Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout0344.000- .:;,-. /.. -- .~. ~. .... .. , ~. '. " -. " j . ",-.~ .June 7, 1990 THE HONORABLE CITY ~~CIL Palo Alto, california Consultant services for 'l'A~.g.~;t .. j:"nergy storage Monitoring Project Members of Council: This report recommends that Council authorize an agreement with California Micro Utility. Inc .. (oro) in the amount of $41 .. 10'0" to provide specialIzed consulting services for the expansion of the Thermal Enerqy Storaqe (TES} Monitoring project.. Council is also requested to authorize $4,110 for change orders to cover additional costs if necessary. Although funds were approved in the 1989-90 budget, this project was inadvertently left off the list of projects submitted to the Finance and PUblic Works (F'PW) Committ.ee (CHR:312:9) for deter.in~tion o~ committee interest in consultant selection approval. 'lihis project is being submitted directly to City council for approval for the folloving reasons: 1.. Cost of Project: Cost red·uctio..'1 is contingent upon approval date. F*PW revie~ would delay Council approval and. s·.lbsequently. start of the project until late July. This ~ould cause staff to miss ~he window of opportunity in the design phase for at least one customer and add approx-imately $~. 00,0 to the installed cost .. 2. Type of Project~ The p.roject is staightf"onrard. It is an expansion of an existing council-approved project. It will connect five new customer sites to a monitoring system that presently collects data for two customer sites. CKR:3H:O • l '.( \ , , \ , \ \ \ "\1<. - .~ .. "~ -!" I I I I I I I I r-I - ----r- e .. .: ~ • _-_-__ -_-_---__ -~~_~ __ -, _____ L __ -" - J. Background o Consultant [or Project. Consultant selection is uncontested. ~he same consultant is reoorn~ended for tbe expansion that designed t~e existing system~ The consultant is ~ell ~alified and will perform the ~ork at a reasonable cost. On December 11 .. 198"1 Cou·ncil, authorized: (CMR:564:7) an agreement with CMU to design and supervise the installation of a custo~ized TES monitoring system at tyO of Palo Alto Utilities' customer sites. CMU was selected as the proj~~t manager because of its unique experience vith TES monitoring~ The system has successfully collected customer data since September 1988. The final deliverables of the initial project ~ere completed April 18.. 1990~ The Objective of this current project is to expand the monitoring systen to include the five new TES systems installed since the start of the monitoring project. The expanded syste~ would p~ovide the Otilities Department with valuable electric load research data. The air conditioning loads measured by the TES monitoring systea are a representative sample of the significant load Which drives the City's electric demand peak. The comprehensive data profile yould be used in electric load forecasting. Monitoring the new TES systems also ~ould determine ~etber the customer's systeD performs for the five years required by the PARTNERS TES installation agreement. The data can also be used to verify the accuracy of Time of Day demand billinq for TES customers as provided in the Utilities' E-2 rate schedule. Tbe data ~ould also be used tor evaluation of the PARTNERS electric incentive program. To accomplish Palo Alto's objective in this project~ it is necessary to hire an experienced ~sultant familiar ~ith TES ~onitorin9 systeD desiqn. CMU has comprebensive kno~ledge in TES monitoring and bas designed 15 sites for Pacific Gas and Electric. CMU bas previous experience vith Palo Alto's custom monitoring system and would provide the City with a compatible expansion to the original project for a reasonable cost. The oonsultantls work is specified in the attached proposal. The work for each of the five sites includes: ,'l.ssessmcnt of site feasibility, productIon of design specifications. project Eanagement during the installation phase~ addition of the CMR,)H:() -- • , ....: , .' '. '. -, \, .,.', \ \ \ -, ~~,~, \ , " . , . '. - .