HomeMy WebLinkAbout0487.000."
! ~\
I ,
bc··~~;ifd:; ." ~"_""_~ __ ._"""_.:L" ___ " __ ._/~_":_~_ ... _"_. ~ .. H"""~""""~""_
'.: ,
I
~ w
\
September 13, 1~90
HONORABLE CIr~ COUNCIL
Palo Alto, California
1
sANTA CLARA COUNTY TRAFFIC AUTHORIT¥ -PRAFT 1990 STRATEGI~~
Meml:lers of the council:
This is an informational report, no Council action is required.
As part of the council meeting agenda on September 17, 1990, Will
Kempton, Executive Director of the santa Clara county Traffic
AuthorIty, is scheduled to make a presentation concerning the Draft
1990 Strategic Plan for the .Keasure A program in santa clara
county, which .the Traffic Authority administers. The purpose of
the presentation is to review current strategic Plan information
and status" respond to quest.ions, and receive any comments frOD the
Council .. prior to final adopt-ion o:f the strategic Plan by the
Traffic Authority.
The Strategic Plan is used to identify the scope, budget, and
schedule tor projects financed through. Measure A.. Measure A is a
half-cent sales tax program for specified hIghway improvements on
Routes 85, lOl~ and 217 in santa Clara county, which was passed by
voters in November 1984. A strategic Plan is adopted by the
Traffic Authority on an ~nnual basis, as a statement of
understanding and intent regarding actions, ongoing and planned,
to complete the Measure A program.
Included as Attachment 1, is section 1 of the Draft 1990 Strategic
Plan, Which provides a summary overview of the programs, actions~
expenditures, revenues and completion plan for the Measure A
program. Remaining sections of the Strategic Plan report contain
more detailed informatIon for specific projects yet to be
completed ..
The Measure A projects that most directly affected Palo Alto
included the yidening of Route 101, to provide an additional travel
lane in the median in each direction, and the construction of
soundwalls along residential areas adjacent to the freeway. This
work Yas all ocmpl~ted several years ago, in the early stages of
CKR:481: 0
.0-.
,
I
.;,.J
•• ,
!
1
!
lil~r~:>
. ~ ~~ ,-.
."" " .. ~;,-:"
o o
the Measure A proqram. Palo Alto's earlier direct experience with
the Traffic Authority vas very positive in terms of sensitIvity.
responsIveness.. professionalism and achievement. CUrrent
indications are that Buch tavorable attributes continue.
Apart. troll a qeneral overview of the status of the Measure A
program, Council may wisb to bear some comments regarding current
thinking on the nee~ for .. and use of, additional revenue from a
potential renewal of the sales tax increment, which is set to
expire at the end of a ten year period (1995).
Respectfully subaitted.
IlARVIN L. OVERWAY
Chie~ Transpo~tion
.J 0/·· . '.
I
Official
ager
;1&z/tdh -£ ~j{ah)?
KENNETH R. SCHREIBER
Director of Planning and
Community Environment
..Attachment s : Section 1 -Santa Clara county Traffic Authority
1990 Strateqic Plan (Draft).
cc: Will Xempton. Traffic Authority
CKR:487:0
! .,
9/13/90
Page 2
•
,
.',.
f~,.:
·J~r.
,
. ··.1
; 1
l
-
o o ATIACHMENt 1
iii' SANtA CLARA COUNty TRAFFIC AUTHORITY
L
HIGHWAY
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
.lIN Il,l,ll. C-AI~~~
c::-.J'II4': ... ME'-'f!....tO en-. C'J-SA,.'" JCSIi
DAIoIItI MO'I'LI'S. \I'\:i 0 ,AI~~
£.;i ... 10'': ilf"Rf5[N";"""!\lE
C;)(,NCI".V:'JI!L.r-Jl', CIT)' C"J-:;~ftATOG"
lON"~I:'I'
"'.-'''01:1, c~ C.t. SoIJ'o.JOSi
III"" O"'IOOll
p.;.:;;;-" 1C~.j[ ~~SEr..'''';11IE
" ..... ":>:1 C,"'~$;,}N",/\''JI.<.!-
'W1U 1CtW'T0fII, :: (5ClJi;Vj; .D''''''~
.iAMn! 'I£RSOfIoI
[:'i:" .... 7w :l:'"".<t 7...M. ~o MAN .... ~r.u
lllEI,.. 0 GOOO'W1IW
t~.,..:·· ::: .. :-:.:;; COMl\ll" .. I",,; ..... I<'£....K'I'~
STRATEGIC PLAN
JUlY 199D
•
) ,
..
.' ,
.' > ,
~
, ,
I
J
I
I
i
.........
/
o
~CtlOD J
INTRODl'CTIO;>:
BACKGROUND
This Srrategk P!a c. identifies the scope. budget I!!~ scb~dl!llc: (or projects fil!laneed
through the Measure A ha1f-.cc:nt sates tax program (or high way improvements in Sa-:lta
Clara COtlZ1ty_ The d'DC1.Hnent a 1$0 discblSseS signifk!Il t creme Ll ~s of tbe l',rojected rcvcJ:l'lJ es
aDd expenditures for t1Ie 'program. The: f!J..B. has been desigcated as the Measure A
Expenditure Plan pursu3l::J[ to the Santa Clara CODEry Commetcr Relief Act. The Traffic
Authority"s uU'lcal rev~w and approval of tbe Stratc:gfc Plan rcpresemfs approvar of the
Expenditure Piau in acco,rdance wit. the JI,tovjsi-ons of lbjs Act. Tbe complete Measure
A program is ShO\\'D on FiglilTC !-], Highway Improvement ProBtim -Samla Clara County
Traffic: Aathorlry.
The o<rjginal Stf::iteiilk Plan 'jl.'3S approved by tbe Autbority ia. A.p,rilI987. The: PIan
is reviewed annually to reflect (he most CUrrect 5co:pe. cost 1nd schedule informuS·on.
FoUowiol initial aCi(l,ption. the .fIll was sub~qoea.tly revised and app("oved)D At1g1Jst
1988 .and November i 9-S9~ Tbis is the injtial report regarding the proposed pTocess for
flpd:at!Eg [be S.tntelZic PIau for ]990. DlJrins t&lS current tlpd'atc. there is a reQ.uiremc::u
to validate original aS5ump,t1o-cs. jncorpo,rate design reficememts, llpdatc scbedule
i:n.fo{'ma6on.aod incorponte acrual cos.t clrp:rience to d'atc.
The re\le~ue SOtlr~es 2 .... ailable ror ~be Measure A pf'ogram coo[ictle to incIode S2.;e5
tax receipts,. bood proceeds... and interest c:arniZlgs. ID ad·dition to the S,60 million
pr-e v.ioo sly projected to become I va iJabre tllrotlgh applka tions fo·r Sta Ie/Lacal Partner.sh ip
matching fUnds, aD addicional S5.2 million is estlmated to accrue: to tbe Mt:asure A
Prosram from additi-onal SUte and local Partnershjp fond applications.. Tbe lvailabili[y
oC t1!esc: fends has p,resoma'bl), 'been assured tJJ.roogh thepas~age of PropositioC; III all tbe
Jane p{,lmary ba Uo-t.. Progra m ezpcoditiHe.s inc1t:l de design costs.. righ t-o( -way ac~uisitlon.
utility rdoca6on. aoa COllstTtlr.tion e:l'pen~5. The 1990 ~tntc:~;c Plam. ... ill incitlce
refinements to (be scope, cost,. and s.chedlllf.e of projects; a.s well as address project
financiJl8 and UI upd:lte concc:rmins tbe~slatus of' unn:soJvcd issues.. Tbe latest projected
a v3ilability o( 5ta re/Local Fa rtnershi,p ('II c.di[lg as a result of tbe rceen t Gas Tn: electIon
res-e.lts wil] 'be incocporated il:l!o the S!r.liegl,c Plam cash flow assump{}ons..
Preliminary In3lyses by starr indicate it may be pos.sibIe 10 deliver the C'nrire
Measure A program Initial Plan as Jons as construction esc3fati'on remaIns reratj\'e!~'
stable and pos;tive bid results contin'Oe. Program CODtl.cgency f~nds will also tl.ave 10 b(:
reduced. however. primarily lIS I resolE 0( incTca~d rigbt:-o(·'\lo·a)' costs Ci .... er tbe past
.sevc-ral years. 1m ad-ditioll~ it is rlOW IDticipatc:d that cerrenl P'ioject scbed.,lc:s will r.c:d
10 be altered as a resort of de1ays jill ,Projects heiDg readied for advc:rti~mellt doc to the
increasin8 I mou Ill[ 0( Pia n work reQ,llring revje 'illS and tile:: hci: of Stl fficiest rCSO'D tees 'by
reyjewinl .sellcies (C.3TtrUIS, ddes aad cotlnty) zo mec[ the AlDtbodty".s I!;grc.ssivc
scbeduJes. The usn [klw however. [or lh~ proposed' '990 fl!A. sbo ... s 1 S22.6 millioc.
s1:l0rZ[11I for the ccrre::H Iaitia! PlaG Program. r.is repreSC'ats kss t!la[l 2% of the IOIJ!
.program.. Sta rf recommend's Ih a t tbe entire h.itia 1 Ph 11 ,proceed' '11111 iJ.c s:afl con tim tI es 0'" eI
I-I
•
, ,
,
,
. ,
•
'.
