HomeMy WebLinkAbout0258.092-
May 14, 1992
HONORABLE CIT1 COUNCIL
Pa1t1 AHa, Cal ifo'tnia.
Attention: F1!\anCe Corrm~tteE
Cgmprehe~s\ve P1an Update Expenses
Members of the Council:
Report in Brief
3UDGET-:;2-94
This report surrrnarizes estimated costs for the proposed Comprehensive Plan
revisfon, including C!utside professio<lal services and internal Planning OiYlsion
e):ptnS(~s beyond the Planning Div; sian operating budget. The report also
rec:omends Finance ComiUee endorsement in funding th~ Compreh~mive Plan
update, with the understanding th~t funding details will be further refined in
June lS92, ~en the City Council acts on the work program, and in late September
or October, when the Council ls expected to act en consultant selection and
ippreptiat~ budget arnen~m~nts for the Plan re~ision.
Backgroynd
The draft wDrk program for updating the Comprehensl~e Plan has been reviewed by
lIIany .ad~isor}l boards 'dnd commissions, inC'.luc!ing the Plannil'lg Commission, the
Architectural Revie'W Board, the Public Arts Corrrnission, the H~storic P.esoui"c~S
Baud, the Utilities Advisory Corrrnissiol'1 and the Human Relations Commission. The
relliews of tnese ad\lisory board and cOlTL'T1issions have facLlsed on tontent, process,
ilnd cost. All boards and commissions ha.ve been strDngly supporti'w'e of tI1e
iJpdate. In addition, a jOint Cit,)' CourH.::l1/?lanning Commission study session was
held on May 4, 1992, to discuss the draft 'WorK program. The discussion at this
meeting focused on the two and one-half-year process, the need for the plan to
have a ~isior. while addressing issues of the 90s, and the need to review costs
wnile recognizing that a revis~d Plan is in investment for Palo Alto's future.
The fo1l~wing paragraphs and attached tables discuss estimated consultant and
internal Plann.ing Dillis10n expenses for the Plan revisitll'\ in excess. of the. nO'nnal
opnating blOdget.
Consy1tant Costs
Estimated cOfisultant costs for the Comprehensi~e Plan reV1Slon ~ere identified
in Section IV, pages 6 and 7 of tne draft ~or~ program. Tnese tables ~lsc are
attilched to this report (see Tables I and JI). The first table identifies costs
CMR:25S:91
L
t
I
·/'\
for the reccrw.lended aTternati'.e ~nri for i lOW and high alternative. Costs fer
the recQr;tTtended a1ternaU ... ·e range fro~, $41)2)500 to ssoo,ona for the entire tlllO
and one-half-year process. The low alternative ranges from 5188.000 to S2S5,OOD,
and t~e high alternati ... e ranges from 5920,000 to $1,268,000 for the revisiorl.
The: s!c:ond tabl e ident i fi es thp. range of cOrlsuHant costs for the recommended
alternative from 1992-93 through 1994-95.
Consu1tant ser ... ic.es focus nn se .... eral areas wh,cre PlaMlng staff does not ha'olE
either technical expe"U,. or speci.l skills (see CMR:238:92 of 4/30/92). Tasks
in the former categcry would include technical expertise in nOiSE, air quality,
transportatlon model 1 lng, sei smic: safety and economic and fi scal resource
analysis. A number of functions identified ir. the proposed revision process also
require special ski11s, ino!:1uciing facilitating pub11c workshops and selected
com1ttee meetings, preparing and analyzing re~uJts of a community survey,
~rep4ring newsletteys during Key pha~es of the Plan re¥isicn, and ~dit1ng the
Plan. A lead consultant is recommend!d to managE and coordinate the functions
of subconsultants. ond tc assure that effcrts cn the Ccm?rehe~sive P1an revislcn
and draft EHI are fully integrated. lastlj, a consultant has been identified in
the r~commended llternati~e to prepare the EIR. lhe advantages of 1 consultant
preparing the EIR include freeing Pl arming staff for preparation of techni'-al
reports, draft policies and. ultimately~ the draft Plal'!. Given the comp~-e)(ity
Df an ErR on a Plan revision, use of consulting services most liKely wOLild be
mor~ cost effective th2n use of in~hcu5e staff. ~ho would handle many areas of
Plan preparatioTI+
Staff w1shes to emphasize that most of the work and responsibility on the
Comprehensive Plan revision wouTd be assumed by staff. (See tab1e attached to
CMR:238:92 of 4/30/92 that ident1fies area$ of the Plan revision ..,.here City staff
has r~spcnsibility and those areas where special cor.su1tant expertise is
requ;red.)