~ " < .-. , . feasible sites into the system software and modification of the user's aanual . CMUls quote of $47.10G is reasonable for the scope of ~ork requested. Funds are budgeted in the fiscal year 1989-1990 operating budget~ Hardware requirements will be deterained subsequent to the consultant's design work and will be funded from fiscal year 1990-1~91 funds. Recommendations staff recoJlUlleoos that council: 1. 2, Autbori~e the Mayor to e~ecute tbe attacbed aqreement with California Micro utility. Inc. in the amount of $41 .. 100 to p·rovide specialized consulting services for the expansion of the TES monitoring project~ Authorize staff to execute change orders in an amount not ~o exceed $4,110. Respectfully sub.itted~ -----'} rtA·., V oove<,<-1.:1 i-? r PETER GOVEA Program Coordinator, Energy Services /~~_M . RICHARD L. YOONF" Director of utilities Assistant city Manager Attachments QIR:]U:G "",---'"7 L \ - • . , I • [ . : r·.· I I I -' _ c .. '- • • -.--"-- /'--- AGREEMENT No. __ . (l1!;:tt 'll<M':tFl RV'e:RRED TO AS CONTRACTOA'.; "'" G(Jt.;.SIDEqAi.o~, Of' iKEI," iIoIUTU.o.L CO\. EV!'.c:i, T-IE f>A"~'E:S H!:.RETO AGJltEE ".S FOUOl'iS • CONTRACTOR SHA.LL ",ROVrne CoR FURN.'S~ T!-1E F':lI .. :JJWi'I',G s.PEC;IFIE D ,'>C",'.1CE S "'<C"Qt'.~! C of' ":11 :.5 5?~If";E ~ IN E"HI8.IT ______ ~ A r f ACHl; t' ><~"I£10 AND 1NC000000000TED "ERErJ\l 81' THIS RE:';;Ei"E:"K.E ~nlcEs shaH be pravicf€d by Contractor, ""hose unique qualiffcations the City is re1ying or.. S.enices to be prollfded for de\lE:loping tr,ermaT er,ergy st,Jrage me,r;itorfng at five sites 1'1 Palo }i,lto,. ;111 accordance with co,nplete scoiJ€ of .... ork. set f,jf'th 7:'1 Exnibit A~ • EXHl~TS THE .FOllOWING .t.TIACHED EXd18lTS KfF;t:SY ,~~E ~,l,!,)E. P",-'1, O. T"'~S A'J':kE~E'\;T A "Sr.:ope of \Jark" B -·Contract Bu~get· • TERMS THE SERVICeS AND~ lOlA i£R~S FUR~SH.t(j. U~IDEA nilS .l\c-.. ~(t:·JE·oIT SH~~L CCi,!~,I(:-o.:::,,; c~, t.:~.e d _~ . .t~ 5 hawn abo ~ e ANC-5!-'.I\L1 13.( COM"'t.ErmElEFOl'IE __ Ju.ne ~ .. 1991~ _ .. _~_ ..... ~_ - • COMPENSATK>N FOf'I '!h'EFUU.F'~RFOfNA~E"G~ T""S""-'R1.[~::·lf ill:. ClrYS.t.l\i-LPMCDNTAACTQR. a total amO(int net to eKceed 547.100 u!',<ioe.r th,ls. Ag<!"eement. Co(,tract'Jr shall SlJ1:lmH montl:!1, il'woice;;; to City for paymef1t~ in accordaTlce \ljHh the budget set f0-rth ~J~~It:'OhUJ~U~U 1111 Exll1'ib; t B attached hereto o>'1d inccrpc)rated hE:rein by tM1S reference~ Citj s~dll pay Contractor witnin thifty (30) days of receipt of such imroices. • PAYMENT RECORD ~ARmEi'OT USE 'F\EVf.RSE 5'0t-.• • GENERAL TERMS AND CONO£TtONS P.RE rNr".;'.UD£D O~. BQ;rK SfOES OF TroiS D·CtCUI,.~.ro.T rw<; AI"RE::~I~~F SH,;,j.L BECOME F"mcTlI.'E UPG~ ~H A?PftQ'.'il,j. J\'jiJ E.(f':lii,O~ S" cln. 1-'" W'T·I~SS.l:-"R, )~. T~E PAP-TlES H,I'/E n~C',,'!D r,.:5 M.iF',uIlOl1:'] f:1!: OA'I.li1JN.fH. A/IOO YEAR FIRST w;'=IIITE:'Il .!2D'JE t4::-11! flARftI'lfSS, (r)fIJ.rF:,lI,CTOR .:I\l't:eS ro inj.mr:ifl; Qol"ml Jntj ~cl~ ~~r'n:e,~ Cil'! II~, ~l"ico":> a-;,r,~, anc ~,,·~;n'.,,'"~ I::," a<')' aJ'l[f dn [fema"~ cla'r1'S 0' II~I;I;':J' ,~ ~"'. n ,trLr:~ 1·1(:u.-llng w'[)n~JI d~~!h. tJ<I,tC !:l)' (lr JI'! >I;l~ c~1 ~I C ,.,.",.,c,,~ :0" So, rt, ~~,,:""S a~-:! '1S (II e''''p:':'f~ '" ""';:' J~1t l1:.1'!, e"c.,,", (l' O'"JI',.l'U"~ r;;r ""IU rr,'" Jr':h:, ,J< c""rI'JCI tur 1lI'1>ctl:Jle :"'IIIr.-·.D'~se~ ~,,-;1 :lJ~II,t'i ')11 C-:'~~~:'!'( f.)R 1r1:tl~ ~"~"-m,Jn-:e-::v ~JII",,-, rlJ ~~""j"r'''' . """"~"~"11 ~ CCJ~I;F.II:iC.R till LRf ~CRFEME ~T. HII'. "M;l r~e In~nt iJllUtlJ:Je'-(rs .JI.) j:1l.n~I~.llin.:; or-:·h~ .. 'l:.';"r.,:; .. !";~':":if ·~w·:~~n! it;~ "n:,,? J';~ ;,~ ,~': n.· ... ~I:r, 11', • .0,1 ~>t:5 "'!~ :e".Jl~r.r ~') ..... ;J [J'JI~ ,~ ,wli .:~:~ ." t!1. e :1111~nl~:II. matfflals (]I' su;op:ies ur pJj "'~1I1 t()r >1;1 ", ~ \'o'!'1!':h "':l~ ~ :ll~ >utJ,;,-;1 ,:rI ~,:; ';0:1,,': ~,., r.,:;,,' '-ilj"~~:l1';~1!, rep--e~~n:a! ": :IS ":~':".:'" ,I­ II.':; ,1!.It",;", oj'~ ulld~"dklll~~ 1IIt1t;1l'er olrar ()T '.