The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About0556.000~, • • " ",.' November 1, 1990 THE HONORABLE CITY COL~CIL Palo Alto, California / Agreement Providing ---.f.Qx---Imple1ltentatioTl of Santa Clara Valley Honpoint Source Program. Approval of Authority to-staff to ~ " 199Q-91 Funds Members of the council: Report. in I}ri ef This report recQruaends that Council authorize staff to expend funds in the amount of $105,560 to pay the City's proportionate share of cost for the FY 1990-91 santa clara Valley Nonpoint SOurce (NPS) Program, as provided in the eXistinq agreement between 13 Sa~ta Clara county cities, the County, and the santa Clara Valley water District (SCVWO) ~ Funds have been appropriated in CIP 47703 .. Storm Water Quality Improvements. Background On April 16 , 1990, C~~il approved a five-year aqree~ent between 13 Santa Clara County cities, t.~e County.. and the SCVWD for implementation of the Santa Clara Vall~y NPS program {CKR:255;OJ~ The purpose of the Program is to control pollution from urban runoff in the Santa Clara Valley. By its approval of the aqreement, the city aqreed to fund its share of the ~·~ram~ The aqreement established a Management Commjttee, oomlri~ed of a representative from each participating agency, to provide overall program direction and to review and recommend an annual program budqet for approval by the parties to the aqreement. Discussion On September 28, 19S0, the Management Committee of the Santa Clara Valley NPS PrograD adoptecS a recommended scope. cf work and corresponding budget for FY 1990-91 (see attached letter .from SCVWDJ. The Committee recommended a F¥ 90-91 Pr~~ram budget of $2,600,000, with the provision that expenditure of $553 I 600 tor budget item '7 (Areawide Proqrams) be subject to further approval by the. Management Committee. Palo Al tol s proportionate share (4. 06 percent) of all seven recommended budget items is $105,560. -1- CJ!R: 556:0 • \ 2 .,-,.1"-. ,-- o R'commendAtion staff recommends that council authorize staft to expend funds in the amount of $105,560 to pay the City's proportionate share of cost tor the FY 1990-91 santa Clara Valley Nonpoint Source Program, as provided in the existing agreement between 13 Santa Clara County cities, the county, and the Santa Clara Valley Water Oistrict~ Respectfully submitted, Assi.t~nt Director of Public Works DAVID C. ADAKS Oireetor of Public Works ~~~~ JUNE FLEKING Assistant City Manager Attachment: Letter from Santa Clara Valley Water ~istrict Related CMR: 255:0 -~-CMR:556:0 ':~ _. -~ -- · , October S, 1990 :/ / " Santa Cora ~ WcJ.erOistrid 57~ "'lMADEN E)PRmw,t.:\" SAN .JOSE. CAkiFOU~IA 9S'!;a TELEPHONE t~8l Z6S·1600 F~IMI1f ~tIlS,1 UHt71 ,\" Mr: .• ,-WM 1CTlO" E!~"lOY!' To: Sant2i Clara Vall~y Nonpoint Source Control Program Participating Agencies Subject: InvoiC1l for Agencies' Share of 1990-91 Nonpo;nl Source Work On September 28, 1990 !he Santo Dara Valley Nonpoim Source Management Committee approved the scope of work for 1990-91 and the corresponding budge! which is atl3ched. The perctntage allocation for each participating agency and !he corresponding dollar amount is also aaached. As yoo note, we are deferring payment of lbe budget item referred 10 as • Areawide Program" (S533,600) since the Management Committee has DOt decided yet ",hal areawide program to fund. The percmtage was applied cnJy 10 52,066,400. In order for the DisIrict to.execute the contract for servi<:es with Woodward-<:Iyde Consultant we need 11> have r=ived allust 90% of the corro..spondent COSIS from !he participant agencies. Therefore, we request that you for ..... d your paymeru ID the District as soon as possible and rtOt later than October 19, 1990. to ens~re a timely conu'oci execution between Ille Program and the CO!lSUlrant. Sincerely, Operations and W.