HomeMy WebLinkAbout2026-01-24 City Council Agenda PacketCITY COUNCIL
Special Meeting
Saturday, January 24, 2026
Mitchell Park Community Center
El Palo Alto Room & Hybrid
9:00 AM
Amended Agenda
Amended agenda items appear below in RED
Palo Alto City Council meetings will be held as “hybrid” meetings with the option to attend by
teleconference or in person. Information on how the public may observe and participate in the
meeting is located at the end of the agenda. The meeting will be broadcast on Cable TV Channel
26, live on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/c/cityofpaloalto, and streamed to Midpen Media
Center https://midpenmedia.org.
VIRTUAL PARTICIPATION CLICK HERE TO JOIN (https://cityofpaloalto.zoom.us/j/362027238)
Meeting ID: 362 027 238 Phone:1(669)900-6833
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Public Comment will be accepted both in person and via Zoom for up to three minutes or an
amount of time determined by the Chair. Requests to speak will be taken until 5 minutes after
the staff’s presentation or as determined by the Chair. Written public comments can be
submitted in advance to city.council@PaloAlto.gov and will be provided to the Council and
available for inspection on the City’s website. Please clearly indicate which agenda item you are
referencing in your subject line. Multiple individuals who wish to speak on the same item may
designate a spokesperson. Spokespersons must be representing five or more verified individuals
who are present either in person or via zoom. Spokespeople will be allowed up to 10 minutes,
at the discretion of the presiding officer. Speaking time may be reduced if the presiding officer
reduces the speaking time for individual speakers.
PowerPoints, videos, or other media to be presented during public comment are accepted only
by email to city.clerk@PaloAlto.gov at least 24 hours prior to the meeting. Once received, the
Clerk will have them shared at public comment for the specified item. To uphold strong
cybersecurity management practices, USB’s or other physical electronic storage devices are not
accepted. Signs and symbolic materials less than 2 feet by 3 feet are permitted provided that:
(1) sticks, posts, poles or similar/other type of handle objects are strictly prohibited; (2) the
items do not create a facility, fire, or safety hazard; and (3) persons with such items remain
seated when displaying them and must not raise the items above shoulder level, obstruct the
view or passage of other attendees, or otherwise disturb the business of the meeting.
TIME ESTIMATES
Listed times are estimates only and are subject to change at any time, including while the
meeting is in progress. The Council reserves the right to use more or less time on any item, to
change the order of items and/or to continue items to another meeting. Particular items may be
heard before or after the time estimated on the agenda. This may occur in order to best manage
the time at a meeting or to adapt to the participation of the public.
1 January 24, 2026
Materials submitted after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection at www.paloalto.gov/agendas.
CALL TO ORDER
2026 ANNUAL COUNCIL RETREAT PROGRAM
1.Overview and orientation to retreat focus
City Council Retreat: Discussion and Selection of the 2026 City Council Priorities and Ad
Hoc Committees. CEQA Status -- Not a Project. Title Updated, Late Packet Report added
A.Public Comment
Members of the public may speak to any item NOT on the agenda or any item on the
2026 Council Retreat Program. 1-3 minutes depending on number of speakers. Public
Comment is limited to 30 minutes. Additional public comments, if any, will be heard at
the end of the agenda.
B.Discussion and selection of Priorities and methods to prioritize and ensure progress
•Key inputs, including Council values, 2025 priorities, and staff draft 2026 objectives
•Discussion of terminology and process for selecting priorities
•Selection of 2026 priorities
Title Updated
C.Discussion of Council ad hoc committees and other strategies to achieve goals
D.Next Steps
ADJOURNMENT
OTHER INFORMATION
Public Comment Letters
Schedule of Meetings
2 January 24, 2026
Materials submitted after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection at www.paloalto.gov/agendas.
PUBLIC COMMENT INSTRUCTIONS
Members of the Public may provide public comments to teleconference meetings via email,
teleconference, or by phone.
1.Written public comments may be submitted by email to city.council@PaloAlto.gov.
2.For in person public comments please complete a speaker request card located on the
table at the entrance to the Council Chambers and deliver it to the Clerk prior to
discussion of the item.
3.Spoken public comments for agendized items using a computer or smart phone will be
accepted through the teleconference meeting. To address the Council, click on the link
below to access a Zoom-based meeting. Please read the following instructions carefully.
◦You may download the Zoom client or connect to the meeting in- browser. If using
your browser, make sure you are using a current, up-to-date browser: Chrome 30 ,
Firefox 27 , Microsoft Edge 12 , Safari 7 . Certain functionality may be disabled in
older browsers including Internet Explorer. Or download the Zoom application onto
your smart phone from the Apple App Store or Google Play Store and enter in the
Meeting ID below.
◦You may be asked to enter an email address and name. We request that you
identify yourself by name as this will be visible online and will be used to notify you
that it is your turn to speak.
◦When you wish to speak on an Agenda Item, click on “raise hand.” The Clerk will
activate and unmute speakers in turn. Speakers will be notified shortly before they
are called to speak.
◦When called, please limit your remarks to the time limit allotted. A timer will be
shown on the computer to help keep track of your comments.
4.Spoken public comments for agendized items using a phone use the telephone number
listed below. When you wish to speak on an agenda item hit *9 on your phone so we
know that you wish to speak. You will be asked to provide your first and last name before
addressing the Council. You will be advised how long you have to speak. When called
please limit your remarks to the agenda item and time limit allotted.
CLICK HERE TO JOIN Meeting ID: 362-027-238 Phone: 1-669-900-6833
Americans with Disability Act (ADA) It is the policy of the City of Palo Alto to offer its public
programs, services and meetings in a manner that is readily accessible to all. Persons with
disabilities who require materials in an appropriate alternative format or who require auxiliary
aids to access City meetings, programs, or services may contact the City’s ADA Coordinator at
(650) 329-2550 (voice) or by emailing ada@PaloAlto.gov. Requests for assistance or
accommodations must be submitted at least 24 hours in advance of the meeting, program, or
service.
3 January 24, 2026
Materials submitted after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection at www.paloalto.gov/agendas.
California Government Code §84308, commonly referred to as the "Levine Act," prohibits an
elected official of a local government agency from participating in a proceeding involving a
license, permit, or other entitlement for use if the official received a campaign contribution
exceeding $500 from a party or participant, including their agents, to the proceeding within the
last 12 months. A “license, permit, or other entitlement for use” includes most land use and
planning approvals and the approval of contracts that are not subject to lowest responsible bid
procedures and have a value over $50,000. A “party” is a person who files an application for, or
is the subject of, a proceeding involving a license, permit, or other entitlement for use. A
“participant” is a person who actively supports or opposes a particular decision in a proceeding
involving a license, permit, or other entitlement for use, and has a financial interest in the
decision. The Levine Act incorporates the definition of “financial interest” in the Political Reform
Act, which encompasses interests in business entities, real property, sources of income, sources
of gifts, and personal finances that may be affected by the Council’s actions. If you qualify as a
“party” or “participant” to a proceeding, and you have made a campaign contribution to a
Council Member exceeding $500 made within the last 12 months, you must disclose the
campaign contribution before making your comments.
4 January 24, 2026
Materials submitted after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection at www.paloalto.gov/agendas.
City Council
Staff Report
From: City Manager
Report Type: ACTION ITEMS
Lead Department: City Manager
Meeting Date: January 24, 2026
Report #:2511-5584
TITLE
City Council Retreat: Discussion and Selection of the 2026 City Council Priorities and Ad Hoc
Committees. CEQA Status -- Not a Project.
RECOMMENDATION
City Council discussion and adoption of 2026 Priorities and planned Ad Hoc Committees.
BACKGROUND
Each year the Council reviews and establishes its priorities at its Annual Council Retreat. A
Council priority is defined as a topic that will receive particular and significant attention during
the year1 . There is a goal of no more than three to four priorities per year. The Council’s 2025
Priorities are:
Climate Action and Adaptation, & Natural Environment Protection
Economic Development & Retail Vibrancy
Implementing Housing Strategies for Social & Economic Balance
Public Safety, Wellness & Belonging
The City Council has reviewed and adjusted its approach to annual priority setting in each of the
past few years. In 2024, the City Council discussed making priorities more strategic and
extending priorities and their strategies to a two-year cycle to allow more time to achieve
1 City Council Procedures and Protocols Handbook, page 36:
https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/v/6/city-clerk/city-charterprocedures/2024-adopted-council-
protocols-and-procedures-manual-10.2024.pdf
Item 1
Item 1 Staff Report
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 1 Packet Pg. 5 of 72
Council goals.3 In 2025, the City Council incorporated review of ad hoc committees into priority
setting.4
ANALYSIS
The plan for the City Council’s Annual Retreat has been updated following the feedback from
the January 12, 2026 study session5 and in consultation with the Mayor. This report outlines
and provides context for the planned discussion.
Amy Howorth from MRG will serve as facilitator. The retreat will begin with welcoming remarks
by the Mayor, who will go over retreat intention and focus for the day. During introductions,
each Council member will reflect on the question “what surprises you about being a
Councilmember?” Public comment will follow this item.
Discussion and selection of priorities
Discuss key inputs
Staff will present key inputs to inform the Council’s discussion of 2026 priorities, including the
Community Survey on 2026 Council Priorities (Attachment B) and an initial staff compilation of
potential 2026 priority objectives (Attachment A). The draft objectives represent staff’s initial
identification of projects that are high priority and will require substantive City Council
involvement. All are intended to reflect SMARTIE (Specific, Measurable, Realistic, Time-bound,
Inclusive, and Equitable) framing. These projects are organized into Group 1, Group 2, and Staff
Not Recommended, as defined below:
Group 1: Objectives that are mission-critical and must be achieved to meet legal,
operational, safety, or strategic requirements. Would require active management and
regular reporting.
Group 2: Value-adding initiatives that are important, improve quality or advance longer-
term goals, but flexible in timing and dependent on capacity or completion of Group 1
priorities. These do not create immediate risk if delayed.
3 City Council Meeting 1/16/2024:
https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/meetings/ItemWithTemplateType?id=3921&meetingTemplateType=2&comp
iledMeetingDocumentId=8890
4 City Council Meeting 1/13/2025:
5 City Council Meeting 1/12/26:
https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/meetings/ItemWithTemplateType?id=10217&meetingTemplateType=2&com
piledMeetingDocumentId=18242
Item 1
Item 1 Staff Report
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 2 Packet Pg. 6 of 72
Staff Not Recommended: Objectives in this category are not recommended to be part of
the 2026 list of objectives, for a variety of reasons including staff capacity, feasibility
challenges, or work is already underway.
These key inputs, along with the 2025 Community Survey report, will serve as foundational
information to support the Council’s work of defining the 2026 priorities and areas of focus.
Discussion of terminology and process for selecting priorities
The Council discussed options for framing its 2026 priorities during a January 12, 2026 study
session, and reached consensus on the need to be more focused and intentional within the
existing framework. The Council noted that the 2025 priorities are very broad, while the
associated objectives are highly specific, indicating interest in an intermediate layer to help
guide Council focus within each priority area while providing flexibility for staff. During this
segment of the retreat, the Council will discuss nomenclature to better define its priorities and
goals. The current definitions in the Council Procedures and Protocols Handbook include:
Priority: a topic that will receive particular, and significant attention during the year.
Council value: an enduring goal and intention to guide the work of the Council, which
allow and maintain enduring intentions while also selecting annual priorities that reflect
short-term projects and goals.
Objective: A discrete project or milestone intended to be achieved within the year.
Additionally, the Handbook articulates a goal of no more than three to four priorities per year
with a two- to three-year time limit, and that Council can identify two to three specific
objectives within a priority.
Selection of 2026 priorities
Once the Council reaches consensus on nomenclature for its 2026 priorities, it will proceed with
identification and prioritization process, which may involve selecting a subset of objectives
identified by staff or articulating higher-level goals for the year.
Discussion of Council ad hoc committees and other strategies to achieve goals.
The retreat provides an opportunity for Council to engage in a discussion of how it should
allocate its limited time to advance agreed-upon priorities. This is specifically applicable to the
selection of ad hoc committees, which would logically corollate to the work of advancing City
Council priorities. To begin that discussion, similar to last year, Council would discuss the
following questions:
1. How does the Council envision its engagement in advancing the Priorities? If involving ad hoc
committees, what should be the scope and goals for these committees?
Last year, the Council continued its strategic approach to advancing its identified priorities,
including identification of ad hoc committees to advance specific goals. In 2025, there were
Item 1
Item 1 Staff Report
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 3 Packet Pg. 7 of 72
four ad hoc committees in addition to the Council’s Standing Committees (Finance, Policy &
Services, Council Appointed Officers, and City/Schools Liaison). The ad hoc committees selected
at the 2025 retreat included:
Climate Action & Sustainability
Cubberley
Rail
Retail
Downtown housing plan & SB79
Oversized vehicle regulation
Synthetic turf
Valley Water Shoreline funding reallocation
Next Steps
FISCAL/RESOURCE IMPACT
Item 1
Item 1 Staff Report
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 4 Packet Pg. 8 of 72
STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
ATTACHMENTS
APPROVED BY:
Item 1
Item 1 Staff Report
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 5 Packet Pg. 9 of 72
2
3
4
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
B C D E F G H I J K L M
2026 POTENTIAL CITY COUNCIL PRIORITIES AND OBJECTIVES
ED CA
IH
S
PS
W
B
$'s
x C
Adopt ordinance updates establishing additional Green Building Standards and
Energy Reach Codes. Milestone: City Council consideration of ordinance for
adoption by June 2026. x 1
x R
Adopt Bird‐Friendly Design standards. Milestone: City Council consideration in
March/April 2026 of ordinance recommended by PTC in late 2025. x 1
x x C
Complete 2026 Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Plan (BPTP). Milestone:
Council adoption of 2026 BPTP x 1
x x C
Adopt an ordinance updating Stream and Creek Corridor Setback requirements.
Milestone: PTC consideration of revised draft ordinance in Q2, 2026; Council
consideration of draft ordinance in Q3, 2026.x 1
x C
Advance recommendations for the Regional Water Quality Control Plant Biosolids
Facility Plan. Milestone: Conduct community engagement, refine and review
recommendations with Council Committee in 2026, and further develop
implementation strategies in preparation for Council acceptance of the Biosolids
Facility Plan in 2027. x 1
x x C
Begin implementation of the City Facility Electrification Plan. Milestone: Council
approval of design consultant contract and procurement of a contractor to
construct projects at first two buildings.x 1
x C
Implement Quarry Road Extension in Partnership with Stanford University, Caltrans
and VTA. Milestone: Execute grant agreement with MTC and submit initial
engineering package to Caltrans to confirm process.x 1
x x C
Advance design of Grade Separation projects at Charleston Road, Meadow Drive
and Churchill Avenue. Milestone: Complete 15% design and select Locally
Preferred Alternative for 35% design at each crossing.x 1
x x N
Pilot electrification as a service, charging as a service, or creative financing
programs to complement the City' s single‐family, multi‐family, and/or non‐
residential electrification programs, that can be scaled. Milestone: At least one
new financing program is available to single‐family, multi‐family, and/or non‐
residential customers by the end of 2026. x 1
x N
Develop long‐term Climate Action funding and financing strategies and scenarios
for Council consideration. Milestone: Present strategies and scenarios to the
Council Committee for consideration by December 2026.x 1
Priority
N/
R
/
C
OBJECTIVES (DRAFT)
Sorted by:
Council Priority, Group #, estimated completion date, and finally by additional resource needs.Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION & NATURAL ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION
Gr
o
u
p
#
Attachment A ‐ 1 of 10
Item 1
Attachment A - 2026
Potential Council Priorities
& Objectives
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 6 Packet Pg. 10 of 72
2
3
4
B C D E F G H I J K L M
2026 POTENTIAL CITY COUNCIL PRIORITIES AND OBJECTIVES
ED CA
IH
S
PS
W
B
$'s
Priority
N/
R
/
C
OBJECTIVES (DRAFT)
Sorted by:
Council Priority, Group #, estimated completion date, and finally by additional resource needs.Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Gr
o
u
p
#
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
x N
Develop and recommend for Council approval a multi‐year grid modernization
capital improvement plan focused on improving reliability and facilitating city‐wide
customer electrification by upgrading sub‐transmission, substation, and
distribution infrastructure. Issue the first tranche of debt financing in 2026.x 1 $$$$
x N
Launch Affordable Housing Electrification Grant Program approved by City Council
in March 2025. Milestone: program is available to customers by Q2 of 2026.
x 2
x x R
Advance design on South Palo Alto Bikeway project to increase walking and biking
and enhance safety. Milestone: Initiate work on pilot bikeway project.x 2
x C
Complete concept design for additional east‐west bicycle/pedestrian crossing of
railroad tracks in the southern part of the City. Milestone: Council review of draft
report on South Palo Alto Connectivity.x 2
x x C
Launch an enhanced multi‐family EV charging program based on design guidelines
approved by the City Council in November 2025. Milestone: New EV charging
program is available to participants by the end of 2026.x 2
x R
Launch an Advanced Commercial Packaged HVAC Electrification Program based on
design guidelines approved by the City Council in November 2025. Milestone: New
program is available to participants by the end of 2026.x 2
x R
Launch pilot program for boiler electrification for multi‐family and commercial
customers. Milestone: boiler electrification program available to customers by end
of 2026.x 2
x x C
Complete Gas Transition Study and begin engagement and review with the Utilities
Advisory Commission (end of 2026/early 2027).x 2
x x C
Continue to implement 3‐phase plan presented to Council in September 2024 for
phasing out leaded fuel at Palo Alto Airport. Milestone: Initiate lead air monitoring
program in Q1, work with the new fuel provider and supplier to inform tenants and
encourage the use of unleaded fuel, and provide a progress update to City Council.
x 2
x x C
Restart and make progress on the Palo Alto Airport master planning process.
Milestone: Develop updated alternatives informed by Council feedback from
September 2024, conduct public stakeholder meetings, and conduct a study
session with Council to review progress.x 2
Attachment A ‐ 2 of 10
Item 1
Attachment A - 2026
Potential Council Priorities
& Objectives
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 7 Packet Pg. 11 of 72
2
3
4
B C D E F G H I J K L M
2026 POTENTIAL CITY COUNCIL PRIORITIES AND OBJECTIVES
ED CA
IH
S
PS
W
B
$'s
Priority
N/
R
/
C
OBJECTIVES (DRAFT)
Sorted by:
Council Priority, Group #, estimated completion date, and finally by additional resource needs.Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Gr
o
u
p
#
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
x x N
Explore options to streamline minor traffic improvements and update the City’s
Traffic Calming Policy to align with Safety Action Plan. Milestone: Engage
consultant in review of existing program, policy needs and approaches.x 2 $
x N
Development of a formal business retention/expansion program focused on
supporting/growing existing Palo Alto businesses. And, develop a business
attraction program to diversify local economy, increase the tax base for essential
public services, and job creation to enhance Palo Alto’s community prosperity.
Complete in Q2 2026.x 1
x C
Adopt an ordinance expanding retail opportunities and strengthening retail
resiliency, including refining retail and retail‐like definitions and updating the retail
preservation ordinance. Milestone: PTC review and recommendation in Q2; City
Council review and action in Q3. Continued engagement with stakeholders prior to
implementation.x 1
x x R
Implement the California Avenue near‐term signage plan replacing the El Camino
Real and Oregon Expressway signs—by completing their procurement and
installation. x 1
x x C
Continue design work on new parking structure in Downtown core (Lot D).
Milestone: Complete entitlement process and design development phase by the
end of 2026.x 1
x x C
Secure City Council approval for the California Avenue Outdoor Activation
Guidelines. These guidelines will be finalized through continued stakeholder
engagement that includes a representative mix of business owners and residents
and a formal Architectural Review Board (ARB) review.x 1 $
x x N
Expanding on the Economic Development Strategies’ Guiding Principles, work
toward activation activities and events in partnership with the Chamber of
Commerce and Palo Alto Recreation Foundation to increase placemaking,
investment, and branding opportunities (globally and with the corporate
community).x 1 $
x x R
Complete stable car free street improvements on Ramona Street, e.g. bollards and
barriers, signage, and parking regulations. x 2
x x x R
Modernize Downtown parking policy to increase availability of premium parking,
reduce operating subsidies, encourage development and economic diversity and
vibrancy, and reduce fossil fuel dependency. Milestone: Council review of options
to modernize parking policy.x 2
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT & RETAIL VIBRANCY
Attachment A ‐ 3 of 10
Item 1
Attachment A - 2026
Potential Council Priorities
& Objectives
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 8 Packet Pg. 12 of 72
2
3
4
B C D E F G H I J K L M
2026 POTENTIAL CITY COUNCIL PRIORITIES AND OBJECTIVES
ED CA
IH
S
PS
W
B
$'s
Priority
N/
R
/
C
OBJECTIVES (DRAFT)
Sorted by:
Council Priority, Group #, estimated completion date, and finally by additional resource needs.Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Gr
o
u
p
#
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
x R
Extend the existing interim ordinance or adopt a new ordinance that restores and
implements subjective wireless communication facility regulations. Milestones:
Present an ordinance to the City Council in Q4.x 2
x R
Begin feasibility analysis of Assessment District for University Avenue Streetscape.
