HomeMy WebLinkAbout2025-11-20 Climate Action and Sustainability Committee Summary MinutesCLIMATE ACTION &
SUSTAINABILITY COMMITTEE
SUMMARY MINUTES
Page 1 of 10
Special Meeting
November 20, 2025
The Climate Action & Sustainability Committee of the City of Palo Alto met on this date in the
Community Meeting Room and by virtual teleconference at 2:00 p.m.
Present In-Person: Veenker (Chair), Burt, Lu
Present Remotely: None.
Absent: None.
Call to Order
Chair Veenker called the meeting to order. The clerk called roll and declared a quorum.
Public Comments
1. David S. spoke about the City's carbon neutrality goal as it related to private auto electrification and
specifically EV chargers. David S. mentioned a project at 391 Oxford Avenue in Palo Alto, where the goal
was to bring power from a home to a detached garage area. The project had 2 options: to run the power
above ground, which costed $8,000 and was visible; or run the power underground, which costed
$18,000. The national electrical code and California electrical code specified that a rigid metal conduit
only needed to be buried 6 inches below grade, but the Palo Alto code specified it had to be buried 30
inches below grade, significantly increasing the cost. David S. was concerned about code obstacles to
electrification.
2. David C. noted there were new homes being built with gas hookups. David C. believed those having
the gas hookups installed should pay the full price to decommission the gas line up front. David C.
suggested charging more than the decommissioning cost as a way to dissuade the use of gas. David C.
mentioned that most new homes have installed a 400-amp service. David C. thought that was
unnecessary and proposed charging people an extra cost up front for the excess electricity.
Standing Verbal Reports
A. Staff Comments
Director Brad Eggleston gave updates on the recent round of statewide incentives for heat pump
water heaters. Over 100 Palo Alto residents signed contracts to install a water heater during round 3
through a combination of full-service emergency and rebate programs. Director Eggleston
highlighted the heat pump water heater giveaway program, in which 24 residents installed heat
pump water heaters to join the contest. There were 40 residents that attended the heat pump
SUMMARY MINUTES
Page 2 of 10
Climate Action & Sustainability Committee Special Meeting
Summary Minutes: 11/20/2025
happy hour on October 23. Director Eggleston explained the refer-a-neighbor promotion, in which
residents that had completed a heat pump water heater installation were eligible to earn $50 per
referral and the referred neighbor could receive $100 after completing an installation. As of 1 week
ago, 14 customers had signed up as new referrers and 2 sign-ups were referred customers. City staff
had received emails with concerns about solar and battery permit fees. In the FY2026 budget, the
City implemented a new cost of service study which inadvertently did not adjust some fees subject
to state statutory caps. Staff will work on a solution. The topic will return to Council in early 2026 for
discussion. The City of Palo Alto was awarded the gold-level designation by the national Charging
Smart program.
B. Committee Member Comments and Announcements
Council Member Burt had requested to develop a spreadsheet of friction points in programs as a
systematic way to address and prioritize all the issues. Council Member Burt wondered why the
solar and battery permitting fees were so high, regardless of State limits. Council Member Burt
opined that fee structures could be dis-incentives to adoption. Council Member Burt questioned
why the latest Reach code requirements were not having the anticipated outcomes regarding gas
hookups on new homes. Council Member Burt asked if the increase in 400-amp services on new
homes will be a problem for the City's grid. Council Member Burt proposed a business advisory
council to bring the business community into the efforts. Council Member Burt wanted the
community and City's identity of being leaders in innovation and sustainability to be an essential
core value in the business community. Council Member Burt queried how the Committee could
make a recommendation for that to occur.
Director Brad Eggleston explained that staff will bring a draft workplan in early January for the
Committee to review and make a recommendation.
Chair Veenker asked if staff could confirm the observations of 400-amp installations. Chair Veenker
liked the idea of integrating the business community, as many big companies had Chief
Sustainability Officers. Chair Veenker reported that the Northern California Power Agency was
recruiting a new general manager and had selected Korn Ferry as the recruiting firm. The next
quarterly legislature and regulatory committee for the CPA will be in early December. The Air
District approved recommending to the Board $23M in charge grants for EV infrastructure, although
the demand was outpacing the infrastructure. The State budget's new projected structural deficit
was $18B due to the bullish stock market. Chair Veenker recalled Al Gore's observation that private
capital was a way to solve climate problems. Of the new energy installed worldwide last year, 93
percent was renewable and 75 percent was funded by private investors, however only 2 percent
was in Africa. Chair Veenker noted the interest in addressing the energy needs for AI technology.
