HomeMy WebLinkAbout0218.091•
TIIB IIOXOR1lllLl! euY COUJICZL
Palo A1to, California
Atten~ioD: Pittance and PUblic Works comaitt ••
1'91.-1.'92 COMlInity nevelou.ment Block Grut runding Jtecomm.!ln4ations
Members of the Council:
RepOrt In Brie'
The purpose ot this report is to present city staff and Citizen
Advisory Committee {CAe) funding recommendations for the 1991-1992
COIIIIIWlity Develop .... nt Block Grant (CDBG) program year. City staff
and the CAe are in concurrence on fundinq reco~.endations for a~l
programs. Recommendations are summarized on Attachment -A-o
Available lUJu!'
The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has notified
the city o:f Palo Alto that the entitlement qrant for th~ 1991-~9'92
program year will be $598,000, a 12 percent increase over the 1990-
1991. grant of $5303,000. Additionally I staff reco1nlUends
reallocating $31,886 in CDBG funds previously aliocateu:l to variQus
projects and either not used due to cancellation c~ the project, or
not used. in their entirety.. This would leave $10,000 in the
contingent fund established last year for e1nergency expenses. during
the year ..
The restnlcturinq and reduction of the City·s Housing Improvement
Program (HIP) has resulted in the availability of $395~OOO in CDBG
funds previously allocated to the HIP, but never spent. Therefore,
total funds available for 199~-~992 distribution are $1,024,886,
representinq the allocation from HUD ($598,000), the reallocation
of unspent funds from various projects in prior years {$31,S86),
and the HIP reallocation ($395, 000).
ProqrJa Incoae
The city of Palo Alto receives program income from two sources;
1) interest paid on COBG funds returned to the City from the sa1e
of the Terman site,. and 2) loan payments and payoffs from the
HOU5inq I~provement Program. Program income from both sources is
expected to be approximately $200 ,000 by the end of the current
year. Program income from the Housing Improvement program ~ill be
used to offset the ongoing administrative expenses of the HIP, and
for the processing of any additional loan applications ..
CMR:l!8:91
•
\
April 4, 11}91
Page Two
o
PUblic 'ortinipatioD
,/
Requests for proposals for CDBG funding were advertised in the Palo
Alto Weekly on November 14 and November 21, 1990. Applications
were also sent directly to an extended Human services mailing list
of nonprofit agencies, organizations and neighborhood groups.
ProqrM Cba.oq'.
There woere several changes to the COBG program this year as a
result of the passage of the Cranston-Gonzales National Affordable
Housing Act. The changes affecting Palo Alto· s program are as
follows: (1) the granteets overall 10"'-.II/moderate income benefit
percentaq~ has been increased from 60 to 70 percent; and, (2) the
1S percent public service obligation limit has been amended to
include program income along with the current year's entitlement
amount •
•• tb9401oay Lor Review
There are a number of constraints which must be balanced in making
allocation recommendations: •
1} HUn regulations limit funds in the Public Service category to
no more than 15 percent or the entitlement amount plus program
income from the pre.vious year. There.for-e, the maximum funding
allowable in this category is $119,700.
2) HOD regulations limit funds to be used for administration to 20
percent of the total of the entitlement amo~~t plus proqram income.
The maximum allowable administrative expen5eS l there-for-e, total
$159,600. Funding for fair housing programs (Midpeninsula Citizens
for Fair Housing), the City's administration of the CDBG program,
as well as a portion of the Palo Alto Housing Corporation's
administrative costs, are allo~able in this category. Expenses
relatinq to the administration of the Housing Improvement Program
are outside the 20 percent limitation, since they are considered
project delivery costs and are taken directly from program income.
3J The City of Palo Alto's COBG Plan, approved by Council on
october 4, 1984, sets qoal~ of 80 percent of ~vailab16 funding ror
housing and housing activities, 15 percent for community-wide
facilities a.nd improvements, and 5 percent for overall CDBG pr-oqram
administration. These goals are not intended to be rigid. but
rather to serve as ~~idelines consistent with the need. Proposed
funding recommendations this year provide 71 percent of available
funds for housing and housing activities, 18 percent for community
CMR:118:91
----_ .. --'"
,.
ApX'il -4, 1991
Page Three
--. "
" ~ ..
,/
·' -"--~~--.. ---.-.
facilities, and 10 percent for-administration. Additionally .. 1
percent of fundinq recommendations is for supportive public
services not dir-ectly related to housing activities (homelessnes~,
drug abuse and senior nutrition).
