Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2026-03-24 Parks & Recreation Commission Agenda PacketPARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION Regular Meeting Tuesday, March 24, 2026, 7:00 PM Council Chambers & Hybrid Vice Chair Bing Wei Remote Call In Teleconference Location: Apt. 201, 1024 E. Del Mar Blvd., Pasadena, CA 91106   Parks and Recreation Commission meetings will be held as “hybrid” meetings with the option to attend by teleconference/video conference or in person. Information on how the public may observe and participate in the meeting is located at the end of the agenda. The meeting will be broadcast on Cable TV Channel 26, live on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/c/cityofpaloalto, and streamed to Midpen Media Center https://midpenmedia.org. Commissioner names, biographies, and archived agendas and minutes are available at https://www.paloalto.gov/Departments/Community-Services/Other- Services/Commissions/Parks-and-Recreation-Commission. VIRTUAL PARTICIPATION CLICK HERE TO JOIN (https://cityofpaloalto.zoom.us/join) Meeting ID: 999 3789 9745 Phone: 1(669)900-6833   PUBLIC COMMENTS Public comments will be accepted both in person and via Zoom for up to three minutes or an amount of time determined by the Chair. All requests to speak will be taken until 5 minutes after the staff’s presentation. Written public comments can be submitted in advance to ParkRec.commission@PaloAlto.gov and will be provided to the Commission and available for inspection on the City’s website three days before the meeting. Please clearly indicate which agenda item you are referencing in your subject line. Multiple individuals who wish to speak on the same item may designate a spokesperson. Spokespersons must be representing five or more verified individuals who are present either in person or via zoom. Spokespeople will be allowed up to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the presiding officer. Speaking time may be reduced if the presiding officer reduces the speaking time for individual speakers. General public comment will be heard for 30 minutes. Additional public comments, if any, will be heard at the end of the agenda. Speaking time may be reduced by the Chair to accommodate a larger number of speakers. PowerPoints, videos, or other media to be presented during public comment are accepted only by email to ParkRec.commission@PaloAlto.gov at least 24 hours prior to the meeting. Once received, the Clerk will have them shared at public comment for the specified item. To uphold strong cybersecurity management practices, USB’s or other physical electronic storage devices are not accepted. Signs and symbolic materials less than 2 feet by 3 feet are permitted provided that: (1) sticks, posts, poles or similar/other type of handle objects are strictly prohibited; (2) the items do not create a facility, fire, or safety hazard; and (3) persons with such items remain seated when displaying them and must not raise the items above shoulder level, obstruct the view or passage of other attendees, or otherwise disturb the business of the meeting. TIME ESTIMATES Listed times are estimates only and are subject to change at any time, including while the meeting is in progress. The Commission reserves the right to use more or less time on any item, to change the order of items and/or to continue items to another meeting. Particular items may be heard before or after the time estimated on the agenda. This may occur in order to best manage the time at a meeting or to adapt to the participation of the public. CALL TO ORDER   PUBLIC COMMENT Members of the public may speak to any item NOT on the agenda.   AGENDA CHANGES, ADDITIONS AND DELETIONS The Chair or Commission majority may modify the agenda order to improve meeting management.   APPROVAL OF MINUTES   CITY OFFICIAL REPORTS Members of the public may not speak to the item(s) 1.Council Liaison Report – 5 minutes 2.Department Report – 20 minutes – Staff Presentation 3.Ad Hoc Committees and Liaison Updates (Discussion) – 15 minutes BUSINESS ITEMS   4.Cubberley Project: Receive Results of Community Poll #2 and #3; Recommendation to City Council on Adoption of the Cubberley Conceptual Master Plan. CEQA Status: A Draft Initial Study Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) Report Was Circulated for a 30-day Public Review Beginning on March 2, 2026, and Ending on April 1, 2026. – 75 minutes – Staff Presentation 5.San Antonio Road Area Plan Land Use and Transportation Alternatives Study Session. CEQA Status: Exempt under CEQA Guidelines Section 15262 (Discussion). – 30 minutes – Staff Presentation COMMISSIONER QUESTIONS, COMMENTS, ANNOUNCEMENTS OR FUTURE MEETINGS AND AGENDAS Members of the public may not speak to the item(s)   ADJOURNMENT   OTHER INFORMATION The materials below are provided for informational purposes, not for action or discussion during this meeting’s agenda. Written public comments may be submitted in advance and will be provided to the Commission and available for public inspection on the City’s website three days before the meeting.   A.Public Comments PUBLIC COMMENT INSTRUCTIONS Members of the Public may provide public comments to teleconference meetings via email, teleconference, or by phone. 1.Written public comments may be submitted by email to ParkRec.Commission@PaloAlto.gov. 2.Spoken public comments using a computer will be accepted through the teleconference meeting. To address the Council, click on the link below to access a Zoom-based meeting. Please read the following instructions carefully. ◦You may download the Zoom client or connect to the meeting in- browser. If using your browser, make sure you are using a current, up-to-date browser: Chrome 30 , Firefox 27 , Microsoft Edge 12 , Safari 7 . Certain functionality may be disabled in older browsers including Internet Explorer. ◦You may be asked to enter an email address and name. We request that you identify yourself by name as this will be visible online and will be used to notify you that it is your turn to speak. ◦When you wish to speak on an Agenda Item, click on “raise hand.” The Clerk will activate and unmute speakers in turn. Speakers will be notified shortly before they are called to speak. ◦When called, please limit your remarks to the time limit allotted. A timer will be shown on the computer to help keep track of your comments. 3.Spoken public comments using a smart phone will be accepted through the teleconference meeting. To address the Council, download the Zoom application onto your phone from the Apple App Store or Google Play Store and enter the Meeting ID below. Please follow the instructions B-E above. 4.Spoken public comments using a phone use the telephone number listed below. When you wish to speak on an agenda item hit *9 on your phone so we know that you wish to speak. You will be asked to provide your first and last name before addressing the Council. You will be advised how long you have to speak. When called please limit your remarks to the agenda item and time limit allotted. CLICK HERE TO JOIN Meeting ID: 999 3789 9745 Phone:1-669-900-6833 Americans with Disability Act (ADA) It is the policy of the City of Palo Alto to offer its public programs, services and meetings in a manner that is readily accessible to all. Persons with disabilities who require materials in an appropriate alternative format or who require auxiliary aids to access City meetings, programs, or services may contact the City’s ADA Coordinator at (650) 329-2550 (voice) or by emailing ada@PaloAlto.gov. Requests for assistance or accommodations must be submitted at least 24 hours in advance of the meeting, program, or service. PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION DEPARTMENT REPORT March 24, 2026 PaloAlto.gov Item 2 PRC Department Report 3.24.26 Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 1 Packet Pg. 5 of 426  RECAP: DISCOVER YOUR PATH – Career Exploration Event Item 2 PRC Department Report 3.24.26 Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 2 Packet Pg. 6 of 426  UPCOMING SPECIAL EVENTS Item 2 PRC Department Report 3.24.26 Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 3 Packet Pg. 7 of 426  CUBBERLEY UPDATES Project Webpage: www.PaloAlto.gov/CubberleyProject Scan the QR Code to sign-up for the project newsletter As a reminder since the beginning of the month, Cubberley Community Center Office has been open by appointment only. Cubberley Community Center questions and inquiries, please: Call: 650-329-2418 Email: cubberley@paloalto.gov Theatre questions and inquiries, please: Call: 650-329-2602 Email:Cubberley-theatre@paloalto.gov Field and tennis questions and inquiries, please: Call: 650-463-4905 Email: playingfields@paloalto.gov Custodial staff help, please: Call: 650-444-5012 Item 2 PRC Department Report 3.24.26 Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 4 Packet Pg. 8 of 426  SUMMER CAMP UPDATE Overall Summer Camp Program •289 camps offered (cancelled 21 skateboarding camps) •3,217 campers enrolled to date Item 2 PRC Department Report 3.24.26 Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 5 Packet Pg. 9 of 426  MITCHELL PARK – Water Feature On Seven days a week 10:00am – 8:30pm Item 2 PRC Department Report 3.24.26 Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 6 Packet Pg. 10 of 426  GOLF COURSE/HOOVER – Repairs and replacements Traffic Garden Example before after Item 2 PRC Department Report 3.24.26 Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 7 Packet Pg. 11 of 426  PEERS PARK – Upgraded fill station and water fountain Item 2 PRC Department Report 3.24.26 Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 8 Packet Pg. 12 of 426  HERITAGE PARK – Site Amenities Replacement (PG-21000) Item 2 PRC Department Report 3.24.26 Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 9 Packet Pg. 13 of 426  Item 2 PRC Department Report 3.24.26 Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 10 Packet Pg. 14 of 426  Parks and Recreation Commission Staff Report From: Community Services Department Meeting Date: March 24, 2026 Report #: 2601-5825 TITLE Cubberley Project: Receive Results of Community Poll #2 and #3; Recommendation to City Council on Adoption of the Cubberley Conceptual Master Plan. CEQA Status: A Draft Initial Study Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) Report Was Circulated for a 30-day Public Review Beginning on March 2, 2026, and Ending on April 1, 2026. RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommend that the Parks and Recreation Commission (PRC): 1. Receive results of Community Poll #2 and #3; and 2. Consider the Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for the Cubberley Conceptual Master Plan (Master Plan); and 3. Recommend City Council adopt the Cubberley Conceptual Master Plan. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The City of Palo Alto (City) is advancing a long-term vision to redevelop a 15-acre portion of the Cubberley campus, including seven acres proposed to be purchased from the Palo Alto Unified School District (PAUSD) for $65.5M. The purchase and improvements are dependent on the City identifying funding, such as a successful ballot measure for a parcel or sales tax, development impact fees, private/public partnerships, and philanthropy. The Community Services Department developed the proposed Cubberley Conceptual Master Plan (Master Plan) in Attachment B through a robust community engagement effort, building upon the 2019 Cubberley Concept Plan. The Master Plan, along with detailed appendices (Attachment B), proposes a three-phased approach combining new construction and renovation, as detailed further in this report. Until additional funding is secured for future phases, the phased approach is necessary to manage costs and sequence renovation, demolition, and new construction while limiting disruption to existing programs and services at Cubberley. While the plan provides a distinct layout of the site with specific features, it represents a concept that should be considered adaptable and dynamic as the project phases continue to progress. Collectively, the plan increases indoor space from approximately 184,000 square feet today to 232,250 square feet after Phase I and Item 4 Staff Report Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 1 Packet Pg. 15 of 426  approximately 284,000 square feet at full buildout, while also significantly expanding and enhancing outdoor spaces. BACKGROUND Item 4 Staff Report Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 2 Packet Pg. 16 of 426  There has been extensive foundational work completed to support the advancement of the Cubberley Project, including several actions by the City Council. Attachment A shares a more detailed summary of actions to date and the history of the Cubberley site. 1 additional milestones have been added including the City Council meeting on October 20, 2025, December 15, 2025, and February 9, 2026. Staff also presented the Cubberley Conceptual Master Plan and CEQA document at a special joint meeting to the Planning and Transportation Commission (PTC) and Architectural Review Board (ARB) on March 11, 2026, where both the PTC and ARB voted separately and unanimously to recommend that City Council adopt the Cubberley Conceptual Master Plan, with considerations. The approved PTC and ARB motions are included in Attachment A and are generally focused on cost effectiveness of renovation versus new construction, parking adequacy, and site circulation for bikes and pedestrians. 1 Staff Presentation, September 23, 2025; https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/viewer/preview?id=0&type=8&uid=efbb1418-4bbe-49b2-b786- 165e29017ca3 Item 4 Staff Report Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 3 Packet Pg. 17 of 426  community meeting. Staff then introduced three 3-D concept plans (The Promenade, The Grid, and The Plaza), each with A, B, and C variations exploring different approaches to building placement, renovation versus new construction, green space, circulation, and parking. The possibility of preserving and renovating certain existing buildings was introduced, as well as the need to phase construction. A phased approach to construction helps to ensure programs and services continue while the campus evolves over time and allows for the acquisition of additional funding sources beyond the ballot-supported tax or bond, such as public-private partnerships, grants, and impact fees. ANALYSIS 3 Building on that foundation, the current process moved forward with a series of three community meetings designed to refine and update the vision for the site. To date, all three community meetings have been held as part of the Cubberley Community Center co-design process, as detailed above, and culminated 3 Cubberley Concept Plan 2019: https://www.pausd.org/about-us/committees-task-forces/archived- committees/cubberley-master-plan Item 4 Staff Report Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 4 Packet Pg. 18 of 426  in a guiding vision for potential development of the Cubberley Community Center site with the completion of the Cubberley Conceptual Master Plan. Phase I: Phase I of the Cubberley Conceptual Master Plan would focus on constructing a new Recreation and Wellness Center, a new Education Building, and renovation of other existing buildings, such as a two-theatre Performing Arts Complex, to ensure the full campus continues to be operational until full funding is secured. The different elements of Phase 1 could be completed incrementally. Recreation and Wellness Center: A new two-story facility designed to serve multiple community needs. The building would include four multipurpose gymnasiums that could accommodate basketball, volleyball, indoor pickleball, and other recreational uses, along with fitness studio spaces, locker rooms, offices, and dedicated health and wellness areas. The facility would also incorporate storage space for emergency services and sheltering supplies such as cots and equipment, supporting the City’s emergency preparedness efforts. Flexible Event Space: Adjacent to the Recreation and Wellness Center is a large, flexible event space capable of hosting a wide range of activities such as ballroom dancing, performing arts, classes, community meetings and presentations, weddings, parties, and Item 4 Staff Report Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 5 Packet Pg. 19 of 426  other community rentals. There is also a café area that can provide light refreshments, beverages, and grab-and-go food for visitors, and a concessions area will serve snacks for gym, pool, and athletic field events. The commercial kitchen could support cooking and nutrition classes, event catering for the large flex space and campus rentals, and food service during emergency shelter operations when the gyms are deployed. Outdoor Programming: The current tennis courts would be elevated, with a surface- level parking lot constructed underneath and the tennis courts reestablished on top. Additionally, Phase I could include the construction of a new outdoor swimming pool to expand aquatics programming and community recreation opportunities. New Education Building: This building would support a range of educational and community programs. This facility could house early education offerings, after-school programs, and other lifelong learning opportunities, creating a dedicated space for youth and family enrichment. Performing Arts: Both the Pavilion and Cubberley Theatre would be renovated to enhance the space as a community cultural hub. These improvements would create flexible spaces for performing arts, dance, martial arts, music, rehearsals, and related activities. Renovations would also include upgraded lobby areas to provide a more welcoming and functional gathering space for audiences and performers. Recently on January 28, 2026, the City and TheatreWorks Silicon Valley announced a partnership to create a two-theatre complex that would include the renovation of the existing Cubberley theatre and Pavilion and adding new construction. The existing Cubberley theatre would be upgraded for continued community use and include new restrooms, expanded back of house and lobby space, and improved accessibility. The Pavilion would be renovated as the new home for Theatreworks Silicon Valley. Existing Building Renovation: The two-story “I” building would be renovated to improve functionality and extend its useful life. Phase I also includes renovation of remaining buildings, so the full site continues to be operational until funding for phases II and III is secured. Buildings and rooms currently used and occupied by PAUSD would become available for programming, visual arts, makerspace and workshops and flexible rental spaces. Phase II: Phase II of the Cubberley Conceptual Master Plan would focus on the construction of visual arts and technology buildings, which includes makerspace and workshop areas for hands- on projects, as well as gallery space for city curated and community exhibitions. This area will also include artist creative studios, expanding opportunities for artists and community members to create, learn, and showcase their work. Phase III: Phase III of the Cubberley Conceptual Master Plan would complete the Community Services section and provide a café and lounge gathering space, a popular request from the community, along with new community service and flexible spaces. The flexible space is Item 4 Staff Report Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 6 Packet Pg. 20 of 426  especially valuable, as it provides the ability to adapt to changing program needs and future community priorities. It is designed to be future-proof, multi-purpose, and nimble—supporting staff-led programs, hourly rentals, office space, and potentially accommodating additional tenants. This intentional flexibility will ensure the campus continues to meet evolving needs long after construction is complete. Recreational space, including gyms and programmable spaces for health and wellness classes and activities; Expanded theater and performing arts spaces with improved accessibility; Visual arts spaces for art programs, classes, and exhibits to the community, including a makerspace and creative workshops; and Flexible spaces for city programming of classes and camps, and rental space. Item 4 Staff Report Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 7 Packet Pg. 21 of 426  determined that this supply would meet typical day-to-day demand based on nationally recognized standards and evaluation of the campus design, square footage, and anticipated uses. Additional traffic analysis would be conducted during future architectural design phases. 5 then ran from November 6 through 13, with a total of 407 residents interviewed via phone and online. The poll results are attached to this report (Attachment C) and summarized below: Two-thirds of likely voters want the Cubberley Community Center updated as a visionary goal. Both the first and second polls show consistency in effectiveness of two specific themes and should be emphasized moving forward: Most are satisfied with the current programs and services offered at Cubberley. Willingness to invest in a package that is focused on basic repairs and upgrades to meet safety and accessibility standards. Voters’ willingness to pay for improvements to Cubberley are more favorable via a parcel tax or sales tax. 5 City Council, October 20, 2025: Agenda Item #1; SR#2503-4353, https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/viewer/preview?id=0&type=8&uid=71b7244b-dd63-4983-814f-fc85664f01cd Item 4 Staff Report Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 8 Packet Pg. 22 of 426  Results of the Third Community Poll On December 15, 2025,7 staff and the City Council discussed launching the third poll in January 2026. The Cubberley Ad Hoc Committee reviewed the poll outline on December 18, 2025. The poll ran from January 5 through 12, with a total of 416 residents interviewed via phone and online. Poll results are attached to this report (Attachment D) and summarized below: Just over one-third see at least “some need” for additional funds for updated facilities, dropping from 55% in November 2025 and 58% from April/May 2025. Support of a parcel tax and a sales tax from interviewed residents improved from the last poll. Parcel tax: received 48% support (from 39% in the second poll); below the required two- thirds requirement to pass on the ballot. Sales tax: received 48% support (from 37% in the second poll); below the 50% + 1 requirement to pass on the ballot. Voters’ top priories: o General-purpose tax: maintaining storm drains, fixing potholes, maintaining streets, and maintaining the City’s financial stability. o Cubberley: preserving trees and outdoor space, upgrading outdated and deteriorating electrical and plumbing, upgrading buildings to meet current standards, and providing safe spaces for children and teens after school and in the summer. Results of this poll were reviewed by the Cubberley Ad Hoc on January 27, 2026. Emergence of partnership opportunities, discussed in the next section of this report, has expanded possible funding streams for the Cubberley project, and these partnership opportunities are part of the funding model. To ensure the highest probability of success and offer the best path forward, the Ad Hoc and staff continue evaluating options for funding and financing strategies. The fourth poll is currently released to the community, March 19 – 28, 2026. This poll will inform whether support from partnership opportunities and other revenue source(s) such as development impact fees, grants, and philanthropy will change voter support for both funding mechanisms. Partnership Opportunities Public Private Partnerships provide an opportunity to advance certain elements of the Cubberley project through a combination of City and private investment while offering valuable programs and services to the community. Several community nonprofit organizations have expressed interest and both staff and members of the Ad Hoc are engaging in conversations 7 City Council, December 15, 2025; Agenda Item #3; SR# 2503-4355, https://recordsportal.paloalto.gov/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=84147&dbid=0&repo=PaloAlto Item 4 Staff Report Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 9 Packet Pg. 23 of 426  with potential partners, including TheatreWorks Silicon Valley and the Friends of the Recreation Wellness Center. TheatreWorks Silicon Valley TheatreWorks began as a Palo Alto program 55 years ago, and now, as a nationally recognized professional nonprofit theatre company, produces mainstage productions at two locations, the Lucie Stern Community Center in Palo Alto and the Mountain View Center for the Performing Arts. Through a partnership with TheatreWorks, a 2-theater complex would be created, through renovation of the existing Community Theatre and Pavilion and new construction. The existing Cubberley Theatre would be upgraded for continued use by local community groups, and would include adding restrooms, an expanded lobby, and upgraded accessibility and technology, while creating a second theatre in what is now the Pavilion as a future home for TheatreWorks. A Press Release was issued on January 28, 2026, announcing the partnership. 9 To establish a framework for future actions, a Letter of Intent was presented to the City Council on February 9, 2026,10 and outlined mutually cooperative strategies to guide ongoing discussions on the key terms and conditions of future agreements. Following approval of the Letter of Intent, the two parties will establish terms for a future agreement that will include cost sharing fundraising goals, timelines, management structures, and other terms. Friends of the Recreation Wellness Center (Friends) The Friends formally organized as a 501(c)3 nonprofit in December 2022 for the purpose of fundraising and building a multi-use gymnasium or recreation wellness center in Palo Alto. A Letter of Intent with the Friends was approved by the City Council on December 2, 2024,11 to demonstrate the City’s commitment to provide the land for a recreation wellness center and the Friends’ commitment to raise donor funds for construction. The Friends and City staff continue to discuss the key terms that will form a future agreement for continued collaboration. Cubberley Workplan Updates As the various project elements advance it is important to recognize the interdependencies that exist and are necessary to meet the timeline. Each workplan step is intentionally designed to inform the next – input and data received during the previous and current master planning efforts inform the polling themes and questions, while poll results will inform the concept plans 9 Press Release, January 28, 2006; https://www.paloalto.gov/News-Articles/Community-Services/Palo-Alto-and- TheatreWorks-Silicon-Valley-Partner-on-Home-at-Cubberley 10 City Council, February 9, 2026, Agenda Item #11; SR# 2512-5774, https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/viewer/preview?id=0&type=8&uid=e1efd425-64a8-4ce3-a516- 330824ba25b0 11 City Council, December 2, 2024, Agenda Item #18; SR# 2410-3634, https://recordsportal.paloalto.gov/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=83117&dbid=0&repo=PaloAlto Item 4 Staff Report Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 10 Packet Pg. 24 of 426  for a new community center at the Cubberley site. Given the constrained timeline and resources needed to complete multiple and complex bodies of work, it is important to maintain focus on the critical path to ensure milestones are met. The milestones listed below are necessary to complete the master plan and draft a potential ordinance by Spring 2026 to reach the November 2026 ballot: bold) Feb 18, 2025 – City Council Visioning Session March 19, 2025 – First Cubberley Master Planning Community Meeting April 21, 2025 – City Council direction on Poll #1 themes April 22, 2025 – Presentation to Parks and Recreation Commission April 28, 2025 –Poll #1 released to Palo Alto community June 9, 2025 – City Council review of Poll #1 results June 12, 2025 – Second Cubberley Master Planning Community Meeting June 19, 2025 – Public Art Commission Meeting June 24, 2025 – Presentation to Parks and Recreation Commission July 9, 2025 – Presentation to Planning & Transportation Commission July 17, 2025 – Presentation to Architectural Review Board September 17, 2025 – Third Cubberley Master Planning Community Meeting September 23, 2025 – Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting October 20, 2025 – City Council recap of third community meeting November 7 –17, 2025 – Poll #2 released to Palo Alto community December 15, 2025 – City Council review Poll #2 results January 5-12, 2026 – Poll #3 released to Palo Alto community February 9, 2026 – City Council review Poll #3 results and TheatreWorks LOI March 11, 2026 – Presentation of Conceptual Master Plan / CEQA to PTC / ARB March 19 – 28, 2026 – Release Poll #4 to Palo Alto community March 24, 2026 – Presentation to Parks and Recreation Commission April 20, 2026 – City Council consideration for Adoption of Cubberley Conceptual Master Plan and CEQA, Review Poll #4 results June 2026 – Council approval to place a measure on the November ballot August 2026 – Deadline to submit Final Ballot Language for November Election November 2026 – Election and placement of a ballot measure Item 4 Staff Report Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 11 Packet Pg. 25 of 426  coordinating with the Friends of the Palo Alto Recreation Wellness Center and TheatreWorks Silicon Valley and continuing community outreach and stakeholder engagement. STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT Project website (www.paloalto.gov/improvecubberley), Online comment card asking for priorities and open fields to share vision and service needs, City updates via medium.com blog space, Project updates sent via email newsletter to the project distribution list and project updates shared through City channels including Nextdoor and digital newsletters, and videos, Utility bill inserts, Resident mailers, and Item 4 Staff Report Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 12 Packet Pg. 26 of 426  Tabling at key City events. ENVIROMENTAL REVIEW The City, acting as the lead agency accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), prepared an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (Attachment B) to evaluate potential environmental impacts associated with implementation of the Master Plan. The environmental analysis concludes that while the project could have significant effects on the environment, revisions to the project and incorporation of mitigation measures reduce all impacts to less-than-significant levels. The IS/MND is being circulated now for a 30-day public review which began on March 2, 2026, and will end April 1, 2026. The City will publish a Final MND prior to Council decision on the project. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: Cubberley Project Background Attachment B: Project Documents Including Cubberley Conceptual Master Plan and the Draft Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration Attachment C: Results of the Second Community Poll Attachment D: Results of the Third Community Poll Item 4 Staff Report Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 13 Packet Pg. 27 of 426  Attachment A The Cubberley Site The 35-acre Cubberley site, located at 4000 Middlefield Road in Palo Alto, operated as Cubberley High School from 1956 to 1979. Beginning in the late 1980’s, the City began leasing portions of the facilities from the Palo Alto Unified School District (PAUSD) at the site. Today, the City operates the areas of Cubberley it controls as a community center, using some of the space for classes and activities in arts, culture, athletics, and sub-leasing additional space at City-subsidized rates to various non-profit and community serving groups. The current lease agreement expires December 31, 2029.1 Today, the City owns eight acres of the 35-acre site. PAUSD owns the remaining 27 acres, most of which are leased to the City. There are currently 23 tenants and 24 artists leasing space at Cubberley from the City and dozens of groups renting the theater, pavilion, classrooms, and athletic fields from the City. Combined, these groups provide the community with programs that support health and wellness, childcare, education, and visual and performing arts. PAUSD uses its retained space for educational purposes and staff offices and has leases with some third-party tenants. The parking lot in the southeast corner of the property houses portable trailers as a temporary site for Hoover Elementary School during construction at the school’s site. A current site map can be found on the City’s website.2 Several master planning efforts have been completed over the years to reimagine and improve the Cubberley site, with the most recent being completed in 2019.3 Memorandum of Understanding with PAUSD In October 2024,4 both the City Council and Palo Alto Unified School District (PAUSD or District) Board of Education approved a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) related to the future of the Cubberley site. The MOU outlines key terms and conditions for the purchase and future planning of Cubberley. The land purchase, which would transfer ownership of seven acres from PAUSD to the City, is contingent on voter approval of a bond measure in November 2026. This condensed timeframe requires development of a master plan for the site by March 2026, conduct stakeholder and community engagement and outreach, polling, financial analysis, CEQA analysis, and other critical tasks. The addition of the seven acres, plus the eight acres already owned by the City of 1 City Council, December 2, 2024: https://recordsportal.paloalto.gov/WebLink/DocView.aspx? id=83118&dbid=0&repo=PaloAlto 2 https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/v/1/city-manager/communications-office/cubberley-community-center_mappdf.pdf 3 Cubberley Concept Plan 2019: https://www.pausd.org/about-us/committees-task-forces/archived-committees/cubberley-master-plan 4 City Council, October 7, 2024; Agenda Item AA1; SR #2409-3500, https://recordsportal.paloalto.gov/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=83032&dbid=0&repo=PaloAlto Item 4 Attachment A Cubberley Project Background Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 14 Packet Pg. 28 of 426  Attachment A Palo Alto provides an opportunity to develop a new community center and other improvements on a combined 15 acres at the Cubberley site to provide a range of City programs, including health, wellness, and recreational opportunities for residents. Master Plan Update and Pursuit of a Local Ballot Measure To advance the master planning effort the City Council took several actions on December 2, 20249 related to the future of the Cubberley site. These actions included approval of a contract with Concordia, LLC, and associated budget actions for development of a revised Master Plan for the Cubberley Community Center site, building on the previous master plan completed in 2019 by Concordia and guided by significant community input. Additionally, the Council approved a Letter of Intent with the Friends of the Palo Alto Recreation Wellness Center for the purpose of fundraising for a recreation wellness center (gymnasium) at the Cubberley site, and a workplan for pursuit of a November 2026 local ballot measure to fund the purchase of land and development of a new community center at the Cubberley site. Subsequent Council actions included approving a five-year lease with PAUSD10 to continue the current use of the property, including playing fields, approval of a professional services agreement with Rincon for CEQA analysis,11 and approval of professional service agreements with Lew Edwards Group and Fairbank, Maslin, Metz & Associates12 for ballot measure strategy advisement and community polling. Cubberley Ad Hoc Committee The Council established the Cubberley Ad Hoc Committee (as a non-Brown Act body) to review and advise staff on efforts related to polling and development of a ballot measure that will successfully receive voter support in 2026. Efforts include polling, financial and revenue modeling for the community center, master planning, and community outreach to complete the Master Plan and place a measure on the November 2026 ballot. The City Council will serve as the governing body for policy direction at key decision points. This includes direction to conduct polling, review of concept designs, direction on 9 City Council, December 2, 2024; Agenda Item 18, SR #2410-3634, https://recordsportal.paloalto.gov/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=83117&dbid=0&repo=PaloAlto 10 City Council, December 2, 2024; Agenda Item 12; SR #2410-3651, https://recordsportal.paloalto.gov/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=83118&dbid=0&repo=PaloAlto 11 City Council, December 16, 2024; Agenda Item 12; SR #2411-3813, https://recordsportal.paloalto.gov/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=83167&dbid=0&repo=PaloAlto 12 City Council, February 24, 2025; Agenda Item 4; SR #2501-4039, https://recordsportal.paloalto.gov/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=83267&dbid=0&repo=PaloAlto Item 4 Attachment A Cubberley Project Background Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 15 Packet Pg. 29 of 426  Attachment A operating and financial models, and decisions on what should be placed on the November 2026 ballot. April 21, 2025 City Council Meeting At the April 21, 2025 City Council meeting,17 staff presented outcomes from the first community meeting held on March 19, an update on the Cubberley Master Plan Project workplan and sought Council authorization to initiate the first community poll. First Cubberley Master Plan Community Meeting The first community meeting for the Cubberley Master Plan Project was held on March 19, 2025, and was attended by over 120 community members and stakeholders. Participants completed two activities in table groups of up to eight people with guided facilitation, focusing on the vision for the community center, programming, and place making. The first meeting goals included a review of the Vision from the City Council session and then using a list from the previous community engagement process, participants were asked to review and confirm desired programming and adjacencies for the future Community Center. The outcomes of the March 19 meeting were presented18 to the City Council on April 21, 2025. The first activity focused on a review of the Council Vision statement and participants were asked to expand the Vision statement with additional values and ideas. Community members valued: Multipurpose, adaptable spaces to accommodate diverse uses over time; Gathering hubs for interconnectivity and communication between diverse social, cultural and generational groups; Accessibility for all ages, cultures and abilities to access holistic wellness resources; Integration of green space and sustainability features in experiential and infrastructural planning; and Affordability for local Palo Altans and for tenants who have a community focus. Overall, participants focused on flexibility, inclusivity, sustainability, and long-term community engagement as high-level themes. The second activity focused on programming and adjacencies of indoor and outdoor spaces. The most selected indoor programs were Theater/Performance Space, Dance Classes, Art Studio, Art Classes, followed by Gym Facility, Flexible Rental Space, and a Café. For outdoor programs, Open Greenspace was the most selected program followed by Playground, Amphitheater, and Pool/Water Area. Compared to 2019, the most mentioned programs then (indoor and outdoor) were Adult Education, 17 City Council, April 21, 2025; Agenda Item 11; SR #2503-4310, https://recordsportal.paloalto.gov/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=83361&dbid=0&repo=PaloAlto 18 Staff Presentation, April 21, 2025; https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/Portal/viewer?id=0&type=7&uid=71ade3d7-a57a-4195-a59b- c410d90832ea Item 4 Attachment A Cubberley Project Background Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 16 Packet Pg. 30 of 426  Attachment A Theater/Performance Space, Greenspace, Makerspace, and Senior/Multigenerational Programs. Feedback on First Community Poll Polling experts, FM3 presented21 themes for the first community poll designed to test voter opinions on the community center’s goals, preferred uses, and willingness to support funding through a tax or bond. The poll themes and questions were developed with input from the Cubberley Ad Hoc Committee and will inform critical upcoming milestones in the project. The Council did not take an action but supported proceeding with the poll. April 22,2025 Parks & Recreation Commission Meeting On April 22, 2025,22 staff presented an informational update to the Parks and Recreation Commission, offering a comprehensive overview of the project's overall workplan and timeline. The presentation included a detailed summary of Community Meeting #1, highlighting key themes and priorities that emerged from the community’s feedback. Staff also introduced Poll #1, which was launched at the end of April, and encouraged Commissioners to help promote the survey to ensure broad community participation. In addition, the presentation outlined several ways the Commission can remain engaged and support the project, including serving as ambassadors within the community, helping to share information, and providing feedback. The creation of a PRC Cubberley ad-hoc committee was discussed and it was decided that this topic will be further considered during the upcoming workplan revisions scheduled for the coming months. June 9, 2025 City Council Meeting On June 9, 2025,23 staff presented to City Council the results of the first community poll, community engagement milestones coming up and updates to the workplan. The focus of the first poll was to survey voter input on the goals and future of the community center and possible support for a tax or bond measure. Staff also shared community engagement. Overall, the poll found broad majority support for improvement at the Cubberley site. Surveyed voters place highest priority on bringing the facility up to modern standards for electrical, plumbing, safety, and accessibility early childhood 21 FM3 Presentation, April 21, 2025; https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/Portal/viewer?id=0&type=7&uid=83ec6422-b6e4-4e83-9ca3- ca746a5971a0 22 Staff Presentation, April 22, 2025; https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/Portal/viewer?id=0&type=7&uid=dae0543c-e007-4fc1-9a69- fd08b156ee94 23 City Council, June 9, 2025, Agenda Item 2; SR#2503-4313, https://recordsportal.paloalto.gov/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=83442&dbid=0&repo=PaloAlto Item 4 Attachment A Cubberley Project Background Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 17 Packet Pg. 31 of 426  Attachment A education; affordability and efficient use of taxpayer dollars; and overall repairs for the facility. Lastly, staff shared with the City Council the community revised Vision Statement for the future of the Community Center. June 12, 2025 Second Cubberley Master Plan Community Meeting A vibrant, beloved, and adaptable destination that promotes learning, connections, joy, and wellbeing where all cultures and generations belong. Following this, staff provided an overview presentation to orient attendees to the three 3-D concept plans being presented. Each conceptual design includes an A, B, and C variations exploring different configurations of building placement, new construction vs renovation, green space, bike and pedestrian circulation, and parking—both above and below ground. Item 4 Attachment A Cubberley Project Background Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 18 Packet Pg. 32 of 426  Attachment A Approximately 130 community members attended the second Cubberley Community Meeting and were highly engaged in providing feedback on the three presented concept designs. Attendees shared a wide range of reactions to various aspects of the designs, particularly discussing building layouts, the placement and amount of green space, parking structures, and preferences between above- and below-ground concepts. While perspectives varied, there was clear consensus around the excitement for the project’s progress and enthusiasm to see the plans taking shape. Community members expressed eagerness to continue the conversation, particularly around program placement, at the next meeting. June 19, 2025 Public Art Commission Meeting 27 City staff presented to the Public Art Commission and discussed potential opportunities to support the City’s Strategic Activation Plan for the Cubberley site, which was developed by staff in coordination with the City Council’s Cubberley Ad Hoc Committee. The plan outlined phased enhancements and activations aligned with the broader master planning process, community engagement efforts, and the anticipated November 2026 ballot initiative. As part of the discussion, Commissioners explored how the ArtLift grant program—previously identified at their January retreat as a potential tool—could be leveraged to support temporary public art installations at Cubberley and other key locations. Ideas included murals, ground art, freestanding sculptures, and performance-based activations to help generate community excitement and reinforce the role of the arts in creating vibrant, inclusive public spaces. June 24, 2025 Parks & Recreation Commission Meeting 28 City staff provided the Parks and Recreation Commission with an informational update on the Cubberley Community Center Master Plan. The presentation included a recap of the second community meeting held on June 12, where Concordia unveiled three concept designs for the site and invited community feedback. Staff also presented the results of the first community poll, released in late April, and shared a list of proposed near-term activation ideas for the Cubberley site, inviting the Commission’s input. In addition, staff sought feedback from the Commission on the three concept designs. The newly formed PRC Cubberley Ad Hoc Committee will continue to refine the activation plans in July. 27 Staff Presentation, June 19, 2025; https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/Portal/viewer?id=0&type=7&uid=a036e199-31cd-4d94-8214- 7fb0170e39ac 28 Staff Presentation, June 24, 2025; https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/Portal/viewer?id=0&type=7&uid=ac29aa36-1b3a-4403-b8b2- cc403685865d Item 4 Attachment A Cubberley Project Background Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 19 Packet Pg. 33 of 426  Attachment A July 9, 2025 Planning and Transportation Commission Meeting On July 9, 2025,31 the Planning and Transportation Commission (PTC) received an update on the Cubberley Master Plan and was asked to provide input to help inform the next phase of the planning process. Staff requested feedback on several key aspects recently reviewed by the community, including arrival and parking, pedestrian circulation, building scale and space organization, greenspace layout, the balance of built and open space, and how the site can be a good neighbor. Additional PTC feedback emphasized the importance of clear cost comparisons between renovation and new construction, interest in public-private funding models, and support for a future bond measure and donor engagement. Commissioners favored partial underground parking and better integration with transit and surrounding neighborhoods. There was broad interest in maintaining flexible green space for events, ensuring safe and separate bike/pedestrian circulation, and preserving multigenerational, inclusive programming. Suggestions also included clearer diagrams, more tangible use examples, and consideration of impacts from surrounding development. On July 17,32 2025, the Architectural Review Board (ARB) received a presentation on the Cubberley Master Plan and provided early feedback to help shape the next phase of planning. The Board expressed strong support for phased development and emphasized minimizing disruption to existing tenants and programs. Members praised pedestrian and bike circulation, supported the proposed balance of buildings and green space, and encouraged improvements to vehicle access and mobility hubs. There was general support for new construction over renovation and interest in enhancing the site's identity through public art and flexible community spaces. The ARB also encouraged a welcoming design that reflects Cubberley’s civic and cultural significance while being a good neighbor to the surrounding community. On September 17, 2025, the City held the third and final community meeting for the Cubberley Master Plan, facilitated by Concordia. Approximately 150 community 31 Staff Presentation, June 9, 2025; https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/Portal/viewer?id=0&type=7&uid=49fc32cf-caa1-4dd9-97f9- 5d5d02150256 32 Staff Presentation, July 17, 2025; https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/Portal/viewer?id=0&type=7&uid=2a9a7988-768f-465b-bcf9- 68166ff9af6f Item 4 Attachment A Cubberley Project Background Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 20 Packet Pg. 34 of 426  Attachment A members attended and were highly engaged in reviewing the refined concept design. At the outset, City staff and Concordia recapped the first two community meetings, provided a project overview, and highlighted updates to the concept plan, including phasing strategies. Following this presentation, participants engaged in two interactive activities to provide focused feedback. Item 4 Attachment A Cubberley Project Background Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 21 Packet Pg. 35 of 426  Attachment A circulation pathways. The feedback gathered will directly inform refinement of the preferred concept plan. The full meeting summary will be finalized in the coming weeks and shared with the community through the project webpage and via City communication channels. Concordia and staff will incorporate this input as they prepare for the final presentation of the proposed master plan, cost estimates, and phasing scenarios to the community and City Council on December 8, 2025. September 23, 2025 Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting 35 2025, the Parks and Recreation Commission (PRC) received a presentation on the refined Cubberley Community Center Master Plan concept following the third and final community meeting held on September 17, 2025. Commissioners reviewed updates on program placement, phasing, and site circulation, and were asked to provide input on the same questions posed to the community: what is working well, what could be improved, and what creative ideas could enhance the campus experience. October 20, 2025 City Council Meeting 35 Staff Presentation, September 23, 2025; https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/viewer/preview?id=0&type=8&uid=efbb1418-4bbe-49b2-b786- 165e29017ca3 Item 4 Attachment A Cubberley Project Background Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 22 Packet Pg. 36 of 426  Attachment A purchase, and the extent of how much voters are willing to pay annually. Following the October 20 meeting, and the November 4 election, the second poll was released. December 15, 2025 City Council Meeting February 9, 2026 City Council Meeting Item 4 Attachment A Cubberley Project Background Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 23 Packet Pg. 37 of 426  Attachment A a two-theater complex through renovation of the existing Community Theatre and Pavilion, with new construction to support TheatreWorks, and upgrades to the Cubberley Theatre for continued community use, including new restrooms, an expanded lobby, and improved accessibility. Staff recommended approval of a Letter of Intent with TheatreWorks to formalize this joint commitment, which Council approved. In addition, staff shared that the Friends of the Recreation and Wellness Center and the City are continuing to develop terms for an agreement to advance a future recreation and wellness center with new multi-court gymnasium space on the Cubberley campus. Avenidas Executive Director, Kristina Lugo, was also in attendance and publicly expressed interest in exploring partnership opportunities with the City at the Cubberley site. March 11, 2026 Planning and Transportation Commission and Architectural Review Board Special Joint Meeting 37 on the proposed Cubberley Conceptual Master Plan and the Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) prepared under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Staff presented the City’s long-term vision to redevelop approximately 15 acres of the Cubberley campus, including the potential purchase of seven acres from the Palo Alto Unified School District (PAUSD) for $65.5 million. Staff noted that the purchase and implementation of the plan will depend on identifying funding sources, which may include a potential parcel or sales tax ballot measure in November 2026, development impact fees, philanthropic contributions, and public-private partnerships. 