Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Report 2512-5750CITY OF PALO ALTO CITY COUNCIL Special Meeting Monday, May 18, 2026 Council Chambers & Hybrid 5:30 PM     Agenda Item     13.Cubberley Project: Adopt the Cubberley Conceptual Master Plan and a Resolution Adopting the CEQA Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigated Monitoring and Reporting Program; Receive the Fourth Round of Community Polling Results; and Provide Direction on Next Steps for a Possible Sales Tax Ballot Measure. CEQA Status - A Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS-MND) Report Circulated for Public Review from March 2, 2026, to April 1, 2026. The City published the Final IS-MND on April 9, 2026. Staff Presentation, Public Comment City Council Staff Report From: City Manager Report Type: ACTION ITEMS Lead Department: Community Services Meeting Date: May 18, 2026 Report #:2512-5750 TITLE Cubberley Project: Adopt the Cubberley Conceptual Master Plan and a Resolution Adopting the CEQA Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigated Monitoring and Reporting Program; Receive the Fourth Round of Community Polling Results; and Provide Direction on Next Steps for a Possible Sales Tax Ballot Measure. CEQA Status - A Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS-MND) Report Circulated for Public Review from March 2, 2026, to April 1, 2026. The City published the Final IS-MND on April 9, 2026. RECOMMENDATION Staff and the Planning and Transportation Commission, Architectural Review Board, and Parks and Recreation Commission recommend the City Council: 1. Adopt a Resolution adopting the Final Initial Study Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Project and associated Mitigated Monitoring and Reporting Program (Attachment A); and 2. Adopt the Cubberley Conceptual Master Plan (Attachment B). Staff recommend the City Council review and discuss results of the fourth community poll (Attachment C) and provide direction on next steps. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The City of Palo Alto (City) is advancing a plan to redevelop a 15-acre portion of the Cubberley campus, including seven acres proposed to be purchased from the Palo Alto Unified School District (PAUSD) for $65.5M. The purchase and improvements are dependent on the City identifying funding, such as a successful ballot measure for a sales tax increase, development impact fees, grants, and private/public partnerships. A conceptual master plan for the 15-acre site was developed following a robust community engagement effort. The conceptual master plan is a long-term vision for the Cubberley campus that could be completed incrementally over time or adjusted based on available funding and readiness of partner organizations. Since the timeline for full implementation is unknown, completing an environmental assessment of the complete conceptual master plan provides the regulatory foundation to move forward as funding is acquired. The Cubberley Conceptual Master Plan, in consideration with the Draft Initial Study Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS / MND), has been reviewed by the Planning and Transportation Commission, Architectural Review Board, and Parks and Recreation Commission and these commissions and staff are recommending the Council adopt both documents as a final step. BACKGROUND ANALYSIS Conceptual Master Plan 1 Building on that foundation, the current process moved forward with a series of three community meetings designed to refine 1 Cubberley Concept Plan 2019: https://www.pausd.org/about-us/committees-task-forces/archived- committees/cubberley-master-plan and update the vision for the site. Outcomes from the three community meetings culminated in a guiding vision for potential development of the Cubberley Community Center site with the completion of the Cubberley Conceptual Master Plan. Phase I: Phase I of the Cubberley Conceptual Master Plan would focus on constructing a new Recreation and Wellness Center, a new Education Building and flexible event space, and renovating existing buildings to create a Performing Arts Complex and to ensure the full campus continues to be operational until full funding is secured. The different elements of Phase 1 could be completed incrementally as sub-phases to align with funding availability and partner readiness. To date, Letters of Intent with TheatreWorks Silicon Valley and the Friends of the Recreation Wellness Center have been approved by the City Council and those areas are likely to advance before other new construction in phase one. Recreation and Wellness Center: A new facility designed to serve multiple community needs. The building would include up to four multipurpose gymnasiums that could accommodate basketball, volleyball, indoor pickleball, and other recreational uses, along with fitness studio spaces, locker rooms, offices, and dedicated health and wellness areas. The facility would also incorporate storage space for emergency services and sheltering supplies such as cots and equipment, supporting the City’s emergency preparedness efforts. Performing Arts: Both the Pavilion and Cubberley Theatre would be renovated to enhance the space as a community cultural hub. These improvements would create flexible spaces for performing arts, dance, martial arts, music, rehearsals, and related activities. Renovations would also include upgraded lobby areas to provide a more welcoming and functional gathering space for audiences and performers. On January 28, 2026, the City and TheatreWorks Silicon Valley announced a partnership to create a two-theatre complex that would include the renovation of the existing Cubberley theatre and Pavilion and adding new construction. The existing Cubberley theatre would be upgraded for continued community use and include new restrooms, expanded back of house and lobby space, and improved accessibility. The Pavilion would be renovated as the new home for TheatreWorks Silicon Valley. Flexible Event Space: Adjacent to the Recreation and Wellness Center is a large, flexible event space capable of hosting a wide range of activities such as ballroom dancing, classes, community meetings and presentations, weddings, parties, and other community rentals and events. There is also a café and concessions area that would serve snacks for gym, pool, and athletic field events. The commercial kitchen could support cooking and nutrition classes, event catering for the large flex space and campus rentals, and food service during emergency shelter operations when the gyms are deployed. Outdoor Programming: The current tennis courts would be elevated, with a surface- level parking lot constructed underneath and the tennis courts reestablished on top. Additionally, Phase I could include the construction of a new outdoor swimming pool to expand aquatics programming and community recreation opportunities. New Education Building: This building would support a range of educational and community programs. This facility could house early education offerings, after-school programs, and other lifelong learning opportunities, creating a dedicated space for youth and family enrichment. Existing Building Renovation: The two-story “I” building would be renovated to improve functionality and extend its useful life. Phase I also includes renovation of remaining buildings, so the full site continues to be operational until funding for phases II and III is secured. Buildings and rooms currently used and occupied by PAUSD would become available for programming, visual arts, makerspace and workshops and flexible rental spaces. Phase II: Phase II of the Cubberley Conceptual Master Plan would focus on the construction of visual arts and technology buildings, which includes makerspace and workshop areas for hands- on projects, as well as gallery space for city curated and community exhibitions. This area will also include artist creative studios, expanding opportunities for artists and community members to create, learn, and showcase their work. Phase III: Phase III of the Cubberley Conceptual Master Plan would complete the Community Services section and provide a café and lounge gathering space, a popular request from the community, along with new community service and flexible spaces. The flexible space is especially valuable, as it provides the ability to adapt to changing program needs and future community priorities. It is designed to be future-proof, multi-purpose, and nimble—supporting staff-led programs, hourly rentals, office space, and potentially accommodating additional tenants. This intentional flexibility will ensure the campus continues to meet evolving needs long after construction is complete. Overall, the conceptual master plan proposes to increase the amount of indoor space from the current 184,000 square feet to 232,250 square feet after Phase I, and ultimately to 284,000 square feet after Phases II and III. The increase in indoor square footage was informed by feedback received from the community and existing tenants during the 2019 co-design process and current conceptual master planning process, and opportunities to build upon existing public private partnerships for expanded community space. Examples where square footage increases are notable include: Recreational space, including gyms and programmable spaces for health and wellness classes and activities; Expanded theater and performing arts spaces with improved accessibility; Visual arts spaces for art programs, classes, and exhibits to the community, including a makerspace and creative workshops; and Flexible spaces for city programming of classes and camps, and rental space. Outdoor space also increases with the proposed plan from 250,000 square feet to 390,000 square feet after Phase I, and to 415,000 square feet after Phases II and III. This provides an opportunity to improve the quality of outdoor spaces at Cubberley and provide for more diverse uses, such as events, performances, outdoor programs, unstructured play and casual gathering spaces. Overall, while the plan provides a distinct layout of the site with specific features, it represents a concept that should be considered adaptable and dynamic as the project phases continue to progress. Site circulation: Recommendations from Planning and Transportation Commission, Architectural Review Board, and Parks and Recreation Commission Funding Strategy Staff and the Cubberley Ad Hoc Committee are actively pursuing public-private partnership opportunities to advance key components of the project. Notably the City Council recently approved a Letter of Intent (LOI) for a partnership with TheatreWorks Silicon Valley which would create a two-theater complex through renovation and new construction, while preserving and upgrading the Cubberley Theatre for community use. In addition, the Friends of the Palo Alto Recreation and Wellness Center (Friends) continue to work with the City toward an agreement to help advance a future Recreation and Wellness Center. An LOI with the Friends was approved by City Council on December 2, 20243. Additional partnership developments underway include Maker Nexus, Palo Alto Community Child Care, and Avenidas. Letters of Intent with these organizations are being developed and will be brought to Council for approval on a future date. These partnerships, together with existing City revenue streams, grants, and philanthropy, are intended to complement a future ballot measure and create a multi-part funding strategy to share in the cost of investment and not over burden taxpayers. The City engaged with Fairbank, Maslin, Metz & Associates (FM3) to develop and conduct polling on public opinion in advance of potentially placing a measure on the November 2026 ballot. The City’s workplan includes four rounds of polling: the first released in April 2025, the second released in November 2025, the third released in January 2026, and the fourth released in March 2026. The fourth survey focused on testing two sales tax ballot measure questions (a ½ cent (0.5%) sales tax measure and a ¼ cent (0.25%)); difference in support amount those who have visited Cubberley versus those who have not; and whether the measure would fund Cubberley upgrades, partnership contributions, sales tax paid by non-residents, and knowing that other regional sales tax measure would be on the same November 2026 ballot would change voter support. Attachment C summarizes results of the poll, with 55% of surveyed voters in support of a sales tax measure. In addition, voter support after positive and negative messaging was measured. Positive messaging did not stand out for voters who took the survey and a brief oppositive statement pushes support below majority with 46% voters supporting. As discussed in this report, to fund critical community improvements at the Cubberley Campus, the City is evaluating a potential tax measure, together with funding from partnership opportunities, use of development impact fees, grants and philanthropy. The purchase of land 3 City Council, December 2, 2024; Agenda Item #18; SR #2410-3634, https://portal.laserfiche.com/Portal/DocView.aspx?id=112713&repo=r-704298fc from PAUSD totals $65.5 million. While cost estimates for phase one of the conceptual master plan are between $300 and $400 million, implementation can advance in phases with initial investments focusing on immediate repairs and partnerships. Project resources for work currently underway, including planning, administrative costs, and special studies are available in the FY 2026 Adopted Capital Budget, Cubberley Community Center Redevelopment Project (CB- 26000). STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT A 10- foot community canvas banner that was presented and signed by the community at the third community meeting and hung on the Cubberley campus, A three-part Family Movie Night series at Cubberley Theatre that averaged 100 participants per night and brought new families to campus, New banners featuring real-life participants, Cubberley Artist Studio Program Open Houses and Workshops, and Launching of the 2026 ArtLift Community Grants which will include five temporary, interactive visual art experiences that will inspire joy, creativity and encourage community participation at Cubberley Community Center. In addition to community meetings and updates to the City Council, Project updates and ways to stay involved and informed are shared through: Project website (www.paloalto.gov/improvecubberley), Online comment card asking for priorities and open fields to share vision and service needs, City updates via medium.com blog space, Project updates sent via email newsletter to the project distribution list and project updates shared through City channels including Nextdoor and digital newsletters, and videos, Utility bill inserts, Resident mailers, and Tabling at key City events. