HomeMy WebLinkAbout0120.091, ~ ~
January 1', 1991
THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL
palo Alto, California
--5
source Reduction and Recycling Element of As:?~...mQJ.-y Bill 939
PUblic Hearing
Members of the council:
Report in Bl" i af
This report requests that Council conduct a public hearing for the
purpose of di.~cussinq the City'S preliminary draft Source Reduction
and Recycling Element (SRREj and takinq comments from ths public~
This is the first of two public hearings required under Assembly
Bill 939 for the review of the City'S preliminary draft SRRE. The
second public bearing will be scheduled in May 1991 to finalize the
draft SRRE for adoption by council and submittal to the county by
the deadline of July 1, 1991~
Legislation whiCh became effective on January 1, 1990 requires all
cities and counties to prepare and submit a SRRE that proposes
programs to reduce or recycle 2S p-ercent .of all solid 'Waste
currently landEilled by 1995, and 50 percent reduction by the year
2000~ In June 1990, Council approved 8n agreement (CMR:354:0) with
Emcon Associates in the amount of $111,800 for consultant services
for the preparation of the SRRE~ Work under this agreement
consists of the review and compilation of eXisting information, a
waste characterization study, and developing new programs to meet
the mandated goals of 2S and 50 percent. The consultant also will
prepare the plans and programs consistent with applicable
r9qulations and viII assist the City in the submittal and approval
process with the appropriate regulatory agencies.
Discussion
AS 939 requires one informational meeting and two public hearings
to discuss the preliminary draft o:f the. SRRE ana incorporate
changes prior to its submittal to the county. The informational
:ll:e.eting took place on Friday, December 14. in the council Cha:rnben •.•
Staff placed notification of the meeting in the Pe_ninsula Times
Tribune, the Palo Alto Weekly,-and the Chamber of Commerce
newsletter. Business and environmental qroups, including the
Sierra Club, War on Waste, Peninsula Conservation Center, Downtown
Environmental Action Project, and Santa Clara County Manufacturing
-1-
CMR:120:91
•
,
')
•
•
'0"" _
/
o
Group., 'Were notified of' the meeting. Approll:ilDAtely ten individuals
attended the December 14 informational meetinq.
Sta:f:! received the preliminary draft of the SRRE at the e.nd of
Oeceaber; copies of the preliainary draft have been sent to the
local task force, adjoining cities" Sants Clara COW"lty and the
California Integrated waste Manaqem.nt Board~ Attach~ent I is an
executive summary of the draft SRRE elements completed to date.
The con~ultant will respond to questions on the executive summary.
A copy of the entire draft is on file at the City Clerk"s office.
Staff bas revi~wed the fir5t draft and found that 21 number of
cbanges will be required. These will be noted as such and
incorpor~ted in the final draft 30 days prior to the second public
hearinq scheduled in May~ Notification viII be placed in local
ne~spapers when copies of the final draft SRRE will be available to
the public at City libraries and the city Clerk's office. A copy
will be sent to the local task force for final review and comment.
At th8~ time, staff will submit a report with the final draft SRRE
discussing the consultant's recommendations and alternatives to
meet the 2S and 50 percent qoals.
COnclusion
At this Council meeting, AS 939's r~quirement for the first public
hearing on the SRR! will be satisfied. Council is not requested to
tHe any action at this he.erinq. The second public hearing is
&cbeduled for Hay 19!;1. At that hearing" Council viII be requested
to make all necessary findill9s for tbe project under the California
Environ.ental Quality Act (CEQAJ.. Then Council will CODment on and
consider all the public comments regardinq the SRRE and adopt the
SRRE by resolution. The final draft SRRE 'Will be forwarded to the
Santa Clara County solid Waste Planning staff to meet the July 1,
1991 deadline, -along vith a signed resolution and documentation
that the jurisdiction has complied witb CEQA.
Respectfully sub~itted"
,*,e;L.P7/~£
MICHAEL H. HILLER
Deputy Director, PUblic Works
:, Qperati~
'L f w.s~ant/I\.~"'~"""'" anager
Attachment: Draft Executive Suamary
Related CMR: 384:0
-2-
CHR:120:91
CAVIll G. ADAMS
Director of Public Works
o.
'\ 1" o • ... ~-.-
: .,
.'