intg~n)l planning Pivision Expenses
The P!arm1ng Ohis,on will i..1l0cat~ app.roxima.tely one-third of eX1st)ng staff
resources for this llpdate. This allocation is ;de~tified in the proposed
operating budget for the next two fiscal yoears. Wh,le the updatE. is ,'1'\ prc·c:.~ss,
ether Plan~in~ Division activities will be limited to deve10pment mnnitoring,
housin9 progrim activities, and minimal speCial study functions,
In addition, the work program for the Plan revision identifjes the need fer an
additional contract Planner and the nepd for an additional one-half support shff
position tD complete the process. The \\Iork program als.o identifies meetings,
notices, outreach, educati~n, presentations, and a level .of community involveme~t
that will far exceed' the scope of normal Planning Division functior.s. As a
result, we have estimated a 30 percent increase over Planning's normal budget
submit tal in many Ii ne item catego ri es. Some 1i ne items ~ nowe\o·er, show a h 'i 9 her
increase, particularly the investmeont in software liceflsl.ng and tr.eining to
supplement our" Geographic Information 'System work. station request in tr 1992~93
budget {see attached lable Ill). Oeta.lled jl.:stHicatioJ"ls for-each of theSE item.~
follows:
CMR:258:92
p:\Clltr\c~boL>dl.~r
5/l4/n
Page 2
.-~~'"Io!If i\oo. _"'~"""" :."-~_.
L
L
•
,--1 ..
,
.--
J
j
-
~,
I. AddiUon.l St,ff, line_Items 3101 and 3Ill
Current di~ision staffing t~ be devoted to the Comprehfnsive Plan
.effDrt includes 3.5 p:-Qfessiona.l positions and substantial
assistance from other City departments tnrough the pr~~osed
Techrdcal Advisory Group (TAG). "The need for an additional c.ontract
p:lanner is well dOCllmente-d ir. the text af tl1e \l.!ork Program. The £1
Carni no Real area phn. a focussed area stud), to be formu1ated in th~
cOi1text and framework of the Comprehensive Phn Update, wi n require
the Equivalent of a~ least ene-half of the full-time contract
plarmer.
The sstimatE"d costs for a cOf1tract senior p1a.,ner for 2.5 years
reflect discussion5 ~ith three planning consultant firms. A senior
planner is def)ned as a~ exp.edenced urban planner ..-ith at least
fiVe years of .extensive experience who requires minimal supervision.
'Th~se CO'f'lSllltants Slid recruiti'!'l9 for thh level of planner, even in
the cw'rent jab market. is very difficult. They provided staff with
estim~tes of !.alaries nec.essary to attract oualifiej candidates.. ~.s
i result of these interviews, staff is recorrrnending .a salary of
575,000 annual1y, .diich is equivalent to !enior planner in Pl10 Alto
at E -Step (i. e , • $54, oeo withol.Jt benefits) p 1 us an adj ust:nent factor
~f 40 percent to (o¥er unpaid benefits.
In estimati ng the support staff needs~ staff atcounted for the
mailings, meetings. minutes, notices and fi1e support documented in
the )lork Plan. A full·time s.upport staff member wClJld be reQuired
to handle this effort. However. one-half of tnat full-time person
need is offset. because no special :;tudy assignments could be
accepted duri n9 the durat lon of the tomprehens i ve PI an update 1 f the
dudlines are to be met. As a r~suH, an additional ha1f·time (0.5)
support position would be required for the Plan revision.
