Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2025-11-03 City Council Agenda PacketCITY COUNCIL Special Meeting Monday, November 03, 2025 Council Chambers & Hybrid 4:30 PM Amended Agenda Amended agenda items appear below in RED Councilmember Vicki Veenker Remote Call In Teleconference Location: Arena Leme Hotel Av. Atlantica 324, Leme, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 22010-000, Brazil Sala Pedro Leme (the Pedro Leme Room) Palo Alto City Council meetings will be held as “hybrid” meetings with the option to attend by teleconference or in person. Information on how the public may observe and participate in the meeting is located at the end of the agenda. The meeting will be broadcast on Cable TV Channel 26, live on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/c/cityofpaloalto, and streamed to Midpen Media Center https://midpenmedia.org. VIRTUAL PARTICIPATION CLICK HERE TO JOIN (https://cityofpaloalto.zoom.us/j/362027238 ) Meeting ID: 362 027 238 Phone:1(669)900-6833 PUBLIC COMMENTS General Public Comment for items not on the agenda will be accepted in person for up to three minutes or an amount of time determined by the Chair. General public comment will be heard for 30 minutes. Additional public comments, if any, will be heard at the end of the agenda. Public comments for agendized items will be accepted both in person and via Zoom for up to three minutes or an amount of time determined by the Chair. Requests to speak will be taken until 5 minutes after the staff’s presentation or as determined by the Chair. Written public comments can be submitted in advance to city.council@PaloAlto.gov and will be provided to the Council and available for inspection on the City’s website. Please clearly indicate which agenda item you are referencing in your subject line. PowerPoints, videos, or other media to be presented during public comment are accepted only by email to city.clerk@PaloAlto.gov at least 24 hours prior to the meeting. Once received, the Clerk will have them shared at public comment for the specified item. To uphold strong cybersecurity management practices, USB’s or other physical electronic storage devices are not accepted. Signs and symbolic materials less than 2 feet by 3 feet are permitted provided that: (1) sticks, posts, poles or similar/other type of handle objects are strictly prohibited; (2) the items do not create a facility, fire, or safety hazard; and (3) persons with such items remain seated when displaying them and must not raise the items above shoulder level, obstruct the view or passage of other attendees, or otherwise disturb the business of the meeting. 1 November 03, 2025 Materials submitted after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection at www.paloalto.gov/agendas. TIME ESTIMATES Listed times are estimates only and are subject to change at any time, including while the meeting is in progress. The Council reserves the right to use more or less time on any item, to change the order of items and/or to continue items to another meeting. Particular items may be heard before or after the time estimated on the agenda. This may occur in order to best manage the time at a meeting or to adapt to the participation of the public.   CALL TO ORDER   SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY (4:30 - 4:40 PM)   1.Proclamation Expressing Appreciation to Fire Chief Geo Blackshire Upon His Retirement AGENDA CHANGES, ADDITIONS AND DELETIONS   PUBLIC COMMENT (4:40 - 5:10 PM) Members of the public may speak in-person ONLY to any item NOT on the agenda. 1-3 minutes depending on number of speakers. Public Comment is limited to 30 minutes. Additional public comments, if any, will be heard at the end of the agenda. COUNCIL MEMBER QUESTIONS, COMMENTS, ANNOUNCEMENTS (5:10 - 5:25 PM) Members of the public may not speak to the item(s).   ACTION ITEMS (5:25 - 5:55 PM) Include: Report of Committees/Commissions, Ordinances and Resolutions, Public Hearings, Report of Officials, Unfinished Business and Council Matters.   2.Approval of three reports: the City of Palo Alto Community Wildfire Protection Plan, the Emergency Preparedness: Wildfire Audit Report by the City Auditor (as recommended by the Policy and Services Committee), and Adopt a Resolution Approving the City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan. CEQA status: not a Project CLOSED SESSION (Item 3: 5:55 - 6:55 PM, Item 4: 6:55 - 8:25 PM)   3.CONFERENCE WITH CITY ATTORNEY-POTENTIAL LITIGATION Subject: Initiation of litigation in one case Authority: Potential Exposure to Litigation Under Government Code Section 54956.9(d) (4) Number of potential cases: 1, as Plaintiff.    2 November 03, 2025 Materials submitted after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection at www.paloalto.gov/agendas. 4.Public Employee Performance Evaluations Authority: Cal. Gov. Code section 54957 (b) Title: City Manager   BREAK (15 MINUTES) CONSENT CALENDAR (8:40 - 8:45 PM) Items will be voted in one motion unless removed from the calendar by three Council Members.   5.Approval of Minutes from October 15, October 20, and October 22, 2025 Meetings 6.FIRST READING: Adoption of an Ordinance Repealing Chapter 15.04 of the Palo Alto Municipal Code and Adopting a New Chapter 15.04, the California Fire Code (2025 Edition) With Local Amendments and Related Findings. CEQA Status: Exempt Pursuant to Section 15061 of the CEQA Guidelines. 7.Approval of Budget Amendments in the Local Housing Trust Fund, Residential Housing In- Lieu Fund, Residential Housing Impact Fee Fund, and Commercial Housing Impact Fee Fund to Reflect Prior City Council Funding Commitments for the Development of 3001 El Camino Real 100% Affordable Multi-Family Housing Project; CEQA Status: Not a Project. 8.Approval of Professional Services Contract Number C26194191 with TJC and Associates, Inc. in the Amount Not-to-Exceed $242,483 for Dahl & Park Reservoirs Structural Evaluation and Condition Assessment. CEQA Status – Exempt Under CEQA Guidelines Sections 15061(b)(2) and (b)(3). 9.Adoption of a Resolution Approving The Palo Alto Museum‘s Facility Naming Plan for the Roth Building; CEQA status – not a project. 10.Approval and Authorization for the City Manager or Designee to Execute Purchase Orders as Needed with the Okonite Company for Underground Cable for the Utility's Electric Underground System in an Annual Amount of $800,000 for a Total Not-to- Exceed Amount of $4,000,000 for a Period of Five (5) Years. CEQA Status: Not a Project. 11.Approval of Seven Items to Support the Automated Weather Observation System Project, AP-19000, at Palo Alto Airport: 1) Approval of Construction Contract No. C26194026 with Vellutini Corporation DBA Royal Electric Company, in an Amount Not to Exceed $1,699,810; 2) Authorization for the City Manager or Designee to Negotiate  3 November 03, 2025 Materials submitted after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection at www.paloalto.gov/agendas. Change Orders Up to a Not-to-Exceed Amount of $254,971; 3) Approval and Authorization for the City Manager or Designee to Execute Contract Amendment 3 to Contract No. C21178372C with C&S Engineers, Inc. for a Not-to-Exceed Amount of $464,613 and a Contract Extension Through December 31, 2026; 4) Authorization and Approval for the City Manager or Designee to Execute Contract Amendment 1 to Contract No. C21178372B with Burns & McDonnell for a Contract Extension Through December 31, 2026; 5) Approval and Authorization for the City Manager or Designee to Execute Contract Amendment 1 to Contract No. C211783782A with Centurion Planning & Design LLC to extend the contract term through December 31, 2027; 6) Adoption of a Resolution Authorizing the Submittal of Applications and Execution of Grant Agreements with the California Department of Transportation for Airport Improvement Program Matching Grants; and 7) Approval of a Budget Amendment in the Airport Enterprise Fund; CEQA Status - Exempt Under CEQA Guidelines Section 15302 12.​Approve a Cost-Sharing Agreement with Stanford University Not-to-Exceed $878,200 for Design and Engineering Services for the Quarry Road Improvements and Transit Center Access Capital Project (PL-16000) and approve budget amendments in the General Fund, Capital Improvement Fund, and the Stanford University Medical Center (SUMC) Fund; CEQA status – statutorily exempt under Pub. Res. Code § 21080(b)(12). 13.Approval of the Acceptance of State of California Citizens Options for Public Safety (COPS) Funds of $211,715 and a Budget Amendment in the Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund for municipal police service expenses; CEQA status – not a project. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS (8:45 - 9:00 PM)   STUDY SESSION (9:00 - 9:30 PM)   14.Establishing the City Council Annual Calendar of Meetings, Recesses, and City Council Events for the Calendar Year 2026; CEQA status – not a project   ADJOURNMENT INFORMATION REPORTS Information reports are provided for informational purposes only to the Council and the public but are not listed for action or discussion during this meeting’s agenda.    4 November 03, 2025 Materials submitted after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection at www.paloalto.gov/agendas. A.Information Report on Sustainability and Climate Action Plan (S/CAP) Implementation; CEQA Status - Not a Project B.Informational Report on the 2023 and 2024 GreenWaste of Palo Alto Certificate of End Use and Traceability Reports; CEQA Status – Not a Project C.2025 Council Priorities and Objectives Q3 Report OTHER INFORMATION Standing Committee Meetings this week Finance Committee November 4, 2025 Public Comment Letters Schedule of Meetings      5 November 03, 2025 Materials submitted after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection at www.paloalto.gov/agendas. PUBLIC COMMENT INSTRUCTIONS Members of the Public may provide public comments to teleconference meetings via email, teleconference, or by phone. 1.Written public comments may be submitted by email to city.council@PaloAlto.gov. 2.For in person public comments please complete a speaker request card located on the table at the entrance to the Council Chambers and deliver it to the Clerk prior to discussion of the item. 3.Spoken public comments for agendized items using a computer or smart phone will be accepted through the teleconference meeting. To address the Council, click on the link below to access a Zoom-based meeting. Please read the following instructions carefully. ◦You may download the Zoom client or connect to the meeting in- browser. If using your browser, make sure you are using a current, up-to-date browser: Chrome 30 , Firefox 27 , Microsoft Edge 12 , Safari 7 . Certain functionality may be disabled in older browsers including Internet Explorer. Or download the Zoom application onto your smart phone from the Apple App Store or Google Play Store and enter in the Meeting ID below. ◦You may be asked to enter an email address and name. We request that you identify yourself by name as this will be visible online and will be used to notify you that it is your turn to speak. ◦When you wish to speak on an Agenda Item, click on “raise hand.” The Clerk will activate and unmute speakers in turn. Speakers will be notified shortly before they are called to speak. ◦When called, please limit your remarks to the time limit allotted. A timer will be shown on the computer to help keep track of your comments. 4.Spoken public comments for agendized items using a phone use the telephone number listed below. When you wish to speak on an agenda item hit *9 on your phone so we know that you wish to speak. You will be asked to provide your first and last name before addressing the Council. You will be advised how long you have to speak. When called please limit your remarks to the agenda item and time limit allotted. CLICK HERE TO JOIN Meeting ID: 362-027-238 Phone: 1-669-900-6833 Americans with Disability Act (ADA) It is the policy of the City of Palo Alto to offer its public programs, services and meetings in a manner that is readily accessible to all. Persons with disabilities who require materials in an appropriate alternative format or who require auxiliary aids to access City meetings, programs, or services may contact the City’s ADA Coordinator at (650) 329-2550 (voice) or by emailing ada@PaloAlto.gov. Requests for assistance or accommodations must be submitted at least 24 hours in advance of the meeting, program, or service.    6 November 03, 2025 Materials submitted after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection at www.paloalto.gov/agendas.   California Government Code §84308, commonly referred to as the "Levine Act," prohibits an elected official of a local government agency from participating in a proceeding involving a license, permit, or other entitlement for use if the official received a campaign contribution exceeding $500 from a party or participant, including their agents, to the proceeding within the last 12 months. A “license, permit, or other entitlement for use” includes most land use and planning approvals and the approval of contracts that are not subject to lowest responsible bid procedures and have a value over $50,000. A “party” is a person who files an application for, or is the subject of, a proceeding involving a license, permit, or other entitlement for use. A “participant” is a person who actively supports or opposes a particular decision in a proceeding involving a license, permit, or other entitlement for use, and has a financial interest in the decision. The Levine Act incorporates the definition of “financial interest” in the Political Reform Act, which encompasses interests in business entities, real property, sources of income, sources of gifts, and personal finances that may be affected by the Council’s actions. If you qualify as a “party” or “participant” to a proceeding, and you have made a campaign contribution to a Council Member exceeding $500 made within the last 12 months, you must disclose the campaign contribution before making your comments.  7 November 03, 2025 Materials submitted after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection at www.paloalto.gov/agendas. City Council Staff Report Report Type: SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY Lead Department: Fire Meeting Date: November 3, 2025 Report #:2510-5294 TITLE Proclamation Expressing Appreciation to Fire Chief Geo Blackshire Upon His Retirement ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: Proclamation Expressing Appreciation to Fire Chief Geo Blackshire Upon His Retirement APPROVED BY: Geoffrey Blackshire, Fire Chief Item 1 Item 1 Staff Report        Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 1  Packet Pg. 8 of 413  EXPRESSING APPRECIATION TO FIRE CHIEF GEO BLACKSHIRE UPON HIS RETIREMENT WHEREAS, Fire Chief Geo Blackshire joined the City of Palo Alto Fire Department in October 1997 and has dedicated 28 years to serving the community. Starting as a Firefighter, he worked his way through the ranks, spending seven years as Deputy Chief and six months as Interim Chief before being appointed Fire Chief in 2019; and WHEREAS, Chief Blackshire earned several professional designations along the way, including being recognized as an Internationally Credentialed Fire Chief through the Center for Public Safety Excellence and Executive Chief Officer through the International Association of Fire Chiefs. He’s also been an active participant in leadership organizations such as the Santa Clara County Fire Chiefs Association, Cal Chiefs Executive Leadership Institute, and the IAFC Diversity Executive Leadership Program, where he was part of the inaugural class focused on advancing diversity and inclusive leadership within the fire service; and WHEREAS, Chief Blackshire has been known for leading with heart, collaboration, and vision. When the COVID-19 pandemic brought uncertainty and fear, he showed up every day to lead his department through it. His calm, consistent presence and focus on the wellness of his team and community embodied the kind of strength and optimism that defined his leadership. During this time, the department made major strides in firefighter wellness and safety, expanding its critical incident stress management program into a robust peer support network; and WHEREAS, Chief Blackshire oversaw the construction of the award-winning Fire Station 3, initiated the rebuild of Station 4, and secured a $3.7 million FEMA SAFER grant to reopen Fire Station 2. Stations were also retrofitted with modern extractors and washers to reduce exposure to combustion byproducts. He also reintroduced Engine 64, launched special operations and water rescue programs to improve response in challenging environments, and is bringing in new specialized equipment such as the Breathing Support Unit “Rescue 62”; and WHEREAS, Chief Blackshire has also focused on strengthening the department’s emergency medical services and staffing, initiating plans to expand EMS single-role staffing and implementing modern recruitment tools like HireVue to make hiring more accessible and efficient. His leadership deepened collaboration with mutual aid partners and Stanford University, enhancing public safety on and off campus and coordinating large-scale planning for special events and multi-casualty incidents; and WHEREAS, through every initiative — from modernizing infrastructure to advancing diversity and inclusion – Chief Blackshire has helped build a stronger, safer, and more resilient organization. His impact on the Palo Alto Fire Department and the community it serves will be felt for many years to come. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Ed Lauing, Mayor of the City of Palo Alto on behalf of the entire City Council do hereby extend our deepest gratitude to Fire Chief Geo Blackshire for his 28 years of dedicated service and unwavering commitment to the community. PRESENTED: October 20, 2025 APPROVED: ______________________ Mayor Ed Lauing ______________________ ______________________ Vice Mayor Vicki Veenker Councilmember Pat Burt ______________________ ______________________ Councilmember George Lu Councilmember Julie Lythcott-Haims ______________________ ______________________ Councilmember Keith Reckdahl Councilmember Greer Stone ATTEST: ______________________ City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ______________________ ______________________ City Manager City Attorney Proclamation Item 1 Attachment A - Proclamation Expressing Appreciation to Fire Chief Geo Blackshire Upon His Retirement        Item 1: Staff Report Pg. 2  Packet Pg. 9 of 413  8 1 0 0 City Council Staff Report From: City Manager Report Type: ACTION ITEMS Lead Department: Office of Emergency Services Meeting Date: November 3, 2025 Report #:2510-5338 TITLE Approval of three reports: the City of Palo Alto Community Wildfire Protection Plan, the Emergency Preparedness: Wildfire Audit Report by the City Auditor (as recommended by the Policy and Services Committee), and Adopt a Resolution Approving the City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan. CEQA status: not a Project RECOMMENDATION Staff recommend that the City Council 1. Adopt a resolution approving the City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan (EOP), 2. Approve the City of Palo Alto Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) and authorize submittal to the County of Santa Clara, and 3. Approve the Emergency Preparedness: Wildfire Audit Report by the City Auditor (as recommended by the Policy & Services Committee). EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report is the culmination of a series of sessions for the public, the Council, and multi- agency planning activities regarding wildfires and emergency preparedness topics. Palo Alto is not unique in facing wildfire risks due to climate change, prolonged drought, and human activity in the wildland-urban interface (WUI), and conducts planning, mitigation, and other activities in accordance with best management practices and as part of larger, regional efforts, as described below. The revised Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) and Community Wildfire Protection Plan are included in this report for Council approval. The Office of Emergency Services (OES) is dedicated to safeguarding the residents, businesses, and visitors of Palo Alto through comprehensive and effective emergency management. The Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) is a foundational tool in this effort, providing the City with a structured approach to respond to a variety of potential Item 2 Item 2 Staff Report        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 1  Packet Pg. 10 of 413  8 1 0 0 hazards, including natural disasters, technological incidents, and human-caused emergencies. The last EOP was adopted in 2016. The CWPP provides one wildfire management plan for the community that combines the historic Foothills Fire Management Plan (FFMP) first established in 1982 and the Santa Clara County Fire Department developed multi-jurisdictional Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) that establishes strategic goals for these more detailed community level fire-planning efforts. The April 8, 2025 meeting of the Policy & Services Committee, a recommendation was made to have the Council approve the audit findings on wildfire preparedness completed by BakerTilly, the City’s Auditor. The Approval of the audit was pulled from the Consent Calendar on June 16, 2025; staff has bundled these topics and work efforts to enable a more comprehensive view of emergency preparations with a focus on wildfire preparedness. BACKGROUND The topics of emergency planning and wildfire preparedness, specifically, have been a longstanding priority for the City and there has been a concerted effort to review these plans and update. This item is part of a series of items on the topic of wildfire preparedness.1 The calendar below provides a summary of engagements and Council / Commission actions discussing fire services, wildfire activities, emergency services planning, and utilities activities. March, California Fire Marshal updated wildfire risk maps for public comment (released on City webpage 3/26) Finance Committee reviewed Fire Department Staffing Options on April 12, continuing discussion from November 2024 exploring changes to enhance fire and ambulance service delivery. Policy & Services review of Emergency Preparedness - Wildfire Audit on April 83. June, City Council adopted additional fire staffing and capital funding to advance additional wildfire fuel reduction in the City’s Open Space Preserves as part of the FY 2026 Budget. City Council received the finished updated Community Wildfire Protection Plan / Foothills Fire Management Plan Update 2025 as an Informational Item in June 20254. 1 News Story: Wildfire Preparedness Public Discussion, April 28, 2025, https://www.paloalto.gov/News- Articles/City-Manager/Palo-Alto-Begins-Wildfire-Preparedness-Public-Discussions 2 Finance Committee, April 1, 2025, Agenda Item #3, https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/meetings/ItemWithTemplateType?id=7399&meetingTemplateType=2&comp iledMeetingDocumentId=13598 3 Policy & Services Committee Meeting 4/8/2025 Staff Report #2410-3635: https://recordsportal.paloalto.gov/Weblink/DocView.aspx?id=52961 4 City Council, June 9, 2025, Information item, https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/viewer/preview?id=0&type=8&uid=c1aa0e08-9818-47b4-9085- ebc4ceb1eb17 Item 2 Item 2 Staff Report        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 2  Packet Pg. 11 of 413  8 1 0 0 The CWPP is posted here: https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/viewer/preview?id=7981&type=2 June, City Council held annual hearing on properties assessed for Weed Abatement work. The Utilities Advisory Commission reviewed and approved the utilities Wildfire Mitigation Plan at its June 4, 2025 meeting9. City Council adopted the ordinance approving the newly revised Fire Hazard Severity Zone map designations released by the State on August 11, 202510. On August 18, 2025, Council approved11 a five-year contract with the Santa Clara County Fire Safe Council (FSC) for fuel reduction addressing Audit Recommendation #4. The City maintains various wildfire protection plans and strategies and takes a regional approach to planning efforts. Coordination and alignment with County and State agencies is key to ensuring responsible agencies can work together in an emergency. Mutual aid agreements with neighboring jurisdictions to enhance firefighting capabilities during large-scale incidents are critical to incident response as no single agency has the resources to respond to a wildfire incident independently. Below is a list of the City’s primary emergency plans relevant to wildfires: Emergency Operations Plan Basic Plan (EOP) Wildland Urban Interface (WUI) Fire Response Annex Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP) Foothills Fire Management Plan (FFMP) / Santa Clara County Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) City of Palo Alto Utilities (CPAU) Wildfire Mitigation Plan Emergency Operations Plan: The Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) ”Basic Plan” is the primary emergency planning document and does not including the various annexes and subplans such as the Community Wildfire Protection Plan. The EOP is an essential guidance document for City staff, key partners, and the community. The City’s Office of Emergency Services (OES) is responsible for the review, revision, management, and distribution of the EOP. In accordance with Municipal Code Section 2.12.080, the EOP basic plan requires 1) review by the Emergency Services Council (ESC) and Palo Alto/Stanford Citizen Corps Council (CCC) and 2) adoption by the City Council. 9 Utilities Advisory Commission Meeting 6/4/2025 Staff Report #2501-4077: https://recordsportal.paloalto.gov/Weblink/DocView.aspx?id=61768 10 City Council, August 11, 2025, https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/viewer/preview?id=0&type=8&uid=736fe7fa-b476-4738-a03a-e2efa564facb 11 City Council, August 18, 2025, https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/portal/item/?meetingItemId=b05aa9e6- 5dab-4cf9-9b12-dd73292fda3a Item 2 Item 2 Staff Report        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 3  Packet Pg. 12 of 413  8 1 0 0 Under the California Government Code 8610, local jurisdictions with an accredited disaster council are required to develop and maintain an EOP to facilitate coordinated and effective emergency response. The EOP incorporates organizational structures, policies, and procedures for delivering emergency services, as well as the legal authorities and references that govern emergency management in Palo Alto. Palo Alto has had an accredited disaster council since 1947 and as such has maintained a Council-adopted EOP since that time. The Office of Emergency Services is responsible for reviewing emergency plans to ensure adherence to the law and to guidance such as the FEMA Comprehensive Preparedness Guide (CPG) 101. On October 7, 2024, the revision to the Local Hazard Mitigation Plan was adopted by City Council.15 The LHMP identifies and prioritizes potential and existing hazards across jurisdictional borders and identifies mitigation projects to reduce the impacts on Palo Alto to our hazards. See www.paloalto.gov/lhmp. Generally, it is advisable to update EOPs after each LHMP revision cycle, since hazard identification is a required step in the EOC update process. Community Wildfire Protection Plan (inclusive of the former Foothills Fire Management Plan): The City developed a Foothills Fire Management Plan (FFMP) in 1982 that provides the planning framework for fire control activities for the City and the Palo Alto Foothills Area which comprises the predominant wildland urban interface (WUI) area for the community. This plan addresses a broad range of integrated activities and planning documents to address and mitigate the impacts of fire hazards in the area west of Foothills Expressway to the City limits of Palo Alto. The City has updated this plan three times: in 1997, 2009, and 2017. City of Palo Alto Staff Report #8030 (10/16/2017) includes an overview of this process.16 Also in 2017, the Santa Clara County Fire Department developed a multi-jurisdictional Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) to establish strategic goals for these more detailed community level fire-planning efforts. This included a Palo Alto jurisdictional annex that accompanied this plan, but apart from the FFMP. During the County’s substantive 2023 CWPP update process, the City made the decision to integrate the FFMP with the CWPP to provide one wildfire management plan for the community which addresses the long-standing history of the FFMP while meeting the best management practices of the CWPP format. Emergency Preparedness - Wildfire Audit: Baker Tilly, in its capacity serving as the Office of the City Auditor (OCA), performed a citywide risk assessment that assessed a wide range of risk areas, including strategic, financial, operational, compliance, technological, and reputation risks. The purpose of the assessment 15 https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/Portal/Meeting?meetingTemplateId=14437 16 https://recordsportal.paloalto.gov/Weblink/DocView.aspx?id=77526 Item 2 Item 2 Staff Report        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 4  Packet Pg. 13 of 413  8 1 0 0 was to identify and prioritize risks to develop the annual audit plan. Recognizing the need for an independent assessment of the City's wildfire preparedness, BakerTilly conducted an audit in alignment with its 2024 Risk Assessment and subsequent Council approved workplan. ANALYSIS Item 2 Item 2 Staff Report        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 5  Packet Pg. 14 of 413  8 1 0 0 A summary of these reports are discussed below. As noted in the prior section, emergency planning and preparedness for wildfires is included in over six planning documents, two of which are recommended for approval in this report. Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) Attachment A & B Departmental Roles and Responsibilities – Clear definitions of the duties and responsibilities of various city departments and personnel during emergencies activations. Public Alert and Warning Systems – Enhanced protocols for communicating with the public and neighboring jurisdictions during a crisis. Emergency Management Phases – Detailed descriptions of the phases of emergency management: mitigation, preparedness, response, and recovery. Emergency Declarations – Procedures for declaring states of emergency, including the associated legal and operational implications. Item 2 Item 2 Staff Report        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 6  Packet Pg. 15 of 413  8 1 0 0 federal emergency management standards: e.g., National Incident Management System (NIMS), Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS), the Incident Command System (ICS), etc. City staff will initiate an update process for related internal plans, procedures, and other documents to align with this new EOP. This effort will also coincide with the transition from the current Emergency Operations Center in the Palo Alto Civic Center to the new Public Safety Building (PSB). Foothills Fire Management Plan / Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) (linked here: https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/viewer/preview?id=7981&type=2) Describes the planning environment Discusses actions taken since the previous update Provides an updated wildfire risk hazard assessment Recommends new fuel treatment actions Includes public education and outreach efforts Lists wildfire mitigation projects the City will endeavor to complete Identifies vegetation treatment standards and methods 19. Emergency Preparedness – Wildfire Audit (Attachment C) 19 Santa Clara County CWPP, https://www.sccfd.org/santa-clara-county-community-wildfire-protection-plan/ Item 2 Item 2 Staff Report        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 7  Packet Pg. 16 of 413  8 1 0 0 procedures as well as FEMA and CAL FIRE standards and best practices to complete this audit work. The BakerTilly Audit Report highlights two findings: FISCAL/RESOURCE IMPACT Item 2 Item 2 Staff Report        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 8  Packet Pg. 17 of 413  8 1 0 0 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT Emergency Operations Plan: The Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) was reviewed during the February 6, 2025, Internal Stakeholder meeting, where representatives from all City departments reviewed the draft and provided feedback regarding edits and general questions. The primary outcome of this meeting was to ensure that departmental roles and responsibilities were clearly defined and accurately reflected for use in an emergency scenario. Foothills Fire Management Plan / Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP): The City hosted a public presentation on the CWPP/FFMP on 25 June 2024 as part of the City’s annual Wildfire Preparedness Community Meeting in which participants received an update on this plan and an opportunity to ask questions about it. Item 2 Item 2 Staff Report        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 9  Packet Pg. 18 of 413  8 1 0 0 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Council action on this item is not a project as defined by CEQA because reviewing and approving audit findings and emergency response plans are an organizational or administrative activity of government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment. CEQA Guidelines section 15378(b)(5). ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: Resolution Adopting the Emergency Operations Plan Attachment B: City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan Attachment C: Emergency Preparedness – Wildfire Audit Report Foothills Fire Management Plan / Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) linked here: https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/viewer/preview?id=7981&type=2) APPROVED BY: Kenneth Dueker, OES Chief & Kiely Nose, Assistant City Manager Item 2 Item 2 Staff Report        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 10  Packet Pg. 19 of 413  NOT YET APPROVED Attachment A 1 027060225 Resolution No. Resolution of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Adopting the City of Palo Alto 2025 Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) R E C I T A L S A. The City of Palo Alto has developed an updated Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) in order to help coordinate resources to make our community safer and better prepared to deal with all hazards. B. The Palo Alto/Stanford Citizen Corps Council is part of the Emergency Services Council as provided by Palo Alto Municipal Code section 2.12.030(a)(5), stating that members include "[s]uch representatives of civic, business, labor, veterans, professional or other organizations having an official emergency responsibility, as may be appointed by the [City Manager] with the advice and consent of the city council." C. Per Palo Alto Municipal Code section 2.12.080, the Citizen Corps Council and the Emergency Services Council recommend that the City Council adopt the new 2025 EOP. The City Council of the City of Palo Alto hereby RESOLVES as follows: SECTION 1. The City Council hereby adopts the 2025 Emergency Operations Plan (EOP), attached hereto and incorporated by reference. SECTION 2. The City Council hereby consents to the updated Palo Alto/Stanford Citizen Corps Council (CCC) membership list. // // // // // // // // // Item 2 Attachment A - Resolution Adopting the Emergency Operations Plan        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 11  Packet Pg. 20 of 413  NOT YET APPROVED Attachment A 2 027060225 SECTION 3. The Council finds that this is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act and, therefore, no environmental impact assessment is necessary. INTRODUCED AND PASSED: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTENTIONS: ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED: City Attorney or designee City Manager Director of Emergency Services Director of Administrative Services Item 2 Attachment A - Resolution Adopting the Emergency Operations Plan        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 12  Packet Pg. 21 of 413  City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN Item 2 Attachment B - City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 13  Packet Pg. 22 of 413  Item 2 Attachment B - City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 14  Packet Pg. 23 of 413  City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN March 2025 City of Palo Alto Office of Emergency Services 275 Forest Avenue | Palo Alto, CA 94301 www.cityofpaloalto.org/oes Item 2 Attachment B - City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 15  Packet Pg. 24 of 413  Item 2 Attachment B - City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 16  Packet Pg. 25 of 413  i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................... II AUTHORITY, APPROVAL, IMPLEMENTATION & DISTRIBUTION ............................................................................. III EOP ADOPTION RESOLUTION ................................................................................................................................ IV RECORD OF CHANGES ........................................................................................................................................... VI RECORD OF DISTRIBUTION .................................................................................................................................. VII DEPARTMENT ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES ......................................................................................................... 1 1.0 REFERENCES ..................................................................................................................................................... 9 BASIC PLAN .......................................................................................................................................................... 10 2.0 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 10 3.0 CONCEPT OF OPERATIONS ...................................................................................................................... 13 4.0 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION ......................................................................................... 18 5.0 WHOLE COMMUNITY APPROACH .................................................................................................................. 20 6.0 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PHASES ............................................................................................................. 23 7.0 EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER ......................................................................................................... 29 8.0 EMERGENCY DECLARATIONS ................................................................................................................... 34 9.0 PUBLIC INFORMATION ............................................................................................................................ 35 10.0 CONTINUITY OF GOVERNMENT .................................................................................................................... 37 11.0 PLAN DEVELOPMENT AND MAINTENANCE .................................................................................................. 39 GLOSSARY AND ABBREVIATIONS ......................................................................................................................... 40 Item 2 Attachment B - City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 17  Packet Pg. 26 of 413  ii E XECUTIVE S UMMARY The Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) outlines how the City of Palo Alto—its government, stakeholder agencies, community groups, business community, and residents—coordinate its response to major emergencies and disasters. This plan is regularly reviewed and updated by staff and approved by the City Council. The EOP identifies operational strategies and plans for managing inherently complex and potentially catastrophic events. City assets, resources, and departments are potentially vulnerable and may become overwhelmed. A primary goal of the EOP is to promote flexibility whenever possible based on good judgment and common sense. This document facilitates emergency response and short-term recovery functions for emergencies and disasters that are outside of the expected capabilities of normal City operations. Palo Alto has officially adopted and integrated the following emergency management, response, and coordination systems: • Incident Command System (ICS) • Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS) • National Incident Management System (NIMS) • National Response Framework (NRF) This EOP addresses the following phases of emergency management: • Preparedness • Response • Recovery • Mitigation The City has adopted a “whole community” approach that actively promotes the inclusion and integration of community partners, neighbors, residents, people with disabilities and access and functional needs, people with language or cultural differences, and other stakeholders in all phases of emergency management planning. Through such collaboration, the City will be better prepared to meet the needs of its residents and daytime populace alike. The City’s Emergency Operations Center (EOC) provides a centralized location where emergency management coordination and decision-making can be supported during a critical incident, major emergency, disaster, or significant event. When activated, the EOC provides support for critical tasks related to communications, coordination, resource management, and executive leadership. If Palo Alto determines that the effects of an emergency are beyond the capability of local resources or may become so, then a local emergency can be proclaimed. There are specific circumstances where the City of Palo Alto can proclaim an emergency even if not beyond capabilities, for example during COVID- 19 and severe storms the City proclaimed an emergency. A local proclamation of emergency allows the City Manager and staff to take measures necessary to protect and preserve public health and safety and support requests for county, state, and federal assistance. A proclamation also provides City staff with additional powers and authorities to increase the speed and effectiveness of City response activities. Item 2 Attachment B - City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 18  Packet Pg. 27 of 413  City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan iii The Palo Alto EOP provides an all-hazard approach to enable Palo Alto EOC staff and City employees managing emergency incidents and planned events. This plan is divided into three sections: Basic Plan -- presents the planning assumptions, policies, and concept of operations that guide the responsibilities for emergency preparedness, response, recovery, and mitigation for Palo Alto. Annexes – Hazard specific and functional applications of the EOP A UTHORITY , A PPROVAL , IMPLEMENTATION & D ISTRIBUTION This Emergency Operations Plan is sanctioned under the authority of the Palo Alto Municipal Code (Palo Alto Municipal Code, 2024) and issued under the authority of the City Manager acting as the statutory Director of Emergency Services. This plan applies to the operations and management of the City of Palo Alto and its respective departments and agencies. This document shall be the official all-hazards Emergency Operations Plan for the City of Palo Alto and shall supersede all previous plans for this purpose. Nothing in this plan shall be construed in a manner that limits good judgment and common sense in matters not foreseen. This plan is approved by the City Manager for the City of Palo Alto and adopted by the City Council. The delegation of authority for specific modifications that may be made to the plan without the senior official’s signature is the Office of Emergency Services Chief. Copies of the plan will be subsequently distributed electronically to each City Department, the EOC, and EOC section chiefs. City of Palo Alto ____________________________________________________________________________ Ed Shikada, City Manager Date Item 2 Attachment B - City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 19  Packet Pg. 28 of 413  iv EOP A DOPTION R ESOLUTION Item 2 Attachment B - City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 20  Packet Pg. 29 of 413  City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan v Item 2 Attachment B - City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 21  Packet Pg. 30 of 413  vi RECORD OF C HANGES PLAN CHANGES / UPDATES Date Change Updated by Department With the input from key stakeholders, City of Palo Alto’s Office of Emergency Services is responsible for maintaining, reviewing, and updating this Emergency Operations Plan. Collaborative plan revisions and updates are essential to ensure accuracy and validity of the EOP, therefore any plan changes and updates will be captured in the table below. Item 2 Attachment B - City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 22  Packet Pg. 31 of 413  City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan vii R ECORD OF D ISTRIBUTION The City of Palo Alto’s EOP is posted online with the City’s Office of Emergency Services maintaining the primary copy. DISTRIBUTION LIST Name Department / Agency Date of Delivery Number of Copies Disclosure Exemptions While sections of this document may be available for public review, other portions may contain sensitive information relevant to the emergency response operation of the City of Palo Alto. Portions that include information with significant implications on City, county, state and /or national security or are otherwise exempt from public disclosure are placed in attachments in accordance with the provisions of the California Public Records Act § 7920 et seq. Adherence to the Plan (EOP) Information provided in this plan is guidance and not policy. Decisions and directions about the most appropriate approach and course of action for response and recovery may be influenced by numerous factors and will be determined based on the best information available at the time. Item 2 Attachment B - City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 23  Packet Pg. 32 of 413  Item 2 Attachment B - City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 24  Packet Pg. 33 of 413  1 DEPARTMENT ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES AGENCY/DEPARTMENT ROLES RESPONSIBILITIES PA Corresponding Annex/Plan City Council • ESF 5 Management State ESF 5 • Empower City Manager in their role as Director of Emergency Services • Through the City Manager, provide policy- level guidance, direction, and decisions related to the incident(s) • Liaison with County Board of Supervisors • Reinforce public information and community engagement efforts as needed • Convene or represent the City at public meetings as needed • Review potential or threatened litigation as needed • Review and approve proclamation of local emergency • Review requirements for special legislation and development of policy • Continuity of Operations Plan/Continuity of Governance (COOP/COG) The City of Palo Alto’s departments may be called upon for the departments’ capabilities and resources to respond to and recover from an emergency or disaster. The lead and support roles are outlined in the table below. It is important to note that lead and support roles will vary depending on the emergency or disaster. For example, the lead agency for wildfire response is the Palo Alto Fire Department while the Community Services Department may play a support role in firefighting by utilizing the Community Services Open Space Rangers. There are corresponding City annexes and plans that each department can refer to before and during an emergency to familiarize themselves with emergency functions. Additional information on roles and responsibilities, EOC activation authorities, and procedures can be found in the Palo Alto EOC Manual. The Emergency Support Functions listed in the following table are aligned with the State of California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services Emergency Support Functions (ESFs). For more information on CAL OES ESFs, please visit CAL OES Emergency Support Functions. Item 2 Attachment B - City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 25  Packet Pg. 34 of 413  2 AGENCY/DEPARTMENT ROLES RESPONSIBILITIES PA Corresponding Annex/Plan City Attorney and City Clerk • ESF 5 Management State ESF 5 • Assess City operations and provide legal counsel as needed • Review potential or threatened litigation as needed • Facilitate and administer proclamations of local emergencies • Oversee and ensure preservation of Vital City documents and records • Facilitate public meetings as needed • Institute Emergency Stand-By Council when necessary • Assist the City Manager as liaison to City Council • Continuity of Operations Plan/Continuity of Governance (COOP/COG) • Department Policies, Emergency Plans (DEPs) and other related procedures City Manager • ESF 15 Public Information State ESF 15 • Director of Emergency Services (City Manager or designee) • Establish EOC operational priorities • Authorize proclamations of local emergencies • Approve public information release • Guide public warnings and alerts • Primary liaison to City Council • Develop and maintain communication with other government bodies • Continuity of Operations Plan/Continuity of Governance (COOP/COG) • Recovery Annex (TBP) • Emergency Public Information and Warning Annex (TBP) Item 2 Attachment B - City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 26  Packet Pg. 35 of 413  City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan 3 AGENCY/DEPARTMENT ROLES RESPONSIBILITIES PA Corresponding Annex/Plan Office of Emergency Services • ESF 1-18 State ESF Functions 1-13, 15-18 Federal ESF 14 • Manage emergency management program and operations including managing and facilitating the City’s EOC • Coordinate incident management and response efforts • Develop plans, procedures, and agreements to assist incident response • Conduct EOC action planning • Lead Emergency Management Mutual Aid • All Planning and Development Services Department • ESF 3 Construction and Engineering State ESF 3 • Staff the Plans Section during EOC Activations • Building Inspection and Code Enforcement • Building Damage Assessment • Emergency Repair Permitting • Employ GIS and Analytics within capabilities • Community Planning support during recovery phase • Establish Local Assistance Center when directed • Damage Assessment Annex • Continuity of Operations Plan/Continuity of Governance (COOP/COG) • Department Emergency Plans (DEPs) and other related procedures • Recovery Annex (TBP) Administrative Services Department/Finance Department • ESF 7 Resources State ESF 7 • ESF 14 Recovery Federal ESF 14 • Staff the Finance and Administration Section during EOC activations • Finance & Revenue Services • Provide emergency procurement assistance • Anticipate and track financial resources • Damage Assessment Annex • Continuity of Operations Plan/Continuity of Governance (COOP/COG) • Department Emergency Plans (DEPs) and other related Item 2 Attachment B - City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 27  Packet Pg. 36 of 413  4 AGENCY/DEPARTMENT ROLES RESPONSIBILITIES PA Corresponding Annex/Plan Administrative Services Department/Finance Department for staff, mutual aid requests, volunteers • Develop financial mechanisms, procurement applications and contracts to facilitate procurement • Oversee staff timekeeping • Oversee compensations and claims • Provide fiscal oversight and tracking of expenses • Oversee coordination for Public Assistance efforts with FEMA. Procedures • Recovery Annex • Multi Agency Coordination (MAC) Plan Fire Department • ESF 4 Fire and Rescue State ESF 4 • ESF 10 Hazardous Materials • State ESF 10 • Staff the Operations Section During EOC Activations • May augment the Plans Section during EOC activations • Orchestrate all firefighting and fire rescue operations • Direct EMS operations • Coordinate for Fire and EMS mutual aid resources • Conduct hazardous material response operations • Enhance emergency public warning and alerts when necessary • Aid in evacuation and re-entry operations • Enhance damage assessment efforts • Provide incident planning and management support as needed • Lead Fire Mutual Aid • Damage Assessment Annex • Hazard Specific Annexes (Storm/Flood, Earthquake, Terrorism, Fire, HazMat) • Multi Agency Coordination (MAC) Plan • Emergency Public Information and Warning Annex (TBP) • Airport Emergency Plan • Evacuation Annex (Draft in production) • Continuity of Operations Plan/Continuity of Governance • Department Emergency Plans (DEPs) and other related procedures Item 2 Attachment B - City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 28  Packet Pg. 37 of 413  City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan 5 AGENCY/DEPARTMENT ROLES RESPONSIBILITIES PA Corresponding Annex/Plan Human Resources • ESF 8 Public Health and Medical Federal ESF 8 • Staff the Finance and Administration Section during EOC activations • Manage City Disaster Service Workers • Manage Human Resources related matters • Provide risk management and employee safety oversight. • Assess employee needs) Screen and track spontaneous volunteers • Compensation and Claims procedures • Continuity of Operations Plan/Continuity of Governance (COOP/COG) • Department Emergency Plans (DEPs) and other related procedures Information Technology Department • ESF 2 Communications State ESF 2 • ESF 18 Cybersecurity State ESF 8 • Staff the Logistics Section during EOC activations • Protect, restore, and sustain cyber and information technology resources • Oversee and manage telecommunication infrastructure • Provide additional technology support as needed • Communications Annex (TBP) • Continuity of Operations Plan/Continuity of Governance (COOP/COG) • Cybersecurity Annex (Draft in production) Community Services Department • ESF 6 Care and Shelter State ESF 6 • Staff and assist the Operations Section during EOC Activations • Manage emergency care and shelter operations • Support infrastructure restoration • Assist in debris clearance from public rights of way • Facilitate evacuation and re-entry operations • Mass Care and Shelter Annex • Damage Assessment Annex • Recovery Annex • Continuity of Operations Plan/Continuity of Governance (COOP/COG) Item 2 Attachment B - City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 29  Packet Pg. 38 of 413  6 AGENCY/DEPARTMENT ROLES RESPONSIBILITIES PA Corresponding Annex/Plan Police Department • ESF 2 Communications State ESF 2 • ESF 13 Law Enforcement • State ESF 13 • Staff the Operations Section During EOC Operations • Conduct law enforcement operations • Enhance emergency public warning and alerts • Facilitate evacuation and re-entry operations • Provide access and control to affected areas • Provide facility and resource security • Enforce curfew as directed • Provide public safety and security assistance • Provide traffic control • Oversee Law Enforcement Mutual Aid • Communications Annex (TBP) • Evacuation Annex (Draft in production) • Emergency Public Information and Warning (TBP) • Mass Care and Shelter Annex • Continuity of Operations Plan/Continuity of Governance (COOP/COG) • Department Emergency Plans (DEPs) and other related procedures • Hazard Specific Annexes (Storm/Flood, Earthquake, Terrorism, Fire, HazMat) Animal Control Division • ESF 6 Care and Shelter • State ESF 6 • ESF 11 Food and Agriculture • State ESF 11 • Assess the status of animal care needs • Determine status of available shelters for animal care populations (pets, large animals, livestock) • Determine need of veterinary services • Provide animal support services • Mass Care and Shelter Annex • Department Emergency Plans (DEPs) and other related procedures • Continuity of Operations Plan/Continuity of Governance (COOP/COG) Library • ESF 6 Care and Shelter State Level ESF 6 • ESF 15 Public Information • State ESF 15 • Enhance community care and shelter efforts with library facility and personnel resources • Establish community call center when directed and in partnership with IT and CMO • Department Emergency Plans (DEP) and other related procedures Item 2 Attachment B - City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 30  Packet Pg. 39 of 413  City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan 7 AGENCY/DEPARTMENT ROLES RESPONSIBILITIES PA Corresponding Annex/Plan Public Works • ESF 1 Transportation State ESF 1 • ESF 3 Construction and Engineering State ESF 3 • Staff the Operations Section during EOC Activations • Conduct infrastructure protection, emergency repair, and restoration • Communicate movement operation/restrictions (traffic and access) • Conduct debris clearance and manage debris operations • Conduct flood fight operations • Provide engineering services • Coordinate with state agencies on state-controlled highways and roads • Manage city facilities • Maintain, repair, and restore wastewater collection infrastructure • Assist in damage assessment efforts • Assist in evacuation and re-entry operations • maintain, repair, and operate Regional Water Quality Control Plant • Manage and respond to issues affecting storm water system • Maintain backup generators • Oversee Public Works Mutual Assistance • Local Energy Assurance Plan • Damage Assessment Annex • Evacuation Annex (Draft in production) • Emergency Public Information and Warning • Airport Emergency Plan • Continuity of Operations Plan/Continuity of Governance (COOP/COG) • Department Emergency Plans (DEPs) and other related procedures • Hazard Specific Annexes (Storm/Flood, Earthquake, Terrorism, Fire, HazMat) Item 2 Attachment B - City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 31  Packet Pg. 40 of 413  8 AGENCY/DEPARTMENT ROLES RESPONSIBILITIES PA Corresponding Annex/Plan Utilities • ESF 3 Construction and Engineering State Level ESF 3 • ESF 12 Utilities • Assist the Operations Section during EOC Activations • Conduct utilities infrastructure protection, emergency repair, and restoration • Enhance public warnings and alerts • Provide utilities engineering services • Maintain, repair, and restore electric, water, gas, wastewater collection, and fiber infrastructure • Conduct utility damage assessment efforts • Provide potable water in support of care and shelter operations • Coordinate with regional water supplies and neighboring water utilities • Coordinate with Pacific Gas & Electric for the restoration of PG&E electrical and gas transmission and distribution services to the Utilities • Oversee Utilities Mutual Assistance • Local Energy Assurance Plan • Damage Assessment Annex • Evacuation Annex (Draft in production) • Emergency Public Information and Warning • Continuity of Operations Plan/Continuity of Governance (COOP/COG) • Department Emergency Plans (DEPs) and other related procedures • Hazard Specific Annexes (Storm/Flood, Earthquake, Terrorism, Fire, HazMat) • Electric Utility Wildfire Mitigation Plan Office of Transportation • ESF 1 Transportation State Level ESF 1 • Assist the Planning Section during EOC Activations • Develop road condition information for PD, FD, Department of Transportation, Public Works, RACES, Utilities, County of Santa Clara, American Red Cross, Media • Assist in transportation planning to support operational objectives • Assist in coordination of regional resources as needed • Evacuation Annex (Draft in production) • Continuity of Operations Plan/Continuity of Governance (COOP/COG) • Department Emergency Plans (DEPs) and other related procedures • Hazard Specific Annexes (Storm/Flood, Earthquake, Terrorism, Fire, HazMat) Item 2 Attachment B - City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 32  Packet Pg. 41 of 413  City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan 9 1.0 REFERENCES The following are the references used in developing the plan. 1.1 Local Authorities and References • City of Palo Alto Municipal Code • City of Palo Alto • Santa Clara County Office of Emergency Management • Santa Clara County Emergency Operations Plan • The Santa Clara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan, including the Palo Alto Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Annex 1.2 State Authorities and References • California Government Code • California Emergency Services Act 2023 • California Disaster Assistance Act • California Code of Regulations • California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services o Standardized Emergency Management Systems Guidelines o Cal OES EOP Crosswalk (2024) local government o State of California Emergency Operations Plan o California Disaster and Civil Defense Master Mutual Aid Agreement o Orders and Regulations that may be promulgated by the Governor during a State of Emergency or a State of War Emergency o California-Federal Emergency Operations Center Guidelines: Integrating Federal Disaster Response Assistance with California’s Standardized Emergency Management System 1.3 Federal Authorities and References • National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) • Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) / Department of Homeland Security • Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, PL 100-707 • Pets Evacuation and Transportation Standards Act of 2006 • National Incident Management System (NIMS) • National Response Framework (NRF) • Developing and Maintaining Emergency Operations Plans Comprehensive Preparedness Guide (CPG-101) • Homeland Security Presidential Directives (5, 8) Item 2 Attachment B - City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 33  Packet Pg. 42 of 413  10 BASIC PLAN 2.0 I NTRODUCTION The EOP serves as the core planning document for Palo Alto’s emergency management activities. The responsibilities of City departments, groups, and staff are outlined in the EOP Basic Plan and associated annexes. To ensure adequate preparedness, City departments should actively participate in preparedness and planning activities including the development of departmental plans and necessary policies and procedures to fulfill assigned roles and obligations during an emergency. As outlined in federal planning guidance, FEMA’s Comprehensive Planning Guide 101 (CPG-101), the City’s emergency management program and the EOP embrace and implement the “whole community” approach to emergency management. The city recognizes the role of non-governmental organizations (NGOs), community-based organizations (CBO), faith-based organizations (FBO), private-sector businesses, educational institutions, and other stakeholders before, during and after disasters. The EOP is intended to reflect the wide variety of support that may be required by residents, visitors, and businesses, including people with disabilities and people with access or functional needs. Consideration for people with disabilities, access or functional needs is implemented in the City’s emergency planning. Internal and external stakeholders and non-government organization (NGOs) agencies will need to collaborate with the City’s Emergency Operations Center (EOC) and among one another, including in circumstances where normal telecommunications may be impaired. By understanding the elements of this plan, the City and such organizations can facilitate that process. Members of the community should be aware of the potential risks and hazards that are present and the responsibility to stay informed, make an emergency plan, and build an emergency kit. 2.1 Purpose The purpose of this EOP is to provide and outline the framework, concepts, and policies of Palo Alto’s emergency procedures and operations to ensure effective management and coordination of the City’s response to emergencies and disasters. It identifies roles and responsibilities for various staff members and departments regarding preparedness, response, recovery, and mitigation activities. This plan serves as a foundational document for other related City plans, as well as a reference document for other government and non-government organizations and entities. It is intended to be used in concert with other related plans, such as mitigation, recovery, and continuity of operations. This EOP complies with current federal, state, and local laws and regulations and incorporates best practices. 2.2 Goals and Objectives The overall objective of emergency management is to ensure the effective coordination of plans, policies, response forces, and resources in preparing for and responding to situations associated with natural disasters, technological incidents and human-caused (deliberate) attacks, including national security emergencies. To fulfill its responsibilities, the emergency management organization will accomplish the following objectives during an emergency/disaster: Item 2 Attachment B - City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 34  Packet Pg. 43 of 413  City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan 11 GOAL 1 Save Lives • Objective 1.1: Prepare and disseminate emergency public information to alert, warn, and inform the public. • Objective 1.2: Provide effective life safety measures. GOAL 2 Incident Stabilization and Restoration of Essential Services • Objective 2.1: Maintain overall coordination/support of emergency response and recovery operations. • Objective 2.2: Coordinate and liaise with appropriate federal, state, and other local government agencies, as well as applicable segments of private sector entities and volunteer agencies. • Objective 2.3: Establish priorities and resolve conflicting demands for support. • Objective 2.4: Provide accurate documentation and records required for cost recovery efforts. • Objective 2.5: Provide for the rapid resumption of impacted businesses and community services. 2.3 Scope The EOP applies to any significant emergency association with any hazard or threat, natural, technical, or human-caused, which may affect the City and result in a planned, coordinated response effort by City government. While all City resources may be called upon as needed, specific departmental responsibilities are outlined in the EOP Basic Plan and associated annexes. To ensure the City is adequately prepared, all City departments are required to actively participate in preparedness and planning activities to include the development and review of departmental plans, policies, procedures, resource information and contact information as necessary to fulfill their assigned roles and obligations. GOAL 3 Protection of Property and the Environment • Objective 3.1: Provide effective response efforts to reduce property loss and damage to the environment. Item 2 Attachment B - City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 35  Packet Pg. 44 of 413  12 For the purpose of this EOP: 2.4 Limitations While many of the elements outlined in the EOP are designed for flexibility and can be utilized as needed to address several emergency and non-emergency events, some activities require special activation or a formal disaster declaration (proclamation) by the City Council. Similarly, the EOP is not meant to outline procedures for routine incidents or minor emergencies which are adequately addressed through existing processes. The EOP identifies operational strategies and plans for managing inherently complex and potentially catastrophic events. Assets, resources, and departments are potentially vulnerable and may become overwhelmed. Deviations from the organizational and response structures outlined in the EOP may be required, based upon evolving needs and available resources. The EOP is an operational plan and does not address or manage response tactics. Tactics are managed by the various departments in their respective field operations protocols and procedures. The EOP is designed to promote flexibility whenever possible and is not intended to limit the use of good judgment and common sense in matters not foreseen or adequately addressed by elements of the EOP and its associated annexes or plans. 2.5 Situation / Hazard Assessment Technological hazards, human-caused incidents, and natural hazards are identified in the City’s Threats and Hazards Identification Risk Assessment and Hazard Mitigation Plan. The City’s current Hazard Mitigation Plan Annex identifies the following as the high and medium natural hazards for the City: Hazard Type Probability Heavy Rain / Severe Storm Highly Likely High Wind Highly Likely o The City refers to the physical location and geo-political boundaries and space described as the City of Palo Alto o The City of Palo Alto refers to the political entity, a municipality in the northern portion of Santa Clara County o The County refers to the County of Santa Clara and its geo-political boundaries. o Event refers to a preplanned or anticipated activity that require City resources from others – government, private sector, and/or community organization. These gatherings may draw large crowd which could make them vulnerable in the case of a natural or human caused emergency. o Incident refers to an unplanned occurrence – natural, technological, or human caused which requires a response to safeguard life and property. Item 2 Attachment B - City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 36  Packet Pg. 45 of 413  City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan 13 Extreme Heat Highly Likely Wildfire Highly Likely Earthquake Likely 2.6 Planning Assumptions Planning assumptions are considered information accepted by planners as being true to provide a planning framework in the absence of facts. Palo Alto OES planners have made the following assumptions in preparing the Emergency Operation Plan: • Palo Alto is susceptible to several hazards and risks that may result in critical incidents which may include natural, technological, or human caused. • Emergencies may occur at any time with little or no warning and may exceed the capabilities of local, state, and federal governments, and the private sector in the affected areas. • All City departments will participate in planning and preparedness activities as available. • City personnel will be adequately trained to perform the emergency roles to which they are assigned; however, some employees may not be trained but will have to perform a role due to extenuating circumstances. • The City’s EOC may be partially or fully activated to support operations during critical incidents. • The City of Palo Alto is primarily responsible for emergency action within their municipality and plans to commit all available resources to save lives, minimize injuries to persons, and minimize damage to property and the environment. • City departments will participate during a significant emergency or disaster; however, personnel may be unavailable or unable to report to work. • Palo Alto will utilize SEMS, ICS, and NIMS in emergency response and management of operations. • The City will commit their resources to a reasonable degree before requesting mutual aid assistance. • Non-essential City operations will likely be reduced or cancelled to prioritize resources. • Following a major disaster or catastrophic incident, Palo Alto may have to rely on their own resources to be self-sustaining until mutual aid is available. • Transportation infrastructure may be disrupted and access to critical facilities may be blocked. • Critical infrastructure and utilities (natural gas, water, electricity, sanitary sewer, garbage, recycling, communications, among others) may be severely impacted. • Residents, businesses, and other entities may need to be self-sufficient for one week or more. • Reasonable accommodations will be made for people with disabilities and/or access and functional needs, but additional planning, resources, and support may be required during emergencies. 