PDES penni! ro
perfOrTI'. a. chronlc TQ,j<;iiy Id~m1ticatlon E,,,,aluatlon ("HE) smdy.
As pan of the Effl\'ler.~ TO);.icity Cha.!t\cter~1.ation Pwgl".lm r~:.j\.:ip~d by the Regkmal B02.rd.
PARWQCP had pr~\'iously condu<.:ted screenmg and va:iJ.bifay te\t:r.g of :;_~ ,~fh.:cnt fOLl:CU!e and
chronic tOxlclty bet'.;t,'~en Septemter 1989 ;lj'lC Ji.Jne i991. The Tesuhs indicated no an.:te wxkit:;.
Of the three speci-es tes!ed for cnrorli: toxi.;ity. onl.v the fresh\li.:J.cer algae SelenastrlAm
capricorruuum consis.rentiy exhibited a cnrvnic roxic res.por,:,e. This chronic response "':as nOled
WhCil lhe test water was above 62 percent eftl:lcnt This TiE study, required as one component of
lhe current NPDES penni~. is imcf1ded to identify potf.'ntlitl sources of chronic toxicity In L'l-Je Palo
Aho eft111ent. Base on directions from the RcgionLlI Board, Se!CIUWTwtJ cap.""icor!'wrum is 10 u!>ed
il1i the te!:;! organism in this chronic TIE SPJdy.
EPA h:!5 promu!galed pr01ocols for conducling .acme TIEs using Pimephalt'$ promclas (f:Hhei3.d
minnows) and Ceriodapli/lia Ilubia" However, 10 dille [l1cre is no published methodology for
using Selenastrum as lest orgal1i.~ms in TIEs to in"e5ti,~ate chronic toxicity. CO'SLIL TA!\! will
coorrlinale with appropri:ue Regional Board Slitff 10 ensure [hat the TIE siudy will be conducted
y:ith Regional Board appro .... al.
A TIE slUdy is a slcpwi.se proces:; which ";:QiTlbines lO"k·ily te~tlng and physical and cllemic;lJ
testing to l..er9 in on sources of eftlllcill toxicity. P;-dimin:lT)' i'!!sling res.\Jlu. Wi:! be used to de.fine
and focus each 5ubseqllt!nl phJ.se or the inves.:iplion. For [his reason, the e;r;:ac[ scope of work
Cilnnot be defined at thi'i> t~m~. C[TY recognile$ ',hn! flexibiht)' to adjust the projecl scope is
necess::t.rv to achit-ve the Dbjec.iv~ of the s,a!dy, CO,~SUL TA:,\T will coordinaH: ""'ith CiTY at key
poir.ts ot the project and ..... ,,11\ obt'-lin prior written. I.lpPf()\'allf th-e DI1dg:.:t:l1) limit '<J. ill be e)l;ceeoed.
Recent sludies cDmpleled for Ihe PARWQCP h,p.'!.': focu~d on mel:1ls. The ~ope of the TIE will
con~ider other agefl.tS) ca\J:;in~ th-e chronic iox.ic;iY ir: the eftluent. alld wiil not be limited to
~t!lls
Task '.1 -Toxlcit.'4I ChaTClc\rril.ation
In order to characterize [he chronic loxicny of the PAR\VQCP eff1ueI1t, CO~SULTA\;T shall
".;oneci five samples. for It-sting. ThiS tJ~k is.dl"'id(!d into 3 Sllb!asi.:s 01:;' f.ollow:
Subtask 7.la -Sampling MobifiLatiun. PriDr to actual sampling, COJ\'SULTAr-.'T sh.;!l!
meel wilh CITY sta.ff .11 the pl3n[ s.ile 10 i<:lenllfy s~mpJing rOCJtlOI1. method of sampling. and
loca~jon of any reqllired utiliries. (elecu-ici.\: COrHlectlon<;. elc), 111 £t!I1cral. COJ"SULTA~T shan
provide the ncces.~;lry s:impli~,g equlprncrH. ~l up of lhe ~JmpieTs., <lnd pick-ujJ and delivery of
samplts [0 irs Jabur.JlOry for tesllr1g PARWQCP .stJ.ff \.I,'IIJ b~ rc'>pon:;ibJe for monitoring: the
s. .. mpl::r during the 'i:lmpiing period This. m~I!:Eng IS renl;U]\,C'!)' .'Och,.;d'Jied for the wed of
Septembc.::r 30. 19~ i
Prior IO sampling, CO!\'SULTA\;T shall pr'p;ue .::! summ:Jt')' instruction sheel for the CITY
operators. AddJlioll:tlly, CO)\'SlJLTA:"\'Tsnali als0 s.pe'::lfy the procedures 10 be used for tesling.