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The proposed project has been assessed in accordance with the authority and criteria contained in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City’s environmental regulations. Specifically, the City published a Draft Initial Study - Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS-MND) on March 2, 2026, which was circulated for a 30-day comment period ending on April 1, 2026. The City received seven written comments on the Draft MND, including one from a public agency, Valley Transportation Authority (VTA), and six from members of the public. The City also received verbal comments at the joint Architectural Review Board and Planning and Transportation Commission hearing on March 11, 2026. Most of the comments received expressed opinions about the project and did not raise concerns about the analysis or conclusions of the Draft IS-MND. Therefore, changes to the Final IS-MND were limited. One commenter expressed concerns about the use of an MND for a long-term project, failure to analyze the whole of the project, aesthetics impacts, traffic impacts, cumulative impacts, and impacts to nearby residences. In accordance with CEQA Guidelines 15070(a), a public agency shall prepare an MND for a project when there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. As identified in the MND, no unavoidable significant impacts were identified. Therefore, no changes to the Final IS-MND were made in response to these comments. The VTA provided comments on the draft Transportation Analysis which included editorial comments on existing transit routes, a comment to include an analysis of transit delay, and a comment to include the Auto Trip Reduction Statement for the project. In response to these comments, the final TA report has been revised to make minor corrections, to include a discussion on the project’s effects on transit delay, and to provide the Auto Trip Reduction Statement for the project. The updated TA report is provided in Appendix G of the Final IS- MND. Changes to the Transportation Analysis did not identify new significant impacts or significant impacts of increased severity compared to the impacts identified in the Draft IS- MND. Because none of the changes to the IS-MND are considered substantial in accordance with Section 15073.5(b) and the information added merely clarifies and amplifies the information previously provided in the analysis, recirculation of the MND is not required. ATTACHMENTS APPROVED BY: *NOT YET APPROVED* 1 0160187_20260506_ay16 Resolution No. _____ Resolution of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Adopting the Cubberley Conceptual Master Plan Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program R E C I T A L S A. The City owns eight acres of the 35-acre Cubberley site, located at 4000 Middlefield Road, and currently operates the areas it controls as a community center, using some of the spaces for classes and activities in arts and culture, athletics, and sub-leases additional space at City-subsidized rates to various non-profit and community serving groups. PAUSD owns the remaining 27 acres, most of which are leased to the City, or used for education purposes, staff offices, or third-party tenants. B. On October 7, 2024, the City Council and Palo Alto Unified School District (PAUSD or District) Board of Education approved a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) outlining key terms and conditions for the City’s purchase of seven additional acres of land from PAUSD, contingent on voter approval of a bond measure in November 2026. The addition of the seven acres, plus the eight acres already owned by the City of Palo Alto provides an opportunity to develop a new community center and other improvements on a combined 15 acres at the Cubberley site to provide a range of City programs, including health, wellness, and recreational opportunities for residents. C. On December 2, 2024, Council advanced the master planning effort of the future of the Cubberley site, approving a contract with Concordia, LLC, and associated budget actions for development of a revised Master Plan for the Cubberley Community Center site and a workplan for pursuit of a November 2026 local ballot measure to fund the purchase of land and development of a new community center at the Cubberley site. Subsequent Council actions included approving a five-year lease with PAUSD to continue the current use of the property, including playing fields, approval of a professional services agreement with Rincon for CEQA analysis, and approval of professional service agreements with Lew Edwards Group and Fairbank, Maslin, Metz & Associates for ballot measure strategy advisement and community polling. The Council also established the Cubberley Ad Hoc Committee (as a non-Brown Act body) to review and advise staff on efforts related to polling and development of a ballot measure that may be placed in November 2026. D. From December 2024 through February 2026 staff held three community meetings and received additional input from Council at five additional hearings, as well as from the Planning and Transportation Commission, Architectural Review Board, Parks and Recreation Commission, and the Public Arts Commission at study sessions. E. On March 2, 2026, the City released a Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration evaluating the environmental impacts associated with the proposed construction and operation of full build out under the Cubberley Conceptual Master Plan for a 30-day public comment period, ending on April 1, 2026. F. On March 11, 2026, the Planning and Transportation Commission (PTC) and Architectural Review Board (ARB) held a duly noticed special joint meeting to consider the Cubberley Conceptual Master Plan and the Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND). Both the Planning & Transportation Commission and Architectural Review Board voted separately, considering the MND, *NOT YET APPROVED* 2 0160187_20260506_ay16 unanimously recommended that City Council adopt the Cubberley Conceptual Master Plan, with a list of considerations for Council and staff to evaluate as the project moves forward into future phases of planning and design. G. On March 24, 2026, the Parks and Recreation Commission held a duly noticed public hearing and to consider the Cubberley Conceptual Master Plana and Draft MND and recommended approval of the project. H. The City reviewed all comments received on the Draft MND and prepared a Final MND, which was published on April 9, 2026. Attachment C of the Final MND includes all written comments received on the project. I. The City Council considered said recommendations after a duly noticed public hearing held on April 20, 2026, and, after considering all public comments on the project and the Final MND, now desires to Adopt the Cubberley Conceptual Master Plan MND and approve the associated Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan, as set forth below. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALO ALTO RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. 1. The environmental effects of the Project have been analyzed in an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) prepared in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (CEQA). The IS/MND is attached to this resolution as Attachment A. 2. The IS/MND identified one or more potentially significant effects of the Project on the environment as well as mitigation measures that would reduce the significant effects to a less than significant level. The City agrees to implement mitigation measures to mitigate the effects to a less than significant level as demonstrated through the adoption of the related Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) in Attachment B of this resolution. 3. Council has independently reviewed and considered the Initial Study/MND, together with any public comments received during the public review process and other information in the record, prior to acting upon or approving the Project. 4. The IS/MND reflects and represents the independent judgment and analysis of the City of Palo Alto as lead agency. 5. Based on the whole record of proceedings, Council hereby finds that there is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment and does hereby adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and related Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program prepared for the Project. *NOT YET APPROVED* 3 0160187_20260506_ay16 6. The Director of Planning and Development Services at the Director’s Office at 250 Hamilton Avenue, Palo Alto, California 94301 is the custodian of records and documents of proceedings on which this decision is based. SECTION 2. This resolution shall be effective upon adoption. INTRODUCED: PASSED:    AYES:  NOES:    ABSTENTIONS:    ABSENT:    ATTEST: __________________________ __________________________  City Clerk Mayor    APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED:      __________________________ __________________________ Assistant City Attorney City Manager __________________________ Director of Planning and Development Services *NOT YET APPROVED* 4 0160187_20260506_ay16 Attachment A Final IS/MND [Editor’s note: The final IS/MND is available for viewing at the link below and will be attached to this Resolution if approved. https://www.paloalto.gov/Departments/Community-Services/Help-Us-Improve-Cubberley *NOT YET APPROVED* 5 0160187_20260506_ay16 Attachment B Mitigated Monitoring and Reporting Plan [Editor’s note: The final MMRP is available for viewing at the link below and will be attached to this Resolution if approved. https://www.paloalto.gov/Departments/Community-Services/Help-Us-Improve-Cubberley Attachment B Project Documents: 1.Cubberley Conceptual Master Plan 2.Cubberley Conceptual Master Plan Appendices 3.Final Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration Directions to review Project documents online 1. Go to: www.paloalto.gov/improvecubberley 2. To review the Conceptual Master Plan project documents, scroll down to find “Draft Cubberley Conceptual Master Plan Documents” and underneath you’ll find the following documents Cubberley Draft Conceptual Master Plan Cubberley Conceptual Master Plan Appendices Final Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration Direct Link to Project Webpage Help Us Improve Cubberley – City of Palo Alto, CA Palo Alto Voter Views of a Ballot Measure Key Findings of a Survey Conducted March 18‐26, 2026 220‐7878 Survey Methodology Dates March 18‐26, 2026 Survey Type Dual‐mode Voter Survey Likely November 2026 Voters in Palo Alto 411 Research Population Interviews (Full Sample) ±4.9% at the 95% Confidence Level (Half Sample) ±6.9% at the 95% Confidence LevelMargin of Sampling Error Telephone Email Invitations Text InvitationsContact Methods Telephone Online InterviewsData Collection Modes Tracking 2013, 2016, 2018, 2020, 2021, 2022, April/May 2025, November 2025 & January 2026 (Note: Not All Results Will Sum to 100% Due to Rounding) 2 Context 3 Palo Alto voters hold mixed views about direction of life in the city overall. First, would you say things in Palo Alto are generally headed in the right direction, or do you feel that things are headed in the wrong direction? Right Direction Wrong Direction Don't Know 61% 43%41%41%40%39%38%37% 34%34%36%34%35% 14% 2016 2018 2021 2022 April/May November January March Q1. 