Assistant Director Jonathan Abendschein said that about one third of people were putting in new
gas lines, which was mostly for stoves, and a small minority of people were doing 400-amp panel
upgrades.
Council Member Burt wanted staff to look at the latest numbers of 400-amp panel requests to see if
there was a correlating trend between the increase of requests and the City's push for home
electrification.
Agenda Items
SUMMARY MINUTES
Page 3 of 10
Climate Action & Sustainability Committee Special Meeting
Summary Minutes: 11/20/2025
1. Status Update on Sustainability and Climate Action Plan Mobility Goals and Key Actions and Request
for Feedback on Tentative 2026-2027 Work Plan Items. CEQA Status - Not a project.
Senior Planner Katie Heuser said there were 3 objectives for the presentation: to provide a status
update on the mobility goals and key actions; to share planned and potential 2026-2027 S/CAP Work
Plan Mobility work items; and to seek Committee feedback on work items.
The City had two Mobility Goals: to reduce the total vehicle miles traveled (VMT) by 12 percent by 2030
compared to the 2019 baseline and to increase the mode share for active transportation and transit
from 19 percent to 40 percent of local work trips by 2030. There had been at least a 25 percent
reduction in total VMT in 2023 compared to 2019, largely due to the pandemic. Mode share remained
around 20 percent. Challenges with VMT measurement included the City's lack of access to detailed
monitoring of every vehicle entering and leaving Palo Alto and its origin, destination, and type. The
S/CAP used 2 different models to estimate VMT: the Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) model, used
in 2019, and Google's Environmental Insights Explorer (EIE), the current model. Google's EIE estimate
was lower than the VTA model. Google's EIE had not published 2024 data nor communicated why or the
timeline for release. Staff was exploring alternatives.
A slide showed a table of long-term and short-term OOT work items. There were 5 main Work Plan
Items for the 2026-2027 S/CAP Work Plan, which pursue reducing VMT and raising the percentage of
local commutes using active transportation. The 5 main items were in line with the approved operating
and CIP budgets for the OOT. The 5 items were: to achieve benchmarks for bike/pedestrian projects; to
implement recommendations included in the micromobility feasibility study; to develop a parking
pricing policy, which will yield revenue; to maintain and modernize traffic signals to improve
multimodality; and to implement goals, policies, and programs in the Housing Element. A slide showed a
table of potential additional work items, which would require reprioritizing items on the prior slide or
additional staff or funding. Column 2 on the table identified what additional staffing or non-salary funds
would be needed to advance the items. Tasks included advancing or accelerating work with additional
full-time staff, expanding transit services, developing a tool to better understand mobility needs,
transportation demand management, and education or programming for adult cyclists and pedestrians.
Staff presented the slide deck to the Climate Action Working Group yesterday. Staff received comments
regarding the value of quantifying potential VMT reduction and that telecommuting policies were in
flux. Suggestions included a focus on bicycling infrastructure, such as separated bike lanes, to create a
more comfortable environment. There was a discussion around the benefits of more people living in
Palo Alto. There was general support for expanding transportation demand management services; for
example, Stanford employees were paid not to drive. There was a discussion about wanting staff to
consider on-demand micro-transit, such as self-driving shuttles.
Council Member Lu asked what the baseline year was for the mode share and if that was based on
census data for Palo Alto residents. Council Member Lu asked if working from home was factored into
the mode share calculations. Council Member Lu questioned if the census data was detailed about
modes of transportation, such as cycling versus walking versus taking a train or bus, and if there was
anything noteworthy. Council Member Lu opined having the extra context on the mode share would be
useful for a deeper evaluation of the plan and proposed items.
Senior Planner Heuser said the baseline year for the mode sharing was 2019 and the census only looked
at Palo Alto residents and the commute, which may be outside the City.