Conduct analysis to determine practicality of an assessment district or similarly
funding strategy as a funding mechanism for capital enhancements to University
Avenue Streetscape. x 2 $$
x x R
Design and provide funding appropriations to improve the car free portion of
California Ave for bike and pedestrian markings and calming and minor physical
environment adjustments to reduce friction with the outdoor dining guidelines
(e.g. movement of bike racks). x 2 $$$
x R
Engage stakeholders to develop design proposals for Car‐Free Ramona Street and
present to Council for necessary funding appropriations to implement initial
phase(s). Begin Historic Resource Board and Architectural Review Board review of
activation guidelines in late 2026/early 2027. x 2 $$$
x x x x N
Initiate process for Development of the Comprehensive Plan Update. Milestone:
Confirm a more limited scope for the upcoming 2030 Comprehensive Plan to
inform the release of an RFP by Q4 2026 to select a consultant to support the
limited scope refresh.x 2 $$$
x C
Adopt an updated Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) ordinance to comply with State
law and implement additional policy alternatives, including increased allowable
square footage and condominium conversions, consistent with City Council
direction (05.15.23). Milestone: Planning and Transportation Commission
recommendation and City Council consideration of draft ordinance in Q2, 2026.
x 1
x C
Present findings to Council on a study that explores approaches to incentivize multi‐
family housing over office uses. Evaluate opportunities that make multi‐family
housing an attractive alternative to commercial office development, consistent
with Housing Element Program 3.9A. Milestones: Seek guidance from Policy &
Services Committee in Q1, 2026 and advance ordinance to Council in Q2, 2026.
x 1
x x C
Partner with Santa Clara County Housing Authority to achieve construction
timeline milestones for the Palo Alto Homekey project (which will provide
transitional housing and services for unhoused residents).x 1
IMPLEMENTING HOUSING STRATEGIES FOR SOCIAL & ECONOMIC BALANCE
Attachment A ‐ 4 of 10
Item 1
Attachment A - 2026
Potential Council Priorities
& Objectives
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 9 Packet Pg. 13 of 72
2
3
4
B C D E F G H I J K L M
2026 POTENTIAL CITY COUNCIL PRIORITIES AND OBJECTIVES
ED CA
IH
S
PS
W
B
$'s
Priority
N/
R
/
C
OBJECTIVES (DRAFT)
Sorted by:
Council Priority, Group #, estimated completion date, and finally by additional resource needs.Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Gr
o
u
p
#
46
47
48
49
50
x R
Develop and present land use and transportation alternatives for the San Antonio
Road Area Plan, and select a preferred alternative based on community input and
City Council direction for use in preparing the draft Area Plan. Milestones: PTC,
community, and advisory bodies' input for alternatives in Q1, Council study section
and selection of preferred alternatives in Q2. EIR NOP in Q3, policy
recommendations in Q4.x 1
x C
Develop and adopt Objective Development Standards for the South of Forest Area
Coordinated Area Plan (SOFA), and present plan amendment options to replace
subjective standards with objective standards for Planning and Transportation
Commission and City Council consideration, consistent with Housing Element
Program 3.7. Milestones: Create draft amendments to the municipal code and
SOFA CAP, as applicable in Q2, 2026; Planning and Transportation Commission
recommendation and City Council consideration of amended SOFA CAP and/or
municipal code amendments by end of 2026.x 1
x R
Codify the R1/SB 9 interim ordinance by establishing objective development
standards and increasing the maximum floor area for SB 9 units from 800 to 1,200
square feet, consistent with Housing Element Program 6.3A, and evaluate
implications for R1 and SB 9 projects within the City’s Individual Review Program.
Milestones: Planning and Transportation consideration of draft ordinance in Q3,
2026; Council consideration in Q4, 2026.x 1
x x R
Conduct and complete a study of short‐term rentals and adopt housing and
neighborhood preservation regulations that prioritize long‐term occupancy,
consistent with Housing Element Programs 4.2D–E. Milestones: report to City
Council in Q3, 2026; prepare alternatives for Council and Planning and
Transportation Commission review in Q4, 2026 or Q1, 2027, if requested. Housing
Element anticipates ordinance adoption by July, 2027.x 1
x x R
Present draft Downtown Housing Plan scenarios to City Council, obtain direction
on next steps, and advance preparation of the draft Downtown Housing Plan and
environmental review, consistent with City Council direction on SB 79
implementation. Milestones: Seek direction from SB 79 and Downtown Housing
Plan City Council Ad‐Hoc Committee on next steps in Q1 and Q2, 2026 based on SB
79 implementation approach; advance Downtown Housing Plan based on direction
received from City Council through Q4, 2026.
x 1
Attachment A ‐ 5 of 10
Item 1
Attachment A - 2026
Potential Council Priorities
& Objectives
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 10 Packet Pg. 14 of 72
2
3
4
B C D E F G H I J K L M
2026 POTENTIAL CITY COUNCIL PRIORITIES AND OBJECTIVES
ED CA
IH
S
PS
W
B
$'s
Priority
N/
R
/
C
OBJECTIVES (DRAFT)
Sorted by:
Council Priority, Group #, estimated completion date, and finally by additional resource needs.Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Gr
o
u
p
#
51
52
53
54
55
x x C
Adopt zoning incentives and development standards that support innovative
housing typologies, including micro‐units, intergenerational housing, housing for
aging adults, students, and lower‐income households, consistent with Housing
Element Program 6.5B. Milestones: Conduct study session with Planning and
Transportation Commission in Q1; present recommendations for Architectural
Review Board consideration in Q2; Planning and Transportation Commission
recommendation and City Council consideration of draft ordinance in Q4, 2026.
x 1
x R
Update and adopt development impact fees for public safety, government
facilities, housing, transportation, parks, and community services, including
completion of nexus and feasibility studies and establishment of fee waivers for
low‐income inclusionary units. (Housing Element Programs 2.1B; 3.1B & C).
Milestone: Present development scenarios and growth assumptions to Council for
feedback by Q2 2026. Adopt Parks, Library & Community Facility Fee Updates by
Q3 2026. Milestone: Adopt additional fee updates by Q1 2027.x 1
x N
Issue Requests for Information or Requests for Proposals (RFI/P) to develop
approximately 218 affordable or workforce housing units on City‐owned surface
parking lots. (Housing Element Program 1.4A). Milestone: Review draft RFI/P with
Policy & Services Committee by Q3 2026 to issue the solicitation process by year
end.x 1
x N
Implement Senate Bill 79 by developing and presenting implementation options
and advancing a recommended approach for City Council adoption. Seek direction
from SB 79 and Downtown Housing Plan City Council Ad‐Hoc Committee on next
steps in Q1 and Q2; present recommendations for City Council consideration and
next steps on SB 79 implementation before July 1, 2026; develop SB 79 alternative
plan if directed by City Council.x 1
x N
Identify and designate additional Housing Element site capacity to maintain RHNA
compliance and buffer by evaluating new opportunity sites to address anticipated
capacity shortfalls in 2026, including impacts from development on faith‐based
sites and downtown parking lots. Milestones: Select consultant to provide
technical analysis in Q1; Planning and Transportation Commission
recommendation and City Council consideration of replacement Housing Element
sites in Q3, 2026.x 1 $‐$$
Attachment A ‐ 6 of 10
Item 1
Attachment A - 2026
Potential Council Priorities
& Objectives
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 11 Packet Pg. 15 of 72
2
3
4
B C D E F G H I J K L M
2026 POTENTIAL CITY COUNCIL PRIORITIES AND OBJECTIVES
ED CA
IH
S
PS
W
B
$'s
Priority
N/
R
/
C
OBJECTIVES (DRAFT)
Sorted by:
Council Priority, Group #, estimated completion date, and finally by additional resource needs.Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Gr
o
u
p
#
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
x x C
Implement Oversized Vehicles Phase 1 work, including options for RV buyback and
storage, new recruiting safe parking and enforcement/signage relating to
detached/inoperable vehicles prohibition. Milestone Q2 ‐ Present options on RV
buyback and storage to Ad Hoc for input, then to Council, for consideration.
Milestone Q2 ‐ Implement, including installing permanent signage, and enforce
detached/inoperable vehicles prohibition. Milestone Q3‐ Work with Ad Hoc on
recruiting new safe parking and bring any potential projects to Council for
consideration. (related to 2025 Objective 3.3.4). x 1
$$‐
$$$
x x C
Initiate and advance Oversized Vehicles Phase 2 work, including oversized vehicle
permit pilot. Milestone Q4: Develop OSV permit pilot, including enhanced services
and bring to Council for consideration. (related to 2025 Objective 3.3.4).
x 1
$$‐
$$$
x C
Report on initial data from the rental registry program. Milestone: Provide report
to City Council on first year of the rental registry program, ending April 2025, in Q2,
2026.x 2
x C
Present to City Council an analysis related to anti‐rent gouging and receive
direction on next steps. Milestone: Present analysis to Policy and Services
Committee by Q2 2026; seek Committee guidance on next steps, if any.x 2
x C
Adopt a renter protection “fair chance” ordinance, including findings and
implementing regulations. (Housing Element Program 6.6I). Milestones: City
Council Policy and Services Committee consideration in Q2 of ordinance revised
based on City Council direction; City Council consideration upon P&S
recommendation in Q3.x 2
x R
Prepare, present, and release a Request for Proposals for development of the one‐
acre site near Matadero Creek dedicated to the City under the 2023 Sobrato/City
Development Agreement. Milestone: Issue RFP by end of 2026.x 2
x x C
Expand and implement the Safe Parking Program in commercial areas by
increasing geographic coverage and service availability citywide. (Housing Element
Program 6.4A and Council assigned 12.04.23). Milestones: Initiate Q4. Milestone:
Initiate draft of zoning text amendment by end of 2026.x 2
x C
Organize an initial review of sources and methods to raise funding to support new
affordable housing production for future evaluation.x 2
Attachment A ‐ 7 of 10
Item 1
Attachment A - 2026
Potential Council Priorities
& Objectives
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 12 Packet Pg. 16 of 72
2
3
4
B C D E F G H I J K L M
2026 POTENTIAL CITY COUNCIL PRIORITIES AND OBJECTIVES
ED CA
IH
S
PS
W
B
$'s
Priority
N/
R
/
C
OBJECTIVES (DRAFT)
Sorted by:
Council Priority, Group #, estimated completion date, and finally by additional resource needs.Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Gr
o
u
p
#
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
x R
Open 429 Bryant Street Community Center. Complete construction and any
necessary partnership agreements to begin La Comida Senior Lunch Program at
the facility by end of July, 2026; plan further work for general community center
operations concurrently. x 1
x N
Execute MOU with Santa Clara County for assignment of clinician to PD Psychiatric
Emergency Response Team (PERT) in Jan 2026.x 1
x N
Update the City's Natural Environment Element Update to comply with recent
state law. Milestone: Prepare draft revisions for review by the Parks and
Recreation Commission, Planning and Transportation Commission, and City Council
by Q3, 2026. Present Comp Plan amendments to PRC, PTC, and City Council by the
Q4 of 2026. x 1
x N
Update the Safety Element and develop an Evacuation Plan pursuant to SB 99, AB
747, and AB 1409. Milestones: contract with consultant to develop evacuation
plan, present draft Safety Element amendments to Planning and Transportation
Commission and City Council consideration with final submittal to state for review
in Q3. x 1
x C
Support Community Mental Health through provision of support for all ages
through community partnerships, programs, and initiatives. Milestone: continue
work with the Jed Foundation engagement to support youth mental health and
suicide prevention efforts.x 1
x C
Cubberley Project – Continue to advance the Cubberley Project focusing on
community polling for potential placement of a measure on the November 2026
ballot, anticipated purchase of 7 acres from PAUSD, and securing partnership
opportunities, and other funding sources.x 1
x C
Develop and adopt updates to the City’s seismic risk mitigation ordinance.
Milestone: Seek policy guidance from Policy and Services Committee, review draft
ordinance with Policy and Services Committee, and Council consideration of
ordinance updates by Q4 2026.x 1
x N
Pursue a natural grass athletic field pilot project to determine the best natural field
type and maintenance to enhance playability and durability.x 1
$$‐
$$$
PUBLIC SAFETY, WELLNESS & BELONGING
Attachment A ‐ 8 of 10
Item 1
Attachment A - 2026
Potential Council Priorities
& Objectives
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 13 Packet Pg. 17 of 72
2
3
4
B C D E F G H I J K L M
2026 POTENTIAL CITY COUNCIL PRIORITIES AND OBJECTIVES
ED CA
IH
S
PS
W
B
$'s
Priority
N/
R
/
C
OBJECTIVES (DRAFT)
Sorted by:
Council Priority, Group #, estimated completion date, and finally by additional resource needs.Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Gr
o
u
p
#
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
x C
Advance Quiet Zones at Palo Alto Avenue, Churchill Avenue, Meadow Drive, and
Charleston Road Rail Crossings. Milestone: Council approval of Notice of
Establishment and Quiet Zone implementation at Palo Alto Avenue; and
identification of funding and procurement of professional services for design of
required improvements to establish Quiet Zones at Churchill, Meadow and
Charleston.x 1 $$$$
x N
Deliver four Hands‐Only CPR classes by the end of Q4 CY 2026, including two
community and two City employee sessions, to improve lifesaving readiness
through accessible and inclusive training.x 2
x x N
Launch new Palo Alto education and rebate program for electric stoves and
cooktops, with a goal of 50 electric cooktop conversions from gas. Milestone:
Program is available to customers by the end of Q2 2026.x 2
x x C
Complete build‐out of fiber‐to‐the‐premises (FTTP) pilot Phase 1 and begin
provision of beta service for a municipal high speed fiber service. Establish internet
service provider operations and through iterative customer engagement, and
provision services to residents in the initial pilot area.x 2
SUMMARY COUNT OF DRAFT OBJECTIVES: ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
CLIMATE ACTION & ADAPTATION & NATURAL ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT & RETAIL VIBRANCY
IMPLEMENTING HOUSING STRATEGIES for SOCIAL & ECONOMIC BALANCE
PUBLIC SAFETY, WELLNESS & BELONGING
$ = up to 50K; $$ = 51‐400K, $$$ = 500K‐999k, $$$$ = 1M +
(C)are objectives that are carried over from the 2025 list,
(R)are objectives from the 2025 list that may have a second phase to the project and have been revised to reflect 2026 goals,
(N)reflect a project that is new in 2026
Group 1 = 41
objectives
Group 2 = 26
objectives
21
13
21
12
Attachment A ‐ 9 of 10
Item 1
Attachment A - 2026
Potential Council Priorities
& Objectives
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 14 Packet Pg. 18 of 72
2
3
4
B C D E F G H I J K L M
2026 POTENTIAL CITY COUNCIL PRIORITIES AND OBJECTIVES
ED CA
IH
S
PS
W
B
$'s
Priority
N/
R
/
C
OBJECTIVES (DRAFT)
Sorted by:
Council Priority, Group #, estimated completion date, and finally by additional resource needs.Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Gr
o
u
p
#
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
x N
Implement a gas‐powered leaf blower ban citywide, based on recommendation
from Policy and Services Committee.
x C
Develop and implement strategies to activate vacant commercial storefronts,
including establishing regulatory tools and streamlined permitting for temporary
pop‐up stores.
x C
Zoning Code Update. Comprehensively Update the City's Zoning Code including
policies that support Economic Development Strategies. Reformat for improved
readability, update definitions, use categories, development standards and
permitting processes.
x C
Prepare and present an El Camino Real Area Plan that prioritizes housing
production and advance implementation consistent with City Council direction.
Milestones: Initiate discussion of scope of and vision for new area plan.
x N
Study and report on vacancy tax options for commercial properties and residential
“ghost homes,” including enforcement mechanisms used in other jurisdictions.
x N
Increase housing capacity in the California Avenue corridor by developing and
adopting policy and zoning options for City Council approval (assigned 08.14.23).
x N
Coordinate and partner with CalCHA (California Community Housing Agency) to
support affordable housing development initiatives.
x N
Zoning Code Text Amendments relating to impacts of higher density housing on
neighboring properties multi‐family uses on commercially zoning properties next
to residential uses (even if not residentially zoned). Assigned 11.13.23: Direct staff
to review proposed amendments to PAMC 18.16.040(b) and 18.16.060 regarding
Redwood residences as described in the November 7, 2023 letter from Kristi
Bascom.
x C
Council consideration of a design option for California Avenue. Continue engaging
stakeholders to refine alternative street designs for California Avenue and present
to Council for discussion and action, including funding appropriations to pursue a
street design in late Q2/early Q3 2026.
$$$
x C
Refine destination marketing efforts and enhance Palo Alto’s international
reputation. Meet with hospitality partners and incubator/accelerators to assess
willingness to partner with the City on destination marketing efforts and propose
next steps, including necessary appropriation actions, to City Council in Q2 2026.
Not Recommended
For various reasons—including staff capacity to advance, feasibility challenges, or work is already underway.
Attachment A ‐ 10 of 10
Item 1
Attachment A - 2026
Potential Council Priorities
& Objectives
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 15 Packet Pg. 19 of 72
Council Priorities Survey Results
To inform the City Council’s discussion at their annual retreat on January 24, 2026, the City
released an online survey seeking community input on priorities for 2026.
Staff released an Open Town Hall survey through OpenGov on December 18, 2025 and
closed on January 11, 2024. The survey forum had 291 visitors and 178 specific community
responses, compared to 578 visitors and gained 431 community responses in 2024.
This online survey is one data point to complement other feedback received throughout the
year such as:
•The annual 2025 Community Satisfaction Survey
•Neighborhood Town Hall meeting input and other community engagement efforts
•Direct input to the Council via email
•Feedback through participation at City Council and Boards, Commissions and
Committee meetings
Summary of Specific Feedback for 2026 City Council Priorities
A summary of input received through the online survey is in the cover report and full report
including individual responses is attached. Both questions asked in the survey were open-
ended.
Question 1: Council is considering extending the existing four annual 2025 Priorities
as their 2026 Priorities. Share your feedback to help inform this annual process.
Question 2: Within the existing four annual priorities, share your feedback on
outcomes for 2026.
Question 3: Which neighborhood do you live in?
Top responses were from the following neighborhoods: Midtown (15%), Duveneck/St.
Francis (9.2%), and Barron Park (8.7%).
Question 2 Response Summary
General themes are listed below for each City Council Priority (listed by alphabetical order,
organized by 2025 Council Priority):
Climate Action & Adaptation, and Natural Environment Protection
•Interest in climate action programs and policies, and concerns about these
programs and cost considerations
•Feedback received on energy and electrification measures, plus concerns about
these efforts and the impacts on climate change worldwide
•Generally positive feedback about environmental protection efforts
ATTACHMENT BItem 1
Attachment B - Community
Survey on 2026 Council
Priorities
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 16 Packet Pg. 20 of 72
• Feedback about high utility rates, costs overall with electrification and prioritizing
housing as a more immediate need
Economic Development & Retail Vibrancy
• Concerns about vacant storefronts
• Barriers exist with business permitting processes
• The need for more retail
• Interest in how Palo Alto is doing compared to nearby jurisdictions such as
Redwood City and Burlingame
Implementing Housing Strategies for Social & Economic Balance
• Need more housing overall and the urgency to provide affordable and workforce
housing options
• Perceptions of slow housing approvals and timelines
• Concern over high rise housing and density and interest in density in transit-oriented
areas
Public Safety, Wellness & Belonging
• More traffic enforcement and concerns raised over roadway behavior
• Perspective of not having Public Safety, Wellness and Belonging together as one
priority
• Road safety for pedestrians and bicyclists
• Mixed comments about the need for more investment in emergency services and
response times, and more access to services in specific neighborhoods
• Homeless concerns in downtown including parking garage safety
• Maintenance and access to fields and parks and recreation, such as expanding
pickleball
• More investment in programs supporting physical activity and social connection
Other
• City processes and governance such as use of consultants, decision-making
timelines, outcome tracking, and public communication
• Need for more transportation infrastructure (rail crossings, bridges, traffic signal
timing)
• Comments about noise impacts such as aircraft overflights, street noise,
equipment noise
• Use and design of public spaces such as car free streets and concerns about El
Camino Real bike lanes
ATTACHMENT BItem 1
Attachment B - Community
Survey on 2026 Council
Priorities
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 17 Packet Pg. 21 of 72
1 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14800 Created with OpenGov | January 12, 2026, 3:03 PM
2026 City Council Priorities Community
Feedback
January 12, 2026, 3:03 PM
Contents
i. Summary of responses 2
ii. Survey questions 5
iii. Individual responses 6
ATTACHMENT BItem 1
Attachment B - Community
Survey on 2026 Council
Priorities
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 18 Packet Pg. 22 of 72
Summary Of Responses
As of January 12, 2026, 3:03 PM, this forum had: Topic Start Topic End
Attendees:291 December 18, 2025, 5:03 PM January 11, 2026, 11:59 PM
Responses:178
Hours of Public Comment:8.9
QUESTION 1
Council is considering extending the existing four annual 2025 Priorities as their 2026 Priorities. Share your
feedback to help inform this annual process.
Answered 154
Skipped 24
QUESTION 2
Within the existing four annual priorities, share your feedback on outcomes for 2026.
Answered 149
Skipped 29
QUESTION 3
Which neighborhood do you live in?
% Count
Downtown North 4.6%8
Crescent Park 6.9% 12
University South 5.2%9
Professorville 1.2%2
2 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14800 Created with OpenGov | January 12, 2026, 3:03 PM
2026 City Council Priorities Community Feedback
Council is exploring keeping their annual priorities the same for 2026. Share your input on priorities.
ATTACHMENT BItem 1
Attachment B - Community
Survey on 2026 Council
Priorities
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 19 Packet Pg. 23 of 72
% Count
Community Center 2.9%5
Duveneck/St. Francis 9.2% 16
Triple El 0.6%1
Embarcadero Oaks 0.6%1
Leland Manor 2.9%5
Old Palo Alto 5.8% 10
Southgate 1.2%2
Evergreen Park 2.9%5
College Terrace 4.0%7
Mayfield / Central 1.2%2
Ventura 1.2%2
Midtown 15.0% 26
Palo Verde 2.9%5
Adobe Meadow 2.9%5
Charleston Gardens 1.2%2
Greenmeadow 8.1% 14
Walnut Grove 0.6%1
Fairmeadow 3.5%6
Charleston Meadows 2.9%5
3 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14800 Created with OpenGov | January 12, 2026, 3:03 PM
2026 City Council Priorities Community Feedback
Council is exploring keeping their annual priorities the same for 2026. Share your input on priorities.
ATTACHMENT BItem 1
Attachment B - Community
Survey on 2026 Council
Priorities
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 20 Packet Pg. 24 of 72
% Count
Monroe Park 0.6%1
Palo Alto Orchards 2.3%4
Barron Park 8.7% 15
Greenacres II 0.6%1
Greater Miranda 0.6%1
4 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14800 Created with OpenGov | January 12, 2026, 3:03 PM
2026 City Council Priorities Community Feedback
Council is exploring keeping their annual priorities the same for 2026. Share your input on priorities.
ATTACHMENT BItem 1
Attachment B - Community
Survey on 2026 Council
Priorities
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 21 Packet Pg. 25 of 72
Survey Questions
QUESTION 1
Council is considering extending the existing four annual 2025
Priorities as their 2026 Priorities. Share your feedback to help inform
this annual process.
QUESTION 2
Within the existing four annual priorities, share your feedback on
outcomes for 2026.
QUESTION 3
Which neighborhood do you live in?