4 Three in five likely voters have visited Cubberley Community Center, about one in six have taken part in discussions about it. First, have you ever taken part in past workshops, community meetings, or town hall discussions about plans for the Community Campus at the Cubberley site? Have you or has someone in your household Cubberley Community Center to in classes or programs there? Yes 15%No 36%No 78% Yes 63%Prefer to Prefer to7% 1% Q13 & Q14. 5 Fewer than half believe that the City has “a great need” or “some need” for additional funding to update community center facilities. In your personal opinion, do you think that Palo Alto has a great need, some need, a little need, or no real need for funds to provide safety, electrical, and other basic updates for community center facilities? Great need need 12%Great/ Some Need 46%34% A little need No real need 17%A Little/ No Real Need 35% Don't know 19% Q5. 6 This is a greater share than those who believed there was a “great or “some need” for updated facilities to provide services. In your personal opinion, do you think that Palo Alto has a great need, some need, a little need, or no real need for funds to provide safety, electrical, and other basic updates for community center facilities? Great/Great Need Some Need A Little Need No Real Need Don't Know Some Need March 2026 12%34%17%18%19% In your personal opinion, do you think that Palo Alto has a great need, some need, a little need, or no real need for additional funds for updated facilities to provide services including classes, camps, fitness programs, or drop‐in casual spaces? 29%January 2026 24%18%32% 20% 21% 29% 4% 2020 7% 6% 5% 5% 26%32%15% 35% Q3. Wording Slightly Different in Previous Survey 7 Initial Views of a Ballot Measure 8 A sales‐tax measure begins with support from a majority – right at the margin of error for passage. City of Palo Alto Community Safety/Services Measure. To provide general city services such as repairing Cubberley Center for current safety, earthquake, accessibility standards; upgrading deteriorating electrical systems, plumbing; acquiring outdoor space/sites; maintaining streets, safe, clean downtown/commercial cores; for natural disasters; repairing deteriorating community spaces, libraries, shall City of Palo Alto’s measure a 0.5% (1/2¢) sales tax, providing approximately $15,600,000 annually until ended by voters, with published audits, all funds used locally, be adopted? Vote Threshold 50%+1 and Margin of Error ±4.9% Definitely yes Probably yes Undecided, lean yes 24% 23% Total 8% Undecided, lean no no 4%Total 11%No 37%Definitely no 23% Undecided 7% Q2. Would you vote yes or no on this measure? 9 Support is seven points higher than it was in January. January 2026 March 2026 City of Palo Alto Community Safety/Services Measure. To provide general City of Palo Alto Community Safety/Services Measure. To provide general services such as repairing Cubberley Community Center for current city services such as repairing Cubberley Community Center for current earthquake, accessibility standards; upgrading deteriorating safety, earthquake, accessibility standards; upgrading deteriorating systems, wiring, plumbing; acquiring outdoor space/sites; electrical systems, wiring, plumbing; acquiring outdoor space/sites; streets, safe, clean downtown/commercial cores; maintaining streets, safe, clean downtown/commercial cores; for natural disasters; repairing deteriorating community spaces, preparing for natural disasters/earthquakes; repairing deteriorating shall City of Palo Alto’s measure enacting a 0.5% (1/2¢) sales tax, community spaces, libraries, shall City of Palo Alto’s measure enacting a approximately $15,600,000 annually until ended by voters, 0.5% (1/2¢) sales tax, providing approximately $15,600,000 annually until with published financial audits, all funds used locally, be adopted?ended by voters, subject to published independent audit, all funds used be adopted? Total TotalDefinitely Yes Probably Yes Undecided, Lean Yes Undecided Undecided, Lean No Probably No Definitely No Yes No March 2026 24% 22% 23%8% 7% 4% 11%23%55%37% January 2026 14%12%11%14%48%41% Q2. Would you vote yes or no on this measure? 10 Nearly two‐thirds of Democrats support the measure; less than half of independent or Republican voters do. Initial Vote by Party, Gender & Age Total TotalDefinitely Yes Probably Yes Undecided, Lean Yes Undecided Undecided, Lean No Probably No Definitely No Yes No Democrats Independents Republicans 29%25% 8% 6% 9%7%8%18% 25% 64%29% 17% 14% 23%14%47%45% 13%8%49% Men 24%21%9% 6% 4% 11%25%54%40% Women 26%7% 8%11% 18‐49 ‐64 28% 20% 23% 22%6% 5%11% 12% 25%55%39% 24%10%8% 8% 8%19% Q2. Would you vote yes or no on this measure? 11 There is no difference in support among those who visited Cubberley versus those who have not. Initial Vote by Palo Alto Need for Funding & Taken Classes at Cubberly Community Center Total TotalDefinitely Yes Probably Yes Undecided, Lean Yes Undecided Undecided, Lean No Probably No Definitely No Yes No Great/Some Need 34%32% 4% 6% 4% 15% 15% 6% 11% 5% 4% 6% 7%77%17% A Little/No Real Need 12%32%62% Don't Know 23%15% 4% 13%24% Visited Cubberley Not 25% 24% 21%9% 7% 4% 10%24%55%38% 5% 8%12%21% Q2. Would you vote yes or no on this measure? 12 There is no difference in support between north and south areas. Initial Vote by North/South of Oregon Expressway Definitely Yes Probably Yes Undecided, Lean Yes Undecided Undecided, Lean No Probably No Definitely No Total TotalYesNo 55%37%South 24% 24% 24%7% 8%11%22% 24%55%38%23%9% 7% 5% 10% Q2. Would you vote yes or no on this measure? 13 Lowering the amount of the tax does not increase support. The final structure of this measure has not been determined. If it enacted a 0.25% (1/4¢) sales tax of a 0.5% (1/2¢) sales tax, providing approximately $7,800,000 annually instead of annually, until ended by voters, would you vote yes or no? Half‐Cent Quarter‐Cent Definitely yes yes 24%28%Total s Total 23%15% Undecided, lean yes 8%11% Undecided, lean no no 4%5%Total Total 11% Definitely no 23%22% Undecided 7%12% Q2. Would you vote yes or no on this measure? 14 Voters are less likely to support a measure with a 30‐year sunset one that is in effect until ended by voters. And if it were instead written to end automatically after 30 years, would you vote yes or no? Until Ended by Voters 30‐Year Sunset Definitely yes yes 24%20%Total s Total 23%10%Yes 42%Undecided, lean yes 8% Undecided, lean no no 4%7%Total Total 11% Definitely no 27% Undecided 7%16% Q2. Would you vote yes or no on this measure? 15 The Impact of Additional Information 16 When informed that the measure would fund Cubberley upgrades, in five “no” voters say they may be more likely to support it. If you knew that a portion of this measure’s revenue would be dedicated to repairing the 70‐year‐old Cubberley Center to meet current safety, earthquake, accessibility standards; upgrade outdated and deteriorating electrical systems and plumbing and purchase Cubberley Community Center land thereby preserving trees and outdoor space, would you be more likely or less likely to support this potential measure, or would it make no difference to you?Total Total MoreMuch More Likely to Support Somewhat More Likely to Support Makes No Difference Somewhat Less Likely to Support Much Less Likely to Support Likely to Likely to Support All Voters 21%27%40%7% 5%48%12% Among "Yes" Voters 33% 17% 34%25%7%67%8% 21% 1% Among "No" Voters 5% Undecided 12% 9%28%61%Voters Q6. 17 Three in five undecided voters say they would be more likely to a measure knowing about the partnerships involved. The City is currently developing partnerships to bring tens of millions of dollars from private donors to the Cubberley Community Center for performing arts, wellness, maker space, and recreation facilities. Would knowing that these dollars would be leveraged to reduce the overall taxpayer cost while keeping the Cubberley Community Center property publicly owned, updated for basic safety and current accessibility requirements make you more or less likely to vote yes on the measure? Total Total More LessMuch More Likely to Support Somewhat More Likely to Support Makes No Difference Somewhat Less Likely to Support Much Less Likely to Support Likely to Likely to Support All Voters 31%35%26%5%66%9% Among "Yes" Voters 48%34%15% 6% 7% 22% 81%3% Among "No" Voters 9%13% Among Undecided 21%41%14% Q7. 18 Most undecided voters are “somewhat more likely” to support a measure knowing that non‐residents and businesses will p ay, too. If you knew that non‐residents who shop in Palo Alto and businesses will pay a portion of the sales tax, meaning that close to 40% of the overall amount raised to meet essential city needs will be paid by non‐residents, would you be more likely or less likely to support this potential measure, or would it make no difference to you? Total Total More Likely to Likely to Support Support Much More Likely to Support Somewhat More Likely to Support Makes No Difference Somewhat Less Likely to Support Much Less Likely to Support All Voters 18%29%44%6%47%9% Among "Yes" Voters 27%35%33%5% 4% 7% 26% 62%5% Among "No" Voters 7%64%11% Among Undecided 43% Q8. 19 One‐third of voters overall are less likely to support the measure knowing it is on the same ballot as the regional sales tax. If a regional transportation sales tax of one half‐cent were on the same ballot as a City of Palo Alto sales tax measure, would you be more likely or less likely to support the Palo Alto sales tax measure, or would it make no difference to you? Total Total MoreMuch More Likely to Support Somewhat More Likely to Support Makes No Difference Somewhat Less Likely to Support Much Less Likely to Support Likely to Likely to Support All Voters 6% 7%53%17%17%13%34% Among "Yes" Voters 11% 9% 9%53%19%8%20%27% Among "No" Voters 59%15%24% Among Undecided 28%23%40%9% Q9. 20 Messaging and Movement 21 Support for the measure declines as voters learn more about it. Vote Threshold 50%+1 and Margin of Error ±4.9% Total TotalDefinitely Yes Probably Yes Undecided, Lean Yes Undecided Undecided, Lean No Probably No Definitely No Yes No Initial Vote 24% 25% 22% 23%8% 7% 4% 11%23%55%37% After Additional Information and Positive Messaging 17%9%13%7%28%51%37% After Negative Messaging 15%9%12%11%28% Q2 & Q11. Would you vote yes or no on this measure? One last time: Would you vote yes or no on the measure titled: City of Palo Alto Community Safety/ Services Measure? 22 Messaging in Support of the Measure Ranked by Very Convincing (STANDARDS) Most Cubberley Community Center buildings are more than 70 years old. They were built well the internet, and do not meet current disabled access and earthquake safety standards. Alto residents deserve a community center that is modern, safe, and accessible to the entire community.29% *(OUTDOOR SPACE) As our city grows and changes, we must protect green space and trees for the value they The funds used to update the Cubberley Community Center will also preserve outdoor space and trees the site for all in the community to enjoy. (WITHOUT) Without this measure, the Cubberley Community Center will continue to fall apart and become outdated and even more expensive to maintain. It will soon become unsafe and obsolete. measure invests in ensuring our community has a safe, up‐to‐date place to gather, learn and play. (AFFORDABILITY) As the cost of living goes up, it is more important now than ever to invest in free or low‐cost 24% places for exercise and play that everyone can use close to home. Palo Alto should invest in creating anaffordable, accessible place where people can gather to learn, play, read, enjoy the arts, experience joy, connect with one another. 24% (STREETS) Funding from this measure will ensure the City can better repair streets and sidewalks,improve traffic flow especially near trains, fix potholes, and provide safe routes to school for children. Q10. First, please consider the following statements from people who may support this measure. For each one, please indicate whether you find it very convincing, somewhat convincing, or not convincing as a reason vote yes. *Split Sample 23 Messaging, Continued Ranked by Very Convincing (ACT LOCAL) With state and federal budget cuts, we must act locally to protect Palo Alto’s unique quality of life.23% This measure will help maintain the City’s fiscal stability by improving fire and police protection,emergency response, streets, parks, and youth and senior services, and address traffic with locally controlled that the State or Federal governments can’t take. (PARTNERS) This measure represents a unique opportunity for Palo Alto taxpayers to invest in an upgraded Community Center for less money. Through partnerships with local nonprofits that are committing of millions of dollars to the project, we can reduce taxpayer costs.22% (REPAIRS) Cubberley Community Center facilities have significant structural issues with deteriorating electrical and plumbing. That’s why we should prudently invest in a new, safe, accessible and modern facility for community to share into the future. 