Proposais received by the January 31.. 1991 deadline were reviewed
by the CAe at their public meetings held on February 15, 20, and
27. and Karch 5, 6, 12, 13, 19 and 20, 199~. Representatives of all
the agencies submitting proposals were personally in~erviewed by
the COmDIittee. TWenty six proposals were submitted for
consideration. Applications for funding totaled $1,233,268.
progrAM I«yi.. criteria
staff and the
recolDltleooations
regulations, as
CAe selected projects and developed funding
based on the HUD eliqibility requirements and
wall as the following criteria:
l~ Majority of project beneficiaries are low/moderate income
2. Projects meet an urgent or special ne~d
3. Value of the service/project
4. Number and diversity of project/service beneficiaries
5. Other funding sources available to applicant aqency
15. Stability of applicant aqency and ability to perform
service/project
Additionally I
served people
priority .for
Commission~
staff and the CAC consiaered applications Which
in crisis, the special needs group identified as a
1991 by the City Council and the Human Relations
It is recommended that $50,000 of the funds in the community
facilities category be allocated for use in contracting with a
consult3.r.t in the Planning Department, to a.~inJster the
rehabilitation and acquisition projects as necessary. These costs
would be allowable as project delivery costs and woula not be
included in the administrative caps. It is the intention of the
Planning Department to initiate an R?P process to secure the
services of an individual or organization familiar with HUD
regulations to oversee the capital projects recommended for
fundill9.
The-CAe and staff 1lre in concurrence on funding recommendations for
all applications received for the 1990-1991 CDBG program year.
Attachment -B-provides a detailed analysis and funding justifica
tions for the applications received.
CMR:21S:91
•
\ ,
(
April 4 .. 19S1
Page Four
/
---'
o
staff recommends that the Finance and Public Wor-ks co:nmittee
recommend to the City Council ~~at it make the following findings:
1~ That the proposals and related funding as recommended by the
staff and the citizens Advisory committee in Attachment -A·
are to be inc~ude.d in the 1991-1992 community Development
Block Grant program; and
2~ That staff be authorizad to submit an application to HUD by
t~e May 31, 1991 deadline to include the Palo Alto 1991-1992
program and required certifications.
3. That the City Manager, on behalf of the City, be authorized. to
execute the HlJ'D application and any other necessary documents
to effect the application, and to otherwise bind the City with
respect to the application.
Respectfully submitted.
p«~<.-<.-,(~Z/
nne Richards
C coordinator
-~-C? --;;~t5=-
Paul IbThi1 tg&n
Dire
l
tor, Co~~jty services
) /, :/' /,~.~{L,7J iun~ Fleming //
,As:;;istant City Ma~g
, i .--""
€p: citizens Advisory Committee Members
Applicant Agencies
Attachments: -A· Funding Recommendation Summary
Q!Rs: 221: 9
235:0
CMR:211 :91
-8" Funding Recommendations and Project Description
•
./
ATIACHMEIIT 'A'
ISSI-1992 COMMUNITY DEYELOPNENT BLOCK GRANT
FUNDING RECOMMENDATION SUNKARY
Pub 11 e Ser.! ce
Catholic Charities -Ombudsman
Community Services Agency
Emergency Housing Consortlu~
Homeless Shelter Program
Famiiy Servlce AssoCiation
Innovative .. lousing
Peninsul a Aru Information' Referral
Sacred Heart Communlty Service
Senlor Coordinating Council -
Shared Housing Counseling
Urban Ministry
Ad@!nlstratlon
City of Palo Alto
~id-Pen;nsula Citizens for fair Housing
Palo Alto Housing Corporati~n
Housina/'d-',"i ty Fad 1 ; ti es
Pilo Alto Housing Corporation
Casa Say -Group Home Acquisition
CIty of Pal. Alto -Park Accessibility
City of Palo Alto -Senior Cent.r Renovation
Cosmunit} Association for Retarded -
Swi. Center Renovation
Lytton Gardens -Emergency Generator
Mid-Peninsula Support Network -
Shelter Renovation
Palo Alto Adolescent Services -
Caravan House Repairs
Pal. Alto Housing Corp_ -Landbank
Peninsula Children's Center
fire Ala~ Syst~
Penfns~ll CAildren's Center
La Casita Acquisitfon
Second Harvest Food Bank -
Distribution Center
Senior Coordinating Council -Cold Storage
Senior Coordinating Council -Home Repair
Stevenson House -Deck Repair
REOUEST
S 9,689
5,000
15,000
40,374
30,000
14,575
8,000
10,000
30,000
BI,OOO
14,333
40,000
67,100
25,000
40,000
140,000
64,735
67,592
25,000
40,000
350,000
15,770
15,000
50,000
5,000
15,000
5,000
City of Palo Alto Planning Dept. Direct Costs
TOTAlS $1,233,268
CAC/STAfF
REt!!llMEI!1)ATION
$ 9,689
1,500
15,000
15,000
24,000
10,000
-0-
10,000
30,000
81,000
22,000
40,000
67,100
-0-
40,000
40,000
64,735
67,592
20,000
39,000
313,000
15,770
-0-
15,000
3,400
15,000
5,000
50,000
$1,024,886
,
ATTACHMENT'S'
CITIZEN'S ADVISOAY COKMITTEE
tOlllUllITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
fUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS AND PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS
TNE IKIIIORABL£ CITY COUIiClt
Palo ~Ito. C.lIfornla
Members of the Council:
The Citizens' Advisory COlTlTlitte2: for the COrmlunit.,Y Deve1cp-ment Block Grant (COBG)
program hereby submits its funding recOJ7I!lendations for the 1991-1992 program
year. The Citizens Advisory COll111ittee met durhg the mnths of February and
March this year to interview and select new committee ~bers, discuss funding
criterii. evaluate the proposa's~ and interview the applicants for CDBG funding.
