HomeMy WebLinkAbout0160.091February 21, 1991
HONORASLE CIT1 COUNCIL
Palo Alto l CalifQrnia
Attention: Finance and Public Works Committee
"I"P' PllOdfCIM Smou.RY {CAPITAL !K_PRQVEKEIlT ~~_9GPAN lIIIAHC:I»
STATUS REPORT
Members of the Council:
The following mi.d.year financial status report details revenue,
expense, and reserve level changes from the ~ldget for the General
and Enterprise Funds for fisc~l year 1990-91. Also attached are a
Selected Capital Projects Status spreadsheet, eight Municipal Fee
Schedule changes and a Budget Amendment Ordinance for Council
approval summariZing changes ~ecommended in this report.
oeberal rynd suamary
When Council adopted the FY 1990-91 budget in June, a slight
operating deficit of $302,000 was projected, :rlainly because the
General Fund -forgave-rent from the Water Fund. Now, staft has
re-estimated. revenues and expenditures in light of the recession
and year-to-date actuals. The result is a lower revenue forecast,
partly offset by a one-time "credit-from the Public Employees
Retirement System (PERS) due to an actua~iel re-valuation~
Therefore., staff no .... expects the Reserve for Capital Projects (CIP
Reserve) to be reduced by $2.4 million by year-end, ~hich is $2.1
.illion more of a reduction than the estimate in the adopte.d
budqet. However, $500,000 of the deficit represents money advanced
to fund the Alma/Meadow intersection project (discussed in the
CMR: 160: 91
·Capital Illpr-ovement F'und'll section of this report). which 'Will be
repaid by 9i!lS ti51X monies in 1991-92; and !$1. 3 p..illion or the
d~ficit represents money ~dvanced to the Storm Drainage Fund which
will be r-epaid by a subsequent bond issue~ The adopt~d budget had
projected a $1.3 million bond sale to fUnQ storm drainage improve
aents~ Cash tloW' projections based on revised engineers' estimatE'S
indicate that it ~ill be more cost effective to delay a sale of
bonds until 1991-92~ Therefore, the CIP Reserve deer-ease is offset
by $L8 million in :money o..-ed by other funds. It only net
operating revenues are calculated, that is, if the advances to
other funds transactions ~.re excluded, the CIP Reserve would
actually qain $106,000 from the current adjusted budqet~
Staff will review the second year of the two-year budget, FY 1991-
92, based on both the new revenue forecasts for this year and the
longer-term economic outlook, and will return to Council with
details as part of the interim budget process this spring~
Revenues, expenditures and estimated transfers to the Reserve for
Capital Projects are detailed in Table l~ The first column shows
the actual results of fiscal year 1989-90 (audited) i the second
column shows the adopted 1990-91 budget; the third column shows the
1990-91 adjusted budget (the adjusted budget refl~cts all Budget
Amendment Ordinances, as vell as encumbram::es and reappropria
tions}; the fourth column displays six-month actual expenditures as
of December 31, 1990; while the fifth column,. -Projected Budget
1990-91-, shows staff's latest forecasts for revenues and expendi
tures; and the last column is the difference between the Adjusted
Budget and Projected Budget.
CHP.: 160: 91 2
TABLS I
1990-9! MTO\'EAR FlNA.'!CIAL Ri:PORT
GSNEltAL FUND REVENUE AND EXi'ENtHTURE SL'MMARY
(lr; thou.qnd~ of dorT.lrs)
Atlnpt~ .... dj~ YTD Projecled
~ Budad Budget Actual B"",..
~ l22Q:P.J. 199(;.91 ~ ~ Pi""""",
Rt.:Vl.:QUC6:
T.II~
PI:ofoertyw.a. 1,SIZ 1,886 1,886 l,lS4 1,921 35
50"" ..... 1),981 14.614 14,674 6,706 14,100 (074)
Uti"t} 'CM:fS tu <C,812 S."/Ol 5,7Q7 2.612 5,200 (507)
Trani. oca.Ip. IIllI l,04{J 3,161 .3,Hil 1.156 J,161 ~
0IN0 ... '" 1,4S2 2,558 2.SS!. 1.0\2 2,(5S (100)
Fi.r.dI Ii-PeoaJtiai J .2SI 1.189 1,189 .,;3 989 (200)
Tocat Tues &. Fines 33,10< 1S,11S )S, i1S 15,303 33.829 (I.""')
Fin: Protect &: Emd'r.
Comm. Stlrv~ 3.029 3, .... 3 .... 1,191. 3 ..... 0
fftl'lA oIfler .~ie:I. SOl 354 384 139 38< 0
~. (OC$ &: pennil" 5,612 6,143 6,15& "2,635 >.863 (295)
hl&c::oest rarninlli 2.381 2,000 2,CXlO .. , 1.000 0 """,,,001 _
13,147 1J,480 13.480 6.519 IJ,48O 0 oo.a_ ..Lill T.tlM L.W ...t.m.l ..Llli --1l
Tn""~ 59,20.3 62.-480 62,5lS 28,371) 60.884 (1.641)
PIWi EIrunIb. " ~.
tUnded linn prior Jr ~ -f.lli --1l
SukoW 59,203 62,4S0 60,848 28,3"19 65.201 (J,64I)
EkpnJirures:
Sat I:. ikne.flts ]8,623 38,586 40,871 19,702 39,323 (1,5SO)
CnnIract Scn-ices 5,052 5.143 6,SS1 2.ISO 6,557 (301
SltIf1PI"lCS a. Muerial:<; 1.336 1.= 2.36S 90< 2,265 (l00)
a-rub"..". 3.390 1.O'i7 1,187 3,66< 8.63<; ....
~a:.~ 530 59() 595 26 595 0
F~ilitM:i &: EQuil" 559 491 BS7 458 831 0
AAl)(:IIted a..rp lO,nS 13.718 ~30.no 1.Cl63 13,""130 10
CUllli~sencie5 .l.lli! _.944 ~ --lW
Suhlotal 61.21" 11.%1 74,158 33,%1 72.897 (1,261)
~ofre-If'1:IUICItIQ~C~j
1:Jl.pmc!jlura Wore. trar~fen (2.0J5) (9.487) (f,310) (.5,.58S) (1.690)
eMit: 160:91 3
•
1990-91 MlDYEA'R F1NANC'lAt. REPORT
GENERAL FUND RE ...... ENUE AND EXPENDlTUIU:: SUMMARY
(ill thc-J1Jsand~ of dnna. .. '1o)
Mop'''' A!ljU!l.ted YTO Projected
Actual Bud',Gd Budl::ct ArtWlI Budget
illMQ. m2:2l ~ J1.!lli2Q LY90-91 Dtffc:l'I::nce.