-"tl"l1 J:~ s:lDer; .. d~(l "=r~!,)~ • >L i'T L lftdsay JoyE' ----- ~~ i) ; ~ 1_ ~.?I Ene ~.gLS.~E~_.!.ce s F 0 80)( lC2!:lO PALO At. lO, CA 9-:1303 Tclc-,:.hone _329-.2.~.el'_ • iNVOICING 50: NQ "'l.l tN\lOC-ES Xl THE CIT 0( ~J';'" fR~-J.'(;:T ~'''~'''''--,E'' . a fV OF PALO ALTO APPROVALS~ lf1Jo.f:: fC,R ;;1(,;,rJII." .. 'p",s ACCOR(qt>.c" TO '.c: • .1'*'l~~". "?FFtCI/b,l80xl$SELO\"{; r. ,.,,; "" . (jr":;~;'~:"t~ ":;,;';Ci; II" ',~V;,: ;~~i ".':."","'" en'> ""NAGE~ ss'o'ru"'_ t--- a ~ _ -----~ "C'fYii ....... GER 161 r ;;~'JC:- I " '"':#-""'-~. 'L - l­ I I [ I I , r t I r • ~- \ ., • - I £) ~ Scope 0/ Won This scope 0( work describes fr.e taslcs required for Cont! actor 10 add Ii_. 3dd'~tional thermal cnerg) storage: (rES) cust0mer sites to tbe exi ... tTng Cit)' of P2to MI.) TES monitoring system.. It co\;ers initial site visits to determine: feasibility. Jonowed by the deve\opment of. monitoring ptans, equlpment specifica60os..w and project management of the instanatFon. Finany~ it includes connecting the sites to the existing ddta S\'stem in the same manner as the t\Iw'o eristing sites. The exlsttng site descriPt;oru;, additional sites and the TES monitoring system are dcscnbed in Appendices A, Band C to this Exhibit A, which are made a part hereof by Ibis reference. C-ontractoc shaD perform an worK required Co complete scope as defined herein. Project scope is d""tvided into three phases: site feasibility, design specificationsTproject management and start-llpldocurnentarlon. Site Feasibility to include: but Dot limited '0: a. Site Sa rvey Contractor shaD: i Verify the prellminary data aboLit each site and collect additional rete\lant data. Th'is may require several site visits. Initial vis.i-t '\With the ClJstomer is 10 be scheduled -with uty Utilities" staff. n. &amine the c~tomer'5 monitoring ~quipmen~ if aD),. and .evaluate: the potential for h"1terfaC( .,.ith City monitori!1g system. iii. Determine if the e.;s.ential equipmt=nt loads are me:a'Sur:ab~e. iv~ Ex.<'l.minc the space constraints and equiprncut proximity 10 the electrical panels. ..... Determine any access constraints. This includes. availability of phone line access ;and any seCUT~ty res.tri...--tions. b. She Evaluation Contractor ~ban: i Provide a brief report d'~$(.TibLng rea.sons fO! any non-fc::aslble sites. 1 . " • \ , " \ "' , I f , , ';' , t I i r ! , : .. ----' .' . 2 c.-n.......d: o o iL Produce a preliminary monitoring equipment list and cost estimate lor bard\l,'are requirements foe feasible sites. as. weD as preliminary cost estimate for any centra! station programming required. Consultation Contractor sbaD: i Discus'S site feasibility with C~ty representat.':ve. ii. Upon City appr",'at. proceed tD Dert pbase ol scope. Design Specif)Ca~onslProlect Management Contractor-shan: a. Produce drawings and equipment specifications sufficient foc an t:lectncal contractor 10 supply, assemble and instarl tbe components. The electrical contractor shaD be contracted separately with Oty. b. Provide project management services. during the ins-taDatioo pnase of monitoring equlpment. Start-uplDocumentation Contractor sball: Program Central Station software 10 retrieve data from new site5 and to proouce repacts. Produce scbernatic diagraiTI or metering equipment and instaTIation foc each monItored site. Update operations manual to indtide identiffCar"ion paramerers 0{ new sites and any otner cnanges. This includes pulse counts, rou Ttip uers,. e t.c. ~onlract Schedule ' ... Contract inItia ted Srte Feasibility pb<l5e completed - DesignJSpeciflCations phase completed - ElectrkaI cootraC1oc contract irUtlated Hardware instaTIation Start-uplDocumentatioc phase cornf"kted - 2 June, 1990 July 30, 1990 August 3{} .. 1990 September 15, 1990 (}. .. tober 15, 1990 November 15, 1990 ~---.. - t ~-.'.j., - .~ ~:. ~~:, , " f . ' f.-s r , , ! Contractoc shall provide the fQlIowing DeUverables A!