SUMMARY MINUTES
Page 4 of 10
Climate Action & Sustainability Committee Special Meeting
Summary Minutes: 11/20/2025
Transportation Planning Manager Sylvia Star-Lack said staff had a conversation regarding how to capture
the data and noted staff tried to keep the KPIs as simple as possible.
Assistant Director Jonathan Abendschein confirmed telecommuting was not included in the mode share
calculations and the number of work trips had declined while the percentage of mode share for those
work trips stayed the same.
Chief Transportation Official Ria Lo explained that some trends came from the census while some came
from other sources. There was still a rebound in the number of trips, some of which were longer. The
absolute numbers of trips were lower but the mode share was going the opposite direction because
there was less transit commuting. The VTA recovered well but was still not at pre-pandemic levels.
Caltrain had made substantial improvements since electrification.
Council Member Burt opined that major breakdowns in the data would be informative. Council Member
Burt said the 80 percent reduction goal was based on the 1990 baseline and asked what was used to
come up with the 1990 GHG baseline. Council Member Burt questioned if the GHG levels for 1990 had
any breakdown on mobile versus stationary sources and if there was a VMT. Council Member Burt
acknowledged the 1990 numbers were less reliable than the 2019 numbers due to improvements in
measurement abilities. Council Member Burt referenced Table 1 and said there was close to a 40
percent decline in the VMT, but the GHGs only reflected a 25 percent decline. Council Member Burt
asked why there was a large discrepancy in the percentages. Council Member Burt queried if staff
thought that Google EIE was more accurate. Council Member Burt asked how staff came up with the
293,413 GHG number. Council Member Burt clarified that, if the GHG for 2019 was adjusted higher to
include data for medium- and heavy-duty vehicles, then the actual decline would be closer to 40 percent
rather than 25 percent. Council Member Burt opined the percentage decline discrepancy should be
reconciled as it was a large contributing factor to the City's overall goals. Council Member Burt said the
decline in the GHG levels appeared similar but because the EIE numbers were not reliable in 2019, there
was uncertainty as to what the actual numbers were. Council Member Burt clarified that ultimately,
staff would have to make best assumptions on the 1990 and 2019 data. Council Member Burt wanted
the assumptions to be transparently presented. Council Member Burt asked if the EIE was discussed
with the Committee and if the EIE had origin and destination data. Google EIE was free.
Council Member Burt queried what the City paid for the Fehr and Peers study. Council Member Burt
referenced Table 2 and asked how rail grade separations would reduce VMTs and noted that vehicular
grade separations reduced traffic congestion and increased vehicular travel. Council Member Burt
questioned how traffic calming would translate to VMT reduction and clarified traffic calming would
promote mode shift. Council Member Burt was skeptical that a shared micromobility system would be
successful in Palo Alto. The post-Covid fixed rail transit use was down across the Bay Area, however
Caltrain had seen recovery exceed projections. Hybrid work and a slow economy meant fewer people
were going to work. Council Member Burt opined that traffic congestion drove transit use.
Chair Veenker acknowledged the VMT was important because it could be influenced but noted the level
of GHGs fell to about the same amount in either mode. Reducing the GHG levels was the ultimate goal.
Chair Veenker appreciated the directionality but wanted more concrete numbers to help craft a policy
that understood the VMT, if possible.
Manager Christine Luong confirmed some goals had a 1990 baseline but the baseline for the mode shift
specifically was 2019. Manager Christine Luong said the 1990 baseline included all categories in the GPC
SUMMARY MINUTES
Page 5 of 10
Climate Action & Sustainability Committee Special Meeting
Summary Minutes: 11/20/2025
methodology, such as on-road transportation, off-road transportation, Caltrain transportation, aviation,
etc. Staff did not have the mode shift breakdown. The earliest VMT data staff had was from 2015. The
reason the City switched to Google EIE was because Google switched the entire methodology to follow
the GPC methodology. The VTA model that Fehr and Peers used was $15,000.
Assistant Director Abendschein explained there had been a lot of evolution in how to measure VMT and
emissions from VMT, even since 2019. Staff focus in the last few years was to improve measurement
methodologies. The inconsistency between the VMT decline and the GHG decline was partly due to the
improvements in measurement methodologies. The Fehr and Peers study was an estimate based on the
County-wide transportation model and Google EIE was in beta mode in 2019 and had a lot of errors.
