HomeMy WebLinkAbout0252.092-
\
May 14, 1992
THE HONORABLE CIT:i COlmeri,
Palo Alto, California
Attention: Finance Committee
proposed Gas Rate Increase
Members of the Council~
Report in Brief
ji.-94
This report recommends Council approval of the attached Resolution
to increase retail natural gas revenue approxi~ately 9 percent or
$1 1 560,000 on an annual basis effective July 1, 1992.
Background
The revenue requirement of the Palo Alto G3S utility consists of a
number of components including the cost to purchase and transport
natural gas, operate and maintain a reliable system, finance an
appropriate portion of the capital improvements from current
operating revenues, fund prudent reserve levels l and produce a
reasonable transfer to the General Fund. A significant change in
any of these factors as well as a change in sales level or in the
contribution from reserves can trigger a rate adjustment from one
year to the next.
Palo Alto's ~atemaking philosophy is "~O price our utilities at the
lowest possible rates, consistent .ith sound financial planning,
whil~ promoting efficient resource utilization and customer
satisfaction.-In accordance with this philosophy, the City
attempts to plan electric and gas rate increases 50 they do not
occur simultaneo~slY in one year. By staggering annual rate
increases between the two largest utilities, the bill impact upon
our customers will be less severe than might otherwise be the case.
sometime-a a utility may forego a rate increase longer than t'Wo
C>IlI'252 , U
L
f
~ ,
I
yea:t':i j while other utilities, such as the Water Fund, may require
rate increases more frequently due to unusual conditions. The Gas
Utility has not had a rate adjustment since a 9 percent increase on
July 1. 1989. The next Electric Fund rate increasE is planned for
FY 93-94.
For FY 9~-93, staff recc~mends a $1.56 million or 9 percent gas
rate increase. A review of the Gas Fur.d financiaJ. operations for
FY 92-93 indicates that current rate levels are inadequate to allow
the utility to meet all its financial obligations. WhilE! the
Utility's largest operating cost, purchased gas expen5e, is
expected to rise only minimallYt a very large increase is planned
in F~ 92-93 for this Fund's Capit~l Improvement Program. The $1.46
million rise in this eX"Penditure is largEly related to the council
approved Infrastructure Project whicn will replace leaking,
inadequately sized and structurally deficient existing gas mains
and services. Thus, of the $1.56 proposed rate increase, $1.46
million or 94 percent of the increase is l'lec~ssary to finance
capital impro~ements and the Infrastructure Project.
ACRl ic:ation of the Proposed Re'.r~_nue Inc~~ase
Staff evaluated a number of alternative methodologies to spread the
$1.56 revenue increase a~ong the customer classes. Met~ods
evaluated included an equal cents per therm increase "across the
board", an equal percentage increase "across the board", and
varying increa$es applieQ among the customer classes to achieve
cost based rates. Some of the primary obj~ctives are to improve
cost of service and customer equity. meet the revenue requirement,
minimize the bill impact on any given customer ~lass, and encourage
the etfil.;ient use of a valuable and finite resource. In addition,
for lIIinter:cuptihle" customers with alternate fuel standby
fecilities. the Key rate~aking objective is to maintain competitive
rates to lessen the risk of these custome~s buying ga& from other
sources.
Given these objectives, the app~oach taken by staff is to spread
the increase in ~ manner vhich ~ill improve the cost of service
relationships between the customer classes and minimize the impact
on customer I s bills. Cost of service studies indicate that the
residential class is paying less than their fully allocated costs
of service~ while non-residential customers are payinq more than
their proportionate share. (Industry studies sho~ that this rate
rel~tionship bet~een the customer classes exists for most
Utilities, public and private.) To address t.his situation and.
improve equity among the customer classes, staff has proposed a
higher percentage increase for residential rates compared to non
residential rates. 1n this instance, residential rates have been
CHR:2S2"Z
L
.,'-.