> de~d in Scope: <:;'~f~lc i . ~,. ".':.::~l:!,-~ ~ ~~; .", 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Feasibility Repoct L NarratIve for nOD-feasible sites. (see Scope: 1,bJ.) b. Narrative and preliminary cost 'estimate for fe.sible sites. (Scope: l,b,ii.) (:. Narrati. ... e and preliminary ~ost estimate {C\{ Central Station programmjng contingent upon cost e.tirn.tion. (Scope: 1,b;1.) DesignJSpeci&ations ror all feasible and cost-justified sites. (see Scope: 2, a.) Project Management (as de.cribcd in Scope: 2,b.) Central station progr.mmlng (Scope: 3, a) Schematic OJagrams (Scope: :>, a.) Update operations manual. (Scope: 3, c.) 3 ' .... ,.~ '. 1. 2. 1. • \ o Appendix A 10 ExhibIt A F.xisting Site Description Cb~nning House • 8~ Webstec. The TES sy>tem is • full stor.ge sy>tem that uses ice stOrage tanks manufactured by Calmac. The s}'stem bas been operational since May 1981. TES Monitoring regan September 1'lS8 .Dd CDnecls data on eIght channels: I) compressor kW, 2) glycol pumps kW, 3) chilled .... ter pumps kW, 4) coodenscr pumps kW, S) cooling load Ions, 6) maIn bu~ding meter kW, 7) .mbient lemperature and 8) lotal cooflng tW. • AJza -950 Page Mill: The fuD storage: turbo ice-harvesting YES system has been on­ line: since January 1988. TES monitoring began September ]988 and conects data on: 1) compressoc tW, 2) chilled "'ater pumps kW, 3) condenser pumps kW, 4) recirculating pump kW, 5) cooftDg load IOns, 6) room temperature, 7) ambient temperature and 8) total cooling tW. AppenclL~ B I<> ExhibIt A Additional Sites Varian.. BUilding 1 -611 Hansell Wa'Ji": The Calma<: ice storage: tanks instaTIed in Oc!OOer 1988 prcMde fun .torege for Builcfmg 1'. peal< load of 66(} IDTIS. Varian has a TraDe Energy Management System .,.,rues. monitors,: o compressor status o pumps status o COOling tower fans status o TES valve posi60ns o chilled water supply and return temperature Reports from this monitoring system sbow Dumber of c-'hille£ starts and runtime llou[s per month. No load data (m 1ions) is conected. Acces.s to -ars. requires S[I.!ARTCOM and a 120() baud modem. 4 __ ... l1li_"2 ',!Ii, ,-.......... ' .... , ...... , ~; .;."""",-'-"';" ... $ -c ..• ';.,".. ""- ~ ;~'L:) ">;i;"". ',_ ... :> ~;'S\.,.< ;q~f'~$4-! . . -.,-. . , "- 2. ..-..... '-3 • yanan. 811Mmg 5 • 3040 Hansen Way: The three buj]dings at thls address are served by • central plaut wit. a peale. load ol 252 Ions.. This fun storage system is also DSing Calmac tanks for ice storage. The tanks and cooling tower are in a pit below gradt;:_ The system is monitored with a Johnson control system (8540).. located in Building 4, and coDects clat. on the folk>wing: o o o o o o " compressor status pumps. status cooling tower fan speed chilled water supply :and return. te~perature condensing water sUW!J and return temperature chmed water flow rate;S percent ke SyntexlSyva.. Building 3: This Dew bullding's -central ptant, ins.taHed in August 1989t also serves buildings 1 and 2. The new plane. peale. load is 1463 toos ol which 276 tons is sbift-ed by a partial ice stOfage system. Ibe ice storage tanks are manufactured by Baltimoce Air Coil Co. No information on tbe monitored points is avallable at this time. 4. Fcrd Aerospace -3875 Fabian Vlav: This system is the only Tram.pbase (eutectic s.a1ts) instanation in Palo Alto~ The system was on~tlne in December" 1989 and has. a peak load of 740 ions... Monitored points are shown in the attached schematic.. Their monitoring computer requires 2: 1200 baud modern foc data retrieval ~ " 5. l..ock~_ed Mi-ssiles and Space -This company is presently examining the feaslbul!y of a E 5(X)..ton load shifttng TES system. The ins1aTIat1o[] is expected to be completed in ~ December, 1990. This site sr,ould be examined fDf potential <:onDectloD '0. O'..!T f exis.ting monitoring system. f s ; j ~ , ~ ., ! j I 1_ 2. 3. 