There was a lot of uncertainty around the 2019 numbers. The VMT measurement and ability to access
vehicle data to estimate emissions from different vehicle types had varied widely. Assistant Director
Abendschein emphasized the broad directionality of significant decreases in VMT from 2019 to 2023.
Staff did not believe the EIE was more accurate in 2019 but the current EIE was more accurate. The
293,413 GHG number from 2019 would be lower than expected for that level of VMT if the data took
into account medium- and heavy-duty vehicles. There would be higher GHG levels for that amount of
VMT if vehicle types were taken into account. The 2023 data took those into account. The Fehr and
Peers model had a lot of uncertainty. The decline could be closer to 40 percent or 20 percent; there was
a wide margin for error. Assistant Director Abendschein agreed with the desire to have an agreed upon
baseline, however there was a lot of uncertainty around vehicles entering and leaving Palo Alto during
2019 and 1990. Staff had estimating methodologies. The focus was to improve those methodologies in
order to have good tracking data going forward. Staff was having issues getting the latest EIE data,
which will be released. If staff was able to continue to use the EIE data, then staff could look back and
determine which uncertain methodology to use as the baseline.
Director Brad Eggleston said staff did not have information on the 1990 baseline at the time but would
look back to understand what the basis was. The EIE was discussed with the Committee before it
became a Brown Act Committee.
Chief Transportation Official Lo explained that grade separations helped reduce VMT by addressing the
issue of electric connected active transportation. The City hoped to redo the traffic calming process to
respond to community input on pedestrian and bicycle concerns, such as reducing speeds.
Transportation Planning Manager Star-Lack agreed that micromobility may not be impactful but
Stanford Research Park asked the City to be included.
Senior Planner Heuser said the micromobility feasibility study was due to the realization that Palo Alto
may not be suitable for shared bikes and scooters. Findings showed it will be most successful in areas
like downtown and Cal Ave. The inclusion of the Stanford campus and shopping center will contribute to
its success.
Chair Veenker referenced the current OOT work items list on slide 5 and asked how using Palo Alto Link
would reduce VMTs. Chair Veenker clarified that Link or Uber does not reduce VMTs but encourages
other ancillary trips to be made on public transit or with another public mode. Chair Veenker referenced
the 2026-2027 workplan items and questioned how the traffic signal upgrades and timing efforts would
reduce VMTs. Chair Veenker clarified the upgrades would be optimized for bike and pedestrians versus
vehicles. Chair Veenker asked if there was an ongoing effort to ensure bike lanes were wide enough for
3-wheelers.
SUMMARY MINUTES
Page 6 of 10
Climate Action & Sustainability Committee Special Meeting
Summary Minutes: 11/20/2025
Council Member Burt was skeptical that utilizing Palo Alto Link would reduce VMTs as much as in other
cities, like San Francisco.
Chief Transportation Official Lo explained the shuttle was cost prohibitive. Palo Alto Link would reduce
VMTs by enabling people to live a car-free lifestyle and was expected to be used in conjunction with
public transportation. Chief Transportation Official Lo said that optimizing the flow of roadways would
reduce GHGs and there would likely be signal priority given to bikes and pedestrians.
Transportation Planning Manager Star-Lack said the signal timing on Bryant through Downtown had
been optimized for bicycle travel. Staff tried to get the widest bike lanes possible.
Item 1 Public Comment
1. David C. wanted to prioritize bike plan projects based on GHG reductions. David C. did not want the
City's work-from-home policies to relax and cause a loss of gains in the GHG and VMT reductions. David
C. suggested a rent-to-own program to promote e-bikes. E-bike trials had an 85 percent conversion to
ownership. David C. proposed holding an e-bike expo but cautioned against the promotion of throttle-
only e-bikes. David C. opined that updating the comp plan so that street closures could occur would help
traffic calming.
2. Ken K. recommended the City evaluate any micromobility proposals using a GHG reduction per dollar
KPI and a safety improvement per dollar KPI. Peer city data showed that the City needed to support 1 to
3 FTE employees to get a modest GHG savings, such as Boulder. Cambridge in the UK had a successful
micromobility program due to its large scale. Small-scale programs had only 10 to 20 percent of trips
replace a car or ride hail; the majority of trips replaced walking or transit. Ken K. opined that other
programs should be considered. Ken K. suggested investing in a micromobility voucher program or
lending library. If the City implemented a shared micromobility program, the contract should be long-
term to prevent the service provider from exiting.