• Downtown North
• Crescent Park
• University South
• Professorville
• Community Center
• Duveneck/St. Francis
• Triple El
• Embarcadero Oaks
• Leland Manor
• Old Palo Alto
• Southgate
• Evergreen Park
• College Terrace
• Mayfield / Central
• Ventura
• Midtown
• Palo Verde
• Adobe Meadow
• Meadow Park
• Charleston Gardens
• Greenhouse
• Greendell
• San Alma
• Greenmeadow
• Walnut Grove
• Fairmeadow
• Charleston Meadows
• Monroe Park
• Palo Alto Orchards
• Barron Park
• Greenacres I
• Greenacres II
• Greater Miranda
• Esther Clark Park
• Palo Alto Hills
5 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14800 Created with OpenGov | January 12, 2026, 3:03 PM
2026 City Council Priorities Community Feedback
Council is exploring keeping their annual priorities the same for 2026. Share your input on priorities.
ATTACHMENT BItem 1
Attachment B - Community
Survey on 2026 Council
Priorities
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 22 Packet Pg. 26 of 72
Individual Responses
Name not shown
in Leland Manor/ Garland
December 18, 2025, 7:06 PM
Question 1
I’m glad to see Climate Action and Adaptation & Natural Environment
Protection as a priority. I think the city’s tree planting is related and
important and should continue to receive full funding in 2026.
Question 2
With respect to Public Safety, Wellness & Belonging I think an emphasis
should be put on school safety and bicycle safety and daylighting
especially near schools!
Question 3
• Leland Manor
Name not available
December 18, 2025, 7:18 PM
Question 1
Nothing you do on climate action makes any difference, except to make
you think you are doing something.
Question 2
Focus on economic development.
Question 3
• Evergreen Park
Name not available
December 18, 2025, 7:35 PM
Question 1
Instead of giving us pre-determined priorities that you chose, how about
getting some meaningful feedback on OUR priorities since we're the ones
paying.
Question 2
None of them unless cutting spending and utility rates are included
Question 3
• Embarcadero Oaks
Name not shown
in Palo Verde
December 18, 2025, 8:26 PM
Question 1
Yes, these are good goals.
Question 2
Please push forward rail crossings and safety barriers at existing crossing
spots.
Question 3
• Palo Verde
Name not shown
in Midtown/ Midtown West
December 19, 2025, 6:41 AM
Question 1
That works.
Question 2
My order would be;
3
2
1
4
I'm interested in seeing a pedestrian crossing of Caltrain south of cal ave
Caltrain station and North of East meadow as well.
Question 3
• Midtown
Ken Horowitz
6 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14800 Created with OpenGov | January 12, 2026, 3:03 PM
2026 City Council Priorities Community Feedback
Council is exploring keeping their annual priorities the same for 2026. Share your input on priorities.
ATTACHMENT BItem 1
Attachment B - Community
Survey on 2026 Council
Priorities
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 23 Packet Pg. 27 of 72
in University Park
December 19, 2025, 1:33 PM
Question 1
These four 2025 priorities are appropriate for 2026. They are very general
so they need to have specific goals with each one that could be achieved
in 2026. The Council should address those that have specific goals and
those that can be completed in one year.
Question 2
Public Safety, Wellness, and Belonging is the most important priority for
me in 2026. So specifically, get the Cubberley tax on the ballot (and
approved by residents) in November. Secondly, develop an action plan
with the Jed Foundation including PAUSD to address youth mental
health(no suicides)
Question 3
• University South
Name not available
December 22, 2025, 2:35 PM
Question 1
Economic development & retail vibrancy along with Public Safety are the
main priorities.
Other benefits stem off of those; if you have a successful city, then
benefits will accrue to all income ranges of workers, for example.
Question 2
Public Safety has arisen as a key issue around California. I do not agree
with inviting transients to the City by directing those random unknown
persons parked illegally on public streets over to other parking locations
(whether church parking slots or contrived parking lots in the City. This
then brings more to the vacated spots. I strongly disagree with a City
Council member who indicated Palo Alto businesses should invite
transients to camp on their properties/park in their lots!)
Question 3
• Duveneck/St. Francis
Name not available
December 24, 2025, 1:26 PM
Question 1
No response
Question 2
No response
Question 3
• Barron Park
Name not available
December 24, 2025, 1:27 PM
Question 1
I'm much more concerned about Climate Action than the other three...
Adding lots of housing is NOT going to help the climate. I realize that
people have to live somewhere but making less babies/encouraging less
folks to come live here does more to aid our long term climate situation.
Question 2
No response
Question 3
• College Terrace
Name not shown
in University Park
December 24, 2025, 4:06 PM
Question 1
Climate Action and Adaptation & Natural Environment Protection: KEEP,
but re-focus on informing the public about end-use technology options,
NOT providing City funding that increases utility rates to everyone.
Economic Development & Retail Vibrancy: KEEP, but re-focus on bringing
down operating costs (high rents and increasing utility rates)
Implementing Housing Strategies for Social and Economic Balance:
REMOVE, since local zoning and construction controls are now out of the
hands of Council.
Public Safety, Wellness & Belonging: MODIFY, since Wellness and
Belonging have nothing to do with Public Safety. Keep public safety, Add
Emergency Services, Delete Wellness and Belonging.
Question 2
Climate Action and Adaptation & Natural Environment Protection: BAD
7 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14800 Created with OpenGov | January 12, 2026, 3:03 PM
2026 City Council Priorities Community Feedback
Council is exploring keeping their annual priorities the same for 2026. Share your input on priorities.
ATTACHMENT BItem 1
Attachment B - Community
Survey on 2026 Council
Priorities
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 24 Packet Pg. 28 of 72
OUTCOME. Lip service only. Spending vast local sums trying to be a role
model for a country that has embraced "Dig, Baby, DIG!" is a fool's
errand.
Economic Development & Retail Vibrancy: BAD OUTCOME. Too many
vacant storefronts. Need more collaboration with Chamber of Commerce
and Stanford Lands.
Implementing Housing Strategies for Social and Economic Balance: BAD
OUTCOME. The state has taken charge. We are a Paper Tiger.
Public Safety, Wellness & Belonging: EHAT OUTCOME? Have we actually
been successful in measuring improvements to Wellness and Belonging?
And what does this have to do with Public Safety and Emergency
Services?
Question 3
• Downtown North
Name not shown
in University Park
December 29, 2025, 4:53 PM
Question 1
I think the priorities are spot on.
Question 2
Because of the economic crunch, we may not be able to move
dramatically forward on these priorities, but we. Ed to do the best we can
Question 3
• Old Palo Alto
Name not available
December 31, 2025, 12:41 PM
Question 1
Encouraging building and converting to green energy solutions plus
energy efficiency in general, I believe, are in the long term interest for all
of us.
Question 2
The apparent compleat reliance on costly consultants to approve just
about everything in this city is getting to be ridiculous. As a recent
example, consultants were hired to study and offer solutions for a bike
crossing over/under the rail tracks in South Palo Alto. All of the options,
except one, required the use of eminent domain to take one private
residence. Since the city is apparently crippled at the though of even
considering eminent domain related to the rail grade separation project, a
truly transformative ifrastructure that will impact the city for at least a
century, the idea that the city would consider eminent domain for a bike
crossing was laughable at best and indicative, to me, of an unnecessary
consultant fee where the outcome was obvious to anyone paying
attention.
Oh yes, the "hybrid" grade separation proposed for East Meadow is a
viaduct, just a few feet shorter. When Hugh speed rail won on the ballot
long ago, the unambiguous voice from South PA was NO viaduct, berm,
elevated rail. It is sad to see the city use consultants to steer the
"solution" elsewhere. Really kills my interest in civic engagement when
consultants matter more than residents.
Question 3
• Fairmeadow
Name not shown
in Charleston Terrace
December 31, 2025, 2:44 PM
Question 1
No response
Question 2
No response
Question 3
• Greenmeadow
Name not available
January 1, 2026, 9:59 AM
Question 1
Palo Alto City Council Priorities
(In no particular order, so please read the entire list. Thank you for your
kind consideration of these suggested Council priorities.)
Continue focus on reducing climate change. (More detailed suggestions
below.)
Roads:
8 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14800 Created with OpenGov | January 12, 2026, 3:03 PM
2026 City Council Priorities Community Feedback
Council is exploring keeping their annual priorities the same for 2026. Share your input on priorities.
ATTACHMENT BItem 1
Attachment B - Community
Survey on 2026 Council
Priorities
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 25 Packet Pg. 29 of 72
Resurface dangerously bumpy bike lanes. Be sure they are kept free of
obstructions, such as waste bins; the one by the high school that is
eastbound on Churchill from Alma to Emerson was frequently blocked,
forcing cyclists into the heavy vehicle lane.
Install and diligently maintain reflective paint, reflectors, and warning
signs on all bulb-outs, medians, traffic circles, etc., that narrow biking and
driving lanes throughout the city. (Car tire strikes have darkened or
removed much of the reflective paint and reflectors, where there was
any.) Currently, many of these create a huge hazard in that someone
going straight down a street (particularly in the bike lane) can easily hit
them without warning. Design future ones and possibly retrofit current
ones to have a soft landing spot, such as a bush, for cyclists who hit these
curbs and flip over their handle bars. (This is a serious suggestion.)
Review all roadway signs, starting with those along bikeways, that say,
“Not a Through Street”. Amend them, as appropriate, to say, “for motor
vehicles” or “except for bicycles and pedestrians”, as often there’s a path
out the other end. Make all signage throughout the city appropriate for
bicyclists (and pedestrians, where appropriate), as they are legitimate
road users and must be encouraged to reduce climate change, pollution,
and the ills of sedentary living. Clarify, perhaps with CA DMV
collaboration, whether bicycles are considered “vehicles” and have
signage reflect this standard.
Air:
Enforce the existing gasoline leaf blower ban, expand it to be city-wide
(not just for residential properties) and cover all landscaping tools. Make
available a more effective downloadable flyer for folks to share with
offending property owners and yard care workers. State the amount of
the fine. Create a reporting tool for easy, anonymous, offense reporting.
Have warnings sent out without the need for staff intervention.
Ban all indoor fireplace wood fires, as they destroy the air quality for
blocks around the offender’s home and are truly ineffective at heating the
home.
Require all wood stoves to be low emission and fed with outdoor air;
catalytic converters and pellet stoves allow relatively clean wood burning
and outside air intakes substantially lower the emissions from burning
wood in a well-sealed house and the air infiltration in a leaky house.
Consider banning all indoor wood burning and further regulating outdoor
fires.
Support building and transportation electrification to displace fossil fuel
use, including evening peak-electric-load gas peaker plants.
Encourage the adoption of electric vehicles by people living in multi unit
and rental housing by expanding and diligently maintaining publicly
available level 1 and 2 EV chargers in the neighborhoods and DC Fast
Chargers in retail areas. (Many municipalities very affordably install level
2 chargers on street light poles.) Require all remodels and new dwelling
units to be EV charger ready. Encourage/require work place charging
(standard 120 VAC, 15 amp outlets are all that’s needed for most
commutes) to make use of the statewide surplus of solar energy during
the day. Encourage/require solar photovoltaics near daytime chargers to
reduce or eliminate the need for grid or building service upgrades to
charge EVs.
Lobby the Federal government to incentivize maintaining, not just
installing, DC Fast Chargers for long distance travel.
Install and encourage electric load shedding and power storage, including
smart breaker panels and bidirectional electric vehicle chargers, whether
behind the meter or municipally owned or contracted. Incentivize the
former by providing rebates and introducing instantaneous two-way
electricity pricing and a communication structure for customers’
equipment to automatically respond to price fluctuations. (OhmConnect
currently provides a limited incentives-for-load-shedding service to PGE
and other utilities’ customers; perhaps OhmConnect could be engaged to
do the same for PA in at least the short term.) Educate local contractors
and residents on how to install and use the aforementioned load shedding
and grid storage equipment.
Aggressively encourage building electrification and natural-gas-free
buildings by giving huge incentives to not pipe gas to new or remodeled
buildings and large rebates to folks who do transition their appliances
from gas to electricity. Progression: Increase the reliability of the electric
supply to reduce resistance to giving up gas appliances such as stoves,
water heaters, wall furnaces, and gas fireplaces that currently don’t
require electricity. Make no new gas connections. Ban installation of new
gas appliances. Require existing gas appliances to be replaced by a
certain date. Cap off older lines to prevent leakage. Cap off all unused
lines. Stop supplying gas altogether or transition non-electrifiable needs
to biogas, possibly supplied through the remaining gas pipeline network.
Reinstate a $2300 or more rebate for DIY heat pump water heater
installations.
Railway:
Follow the lead of other cities on the Peninsula by cost-effectively grade
separating the railway crossings with a hybrid approach of raising the
tracks and lowering the cross streets to go underneath. Be sure that
there are low sound walls on the elevated tracks to protect the nearby
homes from wheel noise. (The electrified locomotives are much quieter
than the old diesel ones, so tall sound walls are not needed.)
Prioritize Biodiversity and the Natural Environment:
Develop and adopt regulations that should help reduce light pollution and
protect the Dark Sky.
9 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14800 Created with OpenGov | January 12, 2026, 3:03 PM
2026 City Council Priorities Community Feedback
Council is exploring keeping their annual priorities the same for 2026. Share your input on priorities.
ATTACHMENT BItem 1
Attachment B - Community
Survey on 2026 Council
Priorities
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 26 Packet Pg. 30 of 72
Develop and adopt regulations that should help reduce bird-collision
hazards.
Develop and adopt regulations to protect water quality in creeks and
protect riparian corridors from encroachment.
Develop and adopt regulations to reduce the use of plastic in landscaping,
especially artificial turf.
Continue to study and implement protections to our baylands, and
protect the community from the impacts of sea level rise.
Thank you.
Lawrence Garwin
Palo Alto
Question 2
No response
Question 3
• Community Center
Adam Schwartz
in University South
January 8, 2026, 5:42 PM
Question 1
My #1 priority is building more homes at all price points.
Question 2
Please move the third bullet to first, and please be more explicit that the
outcome in 2026 should be new homes at all price points.
Question 3
• University South
Name not shown
in Evergreen Park
January 8, 2026, 5:51 PM
Question 1
Would like to see the city move from "Implementing Housing Strategies"
to seeing homes from the current (and an expanded) pipeline built
Question 2
Climate Action and Adaptation & Natural Environment Protection
-increase HPWH adoption
-roll out renter- and MF- programs
Implementing Housing Strategies for Social and Economic Balance
-need more housing built
-increase number of ADUs by making it easier to build
Public Safety, Wellness & Belonging
-Cubberley bond passed
-increased utilization of mental health and youth resources
-paint the curbs red for the daylighting of intersections
Question 3
• Evergreen Park
stephen levy
in University Park
January 8, 2026, 6:54 PM
Question 1
I think extending the existing priority categories is okay and see below for
suggestions within these categories
Question 2
Within housing I would add a focus on a) expanding the size of ADUs so
they can serve as starter homes for families and downsizing options for
seniors who wish to remain in the community. Both groups would be
better served by ADUs in the 1,200-1,400 sq ft range.
Also within housing, I hope council asks staff to begin an active search for
more sites for BMR housing as looks certain we will not approve 4 DTN
parking lot sites in 2024.
Within climate and economic development, I would add a priority on
expanding walking and biking ease DTN as suggested by the ULI report.
Within economic development, I hope council and staff work to finalize a
vision for University Ave and DTN.
I am not sure where it fits in but I hope council will actively support a
regional transportation funding measure on the 2026 ballot as well as a
funding source for Cubberley revitalization.
Question 3
• University South
Name not available
January 8, 2026, 7:00 PM
10 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14800 Created with OpenGov | January 12, 2026, 3:03 PM
2026 City Council Priorities Community Feedback
Council is exploring keeping their annual priorities the same for 2026. Share your input on priorities.
ATTACHMENT BItem 1
Attachment B - Community
Survey on 2026 Council
Priorities
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 27 Packet Pg. 31 of 72
Question 1
I like the existing priorities
Question 2
No response
Question 3
No response
Name not available
January 8, 2026, 7:14 PM
Question 1
I want Foothills Park and the Baylands to enjoy full environmental
protection. I don’t want any big chain stores to rent on California Avenue.
I’m strongly opposed to the ridiculously tall re-development of Mollie
Stone’s. This will cause huge parking problems since Caltrain doesn’t go
to most stores or schools; it will also not be affordable to low-income
workers.
Question 2
I want no more office development in the California Avenue corridor! I
already see buildings with many vacancies.
Question 3
• Evergreen Park
Name not available
January 8, 2026, 10:29 PM
Question 1
Priorities seem fine.
Question 2
This question doesn't make any sense to me. We don't know any
outcomes for 2026.
Question 3
• Adobe Meadow
Name not available
January 9, 2026, 8:58 AM
Question 1
No response
Question 2
There are too many homeless people in the downtown area, especially in
the parking garages. The garages smell like urine. This is impacting our
downtown businesses. It’s only getting worse.
Question 3
• University South
Name not available
January 9, 2026, 9:15 AM
Question 1
How about improving government efficiency and effectiveness, reducing
overhead and red tape and streamlining the permit process?
Question 2
Try reading Abundance.
Question 3
• Fairmeadow
Name not shown
in Oak Creek
January 9, 2026, 9:22 AM
Question 1
Increasing high-density housing close to downtown (and close to
CalTrain) will increase foot traffic for downtown businesses.
Eliminating awful one-way streets in old downtown will make downtown
more inviting for pedestrians and cyclists.
Educating the public about the dangers of gas ranges will encourage
conversion to safe, electric ranges.
Ticketing red-light runners at Sand Hill and ECR (and around the Stanford
Shopping Center) will improve safety for pedestrians, children, bicyclists,
and shoppers.
Question 2
11 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14800 Created with OpenGov | January 12, 2026, 3:03 PM
2026 City Council Priorities Community Feedback
Council is exploring keeping their annual priorities the same for 2026. Share your input on priorities.
ATTACHMENT BItem 1
Attachment B - Community
Survey on 2026 Council
Priorities
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 28 Packet Pg. 32 of 72
Even CostCo is smart enough to build housing above their stores. Yet,
short-sighted members of Palo Alto City Council continue to refuse to let
Stanford build much-needed housing for their own nurses on their own
property at Stanford Shopping Center.
Question 3
• Old Palo Alto
Name not shown
in Midtown/ Midtown West
January 9, 2026, 9:23 AM
Question 1
I'm 56 and when I travel to other places, it makes me realize that,
increasingly, Palo Alto is a city of the old. We need younger people here
for a whole host of reasons - and there's one reason why they're not living
in our town: housing. I'm not sure what "Housing Strategies for Social and
Economic Balance" means, but here's what needs to be included under
that umbrella: more housing. Immediately. Of all types and price points.
High density hubs near transit. Mixed use apartments and condos. Low
income housing. Housing for people with disabilities. Just because some
Gen X and Boomer residents aren't comfortable with change doesn't
mean that City Council should stick its head in the sand on this issue.
Thank you, City Council, for reading, and for all that you do for all of us.
Question 2
No response
Question 3
• Midtown
Name not available
January 9, 2026, 9:23 AM
Question 1
Please emphasize traffic enforcement under public safety. Also do
something about the homeless wandering around downtown.
Question 2
No response
Question 3
• University South
Name not shown
in College Terrace
January 9, 2026, 9:26 AM
Question 1
I think the current priorities are fine, but the #1 adjustment should be to
accelerate building for new housing. The state laws that require more
building especially in transit zones with high buildings are a good ideas --
I'm glad they force Palo Alto to move. Of course, some residents will
always object and the city can be thoughtful about how to achieve the
state building goals or exceed them, but tall buildings next to Caltrain or
El Camino are the best way to do our part to increase housing
affordability. One of the biggest problems for affordability is that we
don't build enough new housing.
Question 2
No response
Question 3
• College Terrace
Name not shown
in Barron Park
January 9, 2026, 9:30 AM
Question 1
As a 50 year resident of Palo Alto, while I support efforts to mitigate
climate change, I believe Palo Alto has gone too far. It's complex building
constraints and requirements in support of climate change have helped
make the construction and expansion of housing in Palo Alto time
consuming, cumbersome and too expensive. As with so many issues in
Palo Alto, enthusiasts and activists have pushed this campaign too far -
at a large cost to many average people who just need jobs and homes
(and shorter commutes). Palo Alto is no longer a small college town (nor
is it a nature preserve) - it is a major global hub and needs to respond to
that reality.
Question 2
Highest priority: Implementing Housing Strategies for Social and
Economic Balance
Next Highest: Public Safety, Wellness & Belonging
Lowest: Economic Development & Retail Vibrancy
Even Lower: Climate Action and Adaptation & Natural Environment
Protection
12 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14800 Created with OpenGov | January 12, 2026, 3:03 PM
2026 City Council Priorities Community Feedback
Council is exploring keeping their annual priorities the same for 2026. Share your input on priorities.
ATTACHMENT BItem 1
Attachment B - Community
Survey on 2026 Council
Priorities
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 29 Packet Pg. 33 of 72
Question 3
• Barron Park
Name not shown
in Greenmeadow
January 9, 2026, 9:31 AM
Question 1
I feel the City Council should focus on more efficiency in planning. It takes
years for projects to happen and this dramatically impacts our ability to
improve our living experience in this city.
I am not sure if the following fits into one of the existing priorities but the
City Council should permanently eliminate car, bus and truck traffic on
University Avenue and California Avenue. These streets should be walking
only in our two main city centers.
Question 2
The Palo Alto city council should adopt more mixed use zoning where
there is retail on the first floor, office space on second floor and
residential on upper floors. This should be done more in areas closer to
public transportation hubs. This would provide a more walkable city as
one can experience when visiting Europe and parts of Asia. Our current
"dedicated" zoning per lot (e.g. commercial only) leads to a system that
mandates the use of cars or a public transportation system that is
inadequate.
Question 3
• Greenmeadow
Name not shown
in Green Acres
January 9, 2026, 9:31 AM
Question 1
All four are relevant. Public safety should be elevated, the community has
been faced with increased low level crime and too many traffic scofflaws
Question 2
For climate action, any work on the baylands and flood prevention is
needed. For Economic developemnt, address rising retail rents and
encouraging businesses locating to the downtown and Cal ave areas.
Housing strategy needs to address the multiple home ownership and
conversion issues of the super wealthy now before more properties are
being used surreptitiously. Public safety, there's a need to review the
police department budget, deployment and focus to address the current
concerns of the community.