'.--".
o o
(he Dc::lll'c:ar IO identify cos.t savlngs and"rcsource5 from addition!!.1 rc'Verl'oes to offs::t tbe
projected cash now shortage.
In rcv}cv"i:I1g thIs doc\1mcnt.. it is important to r:cognhc: that all Meas-ure A funds
are committed. There is DO ad·ditional c:apac1t)' kft ia. the program" with the ex'C::p~joc.
ot minimal set-asides (O~ cODtingency and escaTauon. At tlds point,. amI unfor:secil:
'project expenditures or an)' negative changes in tbe CUrrent eeoDomic and r.:~ ::nue
(oHeaS! v,m n:stlIt i:ll J. n;dllced program.
T1:.is document ul.tic1pates a modest il'lc-Tease in .reV~[:l'C.es over the rernair,ing
'p,ragnm period. The updated Strategjc Plu. contiDOes. 10 forecast TCVCtltlC 8rolL::1:I by
US1D! the sam-: es.:atat:)on !aCtOTS included ia previaos phes. Antidpated re~':!loe
increases lncl'Ode an increase in proj-ected interest eS.lfl:ings of $29.1 millioQ alld th! SS,2
mImo%l:in additional Stateacd ~OcIl1'partL::rsbij) muchins. rll.nds. This increase in i~t!.(st
eanjogs is pl'imarily doe 10 tile s.ec-ond Bond issue recently executed. This. Plan Issumes
nO chug,e 'in the previous!,. p'rojected sal::5 tax re\leoueS 5bo~;ZI in the ]989 Plan.
To date, the Measure A program bas henefjtted from stahle cODStruction CD$ts,.
I"esuluIIg iii! bid results tl'lat arc cOtlsistC:Dtl), bela .... · project estimates.. HO~'e\'e!"~ t1le
continoation of favorabte bid' restlIts e-ouTd be Impacted fly I stlbstanti21 increase in !T.2jor
-CoDstTuction activity 1%1 SUlta Clara Cotlnty over tbe %lex1 t"""o to three yeaTS resulting
from thepassagc of Proposition 108, ]11 aed 116. Ia ad·ditlon. Measure A cash now
reqsh·ements bave tbe po~eGti.allo impact project scbedl~Jes. Tbe Atltcority js corr.:nlT,.
workiIlg willi otlr Financlal AdvIsor to -assess tbese impacts and is e .... a!uu:ng strategies
to mi!!timi;::e an, potential program deTaY5.
On tbe expenditure side o( tbe 'pra!ra~ there: bave beea "Upward p,ressarc:s in three
arus. jncltldill! l'"ight·of·WilY. -construction In(i projccl development services.. Tbe cost
estimates {Of" Tlll.b[~(·wa.J' ae-qtlisi[jon. ano tltillty retocatio[1 activities have jncreased
funher based primarily on tbe contin Ded Jevel of app-recia6oD ill property "Valtles inS!n ta
Clara County and a further re-evaluation of stiIjt, relocation costs as a resolt of final
design.
hi addj6on .. "'\l.·hk 99 percellt of the Measure: .A pr-ojee-ts i8 final design or !lnder
CODstTue-tion, th( scope of some projects bas beeD moce ae-curate!-y defined and s.:ope
descriptions ba~c been revjsed. The p("oject sco.pc revisions bave rescTted in am In:r:ase
to the construction cost estimale.s,. inc:iodinl $263 milHoll to Route IS. $.(.6 milliDn to
R.oute 101, and 52.7 mjllion ro Route 237. Additionally. ecgInceTing -and other 'proj::ct
development servK:C:s cost]. bave iDcreas~d by $-42.9 mi.llion to ao:commodate iocr:ased
desISD effort, riiht of way support, (onsuu :60n suppor-t,. and project scope revisions The
Idd.itional p,roject dcvcJopmeat services have beea required in 'part to respond to
commlil.I1ity inptlt "In" (oncerRS and 10 perform extensive VITtle engineering s.enice:i.
These valne engineering services have resulted ill elcess or 58S mill)on in S"i\'ings tD the
Measure A Projee-Is corutrtlction aDd righI of way budgets..
A discussion oC tlle mor~ sigJlifKallt "Update :items is iocToded ill this htroou:"6on
llnd"er the (oHowing headings::
o .A S~mmar,. o( Proposed Program E.lpenditllres and R.eventles;
o A Summary ot Unresolved Project ]s.suc:s.; alld
e-Stat~s 0( E.vironmenrat DOC\lmerlIs..
Additional iZlrormatton On individual project scope and scbedc:tes is incJud:c illl
Sectiocs::: [broog"" 5 of the P13 •.
1-2
L
Palo Alto
Moonlain
Ylew
Saraloga
! LEGENO
Sunnrvale
los Galas
= Hi\)l1way lrnpfovemenls
- - -future Ro..r1.e 85
o
• Proposed Fun Inlerchange' o Modtr.caGon ex ExI.ling Inlerchange e Proposed I-'.a[ Inlerchar>ge
@ Curren~y Under Review
-
\
/
o
Milpitas
t
N
FIGl"RE I-I
?j\ LOCATION MAP
MEASURE A HlGH'WAY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
1-3
• , , ,-. r
"
L
•
: .")
;~. ,.
..
\
\ . -. \
I
-, ,
!
:~
-
•
\
o o
A SUM~URY OF PROPOSID PROGRAM [XPENDITURIS AND Rn'ISlJIS
The Measure A protra m cxpcnditun:l acd rc"'c::nDC'S tba t arc: .indo ded ill thi'S lI'pd:a te
are summarized ill Ta blc I·J. _"nIl uaJ StT31eRic PIa ~ Program Cost. InItial P la I!~ and Tl.bte
1-2. ARl:l'Uaf Strates.!: Ptu frosram Cost,. CompJetion PlaSl. A discus!51oD of thc:s.e it::.ms
[0110'\1'5..
T.abJc J-3 is aa iodh6dud pr:lject (costrDctioD. cost estimate summary.
IXPENDITURES
The Measure A program expcDdittlrc:s have challgcd IS I restllt of increases in Tight
of "a)' costs, projt:ct scope cbaoges and cIIgincerina $Crvices costs. This Dpdate incJudes
the (oIIo""'icg increases in program expcndirl:1res::
R.igl:!t-o{-wilY cost
CanslTDCtion cost·
Project Dc::sign Senice!a·
S S 8.3 milHo D
$41.5 million
542.9 mHlion
• These costsincluc!e rea1!zed escalation .,lIielt 'ha.s reduced tbe pcoject farure
escar.ltion pro\·isioD aDd (:O$t impact to the p'rogram.. (Se.: $45.2 m.iI1ioD
.redu~tjOD in project escalation in Table 1-1)..
RiZ81-0r-""a} Costs
Rigllt-o(-,.,ay cost estimates. have beeR refined" coosidenbJy since tne J989 PJaL
Since that time. seveTaJ factors have: combined t,o incrc:&s: Ibis cstimate:
D Cocunceci .J,ber escalation oC property values tll'U. previoDsly ,uHidpated.
o Redefinjtion of tbe req'JiTe:d IIllrnber or parcels. incil,ldin& reqciIed constructioo
and lltiljty e:'Z$(:mellu and ad<l:itional.uea foc mitigation sites..
o Re-evaJcattoD of utilhy :rer~catioll costs based on more ad ... ·3.Dcc:d final desi!!\l
serv~es..
Rogt!: as
Ia III I}, Z5I89. the: tOlaf eSllmared R.oute IS right-DC-WI)' costs .... ere S197.5 mll1~on..
iDc:!uding acquisition (SI69...5 million). relocation assistance (59 million} anci nil]r}
reloca don (519 million).. C~rr:n rJy. the to,tat estima ted right-oC -way aCQ Q isitioo. costs ror
parcels ia tbe .Route IS ccrr~do'r that lIave bee. acquired and .remain to be acquiTed by
Measure A (uodsllave beeEl increased 1:". $51.0 million 10 a Iota! of 5220.5 milliQ!L The
S19 million for Ililil1tJ rcloeat;ons, previously jdentifkd, has been ·rc-evaTuated based on
delailed' final desiSll performed to date. and las .Dot: chanled. An aUo'g.'a!lce for
rclocation assistance payments to ;Jropcrt} owccrs lias beea rcd'OC'cd to 57.9 miIliotl from
th: p,reviolJ! aHowance c[ $9 millioa. Therefore. the Iota! for .Route IS rigb t-oC -way costs
is DO ... · estimated to be S247.4' mjUjon.
1-4
;
~
f
t r
\.
,
_r-:ji
, .
.-
o o
TASlEl-l
Summary of Changi3's To the Measure A
Expenditure Plan
{S:I MiffionsJ
Strategic Strategic
Plan Plan
Update Update
JVLY 'a~ June '90
CONSTRUCTION
PRElIMINAR '(
Route 85
rm pro .... ed Scope Definition
and MisceIl&neoos Changes 342.9 ~9.2
Route 101
lmpro .... ed Scope Definition
and MiscerTaneous Changes 96.7 101.3
Route 237
fmpro'led Scope Oefit'1itiOfl
and MiscerTaneous Changes 972 999
StatelOlide Mitfgalion ~rrcl. Ind.