!!ethodolOllY for Rev i ...
To faCilitate the review. applications were divided ieto HUD defined categories
of: 1) public service; 2) adm;~istration; and 3} housing/community development.
Requests for funding were evaluated on urgency. program merits and beneficiaries
(i.e. number of low income and ethnically diversified beneficiaries)~ as well is
performance reliability and financial soundness of applicant agency. The Ctty
Council and Huma~ Relations Committee priorities relating tc people in crisis
~re als~ given consideration.
fundigg Reca.mendatfons
CATNGLIC CHARITIES
1990/91 Funding
Requested Funding:
CAe and Staff Recommendation:
Category: Public Service:
9,228
9,689
9,689
Purpose~ Tbis asency provides complaint investigation and advocacy services to
Palo Alto~s elderly population living in long-tern care facilities. Elderly
reSidents are visited at six local n~rsing homes, and six residential care ~omes
by staff and trained volu"t~er ombudsmen. They are counseled and represented in
the ar~as of patient/resident rights. !lder abuse~ Quality of care, financial
concerns, dt!t~ theft, incorrect placement, eviction and other concerns. The
facilJties are visited on a reguJar basis and as special circ~stan,es dictate.
A f~ll SO percent of Fala Alto's estimated 863 long-term care senior residents
have no family or friends~
Proposal: l.is proposal maintains the current level of administrative support
fn the form of staff salaries.
Justificatign: The Committee reco~nds f~ll funding f~r these services which
are not duplicated by any other agency.
~ ..... -",,--------'-.----.
•
. ,..
'" ~-.-. --' ....;
COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW I LOS ALTOS
1990-1991 Funding:
~eque$ted Funding:
CAe and Staff Recommendation:
Category: Publf( Service
-0-
5,000
2,500
Purpose: Agency adyocat~s on behalf of, or links with dir~ct services, area
residents who have economic, physical (IT social "eeds in order to promote
independence and self-sufficienc), .. This proposal is for sUPP{lrt in t!1e pr<lvision
of the ser.ior l100ntime hot meal and socialization program which is utilized by
approximately 40 low and moderate income seniors from the South Palo Alto area,
close to the Mountain View border.
Proposal: Funds would be used for program administration.
JU$tifjcatiQn~ The Conmittee reconmends parthl funding in order to provide for
tnose seniors f~ the Palo Alto ar!a best served by I location closer to their
homes. The Committee would like to see the agency's van transportation service
extended to these senio~s.
£IIERGENCY HDIlSIII& CONSORTIIm
1990/91 Funding
Requested Funding:
CAe and Staff Recommendation:
Category: Pubhc Service
10,822
15,000
15,000
PurDQse' This agency pro-v1des temp{lrary emergency shelter for homeless
individuals and fillil ~es, food. housing relocat1on/employmer;t assistance. and
other supportive services. located i~ San Jose. 8aergency Hous1ng tonsortiu.
maiRtains single and family shelters in Santa Clara County.
P!()DOsal: 1.1$ reqlJest is for genenl administratfve program support for
sployee services, including salaries and benef; ts. The program obje-c.tive is to
provide a minimum of 1.500 nights of s~elter, meals and supportive servlces to
homeless individuals whose last slgniflcant address was Palo Altc.
Justification: Tne Committee recommends full funding based on the urgency and
need aS$oc~ated with tfle services proVided. Agency has improved the accuracy of
tneir tracking system to provide a more accurate j)'icture of the Pale .AHo c.l ieflts
ser.ed.
folllllY SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF SANTA ClARA VALLEY
1990/~1 runding:
Requested Funding: CAe and Staff Recommendation:
Category: Public Service
2
,
-0-
40,374
15,000
•
o
Purpose: The mission of the orsanizatfon is to fost~r the development cf
~ealthy family life through ca$e work. This proposal is to establish a women's
drug abuse prevention program in the Mountain View office which would be
available to Palo Alto ~omen and thefr families. The vast majority of w~men in
drug abuse treatment programs in Santa Clara County are bet~een the ages of 21
and 44~ the ·child bearing years·. This proposal would spEcifically address the
growlng probl~ of chemical dependency during pregnancy, and would target
c~etDical1y dependent Ilothers is a critical area of need. In addition to the
counseling serYlces, 1~cal community outreach and information serv;tes would be
provided.