2.~ Computgr fer Contuct Phnne-r. Itl:!ms 3123 and 350.4.
The contract planner 'W';'11 require a pers.orlal ccmputer and re1i,t~d
software to perform tl'1e work. Therefore. tile costs. include purchas~
of i per!lanal cQ\1Iputer and related software fer' this lrJdividua.l.
Costs are $3,500 for hardware {PC and a monitor) and $1.500 for
software (WordPerfect, Har~ard Graphics, DOS~ Pagemaker, Reflection
and Windows)_
3. Geographic Informatior. Systems. Items 3122. 3123, 3J25. and 3504
The Comprenensi~e Plan ~pdate creates tne need to SuppleMent the
budgetary request in the 1992-94 budget to invest ; n G€ographic
Information Systems (GIS) for U'1-e Plannlng Di¥lsion+ An
interdepartmental syste-m is curr€ntly being funded and implemented
for the Public ~ori<s a.nd \JtiliUes Departments. The Planning
Division tlas budg~ted SI6,{lOO in 1992·93 for a work station. This
hardware win Tleed supportive software af10 training iii Oider to
become useful a:id operational early in tne Comprehensive Plan
CMR:15B:91
-L
5/14/91
Page 3
-:.~ ..
,.-\,. :;;~'
-"" ~.'--
>i
-"
_ .. ',-
-...... _._-
-
pn:H:ess, Ttle de,.cisiGn to re;:ormend GIS, 21thaugh COSt1i~f than a
traditional CAD ~y$tem for automate~ mapping, was made b~cause we
can both accc.mp1 iSh Our immedi cate mappi ng needs fer the
Comprehensive Plan Upcate. and build an information system which
will sig>liffcantly impiove Otir overall operations and sel"vlce. GIS,
when fl.:~l)l ~mplE:mented, ",in provide not onlY tTie base and themdt~c.
mapping functions requi~ed to complet~ the Comprehensive Plan
update, but 1t also wil1 provide f1ex:'ioi1ity and c.r~ati.l/ity in
imple~enting land US2 regulations.
The costs of initiating a GiS are compds:ed of ,~ardware (S16,OOC for
a work station included in the 1991-93 oudget). soft •• re (GDS
license wilt cost $13,800, 56,400 of which is budgeted i~ 1~92-93J.
training (the Associate Planner .'ould ~e scheduled for two s.eparate
wee Its of off-sHe-tra11'ling, as advised 'by Utilities who ha\le
recenUy completed th~ program), and maintenance {17,000 is
estimated b.y Information ResolJrces to cover Planilir.g's shire of
maintenance for computer resources dedicated to this system).
These 5z~tem compcner.ts, in combinatio~ with the costs for
digitizing mapped information outlined in detail In the Work
Program, wlll provide the basis for our improved information
management. They are neede~ to continually pro\lide and update the
maps identified in the Comprenensi.e Plan Update WorK. Program.
Utility and P~blic Works pepartment Partjcipation in funding the Comprehensive
Ph" Effort.
Tn! Comprehensive Plan Work. Program envisions considerable-invohement and
participition in the update by a11 departments in the City. Two departments,
which will playa prominent role and will benefit greatly from the effort, are
the Utnities and Public liork:! D~partr:ients. Wh'Oe ill departments will
contribute to and gain from participating ir, the Plan revision, these t\110
departments .,,;11 benefit bec::al'se of their si9nificant role in the physical
development of the City_ As a re~~1t, the Plan, and especially elements dealing
.. ith resource mar,agement, City services and fac'\lities~ larid use and employment.
and environmental constraints, will provide H!ese departments loI!ith a pclicy
context for their futllre capital improverner.ts progra~s:.
Therefore. Utilities Department \IIill fund 1S percent of these special
Compre~e~sive Plan costs. These costs include the recommended work program for
consulting ser~i,es and t~e internal Pl~nni~g Division expe~ses. They amount to
approximate1y .sa7,OOO for the revision process over the thre~-year work program.
