Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout0299.092...... .- - (I)", . , , ',' '~,,_, '. ,c.,'" , ' .June HI, 1992 THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL Palo Alto~ California Amendment to Autom!\ __ tatL..lin..qerc:rint SY!l~em 1I.gre1!ln8gt Members of the Council: 8 This report requests that Council approve the Police Department's continued participation in the CAL-ID auto!!lated fingerprint system. Funding has been included in the 1992-93 J?olice Department budget. Background. On January 1, 1986, Senate Sill 190 provided for implE~entation of a Statewide automated fingerprint system that could be accessed by local law enforcement agencies~ This bill appropriated $7,000,000 to the Department of Justice for the purchase of equipment and services to create this State~ide syste~. The bill also provided procedures for local government to receive equipment based upon a sharing of costs ~ith the State. The state paid 70 percent of the cost oE the purchase of the equipment. All other costs for imp1e­ mentinq local systems are the responsibility of local government. To be eligible to participate in this Statewide prog~a~, and to receive the 70 percent matching grant from the state, each county 'Was required to forro a local policy board. The Santa Clara county C}O..L-ID Local Policy Board 'Was formed in 1988 and is currently composed of: Supervisor Diannp McKenna, tram the Board of super­ visors; Mr. John Smith, chai~an, Santa Clara County RAN (Re~ote Access Network) Board; Councilmember John Ash~orth, City of Campbell; District Attorney George Kennedy; Sheriff Charles Gillingham; Chief Louis Cobarruviaz, san Jose Police Department, representing the largest police department; Mr. Donald Bro~~, City Manager of th'!! City of Cupertino; Mr. QuasliIl!. Inham, Director, Santa Clara County Oepartl'L'.ent of Correction; Judge Alfonso Hernandez, Santa Clara Municipal Co'...rtj and Chief Chris Durkinl representing the Police chiefs' Association of santa Clara County. A staff committee subsequently developed the Santa Clara county program. In April 1988, the City council adopted a resolution authorizing the Mayor to enter into an agreement that provided for the Police Department's participation in the CAL-ID system. CMR:299:92 L i I l - Page TWo The San Jose Pol ice Department'S autoIDated fingerprint systeJ:!!. serves as the. link with the Department of Justice' 5 Statewide sy&tem~ Since the system has been operational, numerous identifications of suspects have been made. The City of Palo Alto's share for 1992-93 is $JO,871. Funds have been included in the Police Department's 1992-93 budget. The CAL­ In automated fingerprint system continues to be one of the most significant lav enforcement technological tools available. 8aqommfJi4atiQ.n Staff recommends that council aQopt the attached r~solution authorizing the Mayor to amend the agreement providing for Palo "lto Po~ice. Department's continued participation in the CAL-ID automated finqerprint systetr. foz.' 1992-93. Respectfully ~: ILy., ! -~s DURKIN Poli:::::e Chie.f Attachments CMR:299:92 \ // 1 ______ ' .! f' '/( /"<-'-->.-'--~' --,~--<.. r /1' JUNE FLl:1iING I / Assistant city Ma~qer , / ~ ./ - -----~-----~--~~-- RESOLUTI011 NO. FESOLUTION" OF THE COt;NCIL OF THE CD'¥ OF PALO ALTO AlJ'l'llORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE FOURTH AMEND­ MENT TO AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT ACCESS TO THE CALI~ORNIA IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM WHEREAS, the County and the Incorporllted cities entered. into an agreement dated April 26, 1988, entitled ItAGREEMENT TO PROVIDE I.