3.0 C ONCEPT OF O PERATIONS In accordance with state and federal laws and guidance, the City of Palo Alto officially adopted and integrated the following emergency management, response, and coordination systems into the current emergency management operations: Item 2 Attachment B - City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 37  Packet Pg. 46 of 413  14 Collectively, the congruent operational systems outline how critical incidents, emergency, and disasters will be coordinated in the field across all levels of government – local, county, regional, state, and federal. 3.1 Field-Level Coordination As mandated by both SEMS and NIMS, Palo Alto utilizes the Incident Command System (ICS) to manage response activities in the field. ICS provides for common terminology, processes, and position titles, while allowing the delegation of functions (or tasks) to subordinate positions to promote proper span of control and unity of command. ICS is applicable to any size incident and is designed to scalable as the needs of an incident expand or contract. When utilized, the standardization of ICS principles and nomenclature can integrate large numbers of personnel from disparate organizations. 3.2 Local, Regional, and State-Level Coordination 3.2.1 Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS) SEMS is intended to standardize response in emergencies and is intended to be flexible and adaptable to the needs of the emergency responders. SEMS forms the foundation of emergency management organization throughout the State of California and its use is required by all jurisdictions. SEMS requires agencies use basic principles and components of emergency management including Incident Command System, multi-agency coordinator, operational area concept and established mutual aid systems. Local government must use SEMS to be eligible for state funding of response-related personnel costs. SEMS utilizes five organizational tiers which are activated as need be and they consist of: field response, local government, operational area, regional, and the state. Palo Alto has incorporated the use of SEMS into its emergency management program. D IAGRAM 3.2.1 • Incident Command System • Standardized Emergency Management System • National Incident Management System NIMS Item 2 Attachment B - City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 38  Packet Pg. 47 of 413  City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan 15 3.2.2 Multi-Agency Coordination System (MACS) The Multi-Agency Coordination System (MACS) is a part of NIMS and provides the basic architecture for facilitating the allocation of resources, incident prioritization, coordination, and integration of multiple agencies for large-scale incidents and emergencies. A MAC group is made up of administrators or designees authorized to represent or commit agency resources and funds. MAC groups do not have direct involvement in the incident(s) and may function virtually. The principal functions and responsibilities associated with MACS include: Examples of a MAC Group include San Francisquito Multi-Agency Coordination Group (SFC MAC), policy groups (elected or appointed officials), emergency management committees (emergency managers, first responders and allied agencies), or multiagency committees such as Incident Management Teams or Emergency Management Planning Committees. 3.2.3 Field Response Field response includes on-scene activities and coordination, consistent with ICS, to make tactical decisions in direct response to the emergency of disaster. The field response is managed through an Incident Command Post (ICP). Resource requests and situation reports are routed from the field to the next SEMS organizational level, either through participating response agencies or the local EOC if activated. • Situation awareness / assessment • Incident priority determination • Critical resource acquisition and allocation • Anticipating / identifying future resource requirements • Coordinating policy issues • Providing strategic coordination • Joint Information Systems Item 2 Attachment B - City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 39  Packet Pg. 48 of 413  16 3.2.4 Local Government The City of Palo Alto, as a local government, retains the responsibility and authority for managing response activities within its jurisdiction. To support these efforts, the City may activate its EOC and Departments may activate respective Department Operations Center (DOC). The EOC provides agency coordination, provides logistical support, establishes common operating procedures, identifies overarching priorities, and prioritizes available resources. Additionally, the EOC coordinates with Santa Clara County Operational Area (OA) / County EOC. The Local Government Incident Management Levels graphic derives from the Santa Clara County’s Emergency Operation Plan (Santa Clara County OEM Emergency Operations Plan 2017) and describes the local government incident management levels. 3.2.5 Operational Area The Operational Area (OA) provides response coordination for all political subdivisions within the county’s jurisdiction. The OA coordinates response activities within the county’s jurisdiction through the County EOC, if activated. The OA serves as a link to the regional level and other OAs within the region. Palo Alto is part of the Santa Clara County Operational Area and coordinates with the Santa Clara County Office of Emergency Management (OEM). The City participates in Santa Clara County OA planning and during a critical incident, coordinates with the OA, through either the Santa Clara County OEM or the Santa Clara County EOC, if activated. 3.2.6 Regional The State of California is divided into three regions that each maintains Regional Emergency Operations Centers to coordinate resource requests, support mutual aid, and promote situational awareness between their respective OAs. The City of Palo Alto and Santa Clara County are in the Coastal Region. 3.2.7 State The Governor, through California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES) and its Mutual Aid Regions, will coordinate statewide operations to include the provision of mutual aid and other support to local jurisdictions and the redirection of essential supplies and other resources as required. Santa Clara County is part of the OES Coastal Region. Requests that exceed the capabilities of the Operational Area will be forwarded to the Region. The Cal OES Director, assisted by State agency directors, their staff, and volunteer agency staff will constitute the State emergency management staff. Coastal Region D IAGRAM 3.2.4 1 Item 2 Attachment B - City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 40  Packet Pg. 49 of 413  City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan 17 3.2.8 Mutual Aid The California Mutual Aid System operates within the framework of the California Master Mutual Aid Agreement and under the authority of the California Emergency Services Act. The system allows for the mobilization of resources to and from emergency response agencies, local governments, operational areas, regions, and the state with the intent to provide requesting agencies with adequate resources. Mutual aid is utilized by primary response disciplines: • Fire and Rescue • Law Enforcement • Coroner / Medical Examiner • Emergency Management • Medical & Health Mutual Aid Response Discipline Coordinating Agency Mutual Aid Elements Included Fire and Rescue Cal OES Fire and Rescue Branch Fire and Rescue Mutual Aid Urban Search and Rescue Mutual Aid Hazardous Material Mutual Aid Law Enforcement Cal OES Law Enforcement Branch Law Enforcement Mutual Aid Search and Rescue Mutual Aid Coroner/Medical Examiner Cal OES Law Enforcement Branch Coroner/Medical Examiner Mutual Aid Emergency Management Cal OES Emergency Management Emergency Management Mutual Aid CalWARN Water/Wastewater Agency Response Network Medical and Health California Emergency Medical Services Authority Disaster Medical and Health Mutual Aid Public Works Cal Waste/Wastewater Agency Response Network (CalWARN) Public Works Mutual Aid Utilities California Utilities Emergency Association (CUEA) California Water/Wastewater Agency Response Network (CalWARN) Electric, Natural Gas, Water and Wastewater Utilities Water and Wastewater Utilities The California Mutual Aid System includes six mutual aid regions to facilitate the coordination and flow of mutual aid requests. As part of the Cal OES Coastal Region, Palo Alto, and the Santa Clara (County) Operational Area are part of Mutual Aid Region II. The system includes several discipline-specific mutual aid systems that operate through designated mutual aid coordinators at the Operational Area, regional, and State levels. Mutual aid requests are Item 2 Attachment B - City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 41  Packet Pg. 50 of 413  18 coordinated within their geographic area before unfilled requests are forwarded to the next level. Mutual aid requests that do not fall into one of the discipline-specific mutual aid systems are handled through the emergency services mutual aid system and by emergency management staff at the local government, operational area, regional, and state levels. 3.3 National Incident Management System Issued on February 28, 2003, the Homeland Security Presidential Directive-5 (HSPD-5) requires all Federal departments and agencies to make the adoption of National Incident Management System (NIMS) by State, tribal, and local organizations, a condition for Federal preparedness grants, contracts, and other preparedness activities. NIMS provides a comprehensive national framework for incident management applicable at all jurisdictional levels and across all functional disciplines. Most NIMS requirements are applicable to the City of Palo Alto, including the adoption of Incident Command System (ICS). Additional elements of NIMS outline coordination between federal agencies and the use of federal assets and resources. NIMS is built on the following three components: 3.4 National Response Framework The National Response Framework (NRF) is built upon the premise that incidents are typically handled at the lowest jurisdictional level. The NRF provides the framework for federal interaction with state, local, tribal, private sector, and non-governmental entities in the context of domestic incident management to ensure timely and effective federal support. 4.0 E MERGENCY M ANAGEMENT O RGANIZATION The City’s Municipal Code (Palo Alto Municipal Code, 2024) outlines the purpose of emergency services for the preparation and carrying out of plans for the protection of people and property within respective city in the event of an emergency; the direction of the emergency organization; and the coordination of the emergency functions with all other public agencies, corporations, organizations, Emergency Operation Centers, Department Operation Centers, city departments, volunteers, and affected persons. “All officers and employees of this city, together with those volunteer forces enrolled to aid them during an emergency, and all groups, organizations and persons who may by agreement or operation of law, including persons impressed into service under the provisions of Section 9.28.060, be charged with duties incident to the protection of life and property in this city during such emergency, shall constitute the emergency organization of the city.” (Palo Alto Municipal Code, 2024) 4.1 Director of Emergency Services The Municipal Code defines the Office of Emergency Services (OES) as a public safety department. The Director of the Office of Emergency Services (OES Chief) is also the statutory Assistant Director of Emergency Services. By title and code, the City Manager is the Director of Emergency Services. The • Resource Management • Command and Coordination, including the Incident Command System • Communications and Information Management Item 2 Attachment B - City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 42  Packet Pg. 51 of 413  City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan 19 Director of Emergency Services assists in coordinating the City’s overall response and recovery operations. The Director of Emergency Services also acts as the City government’s key representative and lead agent for day-to-day emergency management, with powers delegated through the Municipal Code to: 1. Direct coordination and cooperation of services and staff of the emergency organization of the City, and resolve questions of authority and responsibility that may arise between them; and 2. Represent the City in all dealings with public or private agencies on matters pertaining to emergencies. To achieve this mandate, OES leads or coordinates planning, intelligence, and coordination, not only internally but also with allied agencies such as Stanford University, the private sector, and the community to promote, coordinate, and advance the four phases of emergency management: preparedness, response, recovery, and mitigation. 4.2 Emergency Services Council The City’s Municipal Code 2.12.030 (Palo Alto Municipal Code, 2024) establishes an Emergency Services Council. The organization chart depicts Palo Alto’s Emergency Services Council. The City’s Municipal Code 2.12.040 (Palo Alto Municipal Code, 2024) establishes the powers and duties of the emergency services council. The Emergency Services Council is empowered to develop and recommend for adoption by the City Council such emergency and mutual-aid plans and agreements, ordinances, resolutions, rules, and regulations that are necessary to implement these plans and agreements. The council shall meet when called by the chairman (Mayor) or when absent by the vice chairman (Director of Emergency Services). General powers and duties of director of emergency services is listed in the City’s Municipal Code 2.12.50 (Palo Alto Municipal Code, 2024): (a) There is hereby created the office of emergency services. The city manager shall be the director of emergency services. (b) There is hereby created the position of assistant director of emergency services who shall be appointed by the director. Palo Alto Emergency Services Council Organization Chart D IAGRAM 4.2 1 Item 2 Attachment B - City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 43  Packet Pg. 52 of 413  20 (c) The director and assistant director are hereby empowered to: (Ord. 2641 § 1 (part) 1971: Ord. 2146 (part), 1963: prior code § 2.1005)4.3 City Employees One of the greatest resources for the City of Palo Alto is its employees. California Government Code designates that all public employees are Disaster Services Workers (DSW) (State of California, 2013). Any employee of the City of Palo Alto may be assigned to perform activities which promote the protection of public health and safety or the preservation of lives and property within their routine levels of training proficiency. Such assignments may require services at locations, times, and under conditions that are significantly different than normal work assignments and may continue into the recovery phase of emergency. 4.4 Santa Clara County Office of Emergency Management Santa Clara County Office of Emergency Management provides Operational Area (OA) coordination during disasters and emergencies and assists jurisdictions with preparedness, mitigation, recovery, and response efforts. Santa Clara County OA is the next SEMS level to provide the City with support and resources during and after an emergency or disaster. 5.0 W HOLE C OMMUNITY A PPROACH Palo Alto’s ability to respond and recover from significant emergencies and major disasters is highly dependent upon planning for the unique needs and specific requirements of the residents and non- resident, commuters, and visitors. To further identify and meet these needs, a “Whole Community” approach has been adopted to include and integrate community partners, neighbors, and other stakeholders in all phases of emergency management. Through these collaborative efforts, Palo Alto will become more resilient and better prepared to meet the needs of its residents, and any daytime population increase, those with disabilities, access and functional needs and cultural consideration. The 1. Request the city council to proclaim the existence or threatened existence of a "local emergency" if the city council is in session, or to issue such proclamation if the city council is not in session, subject to ratification by the city council within seven days thereafter or the proclamation shall have no further force or effect. 2. Request the Governor to proclaim a "state of emergency" when in the opinion of the director, the resources of the area or region are inadequate to cope with the emergency upon request by proper authority. 3. Control and direct the effort of the civil emergency organization of the city for the accomplishment of the purposes of this chapter. 4. Direct coordination and cooperation of services and staff of the emergency organization of the city, and resolve questions of authority and responsibility that may arise between them; and 5. Represent the city in all dealings with public or private agencies on matters pertaining to emergencies as defined herein. Item 2 Attachment B - City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 44  Packet Pg. 53 of 413  City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan 21 City will include the Whole Community Approach when preparing for, responding to, recovering from, and mitigating against major emergencies and disasters. 5.1 Residents Residents of Palo Alto play a fundamental role in emergency management by ensuring that they are prepared for emergencies and disasters. In most disasters, City residents will be the first to respond— family members caring for one another, neighbor helping neighbor. In a major disaster, residents may not have access to City services for days. Individual preparedness will ensure that the City’s limited resources can go where they are most needed. The City recommends that all residents prepare for disaster by taking first aid and CPR training, maintaining disaster supplies of food and water, and safekeeping personal documentation (e.g., personal identification and individual medical records). These actions will better prepare residents to evacuate or shelter-in-place for up to a week. Those families or residents with disabilities and others with access and functional needs may require additional personal planning before, during, and after an emergency to accommodate their need for assistance with communication, maintaining health and medical supplies, independence, support and safety, or transportation. 5.2 Community Organization/ Volunteer Groups OES develops structures to link non-governmental organizations (NGOs), residents, and businesses to the Incident Command System (ICS). Elements of this include the restructured Emergency Services Volunteers (ESV) program which is a unified structure that includes Amateur Radio Emergency Services (ARES), Radio Amateur Civil Emergency Services (RACES), Block Preparedness Coordinators (BPCs), and Community Emergency Response Team (CERT) volunteers. (Emergency Volunteers – City of Palo Alto, CA) The Block Preparedness Coordinator is a grass roots program that trains volunteers to build social networks in our neighborhoods, deter crimes, and prepare for emergencies. During activation, BPCs check on their neighbors, identify and report critical problems to their Neighborhood Preparedness Coordinators (NPCs), and assist in getting resources on the scene. CERT Basic Training is a national program designed to help prepare Palo Alto residents to help themselves, their families, and their neighbors in the event of a disaster. Community Emergency Response Team – City of Palo Alto, CA Palo Alto's Auxiliary Communications Services (ACS) supplements emergency communications with volunteer staff. Both licensed and unlicensed volunteers can serve in one or more functions across administrative, management, technical, or operational areas in both ARES and RACES. (Auxiliary Communications Services – City of Palo Alto, CA) Item 2 Attachment B - City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 45  Packet Pg. 54 of 413  22 The Palo Alto/Stanford Citizen Corps Council (CCC) serves to harness the power of individuals, businesses, and organizations through education, training, and volunteer service. Volunteers who assist and/or support emergency efforts may be required to undergo a screening process and/or background check. Volunteer programs determine the policies, procedures, and protocols for functionality and operations during incidents and events. 5.3 Private Sector Palo Alto has a vibrant business community that includes traditional retail, recreational, entertainment, and corporate businesses. The City engages with the private sector to better understand their needs, identify resources, and develop partnerships. Many of the City’s private sector partners address preparedness planning internally to minimize business disruptions and to support the wellbeing of their employees and offer their resources and technical capabilities to the larger community. The City acknowledges this valuable support and will continue collaborative efforts with the private sector as a component of the overarching emergency management program. In its efforts to engage the private sector, the City may solicit agreements, arrangements, memorandums of understanding and the like with various business and or business groups, such as the Chamber of Commerce. The nature of these relationships and roles and responsibilities will be outlined in any provisions and/or documents. 5.4 People with Disabilities People with disabilities often require additional planning and support to ensure they receive equal access and coverage as required under the Stafford Act as well as other state and federal legislation such as the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990. Covered disabilities are not always apparent and may include impairments of mobility, vision, and hearing as well as some cognitive disorders and mental illnesses. For more information on assisting people with disabilities in an emergency scenario please visit the Earthquake preparedness page: Be Ready for the Next Big Earthquake – City of Palo Alto, CA. To meet the needs of these individuals, Palo Alto is committed to supporting efforts and activities designed to improve and validate capabilities in support of people with disabilities, including but not limited to: • Notifications and warning procedures • Evacuation, transportation and sheltering considerations • Accommodations for service animals • Accessibility to information • Maintaining independence • Effective communication • Transportation • Supervision • Medical care Item 2 Attachment B - City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 46  Packet Pg. 55 of 413  City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan 23 5.5 Individual with Access & Functional Needs In addition to people with disabilities, Palo Alto recognize that additional support may be necessary to support those with access and functional needs (State of Cailifornia , 2019). These are not necessarily related to a specific condition, diagnosis, impairment and are based upon functional areas such as: Individuals with access and functional needs may not have access to support networks outside of their immediate communities or be able to self-evacuate. As a result, they may have additional needs before, during, and after an incident. Those with functional needs often include children, the elderly, tourists, and other segments of the population, such as: 5.6 Consideration for Pets and Animals In 2006, the federal government passed the Pets Evacuations and Transportation Standards (PETS) Act as an amendment to the Stafford Act. The PETS Act directs state and local emergency preparedness plans address the needs of individuals with pets and companion animals during a disaster or emergency. American Red Cross procedures allow for assigned service animals to accompany individuals. Palo Alto works to include consideration for the needs of pets and companion animals in plans as appropriate. Santa Clara County Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (SPCA) maintains shelters including mobile ones for various pets and can be potentially located near a designated shelter. Throughout Santa Clara County there are numerous individuals and organizations (farms, ranches, and others) with large animals such as horses, cattle, sheep, goats, and/or pigs. Owners should make appropriate preparations (e.g., sheltering, transporting) in advance for their animals before an actual disaster occurs. 6.0 E MERGENCY M ANAGEMENT P HASES Emergency management is divided into various phases with each of these phases bending into the next one. There is no clear demarcation of when one phase starts and another one ends. Elements from each phase may be used to support or augment elements from another phase. • People with disabilities • People living in institutionalized settings • People from other cultures • People with limited English proficiency • People without transportation • People who are economically disadvantaged • Women who are pregnant D IAGRAM 6.1 Item 2 Attachment B - City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 47  Packet Pg. 56 of 413  24 6.1 Preparedness Phase The preparedness phase involves activities undertaken in advance of an emergency. These activities develop operational capabilities and effective responses to a disaster. These activities focus on maintaining or improving capabilities that will be used in the response or recovery phases. Preparedness actions might include mitigation activities, emergency/disaster planning, training, exercises, and public education. Preparedness encompasses the whole community and promotes collaboration amongst businesses, residents, agencies, and departments to achieve the common goal of disaster preparedness. Members of the emergency management organization should prepare checklists detailing assignments, notification rosters, resource lists and other useful documents. Personnel should be acquainted with these documents through periodic training and reviews. 6.1.1 Planning Emergency planning includes a wide variety of plans at the strategic, operational, and tactical levels. Strategic plans include the EOP and many of its associated hazard-specific or functional annexes, while operational and tactical planning includes more detailed information such as standard operating procedures (SOP), checklists, personnel assignments, notification rosters, resource lists, and forms. All City departments are required to participate in the development of relevant strategic and operational plans while ensuring that internal tactical planning is sufficient to meet the needs of their outlined roles and assigned objectives. This includes the development of department-specific SOPs required to meet the objectives outlined for each department. 6.1.2 Training Training is an essential component of preparedness and impacts the ability to respond to and recover from a critical incident. The City facilitates trainings and regularly communicates opportunities to the whole community, City staff, and fire staff members. Additionally, the City prioritize trainings that promote staff understanding and familiarity with the following concepts: • Identification and prioritization of essential services • Establishment, promulgation, and maintenance of orders of succession • Identification of delegation of authority • Identification of continuity of communication • Identification and maintenance of continuity of facilities • Maintenance of vital records • Establishment of process of reconstruction • Development of an effective test, training, and exercise program to support continuity efforts • Development of a Continuity of Operations Plan (COOP) – detailed and comprehensive information is contained in the COOP plan; the COOP Plan should be used in concert with the EOP Item 2 Attachment B - City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 48  Packet Pg. 57 of 413  City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan 25 The City Manager and OES are responsible for ensuring that the staff members assigned to the EOC are adequately trained and competent to fulfill their designated responsibilities. Staff members are encouraged to engage in on-going emergency management training to be familiar with current plans and guidance and capable of fulfilling the EOC role to which they are assigned. 6.1.3 Exercises Exercises are a primary tool for assessing preparedness and identifying areas for improvement. They are a valuable method to validate plans and train personnel. Palo Alto incorporates guidance from the Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (FEMA, Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP), 2020) in the development of its exercises. A variety of exercises and trainings are used to assess capabilities and prioritize future planning and training needs. By simulating potential response and recovery scenarios, Palo Alto can validate existing plans and determine where additional training might be needed. The City’s Emergency Management Team will develop a Training and Exercise Program that incorporates a building block approach in the development of planned exercises to facilitate increasing awareness and knowledge. 6.1.4 Public Awareness & Education The Palo Alto Fire Department, the Palo Alto Police Department, and other City departments and their partners promote public awareness and education to strengthen overall preparedness, awareness, and community resilience. By providing community education, outreach, training, and coordination, the City increases the ability of community members and organizations to adequately prepare for and meet their own needs. By promoting self-reliance and preparedness, the city reduces the overall burden on resources and competing needs that may arise during critical incidents. Public Education is an essential tool to teach residents how to prepare for, react to and recover from a major emergency or disaster. Residents can visit: Palo Alto Emergency Preparedness; Be Ready for the Next Big Earthquake ; and Stay Informed – City of Palo Alto, CA to learn more about how to prepare for, respond to, and recover from a disaster. Residents should take advantage of various emergency preparedness information and resources from City, County, State, and Federal governments among other sources and incorporate recommended practices into their regular routines. • Incident Command System (ICS) • California Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS) • National Incident Management System (NIMS) • California Disaster Service Worker (DSW) [CA Government Code 3101] • EOC Functions • EOP Orientation • Department individual training and certifications Item 2 Attachment B - City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 49  Packet Pg. 58 of 413  26 6.2 Response Phase The response phase includes any actions taken immediately before, during, or directly after a critical incident to minimize the potential or existing impacts of the incident. 6.2.1 Pre-Event Some incidents may provide sufficient warning to allow for pre-event or precautionary measures. Depending on the likelihood of significant impacts, pre-event response may include: • Public warning • Evacuations • Resource Mobilization • Staging • Mutual Aid Requests • Proclamation of a Local Emergency 6.2.2 Emergency Response Emergency response activities are actions taken during or immediately after a critical incident to reduce or minimize actual impacts. While these activities are often associated with traditional response units – fire, law enforcement, emergency medical service (EMS), and public works and utilities – the size and complexity may require support from additional governmental agencies, non-government organizations (NGOs), businesses, community and faith-based organizations and other partners. During emergency responses, some incidents may escalate beyond the capabilities of field operation management that may necessitate the need for additional support and coordination requiring the activation of a Department Operations Center (DOC). When an incident, or multiple incidents exceed the capabilities of a DOC, or when multiple department DOCs have been activated and more coordinated efforts are needed, the EOC should be activated. When coordinating emergency response activities and prioritizing needs and objectives, the following hierarchy is utilized: Emergency response may include activities related to short-term recovery and often overlaps with long- term recovery operations. 6.2.3 Prolonged Emergency In addition to continuing life and property protection; operations, mass care, relocation, public information, situation analysis, status and damage assessment operations will be initiated. 1. Life Safety 2. Incident Stabilization 3. Protection of property and infrastructure and restoration of essential services 4. Reduce impacts to the environment Item 2 Attachment B - City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 50  Packet Pg. 59 of 413  City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan 27 6.3 Recovery Phase The Recovery Phase includes short and long-term activities focused on returning the community to pre- incident or improved conditions. In some situations, when a disaster declaration has been made, recovery activities may include the critical task of identifying, documenting and quantifying response and recovery costs eligible for reimbursement. The City of Palo Alto’s Damage Assessment Plan includes more detailed information on recovery operations within the city. The Recovery Phase may begin during the Response Phase or as directed by the EOC Director. Depending on the incident the recovery process may be short or be a sustained operation lasting several years. A comprehensive recovery plan may provide more detailed actions for a prolonged recovery period. A separate and detailed Recovery Plan would contain specific procedures and protocols, roles, and responsibilities. The EOP is intended to be used mostly during the response phase of an incident; it is not intended to be a comprehensive recovery plan. The following actions may assist and facilitate recovery efforts: 6.3.1 Short-term Recovery Short-term recovery operations begin during the response phase and may include activities such as the restoration of essential services, rapid debris removal, and the re-establishment of City services. 