•
",-'
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION
Leglsllltlv. Basis for the Plan &
The CalHomia Integrated Waste Managem9lll Act cf m9iAss9mbly Sill
IABl 939), mandat9S \hat by January I, 1995, 8~IHoml. cily and
COvn\y must divert 25 percent of an sofid waste~'!!!.. ~R or transforma·
00., faciIHi •• truough source reduction, recyclin composflng actM·
ties. By January I, 2000, !he req-.Jlred wa version is 50 percent.
AS a39 responds 10 !he pressir.g need 10 divert aterials from landfills In
orner 10 preserve decreasing sHe capacify and diminishing natural
r9SOUf<*. ~,
AS 939 reqlJires lhat each cify prep~qa~ and submH 10 !he county a
source reduction and recycnng en! {SAAE) thal includes !he
1011owing: ~
• a wasle generation ~
.. source redu<;tion compo!'lent
a recycr.ng~ent
a composfi ponem
a specia e componem
a ~~ hazardous waste componem'
a.~ ~ and pubnc infonnaf"", component
a solid waste disposal facility capacify component
, FoIk;w!ng!he onat1m8f1t 01 AS 2707, !he hoI.osol1old hezMdollS waste _I was
elevatod to ... Sl8IuI 01 an eIenHInt. to be prepared 8$ a sop ...... doCument This element is Il10 ... ___ under .epa_ COVOf.
PJl 199'OOIB.alW ES·\ Rev. 0 January 14, 1991
•
~-------'~.-.. -"-.---~
o
• a funding component
• an integration component
The ln18gl'aled waste management hierarchy established b)I AB 939 is the
following:
Source redtJctio<l to redu<:e generation of waste.
Recycfing and composting 01 materials
En,ironmentally safe transformation of wastes, SllCl1 a.
Incineration, distillation, and pyrolysis
• EnvironmentaOy sale landlilling ~
The City 01 Palo Alto's SARS applies this hierarChY~ planning Ioo! in
!J1e seieclion of p'. ograms designed to meet !he ~& 50 percent diver-
sion goals by t 995 and 2000, respectively. Q . 'D"
Existing Mate<fal Recovery Programs ~
Since 1911, tile City 01 Palo Alto has~raled several nafk)oal1y recog-
nized, award-wiming material recove ams. Mounting pubrlC con·
cern for protection of !he environme Ille appal en! probl8ms associ-
ated with a growing volume 01 s sle in the City provided a strong
basis for Palo Alto's decision m~ 10 material reccvery. C\KT9ntry
37 percent 01 lhe City's res" . wasle stream and 10 percent 01 its
oommercialiindustrfal waste m is recycled; together this _"lis In a
Iota! <frversion rate 0116.4 percent.
Goal. for SRRE ~
The primary goal ~e Cily 01 Palo Aho's SARE is to meet the slate-man
dated was1e~' ~ goals 01 25 and 50 percent by 1995 and 2000,
respectiv&ly. led above, the Cily is currently diverting 16.4 percent
01 their soli 9 stream by a variely of programs.
The fonowlng goal. have guided the development 01 !he City's SflRS:
1. Meel or exceed sta!e-man;lated waste diversion rates
through source red_on, recycling, and composting.
2. Support and encourage regional SOlutions 10 sond waste
management problems.
PJ! 1991001B.EOW ES-2 Rlv.O January 14, 1991
:" ;
'-'.!,
•
,
o
3. Maximize recycijng and compos~ng opportunHie. witl1in
the CHy 01 Palo Alto.
4. Expand community awareness in order k) maximize
parflcipation ., source reducf.'On, recycfing. and
composting programs.
5. Ensure sullicient landfill capacity 10 dispose of wasles 1h8t
cannot be reduced, reused, recycled, or ccmposlec!.
6. Develop and expand Iocai aoo regional markets for
diverted materials.
7. Minimize adverse environmental impacts and ~~ pub-
flC health and safaty. §g
' .. --
MANDATED FORMAT OF SRRE ~
nle 14, Chapter 9 01 the California Code of c_&;ons (CCR) specifies
!he required s<bs!artCe and fomlat of !l1e S~l;be prepared by each
city and county in Caf~omia. The components of t .... SRRE ~at add!9$S
sourclI reduction. recycrong, composti~ and special waste must contain
!he tolJowing sec:tions: >~
• Objec1ives ~
• ExisCng Conc:frtions De~~
Evaluation of AI1em~
Program Implementation
• Monitoring a~ValUation
The regUlaliQn'~6 that Ihe alternatives considered for tJ-.ese lour
cornponenls mu valUaled in accordance wilh ten erileria lIlat rene:!