I
c-'~~~
".~~~
.-;<-"
raised 12.3 percent, while non-reside~tj~l rates ~ere raised a,B
percent. Although application of the rate increase in this manner
'Will not achieve cost of service, it will impro~Je cost of service
"hieh would not occur with any of the eo.q-ual cents or percentage
methodologies, Staft recommends a gradual appro3ch ever several
rate adjuEt~ant5 ~o act.ieve the cost of service objective, in order
to minimize the impact on residential users.
EAt9maXip9 cQDsiderationsJ;nique to Interruptible cust9~
The current five interruptible Gustomers are a He-.'lett-Pacl<ard
f4cility, syntex, Veterans Hospital, Eastman Kodak, and tbe Palo
Alto Landfill Gas Project. Such customers have the ability to
switch to an alternate fuel, such as fuel oil, and are also prime
candidates to bypass the Palo Alto Municipal Gas Utility and secur.e
natural gas ~upplies independently, if Palo Alto prices natur~l gas
significantly l'ligher tr.an can be secured in the open market. Gas
marketers have maae contact with our interruptible customers in
at-tempts to sell them gas. There is a groving interest by our
intercuptible customers to partiCipate in this ne'Wly developinq
spot market for natural gas.
These customers are referred to as ~interruptible", because the
utility Would curtail natural gas service to these custo~ers tirst
in the event of a natural gas shortage or transmission capacity
curtai]~ent since they ~ave alternatives available to theM. In
this sense, they repres~nt large loads which are an important load
aanagement tool; and they can be served at a lo~er cost since they
do not require firm trans~ission or firm supply. This fact enables
the Palo Alto Gas Utility to p~rticipate in the ·spot market W and
acquire lower p~iced gas which henefits all ratepayers. In the Gas
I~du5try, custo~ers ~ho option t~ risk gas curtailment are
compensated bi~ ge!"lerally having lower rates. Ho .... ever, their rates
~re driven 190re by gas and oil prices. in the ",ar"e.t place and
conseque:ratly, such customers paid the highest ra.tes of any customer
c1.a&.s in the 1970·5 and early 1980'S before oil and gas prices
beqan their decline.
For the G-50 "interruptible customers·, the increase is limited to
2.7 percent in order to keep these rates near market levels. Also,
the t~~ Winterruptible" gas Rate S~hedules G-50 and G-6 have been
simplified and combined onto one G-50 Rate Schedule. The previous
G-50 rate structure containing a demand. commodity, customer, and
minimum charge had evolved fr·)m the pre-1988 period, when Palo Alto
tracked Pacific Gas' Electric Cf'G&E) ra·tes~ To eliminate this
cumbersome rate structure, staff placed all the charqes into a
sing-Ie commodity rate similar to the rate structure applicable to
Palo Alto's otner n¢n-residential customers. Finally, the G-6 Rate
ClOl:25:Z:9:Z
--' .. . J
f·
I ,
-
--~~--
r
Schedule applicable to th2 Palo Alto Landfill Gas Project i:\imilarly
evolved by comparing it to PG&E ta~iffs related to curtailment
priorities.
In combining the G-50 and G-6 schedules, the G-6 rate i;rill
necessarily experience a decrease of 10.6 percent since it was
alrea.dy higher than the G-50 rate. Again, the principal rateroakinq
objective here is to price int~rruptible rates close to the market
but high enough to recover the minimum costs of service. This rate
proposal accomplishes this objective. If such rates become
uncompetitive with alternative sources of supply, these customers
will cease buying frum th~ Palo Alto Gas utility. Since they would
no lonq~r contribute to the utility's fixed costs, the r~maining
residential and non-residential ratepayers would carry that burden~
This impact should be avoided~
For a comparison of PG&E customer bills with Palo Alto customer
bills, Figure 1 has been attached to this report. This compari30n
based on PG'E current rates and Palo Alto's proposed rates
indicates that the City's gas rates are approximately 23 percent
and 8 percent below surrounding areas for-residential and non
residential customers respectively. Thus, despite this rate
increase, Palo Alto .i11 continue to maintain the lOifest gas rates
in California. The only exception might be tor California
interruptible customers, who are able to secure gas supplies on the
spot market and arranqe for delivery at a price lower than our
interruptible rate. Rate comparisons in these instances are
di.fficult, because a specific customer's procur.elllent and
transmission costs are generall)" not published; and there are
degrees of service level options making it more difficult to
compare evenly~ Still, staff believes that our interruptible rates
are lo~ and competitive.