6.3.2 Long-term Recovery Long-term recovery operations are often required to address extensive damage to infrastructure or widespread devastation. Activities include the restoration and reconstruction of public facilities and disaster response cost recovery. The recovery period has major objectives that may overlap with other phases of the emergency management cycle, including: • Reinstatement of family and individuals’ autonomy • Provision of essential public services • Permanent restoration of private and public property • Conducting damage assessments • Assessing housing needs – both support and solutions • Issuing permits for repairs and demolition • Debris removal • Opening roadways and transportation routes • Restoring utilities – water, electricity, gas, communications, sewer, internet, cable • Opening local assistance centers (LAC) • Restart government functions • Coordinating efforts with Santa Clara County OEM • Working with local businesses to restore operations • Coordinating with County, State and Federal officials regarding financial recovery for the City • Coordinate with County Public Health efforts for disasters that included health issues • Identify and prioritize essential functions and services Item 2 Attachment B - City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 51  Packet Pg. 60 of 413  28 • Identification of residual hazards • Plans to mitigate future hazards • Recovery of costs associated with response and recovery efforts • Coordination of state and federal, private, and public assistance As the immediate threat to life, property, and environment subsides, the rebuilding of Palo Alto will begin through various recovery activities. Long-term planning efforts, including public safety and infrastructure sustainability, are included in the Palo Alto General Plan. Recovery activities involve the restoration of services to the public and rebuilding the affected area(s). Examples of recovery activities may include: • Restoring all utilities • Establishing and staffing Local Assistance Centers (LACs) and Disaster Assistance Centers (DACs) • Applying for state and federal assistance programs • Conducting hazard mitigation analysis • Identifying residual hazards • Determining recovery costs associated with response and recovery Depending on the severity of the disaster, sheltering activities could be short -term or long-term. Palo Alto will open shelters using the American Red Cross-National Survey System (NSS) as well as County guidance. 6.3.3 Damage Assessment Damage Assessment activities involve identifying, recording, compiling, and analyzing damage information to determine the type of recovery assistance needed. Following major disasters, Preliminary Damage Assessments (PDAs) are used to determine preliminary eligibility for certain state and federal financial assistance and reimbursement programs. Damage Assessments require the coordination of multiple city departments. 6.3.4 Disaster Assistance Programs If the disaster is significant enough to warrant a gubernatorial and a presidential disaster declaration, additional state and federal assistance may become available. A local disaster proclamation does not automatically warrant the provisions of state or federal assistance. The City will have to qualify for these additional resources. If determined to be eligible, the City and its residents may be able to participate in state and federal disaster assistance programs for the following: • Individuals – may be eligible for loans and grants for housing assistance programs (for homeowners and renters), and uninsured disaster-related necessitates (including personal property, medical, dental, and transportation expenses). Other Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (Stafford Act) programs include crisis counseling, disaster unemployment assistance, and legal services, may be available. • Businesses – may be eligible for low-interest loans to assist with uninsured physical damaged through the United States Small Business Administration (SBA). • Government – assistance may be available through state assistance under the California Disaster Assistance Act (CDAA), as well as sever federal programs including the FEMA Public Assistance (PA) Grant Program, and the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP). • Non-profit Organizations - assistance may be available through the state CDAA, as well as several federal programs including FEMA PA Grant Program for eligible non-profit organizations. Item 2 Attachment B - City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 52  Packet Pg. 61 of 413  City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan 29 6.3.5 Recovery Documentation Documentation is the key to recovering eligible response and recovery costs. Damage assessment documentation will be critical in establishing the basis for eligibility of disaster assistance programs. Various state and federal assistance programs require several types of documentation for eligible costs and in addition to structural damage, may include staff time, equipment, and materials utilized in response to the incident. To support the maximum recovery of eligible reimbursement, City departments must identify and support internal mechanisms for tracking and documenting appropriate costs. 6.3.6 After Action Report As part of the recovery phase, and in accordance with SEMS, the State of California requires any city declaring a local emergency for which the governor proclaims a state of emergency, to complete and transmit an after-action report to the California Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES) within 90 days of the close of the incident period. The after-action report should include the following information: 6.4 Mitigation Phase The Mitigation Phase includes actions and measures taken to reduce or eliminate the degree of long- term risk from natural and technological hazards. Whereas preparedness activities increase the City’s ability to respond to the impacts of a hazard, mitigation activities reduce the potential for those impacts in the future, thereby reducing overall risk. Numerous mitigation activities are available and may include the implementation, augmentation, or promotion of the following: • Building and Safety Codes • Disaster/Fire/Flood Insurance • Land Use Planning and Management • Hazard Research and Analysis • Land and Repetitive Loss Acquisition • Monitoring and Inspection • Public Outreach and Education • Relocation • Risk Mapping • Safety Codes, Statutes, and Ordinances • Tax Incentives and Disincentives • Seismic Strengthening or Retrofitting The City participates in local and regional mitigation activities such as the development of risk assessments and mitigation plans. Further, the City’s Comprehensive Plan (General Plan) includes mitigation aspects and elements. This information is located on the City’s website. 7.0 E MERGENCY O PERATIONS C ENTER Palo Alto operates an Emergency Operations Center (EOC) that provides a centralized location where emergency management coordination and decision-making occur and can support field operations during Item 2 Attachment B - City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 53  Packet Pg. 62 of 413  30 critical incident, major emergency, or disaster. When activated, the EOC provides support for several critical tasks related to communication, coordination, resource management, and executive leadership. 7.1 EOC Locations The primary EOC location is: 250 Sherman Ave. Palo Alto, CA 94306 The alternate EOC location is: 3201 East Bayshore Rd, Palo Alto, CA 94303 (Municipal Services Center) Alternate locations are used when the primary EOC would or might be unsafe or unusable. Situations and circumstances may arise in which staffing an in-person EOC fully or partially may be impractical or unwise, such as with the recent COVID-19 pandemic. Alternative staffing options may be considered and implemented and may include remote, virtual, or a combination of in-person and remote. Staff will be provided with appropriate tools, equipment, and training to perform their assigned responsibilities. The City’s Director of Emergency Services will determine if alternate options will be implemented. 7.2 Activations & Deactivation The EOC equipment is maintained by Palo Alto OES staff and may be used for coordination and monitoring activities at any time without the need for a formal activation. However, depending upon the need and circumstances, an official EOC activation may be appropriate to support several activities, including: The activation level and significance of the incident/event will determine who assumes the role of EOC Director. The City Manager would usually assume the role of EOC Director during a full activation. For incidents or events that extend beyond an operational period (e.g., 12 hours) the City Manager may designate an alternate or replacement. This person could be the assistant city manager or one of the emergency services chiefs. 7.2.1 DOC Activation A Department Operations Center (DOC) may activate at the discretion of the senior department decision maker, or the department executive leader based upon current or impending conditions that may alter normal operations for a temporary period of time. DOCs may also activate in support of EOC and field operations during a disaster. A DOC is a centralized location or hub dedicated to coordinating a specific department or agency’s internal incident management and response during emergencies. 7.2.2 EOC Activation Authority The following municipal positions have the authority to activate the City’s EOC: • Field response (disaster or major emergency) • Pre-planned events (conventions, parade, city-wide event) • Local proclamation of emergency • Governor’s declaration of emergency • Presidential declaration of a national emergency • State of War Item 2 Attachment B - City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 54  Packet Pg. 63 of 413  City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan 31 Individuals serving in an acting role or empowered to act on behalf the above positions may activate the EOC. As situations and conditions warrant, Director of Emergency Services will communicate appropriate information to the City Council of escalating or anticipated incidents or events which may have a significant impact on Palo Alto and efforts being made to address the situation. EOC activation may occur based upon escalating incidents or in anticipation of an incident or event. Activation of multiple DOCs may warrant the activation of the EOC. DOC commanders should be communicating with respective department heads of current and projected situation status. 7.2.3 EOC Activation Levels When the EOC is activated, the City will notify the Santa Clara County OEM. The City may also establish Departmental Operations Centers (DOCs) for specific departments (e.g., Utilities, Public Works, or IT) as required to support field operations and coordinate other functions within their respective departments. Activation of multiple DOCs may warrant or necessitate the activation of the EOC. EOC activation levels are scalable based in the evolving needs and may include full or partial staffing as required. See table below: • Palo Alto City Manager, Assistant City Manager, or designee o Palo Alto Police Chief or designee • Palo Alto Fire Chief or designee • Palo Alto OES Chief, Emergency Services Coordinator, or designee Item 2 Attachment B - City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 55  Packet Pg. 64 of 413  32 Similarly, the deactivation of the EOC will be scalable based on the decreasing needs of Palo Alto. Appropriate EOC functions and roles will be deactivated as the situation allows and as directed by the EOC Director. 7.3 EOC Communication & Coordination The EOC has the capability to communicate and coordinate with field personnel, incident commanders, DOCs, external stakeholders, volunteer community groups, and other government agencies. Coordination with field elements from the EOC may be coordinated through relevant DOCs or directly with an Incident Commander. If a DOC is not activated, the Incident Commander may communicate Level Operational Status (Minimum Positions) Trigger Event/Situation (examples include but not limited to) Activities Level 1 Full Staffing as needed All positions (as required) • Large Winter Storm • Terrorist incident • Major Earthquake • Regional Disaster • Major Wildland Fire in Urban interface • Situational Analysis • Public Information • Response Coordination • Resource Coordination • Logistics Support • Recovery Operations • Sustained Operations • Reporting to State Level 2 Partial Staffing Management, EOC Section Chiefs Branches/Divisions/Units Liaison/Agency reps • Large scale evacuations • 2+ incident sites • Severe Weather Warning • Earthquake with minor damage • Major scheduled event • Situational Analysis • Public Information • Response Coordination • Resource Coordination • Logistics Support • Reporting to State Level 3 Minimal Staffing EOC Coordinator • Small incident or event • One site • Potential threat of: o Flood o Severe storm • Escalating incident • Situational Analysis • Public Information • Response Coordination • Resource Coordination • Reporting to State TABLE 7.2.3 Item 2 Attachment B - City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 56  Packet Pg. 65 of 413  City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan 33 directly with their department specific representative, sometimes located in the Operations Section of the EOC. The EOC will communicate and coordinate with the Santa Clara County EOC, when activated, or County OEM, and other cities in the Operational Area. Affected cities will provide situational awareness and relevant resource status to the County EOC. Communication may be by cell phone, internet, or other viable means. Additionally, the EOC may communicate with designated volunteer community groups through alternative methods such as amateur radios. 7.4 EOC Structure – Hierarchy of Command and Span-of-Control The essential ICS functions in SEMS and NIMS are identified as “sections” in the EOC: All other functions are organized as branches, groups, or units within these sections. Only functional elements that are required to meet current objectives will be activated. Below is a sample ICS chart that can be expanded or scaled back based on the size and extent of an incident or event. C HART 7.4 MANAGEMENT OPERATIONS PLANNING LOGISTICS FINANCE Legal PIO Safety o Management—Responsible for overall emergency policy and management coordination; other responsibilities of the management staff include public information, EOC safety and security, legal review of proclamations and other similar actions, and liaising with other agencies. o Operations—Responsible for supporting operations, coordinating emergency response efforts and shelter operation support. o Planning—Responsible for collecting, evaluating, and disseminating information; assists in developing emergency action plan; responsible for collecting all documentation material; planning also includes intelligence-gathering such as weather information. o Logistics—Responsible for providing facilities, services, personnel, equipment, materials, and resources. o Finance—Responsible for financial expenditures, records, and other administrative aspects. Item 2 Attachment B - City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 57  Packet Pg. 66 of 413  34 Management of personnel within the EOC will be accomplished through the assignment of section chiefs (general staff) to the operations, planning, logistics, and finance functions. Section chiefs report to the EOC Director in the Management Section. Management staff consists of such positions as safety, legal, public information officer (PIO), liaison, among others. See the Palo Alto EOC Manual for position descriptions. 7.5 Emergency Action Plans At local, operational area, regional and state levels, the use of EOC action plans (EAP) provide designated personnel with knowledge of the objectives to be attained and the steps required for achievement. Action plans give direction and provide a basis for measuring achievement of objectives and overall system performance in the EOC. The EOC Director will determine and direct the drafting of EAPs. The Planning Section shall be responsible for overseeing EAPs development and drafting. 8.0 E MERGENCY D ECLARATIONS 8.1 Local Proclamation California Government Code allows a local emergency to be proclaimed by a city council or designed official by city council. If the City of Palo Alto determines that the effects of an emergency are, or may become, beyond the capability of local resources, a local emergency can be proclaimed. The Palo Alto City Council has empowered the City Manager and the Director of Emergency Services to issue a proclamation of local emergency when the City Council is not in session. Such a proclamation of local emergency is invalid after seven days, unless ratified by the City Council. Proclamations must be made within ten (10) days of occurrence to qualify for assistance under the California Disaster Assistance Act and must be renewed every 14 days. Palo Alto Municipal Code and the California Disaster Assistance Act specify the requirements for proclaiming and, when necessary, maintaining, a local emergency. Compliance to the California Disaster Assistance Act (CDAA) (State of California, 2015) is required for the City to qualify for assistance. A local proclamation of emergency allows the City Manager and the Director of Emergency Services to take measures necessary to protect and preserve public health and safety and may trigger certain reimbursement opportunities. 8.2 State of Emergency After a proclamation of a local emergency, the governing body, having determined that local resources are not sufficient to mitigate the situation, may request by letter or resolution that the Governor proclaim a state of emergency in the area to fully commit state and mutual aid assistance and provide resources to assist local government. To support its request for a gubernatorial proclamation, it is essential that the City forward an estimate of damage and financial loss to Cal OES through the Santa Clara County OEM as quickly as possible. Item 2 Attachment B - City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 58  Packet Pg. 67 of 413  City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan 35 Estimates of loss are an important part of the criteria that Cal OES considers when deciding to proclaim a state of emergency and request a Presidential Declaration of Emergency or Disaster. A copy of the request for a Governor’s proclamation, with the following supporting data, must be forwarded, to the Santa Clara County OEM Director for transmission to the Cal OES Director: Cal OES prepares a recommendation as to the action that should be taken by the Governor. If the action recommends a Governor’s proclamation, Cal OES prepares the proclamation. The Governor may also proclaim a state of emergency without a local request if the safety of persons and property in the state are threatened by conditions of extreme peril, or emergency conditions are beyond the emergency response capacity and capabilities of local authorities. Local damage assessment documentation and submission may be required for reimbursement. 8.3 State of War Emergency In addition to a State of Emergency, the Governor can proclaim a State of War Emergency whenever the state or the nation is attacked by an enemy of the United States, or upon receipt by the state of a warning from the federal government indicating that such an enemy attack is probable or imminent. The provisions of the Governor granted under a State of War Emergency are the same as those granted under a State of Emergency. 8.4 Presidential Declaration Following the proclamation of a state of emergency, the Cal OES Director may recommend that the Governor request a Presidential Declaration of a major disaster under the authority of Public Law 93-288. The Governor’s request to the president is submitted through the FEMA. Supplementary justification data may be required to accompany the state and local proclamations and Initial Damage Estimate. 9.0 P UBLIC I NFORMATION During a major emergency, disaster, or significant event providing residents and the public with useful and updated information is essential. The EOC PIO will oversee messaging during an EOC activation. If the EOC is not activated, then either the lead department or City’s PIO will be responsible. 9.1 Alerts and Notifications During an incident, the City will utilize various communication tools to disseminate information and directions to its residents. Notifications may be coordinated with neighboring agencies and/or the County. Recognizing that some residents may have limited access or functional needs, the City will strive to address communication in various forms. Communication tools include but not limited to: • Copy of the local emergency proclamation • Initial damage estimate summary that estimates the severity and extent of the damage Item 2 Attachment B - City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 59  Packet Pg. 68 of 413  36 • City Notification System - ALERTSCC o A county-wide community alert and notification system that allows the City of Palo Alto to quickly provide critical information and instructions to subscribers using registered cell phones, emails, or landline phones through a reverse 9-1-1 function. Registration can be completed at http://www.alertscc.gov/ or by texting your zip code to 888777. • Connect With Us – City of Palo Alto, CA o Palo Alto PD publishes news releases, traffic advisories, urgent updates, community news, power outage notifications, and other important safety information on Nixle. o Important City updates are shared on Nextdoor, X (Twitter), and Facebook. • Local news and radio stations participating in the Emergency Alert System. • Volunteer and neighborhood groups and community or faith-based organizations. Public education can be a useful tool to prepare residents in advance of incidents – how to prepare for, react to, and recover from various situations. 9.2 Joint Information System The Joint information System (JIS) is the broad mechanism that organizes, integrates, and coordinates information to ensure timely, accurate, accessible, and consistent messaging activities across multiple jurisdictions and/or disciplines with the private sector and non-governmental organizations (NGOs). It includes the plans, protocols, procedures, and structures used to coordinate and share public information. Federal, State, tribal, territorial, regional, local, and private sector PIOs and established Joint Information DIAGRAM 9.2 Item 2 Attachment B - City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 60  Packet Pg. 69 of 413  City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan 37 Centers (JIC) at each level of SEMS are critical elements of the JIS. The County / Operational Area may orchestrate JIS activities for larger or countywide incidents and events. 9.3 Joint Information Center The Joint Information Center (JIC) is the central location that facilitates the operations of the JIS during an emergency. This location supports personnel with public information responsibilities from multiple agencies, departments, and other local governments. They perform critical emergency information functions, crisis communications, and public affairs functions. A JIC is established at a suitable location to provide for effective management of Public Information functions. When activated, the JIC is staffed by personnel trained to conduct Public Information activities, including coordinating inter-jurisdictional media releases and management of rumor control and community communications functions. Regardless of where the JIC is established, Public Information functions will continue to be centrally managed from the EOC, when activated. 10.0 C ONTINUITY OF G OVERNMENT Continuity of Government (COG) is an essential function of emergency management and is vital during an emergency/disaster situation. Continuity of government is defined as the preservation, maintenance, or reconstitution of the civil government's ability to carry out its constitutional responsibilities. All levels of government share a constitutional responsibility to preserve the life and property of their citizens. The California Government Code and the Constitution of California provide the authority for state and local government to reconstitute itself in the event incumbents are unable to serve. A major emergency or disaster could result in great loss of life and property, including the death or injury of key government officials. At the same time, there could be partial or complete destruction of established seats of government, and the destruction of public and private records essential to continued operations of government and industry. In the aftermath of a major emergency, law and order must be preserved and essential government services must be maintained. To this end, it is particularly essential that local units of government continue to function. 10.1 Continuity Planning Disasters or major emergencies have the potential to disrupt or interrupt critical and essential City services that are vital to the health and welfare of its residents. Planning for such possibilities addresses the continuation of government and succession of officers. 10.2 Line of Succession The lines of succession for essential City positions are listed below. These individuals will assume authority until relieved. This list does not include all City departments. Item 2 Attachment B - City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 61  Packet Pg. 70 of 413  38 Primary City Position Alternate Mayor o Vice Mayor City Manager o Assistant City Manager City Attorney o Assistant City Attorney Director Planning and Development o Assistant Director Planning & Community o Environment Chief Building Official Police Chief o Assistant Chief of Police o Police Captains Fire Chief o Deputy Fire Chief, Operations o Deputy Fire Chief, Administration OES Chief o Emergency Services Coordinator Public Works Director o Assistant Director o Assistant Director Sustainability Climate Action Director Information Technology/Chief Information Officer o Manager Information Technology Chief Financial Officer o Assistant Director Administrative Services City Clerk o Deputy City Clerk Director Community Services o Assistant Director Community Services Director of Utilities o Utilities Chief Operating Officer City Council o Emergency Standby Council 10.3 Essential Facilities-Alternate Government Facilities In the event an alternate location is needed to perform the day-to-day governmental functions, staff will be notified to report to one of several identified governmental facility locations, or other remote locations, where those functions can be carried out. Based upon current conditions and situation status, the alternate location will be determined by the department head or senior City official. Item 2 Attachment B - City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 62  Packet Pg. 71 of 413  City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan 39 10.4 Preservation of Vital Records City leadership will require certain vital records during a disaster. Vital Records are the documents required to continue the mission of City departments and agencies during and after a disaster. The records will assist in providing services both to internal City departments and external customers, such as citizens, contractors, other government entities. Example documents may include: • Public Records • Computer system back-ups/servers • Order of Succession Ordinances or Resolutions • Plans, policies, and procedures for critical processes • Payroll information • Contracts and leases • Legal and financial records • Insurance documents Protection of, and access to, these and other vital records requires planning and is coordinated by the Palo Alto City Clerk. Each City department is responsible for identifying vital records, coordinating with the City Clerk, and assigning internal responsibility for their preservation. Internet and server/client-based software systems also serve as vital records because of the data they host. These systems also require a similar level of planning for remote access as well as system interruptions. 1 1 .0 P LAN D EVELOPMENT AND M AINTENANCE The OES has delegation of authority by City Manager to review, revise, manage, and distribute the EOP. The Chief may delegate this assignment to another public safety staff member or members. The EOP’s Basic Plan is subject to periodic formal approval by the City Council, whereas the Annexes are revised as needed and are not subject to formal review and City Council approval. The EOP Basic Plan will be reviewed every five years by the City’s Office of Emergency Services. The Basic Plan may be modified at any time because of a post-incident or post-exercise evaluation, or changes in responsibilities, laws, guidance, or regulations. Changes to the Basic Plan would require readoption by the City Council. Item 2 Attachment B - City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 63  Packet Pg. 72 of 413  40 G LO SSARY AND A BBREVIATIONS Activate: At a minimum, a designated official of the emergency response agency that implements SEMS as appropriate to the scope of the emergency and the agency’s role in response to the emergency. ADA: American with Disabilities Act After Action Report (AAR): A report covering response actions, application of SEMS, modifications to plans and procedures, training need, and recovery activities. After action reports are required under SEMS after any emergency that requires a declaration of an emergency. Reports are required within 90 days. Agency: An agency is a division of government with specific function, or a non-governmental organization (e.g., private contractor, business, etc.) which offers a particular kind of assistance. In ICS, agencies are defined as jurisdictional (having statutory responsibility of incident mitigation); or assisting by providing resources. Agency Representative: An individual assigned to an incident or to an EOC from an assisting or cooperating agency who has delegated authority to make decisions on matters affecting that agency’s participation at the incident or at the EOC. American Red Cross: A nationwide volunteer agency that provides disaster relief to individuals and families. Available Resources: Incident-based resources that are available for immediate assignment. Cal OES: The California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services. Care and Shelter: A phase of operations that meets the food, clothing, and shelter needs of people on a mass care basis. CBO: Community based organization CDAA: California Disaster Assistance Act CERT: Community Emergency Response Team – a volunteer group organized by a local government to assist during an emergency and/or disaster. Chain of Command: A series of management positions in order of authority. Continuity of Government (COG): All measures that may be taken to ensure the continuity of essential functions of governments in the event of emergency conditions, including line-of- succession for key decision makers. COOP: Continuity of Operations Plan Coordination: The process of systematically analyzing a situation, developing relevant information, and informing appropriate command authority of viable alternatives for selection of the most effective combination of available resources to meet specific objectives. Cultural competence: The ability to understand, value, communicate with, and effectively interact with people across cultures to ensure that the needs of all community members are addressed, with priority given to “culturally diverse communities.” “Cultural competence” includes, but is not limited to, being respectful and responsive to the cultural and linguistic needs of diverse population groups. Culturally diverse communities: Includes, but is not limited to, race and ethnicity, including indigenous peoples, communities of color, and immigrant and refugee communities; gender, including women; age, including the elderly and youth; sexual and gender minorities; people with disabilities; occupation and income level including low-income individuals and the unhoused; education level; people with no or limited or no English language proficiency; as well as geographic location. Damage Assessment: The process utilized to determine the magnitude of damage and the unmet needs of individuals, businesses, the public Item 2 Attachment B - City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 64  Packet Pg. 73 of 413  City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan 41 sector, and the community caused by a disaster or emergency event. Dam Failure: Part or complete collapse of a dam causing downstream flooding. Declaration: The formal action by the President to make a State eligible for major disaster or emergency assistance under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, PL 3-288, as amended (the Stafford Act). Declaration Process: When a disaster strikes, local authorities and individuals request help from private relief organizations and their State government, which give all assistance possible. If assistance is beyond their capability, the Governor requests a Presidential declaration of a major disaster or an emergency. Delegation of Authority: A statement provided to the Incident Commander by the Agency Executive delegating authority and assigning responsibility. The Delegation of Authority can include objectives, priorities, expectations, constraints and other considerations or guidelines as needed. Department Operations Center (DOC): A location used by a distinct discipline, such as fire, medical, hazardous materials, or a unit, such as Department of Public Works, Department of Health, or local water district to manage and coordinate their departmental response functions in a disaster. Department operations centers may be used at all SEMS levels above the field response level, depending upon the impact of the emergency.” Disaster: A sudden calamitous emergency event bringing great damage loss or destruction. DSW: Disaster Service Worker [CA Gov code 3100 – 3109] Emergency: A condition of disaster or of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property caused by such conditions as air pollution, fire, flood, hazardous material incident, storm, epidemic, riot, drought, sudden and severe energy shortage, plant or animal infestations or disease, the Governor’s warning of an earthquake or volcanic prediction, or an earthquake or other conditions. EOC Action Plan (EAP): Similar to an IAP; developed by the Planning Section to provide operational planning direction for the EOC. EMS: Emergency Medical Service Emergency Operations Center (EOC): A location from which centralized emergency management can be performed. EOC facilities are established by an agency or jurisdiction to coordinate the overall agency or jurisdictional response and support to an emergency. Emergency Operations Plan (EOP): The plan that each jurisdiction has and maintains for responding to relevant threats and hazards that defines the emergency management organization, structure, and coordination. Essential Facilities: Facilities that are essential for maintaining the health, safety, and overall wellbeing of the public following a disaster (e.g., hospitals, police and fire department buildings, utility facilities, etc.). May also include buildings that have been designated for use as mass care facilities (e.g., schools, churches, etc.). Evacuation: Organized, phased, and supervised withdrawal, dispersal, or removal of people from dangerous or potentially dangerous areas, and their reception and care in safe areas. Exercise: Maneuver or simulated emergency condition involving planning, preparation, and execution; carried out for the purpose of testing, evaluating, planning, developing, training, and/or demonstrating emergency management systems and individual components and capabilities, to identify areas of strength and weakness for improvement of an emergency operations plan (EOP). FBO: Faith based organization. Federal: Of or pertaining to the Federal Government of the United States of America. Item 2 Attachment B - City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 65  Packet Pg. 74 of 413  42 Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA): This agency was created in 1979 to provide a single point of accountability for all Federal activities related to disaster