~ wide rang.~ ilchnical, ecooomic, instiMJonal, and socio-pofi~cal
lSSU9S. ~
The remai~ lOur ccmpooem. of !he City's SRRE-edocationfptJbl"rc
infonnation, diaposal ''''''lily capaci!y. funding. and integ<ar~viate
somewhat in Ionnat from 'Itle firs! Iouf. as wiD be noted from a "",lew of
the SRRE. The appareollack 01 consistency 10 1118 format is thus cflClat<!d
by 111" I1J9Ulations for Planning GtJidefines and Procedures for Preparing
PJl 1991001B.EOW ES-3 Rev. 0 Janvary '., 1991
..
and Revising Countywide Integrated Wasta Manaeament Plan (Hie 14,
CCR. DMsion 7, Chapter 9, ArfICieS 3, 61. 6.:?, 7, and S).
WASTE GENERATION STUDY
In compnance with AS 939, !he City 01 Palo Aho is required to identify
quanbties 01 sond waste lhat are currenDy being diverted or have the
potential of being diverted from the landlin. In adOrtion, 1I1e City Is required
10 identity the cornpos~ion and quanlity of safld wastes disposed 01 in the
Paio Mo landfill.
WaslaOfsposal Characlerlzallon /.J...
Palo A~o'. waste disposal characterizafion, cond~;;;'~ugUSL 1990,
consislad 01 two elements: (I) the quanW6s 01 w sposed 01, and
(2} an estima1e of the waste compooitioo 10( \'~ sources of waste
generalior'. ~
The waste quantities were based on SCalehou~ecordS and expres.,ed
on a weig!li basis. Waste composition was measured by eamp"ng and
SO<1ing waste Ihal arrived at !he Palo A landfin. A Iotal 01 66 samples
were conecled and sorted. The sa were sorted into categories of
materiats that lneltJded paper, piasf glass, metals, yard waste, other
organics, and special wastes. Th pies wer. lur1her sL.Cdivided into
types 01 materialS within each c
A summary of waste quat1r ,sposed of at the Palo Ahe landfi!l is
presented in Table ES·1. The position of Palo A/1c's wasteslTeam is
shewn In Table ES-2. The resuns of tn. waste characterization study indio
cated fhat pape;;.:cu ofly represents over 50 percent of the City's
reSidential and com I waste stream.
A Iolal of 114, are disposed 01 at the Palo Me landfill annuany.
Wa.t.Ofve~
In compli~;ith AS 939, Ihe City also conducted a waste diversion
study 10 asti mat .. the quant~ of materials d"tvor1ed from !he Palo Me
landfi II fIlrougn recycling, composfing, and source roduction.
The d"lVersion res'J1'Is were obIained !rom (1) City records, (2)1he conec
tors of recyclable materials, and (3) a survey of 691 Minesses in !he City
coocaming Ih&ir wasle d"IVBrsion activitiBs,
PJl IS~I00IB.EOW ES ·4 Ae'll.O January 14, 1991
f' !
, , ,
I
o
The data from the City records and from the surveys wers 3ssum&d to
relied \he Iota! Q1\IertOKl quantities for !he City 0 .•. , the data were no!
ex1<apola1ed). Thus, the sludy resuns reflect a GOnservative cliversion
es~mate k>ta! ~ , 6.4 percent
MMerials Targeted ,.,.. Olverslon
The following categories ~ malerials currently disposed ~ in the City are
targeted for crversion Ihroug/; programs identified in the source reduction.
nocycfing, oomposfrng, and special waste componenll! of th& SRRE:
paper, plastics. glass, metals, yard was'B, oih&r organi<: •. and selected
oth&r wasms, including inert solids such as asphaf!, ~~ and soil.