The following table indicate~ the i~pact of this rate proposal on
a typical bill for the various customer classes:
CUSTOMER
ResidjWinter
ResidjWinter
Resid/Summer
Resid/Su.mmer
Commercial
Industrial
Interruptible-
THERM
~
100
150
2.
45
SOD
4000
G-50 100,000
G-6 7,000
CXR:252 :92
L
PRESENT
~
$36.92
70.07
11.12
23.72
255.00
2,040.00
J7,OOO.00
2,975.00
PROPOSED $ CHANGE t
l!I.!.& 11L_~.llJ,. QIiAHGfj
$41.48 $4.56 12.)
78.73 8.65 12.3
12.49 1. 37 12~J
26.64 2.92 12.3
277.50 22.5C 8.8
2220.00 laO~OO 8.8
3S.0DO~OO 1.000.00 2.7
2,650.00 (1l5.00) (10.6)
--,
. +-:-~-'·1-
-.~-
,
~ .
I
·c·
,C' ,.,~;
-'-?,~ .... ;.-
summary
stat! reco11U!!ends council Approval of the attached Resolution
increasing gas revenue approximat~ly 9 percent effective July 1,
1992.
-
Respectfully submitted,
Ii. RANJ)'l BALOSCIillN
Manager, Rates and customer Services
~ , , "(/ , :~ ;7,·j/'-.uV
ClOI L. 'lOON
irecFor of ~~ies I IN
',I' /. /ff ~I~~h~ FLEMING
~ istant City na er
Attachments:
CIOU252: '2
Fiqure 1: Rate Comparison
Reliolution
Rate schedules G-l and G-SQ
-
'f ,
• Monthly 8m
:20
5C
eo
20
Q
Figure (1)
GAS RATE COMPARISON
RESIDENTIAL
100.9(,1
Commercial & Industrial Classes
• "ont"ly 8111
2tJ(;iJ 2.366
. '
L
'.,
:4.-." •• "
F.ESOrVTrON N04
RESOWTION' OF THE COUNCIL OF ~ITY OF PALO ALTO
AMENDING SCHEDULES G-l AND G-SC OF THE CITY OF
PALO ALTO t~ILITrES RATES AND CHARGES PERTAINlNG
TO GENERAL AND INTERlmnIBLE NATURAL GAS SERVICE
The council of the City of Palo Alto does hereby RESOLVE as
follo'Ws:
~~-14 PuLsuant to Section 12.20.010 of the Falo Alto
Municipal Code. schedule G-l (G€neral Natural Gas Service) and G-50
(Interruptible Natural Gas Service) of the Palo Alto Utilities
Rates and Charges are hereby amended to read as shown on sheets
G-l-l and G-50-1 attached h~reto and in~orporated herein.
SECTION ". This Council finds that the revenue derived
troa the odjustme!"lts of said rates shall bs used o:11y for the
purposes set forth in the Palo Alto City Charter, Article VII~
Section .2, entitled lIII.Pt;blic utili ties Reyenue~ ill The adoption of
t'his r-esolution is, therefore, specifically exempted under the
Public Resources Code Section 210S0{b) (a) from the requiraments of
CEQ ....