Question 3
• Palo Alto Orchards
Name not available
January 9, 2026, 9:33 AM
Question 1
YES - and move housing to the top of the list! We will not have success in
any of the other priority areas without adding housing. New residents
(and new housing opportunities for existing residents) support our
commercial areas; strengthen our budgetary resiliency; improve feelings
of belonging; and new energy-efficient units near shopping, jobs, and
transit are the best form of CLIMATE ACTION.
Question 2
I think we did well laying the foundation for new housing, and the state
really helped us with SB 79 -- especially with regard to the downtown
where the outcome of years of community outreach on a "housing plan"
and yielded very little in terms of potential upzoning or locations for lots
of new and much-needed units. But we need more!
We have 35 PAGES of complicated and costly "Objective Standards", on
top of the thousands of other code requirements. How about FAR
bonuses for all-electric buildings, exceptionally designed bike parking
(with outlets for charging e-bikes and room for parking cargo bikes), or
rooftop gardens/landscaping? This results in more applications for our
notoriously long and unproductive PHZ process - 3 years is too long for
what are really relatively small projects that we really want (looking at you
332 Forest Ave.).
How about more waivers to design standards - or let ARB take a crack at
parking them down and tossing outdated, excessively costly, or
duplicative standards out.
Time to get creative because other cities will eat our lunch in terms of
obtaining limited and hard-to-get financing because it is so much easier to
build there.
Question 3
• Downtown North
Name not available
13 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14800 Created with OpenGov | January 12, 2026, 3:03 PM
2026 City Council Priorities Community Feedback
Council is exploring keeping their annual priorities the same for 2026. Share your input on priorities.
ATTACHMENT BItem 1
Attachment B - Community
Survey on 2026 Council
Priorities
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 30 Packet Pg. 34 of 72
January 9, 2026, 9:34 AM
Question 1
No response
Question 2
No response
Question 3
No response
Name not available
January 9, 2026, 9:35 AM
Question 1
Housing should be by far the number one priority. One city can do very,
very little for the global environment other than try to lead by example.
It's fine to talk about but let's not kid ourselves that it actually advaces
anything other than political agendas. The city just spent more than
double what they told us the new police building would cost so let's drop
it. Further more this is a very safe city all things considered.
Housing - Palo Alto has talked about fixing the "Palo Alto Process" for at
least thirty years and the Planning and Building departments are
absolutely horrendous. I have experience and hear other's stories and
know first hand that getting a project approved and obtaining a building
permit for an approved project continue to be nightmare experiences for
anyone trying to build a large building or remodel a bathroom. After thirty
years I'm convinced nobody cares. It's an embarrassing. Menlo Park is
just as terrible but other cities are much more resonable.
Economic Development and Retail Vibrancy - these go hand in hand with
the above comment. Encouraging investment in PA means telling a
retailer or developer it won't take a year to get permit to do some interior
modifications. A year or more! It's totally ridiculous and I know first hand
numerous retailers that steered clear of PA and went to Mountain View
and Redwood City. They actually want and attract investment and don't
push people away or give them hundreds of reasons and delays for why
not to come to PaloAlto. Ramona? How hard can it be to figure this out?
Do something, make a decision and move on!
Question 2
Fix the above
Question 3
• Professorville
Name not available
January 9, 2026, 9:36 AM
Question 1
Provide reasons why the ultra wealthy people in Palo Alto should invest in
our city. What's in it for them?
Question 2
No response
Question 3
• Community Center
Name not shown
in Old Palo Alto
January 9, 2026, 9:47 AM
Question 1
Most of the priorities have been in place for years with little progress and
just sound virtuous.
Question 2
Implementing Housing Strategies for Social & Economic Balance: This
appears unachievable, but has been discussed, with little to show, for
years ad nauseum.
Climate Action & Adaptation, and Natural Environment Protection: Efforts
here have largely been unnoticed except for attempting to take away our
desired energy sources.
Economic Development & Retail Vibrancy: These half efforts are not
keeping pace with other municipalities. The efforts come up short as
though they were done on a shoestring budget with no funding. Cal Ave
and downtown could be much nicer, how about cleaning the
streets/sidewwalks once in a while (it not enjoyable eating and shopping
on filthy asphalt!). We need to make downtown and Cal Ave much nicer in
order to draw in excellent retail and restaurants. How about closing off
University like Cal Ave and putting in attractive/inviting pedestrian areas.
Take a visit to Santana Row, or downtown Los Gatos/Burlingame/Walnut
Creek for inspiration. Use the $$$ you are overcharging us on utilities into
the general fund to do this.
Public Safety, Wellness & Belonging: We spent/wasted over $120M on
14 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14800 Created with OpenGov | January 12, 2026, 3:03 PM
2026 City Council Priorities Community Feedback
Council is exploring keeping their annual priorities the same for 2026. Share your input on priorities.
ATTACHMENT BItem 1
Attachment B - Community
Survey on 2026 Council
Priorities
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 31 Packet Pg. 35 of 72
the opulent "Taj Mahal" Police Building in a city largely devoid of crime.
Why is that our signature building!!! That money could have been spent
on better attempts to make progress in other areas.
Question 3
• Old Palo Alto
Name not shown
outside Palo Alto
January 9, 2026, 9:52 AM
Question 1
Where is "Finalize train track decisions"? 1. Churchill - fix or leave as is,
but **DO NOT CLOSE** 2. Meadow/Charleston - this is 'long term', so do
the right thing for the future, even it that means (more) property taking.
Don't choose a short term 'half-donkey' (I could not use the perfectly fine
word spelled @$$) or Rube-Goldberg solution (e.g. the loop-back traffic
circle). Do it once; do it right.
I'll use a word that I do not like, but let's not go "over-woke" on
client/environment requirements, particularly those that are more for
show than actual/meaningful/effective solutions. For example, artificial
turf. Ground up tires are out; fumes are out; organic/new infill is in;
temps are down and acceptable; fields are safer (flat/smooth, no pot-
/gopher- holes to twist/break ankles; no bare dirt/rocks), are more
available (no rain/mud closures), support more types of sports/activities,
and don't need weekly re-lining. AND - city employee/water costs will go
up over time, and when they do, GRASS field maintenance will drop down
in the priority list ==> availability and safety will go DOWN, more closures
with less utilization.
Question 2
Resist/fight the state takeover of our zoning/housing plans, but DONT BE
STUBBORN; take opportunities to compromise with some development
proposals (scaling back slightly) in order to get progress going. Let's
speed up (or lubricate) the "Palo Alto Process".
Take action on motor home parking/living. If we have (valid) laws, then
can't we enforce them? But look to solutions to accomodate people for
whom this is perhaps their only viable solution. (income requirements;
distance away; some form of registration to use designated parking areas,
if they can be found; ...)
Question 3
• Palo Verde
Name not available
January 9, 2026, 9:56 AM
Question 1
The Council's focus should be on quality-of-life aspects of Palo Alto,
which have been declining in the 30 years I have lived here.
Question 2
Please focus on things that matter, not this "climate action" or
"belonging" junk.
Question 3
• Old Palo Alto
Name not shown
in Leland Manor/ Garland
January 9, 2026, 9:58 AM
Question 1
I would also like the City to continue doing what it can to fight against
noise from airplane overflights.
Question 2
No response
Question 3
• Leland Manor
Name not available
January 9, 2026, 9:58 AM
Question 1
No response
Question 2
No response
Question 3
• Charleston Meadows
Name not available
January 9, 2026, 10:00 AM
15 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14800 Created with OpenGov | January 12, 2026, 3:03 PM
2026 City Council Priorities Community Feedback
Council is exploring keeping their annual priorities the same for 2026. Share your input on priorities.
ATTACHMENT BItem 1
Attachment B - Community
Survey on 2026 Council
Priorities
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 32 Packet Pg. 36 of 72
Question 1
The 4 is good.
Question 2
Economic development and public safety are key elements for the coming
year. They are basic structures that supports the city.
Emphasis should be put on those.
Then the other 2 priorities will fall into place.
Please remember that Housing will never be solved - we need people
working from home, remote job. The bay area is expensive and not
affordable. We need alternatives and increase high density housing - if
you want high rise to have more people live in - please look up to San
Francisco or Oakland and move there. Our nearby cities are suburbs, not
metropolitan cities like LA, New York, San Francisco.... Please reflect on
this.
The state mandates a blank statement to increase housing which is
irresponsible.
Question 3
No response
Name not shown
in Greenmeadow
January 9, 2026, 10:11 AM
Question 1
Being an "island of moral superiority" is great if you control the
environment, that isn't the case today or for the known future. We need to
really focus on the fact we are one of many cities on the Peninsula and the
larger Bay Area and prioritize actions that are beneficial to the whole not
just the NIMBY.
Drop:
Climate Action and Adaptation & Natural Environment Protection
Since we can't effect regional change.
Keep these:
Economic Development & Retail Vibrancy
Implementing Housing Strategies for Social and Economic Balance
Public Safety, Wellness & Belonging
Because they are beneficial beyond our borders. Look for ways to extend
multi-use zoning to ensure those that serve us in our city can actually live
it our city (reducing commute times, reducing pollution and traffic).
Be more efficient with permitting and zoning (improved ADU permits is
great start).
Improve transportation fixes. This city (and countless councils) have been
ruminating on what to do and eventually kick the decision to future
councils. This has bee the case in 1999. a quarter century is far more than
enough time to make a decision, choose it and deal with the NIMBY's that
will come at you for making the societally beneficial choice.
Question 2
Being an "island of moral superiority" is great if you control the
environment, that isn't the case today or for the known future. We need to
really focus on the fact we are one of many cities on the Peninsula and the
larger Bay Area and prioritize actions that are beneficial to the whole not
just the NIMBY.
Drop:
Climate Action and Adaptation & Natural Environment Protection
Since we can't effect regional change.
Keep these:
Economic Development & Retail Vibrancy
Implementing Housing Strategies for Social and Economic Balance
Public Safety, Wellness & Belonging
Because they are beneficial beyond our borders. Look for ways to extend
multi-use zoning to ensure those that serve us in our city can actually live
it our city (reducing commute times, reducing pollution and traffic).
Be more efficient with permitting and zoning (improved ADU permits is
great start).
Improve transportation fixes. This city (and countless councils) have been
ruminating on what to do and eventually kick the decision to future
councils. This has bee the case in 1999. a quarter century is far more than
enough time to make a decision, choose it and deal with the NIMBY's that
will come at you for making the societally beneficial choice.
Question 3
• Greenmeadow
Richard Mates
in Duveneck/ St Francis
January 9, 2026, 10:17 AM
Question 1
Premise: Palo Alto is broke.
There should only be one priority, start aggressively paying down the
unfunded liability of city employees retiree health insurance. If not done
soon Palo Alto may have to declare bankruptcy which will materially effect
16 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14800 Created with OpenGov | January 12, 2026, 3:03 PM
2026 City Council Priorities Community Feedback
Council is exploring keeping their annual priorities the same for 2026. Share your input on priorities.
ATTACHMENT BItem 1
Attachment B - Community
Survey on 2026 Council
Priorities
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 33 Packet Pg. 37 of 72
real estate values.
My suggestion is to sell the city to Stanford including liabilities.
Question 2
See above.
Question 3
• Duveneck/St. Francis
Name not available
January 9, 2026, 10:18 AM
Question 1
Make Palo Alto walkable by keeping sidewalks free of cars and shrubbery
Question 2
Stop letting billionaires buy up multiple properties and take housing off
the market.
Do something about all the ghost houses.
Question 3
• Midtown
Name not shown
in University Park
January 9, 2026, 10:23 AM
Question 1
Move Public Safety to the top. I am not sure what "Wellness and
Belonging" mean, but it sounds good...
Move Climate Action to the bottom or off of the list. I am all for saving the
environment but Palo Alto has gone way too far with costly building
restrictions.
If you are that worried about carbon, stop (OK, cut back on) buying
products from countries whose main source of electric power is coal.
Question 2
Regarding Public Safety, please start enforcing the laws and codes we
now have and ticket and tow the hudreds of people who are living on our
streets. The idea for four million dollars for signs is absurd. We are
surrounded by cities that have banned living on their streets, so they have
just moved here. Building low income housing will not solve the problem
as you can never match the cost of living in a camper on the street which
is nothing.
Also, please start enforcing traffic laws in the downtown. It is a rare sight
to see anyone stop at a stop sign or even a crosswalk when pedestrians
are about to cross. I cross our streets like a feral cat.
Question 3
• University South
Name not shown
in Downtown North
January 9, 2026, 10:40 AM
Question 1
Agree with your priorities.
Question 2
Perhaps more focus should be on the retail and office space situation.
Before the pandemic, downtown was a vibrant community. Some of that
vibrancy returned but now when I walk downtown I see that some empty
spaces take much longer to fill.
Question 3
• Downtown North
Jennifer Landesmann
in Crescent Park
January 9, 2026, 10:40 AM
Question 1
Council's vote last year to have Public Safety, Wellness & Belonging was
very good (capturing local Issues and projects) though I disagreed with
the back-and-forth on Health vs Wellness & belonging which I suppose
can go both ways- diluting the term health or making the City's standard
to consider something as a health issue very flexible. This said, I strongly
support keeping local issues and projects pertaining to public safety and
health as a core priority and caution against taking it off future lists
because this has the effect of important issues going dormant. What we
need is a better way for the community to track progress on initiatives
related to public safety and health (past and future) with a performance
lens. I suggest that the discussions that made the agenda this past year
17 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14800 Created with OpenGov | January 12, 2026, 3:03 PM
2026 City Council Priorities Community Feedback
Council is exploring keeping their annual priorities the same for 2026. Share your input on priorities.
ATTACHMENT BItem 1
Attachment B - Community
Survey on 2026 Council
Priorities
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 34 Packet Pg. 38 of 72
about how to better manage consultants, and that were largely raised by
public concerns, can also help inform how the community can better
track progress on City priorities. The Consultant discussion captures
some elements of performance tracking; affects all priorities, and the
topic of having a disciplined approach to reporting to the community on
projects at regular intervals could actually have more attention in general
in 2026. So far, there was a meeting late last year discussing the
problems identified with consultant oversight but public input at the
meeting itself was in effect cancelled (due to an agenda schedule issue). I
would like to urge Council to find ways so that when the next discussion
comes back about how to improve the management of consultants - to
please ensure that the Community be given serious consideration to
weigh in on potential improvements. Some ideas for inviting more public
input on the topic were actually raised at the first meeting, none adopted
yet as far as I could tell..but at the minimum, the discussion about
proposed improvements for better managing consultants should be
noticed with plenty of time, scheduling the meeting early enough in the
agenda so that more people can participate, and for this to be done
before final decisions.
I concur with those who have suggested that for the order of priorities
Public Safety should be higher.
Question 2
Per my previous response, the ability to track outcomes with a
performance lens needs attention. I expressed this concern last year
ahead of Council's retreat, that I am especially concerned with Public
Safety and Health issues that do not have oversight from a Commission,
Standing or Ad Hoc Committee; when the topic or a project does not
make the public agenda for years, which results in a lack of transparency.
The Auditor's procurement audit raised lack of performance based
tracking which is especially relevant for tracking "long-haul" projects.
When these issues are addressed, the City can better engage residents
which in my view can be an important asset to handling the City's
challenges and opportunities.
Specifically, for SFO aircraft noise, a high priority issue for many in the
community, I commend the City for challenging the airport's FEIR. At the
same time, I recommend instituting enhanced City communications on
the topic; adding a Quarterly update, as well as Council review of issues
that are highly controversial and problematic such as SFO's methodology
to track noise (for their GBAS project), and given the FAA's lack of Post-
Implementation reviews. This matters because a major part of the
community's advocacy during the Select Committee and since has been
to ensure adequate "before and after" reviews for any airspace changes
affecting Palo Alto. It is not appropriate to use the profile of one or two
aircraft on a navigation path to quantify the real impacts of Nexgen
airspace procedures.
Question 3
• Crescent Park
Name not available
January 9, 2026, 10:42 AM
Question 1
No response
Question 2
I'm particularly concerned about public safety and wellness.
Please prioritize:
- maintaining local control over telecommunications equipment
placement, to ensure that our homes, neighborhoods and schools are free
from intrusive EMF radiation
- reducing air traffic over our city to maintain cleaner air and reduce
noise.
- actively enforce ban on leaf blowers
- consider other ways to reduce toxins in our environment (use of
pesticides, herbicides, rat poisons, etc.)
-
Question 3
• Midtown
Name not shown
in Old Palo Alto
January 9, 2026, 10:45 AM
Question 1
1) The most important is Public Safety, Wellness. Belonging sounds
weird, don’t use that term.
2) Economic development and Retail—I don’t want to see so many
vacancies on University Ave. It’s depressing.
3) Housing strategies need to take neighborhood feel into account. Large
buildings should be on main thoroughfares, like El Camino, and should
have sufficient parking.
4) The only climate action we need to pursue is water preservation. We
should have rain collection tanks for the city of Palo Alto.
Question 2
I listed my feedback above.
Question 3
18 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14800 Created with OpenGov | January 12, 2026, 3:03 PM
2026 City Council Priorities Community Feedback
Council is exploring keeping their annual priorities the same for 2026. Share your input on priorities.
ATTACHMENT BItem 1
Attachment B - Community
Survey on 2026 Council
Priorities
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 35 Packet Pg. 39 of 72
• Old Palo Alto
Name not available
January 9, 2026, 10:56 AM
Question 1
Do not extend existing priorities. Change them to improve the quality of
life of your residents.
We are losing heritage trees that are butchered to allow for outdated
power lines. Power should be undergrounded to save these trees.
You have lost control of city planning to ambitious developers, and
mandates from Sacramento. You should prioritize reassertion of control
of residential planning. Otherwise we will be stuck with overbuilt ugly
buildings not in character with the neighborhood that never get replaced
in the future. Look at the buildings from the lax sixties and seventies with
which we are stuck like the one at Alma and the creek.
We can increase housing stock at a controlled rate in a thoughtful
manner.
Last, outlaw urban camping. It is destructive to the environment and is no
solution to our housing problems.
Question 2
Poor. The priorities themselves were misguided.
Question 3
• Old Palo Alto
Name not available
January 9, 2026, 10:57 AM
Question 1
Agree with 3 of the 4; but not housing for social balance.
How can you have balance with so much foreign investment in property
driving up pricing and locking out middle
class????????????????????????????????
I suggest it is next to impossible
Question 2
Climate, traffic and public safety, sense of Community which has been
LOST in Palo Alto; middle class locked out
Question 3
• Midtown
Name not available
January 9, 2026, 11:08 AM
Question 1
How was the 2025 goal and impact of Retail Vibrancy determined? Please
report it.
Downtown University Ave. design plan execution.
Requiring additional parking. Eliminating park-lets which served their
purpose during the pandemic. Cal Ave retailers voting to have at least for
one lane of traffic?
Re-open Ramona Street - some of the leaders for closure have changed
their position.
What housing projects have been approved in 2025?
How does the council measure success?
Question 2
What specific goals are projected for each priority during the next 12
months?
A quarterly statement from the Mayor advising the residents of the
progress achieved toward each goal.
Question 3
• Crescent Park
Name not shown
in Greenmeadow
January 9, 2026, 11:22 AM
Question 1
In order of priority:
1. Economic development and Retail vibrancy
2. Public safety, wellness and belonging
3. Climate action and adaptation…
4. Implementing housing strategies….
Question 2
No response
Question 3
• Greenmeadow
Name not available
January 9, 2026, 11:22 AM
19 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14800 Created with OpenGov | January 12, 2026, 3:03 PM
2026 City Council Priorities Community Feedback
Council is exploring keeping their annual priorities the same for 2026. Share your input on priorities.
ATTACHMENT BItem 1
Attachment B - Community
Survey on 2026 Council
Priorities
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 36 Packet Pg. 40 of 72
Question 1
Yes
Good idea
Question 2
Concrete actions that engage the community
Steps individuals can take to help reach the goals
Meeting and ways to bring community together around those goal
Communicated goals and strategies to whole community to sensibilize
and engage community
Question 3
• Greenmeadow
Name not shown
in Midtown/ Midtown West
January 9, 2026, 11:44 AM
Question 1
This should not happen. These terms are vague and do not push the city
to include people who are not super wealthy.
Question 2
There needs to be much more focus on building affordable housing, and a
lot of it.
Question 3
• Midtown
Name not shown
in Midtown/ Midtown West
January 9, 2026, 11:58 AM
Question 1
I think this is a very solid process. While I happen to be an independent
voter, I am not a fan of the current administration's methodology
regarding illegal aliens. I wonder if the City should take a position in terms
of how it would react to the "new" approach to enforcement of our
immigration laws (e.g. do we want ICE here in the way it currently
conducts its business).
Question 2
I focus this response on Wellness and Belonging. Pickleball in Palo Alto
has addressed this in such a unique way and I know you have heard a
number of stories on how it has literally changed lives and in some cases,
saved lives. Now, though, its positive effects have been "capped" due to
the lack of available courts. At peak evening and weekend times, the
waits are so bad, that people don't come. The solution is quite simple and
has been put forth by the local club - convert 2 Mitchell Park tennis courts
into 8 pickleball courts. I know that will result in 23 pickleball courts, and
a decrease in Tennis Courts from 58 to 56 (City and School owned).
Given that pickleball interest is about 2x tennis interest based on all I can
read, the resulting 56 vs 23 still is "too high" for "equilibrium" between the
two sports, but will greatly address the current issue and likely the issue
for some time. Pickleball works by having large number of courts in the
same location, so even if there were space for a few courts elsewhere, it
simply would not work efficiently.
Question 3
• Midtown
Name not shown
in Greenmeadow
January 9, 2026, 11:58 AM
Question 1
No response
Question 2
It is essential for Public Safety, Wellness & Belonging to expand pickleball
court access at Mitchell Park ASAP. This small action is the biggest bang
for the Council's buck in addressing Public Safety, Wellness & Belonging.
Question 3
• Greenmeadow
Name not available
January 9, 2026, 11:59 AM
Question 1
1. Economic Development & Retail Vibrancy
2. Public Safety, Wellness & Belonging
3. Implementing Housing Strategies for Social and Economic Balance
4. Climate Action and Adaptation & Natural Environment Protection
20 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14800 Created with OpenGov | January 12, 2026, 3:03 PM
2026 City Council Priorities Community Feedback
Council is exploring keeping their annual priorities the same for 2026. Share your input on priorities.