~2ill; This prDposal is for adm1~istratlve support in the form of salaries,
benefits, and office expenses.
Justificatjon; The Committfe woul~ like to support the establisnment of these
urgent and necessary sendces in the north county area by having the agenc),
leverage these funds to galrt additional finanCial support from surrounding cities
who would also benefit from the progra~.
INNOV~TIYE HOUSING
1990/91 funding
Requested Funding:
CAe and Staff Retommendation:
Catego~y~ PubliC Service
7,SOO
30,000
14,000
PurDose: This agency provides shared housing opportunitl~s for low income Palo
Alto residents, especially single parents with children~ is well is general Tow
income hQusing information and referrill. The agency receives referrals for
housing services from over 70 local agencies, screens candidates, and helps form
hotJs.eholds to share bouses Teased by Innovative Housing. Candidites are
carefllll)' screened for compat i b11 i ty, and he T ped through workshops and COl1f1Se 1 i ng
to create i smoothly-functioning shared household. Project beneficiaries include
homeless Single parent families, frail seniors. ~ery low income single parent
fiailies at risk of home1essness, battered womer. and their children, and others
wlth spec;al housing difficulties.
Proppsal;
ser~ices.
This proposal is for ongoing administrati't"e support for emp10yee
Jystif1catl~n: The Committee re<:or.-rnends increased funding for this program due
the agency's ability to provide qUilit,. affordable housing to those with very
low incomes, and those at risk of becoming homeless. The agency will take on the
additional task of strengthening conaborati~e efforts with other social ser-.ice
agenc'ies to better provide for the ne-eds of their clients. This will also
include expanded outreach efforts to minority comrnuniti!s.
PENI~SUlA AREA INFORMATION AND REFERRAL SERYICE (PAAIRS)
CategQry;
1990/91 funding
Requested funding:
CAe and Staff Recommendation:
Publit Service
3
12,000
14,575
10,000
: •
. ,', '.-
, ._._--
/-
Purpose: fundi would provide informatfD~ and referral services relating to
renhl flousfng and the rights and responsibilities of both tenants and landlords,
referral to the tenant/landlord mediation program where appropriate.
frgpQs.l: Tft1s proposal is for general administrative support in the fo~ of
salaries.
Justificatjon: Contract objecti~es (number of information and referral calls)
have been decreasing o~er the past few years, and more accurate statistics need
to be kept regarding t"e income status of pr<lject beneficiaries. The CAe and
staff support this valuabl!' program, blJt would 1 ike to see more community
outreach and targeting of low income clientele.
SACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICE
1990/91 Funding:
Requested Funding:
CAe and Staff Recommendation:
Categgry; Public Service
-0-
8,000
-0-
Purpose: Agency provides food~ clothing. job counseling. educational services
and housing counseling to low inc<lme and dfsadvantaged people from theh offices
located irll downtown San Jose. Area of service if1cludes all of Santa Clara
County. The goal of this proposal 1S to increase the assistance in the area of
housing counselfng in response to the demand for increased services. The agency
would like to serve an additional 400 clients with afford3ble housing placement
next year.
ProDOial: The proposal is for ad~fnistrative support in the form of salaries
and benefits.
Justification: The Committee d1d not recommend funding due to the fact that
local efforts. offering the same type of ser~ices. are a~ailable. Since travel to
tne San Jose location would be a deterrent to people in the Palo Alto area
seeking affordable housing. it was deCided that the local agencies offering this
servlce would be a more l1kely option for potential clientele.
SEll lOR COORDINATING COUIICll (SCC) -SHARED HOUSING COUNs[LlNG
1990/91 Funding
Requested Funding:
CAe and Staff Recommendation:
Category: Pub1i<: Service
9,500
10,000
10,000
P~rDDse~ Funds would provide shared housing counseling and genaril housing
information and referral for senior cit1zens iA Palo Alto~
PrQPosal: This proposal is for general program and staff support for a one-half
time Hausing Coordinator.
JJistificatiQn: Recommendation is for full funding based on the number of
assisted rentals and shared housing matches accomplished wit~ the use of program
volunteers after State funding was cut.
4
"
UR8AII MINISTRY
1990/91 Funding
Requested Funding:
\ .