Otbet-fiunclaJ aource.; (LlSeS):
Orentiaa: Transfcn; in:
Si:rM lmprov. Fund: M IS 15 53 IS
fed. Revnl.ve Fund 51 II il 27 SI
Spris! Dill. FWYl 273 110 110 55 110
c.p. In1f1OV. FUtld 140
Eowprise Fund 14,41i l3,5'?6 13,652 .,S4G 13,652
00... .Jl!Q --.!l ~ ~ --.!l
To<aI Op. Trans. 111 15,119 13,82.3 13,89') 6,979 n,lI99
Op. TtanSfets oul:
Deht Setvke Fund 9iS 946 '46 473 946
Cal'. hnrrov. FWlU .!.Q!!! 4986 ~~ 3.'53 ~ 21
Total Op. Tr.n5. Out 9,9"19 5,932 8.455 4,226 8.-476
Net Op. TnuuJmo 5,l4<l 1,89! 5,444 2.753 5,423
~CC$S or Revenue & Oth.:.r
Flnanc;inl $o4Jrus o"'~
(undd) Up.mdifur<'~ &:
otho::r financing w;es 3.12$ (J ,596; {I ,866) 0,267)
fr.lns. 10 (fn>m) R~,,·c:ti:
R~tve fur Cap. Pr~. 1,139 (302) (697) (2,4JI) 0,714)
Roervc: Strc:t:t/SNlwl;. (1,050) 5l! 636 129 (5<J7)
.!te<;:. fot G~. Cordio,. 2,DOC (MO} (650) (1) (650)
Iks. for ReaplEncumb. 17.
SLClres~rJ (m)
Adv. LO Other Fund..> 415 (1.J..U) <.LillJ (2) -M2 ) 82{)
ToW ~I"'oie Otan.£o!S 1.125 (1,5%) (l,g66) \2,267) 0
Notei-:
(2) Prevjou", y~r'5 w·".aDCC to Wol!er FlUId to ~ paid bl+Ck in 1990--91 will ron!riNlc 1o Gtmer.d Fund opertlions. off:!ld by:
a 5I,32O.000!0 Storm Draia Ful"d dUe to fX'!'1,roor.c:metJl or !WIlt: or bol1ds.
o SSOO,CKXJ to CIP Fund. 11.1 fund AII"N;M~ int~liOtl im,ruv~m:.M:>. .
•
hIG'! lupd •• HPUt.
Total revenues !Ire projected to be $1~6 million less than the
adopted budget for 1990-91~ Decreases are projected in sales ta~,
utility users tax, other taxes, tines and penalties, and service
fees and permits.
Original budget projections for sales tax r~ceipts in 1990-91 were
cODipleted before third quarter receipts for ~9a9-90 had been
received. At that tiloe, revenues tor 1989-90 sales tax were ne.arly
25 percent above the previous year (1988-89). Clearly, the present
uncertain econo~ic and international circumstances do not support
the optimistic torec~st of a year ago. Receipts for the first two
quarters ot 1990-91 were actually below the same two quarters a
year ago.
Total sales tax receipts for 1990-91 are nov projected to be $14.1
.i ilion, $~74 J 000 beloW" the adopted budget. estimate o~ $14.7
_lliion. The reason fo~ the lower estjmate is the projected impact
of a recession that has hit the national and state economies~ The
recession has dam3qed consumer confidence and, therefore, retail
sales. Further, the recession is accompanied by lower inflation
than previously anticipated. Lo~er inflation translates into a
lower dollar amount of taxable sales and, hence, lower sale5 tAX
receipts.
In its latest forecast~ the City's sales tax revenue forecasting
consultant projects $14.1 tnl11ion in revenues for the 1990-91
fiscal year. Both the consultant's forecast and the staff forecast
aS5ume the Middle East ~ar will end in the early part ot the second
calendar quarter of 1991. If the war draqs on, and if it dra9s
~nsumer confidence down ~ith it, then the outlook for retail sales
and sales tax receipts 'Will correspondingly 'Worsen. So tar,
however. the war appears to have had much less effect on sales tax
receipts than has the recession which ~as already underway.
Next year, sales tax receipts are likely to be below the estimate
in the adopted budget~ This i~ due to the fact that the reduced
sales tax revenue base this year will pass through to next year.
ThUS, the forecastinq consultal1t is estimating 1991-92 ~ales tax
revenue at $14.9 .million~ which is $700,000 beloW' the original
1991-92 budqet estimate.
Property '!'all:
Two changes are affecting property tax receipts, and the net result
is .!in estimated increase of $:35,000 over the adopted budget.
First. unsecured tax receipts are expected to be $150,000 over
budqet, due to an increase of ne.i!irly 11 percent in assessed
CIIR'160:91 5
•
\
valu~tion. Receipts through January ~lready exceec the entire
fiscal year estimate by $52,000; and an additional unsecured
pa~ent, estim~ted at $100,000, is expected in mid-April~
Offse:ttinq this, Santa Clara county has notified cities that,
pursuant to Senate Sill 2557, it ~ill retain a portion of property
tax revenues to cover its administrative costs for handling
property taxes. The amount 'Which the County vill retain to reflect
Palo Alto's share is $115,000.
The outlook for p~ope~ty tax receipts next year is unclear. If the
unexpected $150,000 increase in unsecured property tax receipts is
permanent, then the budget estimate for 1991-~2 is too low; further
IInalysls of this increase is underway. On the other hand,
unsecured proper't.y tax receipts are notoriously volatile, and staff
analysis mo!lY well determine that the 1990-91 surge 'Was is one-t,ime
phenomenon. Finally, if the recession this year dampens investment
in unsecured property, then tax receipts 'Will be adversely affected
next year.
Secured property t~x receipts for 1991-92 could also be affected,
if the local real estate market slumps dramatically this year. As
statf has discussed ~ith Council in the past~ however, it takes
anywhere from 18 months t,o 2 years for changes in property or
valuation to :be processed through the county ASSESSOr" and county
Controller's Offices. This means that the slowdown in property
sales may not be reflected in redu~ed secured property taxes until
late 1991 or early 1992. Staff has been 'Workinq vlth the Palo Alto
Unified School District to develop .a methodolO9Y to better predict
secured tax receipts.
utility Use:rs ~.~
Utility users tax receipts come from two sources. The first is the
tax levied on City-billed utility charqes, vhile the second is the
tax levied by telephone companies on telephone billings to Palo
Alto businesses 8~d residents4 Factors influencing receipts
include utility sales, phone usage, bUsiness activity and economic
growth, and the Wstairstep discount-given to large utility
customers. The stair5tep/e~emptions calCUlation is made up of t~o
factors: the percentage of total uti lity sales at a discounted
utility ~sers tax rate, i.e., at less than the standard S percent
rate; as well as the average discounted rate~ including exemptions.
Since the budget was adopted, a revised ten-year utility users tax
forecast 'WaS developed. Earlier estimates ot both stairstep/exemp
tion factors were incorrect, and utility users tax receipts are now
projected to be $507~OOO less than the earlier estimate.
Motor vehicle in lieu fe~s are bei~ adjusted downward by $100,000
to reflect projections based on a decline during the first half of
CMR:160:91 6
t • I
•
the year that is also reflected i:"l stateYide receipts of motor
vehicle revenues~
Parkifl9 fines end vehicle code fines are projected to come in
$200~OOO below budget. collection afforts hy west Computil, the
new parkin9 fine collection service, are ~ot up to estimates made
based on previous experience with the last vendor~ Datacom. Police
and Finance staff are currently in the process of meeting with West
computil in an attempt to identify and correct any problems~
Servia. ~ ••• , Per.its
Departmentally-qenerated revenues are projecte.d to come in $295,000
below budget~ The major variances are in the following areas:
o Fire Permits
The budgeted figure of $360,000 ... as high primarily because ot
overly optimistic assumptions in the Os~r Fee Study, but ~lso
because the type ~~ development that qenerates large revenues
(i~e., new oftica construction, major commercial remodelinql has
slowed. A more realistic level is nov estimated at $180,000.
o Hiscellaneo-"Ils Pol ice Fees:
Accident investiqetion fees are recommended to be eIiminat~d,
basC':d on consultation with the city Attorney's Office. This
vill result in a decrease in re~enues of $70,OOO~ The fee was
adopted in June 1990, based on recommendations of the User Fee
Study. Pending ~nd threatened litiqation against other cities
has been revie~ed by Police staff, es well as the city
Attorney's ,:)ffice. That litigation argues 'Only direct costs
associated with the duplication of accident reports are
recoverable ~y user charges. Pendinq a tinal court determina
tion on this issue, it is reco~~ended that collection of the
investiqation fee be suspended.