5. -- o o Awe odix C \0 Emibit A Emting Monitoring Sj'$tem Description An sigrojficant components of the TES system are monitored for 10tal electric energy consumption (t\Vh). This includes an space: c:onditkming sys.tem compressors :and pumps in the buil<fmg. Cooling (in tons) delivered by the chiDed water distribution Jcx>p is measured 'Vwitb temperature: sensors and a flow meter and is totalized on sne by a Btu-meter. t'Wh and ton data is recorded in 15 minute: intervals '9.ith a Sangarno Data Star [ccorden.. • Load pulse data from each :site is transfe ned to City Han via modem 10 the Sa ngamo Central Station software and is CGnverted to ASCII text files on ao HP Vectra (PC compatible~ ASCII text files are: k1aded into a custom menu....<J':riverI report generator "";:th graphic­ capabilities. Load data :is analyzed and used k> model performance: of a conventional cCXJTing system to determine the load shifted and overaTI TES, sr-tern performance. , .~ .. "J Exlubit B CODtract Bodgot City shal! pay Contracto.-within thirty (30) days of receipt of monthly invoices foe services provided under t!lis Agreement, in o<cordance with tile foOowing budget: Phase 1. Sit" F eas,bility 1. VlSits, me~tings, tL"lepbone, resear..:h 2. DerIVer Feasibility Report 3. DeEve! Nun-Feasibility Report Phase 2. Design Specifications/Project Management I. Develop Monitoring PlaOiDrawins, 2. Deliver InstaIla60n Specifications 3. Project Management PIlase 3. Start-up!Documenta bon 1. Install New Sites. on Centra! StaGon 2. Update Op<'rations Manual $1860. (I) $1200. (2) $300. (2) $1440. (1) 5480.(2) S2940. (1) $750. (2) 5750. (2) (1) These items are bi11ed eacb 30 days foc the actual110urs s-pent at S60/hr.,. not 10 exceed the stated amounL (2.) These items ate de.1i¥'i:.rabks blTIab1e at a ~tated fi..-v.cJ cost wben de.1i'Jerec. Maximum for a feasible site: Maximom for a non-f~a.s.ibl~ site: Cost for three 'Sites: Cost rex five sites: '> times 59420. 528,260. 5 times 59420. = $47,100. $9420. 52[60. Total payment under this contract snaTI DO{ exceed Forty~&"" ... en Thousand One llundred DoDars ($47,100). 7 , . ~ ,.-. .. -.-' 7 Proposal fu Expand Thermal Energy Storage Mocitoring City of Palo Alto Utlilties April 18, 1990 Suhmitted by Richard C. Rodgers, Jr. Califorcia Micro Utility, Inc. 1195 Park Ave., Suite 202A Emery"ll., CA 94608 (415) 658-1273 -. , o Contents A. Overview \~< )~;< B. Statement cC Work c. Schedule o. Deliverable. E. Cost Proposal F. Experience o. Mere"""" U-P."""""" I. Avallability J. Statement uf Agreement to terms .. . -' . . -'--------~ .. -------.;.., .. --~ A O\'ero..w This propo .. l describes the tasks required to add up to five additional thermal energy storage (TES) customer sites to the existing City DC Palo Alto TES monitoring system.. It covers initiaJ site "islts to determine feasil:ility. foilowed by the development of monitoring p12ns, equipment specifi.cations. and project management of the installation. Fi.n.ally. it includes connecting the sites to the eXlsting data system in the same manner as the two existing 5ite:5. B. Statement of Work The scope of the work eomprises three phases: site reaEibility? design spcrulCations and project management,. and start-up documentation. I. Site Feasibility a. Site Survey i Gather infonnation for each site by telephone and ID8.11. ii. Verify preliminary data and coDed additxmal data with several site visits. iii. Determine if essential loads are measurable. iv. Examine space constraints and location factors. v. Determine ~('cess constraints including telephone lines and security. h. Site Evaluation i. Write l'pporl descnoing reasons for any non-feasible sites. ii. Write a preliminary plan, monitoring equipm<nt list and cost estimate for hardware for feasible sltes. .. ' \ .. I 'f-. ! .