Contlrrgenc)' ...---E,~ 50.4 ~
TOTAl-INITIAL PlAN
CONSTRUCTION 579.4 620.9
OTHER tTEMS
Rjgnt orWa'J
Route 85 197.5 247.4
Route 101 2.3 3.3
Route 237 62.7 707
Totar -Rigllt of Way -26j~ 321.4
EngTne ering !.. Support Service s 126.5 169.4 (4)
Sub total -Program
Expenditures 9690 1111.7
Escalation 623 17.1 '" -----
TOTAL-PROGRAM
EXPENDITURES 10:31.3 1128.8
T A Administration
Expenses 11.5 10.2 '"
TOTAl PlAN EXPENDITURES 1,042.8 1,139.0
I-S -7L .. -.. '-".'" ,."
,
.'
~\
Oifference
'8~ "" '90
26.3
4.6
2.7
n/a
7.S
41.5
49.9
0.4
a.o
sa.3
429
142.7
~3L
97.5
(1.3)
96.2
"d.,;, ....
' .
-
o
TA.BLE 1-1
Summary of Ctlanges to Projected
Measure A Revenues
Change in interest Earnings Frojecflons
State/F"ederat Grants (IncLFAU Credits)
Other Conlributiion s
Ending Cash ealarICe from 1989 Strategic Plan;
TOTAL ADDiTIONAL PROGRAM FUNDS
P1ojec!ed Overan MeaSl.Jfe A Program Fund
ClJITent Cash 8arance fO( the Juoe 19~ Plan
29.1
20.1
15.4
9.0
73.6
{22.6)
No-TES' 1.. C~ EShm,jlln Ir.in the $'1 with .~I'IiC>!1 ..:f<koC:: 10 ba .. ",."".1. li'om 18QIQ,
:t '10 U,tI,,,ro cJ U¥'III: Uigit.lliQJ1 ~II ~ diari!llrted Ig ~jfl(: pojft1a.
a EIlCa1atlQn ~!lI~1I1hot ir.lI&tiQrl ~r"~ Ig dolt.
c '2_! Ill'illiOJ1 ill itUPpQ!1 .. , ........ pl'''''Ol.IIlJ Ine ..... dt>d U "palil. lir. ~I'l: Ibr Corn-nwrwtj' A.l.t'ron&,
"p bMlr< .I:sig"." II p.aI"[ 01 '~cJlviclval RCIU~ .qJtIro ....
1-6
-~-----. ---------~-,-, --.---
\
i
o
./
T"Bi..E 1 -2
COMPl ETION PlAN
o
& CHANGE
AOO'sa PRElIMINARY '90 '88 vS '90
ROOJrE85
USA
'03
>0<
>0.
109
OIRECT CONNECTlQNS.FITE 85/87/101 INT'ERCHA.NGES
COMPlETE DIRECT CONNECTIONS. ATE 85117 tIC
INTERCHANGE RAMP CONNECTlONS AT ourro ROAO
BALANCE a1' asr.:e.O lNTE=tCHANG E
ROOTE 85 -CONSTRUCT>ON COSTS
.. SA
:904 CClMPLETION OF I:NTERCHANGE A. T AOVTE 2371680
:305 Aux' LANES -E.. Of lAFAYETTE TO McCARTHY BLVD.
307 MOEN C-IS LANES; ~tOD.nvo lie's CRT'El01 tMATHrLDAJ
ROUTE 237 -CONSTRUCTlON COSTS
OUTE Zl1 -1l<!ANGtE S1UOY AREA
"SA
3O€i RTE 231:.4-5 lANES (RTS5 lie TOS.OF MIlJC)lEFEIt..[)}
31'} RTE H'IM!S: MOO. EnlrlE.x~ RAMPS & REPLACE
MENT OF OLe MIOOlEFIaD ROAD
312 RTEB5: WiDEN",-!; LANES N.OF ATE 237 TO RTE 101
ROUTE 231 TRt -CONSTRUCTION COSTS
OUTE 237 -TOT At. CONSTRUCTION COSTS
CONTINGENCY
11At -CXlMPlET10N PlAN CONSTRI.JC11ON
RJGHT Of' WAY
ROUTE e.;
AOI..rTE 231
rOTAl-AlGHT~ WA.Y
ENGINEERING S£RVJCCS
ESCALATlON
"-ATEGIC PLAN -COMP\.ET)QN FLAN
'iOle "\. 14:5..-,n~",,* STIPllnds~.$IIH1.
1-7
21.S
"-S
'-0
M
31.3
49.2
3.3
~O_l
n,
16.5
89.'
24.1
144.5
0.7
9.2 ...
252
na
182.'
2UJ 0.0
u (U)
0.0 (1.0)
<.0 co
32.. U
49.2 '" 0.0
u 0,
20-1 0.'
12-. 0."
'.2 M
8.' 0.0
< .• 00
'16.5 M
89.1 '.0 ---------
19.5 (4.E)
124.8 ("-E)
C." (11<)
"'.9 32.7
<2.3 32.<
----~ U
53.S 535
250.3 67,]
\
\
•
•
'I" ,
..
..J
•
\
\
,
I
r
O~~O~~QOCC8000CCOi~S7~~!~C~Cg!~~O~O .... .. ...... .,.. ____ .. --..0_ ..
~~ ~ ~~~ONN~~ .,.. O~C~ ~ ~ Q ~~~_ ... ~_~ _ ~~ __ N
e ~ ~-~~~.,..~~ ~ ~----.. .. .. .. _:II" .... _"2.. ..
_'" N .., ..... .--.... - -,
•
~:888 5-.-.......
1·1 ',.'
"L
-' .-I
i
-,i
..-J j
i I
L
cP'--........ OOO .... ...,2~.:8° ~~~ gg~::ts .... ..,
~~ii ii~·i~iO;!
'" "':. .... oIl ...... C"': ..... -,... _N _
•
,
>
\
\"
\
"~ 'r
. ~'
";~
"
I
J
I
•
" _.
\
o o
Route ]01
There ar~ no rorecasted C"huscs in the right-oC-wl, aCQtlisltioll costs (o,r Route JOJ .
.Rigbto( ~.'IY costs bavc beu. rc-e".Juated. bowe'Hr .. to incl'Cdc aetllaJ el.perienc:e to date
in lttility relocations. and 'havC' beca iDcrea~d by S.4 milJi.on.
Route 231
Ia July ]989 .. tbe to-tal e5-tlmated Route 237 Initial Plan right-of-'II.'a,/lltiEty
relocation costs ""cre 562.' million. The current es:ti:mate p,roposed (o.r tbe J 990 Plan :is
570.7 million.
Scope Challees
Based OD a dditioIlaT engIneering and impco'lO'ed design parameters developed through
tlle final d~sig.a progrcss 10 date. the .sCDpe of sevcral p-rojects has bee-a revis!:d. A
compTete d-escription of eacll ".roject :r.CDpe 15 jnduded illl Section 2. The loUl change is
IlIitial Plan constraetion is estimated to be '$41.5 maHon reflected in Tlble 1-]. A general
de~riptj.on of th~ major scope ebanges by route foUows:
E,oDte R5 -.... 'esx Valley Freewn
Tb:e 1990 l.l.i.A bas inctoded:ll (hree Loop Inten;hans!: at &S/Htaat llad been carried
as all llnresoived issue in tlle 1989l!.llt This ebange has adcled $9.5 milli-on to the Plait.
Scopc cbanges fo(, tlle Route: 'S freeway ca. be primarily C'ategoriz.ed as design
refinements dtlrinB the project dC'\Ielopmcflt p-recess and llc'll.·ly identified reqoir'Cments
due to Freeway Agr~emellt negotiations. A better ItIlderstaodi'nl of overaU requiremeI!lts
and casu lias res~lted from tbe ongoIIlgerJgincering e:frof't. The rerillcmenu that ale most
evident occurred al Route 8S from Pros.pect R.oad 10 exis-ting Route IS (MSA ]02-10); tbe
IS/17 imtercltangc (MSA J04-J,2); .Route!S Crom Dent AVCDllC to Bascom AvcElue (MSA
)05-1,); tne Saratora Avenae i!lte:rcbacge (MSA 106-21); and the "''inchestcr Boulevard
OvercrossImg and' PoUard Road Undcrcros.sing {MSA 106-3)..
In September ol J989 .. public opposition to tbe ROute IS profiJe ud tlle
Saratoga/Stlt!lE.}·vale iaterc"allge: QvlSA 102-10) promp·ted I eommullity meeting in
CDpcruno. As a resolt of tha I public meetin g. the Cit)' G( Cuperti:co reqllested lbe Trarf ic
A ~ thor-iU to stu dy alterlla te profil~s. incorpon tic! V2 r>ous levels oC free'l!.·ay depressi'DD.
Kurncroos 'pro·fiies were designed and re\<jc".'ed oj' ClIpcrtjno and tbe Traffi.c A!Hbor-ity
untll am. acceptabl~ aJterlladve to the bistorie profiI-c: .... as: developed. The refinc:d
alternative increases tlle Je!lgt. of the: d::pr-e:ssed section of .Route IS. TlIis desig3 bas
resulted in a construction cost increa~ of S6.1 mi.lHon.