Vehicle impound fees were instituted for the first time this
fiscal year t based on the User Fee Studt. The first half of the
year's actual revenues ~re coming in lower than projected, and
it is estlmateQ that ye~r-end receipts vi!1 be low by $45,000.
Gener.l Pun4 BXp'A~itures
Ceneral Fund expenditures are projected to come in $1.2 million
under budget. In addition to normal year-end savings of approxi
mately $200,000 projected for non-salary expenditures, siqnificant
savings are expected in salaries anc benefits.
CMR:160:91 7
•
. ~-.
. ;
~ ....... ---......,.------.. ----------------,...-.~~---)
•
'.';
"
•• larres ae4 aenetita
.Net savinqs or $1.5 million in employee services are projected,
primarily due to utilization of a $1.2 million surplus held by PERS
t~r the City of Palo Alto for non-public safety employees. A.l'l
actuarial valuation performed by PERS ~as completed in 1990, which
indicated that the City had paid a surplus into the system. The
PERS Board of Administration has approved the use of these surplus
funds to offset employer contributions due to PERS for the 1990-9l
fiscal year.
In addition, there has been a hi;her number of vacancies throughout
the City than budqeted. Effective in February 1991. vacancies in
the Ceneral Fund will be filled only after revie ... by Human
Resources and the City Hanagerls Office. Therefore, vacan-=y
savings shOYld continue through tha end ot the fiscal year 4
Finally, budqete~ funds to cover worker's compensation and
disability clai~s appear to be high, and additional savings should
accrue DY year-end. These savings are sliqhtly offset by rising
health costs citywide, and higher salary expenditures in the Fire
Departl'llent.
An additional $200,000 is requested in the attached Budget
Amendment O~dinance (SAO), to cover higher-than-budgeted employee
service costs in the Fire Department. It is projected that the
Fire Department will overspend its budget by $200,000 by year-end.
Half of that overage is in overtime, and the other half is in the
reqular salaries accounts. The overaqes are primarily due to
minimum shift staffinq requirements contained in the Memorandum of
Aqreement with the Firefighter's Uni~n. Approximately gO percent
of the overtime spent to date f~lls in this categQry and is not
discretionary. Examples of when ov~rtime is used to cover minimum
staffinq include staffinq the Foothills Fire Station during the
peak fire season (which was longer last year due to drought
conditions); covering for paramedics d!Jrinq mandat.ory annual
training; other departmental trelininq; ate-off illnesses or leaves;
disability injuries; departmental participation in emergency strikoa
response teams, i~e., the fire near Yosemite last August; mutual
aid calls to neiqhbcriTlg' cities; etc~ Finally, there have be.en
fewer vacancies than budgeted in the Fire Oepal tment. As a result,
it appears that regular salaries will be overspent by year-end.
At this time, no additional overtime funds are projected to be
needed by the Police Department. However, the impact of contin,,'.ing
anti-wa.r-events is unk.nowrii and there is a p;:Issibility that
si9nificant unplanned uses of overti~e could occur by year-end.
CMR:160:91 8
•
•
/. ..
COBtract Barvl0 •• /8Uppli ••• n~ Materials
It ill expected that saving's overAll in U".e General Fund of $100,000
viII be rhlized in both the contract services and supplies and
aaterials accounts by year elld. This is in keepinq with prior
years' experience for year end ~avin9s, althcugh the savings are
not identified with any !=Iarticular departm.ent or program. The
savings in contract services is slightly offset by an increase of
$70,000 requested tor the City's share of funding to~ the Conges
tion Man~9'ement Agency. This is a new program area, and is in
addition to existing fund ing for the Golden Triangle programs. The
attached Budget Amendment Ordinance requests an additional $70,000
for the Congestion Management Aqency for the Planning Department.
GeDeral 'bpeD.'.
General expenses are projected to increase $449,000 above the
budget esti2ate. The main increase ($377,000) is due to the new
pollcy instItuted ~y the Coun~y to charge cities tor the adminis
trative costs of' 1:x>oking prisoners at th~ County jail. In
addition, $72,000 of Cable Coop royalty revenue is expected to be
uncollectible. It is an Waged-debt and should be recordeci as
such. The subject of Cable Coop refinancing .. as reviewed by
Council several months ago. The retinancinq includes payment of
this amount to the City, although the status of the refinancing is
uncertain at the present time.
Allogate~ Charaes
The postage budget in the Mailing Internal Service Fund is
increasing-by $20,000 due to the recent postaqe increase. The
increases will be passed on through user charges, roughly half to
General Fund departments 8nd halt to Enterprise Funds.
C!!R:160:91 9
... i.
· -
/
•••• ry. (9% Cepital 'rqj_qt.
The projection for the Reserve tor capital Projects is summsrized
below:
Audited Ending Balance 6/30/90
Decrease in Reserve -
Adopted Budget
8udget Amendments Affectinq the
CIP Rese~e Since 7/1190:
Payroll/Personnel System
(reviewed by Finance and ~~blic
worlcs Committee, to City Council
February 25~ 1991
Information systems elP
Middlefield Well site elP
Building Oemolitions
Tax Auditing Services
Compensation Plan Increases
Single Family Design Guldalines
T!'affic Signals
City Auditor Search services
Parking eita,ion Services
Subtotal, Budget Amendments
Anticipated changes Reflected
in Midyear Report;
o operatio!'ls
o Advances to Other Funds
Anticipated Balance 6/30/91:
"~nicipal ~.e Scbedule Cbang"
$ 75,000
9,540
46,000
33 J 500
6,050
160,000
25,000
10,405
18.500
11.300
$5,399,000
(302,OOO)
(395.295)
106,000
11,820.000)
$2,"7,705
Several fees adopted by Council last June ~re now recommended to be
changed, The changes include:
CMR:160:91 10
•
/
o PinangelReal 1st. t. D1 vI. Ion :
Page 3)
The followinq ch~ngeG are proposed in order to makQ Real Estate
Division fees consi6tent ~ith Public works Enqineerinq Oivision
fees, and to refle=t the recently adopted real estate policy on
receiving market rent on properties. The total impact on
General Fund revenues will not. be Edqnificant, and no revenue
change is recommended in the attached Budqet Amendment Ordi
nance.