OVERVIEW OF SRRE COMPONENTS ~
Source ReducUon @>~
Source ~, activities reduce or prev~e generafran 01 sofld
wasles thal must otherwise be managed WrElCyc~ng, compostng,
lrBnsIormation, and disposal. SoLKce reduction is achieved by changing
production, paCKaging, and consum~pra~ces, resu"ing in dElCreased
GOnsumption, reduced malerial wei volume, and incr9ased product
durabllrty. ProducflOfl and pacl<agi ~ are changed at lila state or
national fe ..... l, while consumi!iO. n ns "'" targeted Iocany.
The sourc. re<luction progra 0 ctad to help meet Palo Alto's clVllfsion
goaJs have tie poI&rrtial to velY cnange consumption patterns. Palo
Ano proposes 10 impleme nt pubfic education programs lllat locus on
increasing tho consume(s IBvel 01 awareness. Sp9CifiCany,!he programs
selected inclLlde ,& waste eva!uar>Of1S, (2}techni<:al assistance,
(3) education prog~S~nd (4) pubfic recognftion and awands,
The estimated ~"'" from source reduction P'''9'ams is 0.41 percent
aMUanY~T i}".,~ very conservative estimate tI1a1 refiec1s tI1e fact that
source . eflo<ls 10 a large degree occur on !he national level.
Manu!ectur of products m arkelad nalionany conIinue 10 reduce and
modify tl1eir paCKaging, !hereby impacting the generation of waStes on the
locaI1evei.
Since lI1e City'. state-mandated crversion rates will be met 1IVO<.'gh
recycling, composting, and Sp9Cial waste programs, Palo Alto inlends 10
emphasize implemgnting ava~ab1e nalional source reduction programs
PJ1 1991001B.EQW ES -5 Rev. 0 January!C, 1991
, .
. -.~.
•
and educaUng lI1e public con<;erning these programs. Tha success 01 the
source redt..tctlon ~am win btl measurabre in terms ~ posrtive impacts
on consumption. product;on and packaging pattems thaI w~1 un,mataly
COf1tribu1e 10 • decrease in the quanlity 01 wastes landfilled.
Recycnng
As cleftned by the EPA·sponsored national Aecycnng Advisory Counc~
(RAe}. recycfing is the resutt 01 "a series ot activities by which material.
11181 would be<;ome 0<" otherwise rem ain wasta ara <flve rted from the sorld
waste stream for conection, separation. and processing and are used as
!TN malerials or fo>edslocks in neu of. 0<" in adcfrtion 10. ~in materials in
the manufaclllre of goods sold or distributed in oornm~.'f.'ilr the reuse 01
such malerials as substitules for goods made trom vir ~al.rials."
'" The City of Palo AlIo currently has a "umber crong programs in
place; these IOCIJs on various types 01 maleria • .,..ated by the public
and private secIons. Th6 success 01 these p $ led 10 a City diver·
sion rate ~ 16.4 percent in 1990. In order for the City 10 reach the diver
sion goals mandated by AB 939. additional recycnng programs are
proposed: ~
• El<pand the multi-family """~ 'ecycfing program par
!icipaf1Of1. El<pec1ed diversl~.21o 0.3 percent.
EstabrlSh/add to co~ program s for businesses
around the City. ExP~ div6fSion: 3 to 5 percent
Eslabnsh a mechanized material recovery fa~"iIy.
Ex~ed d"1V~ ion: I 0 percent
Divert ina ~ 10 a male rials' processor. El<pected
alVersion' 12 percent.
);i
'lti.~p-off facility 10 ioclude mixed paper. expected
: 0.1 to 0.3 percent.
El<pa residanHa! ctJ rb$ide ,ecycfing program 10 include
mixed paper. Expected d"lVorsion: 1 to 3 perce"'.
Pjl 199100IB.EOW es·s Rev. 0 J8nUa!y 14. 1991
j .
I
, .-.
The recycnng pr09fllm s s&laded 10 help meet the City's mandated cfIVer
sion goals tocus 0f1 the segments or the wast9stream t~at offer thl)
greatest <>p!Xl<ItII>1Iy for divorting wasles from landfilling For instancil,
75 percent ~ Palo A~o'. wasle stream comes from the com~r·
cial/lndustrial sector, yBl only 10 percent of ~ is CtJ".ntly recycled. eonec·
lion programs by business.s are therefore an importarrt component of the
City's approacl1lo meeUng mand<:ted cflV9fSion goals. .