19% (ACCOUNTABILITY) This measure will have strict accountability provisions, including independent financialaudits, to ensure that funds are spent efficiently, effectively, and as promised. *(CHILDREN) There are too few affordable places for children and teens to gather, learn and play outside of16% school hours in our community. Upgrading and repairing the Cubberley Community Center will provide safespaces for children and teens after school and in the summer so that they are off the street, near adult and staying out of trouble. Q10. First, please consider the following statements from people who may support this measure. For each one, please indicate whether you find it very convincing, somewhat convincing, or not convincing as a reason vote yes. *Split Sample 24 Messaging in support of the measure does not connect with much intensity. Very Convincing Somewhat Convincing Standards *Outdoor Space Without 29% 27% 27% 24% 33% 33% 62% 60% 59% 58% 32% Affordability 34% 24% 23% 30%54% Act Local 34% Partners 22%40%61% Repairs 21%41% Accountability 19% 16% 36%55% 33%49% Q10. First, please consider the following statements from people who may support this measure. For each one, please indicate whether you find it very convincing, somewhat convincing, or not convincing as a reason vote yes. *Split Sample 25 Voters also heard or read a brief statement opposed. Next, opponents of this measure say that at a time when the cost of is skyrocketing, the last thing we should do is raise our taxes even We are already facing another potential half‐cent sales tax increase Bay Area transit on the same ballot. And anyway, our community has higher priorities right now than land and upgrading the community center. The City should cut and mismanagement of funds before asking to raise our taxes Q12. One last time: Would you vote yes or no on the measure titled: City of Palo Alto Community Safety/ Services Measure? 26 After this brief negative message, fewer than half support the with more intensity on the “no” side. Vote Threshold 50% +1, Margin of Error +/‐4.9% Initial Vote After Negative Messaging Definitely yes yes 24%22%Total s Total 23%15% Undecided, lean yes 8%9% Undecided, lean no no 4%3%Total Total 11%11% Definitely no 23%28% Undecided 7%12% Q2. Would you vote yes or no on this measure? One last time: Would you vote yes or no on the measure titled: City of Palo Alto Community Safety/ Services Measure? 27 Curt Below Curt@FM3research.com Miranda Everitt Miranda@FM3research.com Attachment D The Cubberley Site 1 2 3 Memorandum of Understanding with PAUSD 4 both the City Council and Palo Alto Unified School District (PAUSD or District) Board of Education approved a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) related to the future of the Cubberley site. The MOU outlines key terms and conditions for the purchase and future planning of Cubberley. The land purchase, which would transfer ownership of seven acres from PAUSD to the City, is contingent on voter approval of a bond measure in November 2026. This condensed timeframe requires development of a master plan for the site by March 2026, conduct stakeholder and community engagement and outreach, polling, financial analysis, CEQA analysis, and other critical tasks. The addition of the seven acres, plus the eight acres already owned by the City of 1 City Council, December 2, 2024: https://portal.laserfiche.com/Portal/DocView.aspx?id=112707&repo=r- 704298fc&searchid=c3e3ed6f-6cda-4dd3-ba35-5d8d4be5579e 2 https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/v/1/city-manager/communications-office/cubberley- community-center_mappdf.pdf 3 Cubberley Concept Plan 2019: https://www.pausd.org/about-us/committees-task-forces/archived- committees/cubberley-master-plan 4 City Council, October 7, 2024; Agenda Item AA1; SR #2409-3500, https://portal.laserfiche.com/Portal/DocView.aspx?id=98415&repo=r-704298fc&searchid=e199f724-22ab- 472b8ad8-ca162c4dcf8a Attachment D Palo Alto provides an opportunity to develop a new community center and other improvements on a combined 15 acres at the Cubberley site to provide a range of City programs, including health, wellness, and recreational opportunities for residents. Master Plan Update and Pursuit of a Local Ballot Measure 9 related to the future of the Cubberley site. These actions included approval of a contract with Concordia, LLC, and associated budget actions for development of a revised Master Plan for the Cubberley Community Center site, building on the previous master plan completed in 2019 by Concordia and guided by significant community input. Additionally, the Council approved a Letter of Intent with the Friends of the Palo Alto Recreation Wellness Center for the purpose of fundraising for a recreation wellness center (gymnasium) at the Cubberley site, and a workplan for pursuit of a November 2026 local ballot measure to fund the purchase of land and development of a new community center at the Cubberley site. 10 to continue the current use of the property, including playing fields, approval of a professional services agreement with Rincon for CEQA analysis,11 and approval of professional service agreements with Lew Edwards Group and Fairbank, Maslin, Metz & Associates12 for ballot measure strategy advisement and community polling. Cubberley Ad Hoc Committee 9 City Council, December 2, 2024; Agenda Item 18, SR #2410-3634, https://portal.laserfiche.com/Portal/DocView.aspx?id=112713&repo=r-704298fc 10 City Council, December 2, 2024; Agenda Item 12; SR #2410-3651, https://portal.laserfiche.com/Portal/DocView.aspx?id=112707&repo=r-704298fc 11 City Council, December 16, 2024; Agenda Item 12; SR #2411-3813, https://portal.laserfiche.com/Portal/DocView.aspx?id=117742&repo=r-704298fc&searchid=96e9506b- f1bd-485e-a4cb-fc804b5893d1 12 City Council, February 24, 2025; Agenda Item 4; SR #2501-4039, https://portal.laserfiche.com/Portal/DocView.aspx?id=143364&repo=r-704298fc&searchid=fef509a6- 4d34-4060-bc7a-6ab87db7a0ae Attachment D operating and financial models, and decisions on what should be placed on the November 2026 ballot. April 21, 2025 City Council Meeting 17 City Council meeting, staff presented outcomes from the first community meeting held on March 19, an update on the Cubberley Master Plan Project workplan and sought Council authorization to initiate the first community poll. 18 . 17 City Council, April 21, 2025; Agenda Item 11; SR #2503-4310, https://portal.laserfiche.com/Portal/DocView.aspx?id=166428&repo=r-704298fc 18 Staff Presentation, April 21, 2025; https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/Portal/viewer?id=0&type=7&uid=71ade3d7-a57a-4195-a59b- c410d90832ea Attachment D Theater/Performance Space, Greenspace, Makerspace, and Senior/Multigenerational Programs. 21. The poll themes and questions were developed with input from the Cubberley Ad Hoc Committee and will inform critical upcoming milestones in the project. The Council did not take an action but supported proceeding with the poll. April 22,2025 Parks & Recreation Commission Meeting 22 staff presented an informational update to the Parks and Recreation Commission, offering a comprehensive overview of the project's overall workplan and timeline. The presentation included a detailed summary of Community Meeting #1, highlighting key themes and priorities that emerged from the community’s feedback. Staff also introduced Poll #1, which was launched at the end of April, and encouraged Commissioners to help promote the survey to ensure broad community participation. In addition, the presentation outlined several ways the Commission can remain engaged and support the project, including serving as ambassadors within the community, helping to share information, and providing feedback. The creation of a PRC Cubberley ad-hoc committee was discussed and it was decided that this topic will be further considered during the upcoming workplan revisions scheduled for the coming months. June 9, 2025 City Council Meeting 23 staff presented to City Council the results of the first community poll, community engagement milestones coming up and updates to the workplan. The focus of the first poll was to survey voter input on the goals and future of the community center and possible support for a tax or bond measure. Staff also shared community engagement. Overall, the poll found broad majority support for improvement at the Cubberley site. Surveyed voters place highest priority on bringing the facility up to modern standards for electrical, plumbing, safety, and accessibility early childhood 21 FM3 Presentation, April 21, 2025; https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/Portal/viewer?id=0&type=7&uid=83ec6422-b6e4-4e83-9ca3- ca746a5971a0 22 Staff Presentation, April 22, 2025; https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/Portal/viewer?id=0&type=7&uid=dae0543c-e007-4fc1-9a69- fd08b156ee94 23 City Council, June 9, 2025, Agenda Item 2; SR#2503-4313, https://portal.laserfiche.com/Portal/DocView.aspx?id=182790&repo=r-704298fc&searchid=57dac2b5- 5c42-4ef0-978a-be940766f395 Attachment D education; affordability and efficient use of taxpayer dollars; and overall repairs for the facility. Lastly, staff shared with the City Council the community revised Vision Statement for the future of the Community Center. June 12, 2025 Second Cubberley Master Plan Community Meeting A vibrant, beloved, and adaptable destination that promotes learning, connections, joy, and wellbeing where all cultures and generations belong. Following this, staff provided an overview presentation to orient attendees to the three 3-D concept plans being presented. Each conceptual design includes an A, B, and C variations exploring different configurations of building placement, new construction vs renovation, green space, bike and pedestrian circulation, and parking—both above and below ground. 27. 27 Community Meeting #2 Summary, www.paloalto.gov/files/4280f185-ca1d-4965-940f-1e4fcaf6cb11/M2- Summary-Report-Final.pdf Attachment D June 19, 2025 Public Art Commission Meeting On June 19, 2025,29 City staff presented to the Public Art Commission and discussed potential opportunities to support the City’s Strategic Activation Plan for the Cubberley site, which was developed by staff in coordination with the City Council’s Cubberley Ad Hoc Committee. The plan outlined phased enhancements and activations aligned with the broader master planning process, community engagement efforts, and the anticipated November 2026 ballot initiative. As part of the discussion, Commissioners explored how the ArtLift grant program—previously identified at their January retreat as a potential tool—could be leveraged to support temporary public art installations at Cubberley and other key locations. Ideas included murals, ground art, freestanding sculptures, and performance-based activations to help generate community excitement and reinforce the role of the arts in creating vibrant, inclusive public spaces. June 24, 2025 Parks & Recreation Commission Meeting On June 24, 2025,30 City staff provided the Parks and Recreation Commission with an informational update on the Cubberley Community Center Master Plan. The presentation included a recap of the second community meeting held on June 12, where Concordia unveiled three concept designs for the site and invited community feedback. Staff also presented the results of the first community poll, released in late April, and shared a list of proposed near-term activation ideas for the Cubberley site, inviting the Commission’s input. In addition, staff sought feedback from the Commission on the three concept designs. The newly formed PRC Cubberley Ad Hoc Committee will continue to refine the activation plans in July. July 9, 2025 Planning and Transportation Commission Meeting On July 9, 2025,31 the Planning and Transportation Commission (PTC) received an update on the Cubberley Master Plan and was asked to provide input to help inform the next phase of the planning process. Staff requested feedback on several key aspects recently reviewed by the community, including arrival and parking, pedestrian circulation, building scale and space organization, greenspace layout, the balance of 29 Staff Presentation, June 19, 2025; https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/Portal/viewer?id=0&type=7&uid=a036e199-31cd-4d94-8214- 7fb0170e39ac 30 Staff Presentation, June 24, 