Council Member Lu liked the capital project items but opined micromobility could become a significant
distraction and that staff would need to pay attention to data and practices. Council Member Lu was
concerned that increasing the parking cost would not be impactful due to excess parking. Council
Member Lu asked for more information on the parking and price management item. Council Member Lu
believed parking enforcement was a good way to manage VMT, safety, and mode shifts. Council
Member Lu supported changes in parking color zones. Council Member Lu opined that transit signal
priorities for bikes and pedestrians would be the most impactful and asked if staff knew how many
streets could accommodate traffic signal priorities. Council Member Lu felt that good execution on the
bicycle and pedestrian capital projects would be the most impactful.
Council Member Burt opined that now was not the time to implement parking changes due to the low
demand. Council Member Burt believed increasing long-term parking permits would develop a
sustainable funding source for TMA. Council Member Burt liked the idea of looking at GHG reduction on
a per-dollar basis. Council Member Burt thought putting a greater focus on e-bikes, including cargo and
3-wheel e-bikes for seniors, would be impactful. The e-bike expo in 2016 was popular. Council Member
Burt recommended using a range for GHG reduction goals. Council Member Burt suggested adjusting
the mode shift goal downward but the VMT reduction goal upward. Palo Alto had adopted transit-
oriented developments and communities. A high percentage of development in the region was transit
oriented, however, since pre-Covid, there had been a decline in transit use, which Council Member Burt
SUMMARY MINUTES
Page 7 of 10
Climate Action & Sustainability Committee Special Meeting
Summary Minutes: 11/20/2025
believed was due to limited access. Council Member Burt asked if the mode share shift only looked at
Palo Alto residents or included commuters. Council Member Burt queried if there was a way to get data
on the commuters and wanted to identify commuters as a category, even if it was less accurate. Council
Member Burt opined the planned improvements on University Avenue would benefit mode shift. About
70 percent of residents work outside of Palo Alto. Council Member Burt believed the premise that new
residents would eliminate commuters was false and wanted to do a proper calculation on whether the
new residents would commute at similar levels and similar distances.
Chair Veenker was concerned about downtown pricing policy changes having unintended consequences
for the retail community. Chair Veenker liked the traffic signal timing efforts and the encouragement
programs. Chair Veenker believed a sense of safety was a big factor when considering mode shift and
that an additional level of security and safety would be needed around e-bikes. Chair Veenker agreed
that the mode shift goal may have been too ambitious.
Chief Transportation Official Lo said the current parking policy was the color zones, which generated
emissions and created safety concerns. Chief Transportation Official Lo did not know how many streets
could accommodate bike and pedestrian signal priorities.
Senior Planner Heuser did not know how big the parking issue was.
Transportation Planning Manager Star-Lack confirmed the mode share shift only looked at Palo Alto
residents because of the need for a stable metric. Staff needed a metric that could be tracked year over
year. In order to do estimates for incoming and outgoing commuters, staff would have to use the VTA
travel model. Transportation Planning Manager Star-Lack was unsure if Google EIE would have the data
for commuters.
2. Recommendation that the City Council Accept the “Evaluation of Local Energy Resources to Lower
Costs and Improve Reliability and Resiliency” Report to Complete Reliability and Resiliency Strategic
Plan Strategies Four and Five, and that the City Council Direct Staff to Pursue Various Activities
Related to Flexible Energy Resource and Efficient Electrification to Improve Reliability and Resiliency;
CEQA Status - Not a Project
Assistant Director Jonathan Abendschein explained the study objective was to evaluate the level of
flexible energy technologies and efficient electrification in reducing electric supply costs, deferring
distribution system investment, and enhancing short- and long-term resiliency. A slide showed the study
timeline. The workplan included a work item to complete the reliability and resiliency strategic plan.