ATTACHMENT BItem 1
Attachment B - Community
Survey on 2026 Council
Priorities
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 37 Packet Pg. 41 of 72
Question 2
1. Economic Development & Retail Vibrancy
The economic development/retail vibrancy need to be improved. Its
current state is not as vibrant as pre-COVID times.
2. Implementing Housing Strategies for Social and Economic Balance
Housing for essential workers (teachers, nurses, etc.) would be
appreciated
3. Public Safety, Wellness & Belonging
4. Climate Action and Adaptation & Natural Environment Protection
I think we've overachieved this compared to other towns. So, place it on
the low priority for now.
Question 3
• Duveneck/St. Francis
Name not available
January 9, 2026, 11:59 AM
Question 1
The climate has been changing since the world began. Good luck playing
God.
Question 2
Revitalize the economy in Palo Alto by lowering taxes, including transient
taxes.
Question 3
• Midtown
Name not available
January 9, 2026, 12:03 PM
Question 1
Projects always pushed on and out--ie: Cubberley, train overpasses,
"retail vibrancy" and much more....After 63 years in same home/area, I've
experienced the waffling and waste that characterize City government.
While some projects eventually get done--always late. In many cases it's
less an improvement and always more costly--or a huge fight for the
obvious, ie: No. 4 Fire Station. I've lived and taken part in the Palo Alto
process. And I've creatively addressed it in writing over 50 years for the
community. Mostly "priorities" come down to virtue signaling combined
with everyone being an expert in this town...all part of the problem!
Question 2
Too open ended--nothing specific, ergo, not a true priority, already too
many competing agendas; Even defining these goals will take time and
will once more wind up being inefficient and costly. Example...Charleston
Road! Took forever to nail down an inefficient design. What a slog to wind
up with THE main artery in south P.A. from 101 to 280 a clogged nuisance
in the best of times--and a chilling nightmare in case of disaster. Then add
a huge population planned near term. I often wonder if ANY of the actual
decision makers ever experience the reality of these outcomes.
Question 3
• Walnut Grove
Name not available
January 9, 2026, 12:07 PM
Question 1
Public Safety, Wellness & Belonging - Creating spaces for Palo Alto
residents to meet
Question 2
Hope to have more Pickleball courts built at Mitchell Park
Question 3
• Midtown
Harvey Alcabes
in Barron Park
January 9, 2026, 12:10 PM
Question 1
The priority that most strongly matches my needs as a Palo Alto
homeowner and a senior is "Public Safety, Wellness & Belonging"
Question 2
Improved facilities for wellness and recreation.
Question 3
• Barron Park
Name not shown
21 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14800 Created with OpenGov | January 12, 2026, 3:03 PM
2026 City Council Priorities Community Feedback
Council is exploring keeping their annual priorities the same for 2026. Share your input on priorities.
ATTACHMENT BItem 1
Attachment B - Community
Survey on 2026 Council
Priorities
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 38 Packet Pg. 42 of 72
in Leland Manor/ Garland
January 9, 2026, 12:16 PM
Question 1
No response
Question 2
- I think it is a waste of time to focus on Billionaire enclaves. Focus on
positive things you can do. For example:
- People who rent their houses or leave them empty more than 2 years
should be reassessed as a commercial use, which btw these are. Renting
entitles people to 1031 exchanges and empty houses are investments.
These reassessments will provide better funding for the schools and more
money to take low income housing issues.
- Do not add more complexity to remodels. Our remodel was supposed to
take 1 year. It took 18 months. We had good relations with our neighbors.
Perhaps change fines if there are complaints for breaking rules.
Question 3
• Triple El
Name not available
January 9, 2026, 12:19 PM
Question 1
Yes I agree with keeping these priorities for 2026.
Question 2
With the vibrant community Pickle ball program in place and it serving
many people I would love to see more courts devoted to this sport. Really
a wonderful community building environment
Question 3
• Barron Park
Rick Brooks
in Charleston Terrace
January 9, 2026, 12:19 PM
Question 1
This is a good idea.
Yet people are generally unwilling to reduce their energy usage....
Use a bike, no car or ebike, otherwise walk. Reduce home energy, don't
use heat or AC. Reduce population.
It's not going to happen.
Question 2
I play pickleball at Mitchell Park, I walk there (no car).
We need more courts, it's crowded a lot.
Question 3
• Charleston Gardens
Name not shown
in Palo Verde
January 9, 2026, 12:22 PM
Question 1
No response
Question 2
One of the priorities is “ Public Safety, Wellness & Belonging". It is my
fervent hope that as part of that objective, the city will be voting to add
more pickleball courts over at Mitchell Park. The pickleball courts are
CROWDED, especially evenings and weekends, because Pickleball is so
dang popular! Mitchell Park is absolutely the best place for Pickleball,
because it is surrounded by other community services (schools, parks,
Firestation) and not residences, and so any noise from the paddles does
not bother residents. And my understanding is that the PA Pickleball Club
has largely offered to foot the bill for much of the needed expansion?
Given the relatively few pickleball courts in town compared to the HIGH
number of tennis courts (largely elsewhere, in the smaller parks), this
seems like an obvious win-win.
Another priority is housing. I understand that Palo Alto has very lenient
rules for ADUs as part of this goal. But the rules are, IMO, too lenient. My
neighbor is planning an ADU and it violates every normal rule for housing,
but is completely exempt becuase it’s an ADU. It covers too much of the
land. It extends too far back into the yard. It is encroaching on the
protected perimeter of a protected redwood tree. It protrudes up and is
overly visible along my side fence. All this — and yet there is absolutely
NO REQUIREMENT that this ADU actually even be rented? Simply by
calling in an “ADU”, my neighbor is overbuilding and stretching the rules
for this quiet, small-lot neighborhood. She is free to use this “ADU” space
as basically a guest room in her own home or for whatever other purpose
she wants. How is this helping? Please reconsider the overly-lenient rules
for ADUs.
Question 3
22 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14800 Created with OpenGov | January 12, 2026, 3:03 PM
2026 City Council Priorities Community Feedback
Council is exploring keeping their annual priorities the same for 2026. Share your input on priorities.
ATTACHMENT BItem 1
Attachment B - Community
Survey on 2026 Council
Priorities
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 39 Packet Pg. 43 of 72
• Mayfield / Central
Name not available
January 9, 2026, 12:29 PM
Question 1
Pickleball has had a truly positive impact on my life—physically, mentally,
and socially—and it’s become clear that I’m far from alone in this
experience. The courts at Mitchell Park are constantly full, which speaks
volumes about the community’s enthusiasm for the sport and the need
for more space to play. Expanding pickleball facilities there would not only
meet this demand but would also be a powerful step toward advancing
the City’s “Wellness & Belonging” priority. Pickleball fosters inclusive,
multigenerational connection and encourages active, healthy lifestyles in
a way that few other activities do. With more courts, more residents could
enjoy these benefits, and the City would be investing in exactly the kind of
community-building infrastructure this priority aims to promote.
Question 2
Within the existing four annual priorities, I believe 2026 presents an
opportunity to focus on tangible, community-level outcomes—particularly
in advancing Wellness & Belonging. A measurable and impactful outcome
would be the expansion of pickleball infrastructure, especially at high-
demand locations like Mitchell Park. This would not only address a
pressing recreational need but also reflect a clear commitment to
fostering inclusive, low-cost activities that bring people together across
age, background, and ability. The city could set a 2026 goal of adding a
specific number of new pickleball courts or dedicated play hours, and
track usage and community feedback as indicators of success. This kind
of outcome—practical, visible, and deeply felt by residents—would
reinforce the city’s values and priorities in a way people experience
directly.
Question 3
• Barron Park
Eric Yuen
in University South
January 9, 2026, 12:32 PM
Question 1
As a Palo Alto resident and property owner, I support extending the Public
Safety, Wellness & Belonging for 2026.
Question 2
Withing the Public Safety, Wellness & Belonging priority. I specifically
support expanding the number of pickleball courts at Mitchell Park. As a
Palo Alto resident and property owner, I find that being able to play
pickleball helps my wellbeing and sense of belonging from an exercise and
social interaction perspective. Having a central location for pickleball
within Palo Alto helps me connect with other Palo Alto residents more
readily and frequently throughout the week. The courts at Mitchell Park
have become progressively more crowded such that more courts would
benefit the Public Safety, Wellness & Belonging priority for Palo Alto
residents. Thank you for your consideration.
Question 3
• Downtown North
Name not shown
in Crescent Park
January 9, 2026, 12:32 PM
Question 1
My priorities are Economic Development and Retail Vibrancy and Public
Safety.
I would add traffic and transportation and not Climate Action.
Question 2
Economic and Retail vibrancy should be evident is the shopping quarters
and not see empty storefronts.
Public safety should always be a number one priority.
Question 3
• Crescent Park
Name not shown
in Midtown/ Midtown West
January 9, 2026, 12:36 PM
Question 1
I most support focusing on housing strategies for social and economic
balance if that means it's more affordable housing. Even at the expense
of "character." The other priorities sound good but would be less
important in my opinion
Question 2
23 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14800 Created with OpenGov | January 12, 2026, 3:03 PM
2026 City Council Priorities Community Feedback
Council is exploring keeping their annual priorities the same for 2026. Share your input on priorities.
ATTACHMENT BItem 1
Attachment B - Community
Survey on 2026 Council
Priorities
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 40 Packet Pg. 44 of 72
I would like to see a significant % increase in the total number of available
properties for rent or purchase under 3 million in value.
Question 3
• Downtown North
TONY WYANT
in Southgate
January 9, 2026, 12:42 PM
Question 1
No response
Question 2
“Public safety, wellness, safety, and belonging” seems like it should be
highest priority. It’s also probably the most easily achieved in the short
term with limited resources. I often play pickleball at Mitchell park, and
swim at Rinconada and find both these programs aligned with this
priority.
Question 3
• Southgate
Barbara Tisdale
in Fairmeadow
January 9, 2026, 12:43 PM
Question 1
I am in favor of the city extending all of these priorities for the coming
year.
Question 2
I am personally most concerned with wellness and belonging. When I
retired a few years ago, I began playing pickleball at Mitchell Park. I
believe this had a huge impact on my ability to adapt to my life in
retirement. It has kept me active and engaged in an activity I love and has
enabled me to meet a new group of friends. The courts have become
more and more crowded and there is a definite need for more pickleball
courts. I would love for this to be a priority for the city in 2026.
Question 3
• Fairmeadow
Name not available
January 9, 2026, 12:46 PM
Question 1
Sounds appropriate.
However, I'm concerned though with the MAJOR multi-year, Cubberly
rehab project that may be put out to a vote. I recently received a survey
about that and it was hard to answer in part because it wasn't really clear
what the cost too each homeowner would be (only vague references to
"square footage").
Question 2
I would put Economic Development and Retail Vibrancy as #1
and Implementing Housing Strategies etc., as #2
Question 3
• Community Center
Name not shown
in Crescent Park
January 9, 2026, 1:00 PM
Question 1
Palo Alto should focus on public safety and economic development. I am
concerned about what seems to be a rise in property crime and the
significant number of camper vans on our streets. I also would like the city
to invest in the economic development of previously neglected areas of
the city, including midtown and California Ave.
Question 2
No response
Question 3
• Crescent Park
Name not available
January 9, 2026, 1:04 PM
Question 1
Pickleball is one of my favorite things about Palo Alto. Would love more
people to be able to enjoy this wonderful sport - social and health benefits
galore
24 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14800 Created with OpenGov | January 12, 2026, 3:03 PM
2026 City Council Priorities Community Feedback
Council is exploring keeping their annual priorities the same for 2026. Share your input on priorities.
ATTACHMENT BItem 1
Attachment B - Community
Survey on 2026 Council
Priorities
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 41 Packet Pg. 45 of 72
Question 2
Pickleball ! Pickleball ! Pickleball ! Pickleball !
Question 3
• College Terrace
Name not shown
in Duveneck/ St Francis
January 9, 2026, 1:06 PM
Question 1
I think the priorities should remain the same.
Question 2
I hope we move aggressively toward building denser, more affordable
housing so that we get more school aged children in town, which will allow
us to keep all of our neighborhood schools open.
Question 3
• Duveneck/St. Francis
Name not available
January 9, 2026, 1:14 PM
Question 1
No response
Question 2
I hope the City will focus on activities such as pickleball which will be great
physically,emotionally as well as creating a sense of belonging
Question 3
• Barron Park
Name not available
January 9, 2026, 1:15 PM
Question 1
More pickleball courts, please. The wait times to play are often too long.
Question 2
No response
Question 3
• Barron Park
Name not shown
in Greenmeadow
January 9, 2026, 1:15 PM
Question 1
Please continue to support pickleball and add courts at Mitchell Park.
Pickleball is a healthy activity, and highly social. I have made many new
friends on the courts and PAPC classes, important for seniors like me.
And it's fun to play.
Question 2
No response
Question 3
• Greenmeadow
Name not shown
in Palo Verde
January 9, 2026, 1:20 PM
Question 1
I think the Wellness and Belonging should remain as a 2026 priority
Question 2
I think the City Council should move forward immediately to create
additional pickleball courts at Mitchell Park. The Palo Alto Pickleball Club
has done extensive work with city staff to demonstrate that pickleball is a
huge contributor to Wellness and Belonging in the City. The only thing
holding pickleball back from being an even bigger contributor to the City's
Wellness and Belonging - is the need for more courts. The PAPC has
worked with City Staff to identify tennis courts that are ready to
converted to full time pickleball. Further, its my understanding that the
PAPC will cover the costs of establishing the new courts. What is the City
Council waiting for?
Question 3
25 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14800 Created with OpenGov | January 12, 2026, 3:03 PM
2026 City Council Priorities Community Feedback
Council is exploring keeping their annual priorities the same for 2026. Share your input on priorities.
ATTACHMENT BItem 1
Attachment B - Community
Survey on 2026 Council
Priorities
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 42 Packet Pg. 46 of 72
• Midtown
David Merrill
in Barron Park
January 9, 2026, 1:21 PM
Question 1
These seem like good priorities.
Question 2
As regards Wellness & Belonging...
I love playing pickleball at the Mitchell Park facilities -- always great to find
a game, and the community there is really nice, and open to players of
multiple abilities. It's a wonderful, inclusive environment.
This is important to me for physical fitness and activity, and local
community.
Question 3
• Barron Park
Name not available
January 9, 2026, 1:27 PM
Question 1
On the topic of public wellness and belonging, I seen a significant increase
and made lots of friends playing pickle ball and Mitchell Park. However,
Korte space is getting more and more limited and it’s getting harder,
especially for beginners to join when the courts are full. I love to see an
expansion of pickle ball Availability, so that the club can continue to do
our programs for beginners, close clinics, and organize other events
Question 2
The pull out of pickle ball club has done a great job of activating more
people to be healthier, creating community, and engaging newcomers
with it free events. I love to see their ability to continue to do the work.
Question 3
• Fairmeadow
Name not available
January 9, 2026, 1:44 PM
Question 1
I support extending the 2025 priorities to 2026. More progress needs to
be made.
Question 2
I’d like to see more public pickleball courts built so the current courts are
not so busy all the time and new people can join this fun and community
building game. Another suggestion is to also make courts in public
schools available to residents in the evening and on weekends when they
are not used by the schools. This will further reduce the crowds during
these peak time for those who work during the day.
Question 3
• Midtown
Name not shown
in Duveneck/ St Francis
January 9, 2026, 1:46 PM
Question 1
"Climate Action and Adaptation & Natural Environment Protection" has
no data to show Palo Alto effort has any effect on global environment
change if there is any. So take out this expensive political show from
priority. "Public Safety, Wellness & Belonging" should be the ONLY
priority given the continuous crime increase
Question 2
No response
Question 3
• Duveneck/St. Francis
marty klein
in Evergreen Park
January 9, 2026, 1:47 PM
Question 1
1) "public safety, wellness, and belonging" are NOT a single goal. public
safety requires things only the city can provide. the other psychological
goods should be provided by people's own activities--connecting with a
church, donating time to a food bank, getting acquainted with neighbors,
26 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14800 Created with OpenGov | January 12, 2026, 3:03 PM
2026 City Council Priorities Community Feedback
Council is exploring keeping their annual priorities the same for 2026. Share your input on priorities.
ATTACHMENT BItem 1
Attachment B - Community
Survey on 2026 Council
Priorities
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 43 Packet Pg. 47 of 72
etc.
2) i understand we're at the mercy of the "builder's remedy" when
developers want to scar our city (e.g., 414 california ave). still, i'd like
more transparency from the city about this, so the public can raise a fuss
when it wants to.
Question 2
public safety--reverse the "no right turn" signs that are dotting el camino.
they add NOTHING to safety, but slow down traffic unnecessarily.
economic development--regulate the volume of the various street
musicians' loudspeakers that are taking over california ave.. especially in
warmer weather, there's no place to eat dinner outside without being
blasted by loud amplified music. can't we limit the volume?
Question 3
• Mayfield / Central
Name not available
January 9, 2026, 1:49 PM
Question 1
I think it would be useful to extend the current priorities as they are quite
broad and highlight priorities of residents. The only thing I don't see here
is a priority around transportation efforts especially for local residents eg
bike/pedestrian paths with a focus on local community commutes. For
example, it seems that grade separation effort focus more on north-south
(ie more/less parallel to 101/280) routes and traffic improvements, at the
expense of east west (cross town) improvements despite the fact that
half the high school population live on each sides of the train tracks. On
the other hand I would like to highlight the how the Palo Alto Pickleball
Club supports Public Safety, Wellness & Belonging - not only does it
support wellness, it also facilitates social engagement amongst players,
as well as provide youth, aging, disabled community building through
pickleball.
Question 2
Add/incorporate within Palo Alto / cross town transport improvements
within one of the 4 priorities. Keep a focus on economic development,
climate/environmental protection, public safety, wellness & belonging.
On housing strategies, I hope that projects are reviewed in the context of
the whole city/surrounding neighbourhood, and not only for adherence to
criteria on its own. For example, I'm not sure where the 17 storey
development on top of Mollie Stone's now stands, and while I due support
higher density housing, it doesn't seem to make sense that there should
be 17 storey which will remove light from all the 2 storey apartment/single
family homes in the neighbourhood, and there are no other buildings
remotely this tall planned in Palo Alto as far as I know. Would it make
sense for example to limit the total number of stories ?
Question 3
• Midtown
Name not available
January 9, 2026, 1:50 PM
Question 1
No response
Question 2
I would like to add the need for additional pickleball courts at Mitchell
Park as a subset of the fourth priority.
Pickleball at this park has changed my physical and emotional well-being.
It has provided me with friends and community. Responding to the
demand for more courts fits squarely in the city's priority for public
safety, wellness and belonging.
Question 3
• Duveneck/St. Francis
Name not available
January 9, 2026, 1:51 PM
Question 1
I urge the Council to prioritize affordability across all four
priorities—particularly when implementing climate action. While Palo
Alto's climate goals are commendable, they must not create
unsustainable cost burdens on residents. Rising utility rates that
effectively force out residents who cannot afford energy-efficient
remodels directly undermine our goals for housing and belonging. True
'social and economic balance' requires addressing both housing supply
and the escalating cost of utilities.
Question 2
I commend the City for supporting the thriving pickleball community at
Mitchell Park, which directly advances our priority of 'Public Safety,
Wellness & Belonging.' The drop-in play model is essential to this
success—unlike tennis, which requires finding partners and reserving
courts, the Mitchell Park pickleball community welcomes anyone to
simply show up and play. This accessibility creates an open, friendly
community that brings together residents of all ages and backgrounds.
27 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14800 Created with OpenGov | January 12, 2026, 3:03 PM
2026 City Council Priorities Community Feedback
Council is exploring keeping their annual priorities the same for 2026. Share your input on priorities.
ATTACHMENT BItem 1
Attachment B - Community
Survey on 2026 Council
Priorities
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 44 Packet Pg. 48 of 72
Please continue to prioritize and expand support for pickleball at Mitchell
Park
Question 3
• Greenmeadow
Name not available
January 9, 2026, 2:01 PM
Question 1
I would put public safety first, mainly traffic control. Speeding is out of
control. There seems to be little enforcement, which means respect for
the law diminishes. We need more vigorous traffic control to protect
bicylists, pedestrians, and drivers. The "wellness and belonging" part
seems nebulous and a questionable item for a city to get involved in
(better the schools). But if this is mainly targeted at troubled youth, great!
I am glad I am not a high school student in Palo Alto, with all the soul-
crushing competition.
Question 2
2. Economic development and retail vibrancy (and include south Palo
Alto, the stores along ECR, which have taken a big hit with elimination of
parking on ECR. Were they ever consulted about the loss of parking? I
have heard bicyclists complain about delivery trucks using the bike lane
to serve these stores, but, gee, how are these neighborhood-serving
stores supposed to stay in business? Or are they expendable in the rush
to built apartments? Show a little love to south Palo Alto businesses! They
make my neighborhood walkable, and I bet decrease car trips for many
neighbors.
3. Housing strategies for social and economic balance. (I put this third
because while I know we have to add lots of housing, I have no idea what
"social and economic balance" means. Economic balance might mean
BMR units, which are good, but what is "social balance"? I don't have a
clue.)
4. Climate action (I think that's a more regional, state, or national matter)
Question 3
• Charleston Meadows
Name not available
January 9, 2026, 2:01 PM
Question 1
Please address traffic congestion on University - work with EPA to
improve timing of lights. Roundabout on Center/Hamilton is not working
because cars exiting city from Hamilton to Southwood/E Crescent are
blocking west bound traffic from entering circle. Can timing lights be
added for rush hour similar to 101 on ramp?
Question 2
Replacing Chaucer Bridge to reduce chance of flooding.
Question 3
• Crescent Park
Name not shown
in Old Palo Alto
January 9, 2026, 2:02 PM
Question 1
No response
Question 2
I’d really like to see more pickleball courts in Palo Alto (either more at
Mitchell Park or at other locations in Palo Alto)… the courts are too
crowded!
Question 3
• Old Palo Alto
Name not available
January 9, 2026, 2:23 PM
Question 1
These all are good priorities worth creating awareness and making
progress on.
Question 2
More pickleball courts at Mitchell Park, which has become a central hub
for a huge number of individuals from all walks of life. Pickleball promotes
wellness and belonging, is social and affordable for all. Currently, the
courts are (over) crowded, whereas tennis courts at high schools, public
parks, Cubberly Community Center are often empty. How about making
Cubberly tennis courts a hub for tennis - it's nearby, offers ample parking,
and is rarely occupied.