2025; https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/Portal/viewer?id=0&type=7&uid=ac29aa36-1b3a-4403-b8b2- cc403685865d 31 Staff Presentation, June 9, 2025; https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/Portal/viewer?id=0&type=7&uid=49fc32cf-caa1-4dd9-97f9- 5d5d02150256 Attachment D built and open space, and how the site can be a good neighbor. Additional PTC feedback emphasized the importance of clear cost comparisons between renovation and new construction, interest in public-private funding models, and support for a future bond measure and donor engagement. Commissioners favored partial underground parking and better integration with transit and surrounding neighborhoods. There was broad interest in maintaining flexible green space for events, ensuring safe and separate bike/pedestrian circulation, and preserving multigenerational, inclusive programming. Suggestions also included clearer diagrams, more tangible use examples, and consideration of impacts from surrounding development. July 17, 2025 Architectural Review Board Meeting 35, the Architectural Review Board (ARB) received a presentation on the Cubberley Master Plan and provided early feedback to help shape the next phase of planning. The Board expressed strong support for phased development and emphasized minimizing disruption to existing tenants and programs. Members praised pedestrian and bike circulation, supported the proposed balance of buildings and green space, and encouraged improvements to vehicle access and mobility hubs. There was general support for new construction over renovation and interest in enhancing the site's identity through public art and flexible community spaces. The ARB also encouraged a welcoming design that reflects Cubberley’s civic and cultural significance while being a good neighbor to the surrounding community. September 17, 2025 Third Cubberley Master Plan Community Meeting 35 Staff Presentation, July 17, 2025; https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/Portal/viewer?id=0&type=7&uid=2a9a7988-768f-465b-bcf9- 68166ff9af6f Attachment D Phase 1 consists of two parts: a Recreation Wellness Center and a Performing Arts Center. Phase 1 also includes renovation of remaining buildings so the full site continues to be operational until phases 2 and 3 can be completed. Community members were invited to assess the Phase 1 concept designs for the recreation wellness and performing arts area and were asked to reflect on three key questions: 37. September 23, 2025 Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting 38, the Parks and Recreation Commission (PRC) received a presentation on the refined Cubberley Community Center Master Plan concept following the third and final community meeting held on September 17, 2025. Commissioners reviewed updates on program placement, phasing, and site circulation, and were asked 37 Community Meeting #3 Summary; www.paloalto.gov/files/assets/public/v/1/community- services/cubberley-project/2025.11.11_m3-summary.pdf 38 Staff Presentation, September 23, 2025; https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/viewer/preview?id=0&type=8&uid=efbb1418-4bbe-49b2-b786- 165e29017ca3 Attachment D to provide input on the same questions posed to the community: what is working well, what could be improved, and what creative ideas could enhance the campus experience. October 20, 2025 City Council Meeting 41 with an emphasis on the first phase of site development showing a combination of renovated and new building construction. The focus on the first phase recognizes that funding will likely be a limiting factor in full site redevelopment. At this meeting, staff shared objectives and themes for the second community poll to determine voter support for a bond or tax measure to finance the land purchase, and the extent of how much voters are willing to pay annually. Following the October 20 meeting the second poll was conducted. December 15, 2025 City Council Meeting 42, including results from the second community poll and discussed next steps. Council discussed key findings from Poll #2, which indicate broad voter support for the City acquiring the Cubberley property and willingness to invest in limited funding focused on basic repairs, safety upgrades, and accessibility improvements. Results showed relatively higher support for parcel tax and sales tax funding mechanisms, with a $250 average annual parcel tax testing above 50% support and a 0.5% sales tax increase capable of supporting significantly greater capital financing, pending state authorization. 41 City Council, October 20,2025; Agenda Item #1; SR #2503-4353, https://portal.laserfiche.com/Portal/DocView.aspx?id=231071&repo=r-704298fc 42 City Council, December 15, 2025; Agenda Item #3; SR #2503-4355, https://portal.laserfiche.com/Portal/DocView.aspx?id=246305&repo=r-704298fc Attachment D Council expressed alignment with staff and the Ad Hoc Committee’s recommendation to continue refining ballot measure options and to launch a third poll in January 2026 to further test potential parcel tax and sales tax scenarios. February 9, 2026 City Council Meeting 45, including results from the third community poll and progress on public-private partnerships to advance key components of the project. Staff shared that, in anticipation of possible Council consideration of a November 2026 ballot measure to fund the purchase of seven acres from PAUSD and advance all or portions of the project, three of four planned community polls have been completed. Results show both parcel tax and sales tax funding options testing at approximately 48% support—an improvement from the prior poll, though still below the thresholds required for approval (two-thirds for a parcel tax and a simple majority for a general-purpose sales tax). Despite these challenges, Councilmembers remained optimistic, noting that support levels are approaching viability, particularly for a sales tax option, and that emerging public-private partnerships could strengthen the overall funding strategy. 45 City Council, February 9, 2026; Agenda Item #11; SR#2512-5774, https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/viewer/preview?id=0&type=8&uid=fd6f9939-83a3-4ea7-817a- e7719c9194a4 Attachment D expressed interest in exploring partnership opportunities with the City at the Cubberley site. March 11, 2026 Planning and Transportation Commission and Architectural Review Board Special Joint Meeting 47 on the proposed Cubberley Conceptual Master Plan and the Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) prepared under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Staff presented the City’s long-term vision to redevelop approximately 15 acres of the Cubberley campus, including the potential purchase of seven acres from the Palo Alto Unified School District (PAUSD) for $65.5 million. Staff noted that the purchase and implementation of the plan will depend on identifying funding sources, which may include a potential sales tax ballot measure in November 2026, development impact fees, grants, philanthropic contributions, and public-private partnerships. 47 Staff Presentation, March 11, 2026; https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/viewer/preview?id=0&type=8&uid=c9289f37-122b-455b-959c- febb294cc3c1 Attachment D and staff to evaluate as the project moves forward into future phases of planning and design. Below are the approved motions: Attachment D March 24, 2026 Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting The Parks and Recreation Commission received a presentation from staff49 on the proposed Cubberley Conceptual Master Plan and the Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) prepared under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and results of the second and third community polls. Staff presented the City’s long-term vision to redevelop approximately 15 acres of the Cubberley campus, including the potential purchase of seven acres from the Palo Alto Unified School District (PAUSD) for $65.5 million. Staff noted that the purchase and implementation of the plan will depend on identifying funding sources, which may include a potential parcel or sales tax ballot measure in November 2026, development impact fees, grants, philanthropic contributions, and public-private partnerships. Staff requested that the commission review and consider the Draft IS/MND and provide a recommendation to the City Council regarding adoption of the Conceptual Master Plan. City Council is scheduled to consider adoption of the plan in April 2026, while staff continue advancing environmental review, partnership discussions, and funding and financing strategies. Commissioners expressed strong appreciation for the work completed to date and shared overall excitement about the vision and direction of the project. Discussion included the use of a Mitigated Negative Declaration under CEQA and the level of detail at the conceptual stage, particularly related to architectural and landscape design, including tree preservation and future planting strategies. The Commission also considered key program elements such as recreation amenities and amphitheater capacity, as well as project phasing, funding flexibility, and timelines tied to land acquisition and partnership opportunities. Commissioners also discussed construction impacts on existing operations and opportunities to support the project through grants, partnerships, and continued community engagement and activation efforts. Following discussion and public comment, Commissioner Smith made a motion to approve, it was seconded by Vice Chair Wei, and the vote passed (5–0) with 1 commissioner choosing to abstain. Below is the approved motion: Motion: Recommend that City Council adopt the Cubberley Conceptual Master Plan Moved by: Commissioner Smith 49 Staff Presentation, March 24, 2026; https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/viewer/preview?id=0&type=8&uid=247caade-d1e4-47ca-b8e1- bc3f8694739e Attachment D Seconded by: Vice Chair Wei Vote: 5–0, with 1 abstention Cubberley Community Center Project May 18, 2026 www.paloalto.gov/improvecubberley 2 CUBBERLEY PROJECT •Adopt the CEQA Mitigated Negative Declaration (Resolution) and Cubberley Conceptual Master Plan •Receive results of the 4th poll •Provide direction on next steps 3 COMMUNITY VISION FOR CUBBERLEY A vibrant, beloved, and adaptable destination that promotes learning, interconnectivity, joy and wellbeing where all cultures and generations belong. 4 CURRENT SITE 5 Conceptual Master Plan and Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 6 CUBBERLEY CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN Conceptual Master Plan represents a long-term vision for Cubberley that includes a combination of renovated and new buildings. Phasing allows for the site to be improved over time as funding is secured and minimizes program disruption during construction. Phases could be developed incrementally depending on funding and partner readiness. The plan represents a concept that should be considered adaptable and dynamic as the project phases continue to progress. 7 PHASING Property Acquisition Phase One •Could be developed incrementally o Recreation Wellness Center / Gym o Theatre and performing arts complex o Renovation of remaining buildings o Parking and tennis o Education Building Phase Two •Visual arts and technology Phase Three •Community Services/Rental space/Flexible Space 8 9 INDOOR & OUTDOOR SPACES & PARKING - PROPOSED Outdoor Space 250,000 SF EXISTING SITE PHASE 1 PHASE 2 and 3 Outdoor Space 415,000 SF Outdoor Space 390,000 SF Indoor Space 184,000 SF Indoor Space 232,250 SF Indoor Space 284,000SF 520 Parking 840 Parking 640 Parking 10 SPACE for EXISTING and NEW USES Community Campus Existing User Groups -Ballroom Dance -Senior Table Tennis -Sports Clubs -Education Existing Nonprofit Tenants New Partners -Friends of the RWC -TheatreWorks -Avenidas -Maker Nexus -PACCC New City Programs and Services 11 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT •Draft Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS /MND) •Five environmental resources identified where impacts were found to be "less than significant with mitigation incorporated" •Air Quality, Geology and Soils,Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Noise, Transportation •Public review and comment March 2 – April 1, 2026. •Seven written comments received (VTA and public) •Verbal comments at joint ARB/PTC meeting on March 11 12 ADOPTING the MND and CONCEPTUAL PLAN Allows phases to advance, including near term renovations and partner led improvements, and ensures potential impacts have been analyzed. 5 Results of 4th Community Poll 14 RESULTS of the FOURTH COMMUNITY POLL •Fourth poll released: March 19 – 28, 2026 •Test ballot measure language, informed by prior polling. •Evaluated whether partnership opportunities and additional revenue sources such as development fees, grants and philanthropy will increase voter support for a ballot measure. •Poll examined whether the presence of competing tax measures influenced voter willingness to support a ballot measure. 