CAe and Staff Recommendation:
Category:
o
30,000
30,000
3&,000
PurpQ$e~ lhe Urban Min'stry of Palo ~lto ~rowides emergency services for the
local h~1eo.ss and very low income populat1on. These servic!$ include:
em~rgentJ assistance in the fo~ of food, clothing, personal hygiene supp1i~s,
showers, etc; job referrals. day-labor opportunities, employment-related
counseiing, phone use, trod trans~~rtation assistance for those see~ing
uneltployaent benefit options; advocacy and support in the courts and jail;
administration of the rotating thurth sh~lt~r pro9ra~t the Hotel de lioc; and
coordination of a volunteer corps who assist in counseling and casework with the
hoaeless $tntally ill.
Proposal: This request is to fund ong~lng administrative expens~s in th~ form
of staff salaries and audits.
JustiUcation; The CAe recoowends full funding. The program serves over 3,OGO
uodup11cated homeless and ver) low income lndividuals.
CITY OF PAlO ALTO
1990/1991 FundIng:
Requested Funding:
CAe and Staff Recommendation:
CategorY: Administratfon
81,000
81,000
81,000
Project: The Division of HUII'Ian Services admini stfrs the COZ!JJlUnit), Development
Block Grant ~gram for the City. Admi~istrat;~e costs include staff salaries~
benefits, materials, supplies. and advertlsing.
The City is requesting funding for He costs of ldministering the
pl"'ograra in Palo Alto which includes program planning, implement-ation,
aonitorin9, reporting, and overall pl"'o9ra~ complfance.
.rust Hi catfon: The Committee rec~nds full funding .
NIIlPEIUNSULA CITIZENS fOR fAIR HOUSING
1990/91 Funding:
Requested funding:
CAe and Staff Recomm.ndation:
Category: Administration
21,205
24,333
12,000
project: Agency pro~ldes investigation, counseling~ and legal rfferral for
~ictims Qf housing discriminatl~n, infonmatiDn and referral on gener11 housing
matters. c~~nit1 edutation and QutreaCA regarding fair hOUSing, and dati and
a~a1ysi$ of Palo Alto~s fair hous;~9 practic~s and problems.
5
•
,
\
o
Proposal: T~is proposal is for general administrative p~gram support.
Justif1cltion: The ColTFtittee r~co9niles that the serwices pro\lided by the
agency aTe vital to the communIty, but recommend funding at a level more in line
wiUl the activity in the cOl!ITIUnay. and more proportie>nate to the levels. of
funding from neighboring communities.
PALO AlTO HOUSING CORPORATION
1990/91 Funding:
Requested funding:
CAC and Staff Recommend.tion:
Category: Administration: 40,000
102, ~60
107,200
107,200
Housing ·Special Activities of a Sub-recipient-: 67,200
EnUlli: The Palo Alto Housing torporation increases the number of housing
units that are affordable to low and moderate income residents of Palo Alto by:
lJ acquiring suitable parcels through landban'king; 2) site improvements and
assisted housing; lJ acquisition of housing to be rented by low and moderate
income persons; and 4) aSSistance t~ other organfzations that work toward the
proVision of affordable housing_ Mditional1,Y, the PAHC provides ongoing
manageaent rental units previously acquired under the Ri!ntal Housing Acquisition
Progril1l! (RHAP).
Proposal: Application requests funding for ongo~ng adrniAistrative expenses in
the form of employee salarles and benefits~
Justifk.lti£n-:. The COI'JIIlittee re(',onmends full funding based on the
org2nization~5 active pursuit of low income housing opportunities iD the City of
Palo Alto, increased management rfSpoosibilities for rental lJnits, and housing
consultant ser-.ice3.
USA SAY -GROUP HOllE ACQUISITION
funding Request:
CAe and Staff Recommond.tion;
Cat~: Housing Acquisition
2S,000
-0-
~: Social Advocates for Youth (SAV) is a non-profit agency establishe~
in 1973 iA response to the criSis needs of Santa Clara C~unty yout~ and their
faroilfe$. The agency 'provides crisis reSidential treatment services through tne
Casa Say program, delinquenty prev!ntion services, drug abuse prevention and day
t.N!'atment iervices, independent liVing skills trainlng .. and residential services
for abused and ~eg1ected youth.
Projact: This proposal is for flJnding to r~uce the lI'lortgage debt on the Casa
Sa,)" residenthl facility. located on View Street in MDuntain View, which houses
six at-risk adolesc~nts for I maximum stay of 30 days. The program offers a
cOIIprehensive residential a.nd counseling program specifically hrgeted to
famil1es ill crisis. ElItphasisis placed on providil1g rteeded support to the child
and family i" order to stabilize! tfle hc;.me situation, and prevent court and
proba.tion department involvement.
•
'\
o
JUst; fjcittQn~ The COJmtHtee supports this project~ but the mortgage buy-down
has been ruled an ineligible activity by HUD.