£>O.L LI'.W EN"FQRC~IIT AGENCY ACCESS TO THE CALIFCR.'1IA IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM" (hereinafter '"Original Agreement lt ), in order to fund, implement and operate a local alltomated fingerprint identification system (hereinafter "Local 10 System"), which ~ill provide local law enforcement agencies ~ith direct access ~o the california Identif,ication System (hereinaft-er "CAL-IO System") through the use of local remote access network equipment (hereinaf­ te~ -Local RAN E~~ipment"): and WHEREAS, the County and the Incorporated Cities desire to continue the Original Agreement af".d to modify its teI'l!l5 ..... ith respect to the financial contributions which the County and the Incorporatee Cities ~ill each make to ~~e City of San Jose in order to implement and operat~ the Local 10 System and to extend the term of the Agreement for another year. NOW, THEREFORE, the council of the City of Palo Alto does hereby RESOLVE as follo~s: SECTION 1. The Mayor is authorized to execute an amendment to said Original Agreement to continue for another year implementation and operation of the Local ID System entitled -Fourth A:mendlner.t to Agreement to Provid,,:-Local LaW" Enforcement Agency Access to the California Identification System.ft SECTION 2. The City Manager is authorized to send to the City of San J'::lse's Findnce Departm-ent the City of Palo Alto's check in the amount of Thirty Thousand Eight Hundred Seventy-One Dollars ($30,871.00) for the Local ID System, which is the city of Palo Alto's financial contribution to the opt:!rating budget for fiscal year 1992-93 for the Local ID System. SEcrION 3. The council finds -chat this is not a project und~r the california Environmental Quality Act and, there fore I no environmental impact assessment is necessary~ INTRODUCED A.'1D PASSED: AUoS: NOES: 1 9lO6LOI)'D~ L o ABSENT: ABSTENTIONS: ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FOR~: Sr. Assistant City Attorney APPROVED: Mayor City Manager Director of Finance Police Chief 2 \ , , ' ! I i i 1 1 I I i ! 1 I, --- JRG:CBM:su 4/7/92 o FOURTH AHENDMEN"l' TO AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE LQ(".AL LAlf ENFORCEMENT AGENCY ACCESS TO THE CALIPORNIA IDENTIPICATION SYSTEM T":iIS FOURTH AMEr.."DMENT is made and entered i;lto tr.l.is __ day of _______ 1992, by and betwe.::o the COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, a county of the State of California (hereinafter ~Countyll), the C!TY OP CAMPBELL. a muniCipal corporation, the CITY OF CUPERTINO, a municipal corporation I the CITY OF GILROY, a municipal corpo~ation, the CITY OF LOS ALTOS. a 1n'...lnicipal cOrf.'oration, the TOWN' OF LOS ALTOS HIL~S, a municipal corporation. the TOWN OF LOS GATOS. a municipal corporation, the CITY OF MILPITAS, a municipal corporation. t.he: CITY OF MONTE SERENO, a municipal corporatioD~ the CITi OF MORGAN HILL, a ~Jnicipal corporation. the CITY OF MO~~AIN VIEW, a municipal corporation, th~ CITY OF PALO ALTO, a municipal corporation. the CITY OF SAN JOSE, a muniCipal corporation, the CITY OF SANTA CLARA, a muniCipal corporation. the CITY GF SARATOGA, a municipal corporation, the CITY OF S~~ALE, a wJnicipal corporation (hereinafter collectively refer~ed to aa -Incorporated Cities" J ~ WHEREAS, on or about July 1, 1.989, the county and the Incorporated Cities entered into a First Amendment to excend and modify the terms of the ORIGINAL AGRB~~j and WHEREAS, on or about July 1, 1930. th~ county and the Incorporated Cities entered into a Second k~endrnent to extend and modify the ter.rns of the AGRESMZNT~ and -1- 9264k/0289k - JRG:CBM:SU </7/g2 W~EREhS. on O~ about July 1, 1991~ the County and the Incorporated Cities entered into a Third ~~endrnent to ex~end and modify the te~ of the AGREEMENT; 3.Tld WHEREAS I the ccunty and the I~c~rporated Cities desire to contir::'.1e the Original Agreement and to modify j ts teTIl"cS with resp~ct to the financial contributions which the County and the Incorporated Cities will each make to the City of San Jose in order to implement and operate the Local ID System and to extend the term of the Agreement for another year. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and benefit5~ the Couoty and Incorporated Cities agree that the Original Agreement be amended as follows: 1. Section 3 of the Original Ag~eernent. e~tit12d ~TERM~, is amended to read in full as follows = The term of this Agreement sball COIIID"lenCe upon the date of exe=ution of this Agreeme~t by all parties and shall terminate on June 30, 199.3, unless terrninated earlier as provided hereio. It is anticipated that the parties will renew this Agreement beyond June 3D, 1993, by an express written am€ndrnent. 