37 Staff Presentation, March 11, 2026; c5fb2f7d-a042-4c48-9247-4fd87b9dbc98.pdf - OneMeeting Item 4 Attachment A Cubberley Project Background Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 24 Packet Pg. 38 of 426  Attachment A Commissioners and Board members discussed topics including project phasing and funding, the status of the PAUSD lease and land acquisition, parking and circulation, recreation facilities such as the proposed pool, sustainability goals, long-term campus connectivity, elements of the site layout, the potential renovation versus replacement of existing buildings, and opportunities for philanthropic funding. Following discussion and public comment, both the Planning & Transportation Commission and Architectural Review Board voted separately, and unanimously (5–0) to recommend that City Council adopt the Cubberley Conceptual Master Plan, with a list of considerations for Council and staff to evaluate as the project moves forward into future phases of planning and design. Below are the approved motions: Item 4 Attachment A Cubberley Project Background Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 25 Packet Pg. 39 of 426  Attachment A - To review bike and pedestrian routes including the diagonal promenade and the existing safe routes to school on the property - To clarify that the City lease agreements with PAUSD provide flexibility to the City to make parking improvements including landscaping and paving and have a sufficient duration to adequately provide access to the improvements contemplated in the Master Plan - Modify the preface and executive summary to include language from page 52 about flexibility and to add the words modern, safe, and sustainable to the project goals - To encourage a formal process to raise funding from private sources Item 4 Attachment A Cubberley Project Background Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 26 Packet Pg. 40 of 426  Attachment B Project Documents: 1.Cubberley Conceptual Master Plan 2.Cubberley Conceptual Master Plan Appendices 3.CEQA Draft Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) Directions to review Project documents online 1. Go to: www.paloalto.gov/improvecubberley 2. To review the Master Plan project documents, scroll down to find “Draft Cubberley Conceptual Master Plan Complete” and underneath you’ll find the following documents a. Cubberley Conceptual Master Plan b. Cubberley Conceptual Master Plan Appendices 3. To review the CEQA project documents, scroll down to find “Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Available for Public Comment” and underneath you’ll find the following documents a. Final Notice of Intent b. Mitigated Negative Declaration c. Appendix A - Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Modeling Results d. Appendix B - Health Risk Assessment e. Appendix C - Cultural Resources Report f. Appendix D - Energy Calculations g. Appendix E - Geotechnical Investigation h. Appendix F - Noise Measurement Data and Noise Modeling Results i. Appendix G - Transportation Analysis j. Appendix H - Assembly Bill 52 and Senate Bill 18 Correspondence Direct Link to Project Webpage Help Us Improve Cubberley – City of Palo Alto, CA Item 4 Attachment B - Project Documents Including Cubberley Conceptual Master Plan and the Draft Initial Study Mitigated Negative Declaration Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 27 Packet Pg. 41 of 426  220‐7626 Palo Alto Cubberley Community Center  Vision Survey Results of a Study Conducted November 6‐13, 2025 Item 4Attachment C Results of the Second Community Poll Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 28 Packet Pg. 42 of 426  2 Survey Methodology (Note: Not All Results Will Sum to 100% Due to Rounding) November 6‐13, 2025Dates Dual‐mode Voter Survey         Survey Type Likely November 2026 Voters in Palo Alto Research Population 407Total Interviews (Full Sample) ±4.9% at the 95% Confidence Level (Half Sample) ±7.0% at the 95% Confidence Level Margin of Sampling Error Contact Methods Data Collection Modes 2016, 2018, 2020, 2021, 2022 & April/May 2025Survey Tracking Text Invitations Telephone Calls Email Invitations Telephone Interviews Online Interviews Item 4Attachment C Results of the Second Community Poll Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 29 Packet Pg. 43 of 426  3 Q3 Split A & Split B. 3% 28% 33% 13% 23% Total  Dissatisfied 46% Total  Satisfied 32% Impressions of Cubberley Community Center conditions  and its services and programs differ. 16% 45% 15% 3% 22% Total  Dissatisfied 17% Total  Satisfied 61% Very satisfied Somewhat satisfied Somewhat dissatisfied Very dissatisfied Don't know Condition of Services and Programs How satisfied are you with the (HALF SAMPLE: condition of)  (HALF SAMPLE: services and programs available at)the Cubberley Community Center? Item 4Attachment C Results of the Second Community Poll Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 30 Packet Pg. 44 of 426  4 Q5. 23% 31% 16% 17% 12% Great need Some need A little need No real need Don't know A Little/ No Real Need 33% Great/ Some Need 55% More than half see “great need” or “some need” for additional  funding for recreation facilities in Palo Alto. 18% saw a great need for  funding in the March/April  survey, and 58% saw “great” or  “some need.” In your personal opinion, do you think that Palo Alto has a great need, some need, a little need, or no real need for  additional funds for updated facilities to provide services including classes, camps, fitness programs, or drop‐in casual spaces? Item 4Attachment C Results of the Second Community Poll Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 31 Packet Pg. 45 of 426  5 Q4. 15% 8% 41% 36% Needs more space Could be smaller About the right size Don't know Fewer than one in seven believe that the  Cubberley Community Center needs more space. To meet the needs of our community, do you think that the Cubberley Community Center  needs more space, could be smaller, or is about the right size? Item 4Attachment C Results of the Second Community Poll Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 32 Packet Pg. 46 of 426  6 Voters heard or read the following description  of the Cubberley Campus ballot measure concept. Q6. Do you support or oppose this proposal? The 35‐acre Cubberley Campus, located at 4000 Middlefield Road, originally operated as Cubberley High School in 1956. Today, the City owns eight acres of the campus, where it operates a community center for classes and activities in arts, culture, and athletics, and leases additional space at City‐subsidized rates to various nonprofit and community‐serving groups. The City and the school district have proposed a ballot measure to purchase an additional seven acres of the site from the Palo Alto Unified School District at a price of $65.5 million. The school district will use the sale proceeds for improvements to schools. Any additional proceeds from the ballot measure would be used to repair, upgrade and redevelop the community campus, creating a destination with activities, amenities, and offerings that promote learning, joy, and wellbeing where all cultures and generations belong. Item 4Attachment C Results of the Second Community Poll Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 33 Packet Pg. 47 of 426  7 Q6. Do you support or oppose this proposal?. 34% 31% 13% 10% 11% Strongly support Somewhat support Somewhat oppose Strongly oppose Don't know Total  Oppose 24% Total  Support 66% Two‐thirds support the concept in principle,  with just over one in ten undecided. Item 4Attachment C Results of the Second Community Poll Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 34 Packet Pg. 48 of 426  8 Q8.  17% 14% 14% 7% 22% 23% 22% 22% 11% 7% 9% 9% 12% 15% 12% 19% 38% 40% 43% 43% A parcel tax that would be added to your property  tax bill based on the size of your property A sales tax that would be added to certain purchases  made in the city A bond measure that would be added to your  property tax bill based on the value of your property A utility users’ tax that would be added to your utility  bill based on a portion of your utility usage Strongly Support Somewhat Support Don’t Know Somewhat Oppose Strongly Oppose Please indicate whether you strongly support, somewhat support, somewhat oppose,  or strongly oppose each of the following ways to fund upgrades to the Cubberley Campus.  Total  Oppose Total  Support 50%39% 55%37% 55%37% 62%29% Majorities oppose each specific potential mechanism  when asked without a specific amount attached in the absence of a  ballot question format. Item 4Attachment C Results of the Second Community Poll Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 35 Packet Pg. 49 of 426  9 Q9 a‐d. Please indicate whether you would be very willing, somewhat willing, somewhat unwilling, or very unwilling to support a proposed ballot measure, paying an average of the following amounts per household  per year with a combination of funding from other sources to provide specified upgrades to the Cubberley Campus based on preliminary cost estimates ^Not Part of Split Sample 29% 14% 10% 11% 24% 24% 23% 7% 8% 16% 14% 11% 13% 18% 15% 17% 26% 28% 38% 53% ^$250 to purchase land and do minor  renovations and upgrades $500 to purchase land, build a new recreation  and wellness center and do minor renovations  and upgrades $750 to purchase land and build a new recreation  and wellness center, performing arts center,  and visual arts and technology center, and do  minor renovations and upgrades $1,000 to purchase land and build a new  recreation and wellness center, performing arts  center, visual arts and technology center,  and community service flex space Very Willing Somewhat Willing Don't Know Somewhat Unwilling Very Unwilling Total  Unwilling Total  Willing 39%53% 46%39% 53%32% 71%18% Willingness to pay without reference to a specific mechanism is  limited to $250 per year for minor renovations and upgrades. Bond Amounts Item 4Attachment C Results of the Second Community Poll Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 36 Packet Pg. 50 of 426  10 Q9 e‐g. Please indicate whether you would be very willing, somewhat willing, somewhat unwilling, or very unwilling to support a proposed ballot measure, paying an average of the following amounts per household  per year with a combination of funding from other sources to provide specified upgrades to the Cubberley Campus based on preliminary cost estimates Split Sample 29% 20% 12% 13% 24% 20% 18% 12% 8% 5% 4% 4% 13% 14% 17% 17% 26% 40% 50% 54% ^$250 to purchase land and do minor  renovations and upgrades $650 to purchase land, build a new recreation  and wellness area, and do minor renovations  and upgrades $900 to purchase land, build a new recreation  and wellness center, performing arts center,  and visual arts and technology center, and do  minor renovations and upgrades $1,100 to purchase land and build a new  recreation and wellness center, performing arts  center, visual arts and technology center,  community service flex space Very Willing Somewhat Willing Don’t Know Somewhat Unwilling Very Unwilling Total  Unwilling Total  Willing 39%53% 55%40% 67%30% 71%25% The same is true for amounts keyed to a parcel tax (specific  mechanism was not mentioned, and needs to be, in Poll 3). Parcel Tax Amounts Item 4Attachment C Results of the Second Community Poll Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 37 Packet Pg. 51 of 426  11 42% 40% 28% 28% 30% 26% 32% 40% Improving a downtown community center with a  dedicated space for teens Making improvements to Rinconada Pool Upgrading the Ventura Community Center Developing two acres of parkland into a contemporary  park that honors Asian American history at the location of  a historic, Chinese‐owned cannery Total More Likely Total Less Likely Difference +12% +14% ‐4% ‐12% The structure of this potential measure has not yet been finalized. Given that, additional projects to fund through this  measure are under consideration. For each one, please indicate if packaging an additional project would make you more likely or less likely to support the measure, or if it would make no difference to you.  Q11. Potential additional projects do not dramatically  increase support for the potential package. Item 4Attachment C Results of the Second Community Poll Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 38 Packet Pg. 52 of 426  12 40% 34% 38% 41% 30% 30% 25% 38% 37% 30% 24% 34% 31% 33% 14% 17% 25% 23% 25% 22% 27% 5% 10% 9% 8% 17% 14% 4% 4% Meeting current safety, earthquake,  and accessibility standards ^Upgrading buildings to meet current earthquake  safety, plumbing, and electrical standards Upgrading outdated electrical wiring and plumbing Upgrading deteriorating electrical wiring and plumbing Preserving trees and outdoor space Preserving trees and green space ^Maintaining outdoor space Extremely Important Very Important Somewhat Important Not Too Important Don’t Know Q12. ^Not Part of Split Sample Please consider some things that could be priorities in the plan for the future Community Campus at Cubberley. Please indicate  how important each one is to you personally: extremely important, very important, somewhat important, or not too important. Voters’ top priorities for the future Campus include basic repairs  and meeting safety, earthquake and accessibility standards. Extremely/Very Important 77% 71% 68% 65% 65% 61% 57% Item 4Attachment C Results of the Second Community Poll Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 39 Packet Pg. 53 of 426  13 24% 14% 23% 21% 18% 27% 20% 24% 27% 37% 25% 29% 30% 20% 26% 20% 28% 26% 25% 28% 23% 30% 27% 27% 17% 20% 20% 23% 29% 17% 23% 24% 4% 6% 7% 5% 5% Expanding trees and outdoor spaces Providing a safe, upgraded space for after‐school  arts education and community involvement ^Providing dedicated space for affordable childcare Providing after‐school and summer programs for local  children and teens, including Maker Space Expanding trees and green spaces Providing safe spaces for children and teens  after school and in the summer ^Providing an emergency evacuation center that can  be used in case of natural disaster Creating a vibrant destination for youth, families,  and seniors Extremely Important Very Important Somewhat Important Not Too Important Don't Know Extremely/Very Important 51% 51% 49% 49% 48% 47% 46% 43% Fewer than half highly prioritize dedicated space for children  and teens, or providing on emergency evacuation center. Q11. Please consider some things that could be priorities in the plan for the future Community Campus at Cubberley. Please indicate how important each one is to you personally: extremely important, very important,  somewhat important, or not too important. ^Not Part of Split Sample Item 4Attachment C Results of the Second Community Poll Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 40 Packet Pg. 54 of 426  14 16% 13% 24% 18% 18% 11% 11% 16% 9% 25% 29% 17% 23% 22% 29% 29% 21% 26% 28% 31% 31% 36% 34% 24% 36% 38% 39% 24% 21% 19% 21% 20% 31% 20% 23% 24% 6% 5% 8% 6% 5% 4% Improving accessibility for people with disabilities ^Providing additional space for education and enrichment Creating a central hub for recreation and wellness Providing additional space for youth, family,  and senior programs Creating space for youth, families, and seniors to  gather and learn Creating a central hub for music and performing arts Creating space for youth, families, and seniors to  experience joy ^Providing additional space for recreation and wellness Providing space to experience performing arts Extremely Important Very Important Somewhat Important Not Too Important Don't Know Extremely/Very Important 42% 42% 41% 41% 40% 40% 39% 37% 35% Continued Q11. Please consider some things that could be priorities in the plan for the future Community Campus at Cubberley. Please indicate how important each one is to you personally: extremely important, very important,  somewhat important, or not too important. ^Not Part of Split Sample Item 4Attachment C Results of the Second Community Poll Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 41 Packet Pg. 55 of 426  15 13% 10% 15% 11% 11% 10% 4% 9% 21% 21% 14% 15% 11% 12% 16% 8% 33% 40% 30% 34% 31% 38% 26% 31% 25% 25% 38% 35% 45% 32% 48% 48% 8% 4% 5% 8% 6% ^Providing community and flex space Providing space for gathering and community building ^Building a new, state‐of‐the‐art community center Providing space to experience visual arts Providing an outdoor amphitheater Upgrading the Cubberley theater Creating space for Lunar New Year and  other cultural celebrations Providing an outdoor swimming pool Extremely Important Very Important Somewhat Important Not Too Important Don't Know Extremely/Very Important 34% 32% 29% 26% 22% 22% 20% 18% Voters’ lowest priorities include an outdoor swimming pool, an  upgraded theater, or an outdoor amphitheater. Q11. Please consider some things that could be priorities in the plan for the future Community Campus at Cubberley. Please indicate how important each one is to you personally: extremely important, very important,  somewhat important, or not too important. ^Not Part of Split Sample Item 4Attachment C Results of the Second Community Poll Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 42 Packet Pg. 56 of 426  16 Support for the proposed concept remains at or near two‐thirds as  voters hear positive and negative messaging. Q6. Do you support or oppose this proposal? Q14. Having learned this, would you support or oppose the proposal for the City to purchase the Cubberley site, and repair, upgrade, and redevelop the community campus, creating a destination with activities,  amenities, and offerings that promote learning, joy, and wellbeing where all cultures and generations belong? Q16. One last time: Do you support or oppose the proposal for the City to purchase the Cubberley site, and repair, upgrade, and redevelop the community campus?  34% 35% 31% 31% 36% 33% 11% 5% 13% 13% 17% 10% 13% 15% Initial Opinion Opinion After Positives Opinion After Positives and Negatives Strongly Support Somewhat Support Don’t Know Somewhat Oppose Strongly Oppose Total  Oppose Total  Support 24%66% 26%71% 31%64% Item 4Attachment C Results of the Second Community Poll Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 43 Packet Pg. 57 of 426  17 Ranked by Very Convincing (STANDARDS)Most Cubberley Community Center buildings are more than 70 years old. They were built well before modern internet, and do not meet current disabled access and earthquake safety standards. Palo Alto residents deserve a community center that is modern, safe, and accessible to the entire community. 38% (REPAIRS)Cubberley Community Center facilities have significant structural issues with deteriorating electrical wiring and plumbing. Most buildings are beyond their useful life and would be very costly to repair. That’s why we should invest in a new, safe, accessible, and modern facility for our community to share in the future. 38% ^(AFFORDABILITY)As the cost of living goes up, it is more important now than ever to invest in free or low‐cost places for exercise and play that everyone can use close to home. Palo Alto should invest in creating an affordable, accessible place where people can gather to learn, play, read, enjoy the arts, access childcare, experience joy, and connect with one another. 31% ^(EMERGENCY)Palo Alto needs an up‐to‐date and safe location for the community to shelter in times of emergency, such as an earthquake or fire, or during hot or smoky days. The new Community Campus will serve as a resilience hub built to earthquake safety and accessibility standards, providing refuge when we need it most. 29% Q13. Please consider the following statements from people who may support this proposal. Please indicate whether you find it very convincing, somewhat convincing, or not convincing as a reason to support it.  ^Not Part of Split Sample Top Messaging in Favor of the Cubberley Proposal (Ranked in Order of Effectiveness) Item 4Attachment C Results of the Second Community Poll Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 44 Packet Pg. 58 of 426  18 Conclusions Item 4Attachment C Results of the Second Community Poll Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 45 Packet Pg. 59 of 426  19 Conclusions •While voters generally support upgrades to the Cubberley Center, their willingness to invest is limited to a smaller package focused on basic repairs and upgrades to earthquake, safety and accessibility standards. They are dissatisfied with the condition of existing facilities. Voters do not see Cubberley as needing additional space. No mechanism tested (in isolation without amounts) achieves majority support. Slim majorities are willing to pay $250 per year for basic renovations. •Most are satisfied with the current programs and services offered at Cubberley. •Voters who oppose additional investment in Cubberley are opposed to increasing taxes or see higher priorities for the city. •The next poll will vet ballot measure language, marrying specific mechanism, amount, and uses of funds for voter consideration. Item 4Attachment C Results of the Second Community Poll Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 46 Packet Pg. 60 of 426  Curt Below Curt@FM3research.com Miranda Everitt Miranda@FM3research.com Item 4Attachment C Results of the Second Community Poll Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 47 Packet Pg. 61 of 426  220‐7765 Palo Alto Voter Views of Potential Ballot Measures Key Findings of a Survey Conducted January 5‐12, 2026 Item 4Attachment D Results of the Third Community Poll Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 48 Packet Pg. 62 of 426  2 Survey Methodology (Note: Not All Results Will Sum to 100% Due to Rounding) January 5‐12, 2026Dates Dual‐mode Voter Survey         Survey Type Likely November 2026 Voters in Palo Alto Research Population 416Total Interviews (Full Sample) ±4.9% at the 95% Confidence Level (Half Sample) ±7.1% at the 95% Confidence LevelMargin of Sampling Error Contact Methods Data Collection Modes 2013, 2016, 2018, 2020, 2021, 2022, April/May 2025 & November 2025Survey Tracking Text Invitations Telephone Calls Email Invitations Telephone Interviews Online Interviews Item 4Attachment D Results of the Third Community Poll Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 49 Packet Pg. 63 of 426  3 Context Item 4Attachment D Results of the Third Community Poll Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 50 Packet Pg. 64 of 426  4 Q3. 4% 7% 6% 5% 5% 24% 25% 26% 31% 35% 18% 18% 20% 18% 19% 32% 20% 32% 36% 31% 21% 29% 15% 10% 11% 2026 2020 2018 2016 2013 Great Need Some Need A Little Need No Real Need Don't Know Great/Some  Need 29% 33% 32% 36% 40% Fewer than three in ten see “a great need” or “some need” for  additional funding for the City in principle. Next, how would you rate the City of Palo Alto’s need for additional funding?  Is there a great need for additional funding, some need, a little need or no real need for additional funding? Item 4Attachment D Results of the Third Community Poll Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 51 Packet Pg. 65 of 426  5 Q4. 8% 23% 18% 29% 31% 40% 19% 16% 17% 32% 17% 17% 13% 12% 8% 2026 November 2025 April/May 2025 Great Need Some Need A Little Need No Real Need Don't Know Great/Some  Need 36% 55% 58% Just over one‐third see at least “some need” for additional funds  for updated facilities to provide recreation services. In your personal opinion, do you think that Palo Alto has a great need, some need, a little need, or no real need for additional funds for updated facilities to provide services including classes, camps, fitness programs, or drop‐in casual spaces? Item 4Attachment D Results of the Third Community Poll Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 52 Packet Pg. 66 of 426  6 Views of Potential  Ballot Measures Item 4Attachment D Results of the Third Community Poll Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 53 Packet Pg. 67 of 426  7 Q2 (Split A & B). Would you vote yes or no on this measure? Voters heard one of two potential ballot measures for Palo Alto. Parcel Tax City of Palo Alto Cubberley Community Center Repair/Safety/Update Measure.To purchase Cubberley Community Center land from Palo Alto Unified School District providing $65,500,000 for school improvements; repair aging Center to meet current safety,earthquake, accessibility standards; upgrade outdated/ deteriorating electrical systems/plumbing; and to acquire, construct, repair facilities, sites, and equipment; shall City of Palo Alto’s measure levying 11¢ per square foot of improvements, providing approximately $7,300,000 annually until ended by voters, exempting low‐income seniors, subject to published independent audit, all funds used locally, be adopted? Sales Tax City of Palo Alto Community Safety/Services Measure.To provide general city services such as repairing Cubberley Community Center for current safety, earthquake, accessibility standards; upgrading deteriorating electrical systems, wiring, plumbing; acquiring outdoor space/sites; maintaining streets, safe, clean downtown/ commercial cores; preparing for natural disasters/earthquakes; repairing deteriorating community spaces, libraries, shall City of Palo Alto’s measure enacting a 0.5% (1/2¢) sales tax, providing approximately $15,600,000 annually until ended by voters, subject to published independent audit, all funds used locally, be adopted? Item 4Attachment D Results of the Third Community Poll Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 54 Packet Pg. 68 of 426  8 22% 14% 12% 3% 14% 23% 11% Q2 (Split A & B). Would you vote yes or no on this measure? 17% 15% 15% 6% 16% 21% 9% Parcel Tax Definitely yes Probably yes Undecided, lean yes Undecided, lean no Probably no Definitely no Undecided Total  No 42% Total  Yes 48% Total  No 41% Total  Yes 48% Neither has support from a majority of voters. Sales Tax Requires 66.7%Requires 50% +1 Item 4Attachment D Results of the Third Community Poll Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 55 Packet Pg. 69 of 426  9 Voter Priorities Item 4Attachment D Results of the Third Community Poll Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 56 Packet Pg. 70 of 426  10 36% 26% 22% 27% 28% 19% 26% 34% 37% 39% 32% 30% 38% 30% 24% 27% 34% 32% 25% 35% 28% 5% 9% 6% 7% 13% 7% 15% Maintaining storm drains to prevent pollutants and  garbage from entering the Bay Fixing potholes Maintaining streets Maintaining the City’s financial stability Improving fire and 911 emergency response Maintaining and repairing neighborhood streets Preparing for natural disasters such as earthquakes,  flooding and sea‐level rise Extremely Important Very Important Somewhat Important Not Too Important Don't Know Extremely/Very Important 71% 64% 61% 59% 58% 58% 57% Q6m‐p & r‐aa. Next, here is a list of ways in which funds generated by this measure could be spent.  After each one, please indicate how important each item is to you personally: extremely important,  very important, somewhat important, or not too important. Split Sample General‐Purpose Sales Tax Priorities Voters’ top priorities for a general‐purpose measure include storm  drains, potholes, street maintenance and financial stability. Item 4Attachment D Results of the Third Community Poll Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 57 Packet Pg. 71 of 426  11 20% 29% 15% 28% 20% 14% 19% 36% 22% 33% 18% 23% 28% 21% 38% 26% 33% 20% 30% 44% 40% 7% 18% 17% 31% 20% 14% 20% 5% 6% Maintaining a safe, clean downtown and commercial cores Improving police response to violent crime Providing general city services Funding affordable housing Improving police response Repairing deteriorating libraries Addressing traffic congestion Extremely Important Very Important Somewhat Important Not Too Important Don't Know Extremely/Very Important 55% 51% 48% 46% 43% 41% 40% Q6m‐p & r‐aa. Next, here is a list of ways in which funds generated by this measure could be spent.  After each one, please indicate how important each item is to you personally: extremely important,  very important, somewhat important, or not too important. Split Sample General‐Purpose Sales Tax Priorities Smaller shares value a safe, clean downtown  or general city services as intensely. Item 4Attachment D Results of the Third Community Poll Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 58 Packet Pg. 72 of 426  12 29% 15% 26% 22% 28% 17% 16% 35% 50% 34% 37% 30% 30% 29% 27% 22% 24% 27% 20% 31% 42% 8% 8% 13% 12% 19% 19% 10% 5% Preserving trees and outdoor space Upgrading outdated and deteriorating electrical wiring and plumbing Upgrading buildings to meet current earthquake  safety, plumbing, and electrical standards Providing safe spaces for children and teens after school and in the summer Exempting low‐income seniors Providing space for gathering and community building ^Repairing deteriorating community spaces Extremely Important Very Important Somewhat Important Not Too Important Don't Know Extremely/Very Important 65% 65% 60% 60% 58% 48% 45% Q6a‐l, q & bb. Next, here is a list of ways in which funds generated by this measure could be spent.  After each one, please indicate how important each item is to you personally: extremely important,  very important, somewhat important, or not too important. ^Not Part of Split Sample Cubberley‐Focused Priorities When it comes to Cubberley‐focused priorities, two‐thirds value  preserving trees and upgrading deteriorating wiring and plumbing. Item 4Attachment D Results of the Third Community Poll Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 59 Packet Pg. 73 of 426  13 12% 14% 10% 8% 6% 9% 8% 31% 28% 28% 27% 28% 21% 16% 39% 32% 28% 38% 25% 34% 24% 15% 20% 28% 21% 29% 28% 43% 7% 6% 6% 12% 8% 9% Improving accessibility to city buildings for  people with disabilities Bringing in funding from partner  organizations to support Cubberley Improving a downtown community center  with a dedicated space for teens Acquiring, constructing and repairing  facilities, sites and equipment ^Renovating the existing 70‐year‐old  Cubberley Community Center Improving the Rinconada Pool Extremely Important Very Important Somewhat Important Not Too Important Don't Know Extremely/Very Important 43% 42% 38% 35% 34% 30% 25% Q6a‐l, q & bb. Next, here is a list of ways in which funds generated by this measure could be spent.  After each one, please indicate how important each item is to you personally: extremely important,  very important, somewhat important, or not too important. ^Not Part of Split Sample Cubberley‐Focused Priorities Fewer value improving the Rinconada Pool  or renovating the Cubberley Center. Purchasing seven acres at the Cubberley site with proceeds benefitting the Palo Alto Unified School District Item 4Attachment D Results of the Third Community Poll Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 60 Packet Pg. 74 of 426  14 Messaging and Movement Item 4Attachment D Results of the Third Community Poll Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 61 Packet Pg. 75 of 426  15 The parcel tax never exceeds the two‐thirds vote threshold. Q2, Q8 & Q10. (Split A) Would you vote yes or no on this measure? Parcel Tax Total  No Total  Yes 42%48% 42%49% 46%45% 17% 18% 15% 15% 17% 14% 15% 14% 15% 9% 9% 9% 6% 16% 15% 15% 21% 26% 27% Initial Vote After Positive Messages After Negative Messages Definitely Yes Probably Yes Undecided, Lean Yes Undecided Undecided, Lean No Probably No Definitely No 66.7% Item 4Attachment D Results of the Third Community Poll Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 62 Packet Pg. 76 of 426  16 Segmenting the Electorate by  Consistency of Support – Parcel Tax Consistent Yes:Voters who consistently indicated they would vote “yes” on the measure Consistent No:Voters who consistently indicated they would vote “no” on the measure Swing:Voters who do not fall into any of the other categories – remaining consistently undecided or switching positions The following slide shows demographic groups that disproportionately fall into one category or the other. Consistent  Yes 39% Swing  24% Consistent  No 37% Item 4Attachment D Results of the Third Community Poll Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 63 Packet Pg. 77 of 426  17 The sales tax falls short of majority  support even after positive messaging. Q2, Q8 & Q10. (Split B) Would you vote yes or no on this measure? Sales Tax Total  No Total  Yes 41%48% 43%47% 44%41% 22% 21% 20% 14% 11% 13% 12% 15% 9% 11% 10% 15% 5% 5% 14% 10% 11% 23% 27% 29% Initial Vote After Positive Messages After Negative Messages Definitely Yes Probably Yes Undecided, Lean Yes Undecided Undecided, Lean No Probably No Definitely No 50.1% Item 4Attachment D Results of the Third Community Poll Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 64 Packet Pg. 78 of 426  18 Segmenting the Electorate by  Consistency of Support – Sales Tax Consistent Yes:Voters who consistently indicated they would vote “yes” on the measure Consistent No:Voters who consistently indicated they would vote “no” on the measure Swing:Voters who do not fall into any of the other categories – remaining consistently undecided or switching positions The following slide shows demographic groups that disproportionately fall into one category or the other. Consistent  Yes 39% Swing  26% Consistent  No 35% Item 4Attachment D Results of the Third Community Poll Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 65 Packet Pg. 79 of 426  19 Ranked by Very Convincing ^(STANDARDS)Most Cubberley Community Center buildings are more than 70 years old. They were built well before modern internet, and do not meet current disabled access and earthquake safety standards. Palo Alto residents deserve a community center that is modern, safe, and accessible to the entire community. 26% (ACCOUNTABILITY)This measure will have strict accountability provisions, including a published independent audit, to ensure that funds are spent efficiently, effectively, and as promised.20% ^(BENEFITS FOR PAUSD)This measure is a win‐win for our community. It provides $65.5 million in much‐needed funding for our local schools, which they can use to upgrade technology or make repairs to classrooms. 20% *(STREETS)Funding from this measure will ensure the City can keep up on street and sidewalk repairs, improve traffic flow especially near trains, fix potholes, and provide safe routes to school for children.19% Q7. First, please consider the following statements from people who may support this measure. For each one, please indicate whether you find it very convincing, somewhat convincing, or not convincing as a reason to vote yes. ^Split A – Parcel Tax; *Split B – Sales Tax Positive Messaging Tested (Both Measures) Item 4Attachment D Results of the Third Community Poll Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 66 Packet Pg. 80 of 426  20 Ranked by Very Convincing *(ACT LOCAL)We must act locally to protect Palo Alto’s quality of life. This measure will maintain fire and police protection, emergency response, streets, parks, and youth and senior services, and address traffic with locally controlled funding to benefit Palo Alto residents. 18% ^(LOCAL CONTROL)This proposal would purchase land at the Cubberley site that the City has been leasing for decades. Owning the land would mean city and community control over how we use the space for arts, culture, recreation, and more into the future. 17% *(DISASTER)Our community is uniquely vulnerable to natural disasters like earthquake, flooding, sea‐level rise and fire. This measure will provide locally controlled funding for natural disaster preparation and emergency response. 14% *(DOWTOWN SAFETY)This measure will provide locally controlled funding to help keep our downtown and commercial cores safe and clean, which will keep small businesses local and shoppers and residents safe.12% ^(PARTNER FUNDING)This measure will bring together funding from nonprofits, philanthropists, and partner organizations as well as Palo Alto taxpayers. This is a unique chance to bring the community together to create a Cubberley Center our community can be proud of. 10% Q7. First, please consider the following statements from people who may support this measure. For each one, please indicate whether you find it very convincing, somewhat convincing, or not convincing as a reason to vote yes. ^Split A – Parcel Tax; *Split B – Sales Tax Positive Messaging Tested (Both Measures), Continued Item 4Attachment D Results of the Third Community Poll Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 67 Packet Pg. 81 of 426  21 Q9. Next, please consider the following statements from people who may oppose this measure. For each one, please indicate whether you find it very convincing, somewhat convincing, or not convincing as a reason to vote no. ^Split A – Parcel Tax; *Split B – Sales Tax Ranked by Very Convincing (WASTE)The City should cut waste and mismanagement of funds before asking to raise our taxes again.39% *(FOREVER)This measure is essentially a “forever tax” which would be in effect well past when the projects listed would be done – we shouldn’t raise taxes on our children and grandchildren.38% ^(PRIORITIES/PARCEL)Our community has higher priorities right now than a brand‐new community center, like addressing public safety, the cost of living, and road repairs.35% (COST OF LIVING)At a time when the cost of living is skyrocketing, the last thing we should do is raise our taxes even more with a measure like this.32% *(PRIORITIES/SALES)This measure is a sneaky attempt to fund a brand‐new Community Center by claiming it will be used for roads and safety.21% Negative Messaging Tested (Both Measures) Item 4Attachment D Results of the Third Community Poll Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 68 Packet Pg. 82 of 426  Curt Below Curt@FM3research.com Miranda Everitt Miranda@FM3research.com Item 4Attachment D Results of the Third Community Poll Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 69 Packet Pg. 83 of 426  Cubberley  Community Center  Project March 24, 2026 www.paloalto.gov/improvecubberley Item 4Staff Presentation Item 4 Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 70 Packet Pg. 84 of 426  2 Second Community Poll Results •November 6 ‐13, 2025; 407 total interviews  •Two specific themes moving forward: 1. Upgrading old wiring and plumbing 2. Meeting current safety standards •Most satisfied with the current programs and services •Basic repairs / upgrades to meet safety /accessibility standards •More favorable via a parcel tax or sales tax Item 4Staff Presentation Item 4 Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 71 Packet Pg. 85 of 426  3 Third Community Poll Results •January 5 ‐12, 2026; 416 total interviews •Just over 1/3 see at least “some need” for updated facilities •Support of a parcel tax and a sales tax improved from the last poll •Voters’ top priorities: •General‐purpose tax: maintaining storm drains, fixing  potholes, maintaining streets, and maintaining the City’s  financial stability. •Cubberley: preserving trees and outdoor space, upgrading electrical  and plumbing, upgrading buildings to meet current standards, and  providing safe spaces for children / teens after school and in summer Item 4Staff Presentation Item 4 Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 72 Packet Pg. 86 of 426  4 Next Steps‐Fourth Community Poll •Fourth poll currently released: March 19 – 28, 2026 •Poll will inform whether support from partnership opportunities  and other revenue sources such as development fees, grants and  philanthropy will increase voter support for both funding  mechanisms. •It will also explore whether competing tax measures may influence  voter appetite. Item 4Staff Presentation Item 4 Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 73 Packet Pg. 87 of 426  5 Item 4Staff Presentation Item 4 Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 74 Packet Pg. 88 of 426  6 Cubberley Conceptual Master Plan Conceptual Master Plan represents a long‐term vision for Cubberley. Phasing allows for the site to be developed over time as funding  is secured and minimizes program disruption during construction. •Includes a combination of potential funding mechanisms  which could include development fees, grants, philanthropy, a  ballot measure, and community partners •Combination of new and renovated buildings •Recreation and Wellness Center and Performing Arts •Programmable spaces for education, visual arts, flexible use Item 4Staff Presentation Item 4 Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 75 Packet Pg. 89 of 426  7 CURRENT SITE Item 4Staff Presentation Item 4 Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 76 Packet Pg. 90 of 426  8 Item 4Staff Presentation Item 4 Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 77 Packet Pg. 91 of 426  PHASING OVERVIEW •Phase 1 deconstruction and  construction •Programming relocated to  temporary facilities for program  continuity 9 Item 4Staff Presentation Item 4 Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 78 Packet Pg. 92 of 426  10 Item 4Staff Presentation Item 4 Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 79 Packet Pg. 93 of 426  11 Item 4Staff Presentation Item 4 Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 80 Packet Pg. 94 of 426  12 Item 4Staff Presentation Item 4 Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 81 Packet Pg. 95 of 426  13 PHASE 1 OUTDOOR PROGRAMMING Buildings represent massing only, not architectural design Item 4Staff Presentation Item 4 Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 82 Packet Pg. 96 of 426  14 FUTURE PHASES •Phasing guides the long‐term vision for the site •Phases 2 and 3 would require significant funding •Timing for future phases is unknown •CEQA analysis completed on full‐site buildout to give flexibility Item 4Staff Presentation Item 4 Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 83 Packet Pg. 97 of 426  2015 Item 4Staff Presentation Item 4 Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 84 Packet Pg. 98 of 426  16 Item 4Staff Presentation Item 4 Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 85 Packet Pg. 99 of 426  17 PHASE 1 WALKING & BIKING PLAN Item 4Staff Presentation Item 4 Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 86 Packet Pg. 100 of 426  18 PHASE 1 VEHICULAR CIRCULATION Item 4Staff Presentation Item 4 Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 87 Packet Pg. 101 of 426  19 PHASE 1 PARKING PLAN •640 total spots •323 leased from PAUSD •317 within City owned  land •Parking Analysis by Fehr &  Peers, Appendix B Item 4Staff Presentation Item 4 Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 88 Packet Pg. 102 of 426  20 California Environmental Quality Act • Draft Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS /MND)  • Public review and comment March 2 – April 1, 2026. • Five environmental resources identified where impacts were  found to be "less than significant with mitigation incorporated" • Air Quality, Geology and Soils, Hazards and Hazardous  Materials, Noise, Transportation • Send comments to Kristen O'Kane; Kristen.O'Kane@paloalto.gov Item 4Staff Presentation Item 4 Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 89 Packet Pg. 103 of 426  21 MOVING FORWARD • Community‐driven vision for Cubberley's future • Phase implementation aligned with funding • Flexible spaces that adapt to community needs • A vibrant, inclusive campus for Palo Alto • Continued community partnership will guide implementation City Council Visioning Session, February 2025 Item 4Staff Presentation Item 4 Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 90 Packet Pg. 104 of 426  22 WHAT IS REQUESTED OF THE PRC Next steps:  •Staff present Cubberley Conceptual Master Plan and  CEQA document to City Council on April 20, 2026 Staff recommends the PRC: 1. Consider the Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative  Declaration (IS/MND) for the Cubberley Conceptual  Master Plan; and  2. Recommend that Council adopt the Master Plan Item 4Staff Presentation Item 4 Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 91 Packet Pg. 105 of 426  AMANDA DEML Community Services Assistant Director Amanda.Deml@paloalto.gov (650) 463‐4950 KRISTEN O’KANE Community Services Director Kristen.O’Kane@paloalto.gov (650) 463‐4908 Item 4Staff Presentation Item 4 Item 4: Staff Report Pg. 92 Packet Pg. 106 of 426  Parks and Recreation Commission Staff Report From: Planning & Development Services Department Meeting Date: March 24, 2026 Report #: 2601-5812 TITLE San Antonio Road Area Plan Land Use and Transportation Alternatives Study Session. CEQA Status: Exempt under CEQA Guidelines Section 15262. RECOMMENDATION Receive a presentation on the San Antonio Road Area Plan Land Use and Transportation Alternatives and provide feedback to staff. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The San Antonio Road Area Plan (Area Plan) draft land use and mobility alternatives (illustrated in Attachment A) provide high-level options for development in the plan area. Topics include allowed uses, bicycle/pedestrian facilities, residential density, building heights, commercial office and retail development areas, outdoor space, and roadway improvements. Parks and Recreation Commission feedback on key project considerations and approaches are critical for the City Council to select the preferred alternatives. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The purpose of the San Antonio Road Area Plan (Area Plan) is to develop an integrated land use and transportation approach to guide new development in the 275.3-acre Plan Area along and adjacent to San Antonio Road. The Area Plan objectives include increased housing production, transportation and mobility improvements, outdoor space, commercial and retail nodes, infrastructure, and sustainability measures. The creation of this plan implements policies and programs of the City’s Comprehensive Plan and the 2023-2031 Housing Element (Housing Element). The Area Plan will establish policies, development standards, design guidelines, and the public infrastructure necessary to accelerate the envisioned growth and development. The Area Plan builds on other planning efforts, including the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, the 2022 Sustainability and Climate Action Plan, the Housing Element, the 2025 Safe Streets for All (SS4A) Safety Action Plan, and the 2026 Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Plan update (currently in process). BACKGROUND Item 5 Staff Report Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 1 Packet Pg. 107 of 426  The draft land use and mobility alternatives (illustrated in Attachment A) provide high-level options for development in the Plan Area. Topics include allowed uses, bicycle/pedestrian facilities, residential density, building heights, commercial office and retail development areas, outdoor space, and roadway improvements. Feedback from the Parks and Recreation Commission (PRC) on key project considerations and approaches will be provided to the City Council prior to the Council’s selection of the preferred alternatives. 1. PDAs are locally created to support regional goals set forth by the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) and the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), as described in Plan Bay Area. Plan Bay Area outlines the Bay Area’s Regional Growth Framework, Regional Transportation Plan, and Sustainable Community Strategies through 2050 and beyond. Key goals of PDAs include encouraging and guiding growth around transit and connecting housing to jobs and areas of interest. 2, and work began in April 2025. Phase one of the Area Plan included analysis of the area through literature and regulatory review, site visits, collection of new data, stakeholder interviews, workshops, surveys, and other technical studies to determine the area’s existing conditions, strengths, and challenges. Staff convened both a Community Advisory Group (CAG) made up of area residents and stakeholders, and a Technical Advisory Group (TAG) made up of City staff and subject matter experts. The Chair of the Parks and Recreation Commission has also participated in the CAG to help ensure parks and recreation perspectives are represented. 1 September 18, 2023, City Council Meeting: https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/Portal/Meeting?meetingTemplateId=13026 2 March 10, 2025, City Council Meeting: Item 5 Staff Report Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 2 Packet Pg. 108 of 426  City/School Transportation Safety Committee. A Community Survey was conducted in October 2025, and the first Community Workshop was held on October 23, 2025. The land use and mobility alternatives were presented to the CAG and TAG in January and February 2026. The study has been presented, or is scheduled to be presented, to the following advisory bodies in March 2026: Pedestrian and Bicycle Advisory Committee (March 3, 2026) Human Relations Commission (March 17, 2026) Architectural Review Board (March 19, 2026) Parks and Recreation Commission (March 24, 2026) Planning and Transportation Commission (March 25, 2026) City/School Transportation Safety Committee (March 26, 2026) ANALYSIS Land Use Item 5 Staff Report Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 3 Packet Pg. 109 of 426  Central San Antonio – is generally the area along San Antonio Road between East Charleston Road and Byron Street, excluding the Greenhouse. This area includes several pipeline residential development projects, additional sites likely to redevelop (such as the Magnussen Toyota site at 690 San Antonio Road), and only a handful of sites unlikely to redevelop (such as the two recently constructed hotels at 744 and 750 San Antonio Road). Many properties contain one- to two-story commercial development. These are explored in pages 22-26 of Attachment A. South Fabian – The portion of Fabian Way on either side of Charleston Road, this area includes the Taube Koret Campus for Jewish Life, a private school, and some of the most recently constructed multi-family housing, none of which is likely to redevelop. However, there are several low-rise commercial spaces and surface parking lots which have high development potential. This area contains some pipeline residential development projects. North Fabian – The portion of Fabian Way closest to U.S. 101; this area contains 2-3 story office buildings (including the Maxar Site at 3825 and 3875 Fabian Way) and a private school. While the school is unlikely to redevelop, the owner of the Maxar Site is currently seeking a buyer, with residential development likely to be considered as part of any redevelopment. CTI – The area containing Commercial Street, Transport Street, and Industrial Avenue (CTI), bounded by San Antonio Road, U.S. 101, East Charleston Road, and the City’s border with Mountain View contains a number of small lot, one- to two-story commercial buildings. While there are no active development applications in this area, there is developer interest in consolidating lots in this area. A 16-acre mixed-use development is currently proposed in Mountain View adjacent to this area, and there is a unique opportunity to work across jurisdictions in developing a new neighborhood.. Secondary Sub-Areas (Limited Development Potential Areas) The Area Plan will also consider land use alternatives in other areas which have more limited development potential, listed below. The project team has created a series of alternatives to consider. East and West Bayshore – The area bounded by East Bayshore Road, San Antonio Road, and the Baylands Nature Preserve currently contains a number of low-rise office buildings and the HomeKey transitional housing site. Separated from the rest of the Plan Area by U.S. 101 and in close proximity to the Bay, this area is less desirable for increased residential development. The single parcel along West Bayshore Road adjacent to the U.S. 101 bike/ped bridge also currently has a commercial office use and is not well connected to the surrounding community. Alma – The portion of the Plan Area along Alma Street contains a small townhouse development and two faith-based organizations with larger parking lots. While state laws have made it easier to develop housing in proximity to Caltrain stations, this area is Item 5 Staff Report Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 4 Packet Pg. 110 of 426  still considered less likely to redevelop, with the possible exception of the two faith- based sites. State law has also made development of 100% affordable housing projects easier on such sites, however, given the current scarcity in federal and state funds for affordable housing, local funds would likely be required to make projects on these sites feasible. Stability Areas (redevelopment not anticipated) There are also sub-areas within and adjacent to the plan area which are considered highly unlikely to redevelop due to factors such as lot size, ownership, and/or historic designation. Greenhouse – The Greenhouse (777 San Antonio Road) and the Greenhouse II (765 San Antonio Road) are a series of individually owned townhomes constructed in the 1970s. Green Meadow – Green Meadow is one of Palo Alto’s mid-century subdivisions designed by Joseph Eichler. While it is listed on the National Register, it is not a designated district on Palo Alto’s Inventory. Green Meadow is outside of the plan area, but within the Senate Bill 79 (2025) development area. South San Antonio – South San Antonio is generally the area along San Antonio Road between Byron Street and Nita Avenue. This area contains individually owned townhomes, low-rise apartment buildings, and private schools. During the previous ARB study session on September 18, 2025, individual members indicated interest in seeing the retention of manufacturing jobs, increased building heights and total residential units, and a need to identify outdoor/community spaces in the plan area. These concepts are addressed in some of the alternatives provided. While all feedback from PRC members is welcome, we would like to specifically hear about the type, size, and location of outdoor community spaces the Commission members would like to see included in this Area Plan. Mobility The Area Plan will identify mobility strategies which support the land use alternatives. The Area Plan will reimagine the San Antonio Road corridor in order to accommodate multiple travel modes and support access to adjacent land uses. Key mobility concepts include pedestrian-first design, the creation of low-stress biking routes, first/last mile connections, parking and demand management, and smart corridor technology. Some land use concepts proposed such as small block sizes and paseos also improve walkability/bikability, which will enhance proposed mobility improvements. Mobility recommendations will be developed to coordinate with regional and state transportation investments, including access to the San Antonio Caltrain Station and planned improvements at the U.S. 101 interchange. The Area Plan will also evaluate opportunities to improve transit operations and reliability, vehicle circulation (including goods movement where Item 5 Staff Report Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 5 Packet Pg. 111 of 426  applicable), and active transportation connectivity within and through the plan area. Attachment A presents multiple concepts for the primary focus location described below. San Antonio Road (E. Charleston Road to Middlefield Road) – This segment currently includes an approximately 100+ foot public right-of-way (ROW), four travel lanes (two in each direction), a raised median, and on-street parking that transitions to turn lanes at intersections. Sidewalks are provided on both sides of the street. Bicycle travel is currently accommodated via Class III shared-lane markings (“sharrows”), where people bicycling and motor vehicles operate in the same travel lane – there are no dedicated on-street bicycle lanes or separate bicycle facilities on this segment. The alternatives presented in pages 92-99 of Attachment A provide three concepts to enhance pedestrian and bicycle facilities while maintaining existing general-purpose vehicle travel lanes along the City’s east-west truck route. ATTACHMENTS Item 5 Staff Report Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 6 Packet Pg. 112 of 426  Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting #1 March 24, 2026 Item 5 Staff Presentation - Attachment A - San Antonio Road Area Plan Land Use and Transportation Alternatives Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 7 Packet Pg. 113 of 426  Agenda •Project Update •Overall Design Strategy •Land Use Alternatives •North Fabian Sub Area •CTI Sub Area •Mobility Alternatives •San Antonio Road Item 5 Staff Presentation - Attachment A - San Antonio Road Area Plan Land Use and Transportation Alternatives Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 8 Packet Pg. 114 of 426  S A N A N T O N I O R O A D A R E A P L A N What is the San Antonio Road Area Plan? 3 A City-led initiative to create a 20-year vision with active community input. ENHANCE ECONOMIC VITALITY CREATE A MORE LIVABLE COMMUNITY IMPROVE MOBILITY AND SAFETY SUPPORT SUSTAINABILITY PR E L I M I N A R Y P R O J E C T G O A L S FEASIBLE DESIGN ALTERNATIVES ZONING + DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IMPLEMENTATION TOOLS AND STRATEGIESPR O J E C T O U T C O M E S Item 5 Staff Presentation - Attachment A - San Antonio Road Area Plan Land Use and Transportation Alternatives Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 9 Packet Pg. 115 of 426  S A N A N T O N I O R O A D A R E A P L A N Project Area 4 •The Area Plan covers 275.3 acres along Palo Alto’s border with Mountain View. •The project area covers most of the Bayshore Alma San Antonio (BASA) Priority Development Area (PDA) boundary. •Includes 1.8-mile length of San Antonio Road with major intersections at US-101, East Charleston, Middlefield and Alma/ Central Expressway. •Southern part of the Plan Area is within a half-mile of San Antonio Caltrain station. •Mix of industrial, office, service commercial and residential uses. Adjacent neighborhoods in both Palo Alto and Mountain View are residential. Item 5 Staff Presentation - Attachment A - San Antonio Road Area Plan Land Use and Transportation Alternatives Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 10 Packet Pg. 116 of 426  S A N A N T O N I O R O A D A R E A P L A N ARB + PRC + HRC + PABAC + CSTSC + PTC + CC 5 Project Timeline Workshop (Pop-up TBD) Online Survey Walk Audit CAG+TAG Meetings Council, Commissions, Boards Policy Recommendations + Draft Development Standards Engagement Strategy, Materials, Existing Conditions Report Final Area Plan + EIR Admin. Draft Area Plan + EIR Land Use + Mobility Alternatives, Preferred Alternative ARB + CSTSC + PABAC + PTC + CC Public Review Draft Area Plan + EIR ARB + PRC + HRC + PABAC + CSTSC + PTC + CC PTC + CC Adoption Hearings 20282025 Phase 1 Project Initiation + Existing Conditions Assessment Phase 2 Vision + Land Use/ Mobility Alternatives Phase 3 Analysis + Policy Recommendations Phase 4 Draft Area Plan + EIR Phase 5 Plan Adoption + Implementation 2026 2027 Item 5 Staff Presentation - Attachment A - San Antonio Road Area Plan Land Use and Transportation Alternatives Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 11 Packet Pg. 117 of 426  S A N A N T O N I O R O A D A R E A P L A N Establish “areas of stability” and “areas of change” within Plan Area. Overall Design Strategy and Priorities Land Use Priorities •Create new neighborhoods along Fabian Way and in the CTI area (area along Commercial St., Transport St., Industrial Ave.) •Focus open space, amenities in new neighborhoods •Create smaller, walkable blocks where possible •Infill San Antonio Road with residential Mobility Priorities •Improve ped/bike safety and walkability •Improve streetscape character and pedestrian experience through landscaping,tree canopy •Improve ped/bike experience at intersections •Improve connections to Caltrain, schools, and other amenities Explore focusing on the identified Item 5 Staff Presentation - Attachment A - San Antonio Road Area Plan Land Use and Transportation Alternatives Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 12 Packet Pg. 118 of 426  S A N A N T O N I O R O A D A R E A P L A N 7 Overall Design Strategy Redevelop/infill existing low-density commercial with high-density residential to create new neighborhoods Create new open spaces and "third spaces" with neighborhood serving retail and amenities Improve transit service to community destinations and access to Caltrain Improve ped/bike experience, safety and connectivity on all streets and intersections Item 5 Staff Presentation - Attachment A - San Antonio Road Area Plan Land Use and Transportation Alternatives Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 13 Packet Pg. 119 of 426  S A N A N T O N I O R O A D A R E A P L A N Design Strategy: Outdoor Space Goals •Improve access to parks, decrease distance to parks to under a 10-min walk throughout Plan Area •Improve ped-bike experience linking existing and new open spaces to new residential areas •Create new open spaces to serve existing and new residential neighborhoods (North Fabian and CTI sub areas) •Co-locate retail and services with new open spaces to create “third places” Alternatives explore: •Location, size and number of open spaces •Method of creating open spaces Access to Parks Item 5 Staff Presentation - Attachment A - San Antonio Road Area Plan Land Use and Transportation Alternatives Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 14 Packet Pg. 120 of 426  S A N A N T O N I O R O A D A R E A P L A N 9 •Add new outdoor spaces as part of new development in North Fabian and CTI sub- areas •Improve ped-bike access to existing parks and new outdoor spaces •San Antonio Road becomes a key ped/bike connection with continuous tree canopy to create a pleasant experience connecting new residential areas to amenities and transit •Fabian Way becomes a key bike connection to the Baylands with separated bikeways Design Strategy: Outdoor Space ADD NEIGHBORHOOD SERVING PARK TO NORTH FABIAN SUB-AREA ADD DISTRICT SERVING PARK TO CTI SUB-AREA PROPOSED NEW PARK IN MOUNTAIN VIEW PROPOSED 101 INTERCHANGE PLAN IMPROVE ACCESS AND SAFETY AT INTERSECTIONS CONNECTING TO NEW AND EXISTING OPEN SPACES Item 5 Staff Presentation - Attachment A - San Antonio Road Area Plan Land Use and Transportation Alternatives Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 15 Packet Pg. 121 of 426  S A N A N T O N I O R O A D A R E A P L A N Potential Outdoor Space Types 10 Small Park Mini Park Plaza Less than 0.25 acre Pocket Park Linear Greenway (widened setback) 0.25 to 0.5 acre 0.25 to 0.75 acre~ 1 acre Size varies with length Size varies with length~ 2 acre Neighborhood Park South Park San Francisco, CA Landsby North Mountain View, CA Santana Row San Jose, CA 6th Ave Park Seattle, WA Landsby North Mountain View, CA Johnson Park Palo Alto, CA Mews / Pedestrian Pathways Mission Bay San Francisco, CA Strongly supported by community Strongly supported by community Item 5 Staff Presentation - Attachment A - San Antonio Road Area Plan Land Use and Transportation Alternatives Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 16 Packet Pg. 122 of 426  Land Use Alternatives Item 5 Staff Presentation - Attachment A - San Antonio Road Area Plan Land Use and Transportation Alternatives Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 17 Packet Pg. 123 of 426  S A N A N T O N I O R O A D A R E A P L A N “” are divided into sub-areas for exploring alternatives, that look at different , as well as and Each area is studied at a different level of detail depending on specific opportunities and challenges. Primary Sub-Areas •These areas have the greatest potential for redevelopment and can contribute to creating new neighborhood-serving amenities like outdoor space and retail •These include Secondary Sub-Areas •These areas have limited redevelopment potential in the near term. •These include “Areas of Stability“ •These include , areas that are 100% built-out with low redevelopment potential. •Parts of Green Meadow and South San Antonio are within SB 79’s impact area that allows higher density for projects meeting specific criteria. Utilization of SB 79, however, is likely very low, due to existing conditions in these areas. Sub Area Alternatives 12 Item 5 Staff Presentation - Attachment A - San Antonio Road Area Plan Land Use and Transportation Alternatives Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 18 Packet Pg. 124 of 426  S A N A N T O N I O R O A D A R E A P L A N Sub Area Alternatives Primary Sub-Areas: Estimated Build-out of Alternatives •Central San Antonio + 1,300 to 2,400 Residential Units - 209,000 sf Commercial/Industrial •South Fabian + 600 to 1,100 Residential Units - 177,000 sf Commercial/Industrial •North Fabian +700 to 1,500 Residential Units - 485,000 sf Commercial/Industrial •CTI + 1,000 to 2,000 Residential Units - 528,000 sf Commercial/Industrial + 0 to ~900,000 sf New Office •3,900 to 7,000 New Residential Units •-650,000 sf Net Loss Commercial/ Industrial •+ 0 to 400,000 sf Net New Office •384 Residential Units •438,000 sf Commercial/ Industrial Item 5 Staff Presentation - Attachment A - San Antonio Road Area Plan Land Use and Transportation Alternatives Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 19 Packet Pg. 125 of 426  S A N A N T O N I O R O A D A R E A P L A N North Fabian Sub Area Existing Character •Large Maxar industrial facility •Office buildings that have been converted into private school facilities •Inadequate bike facilities and traffic calming to serve new uses Future Development Potential •Transition to high-density mixed-use •8.7 acres of Housing Element Sites •Approx. 19 acres of potential future development sites Item 5 Staff Presentation - Attachment A - San Antonio Road Area Plan Land Use and Transportation Alternatives Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 20 Packet Pg. 126 of 426  S A N A N T O N I O R O A D A R E A P L A N North Fabian Sub Area Land Use Strategies •Integrate residential uses •Create new outdoor areas to serve existing and new residents in the area •Improve ped/bike access and safety •Create a plan for the future of the Maxar Site •Connect to bike path at US-101 interchange, for ped/bike access to CTI and North Bayshore •Allow for a mix of residential densities; townhouses and apartment buildings •Estimated yield: 900 to 1,400 units •Create publicly accessible parks and outdoor spaces •Create walkable block structure connecting to Fabian Way North Fabian: Maxar Site (See Alts) North Fabian: Other Sites •Maintain allowed land uses •Allow up to 60 or 90 ft with rear setback requirements Item 5 Staff Presentation - Attachment A - San Antonio Road Area Plan Land Use and Transportation Alternatives Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 21 Packet Pg. 127 of 426  S A N A N T O N I O R O A D A R E A P L A N 16 Maxar Site: Potential Site Configurations 5-6 ac 3 ac 1.5 ac2 ac2 ac 1 ac 0.5 ac 0.5 ac Concept A Concept B Concept C Concept D •One big park, one small park •Parks face Fabian Way •Higher density to the west •Lower density to the east •Flex/incubator space along US-101 •One big park, one small park •Big park faces Fabian Way •Higher density residential along San Antonio Rd and US-101 ramp •Two parks of similar size •Lower density residential along San Antonio Rd and US-101 ramp •One larger park These site concepts represent potential configurations of land uses based on the strategies and alternatives presented in previous slides, final designs will be developed through the typical development application and design review process. Ped-bike Connection to San Antonio High Density Housing Retail/Services Low Density For Sale Housing Outdoor Space Flex/Incubator Space Legend Item 5 Staff Presentation - Attachment A - San Antonio Road Area Plan Land Use and Transportation Alternatives Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 22 Packet Pg. 128 of 426  S A N A N T O N I O R O A D A R E A P L A N CTI Sub Area 17 Existing Character •Low-density office and industrial buildings in small buildings •Parcel sizes are small •Single property owner has aggregated a number of parcels but they are non-contiguous Future Development Potential •Transition to high-density mixed-use •7.2 acres of Housing Element Sites •Approx. 25.8 acres of potential future development sites Item 5 Staff Presentation - Attachment A - San Antonio Road Area Plan Land Use and Transportation Alternatives Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 23 Packet Pg. 129 of 426  S A N A N T O N I O R O A D A R E A P L A N CTI Sub Area Alternatives Design Approach The strategy for this area to is create a cohesive and complete neighborhood over time with new outdoor spaces and neighborhood-serving retail. Just south of the CTI Sub Area, in Mountain View, a developer is proposing a project with 488,000 sf of office and 476 units on the shopping center site. Design Opportunities •Create new park/plaza/outdoor space for residential uses •Create opportunity for retail/services/food + beverage •Connect to MV development •Improve ped/bike connections to San Antonio •Improve streets and increase tree canopy Sub Area Boundary Pipeline Projects Housing Element Sites Parcel Lines MV Proposed Project PROPOSED US-101 INTERCHANGE PLAN Item 5 Staff Presentation - Attachment A - San Antonio Road Area Plan Land Use and Transportation Alternatives Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 24 Packet Pg. 130 of 426  S A N A N T O N I O R O A D A R E A P L A N SITE ANALYSIS 19 Fire Access How do streets provide for fire access to mid-rise buildings? Flooding How do projects integrate with public realm considering higher ground floor than sidewalks? Ped/Bike Infrastructure E. Charleston facilities inadequate for higher-density development Street Design Provide for wider sidewalks and increased tree canopy US-101 Buffer Provide for landscape buffer US-101 Interchange Plan Ped/Bike connection to US-101 interchange: multi-use path DEVELOPABLE AREA 25.8 acres HE SITES* 7.2 acres Proposed Project in MV •10.4 Acres Total Parcel Area •488,100 sf Office •476 Residential Units •28,500 sf of Commercial •~1.7 acres of Open Space Outdoor Space Provide publicly access outdoor space(s) for new development Total Existing Building Area : 528,800 sf *Palo Alto’s 2023-2031 Housing Element allocates a total of 1,559 new housing units to the Plan Area (26% of the total citywide) Item 5 Staff Presentation - Attachment A - San Antonio Road Area Plan Land Use and Transportation Alternatives Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 25 Packet Pg. 131 of 426  S A N A N T O N I O R O A D A R E A P L A N 20 Mobility Improvements Proposed Improvements •Improve neighborhood connections to Mountain View •Improve pedestrian and bike infrastructure on Charleston Road •Connect to proposed US- 101 bikeway interchange Bike Infrastructure Setbacks required for new bike infrastructure on Charleston Street Design Provide for wider sidewalks and increased tree canopy 101 Interchange Plan B Ped/bike connection to US-101 interchange multiuse path Neighborhood connection to open spaces and retail Bike infrastructure improvements on E. Charleston Road Block Size Create pedestrian pathways at least one every 800 feet Item 5 Staff Presentation - Attachment A - San Antonio Road Area Plan Land Use and Transportation Alternatives Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 26 Packet Pg. 132 of 426  S A N A N T O N I O R O A D A R E A P L A N 21 Land Use Alternatives (1/2) Alt CTI-B2: Allow Residential up to 90 feet •Estimated growth: •Allows developers to maximize mid- rise building type, providing more flexibility and financial feasibility. Alt CTI-B1: Allow Residential up to 60 feet •Estimated growth: •Maintain existing height limits •Limits residential and residential mixed-use buildings to 5 stories Alternative Summary 1.Residential up to 60 feet (5 stories); and existing allowed uses. 2.Residential up to 90 feet (8 stories); and existing allowed uses 3.Residential and Office up to 90 feet; and existing allowed uses. (Relocate HE sites) 4.Residential up to 160-250 feet and Office up to 135 feet; and existing allowed uses. (Relocate HE sites) ResidentialMixed Use with Retail Housing Element Sites Potential Open SpacePotential Connection ResidentialMixed Use with Retail Housing Element Sites Potential Open SpacePotential Connection Item 5 Staff Presentation - Attachment A - San Antonio Road Area Plan Land Use and Transportation Alternatives Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 27 Packet Pg. 133 of 426  S A N A N T O N I O R O A D A R E A P L A N 22 Land Use Alternatives (2/2) Alt CTI-B4: Allow Office and Residential high-rise (160-250 ft residential/135 ft office) •Estimated growth: 1500 units; 750,000 sf office (Net new 500,000 sf of office assuming 75% of parcels redevelop; up to 150,000 sf net increase between North Fabian and CTI if both redevelop) •Jobs/housing balance is met in the CTI Area. •High-rise building types could reduce office parcel area and allow for more residential parcel area and outdoor space. Alt CTI-B3: Allow Office and Residential up to 90 feet (8 story residential/5-story office) •Estimated growth: 1,200 units; 600,000 sf office (Net new 350,000 sf of office assuming 75% of parcels redevelop; no net increase between North Fabian and CTI if both redevelop) •Jobs/housing balance is met in the CTI Area. •Restricts office development to 5 stories, allowing more height for office could reduce office footprint for same amount of floor area. Relocate Housing Element Sites.Benefits to allowing office: •Move HE sites from US-101 adjacent parcels to internal parcels •Office development can help fund land area for parks and other community benefits •Office and Residential Mixed- use will better support retail and services •Office development may offset cost and improve feasibility for residential projects if developed by same company Residential (No Office)Mixed Use with Retail Housing Element Sites Potential Open SpacePotential Connection Office Allowed Residential (No Office)Mixed Use with Retail Housing Element Sites Potential Open SpacePotential Connection Office Allowed Relocate Housing Element Sites. Item 5 Staff Presentation - Attachment A - San Antonio Road Area Plan Land Use and Transportation Alternatives Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 28 Packet Pg. 134 of 426  S A N A N T O N I O R O A D A R E A P L A N Outdoor Space Considerations 23 ? •Size and amount of outdoor space? •Types of spaces? •Location priorities? •Connections to local ped/bike improvements? •Character of new outdoor space(s)? ? MV Project Item 5 Staff Presentation - Attachment A - San Antonio Road Area Plan Land Use and Transportation Alternatives Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 29 Packet Pg. 135 of 426  S A N A N T O N I O R O A D A R E A P L A N Challenges to Creating New Outdoor Spaces 24 Small Parcels New outdoor spaces and pedestrian connections will require coordination across parcels DEVELOPABLE AREA 25.8 acres HE SITES 7.2 acres Proposed Project in MV (1 parcel) •10.4 Acres Total Parcel Area •488,100 sf Office •476 Units •28,500 sf of Commercial •~1.7 acres of Open Space Challenges •Parcels are small with multiple owners; ownership aggregation is distributed where it occurs •Small parcels are less feasible for residential development •Wider front setbacks are needed to improved sidewalks and increase tree canopy Opportunities •Allow higher value land uses (office) in exchange for creating new outdoor spaces •Distribute new outdoor spaces evenly across all parcels (require front yard “mini parks” on all parcels through requiring larger setbacks and access easements Item 5 Staff Presentation - Attachment A - San Antonio Road Area Plan Land Use and Transportation Alternatives Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 30 Packet Pg. 136 of 426  S A N A N T O N I O R O A D A R E A P L A N 25 Outdoor Space Strategies and Alternatives KEY ISSUES •Visibility and Activation Fronting E. Charleston Road or along an interior street? •Amount of Open Space 1-3 acres of parks/plaza plus pedestrian pathways •Size and Distribution •One large park or distributed open spaces? •What is the minimum size… For the largest park? To be considered a park? •Concentrated on a few parcels or distributed as expanded setbacks on most parcels? Alt CTI-A4. Linear Parks on Expanded Setbacks Alt CTI-A2. Internal Park/PlazaAlt CTI-A1. Plaza/Park on E. Charleston Road Alt CTI-A3. One Large Park Item 5 Staff Presentation - Attachment A - San Antonio Road Area Plan Land Use and Transportation Alternatives Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 31 Packet Pg. 137 of 426  Mobility Alternatives Item 5 Staff Presentation - Attachment A - San Antonio Road Area Plan Land Use and Transportation Alternatives Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 32 Packet Pg. 138 of 426  S A N A N T O N I O R O A D A R E A P L A N Reimagine the corridor as a multimodal spine that balances mobility with placemaking 27 Mobility Strategies to Support Land Use Alternatives PARKING AND DEMAND MANAGEMENT Apply strategies to reduce travel demand and organize allocation of curb space to improve access and efficiency. PEDESTRIAN-FIRST DESIGN Prioritize comfortable, accessible, and inviting streets that encourage walking and biking (while recognizing San Antonio as a regional corridor and truck route. LOW-STRESS BIKING ROUTES Provide high quality bikeways that meet the needs of people of all ages and abilities. Integrate walking, biking, shuttles, and shared mobility to create a seamless journey from doorstep to destination. SMART CORRIDOR TECHNOLOGY Use real-time data, adaptive signals, and digital tools to optimize traffic flow and enhance multimodal safety. FIRST/LAST MILE CONNECTIONS Item 5 Staff Presentation - Attachment A - San Antonio Road Area Plan Land Use and Transportation Alternatives Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 33 Packet Pg. 139 of 426  S A N A N T O N I O R O A D A R E A P L A N San Antonio Rd Priorities A. East of Charleston Rd o Enhance connection to and across US-101 o Create connection through to Fabian Way o Coordinate with VTA US-101 Interchange Project and Google o BPTP Recommendation: Class IV - Separated Bikeways; Class I - Shared Use Path north of Bayshore Road o Provide comfortable walking and biking facilities o Enhance connections across San Antonio Rd o Maintain capacity for vehicle and truck traffic o Coordinate with landowners and developers o BPTP Recommendation: Class IV - Separated Bikeways o Caltrain Station connection o Nita Avenue crossing improvements o San Antonio Avenue enhancements o Coordinate with Mountain View, Caltrain, and Google o BPTP Recommendation: Class IV – New Separated Bikeway on San Antonio Avenue and new Class IV – New Separated Bikeway on San Antonio Road from overcrossing to Middlefield A B C Item 5 Staff Presentation - Attachment A - San Antonio Road Area Plan Land Use and Transportation Alternatives Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 34 Packet Pg. 140 of 426  S A N A N T O N I O R O A D A R E A P L A N San Antonio Intersection Improvements D. Charleston Rd Intersection o Create protected intersection o Remove side street with diagonal parking, extend pedestrian zone o Modify lane geometry, consider removing dual left turn lanes to provide median refuge o Explore grade separated crossing o Create protected intersection o Consolidate existing driveway access o Modify lane geometry, o remove westbound right turn lane, o consider removing dual left turn lanes to provide median refuge o Explore grade separated crossing o Extend existing bike lanes through the intersection o Enhance connection to bike boulevard on Mackay Dr D E F 29 Item 5 Staff Presentation - Attachment A - San Antonio Road Area Plan Land Use and Transportation Alternatives Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 35 Packet Pg. 141 of 426  S A N A N T O N I O R O A D A R E A P L A N C. West of Middlefield Rd 30 •Enhance connections to the Caltrain Station •Provide low-stress bikeway on San Antonio Ave •Extend and connect bike path to Caltrain Station •Create high visibility pedestrian and bike crossing markings •Coordinate with Mountain View, Alphabet, and Caltrain to provide Mobility Hub at/near the Caltrain Station •Enhance bike/ped crossings at Nita Ave to connect to Mackay Dr Item 5 Staff Presentation - Attachment A - San Antonio Road Area Plan Land Use and Transportation Alternatives Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 36 Packet Pg. 142 of 426  Thank you! Item 5 Staff Presentation - Attachment A - San Antonio Road Area Plan Land Use and Transportation Alternatives Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 37 Packet Pg. 143 of 426  From:Phil Mast To:ParkRec Commission Subject:Public Comment: Proposed Cubberley Master Plan Date:Monday, March 23, 2026 6:19:12 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. ! Dear Members of the Parks and Recreation Commission, After reviewing the latest proposed Cubberley Master Plan, I'd like to suggest the following change: Remove building 3.2 from phase 1 of the master plan. This is the new "Lobby + Back of House" building that connects the existing theatre with the Pavilion. It appears to be part of a plan to convert the Pavilion from a gym to a theatre. This change (removing building 3.2) is important for the following 4 reasons: 1) The Pavilion has received extremely heavy use for over 30 years. Because the City has always had a need for more space, the Pavilion will continue to receive heavy use (as a gym) after the new gyms in the Recreation and Wellness Center are complete. 2) The parents of school age children who currently participate in after school sports at the Cubberley gyms generally dislike the idea of converting the Pavilion to a theatre. They don't like making it harder for their child's league to find space. 3) Page 35 of the master plan states: "The future development of this space is dependent on further discussions based on need, potential operators, and funding sources." Given these unknowns, it doesn't seem to make sense to build the new "Lobby + Back of House" structure during phase 1. It should be deferred to a later phase, when the "need, potential operators, and funding sources" are better known. 4) It's questionable whether the proposed 0.5 cent sales tax will pass in November. Reducing this tax to a lower amount will increase the likelihood that the measure will pass. Would it make sense for the council to reduce the scope of phase 1 to only do the following: a) purchasing the property from the school district, and b) completing phases 1.1 and 1.2 of the master plan (i.e., the new Recreation Center)? Would the lower sales tax (just enough for phases 1.1 and 1.2) be low enough to allow the measure to pass in November? For all of the above reasons, I hope that you will give serious consideration to removing building 3.2 from the Cubberley master plan. Sincerely, This message could be suspicious The sender's email address couldn't be verified. This is their first email to you. Mark Safe Report Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 1 Packet Pg. 144 of 426  Phil Mast La Para Avenue, Palo Alto Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 2 Packet Pg. 145 of 426  From:Magdalena Cabrera To:Andrea Wald Cc:Heistein, Ben; ParkRec Commission Subject:Re: Parks and Rec commission mtg 3/24 Date:Monday, March 23, 2026 5:12:28 PM Attachments:Outlook-cidimage00.png Outlook-cidimage00.png Outlook-signature_.png Outlook-oap2qo0k.png Outlook-cidimage00.png Outlook-cidimage00.png Outlook-cidimage00.png CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of openingattachments and clicking on links. i Hello Mr. Heistein, I echo Andrea’s words and look forward to hearing from you about this pilot project. I am for one hoping to come to the commission meeting tomorrow eve and perhaps make your acquaintance. I live in Palo Alto across from John Boulware Park where they put artificial turf in where the children play. I was very disappointed with this decision, but look forward to hopefully determining that a natural grass field will be equally good if not better than artificial turf going forward. Thank you very much for your good efforts on behalf of our community, Magdalena Cabrera On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 4:05 PM Andrea Wald <waldmba@gmail.com> wrote: Mr. Heistein, I am very happy to hear this. Those of us who encouraged the city to do this pilot would be grateful to be kept updated on the progress: - exactly when it might begin (FY27 seems a bit open-ended) - which field(s) are chosen to be part of the pilot - which argonomist is being considered for helping with the planning and support and which one is eventually brought on board and if there is anything more our group can do to assist in helping this project be successful, we are ALL very much interested and available. We all have a stake in this and are hoping for the best possible outcome/results. Thanks. Andrea On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 3:24 PM Heistein, Ben <Benjamin.Heistein@paloalto.gov> wrote: Ms. Wald, Thank you for your thoughtful support of the Natural Grass Pilot. Council has directed staff to move forward with this pilot to optimize maintenance practices for improved playability and durability, and to explore options for transitioning away from synthetic turf This message needs your attention This is a personal email address. This is their first mail to some recipients. Mark Safe Report Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 3 Packet Pg. 146 of 426  at Cubberley. In FY27, we plan to work with an agronomist to develop a turf management plan that will support staff on long-term success, along with a separate field designer to develop high- performance natural grass field specifications, including proper drainage and turf selection. The program will incorporate organic field management practices—such as aeration and compost topdressing—while maintaining a performance-based approach to ensure the fields can withstand heavy use and stay within budgetary constraints. We appreciate your support! Ben Heistein Assistant Director - Open Space, Parks, and Golf Community Services Department (650) 617-3516 |Ben.Heistein@paloalto.gov www.paloalto.gov From: Andrea Wald <waldmba@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2026 3:27 PM To: ParkRec Commission <parkrec.commission@PaloAlto.gov> Subject: Parks and Rec commission mtg 3/24 CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of openingattachments and clicking on links. Dear Commission members, In the Parks and Recreation Commission Draft FY2027 Workplan under Project/Goal 4 is the Natural Grass Pilot program that City Council has directed the Parks and Rec commission to spearhead. I am very much in favor of this endeavor/project and hope that it can be acted on in a timely manner. The sooner this project gets started the more time there will be to get the best results to understand how natural grass can work well in Palo Alto. This will have a huge impact going forward with future needs of upgrades/renovations at existing parks/sports fields. First and foremost is to find and hire the right sources for undertaking this project – from the company that will provide the best design including proper drainage, to one that can advise on the most appropriate grass that can provide the best outcome in terms of watering and maintenance needs and durability/playability, to one that will be able to provide guidance to city maintenance staff on how best to care for the field. There is a growing movement that is proving that natural grass fields, if done right – specifically using organic, regenerative practices – can provide the type of field that sports groups will be very happy with and will address environmental and health concerns associated with unnatural materials – both from the ground cover to how the field is managed (pesticide free). I hope that you will undertake this task with an approach that from the start that will yield the best results possible and put Palo Alto on the map to a transition of caring about our planet and future generations and Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 4 Packet Pg. 147 of 426  the legacy we leave behind. Sincerely, Andrea Wald Co-Founder, Community for Natural Play Surfaces -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CFNPS Leaders" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cfnps- leaders+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cfnps- leaders/CAPhHUjjgYNxmVF0toA%3D%3DSk4RUQ3iYmDEdwQ%2BT4iDft_066fkfw%40mail.gmail.com For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 5 Packet Pg. 148 of 426  From:Andrea Wald To:Heistein, Ben Cc:ParkRec Commission Subject:Re: Parks and Rec commission mtg 3/24 Date:Monday, March 23, 2026 4:07:21 PM Attachments:Outlook-oap2qo0k.png Outlook-cidimage00.png Outlook-cidimage00.png Outlook-cidimage00.png Outlook-cidimage00.png Outlook-cidimage00.png Outlook-signature_.png CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i Mr. Heistein, I am very happy to hear this. Those of us who encouraged the city to do this pilot would be grateful to be kept updated on the progress: - exactly when it might begin (FY27 seems a bit open-ended) - which field(s) are chosen to be part of the pilot - which argonomist is being considered for helping with the planning and support and which one is eventually brought on board and if there is anything more our group can do to assist in helping this project be successful, we are ALL very much interested and available. We all have a stake in this and are hoping for the best possible outcome/results. Thanks. Andrea On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 3:24 PM Heistein, Ben <Benjamin.Heistein@paloalto.gov> wrote: Ms. Wald, Thank you for your thoughtful support of the Natural Grass Pilot. Council has directed staff to move forward with this pilot to optimize maintenance practices for improved playability and durability, and to explore options for transitioning away from synthetic turf at Cubberley. In FY27, we plan to work with an agronomist to develop a turf management plan that will support staff on long-term success, along with a separate field designer to develop high-performance natural grass field specifications, including proper drainage and turf selection. This message needs your attention Some Recipients have never replied to this person. This is a personal email address. Mark Safe Report Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 6 Packet Pg. 149 of 426  The program will incorporate organic field management practices—such as aeration and compost topdressing—while maintaining a performance-based approach to ensure the fields can withstand heavy use and stay within budgetary constraints. We appreciate your support! Ben Heistein Assistant Director - Open Space, Parks, and Golf Community Services Department (650) 617-3516 |Ben.Heistein@paloalto.gov www.paloalto.gov From: Andrea Wald <waldmba@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2026 3:27 PM To: ParkRec Commission <parkrec.commission@PaloAlto.gov> Subject: Parks and Rec commission mtg 3/24 CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. Dear Commission members, In the Parks and Recreation Commission Draft FY2027 Workplan under Project/Goal 4 is the Natural Grass Pilot program that City Council has directed the Parks and Rec commission to spearhead. I am very much in favor of this endeavor/project and hope that it can be acted on in a timely manner. The sooner this project gets started the more time there will be to get the best results to understand how natural grass can work well in Palo Alto. This will have a huge impact going forward with future needs of upgrades/renovations at existing parks/sports fields. First and foremost is to find and hire the right sources for undertaking this project – from the company that will provide the best design including proper drainage, to one that can advise on the most appropriate grass that can provide the best outcome in terms of watering and maintenance needs and durability/playability, to one that will be able to provide guidance to city maintenance staff on how best to care for the field. There is a growing movement that is proving that natural grass fields, if done right – Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 7 Packet Pg. 150 of 426  specifically using organic, regenerative practices – can provide the type of field that sports groups will be very happy with and will address environmental and health concerns associated with unnatural materials – both from the ground cover to how the field is managed (pesticide free). I hope that you will undertake this task with an approach that from the start that will yield the best results possible and put Palo Alto on the map to a transition of caring about our planet and future generations and the legacy we leave behind. Sincerely, Andrea Wald Co-Founder, Community for Natural Play Surfaces Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 8 Packet Pg. 151 of 426  From:Heistein, Ben To:clairee44@gmail.com Cc:ParkRec Commission Subject:Re: Natural Grass Pilot Project Date:Monday, March 23, 2026 3:42:52 PM Attachments:Outlook-wwnrvtdd.png Outlook-cidimage00.png Outlook-cidimage00.png Outlook-cidimage00.png Outlook-cidimage00.png Outlook-cidimage00.png Outlook-signature_.png Ms. Elliot, Thanks for your support of the natural grass pilot. Council has directed staff to move forward with this project to improve field playability and durability, and to explore long-term options for transitioning away from synthetic turf at Cubberley. In FY27, we plan to work with an agronomist for technical guidance on turf management, along with a separate design consultant to develop high-performance natural grass field designs with proper drainage, lighting, and turf selection. The program, both in terms of maintaining our existing fields and future field construction, will integrate organic practices—such as aeration and compost topdressing—while maintaining a performance- based approach to meet heavy-use demands and budget constraints. We appreciate your continued support and for the provided recommendations. Ben Heistein Assistant Director - Open Space, Parks, and Golf Community Services Department (650) 617-3516 |Ben.Heistein@paloalto.gov www.paloalto.gov From: Claire E <clairee44@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, March 13, 2026 12:13 PM To: ParkRec Commission <parkrec.commission@PaloAlto.gov> Subject: Natural Grass Pilot Project CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious ofopening attachments and clicking on links. Dear Parks and Rec Commissioners,I am a Palo Alto resident and retired ecologist who would very much like to see El Camino Park be the last synthetic turf field installed by the city. One step toward making that a reality, would be a successful natural grass pilot project.I amen ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ This message needs your attention Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 9 Packet Pg. 152 of 426  &nbsp; i This is a personal email address. You've never replied to this person. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast CGBANNERINDICATORDear Parks and Rec Commissioners, I am a Palo Alto resident and retired ecologist who would very much like to see El Camino Park be the last synthetic turf field installed by the city. One step toward making that a reality, would be a successful natural grass pilot project. I am encouraged that the city has committed to designing and implementing a pilot natural grass field. I hope that you can expedite this project. Please also ensure that t is well planned has a sufficient budget for both design, installation and most importantly maintenance. Well designed and maintained natural grass fields have been shown to provide a playing capacity similar to the expected capacity of synthetic fields. Please work with city staff to: · Create a a natural grass pilot project. · Hire an agronomist experienced in design and maintenance of grass fields that have shown to provide for extended play. · Consider hiring a contractor that is responsible for all three: the design, installation and maintenance so they have a vested interest in keeping the field safe and the grass healthy. · Ensure that a contract is written that holds back resources to the contractor until they show the fields are functioning well and being adequately maintained. · Lastly, the pilot should include installation of lighting to allow for evening play so that the hours of play can fairly be compared with artificial turf fields with lights. An advocate for natural grass fields in Los Gatos suggested that Palo Alto look into working with Field Source in Ohio run by Ryan DeMay. They also said this organization could be helpful: Natural Grass Advisory Group. Lastly Rika Gopinath, at Beyond Pesticides, offers advisory services to municipalities in avoiding pesticide use in grass management. She can be reached at Rika@beyondpesticides.org. Thank you for considering my input as you move forward to plan this important project. Claire Elliott Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 10 Packet Pg. 153 of 426  From:Heistein, Ben To:waldmba@gmail.com Cc:ParkRec Commission Subject:Re: Parks and Rec commission mtg 3/24 Date:Monday, March 23, 2026 3:24:08 PM Attachments:Outlook-oap2qo0k.png Outlook-cidimage00.png Outlook-cidimage00.png Outlook-cidimage00.png Outlook-cidimage00.png Outlook-cidimage00.png Outlook-signature_.png Ms. Wald, Thank you for your thoughtful support of the Natural Grass Pilot. Council has directed staff to move forward with this pilot to optimize maintenance practices for improved playability and durability, and to explore options for transitioning away from synthetic turf at Cubberley. In FY27, we plan to work with an agronomist to develop a turf management plan that will support staff on long-term success, along with a separate field designer to develop high- performance natural grass field specifications, including proper drainage and turf selection. The program will incorporate organic field management practices—such as aeration and compost topdressing—while maintaining a performance-based approach to ensure the fields can withstand heavy use and stay within budgetary constraints. We appreciate your support! Ben Heistein Assistant Director - Open Space, Parks, and Golf Community Services Department (650) 617-3516 |Ben.Heistein@paloalto.gov www.paloalto.gov From: Andrea Wald <waldmba@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2026 3:27 PM To: ParkRec Commission <parkrec.commission@PaloAlto.gov> Subject: Parks and Rec commission mtg 3/24 CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious ofopening attachments and clicking on links. Dear Commission members, In the Parks and Recreation Commission Draft FY2027 Workplan under Project/Goal 4 is the Natural Grass Pilot program that City Council has directed the Parks and Rec commission to spearhead. I am very much in favor of this endeavor/project and hope thati ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ This message needs your attention Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 11 Packet Pg. 154 of 426  &nbsp; i This is a personal email address. You've never replied to this person. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast CGBANNERINDICATOR Dear Commission members, In the Parks and Recreation Commission Draft FY2027 Workplan under Project/Goal 4 is the Natural Grass Pilot program that City Council has directed the Parks and Rec commission to spearhead. I am very much in favor of this endeavor/project and hope that it can be acted on in a timely manner. The sooner this project gets started the more time there will be to get the best results to understand how natural grass can work well in Palo Alto. This will have a huge impact going forward with future needs of upgrades/renovations at existing parks/sports fields. First and foremost is to find and hire the right sources for undertaking this project – from the company that will provide the best design including proper drainage, to one that can advise on the most appropriate grass that can provide the best outcome in terms of watering and maintenance needs and durability/playability, to one that will be able to provide guidance to city maintenance staff on how best to care for the field. There is a growing movement that is proving that natural grass fields, if done right – specifically using organic, regenerative practices – can provide the type of field that sports groups will be very happy with and will address environmental and health concerns associated with unnatural materials – both from the ground cover to how the field is managed (pesticide free). I hope that you will undertake this task with an approach that from the start that will yield the best results possible and put Palo Alto on the map to a transition of caring about our planet and future generations and the legacy we leave behind. Sincerely, Andrea Wald Co-Founder, Community for Natural Play Surfaces Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 12 Packet Pg. 155 of 426  From:Heistein, Ben To:asdellaporta@gmail.com Cc:ParkRec Commission Subject:Re: Natural Grass Pilot Program Date:Monday, March 23, 2026 3:16:01 PM Attachments:Outlook-lysa4ckg.png Outlook-cidimage00.png Outlook-cidimage00.png Outlook-cidimage00.png Outlook-cidimage00.png Outlook-cidimage00.png Outlook-signature_.png Ms. Dellaporta, thank you for your support of the natural grass pilot. The proposed FY27 budget includes an effort to optimize maintenance practices to improve playability and durability through working with an agronomist. We also plan to work with a field designer to develop high-performance natural grass field specifications, including soil preparation, drainage, and species selection. We appreciate your support as we advance this work. Ben Heistein Assistant Director - Open Space, Parks, and Golf Community Services Department (650) 617-3516 |Ben.Heistein@paloalto.gov www.paloalto.gov From: Angela Dellaporta <asdellaporta@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2026 11:16 AM To: ParkRec Commission <parkrec.commission@PaloAlto.gov> Subject: Natural Grass Pilot Program CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious ofopening attachments and clicking on links. Dear Commission Members,The City Council has directed the Parks and Rec commission to spearhead a Natural Grass Pilot program, which could bring the city closer to its goal of environmental protection and sustainability.I want to urge you to move forward on this project as soona ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ i This message needs your attention This is a personal email address. This is their first email to you. Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 13 Packet Pg. 156 of 426  &nbsp; Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast CGBANNERINDICATOR Dear Commission Members, The City Council has directed the Parks and Rec commission to spearhead a Natural Grass Pilot program, which could bring the city closer to its goal of environmental protection and sustainability. I want to urge you to move forward on this project as soon as possible. It will be crucial to find a company that can carry out this project creating proper drainage, using appropriate grass, and advising city staff on best maintenance practices. Thank you for the work you do! Angela Dellaporta Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 14 Packet Pg. 157 of 426  From:Heistein, Ben To:sue2042@gmail.com Cc:ParkRec Commission Subject:Re: City"s Pilot Project: Organically-Managed Natural Grass Playing Field Date:Monday, March 23, 2026 3:02:46 PM Attachments:Outlook-1gk5pqlg.png Outlook-cidimage00.png Outlook-cidimage00.png Outlook-cidimage00.png Outlook-cidimage00.png Outlook-cidimage00.png Outlook-signature_.png Dr. Chow, thank you for your thoughtful input and continued engagement. Council has directed staff to pursue a natural grass pilot specifically to optimize maintenance practices that improve playability and durability, and to explore long-term options to transition away from synthetic turf at Cubberley. We agree that a science- based approach is essential. In FY27, pending budget approval, we plan to work with an agronomist to help create a turf management program along with a separate design consultant to develop high- performance natural grass field specifications, including soil preparation, drainage, and species selection. Organic field management principles will be incorporated into the program, including aeration and compost topdressing, however, a performance-based approach will be necessary to withstand high use demands and budget constraints. We appreciate your support as we move this effort forward. Ben Heistein Assistant Director - Open Space, Parks, and Golf Community Services Department (650) 617-3516 |Ben.Heistein@paloalto.gov www.paloalto.gov Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 15 Packet Pg. 158 of 426  &nbsp; From: Sue <sue2042@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2026 11:36 PM To: ParkRec Commission <parkrec.commission@PaloAlto.gov> Subject: City's Pilot Project: Organically-Managed Natural Grass Playing Field CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. ParkRec.commission@paloalto.govRe: Pilot Project: Organically-Managed Natural Grass Playing Field Dear Parks and Recreation Commissioners, I am writing as the Chair of the Loma Prieta Chapter of the Sierra Club and as a concerned Palo Alto resident who strongly supports the City’ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ! This message could be suspicious Similar name as someone in your company. This is a personal email address. This is their first email to you. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast CGBANNERINDICATOR ParkRec.commission@paloalto.gov Re: Pilot Project: Organically-Managed Natural Grass Playing Field Dear Parks and Recreation Commissioners, I am writing as the Chair of the Loma Prieta Chapter of the Sierra Club and as a concerned Palo Alto resident who strongly supports the City’s pilot project to establish an organically-managed natural grass playing field. This project represents an important opportunity for Palo Alto to demonstrate leadership in sustainable park management while addressing growing community concerns about artificial turf’s heat risks, microplastic pollution, and maintenance challenges. To ensure this pilot truly succeeds and provides meaningful results for future decision‑making, I urge the Commission to: Frame the pilot as a science‑based demonstration project. Engage an experienced turf agronomist specializing in organic athletic field management to guide soil preparation, species selection, and early‑stage maintenance. Prioritize soil health from the start. Comprehensive soil testing, use of quality compost amendments, and establishment of deep-rooting grass varieties will determine long‑term durability and play quality. Incorporate proper design and drainage. A well‑engineered layout that prevents puddling and muddy conditions during rainy periods is essential to Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 16 Packet Pg. 159 of 426  maintaining playability and protecting field integrity. Ensure continuity of management responsibility. Ideally, the same team should oversee design, installation, and maintenance to maintain accountability and a vested interest in the outcome. Allocate adequate resources for the full establishment period. Organic systems perform best with a strong foundation phase—watering, mowing at the right height, and proper aeration make all the difference during the first 12–18 months. Design fair performance metrics. Compare usable play hours, safety, and resilience with synthetic turf fields under similar lighting and scheduling conditions. By investing care and expertise up front, Palo Alto can produce a grass field that meets athletic needs and environmental goals alike—an achievement worth sharing nationally as part of a growing movement toward safer, regenerative public spaces. Thank you for supporting this essential pilot and ensuring it is implemented with the rigor and care our community expects. Sincerely, Sue Chow, Ph.D Palo Alto, CA -------------------------------------------- Sue Chow, Ph.D Chair, Sierra Club Loma Prieta Chapter Executive Committee Member, Sierra Club California 650-454-0259 Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 17 Packet Pg. 160 of 426  From:ParkRec Commission To:jake.g@turftank.com; ParkRec Commission Subject:RE: field maintenance at Palo Alto Parks and Recreation Date:Thursday, March 19, 2026 5:40:03 PM Hi Jake, Thank you for your emails. They have been received. We will reach out if needed. Thank you, Sarah SARAH ROBUSTELLI Division Manager Open Space, Parks, and Golf Community Services Department (650) 617-3518 | Sarah.Robustelli@PaloAlto.gov www.PaloAlto.gov -----Original Message----- From: Jake Gentile <jake@turftankmarkingrobot.com> Sent: Monday, March 9, 2026 4:39 AM To: ParkRec Commission <parkrec.commission@PaloAlto.gov> Subject: Re: field maintenance at Palo Alto Parks and Recreation CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links. Hi , Just checking in to see if you had a chance to read my last email. Thank you, Jake Gentile Business Development Manager Turf Tank 1110 Allgood Industrial Ct, Marietta, GA 30066 On Fri, March 6, 2026 12:39 PM, Jake Gentile <jake@turftankmarkingrobot.com> [jake@turftankmarkingrobot.com]> wrote: > Hi , hope your Friday is off to a productive start. > > I’m reaching out because many parks & rec departments across California are using Turf Tank to mark their sport fields, compared to manual line marking its up to 7 times faster, streamlining their workflow and improving efficiency, all while delivering perfectly marked lines every time. > > Would Palo Alto Parks and Recreation be open to a demo to see how it can help improve your current field marking process? Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 18 Packet Pg. 161 of 426  > > Thanks, > > Jake Gentile > Business Development Manager > Turf Tank > 1110 Allgood Industrial Ct, Marietta, GA 30066 > > If you’d prefer not to receive messages from me, just reply "opt-out." > Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 19 Packet Pg. 162 of 426  From:Light As Air Boats To:ParkRec Commission Ahoy Buoys & Fender Kits! Date:Thursday, March 19, 2026 10:06:13 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of openingattachments and clicking on links. i This message needs your attention No employee in your company has ever replied to this person. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 20 Packet Pg. 163 of 426  SHOP NOW Hi there, Protect people, vessels and waterways! Our Dock Expert Can Help You Design the Dock Layout That Fits Your Needs & Wants!! Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 21 Packet Pg. 164 of 426  LEARN MORE ABOUT ROYLAN BUOYS HERE Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 22 Packet Pg. 165 of 426  LEARN MORE ABOUT AERE DOCKING HERE Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 23 Packet Pg. 166 of 426  LEARN MORE ABOUT PATRIOT DOCKS HERE For Questions or a Quote - Call or Email Dave - 864.367.6161 dave@lightasairboats.com SEE ALL BOAT DOCKS HERE See 2026 Parks & Camps Catalog Here See 2026 Resorts Catalog Here See 2026 Water Recreation Catalog Here Yours in Wind, Water, and Waves, - The Light As Air Boats Team Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 24 Packet Pg. 167 of 426  We don’t want to spam you. If you're no longer interested in enjoying adventures out on the water Unsubscribe here. Light As Air Boats 13801 Walsingham Rd. Suite A-116 Largo, Florida 33774 Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 25 Packet Pg. 168 of 426  From:Amera Temprim Subject:Re: Family law cases in CA Date:Wednesday, March 18, 2026 8:05:02 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i Hi again, Most family law firms don’t need more inquiries—they need better ones. We help firms connect only with individuals who are serious about retaining counsel for divorce, custody, and support matters—not consultation shoppers or people just gathering information. Open to a quick look? Just reply “yes.” Amera On Tue, Mar 10, 2026 at 12:40 PM Amera Temprim <ametempraim@gmail.com> wrote: Hi, This is Amera from DCM’s Legal Growth Division. We’re selecting one family law firm in your region to handle a steady flow of qualified divorce, custody, and support-related inquiries from individuals actively seeking representation. Most firms receive plenty of inquiries but lose time to consultation shoppers, low-commitment callers, and cases that don’t meet their intake standards. Our system filters that out so you only speak with prospective clients who are serious about moving forward. One of our New York partner firms is averaging 15–20 retained family law clients per month with this setup. Would it make sense to see if this is a fit for your firm? Just reply “yes” with the best number and I’ll send over the details. Best, Amera Temprim This message needs your attention No employee in your company has ever replied to this person. This is a personal email address. Mark Safe Report Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 26 Packet Pg. 169 of 426  From:Jake Gentile To:ParkRec Commission Subject:Re: field maintenance at Palo Alto Parks and Recreation Date:Wednesday, March 18, 2026 8:02:04 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links. Hi , Just checking in to see if you had a chance to read my last email. Thank you, Jake Gentile Business Development Manager Turf Tank 1110 Allgood Industrial Ct, Marietta, GA 30066 On Fri, March 6, 2026 12:39 PM, Jake Gentile <jake@turftankmarkingrobot.com> [jake@turftankmarkingrobot.com]> wrote: > Hi , hope your Friday is off to a productive start. > > I’m reaching out because many parks & rec departments across California are using Turf Tank to mark their sport fields, compared to manual line marking its up to 7 times faster, streamlining their workflow and improving efficiency, all while delivering perfectly marked lines every time. > > Would Palo Alto Parks and Recreation be open to a demo to see how it can help improve your current field marking process? > > Thanks, > > Jake Gentile > Business Development Manager > Turf Tank > 1110 Allgood Industrial Ct, Marietta, GA 30066 > > If you’d prefer not to receive messages from me, just reply "opt-out." > Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 27 Packet Pg. 170 of 426  From:Jake Gentile To:ParkRec Commission Subject:Re: field maintenance at Palo Alto Parks and Recreation Date:Wednesday, March 18, 2026 8:01:09 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links. Hi , I’m making one last attempt to get in touch, as I’m still looking for the best person to discuss how Palo Alto Parks and Recreation can improve field maintenance and reduce expenses and labor. If now isn’t a good time, would it be better if I followed up again in a couple of weeks? Best, Jake Gentile Business Development Manager Turf Tank 1110 Allgood Industrial Ct, Marietta, GA 30066 On Thu, March 12, 2026 11:50 AM, Jake Gentile <jake@turftankmarkingrobot.com> [jake@turftankmarkingrobot.com]> wrote: > Hi , > > I’m still hoping to get in touch with the right person who oversees field maintenance at Palo Alto Parks and Recreation. > > Is there someone else I should be speaking with? > > Best, > > Jake Gentile > Business Development Manager > Turf Tank > 1110 Allgood Industrial Ct, Marietta, GA 30066 > > On Mon, March 9, 2026 11:39 AM, Jake Gentile <jake@turftankmarkingrobot.com> > [jake@turftankmarkingrobot.com]> wrote: > > > Hi , > > > > Just checking in to see if you had a chance to read my last email. > > > > Thank you, > > > > Jake Gentile > > Business Development Manager > > Turf Tank > > 1110 Allgood Industrial Ct, Marietta, GA 30066 > > On Fri, March 6, 2026 12:39 PM, Jake Gentile <jake@turftankmarkingrobot.com> > > [jake@turftankmarkingrobot.com]> wrote: Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 28 Packet Pg. 171 of 426  > > > > > Hi , hope your Friday is off to a productive start. > > > > > > I’m reaching out because many parks & rec departments across California are using Turf Tank to mark their sport fields, compared to manual line marking its up to 7 times faster, streamlining their workflow and improving efficiency, all while delivering perfectly marked lines every time. > > > > > > Would Palo Alto Parks and Recreation be open to a demo to see how it can help improve your current field marking process? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Jake Gentile > > > Business Development Manager > > > Turf Tank > > > 1110 Allgood Industrial Ct, Marietta, GA 30066 > > > > > > If you’d prefer not to receive messages from me, just reply "opt-out." > > > Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 29 Packet Pg. 172 of 426  From:Jake Gentile To:ParkRec Commission Subject:field maintenance at Palo Alto Parks and Recreation Date:Wednesday, March 18, 2026 8:01:05 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links. Hi , hope your Friday is off to a productive start. I’m reaching out because many parks & rec departments across California are using Turf Tank to mark their sport fields, compared to manual line marking its up to 7 times faster, streamlining their workflow and improving efficiency, all while delivering perfectly marked lines every time. Would Palo Alto Parks and Recreation be open to a demo to see how it can help improve your current field marking process? Thanks, Jake Gentile Business Development Manager Turf Tank 1110 Allgood Industrial Ct, Marietta, GA 30066 If you’d prefer not to receive messages from me, just reply "opt-out." Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 30 Packet Pg. 173 of 426  From:Megan Nguyen To:ParkRec Commission Subject:FREE In-Person Family Event hosted by POST - Nature Lotería March 28th Date:Wednesday, March 18, 2026 2:01:54 PM Attachments:image.png image.png image.png image.png image.png Nature Loteria print flyer color.pdf CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i Hi Parks and Rec Palo Alto My name is Megan, and I’m the Community Events Manager at Peninsula Open Space Trust (POST). I’m reaching out today to invite you, your friends, family, and community to attend our free in-person event, Nature Lotería on Saturday, March 28th, 2026, from 5 p.m. – 8 p.m. at Bloomhouse in East Palo Alto. Request: I included a printable flyer. Please print this out and post it to your local bulletin board, or forward this to any other community lists that might be interested in this event. Join POST and partners to celebrate community and culture while connecting with nature. Join us for a fun, interactive game of Nature Lotería and a chance to win prizes. Enjoy music, interact with partner booths, eat food, and play games with other community members. This message needs your attention This is their first email to you. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 31 Packet Pg. 174 of 426  What is Lotería? Lotería (Spanish word meaning “lottery”) is a traditional Mexican board game of chance similar to bingo. It is played on a deck of cards instead of numbered ping- pong balls. Each card features a unique image that represents various aspects of Mexican culture, folklore, and nature. Throughout the event, activities will include: The chance to explore organizational booths and learn about free community resources Three rounds of Nature Lotería with breaks in between Dancing and music by Cumbia DJ Philthy Dronez Free food and aqua fresca Prizes are given to the winners of the game! Designed exclusively for this event, Nature Lotería is a customized game inspired by the traditional Mexican Lotería game—similar to bingo! Local San Jose artist David Cipres designed our one-of-a-kind Nature Loteria cards, which feature stunning illustrations of the Bay Area and California plants and animals. We’ll have food and aguas frescas ready for you to enjoy! All are welcome! Please do not bring pets. Register now to secure your spot and learn more about local biodiversity while celebrating Mexican culture! Thank you! We hope to see you there! Megan -- Megan Nguyen (they/she) Community Events Manager Peninsula Open Space Trust (650) 352-6284 openspacetrust.org Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 32 Packet Pg. 175 of 426  From:Light As Air Boats To:ParkRec Commission Rescue Equipment & Rafts Date:Wednesday, March 18, 2026 10:05:48 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of openingattachments and clicking on links. ! This message could be suspicious The sender's email address couldn't be verified. No employee in your company has ever replied to this person. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 33 Packet Pg. 176 of 426  SHOP NOW Hi there, Get on the water fast when the need arises! Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 34 Packet Pg. 177 of 426  See All Rescue Boats Here! See Water Safety & Rescue Collections Here! Camps & Parks Catalog Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 35 Packet Pg. 178 of 426  Water Recreation Catalog Resorts Catalog We don’t want to spam you. If you're no longer interested in enjoying adventures out on the water Unsubscribe here. Light As Air Boats 13801 Walsingham Rd. Suite A-116 Largo, Florida 33774 Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 36 Packet Pg. 179 of 426  From:Postmaster To:ParkRec Commission Subject:You have new held messages Date:Tuesday, March 17, 2026 12:28:16 PM Logo You have new held messages You can release all of your held messages and permit or block future emails from the senders, or manage messages individually. Release all Permit all Block all You can also manage held messages in your Personal Portal. Spam Policy ametempraim@gmail.com Re: Family law cases in CA 2026-03-17 09:40 Release Permit Block Release all Permit all Block all © 2019 Mimecast Services Limited. Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 37 Packet Pg. 180 of 426  From:Light As Air Boats To:ParkRec Commission Because Summer is Just Around the Bend. Date:Tuesday, March 17, 2026 10:03:24 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious ofopening attachments and clicking on links. i SHOP NOW Hi there, ​ Give Your Guests The Best Summer Days On The Water! These boats deliver! This message needs your attention No employee in your company has ever replied to this person. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 38 Packet Pg. 181 of 426  SEE WENONAH CANOES HERE SEE ADVENTURE GLASS PEDAL BOATS HERE SEE MARTINI NAUTICA PEDAL BOATS HERE SEE ALL PUFFIN ROW BOATS HERE For Questions Or a Quote, Call Dave Tel:864.367.6161 dave@lightasairboats.com SEE CAMPS & PARKS CATALOG HERE Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 39 Packet Pg. 182 of 426  SEE RESORTS CATALOG HERE SEE GOVERNMENT CATALOG HERE We don’t want to spam you. If you're no longer interested in enjoying adventures out on the water Unsubscribe here. Light As Air Boats 13801 Walsingham Rd. Suite A-116 Largo, Florida 33774 Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 40 Packet Pg. 183 of 426  From:Postmaster To:ParkRec Commission Subject:You have new held messages Date:Sunday, March 15, 2026 7:10:56 AM Logo You have new held messages You can release all of your held messages and permit or block future emails from the senders, or manage messages individually. Release all Permit all Block all You can also manage held messages in your Personal Portal. Spam Policy jake@turftankmarkingrobot.com Re: field maintenance at Palo Alto Parks and Recreation 2026-03-15 04:57 Release Permit Block Release all Permit all Block all © 2019 Mimecast Services Limited. Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 41 Packet Pg. 184 of 426  From:Claire E To:ParkRec Commission Subject:Natural Grass Pilot Project Date:Friday, March 13, 2026 12:18:13 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i Dear Parks and Rec Commissioners, I am a Palo Alto resident and retired ecologist who would very much like to see El Camino Park be the last synthetic turf field installed by the city. One step toward making that a reality, would be a successful natural grass pilot project. I am encouraged that the city has committed to designing and implementing a pilot natural grass field. I hope that you can expedite this project. Please also ensure that t is well planned has a sufficient budget for both design, installation and most importantly maintenance. Well designed and maintained natural grass fields have been shown to provide a playing capacity similar to the expected capacity of synthetic fields. Please work with city staff to: · Create a a natural grass pilot project. · Hire an agronomist experienced in design and maintenance of grass fields that have shown to provide for extended play. · Consider hiring a contractor that is responsible for all three: the design, installation and maintenance so they have a vested interest in keeping the field safe and the grass healthy. · Ensure that a contract is written that holds back resources to the contractor until they show the fields are functioning well and being adequately maintained. · Lastly, the pilot should include installation of lighting to allow for evening play so that the hours of play can fairly be compared with artificial turf fields with lights. An advocate for natural grass fields in Los Gatos suggested that Palo Alto look into working with Field Source in Ohio run by Ryan DeMay. They also said this organization could be helpful: Natural Grass Advisory Group. Lastly Rika Gopinath, at Beyond Pesticides, offers advisory services to municipalities in avoiding pesticide use in grass This message needs your attention This is a personal email address. You've never replied to this person. Mark Safe Report Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 42 Packet Pg. 185 of 426  management. She can be reached at Rika@beyondpesticides.org. Thank you for considering my input as you move forward to plan this important project. Claire Elliott Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 43 Packet Pg. 186 of 426  From:Daniela Betco To:ParkRec Commission Subject:California Parks & Recreation Society Conference follow up Date:Friday, March 13, 2026 5:32:13 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious ofopening attachments and clicking on links. i Hi Friend, It was great meeting so many passionate professionals working in field maintenance at the California Parks & Recreation Society Conference. Whether we had a chance to connect there or you didn't get a chance to stop by, I didn't want you to miss the opportunity to see what Turf Tank can do for you, your team, and your sports fields. If you want to see it live, we're offering on-site demos where you can experience the Turf Tank robot in action on your fields. We know every field is different, and seeing is believing. In a one-hour session, you'll see how to: - Create perfect, crisp lines in a fraction of the time it requires manually today - Mark your fields using just a few taps on a tablet - work smarter, not harder - Cut your paint consumption by up to 50% while getting your time freed up for other tasks No strings attached. I WANT TO SEE IT LIVE! We look forward to showing you why more than 5,000 organizations across the United States & Canada have already switched their manual line marking out with Turf Tank. DANIELA BETCO EVENTS AND MARKETING MANAGER m:+1 (239) 758-0294 This message needs your attention No employee in your company has ever replied to this person. Mark Safe Report Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 44 Packet Pg. 187 of 426  e:daniela.betco@turftank.com w:www.turftank.com a:Skjoldet 20, 9230 Svenstrup J, Denmark Turf Tank, 1110 Allgood Industrial Ct, Marietta, Georgia 30062, United States, 877-396-4094 Unsubscribe Manage preferences Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 45 Packet Pg. 188 of 426  From:Light As Air Boats To:ParkRec Commission Safe and Smart Docking Solutions Date:Thursday, March 12, 2026 10:05:42 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of openingattachments and clicking on links. i This message needs your attention No employee in your company has ever replied to this person. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 46 Packet Pg. 189 of 426  SHOP NOW Hi there, Lift, dock & store boats, kayaks, canoes & SUPs safely. Keep boats out of the water without having to haul it to land! Gently raise the boat out of the Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 47 Packet Pg. 190 of 426  LEARN MORE ABOUT AIR-DOCK HERE Create a safe and stable cradle for kayaks, canoes and paddleboards. A better way to launch kayaks. Attaches to floating or fixed docks Provides a safe & stable cradle LEARN MORE ABOUT THE YAKPORT HERE Attaches to almost all floating docks! The cradle system makes it very easy to get in and out of kayaks or paddle boards. When the launch and stow is in the stow position it safely and securely holds light craft out of the water. Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 48 Packet Pg. 191 of 426  Lift kayaks and other crafts up to 36" wide out of the water including the access ladder. Built for one or two light crafts, this launch and stow remains virtually barnacle free! LEARN MORE ABOUT SEAHORSE DOCKING HERE For Questions or a Quote - Call or Email Dave - 864.367.6161 dave@lightasairboats.com SEE ALL BOAT DOCKS HERE SEE ALL KAYAK DOCKS HERE RECREATION CATALOG HERE RESORTS CATALOG HERE CAMPS & PARKS CATALOG HERE Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 49 Packet Pg. 192 of 426  We don’t want to spam you. If you're no longer interested in enjoying adventures out on the water Unsubscribe here. Light As Air Boats 13801 Walsingham Rd. Suite A-116 Largo, Florida 33774 Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 50 Packet Pg. 193 of 426  From:Postmaster To:ParkRec Commission Subject:You have new held messages Date:Thursday, March 12, 2026 7:15:52 AM Logo You have new held messages You can release all of your held messages and permit or block future emails from the senders, or manage messages individually. Release all Permit all Block all You can also manage held messages in your Personal Portal. Spam Policy jake@turftankmarkingrobot.com Re: field maintenance at Palo Alto Parks and Recreation 2026-03-12 04:50 Release Permit Block Release all Permit all Block all © 2019 Mimecast Services Limited. Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 51 Packet Pg. 194 of 426  From:Office of Transportation To:ParkRec Commission Subject:Reminder: Transportation Connect March 2026‍♂ Date:Thursday, March 12, 2026 3:30:37 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious ofopening attachments and clicking on links. View this newsletter as a web page A digital newsletter connecting the community to transportation news, updates, ways to share input & more. Temporary Churchill Ave. Rail Crossing Closure Review and Listening Session Quiet Zone Updates San Antonio Road Area Plan Survey & Workshop Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 52 Packet Pg. 195 of 426  Downtown Parking Experience Community Workshop: March 18 Rail Grade Separation Alternatives Selected to Advance into 15% Design of Preliminary Engineering 2026 Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Plan Status Update Community Safety Tips: Traveling When Sun Glare Appears Events & Meetings   Transportation Updates Temporary Churchill Ave. Rail Crossing Closure Review and Listening Session Staff is initiating the necessary analysis to evaluate what would be required to implement a temporary closure at the train crossing at Churchill Ave/Alma. Share your thoughts with the City as we evaluate the possibility of a temporary closure of the Churchill rail crossing at a listening session on March 12 at 6 p.m. at the Palo Alto Unified School District Board Room. Community feedback received through this listening session and website feedback form will be shared with the City Council as they consider next steps in mid-April. Additionally, review a status update by the Rail Safety Ad Hoc summarizing safety approached and measures. “The City Council, along with our partners, Caltrain and the Palo Alto Unified School District are committed to reducing risks, increasing safety, and supporting our youth. Together, several approaches are actively being pursued to reduce access to lethal means, in addition to other measures recently implemented.” Read the status update by the Rail Safety Ad Hoc. Status of Quiet Zone Studies Palo Alto Avenue Crossing Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 53 Packet Pg. 196 of 426  The cities of Palo Alto and Menlo Park have been collaborating on the Palo Alto Avenue Quiet Zone project. The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) approved construction improvements identified in the Quiet Zone Study for Palo Alto Avenue. Construction was completed in early 2026. On February 26, a review identified necessary changes that will be made over the next few months. The Rail Committee and City Council will consider approval later this year. Churchill Avenue, Meadow Drive, and Charleston Road Crossings On November 10, 2025, the City Council approved installation of four- quadrant gate systems at the Churchill Avenue, Meadow Drive, and Charleston Road crossings to support establishment of Quiet Zones in these locations. Staff is pursuing the necessary funding and will initiate the design of the required improvements. Follow the project here. San Antonio Road Area Plan Survey A community workshop was hosted on March 5 on the San Antonio Road Area Plan options related to housing, outdoor space, bicycle and pedestrian improvements, roadway improvements, transit and commercial development. Presentations and key themes heard will be shared later this month. Additionally, a new online survey is open to share feedback through March 29 that will help inform City Council direction for the Plan’s development. Downtown Parking Experience Community Workshop: March 18 The City is working on updating to its Residential Preferential Parking administrative guidelines and other downtown parking policies. Join one of two sessions on March 18 10:30 a.m. at City Hall and 6:30 p.m. in the Art Room at Avenidas to share your input about your experience parking Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 54 Packet Pg. 197 of 426  in downtown to help guide policy updates. Plus, learn about and share input on updates to the RPP Administrative Guidelines that are intended to help streamline low-income qualifications and thresholds and creating more efficiency. Rail Grade Separation Alternatives Selected to Advance into 15% Design of Preliminary Engineering In mid-December the City Council reached key milestones for the Grade Separation Project at Churchill Avenue, Meadow Drive, and Charleston Road, a collaborative effort by the City and Caltrain. Council selected preferred alternatives for each crossing to advance into 15% design, which includes development of refined cost estimates, constructability evaluations, and technical environmental analyses. A recent update shares more about Council actions advancing this work and what’s planned next. 2026 Bicycle & Pedestrian Transportation Plan Palo Alto’s 2026 Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Plan (BPTP) Update is entering its final stages. Thanks for engaging with us on this priority initiative! Following the City Council Study Session in December, staff is preparing the Final Plan document, which will be presented to the Pedestrian and Bicycle Advisory Committee (PABAC) tentatively on May 7 and City Council consideration tentatively on June 1. The Plan focuses on a connected citywide bikeway network, proactively addresses the growth of e-bike use, and better aligns with the City’s broader climate and safety policies, establishing an updated framework for the next decade of local infrastructure. Community Safety Tips Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 55 Packet Pg. 198 of 426  Traveling when Sun Glare Appears Sun levels right at the horizon, especially during commute times, can create dangerous road conditions. Help prevent collisions by following a few safety tips when traveling with sun glares on the road. Hot Tips: Cyclists – Know who can’t see you. Drivers – Reduce your speed, especially when approaching intersections and corners. Learn more about sun glare safety tips and ways to be safe on the road. Upcoming Meetings & Events Climate Action & Sustainability Committee Public Workshop Friday, March 6, 2 p.m. Hybrid in the Community Meeting Room at City Hall Planning & Transportation Commission Meeting Wednesday, March 11, 6 p.m. Hybrid in the Council Chambers at City Hall Temporary Churchill Ave Rail Closure Listening Session Thursday, March 12, 6 p.m. PAUSD Board Room, 25 Churchill Ave. Parking Policies Update Workshop Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 56 Packet Pg. 199 of 426  Wednesday, March 18, 10:30 a.m. and 6:30 p.m. City Hall and Avenidas City/School Transportation Safety Committee Meeting Thursday, March 26, 10 a.m. Downtown Library, El Camino Room Pedestrian and Bicycle Advisory Committee Meeting Thursday, April 2, 6:15 p.m. Hybrid at the Palo Alto Art Center Auditorium Earth Day Festival Sunday, April 19, 1 p.m. Palo Alto Art Center   HTransportation Quick Links Main Page Palo Alto Link Parking Projects Biking & Walking Office of Transportation | 250 Hamilton Ave 5th Floor | Palo Alto, CA 94301 US Unsubscribe | Update Profile | Constant Contact Data Notice Constant Contact Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 57 Packet Pg. 200 of 426  From:Andrea Wald To:ParkRec Commission Subject:Parks and Rec commission mtg 3/24 Date:Wednesday, March 11, 2026 3:27:21 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i Dear Commission members, In the Parks and Recreation Commission Draft FY2027 Workplan under Project/Goal 4 is the Natural Grass Pilot program that City Council has directed the Parks and Rec commission to spearhead. I am very much in favor of this endeavor/project and hope that it can be acted on in a timely manner. The sooner this project gets started the more time there will be to get the best results to understand how natural grass can work well in Palo Alto. This will have a huge impact going forward with future needs of upgrades/renovations at existing parks/sports fields. First and foremost is to find and hire the right sources for undertaking this project – from the company that will provide the best design including proper drainage, to one that can advise on the most appropriate grass that can provide the best outcome in terms of watering and maintenance needs and durability/playability, to one that will be able to provide guidance to city maintenance staff on how best to care for the field. There is a growing movement that is proving that natural grass fields, if done right – specifically using organic, regenerative practices – can provide the type of field that sports groups will be very happy with and will address environmental and health concerns associated with unnatural materials – both from the ground cover to how the field is managed (pesticide free). I hope that you will undertake this task with an approach that from the start that will yield the best results possible and put Palo Alto on the map to a transition of caring about our planet and future generations and the legacy we leave behind. Sincerely, Andrea Wald Co-Founder, Community for Natural Play Surfaces This message needs your attention This is a personal email address. You've never replied to this person. Mark Safe Report Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 58 Packet Pg. 201 of 426  From:Angela Dellaporta To:ParkRec Commission Subject:Natural Grass Pilot Program Date:Wednesday, March 11, 2026 11:16:13 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i Dear Commission Members, The City Council has directed the Parks and Rec commission to spearhead a Natural Grass Pilot program, which could bring the city closer to its goal of environmental protection and sustainability. I want to urge you to move forward on this project as soon as possible. It will be crucial to find a company that can carry out this project creating proper drainage, using appropriate grass, and advising city staff on best maintenance practices. Thank you for the work you do! Angela Dellaporta This message needs your attention This is a personal email address. This is their first email to you. Mark Safe Report Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 59 Packet Pg. 202 of 426  From:Light As Air Boats To:ParkRec Commission Turn Your Waterfront into a Guest Magnet! Date:Wednesday, March 11, 2026 10:05:05 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of openingattachments and clicking on links. i This message needs your attention No employee in your company has ever replied to this person. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 60 Packet Pg. 203 of 426  SHOP NOW Hi there, Elevate Your Guest Experience with These Pedal Boats! Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 61 Packet Pg. 204 of 426  EXPLORE ADVENTURE GLASS BOATS HERE For Questions & Quotes, Call Andi Tel:706.619.6670 andi@lightasairboats.com SEE ALL PEDAL BOATS HERE See Parks & Camps Catalog Here See Resorts Catalog Here See Recreation Catalog Here Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 62 Packet Pg. 205 of 426  We don’t want to spam you. If you're no longer interested in enjoying adventures out on the water Unsubscribe here. Light As Air Boats 13801 Walsingham Rd. Suite A-116 Largo, Florida 33774 You received this email from Light As Air Boats. If you would like to unsubscribe, click here. Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 63 Packet Pg. 206 of 426  From:Jenny Lewis To:ParkRec Commission Subject:ADA, seniors, or group fitness? There"s a package for that Date:Wednesday, March 11, 2026 5:30:09 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious ofopening attachments and clicking on links. i Professional LinkedIn Banner (3) This message needs your attention You've never replied to this person. Mark Safe Report Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 64 Packet Pg. 207 of 426  Dynamic Linear Fitness Package Dynamic Linear Fitness Package Designing an Outdoor Gym just got easier Outdoor-Fit has created 19 purpose-built fitness packages to help you bring real exercise outdoors without the complexity of selecting equipment piece by piece. Each package is carefully curated to support different project goals, site sizes, and user groups, making it simple to plan an outdoor fitness space that works for your community. You’ll find options that are: Easy to specify and install as a complete solution ASTM-compliant and ADA-accessible options available Weatherproof, tamperproof, and built for long-term public use Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 65 Packet Pg. 208 of 426  Designed with true exercise biomechanics for real results EXPLORE ALL 19 FITNESS PACKAGES Pro Fitness Package Pro Fitness Package Strength Fitness Package Strength Fitness Package Sourcewell Contract Renewed Outdoor-Fit is proud to announce the renewal of our Sourcewell contract under the category, Playground, Water Play and Aquatic Equipment, Site Amenities, and Outdoor Fitness Equipment. Purchase our commercial outdoor fitness equipment through a pre-approved cooperative purchasing process without issuing an RFP. Check if your department is registered with Sourcewell, here. Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 66 Packet Pg. 209 of 426  Outdoor-Fit Exercise Systems Inc., 95 Simmonds Drive, Dartmouth, NS B3B 1N7, 1-877-760-6337 Unsubscribe Manage preferences Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 67 Packet Pg. 210 of 426  From:Sue To:ParkRec Commission Subject:City"s Pilot Project: Organically-Managed Natural Grass Playing Field Date:Tuesday, March 10, 2026 11:37:02 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. ! ParkRec.commission@paloalto.gov Re: Pilot Project: Organically-Managed Natural Grass Playing Field Dear Parks and Recreation Commissioners, I am writing as the Chair of the Loma Prieta Chapter of the Sierra Club and as a concerned Palo Alto resident who strongly supports the City’s pilot project to establish an organically-managed natural grass playing field. This project represents an important opportunity for Palo Alto to demonstrate leadership in sustainable park management while addressing growing community concerns about artificial turf’s heat risks, microplastic pollution, and maintenance challenges. To ensure this pilot truly succeeds and provides meaningful results for future decision‑making, I urge the Commission to: Frame the pilot as a science‑based demonstration project. Engage an experienced turf agronomist specializing in organic athletic field management to guide soil preparation, species selection, and early‑stage maintenance. Prioritize soil health from the start. Comprehensive soil testing, use of quality compost amendments, and establishment of deep-rooting grass varieties will determine long‑term durability and play quality. Incorporate proper design and drainage. A well‑engineered layout that prevents puddling and muddy conditions during rainy periods is essential to maintaining playability and protecting field integrity. Ensure continuity of management responsibility. Ideally, the same team should oversee design, installation, and maintenance to maintain accountability and a vested interest in the outcome. Allocate adequate resources for the full establishment period. Organic systems perform best with a strong foundation phase—watering, mowing at the right height, and proper aeration make all the difference during the first 12–18 months. Design fair performance metrics. Compare usable play hours, safety, and resilience with This message could be suspicious Similar name as someone in your company. This is a personal email address. This is their first email to you. Mark Safe Report Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 68 Packet Pg. 211 of 426  synthetic turf fields under similar lighting and scheduling conditions. By investing care and expertise up front, Palo Alto can produce a grass field that meets athletic needs and environmental goals alike—an achievement worth sharing nationally as part of a growing movement toward safer, regenerative public spaces. Thank you for supporting this essential pilot and ensuring it is implemented with the rigor and care our community expects. Sincerely, Sue Chow, Ph.D Palo Alto, CA -------------------------------------------- Sue Chow, Ph.D Chair, Sierra Club Loma Prieta Chapter Executive Committee Member, Sierra Club California 650-454-0259 Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 69 Packet Pg. 212 of 426  From:Francisco Valenzuela To:Francisco Valenzuela Subject:RSVP your organization to Attend the 29th Annual Legislative Luncheon Date:Tuesday, March 10, 2026 11:48:22 AM Attachments:Legislative Luncheon April 24th.pdf CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i 29th Annual Legislative Luncheon Date: Friday, April 24, 2026 Organizations_RSVP_Here Dear organizations, Please share this with your Board Members, Staff, and Supporters. Looking for our Service Provider / Community Based Organization Partners to attend San Andreas Regional Center’s 29th Annual Legislative Luncheon. Table Sponsorships are available for organizations looking to attend the luncheon as a group. Being that it’s an Election Year, the luncheon will outline issues impacting the disability community and why the right to vote should not be taken lightly. Speakers will include elected officials, parents, individuals with intellectual disabilities, and advocates who support the developmental disability community. The legislative luncheon will highlight the need for policy makers, service providers, educators, and advocates to continue supporting the civil rights of individuals with disabilities. One of the underlining messages of the luncheon will incorporate the understanding for equal access to services, educational opportunities, affordable housing, employment opportunities, and equal treatment for those with differing abilities. The Luncheon will also feature a few dynamic advocates who will speak This message needs your attention You've never replied to this person. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 70 Packet Pg. 213 of 426  about the abilities of individuals with disabilities and the importance of advocating for continued services. Invited Guests: Federal, State, and Local Legislators & they're staff, Individuals with Differing Abilities and their families, Service Providers and they're staff, School Board Members and they're staff, Direct Care workers, Advocates, County and City Programs, Non-Profit Organizations, and the Community at Large from the counties of Santa Clara, Santa Cruz, San Bento, and Monterey. Who Are We: San Andreas Regional Center is a nonprofit, community-based organization contracted by the State of California serving well over 21,000 individuals with developmental intellectual disabilities within Santa Clara, San Benito, Santa Cruz, and Monterey Counties. Save the Date and stay tuned as more information to come. Francisco Valenzuela Director of Government Affairs / Community Relations San Andreas Regional Center Mobile: 408-210-5663 Office: 408-341-3809 Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 71 Packet Pg. 214 of 426  Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 72 Packet Pg. 215 of 426  From:Amera Temprim To:barbara@gardencourt.com Subject:Family law cases in CA Date:Tuesday, March 10, 2026 9:43:01 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i Hi, This is Amera from DCM’s Legal Growth Division. We’re selecting one family law firm in your region to handle a steady flow of qualified divorce, custody, and support-related inquiries from individuals actively seeking representation. Most firms receive plenty of inquiries but lose time to consultation shoppers, low-commitment callers, and cases that don’t meet their intake standards. Our system filters that out so you only speak with prospective clients who are serious about moving forward. One of our New York partner firms is averaging 15–20 retained family law clients per month with this setup. Would it make sense to see if this is a fit for your firm? Just reply “yes” with the best number and I’ll send over the details. Best, Amera Temprim This message needs your attention This is a personal email address. This is their first email to your company. Mark Safe Report Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 73 Packet Pg. 216 of 426  From:Light As Air Boats To:ParkRec Commission You Don"t See These Every Day! Date:Tuesday, March 10, 2026 7:03:36 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of openingattachments and clicking on links. i SHOP NOW This message needs your attention No employee in your company has ever replied to this person. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 74 Packet Pg. 217 of 426  Hi there, Add a Fun Pedal Boat Experience for Your Guests Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 75 Packet Pg. 218 of 426  EXPLORE MARTINI NAUTICA BOATS HERE EXPLORE ADVENTURE GLASS BOATS HERE For Questions & Quotes, Call Andi Tel:706.619.6670 Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 76 Packet Pg. 219 of 426  andi@lightasairboats.com SEE ALL PEDAL BOATS HERE PARKS & CAMPS CATALOG HERE RESORTS CATALOG HERE RECREATION CATALOG HERE Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 77 Packet Pg. 220 of 426  We don’t want to spam you. If you're no longer interested in enjoying adventures out on the water | Unsubscribe here. Light As Air Boats 13801 Walsingham Rd. Suite A-116 Largo, Florida 33774 Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 78 Packet Pg. 221 of 426  From:Daniela Betco To:ParkRec Commission Subject:Friend let"s meet at the California Parks & Recreation Society Conference Date:Tuesday, March 10, 2026 5:34:24 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious ofopening attachments and clicking on links. i Hi Friend, Are you heading to the California Parks & Recreation Society Conference? If so, stop by Booth #833, we’d love to show you how Turf Tank’s autonomous line marking robots help organizations across the USA optimize their field maintenance. Plus, swing by and make sure to grab some awesome merch while you're there! More than 5,000 organizations across the United States already trust Turf Tank for accurate, consistent, and efficient line marking while freeing up their staff's time. A few to mention that you might know: Chico Parks and Recreation El Centro Parks and Recreation Commerce Parks and Recreation Santa Fe Springs Parks and Recreation Sacramento County Parks and Recreation Come join us at Booth #833, and learn how Turf Tank will benefit your athletic fields, your team's efficiency, and your wallet! Grab some merch and connect with our team of local experts. They’ll be there to answer any questions you might have, share insights, and discuss the possibility of setting up a live demo so you can see the robot in action on your field. We look forward to seeing you! This message needs your attention No employee in your company has ever replied to this person. Mark Safe Report Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 79 Packet Pg. 222 of 426  DANIELA BETCO EVENTS AND MARKETING MANAGER m:+1 (239) 758-0294 e:daniela.betco@turftank.com w:www.turftank.com a:Skjoldet 20, 9230 Svenstrup J, Denmark Turf Tank, 1110 Allgood Industrial Ct, Marietta, Georgia 30062, United States, 877-396-4094 Unsubscribe Manage preferences Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 80 Packet Pg. 223 of 426  From:ParkRec Commission To:ParkRec Commission; Contreras, Jaaziel Subject:RE: Public Records Request #W007466-030326 Date:Monday, March 9, 2026 11:05:29 AM Attachments:image001.png image002.png image004.png image005.png Just following up, After checking with the team, the items mentioned does not pertain to Open space parks and golf nor the parks and rec commission. Have you checked with the Utilities department? Eric Vidal Coordinator Rec Prog | Open Space, Parks, and Golf Community Services Department (650) 496-6962 | Eric.Vidal@paloalto.gov www.PaloAlto.gov From: ParkRec Commission <parkrec.commission@PaloAlto.gov> Sent: Monday, March 9, 2026 8:20 AM To: Contreras, Jaaziel <Jaaziel.Contreras@paloalto.gov>; ParkRec Commission <parkrec.commission@PaloAlto.gov> Subject: RE: Public Records Request #W007466-030326 Thank you for bringing this to our attention, I have reached out to our parks team to assist in this matter. Eric Vidal Coordinator Rec Prog | Open Space, Parks, and Golf Community Services Department (650) 496-6962 | Eric.Vidal@paloalto.gov www.PaloAlto.gov Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 81 Packet Pg. 224 of 426  From: Contreras, Jaaziel <Jaaziel.Contreras@paloalto.gov> Sent: Wednesday, March 4, 2026 2:55 PM To: ParkRec Commission <parkrec.commission@PaloAlto.gov> Subject: Public Records Request #W007466-030326 Good afternoon, We received a Public Record Request for electronic copies, from 2/9/2026 to present, regarding the 2026 PCC3 REC RFP (Palo Alto sale of 70,000 MWh PCC1 and purchase of 140,000 MWh PCC3 RECs). I found that it is associated with the Parks and Recreation Committee. I looked up the most recent agendas from the committee meeting in February but could not find information on this item. Could this be an item the committee is familiar with or have any documentation of? Thank you, Jaaziel Contreras Administrative Associate II Administrative Services Department (650) 838-2890 | Jaaziel.Contreras@paloalto.gov www.paloalto.gov Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 82 Packet Pg. 225 of 426  From:ParkRec Commission To:Contreras, Jaaziel; ParkRec Commission Subject:RE: Public Records Request #W007466-030326 Date:Monday, March 9, 2026 8:19:38 AM Attachments:image001.png image002.png image004.png image005.png Thank you for bringing this to our attention, I have reached out to our parks team to assist in this matter. Eric Vidal Coordinator Rec Prog | Open Space, Parks, and Golf Community Services Department (650) 496-6962 | Eric.Vidal@paloalto.gov www.PaloAlto.gov From: Contreras, Jaaziel <Jaaziel.Contreras@paloalto.gov> Sent: Wednesday, March 4, 2026 2:55 PM To: ParkRec Commission <parkrec.commission@PaloAlto.gov> Subject: Public Records Request #W007466-030326 Good afternoon, We received a Public Record Request for electronic copies, from 2/9/2026 to present, regarding the 2026 PCC3 REC RFP (Palo Alto sale of 70,000 MWh PCC1 and purchase of 140,000 MWh PCC3 RECs). I found that it is associated with the Parks and Recreation Committee. I looked up the most recent agendas from the committee meeting in February but could not find information on this item. Could this be an item the committee is familiar with or have any documentation of? Thank you, Jaaziel Contreras Administrative Associate II Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 83 Packet Pg. 226 of 426  Administrative Services Department (650) 838-2890 | Jaaziel.Contreras@paloalto.gov www.paloalto.gov Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 84 Packet Pg. 227 of 426  From:Postmaster To:ParkRec Commission Subject:You have new held messages Date:Monday, March 9, 2026 7:25:08 AM Logo You have new held messages You can release all of your held messages and permit or block future emails from the senders, or manage messages individually. Release all Permit all Block all You can also manage held messages in your Personal Portal. Spam Policy jake@turftankmarkingrobot.com Re: field maintenance at Palo Alto Parks and Recreation 2026-03-09 04:39 Release Permit Block Release all Permit all Block all © 2019 Mimecast Services Limited. Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 85 Packet Pg. 228 of 426  From:Postmaster To:ParkRec Commission Subject:You have new held messages Date:Friday, March 6, 2026 7:17:25 AM Logo You have new held messages You can release all of your held messages and permit or block future emails from the senders, or manage messages individually. Release all Permit all Block all You can also manage held messages in your Personal Portal. Spam Policy jake@turftankmarkingrobot.com field maintenance at Palo Alto Parks and Recreation 2026-03-06 04:39 Release Permit Block Release all Permit all Block all © 2019 Mimecast Services Limited. Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 86 Packet Pg. 229 of 426  From:Office of Transportation To:ParkRec Commission Subject:Transportation Connect March 2026‍♂ Date:Friday, March 6, 2026 2:45:27 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious ofopening attachments and clicking on links. View this newsletter as a web page A digital newsletter connecting the community to transportation news, updates, ways to share input & more. Temporary Churchill Ave. Rail Crossing Closure Review and Listening Session Quiet Zone Updates San Antonio Road Area Plan Survey & Workshop Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 87 Packet Pg. 230 of 426  Downtown Parking Experience Community Workshop: March 18 Rail Grade Separation Alternatives Selected to Advance into 15% Design of Preliminary Engineering 2026 Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Plan Status Update Community Safety Tips: Traveling When Sun Glare Appears Events & Meetings   Transportation Updates Temporary Churchill Ave. Rail Crossing Closure Review and Listening Session Staff is initiating the necessary analysis to evaluate what would be required to implement a temporary closure at the train crossing at Churchill Ave/Alma. Share your thoughts with the City as we evaluate the possibility of a temporary closure of the Churchill rail crossing at a listening session on March 12 at 6 p.m. at the Palo Alto Unified School District Board Room. Community feedback received through this listening session and website feedback form will be shared with the City Council as they consider next steps in mid-April. Additionally, review a status update by the Rail Safety Ad Hoc summarizing safety approached and measures. “The City Council, along with our partners, Caltrain and the Palo Alto Unified School District are committed to reducing risks, increasing safety, and supporting our youth. Together, several approaches are actively being pursued to reduce access to lethal means, in addition to other measures recently implemented.” Read the status update by the Rail Safety Ad Hoc. Status of Quiet Zone Studies Palo Alto Avenue Crossing Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 88 Packet Pg. 231 of 426  The cities of Palo Alto and Menlo Park have been collaborating on the Palo Alto Avenue Quiet Zone project. The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) approved construction improvements identified in the Quiet Zone Study for Palo Alto Avenue. Construction was completed in early 2026. On February 26, a review identified necessary changes that will be made over the next few months. The Rail Committee and City Council will consider approval later this year. Churchill Avenue, Meadow Drive, and Charleston Road Crossings On November 10, 2025, the City Council approved installation of four- quadrant gate systems at the Churchill Avenue, Meadow Drive, and Charleston Road crossings to support establishment of Quiet Zones in these locations. Staff is pursuing the necessary funding and will initiate the design of the required improvements. Follow the project here. San Antonio Road Area Plan Survey A community workshop was hosted on March 5 on the San Antonio Road Area Plan options related to housing, outdoor space, bicycle and pedestrian improvements, roadway improvements, transit and commercial development. Presentations and key themes heard will be shared later this month. Additionally, a new online survey is open to share feedback through March 29 that will help inform City Council direction for the Plan’s development. Downtown Parking Experience Community Workshop: March 18 The City is working on updating to its Residential Preferential Parking administrative guidelines and other downtown parking policies. Join one of two sessions on March 18 10:30 a.m. at City Hall and 6:30 p.m. in the Art Room at Avenidas to share your input about your experience parking Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 89 Packet Pg. 232 of 426  in downtown to help guide policy updates. Plus, learn about and share input on updates to the RPP Administrative Guidelines that are intended to help streamline low-income qualifications and thresholds and creating more efficiency. Rail Grade Separation Alternatives Selected to Advance into 15% Design of Preliminary Engineering In mid-December the City Council reached key milestones for the Grade Separation Project at Churchill Avenue, Meadow Drive, and Charleston Road, a collaborative effort by the City and Caltrain. Council selected preferred alternatives for each crossing to advance into 15% design, which includes development of refined cost estimates, constructability evaluations, and technical environmental analyses. A recent update shares more about Council actions advancing this work and what’s planned next. 2026 Bicycle & Pedestrian Transportation Plan Palo Alto’s 2026 Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Plan (BPTP) Update is entering its final stages. Thanks for engaging with us on this priority initiative! Following the City Council Study Session in December, staff is preparing the Final Plan document, which will be presented to the Pedestrian and Bicycle Advisory Committee (PABAC) tentatively on May 7 and City Council consideration tentatively on June 1. The Plan focuses on a connected citywide bikeway network, proactively addresses the growth of e-bike use, and better aligns with the City’s broader climate and safety policies, establishing an updated framework for the next decade of local infrastructure. Community Safety Tips Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 90 Packet Pg. 233 of 426  Traveling when Sun Glare Appears Sun levels right at the horizon, especially during commute times, can create dangerous road conditions. Help prevent collisions by following a few safety tips when traveling with sun glares on the road. Hot Tips: Cyclists – Know who can’t see you. Drivers – Reduce your speed, especially when approaching intersections and corners. Learn more about sun glare safety tips and ways to be safe on the road. Upcoming Meetings & Events Climate Action & Sustainability Committee Public Workshop Friday, March 6, 2 p.m. Hybrid in the Community Meeting Room at City Hall Planning & Transportation Commission Meeting Wednesday, March 11, 6 p.m. Hybrid in the Council Chambers at City Hall Temporary Churchill Ave Rail Closure Listening Session Thursday, March 12, 6 p.m. PAUSD Board Room, 25 Churchill Ave. Parking Policies Update Workshop Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 91 Packet Pg. 234 of 426  Wednesday, March 18, 10:30 a.m. and 6:30 p.m. City Hall and Avenidas City/School Transportation Safety Committee Meeting Thursday, March 26, 10 a.m. Downtown Library, El Camino Room Pedestrian and Bicycle Advisory Committee Meeting Thursday, April 2, 6:15 p.m. Hybrid at the Palo Alto Art Center Auditorium Earth Day Festival Sunday, April 19, 1 p.m. Palo Alto Art Center   HTransportation Quick Links Main Page Palo Alto Link Parking Projects Biking & Walking Office of Transportation | 250 Hamilton Ave 5th Floor | Palo Alto, CA 94301 US Unsubscribe | Update Profile | Constant Contact Data Notice Constant Contact Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 92 Packet Pg. 235 of 426  From:Jean-Paul Renaud To:ParkRec Commission Subject:Reminder: March 12 - The Great Oak Count - a conversation about Palo Alto’s living legacy Date:Thursday, March 5, 2026 5:28:08 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i Dear Commissioners, Palo Alto’s native oaks tell a powerful story about where the city has been—and where it’s headed. As a critical partner in Palo Alto, you are warmly invited to join us Thursday, March 12 for a public panel discussion hosted by Canopy and the City of Palo Alto: The Great Oak Count: A Panel Conversation on Palo Alto’s Living Legacy Thursday, March 12 6:30-8:00 p.m. Palo Alto Art Center 1313 Newell Rd, Palo Alto, CA RSVP This special evening will explore findings from a multi-year, community-powered study of Palo Alto’s native oaks, which reveals both concerning declines in mature trees in some historic neighborhoods and encouraging signs of renewal and resilience across the city. Moderated by Dr. Erica Spotswood of Second Nature Ecology and Design, a panel of local experts will explore what recent data from The Great Oak Count and Young Tree Care Survey show, why it matters, and how continued collaboration between residents, the City, and community partners can help protect and grow Palo Alto’s urban forest for generations to come. Join us at 6:30 p.m. for a reception and light refreshments, followed by the panel discussion from 7 - 8 p.m. The event is free, but please RSVP here if you plan to attend. We would be delighted to have you with us! JP Jean-Paul Renaud Executive Director phone: 305-495-7156 email: jp@canopy.org This message needs your attention The subject has non-English characters. You've never replied to this person. Mark Safe Report Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 93 Packet Pg. 236 of 426  Working full-time hybrid M-F Canopy.org Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 94 Packet Pg. 237 of 426  From:Postmaster To:ParkRec Commission Subject:You have new held messages Date:Thursday, March 5, 2026 4:04:06 PM Logo You have new held messages You can release all of your held messages and permit or block future emails from the senders, or manage messages individually. Release all Permit all Block all You can also manage held messages in your Personal Portal. Spam Policy support@mails.betom.info Google Reviews - Real and Permanent 2026-03-05 13:54 Release Permit Block Release all Permit all Block all © 2019 Mimecast Services Limited. Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 95 Packet Pg. 238 of 426  Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 96 Packet Pg. 239 of 426  From:Light As Air Boats To:ParkRec Commission Water Experiences Your Competitors Don"t Have Date:Thursday, March 5, 2026 9:02:24 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of openingattachments and clicking on links. i This message needs your attention No employee in your company has ever replied to this person. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 97 Packet Pg. 240 of 426  SHOP NOW Hi Great for Rental. Stand Out This Season!! Light as Air Boats Red Shark Bike Full Kit Option is a transformational multi-use water toy: SUP board, kayak, bike, e- scooter , workout, and fishing! Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 98 Packet Pg. 241 of 426  Light as Air Boats Redshark See All RedShark Water Bikes Here Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 99 Packet Pg. 242 of 426  Sipaboards are equipped with high-efficiency electric jet motors and self-inflating technology. These boards transform the paddleboarding world with extra speed, agility, and safety! Light as Air Boats - Sipaboards See All SipaBoards Motorized SUPs Here Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 100 Packet Pg. 243 of 426  For Questions & Quotes, Call Andi. 706.619.6670 andi@lightasairboats.com No longer want to receive these emails? Unsubscribe. Light As Air Boats Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 101 Packet Pg. 244 of 426  From:Tom Haxton To:Howard, Adam Cc:ParkRec Commission Subject:Re: Request for update on Middle School Sports evaluation Date:Wednesday, March 4, 2026 9:43:02 PM Attachments:image003.png image004.png image006.png image007.png image008.png image009.png CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i Hi Adam, Thank you. I look forward to reading the staff report. Best regards, Tom On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 9:10 AM Howard, Adam <Adam.Howard@paloalto.gov> wrote: Hi Tom, The MSA conversation was scheduled for March, but due to some scheduling issues it had to be rescheduled to April. The meeting in April will be on Tuesday 28th. I can send agenda and staff reports once they are available, typically a week or two before the meeting. Thank you Adam Howard Sr. Community Services Manager, Recreation City of Palo Alto Phone: 650-329-2192 This message needs your attention Some Recipients have never replied to this person. This is a personal email address. Mark Safe Report Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 102 Packet Pg. 245 of 426  E-mail: adam.howard@paloalto.gov www.PaloAlto.gov Please think of the environment before printing this email – Thank you! From: Tom Haxton <tomhaxton@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, February 23, 2026 5:38 PM To: Howard, Adam <Adam.Howard@paloalto.gov> Cc: ParkRec Commission <parkrec.commission@PaloAlto.gov> Subject: Re: Request for update on Middle School Sports evaluation CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. Hi Adam, Thank you again for the December update. I see that the item is not on the February agenda. Would you be able to confirm whether the timeline remains that it is likely to be on the March agenda? Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 103 Packet Pg. 246 of 426  forward. Best regards, Tom On Mon, Dec 29, 2025 at 10:29 AM Tom Haxton <tomhaxton@gmail.com> wrote: Hi Adam, Thank you for the update. I look forward to attending the commission meeting and learning more about the proposed RFP parameters and timeline. Best regards, Tom On Mon, Dec 29, 2025 at 10:16 AM Howard, Adam <Adam.Howard@paloalto.gov> wrote: Good morning Tom, We plan to return to the Commission in early 2026, likely in February or March, though that timing has not yet been finalized. At that time, we will formalize the guidelines for issuing an RFP (Request for Proposals). This will be a more formal process than the RFI (Request for Information) and could result in a group entering a contract with the City to operate the MSA program. At the Commission meeting, the RFP parameters will be discussed and finalized. These parameters will be used to guide and evaluate any proposals the City receives. The next steps and proposed timeline will also be discussed during that meeting. Once the meeting date is confirmed, I will be sure to notify you. Thank you, Adam Howard Sr. Community Services Manager, Recreation Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 104 Packet Pg. 247 of 426  City of Palo Alto Phone: 650-329-2192 E-mail: adam.howard@paloalto.gov www.PaloAlto.gov Please think of the environment before printing this email – Thank you! From: Tom Haxton <tom.haxton@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2025 7:22 PM To: ParkRec Commission <parkrec.commission@PaloAlto.gov> Cc: Howard, Adam <Adam.Howard@paloalto.gov> Subject: Request for update on Middle School Sports evaluation CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Becautious of opening attachments and clicking on links. Dear Parks and Recreation Commission and cc Adam Howard, staff liaison, Thank you for your service on the commission. Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 105 Packet Pg. 248 of 426  As Director of the Palo Alto Middle School Athletics Community Organization (PAMSACO), the local nonprofit whose JLS Cross Country pilot program helped prompt the City’s evaluation of middle school sports, I am writing to request an update on the status of that evaluation. By way of background, the City Council voted unanimously on October 7, 2024 to evaluate transferring management of middle school sports to local nonprofits as part of the FY2025 work plan. I appreciate that the commission formed an ad-hoc committee and that staff prepared an initial report following the Request for Information issued in July 2025. At this point, however, I am not aware of any subsequent milestones or anticipated next steps, and I would appreciate an update on the current status and timeline. I would also like to flag a factual issue in the July 2025 staff report for the record. The report states that Rising Stars LLC estimated its fees at $225 per student. The RFI response, however, listed costs as $225 per hour per instructor, which would translate to approximately $675 per student based on current enrollment and staffing. This distinction is material to any cost comparison and may warrant clarification in future discussions or documents. Thank you for your time and for your continued work on this issue. I would be happy to provide any additional information that may be helpful. Best regards, Tom Tom Haxton Director, Palo Alto Middle School Athletics Community Organization (PAMSACO) Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 106 Packet Pg. 249 of 426  From:Contreras, Jaaziel To:ParkRec Commission Subject:Public Records Request #W007466-030326 Date:Wednesday, March 4, 2026 2:54:37 PM Attachments:Outlook-signature_.png Outlook-signature_.png Outlook-signature_.png Outlook-signature_.png Good afternoon, We received a Public Record Request for electronic copies, from 2/9/2026 to present, regarding the 2026 PCC3 REC RFP (Palo Alto sale of 70,000 MWh PCC1 and purchase of 140,000 MWh PCC3 RECs). I found that it is associated with the Parks and Recreation Committee. I looked up the most recent agendas from the committee meeting in February but could not find information on this item. Could this be an item the committee is familiar with or have any documentation of? Thank you, Jaaziel Contreras Administrative Associate II Administrative Services Department (650) 838-2890 | Jaaziel.Contreras@paloalto.gov www.paloalto.gov Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 107 Packet Pg. 250 of 426  From:sales=openyard.com@smartr.openyard.com on behalf of OpenYard To:ParkRec Commission Subject:Spring Sale on Field Equipment! Date:Wednesday, March 4, 2026 7:02:04 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of openingattachments and clicking on links. i View in Browser openyard GOALS SOCCER NETS SHELTERS TRAINING COACHING SPRING SALE Get your field game-ready with OpenYard.com, your go-to source for top-quality goals, nets, and training equipment since 2003. OpenYard.com Massive Selection - Kwik Goal soccer goals, nets, gear, & more Lowest Price Guaranteed - Tax-free + unbeatable value Fast Shipping - Hit the field sooner Don't miss our Spring Sale! Shop now or request a free quote to lock in these limited-time savings before they're gone. This message needs your attention No employee in your company has ever replied to this person. Mark Safe Report Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 108 Packet Pg. 251 of 426  Shop Now to save on Soccer Goals, Soccer Nets, Lacrosse Equipment, Training Gear and more Thank you for choosing OpenYard.com 888-575-2178 sales@openyard.com Unsubscribe Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 109 Packet Pg. 252 of 426  From:PaloAlto YouthCouncil To:ParkRec Commission; Sanchez, Christofer Subject:Pancakes and Pickleball Invite Date:Tuesday, March 3, 2026 5:03:33 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i Dear Parks and Rec Commission, I hope this message finds you well. The Palo Alto Youth Council is thrilled to invite you to our City Official Meet & Greet event, featuring a Pancakes and Pickleball Tournament, on March 28th, 2026 from 11:00am-1pm, held at the Mitchell Park pickleball courts (3700 Middlefield Rd, Palo Alto, CA 94303). This event is an excellent opportunity to connect with local youth, community members, and city officials in a fun and engaging setting. We would be honored if you could attend and share your insights with our attendees. Thank you so much for your time and consideration. We look forward to hearing from you and hope you can join us for this exciting event! Warm regards, Palo Alto Youth Council This message needs your attention This is a personal email address. This is their first mail to some recipients. Mark Safe Report Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 110 Packet Pg. 253 of 426  From:Light As Air Boats To:ParkRec Commission Be Guest Ready in 2026! Date:Tuesday, March 3, 2026 7:03:48 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of openingattachments and clicking on links. i SHOP NOW This message needs your attention No employee in your company has ever replied to this person. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 111 Packet Pg. 254 of 426  Hi there, Make a splash this summer! Your guests will love you!! Refresh or create your splash park! Explore the best interactive aquatic structure designs for splash pads & spray parks! SEE SPLASH PADS & WATER FEATURES HERE Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 112 Packet Pg. 255 of 426  These mats play a crucial role in helping prevent slip and trip accidents, and improving safety and comfort underfoot. SEE MARINE MATS HERE Explore top-rated pool slides, climbing walls, chairs and starting platforms SEE ALL SPECTRUM HERE Create safe places for kids, Rooftop spaces for condos & apartments, and stellar gym floors! Shock absorbing surfaces, rubberized safety surfacing, flooring and pavers products. SEE ALL RECREATION SURFACES HERE Other designs available: Swan, Duck, Blue Herron, Pink Flamingo, and our Pelican! SEE ALL PEDAL BOATS HERE Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 113 Packet Pg. 256 of 426  For Quantity Discounts or Questions, Call Andi. "Tel:706.619.6670" andi@lightasairboats.com We don’t want to spam you. If you're no longer interested in enjoying adventures out on the water Unsubscribe here. Light As Air Boats 13801 Walsingham Rd. Suite A-116 Largo, Florida 33774 Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 114 Packet Pg. 257 of 426  From:Supervisor Margaret Abe-Koga To:ParkRec Commission Subject:Balancing privacy with crime-fighting. Strengthening guardrails and standards. Date:Friday, February 27, 2026 11:50:31 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious ofopening attachments and clicking on links. i Supervisor Abe-Koga's Newsletter Dear Friends, This week, the Board of Supervisors delved into a policy topic that has gotten a lot of attention lately: ALPRs - - automated license plate readers - - and Flock Safety, the widely used vendor that is one of the largest, with 5,000 contracts with law enforcement agencies across the country, including cities in District Five that contract with the County Sheriff’s Office. These AI-enhanced cameras that record the license plate numbers from passing cars on roads and freeways have rapidly increased in usage and have been credited with solving This message needs your attention You've never replied to this person. Mark Safe Report Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 115 Packet Pg. 258 of 426  crimes as well as finding lost individuals ...But lately, use of ALPRs have become deeply concerning because of reports in this state and across the country that vehicle data has frequently been made available to federal agencies such as the U.S. Border Patrol. On Feb. 24, supervisors voted to remove Flock as a vendor that county personnel can access or use. This is part of the newly updated consolidated surveillance use policy that was approved. It enhances administrative efficiency and promotes consistency across jurisdictions. The cities of Saratoga and Cupertino, who contract with the Sheriff’s Office for police services, currently have contracts with Flock. The Board of Supervisor’s action effectively means Flock camera usage is suspended for those city contracts. The County cannot compel cities to drop Flock. The action taken Tuesday also does not cover private entities such as home-owners associations and businesses. The quality of the discussion on this policy was strong. This is just the beginning of what I hope will be a robust and thorough series of policy discussions on many aspects of ALPR use and data privacy in the future. We know that our constituency is both concerned about the vulnerability of their privacy and also want the use of technology. Can we achieve a balance? Is it possible to place adequate guardrails on this technology? Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 116 Packet Pg. 259 of 426  I know this much: We have to try. And be exhaustive in the process. Sheriff Bob Jonsen has been asked by supervisors to expand conversations with his regional peers – other chiefs who are grappling with this same issue – in an effort to develop analysis that will aid our discussions about our next steps. Santa Clara County made headlines in 2016 for its first-in the-nation Surveillance Technology and Community Safety Ordinance that was heralded by the ACLU of Northern California as “landmark.” Nothing stays still, however, least of all technological advances. That set the bar for Santa Clara County. And I fully expect us to research, debate and consider all aspects of ALPRs as part of our continuing commitment to be fully transparent, accountable and capable of building effective oversight measures. We owe that to the residents of this county. 'Seeing people as people': An invocation from the Rev. Kaloma Smith, UAMEZ To meet these challenges, we also need time for reflection. I believe the invocation we received at the beginning of our meeting help set the tone for this discussion and the many that will follow. Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 117 Packet Pg. 260 of 426  For such an invocation, I want to thank our District 5 constituent, the Rev. Kaloma Smith of the University AME Zion Church, also known as UAMEZ. In recognition of Black History Month, and of the core values of the oldest Black Church in in Palo Alto, Smith called on us to see in each other our common humanity. The Board of Supervisors chambers was packed with people: Constituents, who had all come to voice their views and desires. The supervisors, who each had so much on their minds. Union members and privacy activists. Smith told a story about meeting Martin Luther King Jr.’s lawyer and speechwriter, Clarence B. Jones. He asked Jones for advice. It started with seeing people, Jones responded. “You have to recognize ... people are not numbers. People are not budget items. People are people.” This is the lesson, the tradition and the gift carried down in the African-American church, he added. “...To see the domestic at the same level as we see a lawyer. To see the person who rakes the grass at the same level as an elected official.” Rev. Smith acknowledged that we may be facing difficult times, we may be divided, and that this is a world that would have us label and marginalize each other. “But in this chamber, on this day, and the many moving forward, my prayer is that in this place here, have light where people are seen as Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 118 Packet Pg. 261 of 426  people, hope is given and transformation happens.” That's a reason to pause. And reflect. Thank you. With commitment and care, Stay Informed: Your Guide to Supervisors’ Board Meetings Below are the upcoming meetings that you can join in person at the Board of Supervisors Chambers at 70 W. Hedding Street, San Jose, CA 95110, or virtually. Tuesday, March 10 at 9:30AM -- Regular Meeting Tuesday, March 24 at 9:30AM -- Regular Meeting Tuesday, April 14 at 9:30AM -- Regular Meeting Please email or call our office with any questions at 408-299-5050. How to Participate in Board Meetings Residents are encouraged to get involved in the decision-making process in the following ways: Attend in person at the Board of Supervisors Chambers. Join via Zoom to share public comment. Zoom links for each meeting are available on the Board of Supervisors Meetings Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 119 Packet Pg. 262 of 426  Resource Page. If you need help using Zoom on your smartphone, instructions are available on the same resource page. Submit written comments by email to BoardOperations@cob.sccgov.org. Comments will be shared with the Board as quickly as possible. Please note: It may take up to one business day for documents to appear on the meeting’s agenda outline. Watch via YouTube at the Santa Clara County’s YouTube channel. Community Events in District 5 County of Santa Clara Animal Services Center -- Shelter animals need a dental X-ray machine – Donations through March 6 Be Ready Be Prepared: Inclement Weather – Key steps for inclement weather and emergency situations – In- person, hybrid option available - Los Altos Hills County Fire District – 10AM to noon, Feb. 28 District 5 Women's History Month Luncheon - RSVP by Fri., Mar. 13 Watershed Watch Earth Day Poster Contest – Artwork Deadline: Mon., Mar. 16 District 5 Summer Internship Program – Applications Due Fri., Mar. 20 CalWater Service Group Scholarship applications - $2500 to $10,000: Mar. 26 Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 120 Packet Pg. 263 of 426  Silicon Valley Youth Climate Action Summer Leadership Academy – Applications due Wed., Apr. 22 Supervisor Margaret Abe-Koga 70 W. Hedding Street San Jose, CA (408) 299-5050 Unsubscribe from future updates Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 121 Packet Pg. 264 of 426  From:Light As Air Boats To:ParkRec Commission Bouncy Inflatables Await! Let Your Guests Jump into Big-Sized Fun! Date:Thursday, February 26, 2026 7:04:57 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious ofopening attachments and clicking on links. i This message needs your attention No employee in your company has ever replied to this person. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 122 Packet Pg. 265 of 426  SHOP NOW Hi there,​ Come on Summer! Bouncy springs give the ultimate jump experience! Offered in different sizes to fit every size and budget. Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 123 Packet Pg. 266 of 426  See All Water Bouncers Here! Launch your guests into waterfront fun with our full-sized blobs. Great for a camp or resort, with customizable colors and USA-made, high-quality, 2-ply construction. ⬆ Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 124 Packet Pg. 267 of 426  This Classic Blob comes in three sizes: 30'x 10', 35'x 10', and 40'x10' And will surely be an excellent addition to any waterfront at your resort or camp. See All Water Blobs Here! Guests will have hours of water fun jumping and splashing! See All Water Tramps & Bouncers Here! For Quantity & Quotes, Call Andi.