Palo Alto's recycijng CO!1'ljX><lent also includes a discussion 0/ marl<ets lor
a vari9!y of wasle types: newspaper, high'grade paper (e.9., ledger
paper}, mixed wa.te paper, cvrr\lgated cardboard, aluminum cans, ., ... 1
cans, gias., polystyrene, and plastic.. ~
Compostlng ~
Cornposfing is a process of biological deco~. '" n of sofld organic
debris, such as INves, grass clippfrtgs, and atE an;c materials com·
manly loon<! in !he municipal wasle stream. T product of compost·
ing is a stable humus or srnl-like material fhal ca be used as a soij CO<1dI
!ioner, mulch, or fertilizer, depending on ~s pIlysical propertie •.
Yard wastes mai<a up a very large nt of the wasle.!team in Paio
Mo, comprisi09 approximately rcen! by weiQhI of the Iotal
wastesueam. Composti09 there! ake. an important contribution 10
redtJcing the amount of waste l$po.ed of at the Palo Alto San~ary
landfin. @'"
Palo A"o's existing yard was~post program was evaluated to dBler·
,"ina whether changes could enll.nee ~. el!eelive,-.ess, Currently the
City's compos!ing~am diverts about 6,3 percent of the total ser.d
waste.tream from I '09. It was det.rmined that by increasing partici-
pation in lI1e~XiS ' rogram, 1/1e City could ultimately cfIVert an additional
1.7 10 3.7 per the Iotal wastestream, resulting in an increased
c.version oi ,mately 5,000 Ions per year.
A seCO<1d ~ activity selec:ed by the City involves an enhance·
m8fll of !he existing pr09fllm t!".at is geared toward p<Oducing a h igner
grade compost than is currenUy 9f'n .... ated. By 8<II1aneing !he quar.ty of
!he compost produced, !he City anticipales .igni!ieanUy increasi09 its
mariketabtlity.
ES-1 Rev,O January 10, 1991
•
SpKIalWut.
$pe<)ial waste is solid wasle requiring conec1ion, processing, a:>d disposal
procedures 1I1at differ from those Iypicany needed for olhllf municipal sorld
wastes. Examples of special wasle are sewage sludge, as~, asbeslos,
tires, Wh~8 goods, mattress .. s, abandoned vehicles, and dead animals. At
the Palo Alto IarKl1m, mattresses and wMe goods are the only spedal
waste C1Jf1'&n!1y disposed of. Special wastes be[ng cflVerted include ash,
wMe goods, mattresses, abar.doned vehicles, and dead animals.
Sewage sludge and tires are being transformed (combusted).
The special wasle program selected 10 help meet Palo Alto's olVersion
goals is lh3 salvaging of wMe goods al the C~'s landfi~ltI>oogh white
goods are curren!1y conected and stockpoled at the ~iII. they are also
dIsposed cI altha s~e. 8y salvaging wMe goods acti,e dumping
area al the landfm. disposallaciliiy staff can diV~ 4810 435 Ions of
",atertal annually, Of 0.2 10 0.3 percent of the rid waste stream in
IheCily. Q
Educat\o!l and Pubnc Informatlon
EdueaflOO and public information ~ntial 10 the successful imple-
mentation of the recycrong, soorce r ion, and composting components.
To reacl', waste cfoversion goals of 50 percent, Palo Alto win target
1I1e non-particlpating SeclofS~ m~'f1~ \0 ensure the success of
selected waste cf"ersion pr . The City wm also inform the entire
community about e.pansion modifications \0 e.is~ng programs so
l11at l11e City can effectively reach i!s slated aoversion goals.
The education and~c infO<mation componenl presented in the City's
SRRE describes a ariely of City programs that focus on educating
and informing~, munity. about solid waste issues. Educalion and
p'Moc informa' ogfams promoted by businesses and CO<nmunity
groups in the· re also described.
The ~ and pubrlC information activities selected to enhance
e.isting p<og<am8 are multi-faceted in scope, encompassing media,
community ouIfeach. campaigns, and sehooI curric\.1a.
PJl 199100IB.EOYV ES-8· Rev. 0 JanutIt)' 14. 1991
" /' -, .