ReviSions to US EPA prOi.:~dure:r. ;mel quallty assur;HICe/qLi~JiIY conaol (QAl'QC) procedure~ ~haU
be in~ \ uded.
Ai
•
\
rtldl
Subtask 7.1b • I"eld Sampling and ToxkHy Testing. Betw' .... en October and December,
1991, five s.ampks will be collecled from Ihe P.;.\_F{\\iQCi' cff1uent. The approx.inlJ!e dMCS of these
even~ ~h;ullx; as fOllow;
Week of October 7. 1991.
Week of Ocrober 28. 1991.
Week of November J8. 1991.
Week of December 2.1991.
Week of December 16. 199 r.
CONStJ!. TANT shall provide all nt:,::e~sar)' sampling equipment and can!:liners. set~up and shu[
down the sampling equipment, IHld deliver the s3mplt:s to its bboraror:y for an.al)'sis. CITr-staff
will monitor the sampling ov~r the twenty-four hour inten-'al. Samples coliected shall be 24-hour
composite: samples. CITY will prov;de hourly flow rales to CONSlJLTl'\J\'"r for coa::positing.
SaMples shall be 'I1l:llmained al 4 0C during handiir:g and shipping to the bbori.!tory.
CONSULTANT shall commence fractio:1:ltion and testing of samples within twenty-four flour'S
from th(: end of the collection perlod. The s.ample~ shall be chara.::re-.Ized by a combtnatLon of
fractionation procedures which include moeifled liS EPA PhilS~ I Method,,> (EPfV600/3-88/034)
and Walsh and Ganas ~:tethods (Environ. Sci. & Tech. 17: 180-82}. The modified USEPA tests.
shall include pH Adjustment Test, Flltralion Teil, Aer<!tion Tes-t, C-IS Adwrptior. Test, EDTA
Chelation Te!;.t. and theOx.~dJ.ti.on-Reductior, Test
CONSULTANT s.haH summarize the rt,.s.utts of each sampling e'il!n\ in 1 ci.1.t:l report as descdbo.:d in
Task 7.6 below.
Sublask 7.1c . Progress Meeting No 1. CO,~SULTAs"T shall conduct a prugres:s meeting
8.l PARWQCP to l!pdat(; CiTY nan co the prehminary le:.ull .. of the projecL Tent<ltlvely. this
meetlng wHl be condl.lcled bel'o.veen [he !hird a~d fo:..:.., ..... _h s3mpl~"g C'\·ent.
Task 7.2 -Physical and Chemical Analysis
An aliquot of each of the f!.'1e sampEng episodes analyzed in Task 7.1 wi~l be stored by
C01\rsULTA1'ro.'T at 4 oC. Analysis for specific chemica!s ... ill be guided by ihe re!:l.!l!s of tile
Phase I lesllng. For examp~e, if :he Ph3.:.e 11L'5iirg lfidicaH:S tb.t meta!:s are the t'Jxic ager:b. lhen
chemica) aTiillysis will only be performed fer metals 10 irJemify the concentrJotions. of met::!.ls
present
The number and types of chemlcJt anaiyses which might be performed on ~n'y o.-.e efnuem sampie
cannot be predicted at this poil'lt This \1,:i.U only bt:corne clear when the resLlh~ of the fractionations
become availabLe.
Task ?_l ~ CausaH'o'e To"icartl Identification :wrJ ConfLrmation
Depending on the results of Ph[!se I tC!)ling, additional investi.gJ.tions rna) be' needed [0 furtner
refine or confirm the suspecled 1Dx,icam. This w~1.l be accomphshed by perfonn;ar.ce Gf USEPA
PhJ.5C 11 and Phase m procedLire.s as des;cr.bed ir, ··Me'hod~ for AqLlatic Toxi.:-it."'· Identification and
Evaluatlon, Phases 11 and III" (EPA/600/3-88/035, 036) As with Ta~k 7.1, the number and
types of Ph<!se II and Phase In analy.ses cJ.nnO! be prcdicled 31 t!ll.~ time. ~e types of te.'>rs may
include one or more of II-.e followlIlg"
A-2
•
\
•
Non Polar Organic CHI Meili;l[101 Extrrl"::lions.