CITY OF PAtO ALTO -PARi( ACCESSIBILITY AHO HAHIliCAPPED IHPROVfMfllTS
Requested Funding:
CAe and Staff Recommendation:
Category; Community Facility
40,000
40,000
Purpose: The Parks and Golf Diyis;on of t~e Community S~rvices Department is
reQuestin~ funding to improve accessibility and utililation of City Parks and
Open Spact areas by those witA diiabilities. Most City parks are not eq~ipped
with handicapped play equipment or structures. Additionally, the areas.
surrounding the play structures will be improved so that t~ey are accessibl! to
wheelchairs.
Pro iect: The fundi n9 cou1 d camp 1 ement the Parks Playground FtJrDitul"e and
Equipment Replacement project by increas1 ng the capitiill improvement allotment for
handicapped accessible play str1JcttJres and equipment for Clt)' parks. Funds would
be used to p~rchase and install the specialized structures.
Justif~ation; The Committee recommends full fonding for this project.
CITY OF PALO ALTO -SfMIOR CENTER SEISMIC UPGRADE PROJECT
Requested Fuoding,
CAe and Staff Recoomend.tion:
Category: Coromunity faci1ity
140,000
~O,QOO
Purpose: The Engineering: 01'tision of the Public 'Work.s. Department is requesting
funding for the design phase of the structural strengthening project for the City
own.ed building at 45Cl BT'ya.nt ..nick is. leased. to the Senler Coordin.ating COlJI'oc;l.
The building was. identified as being i~ need of seismic upgrading as a res~lt of
a structural analysis perfnrmed in compliance with the City's 1986 Seismic Man.n:!
Reduction Program ordir,ance.
Prolect: The proposed work. to be performed would bring the Senior Center
building, origina1ly built in 1927 with additions in 1950 and 1977, into
compliance witt! current seismic standards. The project has been divided into two
phase$, the deSign phase and the constructicn phase. The requested funds would
be used to hire engineeriDg , structural and arcfiitecttlral consultants to complete
the desl9n phase of the project.
Justification: 1"e C.omnittee recDmmends pilrthl funding in stlpport of this
project in oT'der that 1t .ay be started, but is concerned about the cost of the
entire project given the fact that the re1ocation and: actual construction
expenses wi11 be i~ addition to tne design phase.
COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION FOR RETARDED, INC.
Requested Funding;
CAt and Staff Recommend.tion:
64,735
64,735
--
CategorY: Cornn¥Jntt~ Facility
Proltct: Conwunity Association for Retarded (tAR) is a llonprofit agency
located in Palo AHo whose mission is to provide cOrmlunity bas!d services to
people ~ith developmental and otner disabilities to assist t~em in the process
of personal development. family compatibility, and community integration, The
Betty Wright SiII;1I Center ~royjdes therapeutic 5""11 opportunities to area
residents vfth disabilities, as well as swimming lessons to children and adults
w1tA al' types of physical. mental, educational, and emotional disabilities.
Proposal: T~fs proposal is to undertake major renovations to the Setty Wright
Swim Center in order to maintaiD health and safety standards and compensate for
t~e heavy daily usage over the past twenty year5~ Additionally, the proposal
indi.ldes the addition of a handicappe-d-iccessible 'Iestibul@ entrance. The
p1anned improvements include retil1ng of shower areas, floor resurfacing, and
improved ventilation system, and the repair and replacement of partitions.
Justification: The Corrmittee recorrmends full funding for tf'lis proposal in
order to provide a heal t"y. clean and appeal1ng environment for the swim
pr0!ilralls~
l m1lll GARIl.EIIS -E1!ERGEllCY GEI!EIlATOR
Funding ReQuest:
CAC and Staff Rec~ndation;
Categorv: Housing RehabilitatiDn
67,592
67,592
Project: lytton Gardens is i non-sectarian. nonprofit organization that
operates 318 low and moderately priced res1dentlil units for seniors and a 128
bed skilled nursing and long-term care facility in Pal{1 Alto. The facilities
offer a continuum of care frOID complete independent lh'ing to supervised
conmunity care to lu.r:rs;ng, recuperative care. The fa1:il t ty promotes an
environment supportive of independence~ social inter.ction and personal growth
for its 450 residents and patients.
JIJstif1cation; The CO:Tlllittee recorrmends fl,lll fund1Plg for this prop<lsal tc
assist residents 1Ft their quest for secur1t)'~ ~,ndependence, and peace of lIlind in
prep.ring for emergencies. Tne iverage age of the lytton resident is 87, and an
emergency situation can create ~ state of extreme anxiety, especially if there
is no lighted ComIOr. area in which to c.on:,}regate. Additionally, many of the
residents and all of the patients are not capable of preparing their vwn meals
jf the ~il service is 1nterrupted~
M!D-PENINSUlA SUPPORT NETWORK -SHELTER R£NOVATION
Funding Request:
CAe and Staff Recommendations:
~OJ:t; Housing Rehabilitation
25,000
20,000
Project: Tbis agency assists battered wocen and their families tnroughits
reSidential. cr~sis inter .... ention. legal, cOiIITIunity education. and children's
programs. Families iA crisis are helped to rebuild posit1ve 1 non-~iolent family
8
, .
structures. Curing the 1989/90 fiscal yen, the-agency serve1 over 1,000
battered women and their children, 129 percent increase OYer the previous year.