«r Qu.lity Manager cc: Peter Ma"~arena Woodward-<:lyde CoruuUarus t:1T'r Of" Plo lO AL 70 RECEIV,=Q .' " . . ~i:~"---" o SANTA (L4,fcA VALUiY NONPOINT SOURCE CONTROL PROGRAM 1~91 BUDGET I. CONSULTING SE!<.VTCES FEES $1,700,400 This budget item includes fees (0< engineering. legal and public relations servKes. The detailed bI>dget is included in the aaached r."o,t "Tccllnic:aI Support (0£ NPDES Storm Water Pmnit (199I}-1991)' prepared by Woodward.aydc Consultlnts under the direction of !he Budget Subcommittee. Alii PROORAM SUPPORT S 35,000 TIlls Il'oldgot item ronsists of !he SCVNPSC program panicipation in !he funding of AHI', progr.un. AMI is a nonprofit corpo<ation governed by a Board of Dir«:t.on on bebaH of regulalo<y agmcico, disclwgers and !he public. Its ~ missioD is 10 de5ign ...,d implemem =ch and monitoring progruns to evaluate the preoent and pote.otial future effects of poDDtioD Dn !be beneficial uses of the _ of !be San FIaIlCioco Bay. Alli .150 bas a legislative mandate 10 oerve as I coordIn.tor of and archive fa< aD monItoring and =cllinfonnatiOD deYeJ"ped OIl \be Bay-Delta, and 10 actively $(l!Icit public ."cbange of vkws on Bay researcb. 3. -PERMIT FEES S 20,000 ThIs is lIle annu.al NPDES permit fee required by the Regional Board by SUtue of the Water Code: T"ttJe 23, Chapter 3, Subchapter 9, Section 2200. 4. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION S 95,000 Th is budget item consists of the costs incurred by th::. SCV\VD in represencllion of the Stnta Ctard. Vaney Nonpoint Source C~trol Program before LJ:Je Regional Bo.ard, work 10 assure: • ' ..... . ' comp:iaDCe with the NPDES permil, transmission of compliance reports 10 the Regional Board.. responding ({'I questions from ag~, adminis.tralioa of consut13'1ts t:OntraclS, d"1SIribution of material. fo.-review by p.miclpating agencies, and representation of the SCV program in federal, stale and regillnal task forces. s. STATEWIDE BMP MANUAL· APWA S lO,ooo This budget ittm CQnsiSlS of tile progtalll', co"ltib"tion to the APWA SIOOlIwaler Task Force foc !be preparation of • Slalewide best management pnctkes manuaL In additiOG to tile fundIng by the ag""';" tlu.t =ently h!ve N?DES Slormwater permits, the Stonnw",", Task Focce is applying foe • fedem grant. The manual "ITi<>UId serve as • regulatory basis foe the Regional Wate< Quality Coolro! 80< .is to dete<miDe complianee with BMP implementation to ..wmum el<1<nt pnctkable (MEI'). 6. RESERVE FUND -lO!!; S 186,000 These funds could be used for additioaal consulting services, demonstrntian proje<ts, additional morulOring activities. regional. statewide and national activities or for the program's cost sharing of gralIt programs. The utilizatioo of tIoese funds will be reviewed by the lludgd Subcommittee and approved by tile Management Committee. 7. AREA WIDE PROGRAMS S 553,600 These funds ... ill be anocated for specific Areawide 'tasks to be implemented by tile partir.ipa.ing agencies. Expenditure of tMse fmds ml'S! be api'fOved by L~e Manag:meal Committee. TOTAL S2,600,000 • .-' < o EXHIBIT B SANTA CLo\AA VAllEY 1'01>1'000 SOURCE PROVR.'I,.\I SCHEDU1.E Of' COST SHAlUNG PROPORTIONS JURlSOrcnoN C>"'1'~1l Cup<rtInO Los AllC.s lo. A.'",. Hills f.D. Gal"' Milpit;}s Manle $.:reo t-founr3:in V1e\i> P,Io Alto Sanll a3~ SOJr.tt~iI Sunnw3!~ $olnti asrj COLlnry Sub,o •• l s •• ~ S--'"VV.D TOTAL PROPORl}ONALSHARE 1.88% 2.46% J.~9~ 0.43% 1.'i4% 2.15% ,O.14c:i .l9J~ ""a6~ 6.13~ 1.!i9~ 1.25% ,.;"'~ 30,oa~ 3O.00~ )fA1OO~ '-,