Question 3
28 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14800 Created with OpenGov | January 12, 2026, 3:03 PM
2026 City Council Priorities Community Feedback
Council is exploring keeping their annual priorities the same for 2026. Share your input on priorities.
ATTACHMENT BItem 1
Attachment B - Community
Survey on 2026 Council
Priorities
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 45 Packet Pg. 49 of 72
• Barron Park
Name not available
January 9, 2026, 2:31 PM
Question 1
No response
Question 2
Economic Development & Retail Vibrancy
Public Safety
Not interested in other two
Question 3
• Palo Verde
Shani Kleinhaus
in Charleston Terrace
January 9, 2026, 2:34 PM
Question 1
I support extending these priorities, especially the Natural Environment
Protection. I would like to see more of the aspirations of the Comp Plan
Natural environment policies and programs come to life. More native
species in our landscape and urban forest, for example, can support local
biodiversity and connectivity for birds and pollinators.
Question 2
I am glad the City adopted a Dark Sky ordinance, and hope the Bird
Friendly Design ordinance will be adopted and help protect birds in Palo
Alto. I hope the Creek setback policy moves forward as well.
Question 3
• Adobe Meadow
Name not available
January 9, 2026, 2:43 PM
Question 1
Your four priorities cover broad areas and some are more important than
others, to me. Yes, "climate action" is important but I doubt if Palo Alto
can make a big and immediate difference in this aspect of my life. Yes,
the downtown is lackluster and even depressing but it's been that way for
years.
Sure, we need to make gradual progress in these areas but the
investment should be gradual and low-level.
In my case, I care more about pickleball, relating to "Public Safety,
Wellness & Belonging" - see below.
Question 2
PA has only one set of pickleball courts, at Mitchell Park (MP). They are
popular and the waiting times are too long. Please add more courts,
especially in areas where we can play until 10 PM.
Since moving to PA in 1989, pickleball at MP has become the #1 activity
that I enjoy in PA, allowing me meet lots of new and nice people, and
extend my life through more exercise.
Question 3
• Community Center
Name not shown
in Old Palo Alto
January 9, 2026, 3:07 PM
Question 1
Pickle ball
Question 2
No response
Question 3
• Old Palo Alto
Name not available
January 9, 2026, 3:24 PM
Question 1
I support keeping the priorities the same.
Question 2
29 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14800 Created with OpenGov | January 12, 2026, 3:03 PM
2026 City Council Priorities Community Feedback
Council is exploring keeping their annual priorities the same for 2026. Share your input on priorities.
ATTACHMENT BItem 1
Attachment B - Community
Survey on 2026 Council
Priorities
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 46 Packet Pg. 50 of 72
Within Public Safety, Wellness and Belonging: Last year I started playing
pickleball at Mitchell Park and it has been an amazing way to meet other
Palo Alto residents and improve my health (my doctor was impressed
that I’ve lost 10 pounds and improved my labs). Mitchell often has 2x as
many people sitting waiting to play as actually playing. I hope the city will
consider adding more courts!
Question 3
• Fairmeadow
Name not available
January 9, 2026, 3:40 PM
Question 1
Need to change the order. Number one priority is affordable housing.
Question 2
Not enough bold work on housing.
Question 3
• Midtown
Name not available
January 9, 2026, 3:41 PM
Question 1
No response
Question 2
No response
Question 3
• Midtown
Carl Thomsen
in Duveneck/ St Francis
January 9, 2026, 3:48 PM
Question 1
The priorities are too general. Particularly the first and last priorities.
Public safety, wellness and belonging could cover almost any project that
the city takes on. The only way to measure success on any of the
priorities is to have a baseline to measure from so I'd recommend that the
Council ask the staff for the measurement criteria to determine if
progress has been made.
Question 2
First, I'd like to know the outcomes that actually were achieved in 2025.
As for outcomes for 2026, how about enforcing the traffic regulations,
speeding is just normal on almost any Palo Alto street currently, and
seeing someone actually stop at a stop sign is a cause for celebration.
Many times, I have seen motorists barely slow down or not slow down at
all at a stop sign. I've also seen people run redlights a number of times.
Not lights that just turned red but where the cross traffic had already
started to move and a car sped through the intersection. Related to traffic
issues, putting some regulations on ebikes would be a real improvement
in safety. I've seen them going very fast on sidewalks and routinely going
full speed through stop signs. I don't know what the rules are for ebike
helmets but i don't think I've ever seen someone riding an ebike with a
helmet on.
Question 3
• Duveneck/St. Francis
Name not available
January 9, 2026, 3:52 PM
Question 1
Public safety, Wellness & Belonging
are the most important priorities for Palo Alto community.
Question 2
We hope to see more pickleball courts for Palo Alto.
Question 3
• Evergreen Park
Donghui Li
in Charleston Meadows
January 9, 2026, 4:20 PM
Question 1
I am a retired engineer and lived in Palo Alto for more than 20 years. I
started play pickleball a few years ago and it become my daily activity. I
really enjoy playing it and get lot of benefit both physically and mentally. I
30 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14800 Created with OpenGov | January 12, 2026, 3:03 PM
2026 City Council Priorities Community Feedback
Council is exploring keeping their annual priorities the same for 2026. Share your input on priorities.
ATTACHMENT BItem 1
Attachment B - Community
Survey on 2026 Council
Priorities
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 47 Packet Pg. 51 of 72
made lots of friends from it. I will more people will benefit also, the only
problem is we still short of pickleball croutes, and most of time, we have
to wait in line to the next available court. I wish we could have more courts
in the future.
Question 2
No response
Question 3
• Charleston Meadows
ceci kettendorf
in Charleston Terrace
January 9, 2026, 4:24 PM
Question 1
I want to emphasize the Protection of Palo Alto's Natural Environment. I
approve the adoption of the Dark Sky ordinance. I am looking forward to
Bird Friendly Design, Creek corridors, and more locally native trees to
support local biodiversity (pollinators and birds). Thank you for your work
towards the latter goals.
Question 2
Public Safety: There has been no real progress in protecting south Palo
Alto from fire. The engine at Cubberley is really just for show, since it is
not staffed. Rather, the cross staffing policy there means, when the
ambulance is out on a call, which it generally is, the remaining two
firefighters cannot launch the engine since it requires three. (I am told
that the ambulance service there is the priority anyway.) So engines still
come from miles away; the response time therefore is dismal to south
Palo Alto fires; lives and property are placed unnecessarily in danger.
Meanwhile, Stanford has SIX fire fighters. May we have one of them to
give us a total of five so we could have an active engine?!
Question 3
• Adobe Meadow
Virginia Van Kuran
in Leland Manor/ Garland
January 9, 2026, 4:38 PM
Question 1
I agree
Question 2
I agree with the priorities and my input on the order is -
- Climate Action and Adaptation & Natural Environment Protection
- Implementing Housing Strategies for Social and Economic Balance
- Public Safety, Wellness & Belonging
- Economic Development & Retail Vibrancy
Question 3
• Leland Manor
Name not shown
in Crescent Park
January 9, 2026, 4:38 PM
Question 1
The four priorities are nice, but these should be higher:
1) Accelerate replacement of the Pope/Chaucer Bridge. Get it done. The
current Reach 2 plan is an excellent balance of flood risk reduction, cost,
community benefit and minimum inconvenience to individuals. It has
been studied and overstudied. No more delays! Overcome the
obstacles!
2) Make an orderly plan to reduce the number management layers (and
increase the span of control) withiin the city staff. Reduce the number of
managers so as to cut 25% from the overall salary budget. Do not reduce
any ground-level positions, e.g. no reduction in library hours, public safety
staff, etc, just reduce the number of managers to align with the best
practices of well-run cities. Empower city staff to act without consultants
(and cut consultant expenses by half). Done competently, thinning
management will result in better service levels via more staff
empowerment (and less meeting and memo time), will secure the city's
finances for years longer, and will free up funds to invest in public
facilities and services within a balanced budget without new tax
measures.
Note: No criticism of staff is implied. The city has undergone normal
Parkinson's Law bureaucratic creep for decades, and now is the time to
reverse it. Our staff are good and will find good jobs elsewhere. Many do
not live here because they can't afford it, so we will not be ripping them
away from their home communities. Retention of management staff
should not be, by itself, a city priority or even a goal.
Question 2
The four priorities are good, but improved Public Safety should be at the
top.
Put more emphasis on a much higher detection and apprehension rate of
31 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14800 Created with OpenGov | January 12, 2026, 3:03 PM
2026 City Council Priorities Community Feedback
Council is exploring keeping their annual priorities the same for 2026. Share your input on priorities.
ATTACHMENT BItem 1
Attachment B - Community
Survey on 2026 Council
Priorities
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 48 Packet Pg. 52 of 72
burglars and shoplifters. This requires innovation, not just more money
spent on the same old things (more patrol cars cruising the streets is
good but very expensive).
Likewise, use innovation to detect and ticket stop sign runners. This is
rampant in Palo Alto. It's a hazard to pedestrians, cyclists, cars, and to
goodwill among drivers, a it's a greater hazard than speeding. Ticket
bicycles who run stop signs, very much for their own good and to prevent
the massive trauma and grief of the motorist who will inevitably, at no
fault of their own, kill a cyclist who runs a stop sign in front of them.
Question 3
• Crescent Park
Samuel Bunger
in Midtown/ Midtown West
January 9, 2026, 4:45 PM
Question 1
Yes let's continue with these priorities
Question 2
Wellness and belonging. For the past year and a half I and my partner
have been members of PAPC and participating at pickleball facilities at
Mitchell park. We have met many new friends and feel not only the been
great for our well being but a great way to feel very connected with our
community. We would hope to see this continue and increase to keep this
open to even more citizens of Palo Alto.
Question 3
• Midtown
Jim colton
in Green Acres
January 9, 2026, 4:55 PM
Question 1
I agree with all four priorities. It's surpising to me how much pickleball
builds Wellness and Belonging. I played tennis for 50 years in Palo Alto
and had a great time doing it. But it was almost a individual activity--I was
on one side of the net and my opponent was on the other side and very
few words were exchanged. Pickleball is completely different. Almost all
play is doubles and players are much closer together so there is more
social interaction. Also you tend to find new players after a few games. So
pickleball players are a real community that cares about each other,
socializes before and after games and celebrates many holidays with
potlucks. And there is a lot of kidding that goes on. One woman recently
aced me with her serve. I told her if she did that again I was going to take
her out of my will!
Question 2
The new residential building near Mitchell Park is a great
accomplishment. We need more low income housing in Palo Alto.
Question 3
• Greenacres II
Name not shown
in Palo Verde
January 9, 2026, 4:57 PM
Question 1
I think the priorities are great! I’d love to hear how the city feels it is doing
on these initiatives along with the results of this survey.
Question 2
On Wellness and Belonging I’d like to comment. First, the activities that
have taken place at various Palo Alto spaces have been wonderful,
including educational events at the Mitchell Park Library and theater
events at Lucy Stern. I hope those continue unrelentingly.
Secondly, since retiring last year I found Mitchell Park pickleball to be a
terrific outlet, not only for the exercise but also for community building. I
have met many friends from playing. Moreover, volunteering for the club
has given me a chance to be very engaged. I hope in the future, the city is
able to expand the facilities, as the activity is so valuable in many ways.
Question 3
• Palo Verde
Name not available
January 9, 2026, 5:02 PM
Question 1
Frankly I don't understand your economic balance strategy. Billionaires
buying rentals make home prices higher for everyone by taking homes off
the market. You ignore it. Palo Alto is not affordable, and you do nothing
about this. It's only going to get worse.
32 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14800 Created with OpenGov | January 12, 2026, 3:03 PM
2026 City Council Priorities Community Feedback
Council is exploring keeping their annual priorities the same for 2026. Share your input on priorities.
ATTACHMENT BItem 1
Attachment B - Community
Survey on 2026 Council
Priorities
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 49 Packet Pg. 53 of 72
Question 2
Housing issues will get worse. How does that make people feel like they
belong? It doesn't.
Question 3
• Downtown North
Name not available
January 9, 2026, 5:03 PM
Question 1
No response
Question 2
No response
Question 3
• Crescent Park
Name not available
January 9, 2026, 5:07 PM
Question 1
I agree w all the priorities!
Question 2
I think all the priorities are important. I especially like the public safety
wellness, and belonging. Ever since I started playing pickle ball two years
ago, I found an amazing community. I’ve never seen so many adults
playing so happily at the park. The joy and laughter is contagious.
Anywhere I walk near Mitchell Park, I always can find a friend near by. We
also have a youth league and gotten many students and our elderly
neighbors involved. I also feel good about giving back doing fundraisers
with tournaments that benefits Ada’s café and Abilities Path nearby. I love
going to Ada‘s cafe & the library. It provides us a place to socialize and
connect with our community. The more we can connect with each other
and know more of our neighbors, the safer our community is. I only wish
we had a few more pickleball courts to extend the joy even further.
Question 3
• Midtown
Name not available
January 9, 2026, 5:35 PM
Question 1
Under the Wellness & Belonging Priority, expansion of Mitchell Park
Pickleball Courts is under consideration. This initiative warrants
consideration due to the overwhelming participation in this community-
oriented sport. It has already proven itself to have and also continues to
bring joy, fitness, and inclusion. Even pickleball players who are visiting
our community are impressed by our remarkable courts and the Palo Alto
Pickleball Club.
Question 2
My concern is, that at this point, we are not serving the massive number
of Palo Alto community pickleball enthusiasts who have made this sport
their local fitness and/or social activity, because the number of courts is
not enough to accommodate this huge population of pickleball players.
And because its function is especially one of building and servicing a
strong sense of community, building more courts in another location does
not serve this goal, and in fact, would achieve the opposite. A solution is
available--to build additional courts at Mitchell Park. However, along with
additional courts, Mitchell Park will need to increase parking. Already the
increasing numbers of pickleball players parking in the current available
parking spaces is causing: 1) traffic jams in the lot, 2) inability of families
who want to use the playground and the park grounds to find parking in
order to access the park, 3) an overspill of cars into and disruption of
adjoining neighborhoods because the lots are full, and 4) library members
being unable to find parking so that they can use the library services. As
more courts are added, more parking will also be absolutely necessary.
Otherwise, the wellness & belonging aspect of adding more pickleball
courts will be adversely impacting the other offerings that the park offers
in the category of serving our community.
Question 3
• Barron Park
Name not shown
in Downtown North
January 9, 2026, 5:35 PM
Question 1
One priority should be the financial deficit and liabilities of the city. There
should be an evaluation of the cost of any action to residents and to the
city.
Question 2
33 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14800 Created with OpenGov | January 12, 2026, 3:03 PM
2026 City Council Priorities Community Feedback
Council is exploring keeping their annual priorities the same for 2026. Share your input on priorities.
ATTACHMENT BItem 1
Attachment B - Community
Survey on 2026 Council
Priorities
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 50 Packet Pg. 54 of 72
Public Safety, Wellness & Belonging - provide more opportunities for
participation like more pickleball courts, more availability of fields for
sports
and Economic Development & Retail Vibrancy - help get retail space
rented by streamlining/reducing the cost of permits
Question 3
• Downtown North
Name not shown
in Crescent Park
January 9, 2026, 5:38 PM
Question 1
I would rank public safety and wellness much higher than the other
issues. I am not sure what belonging means.
Question 2
Economic development is important for both community and city revenue
so that should be attended to.
Climate adaptation should be foremost as there is little that the city can
do to impact global climate. Even if the city were to eliminate all energy
use and its citizens couldn't travel it would have no impact on the climate.
Preparation is much less costly than repair.
Housing is being dictated by Sacramento and their developer donors and
there is little Palo Alto can do about that but any attempts to retain a
unique environment are worthwhile. Unfortunately no amount of building
will make the city "affordable" unless it becomes a much less pleasant
place to live.
Question 3
• Crescent Park
Name not available
January 9, 2026, 5:40 PM
Question 1
I don't know the priorities so I cannot respond--this is very very troubling
Question 2
I don't know the priorities so I cannot respond this is very very troubling.
Question 3
• Leland Manor
Name not available
January 9, 2026, 5:47 PM
Question 1
More Pickleball courts at Mitchell Park to aleviate overcrowding. Mitchell
Park is the only city park I know of where Pickleball noise is not a factor as
there are almost no residences next to the park. Adding courts at other
parks will just cause noise issues with neighbors.
Part of this should address the need for additional restroom facilities near
Magical Bridge and the current Pickleball courts. The current two stall
facility near the tennis courts are insufficient for the volume of people
who use Magical Bridge and the 15 Pickleball courts.
Question 2
No response
Question 3
• Monroe Park
Name not available
January 9, 2026, 5:58 PM
Question 1
Climate Action and Adaptation & Natural Environment Protection is the
absolute highest priority for both human and non-human life on this
planet. Public Wellness & Belonging is also very important, as is
Implementing Housing Strategies for Social and Economic Balance. I'm
proud of and applaud these goals for 2026!
Question 2
I'd love to see more of the immense wealth of both individuals and
corporations be channeled toward these priorities:
Climate Action and Adaptation & Natural Environment Protection
Implementing Housing Strategies for Social and Economic Balance
Public Safety, Wellness & Belonging
Question 3
No response
Name not available
34 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14800 Created with OpenGov | January 12, 2026, 3:03 PM
2026 City Council Priorities Community Feedback
Council is exploring keeping their annual priorities the same for 2026. Share your input on priorities.
ATTACHMENT BItem 1
Attachment B - Community
Survey on 2026 Council
Priorities
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 51 Packet Pg. 55 of 72
January 9, 2026, 5:58 PM
Question 1
In responding to the number 4 priorities, Public Safety, Wellness &
Belonging, as Palo Alto resident we are very fortunate to have public
pickleball courts in Mitchell Park. There are bunch of volunteers help
organize events, help facilitate the safety of the courts by ensuring the
nets and the surrounding are properly installed... etc. I can see all
participants are enjoying the pickleball activities, help enrich our social
life, and contribute to the sense of belonging to city of Palo Alto
Question 2
We are hoping to be able to expand our pickleball courts in Mitchell Park
to address the growing population of pickleball fans. As you can see the
sports does bring unity of the community. Thank you .
Question 3
• Midtown
Name not shown
in Downtown North
January 9, 2026, 6:26 PM
Question 1
Please start focusing on tangible improvements for taxpaying residents in
the community. I loved seeing the approval for the new grade separation
at Alma and safer bike lanes even though I'm not a cyclist, high school
student, or parent of a high school student that uses these routes. I was
disappointed to see so many resources go towards people who neither
live here (yet) nor pay taxes: the RV signs costing millions, homeless
funding and shelters in downtown, and RHNA (although I do realize this is
a state requirement). For next year, I'd love to see a focus on improving
our public spaces that seem more and more run down—improvements at
highly-trafficked parks like Johnson Park, improvements to our
downtowns that seem to have more and more vacancies, improvements
at our community libraries (the new Atherton library would be an
excellent reference point), more parades and community events (like
Mountain View or Los Altos) that make us feel like a real community of
families vs. only investors and landlords, etc.
Question 2
It seems like we didn't make any progress on improving public spaces for
our community this past year. I'd love to see a prioritized plan for
improvements to downtown and Cal Ave finalized this year, hopefully with
work beginning in 2027. As a bonus, I'd love to see a plan that further
builds community, whether it's through more parades or more
engagement at community gardens or new improvements at our busiest
parks.
Question 3
• Crescent Park
Name not available
January 9, 2026, 6:37 PM
Question 1
I agree with the four priorities.
Question 2
I would like to express my support for priority #4: Public Safety, Wellness
& Belonging. I would like to express my support for more pickelball courts
in Palo Alto. Pickelball is a great sport for all ages that brings several
generations together. It's a great way to meet and connect with people of
all ages, and to make new friends. Pickelball also provides a great outlet
for stress reduction, weight loss, frustration and loneliness in these
difficult times.
Question 3
• Barron Park
Name not available
January 9, 2026, 6:44 PM
Question 1
No response
Question 2
No response
Question 3
• College Terrace
Name not available
January 9, 2026, 6:53 PM
Question 1
No response
35 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14800 Created with OpenGov | January 12, 2026, 3:03 PM
2026 City Council Priorities Community Feedback
Council is exploring keeping their annual priorities the same for 2026. Share your input on priorities.
ATTACHMENT BItem 1
Attachment B - Community
Survey on 2026 Council
Priorities
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 52 Packet Pg. 56 of 72
Question 2
Regarding the Public Safety and Wellbeing - I do not support
CONVERTING EXISTING tennis courts into pickle ball courts. I do support
building NEW pickle ball and tennis courts. Tennis players are struggling
to find courts to play as they are always full.
Also Palo Alto residents and tax payers should be given priority, on the
use of these courts. The current tennis courts are occupied by coaches,
USTA matches and non-residents reserving and hoarding these courts!
Question 3
• Midtown
Name not available
January 9, 2026, 7:55 PM
Question 1
All four are still worthy goals for the City Council.
Question 2
I'm retired, and spend several hours a week at the Mitchell Park pickleball
courts, both as a player and volunteer. These courts, and the club that
gathers there every day to socialize and get exercise, is a very special
place for many Palo Alto residents, and interest in the sport is growing
fast. Expanding these courts to just two additional tennis courts would
reduce waiting times in the evening after work for players and families
with busy schedules. It would also make it easier to reserve courts during
the day for kids and family gatherings after school hours and for Getting
Started sessions for new players.
Question 3
• University South
Name not available
January 9, 2026, 8:47 PM
Question 1
Agree the 4 2025 priorities should be extended, as the goals have not
been met
Question 2
#4 is my concern. I’m a senior living alone. A great joy has been joining
the PAPC and its community of like-minded, friendly neighbors. That said,
hope the city will prioritize expanding the courts, adding more(Rinconada
and MP)their availability and provide city assistance to the numerous
volunteers dedicated to ensuring the program run smoothly.
Making new connections and Participating is the highlight of my week
Question 3
• Palo Alto Orchards
Name not available
January 9, 2026, 9:05 PM
Question 1
Natural capital (priority 1) , Social capital (priority 3 & 4) and Economic
capital (priority 2) provide the lifeblood for a community and it is
encouraging that the council continues to focus on facilitating the
stewardship and creation of these distinct types of capital.