​ Tel:706.619.6670 andi@lightasairboats.com Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 125 Packet Pg. 268 of 426  We don’t want to spam you. If you're no longer interested in enjoying adventures out on the water Unsubscribe here. Light As Air Boats 13801 Walsingham Rd. Suite A-116 Largo, Florida 33774 Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 126 Packet Pg. 269 of 426  From:Hartmann, Chase To:Lauren; Robustelli, Sarah; ParkRec Commission Subject:Priority Field use by youth soccer clubs - request for reconsideration Date:Wednesday, February 25, 2026 4:31:10 PM Attachments:image001.png image002.png image004.png image005.png image006.png image007.png Dear Ms. Wye, Thank you for your email. We always welcome Palo Alto participants to use our fields. Under our current field use policy for nonprofit organizations, each season organizations are required to provide their team numbers and total participant count for the upcoming season (for example, information submitted now would apply to the Fall 2026 season, August through December). This submission must include: A breakdown of Palo Alto residents and non-residents The total percentage of Palo Alto residents across the entire organization All teams within the organization, including those not based in Palo Alto More recently, Stanford Strikes staff met with us and informed us that they have merged with Menlo Park. As a result, the organization no longer meets the 51% Palo Alto residency requirement and therefore no longer qualifies under the Youth Nonprofit Priority Group. Each season, we send an email to organizations requesting their residency rate for the entire organization. If 51% or more of all participants are Palo Alto residents, the organization qualifies as a Youth Nonprofit Priority Group. If the organization does not meet that threshold, it is placed within the appropriate category on the priority list. Field use guidelines for priority booking at the start of each seasonal brokering period are as follows: 1. City and District Activities 2. Palo Alto Youth nonprofit organizations with at least 51% residency 3. Palo Alto Adult nonprofit organizations with at least 35% residency 4. Nonprofit groups with 25% or more Palo Alto residency (priority for any remaining fields) 5. Other groups not meeting the 25% requirement or for-profit organizations (considered at staff discretion) You may review the full City of Palo Alto Fields Policy here: https://www.paloalto.gov/files/assets/public/v/2/community-services/facility- rentals/reservations-community-centers-fields/field-and-tennis-court- reservations/city-of-palo-alto-field-and-court-use-policy.docx.pdf We will continue working with your organization to identify available field space. Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 127 Packet Pg. 270 of 426  &nbsp; Availability will depend on the organization’s priority status each season and what remains available at the time of reservation. If you would like to discuss this further, please feel free to contact me by phone or I would be happy to meet in person. Best regards, Chase Hartmann Community Services Manager Community Services Phone: (650) 329-2464 chase.hartmann@paloalto.gov www.paloalto.gov From: Lauren <laurenwye@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2026 3:37 PM To: Hartmann, Chase <Chase.Hartmann@paloalto.gov>; Robustelli, Sarah <Sarah.Robustelli@paloalto.gov>; ParkRecCommission@paloalto.gov Subject: Priority Field use by youth soccer clubs - request for reconsideration CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. To whom it may concern, We are long-time residents of Palo Alto (20+ years) with a 7-year-old son on a Stanford Strikers “South” team (their South division denotes Palo Alto and into Mountain View). In Palo Alto, we are fortunate to have two nearby soccer clubs available to our ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ i This message needs your attention This is a personal email address. This is their first mail to some recipients. Mark Safe Report CGBANNERINDICATOR To whom it may concern, We are long-time residents of Palo Alto (20+ years) with a 7-year-old son on a Stanford Strikers “South” team (their South division denotes Palo Alto and into Mountain View). In Palo Alto, we are fortunate to have two nearby soccer clubs available to our children: Palo Alto Soccer Club (PASC) and Stanford Strikers South. Our daughter plays on PASC and our son on Strikers. We like having the choice between clubs to find the compatibility and synergy that best suits our kids. Powered by Mimecast Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 128 Packet Pg. 271 of 426  This season, we were disappointed to learn that our son’s Strikers practices could no longer be held at JLS and our “home” game fields would all be in Menlo Park. The Strikers club explained that their 200 Palo Alto players were not enough to push them into a high enough residency percentage to have priority in the reservation process, and that the remaining fields are charged at very high rates. I am writing to respectfully request reconsideration of the field prioritization process. Many of the Strikers South players are Palo Alto residents (likely well above 50%). However, we are now looking at increasing our commutes to practice on lower quality Palo Alto fields, fields that are uneven and risk player injury. And our “home” games are in another city. Not only does this create additional strain on an already challenging sport-life balance, but it also creates extra traffic on clogged roads. We are disappointed not to have the ability to use the high-quality nearby fields that our tax dollars are paying for. We are also trying to figure out how we can sustain the increased commute long term. If the current field prioritization process continues, it may have the unfortunate outcome of reducing Palo Alto participation in the Strikers club. Diminishing the diversity of club options ultimately harms the players and the quality of the sport. Thank you for your consideration. Kind regards, Lauren Wye Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 129 Packet Pg. 272 of 426  From:Lauren To:Hartmann, Chase; Robustelli, Sarah; ParkRec Commission Subject:Priority Field use by youth soccer clubs - request for reconsideration Date:Wednesday, February 25, 2026 4:18:34 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i (Resending due to a typo in one of the email addresses) To whom it may concern, We are long-time residents of Palo Alto (20+ years) with a 7-year-old son on a Stanford Strikers “South” team (their South division denotes Palo Alto and into Mountain View). In Palo Alto, we are fortunate to have two nearby soccer clubs available to our children: Palo Alto Soccer Club (PASC) and Stanford Strikers South. Our daughter plays on PASC and our son on Strikers. We like having the choice between clubs to find the compatibility and synergy that best suits our kids. This season, we were disappointed to learn that our son’s Strikers practices could no longer be held at JLS and our “home” game fields would all be in Menlo Park. The Strikers club explained that their 200 Palo Alto players were not enough to push them into a high enough residency percentage to have priority in the reservation process, and that the remaining fields are charged at very high rates. I am writing to respectfully request reconsideration of the field prioritization process. Many of the Strikers South players are Palo Alto residents (likely well above 50%). However, we are now looking at increasing our commutes to practice on lower quality Palo Alto fields, fields that are uneven and risk player injury. And our “home” games are in another city. Not only does this create additional strain on an already challenging sport-life balance, but it also creates extra traffic on clogged roads. We are disappointed not to have the ability to use the high-quality nearby fields that our tax dollars are paying for. We are also trying to figure out how we can sustain the increased commute long term. If the current field prioritization process continues, it This message needs your attention This is a personal email address. This is their first mail to some recipients. Mark Safe Report Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 130 Packet Pg. 273 of 426  club. Diminishing the diversity of club options ultimately harms the players and the quality of the sport. Thank you for your consideration. Kind regards, Lauren Wye Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 131 Packet Pg. 274 of 426  From:Office of Supervisor Otto Lee To:ParkRec Commission Subject:Save the Date! State of the County 2026, March 13 Date:Wednesday, February 25, 2026 12:40:52 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious ofopening attachments and clicking on links. i Dear Friends and Neighbors, We are just a few weeks away from the upcoming 2026 State of the County address, and we are sincerely looking forward to seeing you there! The FREE event will take place on Friday, March 13, 2026, beginning at 5:45 PM at the Board Chambers located at 70 West Hedding Street, San Jose, CA 95110. Additionally, it will feature live performances, as well as a special awards ceremony to recognize local heroes, nominated by each of our five Board offices. These awards honor outstanding residents and partners who have demonstrated This message needs your attention You've never replied to this person. Mark Safe Report Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 132 Packet Pg. 275 of 426  exceptional service, leadership, and meaningful impact in their communities. I will also deliver this year’s address, highlighting the County’s accomplishments from 2025 and our priorities and plans for 2026. The address will be livestreamed on the County’s YouTube channel. 2026 State of the County Friday, March 13, 2026⏰5:45 PM Board Chambers -- 70 W. Hedding St., San Jose, CA RSVP to attend! Wondering what YOU have to look forward to? Here are just a few of the highlights of what's to come at this year's State of the County: A song performed by Victoria Vi Thuy McDowell A poetry reading by County Poet Laureate Yosimar Reyes Performances by M.A.N.O.S. Folklorico, JP2 Lion Dance Team and more! And so much more! Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 133 Packet Pg. 276 of 426  Countdown Please make sure to share this invitation widely with your networks, and please RSVP in advance. Feel free to contact our office at 408- 299-5030 with any questions. We look forward to seeing you on March 13 -- thank you! Sincerely, Otto Lee Board President Santa Clara County Supervisor, District 3 70 West Hedding 10th Floor San Jose, CA 95110 (408) 299-5030 Email Supervisor Lee District 3 Website Unsubscribe from future updates Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 134 Packet Pg. 277 of 426  From:Howard, Adam To:Tom Haxton Cc:ParkRec Commission Subject:RE: Request for update on Middle School Sports evaluation Date:Wednesday, February 25, 2026 9:10:22 AM Attachments:image001.png image003.png image004.png image006.png image007.png image008.png image009.png Hi Tom, The MSA conversation was scheduled for March, but due to some scheduling issues it had to be rescheduled to April. The meeting in April will be on Tuesday 28th. I can send agenda and staff reports once they are available, typically a week or two before the meeting. Thank you Adam Howard Sr. Community Services Manager, Recreation City of Palo Alto Phone: 650-329-2192 E-mail: adam.howard@paloalto.gov www.PaloAlto.gov Please think of the environment before printing this email – Thank you! From: Tom Haxton <tomhaxton@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, February 23, 2026 5:38 PM To: Howard, Adam <Adam.Howard@paloalto.gov> Cc: ParkRec Commission <parkrec.commission@PaloAlto.gov> Subject: Re: Request for update on Middle School Sports evaluation CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 135 Packet Pg. 278 of 426  Hi Adam, Thank you again for the December update. I see that the item is not on the February agenda. Would you be able to confirm whether the timeline remains that it is likely to be on the March agenda? I appreciate the continued work on this and look forward to participating when it comes forward. Best regards, Tom On Mon, Dec 29, 2025 at 10:29 AM Tom Haxton <tomhaxton@gmail.com> wrote: Hi Adam, Thank you for the update. I look forward to attending the commission meeting and learning more about the proposed RFP parameters and timeline. Best regards, Tom On Mon, Dec 29, 2025 at 10:16 AM Howard, Adam <Adam.Howard@paloalto.gov> wrote: Good morning Tom, We plan to return to the Commission in early 2026, likely in February or March, though that timing has not yet been finalized. At that time, we will formalize the guidelines for issuing an RFP (Request for Proposals). This will be a more formal process than the RFI (Request for Information) and could result in a group entering a contract with the City to operate the MSA program. At the Commission meeting, the RFP parameters will be discussed and finalized. These parameters will be used to guide and evaluate any proposals the City receives. The next steps and proposed timeline will also be discussed during that meeting. Once the meeting date is confirmed, I will be sure to notify you. Thank you, Adam Howard Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 136 Packet Pg. 279 of 426  Sr. Community Services Manager, Recreation City of Palo Alto Phone: 650-329-2192 E-mail: adam.howard@paloalto.gov www.PaloAlto.gov Please think of the environment before printing this email – Thank you! From: Tom Haxton <tom.haxton@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2025 7:22 PM To: ParkRec Commission <parkrec.commission@PaloAlto.gov> Cc: Howard, Adam <Adam.Howard@paloalto.gov> Subject: Request for update on Middle School Sports evaluation CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Becautious of opening attachments and clicking on links. Dear Parks and Recreation Commission and cc Adam Howard, staff liaison, Thank you for your service on the commission. As Director of the Palo Alto Middle School Athletics Community Organization (PAMSACO), the local nonprofit whose JLS Cross Country pilot program helped prompt the City’s evaluation of middle school sports, I am writing to request an update on the status of that evaluation. By way of background, the City Council voted unanimously on October 7, 2024 to evaluate transferring management of middle school sports to local nonprofits as part of the FY2025 work plan. I appreciate that the commission formed an ad-hoc committee and that staff prepared an initial report following the Request for Information issued in July 2025. At this point, however, I am not aware of any subsequent milestones or anticipated next steps, and I would appreciate an update on the current status and timeline. I would also like to flag a factual issue in the July 2025 staff report for the record. The Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 137 Packet Pg. 280 of 426  report states that Rising Stars LLC estimated its fees at $225 per student. The RFI response, however, listed costs as $225 per hour per instructor, which would translate to approximately $675 per student based on current enrollment and staffing. This distinction is material to any cost comparison and may warrant clarification in future discussions or documents. Thank you for your time and for your continued work on this issue. I would be happy to provide any additional information that may be helpful. Best regards, Tom Tom Haxton Director, Palo Alto Middle School Athletics Community Organization (PAMSACO) Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 138 Packet Pg. 281 of 426  From:Joshua Allen To:Joshua Allen Subject:VA Services Date:Tuesday, February 24, 2026 8:54:10 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i Hi there, I provide Virtual Assistants to Business Owners. We help aid with their tedious day to day tasks like; -Lead Generation -Prospecting -Cold Calling -CRM Management -Database Management -Social Media -Design Services -Content Writing -Accounting -Bookkeeping -Administrative tasks Are you currently looking for any support? This message needs your attention This is their first email to your company. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 139 Packet Pg. 282 of 426  From:Diane Elaine Moore To:ParkRec Commission Subject:Foothills-Arastradero Parks connection Date:Tuesday, February 24, 2026 10:34:40 AM I’m writing to commend the City for finally putting in an opening in the fence between Arastradero and Foothills Parks. Now that Foothills Park is open to everyone and walkers are not charged, there really is no need for a fence there at all. My friends and I (all senior citizens) appreciate not having to climb over the fence any more. Diane Moore Colorado Avenue Palo Alto Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 140 Packet Pg. 283 of 426  From:Light As Air Boats To:ParkRec Commission Smart Dock Solutions for Safer, Stronger Waterfronts Date:Tuesday, February 24, 2026 7:03:58 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of openingattachments and clicking on links. i This message needs your attention No employee in your company has ever replied to this person. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 141 Packet Pg. 284 of 426  SHOP NOW Hi there, Because Everyone Needs to Spend More Time on the Water This Summer! Our Dock Expert Can Help You Design the Dock Layout That Fits Your Needs & Wants!! Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 142 Packet Pg. 285 of 426  LEARN MORE ABOUT CONNECT A DOCK HERE LEARN MORE ABOUT AIR-DOCK HERE Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 143 Packet Pg. 286 of 426  Extended length provides space for boat mooring, swimming, and other water activities. Built with quality materials and a sturdy design, this dock ensures long-lasting durability and offers a reliable and versatile solution for your waterfront needs. Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 144 Packet Pg. 287 of 426  For Questions or a Quote - Call or Email Dave - 864.367.6161 dave@lightasairboats.com LEARN MORE ABOUT PATRIOT DOCKS HERE SEE ALL BOAT DOCKS HERE See 2026 Parks & Camps Catalog Here See 2026 Resorts Catalog Here See 2026 Water Recreation Catalog Here Yours in Wind, Water, and Waves, - The Light As Air Boats Team Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 145 Packet Pg. 288 of 426  We don’t want to spam you. If you're no longer interested in enjoying adventures out on the water Unsubscribe here. Light As Air Boats 13801 Walsingham Rd. Suite A-116 Largo, Florida 33774 Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 146 Packet Pg. 289 of 426  From:Alice Mansell To:ParkRec Commission Cc:Staiger, Steve; news@padailypost.com Subject:Public Comment Palo Alto Park & Rec Meeting 7PM, 2/24/26, Anza plaque Date:Monday, February 23, 2026 10:11:32 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i Hello, Does the City of Palo Alto have any plans to mark the visits 250 years ago in March 1776 of Juan Bautista de Anza and his exploration party to Palo Alto? He stopped twice on land which became El Palo Alto Park. He stopped there on March 26, 1776 northbound to San Francisco and again on March 30, 1776 southbound when his Expedition chaplain Friar Pedro Font measured the height of El Palo Alto redwood tree. On March 30, 1976 during the USA Bicentennial's official Anza Reenactment event, an HP engineer measured El Palo Alto with a laser device and a Font reenactor used 1770s tools. They got the same measurements. Anza also noted San Francisquito Creek was dry at that spot and thus took Palo Alto offf the official Spanish list of potential future Franciscan mission sites. Also on March 30, 1976, Palo Alto unveiled an Anza 1775-6 Expedition bronze marker by El Palo Alto which is no longer there on public view. Is it at the soon to open new Palo Alto Museum? image.png (March 30, 1976 photos at El Palo Alto from the final report of the 1976 Anza Reenactment) A very belated congratulations getting your segments of the Anza Trail at Arastradero Preserve and Baylands onto National Park Service maps of its Recreational (non-motorized) Anza Historic Trail. Many regards, Alice Mansell This message needs your attention This is their first mail to some recipients. Mark Safe Report Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 147 Packet Pg. 290 of 426  From:Tom Haxton To:Howard, Adam Cc:ParkRec Commission Subject:Re: Request for update on Middle School Sports evaluation Date:Monday, February 23, 2026 5:38:41 PM Attachments:image003.png image004.png image006.png image007.png image008.png CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i Hi Adam, Thank you again for the December update. I see that the item is not on the February agenda. Would you be able to confirm whether the timeline remains that it is likely to be on the March agenda? I appreciate the continued work on this and look forward to participating when it comes forward. Best regards, Tom On Mon, Dec 29, 2025 at 10:29 AM Tom Haxton <tomhaxton@gmail.com> wrote: Hi Adam, Thank you for the update. I look forward to attending the commission meeting and learning more about the proposed RFP parameters and timeline. Best regards, Tom On Mon, Dec 29, 2025 at 10:16 AM Howard, Adam <Adam.Howard@paloalto.gov> wrote: Good morning Tom, We plan to return to the Commission in early 2026, likely in February or March, though that timing has not yet been finalized. At that time, we will formalize the guidelines for issuing an RFP (Request for Proposals). This will be a more formal process than the RFI This message needs your attention Some Recipients have never replied to this person. This is a personal email address. Mark Safe Report Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 148 Packet Pg. 291 of 426  operate the MSA program. At the Commission meeting, the RFP parameters will be discussed and finalized. These parameters will be used to guide and evaluate any proposals the City receives. The next steps and proposed timeline will also be discussed during that meeting. Once the meeting date is confirmed, I will be sure to notify you. Thank you, Adam Howard Sr. Community Services Manager, Recreation City of Palo Alto Phone: 650-329-2192 E-mail: adam.howard@paloalto.gov www.PaloAlto.gov Please think of the environment before printing this email – Thank you! From: Tom Haxton <tom.haxton@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2025 7:22 PM To: ParkRec Commission <parkrec.commission@PaloAlto.gov> Cc: Howard, Adam <Adam.Howard@paloalto.gov> Subject: Request for update on Middle School Sports evaluation Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 149 Packet Pg. 292 of 426  CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Becautious of opening attachments and clicking on links. Dear Parks and Recreation Commission and cc Adam Howard, staff liaison, Thank you for your service on the commission. As Director of the Palo Alto Middle School Athletics Community Organization (PAMSACO), the local nonprofit whose JLS Cross Country pilot program helped prompt the City’s evaluation of middle school sports, I am writing to request an update on the status of that evaluation. By way of background, the City Council voted unanimously on October 7, 2024 to evaluate transferring management of middle school sports to local nonprofits as part of the FY2025 work plan. I appreciate that the commission formed an ad-hoc committee and that staff prepared an initial report following the Request for Information issued in July 2025. At this point, however, I am not aware of any subsequent milestones or anticipated next steps, and I would appreciate an update on the current status and timeline. I would also like to flag a factual issue in the July 2025 staff report for the record. The report states that Rising Stars LLC estimated its fees at $225 per student. The RFI response, however, listed costs as $225 per hour per instructor, which would translate to approximately $675 per student based on current enrollment and staffing. This distinction is material to any cost comparison and may warrant clarification in future discussions or documents. Thank you for your time and for your continued work on this issue. I would be happy to provide any additional information that may be helpful. Best regards, Tom Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 150 Packet Pg. 293 of 426  Tom Haxton Director, Palo Alto Middle School Athletics Community Organization (PAMSACO) Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 151 Packet Pg. 294 of 426  From:Jean-Paul Renaud To:ParkRec Commission Subject:Join us March 12: The Great Oak Count - a conversation about Palo Alto’s living legacy Date:Monday, February 23, 2026 3:54:25 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i Dear Palo Alto Parks and Recreation Commissioners, Palo Alto’s native oaks tell a powerful story about where the city has been—and where it’s headed. As critical community partners, you are warmly invited to join us Thursday, March 12 for a public panel discussion hosted by Canopy and the City of Palo Alto: The Great Oak Count: A Panel Conversation on Palo Alto’s Living Legacy Thursday, March 12 6:30-8:00 p.m. Palo Alto Art Center 1313 Newell Rd, Palo Alto, CA RSVP This special evening will explore findings from a multi-year, community-powered study of Palo Alto’s native oaks, which reveals both concerning declines in mature trees in some historic neighborhoods and encouraging signs of renewal and resilience across the city. Moderated by Dr. Erica Spotswood of Second Nature Ecology and Design, a panel of local experts will explore what recent data from The Great Oak Count and Young Tree Care Survey show, why it matters, and how continued collaboration between residents, the City, and community partners can help protect and grow Palo Alto’s urban forest for generations to come. Join us at 6:30 p.m. for a reception and light refreshments, followed by the panel discussion from 7 - 8 p.m. The event is free, but please RSVP here if you plan to attend. We would be delighted to have you with us! JP Jean-Paul Renaud Executive Director phone: 305-495-7156 email: jp@canopy.org This message needs your attention The subject has non-English characters. This is their first email to you. Mark Safe Report Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 152 Packet Pg. 295 of 426  Working full-time hybrid M-F Canopy.org Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 153 Packet Pg. 296 of 426  From:Parks To:ParkRec Commission Cc:Robustelli, Sarah; Heistein, Ben; Lythcott-Haims, Julie; O"Kane, Kristen Subject:Public Comments – PRC meeting February 24, 2026 Date:Monday, February 23, 2026 3:41:03 PM Attachments:image001.png image002.png image003.png Good afternoon Commissioners, The public comments received to date have been posted and are available for your review at the following link: https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/Portal/Meeting?meetingTemplateId=19731 As referenced in the meeting agenda under the “Public Comments” and “Other Information” sections, written public comments submitted in advance to ParkRec.commission@PaloAlto.gov are provided to the Commission and made available for public inspection on the City’s website at least three (3) days prior to the meeting. For Parks and Recreation Commission meetings, in accordance with Clerk’s Office regulations, comments are posted by the Thursday preceding the meeting date. Additionally, in response to Commissioner feedback, we will post a second batch of public comments received in the days immediately preceding the meeting. The deadline for inclusion in this supplemental posting is 1:00 p.m. on the Monday prior to the meeting. Any comments received after that time will be included in the following month’s public comments packet. Please let me know if you have any questions. Eric Vidal Coordinator Rec Prog | Open Space, Parks, and Golf Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 154 Packet Pg. 297 of 426  Community Services Department (650) 496-6962 | Parks@paloalto.gov www.PaloAlto.gov Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 155 Packet Pg. 298 of 426  From:Light As Air Boats To:ParkRec Commission Adventure Awaits! Best Inflatable Boats, Kayaks & Rafts! Date:Thursday, February 19, 2026 7:01:51 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of openingattachments and clicking on links. i This message needs your attention No employee in your company has ever replied to this person. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 156 Packet Pg. 299 of 426  SHOP NOW Hi there, Best addition to your camp or resort! Check out these inflatable kayaks, boats & rafts! Made in the Czech Republic.‍♂ Gumotex Boats alongside a cruise ship See Parks & Camps Catalog Here See Resorts Catalog Here Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 157 Packet Pg. 300 of 426  EXPLORE GUMOTEX CANOES & KAYAKS HERE! For Questions & Quotes, Call Andi Tel:706.619.6670 andi@lightasairboats.com Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 158 Packet Pg. 301 of 426  https://lightasairboats.com/collections/vendors?q=Gumotex&sort_by=price-descending#MainContent See Parks & Camps Catalog Here See Resorts Catalog Here Yours in Wind, Water, and Waves, - The Light As Air Boats Team Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 159 Packet Pg. 302 of 426  We don’t want to spam you. If you're no longer interested in enjoying adventures out on the water Unsubscribe here. Light As Air Boats 13801 Walsingham Rd. Suite A-116 Largo, Florida 33774 Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 160 Packet Pg. 303 of 426  From:Parks To:ParkRec Commission Cc:Robustelli, Sarah; Heistein, Ben; O"Kane, Kristen; Lythcott-Haims, Julie Subject:Reminder: Preparation for Item 4 – February 24, 2026 Agenda Date:Wednesday, February 18, 2026 12:38:08 PM Attachments:image001.png image002.png image003.png image005.png Good Afternoon Commissioners To help ensure an efficient meeting, this is a friendly reminder to please connect with your assigned staff contact for your respective ad hoc committees/liaison in advance of Item 4. Ad Hoc Committees and Liaison Updates (Discussion) – 15 minutes on the February 24, 2026 agenda. Coordinating with staff beforehand will help ensure any relevant updates and information are prepared and available for the meeting. Agenda and packet for February 24, 2026 meeting was posted yesterday at the following link: Meeting If you have any questions or need assistance identifying your staff, contact, please feel free to reach out or they can be found under item 8. Attachment A on your agenda. Thank you for your attention and preparation. Eric Vidal Coordinator Rec Prog | Open Space, Parks, and Golf Community Services Department (650) 496-6962 | Parks@paloalto.gov www.PaloAlto.gov Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 161 Packet Pg. 304 of 426  From:Canopy To:ParkRec Commission Subject:Remembering Dave Muffly Date:Tuesday, February 17, 2026 10:05:29 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious ofopening attachments and clicking on links.   Remembering Dave Muffly Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 162 Packet Pg. 305 of 426  Canopy has lost a treasured tree advocate and a trusted friend with the passing of Dave Muffly. Throughout his life, Dave wore countless Canopy hats, leaving his mark on remarkable planting projects across our region. His loss is deeply felt, as a friend and as a valued resource and passionate advocate for Canopy’s mission. Canopy and Dave share a long and meaningful history from our earliest planting efforts when Dave served as Canopy’s first Program Director in 1998-1999, to his tenure on Canopy’s Board from 2006- 2011, to his unwavering commitment to the youngest tree stewards who joined him on tree walks. Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 163 Packet Pg. 306 of 426  Dave shares his tree knowledge with children at a 2024 tree walk in Palo Alto. Unfailingly, Dave understood and championed the Quercus family and Canopy’s mission, community collaboration, and education. For nearly three decades, he engaged with generations of “Cano-people,” helping to shape the culture, values, and relationships that continue to carry Canopy’s mission forward. Dave was instrumental in dramatically changing Canopy’s trajectory through his enormous impact on Canopy’s early work in East Palo Alto. In 2006 Canopy, in partnership with the East Palo Alto community, received a grant to plant 1000 trees in East Palo Alto, most of which were planted along the Highway 101 frontage roads. Canopy had never undertaken a project of this magnitude, and Dave’s design, implementation, and many years of subsequent tree care were essential for the success of this award-winning project. This work was followed by large planting projects at all Ravenswood City Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 164 Packet Pg. 307 of 426  School District sites. One audacious day included planting nearly 200 trees in a day at one site followed by another 160-tree planting that attracted over 500 community volunteers! This work led to Canopy’s sustained presence in East Palo Alto and created the trust and connections that established Canopy as a community partner in Palo Alto and East Palo Alto. Sharon Kelly, Catherine Martineau, and Dave Muffly smile next to a newly-planted tree at the East Palo Alto Soundwall in 2007. Dave shared his deep knowledge and time generously, sharing his expertise as a volunteer and mentor to ensure others could learn, grow, and carry the work forward. Whether working alongside seasoned arborists, volunteers, or young people just beginning to see themselves as environmental stewards, he met everyone with enthusiasm. A tree walk with Dave along the soundwall trees or at Apple Park was full of humor and fresh and exciting ways to look at Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 165 Packet Pg. 308 of 426  the trees and our place in the world. His reverence for expanding access to trees was seemingly encouraged by a vision that urban forestry is about exploration and pushing limits, as much as it is about expanding tree canopy. Canopy, and the broader world of urban forestry, is stronger and more expansive today because Dave Muffly was part of our community. The trees he helped plant, the innumerable people he inspired, and the colleagues he mentored are undoubtedly affected by his unique walk through the world. As we continue our community forestry work, planting, educating, and building a more resilient urban forest, we carry forward Dave’s example: to remain curious, to generously teach, and to seek partners and collaborators to make more of this important work possible. Canopy will share photos of a tree planted in Dave’s honor, and our friends at Magic invite you to visit their Tribute Page to share your memories of the impact Dave had on our lives and our forests. Submit a Tribute Tree Library Find an Arborist Canopy Jobs Newsletter Archives Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 166 Packet Pg. 309 of 426  Canopy's mission is to collaborate with communities to grow and sustain equitable urban forests for all. We envision connected communities thriving within a vibrant urban forest. Canopy | 3921 East Bayshore Road | Palo Alto, CA 94303 US Unsubscribe | Update Profile | Constant Contact Data Notice Constant Contact Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 167 Packet Pg. 310 of 426  From:Light As Air Boats To:ParkRec Commission Turn Up the Water Fun This Season! Be Guest Ready! Date:Tuesday, February 17, 2026 7:03:03 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of openingattachments and clicking on links. i SHOP NOW This message needs your attention No employee in your company has ever replied to this person. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 168 Packet Pg. 311 of 426  Hi there, Be Summer Ready! Your guests will love you!! Build Smarter, Safer Splash Zones! See All Spectrum Water Slides Here! See All Empex Water Toys Here! See All Rain Drop Products Here! Refresh or create your splash park! Design a Standout Splash Experience! SEE SPLASH PADS & WATER FEATURES HERE Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 169 Packet Pg. 312 of 426  Create safe places for kids, Rooftop spaces for condos & apartments, and stellar gym floors! See All Unity Surfacing Systems Here! For Questions & Quotes, Call Dave. 864.367.6161 dave@lightasairboats.com Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 170 Packet Pg. 313 of 426  We don’t want to spam you. If you're no longer interested in enjoying adventures out on the water Unsubscribe here. Light As Air Boats 13801 Walsingham Rd. Suite A-116 Largo, Florida 33774 Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 171 Packet Pg. 314 of 426  From:Postmaster To:ParkRec Commission Subject:You have new held messages Date:Friday, February 13, 2026 12:28:06 PM Logo You have new held messages You can release all of your held messages and permit or block future emails from the senders, or manage messages individually. Release all Permit all Block all You can also manage held messages in your Personal Portal. Spam Policy joshua@smartassistanthub.com VA Services 2026-02-13 08:01 Release Permit Block Release all Permit all Block all © 2019 Mimecast Services Limited. Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 172 Packet Pg. 315 of 426  From:Light As Air Boats To:ParkRec Commission Water Experiences Your Guests Will Love Date:Thursday, February 12, 2026 7:03:40 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of openingattachments and clicking on links. i SHOP NOW This message needs your attention No employee in your company has ever replied to this person. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 173 Packet Pg. 316 of 426  Hi there, Elevate Your Guest Experience with These Pedal Boats! Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 174 Packet Pg. 317 of 426  EXPLORE ADVENTURE GLASS BOATS HERE Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 175 Packet Pg. 318 of 426  EXPLORE MARTINI NAUTICA BOATS HERE For Questions & Quotes, Call Andi Tel:706.619.6670 andi@lightasairboats.com SEE ALL PEDAL BOATS HERE See Parks & Camps Catalog Here See Resorts Catalog Here Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 176 Packet Pg. 319 of 426  We don’t want to spam you. If you're no longer interested in enjoying adventures out on the water Unsubscribe here. Light As Air Boats 13801 Walsingham Rd. Suite A-116 Largo, Florida 33774 You received this email from Light As Air Boats. If you would like to unsubscribe, click here. Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 177 Packet Pg. 320 of 426  From:David Siegel To:ParkRec Commission Cc:Howard, Adam Subject:Inaccurate Next Door Posts Referencing Pickleball at Mitchell Park Date:Wednesday, February 11, 2026 4:26:42 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i It was suggested to include these Next Door posts in the public comment section of the PRC's "packet" for its upcoming meeting. The two statements are not only unsubstantiated, but outright false. POST NUMBER ONE mingxia zhang 5d· Author ·Adobe Meadow some players complained that the pickleball club bring a lot homeless to Mitchell park. they just play, then go to library to take break or nap, then go back to play FACT - The Palo Alto Pickleball club does not "bring" any group to Mitchell Park. Like any other public park, homeless people are not excluded. I also wonder how someone could tell that a player was homeless. If there happen to be a player that was actually homeless, they would be welcome. But "brining them" (like we go out and bus them in) - simply not the case. POST NUMBER TWO mingxia zhang 5d· Author ·Adobe Meadow Joshua we measured, and it is over the ordinance level. last year the city said now the problem was how to handle the noise, not expansion, if we file complaint, they had to close all the pickleball courts. Ability path stood out too that the kids are afraid of the noise. but now the city ignores these complaint. if they allow the expansion, neighbors have to sue the city. FACT - regarding the underlined passage that says " Ability path stood out too that the kids are afraid of the noise". Please note the email below from the Facilities Director at Ability Path Palo Alto: This message needs your attention Some Recipients have never replied to this person. This is a personal email address. Mark Safe Report Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 178 Packet Pg. 321 of 426  From: Scott Green <sgreen@abilitypath.org> Date: Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 9:08 AM Subject: Re: Specific Question To: David Siegel <davidsiegel1958@gmail.com> Good morning David, I’ve talked to both the adult program and our preschool and no one has made a complaint ever about the noise from Pickleball. Thanks for checking in, but it might be the kids at the challenger school who are complaining. It’s not from Abilitypath rest assured. Scott Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 10, 2026, at 10:25 PM, David Siegel <davidsiegel1958@gmail.com> wrote: > >  > Hi Scott: > > I saw the following post on NextDoor (a neighborhood app). > > <2026-02-10 22_19_21-NextDoorPickleballPosts20260209.pdf - Nitro Pro.png> > > We want to be a great neighbor, so I am wondering about the accuracy of the statement that "the kids are afraid of the noise" (from pickleball). To that end, are you aware of any complaints from your staff or clients about the noise? If so, I would appreciate any quantification you can give me and/or any details about noise issues being outside, or inside (classrooms), neither or whatever light you can shed. > > If there are significant issues, there maybe steps we can take to reduce it. But it is best to deal with facts from the people that work there, rather than third parties that might have another agenda. > > Thanks much and I would very much appreciate a prompt response to this one. > > Regards, > > Dave Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 179 Packet Pg. 322 of 426  From:Postmaster To:ParkRec Commission Subject:You have new held messages Date:Wednesday, February 11, 2026 12:26:07 PM Logo You have new held messages You can release all of your held messages and permit or block future emails from the senders, or manage messages individually. Release all Permit all Block all You can also manage held messages in your Personal Portal. Spam Policy evander@swifttaskexperts.com No-Pressure Assistance to Improve Your Operations 2026-02-11 11:01 Release Permit Block Release all Permit all Block all © 2019 Mimecast Services Limited. Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 180 Packet Pg. 323 of 426  From:Kathy Fan To:Howard, Adam Cc:ParkRec Commission Subject:Re: Pickleball Noise at Mitchell park Date:Wednesday, February 11, 2026 11:19:59 AM Attachments:image006.png image004.png image007.png image003.png image008.png image009.png CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i Hi Adam, Hope this email finds you well. I was wondering the city has done anything to mitigate the noise since last October? Or any further investigation to show that there is no ordinance violation at all? Your response is highly appreciated! Best regards, Kathy Fan On Thu, Oct 9, 2025 at 9:49 AM Kathy Fan <kathyxfan@gmail.com> wrote: Adam, good morning! It is good to hear from legal. I look forward to hearing more about additional solutions to the court shortage. Thank you and have a great day! - Kathy On Thu, Oct 9, 2025 at 8:53 AM Howard, Adam <Adam.Howard@paloalto.gov> wrote: Good Morning Kathy, I did hear back from legal, and as you suspected, adding pickleball to Mitchell Park does not make it a part of the ambient noise. If you wanted to make a formal complaint you would do that through Palo Alto 311, link is here. This message needs your attention Some Recipients have never replied to this person. This is a personal email address. Mark Safe Report Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 181 Packet Pg. 324 of 426  moves forward. Staff is trying to gather more information, look for additional solutions to the court issues so it will be a while before it is brought back to the Recreation Commission. Staff would like to find solutions that everyone can be happy with. I haven’t selected a future date yet, but we will do that soon. I will make sure to communicate once a future date is selected. Thank you Adam Howard Sr. Community Services Manager, Recreation City of Palo Alto Phone: 650-329-2192 E-mail: adam.howard@paloalto.gov www.PaloAlto.gov Please think of the environment before printing this email – Thank you! Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 182 Packet Pg. 325 of 426  From: Kathy Fan <kathyxfan@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 7, 2025 4:04 PM To: Howard, Adam <Adam.Howard@paloalto.gov> Cc: ParkRec Commission <parkrec.commission@PaloAlto.gov> Subject: Re: Pickleball Noise at Mitchell park CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Becautious of opening attachments and clicking on links. Adam, I hope you’re doing well. I wanted to follow up to see if there’s any update regarding my earlier question about the Noise Ordinance. Also, since my petition is still open to gather more signatures, could you please let me know whether the proposed expansion of pickleball courts at Mitchell Park is expected to appear on the PRC agenda this month or at a future meeting? Thank you very much for your time and assistance. Best regards, Kathy Fan On Thu, Sep 25, 2025 at 10:29 AM Howard, Adam <Adam.Howard@paloalto.gov> wrote: Hi Kathy, Thank you for the additional information, I will get back to you as soon as I can with information about the sound ordinance. Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 183 Packet Pg. 326 of 426  Like you, we are looking at as many options as possible to see if we can find way to help both tennis community and pickleball community thrive in Palo Alto. Thank you Adam Howard Sr. Community Services Manager, Recreation City of Palo Alto Phone: 650-329-2192 E-mail: adam.howard@paloalto.gov www.PaloAlto.gov Please think of the environment before printing this email – Thank you! Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 184 Packet Pg. 327 of 426  From: Kathy Fan <kathyxfan@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2025 8:29 AM To: Howard, Adam <Adam.Howard@paloalto.gov> Cc: ParkRec Commission <parkrec.commission@PaloAlto.gov> Subject: Re: Pickleball Noise at Mitchell park CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Becautious of opening attachments and clicking on links. Dear Adam, Good morning! It was nice talking to you this Tuesday and your hard work to get a balanced solution for both communities of pickleball and tennis are highly appreciated! I sincerely hope we can have something figured out that everyone is happy with. I am not someone who usually causes trouble. Two years ago, I attended meetings to stand up for the tennis community, but unfortunately we lost to pickleball. Now, despite already taking over so much, the pickleball community is demanding even more. The proposal to convert two additional tennis courts, under the excuse of “zero cost”, is simply greedy, unfair, and completely beyond reason. While my friend, Irene Zhang, communicated to you yesterday that the noises caused by additional conversion will harm the disabled kids at AchieveKid, the existing 15 courts actually have been disturbing residents nearby for the past two years. Last night, I stopped by Stevenson House around 9:55 p.m. and measured the noise levels before and after the pickleball activity. After 10 p.m., the noise level dropped to 38–40 dB. Between 9:55 p.m. and 10 p.m., the levels ranged from 48–53 dB. Per Noise Ordinance 9.10.030(a), no person should produce, suffer, or allow to be produced ….. a noise level more than 6 dB above the local ambient at any point outside of the property plane. Considering that pickleball activity takes place daily from dawn until 10 p.m., the noise pollution indeed is very severe for the elderly residents of Stevenson House and at a less degree for the residents at nearby houses. However, you mentioned pickleball noises could be part of local ambient, so I am interested in finding out the legal position on this issue. Best regards, Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 185 Packet Pg. 328 of 426  Kathy Fan On Mon, Sep 22, 2025 at 1:29 PM Howard, Adam <Adam.Howard@paloalto.gov> wrote: Hi Kathy Thank you for sharing your comment. We’ve received your email and will take your feedback into consideration as this topic moves forward. Staff and members of the Parks and Recreation Commission’s Courts Ad Hoc Committee are continuing to gather information and explore solutions to this complex issue. Your email will be added to the contact list for this subject, and we will keep you informed about next steps so you can stay involved and continue providing feedback. Thank you Adam Howard Sr. Community Services Manager, Recreation City of Palo Alto Phone: 650-329-2192 E-mail: adam.howard@paloalto.gov www.PaloAlto.gov Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 186 Packet Pg. 329 of 426  Please think of the environment before printing this email – Thank you! From: Kathy Fan <kathyxfan@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, September 22, 2025 12:13 PM To: Howard, Adam <Adam.Howard@paloalto.gov>; ParkRec Commission <parkrec.commission@PaloAlto.gov> Subject: Re: Pickleball Noise at Mitchell park CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Becautious of opening attachments and clicking on links. Dear Adam and Commissioners， Following my previous email, I would like to provide some additional information. I have long wondered why Mitchell Park was allowed to have 15 pickleball courts, until I came across an interview clip with Monica Williams by Palo Alto Online in 2019. In the interview, Monica acknowledged that pickleball is a noisy sport, and she herself would not want to live next to pickleball courts. Mitchell Park is unusual in this regard because there are no residences directly adjacent to it—the closest homes are at least 300 feet away. https://fb.watch/ChlmIs7CHm/?mibextid=wwXIfr&fs=e Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 187 Packet Pg. 330 of 426  The Stevenson House is only 259 feet, and the noise is clearly audible, particularly at night when it is most disturbing. I respectfully ask that you take this into consideration when reviewing the proposal for further pickleball court expansion in Mitchell Park. I also suggest that it may be necessary to revisit the prior decision to convert the five tennis courts into 15 pickleball courts at Mitchell park. Lastly, the petition to “stop new pickleball courts in Mitchell Park” has already gathered over 1,000 supporters, reflecting the strong concerns of our community. The comments are especially powerful and speak directly to the real impacts residents are experiencing. https://c.org/bVpQF6hshY Thank you very much for your time and attention. Best regards, Kathy Fan On Mon, Sep 22, 2025 at 9:28 AM Kathy Fan <kathyxfan@gmail.com> wrote: Adam, Good morning! I understand that John Wang represented the residents at Stevenson House that their residents are not bothered by the noises from the pickleball courts. But I heard differently from many other sources. Not only the residents at Stevenson house dislike the noises, even residents at single family houses near Mitchell park are disturbed by the noises. To find out the truth, I walked by Stevenson house after 9 pm last night and made a short video which is attached to this email. I also attached here two documents: one is City’s Noise Ordinance and the other is the noise category by being heard with human ears. Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 188 Packet Pg. 331 of 426  May I ask two questions? 1. Will the statement by John Wang, the facility manager, make the pickleball noises exempt from the Ordinance? 2. When the city finally moved to convert court 5 and 6 into pickleball courts a few years ago, was the city aware of the noise is in violation of the City Ordinance 9.10.050 (a)? Your attention to this email is highly appreciated. Best regards Kathy Fan 425-306-4836 Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 189 Packet Pg. 332 of 426  From:Rainarrel.ca To:ParkRec Commission Subject:Much Better Municipal Rain Barrel and Composter Distribution Programs Date:Wednesday, February 11, 2026 6:09:34 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious ofopening attachments and clicking on links. i Hello, Your community is invited to join the 2026 Best U.S.A RainBarrel.ca Sale. Since 2010, RainBarrel.ca has supported over 1,500 organizations, including municipalities, conservation authorities, and non-profit community organizations, to bring rain barrel and rolling composter distribution events to local residents. Our popular community engagement events offer affordable and durable rainwater harvesting and household organics composting solutions that were designed with a focus on ease of use. These initiatives support municipal goals by managing these resources at the source, reducing stormwater runoff, easing pressure on aging infrastructure, reducing demand on potable water supplies and by diverting compostable nutrients from landfill sites. As communities face increasing challenges related to extreme rain events, flooding, infrastructure degradation and landfill capacity, rain barrel and composting programs have become practical and measurable actions that residents are willing to support. Communities that implement our programs should expect to see: Reduced runoff into storm systems Lower demand on potable water supplies Increased resident participation rates in sustainability initiatives Stronger public awareness of conservation opportunities Our turnkey programs are cost-free and designed to minimize demands on staff. This message needs your attention This is their first email to you. Mark Safe Report Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 190 Packet Pg. 333 of 426  order and payment processing, including 24/7 real-time reporting, while ensuring complete transparency and data security. We collaborate to prepare actionable communication plans and we coordinate the logistics to transport all orders to your community. We support meet and greet, pick up events, coordinate home delivery services and encourage both pick up and home delivery options to maximum results. Programs can be presented through community-wide sale events, fundraising partnerships, or rebate-supported models, tailored to align with community priorities. To learn more, please view our program or book a time for a call at: [calendar link]. Kind regards, Wonderful Chimezie Partner Support RainBarrel.ca wonderfulcrainbarrel@gmail.com 844-422-7735 ext 702 Book a Meeting Want to change how you receive these emails? You can update your preferences or unsubscribe Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 191 Packet Pg. 334 of 426  From:John Jacobs To:ParkRec Commission Subject:Checking in Date:Tuesday, February 10, 2026 8:03:08 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links. Hi, Sorry to bother you. Do you order or have an Amazon account? John Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 192 Packet Pg. 335 of 426  From:Parks To:ParkRec Commission Cc:Lythcott-Haims, Julie; Shikada, Ed; Shimizu, Tim; O"Kane, Kristen; Heistein, Ben; Howard, Adam; Robustelli, Sarah Subject:Parks & Recreation Commission Retreat – Friday, February 13 (9:00 AM – 12:00 PM) Date:Tuesday, February 10, 2026 5:44:25 PM Attachments:image001.png image002.png image004.png Good Afternoon Commissioners, This is a reminder regarding the upcoming Parks & Recreation Commission Retreat scheduled for Friday, February 13, from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. The retreat will take place in the Matadero Room at the Mitchell Park Community Center, 3700 Middlefield Rd, Palo Alto, CA 94303. Coffee and pastries will be available beginning at 8:30 a.m. We encourage you to arrive a few minutes early to allow time to settle in before the retreat begins promptly at 9:00 a.m. The presentation for the day, along with the full agenda packet and public comments, are available online at the following link: https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/Portal/Meeting?meetingTemplateId=19850 We look forward to a productive and engaging discussion. Eric Vidal Coordinator Rec Prog | Open Space, Parks, and Golf Community Services Department (650) 496-6962 | Eric.Vidal@paloalto.gov www.PaloAlto.gov Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 193 Packet Pg. 336 of 426  From:Robustelli, Sarah To:ParkRec Commission Cc:Pham, Tina; Li, Connie; Heistein, Ben Subject:FW: February 24, 2026 - Palo Alto Regional Water Quality Control Plant - Biosolids Public Meeting Date:Tuesday, February 10, 2026 1:46:34 PM Attachments:Outlook-Logo__Desc.png image001.png image002.png image003.png Hi Commissioners, Below please find an upcoming Biosolids Public Meeting scheduled before your next Parks and Recreation Regular Commission Meeting. This will be important for anyone on the Park Dedication liaison or Ad Hoc to attend. Details included below. Thanks, Tina. SARAH ROBUSTELLI Division Manager Open Space, Parks, and Golf Community Services Department (650) 617-3518 | Sarah.Robustelli@PaloAlto.gov www.PaloAlto.gov From: Pham, Tina Sent: Friday, January 30, 2026 4:05 PM To: Pham, Tina <Tina.Pham@paloalto.gov> Subject: February 24, 2026 - Palo Alto Regional Water Quality Control Plant - Biosolids Public Meeting HI All, Thank you for your continued interest in the future of biosolids management at the Palo Alto Regional Water Quality Control Plant (RWQCP). We are hosting an important Biosolids Public Meeting on Tuesday, February 24, 2026, from 4:00 PM to 5:30 PM virtually via Zoom, and we would like to invite you to participate. As part of the ongoing Long Range Facility Plan Update process, this meeting will build upon information presented in prior public meetings in May and July 2025. We are seeking valuable input to help shape the future of our biosolids processing and Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 194 Packet Pg. 337 of 426  management strategies. Meeting Details: Date & Time: Tuesday, February 24, 2026 from 4:00 PM - 5:30 PM Location: This is a virtual meeting being held on Zoom. During this meeting, you will have the opportunity to: Learn about wastewater treatment plant and the plant’s long-term biosolids planning efforts Get an update on the findings from detailed biosolids processing technology evaluation Stay informed of the project's intended pathway forward and potential recommendations including whether the Measure E site adjacent to RWQCP could be used. Share your feedback and pose questions to City staff and the project team Receive updates on the next steps in the Plant's long-term planning efforts This meeting is a critical part of the Biosolids Facility Plan Update, which is anticipated for release later this year. Your feedback will be instrumental in guiding the decisions regarding the future of biosolids processing at the Plant. Please feel free to share this invitation with other community members and encourage their participation. For additional information, please visit the event page: Biosolids Public Meeting How to join the Virtual Meeting: Zoom Information Meeting ID: 814 4474 8652 Join the Zoom Webinar We look forward to your participation and valuable input! Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 195 Packet Pg. 338 of 426  Sincerely, -Tina Pham Tina Pham Senior Engineer Regional Water Quality Control Plant (650) 838-2896| tina.pham@PaloAlto.gov www.PaloAlto.gov Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 196 Packet Pg. 339 of 426  From:Light As Air Boats To:ParkRec Commission Discover The Top E-Bikes & Recumbent Trikes For Your Guests! Date:Tuesday, February 10, 2026 8:01:35 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of openingattachments and clicking on links. i SHOP NOW Hi there! Meet the Best in Recumbent Bikes & E-Bikes! Your guests will love these! This message needs your attention No employee in your company has ever replied to this person. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 197 Packet Pg. 340 of 426  Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 198 Packet Pg. 341 of 426  For Questions & Quotes, Call Andi. 706.619.6670 andi@lightasairboats.com Yours in Wind, Water, and Waves, - The Light As Air Boats Team Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 199 Packet Pg. 342 of 426  We don’t want to spam you. If you're no longer interested in enjoying adventures out on the water Unsubscribe here. Light As Air Boats 13801 Walsingham Rd. Suite A-116 Largo, Florida 33774 Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 200 Packet Pg. 343 of 426  &nbsp; From:Robustelli, Sarah To:ParkRec Commission Subject:FW: Consent Item #6 Extend First Tee - Silicon Valley Contract Date:Monday, February 9, 2026 3:00:06 PM Attachments:image001.png image002.png image003.png Hi Commissioners, Commissioner Kleinhaus has asked me to forward the below message to the Parks and Recreation Commission. Sarah SARAH ROBUSTELLI Division Manager Open Space, Parks, and Golf Community Services Department (650) 617-3518 | Sarah.Robustelli@PaloAlto.gov www.PaloAlto.gov From: Shani Kleinhaus <shani@scvbirdalliance.org> Sent: Saturday, February 7, 2026 9:25 AM To: Council, City <city.council@PaloAlto.gov> Cc: Robustelli, Sarah <Sarah.Robustelli@paloalto.gov>; Heistein, Ben <Benjamin.Heistein@paloalto.gov> Subject: Consent Item #6 Extend First Tee - Silicon Valley Contract CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. Dear Mayor Veenker and Council membersMy name is Shani Kleinhaus and I write as a resident of Palo Alto and the Environmental Advocate for the Santa Clara Valley Bird Alliance. I am also a Parks and Recreation commissioner, but I do not speak for the commission. My comment addres ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ! This message could be suspicious Similar name as someone you've contacted. Mark Safe Report CGBANNERINDICATOR Dear Mayor Veenker and Council members My name is Shani Kleinhaus and I write as a resident of Palo Alto and the Environmental Advocate for the Santa Clara Valley Bird Alliance. I am also a Parks and Recreation commissioner, but I do not speak for the commission. My Powered by Mimecast Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 201 Packet Pg. 344 of 426  comment addresses Consent Item #6, extending the First Tee - Silicon Valley Contract for use of the Youth Practice Area at Baylands Golf Links, located along the Embarcadero Road edge of the course. I support approval of this consent item. However, I ask you to provide clear guidance now for any future improvement projects at this site, including netting, turf replacement, or a potential second-story driving range, so those investments align with adopted City policy and the Baylands’ unique setting. First, on turf and plastic materials. Recent City Council discussions have already raised concerns about plastic ground cover and artificial turf, including microplastic pollution, heat impacts, stormwater runoff, and long-term maintenance and disposal issues. Given the Baylands’ proximity to sensitive wetlands and waterways, future projects here should avoid plastic ground cover, including artificial turf, and prioritize natural, permeable, and ecologically functional materials. Second, along Embarcadero Road. This edge of the Baylands is a major visual gateway and an ecological transition zone. The Comprehensive Plan, Parks and Recreation Master Plan, and Baylands Master Plan all emphasize protecting nature, strengthening habitat values, and enhancing the experience of Baylands. Any future improvements should include an ecological landscape element along Embarcadero Road, using native trees and vegetation to support biodiversity, improve the scenic corridor, and better reflect the Baylands’ character. Third, habitat connectivity. Adopted City policies consistently call for improving habitat connectivity and integrating biodiversity into park design. Roadway edges and perimeter areas like this are key opportunities to support birds and pollinators moving through the Baylands. Future investments at this site should enhance - not fragment - habitat connectivity and ecological function. Providing this guidance up front will help avoid piecemeal impacts, align future capital decisions with adopted plans, and ensure that recreational improvements at Baylands Golf Links also contribute to the long-term health and resilience of the Baylands. Respectfully, Shani Kleinhaus, Ph.D. Palo Alto resident Parks and Recreation Commissioner Environmental Advocate, Santa Clara Valley Bird Alliance ----------------------------------------------------------- Shani Kleinhaus, Ph.D. Environmental Advocate Santa Clara Valley Bird Alliance 650-868-2114 shani@scvbirdalliance.org Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 202 Packet Pg. 345 of 426  From:Lisa Adaboina To:ParkRec Commission Subject:Secure City Of Palo Alto families & simplify staff compliance before the Spring rush Date:Monday, February 9, 2026 8:07:19 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i Hi City, Between registrations and team prep, ensuring every coach is vetted and every athlete is protected shouldn't be another headache for City Of Palo Alto. At SportsPlus, we believe the right system doesn't just help manage your club - it protects it. We've helped organizations like City Of Palo Alto move toward Total Control with: Digital Waiver Tracking: Collect and store legal signatures during the registration flow. Automated Background Checks: Ensure all staff members are fully vetted without manual data entry. Secure Member Data: Move away from risky spreadsheets to a single, encrypted login. Communication & Operations Audit: Total oversight of every message and all staff operations. Let’s make 2026 the year City Of Palo Alto trades compliance headaches for peace of mind. Are you available for a quick personal demo? Book it at a time that is convenient for you: https://crm.sportsplus.co/meeting/101775/1 Best Regards, Lisa Adaboina This message needs your attention No employee in your company has ever replied to this person. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 203 Packet Pg. 346 of 426  If you don't want to receive this type of email in the future, please unsubscribe. Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 204 Packet Pg. 347 of 426  From:Kathy Fan To:PlayingFields Cc:Howard, Adam; ParkRec Commission Subject:Re: A Small Display Request Date:Wednesday, February 4, 2026 4:23:15 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i Chase, I understand that the City cannot proceed with this request. This plaque was intended more as an honor to the home facility rather than to an individual or a single team. That said, I’m also happy to keep it at my home. Thank you, and have a great day! On Wed, Feb 4, 2026 at 3:20 PM PlayingFields <playingfields@paloalto.gov> wrote: Hi Kathy, Thank you again for taking the time to speak with me yesterday. As we discussed, while this is truly an impressive achievement for you and your team, allowing a plaque to be placed on the fence at Mitchell Park would require us to extend the same opportunity to all future honorees. After further discussion with city staff, we are in agreement that we cannot permit plaques to be installed on any of the tennis court fences for this reason. I appreciate your understanding, and I’m sorry that we’re unable to move forward with this request. Thank you, Chase Hartmann From: Kathy Fan <kathyxfan@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 3, 2026 3:03 PM This message needs your attention Some Recipients have never replied to this person. This is a personal email address. Mark Safe Report Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 205 Packet Pg. 348 of 426  To: PlayingFields <playingfields@PaloAlto.gov> Cc: Howard, Adam <Adam.Howard@paloalto.gov>; ParkRec Commission <parkrec.commission@PaloAlto.gov> Subject: Re: A Small Display Request CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. Chase, I called three times today, unluckily, I couldn’t get hold of you. I talked to Julia briefly who suggested me presenting this idea to Park and Recreational Commission Committee. So here below is my follow up email to Adam and PRC members. Actually, there have been quite a few occasions when teams with home bases in Palo Alto won sectional championships, but no plaques were ever offered to the City. In many of those cases, the teams simply used Palo Alto’s tennis courts, but did not truly consider Palo Alto to be their “home” base. For me, it is different. I live in Palo Alto, learned to play tennis at Mitchell Park, interviewed new players and organized team practices here. Most importantly, this is the first time in the Palo Alto history that a team captained by a Palo Alto resident with team roster met the residence requirement won a sectional championship! When I received the plaque, my very first thought was to give it to the city and display it at the Mitchell Park tennis courts. This request is not meant to showcase an individual or team achievement. Rather, it is a genuine expression of appreciation for the City’s continued support and for providing excellent public tennis facilities that made this achievement possible. I understand the concern that public facilities should not be used to highlight individual achievements. That said, similar to how schools display team trophies, cities often recognize the accomplishments of their residents. This is particularly meaningful when the city has supported the team by providing its home courts. Lastly, I am not aware of any City regulations or policies that prohibit this type of display. On the other hand, there are currently multiple advertising banners from the Palo Alto Pickleball Club displayed around Mitchell pickleball courts. Given this context, I did not anticipate that a small commemorative plaque would be an issue. Attached are our team roster, the plaque display at Sunnyvale Municipal Tennis Center and PAPC banner at Mitchell park. Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 206 Packet Pg. 349 of 426  Please kindly reconsider my request. Thanks and best regards, Kathy Fan Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 207 Packet Pg. 350 of 426  On Tue, Feb 3, 2026 at 9:22 AM PlayingFields <playingfields@paloalto.gov> wrote: Hi, Sure. You can give me a call at 650-329-2418. If I don’t answer, please leave a message. Thanks, Chase Hartmann From: Kathy Fan <kathyxfan@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 3, 2026 7:57 AM To: PlayingFields <playingfields@PaloAlto.gov> Cc: Howard, Adam <Adam.Howard@paloalto.gov> Subject: Re: A Small Display Request CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Becautious of opening attachments and clicking on links. Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 208 Packet Pg. 351 of 426  Chase, Thank you very much for your quick reply! May I give you a call today? I think I probably didn’t make myself clear enough in the email. Thank you! Kathy Fan On Mon, Feb 2, 2026 at 1:07 PM PlayingFields <playingfields@paloalto.gov> wrote: Hi Kathy, Congratulations to your team on winning the Mitchell Park 7.5 Women’s Combo Championship — what a great accomplishment! Unfortunately, because the tennis courts are public facilities, we’re unable to display the plaque. If we made an exception, we would need to allow the same for all other groups, which isn’t something we’re able to do. Thank you for your understanding, and congratulations again on a fantastic season. Chase Hartmann From: Kathy Fan <kathyxfan@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, January 30, 2026 1:48 PM To: Howard, Adam <Adam.Howard@paloalto.gov> Cc: ParkRec Commission <parkrec.commission@PaloAlto.gov>; PlayingFields <playingfields@PaloAlto.gov> Subject: A Small Display Request CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 209 Packet Pg. 352 of 426  cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links. Dear Adam and Parks and Recreation Commission members, I wanted to share some happy news from our local tennis community. Our Mitchell Park 7.5 Women’s Combo team won the championship at last weekend’s Sectional tournament, and we’re all still very excited about it. The Women’s 7.5 Combo evening league is one of the largest and most competitive USTA leagues in Northern California, with more than 100 teams and over 2,000 players participating. Every match was hard-fought, and our players showed incredible teamwork and spirit throughout the season. We played in total 17 team matches and only lost one. In the elimination rounds, we went on to win against a strong San Francisco team in the semifinals and a Sunnyvale (we lost to Sunnyvale last August) team the finals to take the title. The organizing committee awarded us a commemorative championship plaque — I’ve attached a photo to share the moment. As a year-round USTA captain based at Mitchell Park, I truly appreciate how important reliable access to Palo Alto’s public courts has been for our teams. Having these courts available makes it possible for us to practice, build teams, and stay active in the community. We were hoping to ask if it might be possible to display our championship plaque at the Mitchell Park tennis courts. It would mean a lot to our players, and we hope it can also be a fun and encouraging sign for other Palo Alto tennis teams and players. For reference, I’ve also attached photos of similar displays at the Sunnyvale Municipal Tennis Center and Fremont Tennis Club. Warmly, Kathy Fan Captain Mitchell Park Women’s 7.5 Combo Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 210 Packet Pg. 353 of 426  Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 211 Packet Pg. 354 of 426  From:PlayingFields To:kathyxfan@gmail.com Cc:Howard, Adam; ParkRec Commission Subject:RE: A Small Display Request Date:Wednesday, February 4, 2026 3:20:30 PM Hi Kathy, Thank you again for taking the time to speak with me yesterday. As we discussed, while this is truly an impressive achievement for you and your team, allowing a plaque to be placed on the fence at Mitchell Park would require us to extend the same opportunity to all future honorees. After further discussion with city staff, we are in agreement that we cannot permit plaques to be installed on any of the tennis court fences for this reason. I appreciate your understanding, and I’m sorry that we’re unable to move forward with this request. Thank you, Chase Hartmann From: Kathy Fan <kathyxfan@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 3, 2026 3:03 PM To: PlayingFields <playingfields@PaloAlto.gov> Cc: Howard, Adam <Adam.Howard@paloalto.gov>; ParkRec Commission <parkrec.commission@PaloAlto.gov> Subject: Re: A Small Display Request CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links. Chase, I called three times today, unluckily, I couldn’t get hold of you. I talked to Julia briefly who suggested me presenting this idea to Park and Recreational Commission Committee. So here below is my follow up email to Adam and PRC members. Actually, there have been quite a few occasions when teams with home bases in Palo Alto won sectional championships, but no plaques were ever offered to the City. In many of those cases, the teams simply used Palo Alto’s tennis courts, but did not truly consider Palo Alto to be their “home” base. For me, it is different. I live in Palo Alto, learned to play tennis at Mitchell Park, interviewed new players and organized team practices here. Most importantly, this is the first time in the Palo Alto history that a team captained by a Palo Alto resident with team roster met the residence requirement won a sectional championship! When I received the plaque, my very first thought was to give it to the city and display it at the Mitchell Park tennis courts. This request is not meant to showcase an individual or team achievement. Rather, it is a genuine expression of appreciation for the City’s continued support and for providing excellent public tennis facilities that made this achievement possible. I understand the concern that public facilities should not be used to highlight individual achievements. That said, similar to how schools display team trophies, cities often recognize the accomplishments of their residents. This is particularly meaningful when the city has supported the team by providing its home courts. Lastly, I am not aware of any City regulations or policies that prohibit this type of display. On the other hand, there are currently multiple advertising banners from the Palo Alto Pickleball Club displayed around Mitchell pickleball courts. Given this context, I did not anticipate that a small commemorative plaque would be an issue. Attached are our team roster, the plaque display at Sunnyvale Municipal Tennis Center and PAPC banner at Mitchell park. Please kindly reconsider my request. Thanks and best regards, Kathy Fan Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 212 Packet Pg. 355 of 426  Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 213 Packet Pg. 356 of 426  On Tue, Feb 3, 2026 at 9:22 AM PlayingFields <playingfields@paloalto.gov> wrote: Hi, Sure. You can give me a call at 650-329-2418. If I don’t answer, please leave a message. Thanks, Chase Hartmann From: Kathy Fan <kathyxfan@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 3, 2026 7:57 AM To: PlayingFields <playingfields@PaloAlto.gov> Cc: Howard, Adam <Adam.Howard@paloalto.gov> Subject: Re: A Small Display Request CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links. Chase, Thank you very much for your quick reply! May I give you a call today? I think I probably didn’t make myself clear enough in the email. Thank you! Kathy Fan On Mon, Feb 2, 2026 at 1:07 PM PlayingFields <playingfields@paloalto.gov> wrote: Hi Kathy, Congratulations to your team on winning the Mitchell Park 7.5 Women’s Combo Championship — what a great accomplishment! Unfortunately, because the tennis courts are public facilities, we’re unable to display the plaque. If we made an exception, we would need to allow the same for all other groups, which isn’t something we’re able to do. Thank you for your understanding, and congratulations again on a fantastic season. Chase Hartmann From: Kathy Fan <kathyxfan@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, January 30, 2026 1:48 PM To: Howard, Adam <Adam.Howard@paloalto.gov> Cc: ParkRec Commission <parkrec.commission@PaloAlto.gov>; PlayingFields <playingfields@PaloAlto.gov> Subject: A Small Display Request CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links. Dear Adam and Parks and Recreation Commission members, I wanted to share some happy news from our local tennis community. Our Mitchell Park 7.5 Women’s Combo team won the championship at last weekend’s Sectional tournament, and we’re all still very excited about it. The Women’s 7.5 Combo evening league is one of the largest and most competitive USTA leagues in Northern California, with more than 100 teams and over 2,000 players participating. Every match was hard-fought, and our players showed incredible teamwork and spirit throughout the season. We played in total 17 team matches and only lost one. In the elimination rounds, we went on to win against a strong San Francisco team in the semifinals and a Sunnyvale (we lost to Sunnyvale last August) team the finals to take the title. The organizing committee awarded us a commemorative championship plaque — I’ve attached a photo to share the moment. As a year-round USTA captain based at Mitchell Park, I truly appreciate how important reliable access to Palo Alto’s public courts has been for our teams. Having these courts available makes it possible for us to practice, build teams, and stay active in the community. We were hoping to ask if it might be possible to display our championship plaque at the Mitchell Park tennis courts. It would mean a lot to our players, and we hope it can also be a fun and encouraging sign for other Palo Alto tennis teams and players. For reference, I’ve also attached photos of similar displays at the Sunnyvale Municipal Tennis Center and Fremont Tennis Club. Warmly, Kathy Fan Captain Mitchell Park Women’s 7.5 Combo Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 214 Packet Pg. 357 of 426  Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 215 Packet Pg. 358 of 426  Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 216 Packet Pg. 359 of 426  From:Kathy Fan To:PlayingFields Cc:Howard, Adam; ParkRec Commission Subject:Re: A Small Display Request Date:Tuesday, February 3, 2026 4:35:14 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i Chase, see the attached screenshot for sectionals. Our team is Mitchell Park 7.5 combo. There are too many “Rinconada” teams, so I chose “Mitchell” trying to differentiate our team. And it was the fourth season I selected “Mitchell Park” as home base. Thank you!! This message needs your attention Some Recipients have never replied to this person. This is a personal email address. Mark Safe Report Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 217 Packet Pg. 360 of 426  On Tue, Feb 3, 2026 at 4:18 PM Kathy Fan <kathyxfan@gmail.com> wrote: Chase, you can call me anytime now until 5 pm. You have my number on the court reservation permit. Thank you! On Tue, Feb 3, 2026 at 3:51 PM PlayingFields <playingfields@paloalto.gov> wrote: Hi Kathy, So sorry I missed your calls. We currently have a water leak at Cubberley and needed to shutdown the entire water source at Cubberley and have been attending to that. If there is a good time to speak over the phone, please let me know and I can reach out to you directly. Thanks, Chase Hartmann Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 218 Packet Pg. 361 of 426  From: Kathy Fan <kathyxfan@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 3, 2026 3:03 PM To: PlayingFields <playingfields@PaloAlto.gov> Cc: Howard, Adam <Adam.Howard@paloalto.gov>; ParkRec Commission <parkrec.commission@PaloAlto.gov> Subject: Re: A Small Display Request CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Becautious of opening attachments and clicking on links. Chase, I called three times today, unluckily, I couldn’t get hold of you. I talked to Julia briefly who suggested me presenting this idea to Park and Recreational Commission Committee. So here below is my follow up email to Adam and PRC members. Actually, there have been quite a few occasions when teams with home bases in Palo Alto won sectional championships, but no plaques were ever offered to the City. In many of those cases, the teams simply used Palo Alto’s tennis courts, but did not truly consider Palo Alto to be their “home” base. For me, it is different. I live in Palo Alto, learned to play tennis at Mitchell Park, interviewed new players and organized team practices here. Most importantly, this is the first time in the Palo Alto history that a team captained by a Palo Alto resident with team roster met the residence requirement won a sectional championship! When I received the plaque, my very first thought was to give it to the city and display it at the Mitchell Park tennis courts. This request is not meant to showcase an individual or team achievement. Rather, it is a genuine expression of appreciation for the City’s continued support and for providing excellent public tennis facilities that made this achievement possible. I understand the concern that public facilities should not be used to highlight individual achievements. That said, similar to how schools display team trophies, cities often recognize the accomplishments of their residents. This is particularly meaningful when the city has supported the team by providing its home courts. Lastly, I am not aware of any City regulations or policies that prohibit this type of display. On the other hand, there are currently multiple advertising banners from the Palo Alto Pickleball Club displayed around Mitchell pickleball courts. Given this context, I did not anticipate that a small commemorative plaque would be an issue. Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 219 Packet Pg. 362 of 426  Attached are our team roster, the plaque display at Sunnyvale Municipal Tennis Center and PAPC banner at Mitchell park. Please kindly reconsider my request. Thanks and best regards, Kathy Fan Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 220 Packet Pg. 363 of 426  On Tue, Feb 3, 2026 at 9:22 AM PlayingFields <playingfields@paloalto.gov> wrote: Hi, Sure. You can give me a call at 650-329-2418. If I don’t answer, please leave a message. Thanks, Chase Hartmann From: Kathy Fan <kathyxfan@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 3, 2026 7:57 AM To: PlayingFields <playingfields@PaloAlto.gov> Cc: Howard, Adam <Adam.Howard@paloalto.gov> Subject: Re: A Small Display Request Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 221 Packet Pg. 364 of 426  CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Becautious of opening attachments and clicking on links. Chase, Thank you very much for your quick reply! May I give you a call today? I think I probably didn’t make myself clear enough in the email. Thank you! Kathy Fan On Mon, Feb 2, 2026 at 1:07 PM PlayingFields <playingfields@paloalto.gov> wrote: Hi Kathy, Congratulations to your team on winning the Mitchell Park 7.5 Women’s Combo Championship — what a great accomplishment! Unfortunately, because the tennis courts are public facilities, we’re unable to display the plaque. If we made an exception, we would need to allow the same for all other groups, which isn’t something we’re able to do. Thank you for your understanding, and congratulations again on a fantastic season. Chase Hartmann From: Kathy Fan <kathyxfan@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, January 30, 2026 1:48 PM To: Howard, Adam <Adam.Howard@paloalto.gov> Cc: ParkRec Commission <parkrec.commission@PaloAlto.gov>; PlayingFields <playingfields@PaloAlto.gov> Subject: A Small Display Request Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 222 Packet Pg. 365 of 426  CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Becautious of opening attachments and clicking on links. Dear Adam and Parks and Recreation Commission members, I wanted to share some happy news from our local tennis community. Our Mitchell Park 7.5 Women’s Combo team won the championship at last weekend’s Sectional tournament, and we’re all still very excited about it. The Women’s 7.5 Combo evening league is one of the largest and most competitive USTA leagues in Northern California, with more than 100 teams and over 2,000 players participating. Every match was hard-fought, and our players showed incredible teamwork and spirit throughout the season. We played in total 17 team matches and only lost one. In the elimination rounds, we went on to win against a strong San Francisco team in the semifinals and a Sunnyvale (we lost to Sunnyvale last August) team the finals to take the title. The organizing committee awarded us a commemorative championship plaque — I’ve attached a photo to share the moment. As a year-round USTA captain based at Mitchell Park, I truly appreciate how important reliable access to Palo Alto’s public courts has been for our teams. Having these courts available makes it possible for us to practice, build teams, and stay active in the community. We were hoping to ask if it might be possible to display our championship plaque at the Mitchell Park tennis courts. It would mean a lot to our players, and we hope it can also be a fun and encouraging sign for other Palo Alto tennis teams and players. For reference, I’ve also attached photos of similar displays at the Sunnyvale Municipal Tennis Center and Fremont Tennis Club. Warmly, Kathy Fan Captain Mitchell Park Women’s 7.5 Combo Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 223 Packet Pg. 366 of 426  Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 224 Packet Pg. 367 of 426  From:Kathy Fan To:PlayingFields Cc:Howard, Adam; ParkRec Commission Subject:Re: A Small Display Request Date:Tuesday, February 3, 2026 4:18:38 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i Chase, you can call me anytime now until 5 pm. You have my number on the court reservation permit. Thank you! On Tue, Feb 3, 2026 at 3:51 PM PlayingFields <playingfields@paloalto.gov> wrote: Hi Kathy, So sorry I missed your calls. We currently have a water leak at Cubberley and needed to shutdown the entire water source at Cubberley and have been attending to that. If there is a good time to speak over the phone, please let me know and I can reach out to you directly. Thanks, Chase Hartmann From: Kathy Fan <kathyxfan@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 3, 2026 3:03 PM To: PlayingFields <playingfields@PaloAlto.gov> Cc: Howard, Adam <Adam.Howard@paloalto.gov>; ParkRec Commission <parkrec.commission@PaloAlto.gov> Subject: Re: A Small Display Request CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious This message needs your attention Some Recipients have never replied to this person. This is a personal email address. Mark Safe Report Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 225 Packet Pg. 368 of 426  of opening attachments and clicking on links. Chase, I called three times today, unluckily, I couldn’t get hold of you. I talked to Julia briefly who suggested me presenting this idea to Park and Recreational Commission Committee. So here below is my follow up email to Adam and PRC members. Actually, there have been quite a few occasions when teams with home bases in Palo Alto won sectional championships, but no plaques were ever offered to the City. In many of those cases, the teams simply used Palo Alto’s tennis courts, but did not truly consider Palo Alto to be their “home” base. For me, it is different. I live in Palo Alto, learned to play tennis at Mitchell Park, interviewed new players and organized team practices here. Most importantly, this is the first time in the Palo Alto history that a team captained by a Palo Alto resident with team roster met the residence requirement won a sectional championship! When I received the plaque, my very first thought was to give it to the city and display it at the Mitchell Park tennis courts. This request is not meant to showcase an individual or team achievement. Rather, it is a genuine expression of appreciation for the City’s continued support and for providing excellent public tennis facilities that made this achievement possible. I understand the concern that public facilities should not be used to highlight individual achievements. That said, similar to how schools display team trophies, cities often recognize the accomplishments of their residents. This is particularly meaningful when the city has supported the team by providing its home courts. Lastly, I am not aware of any City regulations or policies that prohibit this type of display. On the other hand, there are currently multiple advertising banners from the Palo Alto Pickleball Club displayed around Mitchell pickleball courts. Given this context, I did not anticipate that a small commemorative plaque would be an issue. Attached are our team roster, the plaque display at Sunnyvale Municipal Tennis Center and PAPC banner at Mitchell park. Please kindly reconsider my request. Thanks and best regards, Kathy Fan Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 226 Packet Pg. 369 of 426  Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 227 Packet Pg. 370 of 426  On Tue, Feb 3, 2026 at 9:22 AM PlayingFields <playingfields@paloalto.gov> wrote: Hi, Sure. You can give me a call at 650-329-2418. If I don’t answer, please leave a message. Thanks, Chase Hartmann From: Kathy Fan <kathyxfan@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 3, 2026 7:57 AM To: PlayingFields <playingfields@PaloAlto.gov> Cc: Howard, Adam <Adam.Howard@paloalto.gov> Subject: Re: A Small Display Request CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Becautious of opening attachments and clicking on links. Chase, Thank you very much for your quick reply! Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 228 Packet Pg. 371 of 426  May I give you a call today? I think I probably didn’t make myself clear enough in the email. Thank you! Kathy Fan On Mon, Feb 2, 2026 at 1:07 PM PlayingFields <playingfields@paloalto.gov> wrote: Hi Kathy, Congratulations to your team on winning the Mitchell Park 7.5 Women’s Combo Championship — what a great accomplishment! Unfortunately, because the tennis courts are public facilities, we’re unable to display the plaque. If we made an exception, we would need to allow the same for all other groups, which isn’t something we’re able to do. Thank you for your understanding, and congratulations again on a fantastic season. Chase Hartmann From: Kathy Fan <kathyxfan@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, January 30, 2026 1:48 PM To: Howard, Adam <Adam.Howard@paloalto.gov> Cc: ParkRec Commission <parkrec.commission@PaloAlto.gov>; PlayingFields <playingfields@PaloAlto.gov> Subject: A Small Display Request CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Becautious of opening attachments and clicking on links. Dear Adam and Parks and Recreation Commission members, I wanted to share some happy news from our local tennis community. Our Mitchell Park 7.5 Women’s Combo team won the championship at last weekend’s Sectional Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 229 Packet Pg. 372 of 426  tournament, and we’re all still very excited about it. The Women’s 7.5 Combo evening league is one of the largest and most competitive USTA leagues in Northern California, with more than 100 teams and over 2,000 players participating. Every match was hard-fought, and our players showed incredible teamwork and spirit throughout the season. We played in total 17 team matches and only lost one. In the elimination rounds, we went on to win against a strong San Francisco team in the semifinals and a Sunnyvale (we lost to Sunnyvale last August) team the finals to take the title. The organizing committee awarded us a commemorative championship plaque — I’ve attached a photo to share the moment. As a year-round USTA captain based at Mitchell Park, I truly appreciate how important reliable access to Palo Alto’s public courts has been for our teams. Having these courts available makes it possible for us to practice, build teams, and stay active in the community. We were hoping to ask if it might be possible to display our championship plaque at the Mitchell Park tennis courts. It would mean a lot to our players, and we hope it can also be a fun and encouraging sign for other Palo Alto tennis teams and players. For reference, I’ve also attached photos of similar displays at the Sunnyvale Municipal Tennis Center and Fremont Tennis Club. Warmly, Kathy Fan Captain Mitchell Park Women’s 7.5 Combo Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 230 Packet Pg. 373 of 426  Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 231 Packet Pg. 374 of 426  From:PlayingFields To:Kathy Fan; PlayingFields Cc:Howard, Adam; ParkRec Commission Subject:RE: A Small Display Request Date:Tuesday, February 3, 2026 3:51:46 PM Hi Kathy, So sorry I missed your calls. We currently have a water leak at Cubberley and needed to shutdown the entire water source at Cubberley and have been attending to that. If there is a good time to speak over the phone, please let me know and I can reach out to you directly. Thanks, Chase Hartmann From: Kathy Fan <kathyxfan@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 3, 2026 3:03 PM To: PlayingFields <playingfields@PaloAlto.gov> Cc: Howard, Adam <Adam.Howard@paloalto.gov>; ParkRec Commission <parkrec.commission@PaloAlto.gov> Subject: Re: A Small Display Request CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links. Chase, I called three times today, unluckily, I couldn’t get hold of you. I talked to Julia briefly who suggested me presenting this idea to Park and Recreational Commission Committee. So here below is my follow up email to Adam and PRC members. Actually, there have been quite a few occasions when teams with home bases in Palo Alto won sectional championships, but no plaques were ever offered to the City. In many of those cases, the teams simply used Palo Alto’s tennis courts, but did not truly consider Palo Alto to be their “home” base. For me, it is different. I live in Palo Alto, learned to play tennis at Mitchell Park, interviewed new players and organized team practices here. Most importantly, this is the first time in the Palo Alto history that a team captained by a Palo Alto resident with team roster met the residence requirement won a sectional championship! When I received the plaque, my very first thought was to give it to the city and display it at the Mitchell Park tennis courts. This request is not meant to showcase an individual or team achievement. Rather, it is a genuine expression of appreciation for the City’s continued support and for providing excellent public tennis facilities that made this achievement possible. I understand the concern that public facilities should not be used to highlight individual achievements. That said, similar to how schools display team trophies, cities often recognize the accomplishments of their residents. This is particularly meaningful when the city has supported the team by providing its home courts. Lastly, I am not aware of any City regulations or policies that prohibit this type of display. On the other hand, there are currently multiple advertising banners from the Palo Alto Pickleball Club displayed around Mitchell pickleball courts. Given this context, I did not anticipate that a small commemorative plaque would be an issue. Attached are our team roster, the plaque display at Sunnyvale Municipal Tennis Center and PAPC banner at Mitchell park. Please kindly reconsider my request. Thanks and best regards, Kathy Fan Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 232 Packet Pg. 375 of 426  Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 233 Packet Pg. 376 of 426  On Tue, Feb 3, 2026 at 9:22 AM PlayingFields <playingfields@paloalto.gov> wrote: Hi, Sure. You can give me a call at 650-329-2418. If I don’t answer, please leave a message. Thanks, Chase Hartmann From: Kathy Fan <kathyxfan@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 3, 2026 7:57 AM To: PlayingFields <playingfields@PaloAlto.gov> Cc: Howard, Adam <Adam.Howard@paloalto.gov> Subject: Re: A Small Display Request CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links. Chase, Thank you very much for your quick reply! May I give you a call today? I think I probably didn’t make myself clear enough in the email. Thank you! Kathy Fan On Mon, Feb 2, 2026 at 1:07 PM PlayingFields <playingfields@paloalto.gov> wrote: Hi Kathy, Congratulations to your team on winning the Mitchell Park 7.5 Women’s Combo Championship — what a great accomplishment! Unfortunately, because the tennis courts are public facilities, we’re unable to display the plaque. If we made an exception, we would need to allow the same for all other groups, which isn’t something we’re able to do. Thank you for your understanding, and congratulations again on a fantastic season. Chase Hartmann From: Kathy Fan <kathyxfan@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, January 30, 2026 1:48 PM To: Howard, Adam <Adam.Howard@paloalto.gov> Cc: ParkRec Commission <parkrec.commission@PaloAlto.gov>; PlayingFields <playingfields@PaloAlto.gov> Subject: A Small Display Request CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links. Dear Adam and Parks and Recreation Commission members, I wanted to share some happy news from our local tennis community. Our Mitchell Park 7.5 Women’s Combo team won the championship at last weekend’s Sectional tournament, and we’re all still very excited about it. The Women’s 7.5 Combo evening league is one of the largest and most competitive USTA leagues in Northern California, with more than 100 teams and over 2,000 players participating. Every match was hard-fought, and our players showed incredible teamwork and spirit throughout the season. We played in total 17 team matches and only lost one. In the elimination rounds, we went on to win against a strong San Francisco team in the semifinals and a Sunnyvale (we lost to Sunnyvale last August) team the finals to take the title. The organizing committee awarded us a commemorative championship plaque — I’ve attached a photo to share the moment. As a year-round USTA captain based at Mitchell Park, I truly appreciate how important reliable access to Palo Alto’s public courts has been for our teams. Having these courts available makes it possible for us to practice, build teams, and stay active in the community. We were hoping to ask if it might be possible to display our championship plaque at the Mitchell Park tennis courts. It would mean a lot to our players, and we hope it can also be a fun and encouraging sign for other Palo Alto tennis teams and players. For reference, I’ve also attached photos of similar displays at the Sunnyvale Municipal Tennis Center and Fremont Tennis Club. Warmly, Kathy Fan Captain Mitchell Park Women’s 7.5 Combo Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 234 Packet Pg. 377 of 426  Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 235 Packet Pg. 378 of 426  Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 236 Packet Pg. 379 of 426  From:Kathy Fan To:PlayingFields Cc:Howard, Adam; ParkRec Commission Subject:Re: A Small Display Request Date:Tuesday, February 3, 2026 3:03:58 PM Attachments:IMG_6529.png CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i Chase, I called three times today, unluckily, I couldn’t get hold of you. I talked to Julia briefly who suggested me presenting this idea to Park and Recreational Commission Committee. So here below is my follow up email to Adam and PRC members. Actually, there have been quite a few occasions when teams with home bases in Palo Alto won sectional championships, but no plaques were ever offered to the City. In many of those cases, the teams simply used Palo Alto’s tennis courts, but did not truly consider Palo Alto to be their “home” base. For me, it is different. I live in Palo Alto, learned to play tennis at Mitchell Park, interviewed new players and organized team practices here. Most importantly, this is the first time in the Palo Alto history that a team captained by a Palo Alto resident with team roster met the residence requirement won a sectional championship! When I received the plaque, my very first thought was to give it to the city and display it at the Mitchell Park tennis courts. This request is not meant to showcase an individual or team achievement. Rather, it is a genuine expression of appreciation for the City’s continued support and for providing excellent public tennis facilities that made this achievement possible. I understand the concern that public facilities should not be used to highlight individual achievements. That said, similar to how schools display team trophies, cities often recognize the accomplishments of their residents. This is particularly meaningful when the city has supported the team by providing its home courts. Lastly, I am not aware of any City regulations or policies that prohibit this type of display. On the other hand, there are currently multiple advertising banners from the Palo Alto Pickleball Club displayed around Mitchell pickleball courts. Given this context, I did not anticipate that a small commemorative plaque would be an issue. Attached are our team roster, the plaque display at Sunnyvale Municipal Tennis Center and This message needs your attention Some Recipients have never replied to this person. This is a personal email address. Mark Safe Report Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 237 Packet Pg. 380 of 426  PAPC banner at Mitchell park. Please kindly reconsider my request. Thanks and best regards, Kathy Fan Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 238 Packet Pg. 381 of 426  On Tue, Feb 3, 2026 at 9:22 AM PlayingFields <playingfields@paloalto.gov> wrote: Hi, Sure. You can give me a call at 650-329-2418. If I don’t answer, please leave a message. Thanks, Chase Hartmann Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 239 Packet Pg. 382 of 426  From: Kathy Fan <kathyxfan@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 3, 2026 7:57 AM To: PlayingFields <playingfields@PaloAlto.gov> Cc: Howard, Adam <Adam.Howard@paloalto.gov> Subject: Re: A Small Display Request CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. Chase, Thank you very much for your quick reply! May I give you a call today? I think I probably didn’t make myself clear enough in the email. Thank you! Kathy Fan On Mon, Feb 2, 2026 at 1:07 PM PlayingFields <playingfields@paloalto.gov> wrote: Hi Kathy, Congratulations to your team on winning the Mitchell Park 7.5 Women’s Combo Championship — what a great accomplishment! Unfortunately, because the tennis courts are public facilities, we’re unable to display the plaque. If we made an exception, we would need to allow the same for all other groups, which isn’t something we’re able to do. Thank you for your understanding, and congratulations again on a fantastic season. Chase Hartmann Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 240 Packet Pg. 383 of 426  From: Kathy Fan <kathyxfan@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, January 30, 2026 1:48 PM To: Howard, Adam <Adam.Howard@paloalto.gov> Cc: ParkRec Commission <parkrec.commission@PaloAlto.gov>; PlayingFields <playingfields@PaloAlto.gov> Subject: A Small Display Request CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Becautious of opening attachments and clicking on links. Dear Adam and Parks and Recreation Commission members, I wanted to share some happy news from our local tennis community. Our Mitchell Park 7.5 Women’s Combo team won the championship at last weekend’s Sectional tournament, and we’re all still very excited about it. The Women’s 7.5 Combo evening league is one of the largest and most competitive USTA leagues in Northern California, with more than 100 teams and over 2,000 players participating. Every match was hard-fought, and our players showed incredible teamwork and spirit throughout the season. We played in total 17 team matches and only lost one. In the elimination rounds, we went on to win against a strong San Francisco team in the semifinals and a Sunnyvale (we lost to Sunnyvale last August) team the finals to take the title. The organizing committee awarded us a commemorative championship plaque — I’ve attached a photo to share the moment. As a year-round USTA captain based at Mitchell Park, I truly appreciate how important reliable access to Palo Alto’s public courts has been for our teams. Having these courts available makes it possible for us to practice, build teams, and stay active in the community. We were hoping to ask if it might be possible to display our championship plaque at the Mitchell Park tennis courts. It would mean a lot to our players, and we hope it can also be a fun and encouraging sign for other Palo Alto tennis teams and players. For reference, I’ve also attached photos of similar displays at the Sunnyvale Municipal Tennis Center and Fremont Tennis Club. Warmly, Kathy Fan Captain Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 241 Packet Pg. 384 of 426  Mitchell Park Women’s 7.5 Combo Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 242 Packet Pg. 385 of 426  Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 243 Packet Pg. 386 of 426  From:Light As Air Boats To:ParkRec Commission Be Ready For Spring Guests Date:Tuesday, February 3, 2026 8:04:20 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious ofopening attachments and clicking on links. i SHOP NOW Hi there, ​ Give Your Guests Special Days On The Water! These boats deliver! This message needs your attention No employee in your company has ever replied to this person. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 244 Packet Pg. 387 of 426  SEE 2026 CAMPS & PARKS CATALOG HERE Puffin Boats are easy to set up and operate, making them accessible for both beginners and seasoned boaters. Beautiful, inexpensive, and tough. You can even add a sail! Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 245 Packet Pg. 388 of 426  The sailing option includes a sail manufactured by North Sails and an aluminum mast and boom. Puffin uses the same solid oak in the seats to hand make the rudder and dagger board, which is also included in the package. SEE ALL PUFFIN BOATS HERE SEE ADVENTURE GLASS BOATS HERE Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 246 Packet Pg. 389 of 426  Our boats are built for fun! SEE 2026 CAMPS & PARKS CATALOG HERE For Questions Or a Quote, Call Dave Tel:864.367.6161 dave@lightasairboats.com Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 247 Packet Pg. 390 of 426  We don’t want to spam you. If you're no longer interested in enjoying adventures out on the water Unsubscribe here. Light As Air Boats 13801 Walsingham Rd. Suite A-116 Largo, Florida 33774 Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 248 Packet Pg. 391 of 426  From:Kathy Fan To:Howard, Adam Cc:ParkRec Commission; PlayingFields Subject:A Small Display Request Date:Friday, January 30, 2026 1:49:15 PM Attachments:IMG_6529.png CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i Dear Adam and Parks and Recreation Commission members, I wanted to share some happy news from our local tennis community. Our Mitchell Park 7.5 Women’s Combo team won the championship at last weekend’s Sectional tournament, and we’re all still very excited about it. The Women’s 7.5 Combo evening league is one of the largest and most competitive USTA leagues in Northern California, with more than 100 teams and over 2,000 players participating. Every match was hard-fought, and our players showed incredible teamwork and spirit throughout the season. We played in total 17 team matches and only lost one. In the elimination rounds, we went on to win against a strong San Francisco team in the semifinals and a Sunnyvale (we lost to Sunnyvale last August) team the finals to take the title. The organizing committee awarded us a commemorative championship plaque — I’ve attached a photo to share the moment. As a year-round USTA captain based at Mitchell Park, I truly appreciate how important reliable access to Palo Alto’s public courts has been for our teams. Having these courts available makes it possible for us to practice, build teams, and stay active in the community. We were hoping to ask if it might be possible to display our championship plaque at the Mitchell Park tennis courts. It would mean a lot to our players, and we hope it can also be a fun and encouraging sign for other Palo Alto tennis teams and players. For reference, I’ve also attached photos of similar displays at the Sunnyvale Municipal Tennis Center and Fremont Tennis Club. Warmly, Kathy Fan Captain This message needs your attention Some Recipients have never replied to this person. This is a personal email address. Mark Safe Report Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 249 Packet Pg. 392 of 426  Mitchell Park Women’s 7.5 Combo Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 250 Packet Pg. 393 of 426  Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 251 Packet Pg. 394 of 426  From:Naomi Roberts To:Robustelli, Sarah; Council, City; ParkRec Commission; nellis.freeman@gmail.com; O"Kane, Kristen; Prior, Christine; Lythcott-Haims, Julie; City Mgr Cc:rwr221954@gmail.com Subject:The Preservation and Protection of land of the William Frank Peoples Jr. Memorial Playground Date:Wednesday, January 28, 2026 10:56:17 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i Naomi Roberts 3067 Rafahi Way Hayward,CA. 94541 Cell phone: (510) 648-6263 January 27, 2026 Dear Mayor of Palo Alto, the Honorable Members of the Palo Alto City Council, the Palo Alto Park & Recreation Commission Staff Members, Re: Preservation and Protecting the land of the William Frank Peoples Jr. Memorial Playground After my recent online meeting with Mr. Nellis and Ms. Sarah of the Park and Recreation Department on January 16th, I am requesting that the area currently operating as parkland at Ventura be formally dedicated and named in honor of my brother, William F. Peoples Jr.. The park area has been there for 51 years. From my understanding the area discussed includes the Palo Alto Community Childcare Center, a Bike Safety Park, the Ventura Community Garden, Athletic Grass Field and my brothers' playground area. As I have continued to state and wanted to clarify my request does not include or impact the Palo Alto Community Childcare Center Facility. In April of 1974, the time of death he was a 6th grader at the Ventura Elementary School, now known as the Palo Alto Community Childcare Center. I am not asking for all the area of the community center to be included, our family is requesting to preserve and protect the land of the playground area. This message needs your attention Some Recipients have never replied to this person. This is a personal email address. Mark Safe Report Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 252 Packet Pg. 395 of 426  In the playground area there is a surrounding grass area adjacent to the park and a basketball area where his sign is located. Will we measured the area that was dedicated in June 14, 1974 and in April 16,1995, where the park equipment and structures has been located, where there is no changes with anything? Or do we remeasure a certain portion of the existing park area for the preservation and protection of land? My request is to preserve and protect the land and to recognize my brother through the dedication and naming of the park land area. For our family, the park dedicated in Williams' honor is not simply a parcel of land, it is a living memorial to a young life lost far too soon. I continue to believe my brothers’ memorial playground area will continue to be a place filled with love, joy, happiness and fun for many years to come. I wanted to attend the January 24th City Council Annual Retreat, at Mitchell Park Community Center, but was unable to attend, hopefully I can attend the upcoming event for the Parks and Recreation Annual Retreat on February 13, 2026. Thanks again your thoughtful consideration regarding our family's request. Sincerely, Naomi Roberts Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 253 Packet Pg. 396 of 426  From:Deborah Goldeen To:friends@friendsofpaparks.org; ParkRec Commission Cc:Lythcott-Haims, Julie Subject:Bathrooms at Eleanor Pardee Date:Wednesday, January 28, 2026 1:21:43 PM I live near Peers Park. Peers Park has great bathrooms - thank heavens! They lock at night. I’ve lived in this neighborhood for FORTY years. To my knowledge, we have had ZERO problems associated with these bathrooms. With Rinconada, there are toilets at the Jr Museum, the Chidlrens library and at the pool. With Mithchell Park, there are toilets at the library. The last time I took my five year-old grand daughter to Johnson Park, which she loves, we had to make a made dash across town to get her back home to a toilet (there are no public facilities in downtown and it was a weekend so city hall was closed) before she peed her pants. The residents who don’t want Eleanor Pardee to have toilets simply want Eleanor Pardee to be for the exclusive use of people who live close by to it. Not that the same rule applies to them. They drive to Peers and Mitchell to use the dog park or tennis courts or pickle ball courts or…. If they want to live in an exclusive, gated community, they should move to one. That or the city should stop subsidizing that park - no grass mowing, no trash can emptying, no watering, no policing of park, etc… The fact that Eleanor Pardee didn’t get toilets years ago is beyond me. Deborah Goldeen, Birch St., 94306 Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 254 Packet Pg. 397 of 426  From:Postmaster To:ParkRec Commission Subject:You have new held messages Date:Wednesday, January 28, 2026 12:17:09 PM Logo You have new held messages You can release all of your held messages and permit or block future emails from the senders, or manage messages individually. Release all Permit all Block all You can also manage held messages in your Personal Portal. Spam Policy johnajacobs@comcast.net Checking in 2026-01-28 07:29 Release Permit Block Spam Policy johnajacobs@comcast.net Checking in 2026-01-28 07:45 Release Permit Block Release all Permit all Block all © 2019 Mimecast Services Limited. Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 255 Packet Pg. 398 of 426  From:Jenny Lewis To:ParkRec Commission Subject:2026 Outdoor Fitness Equipment Catalog Date:Wednesday, January 28, 2026 10:13:43 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious ofopening attachments and clicking on links. i Outdoor-Fit banner Outdoor Fitness Equipment Catalog This message needs your attention You've never replied to this person. Mark Safe Report Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 256 Packet Pg. 399 of 426  Download your free copy of Outdoor-Fit's 2026 catalog, a showcase of our 90 outdoor gym products, thoughtfully designed, engineered, and manufactured to meet the highest ASTM safety and durability standards and based on the biomechanics of real commercial indoor fitness equipment. This is real outdoor gym equipment for real results. Please contact us if you have any questions or would like more information about our outdoor fitness equipment: https://outdoor-fit.com/contact-us Download Catalog Here Outdoor-Fit catalog Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 257 Packet Pg. 400 of 426  Outdoor-Fit Exercise Systems Inc., 95 Simmonds Drive, Dartmouth, NS B3B 1N7, 1-877-760- 6337 Unsubscribe Manage preferences Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 258 Packet Pg. 401 of 426  From:Jake Gentile To:ParkRec Commission Subject:Re: Palo Alto Parks and Recreation / Turf Tank - demo Date:Tuesday, January 27, 2026 8:16:08 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links. Hey , I’m still hoping to get in touch with the right person who oversees field maintenance at Palo Alto Parks and Recreation. Is there someone else I should be speaking with? Thank you, Jake Gentile Business Development Manager Turf Tank 1110 Allgood Industrial Ct, Marietta, GA 30066 On Thu, January 15, 2026 1:04 PM, Jake Gentile <jake.g@turftankinfo.com> [jake.g@turftankinfo.com]> wrote: > Hi , > > Just checking in to see if you had a chance to read my last email. > > Thanks, > > Jake Gentile > Business Development Manager > Turf Tank > 1110 Allgood Industrial Ct, Marietta, GA 30066 > On Mon, January 12, 2026 1:03 PM, Jake Gentile <jake.g@turftankinfo.com> > [jake.g@turftankinfo.com]> wrote: > > > Hi , I won't take much of your time in case you're having a busy Monday. > > > > I wanted to reach out as many park & rec departments in California are switching to robotic field marking to save hours of manual work while reducing costs. It’s quick, precise, and allows your team for other priorities. > > > > I was wondering if Palo Alto Parks and Recreation would be interested in a quick demo to see how that can be done? > > > > Best, Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 259 Packet Pg. 402 of 426  > > > > Jake Gentile > > Business Development Manager > > Turf Tank > > 1110 Allgood Industrial Ct, Marietta, GA 30066 > > > > Should you prefer not to receive updates from me, just reply "opt-out." > > Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 260 Packet Pg. 403 of 426  From:Jake Gentile To:ParkRec Commission Subject:Re: Palo Alto Parks and Recreation / Turf Tank - demo Date:Tuesday, January 27, 2026 8:16:08 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links. Hey , I’m making one last attempt to reach out, as I’m still looking for the best person to discuss how Palo Alto Parks and Recreation can improve field maintenance and reduce expenses and labor. If now isn’t a good time, would it be better if I followed up again in a couple of weeks? Best, Jake Gentile Business Development Manager Turf Tank 1110 Allgood Industrial Ct, Marietta, GA 30066 On Sun, January 18, 2026 1:03 PM, Jake Gentile <jake.g@turftankinfo.com> [jake.g@turftankinfo.com]> wrote: > Hey , > > I’m still hoping to get in touch with the right person who oversees field maintenance at Palo Alto Parks and Recreation. > > Is there someone else I should be speaking with? > > Thank you, > > Jake Gentile > Business Development Manager > Turf Tank > 1110 Allgood Industrial Ct, Marietta, GA 30066 > > On Thu, January 15, 2026 1:04 PM, Jake Gentile <jake.g@turftankinfo.com> > [jake.g@turftankinfo.com]> wrote: > > > Hi , > > > > Just checking in to see if you had a chance to read my last email. > > > > Thanks, > > Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 261 Packet Pg. 404 of 426  > > Jake Gentile > > Business Development Manager > > Turf Tank > > 1110 Allgood Industrial Ct, Marietta, GA 30066 > > On Mon, January 12, 2026 1:03 PM, Jake Gentile <jake.g@turftankinfo.com> > > [jake.g@turftankinfo.com]> wrote: > > > > > Hi , I won't take much of your time in case you're having a busy Monday. > > > > > > I wanted to reach out as many park & rec departments in California are switching to robotic field marking to save hours of manual work while reducing costs. It’s quick, precise, and allows your team for other priorities. > > > > > > I was wondering if Palo Alto Parks and Recreation would be interested in a quick demo to see how that can be done? > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > Jake Gentile > > > Business Development Manager > > > Turf Tank > > > 1110 Allgood Industrial Ct, Marietta, GA 30066 > > > > > > Should you prefer not to receive updates from me, just reply "opt-out." > > > Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 262 Packet Pg. 405 of 426  From:Jake Gentile To:ParkRec Commission Subject:Re: Palo Alto Parks and Recreation / Turf Tank - demo Date:Tuesday, January 27, 2026 8:16:08 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links. Hi , Just checking in to see if you had a chance to read my last email. Thanks, Jake Gentile Business Development Manager Turf Tank 1110 Allgood Industrial Ct, Marietta, GA 30066 On Mon, January 12, 2026 1:03 PM, Jake Gentile <jake.g@turftankinfo.com> [jake.g@turftankinfo.com]> wrote: > Hi , I won't take much of your time in case you're having a busy Monday. > > I wanted to reach out as many park & rec departments in California are switching to robotic field marking to save hours of manual work while reducing costs. It’s quick, precise, and allows your team for other priorities. > > I was wondering if Palo Alto Parks and Recreation would be interested in a quick demo to see how that can be done? > > Best, > > Jake Gentile > Business Development Manager > Turf Tank > 1110 Allgood Industrial Ct, Marietta, GA 30066 > > Should you prefer not to receive updates from me, just reply "opt-out." > Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 263 Packet Pg. 406 of 426  From:Office of Supervisor Otto Lee To:ParkRec Commission Subject:My Statement on Minneapolis Date:Tuesday, January 27, 2026 11:53:50 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious ofopening attachments and clicking on links. i Dear Friends and Neighbors, This past Sunday over breakfast, I asked my daughters: "Who is Pretti and Good?" Both said, almost immediately in unison, "Oh, that's me." So I had to explain, Pretti and Good were not adjectives -- they were people. Extraordinary names we should never forget. Alex Pretti and Renee Good were two 37-year- old American citizens who were gunned down by ICE agents in broad daylight in Minneapolis two weeks apart. Both were horrifically labeled as "domestic terrorists." But the truth tells a very different story. This message needs your attention You've never replied to this person. Mark Safe Report Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 264 Packet Pg. 407 of 426  Alex Pretti was an ICU nurse who spent his days saving the lives of our veterans at a VA hospital. Renee Nicole Good was a loving mother, deeply cherished by her family and friends. Thanks to the brave bystanders who recorded these killings from multiple angles on their cell phones, the truth is now visible to the world, directly contradicting what DHS officials initially claimed or attempted to conceal. I will not go frame by frame today, but I will urge you to watch the videos yourselves, and I must warn you -- what you will see is cruel, horrific, and profoundly un-American. And these were not isolated incidents. In Minneapolis: A 57-year-old U.S. citizen was dragged out of his home wearing only boxers and Crocs in freezing temperatures, after ICE agents ignored his citizenship documents inside his home. A U.S. Army veteran was detained and interrogated for eight hours. A five-year-old child was taken by ICE agents and flown to a detention facility in Texas. A woman was arrested and publicly photographed -- her image later manipulated using AI to make her appear hysterical. Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 265 Packet Pg. 408 of 426  These acts were so egregious that even Republican senators publicly condemned them. Even President Trump acknowledged these tragedies. Yesterday, he removed the Minneapolis ICE commander, Mr. Bovino, and barred DHS Secretary Krisi Noem from visiting the city. As the Super Bowl will be coming to our County soon, ICE already said they will be here. But let me be clear -- no one is above the law. There is no absolute immunity, and there is no license to kill. If anyone comes into our County masked, spreading terror, breaking laws, or threatening our residents, they will be arrested by our Sheriff's deputies and police officers and held accountable under the full force of federal and state law, before our courts and judges. When we hear the term "domestic terrorists," I ask you to consider this: Who are the aggressive masked gunmen stopping cars, breaking down doors, abducting our neighbors, covering up crime scenes, spreading lies, and terrorizing communities across American cities? As I told my daughters: Remember Alex Pretti and Renee Good. These were brave Americans who stood up for the most vulnerable among us, and who exercised their constitutional rights to protect our freedom and the rule of law. Honor their sacrifice; tell their stories. Teach them to our next generation. Do not allow lies, politics, or internet memes to erase their courage and sacrifice. We must demand a full independent investigation into their tragedies, so that those responsible are prosecuted and held accountable. There are tragedies like these happening not only in Minneapolis, but across our country. Below are the names of more than 40 people who have died in ICE custody or were killed by ICE agents since 2025. Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 266 Packet Pg. 409 of 426  I ask that you take a moment of silence to honor these victims today, and make sure to share their names and bravery with your loved ones. Sincerely, Otto Lee Board President Santa Clara County Supervisor, District 3 70 West Hedding 10th Floor San Jose, CA 95110 (408) 299-5030 Email Supervisor Lee District 3 Website Unsubscribe from future updates Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 267 Packet Pg. 410 of 426  From:Light As Air Boats To:ParkRec Commission What"s New for Camps, Parks And Resort Waterfronts ‍♂ Date:Tuesday, January 27, 2026 9:04:04 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of openingattachments and clicking on links. i SHOP NOW Hi there, Splashing into 2026 with big-time excitement for camps, parks, yachts, and resorts. This message needs your attention No employee in your company has ever replied to this person. The subject has non-English characters. Mark Safe Report Powered by Mimecast Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 268 Packet Pg. 411 of 426  2026 Watersports Catalog for Camps & Parks Check out what's hot in 2026! For Questions & Quotes, Call Andi 706.619.6670 andi@lightasairboats.com SEE ALL OF OUR CATALOGS HERE Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 269 Packet Pg. 412 of 426  We don’t want to spam you. If you're no longer interested in enjoying adventures out on the water Unsubscribe here. Light As Air Boats 13801 Walsingham Rd. Suite A-116 Largo, Florida 33774 Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 270 Packet Pg. 413 of 426  From:Claire E To:ParkRec Commission Subject:Comments for January 27, 2026 meeting Date:Monday, January 26, 2026 2:42:42 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i January 26th, 2026 Subject: Public Comment for Palo Alto City Council meeting on 1/27/2026, item #5: Review of projects to be proposed in the Fiscal Year 2027-2031 Capital Improvement Program Plan Dear Parks and Recreation Commission Chair Nellis Freeman and Commissioners: I am sharing with you comments I made at the City Council retreat on January 24th that relate to Palo Alto parks. In those comments, I asked that the council consider adding two new objectives to the Climate Action and Adaptation and Natural Environment Protection priority for 2026 that would also help meet the Public Safety Wellness and Belonging priority. These two objectives are: Develop and implement a natural grass pilot project with the goal of showing that well designed, installed and maintained grass fields can substantially extend the play time, making further plastic grass fields unnecessary. This should be a Group 1, first quarter priority so planning and implementation can happen as soon as possible. Reduce microplastic pollution and the exposure of the public and environment to forever chemicals through public education, development of thresholds for PFAS and a moratorium on landscape use of plastic surfaces. This objective could include these efforts: Reject the turf study officially so that it is not quoted by other cities, Ensure El Camino Park’s synthetic field will be the last one to be installed in Palo Alto. Develop and adopt an ordinance placing a moratorium on installation of plastic surfaces in landscaping including in residential, commercial, and city parks. This message needs your attention This is a personal email address. This is their first email to you. Mark Safe Report Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 271 Packet Pg. 414 of 426  Develop an educational program for the public about the hazards of plastic surfaces. Determine a threshold for acceptable levels of PFAS as “PFAS free” is not currently possible to demonstrate. Ensure the El Camino turf is analyzed for total fluorine and not individual PFAS compounds. Ask for chain of custody documents from the waste haulers and handlers to learn and share with the public the fate of the waste turf from El Camino Park. Thank you again for your time and the hard work you do for our community, Claire Elliott Ventura Neighborhood of Palo Alto Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 272 Packet Pg. 415 of 426  From:Laura Fay To:ParkRec Commission Subject:Public Comment for Palo Alto Parks & Rec Commission Mtg on 1/27/2026, item #5: Review of projects to be proposed in the Fiscal Year 2027-2031 Capital Improvement Program Plan Date:Monday, January 26, 2026 12:08:11 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i Dear Parks and Recreation Commission Chair Nellis Freeman and Commissioners: As you review the proposed projects, please forego plastic surfacing outdoors in landscapes, on playgrounds, in dog parks, in community gathering areas and on sports fields where plastic is demonstrably not needed, for example on golf courses or baseball fields (or even on soccer fields). There are ready biodiverse and natural alternatives for all places mentioned above. Unmentioned however, in the Fiscal Year 2027-2031 Capital Improvement Program Plan are any alternatives for outdoor plastic surfacing. Why is that? Are these plans in full alignment with Palo Altos' stated environmental goals? Please reject synthetic surfaces, for the health of the city's citizens and the environment. Sincerely, Laura Fay This message needs your attention This is a personal email address. This is their first email to you. Mark Safe Report Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 273 Packet Pg. 416 of 426  From:Susan Hinton To:ParkRec Commission Subject:Public Comment for item #5, 1/27/2026, Palo Alto Parks & Recreation Committee meeting Date:Sunday, January 25, 2026 5:45:48 PM Attachments:20260127_PaloAlto-ParksRecCommission.pdf CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i This message needs your attention This is a personal email address. Mark Safe Report Subject: Public Comment for Palo Alto City Council meeting on 1/27/2026, item #5: Review of projects to be proposed in the Fiscal Year 2027-2031 Capital Improvement Program Plan Dear Parks and Recreation Commission Chair Nellis Freeman and Commissioners: Given Palo Alto’s stated environmental goals, one expects the City of Palo Alto to forego plastic surfacing outdoors in landscapes, on playgrounds, in dog parks, in community gathering areas and on sports fields where plastic is demonstrably not needed, for example on golf courses or baseball fields (or eventually on soccer fields). There are ready biodiverse and natural alternatives for all places mentioned above. Unmentioned, however, in the Fiscal Year 2027-2031 Capital Improvement Program Plan are any alternatives for outdoor plastic surfacing. Please read the attached PDF letter and accept it into the public record. Sincerely, Susan Hinton Chair, Plastic Pollution Prevention Committee Sierra Club Loma Prieta Chapter https://www.sierraclub.org/loma-prieta/plastic-pollution-prevention Powered by Mimecast Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 274 Packet Pg. 417 of 426  From:Neil P. Osnato To:Clerk, City; UAC; Planning Commission; Shikada, Ed Subject:Independent, Procurement-Safe Diagnostic on Municipal Lighting Cost & Demand Exposure Date:Sunday, January 25, 2026 9:13:39 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i Dear City Leadership Team, I am writing to introduce a small, procurement-safe analytical effort that may be relevant to your ongoing responsibilities around operating costs, utility demand, and long-term infrastructure exposure. I work with an independent framework called IDEA — Infrastructure Degradation & Economics Analytics. IDEA is designed as a vendor-neutral, audit-style diagnostic to help municipalities understand whether lighting systems — both outdoor (street and area lighting) and indoor (public buildings and facilities) — are quietly driving higher operating costs and continuous electrical demand than is visible through budgets, utility invoices, or asset records. This work is strictly diagnostic. It does not: recommend vendors or technologies initiate procurement or capital projects replace existing audits or utility reviews Instead, IDEA focuses on identifying: asset inventory or classification inconsistencies structural cost distortion within lighting portfolios “always-on” electrical demand attributable to lighting long-term operating exposure that is not apparent in annual budget cycles Across many jurisdictions, streetlighting is often the most straightforward analytical starting point, but the larger and more persistent exposure frequently emerges in indoor This message needs your attention No employee in your company has ever replied to this person. This is a personal email address. Mark Safe Report Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 275 Packet Pg. 418 of 426  lighting across public facilities — administrative buildings, public safety facilities, garages, and other continuously occupied assets where load is constant. The framework draws on established public-sector audit logic, academic work in infrastructure economics, and patterns observed in well-documented municipal lighting audits. In parallel, I am currently collaborating with three federal government auditors on related analytical matters, which has informed the rigor, documentation standards, and neutrality of this approach. If useful, I would welcome guidance on whether a short, limited introductory conversation would be appropriate to determine if this type of diagnostic could be helpful for your organization, or to identify the most appropriate internal point of contact. Thank you for your time and consideration. Respectfully, Neil P. Osnato Σ VC Fund | Empowering Tangible Innovation | New Jersey, USA 609-464-9055 Zoom meeting upon request "If it is not right do not do it, if it is not true, do not say it." ~Marcus Aurelius Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 276 Packet Pg. 419 of 426  From:Chris Cummings To:Evan Reade Cc:Veenker, Vicki; Stone, Greer; Burt, Patrick; Reckdahl, Keith; Lauing, Ed; Lu, George; Lythcott-Haims, Julie; Council, City; Shikada, Ed; Robustelli, Sarah; Reifschneider, James; ParkRec Commission Subject:Re: Eleanor Pardee Park restroom project Date:Saturday, January 24, 2026 6:48:51 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i Dear All, I echo Mr. Reade's opposition to this project, both on budget grounds as well as over the need, as I have stated in multiple council and parks commissions meetings. A simple, sensible suggestion that was made by many of us approximately 1 year ago and never followed up on is to produce an legitimate survey. Right now, proponents point to survey results from a 100% flawed survey -- no restriction on who could take it, no requirement to be a palo alto resident, and no restriction on how many times it could be taken and submitted. I believe if any of you stepped back 2 feet, you would see this is absolutely absurd. Time to level up and make a sensible economic decision for Palo Alto. Best, Chris Cummings 870 Sharon Ct, Palo Alto, CA 94301 On Sat, Jan 24, 2026 at 1:52 PM Evan Reade <evanreade@aol.com> wrote: Dear Madam Mayor, Dear City Council Members: Following up on my letters to you and the Parks and Rec Commission dated March 31, 2025, May 15, 2025, September 3, 2025, my appearances before both the Council and the Commission, and separate discussions I have had with several of you: HEADLINE: "Palo Alto faces lean budget years. Staff predict total deficit of $80M+ over 10 years." (Palo Alto Weekly, January 23, 2026, Page 5.) This message needs your attention This is a personal email address. This is their first email to your company. Mark Safe Report Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 277 Packet Pg. 420 of 426  QUESTION: Given the need to make cuts, why have you approved (or are in the process of approving) the expenditure of an estimated $1 million on the construction of a restroom that is not needed and that will require continued regular expenditures indefinitely to maintain? I am resending below a summary of why I continue to oppose this unnecessary and wasteful so-called "capital improvement project." BOTTOM LINE UP FRONT - Why I continue to oppose constructing restrooms at Eleanor Pardee Park: History - 100+ years without one. Why now? Impact on Park - Restrooms will change this neighborhood park into a regional park. Impact on Neighborhood - Increased traffic, parking, noise, trash. Cost - $1M to design and install?! And how much to maintain on a daily basis? Public Safety - I used to be a police officer in this city. Unsupervised public restrooms result in vandalism, attract the unhoused, and worse. Process - The park's neighbors have not been adequately consulted. The so- called "survey" was flawed. Current History - Current park restrooms are often a mess to the point of being unusable. Go take a look sometime. Recent Past History - I'd like to know what became of the JDDecaux restrooms downtown. Why are they gone? Could it be due to the cost and public safety issues mentioned above? Not needed - Rinconada Park, only four short blocks away, has TWO restrooms, plus the following public city-owned restrooms within yards: Junior Museum, Children's Library, Children's Theatre, Lucie Stern Community Center, Rinconada Pool, Art Center, Main Library. Sincerely, Evan G. Reade Sharon Ct. Palo Alto cc: City Manager Ed Shikada Community Services, Sarah Robustelli Acting Chief of Police James Reifschneider Parks and Rec Commission Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 278 Packet Pg. 421 of 426  From:Evan Reade To:Veenker, Vicki; Stone, Greer; Burt, Patrick; Reckdahl, Keith; Lauing, Ed; Lu, George; Lythcott-Haims, Julie; Council, City Cc:Shikada, Ed; Robustelli, Sarah; Reifschneider, James; ParkRec Commission Subject:Eleanor Pardee Park restroom project Date:Saturday, January 24, 2026 1:52:13 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautiousof opening attachments and clicking on links. i Dear Madam Mayor, Dear City Council Members: Following up on my letters to you and the Parks and Rec Commission dated March 31, 2025, May 15, 2025, September 3, 2025, my appearances before both the Council and the Commission, and separate discussions I have had with several of you: HEADLINE: "Palo Alto faces lean budget years. Staff predict total deficit of $80M+ over 10 years." (Palo Alto Weekly, January 23, 2026, Page 5.) QUESTION: Given the need to make cuts, why have you approved (or are in the process of approving) the expenditure of an estimated $1 million on the construction of a restroom that is not needed and that will require continued regular expenditures indefinitely to maintain? I am resending below a summary of why I continue to oppose this unnecessary and wasteful so-called "capital improvement project." BOTTOM LINE UP FRONT - Why I continue to oppose constructing restrooms at Eleanor Pardee Park: History - 100+ years without one. Why now? Impact on Park - Restrooms will change this neighborhood park into a regional park. Impact on Neighborhood - Increased traffic, parking, noise, trash. Cost - $1M to design and install?! And how much to maintain on a daily basis? Public Safety - I used to be a police officer in this city. Unsupervised public restrooms result in vandalism, attract the unhoused, and worse. Process - The park's neighbors have not been adequately consulted. The so- called "survey" was flawed. Current History - Current park restrooms are often a mess to the point of being unusable. Go take a look sometime. Recent Past History - I'd like to know what became of the JDDecaux restrooms This message needs your attention Some Recipients have never replied to this person. This is a personal email address. Mark Safe Report Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 279 Packet Pg. 422 of 426  downtown. Why are they gone? Could it be due to the cost and public safety issues mentioned above? Not needed - Rinconada Park, only four short blocks away, has TWO restrooms, plus the following public city-owned restrooms within yards: Junior Museum, Children's Library, Children's Theatre, Lucie Stern Community Center, Rinconada Pool, Art Center, Main Library. Sincerely, Evan G. Reade Sharon Ct. Palo Alto cc: City Manager Ed Shikada Community Services, Sarah Robustelli Acting Chief of Police James Reifschneider Parks and Rec Commission Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 280 Packet Pg. 423 of 426  From:Office of Supervisor Otto Lee To:ParkRec Commission Subject:Save the Date! State of the County 2026, March 13 Date:Friday, January 23, 2026 11:10:35 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious ofopening attachments and clicking on links. i Dear Friends and Neighbors, We are so pleased to invite you to the upcoming 2026 State of the County address, taking place on Friday, March 13, 2026, beginning at 5:45 PM at the Board Chambers located at 70 West Hedding Street, San Jose, CA 95110. The event will feature live performances, as well as a special awards ceremony to recognize local heroes, nominated by each of our five Board offices. These awards honor outstanding residents and partners who have demonstrated exceptional service, leadership, and meaningful impact in their communities. I will also deliver this year’s address, This message needs your attention You've never replied to this person. Mark Safe Report Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 281 Packet Pg. 424 of 426  highlighting the County’s accomplishments from 2025 and our priorities and plans for 2026. The address will be livestreamed on the County’s YouTube channel. 2026 State of the County Friday, March 13, 2026⏰5:45 PM Board Chambers -- 70 W. Hedding St., San Jose, CA RSVP to attend! Please make sure to share this invitation widely with your networks, and please RSVP in advance. Feel free to contact our office at 408- 299-5030 with any questions. We look forward to seeing you on March 13 -- thank you! Sincerely, Otto Lee Board President Santa Clara County Supervisor, District 3 Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 282 Packet Pg. 425 of 426  70 West Hedding 10th Floor San Jose, CA 95110 (408) 299-5030 Email Supervisor Lee District 3 Website Unsubscribe from future updates Item A public comment 2.23.26 3.18.26 Item A: Staff Report Pg. 283 Packet Pg. 426 of 426