SECTION 3. The foregoing chanqes shall becoree effective
July 1, 1992~
INTRODUCED AND PASSED:
"'YES:
NOES:
"'BSENT:
ABSTENTIONS:
... nEST: APPROVED:
_ ...... _ .. _----
City Clerk Mayor
... PPROVED AS TO FORM: City Manager
City Attorney Director of-Finance
Director of Utilities
.:t' .
, -
-'-', .
GENERAL NATIJRAl GAS SERVICE
J,LTILI1Y RATE SCHE'DUt..LG:1
A. APPUCABIUTY:
This schedule applies to al! firm natt. ... ral gas service
B. TERRITORY:
Wrtl1in the service area of lI'.s City of Palo AHa end on land owned or leased by the City.
C. RATES:
1 G1-8 eommod"tty Charge: (For indr.ridvally metered residenti31 customers.)
(A) Summer Rate (May 1 to October 31):
Per Meter
p~r Month
0-20 therms per therm .......... , ' , , .. , ' , , , ' , . ' . , , ,. 40.1
Over 20 therms per thenT. . .. , .. ,.".,." .. ".",", 74,5
(9) Winter Rate (Nov, 1 to Apr~ 30):
0-96 therms per therm . , , . , ' .. ' . , , , . ' .. , .. , ' , . , . , , " 40,1
Over 96 tharms per therm ' .. , .... ,' .. , ... ",.,., ....... ,. 74,5
2. G1:C Commodrtv Charge: FOf all other customers, iflCi!.Jding comwercial customers
Year-round rate for aii ~as usage:
0-25,000 !herms per !herm , ' ........... , ..... ' , , .. , , .. , , . , . ,. 55,5
Over 25,000 !herms per therm '."' .. , ... ,'." ..... ,,",,"," 48.7
D. SPECIAL NOTES:
1. Seasonal rale changes: The app"cable residential rate strJcture will be prorated in
the May and November billing periodS based on the rates of the nu mber of days
prior to May 1 and subsequent to October 31, respectively, to the total number Of
days in the billing period,
CITYOF PALO ALTO UTIUTIES
Issued by the City Council
Supersedes Sheet No, G-1-1 dated 7,189
L'"'--"
Effective 7 +92
Sheet No. G-1-1
. ' , .
\ .. ;-, \
I
'--
INTERRUPTIBLE NATURAL GAS SERVICE
UTILITY RATE f,CHEDULEG..o~
A. APPUCABILITY:
This schedule applies to interrup!;ble ser/ice ~or custCr:lers ','thO have altemate fuel
standby facHities. The alternate fuel may be non-gaseous such as f1..:cl aiT Q( gase-Qus fuei
s~ch as propane Of methane.
B. TERRITORY:
Wrthin the service area of the City of Palo Alia and on land owned or leased by the City.
C. RATES:
1. Commodity Charge Per Tr,erm
D. SPECIAL CONDITIONS:
Per Meter
Per Month
1. Service under this schedu!e is subj~ct to discontinuance In whole or in part in case of
actual Of anticipated shortage of natural gas resurt'lng from an insufficient supply,
inadequate transmission or del,very capacity of faciri!~es, or sth..""If'tage requirements.
However. the City wlli attempt to minimize disruption by providing adequate notice
prior to curta~menL The City will not be nable for damages occasioned by
intecruption or disoontinuance of service suppl:ed under this schedule.
2. No customer shall be entitled to service hereunder unless adequate standby
equipment and fuel are provided and are ready at a;1 times for immed:ate operation in
the event that the supply of gas hereunder shall be discontin'Jed in whole or in part
Customer sha~ be able to demor.strate the abiiity to convert to an alternate fuel upon
City request to continue efigibilitj under t'1is ratB SChedule (G-50).
CITY OF PALO ALTO UTILITIES
Issued by the City Counc"
Supersede~ Sheet No. G-SO-l daled 7-1-89
Effective 7 ·1-92
Sheet No. G·50-1