HomeMy WebLinkAbout0309.091,
~
.' ! ,
I
June 6, 1991
~ HONORABLE CITY COVNCIL
Palo Alto, California
Foothills Park Neighbors Days Proposal
Members of the Council:
Report In Brie f
5
At the October 9, 1990 Council Meetin9~ Council requested that
staff evaluate and report back on the feasibility and particulars
of opening Foothills Park on a limited basis to non-Palo Alto
residents. This staff report responds to that request.
Background
Council's proposal was to open Foothills Park to residents of
incorporated and unincorporated co~unities bordering on pal~ Alto
on what would be called Neighbors Days. Neighbors Days were to be
variable days of access throughout the year. Environmental
sensitivity and preservation of Palo Al tans I spontaneous ac.:.ess
were to be controlling factors in the staff response.
Discussion and Recgmmendations
In response to Council, staff is proposing two Neighbors Days
plans, Plan A and Plan B. Plan A ~ould establish Neighbors Days on
variable days throughout the year and limit non-Palo Alto resident
Foothills Park use to neighboring communities as Council directed.
Plan B is recommended by staff as an alternative.
Plan A.
1. Non-Palo Alto use of Foothills Park on Neighbors Days
would be restricted to residents of incorporated and
unincorporated communities whi'ch are contiguous to Palo
Alto. These communities are Altamont Hills, CUpertino,
East Palo Alto, Los Altos, Los Altos Hills, Los Trancos
Woods, Menlo Park, Mountain VieW', Portola Valley and
Stanford.
2. Neighbors Days would be rotated through the week for a
trial period of one year, beqinning with Monday,
July 1, 1991.
CMR:309:91
•
o
Under this plan I succeeding Neighbors Oays .... ould occur on
Tuesday, July 3; wednesday, July 17; Thursday, July 25; and
Friday, August 2. The rotation vould then begin again the
next week with Monday, August 5. weekends and holidays would
not be included in the N(.ighbors Oays rotation during the
months of May throlJgh September, lihen Park attendance on
'Weekends and holidays is heavy. Attachment,1 lists all
proposed Neighbors Days for Plan A from Monday, July 1, 1991
through Thursday, June 25, l~g2.. Under Plan A, no limit would
be set on the number of non-residents admitted. t.."hen the Park
capacity ot 1,600 ~as reached, the Park would be closed. At
the end of the trial period, staff would report back to
Council with recom..mendations, if an:f, for modifications of
Neighbors Days~
Plan B.
1. Any non-Palo Alto resident would be allo .. ed to use
Foothills Park on Neighbors Days.
2. Neighbors Days ~ould occur on the same days of the week
thr-o-ughout the year, for a trial period of one year,
beginning Tuesday, July 2, 1991 through Tuesday,
June 30, 1992.
Under-this plan, all Tuesdays during the year would be
designated as Neighbors Days~ Tuesday is recommended because
it is the weekday whe~ Foothills Park has its lowest
attendance (see the attachlcent #2 fer Foothills Park daily
attendance information).
As part of plan B, staff also recolt.mends that the first
Saturday of each month, October through April, be designated
Neighbors Days. opening the Park on Saturdays provides non
residents the opportunity to use the Park as a family unit.
CUrrent Foothills Park Saturday attendance during non-summer
months is low enough to permit the anticipated additional use
on Neighbor Days without causing cro~ding in the Park.
Attachment #3 lists all proposed Neighbors Days for Plan s.
Staff recoDUllends Plan B because it will result in fewer
public relations problems for the city and be easier for staff
to administer than Plan A. Moreover, the city Attorney
believes that it 'Would be more difficult l although not
impossihle, to justify factually restrictions which
CMR:309:91
2
•
'.
distinguish between different non-resident groups. Under Plan
A, non-Palo Al to residents 'Would he turned away from Foothills
Park if they were not from com..'Tluni ties contiguous to Palo
Al to~ This would require staff to establish and implement
procedures to verify residents. It increases the possibility
of residents from non-designated communi ties mist.akenly
thinking they could use the Park on Neighbors Days. It ~il1
be difficult for staff to deal with the anticipated number of
angry Foothills Park turnaways under Plan A. Plan B~ since it
opens the Park to non-Palo Alto residents on the same day each
week, reduces the likelihood that non-Palo Alto residents will
be turned away from Foothills Park because they have come to
the Park on the wrong day~ Plan e would also be easier to
administer, because it will not require staff to verify
residency.
Staff is concerned that opening Foothills Park to non-residents on
the limited basis proposed in either Plan A or Plan B ~ould cause
Palo Alto residents to lose spontaneous access to the Park.