Specific policy linkages betweer. Utilities functions and the Comprehensive Plan
include: 1) land u~e designation~ and pol~cies th~t determine type, amount and
location of land uses which in turn affect Utilities demand and long-rang!
facility planning, Z} employment policies tMt deSignate and forecast types a.nd
amounts of employment-reli!.ted uses, \ffhi01 in tUrn a.ffect deliver)' of utility
services and lon9~rii.nge faeil ity planning; and 3) environ"enhl resol..Crc.e paHcies
which rela~e to numerous water c.on~ervation and re$O'Jrce management functions
within the Utilities Department.
CMR:258:92
p: \CII'r\r.:pbudl, crnr
'l:' .... "--
5/14/92
Page 4.
-
" ," ... -. ',' '":: '''\
'":~~?i~"
In addition, the Depart~~t of Public \liorks I.dll fund 10 percent of these spe~ul
Comprehens.ive Plan <:osts from its. enter-prise funds (Refuse, Water QUcllity Control
Plant and Storm Drainage funds), that \IIould ",mount to a.pprLl~~mately 598,000 oller
the proposed three-year process. Examples o-t re1ati~r,sh;ps betWi!en Public Works
funct10ns and the Comprehel"lsille Plan include land Use, employment and Housing
E1eQent policies. Comprehensive Plan policies in these ~ections, as noted
ear-lier, determine amount and location IoIhere land shall be devoted to specific
USilS, e.g., cOlm1ercia', indust.,.jal and residentiaL As a result of such
policies~ Public Works cail assess areas of l;llperli;olJs cOllerdge (for storm dra'in
plan~ing), project refuse and recycling demand based en land use policies, and
determine waste water load treatmE;,.t needs from both policies in the above
sections and from forecasts prepared fa .... t"le ComDrenensive Plan.
Funding of CQmprehensive Plan Revision Expe:lses
The following table summarizes the proposed Cornprehensille Plan revision expenses
di5cuss~d in the previous sections and described in the attached tables. These
estimated expenses are for both consulting serlllces and for internal Planning
Oivision costs. They do not include allocation of Planning Chision staff that,
as ~reviou5'Y noted, has been incorporated into the proposed Flanning Division
o~erat;ng budget fDr f1sca~ years 1992·93 and 1993-94.
This table also identifies funding from Utilities and PubliC Works enterprise
funds discyssed in the prellious section of tn1s report. The balance of fundi~g
for the Pl an rev1 s1em wi 1 1 requi re a COrllllitment of resources from the Reser-ve for
Capita' Projects. The Resen'e is anticipated to be ever 57 million at the f!nd
of fiscll year ]991·92. This does not include the approximately S5.1 million
Generill Fund reserve Hat has been 5€'t up to account fof'" the AS 702 PERS rebate~
5~ould l1tlgation prove positive for the C1ty.
PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVISION EXPENSES
[xpense -fY 9'-~~ FV ,3-24 [I 94-95 Total
Cansul tant Ex.penses $256,000 S270,OOil $ 79,000 $605 1 000
Internal Planning
Division Expenses 116, 000 14 0,100 109,600 375,700
Total * $382,000 HIO,lOC SI88,600 $980,700
Utilities 15% funding ( 57 ,300) 61,500) 28,300) (147,100)
Public Wor.s 10%
Funding LM>l.O.Ql 4l.000l 18,900 1 L9_~ .... 19..Ql
8al ance Requi ring
Funding $,85,500 $307,600 $141,400 $735,500
• Allocation of Planning Division staff for C.omprehensive Plan re~ision is
in the proposed Planning Di~ision ~perating budget for FYs. 92·93 ar.d 93·
94. As a resu1t~ these costs are not included in the special expeilses
identified abo .... e fCir the Ccmpreohensi'le Plan reviSion.