I. the 1989 Stnlelk Pia. stOf"m IOd' sanitary sewer interceptors "'crC in.:-1t:dc:d in
lh~ sco~ o( the Route IS project (rom ~nt Aventle to Bascom ""veDD.e (MSA 10>-1) to
mitigate tbe impact on exis.tifll drainage and sallitary iacillties. As tbc design process
prolresseC! .. ad·djtj.ooat npaeity ... as deemed I1ec~ssary 10 mitigate exisriDg drainagt:
requirements. The proposed d-esiglll no"ll" bas a storm sewer jl:l!crccptoc in tlle Irce""ay
seedoD from DeDt 10 Bascom (MSA 105--]0) Ind storm ItI" saaitllry sewer-iDten:eptors
olltside of the: freeway rigJu of ... ay ill this area (MSA IO~]J). The ma.jor cocsuuet"ion
cost iDcr ease is f Of' the drainale: and samlur)' se .... er ... ork and' lajs cl:ianlc is DO .... estima ted
u Sll.2 million above the previously approved SUJtegk PI •• es-timall: roc this ~gment
oC Route IS.
1-l0
~: .. -,
.~~.
,
•
\"
\" \
\
\
r-
I
1 ,
...
1
i
J,
-
.. ---.
!
, ,
•
•• :-!-." .-<,,,,_!,'~>.;...,: t:·~:;<~w<,,* ,
o o
At its November 6, 19&9 met-tina. the "tlt'ho-Tity abo 3PC1o ... ed the dcsisn scope and
cost Cot the SaratoJiI A'Vc:noe iftlercha%llC: (MSA 106-2J) wbkh inc-laded a $5.1 mill i<: I!
scope adjuMmcnt to at-commodate 1: transfer of .... ork from the Los Ga.tos Creek to
Saratoia Creek freeway scgment (MSA I06·1O} aO;d to provide roc addit}:ocal pavemeDt
At its Febru3IY S.199-0 mcttinB~ tbc A,1iIthcrlt)' ap-proved tbe re'o/ised <!esi&tI scope and cost
10 split the Saratoga Avcnel: j!!fc:rchangc package jato tbe Sarawla Creek temporary
!hoofl} $trllcturt (M.SA. 106-12) 'and the Santoga AYCDue illtcr(;hansc (MSA 106-21).
Additional draina8c rcq,QiremcD[S and complexjdc:s i14'\1o-Ived witk constructKln staling
'has added $1.0 mllGoD to construction ~o~t.
At it$. Mal 7. 1990 meeting. the Authorit), app·ro .... cd lddit10nal project scotle at
Winchester Booic .... ard Inc! Potrard Road Q.1$A 106·3) ll'hicb restlJced ia a $2.2 million cost
increase. The nel increas.e reslltted from a pllmp statioo. at PI>Hard: Road .. a.d railroad
shoo.(Jjcs Ind Road detou rS at both Wincbester Boule .... ard a Ild Polhrd Road. Additiona U Y.
~ted Railroad Struct'llres have bee1l reqaire~ by tbe Southerl1 Padf)c Tnns.po.rtat:icn
Compaay C.SPTC) ",-hi,. were ot"igioa!1), tlnaot1cipated in ;lrev)OUs plans.
Scope chacges due to the final desilll of the~ ,,·ro~'Crs arc bOW incorporated i!lto
tbe Strategjc PlalL The total iIicTuse is app.roximate1', 5029.2 mini-on. (cxdud.~ng
CODtbgcncy) as sho'A'";J, on Tabte ].J.
Route JOI
The primary items con tributing -to the S4.0 mill i all cba n ge to the Pla D roc ROlJte ]" 1
wert _ $J,6 milEon scope c-t:au"gc: for the 4tft Street t,o Trimbl-: Road project (MSA 20:'·4)
apP1'oved by the Aotho-rit)' at hs March 5.1990 meeting. aDd a SJ.6millj.oc. scOope change
ror the Berryessa to SPRR project (MSA 2{)2~2} pending approval by the Allthority:a.s part
or [his l.l.!J!.revielllpfDCCSS. Orf.s-ett:inJ these increases "'·ere 50m( minor re-dDccjollS in the
actual costs experienced on the '!.OutberD. sec,-lor. of Joule 101 from Bernal Road to
2iOJ680/l01 Inter.bange.
:liI the 4th Street to Trimble Road (MSA 201·4) segment DC Route ]OJ~scope cbacges
spp£oved at the Amtborhy"s Mar-c. 5.1990 meet:J~g have been adde-j to tbe f..l.u.. The sted
structure com,,!c.l[lry 001 (he North Jst Street overc!'ossIcg is greater thaa wbat had beeD
iccludcd iA pTe ... ious pians. w1:.kh added SO.S miHi-on. Traffic ContrOl and detour cos-~s
lIa"'e beee increased by SO.4 million. Ret.ainiDg ""'a1l {ound:;l.rions have ilJcrea~d by 50.1
tni1l~on and cr?sion control reqtliremetlts. in the Gu-a:da!upe Ri .. ·eT have beea added {o(:
$0.2 mnlion. Lisbt Rail related protectioll reqllirements have also ~el ideDtifi<:d at
No-rt"h, 1st StTtet add.i.n.g $0.2 miBioll. State furnished and s>Jpplemental ..... c£k.items nave
also ~eD identified ad·dil:ll 2111 additional SO.1 million.
The Bcrryessa 10 SPRR segment (MSA 201-2) scope chang: is due 10 findings {rom
-a materials repe,-t wbiell indi-t:ates that retainillg wans will reQ.uire u,tensi .... e pile
fOtlnd'a6oDs adding S2.0 m.iIHoo is cost. Value engineeril:lg chatlges lIav~ beta i-deEltifi<d
resulti~1 in -a SO . ./( million decrease im the tont
Route 2}J~
Tbt-L99-0 Stntuk P13!!. rtnccts TnJfic. ..... tbo,rlty aw:rovlll {o:r ID. additional
u.pc:nditure of SO.5 miIHol1 (oe tbe design and (onsullction oC ramp meters on an
~,.stbouDd nmps on Ro~te 2-;'7 I.t the rtqu(s,t of tbe MetTopo.1it3.D. Tn.nspOrt3tioD
Comm;ssjon (MTC).
1·11
•
\
\.
."
,
\
\
1 , ,
.. j>..
..
'-.~ .
"~'" , . ,
". -
-
•
-..
\
o o
The. 1990 Srntclk Prall hu taltCD I cOD~rvatlvc app-roach 10 a Dcmber of
unresolved issues all Route 231. There i! a possibility that Cahn,ns will assume thc cesigl1
res.ponsibility {(K the Great America Pavcmelll (MSA ,3.09·30) and' Route 880 Near-Term
Improvemtrl,LS (MSA 304·) 1) at itO cost to tbe Autho-riry. \'alae tllsineerin& efforts
cODtis'Oe 10 refine tJ:lc mose cost-effective: desiglll to-r the Zanier bterchlDge Inc Ncar
Term ImprovemeQu llonl Route 237 Ind 180. Tb~ Nortll Sflo..-ctine Nortll Side
Improvements Project is just entering the COD(;epnat design stise and' a firm cost
effective desi&& c:o'Ou.c: lias }'clIO be set. There is • posslbi1ity that S.s million could' be
saved (Tom (he proposed' ]990 Strateik PIal jf all t.he above issues were to be resolved
favorably.
Measure A improvemects.I the Zal:l.ker htercha!::lge ad\'c:rs.:ly affeci tbe ,.(" and 60"
Cit, ot Sam Josc unhary scwers tbat rum parallel to Zalilker Road. The 1990 SUBtegtc
ll..i..a incorpoures 12.7 mlIJi:on. or SO ;:Jen::ent or the estlma ted costs.. to reloca te these llnes. ... '.
The Cjty o( SaB lose will fund tbc baTan(;c or the se""er improvemelHs..
Since the ad'option of tbe initial Strat-egk Plan Caluans and tbe Autlloclty bavc
agreed to :I 'policy S'Jppof"ted by State JeSislu)on which assigns d:si&a ccgineerjo! cost
res.ponsibilit)' to kical landing Intborhies.. ra, ..... ;>OOS«:. tbe 1989 PI all inct'Od-ed U115.5
million for design and other s.en6-ces (or tbe lnitJal Plaa p-rojects...
la tllis llpdate of the Strate:;:k Plu a. ad'ditjonal S42.9 miUion jn cm'llUOnInCDtal,.
desigD and construction SUPl>Orl servke5 costs bave been defined. A cos.t summary and
d~tailed explanation. by cat-:gory foUows:
Phase: -0".: Environmental Scrvkes
Phase .J-:-Final Design Services
Phase "'2"'; Rigbt-O(·',/ay Support Services
Phase -3"-: ConstrUclloD Eflgineerlnl
Services
Total
R.e.1ized EscaJation
GTlnd Total
EBviTonm;;ntal :*uvkes (Phax ·0")
S"fiIHoos
S3.1
SI7.9
55.0
S95
S35.S
SH
542_9
The 1990 Strategic Plall jncillde~ Ipproxilr·a tely $3.1 million "identified a.s additional
ell. 'IIhollm~lltal ~n·ices. This increase is consistlCDt with the incr-ease ill constructed valoe
elsewhere is tbe Plan. EB.viroomentalservices .. ave remained approxjmately 3.2 puceDt
e( CODstrucled value as p.rojected in the 1989 Strltegie Plan.
The ]9'90 PIa. DOW include! a I-otal ot $20 .• mmiOD (oc ElI'ilironmental Services.
TkJ.s amount includes S2.0 million lbar ..,jH be recovered from the State is accordance
wita the: Al1thoriti·s EllviTonmC:DtaJ Services Coop ASTec:m::at and tbe Statc:'"s ·PoHc)' loc
1-12
..