mitigation and emergency preparedness, response, and recovery. First Responder: This term refers to individuals whose organizations specific and primary responsibility is to respond to life safety incidents. Hazard: Natural or man-made source of danger or difficulty to people or property. Hazardous Material (Hazmat): A substance or combination of substances, which, because of quantity, concentration, physical, chemical, radiological, explosive, or infectious characteristics, poses a potential danger to humans or the environment. Generally, such materials are classed as explosives and blasting agents, flammable and nonflammable gases, combustible liquids, flammable liquids and solids, oxidizers, poisons, disease-causing agents, radioactive materials, corrosive materials, and other materials including hazardous wastes. Hazard Mitigation: A cost-effective measure that will reduce the potential for damage to a facility from a disaster event. Hazard Mitigation Plan (HMP): The plan resulting from a systematic evaluation of the nature and extent of vulnerability to the effects of natural hazards, including the actions needed to minimize future vulnerability to identified hazards. HSEEP: Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program Incident: An occurrence or event, either human- caused or by natural phenomena that requires action by emergency response personnel to prevent or minimize loss of life or damage to property and/or the environment. Incident Action Plan (IAP): The plan developed at the field response level that contains objectives reflecting the overall incident strategy and specific tactical actions and supporting information for the next operational period. The plan may be oral or written. Incident Commander (IC): The individual responsible for the command of all functions at the field response level located at the ICP (Incident Command Post). Incident Command System (ICS): The nationally used standardized on-scene emergency management concept specifically designed to allow its user(s) to adopt an integrated organizational structure equal to the complexity and demands of single or multiple incidents without being hindered by jurisdictional boundaries. ICS is the combination of facilities, equipment, personnel, procedures, and communications operating within a common organizational structure, with responsibility for the management of resources to effectively accomplish stated objectives pertinent to an incident. Joint Information Center (JIC): A facility established to coordinate all incident-related public information activities. It is the central point of contact for all news media at the scene of the incident. Public information officials from all participating agencies should collocate at the JIC. Joint Information System (JIS): Integrates incident information and public affairs into a cohesive organization designed to provide consistent, coordinated, timely information during crisis or incident operations. The mission of the JIS is to provide a structure and system for developing and delivering coordinated interagency messages; developing, recommending, and executing public information plans and strategies on behalf of the IC; advising the IC concerning public affairs issues that could affect a response effort; and controlling rumors and inaccurate information that could undermine public confidence in the emergency response effort. Jurisdiction: The range or sphere of authority. Public agencies have authority at an incident related to their legal responsibilities and authority for incident mitigation. Jurisdictional authority at Item 2 Attachment B - City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 66  Packet Pg. 75 of 413  City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan 43 an incident can be political/ geographical (e.g., special district city, county, state, or federal boundary lines), or functional (e.g., police department, health department, etc.) Local Emergency: The duly proclaimed existence of conditions of disaster or of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property within the territorial limits of a county, city and county, or city, caused by such conditions as air pollution, fire, flood, storm, epidemic, riot, or earthquake or other conditions, other than conditions resulting from a labor controversy, which conditions are or are likely to be beyond the control of the services, personnel, equipment, and facilities of that political subdivision and required the combined forces of political subdivisions to combat. Logistics: Providing resources and other services to support incident management. Mitigation: Pre-event planning and actions that aim to lessen the effects of potential disaster. Mutual Aid Agreement: Written agreement between agencies and/or jurisdictions in which they agree to assist one another upon request, by furnishing personnel and equipment. Mutual Aid Region: A subdivision of Governor’s Office of Emergency Services established to assist in the coordination of Mutual Aid and other emergency operations within a geographic area of the state, consisting of two or more county (operational) areas. Sonoma County is in Mutual Aid Region II. National Incident Management System (NIMS): A system mandated by HSPD-5 that provides a consistent nationwide approach for Federal, State, local, and tribal governments; the private-sector, and nongovernmental organizations to work effectively and efficiently together to prepare for, respond to, and recover from domestic incidents, regardless of cause, size, or complexity. To provide for interoperability and compatibility among Federal, State, tribal, and local capabilities, the NIMS includes a core set of concepts, principles, and terminology. HSPD-5 identifies these as the ICS; Multi-agency Coordination Systems; training; identification and management of resources (including systems for classifying types of resources); qualification and certification; and the collection, tracking, and reporting of incident information and incident resources. National Response Framework (NRF): A plan mandated by HSPD-5 that integrates Federal domestic prevention, preparedness, response, and recovery plans into one all- discipline, all- hazards plan. NWS: National Weather Service Nongovernmental Organization (NGO): An entity with an association that is based on interests of its members, individuals, or institutions and that is not created by a government but may work cooperatively with government. Such organizations serve a public purpose, not a private benefit. Examples of NGOs include faith-based charity organizations and the American Red Cross. Office of Emergency Services: an office that coordinates emergency response and management and resource support either at the local, county, or state level. This office may also be referred to as Emergency Management Department (EMD) or Department of Emergency Management (DEM) or Office of Emergency Management (OEM). Operational Area: An intermediate level of the state emergency organization, consisting of a county and all political subdivisions within the county’s geographic borders. An operational area is defined in law (Section 8559, California Government Code) as an organization (not a jurisdiction) whose boundaries are those of a county. This organization is not necessarily a county government; it could be several cities, or a city and a county, a county government, or several county governments, willing to undertake to coordinate the flow of Mutual Aid and information within the defined area. The operational area concept is the backbone of SEMS. Item 2 Attachment B - City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 67  Packet Pg. 76 of 413  44 Plan: As used by OES, a document that describes the broad, overall jurisdictional response to potential extraordinary emergencies or disasters. Preparedness: The range of deliberate, critical tasks and activities necessary to build, sustain, and improve the operational capability to prevent, protect against, respond to, and recover from domestic incidents. Preparedness is a continuous process. Preparedness involves efforts at all levels of government and between government and private- sector and nongovernmental organizations to identify threats, determine vulnerabilities, and identify required resources. Within the NIMS, preparedness is operationally focused on establishing guidelines, protocols, and standards for planning, training and exercises, personnel qualification and certification, equipment certification, and publication management. Prevention: Actions to avoid an incident or to intervene to stop an incident from occurring. Prevention involves actions to protect lives and property. It involves applying intelligence and other information to a range of activities that may include such countermeasures as deterrence operations; heightened inspections; improved surveillance and security operations; investigations to determine the full nature and source of the threat; public health and agricultural surveillance and testing processes; immunizations, isolation, or quarantine; and as appropriate, specific law enforcement operations aimed at deterring, preempting, interdicting, or disrupting illegal activity and apprehending potential perpetrators and bringing them to justice. Private Sector: Organizations and entities that are not part of any governmental structure. It includes for-profit and not-for-profit organizations, formal and informal structures, commerce and industry, and private voluntary organizations. Public Information Officer (PIO): The individual at field or EOC level that has been delegated the authority to prepare public information releases and to interact with the media. Duties will vary depending upon the agency and SEMS level. PAFD: Palo Alto Fire Department PAPD: Palo Alto Police Department Recovery: Activities traditionally associated with providing Federal supplemental disaster recovery assistance under a Presidential major disaster declaration. These activities usually begin within days after the event and continue after the response activities cease. Recovery includes individual and public assistance programs that provide temporary housing assistance, grants and loans to eligible individuals and government entities to recovery from the effects of a disaster. Resources: Personnel and equipment available, or potentially available, for assignment to incidents or to EOCs. Resources area described by kind and type and may be used in tactical support or supervisory capacities at an incident or at EOCs. Response: Activities to address the immediate and short- term effects of an emergency or disaster. Response includes immediate actions to save lives, protect property and the environment, stabilize communities, and meet basic human needs following an incident. Based on the requirements of the situation, response assistance will be provided to an affected State under the National Response Framework using a partial activation of selected Emergency Support Functions (ESF) or full activation of all ESF to meet the needs of the situation. Risk: Potential for an unwanted outcome resulting from an incident, even, or occurrence, as determined by its likelihood and associated consequences. Special District: A unit of local government (other than a city, county, or city and county) with authority or responsibility to own, operate or maintain a project (as defined in California Code of Regulations 2900(s) for purposes of natural disaster assistance. This may include a joint Item 2 Attachment B - City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 68  Packet Pg. 77 of 413  City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan 45 powers authority established under section 6500 et seq. of the Code. Stafford Act: Robert T. Stafford disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, PL 100-707, signed into law June 23, 1988; amended the Disaster Relief Act of 1974, and the Sandy Recovery Improvement Act of 2013. Standard Operating Procedures (SOP): A set of instructions having the force of a directive, covering those features of operations that lends themselves to a definite or standardized procedure. Standard operating procedures support an annex by indicating in detail how a particular will be carried out. Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS): A system required by California Government Code for managing response to multi-agency and multi-jurisdiction emergencies in California. SEMS consists of five organizational levels that are activated as necessary: Field Response, Local Government, Operation Area, Region, and State. State of Emergency: The duly proclaimed existence of conditions of disaster or of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property within the state caused by such conditions as air pollution, fire, flood, storm, epidemic, riot, TEP: Training and Exercise Plan – a plan that outlines a schedule of emergency management and related training courses for EOC and other support staff as well as a calendar of scheduled EOC and similar exercises. THIRA: The Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment is a three-step risk assessment process that helps communities understand their risks and what they need to do to address those risks (FEMA). Threat: An indication of possible violence, harm, or danger. Tsunami: Also called a seismic sea wave. It is a large oceanic wave generated by earthquakes, submarine volcanic eruptions, or large submarine landslides in which sudden forces are applied to the water mass. Vulnerability: Physical feature or operational attribute that renders and entity open to exploitation or susceptible to a given hazard. Tetra Tech, Inc. | Emergency & Disaster Management Unit 2301 Lucien Way, Suite 120 | Maitland, FL 32751 www.tetratech.com Item 2 Attachment B - City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 69  Packet Pg. 78 of 413  Item 2 Attachment B - City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 70  Packet Pg. 79 of 413  1 Item 2 Attachment B - City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 71  Packet Pg. 80 of 413  March 31, 2025 City of Palo Alto Office of City Auditor Emergency Preparedness - Wildfire Audit Item 2 Attachment C - Emergency Preparedness - Wildfire Audit Report        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 72  Packet Pg. 81 of 413  Contents network of Baker Tilly International Ltd., the members of which are separate and independent legal entities. Baker Tilly US, LLP is a licensed CPA firm that provides assurance services to its clients. Baker Tilly Advisory Group, LP and its subsidiary entities provide tax and consulting services to their clients and are not licensed CPA firms. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................. 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 4 DETAILED ANALYSIS ..................................................................................................... 7 AUDIT RESULTS.............................................................................................................. 9 APPENDIX A MANAGEMENT RESPONSE MATRIX ......………………………………..25 Item 2 Attachment C - Emergency Preparedness - Wildfire Audit Report        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 73  Packet Pg. 82 of 413  Executive Summary Purpose of the Audit Baker Tilly Advisory Group, LP (Baker Tilly), in its capacity serving as the Office of the City Auditor (OCA) for the City of Palo Alto (the City), conducted an Emergency Preparedness – Wildfire Audit based on the approved Task Order 4.25. The objective of this audit was to determine whether the City is working to prevent wildfire and adequately prepared to respond to wildfire as part of the City’s emergency management plan. Report Highlights (Page 13) programs aimed to prevent and mitigate wildfire risks; we noted some areas for improvement including enhancing community outreach and engagement. • The City of Palo Alto Utilities Department (CPAU) has made significant investments to reduce wildfire risk: o Undergrounding distribution lines – the City is in the process of undergrounding its main distribution line in the Foothills high-risk area to reduce the potential for wildfire caused by damaged or downed lines. o Installing weather stations – to collect localized weather data to share with first responders. o Public Power Shutoff Procedure – provides guidance for when to de- energize lines when needed to reduce wildfire risk and communicating information to the public. o Formalizing Utility Infrastructure Maintenance Program – CPAU is in the process of formalizing its utility infrastructure maintenance program which will help guide and prioritize the utilities maintenance efforts. o Use of FLIR cameras – to detect electrical hotspots and areas that may require maintenance. • The City has several programs to address vegetation management and improved tracking efforts may increase compliance: o Line Clearance Program – this program is managed by the Urban Forestry division of the Public Works Department in collaboration with CPAU and ensures vegetation is cleared from electrical equipment and utility lines. OCA noted areas to improve documentation of work scheduled and performed and overall program guidance. o Property inspections in the Wildland Urban Interface (WUI) help ensure properties in high-fire danger areas are cleared of vegetation that could potentially fuel a wildfire. OCA noted areas for improved tracking and follow-up for properties that are in violation of the City’s code. • While the City has partnered with CAL FIRE and is included in Santa Clara County’s Community Wildfire Protection Plan, community involvement could Item 2 Attachment C - Emergency Preparedness - Wildfire Audit Report        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 74  Packet Pg. 83 of 413  EXECUTIVE SUMMARY wildfire resilience and promotes collaboration between residents, fire departments and other stakeholders. • Community education and outreach could be enhanced by policies and procedures to guide efforts and track and measure their effectiveness. Key Recommendations We recommend the City consider the following improvements to enhance its wildfire prevention efforts: 1. Continue efforts to underground Wildland Urban Interface (WUI) distribution infrastructure and prioritize, as appropriate, maintenance and possible replacement of the oldest utility poles should they remain in place. 2. Line Clearance policy documents should be established and or reviewed, updated and finalized (e.g. Draft Tree and Landscape Technical Manual 3. Continue efforts to better track and monitor property violations in the WUI to enhance enforcement. 4. Prioritize efforts to establish a Firewise Community including stakeholder engagement throughout the process 5. Formalize the contract with CAL FIRE to ensure service provision continues into the future. 6. Ensure wildfire education and outreach plans document coordination efforts between the Office of Emergency Services (OES), Fire and CPAU to ensure information is consistently and regularly provided to residents. (Page 15) Overall, the City has a strong emergency response plan but should consider if improvements can be made to evacuation planning, after action report recommendation implementation, and communication efforts. • The City has a comprehensive set of emergency response and wildfire plans, but should consider if evacuation plans could be enhanced and some plans may require updating and review. o Overall, OCA found that the City’s plans align with the majority of Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) guidance; however, they would be strengthened by incorporating a more comprehensive revision history and an enhanced review process to ensure that plans are regularly reviewed and updated. In addition, while the Foothills Fire Management Plan (FFMP) addresses evacuation routes and ensuring these routes remain clear for emergency personnel as well as residents for evacuation, we recommend the City consider additional planning activities based on the U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s, Planning Considerations: Evacuation and Shelter-in-Place; Guidance . Item 2 Attachment C - Emergency Preparedness - Wildfire Audit Report        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 75  Packet Pg. 84 of 413  EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • implemented a new sign-in process to improve tracking. • While the City conducts training and after-action reports (AAR) after critical incidents, efforts to track and implement resulting recommendations could be improved. • The City is enhancing its wildfire detection capabilities through the use of gas monitoring sensors deployed in the Foothills area. • The City employs several methods for communicating critical information to its residents during an emergency and should continue to explore methods to increase participation in the County’s emergency alerting system. o Based on the alert system sign-up data provided and Santa Clara County, 17% of Palo Alto residents were registered in the system in 2025. • While the City has strong relationships with their mutual aid agreement partners 1, the City does not maintain these agreements in a central repository for easy tracking and monitoring. Key Recommendations We recommend the City consider the following improvements to enhance its Wildfire response efforts: 1. The City’s emergency plans align with the majority of FEMA guidance; however, they would be strengthened by incorporating a more comprehensive revision history and an enhanced review process. The City should also review its evacuation plans and consider if plans could be enhanced by reviewing best practices in other cities such as establishing evacuation locations and sheltering agreements with neighboring communities. 2. City management should more formally track and monitor findings and recommendations identified during training exercises and in AARs of emergency incidents to ensure needed improvements are made and issues are timely resolved. 3. Continue to explore ways to increase resident registration in the County’s emergency alerting system. Opportunities may include partnering with schools, homeowner associations, and local businesses to disseminate wildfire education materials and encourage participation in City programs and the County’s emergency alert system. 4. Determine an appropriate solution for staff to more easily access, track and monitor the status of all mutual aid agreements, including active dates, renewal deadlines, and responsible contacts for updates. For example, a centralized tracking system for mutual aid agreements would provide clarity on the status of each agreement, preventing lapses in mutual aid coverage and ensuring that expired agreements are addressed promptly. 1 Mutual aid partners include Los Altos Hills, Santa Clara County, Woodside, Mountain View, and the California Department of Forestry and Fire protection. Item 2 Attachment C - Emergency Preparedness - Wildfire Audit Report        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 76  Packet Pg. 85 of 413  Introduction The objective of this audit was to determine whether the City is working to prevent wildfire and adequately prepared to respond to wildfire as part of the City’s emergency management plan. Background change, historical land management practices, human activities, and ecological shifts, all of which impact cities like Palo Alto that are situated near high-risk wildland-urban interface (WUI) zones. Climate change has intensified the state’s wildfire risk by driving higher temperatures, wind speeds, and drier conditions, which extend the fire season and increase the probability of fires. Historical land management practices, including the suppression of indigenous fire management techniques and aggressive fire suppression policies in the 20th century, have led to an accumulation of vegetative fuels. Additionally, logging practices have left denser forests prone to more intense fires. Human activities— ranging from infrastructure failures to recreational fires—are the primary sources of ignition, particularly as urban areas expand into WUI zones, increasing both the human and economic impact of fires. In response to wildfire risks, the City of Palo Alto’s Office of Emergency Services (OES), Fire Department, and City of Palo Alto Utilities (CPAU) are all actively engaged in wildfire preparedness, prevention, and response efforts, coordinating resources and community education initiatives to address these risks. The City works closely with CAL FIRE, regional partners, and neighboring cities to implement and refine emergency response plans, ensure effective evacuation routes, and conduct community outreach on wildfire preparedness. Recognizing the need for a multifaceted approach to wildfire mitigation, the City supports initiatives that promote sustainable land management practices, encourages defensible space in WUI zones, and advocates for policies to reduce human- caused ignitions. By fostering partnerships and promoting proactive wildfire safety measures, Palo Alto is dedicated to enhancing the city’s resilience against the growing threat of wildfires in California. The following table provides an overview of the City’s various planning documents related to wildfire preparedness and response, as well as their purpose and when they were last updated. Item 2 Attachment C - Emergency Preparedness - Wildfire Audit Report        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 77  Packet Pg. 86 of 413  INTRODUCTION Table 1: City Emergency Preparedness Plans Title Purpose Date Emergency Operations Plan Basic Plan (EOP) The EOP embraces the FEMA "whole community" approach. According to the EOP, the City has undergone multiple hazard analysis processes per the FEMA Comprehensive Preparedness Guide 201. The EOP also states the City actively manages training activities and allocates funding in relation to fluctuating needs, personnel turnover, and course availability. January 2016* Emergency Operations Center Manual (EOC) The EOC wildland fire response is primarily addressed through the EOC activation, the plan's emphasis extends beyond immediate response to a broader, proactive strategy. According to the EOC the City prioritizes comprehensive hazard analysis and ongoing training aligned with state and national standards such as ICS, SEMS, and NIMS. July 2021 Wildland Urban Interface (WUI) Fire Response An annex to Palo Alto’s EOP, focusing on WUI fire response. It aligns with state and national emergency management systems (SEMS and NIMS). The primary goals are to guide initial response planning, support the development of incident plans, and ensure coordinated interagency actions. August 2023 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP) The LHMP is part of the larger Santa Clara Operational Area Hazard Mitigation Plan and has a Palo Alto Annex. The LHMP details potential hazards for Palo Alto and provides recommended action on the hazards. October 2024 Foothills Fire Management Plan (FFMP) The FFMP focuses on mitigating wildfire risks in the Foothills area through targeted vegetation management and strategic planning. The document highlights accomplishments since the initial 2009 plan, including improved evacuation routes, prescribed burns, and reduced fire hazards near critical infrastructure. The update emphasizes ongoing efforts like annual maintenance of treated areas, collaboration with regional agencies, and leveraging funding opportunities. The plan includes post-treatment fire behavior analysis, showcasing how vegetation management efforts have improved emergency access and reduced the likelihood of wildfire spread. January 2017 CPAU Wildfire Mitigation Plan caused by electric lines and infrastructure. Key strategies include undergrounding power lines in high-risk areas, such as the Foothills region, updating Public Safety Power Shutoff (PSPS) protocols, enhanced vegetation management, and the use of advanced technologies like non-expulsion fuses and remote deenergization switches. The plan emphasizes collaboration with other departments, such as Fire and Urban Forestry, to ensure comprehensive wildfire prevention efforts. Regular inspections, vegetation clearance exceeding regulatory standards, and continuous monitoring are highlighted as critical components. The plan includes performance metrics to track the effectiveness of mitigation efforts, ensuring proactive adjustments where needed. June 2024 Santa Clara County Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) The Santa Clara County CWPP aims to reduce wildfire risk by establishing cooperative relationships with federal, state and local stakeholders before an event occurs and developing pre-attack plans to enhance firefighter readiness and safety. The CWPP includes annexes which offer information and project recommendations specific to geographical planning areas. The City of Palo Alto is included as an annex. Communities are currently updating their annex plans. August 2016 Item 2 Attachment C - Emergency Preparedness - Wildfire Audit Report        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 78  Packet Pg. 87 of 413  INTRODUCTION 2 Government auditing standards require an external peer review at least once every three (3) years. The last peer review of the Palo Alto Office of the City Auditor was conducted in 2017. The Palo Alto City Council approved a contract with Baker Tilly U.S., LLP for internal audit services for October 2020 through June 2022 with an extension through June 2025. City Council appointed Kate Murdock, Audit Manager in Baker Tilly’s Risk Advisory practice, as City Auditor in May 2024. As a result of transitions in the Audit Office and peer review delays due to the COVID pandemic, an external peer review is targeted for 2025. It should be noted that Baker Tilly’s most recent firmwide peer review was completed in October 2021 with a rating of “Pass”. The scope of that peer review includes projects completed under government auditing standards. A report on the next firmwide peer review should be available later in 2024. Scope The OCA evaluated the City’s plans and efforts related to wildfire prevention and preparedness by assessing related activities and internal controls from FY2023 through FY2024 in the OES, Fire Department, and CPAU. Methodology • Interviewed the appropriate individuals to understand the roles and responsibilities, processes, and controls related to Emergency Preparedness (Wildfire) activities. • Analyzed current policies and procedures (P&P) as well as FEMA and CAL FIRE standards and best practices. • Evaluated relevant documents such as City of Palo Alto EOC Manual, CPAU Wildfire Mitigation Plan, FFMP, and various other plans • Gathered information and reports to assess if current City plans are sufficient in preventing and responding to wildfire risks. • Inquired with OES departments for clarification and understanding of emergency plans. • Completed audit report of findings, conclusions, and recommendations based on the supporting evidence gathered Compliance Statement accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards, except for the requirement of an external peer review 2. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain sufficient, appropriate evidence to provide a reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions based on our audit objectives. We believe that the evidence obtained provides a reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions based on our audit objectives. Organizational Strengths demonstrated by the Emergency Preparedness team. We also observed their willingness to provide and receive feedback regarding the emergency preparedness process, which includes their receptiveness to process improvements. The OCA greatly appreciates the support of the Fire Department, Office of Emergency Services, City Manager’s Office, and City of Palo Alto Utilities Department in conducting this audit. Thank you! Item 2 Attachment C - Emergency Preparedness - Wildfire Audit Report        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 79  Packet Pg. 88 of 413  DETAILED ANALYSIS Detailed Analysis Emergency Preparedness & Response In its publication, Developing and Maintaining Emergency Operations Plans, FEMA highlights five key areas for communities to address related to Emergency Preparedness. These include: • Prevention – reducing risk from human-caused incidents • Protection – reducing or eliminating the threat to people and critical infrastructure • Response – actions taken in the immediate aftermath of an incident • Recovery – short-term and long-term efforts for rebuilding and revitalizing the affected community • Mitigation – structural and non-structural approaches to eliminating or limiting the hazards presence This audit report focuses on the first three areas as they relate to the audit objectives, but recognizes the City has efforts related to recovery and mitigation of wildfire risks too. Shared Community Preparedness themes Additional best practice information comes from the National Incident Management System (NIMS) and CAL FIRE. NIMS offers guidance on resource management, mutual aid, and communication during emergency events. CAL FIRE provides guidance and best practices for wildfire events specific to Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZ), further described below. Guidance from FEMA, NIMS, and CAL FIRE all emphasize the importance of the following principles in preparing communities for emergencies including wildfires. Common themes include: • Community Engagement: Public education and participation are key to ensuring communities are informed and involved. • Response Coordination: Implementing reliable policies for consistent response across agencies and stakeholders is key to NIMS ICS framework and mutual aid strategies with FEMA’s planning and CAL FIRE’s interagency collaboration. • Training and Communication: Regular drills and clear communication protocols are critical to ensure preparedness and efficiency during emergencies. FEMA offers additional guidance related to wildfire emergency preparedness. FEMA's best practices, as highlighted in their publication Developing and Maintaining Emergency Operations Plans. These best practices include: • Risk Assessment and Planning: Conducting thorough risk assessments to identify potential wildfire hazards and developing comprehensive emergency plans that address these risks. Item 2 Attachment C - Emergency Preparedness - Wildfire Audit Report        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 80  Packet Pg. 89 of 413  DETAILED ANALYSIS •Public Information and Warning information is provided to the public about wildfire risks, evacuation orders, and safety measures. NIMS offers important recommendations for departments handling wildfire emergencies. These best practices include: • Communication and Information Management: Implementing reliable communication systems and protocols to ensure timely and accurate information sharing during wildfire emergencies. • Incident Command System (ICS): Utilizing the ICS to coordinate response efforts and manage resources effectively during wildfires. CAL FIRE offers comprehensive guidance related to wildfire emergency preparedness. CAL FIRE's best practices provide essential recommendations for departments handling wildfire emergencies. These best practices include: • Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZ): Identifying and mapping areas with varying degrees of fire hazard severity to prioritize resources and mitigation efforts. • Evacuation Planning: Developing and regularly updating evacuation plans to ensure that residents can safely and efficiently evacuate in the event of wildfire. Item 2 Attachment C - Emergency Preparedness - Wildfire Audit Report        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 81  Packet Pg. 90 of 413  Audit Results City Efforts to Prevent and Protect from Wildfire the City has made significant investments in and has strong programs aimed to prevent and mitigate wildfire risks; we noted some areas for improvement including enhancing community outreach and engagement. neighboring jurisdictions to prevent and protect the City and its residents from the risk of wildfire. These risk areas include utility infrastructure maintenance, vegetation management, and community outreach and education. CPAU has made significant investments to reduce wildfire risk CPAU provides electricity to the entire Palo Alto service area including the Foothills/Wildland Urban Interface (WUI) Area and prepares and submits a Wildfire Mitigation Plan to the California Wildfire Safety Advisory Board each year. CPAU has invested in several projects to reduce wildfire risk including undergrounding distribution lines and installing weather stations. The Utility has also developed a Public Safety Power Shutoff (PSPS) procedure. Undergrounding Distribution Lines CPAU began the Foothills project to underground distribution lines in the Foothills high-risk area in 2021. This project, which will be completed in summer 2025, includes the undergrounding of approximately 49,200 feet of distribution lines. The project includes undergrounding the main 12470- voltage distribution line as well as fiber optic cable. Utility distribution lines pose a significant wildfire risk and undergrounding these lines largely eliminates this threat as lines cannot be damaged by trees or high winds which can spark fires by falling on vegetation below. Based on information provided by CPAU, much of the overhead infrastructure within the Wildland Urban Interface (WUI), designated as the High Fire Threat Tier 2 zone, encompassing all city areas west of Highway 280, known as the "Foothills Area" will be undergrounded. As part of City’s wildfire mitigation strategy, CPAU has prioritized the undergrounding of its overhead infrastructure in the WUI/Foothills Tier 2 area. The Foothill Fire Mitigation Project includes the following key activities: • Substructure construction, including the installation of boxes and pad-mounted equipment • Cable pulling and line energization • Decommissioning of overhead poles and equipment According to CPAU, the Foothill Fire Mitigation Project is estimated to underground 182 of the total of 203 poles and overhead lines in the high-risk area. The estimated 21 remaining poles require additional coordination with pole attachers, and customers prior to either undergrounding or implementation of additional fire hardening measures. As of March 2025, CPAU management reported it has completely de-energized and undergrounded electric lines for 69 of the 182 poles, significantly reducing the wildfire risk associated with overhead power lines in the area. Item 2 Attachment C - Emergency Preparedness - Wildfire Audit Report        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 82  Packet Pg. 91 of 413  3 Red Flag Warning removed as part of the initial Foothill Fire Mitigation Project. Table 2: Age of Remaining Poles in WUI *Analysis conducted by the OCA in March 2025 The OCA saw a range of estimates on how long utility poles can last, anywhere from 35 to 75+ years depending on conditions and maintenance, which suggests CPAU should prioritize maintenance and possible replacement of the oldest poles should they remain in place. Additionally, CPAU is implementing a multi-year Grid Modernization initiative that will enhance grid resiliency and reliability of the electric distribution system by replacing poles, transformers, aerial wires, some cabinets and underground substructure. The initiative also includes upgrades to two of their substations, with a target completion by 2032. Weather Station Installation CPAU installed weather stations in the Foothills area and at the Utility Control Center to collect localized weather data which is shared with first- responder departments to determine if any actions are needed due to conditions. The Utility also monitors regional conditions and receives red flag warnings which signal when fire conditions are heightened 3. Public Safety Power Shutoff Procedure CPAU has a Public Safety Power Shutoff procedure which provides Item 2 Attachment C - Emergency Preparedness - Wildfire Audit Report        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 83  Packet Pg. 92 of 413  4 California Public Resources Code Section 4293 Residents in the Foothills area are notified via email when de-energization is anticipated and are typically provided with dates and shutoff times. Forward Looking Infrared (FLIR) Cameras In addition to visual inspections, CPAU utilizes FLIR Cameras which are used to detect hotspots where electrical equipment could be overheating and treat areas before they become a problem. This use of technology helps enable the City to proactively address maintenance issues. The City has several programs to address vegetation management and improved tracking of efforts may increase compliance Wildfires and their spread are dependent on several conditions, such as fuel load or the accumulation of vegetation, as well as weather conditions which determine their severity. The City has several programs and resources dedicated to managing vegetation including resident assistance programs. These programs include: • Line Clearance Program • Right Tree Right Place • Property Inspections in the Wildland Urban Interface • Santa Clara Fire Safe Council CAL FIRE Line Clearance Program The City’s Line Clearance Program ensures vegetation is cleared from electrical equipment and utility lines, patrol to ensure access roads to facilities remain clear, and right-of-way clearing. The Program, typically completed via a contract with the Fire Safe Council (FSC), is managed by the operations division of the Public Works Department in the absence of a contract with FSC and in collaboration with CPAU. The City’s aim is to maintain a 10-foot clearance from trees in the Foothills area which is in accordance with California law 4 and the California Public Utilities Commission. According to the City’s Tree Management Plan and interviews with staff, the entirety of the Foothills area is inspected and cleared each year in the Spring with a follow-up inspection conducted in the fall. Staff stated that they have not experienced any resource constraints and major tree trimming occurs every 3 to 4 years. Compliance is maintained in intervening years through the biannual inspections and subsequent tree trimming. Tree trimming activities are tracked using a software program called TreeKeeper. Staff reported they do not currently track inspections but are working on how to capture them as a work record in TreeKeeper. The table below shows how many trees were trimmed in the Foothills area from 2021 to 2024. Item 2 Attachment C - Emergency Preparedness - Wildfire Audit Report        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 84  Packet Pg. 93 of 413  Table 3: Number of Trees Trimmed in the Foothills Area from 2021 to 2024* *Data analysis conducted by OCA in October 2024 Urban Forestry staff provided the OCA with two guiding documents: Urban Forest Master Plan and Draft Tree and Landscape Technical Manual. While the Urban Forest Master Plan provides overall guidance and includes information on the Line Clearance Program, the Draft Tree and Landscape Technical Manual provides information on what equipment and what environmental conditions to consider for conducting tree trimming to reduce the risk of ignition due to maintenance activities. Staff said that the Manual is intended as a supporting document to the City’s tree ordinance and its Fire- Safe Landscapes section provides residents with tree and landscaping guidance in support of creating a defensible space around one’s home against wildfire risk. The OCA noted that this draft manual did not appear to be complete. For example, there were imbedded notes for staff to determine seasonal criteria for tree trimming. Overall, while these documents provide good information, they require updating, completion, and dissemination. Right Tree Right Place Program The Right Tree Right Place Program provides resources for residents with trees that conflict with power lines. The program includes removing trees at no cost, reimbursement for stump removal and reimbursement for replacing trees with appropriate tree alternatives. Property Inspections in the Wildland Urban Interface The City’s Fire Marshal oversees fire safety inspections of businesses and properties. These inspections ensure businesses and residents comply with California Fire Code and keep properties clear of fuel that could increase the risk of wildfire. When a property is found in violation of the Fire Code, they are issued a “Notice of Violation” and typically given a month to make Item 2 Attachment C - Emergency Preparedness - Wildfire Audit Report        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 85  Packet Pg. 94 of 413  reinspection fees incurred by the City. The City also adopts a Weed Nuisance Abatement resolution annually and works in coordination with the County of Santa Clara to address properties with weeds that are deemed a nuisance and/or fire hazard. Based on reports analyzed by the OCA, in 2023 there were 133 homes in Palo Alto’s Wildland Urban Interface (WUI). Inspections were conducted for 104 of these homes and 86 of these passed the first inspection. However, it appears that only 3 homes were reinspected and 26 homes had outstanding violations at year-end. Management stated that this report needs to be cleaned up and there may be less than 133 properties in the Palo Alto WUI. In 2024, through the third quarter of the year, the City had performed 138 inspections in the WUI. The City recently began using a new system to track fire inspections and management reported they are working with the City’s Information Technology Department to develop more robust reporting capabilities so the Fire Marshal can more easily track metrics on how many violations have been issued, how many have been corrected, how many referred to the fire prevention bureau, etc. With improved data tracking and reporting capabilities, the City will be able to better and timelier follow-up with businesses and residents who are not in compliance with the Fire Code and ensure wildfire risk is reduced. Santa Clara Fire Safe Council The City has a short-term contract with Santa Clara Fire Safe Council to help with roadside clearance work, public education, and pursuing grant opportunities. Staff stated that the City has introduced the Firewise program in the past through the Fire Safe Council, but the program has not had much traction and Palo Alto does not currently have a Firewise Community, a program that must stem from the impacted residents. The Firewise USA® program offers a structured approach for communities to enhance their wildfire resilience and promotes collaboration between residents, fire departments and other stakeholders. Establishing a Firewise program is also recommended for Palo Alto in the Santa Clara County Community Wildfire Protection Plan. A core principle in Community Wildfire Protection Plans is to include as many agency representatives and resident leaders in the planning process as possible. The first goal in FEMA’s Creating a Community Wildfire Protection Plan is to “Create fire-adapted communities” which includes pursuing Firewise site recognition, providing information to the community about fire safety, and reducing risks for home ignition. As stated in the CWPP, the City should strongly consider working with the local Foothills community to attain and maintain Firewise USA recognition. Item 2 Attachment C - Emergency Preparedness - Wildfire Audit Report        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 86  Packet Pg. 95 of 413  CAL FIRE has provided assistance to the City over the past couple of years in clearing out vegetation in the Foothills area and including some areas with Eucalyptus trees. The City does not currently have a formal contract with CAL FIRE for these services, however, this is something they should consider ensuring for service provision in the future. Community Education and Outreach could be improved. While the City has implemented various programs and trainings to promote the community's wildfire awareness and prevention efforts, there is room for improvement. Currently, there is no comprehensive policy or set of requirements established for the City's overall community outreach and education efforts to ensure sufficient information and education are provided to the residents for wildfire prevention and emergency preparedness. As a result, the City's overall community outreach and education efforts are not tracked to ensure goals are met. Limited efforts to measure education and outreach effectiveness According to management, community outreach and education responsibilities are shared between Fire Prevention and OES and the citywide communications team. Staff said efforts were tracked in the past, but they lost the position responsible for this activity and there are currently no P&P in place to guide the provision or tracking of education and outreach efforts. Staff indicated that recent efforts have not been well attended by residents, making it difficult to assess how engaged and prepared the community is to prevent and respond to wildfires. CPAU also performs community education and outreach activities and includes wildfire information as part of its regular communications with customers. CPAU employs several methods for communicating with customers including utility bill inserts, email newsletter, direct mail, social media, and the CPAU website. While staff provided several examples of wildfire education efforts, they indicated there is no policy or plan outlining expectations or responsibilities for outreach and education efforts, how often they should be performed and/or how to determine what information gets shared. In accordance with State law, the Utility Wildfire Management Plan is presented annually in a public meeting to the Utilities Advisory Commission. Developing a guiding document with appropriate goals and targets could help ensure the utility consistently communicates with residents and could aid in tracking the effectiveness of these efforts over time. Some residents report a lack of wildfire preparedness education and a desire for more information related to City prevention efforts The City of Palo Alto’s Community Survey results from 2023 support the observations above that the City could improve outreach efforts to community members. When asked about the quality of Palo Alto’s fire prevention and education services, 37% of respondents in 2023 answered “don’t know”, 18% answered “fair” or “poor”, and 45% answered “good” or Item 2 Attachment C - Emergency Preparedness - Wildfire Audit Report        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 87  Packet Pg. 96 of 413  nor is the sample size specific to the WUI region. In 2022, CPAU’s study of Key Account Customers found that 40% indicated being “very concerned” with future wildfires and a 2023 Residential Electric Customer Satisfaction Study reported that the second most desired topic of information (44%) is “what CPAU is doing to prepare for emergencies like wildfires and earthquakes.” The City’s Fire Department conducts annual property inspections in the WUI to detect dangerous conditions that could contribute to or exacerbate wildfire risk. As noted above, our analysis of the fire inspection log from 2023 shows that 26 out of an approximate 133 homes in the WUI had outstanding violations and in 2024 more than 74 homes had violations. Annually doorhangers are provided to residents in this area. Additional measures such as education, outreach, and fines may help to reduce violations by informing residents of the dangers of excess vegetation and any maintenance or prevention related resources available to them. The Fire Department does maintain an online wildfire preparedness resource for community members: https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/Departments/Fire/Prepare-For-Wildfire- READY-SET-GO. Recommendation Wildfire prevention efforts: 1. Continue efforts to underground WUI distribution infrastructure and prioritize, as appropriate, maintenance and possible replacement of the oldest poles should they remain in place. 2. Line Clearance policy documents should be established and or reviewed, updated and finalized (e.g. Draft Tree and Landscape Technical Manual) 3. Continue efforts to better track and monitor property violations in the WUI to enhance enforcement. 4. Prioritize efforts to establish a Firewise Community including stakeholder engagement throughout the process 5. Formalize the contract with CAL FIRE to ensure service provision continues into the future. 6. Ensure wildfire education and outreach plans document coordination efforts between OES, Fire and CPAU to ensure information is consistently and regularly provided to residents. Management Response Please see appendix for responses. Item 2 Attachment C - Emergency Preparedness - Wildfire Audit Report        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 88  Packet Pg. 97 of 413  City Wildfire Response Plans Overall, the City has a strong emergency response plan but should consider if improvements could be made to evacuation planning, after action report recommendation implementation, and communication efforts. mitigating wildfire risks by coordinating closely across its own departments— such as the OES, Fire Department, CPAU, and Public Works—and with neighboring jurisdictions. These risk areas include Planning, Training, Detection, Communication, and Resources. The City has a comprehensive set of emergency response and wildfire plans, but the City should consider if evacuation plans could be enhanced and some plans may require updating and review The City has several plans that all work in conjunction with each other to ensure the City is prepared to response to various disasters and hazardous conditions. In addition to internal plans, the City is part of Santa Clara County’s Community Wildfire Protection Plan. We discuss several of the plans guiding the City’s response approach, below. The City has 6 plans related to wildfire. • Overarching Emergency Operation Plans (EOP) which contains the annexes Emergency Operations Center Manual (EOC), • Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP), • Foothills Fire Management Plan (FFMP), • Wildland Urban Interface Fire Response (WUI), and • CPAU Wildfire Mitigation, which is a wildfire plan for the City Utilities Department. • The EOP adopted by city council on January 11, 2016, states that it follows FEMA's "whole community" approach. The EOP in general follows the format laid out by FEMA. The revision history and certification of biennial review on the EOP are blank both on the EOP provided to auditor and on the City website, indicating that the plan has not been updated or reviewed in 8 years. The distribution section of the EOP does not adhere to FEMA's recommended format, which specifies that this section should be presented as a list. Management has identified that the EOP is currently undergoing review and update in 2025. In the EOC, wildland fire response is primarily addressed through the EOC activation, the plan's emphasis extends beyond immediate response to a broader, proactive strategy. According to the EOC, the City prioritizes comprehensive hazard analysis and ongoing training aligned with state and national standards such as ICS, SEMS, and NIMS. The LHMP is part of the larger Santa Clara Operational Area Hazard Mitigation Plan and has a Palo Alto Annex. The LHMP details potential hazards for Palo Alto and provides recommended actions to prepare for these hazards. This plan was recently adopted by the City Council in Item 2 Attachment C - Emergency Preparedness - Wildfire Audit Report        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 89  Packet Pg. 98 of 413  The FFMP for Palo Alto focuses on mitigating wildfire risks in the Foothills area through targeted vegetation management and strategic planning. The document highlights accomplishments since the initial 2009 plan, including improved evacuation routes, prescribed burns, and reduced fire hazards near critical infrastructure. The update emphasizes ongoing efforts like annual maintenance of treated areas, collaboration with regional agencies, and leveraging funding opportunities. The plan includes post-treatment fire behavior analysis, showcasing how vegetation management efforts have improved emergency access and reduced the likelihood of wildfire spread. There is a monthly meeting with OES, CSD Open Space Division, Fire Marshal’s Office, Public Works Operations, and Utilities Engineering to address and discuss current issues within the FFMP. The City is currently in the process of updating this plan. The WUI focuses on WUI fire response and provides a concept of operations in the development of an effective and coordinated response to a significant wildland urban interface (WUI) Fire. This provides direction for city departments, community groups, and allied stakeholders ensuring interagency coordination in accordance with the City’s EOP, the California Emergency Services Act, the Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS), and the National Incident Management System (NIMS). The CPAU Wildfire Mitigation plan focuses on minimizing the risk of wildfires caused by electric lines and infrastructure. Key strategies include undergrounding power lines in high-risk areas, such as the Foothills region, enhanced vegetation management, and the use of advanced technologies like non-expulsion fuses and remote deenergization switches. The plan emphasizes collaboration with other city departments, such as the Fire Department and Urban Forestry, to ensure comprehensive wildfire prevention efforts. Regular inspections, vegetation clearance exceeding regulatory standards, and continuous monitoring are highlighted as critical components. The plan also includes a performance metrics framework to track the effectiveness of these mitigation efforts, ensuring proactive adjustments where needed. Areas for Improvement Overall, OCA found that the City’s plans align with the majority of FEMA guidance; however, they would be strengthened by incorporating a more comprehensive revision history and an enhanced review process to ensure that plans are regularly reviewed and updated. In addition, while the FFMP addresses evacuation routes and ensuring these routes remain clear for emergency personnel as well as residents for evacuation, we recommend the City consider the following enhancements based on Homeland Security’s, Planning Considerations: Evacuation and Shelter-in-Place; Guidance for State, Local, Tribal, and Territorial Partners, July 2019. This guidance highlights the following responsibilities for local jurisdictions: • Setting clear expectations for whole community partners through education, training and information sessions, Item 2 Attachment C - Emergency Preparedness - Wildfire Audit Report        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 90  Packet Pg. 99 of 413  • the community, • Identify evacuation shelters within the community and in other communities working with those neighboring communities to establish notification and operational procedures, • Create pre-approved accessible messaging for rapid distribution regarding incident and shelter in place or evacuation instructions, • Have a continuity plan to help maintain response operations if interrupted, and • Provide real-time mapping and navigation routing systems through Geographic Information System (GIS). Homeland Security’s guide also highlights key lessons from past wildfire emergencies that occurred in Los Angeles County, CA and Larimer County, Colorado: • Need for increased coordination for quicker incorporation of GIS data into analysis • Identification of the safest evacuation routes combined with the use of multiple forms of communication to keep residents informed regarding timing and location of evacuated areas. • Use of a tiered evacuation approach o First, direct residents out of an immediate impact zone to an evacuation point, out of danger, where additional information is provided, o Second, if the danger is prolonged, direct residents from the evacuation point to an evacuation center where water, food and power resources are available to charge mobile devices, and o Third, if overnight or multi-day evacuation is necessary, direct residents to shelters in nearby communities. Training The City monitors training requirements and compliance and recently implemented a new sign-in process to improve tracking Fire, OES, and Police all serve critical functions in emergency response with different training requirements depending on their roles and responsibilities. In terms of wildfire response training, the Fire Department provides wildfire training through modules provided by Vector Solutions as part of an annual fire safety refresher course, RT-130 which is required per the National Wildfire Coordinating Group (NWCG) for designated positions for all personnel assigned with Fireline duties. The training is completed before the start of the Wildland season which typically runs from May to November but can vary from year to year. A new QR check-in system may have resulted in Item 2 Attachment C - Emergency Preparedness - Wildfire Audit Report        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 91  Packet Pg. 100 of 413  as of the writing of this report. There was a total of 77 employees signed up and as of August 29th, 2024, 71 had completed the required training. Out of the 6 who had not completed the training, five were due to workers’ comp or medical issues. Management was unable to provide an explanation of why the remaining employee’s training was not completed but noted that the individual received follow-up training to ensure understanding of training requirements and protocols. Management stated that a new check-in system is now in place and will help the City more easily track training compliance in the future. The OES training primarily covers critical incident response, with minimal emphasis on wildfires. Finally, the Police Department does not have specific wildfire training. Instead, they focus on support roles during such incidents, including using police speakers for warnings, directing traffic, and ensuring clear roads. After Action Reports (AAR) According to The National Wildfire Coordinating Group (NWCG) AARs are essential for wildland firefighters to learn from mistakes and capitalize on successes. The objective of the AAR is to immediately identify these successes and failures. Once they have been recognized, further exploration allows the team to perfect its skills and be better prepared for future endeavors. NWCG is a partnership of federal, state, tribal, and local wildfire management agencies that work together to establish standardized practices for wildland fire operations in the United States, its primary goal is to enhance efficiency, safety, and effectiveness in wildland fire management and response. The NWCG develops training programs, operational guides, and policy frameworks to ensure consistent and coordinated wildfire management across jurisdictions. It also serves as a central resource for promoting best practices, improving interagency collaboration, and supporting the professional development of fire personnel. While the City conducts training and AARs after critical incidents, efforts to track and implement resulting recommendations could be improved All the departments come together to engage in tabletop exercises for training purposes. Departments also work together after critical emergency incidents to conduct AARs to report their successes and improvement opportunities. While some AAR recommendations have been implemented others have not and staff said they do not formally track and monitor the implementation of recommendations. Areas of improvement noted in training exercises and in AARs cover various areas such as communication, recovery and proper use of PPE. Item 2 Attachment C - Emergency Preparedness - Wildfire Audit Report        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 92  Packet Pg. 101 of 413  Training Exercises 2024 XSC Readiness Drill A drill hosted by the County of Santa Clara to provide pre-incident training on bulldozer, hand crew, and helicopter operations during a wildfire. This event was attended by county-wide OES departments. Areas of improvement included: • Creating clarity around the communications center and coordinating the process and flow of mutual aid initial attack orders. Vulcan Forge Tabletop Exercise The City of Palo Alto Vulcan Forge Tabletop Exercise was intended to discuss and validate existing procedures. The drill provided an opportunity for City staff to exercise their role and gain a greater understanding of the processes and procedures that will occur during wildfire response. Areas of improvement included: • The WUI ConOps is lacking specific procedures to reach those with limited English proficiency or for people with disabilities, and others with access and functional needs (DAFN) • Participants didn’t appear to know how best to alert residents who were experiencing power outages • The WUI ConOps does not have a procedure for approving PIO to disseminate to the public • Define terms such as “mass care” vs. “sheltering” to create clear understanding of evaluation points, centers, shelters, and the like • Establish evacuation center and sheltering operation criteria, P&P and train appropriate staff • Current plans lack sufficient detail on recovery and relief efforts • OES needs to create P&P for re-entry and re-population After Action Reports PAFD AAR Dish Fire A fire of unknown origin started near the Stanford Hiking Dish Trail and the PAFD responded to put out the fire. The fire was in an area of the dish hiking trail that’s nearest the intersection of lower Reservoir Road and the Stanford Hiking Dish Trail with the closest gate access being the Gerona Gate. Areas of improvement included: • There was a delay in dispatching mutual aid and additional hands-on training was requested • Proper PPE must always be worn when responding OCA’s analysis of training exercise notes and AARs found areas of improvement are often identified with suggestions for process Item 2 Attachment C - Emergency Preparedness - Wildfire Audit Report        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 93  Packet Pg. 102 of 413  5 https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/Departments/Emergency-Services/Emergency-Preparedness 6 https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/Departments/Fire/Prepare-For-Wildfire-READY-SET-GO monitor these findings and recommendations to better determine if they should be implemented, what resources may be needed, and to establish an appropriate timeline for implementation. The City is enhancing its wildfire detection capabilities through the use of gas monitoring sensors deployed in the Foothills area Detection is crucial in wildfire emergencies because it enables early response, reducing the spread and potential damage of fires by allowing for quicker containment efforts. Early detection systems, such as remote sensors and aerial surveillance, are vital for protecting communities and natural resources, as they help agencies mitigate risks before fires escalate to dangerous levels. The City recently set up N5 Sensors which are an advanced gas monitoring system designed to provide early alerts in the event of a wildfire. In a collaborative program, the City is partnering with Stanford and Woodside, with Stanford purchasing 25 N5 sensors and receiving an additional 25 at no cost. Of these, Palo Alto will receive 12 sensors, while Woodside will receive 13. Each city will cover its own data expenses, estimated at $22,000 per city for the first two years. Palo Alto received a grant from the Department of Homeland Security to assist with the expenses. The Fire Safe Council will handle the sensor installation and program management. Although N5 Sensors will not provide complete coverage across all areas, they are strategically positioned to enhance early warning capabilities in high-risk zones. Additionally, the City has explored the use of drones for monitoring, but concerns over privacy, public perception, and restrictive municipal codes have made their approval challenging. Communication The City employs several methods for communicating critical information to its residents during an emergency and should continue to explore methods to increase participation in the County’s emergency alerting system The City has established multiple communication channels such as the City’s website, news releases, social media, and radio announcements to remind residents of wildfire season and keep them informed of the City’s events and emergency notifications. City web pages dedicated to general emergency preparedness 5 and wildfire prevention include CAL FIRE’s Ready-Set-Go 6 video, Palo Alto Wildfire Planning Map, evacuation information, a link to sign up for Santa Clara County’s alerting system, and other resources. Palo Alto utilizes Everbridge, the mass notification system used throughout Item 2 Attachment C - Emergency Preparedness - Wildfire Audit Report        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 94  Packet Pg. 103 of 413  Under California’s emergency management structure, each county operates as an "Operational Area," giving it independent authority and responsibility for issuing alerts and warnings within its jurisdiction. Santa Clara County has been using Everbridge for several years, with trained personnel across jurisdictions, including staff from Palo Alto’s OES and Police dispatch. Everbridge is Palo Alto’s primary tool for sending mass alerts in wildfire situations. There are two main response scenarios: First, if a fire breaks out within Palo Alto’s jurisdiction, OES will issue an immediate alert after assessing the fire's location and direction. Second, if a fire starts outside the area but moves toward Palo Alto, they monitor and notify residents as needed. Residents can "opt in" to receive these alerts by registering at alertscc.org. Additionally, Everbridge includes an "all records" list, which contains duplicates, and includes data from their reverse 911, purchased cell phone records, white and yellow pages, and data from the prior system, Blackboard. However, this “all records” list contains duplicates making it difficult to determine the total number of residents signed up for the service. For example, an individual might have their information listed in all records noted above and each record lists them as a separate contact. Based on the alert system sign-up data provided by Santa Clara County, the percentage of Palo Alto residents signed up for alerts increased from 15% in 2023 and 2024 to 17% in 2025. Participation among other Santa Clara County cities in 2025 ranges from 7% to 29%. Some cities may have more or less of their population occupying WUI areas which may account for some of the differences in emergency alert adoption. The OCA recommends the City continue to explore ways to increase resident participation in this program since it is the City’s primary communication tool for reaching residents in an emergency. Resources The City has seven fire stations. Six fire stations are staffed full-time and the seventh station provides seasonal coverage in the foothills region during high-fire danger months. This seventh station is staffed through an interlocal agreement with Losa Altos Hills and Santa Clara County which specifies a rotational schedule to ensure coverage. Mutual aid agreements are essential in wildfire management, enabling communities to combine resources, expertise, and personnel across jurisdictions for a more effective and rapid response to large-scale fires. Wildfires spread quickly and can overwhelm local resources, making support from neighboring cities, counties, and state agencies critical for containment and suppression. These agreements establish protocols for communication, resource sharing, and logistical coordination, which helps reduce response times and enhances overall operational efficiency. FEMA and CAL FIRE emphasize that such partnerships strengthen resilience by ensuring that participating agencies are prepared to respond cohesively to the complex challenges of wildfire emergencies. Item 2 Attachment C - Emergency Preparedness - Wildfire Audit Report        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 95  Packet Pg. 104 of 413  Recommendation partners, the City does not maintain these agreements in a central repository for easy tracking and monitoring Palo Alto has 5 mutual aid agreements for wildfire response, though some require updates for ongoing effectiveness. The Station 8 agreement remains active, providing 24/7 monitoring during wildfire season, while the Mutual Threat Zone operating plan with CAL FIRE establishes guidelines for resource usage and remains in force until a 30-day termination notice is issued. Additionally, the agreement among Palo Alto, Santa Clara County, and Los Altos Hills ensures the availability of nearby resources for emergencies, continuing unless ended by a 30-day notice. The agreement with Woodside, which expired sometime in 2019 had no specified end date, according to the Deputy Fire Chief negotiations for a new contract are currently underway. The mutual aid agreement with Mountain View is also expired, though still honored by both cities. The OCA noted that these agreements are not kept in a central repository which may make it difficult to track and monitor the status of the agreements. We recommend the City consider the following improvements to enhance its Wildfire response efforts: 1. The City’s emergency plans align with the majority of FEMA guidance; however, they would be strengthened by incorporating a more comprehensive revision history and an enhanced review process. The City should also review its evacuation plans and consider if plans could be enhanced by reviewing best practices in other cities such as establishing evacuation locations and sheltering agreements with neighboring communities. 