Non·PotarOrganic XAD Separndoos.
Clinotilo1yte. Trearmem ...
HPLC Separ.:1tion.
CONSULTAr-.7 shall commcr.ce ',I.:i!h [his t~~k ;:~Jt('r the Progress ~'Ieeting described J.bo\'c. The
approach and te!:.ted ~o be performed as ro.n of this. ~sk. sh3.U be diSCllS:;.ed lG this meeul1g.
Task 1.4 a Tre:ltment To.'\icily E\'aIu.a~jon
In this task:. the effect that the treatment plaJll ha.<; on effluent toxicilY 5hall be cvaluz-Ied. "His wW
be accomplished by simuttaneously sampling the comb1ntd influent to the PAR\VQCF
concurrently with O:1e of l'tJe efDuenr samplifLg events described in Task 7. I. Tbe influent sample
will be e .... aluax:::d for toxici~ and the causative agents ider;tified. If:he toxic l:!.gents were l>'1e same
as ;n the effiuem., pa.ss-throu,gb to.xicity wili be il1dicJted. If Lie [oxic agents differ, the res.ulLS may
indicate wbether toxicity is (ormed ~n ~he ?!am process (fOm treatmem chemicals. The.se res'Jhs
will be instrumenlal in addressing whether trealrner,1 polymers ofchlor1natloo ~)'+produC[s are toxic
agents ~n the efflu;ent. If effluent toxkity is de\~rmin ... d to migtn3te in the treatrnem pb.nt, dose
dlrenlion will be pJid to these jV,,'O classes of chemkals. The resu.lts of this task ""til a150det:rmine
how w~U!.he treatmt.m system removes \Oxidty.
Task 7.4 wm "ot be tnit:ated until aft':.r Task. 7.1 ha:i pro\'i'kd s-nmc ins~ghl as. w the causes of
effluent tcxldry. R;:suhs of Task 7, I will pro .... ide il ".~arch ·i'l1Jge" for I!"vaTuari . .,g the: influent
scream. Th.is "£earch--im:l.ge" may be either a s-pecLEc chemica! or a etass of cnemicals, dependtog
upon how successful L1e toxicilY cr.araC'teriUltiol1 '.,I,'a~. It i., .,ntlcip::l!ed !.hal one influent sample
will be .r:cLLec.~ed and .malY1.ed for Task 7 .4, cone.~po"dlng \0 the fl"'\.mh sample ir. Ta';)k 7.1. The
approach to Task 7.4 wiU be discussed in Ihe project coordm':l.iior: meeting prior to the fourth
S-J.mpling round.
Task 7.S -De\'elopment or Source fdentification Procedures
CONSULT.o\!'iT shall de\.'elop rrocedures to aid in [he id<:ntificatiorJ or those influ-.!M streams
.. ",:hich are the SOPJ.n:.e of final eff1uem to;o:;icilY. These procedures wilt be dctetmined by the results
or Tasks 7.1 Oll1d 7.2. ·ne pro..::edures will be a "search+image" of either a pass-through [oxic
chemi.cal, or a precursor chem[cal v.:nlch eveniu;J.Uy forms the tina! efnul!-ni to).;icant. The
procet:iures for identifyi:lg the chemi:::al in source st:'"eams shall be described
Due 10 th(: limtted time a!loiled 10 this smdy, an :3C1Li.:!1 Sour.:.:e Idenufication E\'alua,ion (SIE) ",ill
not be included imo the scope.. of work., The product of Task 7.5 wiIl provide th! tools fo-:
performing such a SIE when time anQ re5Qun::es are avail.:>b!e,
T.ask 7.6 -Repart Preparation
CO~SUL TA~T shari prep::JIe J.nd submit fQUT data. r~poru, a maf: pmjec[ n:pon and a final project
report. The four dnla reports ~ ltl be prep.ucd de,-cribing tbe resu1rs of the firs.t four toxicity
ch:u--a.::teril.1Tion events. Dala reporu shari be :iubmillc:d '>"-'Ilhm four weeks of the completion of the:
cnardclerizalion events. A draft report smnm:lmjng the fmdir.gs of the. pro)ec! .,hall be subrrutted
by Janu:JJ)' 31,1992 and the final report shall be sllbmitted by February 2S, 1992. Three copies
of each diHa report,. three copies of (!"Je-drdfl report, and flve CGjlleS of Ihe finJ..l repon shall be
submitted by CONSUL TAr'>.T.
•
_.-':.