Easement Vacation -ResidentIal arl(j Non-Residential
current: $150
Proposed: $300 or fair market value.
conveyance of Permit or Temporary Lease to CUre an Encroach
ment Onto City Property, Non-Residential
current: USO
Proposed: $300 or fair market value, whichever i~ greater
consent to Assiqnrnent of Lease or Sublease
CUrr'2nt: $150
proposed: $300
Consent to Hrpothecation of Leasehold (i.e., is. pledqe. of a
leaeeh~ld as security or collateral for a loan by a lessee)
current: $150
Proposed: $300
o Police Dapart •• nt:
Page ul
Existing Fee: $30
proposed Fee: Eliminate
As mentioned earlier, this t~e is reco~~ended to be elimin~ted
pending the outeo'me. of 1 iti9ation in other jurisdictions. The
impact will be a reduction in Gener31 Fund ra~nu~s of $70,OOO~
o Police Departllent: Document Retrieval and copy F.. (F ••
ScbaOule Paq. 26)
E:xist~ng Fee:
Proposed Fee:
$19 for 1st 10 Pages
$11 for 1st 10 Pa9~s
This fee change is related to the Accident InvestiqatiGn Fee and
is also recommended to avoid possible liti9ation~ The iEpact on
General Fund revenues ~ill be minimal.
CIIR:160:91 11
•
I . .'
The follOWing chanqes are recommended to allow for a consistent
collection of lap s\;;'imminq tees tor both residents and non
resident. within the current staffinq and physical constraints
of the avimmlnq pool •.
Swimmlng pool, Non-Resident Adult
CUrrent: $2.00
Proposed: Eliminate
A~d: Lap SWimming $2.00 tor ~ll
Syim Coupon Books. Non-Resident adults. lap swim
CUt'rent: $2D
Proposed: Eliminate
Add~ Swim coupons tor Lap SWimmin9, tor all (10
tickets)
-Rasidents $!2.50
-Non-residents $20.00
Ipterpris. puna. 'ummary
OVerall" tl"le Enterprise Fund Reserves are projected to be drawn
down $9.6 Ildllfon by year-end, 'Which is $.6 million more of a
reduction than the estimate in the aC!opted boudget. Significant
ch8nqes from the adopted budqet include:
o PERS savings in all Enterprise Funds
o Increases in Gas and Water sales and purchases
o A decline in inte~est earnings in the Electric Fund
o Settlement of the Arastradero fire litigation
o Postponement of storm Drainage bond sales
The following table summarizes Enterprise FUnd reserves. revenues,
and expenditures:
CMR,160:91 12
TABLE 2
trwHOYEAR flNASClAl,. REPORT
SNTERPRlSS FUNDS
~EV£NUE '""0 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
(iD rflWAlHls of doltln;)
.Adop<od Adjus.led TID Projec(1I'Jd
ActoW Uwpt BU.dlet Actuol Bode<'
J.m:22. ~ 199!>-91 llilli2Q J.mll. l2:i[!ellm:l --T""" SaIeo 10Sl,4,S.s 113,380 113,380 SI,I31 115,078 !,698
Inkn:$I 1DcoD'IC: 6.~99 6,744 6.744 3.250 6,362 (381j
Other loc;)Mt: 4.011 3,110 3,).07 l.lOS 3.3<>1 0
A4v-=e from General FIJnd' 0 ~ 0 0 1,320 1,320
Boodh"cmue --l1 ....l.lli .L.UQ --l1 -.-2 (UW
TIUI Jt.ewnua 119,872 124,615 124,152 55.685 126,067 1,3[5
Plus ]1'" i opt .ions &.
~ (rom Prior Year 0 0 11)580 0 !2,680 0
e.~,
Utili!: Plut:hasa 5.1.390 54.082 54.082 25,1)2: 5<1.331 2.249
Sahll;_ &: 8cotfib lO,SiO 10.995 ll,562 5.366 10.862 aOO)
c.oau.ct Stn'i0e5 3.311 4,351 5.879 1,599 5.8;79 0
Supplies A M.aeri!ls 1.381 1.797 J,1!59 699 1.!59 0
o-IEx_ 4.43<> '1,533 I !,,59O 4,639 11.590 0
Loultu.-]I 362 362 17 362 0
FllC'ilitics ... Equipm«ll 122 321 329 109 329 0
Co .. ti::.n~;n 0 ),1$6 2,404 0 2,404 0
A_Chatr<o 10.557 11,813 12,294 5.025 12.194 (00)
Noa-CdI a. ........ 2,in ),HIS 5,165 1.004 5.165 0
!iodOd>t&_ -.m ..-ill --1ll -.-2 -.ill _--ll
Total 0peq1lnr Expt:nse:s 14.534 lOl,7!l4 105,675 44.619 107,134 1.459
OpmtJiftJ Tran.~ Out
GenenI F"oo 14,612 il.516 '3,652 6,13'9 13,652 0
C1P 327 923 923 310 921 0
VelU;:;k: IlepllCC11'1mt Fur.d D 358 35S 11. lSi C
Self Jeswance fund ---'! _---.Il ---Y ---'! ---IQ!l ~
Total Tr.nsfcr .. 14.999 14,857 14.933 7,348 15,413 5ro
T ou.I EJ;;pcadi~res 99.533 1111,641 nO,6OS 51.967 122.566 ],959
C.".1a! Ex,.,..a; ..... 1.446 ]:),71S 24.583 .c,l? 2<, •• S (85)
~ or AdVUlCCi from GF ---'! J.lli ...LID _0 -LID J
Nt:t 10 (from) Reservt!lO 11,8513 C9,OS6} {9,O14) (656) (;,513) (559)
CMR:I60::91 13
\
-.-'r
BDterprise Fun4 a.vanu5. end commodity Purcha.e.
No .ignificant changes are projecte~ for sales or purchases in the
Electric, Wastewater, Refuse and Storm Drainaqa Funds. However¥
increases in revenues and cO~~odity purchases are projected in the
Gaa and water Funds.
The recent abnormally col~ weather, and a change in market
conditions p~eventing the acquisition of less expensive gas are
causlnq an increase in qas purchases by $1.{ million by year-end.
Tbia is somewhat offset by hi9her sales projecte~ in the Gas Fund
of $0.5 million.
water purchases Are projected to increase by $0.9 million. Actual
consnmption has been higher, primarily due to extremely dry months
1n December and Janl.lary. In addition, the adopted Water Fund
budqet was premised on ~eetin9 a water allocation target level set
by the san Francisco Wate.r Department. P;;!nalties have been
assessed a9ainst the City for going over those allocation tarqets.
This is offset by an estimated increase in water sales of $1.2
million .
Chanqes to interest income are projected for the Electric and
Wastewater Fl.lnds. The Electric Fund is expected to realize a
dee-rease in interest earnings of $. c m.illion due to lover-than
projected cash balances( while the Wastewater Fund is antiCipated
to realize a net qain in interest of $19,000. Within the Waste
water Fund, however, the collection Subf~nd is expected to realize
a decrease in interest earnings of $'7~OOO, while the Treatment
Subfund should qain about $96,000.
Salaries and B.n~fita
The PERS savings of $.B million mentioned e.arlier will affect the
Enterprise Funds as follows:
Administration
water
Gas
Electric
Refuse
wastewiCliter
storm Drainage
Total
CMR:l60: 91 14
$100,000
70,000
88,000
263,000
62,000
.2 OS ,000
12.000
$§QO,P90
•
/
settlement of the Arastradero tire litigation 'Will increase. the
Electric Fund expenses In the second half of the 1990-91 tiscal
y.ar~ The l5ettlemant totals $l~O million and requires that a
trans.fer of $500,000 be made this fiscal year from the Electric
Fund to the city's self-ins~r.nce reserve, trom which the 5ettle
.ant ~ill be paid. The fin&l transfer ot $500,000 viII be made
next fiscal year.