220-7878 Palo Alto Voter Views of a Potential Ballot Measure Key Findings of a Survey Conducted March 18-26, 2026 16 Dates March 18-26, 2026 Survey Type Dual-mode Voter Survey Research Population Likely November 2026 Voters in Palo Alto Total Interviews 411 Margin of Sampling Error (Full Sample) ±4.9% at the 95% Confidence Level (Half Sample) ±6.9% at the 95% Confidence Level Contact Methods Data Collection Modes Survey Tracking 2013, 2016, 2018, 2020, 2021, 2022, April/May 2025, November 2025 & January 2026 Survey Methodology (Note: Not All Results Will Sum to 100% Due to Rounding) Text Invitations Telephone Calls Email Invitations Telephone Interviews Online Interviews 17 Context 18 Q1. 61% 43%40%41%37%39%41% 36%25%37%34%35% 25%26% 14% 20% 27%24% 36%34%34% 38% 2016 2018 2021 2022 April/May 2025 November 2025 January 2026 March 2026 Right Direction Wrong Direction Don't Know First, would you say things in Palo Alto are generally headed in the right direction, or do you feel that things are headed in the wrong direction? Palo Alto voters hold mixed views about the direction of life in the city overall. 19 Q13 & Q14. Yes 15%No 78%Prefer Not to Say 7% Yes 63% No 36% Prefer Not to Say 1% Three in five likely voters have visited Cubberley Community Center, while about one in six have taken part in discussions about it. First, have you ever taken part in past workshops, community meetings, or town hall discussions about plans for the Community Campus at the Cubberley site? Have you or has someone in your household visited Cubberley Community Center to participate in classes or programs there? 20 Q5. 12% 34% 17% 18% 19% Great need Some need A little need No real need Don't know A Little/No Real Need35% Great/Some Need46% In your personal opinion, do you think that Palo Alto has a great need, some need, a little need, or no real need for additional funds to provide safety, electrical, and other basic updates for community center facilities? Fewer than half believe that the City has “a great need” or “some need” for additional funding to update community center facilities. 21 Q3. Wording Slightly Different in Previous Survey 12% 4% 7% 6% 5% 5% 34% 24% 25% 26% 31% 35% 17% 18% 18% 20% 18% 19% 18% 32% 20% 32% 36% 31% 19% 21% 29% 15% 10% 11% March 2026 January 2026 2020 2018 2016 2013 Great Need Some Need A Little Need No Real Need Don't Know Great/Some Need 46% 29% 33% 32% 36% 40% This is a greater share than those who believed there was a “great need” or “some need” for updated facilities to provide services. In your personal opinion, do you think that Palo Alto has a great need, some need, a little need, or no real need for additional funds to provide safety, electrical, and other basic updates for community center facilities? In your personal opinion, do you think that Palo Alto has a great need, some need, a little need, or no real need for additional funds for updated facilities to provide services including classes, camps, fitness programs, or drop-in casual spaces? 22 Initial Views of a Ballot Measure 23 Q2. Would you vote yes or no on this measure? 24% 23% 8% 4% Definitely yes Probably yes Undecided, lean yes Undecided, lean no Probably no Definitely no Undecided City of Palo Alto Community Safety/Services Measure. To provide general city services such as repairing Cubberley Community Center for current safety, earthquake, accessibility standards; upgrading deteriorating electrical systems, wiring, plumbing; acquiring outdoor space/sites; maintaining streets, safe, clean downtown/commercial cores; preparing for natural disasters; repairing deteriorating community spaces, libraries, shall City of Palo Alto’s measure enacting a 0.5% (1/2¢) sales tax, providing approximately $15,600,000 annually until ended by voters, with published financial audits, all funds used locally, be adopted? Total Yes55% Total No 37% A sales-tax measure begins with support from a majority – right at the margin of error for passage. Vote Threshold 50%+1 and Margin of Error ±4.9% 24 Q2. Would you vote yes or no on this measure? January 2026 City of Palo Alto Community Safety/Services Measure. To provide general city services such as repairing Cubberley Community Center for current safety, earthquake, accessibility standards; upgrading deteriorating electrical systems, wiring, plumbing; acquiring outdoor space/sites; maintaining streets, safe, clean downtown/commercial cores; preparing for natural disasters; repairing deteriorating community spaces, libraries, shall City of Palo Alto’s measure enacting a 0.5% (1/2¢) sales tax, providing approximately $15,600,000 annually until ended by voters, with published financial audits, all funds used locally, be adopted? March 2026 City of Palo Alto Community Safety/Services Measure. To provide general city services such as repairing Cubberley Community Center for current safety, earthquake, accessibility standards; upgrading deteriorating electrical systems, wiring, plumbing; acquiring outdoor space/sites; maintaining streets, safe, clean downtown/commercial cores; preparing for natural disasters/earthquakes; repairing deteriorating community spaces, libraries, shall City of Palo Alto’s measure enacting a 0.5% (1/2¢) sales tax, providing approximately $15,600,000 annually until ended by voters, subject to published independent audit, all funds used locally, be adopted? Support is seven points higher than it was in January. 24% 22% 23% 14% 8% 12% 7% 11% 4%11% 14% 23% 23% March 2026 January 2026 Definitely Yes Probably Yes Undecided, Lean Yes Undecided Undecided, Lean No Probably No Definitely No Total Yes Total No 55%37% 48%41% 25 Nearly two-thirds of Democrats support the measure; less than half of independent or Republican voters do. Q2. Would you vote yes or no on this measure? Initial Vote by Party, Gender & Age 29% 17% 14% 24% 25% 28% 20% 23% 25% 23% 13% 21% 26% 22% 24% 25% 9% 7% 9% 7% 6% 10% 8% 7% 8% 8% 6% 8% 5% 8% 9% 6% 4% 8% 8% 14% 14% 11% 11% 11% 12% 8% 18% 25% 49% 25% 21% 25% 25% 19% Democrats Independents Republicans Men Women 18-49 50-64 65+ Definitely Yes Probably Yes Undecided, Lean Yes Undecided Undecided, Lean No Probably No Definitely No Total Yes Total No 64%29% 47%45% 29%62% 54%40% 57%35% 55%39% 55%37% 56%35% 26 There is no difference in support among those who have visited Cubberley versus those who have not. Q2. Would you vote yes or no on this measure? Initial Vote by Palo Alto Need for Funding & Taken Classes at Cubberly Community Center 34% 12% 23% 25% 24% 32% 16% 15% 21% 27% 11% 4% 6% 9% 5% 5% 6% 15% 7% 8% 4% 4% 4% 4% 6% 15% 13% 10% 12% 7% 44% 24% 24% 21% Great/Some Need A Little/No Real Need Don't Know Visited Cubberley Have Not Definitely Yes Probably Yes Undecided, Lean Yes Undecided Undecided, Lean No Probably No Definitely No Total Yes Total No 77%17% 32%62% 44%41% 55%38% 56%36% 27 There is no difference in support between north and south areas. Q2. Would you vote yes or no on this measure? Initial Vote by North/South of Oregon Expressway 24% 24% 24% 23% 7% 9% 8% 7%5% 11% 10% 22% 24% South North Definitely Yes Probably Yes Undecided, Lean Yes Undecided Undecided, Lean No Probably No Definitely No Total Yes Total No 55%37% 55%38% 28 Q2. Would you vote yes or no on this measure? Q3. 24% 23% 8% 4% 11% 23% 7% Half-Cent Quarter-Cent Definitely yes Probably yes Undecided, lean yes Undecided, lean no Probably no Definitely no Undecided Total No37% Total Yes55% 28% 15% 11% 5% 7% 22% 12% Lowering the amount of the tax does not increase support. Total No34% Total Yes54% The final structure of this measure has not been determined. If it enacted a 0.25% (1/4¢) sales tax instead of a 0.5% (1/2¢) sales tax, providing approximately $7,800,000 annually instead of $15,600,000 annually, until ended by voters, would you vote yes or no? 29 Q2. Would you vote yes or no on this measure? Q4. 24% 11% 7% Until Ended by Voters 30-Year Sunset Definitely yes Probably yes Undecided, lean yes Undecided, lean no Probably no Definitely no Undecided Total No 37% Total Yes55% 20% 8% 16% Voters are less likely to support a measure with a 30-year sunset than one that is in effect until ended by voters. Total No43% Total Yes42% And if it were instead written to end automatically after 30 years, would you vote yes or no? 30 The Impact of Additional Information 31 When informed that the measure would fund Cubberley upgrades, one in five “no” voters say they may be more likely to support it. Q6. If you knew that a portion of this measure’s revenue would be dedicated to repairing the 70-year-old Cubberley Center to meet current safety, earthquake, accessibility standards; upgrade outdated and deteriorating electrical systems and plumbing and purchase Cubberley Community Center land thereby preserving trees and outdoor space, would you be more likely or less likely to support this potential measure, or would it make no difference to you? 21% 33% 5% 9% 27% 34% 17% 28% 40% 25% 57% 61% 7% 7% 8% 5% 12% All Voters Among "Yes" Voters Among "No" Voters Among Undecided Voters Much More Likely to Support Somewhat More Likely to Support Makes No Difference Somewhat Less Likely to Support Much Less Likely to Support Total More Likely to Support Total Less Support 48%12% 67%8% 22%21% 37%1% 32 Three in five undecided voters say they would be more likely to support a measure knowing about the partnerships involved. Q7. The City is currently developing partnerships to bring tens of millions of dollars from private donors to the Cubberley Community Center for performing arts, wellness, maker space, and recreation facilities. Would knowing that these dollars would be leveraged to reduce the overall taxpayer cost while keeping the Cubberley Community Center property publicly owned, updated for basic safety and current accessibility requirements make you more or less likely to vote yes on the measure? 31% 48% 9% 21% 35% 34% 35% 41% 26% 15% 43% 14% 5% 6% 22% 7% All Voters Among "Yes" Voters Among "No" Voters Among Undecided Voters Much More Likely to Support Somewhat More Likely to Support Makes No Difference Somewhat Less Likely to Support Much Less Likely to Support Total More Likely to Support Total Less Likely to Support 66%9% 81%3% 43%13% 62%24% 33 Most undecided voters are “somewhat more likely” to support a measure knowing that non-residents and businesses will pay, too. Q8. If you knew that non-residents who shop in Palo Alto and businesses will pay a portion of the sales tax, meaning that close to 40% of the overall amount raised to meet essential city needs will be paid by non-residents, would you be more likely or less likely to support this potential measure, or would it make no difference to you? 18% 27% 7% 29% 35% 18% 43% 44% 33% 64% 28% 6% 5% 4% 26% 7% All Voters Among "Yes" Voters Among "No" Voters Among Undecided Voters Much More Likely to Support Somewhat More Likely to Support Makes No Difference Somewhat Less Likely to Support Much Less Likely to Support Total More Likely to Support Total Less Likely to Support 47%9% 62%5% 25%11% 45%26% 34 One-third of voters overall are less likely to support the measure knowing it is on the same ballot as the regional sales tax. Q9. If a regional transportation sales tax of one half-cent were on the same ballot as a City of Palo Alto sales tax measure, would you be more likely or less likely to support the Palo Alto sales tax measure, or would it make no difference to you? 6% 11% 7% 9% 9% 53% 53% 59% 28% 17% 19% 15% 23% 17% 8% 24% 40% All Voters Among "Yes" Voters Among "No" Voters Among Undecided Voters Much More Likely to Support Somewhat More Likely to Support Makes No Difference Somewhat Less Likely to Support Much Less Likely to Support Total More Likely to Support Total Less Likely to Support 13%34% 20%27% 2%39% 9%63% 35 Messaging and Movement 36 Support for the measure declines as voters learn more about it. Q2 & Q11. Would you vote yes or no on this measure? Q12. One last time: Would you vote yes or no on the measure titled: City of Palo Alto Community Safety/ Services Measure? 24% 25% 22% 23% 17% 15% 8% 9% 9% 7% 13% 12% 4%11% 7% 11% 23% 28% 28% Initial Vote After Additional Information and Positive Messaging After Negative Messaging Definitely Yes Probably Yes Undecided, Lean Yes Undecided Undecided, Lean No Probably No Definitely No Total Yes Total No 55%37% 51%37% 46%42% Vote Threshold 50%+1 and Margin of Error ±4.9% 37 Ranked by Very Convincing 29%(STANDARDS) Most Cubberley Community Center buildings are more than 70 years old. They were built well before the internet, and do not meet current disabled access and earthquake safety standards. Palo Alto residents deserve a community center that is modern, safe, and accessible to the entire community. 27%*(OUTDOOR SPACE) As our city grows and changes, we must protect green space and trees for the value they provide. The funds used to update the Cubberley Community Center will also preserve outdoor space and trees on the site for all in the community to enjoy. 