-'/" :1...."' ::.:..."-~ ........ _
In addition 10 the Pro.§.Tess Meeting No, 1 d~scribe-d abo",e, CONSULTANT snatJ meet once: with
CITY st&ffduring the repon review perioo to discuss lhe findillgs of the [e-port
Task 7.7 . Projecl Coordination
CONSULTANT shall also meet with the Regional Board twice during the projeci to discuss the
states and fi nding:s of the project
A4
;:.,.:
,,.-.
•
;:-
-.
>
-, ,
'-
•
EXHIBIT S, AS AMENDED
RATE SCHEDliLE A:'iD PAY~!E:\T SCIIEDt,LE
t ,
,"
. .
. ,-~ '.-
".
S,R KANSEN ASSOCIATES COST ESTIMATE FDRPHASE W
TASK oeSCRiP11ON
TASK 1
Phase I C hrMc T IE U'(lfr'19 Sellr.a"~rurn
Samp'a ColllI(;,oo and o .. rmlrY
Pro-gres.s MeetJng (S HaMenl
Subla!!";1
Tull: 2 • S~lfit: Chamicai Analystt.
a.;ijtal$.lOr9a~ics Ar.a~"Si:lS
5I.JCIOlaJ
UNiT
COSTS
$750Q,ITiE
$~COOiT:E
$95:nr
r ... k 3 • Toxic.ant Identificat'cl1 and Co"'firmal~o"
Non-P;:,lar Orgar'llc C18 Me:tJanoJ tJ:lia,,"1i..,., $1.500
~on-Polar 0'9<"ni.: XAD Sep.uattOn $ t ,000
CI;nOI1 1olJ1e TrF.atment $1,000
HPLC $e::>aralion $3,S')"
Subtotal
rad; ... Treatrnll'l'1t Tox,city Evalu3lior"l
Phase I Chrcnic i IE U:!irng SelenaslIlJ m
Sarr.p;e COilectlon a'ld De~ I'''",{
Subtotal
Task S 4 Source ld@ntir-Co1LilJn
Deyelop PrOC1!m.m~5
(S. Hansen.)
fG. Wenham)
Subtolal
T.d .. 6 • Repon Prep.ralior1
Data Rg~or:s;:
!S. Han~)
(Go Won. .. .am)
Draft Report:
(S. Hans&ll)
(G WonoamJ
Fi.w RII?OI'!:
IS Har:sen)
IG. WcnNi.'n~
PrDg,ei:;; Meell"g ($ H"'"S('r'l
SU!Hol;jl1
Tu~ ... Proj'!'ct Coorc!in;jllion
Meetings Wi ~IOr.ai Boarel (S HaMe"lj
Sublobl
Projec1 Tolal
S75~0,IT:E
$1 DOO/TIE
$95;h,
53.,1,90, hr
5951 hr
534.QOinr
595/1),
5;3430'hl
595 'I": r
S34,9:',:"I,
Ni,,:MBE:.R
5
5
5
5
2
3
2
40
"
" "
60
50
" " ,
? .• }7.
ESTIMATED
COSTS
$37,5(;0
$5,00(j
.$570
1'6,000
$:3,000
$3,OG,'
$2,000
$3,5-00
$7,500
5t,OOO
53,B,OO
$' ,,<l 00
$1,520
51,' 17
55,,700
P,094
53 ,E ~:J
5839
$I,14J
TOTAL
$43,070
56"oeo
$~',500
$-",500
5 So,,200
SI5,6~9
$1,140
'f.'~;'
"",,,>.,.
';~<-..
':< ,...-.
SCHEDULE Of HOURLY RATES FOR ENGINEERlNG FEES'
EE'fECTIVE JA..'1lfARY I, 1991
Senior Company Officer
Principaf Professjo~al
Principal Administn:lIor
Super;ising Profession a!
Senior Professional
Senior Administrator
Profe.\sion a r
Associate Professional
Administrator
Assistant Proressional
$en lor Designer
Designer
Drafler
Senior Resident Engineer
Resident Engineer-!nspector
SeCTC!ary
Reproduction Typist
Clerk
U per hour
$126 per hour
51 IJ per hour
S 92 per hour
S 79 per .hour
$ 65 per hO'llf
.s 65 per hour
$ 54 per ~ou,
S 45 per l10iJf
$, 38 per hGur
$ 72 per hour
$, 50 per hm.lf
S 33 per hour
$ 89 per hour
$ 58 per hour
.$ 42 per hour
$ 39 per hou.r
$ 31 per hour
• The individuitJ hourfy rales includes salal}'. overhead. and profit .