CHR:258:91
Il ~ \g,r\c:pbu.c:ll ,c::mr
L
5/14/92
Page "
-
Afte-r finance Cotmlittee re ... ·;i!\I( of these estimated Compr-enens;\le P1an e.xpenses,
th~ City Council will ha~~ an additional opportunity to revie~ and refine th~se
costs when it acts on the ,,"ork program and fundi ng far the Compf"ehensiYe Pl an
revision nn June IS, 1992. Approval of actual budget amendments fer the Plan
reyis1Q~ will not occur until Council a~ts on co~sultant c~ntracts in late
September or October 1992.
SUllITIiiirV and Conc1uslon
Staff noted in earlier reports (see report to t~e Planning Commission of April
10, 1992) t~at a maj~r Comprehensive Plan re~ision requires substantial funding,
takes t ime~ and requires an extens ive com.'l'11tment of staffi!1g r~s.ources.. ff the
finance Corrrnittee and the c.ity Council determine that the benefits of a revised
Comprehensive Plan, IIIh;c'" addresses issu.es of tI'1e 1990s and reflects ill City
.... is;on for the twel"lty·first century. justify sud an investment. then staff
believe$ the finance Committ~e sh~uld endorse funding requir~d for the re\lisicn.
Such funding would reflect !!stimat€d expenSES identified ir: the recofmlended
i1ternative for the Comprehe~sive Plan re~i$iQn. A Finance Committee
endorsel!lent, as noted eirlier, could be fUrther r~fined \rIo'hen the City CGundl
acts on tne Work Program on June 15~ 1992,
Reconmendati on
Stiff re-co!!lT!ends that the finance Committee 2ndorse funding the Comprehensive
Plin re~ision for the recommended alternative that is described in the Executive
Summary of the work program and in the main body of the work program,
~.(1;ctfUllY SU~itted. ~tt~~
Assistar,t pf~ng Offi cial
;{f;f,:.,d' f ~Ju~l
KENNETH R. SCHREIBER /
Director of P1annir.g and
~IAM m;CP-
Cormunity Envircnment
City Manager
Attach"",nts: Table ,. Recommended Con~u'ting Services Budget and ,.
Alternati.ves
Table I I : .Recof!i"~lended Consulting Ser ... ices Budget
Three Years
Table Ill: fnterna 1 PJann i ng
",lated CMRs: CMR:239:92, CMR;116:92
cc; PlannIng Commission
Architectural Review Board
Comprehens;ye Plan Update Mailing List
CHR: 258:92
p: \om-\epbud 1 CPIIIr
L
Division Expe~ses
Over
5/14/92
Page 6
,
~
J
r
l
~ !
i
______________ ~~. ___ v~' ->,
Recommended Consulting Services Budget and Alternatives
R.ecornmendfd
Community Envlronthl!'nt
Economi.c./FI,'JcAl ~\!rCt'S 525,000-$30llOO
Tran~portlltlnn IW,OOO-$30.ooo
Urba.n [\O~lgn SlS.OOO-ILW.xJ
Cnmmuftity FadllUe", 'tid Service"
Socli,l ScI'VI~!I; $7,50]-$10,000
El1vimnmt'ntal Rt'lIo\m::es and Safety
Nnl!'ie $25,000-$30,000
ScJ!mkSai£'ly $10,(lOO'$tS,OOO
Air QUAllty $10,000-$15,000
EI CHnlnn neAl Art'i1 Plan $75,000'$100,'''')
Other
NeW!ll('lh'(9 (3) $15,001
M('('ttng Flldlll~tlon (15) $11,,,,",,
Cnmmunuy Survey $lS,OO(J-$18/KXJ
Fuluris.t (for T",nJ~ Rq:1Ort) $:<100-$10,01)\
Ma"9P~uction .$4.,000-550,01»
Editing 520,[m·$25,OOO
Printing and Mailing $35,OOO·$.~),OOO
EIR C()m.u"!\\\ "t S!'OO,OOO·$75,OOO
lPdd Consultant $75,om'$90,OOO
Tot .. l $462,.''iOO-6(X),OOO
-Sce Budget Notes beginning on Pi\g~ 8.