27%(WITHOUT) Without this measure, the Cubberley Community Center will continue to fall apart and become increasingly outdated and even more expensive to maintain. It will soon become unsafe and obsolete. This measure invests in ensuring our community has a safe, up-to-date place to gather, learn and play. 24%(AFFORDABILITY) As the cost of living goes up, it is more important now than ever to invest in free or low-cost places for exercise and play that everyone can use close to home. Palo Alto should invest in creating an affordable, accessible place where people can gather to learn, play, read, enjoy the arts, experience joy, and connect with one another. 24%(STREETS) Funding from this measure will ensure the City can better repair streets and sidewalks, improve traffic flow especially near trains, fix potholes, and provide safe routes to school for children. Q10. First, please consider the following statements from people who may support this measure. For each one, please indicate whether you find it very convincing, somewhat convincing, or not convincing as a reason to vote yes. *Split Sample Messaging in Support of the Measure 38 Ranked by Very Convincing 23%(ACT LOCAL) With state and federal budget cuts, we must act locally to protect Palo Alto’s unique quality of life. This measure will help maintain the City’s fiscal stability by improving fire and police protection, emergency response, streets, parks, and youth and senior services, and address traffic with locally controlled funding that the State or Federal governments can’t take. 22%(PARTNERS) This measure represents a unique opportunity for Palo Alto taxpayers to invest in an upgraded Cubberley Community Center for less money. Through partnerships with local nonprofits that are committing tens of millions of dollars to the project, we can reduce taxpayer costs. 21%(REPAIRS) Cubberley Community Center facilities have significant structural issues with deteriorating electrical wiring and plumbing. That’s why we should prudently invest in a new, safe, accessible and modern facility for our community to share into the future. 19%(ACCOUNTABILITY) This measure will have strict accountability provisions, including independent financial audits, to ensure that funds are spent efficiently, effectively, and as promised. 16%*(CHILDREN) There are too few affordable places for children and teens to gather, learn and play outside of school hours in our community. Upgrading and repairing the Cubberley Community Center will provide safe spaces for children and teens after school and in the summer so that they are off the street, near adult supervision, and staying out of trouble. Q10. First, please consider the following statements from people who may support this measure. For each one, please indicate whether you find it very convincing, somewhat convincing, or not convincing as a reason to vote yes. *Split Sample Messaging, Continued 39 Q10. First, please consider the following statements from people who may support this measure. For each one, please indicate whether you find it very convincing, somewhat convincing, or not convincing as a reason to vote yes. *Split Sample 29% 27% 27% 24% 24% 23% 22% 21% 19% 16% 33% 33% 32% 34% 30% 34% 40% 41% 36% 33% 62% 60% 59% 58% 54% 58% 61% 63% 55% 49% Standards *Outdoor Space Without Affordability Streets Act Local Partners Repairs Accountability *Children Very Convincing Somewhat Convincing Messaging in support of the measure does not connect with much intensity. 40 Voters also heard or read a brief statement opposed. Q12. One last time: Would you vote yes or no on the measure titled: City of Palo Alto Community Safety/ Services Measure? Next, opponents of this measure say that at a time when the cost of living is skyrocketing, the last thing we should do is raise our taxes even more. We are already facing another potential half-cent sales tax increase for Bay Area transit on the same ballot. And anyway, our community has higher priorities right now than purchasing land and upgrading the community center. The City should cut waste and mismanagement of funds before asking to raise our taxes again. 41 Q2. Would you vote yes or no on this measure? Q12. One last time: Would you vote yes or no on the measure titled: City of Palo Alto Community Safety/ Services Measure? 24% 23% 23% Initial Vote After Negative Messaging Definitely yes Probably yes Undecided, lean yes Undecided, lean no Probably no Definitely no Undecided Total No37% Total Yes55% 22% 15% 28% After this brief negative message, fewer than half support the measure, with more intensity on the “no” side. Total No42% Total Yes46% Vote Threshold 50% +1, Margin of Error +/-4.9% Curt Below Curt@FM3research.com Miranda Everitt Miranda@FM3research.com 15 RECOMMENDATION Staff and the PTC, ARB, and PRC recommend the Council 1.Adopt a Resolution adopting the Final Initial Study Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Project and associated Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program; and 2.Adopt the Cubberley Conceptual Master Plan Staff recommend the Council provide direction on next steps. 16 EXAMPLES OF NEXT STEPS 1.Direct staff to pursue a ballot measure for a new ¼ or ½ cent sales tax in the November 2028 General Election •Staff to bring forward a Resolution and other required documents on June 8 OR 2.Direct staff to engage with PAUSD to purchase 7 acres from PAUSD using existing funding sources KRISTEN O’KANE Community Services Director Kristen.O’Kane@paloalto.gov (650) 463-4908 CHRISTINE PARAS ASD Assistant Director Christine.Paras@paloalto.gov (650) 329-2486 From:kwlukenat@gmail.com To:Council, City Subject:Cubberley dance pavilion Date:Wednesday, May 13, 2026 11:20:17 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links. To: The Palo Alto City Council My husband and I have been dancing at Cubbery Pavillion for over 10 years. We’ve had many dance lessons there and danced regularly on Friday and Saturday nights. It’s such a wonderful group of dancers and a great venue. I hope it can continue as a ballroom dance pavilion for many years to come! Thank you! Katherine Williford Sent from my iPhone From:Paweł Zawadzki To:Council, City Subject:Urging Council Support for Cubberley Community Center Modernization Date:Monday, May 18, 2026 11:59:39 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i Dear City Council Members, I am writing to urge the City Council to advance a ballot measure to fund the comprehensive revitalization of the Cubberley Community Center and designate it as a primary beneficiary of general use tax revenues. The Cubberley campus is a vital hub for South Palo Alto, yet its 1960s-era facilities have fallen into deep disrepair. For years, residents in our neighborhood have advocated for its renewal, often feeling that the needs of this part of the city have been overlooked. As Palo Alto moves forward with increased housing density—particularly in the southern neighborhoods—the strain on our local infrastructure will only grow. A modernized Cubberley is essential to meet these expanding recreational and community needs. Furthermore, upgrading this facility serves as an effective traffic mitigation strategy, allowing local families and seniors to access essential programs and classes without adding to cross-town congestion to reach northern facilities. Please show your commitment to equitable infrastructure and the well-being of all Palo Alto residents by enthusiastically supporting this measure. Sincerely, Pawel Zawadzki 264 Scripps Ct, 94303 Palo Alto, CA This message needs your attention This is a personal email address. This is their first email to your company. This person's name has non-English characters. Mark Safe Report From:Catherine Perman To:Council, City Subject:Public Comment to City Council May 18 meeting: Agenda Item 13 Cubberley Project Date:Monday, May 18, 2026 7:56:26 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i Public comment to City Council May 18 Meeting: Agenda Item 13 Cubberley Project Thank you for this opportunity to comment on the Cubberley Conceptual Master Plan. This plan includes many laudable ideas and design considerations. Thanks to all the contributors for their hard work! My “Cubberley Time” is primarily at Zohar Dance Company and other dance studios at Cubberley Building L. I have been a part of the Zohar community since I moved to Palo Alto in 1984. Zohar provides a supportive and positive space which encourages everyone to find joy in dance. Zohar offers classes, space for rehearsals, performances, special workshops and master classes that are open to the local community. I have been reviewing the Cubberley Conceptual Plan plan and its appendices to better understand how long term leasers will be able to sustain their activities and day-to-day operations during construction phases. In particular I have a personal interest in the 3 dance organizations with studios/performances/offices spaces in building L: Zohar, Dance Visions, and Dance Connection. The plan very briefly mentions finding transitional spaces for these types of organizations in PAUSD owned buildings. To quote the plan: “During construction, current program providers and tenants who occupy buildings affected by Phase 1 Construction will move to a temporary location which will be vacated by PAUSD prior to the project start” (see pages 49 and 52). That’s an admirable intention but without any additional information is it not really sufficient to assist the long term leasers. A conceptual plan might not include specific timelines, detailed designs or step by step processes but should include content for major transitional events. These organizations rely on daily activities including: classes, rehearsals and performances. Interruptions to these schedules would not only be detrimental, but could in fact jeopardize the organizations’ ability to remain solvent. I recommend that the conceptual plan describe possible processes that include long term leasers so that they can contribute to any additional planning. I think it would be prudent to include more than one sentence on how these leasers can start looking forward to their futures at Cubberley. There are several comments in the appendices that provide more details on the This message needs your attention This is a personal email address. This is their first email to you. Mark Safe Report needs of these dance studios. I would be grateful to follow up with the planners on this matter. I appreciate this opportunity to speak to the City Council. Catherine Perman Palo Alto Resident From:Diane Reklis To:Council, City Subject:Cubberley Date:Sunday, May 17, 2026 11:07:46 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i The most important thing we can do to prevent suicides is to Make Palo Alto Fun Again. Rebuild Cubberley to preserve current programs, provide for future growth near San Antonio Road, and add joy to all of our lives. Our community centers should be welcoming and fun, not embarrassing and sad. Diane Reklis This message needs your attention This is a personal email address. This is their first email to you. Mark Safe Report From:edie groner To:Council, City; GMCA-Discuss Cc:Edie Groner; Gabe Groner Subject:Remodeling Cubberly Community Center Date:Sunday, May 17, 2026 9:38:49 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i Dear City Council Members, I encourage the Council members to move forward with a ballot measure to support remodeling Cubberley Community Center and it should be a priority beneficiary of the general use tax revenue. As a member of Greenmeadow, we need a renewed community center for those who live in South Palo Alto, and others from Palo Alto neighborhoods. The conditions of the buildings built in the 60's are in disrepair and in need of renewal. For years we have begged the city council to take action to renovate the Cubberley campus and felt that our needs were being neglected by the city. Our seniors in the South of Palo Alto utilize this Cubberley Community Center . With developments in housing increasing in South Palo Alto, it is important for the city to have sufficient recreation needs met at Cubberley Community Center. Traffic will increase in the city with housing developments which means that a rejuvenated Cubberley Community Center will make it easier for young people and seniors to access Cubberley without having to go to the north part of the city for classes and programs. I encourage each member of the council to enthusiastically support this ballot measure by showing that you care about the well being of Palo Alto residents of both the south and north of the city who will utilize this facility. Sincerely, Edie Groner 230 Pakside Dr. Palo Alto, CA 9306 This message needs your attention This is a personal email address. This is their first email to your company. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast From:Stephanie Sharron To:Council, City Cc:Jeff Hickman Subject:Cubberley Date:Sunday, May 17, 2026 8:45:33 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links. Dear City Council: Please vote to purchase the additional 7 acres of the 35-acre Cubberley site from the school district for $65.5 million. Please don't lose this opportunity. We need a community center in South Palo Alto ASAP. Thank you so much. Best, Stephanie Sharron 343 Shasta Dr Palo Alto CA 94306 From:arl mock To:Council, City Subject:Keep Pavilion as a gym! Date:Sunday, May 17, 2026 7:16:39 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i To the Palo Alto council members, I have been dancing at the Pavilion for years. My primary doctor, Ganna Baetge has encouraged me to "KEEP ON DANCING". The recent (May 2026) result of my bone density scan test showed an increased bone mineral density since the last test was taken in 12-18-23 and did not take any prescribed drugs for bone density. Ganna had remarked that it was the FIRST time that a patient of her made this remarkable improvement in increasing bone mineral density. Also being in that I am physically active, especially in dancing had prevented a recommended hip surgery in 2018. We need to keep the Pavilion as a gym and not another theater so that our community can continue to have a place that will provide wellness in mental and physical health, as well as to maintain a good standard of living filled with a lifetime full of joyful and healthy life for all. Sincerely, Arlene Mock Palo Alto resident since 1969 This message needs your attention This is a personal email address. This is their first email to you. Mark Safe Report From:spencecovey@aol.com To:Council, City Cc:spencecovey Subject:Cubberley Pavilion should remain as is. Date:Sunday, May 17, 2026 5:13:50 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i Please not the following: 1. I have been attending ballroom classes at Cubberley Pavilion since 1990 or 36 years. Prior to Covid the place use to be packed on Friday and Saturday evenings. Ballroom dancing took a major blow when Covid hit but is slowly making a comeback. It's so nice to see people returning to such a great activity as ballroom dancing. It's the only real ballroom to go to between San Jose and San Francisco! 2. A few weeks back the Pavilion was closed for floor refinishing and the dance took place in a gym about 100' just north of the Pavilion. The gym had no acoustic qualities like the Pavilion and it was a total disaster. No one could hear the instructors, the echo's were unimaginable and the music quality was horrible. The Pavilion on the other hand has a domed ceiling, excellent acoustic properties and a very large dance floor. I have read it is the largest dance floor in California. 3. Ballroom dancing is an asset to the community. The people that go are high quality people that enjoy music, Waltz, Fox Trot, etc. In fact, Stanford University's ballroom students have put on many performances at the Pavilion and have appreciated having such a nice place to show off their abilities! 4. To tear down such a wonderful place at the cost of millions of dollars would be a huge mistake. The Pavilion is one of a kind type of ballroom. It cannot be replaced by holding dances in the gyms. Thank you so much for your consideration! Sincerely, Spencer Covey 576 Maple Street San Mateo, Ca.94402 This message needs your attention This is a personal email address. This is their first email to your company. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast 650 570-6400 Cell spencecovey@aol.com From:Barbara Platt To:Council, City Subject:CUBBERLEY Date:Sunday, May 17, 2026 4:29:29 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i Dear Council Members I enthusiastically support the City of Palo Alto adopting CUBBERLEY Master Plan As a Palo Alto residence for 35 years, I have seen CUBBERLEY decline Over the years The proposed community partners of Avenidas, TheatreWorks, friends of Palo Alto recreation and wellness center, maker Nexus, and Palo Alto community childcare are important to the Greenmeadow community and the City of Palo Alto at large. I want CUBBERLEY to be the priority beneficiary of the general use tax revenue This project will have my support of time money and my vote thank you for your kind attention Barbara Platt 490 El Capitan Pl. This message needs your attention This is a personal email address. Mark Safe Report From:Sonya Bradski To:Council, City Subject:Please Purchase Cubberley Community Center from PAUSD Date:Saturday, May 16, 2026 3:29:09 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links. Dear City Council: Please vote to purchase the additional 7 acres of the 35-acre Cubberley site from the school district for $65.5 million. I think it will be easier to have one owner of the property to do the next step of the Cubberley property. Please don't lose this opportunity. We really need a community center in South Palo Alto ASAP. Thank you so much. Sonya Bradski Greenmeadow Resident (Next Door Neighbor to Cubberley) From:Phyllis Brown To:Council, City Subject:Cubberley: item 13 on the May 18 Council Agenda Date:Saturday, May 16, 2026 3:20:03 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. Mayor Veenker and City Council Members, I urge the City Council to approve the Conceptual Plan for the Cubberley renovation and adopt the CEQA mitigated negative declaration. The conceptual plan is very ambitious, but the three phases of implementation and the strong support from a variety of Palo Alto organizations that want a renovated Cubberley to be their new home makes it realizable. Palo Alto deserves an ambitious renovation of Cubberley, a valuable community resource even in its current delapidated state. Please do everything you can to purchase the necessary seven acres from the Palo Alto Unified School District. I understand that the ballot measure you are considering, authorizing the 1/2 cent increase in sales tax, is a general purpose tax and cannot focus solely on the purchase of Cubberley acreage and renovation of the community center. However, it will be important for voters to trust that the City will use tax revenues for that purpose if the ballot measure passes. I have reviewed the draft language for the CIty of Palo Alto Community Safety/Services Measure in both the January and the March polls and would like to see more assurance that the tax increase would support Cubberley renovation and maintenance over the years. Assuming the Council moves ahead with the ballot measure, I certainly will vote for it. But I will feel deeply betrayed if the funds end up going to maintenance of city streets and development of resources in North Palo Alto instead of to renovation of Cubberley. South Palo Alto will be experiencing a population surge over the next ten years. A renovated, vibrant Cubberley will be central to the success of Palo Alto's growth in housing. Phyllis Brown From:slevy@ccsce.com To:Council, City Subject:Cobberley Date:Saturday, May 16, 2026 11:37:17 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. ! Dear Mayor Veenker and council members, I write in support of moving forward to improve the Cubberley site. I write in memory and appreciation for community leaders like Aggie Robinson, Ray Bacchetti and many others who promoted the common good and made this a great place for Nancy and I to live and raise our family. I am and expect to be an infrequent user of the improved Cubberley site and write to explain why, nevertheless, I am a strong supporter. The improved site will be a plus, not only to current users, but to the broader south Palo Alto area where much new housing is planned and I say this as a downtown resident with direct access to great amenities. In particular, the Cubberley site and their next door neighbor, the Charleston Shopping Center, will be a vital and much appreciated destination for the many new residents planned in the San Antonio area. I believe strongly in investing for the common good whether it benefits Nancy and I directly. As a practical matter, I believe articulating the common good for this endeavor will be important to many voters, who like ne, will be infrequent users. I also note that to achieve these common good benefits, future phases must move well beyond physical renovation to add a variety of new facilities and activity areas. Onward!! Stephen Levy This message could be suspicious The sender's email address couldn't be verified. Mark Safe Report From:John Williford To:Council, City Subject:Concerns about Cubberly Proposal Date:Thursday, May 14, 2026 9:27:46 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links. Dear City Council Members: I am very concerned about the proposal to spend millions of dollars to convert Cubberly gym to a Theater. -I’ve been dancing at Cubberly for more than a decade, and closing it for dancing will affect me and the more than 100 people who dance in a close community there each week. There is no reasonable alternative in the proposal. We already have theaters at Lucy Stern and Mountain View. This proposal would cost a lot of money and only harm the many people who rely on Cubberly for an important part of their social lives. Please turn it down. John Williford Sent from my iPhone From:Phil Mast To:Council, City; Clerk, City Subject:A TheatreWorks Supporter’s Perspective On The Pavilion Conversion To A Theatre (5/18 Meeting, Agenda Item 13) Date:Wednesday, May 13, 2026 4:34:23 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. ! Dear Members of the Palo Alto City Council, I am a Barron Park resident and a longtime supporter of TheatreWorks. My wife and I have had season tickets for more years than I can remember. However, after reviewing the proposal to convert the Cubberley Pavilion into a theatre space, I am writing to urge the Council to reconsider this plan. While I support the arts, and TheatreWorks in particular, I do not believe this conversion serves the best interests of the city or its residents for several reasons: Redundant Artistic Value: As a frequent attendee, I’ve looked closely at how this new venue would improve the TheatreWorks experience. The reality is that there would be no noticeable difference. Watching a production at the Lucie Stern Community Theatre is fundamentally equivalent to watching it at a converted Pavilion. We are essentially proposing a lateral move rather than a step forward. The Critical Gym Shortage: It is no secret that Palo Alto faces a persistent shortage of indoor recreational gym space. Our Palo Alto parents don't want to drive their children to neighboring cities just to participate in soccer, volleyball, and other basic sports activities. Efficiency of Existing Infrastructure: Even with the proposed new recreation center at Cubberley, keeping the Pavilion as a gym helps ensure that we meet current and future athletic demands. The Pavilion is already a heavily used, functional asset for our youth and adult sports programs. Fiscal Responsibility: Converting a high-utilization gym into a theatre is estimated to cost tens of millions of dollars. As a taxpayer and an arts supporter, I find it difficult to justify such a significant expenditure for a project that provides no tangible benefit to the theatre-going experience while simultaneously stripping the community of much-needed athletic space. This message could be suspicious The sender's email address couldn't be verified. This is their first mail to some recipients. Mark Safe Report I strongly encourage the Council to preserve the Pavilion as a gymnasium. Let’s focus our resources on solutions that address our city's genuine deficit in recreational space rather than duplicating existing theatre facilities at a massive premium. Thank you for your consideration of this. Sincerely, Phil Mast Barron Park Resident and Longtime TheatreWorks Supporter From:Ali Vahedi To:Council, City Subject:Friday Night Cubberley Ballroom Dance Date:Wednesday, May 13, 2026 4:10:07 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i Dear Palo Alto Cirty Council Members, This is Ali Vahedi, a software engineer. I have been participating in Friday/Saturday Night Cubberley Ballroom Dance for the last ~12 years. Did not have any real dancing experience when I started. Dancing has become an enjoying hobby at later stage of my life, especially after I lost my job. Dancing at Cubberley is managed diligently by people who care for the community. On average attendees are more than 100 each Friday night, from all walks of life, culturally, financially, ..... The charge of $10 per night, which covers teaching sessions and social dance, is affordable for many people. Needless to add, the venue is used by many sports teams, especially the young generation. Please consider keeping the Ballroom as is. Thanks aliavah@yahoo.com This message needs your attention This is a personal email address. This is their first email to your company. Mark Safe Report