•• To 'be delermined on an indi\liduaI basis .
ACOP.lt.
JARDINE I'NS'ORA1lCE B;ROUitS [.OS A..~GE:U::S
11835 If. OlYKPIC !~VD .• 5rH FL.
LOS ANGEu.s~ CAl.IFOR..~1A 90D64
TE~: (213) 444·3333
CONTACT: ~CKEY LEE (213) 444-3752
JAMES H. HON'l'GOMERY
Ct)~SUL"tlNG 2NGINEEP..S. INC. ET AL
250 N. MADISON AVEJrJE
C~ 91101
COMPANIES Ar=FOAO!NG COVERAGE
~T~~N'" A u.oYDS 6 CERTAIN COMPA..N.I~~~~_I?~
f~"~~\" B .. SEPS .. 1931
__ .ENVtRCNME!.f!' I.i.. _
COMPUANCE woe P
?X-10:;'2
WC~I(U'I 's. CO""~":$':' ~'Q~
.~
PrC/fes:s.101\1.1 l iat: i l i ty
'C:L.i"~l
1.iability Cenif[cac:e.
PUNr E~NIRmiMEN!AL STUDIES
CITY OF PALO AJ.TO
P.O. SOX 10250
lAiD ALTO, CA 94303
ATTN: PHlL BOBEL
8-31-91
8 31-91 8<31-92 fie" CL.a'1II 5,000,ODO'"
"\l.g~a~1! 5,000,000
Th:'s certifica.te ca.ncels & :supcrcedes any previously i!iS'ued
AS RESPECTS J:'f'1 JOe NO. UY .. 'l" -RiGIONAL r,,'ATER Qu.",:.rTY
$i-iOtJ.!.O ... NY Ol' T~~ ",.,0,'1:: DE$C~!.eE.:l .P-OClCI!:S BE CANCEl~E:C; 9:::':01:1<:: n"n::
fll:":~"I]oaN. ClArE THE~~O'. THE ISSUI'NS COM?ANI( WilL [ .... ~e:AVO~ TO
"~, __ . i'lOTICE 1"0 ":'HE cE.r,IF:C .... ri: "OLClE'==' NA.),AE~ TC HIE
gUT S\.lC~ N01IC.e: S~AlL jM~O$.e. !'lie, OB:'I{>"TIO,,-OR
rrs AQE"-:-S 0"
INSURANCE BROKERS LOS AN~EL!S
tLVD.. 5TH FL.
,"",.L'". CALlFORNIA 90064
444-3>33
MARY BAK£~ (21l) ~44-3~~J
I"SlJ~ECO
JAMES 'M. "'MONTGOMERY. tONSIJl.'UNC
ENGINEERS. INC. E~ AL
25(} N. XADISON &\V'El-.'Ut
PASADENA, CALIFORNIA 91101
CITY OF PALO ALia
P.o. BOX 10250
CL 7702114
($100,000. SIR)-
PALO ALTO, CALrFO~~rA 94303
ATTN; PHIL BOBEL
4 a j 25£1
. -_.---
f---.. ------.--.
~~';"C 4 1991
. ,''';.-i-GNMENTAt..
._CCiJ?UANC~ wacp - -.•
~AY "AVE 1!!:EN F:E"DL.'CE!.) 81' PAID C'-A!MS.
8·31·91
18-31-91
I
----------, , ,
8-31·92
c::c"'~,"r~ 5111,ml!:
LI>.\'~
e:O.ooIL'I ;W\IF'I~ 1"'"'_""""
S;D::I~'" ~URY
~.·r.o'_~l
"':5: ~.s~-5' '.::.,:::y "I:T
c's
1.1~1T5
:,1,000,000
!,
I
,
I,
IIi'S'Ot.UCf ,l,VAlW"E TO T~( Clt1 OF I',I,l.0 A~'O. iTS OFFICERS, ,t;C;'~;.' E~f'lO\'U'.
S"'O'cI'.O ,l,N'" OF '1"",;0 ",eO'-1E on::,"",e~~ :?-DUCIt:S BE C,l,NCE'~'_=:) aE"'OI'\E 1..-1;:
E.>:"'I"'jaCJN D~r;:: 1H~;::'=OF, TI-E rs.s;,;:!;c, CO~P""N'f WIL!.~
M-~h.
.'.-
"