Therefore, staff recommends that space be reserved for Palo Alto
residents by not admitting non-residents after the Park reaches 75
percent (1,200 visitors) of its legally established limit (1,600
visitors)~ If the current average attendance on the days proposed
as Neighbors Days were to double, the increase under Plan A would
be about 7.400 visitors pe~ year, and, under Plan B, 8,400 visitors
per year~ The number of additional autos would be 3,000 and 3,350
respectively.
Staff is additionally concerned 'With the possible overuse of
Foothills park. The Park 'Was set aside not only for people to
enjoy. but in order to preserve its natural values. Periods of lo~
attendance are positive, for that allows ecological recovery to
occur. Constant heavy intrusion is a negative factor for the Park.
These lower use periods also provide visitors ~ith an opportunity
:for serenity and give the staff time and space for maintenance
activities~ The current restriction is the best approach to
protect the park environment. While historically there has been
higher use of the Park, it was also very difficult to maintain the
Park properly 'While attending to the problems associated .... ith
larger numbers of visitors.
Staff recommends that non-residents be charged a fee of $5.00 per
vehicle to enter Foothills Park on Neighbors Days. This is higher
than the $3.00 fee charged by local county parks, but is comparable
to the $5. 00 and $6.00 day-use fees charged by national and
California State Parks respectively~
CMR:309:9l
J
•
, . -.,.. ..
o o
Summary
Plan A.
l~ Foothills Park's Neighbors Oays would be rotated through
the week., beginning Monday, July 1# 1991, for a test
period of one year. Weekends and holidays 'Would not be
included in the Neighbors Days rotation during the months
of May through September a
2. Non-Palo Al to resident use of Foothills Park on Neighbors
Days would be restricted to residents of those
communities which are contiguous to Palo Alto. These
communities are Altamont Hills, CUpertino, East Palo
Alto, Los Altos, Los Altos Hills ... Los Trancos Woods,
Menlo Park, Mountain Vie~, Portola Valley aT~ Stanford.
3. Non-Palo Alto residents would be charqed a day's use
entry feg of $5.00 per vehicle, and non-resident hikers
and bicyclists 'Would be charged a fee of $2.00 each.
Annual passes would not be available to non-Palo Alto
residents.
4. Plan A contains 47 days during the year when non-Palo
Alto residents yould be admitted to Foothills Park.
Plan B.
1. Foothills Park's Neighbor-s Days would occur on all
Tuesdays during the year and the first Saturday of each
month from october through April. There wculd be a test
period of one year, beginning ~~esday. July 2. 1991.
2.. Foothills Park -would be open to all non-residents on
Neighbors Days4
3. The number of non-residents admitted to the Park on
Neighbors Days would be limited to 1,200 per day.
4. Non-residents would be charged a day's ~se entry fee of
$5.00 per vehicle, and non-resident hikers ana: bicyclists
would be charged a fee of $2.00 each. Annual passes
would not be available to non-Palo Alto residents.
5. Plan B contains 60 days during the year ~hen non-Palo
Alto residents would be admitted to Foothills Park.
CMR:J09:91
4
..
!
',-, -
": ~> ~./.
"
/'
Staff can implement either Plan A or B. Consistent maximum use of
the Park does endanger its delicate balance, as it was designed to
preserve the area's fragile natural state and to allow limited
access to protect that balance. Low use periods are therefore
consistent with the need to preserve the facilitY4 Either plan
will limit access, so that no irreversible damage will occur to the
Park. Plan B comes closer to preserving the Park and allowing non
resident access and is a plan which is easier to administer.
Whichever plan is i~plemented, staff will report hack within one
year~
ReC9UlJDenda t i on
Either plan can be implemented, however, staft recommends that City
Council approve Plan B because it is a simpler. less confusing
system of admitting non-Palo Alto residents to Foothills park.
~=F~I
June Fleming ~
Assistant city Managar
Attachments: Plan A
Mary .10 Levy. Acting Director
community Services
Average Daily Attendance
Plan B
CMR:309: 91
5
~ ---~--~---------------:;~:::::
o
. /.