,.
•
-.
":-.?
o o
DealiDK with Special Tax fttnded 'rojects"~ The Plall also iocJud-es sliglHly mere t:ham 54
million paid to CarUlliS earl)' in the Me::1sure A Program pdoc 10 tbe States ad<lption of
tIle ·Poltey-Cor ...... ick Ibe Atttborir-, ... m PQuae recovery with the State itll accordance
with !llis potiey_
Tbe 1990 PIau docs DOl: icclude IU, costs usociated ","':it:&' t:he Triangle Area
ea"ironmental docl!ment auumed 10 be pa~d (Of' by tbe Stue in ac:eocdaace .'ith State
,IIIde1ines for dearina wit. sp.c:ciaJ lu:-hnd.ed pcojcClS.
Eilla! PsSjRD xrv;ces <P"~
The $17.9 million !OCfe3~ fo~ final desila. Krvkes iii tbe 1990 Strategic Plaq is Ibe
result oC S12.4 milljon in additional final design KTvKes previously approved by t'he
Alltboritl". 52.S mi1!i-on rOt 'public reJat>oDs costs transferred [rom the: All.tllorlty"s
Administrati-on BudJe:t..lod S3.0 milGon additionallUowa:cce for future de:sigB chJ.llges..
Of the SJ2.4 million iDcre35-e in final dc-sigs cos-ts.. 56.'; minjon arc: a r~sult of the
iacrease in construction costs..sbowa ill table 1~'.IDd the.flll target (0£ design services
cf 1.5 pc:reect of constructed vaTu¢. Tbc. rcmaioiol increase (lC $6.0 millioll has resulted
(rom re-desig. activitks on ~ver31 Measure A projects. and a dd:itl,onal va Icc cngineerjng
cffo('ts. These .dditicnal vaJcc cnginccriol erto('ts bave resulted in a savings to the
Measure A construction and right-of-way budgets of more than SSS miHi(lD.
The 1990 s«ntcSic Pratt flOW iocttld-es a total of S76.0 mjllion Ccr fil'lal d-c:sigIl costs
... bkh is 12.2 percent of the constructed vaJue showD. in tabr~ 1-1 of S622.r mHHoD. If the
Sta te~s poni-o'O of CODSlrtlcted va1":le on combiced $..t:a lelA 'Mtbo.rity ~.J'ojeCts. ShC'WB beJ.ow ..
Cor ... hick the A lIIthOcity has agrc:d to peTform desis:a. services is inctu ded. [his perce:n tage
wOllJd be reduced to 11.5 percec.t. This percentage is within tbe: States J3 percent
Illideline fol' sLml1ar service:s.
Tbe (011-0 ... )118 is I listing of combined Authority lad Sute projectS "ith tbe States
estimated share oC the constr\lcted "aIDe:
MSA
202-3
202-11
202-7
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
880/101 [Dt~rcbaDge
Silver Creek
Alum Rock
Rl9.I:lt 0( ~r3' SnpPof't Services (Ph~
St31e Share
S Construction
Mil1ign,
17.1
1.5
175
The 1990 Sir:.!.!.U.ic Plaa now includes SII.6 m:illjoD in Corecast S\lPP0T[ services
rcq\lired lor tbe aCQ.uisi6oll oC rrgbt-of-wa, Ind' l1tDity rcJoc3tion actIvities: and alii
additioDal contingency provision of SI.O millioo. Tais .rcpccscnts all increase of 55.0
million (rom the 1989 l.!i.ll.. nis (of'Ccast in rig'lf oC ,.,1.y suppOrt serviccs cost equals 15.1
percent oltbe riS'ht-o(· .... ay capital budgct. The J989 PIan including these rigll.t of .. ·ay
SUppoJ't servkes aE value of S.6 percent of rigllt of way capital bc:dge:t. The 0.5 percell[
increase is due 10 I greater levc1 or erroct expen"ed' OD IppninJs and appnlsal revkws
they alltKip3ted by the ]989 ~ Pari ot Ibe j!lcrea~ also reflects the CaTuaElspropert)'
management rDuction. [or wllkh oUsetting reVenDes
1-13
•
•
•
, ,. . :
C"J'i;
.. -,-
."--. --"
"--1""
-
•
•
o o
arc in::llld-ed in Ihe "other ec:mtd'bUOoos· eategory of [C"-CAnes (Of' Ibe reIltS recch'ed for
occupied Measure A ri&bt o( wly property+ The: State: 8aidcIlDcs for estimatii'll tbe cost
or tbe right or '"a)' S'O,ll"~x){"t serv~u varks -and C1Ulto be IS muck 1.$ 22 ~rCCQt of tbe cO-'ltaJ
eost of rjlllt-or~way.
Properties acquired (oc Rout~ IS by other a&cllcic:s p-r-i:or to tbe passage o( Meas\Jfc
A are CODsidered to be local coot1iburiDns 10 !he "ragrltJl. Properties currcnrJy being
'purcha~~ tly o{hcr 8gencies aTe included ill! the S{!3!!OgK: Pta. at all amOtlD! estimated 10
be the: Tnrric Allllbority's sbare.
Conr;truetion EnRipec:Tinl Services (Phase "31
Foo£ the Measure A prOj!ram, tbe S-tate bas issued :a "PolK:Y for Dea1jng "jtb
Special Tax Ftlcded Projects-througa which tlle State provides a PDnj.on of tbe
constructkln EDgiceeriDg S("rv)ce.s. at no cost to the Alllhorit;,.
The J989 Plao included ~on5trl}ction administration costs BSiD8 t"be S.:ates ·Policy"
criteria for all Measure A projects. This criteria ",,las estimated at i.5 perceot of
COn.5UllCled 'u!ne f;:).£ all C"onstructMln engiDeerin& scrv>ccs including Caluns
:rcimbllrsabJe services aDd Alltbority provjded COCSlrllction etlgineeriDg eODsultUlt
services... This polky assumed tbat Caluans would adminisler the constructi,oc contract5,.
and that the AtttborjtJ would reimbprse th~ State {O~ construction engineeri!!g personner
I!!d services below the Jc"c:J of R.esideD[ Engineer~ Tbe Alitbodty .... ould p·rovj.de field
inspec[ot.S as requested by the State tbroogh Constrl;Jctiotli ElIgic~ering Support
CODSU!tants...
The J990 Strategk Plae for COOStTDct>on Ellgineering Services is 55.3.0 million. aD.
increase oC 59.5 milljon (rom the 1989 fIll of 5435 million. Tilis Pia. (c!!cast of $53
miUiQn eqoats 8,6 percent 0( the <J"cra.ll constructed .... a!oe for-Me.asure A projects.,. Vo'e.t1
"'ithim the Stat:·s IBideline o( IIlP 10 18 p~rceBt for construction c[lgiDeerlcg services oc.
Stale projects.
53.0 million oC Uo.is iocruse is utributable to the] 990 f.!.ll increase in coc.str-uct'ion
u:penditllres of $42.1 milli<>n; S4..1 mW;oD isdue to klgber suppoct reQ.uiremeDLS thaD the
1989 tI.u.HQ.::!ired {oc Idmiftlstn tiel'! of non-State sponso.r~d c:onstn~ctioD coe tracts; and'
S2.7 mIllion is renecthe oC attoa] experlcoce on completed Of' nearr!'-complet~d
construction contracts ",)}c:h ~1'\Ie resulted in construction clIgio-eeriDI senl.:es costs of
apPcoxlmatel, • percent oC constructec3 "alue comparec3 to the c:stirnatc:d 7.5 percent
inclcded ia the 1989 St.nUigk PIal.
There are also several constroc(ioD: agreements that .... ere I.'p-pro,..:d vio,r to
development ij{ the ·PaHcy· sucll as the: Goadalupc Corridoe overlag projc~ts... la addition..
tbe Route'S uwer inlercep'lor prOjecl is being, 1!o(atly admiaistered by tbe Cit} of Sam
Jose and tkus lbe Policy docs DOt apply. For these proje.cts. tbe actsa1 CO$t of Construction
Ellgineering S:::r\lkes experienced is faUinl betwceB J2 perClClIt and J5 perc..:nt of
COns.trDCled value.
The (oUowing is a lummuy of tbe: categ()('ic:s that tbe Measure A construction
CODtr3Cts fan imlo Irld the c:sljmal~d percc:ntale: Df COIlSlruc:t;on suppOrt a.c:6v"ities
reQ.aired to be fltnded by the Mc:asure A program for eack catcgol"Y:
1-14
.----".. --.#,.,
..,.
-,
\
\
\
.", \
~--'-
t
,
,
'[ '. '-.... :-:, "t-
•
\
l' ._.~. . .... · .... '.· .. _· .. ·.<i.·.·.~ .• ·./r.·., .•..•.......•... '.". ..' _ .. ~ ' __ " _.0:....-__________ " .. -~ """"~,~."... ___ ,""'_ __ ~.:-...z,<:-" ,~.,~~ ·.~;;;;;~·_"":-:.~~'$~%:A"!;~
.-.. ;
-
o
Agreements aader State Policy
Guadalupe Overlap PlOjects
City Pl"ojc(:ts
Totat
REVENUES
o
Estimlled Millions
S Con sl r\l£.!i.2..g,
620.9
Constr
Engintc'ing
Estimated
%o(Cons.t.