It should be noted that the Calaveras Reserve is beinq tapped tor
the first tiMe this fiscal year, as planned~ The Reserve will be
drawn down over the next ten years to fund debt obligations arisinq
from the Calaveras Hydroelectric Project .
• tor. Draiuaq. PUDd
The adopted budget for the Storm Drainage F'"md projected bond
revenue of $1.J million to fund capital expenditures during 1990-
91. staff has done a cash floW" analysis, based on revised
engineering estimates of the timing of capital projects# and has
concluded that bOlld financing would more likely occur during the
1991-92 fiscal year~ !t is expected that staff will pursue
approximately $3.0 to $3~5 million in financing for capital
projects for the 1991-94 ~i'P!1e period in tall 1991. .Because bond
proceeds 'Will not be available in the Cl.lrrent fiscal year, the
General Fund will continue to advance a.ny cash needed to the Storm
Drainage Fund this fiscal year to keep it solvent until financing
occurs. The General Fund will be repaid when bonding occurs.
EDt.rpriae Fund Reserve.
Significant changes to Reserves since the ~dqet was adopted are
projected in the Water, Gas, and Storm Orainaqe Fur~s.
water Fund Reserves
The increase in sales revenue ($1.2 million) and PE:RS salary
savinqs ($70,~OO) are somewhat offset by an inc~ease in purchases
($.9 million). The net change is an increase in the water reserves
of $.4 million over and above the amount adopted by Council.
Gas Fund Reserves
The increase in sales revenue ($.5 million) and PERS salary savings
($88,000) are offset by an increase in purchases ($1.4 million).
The net change is a d~cr~ase to the Gas reS9rves of $.B million
below the amount adopted by Council.
CMR: 160: 91 15
•
\.
Electric Fund Reserves
The decrease: 1n lnterest: income of '$401,000 1s somewhat ot'tset by
p~ salary savings ot $263,000 ane! other operatinq sovings of
$40 4 0004 Ho~aver, combined vith the tr~nsfer of $500,OOa to the
Belt Insurance Reserve to tund Araatradero Fire settlement.
Electric Fund reserves will decline $598,000 by year-end.
$torm Drainag~ FUnd
Storm Drainage ~nd
PO$tponlng bond sales until 1991-92 vill mean a 4ecre&s. in the
Stora Drainage Fund's reVenue sources of $1.3 million that will be
Jlade up by a teQlpor~ry cash advance f.rOl'D. the General FunGI at year
end.
OIR: 160:91 16
eIP MIDYEAR srAros RBPORr
Selected capital projects over $100~ 000 for th.e Capit41 I1!Iprovement
FUnd, Street I~rov~ment Fund, and Enterprise Funds are included as
Attachment A.
Cepltal I-crov .. ept fund
All General and Special Revenue Fund capital hnprovelr,ent projects
(CIP) are within budget, ~xcept elP No. 18812, Information Systems
Development. The project is over-expended. by $21,500, due to
underestimatinq sales tax on a large systelll acquisition. An
additional appropriation from the Reserve for capital Projects is
requested to cover the overexpenditure. The attached BAD includes
• request for $21,500 to bring t~e project to a positive project
balance ..
Projects with significant 8ctivity in this fund for the first two
qua~ters of 1990-91 include Greer Park Oev9lOPDent~ Information
System Development, and Street Meintenance.
All street Improveme.nt capital projects are within budqet. A
projected expenditure of $500,000 in 1991-92, to improve the
intera:ection at AlmatMeadoial" on elF No. 19073, is proposed to be
pulled forward and appropriated to 1990-91.. The Public Works
Oepartment is 'Working on this prQject in conjunction 'With the
California Transpor-tation Department and Southern Pacific Railroad.
Southern Pacific no .. requires at least six months to procure
equipment and complete construction. Since Council has requested
that the intersection improvements be completed before school opens
in September 1991, and the construction contract must be awarded at
least six months in advance of completion, proposed funding for
1991-92 needs to be made ava:ilahle now. consequently I the attached
BAO requests an additional eppropri~tion of $500,~00 to CIP No.
1907:), tunded from an Advance from the General FUnd until next
yearrs Gas Tax receipts corne in. Project fundinq ~as anticipated
from qas tax monies in 1991-92, but ell 1990-91 gas tax revenues
·.,ere appropriated for 1990-91 elP projects. The Advance trom the
General Fund will be reimbursed in 1991-92 from a small Transporta
tion Development Act grant and 1991-92 qas tax rev~nue~ There ~ill
be no appropriation request for CIP No. 19073 in 1991-92.
Bpterprist lund'
As of December 31, all Enterprise Fund projects are within budget.
Kajor expenditures for the first two quarters in 1990-91 include
C1!R:l60: 91 17
•
w4ter and Gas Main R~placements, Byxbee Park, and the Middlefield
Underqround District.
An adjust~.nt to the Storm Drainaqe Fund elP No. 47702, Collection
Syst •• Improve~e~ts, is proposed to modlfy the scope of the 1990-91
prDject and reduce the budgeted funding. The proposed $85,000
reduction is due to re .... ised cost estim.ates on two projects, and
.tatfing constraints which have delayed the planned design of & new
.torm main along EV'I!rett Aver.ue. fhi6 is oftset by the proposal to
include the desiqn and ccnstry.ction of a City..'ide curb and qutter
replaceme •. t. ,Program. in this project. The revised total funding tor
1990-91 is $1.45 million, a decre.se of $85 t OOO from the budgeted
amount, which is refl~cted on the attached Budget Amendment
Ordinance.
hcoM_n4a tio-D
It is recommended that Council approve
Amendment Ordinance containing adjYstments
turea, and the Municipal Fee Schedule.
Reape~tfu~~tted'
3::ELE ~9~iE Manager
~.d~
EMILY IlARRlSON
Directo~ of Finance
~.,-~~~ Ci~nag .. r
Attachment A
Budqet Anendment Ordinance
CIIR:160:91 18
the attached Budget
to revenues, expend!-
,. '-
•
c.pft.t l .. ~t ... ojects ~ry
( $e\ectf!od ' .. ojectl O¥er 1100~OOO ,
llid ,. ..... "",Ift 1m·1"1
'"1-=t AclJ~tN (!II) rhr-u ....., rill """" fut ..... Tf'". fut\1t'41 '1"01. I.t. TtIt ••
Proj..::t: TiUe .-~ to D-n_ 6{]tJJ'/O Jiicr:.-' hlmce ....... .z=.pendI ':u;a; PMJ!. flIP. ... -.... _ ..................... _ ........ "_.-._ .... " --_ ..................... " ........ _ ... -... ---.. .. ------.. -........ _. _ .......................
,"",,,,fc I rtfo. Cyst_ , .... 367,500 216,906 '19,6'50 13(l,M4 1047~5OD 57a.444 11'5-,_ ,t"" ~Uptre6 111614 "1,500 IliH,764 >. ,." ....... >1,000 "',-.......
FF ... Str.:l~ k-rw. tllP. '191, "".OCO 7,5.."'5 7.5l5 ~,9'50 ,,",,'" .......
