HomeMy WebLinkAbout0596.000,
• ,
o.c:8lI\l)er 6, 1990
THE HON~RABLE CIT~ COUNCIL
Palo Alto, California
Attention: Finance and public Works committee
Members of the council:
RepOrt: ill .riar
This is an informational report and no Council action is re~ired.
The Finance and Public Works Committee requested in 1989 that
discussion of the Committee's accomplishments this year be made an
agenda item tor the last meetinq of each calendar year~ This
report summarizes the major progress made on the work plan of the
committee for 1990~ Appended to this report is a listing of all
aqend~ items which the Committee addressed during the year.
eo.aitt •• prIorities
Xn 3anuary 1990, the committee decided upon a work plan with five
major components, in order to address the council priority o!"
beco.inq more active in quidinq Palo Alto's economic future and
developing an econo~ic strategy~ The five components were:
o New revenues
o Revenue forecasting
o Economic outreach
o Fiscal impact of land U5e decisions
o Redevelopment
Action taken on the york plan items is summarized below:
CMR:S96:0
o o
MY hUJmU
The User Fee/Cost Recovery Study w~s presented to the Committee on
April 24. The .ethodology tor developinq interdepartmental and
Intertund charges and preparing a user fee schedule tor proposed
cost recovery levels, as ~ppropriate for City services, was
reviewed and reccmmended ter adoption by the Council. The
Comllittee reviewed individual fees with departmental budgets during
the 1990-92 budget hearings and recommended revised s.chedules which
vere subsequently approved by the Council.
A Real Property Asset Mana.gement Folicy was reviewed by the
Co~1ttee in April 1990 and subsequently adopted by the Council.
The policy establishes that all real property owned by the City
wil.l be considered as an a.sset. in terms o"f ~valuat.ing revenue
potential prior to the property~s sale, lease or qrantinq ot any
rights. Discussion on disposition of surplus well sites in October
1990 was predicated on the Policy.
The Committee reviewed a stafr report concerninq improved
collection rates for City revenues in April 1990 .
• eY'pue lorecaatlDq
Inforaation on sales tax and property tax revenue forecasts was
included in the minutes from the Economic outl~k committee lEOC)
aeetinqs in Hay and September and forwarded to the F.PW Committee.
Various Committee and council members have also attended EOC
.eetinqs and discussed information supplied by the City's
consultants on sales tax.
Statt I S revenue forecasts for 1990-92 were discussed durinq the
budget ~ear inqs.
~o.lc outreaeh
In response to the Committee's expressed concern about reaching out
to local businesses and offering support, the Planning Director and
Finance Director have undertaken a joint outreach effort. to the
businesses in the Stanford Research Park. Intensive interviews
'lasting from one to three hours have been held with Xerox, Keenan-
Lovewell, WSJ Properties, DNAX, Dialog Information systems, Syntex,
Varian, Hevlett-P&ckard, TAB Products, Lockheed, Alza, Electric
Power Research Institute, Wall Street Journal, and the U.S.
Geological Survey. The intent is to meet with all the major
tenants of the Park, and then to provide feedback at a qeneral
aeetin9 of all participants reqardinq the information accumulated.
Companies are told at those aeetings that a stanford Research Park
Roundtable, similar to the Economic OUtlook Committee, will be
foraeel after the interview process is completed. The Roundtable is;
anticipated to also meet on a quarterly basis.
CMR:S9&:O 2
•
,
Meetings have been held with Jim Baer of Ware and Fre!denrich and
a representative of Digital Equipment Corporation reqarding the
feasIbility of locatlnq a Bales office in Palo Alto.
As .u~eBted by the Committee, staff produced informational
brochures designed for the public coverinq the City's annual
financial report and the proposed 1990-92 budqet. The "Financial
Highlights" puhlication has been u&ed at rating agency
presentations and Town Hall meetings and has been requested by
other cities..
1110&1 tapac~ 01 'aDA pl. 'p.ai.lop'
rn September, the Committee reviewed a staff report on revenue
bpact analysis. The committee alao approved a staff
rflcomaendation to have the City require revenue impact analysis
preparation paid for by the developer tor major development
proposals. requiring Comprehensive Plan and Zone Map chanqes. as
well AE! allocating resources for such an analysis for future
special area studies that have a potentioal for significantly
affecting City revenues. .In addition,. tl'le Committee approved
st.aff's recoiDenda'tion to retain a consultant to identify potential
revenue opportunities in the City within the context of existing
city planning policies and regulations and to determine what
actions would be necessary to maximize those opportunities.