I,D,*,
ao '*' 15.0,*,
ChaDges ja l'cojected M=a~ure A rc .... cnoes have resulted from an iDcrea~ :in the
projected State match (or-the: reccDtI)' funded S[atc/k>cal Partnership SB 300 'progam.
additional interest nrainss... further lise of FAU f1IDd~ a rc-cvaJDation or the value of
ex~css rlgbt~oC-.... a7 planDed (oe sale aDd mu:imjzicg the rCVC:GDC5 from other
coctributioas suell: as the State5~ ["ctrelit .sotlDdwaU prolram. Tilis 'IIpdate includes die
(oUowinl increases'ill program revenues:
Sta l-ejloc:al Partnershjp rna tch
hlterc:st eanllIJ.lg projections
Additional SaJ-e of excess riglltaoC-way
Additjonal FAU rands
M:i~. Increases 1n ether contrjbatjons
S 5.2 million
$29.] million
S 5.0 millioD
S14.9 mimon
SIO.4 milUoD
Actua] uJes tu: rCVeODes ror tb:~ 1989-90 fiscaf year "'ere \ler)' close to what "'as
projected ia the in tbe 111.1)' ]990 SUjltc@'k PlaB... The 1990 S:vategj-e Plat! therefore:
remains 1LDcbangecf_
State Trallsporfatloa Matchilll F.ads·-S.B~ 300
Senate Bi1I 300, adopted by the Calironlia leg~Iature io 1989 and SliDe!! into 1a~'
by the Governor. io.crlldes Ja.!!guage indicating that it is the Legis1ature·s jntent to
Ipp-ropriate $2.0 bilGOD over a Icn-year period bc:gin!:lIns in t},e 1990-91 Fiscal Year ror
1he purpose of funding eligible local projects liP to SO ,percent match.
The Autbodty has appro .... ed applicatioDs (0£ th.is program (or some $441 miIlioo. of
pc-ojcca. The matcllia! ratio 10 ac-tualJ,. be received has :lOW beca. csubHsll.ecl at
approl.imuefy U.s percent lo~ I maximcm £lied varae ror tbe {lrst year oC the program
DC S2SO mi1ljon. Based OQ this. mate. and the propostd project deveJ.opment -mete-ring"
:sehed.Ie. ,Pf"opos-ed in ~ctiO!l 5 (o~ the 1990 ~ tlIis .... in result ia the ~an.::re A
prOlram receiving S27.6 million in sa lOO fandiDI (rom the first yeu of this pi'ogram.
The balance or the Measure A Projects malc'hiog funds will come from tbe second yc:ar
of the Program.
For the purpo~5 of (orecastiDl1otal revemucs lIo.dcr tbe S8 300 p,,-ogram ror tbe
]99-0 l1..!.!!.. a U.s percent match "as a150 beea estimated ror tbe secoed year oC the
program. 01111\is basis the $(coad year of the prolram would provide III c:!ilimated 537.6
millioD ill: SB 300 revenues. The estimated total reVCUDCS rorecast (tom SB lOa iD. the 198~
ll!.!.thereforc 'ave beca iacre35(d ill (he 1990 Plall by SS.2 mimon and e-qca1S6S.2 minioo..
I-IS
'.;. ..
~
•
,t"
Ii
, ,
1
i •
. I
, ,
-I
.
-
•
,
o o
hleresl :EU.liD&1O
Net i:c.teres.1Ur:lings rOof (be 1989 StrjtC:Ric flag "'crc estimated 10 be S64.0 million.
representing carlliegs oOllle Ivailable cask balances dtlrll'lg, the: pofo&ram implcmerH3tton
period.les! estImated sh01't~term bOHO"'ing to meet the schedule's cash now demands. Tnc
1990 f.1..!A is calculated on tbe same basis. The 1990 Pfa:! shows interest earlllcgs.
estimated to be SJ39.SI mimoD. The contintlcd acceTera!c" program sche(juie e\.~D
incJ'Cding tbe ad'·ditional rc:'\I~'W time dis.cussed 1:1:1 sect>on S .. will require sllort-term
borro'll'rnS to meet that .$chcdc.Jc"l cash now demands IDd "'ill result in IclditiO[l31
bono .... ·ing CCI5t5.. Accordicgly. projected Dc:t illterest earnings have: bC:C9 reduced 10 S 13:::.4
millioD... Ho","cvcr. this.is stll] aD improvcmc:Dt of S29.1 miltton over the 19@9.f..!.!A.
Sale of £xce-u LaDd
A=. evaluatioe. aCright of "'ii)' purchased prior to Measer-e A desigll anci eDgiceerin.g
sttldics and Cl:lrrent rigbt of ,..'3r J'Cqu;remcnt~ has identified excess l!lnd holdings, The::
,,'a1'e e of these pcc)perlies w;as S 1 0 mll1ion illl (b e 1989 fIll. The c~rrent c"'311i.a tion results
ill.a projected earnings from tbe sale of e.xcess Jands for the 1990.f.!i..B. of SI5 milHon, or
an inuea~ ill expected reVetu~e or SS milHon.
Oilier CClDtributioDs
The 1990 Plall bas h.rther c"'al11ated tbe contribution'S from o(ber sotlrCCS thar are
u:pected to accrue to the Measure A program. These: other cODuibot)ons i~clude P3Y
backs from the State fof' CaItu.ns projects that ""ere ad\:aDce (Doded by the Traffic
AlIlhority (1ncl'Ddicg R.outc ]01 Lawrence to San Mateo CO'Dnty Line ilnd Silver Creek
Bridge).. I"cimbur~menc fof' eB"ironmental support services C<lDsuJtant CXpellseS that are
-ander contra;:tlO tbe Alltbority tbat arc a Sute responsibility. Q'Dalif)'img SOlil:lcI .... alls ra ...
tbe State"s retrofit souDcillt.'aU program, reimbDrS!mellt for LRT Route 85 mcdiam (05ts
(rom t'be COOIlty, and tbe receipt o( tight o( wa-y commitmcllts (rom local jurisdictioDs
tbat predated' tbeMeasurc A Jegislation.. The 19510 Plam evaluation fo-r these ilems resorts
ill a projected 5]0,4 mHHoo increase in rc:vc!!.u:::s rol" these items.
CASH FLO .. · PL>.N
The cas.h now plsa res;olting from the relienoes and C1.~DlHtures mCIlt}oned abo\c,
and tbe proposed project delivery schedule di~us:seci ill SectIon S, are pcesenteci in Table
1-~ Proposed Capital Financing Program. A ncgatille cash f~o .. : balance: is indicatcd from
Fiscal Year 1993 until tbe last year of the program.. for the 19510 f1..!1!. it i:s assumed that
the cash flo,,· problem ... ·iIl be ad-dres~d tilrougb. shoet-term Dotes oc boods and tbe
expenditures ISsome a 7.0 percellt cosl of bono",·in& (or (his per~od.
The 19B9 ~had jndicated thaI bOf'Towiog would lIal''C lIitd 10 bc:gi. ill the 1992
Fiscal Yea,. During the: 1990 Fiscal Year just ended. the AlIthoC'it)' issued I second Bone!
offering of $:74 millioD. This bas resulted in tbe larger interest eUDings discussed above
and has aUo~'eci the program to proceed as sclledLJlcd until J993 bc:Coce • decis'ioD v .. i.11
'have to be made on. borrclIIing ad·ditwnal tands or mo .. <ing to a pay as YOD 10 bas.is... to
complete tbe imilial program.
l-l6
.,
.. "" :;;
•
,.
\
..
·,:A::: .... .. ···1
I
~
I
" ..
L" .'.
'.
, ' -':'. . '''',; Yii~-Wlc'
--~-----
,~ .,-'
., r'! I
{;o
?:;
• .
$
, :"~ > ' L'
;l~,', ,<:"',, \.~~"-
r~8Le,. 0
SANT~ CL~R~ COUNTY mAPPIC AU'l'HOIII'lY
STRAreOIC PI.~N • JUNE 1990
PROPOSED CAPITAL ~INANCING PROGRAM
($ Million.)
AUTHORITY ReveNVE PROJECTIONS
PRELIMINARY
PISCALYEAA
19B5 19B6 19B7 19BB 1989 1990 1991
SOURCE oP PUNDS
AEVENuE9
sALES TAX 8,3 65,8 69.0 76.5 83,2 89,5 96,6
INTEREST EARNINGS 0,0 2,2 16.6 22,3 26.1 26,3 25.3
PAU CREDrrs 0,0 0,0 3,7 1,2 10,7 37,0 21,0
STAT~DERALG"ANTS 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0.0 0,0 41.3
O'I'HER CONTAlOvnONS 0,0 0,6 1,1 1,0 7,7 0,8 5.3
NET BONO PROCeeDS 1~,O 242,7
nONO AI'::SEAVe PUND 15,0
TOTAL 8,3 68.6 27 .. ,,, 101.4 128,2 411,3 195,4
APPLlCA110N OP PUNOS
PAOORAM EXPeNDmJAEB 0,3 31,A 30,9 ~8.3 93,6 1'11,8 239.6
PAU EXPENorruAES 0.0 10.0 1,4 0,0 1'1.7 ",0 21.&
ADMINISTAAnON & SUPPORT 0.1 1,0 1,3 0.8 1,3 1,2 1.1
BONO De"~ SERVICe 0,0 0,0 26,8 29.8 29."' 153,3 16.1
SURPLUS
TOTAL 0 •• "2.4 60" 68.9 142." 337,1 278.4
CASH AAlANCF. 7,8 34,0 2411.0 780.5 :->66,4 326,6 ?42,6
-------,--.--'---.-. --
,
• "
,-";"'_.,,,,,,,"~ii.\,'
1992
1().4.2
16.3
0,0
31.9
B,O
166,8
2'''.8
0,0
1,1
79,7
295,8
113,7
1993
111,8
•• 2
0,0
7,0
r.'
lM,5
204.0
0.0
1.2
79.7
264,9
~"O,7
"If ~ , ."