DIsposal Facility capacity
The Inlegrated Waste Management Act o! t989 require. !hat jufisdictioos
identif)· t~.ir current and future sond wasl. disposal capacity needs in the
SRRE. Specificany,!he City 01 Palo Ana is 'equlred 10 identify Hs disposal
capacity ovor 1he 15 year period 1991 through 2006. In Palo Alto the ooly
permitted solid wasta disposal facility is the City's landfill located al the
eastem end of Emo.arcadero Road. Accepting refuse cnly from the
incorpo<ated areas of the C iIy 01 Palo Ana, the landfill receive. al>ou1
320 Ions per day of refuse (114,100 Ions per year).
Eyen wfthout additIDr1al waste diversion s1emming from serected programs
descrhd in !his SRPE, !he Palo Alto landfill has refus~acily to 2002,
n._ h. , 00 >M ... ~ W M '"#;., ,_"" '"'~
!he sho<1-term (1991-1995) or medium tenn (1996-2 eriods.
Assuming the successful impiem<>nlallon of so duction, rec¥cling,
compos~ng, and other programs identiffed in ! 's SRRE, the s~. iije
of the landftn could b'3 extended 10 !h. year ,Furtnermare, K one
adds 10 lIle selected diversion described in l!1e SRR E 1I1e diversion o! two
lhirds of Pa!c Mo's waste 10 !he SM~R alien in Sunnyvale b'3g;nning in
1992, the Tandmy. s~e Iff. could be ex 10 2036.
Currently cor.tract negoliations ar rway concel'i1ing the implemenla-
tion 01 tI1e SMaRT Slation. ~., me of these discussions will deter-
mine the role that t~is propos rial recovel)' facility win play in con-
serving additional landfi~ ca~ Ihe City of Palo Me.
Fur.dlng
Sand waste mana~ programs in the City of Palo Ma are principany
funded by !he ~e Enterprise Fund. ConecflOl1 and !ipplng fees
charged 10 res i ' and com mercial customers represent the major
source 01 ~ this fund. .
Collecfion~~ reluse in Palo Ana are approximately $44,00 per ton;
disposal cos~ about $45.00 per ton. The minimum charge is based upon
the collection 01 refuse from one 32-ganon container.
Programs selected by Palo AJ10 10 help m .... ! mandated diversion goals
will be funded by the Refuse Enterprise Fund and revenue-gener!,ting
prog<ams.
PJI 199100IB.eoW ES -9 Rev. 0 January 14, '991
, .. ".
Additional Cily slaff will be required 10 help implement source reduction.
teeyc!i"", composting, and public education programs. A soud waste
manager and two recye"ng coordinators are recommended to be added to
the Cily's staff; their salaries will be fund'Kt Ihtough the Refuse Enterprise
Fund.
integration
To reach the waste cf ... ersion goals mandated by AS S39, the City of Palo
Ano must integrate source reduction, recyc"ng, composfing and special
wasle program. and aC1iv~iGS tollowing the integrated waste management
hierarchy of (1) reduction. (2) reoyenng and Mg, and
(3) environmentany safe transformation and disposal. mblnation 01
existing wasts cflversion prog<ams, planoed expa of exfsling pr0-
grams, and ,._ source reduction, racyc""" a sling program $
and activities ~!her wm con!nbu1e to the C ily' ailing 1I1e <!'rvarsion
targets mandated by law. ~
Currently Palo Alto diverts an es~mated 16.4 percent 01 its solid wastes
from landfilli"". By 1995, the cily pro~. 3 a minimum cfrversion rate of
38 percent; by 2000, a minim um rat 50 percent These projected
diverslon ,-..te. meel or exceed the ~a ed levels 01 25 percent in 1995
and 50 percent in the year 2000. ~.
SUmm&ry 01 DiversIon Prog~
Summarized I.~ Table 3 are ~:rce raduction, recycnr.g, special waste,
and compos~ng diversion program. s"leeled !or 1119 City 01 Palo Alto.
Included is (I) ~ate 1 implementalion, (2) tons cfrvarted, (3) percen!
cflverslon 01 the t asle stream each program would achieve,
(4) cap~aI costs, annual operating costs, and (6) additional .taff
needed lor each programs.
~~
PJl 1991oo1aeow ES ·10 Rev.O J"""III)' '., 1991
•
. -~' -
I
ES-'
SUMMARY Of WASTE OlSPOSAL OUANTITIES (1990)
Ton, Tons
Per Per
So<J= Day-7 (1) Ye~r Percerd..