~ f :":,~ ~ • r i , 1 :1 c_ i . , o Consultation Discus. site feasibility and results of work to current point of study_ Schedule 1_ Contrad; initiated 5110190 2_ Site Feasibility Phase completed 6flV90 3_ DesignlSpecification. Phase completed 7/10190 •• Installation begun 811190 5. Installation completed 8124J90 6. Start-up Documentation phase completed 917/00 0_ Deliverables As descn"bed in Statement of Wo,k: 1_ Feasibility Repcrt Narrative for non-f€asible sites b_ NllIT2tive and p<eliminary cost estimate for feasible sites. 2. DesignlSpecifications fo< feasible sites 3. Install new sites on central station soft.ware. •• Update operations manual. ',--".' • c, ';~, " ~ -;-.- , ~ : ~ -~ , j ;~ , ,~ ! 'i f p. -~, "'" E. Cost Proposal The foDowing costs ar'! given on a pel' site basis. They are then ~ombined to> give the total fal-Wee and five feasible sites. Site Feasibility 1:. Visi~" meetings_ telepbon.e. researcn 2. Deliver Feasibility Report 3. Deli,,", Non·Feasibility Repart Design Specificati"ns/Proje<:t Managem.,ot 1. DevelDI' Monitoring PlanIDrawings 2. Deliver InoWlaoan Specifi<:auoos 3. Project Management Start-upIl)ocumentation 1. ms!.all New Sites on Central Station 2. Update Operations Manual $1&30. (1) $1200. (2) -. $300.(2) j $1440. (I) $480. (2) $2910. it) $750. (2} $7s.:J. (2) .: .~.-:::. ,,-.~ .;::....ll,,--.:......-- (l) These items are billed eacl130 days lOr the actu.1 hours <pent at $GOIbr., not to> exceed the stated amount. (2) These itelIL'l are deliverables billable at a stated fixed cost when delivered. Maxim= for • feasible site: $11420. $'2100. Maximum for a llOD·feasibfe site: Cost for three sites: Cost m in'. site.: <I times $9~20. ~ $28,200. 5 times $9420. = $41,100. 1 1 I -. - o o ~'. Eq>erie""e See attached resume. G. References Provided on requesL H_ PeTSOllllel Rkhard C. Rodgers. Jr. is the sote person ""orlcing on this contract. Availability 7'be wOI'k can begin as soon as the contract is signed. There are no scheduling conflicts. J . Statement of Agreement to terms I agree to the terms of the contract. ... tr.""' .... I!_I"I,.c-_ ..... IIIi,..' .. ,""'~""1 it-'5-' L __ ~~_,; ~ _ "l~, • .~:-1j..- ~ ":'3~ ~~'{ ,-- • \ '~. ' \ ~ " " " -----~----- o TES MONITORING ~QUEST FOR PROPOSAL Request ,,,, Proposal lor Desig. Senia. lur Expansion of Ex!stiD~ Thermal Ener" Stonge Monitoring Sy.tem Porpose IJNU-'l' The purpooe of this project is t(} connect up 10 five (5) additiooal remote customer sites 10 an existing central statio[} TES monitori..'"1g 'System. The purpose of this Request fa< Proposal is 10 solid, a proposal from California M',cm Utility, Inc. (CMU) 10 pr",1de design. project management and start-op services to bring the acJdioonal sites on-tine. I. Monlt<>red Sites The City ol Palo Aho UtJ.1ities presently bas m0niti.xing eq1Jipment at two tbermal energy storage instarla 6ons. The project ""'as partiany funded by a grant and was ccmpTe'~d Octo«r 1988. Existing equIpment includes: Fouf-<:hannel recorders., Btu-rnekrs, temperature sensors,. flow metef"S and .cllrrt:nt transformers.. A phone line is instaned \0 tbe recorder·s modem 10 anow data. transfer 10 City Halt Existing sites are described m Appe nOll< A 2. Additional Sites J. Four new thermal energy s!!.xage (rES) systems l1ave been instane.d and one system is expected to be instaned 'v/ithin a year. The Ci-ty desires to .connect monitoring equipmellt to these ,ys.tem.s. if feastbie and cost justified. Each .ite and IES system type is described in Appendix B. Existing Monit<>ring System Field data recorders cotlect pulses and are con rJeC1ed. via modem, be the central station at aty Han.. The central stations soft,".:are is loaded QO an HP·Vectra, whiell is IBM PC compatiNe. load pulse <lata is converted to ASL-'I kx.t files v..'hicb are used in a C1Jst:orn menu driven program kJ produce tabular and graphlc data repoets. &e Appendix C fa< further S}>tem des-."ription. 1 '. '\ • • ",''}-- ~~. ':,\! '.--<~ . , • . ,,'. - • ,.; • ;"'-.' .,-.to =c...;, .•.•. ,,"'-"-..;.. __ ~ ..... _ .••. ~ ... __ ""'~~"'''''''''''''''''' ___ ''''''''''_~_-"''''''+' "~r_..,;>;:.'':''':'ir'.:c>-_-:.,'~9t.