There was a general assumption that it was worthwhile to promote technologies for voluntary adoption
and to reduce barriers. The Utilities Advisory Commission (UAC) was the primary body focused on the
study. Over the summer, this Committee and the UAC reviewed the preliminary study results and
provided feedback, which was incorporated into the study. The overall findings were that there was no
positive cost benefit based on the savings to utility supply cost and benefits of short-term reliability of
technologies. The final study was updated to remove the investment tax credit, which hurt the numbers.
There were a few areas for a case-by-case focus. Time of use rates were beneficial. It was worthwhile to
promote the technologies, reduce barriers, and provide low-cost technical assistance. Included in the
staff recommendation was to come back in 2026 for further discussion on long-term resiliency. Slides
showed the updated results for residential and commercial; there were no positive cost benefits. A slide
SUMMARY MINUTES
Page 8 of 10
Climate Action & Sustainability Committee Special Meeting
Summary Minutes: 11/20/2025
showed feedback on the Policy Straw Proposal, all of which was integrated into the recommendations
brought to the Committee. A slide showed a graph of technology cost projections. Without the ITC,
commercial batteries and solar were forecasted to become cost-effective in the next 5 to 10 years,
whereas residential solar and battery would take until 2040 or later.
The Working Group was presented with this information and had feedback. There were clarifying
questions on the report methodology and comments agreeing with the staff recommendation. There
was also a recommendation to continue to focus on adopting efficient electrification technologies and
reducing barriers. There were several suggestions, including considering adjusting the staff
recommendation so commercial battery-only projects were considered on a case-by-case basis; doing an
annual update to the cost-benefit, adjusting only electricity costs; and quantifying long-term resiliency
by doing a scenario analysis on direct City savings instead of macroeconomic analysis. Staff asked the
Committee to recommend acceptance of the report and ask Council to direct staff to continue to work
on reducing barriers, promoting technologies, and looking for case-by-case opportunities.
Director Brad Eggleston said this item was planned to go to Council as an action item in early 2026
because it included an item that was pulled from consent regarding the reliability and resiliency strategic
plan.
Item 2 Public Comment
There were no requests to speak.
Council Member Lu asked how utility-owned or larger-scale battery storage solutions may apply. Council
Member Lu confirmed the short-term reliability benefits were considered but it was a complex issue and
the benefits did not scale up well. Council Member Lu encouraged staff to consider ways to make the
process easier on a code level.
Council Member Burt was encouraged that solar and battery provided a benefit to commercial
customers, especially regarding resiliency. Council Member Burt noted the gap between the supply cost
benefits for residential customers on slide 6. The majority of residential solar installations included
batteries even though there was no economic benefit. Council Member Burt believed that was because
households valued reliability. Council Member Burt was unsure if commercial businesses placed the
same value on reliability and wanted to get input from the Sustainability Council. Council Member Burt
asked how staff derived the estimates for the value commercial businesses placed on short-term
reliability. Council Member Burt opined that commercial businesses had subjective and emotional
reasonings for solar and battery installation, and that it was not solely based on economics. Council
Member Burt was glad to see the airport location was recognized as a possible microgrid and queried if
the UAC was briefed on that.
Chair Veenker did not see any resiliency benefits included in the residential results on slide 6 and asked
why. Chair Veenker believed that long-term resiliency could make up a significant amount of value. Chair
Veenker opined that technology promotion and barrier reduction was important but asked for
clarification on the collection of things listed under item 2 on the staff report. Chair Veenker referenced
page 11, item 4 of the staff report, which mentioned backup power for the Regional Water Quality
Control Plant and the airport, and asked for clarification. Chair Veenker liked the idea of having
alternative policies that provided incentives for solar and battery microgrids for things such as grocery
SUMMARY MINUTES
Page 9 of 10
Climate Action & Sustainability Committee Special Meeting
Summary Minutes: 11/20/2025
stores. Chair Veenker appreciated income-qualified incentives. Chair Veenker did not want to defer an
investment in the grid upgrades.