;r...,. ,Kt o..l~t: , .... Z,I19,571 2IS~6SZ 1,191,1'93 n1,901 755, ()QQ ,,4~.PaJ it,_ ... ua
...... I.D .... I ,.." '. '60,COO 2'0~'1] 19 .. J21 '! .. 1.l(t,006 1'55,000 .,a1'5,_ 1~Vt!i',000
Orlri,. ......, TtII e...p... ,-199,000 1IO.t.61 1~.392 1'. '47 ".'~ ''' .. -~ Ctt-hetf~ll. '191' ....... ...... ".5'Z .... 112 .... 112 .... -""'up keen IIKlltty ,.." 115,000 ...... ".799 loC. '47 40,'''1 1'1'5,_
Infr. S)'II.t-~..-m ,.,c •• S-'O lS',o584 ~S.905 Ctl,2S2) 301 .... .... N t, "',540
MIt 11'1_ t .. it .-"'.-'SIll."' 10,,", 10,'16 ...... .......
P\b{ Ie It_ StNt~ r.., ' .... Z,11Z .. 911l-1.'!60,046 89. ~37 9D,727 Z.W,OOQ ',:l11 .. m 4,'567,910
............ t .. '.l.t .... ,...,. m.'" 1'l6.402 " ...... ...... m ....
... mrt. UC 'ft a-w.l 'MIl 2'5,000 1~'.D01 ...... 65 .... 215,_
..... at J"'~ ... tr __ Spt. ,-....... "".m 100,205 125,000 225 .... 515,_
Sdiool SI .... 144 1110,. "".m 215.19l 1062 .. "'" 14Z.440 .......
afrpwt , ...... , '9001 no,ooo 57 .... 15.544 t1t.~6ltt 116 .... no ....
.,~ P'oo( I .... _It ,-'''',000 t35~7Zi! '.m <.m '40.000
Cf~c ct:.r-Entor'I)' ,... '90t7 ....... " .... 5.'" .... .,. ....... .......
In ............ , .... CConn!' ,OO" 1,225 •• ".417 '.U9.~ 1,U9.52S I,m ••
Send iHI IoMI ISr. 'ton 5!)1).000 _.932 498.061 4'il1 .. 061 SOD ....
fft Il'IWattlM ICI'I , __ 19101 171t,noo 17Ci1,OOO '7'1),_ 17'11 .. _
.. I.,..,..... F..-nt.' Ecp.'jp. 19H6 1105 .. Dr.O 10,000 1S5,ooa "" .... ....... 450,_
Prlntf". s..: e.ript ... 191'. 130,000 110.000 130.000 I)O,GOO
...... icl.~ ,..14 33',5011 ... .., ~1.53S It.1.m J!~.500
Cfric ttr IOaIdIl/IotGC. ,., .. 5", 'SCI 51$.UO 511,150 51J,IH
luHIII,. CIId. ,-W7,«KI 11."" 435,106 43S~I~ 441,_
,.[~ .. ,n...-r..., Ie , .... M,'65 1OP~S42 245,6Z3 ....... .... "" _ ...
15,7ZZ.~ 4."".UI 2,l6I,Il5I .,a6G.1Il 5 .. 082,_ ",9O,lIiZ iO,ID5.'se ._-....... -.............. _ ... -_._. -_ ................... " ......... _ .......... _. -.-......... ---..............
Street IIIbfm:...-.::_
Str ... _fnt..-.
""'[kll",1 ...
'''''''' ...,., , ....
5,012,500
i
I .... ,.
-
Eat rreffie Ih..."
Ka~..w_l...,
'm'le Sf .... EC.,run
BIt,IIrIIt.edIr •• ..,t "'not' IntwMcttOl"l I ....
.. ,.. IMenllCt:ten I ....
freffk. tcwoJt:,.t c...t~_
_II.
",..jert Acfl~t_
~ "dfet to D.~.
111m ,orn
'1107' .1fI71 .....
"'" """"
1l4o,IXIO
14'.4G'5
101 ••
111._ m ....
150 ....
144,000
'.D66.~
ClPlul l,-iQYeMnt Pr-oj.ctl s...""
( 'Sel«ted J'Toj.cta Ow!' J1M.GOO ,
Mid Tur hyi ... 199Cl-1S091
1a.sS9
.W .. OOO 12.405 ...... ......
., ,21' • t2,101 17~151
401.01.5 2t4,~
'.441 • 11 .....
It .... 27',* ".m 500.000 ......
....... ....-
....... 500 ....
'."1 • 11 .....
It .... m._
.... m ......
.......
.......
Est. ?ot.t
,r.J. lJIp.
t".GGG
141.445 '.,001 10 .. _
m .... ... .... m ....
',!M6,YS
N
..
~"""D •. ,e
e.l ..... no
'"IftifIIIfc 1",0.""1:_ c.. It.tlc:n I .... 4 == ,t
L..b. reel IU"'" I 1tW1_
l.INffl II ......,., 'Iftr ilia.
Lli'dfll! PItnI Ftwc INt.
~ t.wcbt. Cetleoc1 •
u.ter lutfar! I ••
iIItll Iftl .....
.........-y 1Id.\.2fC11,.....-.
~ .., 12 rv IdIt1't1."
• 'ct:Ilotfl.ld IhIIIf ~.
1illMr.-1 .. bcl..-tfon
~ lilt ..... lfty I,..
llndffU IliWthi (;1,.,... _AI.
clIPint I~t I"roj«-eta ~"l'
( se~_ta:i ,.,..jec:t. C'wer "00,000 )
Mid 'nr-bYI., 1990-Im
I"roject Adjusted E. 1l:N .weer ludpet to Cit.. iWlO/90
"'7 2,1)4~OOO 4n .. ,14 307.703 ',l4II.m
0934 1151, T12 ....... 2,.19 25 .... ... , S86,I5(I 377~ 139 ...... 162,1.65 .,,, "'.30> 115,397 1.424 198,481 .... , .... 60Z as. 659 1'.8W 141.167 .... 41'D.Q :564,5'2 ... 1.,..191
om 101).000 95.101 ..... .... _.13& 862.221 11.231 '.613 .... m .... .,6" 1~.5n 132, rn .... ... .... 45.281 2.812 192.S95
.037 700.'" 25.61Z ...... 64J.'" 9I!5l 797. OOCI )t., 118 "71: .. 2'12: .... 1,191,000 44,545 ....... 1 .. 2'Il,Dt1 "'. 150.000 15(1,COO ., .. .... 000 ...... 1".IQI!I 91" '.125.000 2'1.4. t12 _.-Ins
to ••• * J.:gz .. 915 1 .. 62],:125 ",iI51.SZ!6
1,)1.1 •• ......
162' .. 465
' •• '11
111t,OOO 257.167
1-04.'93 ' .... 9,673
132.174
19'1,59S
no .... m ....
"lI,Z'Z ".000 1 • .zn,091
'5C,OOO ....... "'.000 416,100 -....
.... 000 6,m.w
ht.Ttrt,t
Proi. E~
Z.134.000
1151,122
_,ISO
.... 30> .......
'7'D.08t 100.-m.t. ... .... .......
~.D50.000:
197 .... '.151,. -..... ... ....
1 .. 125._
".714._ ......... -----_.--_. -~-•• -•••••••••••••• -•••••• + •••• -•• -•••• ~~.~~ •• ~.-. _ •••••••••• , •••••••••••••••••••• -
.. ~ COl.t '" kMb
S"torII DnI'.-.. hlp.
....,. .. fl'lllpl~
a. ..... n Iapl..-m
.,13
..", ..,. .. ,.
rur .... ,t!ftt..-prIM ,..", ,.". lech
on·to' ....