-':~I'.; ~
-,;"
Attachment tl
FOO'1'IIILLS PARK
NEIGHBORS DAYS -PLAN A
Rotatinq Days Through The Week-
Monday, July 1, 1991
Tuesday~ July 9, 1991
Wednesday, July 17, 1991
Thursday, JUly 25, 1991
Friday, August 2, 1991
Monday, August 5, 1991
Tuesday, Auqust 13, 1991
Wednasday, August 21, 1991
Thursday, August 29, 1991
Friday, September 6, 1991
Monday, September 9, 1991
Tuesday, September 17, 1991
Wednesday, September 25, 1991
Thursday, OCtober 3 I 1991
Friday, October 11, 1991
saturday, october 19, 1991
Sunday, OCtober 27, 1991
Monday, November " 1991
Tuesday, November 12, 1991
Wednesday, Nov~er 20, 1991
Thursday, November 28, 1991
Friday, December 6, 1991
Saturday, December 14, 1991
Sunday, December 22, 1991
Monday, December 30, 1991
Tuesday, Janu&r}" 7, 1992
Wednesday, January 15, 1992
Thursday, January 23, 1992
Friday, January 31, 1992
Saturday, February 8" 1992
Sunday, February 16, 19~2
Monday, February 24, 1992
Tuesday, March 3, 1992
Wednesday, Karch II, 1992
Thursday, March 19" 1992
Friday, Karch 27, 1992
Saturday, April 4, 1992
Sunday, April 12, 1992
Monday" April 20, 1992
Tues~ay, April 28, 1992
Wednesday, May 6, 1992
Thursday, May 14, 1992
Friday, May 22, 1992
Mon~ay, June I, 1992
Tuesday, June 9, 1992
Wednesday, June 17" 1992
Thursday, June 25, 1992
• Weekends and Holidays, during the months of Kay through
september, not included in this rotation~
.•
pay of Week
Konday
TUesday
Wednesday
Thursday
Friday
Saturday
Sunday
.c-,-,
;""-' "
Attacllllent U
FOOrKILLS PARX
AVERAGE DAIL1I: M'TXIlllAlICE
FISCAL YEAR 1989-90
Annu 5l1 Daily =211Bll!'l!:I:: (Junt.l:llllllu.sl
AVlrage Visitor DA~~X V1§itor Avgrage
Attendanc~ Attendance
i161tQr~ Autos V1sitQl:& ~
108 43 176 70
93 37 144 58
96 ~8 174 70
103 41 16'1 67
130 52 200 80
359 1" 479 192
535 214 763 305
"."
/
o o
Attachment t3
FOOTHILLS PARK
NEIGHBORS DAYS -PLAN B
Same Days Ot The Week*
TUesday, July 2, 2991
Tuesday, July 9, 1991
TUesday, July 16, ~991
TUesday, July 23, 1991
Tuesday, July 30, 1991
TUesdey, Auqust 6, 1991
Tuesday, Auquat 13. 1991
Tuesday, August 20, 1991
Tuesday, August 27, 1991
Tuesday, September 3, 1991
Tuesday, September 10, 1991
Tuesday, September 17, 1991
~~esday, September 24, 1991
Tuesday october 1, 1991
Saturday, october 5, 1991
TUesday, October 8, 1991
Tuesday, October 15, 1991
Tuesday, October 22, 1991
Tuesday, october 29, 1991
Saturday, November 2, 1991
Tuesday, Noveaber 5, 1991
Tuesday, Nove~r 12, 1991
Tuesday, November 19, 1991
Tuesday, November ~6, 1991
Tuesday, December 3, 1991
Saturday, Oec~er 7, 1991
TUesday, oece~er 10, 1991
Tuesday, Dece&ber 11, 1991
Tuesday, December 24, 1991
TUesday, Deeember 31, 1991
Saturday, January 4, 1992
TUesday, January 7, 1992
TuesdaYI January 14, 1992
TUesday, January 21, 1992
TUesday. January 28, 1992
Saturday, February 1, 1992
Tuesday, February 4, 1992
Tuesday, February 11, 1992
Tuesday, February IB, 1992
Tuesday, February 25, 1992
Tuesday, March 3, 1992
Saturday, March 7, 1992
Tuesday, March 10, 1992
Tuesday, March 17, 1~92
Tuesday, Karch 24, 1992
Tuesday, ~arch 31, 1992
Saturday, April 4, 1992
Tuesday, April 7, 1992
Tuesday, AF~il 14, 1992
Tuesday. April 21. 1992
Tuesday, April 2B, 1992
Tuesday, May 5, 1992
Tuesday, May 12, 1992
Tuesday, May 19, 1992
TuesdaYI xay 26, 19S2
Tuesd,ay, J"u.."1.e 2" 1992
TUesday, June 9" 1992
TUesday, June 16, 1992
Tuesday, "June 23, 1992
Tuesday, June 30, 1992
* Saturdays not inclUded durinq the month~ o~
May throuqh Septe2ber.
•