Assistant Director Abendschein pulled up slide 7. Large-scale battery storage solutions were not
considered directly but the commercial results for battery-only storage provided insight. A lot of value
for large-scale batteries was in the short-term reliability. It would be a challenge to achieve the short-
term reliability benefits on a utility-wide scale. The batteries were standalone and did not provide long-
term resiliency. There were difficulties when considering the short-term benefits for multiple customers
due to complexities with switching and the ability of the battery. There was a cost benefit on the
commercial side for battery and solar but businesses wanted a 2-to-4-year payback when investing
working capital. Slide 7 showed there was a 15-to-20-year payback for commercial businesses and that
financing would be a major factor. Staff included commercial estimates for short-term reliability,
indicated by the light green in the chart. Long-term resiliency was not included. The UAC provided
feedback on the models proposed by the consultant for the study. The interruption cost estimation (ICE)
model was used, which was based on surveys of commercial customers actual studies of impacts of
outages on things like productivity, spoilage, etc. The City was well set up to allow people to invest in
solar and batteries if desired for the short-term reliability benefit. The UAC received the same briefing as
the Committee. The residential resiliency benefits for residential solar and BESS were small but long-
term resiliency was not factored in. The amount of people buying solar plus battery was small compared
to the total population of Palo Alto. The confusion in the staff report under item 2 was due to a comma,
and should have read "vehicle to load, vehicle to home, and vehicle to grid technology." Assistant
Director Abendschein explained it was important to look at all backup options for the RWQCP because
solar and storage were expensive.
Chief Operating Officer Terry Crowley explained that current battery technology was for the short-term
and it would become an arbitrage on finance of how to mitigate the resource adequacy cost and shape
peak demand. The benefits were not economic based on the financial arbitrage; however, when
considering the reliability, the numbers for the benefit-to-cost ratio may change.
Architect, Urban Planner, and Policy Analyst Nathaniel Gunderson explained that the ICE model was
based on several different mass surveys that estimated the potential impacts of outages over varying
durations for residential and commercial. The residential side was based on a willingness to pay.
Individual customer characteristics determined the value ascribed to an outage of a certain duration. On
the commercial side, those values were assigned based on different types of economic sectors, cost
models, and what the hit to revenue would be if an outage occurred where income could not be
generated during a certain period of time. The models generated a certain level of uncertainty past the
16-hour mark. After 1 day of an outage, there were other indirect costs distributed throughout the
economy that would require more extensive macroeconomic modeling to understand, which was why
the long-term estimates were not included. The ICE model was developed by the Lawrence Berkeley
National Lab, was peer reviewed, and updated recently. The residential resiliency benefits were small
compared to commercial customers because of the higher costs associated with business losses. It was
based on data collected through surveys and what people expressed. The emotional factor, such as
preference for comfort, was included. The survey data had been tracked for the past 2 decades and had
not changed drastically.
Director Eggleston explained that the City investigated having a microgrid provide backup power for the
RWQCP. The current backup power for the plant was diesel generators, which brought concerns about
the length of time to have power and the availability of diesel fuel and capacity to transport it in the
SUMMARY MINUTES
Page 10 of 10
Climate Action & Sustainability Committee Special Meeting
Summary Minutes: 11/20/2025
event of a significant emergency. Staff wanted to take a closer look at the Water Quality Control Plant
regardless of the microgrid idea.
Council Member Burt clarified there were 2 options in the staff report, the second being a more
aggressive approach to promotion. Council Member Burt was interested in pursuing the second option
and asked if the funding would come from utilities or the general fund.
Chair Veenker noted the report said staff would restrict efforts to .1 to .2 FTE.
Assistant Director Abendschein confirmed the alternative option would promote more and required
additional resources and discussion. The second option was located in the fiscal impacts section under
the second bullet on page 8. It would require a .5 FTE hourly budget and staff would need to find a
funding source. Assistant Director Abendschein said the City did not have resources allocated to utility-
scale local storage.
Motion: Council Member Burt moved, seconded by Chair Veenker that the Climate Action and
Sustainability Committee (CASC) recommend the City Council adopt the Staff recommendation and as
noted in the staff report, that a .5 FTE funding source would return upon greater evaluation.
MOTION PASSED: 3-0
Future Meetings and Agendas
The next meeting will be on Friday, December 12, with a plan to review City facility electrification and an
update on the Sea Level Rise adaptation plan. There will be a 4-hour workshop on Saturday, December
13, titled "Workshop on Economics of Large-Scale Community Electrification Challenges and Innovative
Strategies for the Single-Family Sector." It will be formatted as a workshop to allow more community
participation.
Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned at 4:27 p.m.