Drt-eoi ".
0rJ'1JO!'"
On-:JOi",.
:M'.129 111.sn
4W.GJ1
'9.967
.... 000
i .... ,..
...
ORDINANCE NO.
ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY CF PALO ALTO
AMENDING THE BUDGET FOR FrSCAL ¥EAR 1950-91
'J'O ADJUST BUDGETED REVENUES AND EXFENDITURES IN ACCORDANCE 'WITH
RECOMMENDATIOIIS Iii THE MID-YEAR REPORT.
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 12 of Article
III of the Charter of the city of Palo Alto, the council on June
18, 1990 did ~dopt a budget for fiscal year 1990-91; and
WHEREAS, after reviewing the current budgeted revenues and
expenditures for fiscal year :i.990-91, adjustments to the budget are
reCOmDended to more accurately reflect year-end proje~tions
including revisions to the MUnicipal Fee Schedule.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Palo Alto does
ORDAIN as follows:
SECTION 1. The. net sum of One Million Six Hundred and
FOl.'ty-one Thousand Dollars ($1/641.000) is hereby reduced from the
budgeted revenues and revenue transfers in the General Fund as
displayed on Exhibit ~AM, ~hich is attached to this ordinance and
incorporated herein by this reference.
SECTION 2. The net sum of One Million Thirty-nine Thousand
Eiqht Hundred Fifty Dollars {$1,OJ9 j 8S0J is hereby reduced from the
budgeted exper~itures in t~e General FUnd as displayed on Exhi~it
-AM.
SECTION 3. 'I'he Reserve for Capital projects 'Will d.ecrease
One Million Nine Hundred Fourteen Thousand One Hundred Fifty
Doll~rs ($1,914,150) for a projected ending balance of Two Million
Seven Hundred Forty Thousand Eight Hundred Fifty Dollars
($2,740,850), and the Reserve for streets and Side'Jalk:s will
decrease Five Hundred Seven Thousand Dollars ($507,000) for a
projected ending balance of $581,000, as displayed on Exhibit MA-.
SECTION 4. The sum of Twenty 'I'housa!"'ld Dollars ($20,000) is
hereby added to the postage budget in the Mailing Services Internal
Service lund and budgeted Mailing Services revenue is
correspondingly increased, as displayed en Exhibit ·A~.
SECTION S~ The sum of One Million Two Rundred Thousand
Dollars ($1~200,OOO) is hereby added to Water Sales in the Water
Fund and the net sum of Seven Hundred Ninety-four Thousand Six
Hundred Thirty-five Dollars ($794,635) is hereby added to
ell.-penditures increasing the Transfer Stabilization Reserve Four
Hundred Vive Thous~nd Three Hundred Sixty-fiv~ Dollars ($405:365)
as shown on Exhibit "BD, ~hich is attached to this ordinance and
incorporated herain by this reference .
•
•
\
,
•
,
SECTION 6. The SU!Il of Four Mun!:!r-ed one Thousand One
HUndred Thirty-Eiqht Dollars ($401,138) is reduced fram Interest
Income in the Electric Fund; the net sum of Three Hundred 'J'W'o
Thousand Five Hundred Twenty-thr-ee Dollars ($302,523) is he~e:by
reduced fro~ expenditures, and the sum of Five Hundred Thousand
Dollers ($500,000) is hereby transferred from the Electric Fund to
the Self Insurance reserve fer settlement of the Arastradero Fire
claim hereby reduc:in9 the Transfer Stabilization Reserve in the
Electric Fund 1n the amount of Five Hundred Ninety-eight Thousand
six Hundred Fifteen Dollars ($598,515), as shown on Exhibit ·B~.
SBCTION 7. The sum of Four Hundred Ninety-eight Thousand
Dollars ($498,000) is hereby aQded to Gas Sales, 8nd the n9t sum of
One Mill.1on "l"wo Hundred Fifty-nine Thousand Six Hundred Sixty-eiqht
Dollars ($1,259,668) is bereby adaed to expenditures in the Gas
FUnd and the Transfer Stahilization Reserve is ccrrespondingly
reduced by Seven Hundred. Sixty-one Thousand Six Hundred Sixty-eight
Dollars ($761,668) as sho·wn on Exhibit -aN.
SECTIO:-4' 8. The net sum of sixty-three Thousand ~ine
Hundred Fourteen Dollars ($63,914) is hereby reduced from
expenditures in the Refuse Fund and the System Improvement Reselve
is correspondingly increased as shown on Exhibit ·B~.
SECTION 9. The net sum of Eighteen Thousand Two Hundred
One Dollars ($18,201) is added to Interest Income in the Wastewater
Fundi the net sua of Two Hundred Eighteen Thousand Four Hundred
Fifty-tour Dollars ($218,454) is hereby reduced from expenditu~es,
and the sum of Two Hundred ThirtY-SiX Thousand Six Hundre~ Fitty
~ive Dollars ($236,655J is added to ~he System Improvement Reserve
as shown on Exhibit ·B~.
SECTION 10. The Storm Drainage Fund erp No. 47702,
COllection System Improvements, is hereby modified and reduced
Eiqhty-flve Thousand Dollars ($85, 000); the sum of One )lilli-on
Three Hundred Twenty Thousand Dollars ($1,320,000) in budqe:ted bond
fund in; is exchanged fer a correspcrAing advance from the General
Fundi the net sum of Ten Thousand Five Hundred Sixty-t .. ·o Dollars
($10,562) is re~uced from expenditures as indicated on Exhibit -S
and the System Improvement Reserve .i s hereby increased in the
amount of Ninety-five Thousand Five Hundred Sixty-Two Dollars
($95,562).
SECTIQN 11~ The sum of Five Hundred Thousand Dollars
($500,000J is hereb~' appropriated to the street Improvement ell'
Project No. 19013, Alma/Meadow Intersection I1f~provements, and the
Reserve for Capital Projects is correspondingly reduced.
SECTION 12. The Municipal Fee Schedu.le for fiscal year
1990-91, as adopted under Ordinance No. 3968, is hereby amended to
read as set forth in Exhibit ·c ft , 'Which is attached to this
ordinance and incorporated herein by this reference~
, ,
•
· .
SECTION 13~ The Council of the City of Palo Alto hereby
finds that the enactment of the ~rdinance is not a project und~r
the Cali!ornia Environmental Quality Act and, therefo~e# no
environmental impact assessment is necessary .
.§.EC1ION 14. As provided in Section 2.04 .J75 of the Palo
Alto Municipal Code, th.is ol."dinance shall become effective upon
adoption.
INTRODUCED AND PASSED:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTENTIONS:
ABSENT:
ATTEST: APPROVED:
city Clerk Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Asst. city Attorney
APPROVED:
city Manager
D~rector ot Flnance
Director of PubllC Works
Dlrecto~ of Otilitie$
iCI·Fve1 1990·91 Mldyetir U: ... t.e.'lta
k<' ::tIj~t !>eKrlptl..,. crw,t ... It """, . ................... ...... .......... ................ ............ ......
h"hfbft •
IHEUI. ,... ......... ........ 11111 ...... ... 115,OOC ........ '''' ........... t50,I:IOG ........ 111' SoIt" rlU!: 574,000 ........ 11 .. 'ltIfcll In Lieu 100,000
"""'710 flO' "IltIlel_ Coct. '00,000
Q027077'O iZOl .P.rkl,.. VioLation loo,OC"<l ,..ram '313 YIIMc:lel~ ".000 ...,..,. "'. ",",dent Il'NHt IS ....