Procpsal: The proposal is to install I heatir;og and cool ;ng system in the
shelter to rep1ate the unre1iable and unsafe .i" heaters currently," use; and
also to instill safety lights near darkened stairwel15~ R~vised bids received
at a liter date indicat-ed the project cOIJ1d be accomplished. fo'l" a lesser amolJnt
t~an ~riginalTJ anticipated.
Jystification: The Committee recommends f~ndi~g in support of the work of the
agenty and for the s~fety of residents and the1r chtldren.
PALO ALTO ADOLESCENT SERVICES CORPORATION -CARAYAN HOUSE REPAIRS
Req~est for funding:
CAe and Staff Recommendation:
Category: Housing Rehabilitation
Purpose: Pala ... lto AdoTescent Services Corp (PAA..c;.q, a nonprofit corporation,
owns and operates Caravan House, I residential treatarent facility 10cated in Palo
Alto for eaotiona11y and behavforally disturbed adolescents. The residents are
teenage girls who have been placed in tile hell ity by the Department of Social
Services. the Juvenile Probation Department, or their (ami lies as. a result of at
risk beftaviors a~d/or dysfunctional family situations. PAASC also provides
counseling services for adolescents in their on-campus programs at the three PaTo
Alto secondary schools (Palo Alto Hig~ School, GUno High School and Jane Lathrop
Stanford Middle School).
Project: This applfcation is to fl.mr:t sever.al majDr repair and maintenance
projects at the Palo Atto Caravan House facnity. These include structural
repairs which resulted from extensive dry rot and termite damage, roofir.g and
eleetrical repairs.
Justification: The Conmittee recommends funding to ensure the retention of safe
and adtquate housing for the residents of this ;,uch needed facility. The
difference in the request and funding recorrmenddtion is due to an adjustment in
the request as the result of an additional bid.
PALO ALTO HOUSING CORPORATION
Request for funding;
CAG and Staff RecommendatIon:
3S0,OOO
313,000
Category: Housing ·la~dbank/Rental Housing Acquisition Program-
Project: RHAP is a continuing program under which PAHC seeks to acqui re,
rehabilitate {if necessary}. ~nd operate existing rental housing i~ PaTo ATto iM
order to assist in providing and preserving a stock of rental housing affordable
to low and moderate in<:ome reSidents, The landbankjng program provides funds for
the acquisition of property appropriate for new constr~'tion of low and moderate
income housing.
9
. ,
• Proposal; To allocate additional funds for these programs te the existing COSG
BOney available from COSG allocations from past prQg~a~ years.
Justification: The Committee recommends a signific~nt allo<ation to this fund
as it is antitipated tnat it will substantia11y increase the nu~ber of hDusing
unHs available to individuals of low and moderate income. The C0nrl11tt'2e
recOIMIends th1S al1{1cation based on He assumption that the majority of the furads
will be spent In the VEry ne.r future, and the City and the PAHC are diligently
pursofng e ... ·ery opportunity to expe~d these fonds as soon as possible.
PENINSULA CHILDIlfN'S CENTER -fiRE AlARII SYSTElI
Requested Funding:
CAe and Staff Recommendation:
Catggorv: Community Facility
15,770
15,770
proiect: Peninsula Children's Center (Pee) is i nonprofit special education
and mental health program serving severely disturbed chiidren. adolescents and
t~eir families. Programs are provided in four areas: integrated ~ntal health
and special edu"tlon day programs, therapeutic recrEatiofi, outpatient
coonsaling. and the -MoYing On-residential treatment facility for six autistic
,doles.cents.
proposal: Hlis. proposal is for the installation of a CEntral fire alarm system
throughout the scho~l facilit, located on Middlefield road in Palo Alto. ,ne
fire system .. auld bring the hciT it)' into complfance with existing fire codes and
augMent the existlng manual pull stations. The system Will include smoke and/or
heat detectors connected direct11 to the fire station.
J.ystificat1Qn: The Comithe reccnmends full funding for tftis project based on
t~e safety and \i.e 1 fare of the agency clientelle and staff.