Question 2
Despite good intentions, attempts to create and promote social capital
(wellness, belonging, social balance) languish. The city has very little
visibility into the grassroots efforts that build connections across citizens
of different generations and socio-economic status. The city has few, if
any, effective tools for assessing and promoting wellness and belonging
(e.g. social capital) in the community. Instead city staff spend
considerable staff time, money, and effort promoting and then reporting
on city-led initiatives that fail to move the needle. Staff and officials act
with good intentions but they ignore (and often hinder) citizen efforts. To
use just two examples: City involvement in middle school athletics has
created many problems -- problems that detract from the good will of
parents and are a lost opportunity to build a strong sense of belonging for
many youth at a critical period in their development. As a second, related
example the city is losing a huge opportunity to develop a vibrant center
for youth pickleball where students of all ages and abilities can drop in at
anytime and find a sense of belonging. The Palo Alto Pickleball Club has
been a shining success of grassroots efforts building social ties all across
the community. They have the people and the social capital to greatly
expand opportunities for youth and other community members but these
efforts are squeezed into a space roughly equivalent to just 4 tennis
courts. To date, the city has been unwilling or unable to expand the court
capacity necessary to foster a welcoming place for community based,
youth pickleball.
With the right tools and focus, the city could do a much better job at
identifying and accelerating citizen based efforts that create real social
capital, wellness and belonging.
Question 3
• Barron Park
36 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14800 Created with OpenGov | January 12, 2026, 3:03 PM
2026 City Council Priorities Community Feedback
Council is exploring keeping their annual priorities the same for 2026. Share your input on priorities.
ATTACHMENT BItem 1
Attachment B - Community
Survey on 2026 Council
Priorities
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 53 Packet Pg. 57 of 72
Name not available
January 9, 2026, 9:13 PM
Question 1
Housing is the most important. We need affordable housing for working
families, and supportive transitional housing for currently unhoused
individuals and families. Housing First!
Question 2
Housing housing housing!
Question 3
• Palo Alto Orchards
Name not available
January 9, 2026, 9:19 PM
Question 1
No response
Question 2
No response
Question 3
• Duveneck/St. Francis
Name not shown
in Community Center
January 9, 2026, 9:21 PM
Question 1
I strongly support extending the 2025 City Council Priorities into 2026.
These four focus areas reflect the real needs of our community and
provide a balanced framework for long-term success.
In particular, the Public Safety, Wellness & Belonging priority has a direct
impact on daily quality of life. Investing in accessible, inclusive spaces like
parks, and community programs, helps people stay healthy, connected,
and supported.
Projects such as expanding pickleball courts at Mitchell Park directly
support this goal. They promote physical activity, mental well-being, and
social connection across all ages and backgrounds. Continuing these
priorities into 2026 will allow the City to build on progress already made
and create lasting, meaningful impact for residents.
Question 2
Pickleball has truly enriched my life—physically, mentally, and socially.
It’s more than a sport; it’s a place where people of all ages connect, stay
active, and feel they belong.
Mitchell Park is at the heart of that community, but the current number of
courts can’t meet the demand. Long waits and overcrowding prevent
many from participating.
Adding more courts would directly support the City’s Wellness &
Belonging goal by improving access to healthy activity, strengthening
community connections, and helping more residents feel included and
engaged.
Question 3
• Duveneck/St. Francis
Bob Moss
in Barron Park
January 9, 2026, 9:41 PM
Question 1
None of them have been totally completely achieved, all are worth
keeping, so extend all 4 Priorities for 2026.
Question 2
For climate change, transfer more gas service to electric, increase
amount of total power is from renewable closer to 100%; continue
reducing the number of property crimes, car break-ins and suicides; add
more paramedics to emergency responses.
Question 3
• Barron Park
Alan Marcum
in Midtown/ Midtown West
January 9, 2026, 10:03 PM
Question 1
If public safety, wellness, and belonging includes all residents feeling safe
from ICE raids and similar abuses of government power, it should be the
37 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14800 Created with OpenGov | January 12, 2026, 3:03 PM
2026 City Council Priorities Community Feedback
Council is exploring keeping their annual priorities the same for 2026. Share your input on priorities.
ATTACHMENT BItem 1
Attachment B - Community
Survey on 2026 Council
Priorities
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 54 Packet Pg. 58 of 72
top priority. If it does not, then that safety from ICE, etc. needs to be
added.
Question 2
Housing strategies have not been addressed well, but that's in part thanks
to past problems with housing strategies resulting in builders' remedy
being invoked frequently, including in ways and in places that should not
have housing projects for safety reasons.
Question 3
• Midtown
Name not available
January 9, 2026, 10:12 PM
Question 1
I would demote "Climate Action, etc.", focusing only on the other three.
Question 2
Based on polling data, the Palo Alto voting public is suffering from tax and
inflation fatigue; more fatigue should be expected as federal funding dries
up. As a result, the appetite for funding Cubberley is diminished. Defer it.
Question 3
• Duveneck/St. Francis
Name not available
January 9, 2026, 10:25 PM
Question 1
Stay focused on 2025 priorities
Question 2
Accomplish meaningful results someplace! Show me some successes! I
really want to see closure on civic goals. Personally I care about my
neighbors, but show me progress anywhere in town.
Question 3
• Evergreen Park
Name not available
January 9, 2026, 10:29 PM
Question 1
Climate Action should be suspended until the "climate" for climate action
becomes more favorable and less counter-productive
Replacing Cubberley Community Center should be at the top of the list
Question 2
Housing strategies should carefully examine density. In some cases,
higher density than the plans anticipate may be welcome. In other cases,
developers are coming forward with proposals that ask for zoning waivers
that are totally out of context with the surrounding structures.
Question 3
• University South
David Claudino
in Midtown/ Midtown West
January 9, 2026, 10:44 PM
Question 1
Wellness & Belonging should definitely remain a priority. There are
insufficient social infrastructure facilities to address the loneliness
epidemic.
Question 2
A key outcome for 2025 should be the expansion of pickleball courts at
Mitchell Park. Pickleball is an awesome solution to the loneliness
epidemic, and it also results in a much more connected community
across socio-economic, cultural, ethnic, gender, and age demographics.
Question 3
• Midtown
Name not shown
in Palo Verde
January 9, 2026, 10:51 PM
Question 1
I support Public Safety, Wellness & Belonging, specifically to add more
pickleball courts in Mitchell Park because most of the time I am there, it is
overcrowded and I need to wait half an hour to play.
38 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14800 Created with OpenGov | January 12, 2026, 3:03 PM
2026 City Council Priorities Community Feedback
Council is exploring keeping their annual priorities the same for 2026. Share your input on priorities.
ATTACHMENT BItem 1
Attachment B - Community
Survey on 2026 Council
Priorities
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 55 Packet Pg. 59 of 72
Question 2
I support Public Safety, Wellness & Belonging, specifically to add more
pickleball courts in Mitchell Park because most of the time I am there, it is
overcrowded and I need to wait half an hour to play.
Question 3
• Midtown
Name not available
January 10, 2026, 2:34 AM
Question 1
I support the priorities
Question 2
Revise residential zoning to focus on truly affordable multi unit structures
and to eliminate allowing larger structures in R1. ADUs are absurd
especially on smaller lots such as 7,000 square feet and under. They
allow enormous structures (monster homes) for the wealthy that are out
of scale and out of character in residential neighborhoods and are
primarily used for family members of homeowners. They do nothing to
address affordable housing.
Also for wellness and belonging, transition Mitchell park tennis courts to
pickleball courts with a priority for Palo alto residents to play. There are
more than sufficient tennis courts throughout the city but not nearly
enough PB courts to meet the growing demand. PB is one of the
healthiest community builders for physical and social/ emotional well
being. Rarely has a sports activity presented this opportunity for people
of nearly all ages and all backgrounds.
Thank you
Question 3
• Midtown
Name not available
January 10, 2026, 5:32 AM
Question 1
Forget about climate action and equal housing! Focus on economic
development and public safety and wellness. Be practical and take
actions please!
Question 2
More pickleball courts especially converting 2 more tennis courts to
pickleball courts in Mitchell Park! It’s a great community building
experience and promotes healthy living and more visitors to spend in Palo
Alto. The supporting voices are loud and clear and why not take quick
actions?
Question 3
• Ventura
Name not available
January 10, 2026, 7:38 AM
Question 1
Continue as planned
Question 2
Would be nice to increase the number of pickleball cts. Popularity of a
game that should have 20 min per game is now 20 min of play than 30-40
min of wait time. There seem to be other ct resources at Mitchell that
seem to be underutilized
Question 3
• Midtown
Name not available
January 10, 2026, 8:18 AM
Question 1
Public Safety, Belonging, and Wellness are all prioritized by how we
organize and maintain our parks. Please keep the usage of these parks
maximized, expressing these values in our community.
Question 2
Love the expansion of the Dog Park at Mitchell.Would love to additionally
see the expansion of the Pickleball Courts as these are currently are
currently over-crowded and thoroughly enjoyed by our and neighboring
communities. Keeping this up keeps are parks populated and safe.
Question 3
• Charleston Gardens
Name not available
39 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14800 Created with OpenGov | January 12, 2026, 3:03 PM
2026 City Council Priorities Community Feedback
Council is exploring keeping their annual priorities the same for 2026. Share your input on priorities.
ATTACHMENT BItem 1
Attachment B - Community
Survey on 2026 Council
Priorities
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 56 Packet Pg. 60 of 72
January 10, 2026, 8:29 AM
Question 1
No response
Question 2
For "Public Safety, Wellness & Belonging", I play pickleball at Mitchell
Park all the time. I started playing shortly after Covid ended, and I have
developed a strong community of friends there. Everyone is always
welcome (regardless of age, gender, ethnicity). There are so many people
there - it would be great if I didn't have to wait so long to play!
Question 3
• Fairmeadow
Name not available
January 10, 2026, 9:01 AM
Question 1
There needs to be a focus on how housing strategies, i.e. allowing high
density housing along El Camino Real in South Palo Alto, are causing
both parking and traffic delays for residents.
Question 2
Public Safety, Wellness & Belonging: We need to prioritize supports,
facilities and services for families with young children and for seniors to
ensure community well-being.
Question 3
• Barron Park
Yi Zhang
in Charleston Terrace
January 10, 2026, 9:06 AM
Question 1
I strongly support extending the existing four annual priorities into 2026.
In particular, the priority of Public Safety, Wellness & Belonging has had a
meaningful and positive impact on the Palo Alto community. Programs
and facilities that encourage active, inclusive, and intergenerational
recreation, such as pickleball, directly improve both physical and mental
well-being, while also fostering social connection and a strong sense of
belonging.
Pickleball has become one of the most effective and accessible ways for
residents of all ages and backgrounds to stay active, meet neighbors, and
build community. The overwhelming participation in pickleball across the
city clearly demonstrates how well this activity aligns with the City’s
stated goals. Continuing these priorities will allow Palo Alto to build on
existing momentum rather than reset progress.
Question 2
Within the Public Safety, Wellness & Belonging priority, I encourage the
City to focus on expanding access to recreational infrastructure that has
already proven successful, specifically, increasing pickleball court
availability at Mitchell Park.
Currently, demand for pickleball courts far exceeds supply, resulting in
overcrowding and limited access. This overcrowding is not a failure, but
rather a strong indicator of success: residents want to participate. By
adding more courts, the City can significantly expand safe, healthy, and
inclusive recreational opportunities, reduce congestion-related conflicts,
and better serve seniors, families, and working residents alike.
For 2026, a key outcome should be measurable improvement in
community access to wellness activities, including reduced wait times,
safer play conditions, and increased participation. Expanding pickleball
courts at Mitchell Park would be a highly efficient and impactful step
toward achieving these outcomes and further advancing Palo Alto’s
commitment to wellness and belonging.
Question 3
No response
Mark Fan
in Leland Manor/ Garland
January 10, 2026, 9:30 AM
Question 1
We're satisfied with these 4 priorities since they will all result in improved
the lives of residents.
Question 2
It would be great if the city can add more pickleball courts at Mitchell
Park. The existing 15 courts at Mitchell Park often have long wait times
during weekday evenings, weekends, and holidays. The wait times are
getting worse due the rapidly growing popularity of the sport.
Question 3
40 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14800 Created with OpenGov | January 12, 2026, 3:03 PM
2026 City Council Priorities Community Feedback
Council is exploring keeping their annual priorities the same for 2026. Share your input on priorities.
ATTACHMENT BItem 1
Attachment B - Community
Survey on 2026 Council
Priorities
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 57 Packet Pg. 61 of 72
• Duveneck/St. Francis
James Taylor
in Greenmeadow
January 10, 2026, 9:56 AM
Question 1
That seems reasonable - absent some local impact of the current
administration, these are good objectives
Question 2
Climate Action ... and Housing ...
- We need to build more and we need to upgrade our housing stock to be
more efficient and resilient.
- This means allowing lot splitting and the creation of medium density
homes not just rentable apartments
- It means allowing tear down/rebuild to improve efficiency and
wildfire/EQ safety by bringing housing to code
Wellness & Belonging
- The explosion of interest in Pickleball has generated huge benefits in
terms of exercise opportunity and community, especially for those of us
who are older. Palo Alto should double down on this, expanding the
availability of pickleball courts in the core Mitchel Park area as well as
adding more elsewhere
- It's good the city is investing in bike infrastructure but too much of this
money is spent for hard code bikers (ECR plan, trails) and not enough to
encourage casual adult bikers.
Question 3
• Greenmeadow
Name not shown
in Green Acres
January 10, 2026, 10:21 AM
Question 1
Our family's number 1 issue is housing. Palo Alto needs to cut the red
tape and process that makes building housing too hard. We are now
empty nesters and would love to buy a condo in Palo Alto that is big
enough for us and let our kids stay with us when they visit. There are
none that we can find. It seems like a win-win if we could sell our five
bedroom house to a young family and we could stay in Palo Alto.
Unfortunately, it seems like such projects are almost non-existent in Palo
Alto. Mountain View has them. Why can't we?
Question 2
I repeat what I said. Housing is by far the most important.
Question 3
• Greater Miranda
Hweiling Shu
in Green Acres
January 10, 2026, 10:48 AM
Question 1
I agree these four priorities are important.
Question 2
Pickleball has helped me to have regular exercise, make new friends and
have so much fun. I play pickleball at Mitchell park 4 days a week. I have
gotten to know more people in the local community while on the courts.
We share much laughter during our games. As a senior citizen, this is
helping to keep me healthy and have a sense of community.
Right now the Mitchell park courts are getting more crowded
and busy, and there are usually wait times to get on the court.
More pickleball courts would certainly help Palo Alto to cultivate wellness
and belonging in our city.
Question 3
• Palo Alto Orchards
Name not shown
in Palo Verde
January 10, 2026, 11:45 AM
Question 1
I support the extension of the four 2025 priorities.
Question 2
CLIMATE ACTION / ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION
- Palo Alto is doing a strong job on biking advocacy, electrification, and
green spaces.
- More emphasis is needed on mitigating sea-level rise. I live five blocks
from 101 in a flood zone, and this is a major concern.
- Freeway noise has increased since the new housing development on
41 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14800 Created with OpenGov | January 12, 2026, 3:03 PM
2026 City Council Priorities Community Feedback
Council is exploring keeping their annual priorities the same for 2026. Share your input on priorities.
ATTACHMENT BItem 1
Attachment B - Community
Survey on 2026 Council
Priorities
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 58 Packet Pg. 62 of 72
Bayshore near Greer Park. The sound wall helps the new homes but has
redirected and increased the noise toward residents several blocks
away.
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT / RETAIL VIBRANCY
- I appreciate the permanent pedestrianization of California Avenue (this
is the area I love going to most). Being from Europe I enjoy being able to
walk and enjoy local businesses away from cars. In addition to the 3 areas
the City is working on, I would like to see Midtown/Middlefield business
area added to the plan. Switching the street to a 2 lane road between
Ellsworth Place and Oregon would slow down traffic and allow for wider
sidewalks. The improvement could also include a redesign of the alley in
front of Cavour/Indochine/Oh My Salon that is too narrow for cars to
drive through.
HOUSING STRATEGIES
- With more than 6,000 new housing units planned, the City is well
positioned. Please avoid approving luxury developments with only token
affordable units — they do not support genuine socioeconomic diversity.
Palo Alto’s demographics remain unbalanced, with low representation of
Hispanic/Latino and African American residents.
- Developers/Investors should not be allowed to tear down perfectly good
homes and replace them with oversized “monster homes,” which widen
the social gap and reduce opportunities for lower-income families to
remain in Palo Alto.
PUBLIC SAFETY / WELLNESS & BELONGING
- Congratulations on the new Public Safety Building. Wellness and
belonging priorities I’d like to highlight:
- Cubberley Community Center - As a resident since 1987 and a frequent
user of Cubberley, I strongly encourage the City to begin Phase 1 as soon
as possible. The site is severely dilapidated and poses safety risks,
especially with children and seniors navigating the confusing traffic flow. I
work with HeartFit For Life in the back of the Center and have seen
multiple close calls. One of our members was seriously injured after trying
to avoid a car on his bike and spent weeks in the hospital, though he
declined to report the incident.
- Pickleball - As a recreational player who uses the Mitchell Park courts, I
do not support adding more courts there. Parking, crowding, competition
with tennis courts, and general overuse are already issues. Instead, I
recommend converting a few tennis courts at Cubberley. They are often
empty, there is ample parking, and the cost would be far lower.
- Third Thursday on California Avenue - The monthly event was an
excellent way to promote wellness and belonging by bringing music,
community interaction, and vibrancy to the evenings. Its abrupt
cancellation — without notice or a clear explanation — was extremely
disappointing. The organizer worked for months and was deeply
committed to the event’s success, yet was reportedly not informed that a
petition had been started against her. Rather than canceling outright, the
City and involved parties could have mediated a solution. As a result, the
community now lacks a free, local place to gather and enjoy music
together.
Question 3
• Palo Verde
Name not shown
in Green Acres
January 10, 2026, 11:59 AM
Question 1
No response
Question 2
Regarding "Wellness & Belonging", I experience significant benefit many
times a week from our parks in Palo Alto. Especially since the pandemic I
have made it a habit to play pickle ball several times a week. One friend
introduced me to playing at Mitchell park, and since then I have developed
many friends. It's almost like Cheers, where "everybody knows your
name". I'm deeply grateful for whomever helped establish the park that
we have now, and would love to see the city further invest in what is
working well for the community. I've been able to play myself, bring my
school children, and play with pickleball with my mother too! I've never
seen a city resource add so much social building value across a diverse
set of people.
Question 3
• Barron Park
Name not shown
in Community Center
January 10, 2026, 12:29 PM
Question 1
I strongly support this.
Question 2
I would like to see the council take action on the intersection of public
wellness and climate action by tackling the health impacts of natural gas
stoves issue. We seem to be skirting around it, and in my mind, I feel that
we have easy avenues to at least inform the public of the health impacts,
and I trust that that will at least then move some people to transition their
appliances. People not knowing is a problem, and we can change that.
Question 3
• Duveneck/St. Francis
42 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14800 Created with OpenGov | January 12, 2026, 3:03 PM
2026 City Council Priorities Community Feedback
Council is exploring keeping their annual priorities the same for 2026. Share your input on priorities.
ATTACHMENT BItem 1
Attachment B - Community
Survey on 2026 Council
Priorities
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 59 Packet Pg. 63 of 72
Name not available
January 10, 2026, 12:42 PM
Question 1
In regards to wellness & belonging:
I was pretty darn nervous the first time. I had taken a few of Sal‘s classes
from Palo Alto online and he always suggested that we walk over to the
Pickleball courts and just start playing. I didn’t do it for several weeks.
Those courts were intimidating at first. Instead, I just practiced my
pickleball skills on the wall.
One day, I had more courage in me and decided I was gonna walk over
there by myself with my heart pounding and paddle down. Luckily there is
one court that says ‘beginner friendly’. That worked for me. Kind of
couldn’t believe how nice and friendly all were. They were patience and
helped me to learn. Day one started laughing while we played.
A year later, I now can go over and say hi to about 30 people no matter
the day or the hours. We laugh hard, play hard. And I never ever turn
down an opportunity to help a new person get started.
I moved to Palo Alto in 1984, married, bought our home, had my two kids,
raised them, sent them to the Palo Alto schools. My children are grown
starting their own life and empty nest hit me hard. I knew I needed to have
a purpose. A connection even. Didn’t know Palo Alto Pickleball was going
to provide that for me. But I definitely now feel part of something. Part of
something fun.
My doctors are pretty pleased with me too. I have severe osteoporosis as
a lifetime of swimming and biking didn’t do enough to build strong bones.
Come to find out Pickleball is great weight-bearing exercise better than
running according to my doctors. Who would’ve thought. My latest bone
density scan is returning better numbers than I’ve had in 10 years. Can’t
beat that.
Exercising, laughter, and connections are a great way to grow old in Palo
Alto.
Question 2
For 2026 I would love to see you guys prioritize the pickleball
phenomenon happening at Mitchell Park. Expand it even. It brings people
together, exercise, laughter, no iPhones, strangers becoming friends.
Can’t beat that.
Question 3
• Greenmeadow
Name not available
January 10, 2026, 12:53 PM
Question 1
Regarding the Public Safety, Wellness & Belonging Priority:
I’ve lived in south PA for almost 40 years, about 2 blocks from Mitchell
Park. My family has enjoyed MP as our neighborhood park for years. As I
was contemplating how to stay engaged during my retirement a few years
ago, I began to notice the pickleball activity at MP. Intrigued, I then signed
up for a couple of the CPA ‘Enjoy’ pickleball classes and then followed by
playing regularly there. I’ve met hundreds of players of all ethnicities and
backgrounds and ages from less than 12 to mid- eighties, and developed
new friendships with dozens. The positive impact to my wellness and
community belonging cannot be overstated. Pickleball at MP has become
a major part of my physical activity and social engagement. A key unique
benefit that MP pickleball offers is that it’s a convenient, welcoming,
physical activity with extensive social engagement. Due to its growing
popularity and crowding at MP, these opportunities are now sometimes
limited and discouraged by extensive waits to play.
Question 2
As the Mitchell Park pickleball facility has an outsized impact and public
benefit relating to Wellness and Belonging, I strongly encourage you to
support the expansion of the wonderful pickleball facility with the addition
of eight additional pickleball courts at Mitchell Park.
Question 3
• Greenmeadow
Name not available
January 10, 2026, 1:25 PM
Question 1
The Implementing Housing Strategies for Social and Economic Balance
priority should be extended into 2026.