00Z15330 '''' 1f~ hnIit 180,000 ...,.... .,86 Wt-Clty .... 000
003000OO "17 wr·pt, .... 1~,OOO
".~ 1SO,OOO 1 .. 791 .. 1)O(J {1.64',OOOl
........ -....... ........ .... .... ',t t.avf.,. 1,Z20~ooa
ll0>0OOOO lOG. VM:lI'Cf ... "'.000
COZ7'5Z2Q ... , Fire SoIlary·Rea 100,000 •
... m20 .... Fire ",tVY'OT 100,000
00Z3ZS40 ., .. "'"'"t ~ lJenC;Y "' ....
0023S540 .... a.cI IIl1bt Clbie 71 .. 500 •
00Z7C330 .... IOokf". 0tfI "".'" •
OOl4It1G .... Poeu,a·Ae:ct • ... •
00261110 !90> Fon ... ·Pt. 1 .... •
IJIIZ1l1Z>O , ... POIu,.-P'Ol "'" •
.....,10 .... ~t .... Art '.500 •
D02att510 .... IIi'ost~Lib '."'" • ......... """ ~t ..... l« ',aso -",,, lion-.. Iary CCIJ1t i ngeney ".000 • ........ ... , ~IP ino:~ 21.SOO .......... .......... . .........
TOUlI Cif fXpetIH ',7'90,000 i'5O,l~ ",039,150)
Genera' fWW;:: ~ Cbw"Ige T,fI4::',OOO 2,~I,150 C601.1~l
CKAlIIC !II lESERVE$ -.... "'tW'lC'e to otMr F~ , ,II2G, 001) -.... c.p!t.ll~t SVi .. 1SO '.91'.150 .. , ..... .... $tl"HtJ: , 'i~t ..... S07~OOO
tfLF·In.JtAMa F\III -.... Ar.nr ..... Ffr-e 5oo,!IOO ........ m • LilblLl'ty ct.iIC "'.COO • ..........
'.I6',I~ ],0" .1~O 1,$20,000
mElUL SEhU1! P\.IIIlS
..... '50 , ... "-Iii",, 1--.-ZO .... •
.... '50 .... JlO$t8'1Jt Jnc:rMft "',COO • .......... . ..... _.-.
",000 ......
2'O~'''·91 !99C-9( *idyellr Mj~UlC!flh
... , I1DJltCt Dekrfpt'<:ItI Or"', D«Ift -, . " .~ .... ~., ---.-.. -. -., --". -'"---_ ... ----_ .... -... -. -" .
£Joh~btt I
mbf'IJIl' NiIOC
~n'ooo .... nn.~tj ... '0Cl~00Q v_ ,.,. Adlin .U~ t.a...t:tian 100-,000
='QOO :>ooz 'OtII.·"O:., '$~50 + =, ... lOI'O tEQ IMlJc::c' on 57.'1)6
mo .... m, "'1" I.HQII: bwuiDl'! tl.OOQ .... ""'" -PP'I.u:t!on ,~.7tJ9
~ 1711 hi ... i~r .... t • .iOQ ,I'JQO •
~ .... 'At'tl' hlfc:l'td"H "','" • .-""'" ,nc-....... " f~ '" 4-tiS,3M •
zm1'" ,... ~t.-E~f:e 2,100 + _.000 -P£l' I.u:tlan 111,060 =.000 lql0 I4Iln lUv.. l~t;OI'\ ",'" l>f>'''' .... 1£:Q IIdJeUCfl a, ,;51
2WO<»O , .. , %M:.,...t 1I.ecf'tAM ~~,1l1 .......,. -1'r1 for-UflC:.-.ow-o Fit. 5(1(';,004 • --..... (lU "r lSl 598.6tS ........ ,... foat ... ·&-. 'A 1'5~ + ... .,..., ,.,. "..in .. ~ loc tedLll:1'on n.""
,.." ... "'" nls Ilf(U;:tion ...... .... , ... .... JIUS llIdLttiQ."J 55.ae ........ Ui1 S.l .. f.>'ICr.etiot 4;18,000 • ........ "'" ... "" ....... 'zl69.CIlCl + ........ -VU cf SI. "',661
ZS5S921C! .... her..,.· ...... '! ',<00 •
l5Smlo me ArtrIin .. ~ ~OI: l!iCl.Ic:r;an ','" 255S9Z10 .... PEts ledofetfon 62,51. ,.-.... tnc,..., ,,. SII 63.~'" •
266rC6no .... I'Els ~tfor, 1SJ.m
26626,'Q ,. .. .-.,1'11 .110: lllld..ll:'f:lv. ..... -"" fM~t lrocr .... ".-• ......,.. .... ~nc:rlNH i" SIll Z57~864 •
2IIr.?1000 ,..,. Pot.t..-C,,;t ',,",,, •
ZifiR1t;1C11t "" AcIIIi" Iljoc: l..a..:tiM ".OW an100Cl ,... ms hc;U:tlon. » ....
-'''''' ,... PElS I.-;U:H 01) 13.?'So!5 .. -'60' rnt"'nt dter_ 1'7;S"l'9 .. ,..... .... u.. flf $1' 2,',m
tm181a .... pl)t.t .... -$t4~ Or.rn ',ssa •
l1'1S1!Il0 .... PU$' 16tictlGn 12~ 11.Z .-Ult) IoN f'Wld'!,. dlrl_y f.llG,OOQ ...,..... .... I'""''' ..... '",SI1 ",so> + ...,..... ,... ~f"*'" t,!IlO.OCO •
tapfC.1 PKI'HM-...... ... ~ ..... "
r ...... t Et'ltct'pl'i .. fl.rid!J ",380. ()St 5,J60,052
EXHIBIT C
Municlpal Fee Schedule Chanqe~:
o Finance/Real Estate Diy is ion: Processing Fees (Fee SChedule
Page J)
Easement vacation -Residential ana Non-Residential
current: $150
Proposed: $300 or fair market value,
Conveyance of Permit or Temporar.l Lease to CUre an
Enc~oachment Onto city Property, Non-Residential
CUrrent: $150
Propo&ed: $300 or fair market value, yhiehever is qreater
Consent to Assiqn~ent of Lease or Sublease
current: $150
Proposed: $300
consent to Rypothecation of Leasehold
CUrrent: $150
Proposed: $300
o Police Department. Accident Investigation Fee (Fee SChedule
page 26)
o
Existing Fee: $30
Proposed Fee: Eliminate
Police Depart:Joent:
SChedule Page 26)
Existing Fee:
Proposed Fee:
Document Retrieval and copy Fee (Fee
$19 for 1st 10 Pag~s
$11 for 1st 10 Pages
o Recreation Division: Swimming Fees (Pee Schedule Paqe 41)
SWimming Pool, Non-Resident Adult
CUrrel1t : $ 2 • O{)
Proposed~ Eliminate
Add: Lap SWi~in9 $2.00 for all
Swim Coupon Books, Non-Resident adults, lap swiz
Current: $20
Proposed: Eliminate
Add: SWim Coupons fo~ Lap Swimming for all, (10
tickets)
-Residents
-Non-residents
$12.50
$20.00
, ... '