PENINSUlA CHILDREN'S CElITER -LA CASITA ACQUISITION
Requested Funding:
CAC and Staff Recommendation:
tateaory: Housing Rehab;litat~on
IS,OOO
·0·
p~: Peninsula C~i1dren's Center (Pet) is a nonprofit spedal tducation
and mental health program serving seve(ely disturbed c~jldren. adolescents and
their fallil ies.
f!::Qw.al: Hlis proposal Is for tne acquisition of the agenc'y'"s JIIountaic View
group home serving developmentally disabled children.
Justification: The Committee does not recommend funding for this program since
we are currently providing partial funding for the acquisition of a pee group
~ose in Palo Alto serving developmentally disabled adolescents.
SECOfI) IlARVEST FOOD BAlIK -DISTRIBUTIO!! CElITE.
Requested Funding:
CAC and Staff Recommend.tion:
10
50,000
25,000
•
.~.: ..
. ~ ~
o o
Category: C .... nity Facility
project: Second I-!ar-.... est Food Bink of SantI Clara and San Mateo C{)unties
dhtributes food to area soup xHchens. shelter-s, emergency food providers. other
nonprafits. and brown bag groceries directly to low-income seniors. Agencies
served in the Pa10 -"1ttl COTllTlunity inc1ude: La. Comida, Cf:-.R, Pet, t.cumenica1
Hunger Progru, Moying Cn Group Home. Peninsula Children's Center, and the
Ventura School Brown Bag sit~.
Proposal: T~i~ proposal is for ~ portion of the ~apital costs to construct a
new 60,000 square foot food distrib~tion facilitJ to better serve the recipients
of the 50,000 pounds of food distributed each d'J-The new f.cility will ha,.
loadfng docks, special ized rooms and equipment for processing food, adequate
refrigeration and freezer space, improved traffic patterns, and adequate offic~
space for volunteers and staff. The current 23,000 square foot plant is no
Janger meeting Uie needs of the Food Bank. Agencies using the FoGd Bank nave
recently reported up tc a 30 percent incre:i.se in demand f{lf services in the
immediite area. Surveys reveal t~at those most in need of help are children and
the lQW-i"c~~, frail elderly_
Justification: The Committee recommends funding based on the necessary and
excellent services provided to the lOW-income residents {If Palo Alto l and
requests that the Food Bank encourage more North County program partiCipation in
anticipation of tne increased deliver1 capabilities of the new facility.
SENIOR COORDr~TIN& COUNCIL -tOLD ~TORAG£
Requested Fund;ng~
CAe ".d Staff Recommend.tlon:
Category: Community facility
5,000
3,400
Prgject: The Senior Coordinating Council leases a portion of their Palo Alto
facility to the La (oaida Nutrition program which provides daily. low-cost m~als
to seniors, as well as the -Heals on Whe!ls· program for senior shut-ins. Cold
storage capabilities t both refrig~ration and freezing, are a necessary component
of storing and preserving food for the program.
Proposal: This proposal ;s to replace the condenSing units in the large walk-in
refrigeration and freezing units which were originally built into t~e senior
center in 1976. The original bid of SS.DDO has been replaced by a lower bid of
$3 ,400 to cQmplete the same work.
Just'fication: The COft3'Ilittee r-ecolmlends f!.l11 funding for this project in order
to keep this important progr~ running.
SENIOR COORDINAlIN& COUNCIL -SENIOR HQHE RE~AIR PROGIWI
Requested Funding:
CAe and Staff Reco~ndatiQn:
Category: Housing Rehabilitation
15,000
15,000
Project: This proqram is designed to pro~ide affordable home repair services
to Palo Alto hemeowners who are 60 years of age or older. The program increases
II
-,
•
3~'-.
the opportunity for seniors to remain in the~r own homes as long as poss; ble, and
helps to maintain the Quality of current ~ousing in the Cit~. fees are based on
I sliding scale.
ProDQSJl~ This application is to provide subsidy money for low-income seniors
unable to pay the ful;, rlon-subsidized repair rates ..
Justlfjcatjon~ The C08I1'Iittee recommends full funding. This program
appropriately addresses health, safet1 and housing needs of low-income senior
homeowners.
ST£YENSOII HOUS£ -OECK REPAIR
ReQuested Funding:
CAC and Stoff R.<omoendation:
Category: Housing Rehabilitation
5,000
5,COO
Project: stevenson House is senior housing project. affordable to low-and
lRoderate-income persons, .hfch is owned and o~erated by Pilo Alto Senior Housin9~
rncorporated, a nonprofit organization. Currently tnere are 135 senjar adu1ts
living in the residential c~mmunity.
Proposal: Stevenson House is requestil"lg money to repair and recoat the two
declc.$ .Meh connet:.t the second and third floors ~f t~e fac;' lty's three buildings
whic" have cracked and cbipped making it a safety hazard for the elderly
residents, especiiH, those with wlilkers.
Justifjcation: The Committee recommends full funding for this project.
11