In November, the Committee approve~ a Request for Proposal (RFP}
for consultant services to perform an economi~ land use study of
certain key areas in Palo Alto... including urban Lane/Town and
COUnty Village area; El camino Real, south of Stanford Avenue to
the Los Altos{Mountain View city limits; three neighborhood
shopping centers; and the california Avenue Business District. In
addition, the RFP asks for an evaluation Q£ the potential effects
of the 65,000 square foot expansion cap on the Stanford Shopping
center and the appropriateness of the hotel overlay zone applied to
several commercial properties in 1989. The consultant's
recommendations will go to the Planning Commission for review prior
to being brought to th~ Council.
led eT.lopa_At
In November, the Committee reviewed a staff report (CMR:573:0) on
redevelopaent options and accepted staff's recommendation to
proceed vith special area studies identified at the conclusion of
the Citywide Study, beqinninq in the fall of 1991 with is study of
the CS Orban Lane Area. to be followed by a study of the LM East
Meadow Circle Area.
CHR:S96:0 3
.•.
•
•
Respectfully aubmittad,
. ~~ !J4Ad0
-~'~ISON
Di ector Finance
anaqer
CMR:S96:0 4
...
CI!R:103,O
CI!R:134:0
CMR:135:0
CI!R:156:0
CMR:138:0
CMR:148:0
CMR:15],O
CMR:149:0
CMR:l51: 0
CKR; 1.69: 0
CMR:200:0
CI!R:185:0
CMR:192:0
CMR:22E:O
CMR:235:0
CI!R:238:0
am:220:0
CI!R:279:0
CMR:25J:O
CKR: 596:0
1990 AGENDA ITEMS
1988-89 Financial Report, Menag8111ent Lettt:lr, and
Additional Coopars , Ly~rand Audit Reports
Schedule for Departmental Reviews
Real Property Analyst -CUbb~rley School
R'I!'gicnl!l:l water Qllality Control Plan Air Toxics
Emissions Inventory
Cost Recovery -spay and Neuter Clinic
Landfill Post-Closure Care Financial ~equirements
Household Hazardous Waste Disposal Program
Consultant Solection Sand Hill Corr.idor
Environaental I.pact Report
Utility Rate Schedule -Landfill
Underwriter -Refunding Utility Revenue Bonds
.A:m.e.n<1raent No ~ 3 to T Me Aqree.m.e.nt
Mid-year Financial Report/cIP Financial Status
Report
Fixed Assets
Waste Minimization Program
CGntract for Audit Services
Financial Documents fcc Investment with East Palo
Alt~ Sanitary District
Recommend~tions for CDBG Allocations
Trustee services
Requirements
Landfill Closure Financial
Real property Asset Kanagement Policy
1990-92 Budget
Bevenue Collection Activity
5
!
I CIIR,2S1:0
CIIR:271: 0
ClIR,27S:0
CMR: 482 , 0
ClIR: 273: 0
CHR:JS2:0
ClIR:389:0
CI'IR:398:0
CMR:H2:0
ClIR:U2,O
C!m:.9J:O
ClIR:485:0
CMR:4U:0
ClIR,5l0,O
CIIR:545:0
0IR:565:0
ClU1:573:0
CMR:571 :0
am:596:0
o
User Fee/Cost Allocation study and
Changes to the Hunicipal Fee SChedule
Sales Tax Auditinq Information
Minor Audit Reports
Recommended
stAnford Lease/El Camino Park. ~QcArthur park
Restaurant, Re~ Cross, santa Clara County Transit
Consultant. Selection for Regional water Qual.ity
Control Plant Diacb4rge Monitoring
Economic Qutloo~ Co-sittee Meeting (2 aeetin9s)
8ay Konltorinq Consultant Selection
Enterprise FUnds Capital Improvement ~ojects
Financial status Report
Selection of Consultant Contracts tor Con.:mittee
Reviev
Cable Tel~visiOa' Franchise
Gol~ Course capital lmprovements
Revenue I.pact Analysis
rFAS Implementation Consultant Agreement
Gann Issue
B&rrOl'l Park stree.ts .and Sidewalks
Disposition of Surplus Well Sites
Incorporation of Air Riqhts int.o Real Property
Asset Management Policy
Issues and Options Related to Redevelopment
Land Use Revenue Analysis Request for propoBal
6