Residential 5a.6 2',392 '9.0
. , 112.5 41,061 36.0
IncilstriaI'RoI-cft 72.6. 26,499 ~o
SelI-haul '3.9 5,066 §g 40
¢ityICIP (2) 54.8 "'i/'W' '"0
TOlar 312.' 114.0 100.0
1. ea-lon • 7-day .,eeJC /)
12, Capftallmprtwement Programs .... ~
I
.... ,.,~ ... .. ..,<"1.,. ..
c~"'oI"i~
~~~~~ ._ID .........
N
c-·-.... ..... .,~ ......
.af"i.o!'i'; N _
• • "
..
N ,;
~
..,., ........ I!>o ...... -.... "'" CCO~"ni
.. GO ..........
".O<'1N O":O"':,a
., .. .,. .. 0"''''_ 0"00 C
~:.8~;t;~~
0"0' c: <0 0 c:if6i
d> .... ..,OOO
"'''",":'':0-
f')0"~~"
o.moo,,""
"1Oa-CO..
lliiOf'iOON
o • ..;
:: ,;
o o ,;
:: .;
g
,;
0001;)
00 10
::_ 0000:=000
000000
~g~~8~ l::g~
OOOOOQ ._
° 0 0 0 0 0 1::0: 000.°.0.0 .0
0001;>00
•
1
2
I ..
.!:
;;
!
Ptognm
Tobl. ES -3
SUl'l'llf1'liW)' 0' Olvandon Programs
AddIt"", ..
Impktmantdon Ton.
Date Diverted
Addtttonal
Plroonl OIverslon of
Total Waslo Stream
AdcUttooal
_Costs l
CapilAl
($)
AnnuoJ
Operating
($)
_ ..
Stoll "."..
(P"",,"YHnJ)
' ..
Sourw ftNuotton ,
• T echnioaI1HeislanOa
• Eduoatlon8l_. fJ 7/ll~
7192
7/92
7/92
T60" TOO -T In~ ~ EduoaUon and Public InfOf'mJtion
• Public recognIl"'" and._ ~ ~
~ollng <1 , • local """""omanl ordInanCe "(!;~
• :;::::::''''''''1'<'1''''' In muKKarnI'Y reoy . ~ 7191
• Establish/add _ P<OIl"""" fo< 7/ll1
~74-411
4,10i·6,~
OOlinelS88
• SM.AT SIatIon
• OMtrtlnen IOAidI to a m,tenals ptOOea80f'
• Add mlkOd papat to droI><>fl t.cllfty
• Add mikOd P<'pat to AlsJdonltal curbaide
CompoeIIng
• -. p8ItIdpatfon In .... tlng p!'OQI'am · _. _'in9_1ee
..... lotW ....
• WhIt.!jOOda &aIVegIng at IondftH
Eclucotlon ... d _'0 In_don
92(?)M\~ 13,698 71!11~ 213 -16 .• 27
1/96 ~1-411
1/96 "if~' 107
719H/95 10,951 .';~91
92-95 N/{/'vu
7191 3<18·435
71!l1 Nil<
I I
O.~· 0.3 , 0 5.000
3·5 "I'SI) TeO
10 0 2,439,361"
6·12 0 TBO
0.1 -0.3 TSD 5.000
, . 3 '00,000 20,000
17·3.7 0 10,000
NI" 250.000 0
@.03 10 $0
16(), ()()().
200.000 ,
.1LOO2 1
I
M ........... O' .. _dl_aton """'.
To,", '. 38.087-116,012
~~~l:
22.2·34.8 I m.OOO' lj/91 I ~
f--------------I I ........l....-.
237,~
1. Coals shown are In 1990 dollars,
2. ,_ otty 81,," time onty.
3. To be d_.
4. _ on $111"'" lipping I ... at SMaRT Sial"'".
5. 'rhe SMaRT Statioo funotJona as a Iransfer elation as well as rooyding oenter; operating costs are noIlncluded In Ihs total.
PJI 1991oo1B.EOVV
~
0.10
0.35
0
0
0.03
0,03
0.20
0.05
~ 10
3.28
Rev. 0 January la, t991
lx' , ,," .
'.,'~h'"
• ,,:_"0' . ' .
•