~ ... ~: _______ ~.,:-:- 1.J2'\RFI' o o Consultant shall perfocm an work required to complete scope as defined herein.. Project scope is divided into three phases; site feasibility. design specifications/project management and start-up/documentation. I. Site FusibIlity 10 include but not Emited 10; a. Site Survey Consu!tant shan: 1. Verif)' the preliminary data about each site and coDect additional relevant data. This may require several she visits. Initial visit with the customer is to be 'SCheduted with Utilities' staii. i. Examine the custorner"'.s monitoring equIpment, if 3ny. and evaluate the porentlal roc interface with our monitoring system. m. Determine if the esse[]tial equipment loads are measurable. iv. Examine the space constraInts and equipmeut proximity to the e 1ectrical pa oels. v. Determine any access constraints. This indudes availability of phone Ene ~ce~ a rid a oy sec urity restrictions.. b. Site Evaluation Consultant shan: i Prcwide: a bOef report describing reawns for any DOD­ feasible sites.. i. Produce a prcllrninary monitoring equipment list and cost estimate foe hardware requIrements foe feasible sites, as ,..'cll as prellminary cost estIm.ate for any central s.tatkm programming required. c, Consultation Consuttanl shan: i Discuss site feasibility ,.,;:th Crty representative, i. Upon aPPfO"'dl, pcoceed to r:;ext pbase d scope. 2. Design SpecifICations/Project Management ConsultaO! sltall: a. b. Produce dra\loings and eqcipmeot specifICations sufficient for an electrical contrd'l..1or 10 supply, assemble an.d in~tal1 the components. The electrical contractor-s.haC be: contracted separately with City. Proo.id'e project management ser.ices during the instanation phase 0{ mooitorirlg equipment. z ~, 0'-" .• - ~ - .' , f I -' . • ! 1 t ! , ~--. • , .. --.J .' I • - 3. Start-uplDocumenlation ConSl;."'.'lDt sball: t. Program Central Station soCNiare \0 retrieve data from ne.;J{ s,ites. and 10 produce re poc1s. b. Produce scbematic diagram of metering equipment and insta11awn foc each monitored sTte~ c. Update operations manual to include identificatioo parameters of new sites and any other changes. This includes pll1se counts, multipliers, e'c. Prvjeded Schedu.le I. 2. 3. <- 5. 6. Contract initiated Site Feasibility phase completed - DesignJSpecifications phase completed ~ Electrical .contraCkX contract initiated Hardware instanation Start-oplDocumentatioc phase completed - As described in Scope: 1. Feasibility Report June, 1990 July 30, 1990 Augu>! 30, 1990 September 15, 1990 October 15, 1990 NO""e mber 15, 1990 a. Narratr..'e foe nOil-feaslble sites. (see Scope: l,b,i) , b. Nanatr..'e and p!efimi:1ary cost estimate (0£ fc:asibie shes. (Scope: 1.b,ii) • (:.. Narrative and pi'ellminary cost estimate roc Ce[jtra~ Station programmIng contingent upc>n cost es.tirnatlo[l.. (Scope: 1.bji.) 2. DesignJSpeciflCations foe an feasible and cost-jusli£ed sites. (see Scope: 2, a.) 3. Project Management (as described in Scope: 2,b.) <-Central s,ation programming (Scope: 3, a.) 5_ Scbematk diagrams (Scope: 3, a.) 6. Upda'" operations manual (Scope: 3, c.) 3 ;, .-, , " '. . --+- f 0",'. o o f_~1 Submittals Proposals shaD contain: L s. 6. 7. Consuttant relevant experience L Familiarity "'th Utllities metering. Thermal Energy Stordge (rES)HY AC systems, Sangamo Central Station software. b. Work experience 0[1 sirrular projects. At least ] references. A fist Q( personnel ",signed to the projecL Proposed cost foe each of. the 3 phases of. projecL a. Assume 2 scenarios: -S feasible of 5 sites investigated,. -3 feasible of 5 sites investigated. b. Include • summary sbeet for p<oposed costs. Commentary on availability for project and projected schedules. Statement of ability 10 compl'J with cooditions 0( agreement bm (attached).. Narrative describing proposed modification, if any, to scope or terms and conditions. 4 f!i~ .••..... III!r:."' ........ -._ . .