),1.'
':-
1994
"9.6
.. 3,5
0,0
8,0
2,0
126.&
96,2
0.0
0.6
79.7
176.6
.. 90,1
.J~".~Y'~
1995 "OTAL
0 •
116.9 841.3
·".0 132.4
0,0 79.5
0,0 9<,2
I, I :MI,2 .... .'
426.7
21.4 42.4
141,4 1762,1
B,I 0 .. ,8
0,0 61,8
0,5 10,2
79,7 670.6
"22.6
68.3 1751.7
"22.6
-,~/
•
'-,.
"
1-"'...... ~-I ~. __ --. " . ,
-
.-
,-
•
'-
o
A SUMMARY OF UNRESOLV[D PROJECT ISSUES
A nomber of issaes that co'01d' impaclptO&ram expenditure! have DO{ be~ll resoh-ed.
Tbese issues ioc!nde tbe remaining Frc:ew:I,. ..... 'reeme!lt consil1cTations... crloresolved
Cluest)oos ot scope. and t1lc: potential oC specIfic Meul,Irc: A commitmects to frler.cue:
Jc'Vc:usc in the State Transportation Improvement Program {STIPj 'process. A brief
discusstoD of thc:~ issues (oHows:
Rrlate-' STIP Pnjects
The Measure A Prosram bas idc:rn.if)c:d tbe need (or Ca!trans to deHlop state: .i.Sb ... ·a]'
impco"ilcmcnts related to Mc:.uurc A projects that .... 0'01.:1 be: most ~Ds:t-Cr[ccti.ve jf
developed cODClinentl,.. 01' ja CODjUDctio.c.. wltll1he Measure: .... prCignm.
RQpte nO/lO] Separatiog Structure
III order to p-rovidc cigbt Tanes o( traffic lbroDg\ the t1himate c-ollfiglilrauon (or the
880}JO) intercbang.e. a STIP project (N leplacc.meD[ of the S80nOJ ~para6oa.
s.tructlJre must be completed first. Calt1ans orlginany identified a S12.6 m.jl1iol1
ST[P p('oject (Of' replacement DC tbe s.epara6on slTuCt'tlr~ and related iDten:hange
ramp imp-rov~ments that is consistent w'itll CaJtrans· ultimate interchange
<onf.igura6on. T~Is c::;timate llas reccntly beeR revis:d in the 3S percent design
package to S17.1 million. The s.tate is currently ,PcrsolIlg funds througll: the STJP
process to pay [or 1hese imp.rovemeats.
The: Ronte 8&O}101 lDterc:hange .is cuerently nnked as the !lumber-ODe priority
ljgll..,ayimpcovement projecti:l1he CDtl.r( Bay Area) 990 STIP by the MeU'opoHta:e
Transportation Commission. Eve. so. ('Dndins (or 1990 STIP ll.igb. 'Vo'ay projects is nO{
e.xpectec! to be: .... ailable Crom tbe State 8ctilthe 1994/95 fiscal year. Tbe Authority
is.. therefore. advancing hods (Of' f.ina' desrg. services {or the-:s.e improvements
t~roDgh tl:Je 6.5 percen[ 5u.bmittal sta,e .Pending tl:Je a·uilabi.lity of State funds. If
t1li3 project is to remain OD s.ellech:le Cor-completion. in. 1992, the A tI tllof'"hy rna)':ha ve
to consider advaDcin& the CODstrUctton fll.Dds ba~d on a guaranteed pa)'back from
the State.
Bpure BBQ!237 Ultimate SU2ed Cons.uu£ligtl
Caltra ns lias divided tbo: cltima te placned improvements:a. rbe &80)237 iLterc:baIlgc
int-o three stages of con5truc6on~ Stages A. B .nc:! C. Stage A is a S60 million p.rojecl
putiany [ulld(:d ill tbe Mea.stlore A leitial Plaa (MSA s04·]{)/l1 .. 109·S). Stages Band
C arc Completion Plan .PI't:-jccts (MSA lO4·2) vallJed at S33.0 millLoD Ind S52.0
millioD,. respcctivefy.
r. Of'der to provide immediate congestion relief 10 the traveling pubtic at a J.oW-<:OSl
re!ltivc to subs.eqlleal stl,U of cons.truction.,. the A lItbor!t)' is po.TS'tl in! devdopmen t
or. package or Near·Term Jmpro\lcme:llts (or tbe intercban,e. TbeS(: Near·Term
lmp-rovemen ts totl1 sa.l million and include rilht·or -wa y iIII cQuisition (S3.e m itljo c.),
utilily relocation (SO .• miU;oa).. and construction ($5.0 mHl.ion).
CaTtrallS lias. agreed 10 des.iBD .nd' constru-:'I tbe ,Port;OI3 of I'll=: Ne:ar·Term
Improvemellts alonl R.otlte ISO IS part or Iheir-itoute 180 ";dcniflg projecL
Ciltrans has yet to define the exlclU 0.( dcsisa OJ consullctio:c a~[ivi6e.s necessary
to c:f(c1:t tbes«: improvc:cments.
HI
.-""'--.. :~ ...•. --
.;:) ..
;~:
•
I
--.J
''-,
I ,
, I
1
I
1
j
1
1
1
o o
The Traffic Authority (lIr1din. eommitmeel to:, tile: balance of th~ Stage A project
(MSA 304-10. I SS4.S milli-on project i1ll 1ouI) is StJ.9 mi11iotl. This figl,lrc
corresponds to thc $CO.O millioa loul included in the l!l.n. Jess tbe $!I.J milliol1
prOBTammed 'te Ncar Term Improvements.
The Stl!t I')f other fUDdicl SCollTCCS wiU be reQuired to p'Tovii1e the b1.Iat'l.ce of S41.6
milHoa iD order (or Stale A to proceed. TlIis project is tbe D'Ilmbu twa projc.cc ill;
Santa Clara COllDt, in terms of pri¢Tit1 10 receive 1990 STIP CandiD!. The current
STJP (undiD. rcqtlc~t caiJs for $45 mi1!ioD in State construction and ri!!b[-or-~·a.}'
funding phased ever a five year puiod. E"cli if acccptcd~ tbe first years fU!l;jinl
is not upcctcd tlDtl1 the 1994/95 fiscal year. Tbc: [i"Injng or STIP fundicg {'Or tbis
project .... ill l.tmos.t cert3.i1'lIy lUll beyond tbe tentlre. of the MeaS'Ufe A prC~ram.
Thy.!. the ability to complete: Scale A impro y cmest5 wicfl:ia the MeaS'ure A
utnefn.me is stillllllCtnalll.
llotlte 111 Nortlt Side linpnnmeau
The North Sbon.tine Boulevard (for-mcll., Sticrtin R.oad} cvcrcI"Ossl!11 on Route 10 I
is just north of c'be cotlDtctiol1 o( Roule 1$ and Roule 10J. Tile City o( MouotillD View
is c:s.pandiDI tnc Nonlt ShOfcline Boa.Tevald; QvCtcr'OSsi'Dl in con3tulction wite Measure.4..
replacemenc of thc existing overerossina.-The uistiel overerossing must be replac-:-d 1'0
increase tbe s.pa .. O .... CI R.outc 101 to ae~ommodatc 'J.1l improved; co11ecto,r toad s~stem foc
the Rout!. 'S}lOl iDtcrchamgc complcx., Tilis revision will pt'ovide better mainline
Creewa, oper'lticn\ by movins "'Weaving/rocraiDI activities to collector rO-ads.
Durinl preliminary design sttidic.~ 1.8 attenau'Yc "Ifi.S proposed to p:r-o'lidc acc!ss
betweea nort.!lboDnc:! R.oute .S/lOI alld: westbound' R.oa.te 10J by providing as ad,ditlonJJ
n,mp and stnlc-ture. TtLis alter-oative would mail1taiD. a nonhboo.nd mO'Yemcat ~·i-::.hout
v)olatrol welvinl Of' mer-giag d.e!igD sundards.. The cost is approximately SS milJi.C''!l fo~
..... hich no fundic.1 has 'betll idemtified.
The p.referred Route 101/lS Imrercnanse dcsiga atso proposes to close L~Aven.lda at
NoctJa. Shocelinc Botrlevard "lid replace access to Nor-til Shoreline Boulevard witll a new
conoectO!' road bet ..... cc'll l."Avcnida and Pear Avelluc. The Count)' of Sun3. Ctan is
opposed to tbe: closure: of L~Avcnida becali1~ it .... ill reqoire tbe rerooting of buses from
the County", Nortll CoaclL Terminal.. Fa-oding (or this connector road "'as not been
ide.ntifl.ed.