L1rtt/1 W/l'~ I'rog",," (Apt'iI J, 19'.111
,
;...,
,' .. '.
AHtmalive 1 AllttnatlVI! 1:
0 $50,000-575.000
520.000·$30.000 $50,000-$75,000
$~.500-$S,OOO $25.000-$40.000
0 $20llOO·$25,OOO
$25.000'5;>0,000 $40.000-$50,000
!7.'<Xl·Sl0,oro $25,Doo-$,.'\(1,000
$10,000-$15,01)) $30,000·$4/),000
0 $1'>O,Il()()·$200,tl(Xl
0 $40,000-550,000
0 $>5,000-$30,000
0 515,000-$18,000
0 $lS,()OO-$25,OfXJ
$4<,000-$50,000 $60,000·$80,000
0 !o4M))
$2S,OOO-$40,oro $75,ooo·$911.0IXI
!50,OI"-$75,Ooo $2(J(),OOO-$2,'O,O(Xl
0 51Il(l,OOD-$1s<l,OOO
$188,000-255,000 $920,000-1,268,Ofi)
"·1"
)
S'efill" IV, P.f.~ 6
'. \
,
. " .
"'.
I
r' Recommended Consulting Services Budget Over Three Fiscal Years
I FY92-93 FY.H. FY.4-9.
Comm,,"Uy Envlronmrnl
El'Ol\Oml('/Fiscal Re!lource(l 515.000-$20,000 510,000-$15.000 SO \
T,.n9:portatlon $5,00>-$10,000 51O'oo}-515.ooo $5.000
Urban l:>e!l:lgn $5,000-510,000 $5,OO}-$10,OOO $5.000
Community F,dltUl'land SnvlC't1l
S(tciltl SeI'\'I~!I $2,soo-$'.ooo $'),(00 50
Envlronml'ntal RplIOUr«1 and S,jII(dy
NolSf' $10,000-$15,000 $15.000 SO
Sel~ml(' Sak-ty 510.000-$15,000 SO SO
Air Qunllly $5'oo}-510,OOO $5,IJJO $0
EI Camino Real Art'8 r'lIn 575,000-$50,000 5SO,OOO $0
Olhl'r
NewltlCti('l''S (J) $5,000 $5,000 SS.ooo
M~tlng FadlHation OS} $3.000 $5,000 $4A'lO
Comrnlm\1;y SUNC)' ''',OOO-SI8,000 SO SO
FIltunst (for Trends R<'port) $~tom·$10.00J $0 $0
Map Production $14,000-525,00,' $24,OCXJ-$25,IOO SO
Fdltlng S(1 520,0(\() $,5,t'(tl,)
Printing and Mailing S5,OOO-SIO,()(X) S25,OOO-$30,OO(l $'1100-$10.000
f:lR COn.9ullnnt SI0,OOO-$2OAlfJ $30,OOO-$40,(l'JO 510,000-$15,000
Lead Consultant $25.000-530,000 S2S,OO>-$)OAl'JO S:'!5,{)oo-S3f),OO(J
;'f;
TOti1i 5169,500-$256.000 S234,OOO-$27tl.(l()() 564,000-$79,(,00
~~.
Jl!
t-
. ;;
.'-..
Dr .. /I \.\lorA /'mgmtrf (/11"'1/03, 19'm
------~---.
L
L '"\;~i~-j~
-~
Note: The rises' yttlr hlldgtlJ
1I.rt appro:rimanorr., only. A
"'fe,lr'wo mo"," delay in ,~
~chnlulealrl pul $10,000 /ffIm
Mft /isml y(JI.r 10 'lte nt.xt. It iI
lik,ly that fM~ar l{mr 92-93
trptndilu~es will ht ItS! OUlft
indicated, unlh fis~tllljNl' 9-1-
95, bt-Ing mort' IhtI." ,""dicsr"d,
ConfirqUtntly, the tQble
rqn~cnts a lih-ly wor5t-<",",,, in
the nNlr-l~m,
_WI .. " lV, r.g~ 1 ....
i \ .