Question 2
Within the Housing Strategies for Social and Economic Balance priority,
CPA should be looking to implement strategies and policies that will limit
people living on the streets and in the parks. The current policies have
allowed the expansion of these practices, as evidenced by the increase of
43 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14800 Created with OpenGov | January 12, 2026, 3:03 PM
2026 City Council Priorities Community Feedback
Council is exploring keeping their annual priorities the same for 2026. Share your input on priorities.
ATTACHMENT BItem 1
Attachment B - Community
Survey on 2026 Council
Priorities
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 60 Packet Pg. 64 of 72
on street living on Fabian, East Meadow Circle, and the
Embarcadero/Baylands area, as well as those regular residents of
Mitchell Park. We should be looking to provide housing solutions for
those true long-term residents of Palo Alto, but not implement policies
that encourage people to move here due to the lack of meaningful policies
or lax enforcement of those that do exist.
Question 3
• Greenmeadow
Name not available
January 10, 2026, 1:29 PM
Question 1
No response
Question 2
No response
Question 3
• College Terrace
Name not available
January 10, 2026, 1:56 PM
Question 1
Wellness and Belonging at important. I’m glad they will continue to be
priorities.
Question 2
Having pickleball courts at Mitchell Park is such a gift. Our family
including our two children are able to play with us, and together we’ve
made many friends. There’s such a sense of community there with all the
activities that the Palo Alto Pickleball Club has organized. Friendly,
inviting, welcoming. I’m so glad Palo Alto can support pickleball and our
residents who are able to enjoy this sport.
Question 3
• Southgate
Name not shown
in Greenmeadow
January 10, 2026, 2:09 PM
Question 1
As a Palo Alto resident and business owner, I agree with extending these
priorities.
In these difficult times, I am particularly interested in taking actions to
promote wellness and belonging.
Question 2
The most concrete Palo Alto community benefit promoting wellness and
belonging I have seen is the pickleball community at Mitchell Park where
every day hundreds of Palo Alto residents come together to play
pickleball with both friends and strangers. I have never seen any
community offering or activity with such a consistently outsized impact
on both physical and emotional health as well as promoting a sense of
belonging and community to everyone.
Palo Alto should find ways to support and expend this community boon
including a 2026 outcome of expanding the number of courts at Mitchell
Park in order to both improve the experience (alleviate crowding) for the
thousands of residents who play at Mitchell Park every year, as well as to
make literal space for more community events like the youth meetups,
Senior Games, Rotary Tournaments, etc. that currently vie for limited
space.
Thank you.
Question 3
• Greenmeadow
Name not available
January 10, 2026, 3:13 PM
Question 1
On the whole, I agree with this extension and the content. However, I'd
prioritize the last bullet as its most important: public safety, wellness and
belonging.
Question 2
I think the importance of community belonging should be a greater
emphasis for 2026. In today's divided political and cultural climate and
economic challenges, it's far more important for each member of the
community feel that they belong and commit to help one another. One
area which I have observed in the city which nicely contributes to
community belonging is the vibrancy of the city's pickleball community.
44 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14800 Created with OpenGov | January 12, 2026, 3:03 PM
2026 City Council Priorities Community Feedback
Council is exploring keeping their annual priorities the same for 2026. Share your input on priorities.
ATTACHMENT BItem 1
Attachment B - Community
Survey on 2026 Council
Priorities
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 61 Packet Pg. 65 of 72
Whenever I pass by the Mitchell Park court, I see people of all ages and
background play with one another and share great joy. It complements so
well with the adjacent Magical Bridge playground. One challenge though
is that in the few occasions when I try to join in the play, it's always full
with many waiting while other play courts (such as tennis) sit empty or
barely used. I'd suggest that expanding the pickleball infrastructure
would allow the city to take advantage of the current momentum and
make a good thing even better.
Question 3
• Charleston Meadows
Name not available
January 10, 2026, 4:58 PM
Question 1
The most important priority by far is Public Safety. There have been a
rash of break-ins to residences in our neighborhood over the last year or
two, and this is very scary. What can the city do to prevent these crimes?
Is the city planning to install more video cameras and license plate
readers? I would also like to see an additional priority added to the
existing four priorities, which is getting our finances under control. This
would start with reforming Palo Alto's pension plans (e.g., shifting to
defined contribution for new employees), and addressing the city's
massive unfunded pension liability. My understanding is this liability is
roughly half a billion dollars and I'd like to know what the city is planning
to do about it.
Question 2
Increase the size of the city's police force.
Achieve a significant reduction in crime of all types, along with higher
conviction rates for any perpetrators.
Reform the city pension plan and reduce our unfunded pension liabilities.
Prevent "builder's remedy" construction projects of massive high rises.
Control costs for our utilities, ideally achieving a zero increase in utility
prices for the next year by seeking across the board efficiencies.
Back away from trying to force residents to give up natural gas
appliances.
Question 3
• Leland Manor
Name not shown
in Duveneck/ St Francis
January 10, 2026, 6:24 PM
Question 1
1 Public and community Safety
2. Fix the bridges to prevent from future flooding
Question 2
No response
Question 3
• Duveneck/St. Francis
Name not available
January 10, 2026, 8:04 PM
Question 1
Much has already been said during the past few years about the benefits
of pickleball, a sport which has mushroomed throughout the U.S. As an 81
year old who has been playing for six years, I can readily attest to its many
benefits. I try to play several times a week, limited only by court
availability and weather. A good day is a pickleball day: reconnecting with
friends, getting lots of exercise and always looking forward to the next
game. I arrive at the Mitchell courts around 7:30 a.m. as it's the only time I
know I can be relatively certain to find an open court. (Courts are normally
filled by 9 a.m., sometimes much sooner.) If a team loses a game, that
team has to come off the court and then wait their turn to come back on,
pretty inefficient if one has limited available time for playing, as many do.
Question 2
I have heard this same discussion take place over many years now. Many
folks are intimidated about coming to play at Mitchell because of the
crowds. Clearly, more courts would ease the logjam and attract more
players, providing greater access so that more can benefit from what is
now a very popular sport. Yes, I feel fortunate to have the facilities that we
have at Mitchell, but it only makes sense to try to try to ease access so
more members of the community can enjoy the physical and social
benefits of regular play.
Question 3
• Adobe Meadow
John Jacobs
in Charleston Terrace
45 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14800 Created with OpenGov | January 12, 2026, 3:03 PM
2026 City Council Priorities Community Feedback
Council is exploring keeping their annual priorities the same for 2026. Share your input on priorities.
ATTACHMENT BItem 1
Attachment B - Community
Survey on 2026 Council
Priorities
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 62 Packet Pg. 66 of 72
January 10, 2026, 9:33 PM
Question 1
Many of us pickleball players have written to both Parks and Recreation
and City Council members over the past few years, as well as attended
meetings, extolling the virtues of pickleball. I think all has been very well
documented, so it's a bit of a mystery to me as to why we are being asked
to do this again.
Question 2
The Mitchell Park pickleball community is a great community, providing
positive social interactions for all of us, but the Mitchell Park courts are
usually crowded, with wait times all too common. Many folks stay away
because they're intimidated by the crowds, while many others have a less
than ideal experience for the same reason. Let's do what's obviously
needed: build additional courts so that more community members can
reap the very rich benefits of this fast-growing sport.
Question 3
• Adobe Meadow
Name not available
January 10, 2026, 10:01 PM
Question 1
Public safety, wellness and belonging.
Question 2
No response
Question 3
• Midtown
Joshua Philp
outside Palo Alto
January 10, 2026, 10:08 PM
Question 1
The growing demand for pickleball courts at Mitchell Park reflects
something truly special that has developed here—a genuine sense of
community that is welcoming, inclusive, and uplifting. Every day, players
of all ages, backgrounds, and skill levels come together on an equal
playing field, sharing not just competition, but encouragement, respect,
and camaraderie. Whether games are recreational or competitive, the
atmosphere remains positive, supportive, and rooted in mutual
appreciation for the sport and for one another.
Mitchell Park has also become a space where people feel safe,
comfortable, and looked after. Players consistently watch out for one
another, help return lost items, and step in when someone needs
assistance. There is a shared understanding that this is more than just a
place to play—it is a community hub built on trust, kindness, and
collective responsibility. Expanding pickleball courts would not only meet
the overwhelming demand, but would further strengthen these
connections, allowing more people to experience the sense of belonging,
wellness, and togetherness that Mitchell Park so uniquely provides
Question 2
The growing demand for pickleball courts at Mitchell Park reflects
something truly special that has developed here—a genuine sense of
community that is welcoming, inclusive, and uplifting. Every day, players
of all ages, backgrounds, and skill levels come together on an equal
playing field, sharing not just competition, but encouragement, respect,
and camaraderie. Whether games are recreational or competitive, the
atmosphere remains positive, supportive, and rooted in mutual
appreciation for the sport and for one another.
Mitchell Park has also become a space where people feel safe,
comfortable, and looked after. Players consistently watch out for one
another, help return lost items, and step in when someone needs
assistance. There is a shared understanding that this is more than just a
place to play—it is a community hub built on trust, kindness, and
collective responsibility. Expanding pickleball courts would not only meet
the overwhelming demand, but would further strengthen these
connections, allowing more people to experience the sense of belonging,
wellness, and togetherness that Mitchell Park so uniquely provides
Question 3
• Old Palo Alto
Name not shown
in Midtown/ Midtown West
January 10, 2026, 11:04 PM
Question 1
For the four existing priorities, the order of importance to me is as
follows:
1. Public Safety, Wellness & Belonging
2. Economic Development & Retail Vibrancy
3. Climate Action and Adaptation & Natural Environment Protection
4. Implementing Housing Strategies for Social and Economic Balance
46 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14800 Created with OpenGov | January 12, 2026, 3:03 PM
2026 City Council Priorities Community Feedback
Council is exploring keeping their annual priorities the same for 2026. Share your input on priorities.
ATTACHMENT BItem 1
Attachment B - Community
Survey on 2026 Council
Priorities
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 63 Packet Pg. 67 of 72
Question 2
Regarding public safety, wellness, and belonging, pickleball has become
an important activity for me since my retirement in 2024. It provides me
with cardiovascular exercise and motivates me to become a more skilled
player through regular participation and study of the game. The City of
Palo Alto provides 15 pickleball courts at Mitchell Park. These courts are
heavily utilized, and often players need to wait to gain access to a court
for a game only to yield to the next group upon its completion. Pickleball
players would benefit from an expansion of pickleball courts in Palo Alto.
The sport helps to create new friendships and is more social than some
other sports such as golf, which I played before transitioning to pickleball.
The best outcome for pickleball players in 2026 would be the addition of
more pickleball courts in Palo Alto.
Question 3
• Midtown
Name not available
January 10, 2026, 11:06 PM
Question 1
No response
Question 2
Climate action is most important. Housing is least important.
Question 3
• Crescent Park
Name not available
January 11, 2026, 8:01 AM
Question 1
Love the priorities. Thank you for setting these goals.
Question 2
Hoping that we do more to help Black and latinx people feel more
welcome. Also help women feel safer (there are many mentally
unstable/ill folks around downtown at all hours. My daughter and her
friends absolutely do not feel safe walking around downtown. It's not a
very family-centered, safe place anymore.
Question 3
• Professorville
Name not available
January 11, 2026, 9:06 AM
Question 1
Public safety and housing should be the City’s top priorities moving into
2026. A safe community and access to stable, affordable housing are the
foundation for everything else, including economic vitality, wellness, and
environmental progress. These areas deserve focused attention,
sustained funding, and measurable outcomes.
Question 2
By 2026, I would like to see improved emergency response capacity,
better staffing and resources for public safety services, and meaningful
progress on housing availability and affordability. Outcomes should
include faster response times, stronger community safety programs, and
concrete steps toward increasing housing supply for working residents.
Question 3
• Ventura
Tom Glenwright
in Duveneck/ St Francis
January 11, 2026, 9:36 AM
Question 1
No response
Question 2
For the Public Safety, Wellness and Belonging priority, and specifically in
regards to Wellness and Belonging, I'd like to see the City expand the
number of pickle ball courts, especially at Mitchell Park. I play there
several times a week and it's always packed, with many players waiting for
an available court. Pickle ball has become very popular, not just for older
adults but for people of all ages. I often see teenagers come to the courts
in groups to both play and hangout with each other. I also see many of the
same people there every time I go, and have made many new friends.
Many of the people I have met there come by themselves with the
expectation they will be welcomed to play with other players. So pickle
ball is more than a Wellness activity, and if anything is more of a
Belonging activity. That's why it's important to add more courts in the
same location as the existing courts rather than adding/converting a few
courts in multiple locations scattered around the City. Pickle ball is a
47 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14800 Created with OpenGov | January 12, 2026, 3:03 PM
2026 City Council Priorities Community Feedback
Council is exploring keeping their annual priorities the same for 2026. Share your input on priorities.
ATTACHMENT BItem 1
Attachment B - Community
Survey on 2026 Council
Priorities
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 64 Packet Pg. 68 of 72
unique physical activity where you can show up alone and be welcomed to
play with others, but that requires a critical mass of players and courts. A
few courts scattered around the City cannot achieve that. I have seen this
first hand, when I've visited courts at other locations, such as Nealon Park
in Menlo Park, which only has 4 pickle ball courts. While it's possible to
join in with other players there when it's busy, most of the time it's not
busy and thus limited or no opportunities to join other players. That's why
I don't go there as a single player. I go to Mitchell Park instead where I'm
almost always guaranteed to be able to join in games with other single
players, socialize with people I've met there, and make new friends.
Question 3
• Duveneck/St. Francis
Name not available
January 11, 2026, 10:21 AM
Question 1
How are these priorities being measured to know what progress is being
made. Hard to believe that after a year the council sees no need to change
the priorities.
Question 2
Economic development should be at the top of the priority list followed by
public safety.
Question 3
• Crescent Park
Name not available
January 11, 2026, 10:54 AM
Question 1
Continue work to reduce aviation impacts including noise and emissions
from PAO, SFO, OAK and SJC. Prepare and protect the city from future
aircraft - Advanced Air Mobility and Drones. Protect Palo Alto's Natural
Environment such as a successful example, the Dark Sky ordinance, and
for future efforts regarding Bird Friendly Design, Creek corridors, and
more locally native trees to support local biodiversity (pollinators and
birds). Exercise fiscal responsibility, e.g. it isn't just about building a new
gym it is the future cost to run and maintain it also. Please consider a
stronger efforts on goals regarding electrification. There is activity/goals
that sound, yet not lots of concrete, game-changing outcomes. Need to
dial up with efforts to drive stronger goals/results for meaningful
outcomes.
Question 2
- Building approves for housing
- Dark sky ordinance
- SF commission appeal re: airport changes
Question 3
• University South
Name not available
January 11, 2026, 12:33 PM
Question 1
Public Safety Wellness and Belonging should be number 1. Within that,
getting grade separation done for the Caltrain tracks should be included.
Question 2
No response
Question 3
• Charleston Meadows
Name not available
January 11, 2026, 12:37 PM
Question 1
Fine for another year
Question 2
No response
Question 3
• Duveneck/St. Francis
Name not available
January 11, 2026, 12:47 PM
Question 1
More Pickleball Please
Question 2
48 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14800 Created with OpenGov | January 12, 2026, 3:03 PM
2026 City Council Priorities Community Feedback
Council is exploring keeping their annual priorities the same for 2026. Share your input on priorities.
ATTACHMENT BItem 1
Attachment B - Community
Survey on 2026 Council
Priorities
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 65 Packet Pg. 69 of 72
More Pickleball Please
Question 3
• Old Palo Alto
Name not available
January 11, 2026, 3:46 PM
Question 1
Pickleball has really helped my Wellness and Belonging in the years that I
have been playing. I am, by nature, an introvert, but although I have MS I
have also always been quite athletic (now with limitations). On the pb
courts I have met friends and maintained friendships, gotten great
exercise (and laughs) and have found support among the other players
for the limitations that I have with this kind of activity. Pickleball has
definitely made my life more fulfilling and enjoyable.
Question 2
The courts are very crowded. We need access to more courts. There are
times when it is so crowded (paddles in the racks on every court) that I
have to chose between leaving to swim instead or must use my available
time and energy standing around waiting to play (no matter what I choose
to do I have used up my energy by 10:30am). Last week I was only able to
play 3 games in 2 hours and 15 minutes. This is happening all over the
existing pickleball courts. I only play in the early morning, but I have
heard, and occasionally seen, how busy the courts are all day and during
the evening hours too. Additional courts would be very conducive to the
wellbeing of a lot of people.
Question 3
• Downtown North
Name not shown
in Midtown/ Midtown West
January 11, 2026, 4:56 PM
Question 1
I think it makes sense to extend these priorities into 2026 to allow for
more time to take actions that meaningfully address the City Council
Priorities
Question 2
Specifically, to the priority of "Public Safety, Wellness, & Belonging", I
think the City Council should approve of the expansion of Mitchell Park
Pickleball Courts in 2026. I'm retired and I play Pickleball at Mitchell Park
most days of the week, getting exercise, socializing, and enjoying a sense
of "belonging" that the Mitchell Park Pickleball Community provides. I
think the City Council should embrace the expansion of the number of
Pickleball Courts at Mitchell park as a way of addressing the Priority of
Public Safety, Wellness, & Belonging,
Question 3
• Midtown
Name not available
January 11, 2026, 5:37 PM
Question 1
RE artificial turf should not be allowed in public spaces, assume this
would be related to the following
Climate Action and Adaptation & Natural Environment Protection
Public Safety, Wellness & Belonging
Question 2
Several cities have already moved to no longer allow new or replacement
of artificial turf. Palo Alto should follow suit.
I understand real grass needs more water and maintenance, but public
spaces should also allow some time in nature after all we are named after
a tree!
Question 3
• College Terrace
joseph Afong
in Community Center
January 11, 2026, 6:17 PM
Question 1
I think the four priorities are good. I like to make a comment on the fourth
priority - public safety, wellness & belonging
Question 2
My wife and I started playing pickleball at Mitchell Park about three years
ago. We started slowly but have grown to love the game. We now play 4
to 5 times a week. Besides the game we also love the sense of community
at Mitchell Park. We participate in the various activities of the Palo Alto
Pickleball Club frequently. We met numerous friends through pickleball
at Mitchell. Playing pickleball and socializing with our pickleball friends
49 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14800 Created with OpenGov | January 12, 2026, 3:03 PM
2026 City Council Priorities Community Feedback
Council is exploring keeping their annual priorities the same for 2026. Share your input on priorities.
ATTACHMENT BItem 1
Attachment B - Community
Survey on 2026 Council
Priorities
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 66 Packet Pg. 70 of 72
have become a way of life for us. We would go to lunch and dinner with
our pickleball friends and even travel together. My wife and I are both
retired. Pickleball at Mitchell Park provides us companionship with so
much fun and joy. Thank you Palo Alto for offering the park for us to play.
In the past couple of post Covid years the courts have become so
crowded that many new players found the courts to be unapproachable.
They ended up not coming to the park resulting in the loss of opportunity
to further grow our community. I wish the City would expand the courts,
thus also expand the Mitchell Park pickleball community.
Question 3
• Community Center
Name not available
January 11, 2026, 8:09 PM
Question 1
If the City Council is serious about its climate goals, the best thing we can
do is build dense housing.
Question 2
We need to construct more market-rate housing. We also need to reform
the process so there are few veto points.
Question 3
• College Terrace
Name not shown
in Leland Manor/ Garland
January 11, 2026, 9:18 PM
Question 1
I agree with these four priorities, however we should definitely stress the
climate action goals as well as public health.
Question 2
I think a critical action is to help transition the residential sector away
from natural gas stoves. This aligns with the city's public health and
climate change priorities.
Question 3
• Duveneck/St. Francis
Name not shown
in Greenmeadow
January 11, 2026, 9:28 PM
Question 1
I think that priority #3 (Implementing Housing Strategies for Social and
Economic Balance) is definitely the lowest priority.. Just 2d and 3d door
from our house, one house has filled every square inch of their lot with a
remodeling and some random second-story rooms (probably illegal
because the remodel is too close to the lot border), and the other person
converted their 4 bedroom 2 bath hourse to a 5-bedroom mini-hotel
(each bedroom has a private bath), and then flipped it to a googler. If
anything, I would like the city to do a better job of controlling ad-hoc
permit-less densification, the opposite of #3.
Question 2
I (Donald Gillies, 461 Ferne Ave) am a frequent player of Pickleball at
Mitchell Park, and my wife plays religiously (at least 3d a week).
Unfortunately, there is a shortage of courts there, and we need more - it
would be good if court space could be expanded.
Question 3
• Greenmeadow
Name not available
January 11, 2026, 10:59 PM
Question 1
Climate action and social justice have no place in the City Council
Priorities. Of the current four priorities, only the second (economic
development) and fourth (public safety) are within the remit of the City
Council. How about infrastructure? Like getting grade separation for
Caltrain. Isn't that something that should be within your wheelhouse? Or
a safe, underground, upgraded power grid. Do you realize that the above
ground power infrastructure is being increased in voltage, that higher
voltage is more dangerous, and that the new above ground high voltage
lines have already caused at least one fire? Why are we deploying new,
above ground, high voltage power lines which we know are extreme fire
hazards?
Question 2
Start with public safety and something as simple as traffic law
enforcement. Is there any? Have you ever looked at any intersection and
counted how many cars come to a full stop at a stop sign? Or watched
what happens as a traffic light goes to yellow and then red? There needs
to an attitude adjustment where the sights are adjusted down from the
50 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14800 Created with OpenGov | January 12, 2026, 3:03 PM
2026 City Council Priorities Community Feedback
Council is exploring keeping their annual priorities the same for 2026. Share your input on priorities.
ATTACHMENT BItem 1
Attachment B - Community
Survey on 2026 Council
Priorities
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 67 Packet Pg. 71 of 72
clouds (Climate Action ...) and back to earth where ordinary people need
be able to cross the street or the railroad tracks without being killed, and
need to power our homes without danger of incineration from fire, and get
through the winter without being flooded. Get that done. That is what we
need, and that is what the City Council should be doing.
Question 3
• Crescent Park
51 | communityfeedback.opengov.com/14800 Created with OpenGov | January 12, 2026, 3:03 PM
2026 City Council Priorities Community Feedback
Council is exploring keeping their annual priorities the same for 2026. Share your input on priorities.
ATTACHMENT BItem 1
Attachment B - Community
Survey on 2026 Council
Priorities
Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 68 Packet Pg. 72 of 72