Studies wIU cOlltillllC:O determine the most benericial and cos.t-.(:Ue:cliv:: c:!cslg::a to
pursue in. final piaen.in, states that will meet an puties fechnicaI anc:! ec:onomic: concerns.
F •• diaC loc the: KOllle: 137fM,aa:d't/Mi.dclldie:1d lateTcll,ut,e Compru::
Trarfic Autnocitr cortsuttants lIavc: completed :a (oc.cep-tual d(sigm. iN the
iDtercJJamlc 00 Route 2)7 u Maod.e Avcmoe and Md,d1.eneld Road. The prcfl:rred
alternati1le is projec:ted 10 cost S I 15.9 milHoo. (or construction~ and SIl.S milti-oo. for rilht
of·way (oe • toul cost o( S3O.7 mill;on. Partjaf (ulodina (oe ,he il:lferc1:langl: of S3.S
miJHoD. (or ri&b[-o(-"Il' and S15.6 million Cor const1uction Cor I tot.al or S10.1 miHion is
inclgdcd in the J990 SrrafeRH: PIaL Filodini from otber 50urces must be idcc.tified to
provide the balance or t1'le reqfilired hnc!s.. LOCll hodillg conditions are also being
ca:amined. .
l-l9 -
•
•
..
\
\
\
\
, -'\ . '-'. -
7::"'1,--,,-, ',',' . ,-:-'-.. "l '
/--
'-.--
.".
i
l
-
•
-~.'
o o
Rout~ IS/280 hterc ••• ee
The preferred conceptual Icomc:trk for t'be Roote: 85/280 hltercl!acse l'cscIts In
cosU excc:cdilll the available blldgC:l Lov.'-cost alternatives for the improvements !o tl:!e
Roctc 15j280 1c.lcrchangc Irc c:~nentl)' bcins stud~erj. The initial plan includes
cODstructing the northboulld impfovc:mclIts: idcl!l.tifjed in the J939.f.l.l.n.. The SoolnbbotJnd
improveme!llts..recec.t1y identified ..... iIl k added to tbc CompJc:tjoD P)aa. The nonb'bol:cd
improvements and' I traffic mjtiSltlon It uide arc CllrtCntJ')I included jQ; tlle Slr!!tegic
f1..!.n. at Si.5 mm;oIl Ind.a additional 500.9 mil!ion in cDDtil:lgcncy (or f"Cccotly identified
potentia] souDdwaU extensiOOL The sotlthbotlnd impco .... ernents arc currently in tbe
compTctWD pTa'!! U S4.0 miWon (or COl1strocwn.
RGute 137JMatllifda A't'uae
The KOpe of jmpro\le:m~!Its (or tbis project :arc: dc:~ndcIlt IIpon conceprual
engincerinl studies curreEltly lI!lderway by tbe Cjt1 0( SUlll:J)'vak. It is ilIlticipated tbat
the s-c:opc oC the project will be solidified duiIlI the summer of this year.
At tbe Rout'C IS/n intcl"challgc. the ill2....S1.rateaK: flam jDclud~d it balf diamond
intcn;hange at Basc:om AVC:Eluc witllnmps to aDd from [:be south. The To"'n of Los G;uos
indicated its supporl oC a rau ictercbaoJ!:e at Ba.s.com~ lh~ City oC SaD Jose expressed
slgaifica:at COllcen regardinSI {pll i:Clercllnge based on u.tkipatec.f impacts to local
traffic pauc:u.5. AU puties have receally agreed 10 construct a (1111 i~terchange at
BascoD.! witb conditions. Tbese conditions includ~ ,.,jdeEling Lo~ Ga 105 Boaleval'd bctweer.::
tbe freeway con'd·or-an_d Lark A veDue (rom Iwo to six lalles pctoc 10 cODstruCtloCi of tbe
(all Bas;-om Intercha.Elle. estabtishinl I consensus (0£ I process to Icl1ievc consensus) OIl
the in tensifj.ca6oD oC land usc i. the ... kiajty I)f the Bascom blierchalZge. alld preparu;oll
oC a J.oc-.d traffic: mitillUOD pha ror the Iffected joTisdi.:tions. FUlldiDg 'is pro~ed ia
the Draft 1990 StratelZic Plj" to cO\ler tile:. construction requirements associated' ~..rth tbc:
two additional ramps at Bascom. AsstlmiIlJ!:, CUl'ldjIl! caa be identified 10 ..,idell LOSG3tOS
BODIevard IDd consensus is reacbed On tlle otller conditjons. tbc lDlI intC'r.cnange at
Bascom "iII be CODstrllcled iill coajuactioa witA the Route ISft) [Dtercbang::. Tbe
A 11 tb O£it)' is curren tIy purstliIllstgdies 10 determine: alterna tive funding scenari os for tbe
w;deaing of Los Gatos Boolevard.
The Rocte IS EIRlEIS included a (~n iDtercbange at 'lncbestcr BotJJe .. ':ard.'. The
Tow. of Los Gatos was cODce:nll:c.f Ibout the Ilegative traffic impa.cts of !. hn
intercoaDge. w1lile: tbe Cities or Ca[JJpbe~ Sa. Jose all d Saratoga fa vOfcd c:cr:su~::t;otl of.
at least, a partial interchaDle. Now tllu tbe Route 8S/17 1llter.:llallgc tuffi.c anaTysishas.
bees completed~ the Tow. of Los Gatos lias agreed to .. bat{ j!ltc:rchallge aE -a-jnchestC'r
that wit} provide ramps to and (rom the I10f'tlll as SOrlB IS it is eonstructed no soocer thaZl!
t:be hn intercbaDse a I Bascom A "eElue. The 19&9 Strategic Pla 1:1 was ba~d' on tlilis crIteria
a:cd c:cntiDtles on t:be "me basis i!!i tbe J990 llt..!..
STATUS OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS
A key element (oe eac. project scbea~le is the compJetjoa or its cll.vironmeDta!
docamellt., because rigIU4·"I,. ICQuisi60u alld cocstruCI;OD c:alluOf: pf'oceed lIo'jt:bollt
C8vironme81at cleaUDce.
Tbe environmciltal d«:l1mcllts for R.octe IS.lhc Imterlm Widening Projectl'egative
[)cclaration (ND) arid the West VaHey CClHjd'or EBvirocmeDtal Impact Statement (IJS)
1-20
•
, "
I
;:"
I ,
I
•
\
\
\
l
\
\
"~'·_"-'.~"l' .
;
...... ':~ -
'~~.
--1""
1
J
I
j
j .,
~
'f
i
l
1
-
)
have: been completed. Tt.e NCSoithc: Declaration wa.s approve", ift Fcbruary .. 19811lnd the
EJR/EIS was approyed' ia November. 191". ]a. order to evaluate desi.s81lteraativcs to the
approved p(ajce-loa nppfcmcDtal EllviroDmcllItal Impact Rcpoct (EIR) was prepared for
the BUl!lham Lane ovcrcrossiDa.. Thls supplemental EIR..,a.s approved illi At:gust 1988.
Ia aDticipation thai ~ha:aBcs "ill ocC'ur 10 Jarge projcet~ botla the NaticmJI
Eaviroamental Policy Act (NEJ"A)lnd tbc Califoni. Ellvironmcntal Quality Acl (CEQA)
have established' processes 10 address these cltaDlcs,. tbe Reevaluation oC. Fi.nal ErS .and
•• AddeDduMto a. EIR. Caftrl'Rs.. tbe Federal Hishwa'1 Administration (FHWA) and the
Traffic AathOf'ity IBn::ed that Rec:valuatioD/Add'c:ndllm documects should be prepared
as DtCessary to assess the Rotue 1.5 project c-'haDles..
The first Reevaluation/Addendum "u app-rovc:d by tbe FHWA JOc! Cattnns in
J .. IJ~ 1919. The second dnfr Ree\laluaioD/Add~o:dum WIS pre.,ared ia May. ]990 and seDt
10 Caltrans/FHWA foc rc",ieW' and comme.acs. Tbe doctlmellts make rec(lmmendatioas OD
",m~tlts where no additiollll eavuonmcDtal review is required and the project may
proceed. It lIso idc!ltif.ies segments ... bea ellall!,es ba'llc occurred aed ruther desilD and
e.'lIironmenta! studies arc reQ.aITed to determine jf a 5upplemeutal E1SIEIR may be
necessary. The Authority is expected' to re"'ie ... • tacse docume!lts ia AUluS!.. ]990.
Route 101 improvemeau involve [j'lle separa:e cllviTonmeotal documents.. The last
of the n"'e documents.. a Negative Declaration fo-r Route 10) wideaiZlI bet"'ecll tnc
Routes 280/680/101 intcrchallge and Trimble Road/De La ern Boule .... ard. was appro'\'ed
ill April, 1989,
Route 237 improvcme!lts lrc: covuc:d' by the TriaD ale S.tudy :ElS aDd Ronte .237
(MatA.jlda to ROt>te SSO) EIS. The Route 211 E)S ~hedmle is schedaled {or approval iD
11lr, .. 1990. The Triallgle Study E1S scbedaTe is currently being prepared based ':lpon
receat resolution or conccpt~al desjlll issues.. It is expected that a final scbec:!ule "'ilI be:
pi"cpared in mid-Ansas.!.. ]990.
The Measure: A eavironmenta] documCllts are dtsc\lss.ed (crther ill. SectjOD."
1-21
" ,
•
•
\
\
\
·l .
\
\
\ ,
, ,
.J