2. As ~eq'...lired under Section 6.C.3. of the Original Agrecment~ a list setting out the operating b;J.dget fer fiscal year 19.92-93 and reflecting the financial contriLutions of each party to the A9rea~ent fer fiscal year 1992-93 operating costs of the Local ID System is attached as Exhibit .p,_". -2- 9264k/02B9k • \ , I 1 I j JRG:~:S'IJ 4/7/92 3. This Fourth A~~ndment may be executed in one or more counterparts each of which shall be an original, but all of which together shall con~citute one a~d the sam~ document. 4~ All other terms and conditions of the Original Agreernent remain in full force and effect. WITNESS THE EXECUTION HEREOF the day and year first hereinabove written. CITY OF CAMPBELL APPROVED AS TO FORM, By' Dated: City Attorney CITY OF CUPERTINO Dated: City Attorney crTY OF G1LROY AP PROVED AS TO FORM, By: Dated: City Attorop.:y CITY QP-LOS ALTOS APPROVED AS TO FO;<M, By' Dated: City Attorney TOWN OF ALTOS HILLS APPROVED AS TO FORM, By' Dated: Town Attorney TD'Io."N OF LOS GATOS APPROVED AS TO FORM: By' ------~--Dated: Town Attorney -3- 9264k/0289k ·~f'f·-·m~' __ ... ~-..,..-... ..--' ... '-~ ...... '-'''''<'- '\:.. '''.," - • .' ~-i ,j ~-i ~ 'I I . , i :j I I i i I I -: JRG: CBM:su 4/7 /92 APPROVED AS TO FOR.'1, City Atto:tney APPROVED A..' TO FOR.'1, City .~ttvrney APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney APPROVED AS TO FORl"'l:: Cit}.-Attorney APPROVED AS TO FOP1~' City AttOrney APPROVED AS TO POR1-f: City At.tornfr~{ APPROVE~ AS TO FORM: City Attorney AP?ROVED AS TO FOR..~: City Attorney 9264l</0289k • . . ---" CITY OF MILPITAS By, D':1ted: _______________ _ CITY OF MO~lE SERENO By' Dated: CITY OF MORGAN' HILL Dated: CITY OF t10UNTAIN VIEW By, __ ""'. _____ _ Dated: CiTY OF PALO ALTO Dated: CITY OF S~~ JOSE By: Dat-:;od: CITY GF SANTA CLARA By: Dated: CITY UP SARATOG.~ Dated: ,4· .; I I -- JRG:C'aM:8U 4/7/92 o APPROVED AS TO FORM, Ci ty At torney APPROVED ~.s TO FORM, County Counsel 9264k/02B9k CITY OF SUNNYVALE Dated: COUNTY 0 F SANTA ClAJ<A By, Dated: -5- - JRG;CBM:f3U 4/7/92 CAMPBELL CTJPBRTINO GILROY LOS ALTOS LOS ALTOS LOS GATOS I'.ILPITAS HILLS MONTE SERENO MOR,'3A,N HILL MOUNTAIN VIEW PALO ALTO SANTA CLA.'<A SARATOGA SUl/NYVALE '-.. ,;- SANTA CLARA CO~'"NTY TOTAL: 9264k/C289k o EXHIBIT A SANTA CLARA. COT...!,,};"Tl". CAL-ID 1/1/91 !:Qg~latiQn ! __ Sbar.e. £QJl.sri®.tion 35,250 5 _0248 $19,983 40,350 5.5931 $22,244 32,750 4. 4010 $'17.503 26,350 3.6325 $14,526 7,525 1. 0430 $4,148 27,450 3.8050 $15,1.32 51,600 7.1526 $28.446 3,290 .4560 $1,81.3 24,750 3_4307 $13.644 68~200 9.4536 $37,597 .56,000 7.7625 $31J,871 94,100 13.0438 $51,875 28,000 3+8812 $15,435 11.9.600 16.5785 $6S,S33 106.200 .l4_.nlii. liL5_4~ /21.415 lOOt 397,697 A-l JRG : CBM; S\J (,/7/9'2 PERSONNEL .QAk:.ID PROJECTED BUDGET fJ~_,«l!..'L19 9 2 . :u SAN JOSE POLICE DEP~RTME~~r SANTA CLARA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT A..I:;'_~ NON-PERSONAL TERMINAL MAINTENANCE CONTRACT FAX MAI""I'ENANCE CONTRACT PCLAROID FILM TERMINAL PRINTER SUPPLIES 'l'RACING FILM SUPPLIES $232,329 __ :l,_;3~~~ ___ ~ TOTAL:$372,11 7 $13,650 780 8,OCO 800 350 2.000 AREA TOTAL,. 25,580 "OOIPMENT NONE 9264;c/0289k A-2 $ __ --"0 .OJ<EA TOTAL: $ a $397 69.]. • " '''''~~'''''''''.''.'.' .. ' .. '.'.' . . " ~- I - J'RC:CBM:9U 4/7/92 o DURING 1991, THE AUTOMATED F'INGEEPRHrr IDENTIFlCA1'ION SYS'I'E~.s AT SA-V JOSE POLICE DEPA.~TMENT (SOLVE &. C.U-ID) GENEP..AT£I:i THE FOLLOWING: 1. TEN PRINTS ADDED TO DATABASE: 19,396 -Tctal i~ database: 25'3,99i: 2. TEN A. B . PRr~~ HTTS (Prisoner SOLVE"" 2,543 Cal· ID _ 625 identification): 3,168 • Explanation: Prisoner providing false identification were correctly ioentified and, if in custody at the time of identification, 'Warrants served. 3. OUTSTANDING WAP..RA..~S IDENTIFIED: 877 A. SOLVE -671 B. Cal-ID "" 2G6 C. With bail: 744; Nu bail: 133 4. WARR.A."'ITS IDE.'N'"i'IFlEO DOLiAR VALUE: ~Q __ ~_.....l_~ __ 4 A. Warrants served: $3.728.572 B. Warrants missed: $ 474.750 (prisoner no longer in custojy at time of I.D.) C. SOLVE identi.fied .$3,209,352. Cal-ID = $99.3,97G 5. LATENT PRINT HITS: 175 A. SOLVE· 82 B. Cal-ID "" l10 5. LATENT PRINT HIT BY TYPE OF CRIME: Burglary: 111 Grand Theft: 4 Petty Theft: J Homicide: 4 Narco: 2 Questio~ of ID ~ 8 Other: 9 Trespass: 2 Robbery: 7 Rape: 2 Kidnap: 1 Auto Theft: 42 A·3 9264k/0289k