-... -_.",-, ..... -"'" , , ;. - n - I. 2. I· Appendix A Existing Site Description Channing House • 850 Webst«: The TES 'Y'tem is a fun storage 'Y'tem that uses ice storage tanks manufactured by Ca!mac. The ¥tem has been operational since May 1987. TES Monitoring began September 1988 and conec1S data on eight channels:: 1) compressor kW. 2) glycol pumps kW, 3) cbined water pumps kW. 4) condenser pumps kW, 5) coormg load IOns, 6) main building meter kW, 7) ambient temperature and 8) tctal cooling lW. \ Afza -950 Page Mill: The fuTI storage turbo ice-harvesting TES system bas been O!)­ nne since January 1988. TES monitoring began September 1988 and conects data on: 1) compressor kW, 2) dulled waler pumps kW, 3) condenser pumps ,W, 4) recirculating ""mp kW, 5) cooTIng load IOns, 6) room temperature, 1) ambient temperature and 8) lOtal coonng k W. AppenalX B Addi:tiOnaI Sites Varian. Building l -611 Hansen Volay: The C::!Jmac ice storage tanks instaned in Oc!Ober 1988 provide fun storoge for Building I·, prak Imd of F,6O IOns. Varian bas a Trane Energy Management System which monitors: o .compressor status o pumps status o cooling tower fans status 0. TES vah-"e p;)sltions o c.hilled water supply and return. temperature Repol13 from this monitoring system show D umber of chiller starts and runtime hOUTh per month. No Joad data (in IOns) is conected. Access f,o EMS requires SMARTCOM and a 1200 baud modem. 5 c • ~ t I ; , i : t I ~ r ~ f ~ l f • ! I i ; \ .. , . i • .. . L • \ .--. o o 2. Varian. BuildinS So a .3040 Hansen Wav: The three bui1dings at this address are ser,red by a central plant with • peak load of 252 1Ons. This fun storage system is also "SLng Calmac tankS fo< ice storage. The tanks and cooling \OWer are in • pit below ~rade. The system is monitored with • Johll5Oc coctrol system (8540), located in Building (, and collects data on th.: fona";ng-. o o o " o o o compressoc status pumps status cooling tower fan speed chIDed v;ater supp1y and return temperature condensing water suppl) and return temperature chilled water flow rates percent ice 3. SyntexlSyya, BuilaU)B }: Thts new buildLng's central plant, instaDed in August 1989, also serves boildings 1 and 2. The new plant'. peak load is 1463 tons of which 27ti K>o5 is shifted by a partial ice storage system. The ice stonge tmks are manufactured by Baltimore Ak Co~ Co. No inf'X"matioo ac the monitored poln" is available at this time. (. 5. ford Aerospace. 3815 Fabian Way: This syskm is. tbe only Transphasc (euteL1.ic :salts) instanation in Palo Mo. The system was on-line "in December, 1989 and Ims a peak: load at 740 tons.. ]...fonitoced points are shown in the atta<::bed schematic. Tbc:rr monitoring compute£ requires a 1200 baud modern for data retrieval Lockheed M"lSSiles and Space -This company is presently examIning the feasibility of a 500-ton load sbitting TES system. The instaUation is expected to be completed in December" 1990. This site sbould be examIned for potential connection to our exi>"ting monitoring syste rn. , .-..io. ' ... ----:....--~,," ':""-~, . "' .. ~ .- -' r '. 1. •. ' AppenolX C EJOsting Monitoring System Description All significant components of the TES system are morutor<d roo-\01.11 e1eetric energy consumption (kWb). This indu<ks an space conditioning SJ"em compressors and pump< in the bu~omg. Cooling em IOns) delivered by tll<! chined water ol>tnbutioa 1009 :io; measured with tempenture sensors. aDd a. flo .... meter and :i5. totaftzed 00 5it~ by • 3!1J-meter. 2. tVlb and eon data is recorded in 15 min ute intervals '\Iro1..th So Sangamo Data Star recorders. 3. Load pulse data from each sit~ is ttansferred to City Hall via modem to the Sangamo Central Station software aad is converted to ASCIl lext flles on an HI' Veetr. (PC compatible) 4-. ASC'U Lext files are loaded into a custom ml!uu-dmen report generator ",;,tb grarhic capabilities. 50. 1...0'21.13 data is analyzed and used 1C model performance of a conventional cooling system 10 determine the load shifted and overan T£S sy>tern penormance. 1 --'L-. . ~ .. ~