<)
)
,--. I & 4S ~71DL
I .',
i ",.;,,-C,' •• 1 ~!if!' ,\:' ':
I i
,
i
j
~
~. ;
" 1
,
, ... '
. -.~
>.
;.-
• -.:c. < :-:.~
ct~~ ~ .. :~:..:; "
l~
TA~LE J 11
IKTERKAL PLAHNING DIVISJON EXPENSES
Unlfll Item ~_lm;t>er fY 92-93 fY 93 -94 FY 94-9~ Exr-lanat fon
3102 -Planning $56,000 S75.000 156,000 Senior Pl ann3'r at t-Step
Contract Services equi'lla1ent. with 40% fer benefit
adj~5lm2nt, fo~ 2.5 years
beqin"inq ]0(1/92.
3120 -Ad¥ertis1ng
• nd PublishinQ
1;,000 15,000 15,000 30% of present request .
3121 -Secr-etarial $18,000 S24,000 S18,000 0.5 Staff Secr€tary at E-Step
and Clerical equlvalent, w1th 28% ~oberta's
Contract Senolces markup, for 2.5 years beginr.ing
10/1/92.
3122 -Instruct'on S1,500 0 ° Tuition of S150 per day for 10
and Training days of trainin9, in two one-~eek
periods. This is part of a
$4,000 estimate for traini~9 or.
the GIS System, which is held out
of state. ~;r fa.!'e, nctel and
meals exper.ses, estimated it
S2,500, are in the Travel and
Meetirgs line item.
3123 -Programming $8,900 0 0 GDS license and software for ene
and Computer wGrkstaticn ~i11 cost Sn,BOc.
Since $6,400 was a1ready budgeted
fer F~ 92-93, S1,400 .i 11 be
needed in this Special
Comprehensive P1an Budget fer the
GDS License. $1,500 for Contract
P1anner's personal
compl.!terlsoftware.
312S -[Quip_ent 57,OOC 57 ,000 $7,000 57,000 per lear for mai~tenance
Maintenance a.nd of the GIS application, work
Repair :s.tation 1 a~d Planning's share of
ma~nt€nance on the minicomputer.
(Shared cont~}ct wjUtilities and
Pub1ic J!crks.
320! • Office 52,700 52,700 $2,700 30% of present request.
SUDol ie,
3203 . Art and 52,100 S 2, I 00 $2,100 30". of present request.
Pnoto
P,ge 1
.,
-
------~-------------
Line ltam Numb.,. FJ 'l1-~3 FV 93·94 I fI 94-9~ £xoiaO'lation
3299 -Other 11,,00 5l,500 $1,500 30'% of pr-ese.,t request.
Supplies and
Mater1als
3305 • Transporta-S300 5300 5300 30% of present req~est.
tion and Drayaoe
3306 -Tr.vel and $1,500 0 0 Travel and meeti~gs expenses
H-letings cot.nected with G1S train'ing in FY
92-93 noted if) , ine item 3122,
above.
3401 -Reotl' of 5500 5500 5500 Renta1 of rooms for 3 public
meetiil9 rooms I meetings. to be held in areas of
Palo Alto where City facilities
may not be avai1able.
)504 -Pl.Irchase 53,500 0 0 Personal computer and monitor for
cOl!Ij>uters ccntract senior planner.
3902 -Min ;ng 56,000 58,000 $6,000 30% ~f amended request of
Services 3/30/92 . Special mailing and
printing expenses ~;ll extend
frcm 10/1/92 to 3;;1/95; h.nce
upenses In f'i 91-93 and FY 94-95
are for 9 menU,s.
3904 -Printing S10,500 $14,000 $JO,500 30% of amended request of
Servjces 3/30/,1. S~e note on 3902,
above.
TOTAl $126,000 Sl40,10O Sl09,600 Total £xpenses for Fiscal 'rears
92-93, 93-94 and 94-95.
Page 1
-