2. City management should more formally track and monitor findings and recommendations identified during training exercises and in AARs of emergency incidents to ensure needed improvements are made and issues are timely resolved. 3. Continue to explore ways to increase resident registration in the County’s emergency alerting system. Opportunities may include partnering with schools, homeowner associations, and local businesses to disseminate wildfire education materials and encourage participation in City programs and the County’s emergency alert system. 4. Determine an appropriate solution for staff to more easily access, track and monitor the status of all mutual aid agreements, including active dates, renewal deadlines, and responsible contacts for updates. For example, a centralized tracking system for mutual aid agreements would provide clarity on the status of each agreement, preventing lapses in mutual aid coverage and ensuring that expired agreements are addressed promptly. Item 2 Attachment C - Emergency Preparedness - Wildfire Audit Report        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 96  Packet Pg. 105 of 413  7 CPAU contracts with a third-party vendor to conduct compliance inspections to ensure utility poles and equipment are well maintained. Visual inspections are conducted annually and a detailed inspection every five years. Every ten years, the vendor performs an “intrusive inspection” which can include drilling into the poles to determine their condition. Lines and poles are rated using a 3-point scale from P1 (most serious and needing immediate attention) to P3 (less urgent). Staff stated that poles rated with a P1 are remediated immediately, however, the OCA could not assess the timeliness of response based on the reports provided. Management Response Additional Observation electric Grid Modernization Project, it does not have a formal maintenance schedule that proactively anticipates and schedules maintenance as the infrastructure ages. Instead, maintenance issues are addressed on an as needed basis. Management stated that the Utility is currently behind schedule in addressing line and pole maintenance due to resource constraints but is on schedule to complete all Overhead and Underground facility inspections for 2024. The OCA has performed a general assessment of CPAU’s line and pole maintenance program noting some areas for the City to consider. The OCA analyzed pole data from the Utility’s pole inspection report 7 and noted that approximately half of the City’s poles are over 40 years old, with some poles dating back to the 1940’s. 545 of CPAU’s poles are 60 years old or older and may present age-related maintenance issues. It should be noted that many of these poles may be scheduled for replacement as part of the Grid Modernization project. In addition to the Utility’s pole inspection report, the OCA asked for example inspection reports for individual pieces of equipment and poles. These reports are entered into the CPAU Electric Equipment & Maintenance Database. The audit team noted that for the example reports received, the previous inspection dates on the forms appeared to be more than 10 years ago. The OCA recommends the City consider implementing a formal infrastructure maintenance program as part of its Grid Modernization efforts to ensure ongoing timely inspection and maintenance in the future. Item 2 Attachment C - Emergency Preparedness - Wildfire Audit Report        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 97  Packet Pg. 106 of 413  Appendix A: Management Response Matrix 1. Continue efforts to underground WUI distribution infrastructure and prioritize as appropriate maintenance and possible replacement of the oldest poles should they remain in place. efforts should continue to underground and harden distribution infrastructure within the high fire danger area. The City’s Utilities Wildfire Mitigation Plan, updated and approved annually, prioritizes the undergrounding of the City’s overhead infrastructure in the high fire danger area on Arastradero Road. The first phase of the Foothill Fire Mitigation Project will move powerlines underground and remove approximately 182 of the total of 203 power poles and overhead powerlines in the high-risk area. The estimated 21 remaining poles and associated equipment require additional engineering and coordination prior to additional fire hardening measures. The Foothill Fire Mitigation Project includes substructure construction, including the installation of boxes and pad-mounted equipment; Cable pulling and line energization; Decommissioning of overhead poles and equipment. documents should be established and or reviewed, updated, and finalized (e.g. Draft Tree and Landscape Technical Manual) Manual (TLTM), and the recent the public comment period on the proposed revisions closed March 2025. Comments are under review and a draft of the TLTM is scheduled for review with the Parks and Recreation Commission, with a final version expected this year. Staff agree and plan to establish a line clearing policy for trees and landscape track and monitor property violations in the WUI to enhance enforcement and at the time of this report has now fully implemented this tool. This software, specifically designed for fire inspections, will improve inspection management, including tracking and monitoring of properties a Firewise Community including stakeholder engagement throughout the process contract with the Fire Safe Council including cost estimates for roadside clearance and public education resources, i.e. Firewise Community. PAFD is seeking partnership with Woodside Fire Protection District and Los Altos Hills Fire District to enhance our presence and efforts towards public education and will support residents in the pursuit of participation Item 2 Attachment C - Emergency Preparedness - Wildfire Audit Report        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 98  Packet Pg. 107 of 413  Finding 1: While the City has made significant investments in and has strong programs aimed to prevent and mitigate wildfire risks; we noted some areas for improvement including enhancing community outreach and engagement. Key Recommendation Concurrence Responsible Department(s) Action Plan Target Date (calendar year) will work with local Foothills community to attain and maintain Firewise CAL FIRE to ensure service provision continues into the future. Agree understand that operationally this may not be feasible since it would add administration obligations for an outside agency. The summer of 2025 will be the third year that CAL FIRE assists the City of Palo Alto with hazardous fuel removal. CAL FIRE provides similar services for multiple agencies in the county (San Jose, Morgan Hill) without a contract. Staff will seek this formalization to ensure stability and continuity, though it may be infeasible if CAL FIRE does not agree to a formal contract. CAL and outreach plans document coordination efforts between Office of Emergency Services (OES), Fire and CPAU to ensure information is consistently and regularly provided to residents. Agree Utilities, CMO departments. Staff will look to update the City’s existing plans and hazard-specific annex documents ensuring communication of information is consistent and timely, reflecting the practices in place. The existing EOP identifies communication protocols and responsibilities in the event of a disaster but could add details to formalize wildfire preparedness and outreach. The leadership team reviews all scheduled community events and engagement points on a monthly basis, including educational events for seasonal events such as floods and wildfires. A unified wildfire preparedness effort among departments to build community awareness, offering tools and tips, and sharing online resources already includes the following: annual door hangers, utility bill inserts, general emergency services communications such as continued promotion of AlertSCC, the City’s emergency alert system, annual test of Alert SCC, and annual community presentations on wildfire preparedness all available on the ‘Ready, Set, Go!” web resource referenced in the report. Annually, OES and PAFD host public education Item 2 Attachment C - Emergency Preparedness - Wildfire Audit Report        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 99  Packet Pg. 108 of 413  Finding 2: Overall, the City has a strong emergency response plan but should consider if improvements could be made to evacuation planning, training, after action report recommendation implementation, and communication efforts. Key Recommendation Concurrence Responsible Department(s) Action Plan Target Date (calendar year) with the majority of FEMA guidance; however, they would be strengthened by incorporating a more comprehensive revision history and an enhanced review process. The City should also review its evacuation plans and consider if plans could be enhanced by reviewing best practices in other cities such as establishing evacuation locations and sheltering agreements with neighboring the City’s published emergency plans are timely completed with revision histories clearly documented, beginning with the current update of the EOP underway. The City has evacuation maps available on the OES website and all public education materials and sessions advise residents of the location and content of the resources. PAFD and OES continue to utilize Genasys (formally Zonehaven) software that notifies residents in a particular zone of evacuation warnings and orders related to natural and human caused disasters: what is happening, where to evacuate, etc. which also includes pre-approved messaging in the platform. more formally track and monitor findings and recommendations identified during training exercises and in emergency incident AAR recommendations to ensure needed improvements are made and issues are timely resolved incidents, though the outcomes of these are tracked differently depending on the nature of the incident or training. For tabletop exercises, OES regularly conducts citywide AARs for training exercises and incidents. OES reviews and follows-up on necessary improvements identified in the AARs, however, to instill further rigor, OES will implement a post-AAR process review every six months until resolution of identified action items for final closure. PAFD routinely conducts AARs following major incidents, which are then reviewed by executive command staff. Depending on any identified areas for improvement, such as further training or policy updates, the Deputy Chief over operations is responsible for ensuring completion of applicable follow-up steps including additional feedback to departments increase resident registration in the County’s emergency alerting system (AlertSCC). OES, Fire engagement, notification, and education activities and to increase AlertSCC sign ups. This is prominent on many pages of the City’s website, a recurring item in digital newsletters and printed outreach and Item 2 Attachment C - Emergency Preparedness - Wildfire Audit Report        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 100  Packet Pg. 109 of 413  Finding 2: Overall, the City has a strong emergency response plan but should consider if improvements could be made to evacuation planning, training, after action report recommendation implementation, and communication efforts. Key Recommendation Concurrence Responsible Department(s) Action Plan Target Date (calendar year) homeowner associations, and local businesses to disseminate wildfire education materials and encourage participation in City programs and the County’s emergency alert system. message provided at community events through tabling. An annual AlertSCC test is scheduled citywide to encourage more registrations. Staff agree that continuing to support participation in this program is important, and will continue to promote AlertSCC registrations in various City engagement efforts. Note that the City continues to be ahead when compared to the Countywide 10% opt-in level. Last year, as a result of communications efforts, over 7,000 City contacts opted into receive emergency alerts. Furthermore, staff agree and will continue to partner with schools, Palo Alto Neighborhoods, and local businesses to share solution for staff to more easily access, track and monitor the status of all mutual aid agreements, including active dates, renewal deadlines, and responsible contacts for updates. For example, a centralized tracking system for mutual aid agreements would provide clarity on the status of each agreement, preventing lapses in mutual aid coverage and ensuring that expired agreements are addressed promptly. Agree the CA Master Mutual Aid Agreement. This includes a list of mutual aid response disciplines, coordinating agencies, and specific elements included, e.g. fire & rescue, search and rescue, emergency management, etc. Although current mutual aid agreements for fire services are retained by the Fire Department in current operations, staff agree that a central repository of auto-aid agreements will be kept with emergency protocol documentation as an appendix/reference document, for broader and more ready accessibility in an emergency. A tracking system is not needed as all auto aid agreements within Santa Clara County agencies are current and have no expiration dates. Locally, the Santa Clara County XSC Mutual Aid Plan is reviewed and updated annually. San Mateo County fire chiefs are looking at the details of the mutual aid agreements in the County to review operational impacts countywide. The auto aid agreements with Woodside Fire Protection District and Menlo Park Fire, both of which are in San Mateo County, do have end dates Item 2 Attachment C - Emergency Preparedness - Wildfire Audit Report        Item 2: Staff Report Pg. 101  Packet Pg. 110 of 413  City Council Staff Report Report Type: CONSENT CALENDAR Lead Department: City Clerk Meeting Date: November 3, 2025 Report #:2510-5326 TITLE Approval of Minutes from October 15, October 20, and October 22, 2025 Meetings RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council review and approve the minutes. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: October 15, 2025 Draft Action Minutes Attachment B: October 20, 2025 Draft Action Minutes Attachment C: October 22, 2025 Draft Action Minutes APPROVED BY: Mahealani Ah Yun, City Clerk Item 5 Item 5 Staff Report        Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 1  Packet Pg. 111 of 413  CITY COUNCIL DRAFT ACTION MINUTES Page 1 of 2 Special Meeting October 15, 2025 The City Council of the City of Palo Alto met on this date in the Council Chambers and by virtual teleconference at 4:30 P.M. Present In Person: Burt, Lauing, Lu, Lythcott-Haims, Reckdahl, Stone, Veenker Veenker Arrived at 4:32 P.M. Present Remotely: Absent: Agenda Changes, Additions and Deletions Special Orders of the Day: Boards, Commissions, Committees Interviews 1. Interview Candidates for Vacancies on the Human Relations Commission (HRC), Parks and Recreation Commission (PRC), and Public Art Commission (PAC); CEQA Status - Not a Project NO ACTION Closed Session 2. CONFERENCE WITH CITY ATTORNEY-POTENTIAL LITIGATION Subject: Potential litigation regarding 156 North California Avenue, as set forth in letter(s) from Holland & Knight LLP dated September 3, 2025 Authority: Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2); One case, as Defendant. MOTION: Councilmember Stone moved, seconded by Councilmember Lu to go into Closed Session. MOTION PASSED: 7-0 Council went into Closed Session at 8:40 P.M. Item 5 Attachment A - October 15, 2025 Draft Action Minutes        Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 2  Packet Pg. 112 of 413  DRAFT ACTION MINUTES Page 2 of 2 Sp. City Council Meeting Draft Action Minutes: 10/15/2025 Council returned from Closed Session at 9:24 P.M. Mayor Lauing announced no reportable action. Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned at 9:25 P.M. ATTEST: APPROVED: ____________________ ____________________ City Clerk Mayor NOTE: Action minutes are prepared in accordance with Palo Alto Municipal Code (PAMC) 2.04.160(a) and (b). Summary minutes (sense) are prepared in accordance with PAMC Section 2.04.160(c). Beginning in January 2018, in accordance with Ordinance No. 5423, the City Council found action minutes and the video/audio recordings of Council proceedings to be the official records of both Council and committee proceedings. These recordings are available on the City’s website. Item 5 Attachment A - October 15, 2025 Draft Action Minutes        Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 3  Packet Pg. 113 of 413  CITY COUNCIL DRAFT ACTION MINUTES Page 1 of 6 Regular Meeting October 20, 2025 The City Council of the City of Palo Alto met on this date in the Council Chambers and by virtual teleconference at 5:30 P.M. Present In Person: Burt, Lauing, Lu, Lythcott-Haims, Reckdahl, Stone, Veenker Veenker arrived at 5:32 P.M. Present Remotely: Absent: Call to Order Special Orders of the Day: Boards, Commissions, and Committees Interviews AA1. Interview Candidate for Vacancies on the Parks and Recreation Commission; CEQA Status - Not a Project NO ACTION Agenda Changes, Additions and Deletions Public Comment Council Member Questions, Comments and Announcements Study Session Item 5 Attachment B - October 20, 2025 Draft Action Minutes        Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 4  Packet Pg. 114 of 413  DRAFT ACTION MINUTES Page 2 of 6 City Council Meeting Draft Action Minutes: 10/20/2025 1. Cubberley Project: Receive an Update on Development of a Master Concept Plan and Phasing; Review and Provide Feedback on Themes for the Second Poll; Receive an Update on Strategic Activation Plan and Review an Update on the Workplan for the Cubberley Master Plan in Consideration of a November 2026 Ballot Measure; CEQA Status – the Master Plan will undergo CEQA review. NO ACTION Consent Calendar MOTION: Vice Mayor Veenker moved, seconded by Councilmember Reckdahl to approve Agenda Item Numbers 2-15, AA2. MOTION PASSED: 7-0 2. Approval of Minutes from September 29 and October 6, 2025 Meetings 3. PUBLIC HEARING / QUASI-JUDICIAL. 70 Encina Avenue [25PLN-00034]: Request for Approval of a Tentative Map to Merge Two Lots and Allow for a Condominium Subdivision to Create 10 Units on the Resulting 12,119-Square-Foot Parcel. The Subdivision Map Would Facilitate Construction of Ten New Residential Units in One Building, which was previously approved on April 14, 2025 (24PLN-00095). CEQA Status: Exempt from the Provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in Accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 (Comprehensive Plan Consistency). Zoning District: PC-5654. 4. PUBLIC HEARING: Finance Committee Recommends Adoption of Resolution Amending Five Rate Schedules Setting Forth Utility Connection Fees and Other Charges: Utilities Rate Schedule E-15 (Electric Service Connections), W-5 (Water Service Connections), G-5 (Gas Service Connections), S-5 (Sewer Service Connections) and C-1 (Utility Miscellaneous Charges); CEQA Status: Not a Project Under CEQA Guidelines Sections 15378(b)(4) and (5) and Exempt Under Section 15273(a) 5. Approval of an Increase of Construction Contingency for Contract No. C24189237 with SAK Construction, LLC in the amount of $1,000,000, funded by the Wastewater Treatment Enterprise Fund for the Joint Intercepting Sewer Rehabilitation (Phase 1) Project (WQ-24000), and Approval of Addendum 13 to the Basic Agreement Between Mountain View, Los Altos, and Palo Alto for the Acquisition, Construction, and Maintenance of a Joint Sewer System to Increase the Maximum Authorized Project Funding of $8.9 million to $12.6 million; CEQA Status – Exempt under CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (Repairs to Existing Facilities) Item 5 Attachment B - October 20, 2025 Draft Action Minutes        Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 5  Packet Pg. 115 of 413  DRAFT ACTION MINUTES Page 3 of 6 City Council Meeting Draft Action Minutes: 10/20/2025 6. Approval of Contract Amendment No. 1 to Contract No. C23187298C with Hinderliter, de Llamas, and Associates (HdL) for Business Tax and Business Registry Certificate Fee Administration Services in the Amount of $750,000 for Additional Administrative and Operational Services and $2,120,000 Contingent Fees for a Revised Total Not-To-Exceed Amount of $2,870,000, to Extend the Term by Two Years to June 30, 2028, and Approve a Budget Amendment in the General Fund (Requires 2/3 vote); CEQA Status – Not a Project 7. Approve Contract Amendment No. 1 to Contract No. C25193598 with Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin, Metz, and Associates (FM3) in the Amount of $26,775 for one Additional Poll (Four Polls, Total) for the Potential November 2026 Ballot Measure for a Total Not to Exceed Amount of $153,000 and Approve Budget Amendments in the General Fund and the Cubberley Property Infrastructure Fund; CEQA Status: Not a Project 8. Approval of Five Items to Support the Fire Station 4 Replacement Project PE-18004: 1) Construction Contract Number No. C26194287 with Beals Martin and Associates, Inc. in an Amount Not to Exceed $11,530,676 and Authorization for the City Manager or Their Designee to Negotiate and Execute Change Orders to the Contract up to a Not-to- Exceed Amount $1,153,067; 2) Contract Amendment No. 1 to Contract No. S24188865 with Schaaf & Wheeler Consulting Civil Engineers to Extend the Contract Term Through April 30, 2027; 3) Contract Amendment No. 1 to Contract No. S23185811 with Earth Systems Pacific, Inc. to Extend the Contract Term Through February 28, 2027; 4) Amendment No. 1 to Contract C21179569 with Brown Reynolds Watford Architects, Inc. to Add $41,366, Increasing the Not-to-Exceed Amount to $838,514 and Extend the Contract Term Through June 30, 2027 for Construction Support Services; and (5) Amendment No. 1 to Contract C24189293A with Cumming Management Group, Inc. to Extend the Contract Term Through August 31, 2027; CEQA Status - Exempt under CEQA Guidelines Sections 15302 and 15303 9. Approval of Construction Contract C26195058 with JJR Construction, Inc. in an Amount Not to-Exceed $1,281,689 and Authorization for the City Manager or Their Designee to Negotiate and Execute Change Orders for Related Additional but Unforeseen Work that May Develop During the Project Up to a Not-to-Exceed Amount of $128,169 for the Fiscal Year 2026 Sidewalk, Curb & Gutter Project, Capital Improvement Program Projects PO-89003 and PO-12001; CEQA Status – Exempt under Section 15301(c) 10. Approval of a 10 Year License Agreement with La Comida de California for Operation of a Senior Nutrition Program and Meal Service in a Portion of the City-owned Building Located at 445 Bryant Street; CEQA Status – Exempt under CEQA Guidelines sections 15301 and 15303 11. Adoption of a Resolution to Extend the City’s Participation in the Northern California Power Agency’s Support Services Program for Another 10 Years to 2037, Designating Item 5 Attachment B - October 20, 2025 Draft Action Minutes        Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 6  Packet Pg. 116 of 413  DRAFT ACTION MINUTES Page 4 of 6 City Council Meeting Draft Action Minutes: 10/20/2025 Authorized Signatories, and Updating Contracting Authority to Align with the Municipal Code; CEQA Status – Not a Project 12. Approval of the Dispatch Center Assessment Report as Recommended by the Policy & Services Committee. 13. Approval of Professional Services Contract Number C26194598 with Thomas Sarsfield in the Amount Not to Exceed $660,000 for Providing Tennis Instruction Services for Seasonal Classes and Summer Camp Sessions for a Period of Five Years; CEQA Status - Not a Project. 14. Approval of Contract Number C25194217 with Veteran Pipeline Construction in the Amount of $8,962,204 for the Gas Main Replacement Project 25 (GS-15000) in the Duveneck/St. Francis, Leland Manor, Midtown, and Palo Verde neighborhoods; Authorization for the City Manager to Negotiate and Execute Related Change Orders Not-to-Exceed of $896,221 for a Total Not-to-Exceed Amount of $9,858,425; NEPA status - B5.4 categorical exclusion; CEQA status — Exempt under CEQA Guidelines 15302 (Replacement or Reconstruction of Existing Facilities). 15. SECOND READING: Adoption of Eight Ordinances Amending Various Sections of the Palo Alto Municipal Code (PAMC) Related to the 2025 California Building Standards Code (CA Code of Regulations Title 24) Update, including: (1) Chapter 16.04 Incorporating the 2025 CA Building Code With Local Amendments; (2) Chapter 16.05 Incorporating the 2025 CA Mechanical Code With Local Amendments; (3) Chapter 16.06 Incorporating the 2025 CA Residential Code With Local Amendments; (4) Chapter 16.08 Incorporating the 2025 CA Plumbing Code With Local Amendments; (5) Chapter 16.14 Incorporating the 2025 CA Green Building Standards Code with Local Amendments; (6) Chapter 16.16 Incorporating the 2022 CA Electrical Code With Local Amendments; (7) Chapter 16.18 Incorporating the 2024 International Swimming Pool and Spa Code With Local Amendments; (8) Chapter 16.17 Incorporating the 2025 CA Energy Code With Local Amendments; CEQA Status: Exempt Under CEQA Guidelines Sections 15061(b)(3) and 15308. (FIRST READING: October 6, 2025, PASSED: 6-0-1, Lauing absent) AA2. Approval of Appointment and Employment Agreement with Stephen Lindsey as Fire Chief; CEQA Status – Not a Project New Item Added City Manager Comments Ed Shikada, City Manager Action Items Item 5 Attachment B - October 20, 2025 Draft Action Minutes        Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 7  Packet Pg. 117 of 413  DRAFT ACTION MINUTES Page 5 of 6 City Council Meeting Draft Action Minutes: 10/20/2025 16. Policy and Services Committee Recommendation to the City Council to Approve a Phased Approach to Address Oversized Vehicle (Including Recreational Vehicle) Impacts, Particularly Relating to Individuals Living in Vehicles and Approve Budget Amendments in various funds; CEQA status – categorically exempt. MOTION: Mayor Lauing moved, seconded by Vice Mayor Veenker to approve the Policy and Services Committee recommendation to direct staff to: Phase 1: 1. Develop an urgency ordinance to prohibit parking of detached/inoperable vehicles on public streets, 2. Develop an urgency ordinance to prohibit the renting of public parking spaces (“vanlording”), 3. Refine the scope and begin implementation of additional street cleanups and sweeping, 4. Return to Council for approvals of ordinances and contract amendments (e.g., street sweeping) as soon as possible, estimated to require up to four (4) months, 5. Implementation and enforcement of these actions would follow, 6. Work with LifeMoves to consider options, such as a buyback or parking program, to accept RV residents quickly at the Homekey site or other housing options, 7. Recruit new safe parking on privately-owned and congregation-based parking lots, excepting any safe parking site that requires undedicating parkland, 8. Create an Ad Hoc Committee to recommend details on the increased enforcement and other issues on implementation on items 1-7 above; evaluation of activities in Phase 2 and report back to Council in 4-months, in furtherance of Council goals including public health and public safety, 9. Approve amendments to the Fiscal Year 2026 Budget Appropriation (requires a 2/3 vote) to resource aspects of the phased approach in the General Fund by: a. Increasing the contractual services appropriation for the City Manager’s Office by $157,000 for resources to support program implementation; b. Decreasing the Reserve: Business Tax Revenue for Housing Affordability by $157,000; c. Increasing the contractual services appropriation for the Office of Transportation by $150,000 for engineering services; Item 5 Attachment B - October 20, 2025 Draft Action Minutes        Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 8  Packet Pg. 118 of 413  DRAFT ACTION MINUTES Page 6 of 6 City Council Meeting Draft Action Minutes: 10/20/2025 d. Increasing the contractual services appropriation in the Public Works Department by $60,000 for street clean-up services; e. Increasing the contractual services appropriation in the Police Department by $95,000 for marking and enforcement of vehicles; Decreasing the Budget Stabilization Reserve by $305,000; f. Refuse Fund by: i. Increasing the contractual services appropriation by $245,000 for new permanent and temporary street cleaning signage; and ii. Decreasing the Ending Fund Balance by $245,000. MOTION PASSED: 7-0 Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned at 11:49 P.M. ATTEST: APPROVED: ____________________ ____________________ City Clerk Mayor NOTE: Action minutes are prepared in accordance with Palo Alto Municipal Code (PAMC) 2.04.160(a) and (b). Summary minutes (sense) are prepared in accordance with PAMC Section 2.04.160(c). Beginning in January 2018, in accordance with Ordinance No. 5423, the City Council found action minutes and the video/audio recordings of Council proceedings to be the official records of both Council and committee proceedings. These recordings are available on the City’s website. Item 5 Attachment B - October 20, 2025 Draft Action Minutes        Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 9  Packet Pg. 119 of 413  CITY COUNCIL DRAFT ACTION MINUTES Page 1 of 4 Special Meeting October 22, 2025 The City Council of the City of Palo Alto met on this date in the Council Chambers and by virtual teleconference at 5:30 P.M. Present In Person: Lauing, Lu, Lythcott-Haims, Reckdahl, Stone, Veenker Present Remotely: Burt Absent: Boards, Commissions, and Committees Appointments 1.Appointment of Candidates to the Human Relations Commission (HRC), Parks and Recreation Commission (PRC), and Public Art Commission (PAC); CEQA Status: Not a Project Human Relations Commission First Round Voting for Three (3) Vacancies (Seats 2, 3, 7) on the Human Relations Commission ending on October 31, 2028 Allyson C. Rosen: Bridget Algee: Burt, Lythcott-Haims (2) Mare Lucas: Michelle Kraus: Burt, Lauing, Lu, Lythcott-Haims, Reckdahl, Stone, Veenker (7) Raizel Rosenberg: Lauing, Lu, Stone (3) Salwa Ansari: Burt, Lu, Lythcott-Haims, Reckdahl, Veenker (5) Sridhar Karnam: Lauing, Reckdahl, Stone, Veenker (4) Sunny Dykwel: None of the Above: Candidate Michelle Kraus receiving seven votes is appointed to the full-term expiring on October 31, 2028. Candidate Salwa Ansari receiving five votes is appointed to the full-term expiring on October 31, 2028. Candidate Sridhar Karnam receiving four votes is appointed to the full-term expiring on October 31, 2028. Item 5 Attachment C - October 22, 2025 Draft Action Minutes        Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 10  Packet Pg. 120 of 413  DRAFT ACTION MINUTES Page 2 of 4 Sp. City Council Meeting Draft Action Minutes: 10/22/2025 Parks and Recreation Commission First Round Voting for Three (3) Vacancies (Seats 2, 3, 4) on the Parks and Recreation Commission ending October 31, 2028. Bobi Adle: Burt, Reckdahl (2) Brenton Hanlon: Drew Pearson: [Application withdrawn by applicant] Hurjane Vongsachang: [Application withdrawn by applicant] Marc Schoenen: Lu, Lythcott-Haims, Veenker (3) Nellis L. Freeman, Jr.: Burt, Lauing, Lu, Lythcott-Haims, Reckdahl, Stone, Veenker (7) Roger V. Smith: Burt, Lauing, Lu, Lythcott-Haims, Reckdahl, Stone (6) Vadim Axelrod: Lauing, Stone, Veenker (3) None of the Above: Candidate Nellis L. Freeman, Jr. receiving seven votes is appointed to the full-term expiring on October 31, 2028. Candidate Roger V. Smith receiving six votes is appointed to the full term expiring on October 31, 2028. No other candidate received the four votes necessary for appointment. A second round of voting is required. Second Round Voting for One (1) vacancy on the Parks and Recreation Commission ending October 31, 2028 Marc Schoenen: Burt, Lu, Lythcott-Haims (3) Vadim Axelrod: Lauing, Reckdahl, Stone, Veenker (4) None of the Above: Candidate Vadim Axelrod receiving four votes is appointed to the full term expiring on October 31, 2028. Public Art Commission First Round Voting for Three (3) Vacancies (Seats 1, 4, 7) on the Public Art Commission ending October 31, 2028. Anjana Joshi: Burt, Lauing, Stone (3) Claude Ezran: Reckdahl (1) Donny Foley: Eedit Bareket: Marilyn Gottlieb Roberts: Lu, Lythcott-Haims, Veenker (3) Robin Mullery: Burt, Lauing, Lu, Lythcott-Haims, Reckdahl, Stone, Veenker (7) Item 5 Attachment C - October 22, 2025 Draft Action Minutes        Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 11  Packet Pg. 121 of 413  DRAFT ACTION MINUTES Page 3 of 4 Sp. City Council Meeting Draft Action Minutes: 10/22/2025 Simon Tran: Burt, Lauing, Lu, Lythcott-Haims, Reckdahl, Stone, Veenker (7) None of the Above: Candidate Robin Mullery receiving seven votes is appointed to the full-term expiring on October 31, 2028. Candidate Simon Tran receiving seven votes is appointed to the full-term expiring on October 31, 2028. No other candidate received the four votes necessary for appointment. A second round of voting is required. Second Round Voting for One (1) Vacancy on the Public Art Commission ending on October 31, 2028. Anjana Joshi: Burt, Lauing, Reckdahl, Stone, Veenker (5) Marilyn Gottlieb Roberts: Lu, Lythcott-Haims (2) None of the Above: Candidate Anjana Joshi receiving five votes is appointed to the full-term expiring on October 31, 2028. Agenda Changes, Additions and Deletions Public Comment Council Member Questions, Comments and Announcements Study Session 2. City Council Feedback on an Updated Housing Project Design Concept and Other Project Updates Related to the City and Alta Housing Partnership to Develop the Downtown Surface Parking lot at the Corner of Kipling Street and Lytton Avenue (Lot T) for Affordable Housing. CEQA Status – Not a Project. Item Heard Out Of Order After Item #3 Item 5 Attachment C - October 22, 2025 Draft Action Minutes        Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 12  Packet Pg. 122 of 413  DRAFT ACTION MINUTES Page 4 of 4 Sp. City Council Meeting Draft Action Minutes: 10/22/2025 NO ACTION 3. Reinforcing Best Practices in Managing Consultant Services Item Heard Out Of Order Before Item #2 NO ACTION Action Items 4. Update and Direction to Staff on the Downtown Housing Plan Project and Implementation of Senate Bill 79 (2025-2026). CEQA Status: Exempt Under CEQA Guidelines Section 15262. NO ACTION Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned at 8:38 P.M. ATTEST: APPROVED: ____________________ ____________________ City Clerk Mayor NOTE: Action minutes are prepared in accordance with Palo Alto Municipal Code (PAMC) 2.04.160(a) and (b). Summary minutes (sense) are prepared in accordance with PAMC Section 2.04.160(c). Beginning in January 2018, in accordance with Ordinance No. 5423, the City Council found action minutes and the video/audio recordings of Council proceedings to be the official records of both Council and committee proceedings. These recordings are available on the City’s website. Item 5 Attachment C - October 22, 2025 Draft Action Minutes        Item 5: Staff Report Pg. 13  Packet Pg. 123 of 413  City Council Staff Report From: City Manager Report Type: CONSENT CALENDAR Lead Department: Fire Meeting Date: November 3, 2025 Report #:2509-5206 TITLE FIRST READING: Adoption of an Ordinance Repealing Chapter 15.04 of the Palo Alto Municipal Code and Adopting a New Chapter 15.04, the California Fire Code (2025 Edition) With Local Amendments and Related Findings. CEQA Status: Exempt Pursuant to Section 15061 of the CEQA Guidelines. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached ordinance that repeals Chapter 15.04 of the Palo Alto Municipal Code (PAMC) and adopts a new PAMC Chapter 15.04 adopting the California Fire Code (2025 Edition) with local amendments. BACKGROUND Every three years, California updates its Building Standards Code, known as Title 24, to incorporate the latest technology, best practices, and policy goals for safe, efficient, and sustainable buildings. Jurisdictions may adopt the model code as-is or adopt local amendments that are more stringent than the model code adopted by the state. State law imposes certain requirements when jurisdictions adopt local amendments to any of these 13 parts, including that the jurisdiction make express findings that each amendment is reasonably necessary because of local climatic, geological, topographic or environmental conditions. If no local amendments are adopted before the beginning of the new code cycle, in this case January 1, 2026, then the model code adopted by the state automatically applies. If prior local amendments are not readopted before the new code cycle begins, they expire and can no longer be applied or enforced at the local level. The California Building Standards Code is organized into 13 parts, as shown below. Note that there are both Parts 2 and 2.5, creating a total 13 parts. Part 7, the Wildlands-Urban Interface (WUI) Code is a new addition this cycle. It replaces Chapter 49 of the California Fire Code. ·Part 1: CA Administrative Code ·Part 2: CA Building Code Item 6 Item 6 Staff Report        Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 1  Packet Pg. 124 of 413  ·Part 2.5: CA Residential Code ·Part 3: CA Electrical Code ·Part 4: CA Mechanical Code ·Part 5: CA Plumbing Code ·Part 6: CA Energy Code ·Part 7: CA Wildlands-Urban Interface Code ·Part 8: CA State Historical Building Code ·Part 9: CA Fire Code ·Part 10: CA Existing Building Code ·Part 11: CA Green Building Standards Code ·Part 12: CA Reference Code Standards On October 6, 2025 the City Council approved ordinances adopting the 2025 editions of the other parts of the California Building Standards Code and directed staff to return on the Consent Calendar with ordinances adopting the 2025 editions of the California Fire Code and California WUI Code with local amendments.1 On further review, staff determined that no local amendments to the WUI Code are necessary, and proposes to allow Part 7 of the CBSC to take effect without amendment. ANALYSIS Staff recommend that the Council adopt the attached ordinance adopting the 2025 Edition of the California Fire Code with local amendments. The proposed ordinance re-adopts local amendments adopted in previous code cycles with some clarifying language and formatting. It also removes prior local amendments that have been incorporated into the updated 2025 State Code or incorporated into the new Part 7 (Wildland-Urban Interface Code). This ordinance also adopts new local amendments, most of which are administrative and similar to amendments or practices currently in place. Most of the new local amendments are derived from the collaborative efforts of the Santa Clara County Fire Marshals’ Association. Several sections of the California Fire Code (CFC) related to definitions, fire sprinkler specifications and hazardous materials are amended to allow the Fire Department greater flexibility and application of life safety and property conservation controls. Specifically, this ordinance adopts new local amendments that: 1) define triggers for automatic sprinkler systems and more intense fire sprinkler design for different types of new and existing nonresidential buildings; 2) specify exhaust requirements for nonresidential parking garages; 3) define maximum allowable quantities of Energy Storage Systems in fire areas; and 4) add 1 October 6, 2025 staff report: https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/api/compilemeetingattachmenthistory/historyattachment/?historyId=2a2b3 4e2-2c23-4b9f-ab42-c67dd1176b35. Item 6 Item 6 Staff Report        Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 2  Packet Pg. 125 of 413  Business Occupancies to the list of occupancies where the use of portable unvented heaters is prohibited. FISCAL/RESOURCE IMPACT STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: Ordinance repealing PAMC Chapter 15.04 and adopting a new Chapter 15.04, incorporating California Fire Code (2025 Edition) and local amendments and related findings APPROVED BY: Item 6 Item 6 Staff Report        Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 3  Packet Pg. 126 of 413  NOT YET APPROVED 1 20251017_ms29 Ordinance No. ____ Adoption of an Ordinance Repealing Chapter 15.04 of the Palo Alto Municipal Code and Adopting a New Chapter 15.04, the California Fire Code (2025 Edition) With Local Amendments and Related Findings The Council of the City of Palo Alto does ORDAIN as follows: SECTION 1. Title 15 of the Palo Alto Municipal Code is hereby amended by repealing in its entirety Chapter 15.04 and enacting a new Chapter 15.04 to read as follows: CHAPTER 15.04 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE, CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, TITLE 24, PART 9 Sections 15.04.010 2025 California Fire Code, Title 24, Part 9 adopted and amended. 15.04.020 Local Amendments. 15.04.030 Section 102.5 Application of residential code. 15.04.040 Section 103.2 Appointment. 15.04.050 Sections 105.3.9 Permits/Permit fees. 15.04.060 Table 105.5.9 Permit amounts for compressed gases. 15.04.070 Table 105.5.22 Permit amounts for hazardous materials. 15.04.080 Section 105.5.25 and Sections 105.5.55 through 105.5.59 Operational permits. 15.04.090 Section 105.6.13 Hazardous materials and Section 105.6.26 Construction permits. 15.04.100 Reserved 15.04.110 Section 108.7 Certified Unified Program Agency Fees. 15.04.120 Section 109.1 Inspection authority. 15.04.130 Section 104.1.1 Enforcement/citation authority. 15.04.140 Section 113.4 Violation penalties. 15.04.150 Definitions Section 202 15.04.160 Section 316.7 Roof guiderails at interior courts. 15.04.170 320.3.13 Safety certification. 15.04.180 Section 322.6 Fire protection system. 15.04.190 Section 401.5 Making false report. 15.04.200 Section 503.1 Fire access roadways. Item 6 Attachment A - Ordinance repealing PAMC Chapter 15.04 and adopting a new Chapter 15.04, incorporating California Fire Code (2025 Edition) and local amendments and related findings        Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 4  Packet Pg. 127 of 413  NOT YET APPROVED 2 20251017_ms29 15.04.210 Section 503.2.1 Dimensions. 15.04.220 Section 503.2.2 Authority. 15.04.230 Section 504.5 Access control devices. 15.04.240 Section 505.1.1 and 505.1.2 Premises identification. 15.04.250 Section 509.1.2 Fire protection equipment identification. 15.04.260 Sections 603.10 through 603.12. 15.04.270 Section 4103.1.2.1.1 Prohibitive locations. 15.04.280 Section 903.2 Automatic sprinkler systems, where required. 15.04.290 Section 903.3.1.1 NFPA 13 sprinkler systems. 15.04.295 Section 903.3.1.1.5 Increase in fire sprinkler design criteria. 15.04.300 Section 903.3.1.2 NFPA 13R sprinkler systems. 15.04.310 Section 903.3.1.3 and 903.3.1.3.1 NFPA 13D sprinkler systems. 15.04.320 Section 903.3.10 Floor control valves. 15.04.330 Section 905.3.1 Height. 15.04.340 Section 909.20.7 Maintenance and operational schedule. 15.04.350 Section 1008.3 Illumination required by an emergency electrical system. 15.04.360 Section 1031.2 Where required. 15.04.370 Section 1207.1.5 Large-scale fire test. 15.04.375 Section 1207.5.2 Maximum allowable quantities. 15.04.380 Section 1207.11.3 Location. 15.04.390 Section 3303.7 Fire walls. 15.04.400 Section 3307.1.2 and 3307.1.4. 15.04.410 Reserved. 15.04.420 Reserved. 15.04.430 Reserved. 15.04.435 Section 4103.1 Portable unvented heaters. 15.04.440 Section 5001.2.2.2 Health Hazards. 15.04.450 Section 5001.7 Hazard materials management plan electronic submissions. 15.04.460 Section 5003.1.3.1 Toxic, highly toxic, moderately toxic gases and similarly used or handled materials. 15.04.470 Section 5003.1.5 Other health hazards including carcinogens, irritants and sensitizers. 15.04.480 Section 5003.1.6 Additional secondary containment requirements. 15.04.490 Section 5003.2.2.1 Design and construction. 15.04.500 Section 5003.2.2.2 Additional regulations for supply piping for health hazard materials. Item 6 Attachment A - Ordinance repealing PAMC Chapter 15.04 and adopting a new Chapter 15.04, incorporating California Fire Code (2025 Edition) and local amendments and related findings        Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 5  Packet Pg. 128 of 413  NOT YET APPROVED 3 20251017_ms29 15.04.510 Section 5003.3.1 Unauthorized discharges. 15.04.520 Section 5003.5.2 Ventilation ducting. 15.04.530 Section 5003.5.3 “H” Occupancies. 15.04.540 Section 5003.9.11 Fire extinguishing systems for workstations dispensing, handling or using hazardous materials. 15.04.550 Section 5003.10.4 Elevators utilized to transport hazardous materials. 15.04.560 Section 5004.2.1 Spill control for hazardous material liquids. 15.04.570 Sections 5004.2.2 and 5004.2.2.2 and Table 5004.2.2 Secondary containment for hazardous material liquids and solids. 15.04.580 Section 5004.2.3 Containment pallets. 15.04.590 Section 5704.2.7.5.8 Overfill prevention. 15.04.600 Section 5704.2.7.5.9 Automatic and/or remote filling of tanks. 15.04.610 Reserved. 15.04.620 Section 6001.1 Site scope. 15.04.630 Section 6002.1 Definitions. 15.04.640 Section 6004.1 Highly toxic, moderately toxic, and toxic compressed gases. 15.04.650 Sections 6004.2 and 6004.2.1 Indoor storage and use. 15.04.660 Section 6004.2.1.1 and Table 6004.2.1.1 Quantities. 15.04.670 Section 6004.4 through 6004.4.8.2 General indoor requirements. 15.04.010 2025 California Fire Code, Title 24, Part 9 adopted and amended. The California Fire Code, 2025 Edition, as adopted by the California Code of Regulations Title 24, Part 9, and Appendices B, C, D, E, F, G, H, and K is adopted as herein amended. One copy of the California Fire Code is on file and open to public inspection in the Office of the City Clerk. Additional copies of the secondary codes set forth within the California Fire Code, and the amendments set forth in this chapter, are on file and open to public inspection in the fire department administrative office. Whenever the phrase “California Fire Code” appears in this code or in any ordinance of the city, such phrase shall be deemed and construed to refer to and apply to the “California Fire Code, 2025 Edition” as adopted by the California Code of Regulations Title 24, Part 9 and as adopted and amended by this chapter. 15.04.020 Local Amendments. The provisions of this Chapter shall constitute local amendments to the cross-referenced provisions of the California Fire Code, 2025 Edition, and shall be deemed to replace the cross-referenced sections of said Code with the respective provisions set forth in this Chapter. Where used in this Chapter 15.04, ellipses shall indicate text of the California Fire Code, 2025 Edition, that has been Item 6 Attachment A - Ordinance repealing PAMC Chapter 15.04 and adopting a new Chapter 15.04, incorporating California Fire Code (2025 Edition) and local amendments and related findings        Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 6  Packet Pg. 129 of 413  NOT YET APPROVED 4 20251017_ms29 adopted without amendment but is omitted for brevity. 15.04.030 Section 102.5 amended - Application of residential code. Section 102.5 of the California Fire Code is amended to read as follows: 102.5 Application of residential code. Where structures are designed and constructed in accordance with the California Residential Code, the provisions of this code shall apply as follows: 1. Construction and design provisions: a. Provisions of this code pertaining to the exterior of the structure shall apply, including, but not limited to, premises identification, fire apparatus access, and water supplies. b. Provisions of this code pertaining to the interior of the structure shall apply when specifically required by this code including, but not limited to, Sections 903.2 through 903.3.7 and Section 907.2.10. c. Where interior or exterior systems or devices are installed, construction permits required by Section 105.6 of this code shall also apply. 2. Administrative, operational, and maintenance provisions: all such provisions of this code shall apply. 15.04.040 Section 103.2 Appointment deleted. Section 103.2 of the California Fire Code is deleted. 15.04.050 Sections 105.3.9 Permits/Permit fees. Section 105.3.9 is added to the California Fire Code to read as follows: 105.3.9 Permits/Permit fees. All permit fees shall be established by the City Council as set forth in the municipal fee schedule. 15.04.060 Table 105.5.9 Permit amounts for compressed gases. Table 105.5.9 of the California Fire Code is amended to read as follows: TABLE 105.5.9 PERMIT AMOUNTS FOR COMPRESSED GASES1 TYPE OF GAS 2 AMOUNT (cubic feet) X 0.0283 for m3 Item 6 Attachment A - Ordinance repealing PAMC Chapter 15.04 and adopting a new Chapter 15.04, incorporating California Fire Code (2025 Edition) and local amendments and related findings        Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 7  Packet Pg. 130 of 413  NOT YET APPROVED 5 20251017_ms29 For SI: 1 cubic foot = 0.0283m3. 1 Refer to Chapters 27, 30, 32, 35, 37, 40 and 41 for additional requirements and exceptions. 2 Cubic feet measured at normal Temperature and pressure. 15.04.070 Table 105.5.22 Permit amounts for hazardous materials. Table 105.5.22 of the California Fire Code is amended to read as follows: TABLE 105.5.22 PERMIT AMOUNTS FOR HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AMOUNT Carcinogens 10 pounds Combustible liquids See Section 105.5.16 Corrosive materials: Gases Liquids Solids See Section 105.5.8 55 gallons 500 pounds Gases Liquids See Section 105.5.8 See Section 105.5.16 Item 6 Attachment A - Ordinance repealing PAMC Chapter 15.04 and adopting a new Chapter 15.04, incorporating California Fire Code (2025 Edition) and local amendments and related findings        Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 8  Packet Pg. 131 of 413  NOT YET APPROVED 6 20251017_ms29 Liquids Solids Any amount Liquids: Class I-IV Liquids: Class V Solids: Class I-IV Solids: Class V Any Amount No Permit Required Any Amount No Permit Required Gases Liquids 504 Cubic Feet Any amount Hazards: 55 gallons 500 pounds Gases Liquids Solids Any amount Any amount Any amount Gases Liquids Solids Any amount Any amount Any amount Gases Liquids Solids Any amount Any amount Any amount Liquids Solids Any amount For SI: 1 gallon = 3.785 L, 1 pound = 0.454kg. a. 22 gallons when Table 5003.1.1(1) Note k applies and hazard identification signs in accordance with Section 5003.5 are provided for quantities of 22 gallons or less. b. 220 pounds when Table 5003.1.1(1) Note k applies and hazard identification signs in accordance with Section 5003.5 are provided for quantities of 220 pounds or less. Item 6 Attachment A - Ordinance repealing PAMC Chapter 15.04 and adopting a new Chapter 15.04, incorporating California Fire Code (2025 Edition) and local amendments and related findings        Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 9  Packet Pg. 132 of 413  NOT YET APPROVED 7 20251017_ms29 15.04.080 Section 105.5.25 and Sections 105.5.55 through 105.5.59 Operational permits. Section 105.5.25 of the California Fire Code is amended and Sections 105.5.60 through 105.64 are added to read as follows: [. . .] 105.5.25 Hot work operations. An operational permit is required for hot work including, but not limited to: 1. Public exhibitions and demonstrations where hot work is conducted. 2. Use of portable hot work equipment inside a structure. Exception: (deleted) 3. Fixed-site hot work equipment, such as welding booths. 4. Hot work conducted within a wildfire risk area. 5. Application of roof coverings with the use of an open-flame device. 6. Where approved, the fire code official shall issue a permit to carry out a hot work program. This program allows approved personnel to regulate their facility’s hot work operations. The approved personnel shall be trained in the fire safety aspects denoted in this chapter and shall be responsible for issuing permits requiring compliance with the requirements found in Chapter 35. These permits shall be issued only to their employees or hot work operations under their supervision. [. . .] 105.5.60 Liquid gas fueled equipment. An operational permit is required for liquid gas fueled equipment. 105.5.61 Battery operated equipment. An operational permit is required for commercial/industrial/research battery operated equipment. 105.5.62 Underground storage tank. An operational permit is required for Underground Storage Tanks. 105.5.63 Radioactive materials. An operational permit is required to store, use or handle any radioactive material or source. 105.5.64 Day care permit. An operational permit is required to operate a day care facility for more than six children or adults. Item 6 Attachment A - Ordinance repealing PAMC Chapter 15.04 and adopting a new Chapter 15.04, incorporating California Fire Code (2025 Edition) and local amendments and related findings        Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 10  Packet Pg. 133 of 413  NOT YET APPROVED 8 20251017_ms29 15.04.090 Section 105.6.13 Hazardous materials and Section 105.6.26 Construction permits. Section 105.6.13 of the California Fire Code is amended, and 105.6.26 of the California Fire Code is added to read as follows: [. . .] 105.6.13 Hazardous Materials. A construction permit is required to install, repair damage to, abandon, remove, place temporarily out of service, or close or substantially modify a storage facility or other area regulated by Chapter 50 where the hazardous materials in use and when equipment is modified or installed that uses, stores, processes, or conveys hazardous materials. Exceptions: 1. deleted 2. For repair work performed on an emergency basis, application for permit shall be made within two working days of commencement work. [. . .] 105.6.26 Underground fire service lines: installation or modification. A construction permit is required for the installation, modification or removal from service of underground fire service lines. 15.04.100 Reserved 15.04.110 Section 108.7 Certified Unified Program Agency Fees. Section 107.7 is added to the California Fire Code to read as follows: 107.7 Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) Fees. Pursuant to the Participating Agency Agreement between the County of Santa Clara and the City of Palo Alto dated July 1, 1997, or as amended, the Fire Department is authorized to collect fees associated with the CUPA programs. The CUPA fees will be collected on an annual basis or as specified in the Palo Alto Municipal Fee Schedule. 15.04.120 Section 109.1 Inspection authority. Section 108.1 of the California Fire Code is amended to read as follows: 109.1 Inspection authority. The fire code official is authorized to inspect, as often as necessary, buildings and premises, including such other hazards or appliances designated by the fire code official for the purposes of ascertaining and causing to be corrected any Item 6 Attachment A - Ordinance repealing PAMC Chapter 15.04 and adopting a new Chapter 15.04, incorporating California Fire Code (2025 Edition) and local amendments and related findings        Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 11  Packet Pg. 134 of 413  NOT YET APPROVED 9 20251017_ms29 conditions which would reasonably tend to cause fire or contribute to its spread, result in an unauthorized discharge of hazardous materials, or amount to any violation of this code or any other law or standard affecting fire and life safety. 15.04.130 Section 104.1.1 Enforcement/citation authority. Section 104.1.1 is added to the California Fire Code to read as follows: 104.1.1 Penal code citation authority. The employee positions designated in this section are authorized to exercise the authority provided in California Penal Code section 836.5 for violations of the California Fire Code. The designated employee positions are: Fire Chief, Deputy Fire Chief, Fire Marshal, Assistant Fire Marshal, Fire Inspector, Hazardous Materials Specialist and Hazardous Materials Inspector. 15.04.140 Section 113.4 Violation penalties. Section 112.4 of the California Fire Code is amended to read as follows: 113.4 Violation penalties. It is unlawful for any person to violate any provision or to fail to comply with any of the requirements of this Title 15 or any permits, conditions, or variances granted under this Title, and violators shall be subject to any penalty or penalties authorized by law, including but not limited to: administrative enforcement pursuant to Chapters 1.12 and 1.16 of the Palo Alto Municipal Code; and criminal enforcement pursuant to Chapter 1.08 of the Palo Alto Municipal Code. Each separate day or any portion thereof during which any violation of this chapter occurs or continues shall be deemed to constitute a separate offense. When the Fire Chief or his/her designee determines that a violation of this Chapter has occurred, the Fire Chief or his/her designee may record a notice of pendency of code violation with the Office of the County Recorder stating the address and owner of the property involved. When the violation has been corrected, the Fire Chief or his/her designee shall issue and record a release of the notice of pendency of code violation. [. . .] 15.04.150 Definitions Section 202 Except as noted herein, Section 202 is adopted in full. The following definitions are amended or added to Section 202 of the California Fire Code to read as follows: CORROSIVE LIQUID. Corrosive liquid is: 1) any liquid which, when in contact with living tissue, will cause destruction or Item 6 Attachment A - Ordinance repealing PAMC Chapter 15.04 and adopting a new Chapter 15.04, incorporating California Fire Code (2025 Edition) and local amendments and related findings        Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 12  Packet Pg. 135 of 413  NOT YET APPROVED 10 20251017_ms29 irreversible alteration of such tissue by chemical action; or 2) any liquid having a pH of 2 or less or 12.5 or more; or 3) any liquid classified as corrosive by the U.S. Department of Transportation; or 4) any material exhibiting the characteristics of corrosivity in accordance with Title 22, California Code of Regulations §66261.22. EMERGENCY POWER OFF (EPO). A manually operated device that disconnects electrical services to the building or specific equipment. FALSE ALARM. The willful, knowing, or negligent initiation or transmission of a signal, message, or other notification of an event of fire when no such danger exists. LARGE-SCALE FIRE TESTING. Testing a representative energy storage system that induces a significant fire into the device under test and evaluates whether the fire will spread to adjacent energy storage system units, surrounding equipment, or through an adjacent fire-resistance-rated barrier. MAXIMUM THRESHOLD QUANTITY (MAX TQ). Maximum threshold quantity is the maximum quantity of a moderately toxic or toxic gas, which may be stored in a single vessel before a more stringent category of regulation is applied. The following equation shall be used to calculate the Max TQ: Max TQ (pounds) = LC50 (ppm) x 2 lb. MODERATELY TOXIC GAS. A moderately toxic gas is a chemical or substance that has a median lethal concentration (LC50) in air more than 2000 parts per million but not more than 7500 parts per million by volume of gas or vapor, when administered by continuous inhalation for an hour, or less if death occurs within one hour, to albino rats weighing between 200 and 300 grams each. HEALTH HAZARD -OTHER. A hazardous material which affects target organs of the body, including but not limited to, those materials which produce liver damage, kidney damage, damage to the nervous system, act on the blood to decrease hemoglobin function, deprive the body tissue of oxygen or affect reproductive capabilities, including mutations (chromosomal damage), sensitizers or teratogens (effect on fetuses). SECONDARY CONTAINMENT. Secondary containment is that level of containment that is external to and separate from primary containment and is capable of safely and securely containing the material, without discharge, for a period of time reasonably necessary to ensure detection and remedy of the primary containment failure. SPILL CONTROL. Spill control is that level of containment that is external to and separate from the primary containment and is capable of safely and securely containing the contents of the largest container and prevents the materials from spreading to other parts of the room. Item 6 Attachment A - Ordinance repealing PAMC Chapter 15.04 and adopting a new Chapter 15.04, incorporating California Fire Code (2025 Edition) and local amendments and related findings        Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 13  Packet Pg. 136 of 413  NOT YET APPROVED 11 20251017_ms29 WORKSTATION. A workstation is a defined space or independent principal piece of equipment using hazardous materials with a hazard rating of 1. 15.04.160 Section 316.7 Roof guiderails at interior courts. Section 316.7 of the California Fire Code is added to read as follows: 316.7 Roof guardrails at interior courts. Roof openings into interior courts that are bounded on all sides by building walls shall be protected with guardrails. The top of the guardrail shall not be less than 42 inches in height above the adjacent roof surface that can be walked on. Intermediate rails shall be designed and spaced such that a 12-inch diameter sphere cannot pass through. 15.04.170 320.3.13 Safety certification. Section 320.3.13 of the California Fire Code is added to read as follows: 320.3.13 Safety certification. The equipment, process, training procedures and occupancy associated with industrial additive manufacturing may be required by the fire code official to receive a safety certification from Underwriter's Laboratory or equivalent. 15.04.180 Section 322.6 Fire protection system. Section 322.6 of the California Fire Code is added to read as follows: 322.6 Fire protection system. The storage and/or charging of power micromobility devices shall be protected with a NFPA 13 fire sprinkler system. The system shall be designed to Ordinary Hazard II. Exception: Micromobility powered devices in residential units. 15.04.190 Section 401.5 Making false report. Section 401.5 of the California Fire Code is amended to read as follows: 401.5 Making false report. A person shall not, knowingly or unknowingly, give, signal, or transmit a false alarm. Initiation or transmission in a twelve-month period of three or more signals, messages, or other notifications of an event of fire when no such danger exists shall be presumed negligent. 15.04.200 Section 503.1 Fire access roadways. Section 503.1 of the California Fire Code is amended to read as follows: Item 6 Attachment A - Ordinance repealing PAMC Chapter 15.04 and adopting a new Chapter 15.04, incorporating California Fire Code (2025 Edition) and local amendments and related findings        Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 14  Packet Pg. 137 of 413  NOT YET APPROVED 12 20251017_ms29 503.1 Fire access roadways. Where required, fire apparatus access roads shall be provided and maintained in accordance with Sections 503.1.1 through 503.1.3 and as per Fire Department Access Road Standards. [. . .] 15.04.210 Section 503.2.1 Dimensions. Section 503.2.1 of the California Fire Code is amended to read as follows: 503.2.1 Dimensions. Fire apparatus access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 20 feet (6096 mm) exclusive of shoulders, or as required by Appendix D, except for approved security gates in accordance with Section 503.6, and an unobstructed vertical clearance of 13 feet 6 inches (4115 mm). 15.04.220 Section 503.2.2 Authority. Section 503.2.2 of the California Fire Code is amended to read as follows: 503.2.2 Authority. The fire code official shall have the authority to require or permit modifications to the required access widths and/or vertical clearance where they are inadequate for fire or rescue operations or where necessary to meet the public safety objectives of the jurisdiction. 15.04.230 Section 504.5 Access control devices. Section 504.5 of the California Fire Code is amended to read as follows: 504.5 Access control devices. When access control devices including bars, grates, gates, electric or magnetic locks or similar devices, which would inhibit rapid fire department emergency access to within and throughout the building, are installed, such devices shall be approved by the fire code official. All electrically powered access control devices shall be provided with an approved means for deactivation or unlocking from a single location or otherwise approved by the fire code official or his/her designee. Access control devices must also comply with Chapter 10. 15.04.240 Section 505.1.1 and 505.1.2 Premises identification. Sections 505.1.1 and 505.1.2 of the California Fire Code are added to read as follows: 505.1.1 Address illumination. Address identification required by Section 505.1 shall be illuminated. Item 6 Attachment A - Ordinance repealing PAMC Chapter 15.04 and adopting a new Chapter 15.04, incorporating California Fire Code (2025 Edition) and local amendments and related findings        Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 15  Packet Pg. 138 of 413  NOT YET APPROVED 13 20251017_ms29 505.1.2 Address identification size. Address numbers and letters required by Section 505.1 shall be sized as follows: 1. When the structure is between thirty-six (36) and fifty (50) feet from the road or other emergency means of access, a minimum of one-half inch (0.5”) stroke by six inches (6”) high is required. 2. When the structure is fifty (50) or more feet from the road or other emergency means of access, a minimum of one inch (1”) stroke by nine inches (9”) high is required. 15.04.250 Section 509.1.2 Fire protection equipment identification. Section 509.1.2 of the California Fire Code is added to read as follows: 509.1.2 Fire Protection equipment identification. Exterior fire control valves, standpipes, hose valves, fire department connection, post indicators, fire service backflow preventers and other fire department appurtenances are to be painted red for identification. 15.04.260 Sections 603.10 through 603.12. Section 603.10 through 603.12 is added to the California Fire Code to read as follows: 603.10 Immersion heaters. All electrical immersion heaters used in dip tanks, sinks, vats and similar operations shall be provided with approved over- temperature controls and low liquid level electrical disconnects. Manual reset of required protection devices shall be provided. 603.11 Electric vehicle service equipment – car chargers. Electric vehicle service equipment shall be equipped with collision protection and an emergency power off (EPO) switch as determined necessary by the Fire Code Official. 603.12 Enclosed parking manual exhaust system. Enclosed parking garages associated with non-residential buildings shall install a Knox remote power box to manually activate the mechanical ventilation system to 100% capacity. 15.04.270 Section 4103.1.2.1.1 Prohibitive locations. Section 4103.1.2.1.1 of the California Fire Code is amended to read as follows: 4103.1.2.1.1 Prohibitive Locations. The storage or use of portable outdoor gas- fired heating appliances is prohibited in any of the following locations: 1. Inside of any occupancy where connected to the fuel gas container. 2. Inside of tents, canopies and membrane structures. Item 6 Attachment A - Ordinance repealing PAMC Chapter 15.04 and adopting a new Chapter 15.04, incorporating California Fire Code (2025 Edition) and local amendments and related findings        Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 16  Packet Pg. 139 of 413  NOT YET APPROVED 14 20251017_ms29 3. On exterior balconies and rooftops. Exception: intentionally deleted 15.04.280 Section 903.2 Automatic sprinkler systems, where required. Section 903.2 of the California Fire Code is amended to read as follows: 903.2 Automatic sprinkler systems, where required. Approved automatic sprinkler systems in new buildings and structures and in existing modified buildings and structures, shall be provided in the locations described in this section. Automatic fire sprinklers shall be installed per the requirements set forth in Sections 903.2.1 through 903.2.18 and as follows, whichever is the more restrictive: 1. An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided throughout all new buildings and structures. Exception: New non-residential occupancies, buildings or structures that do not exceed 350 square feet of building area and contain no interior plumbing fixtures. 2. An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided throughout all existing buildings when modifications are made that create conditions described in Sections 903.2.1 through 903.2.18, or that create an increase in fire area to more than 3,600 square feet or when the addition is equal or greater than 50% of the existing building square footage whichever is more restrictive. 3. An automatic fire sprinkler system is required in basements when any of the following occurs: a. New basements used for storage, utility, occupancy, or habitable space regardless of size. b. Existing basements that are altered for the use of storage, utility, occupancy, or habitable space regardless of size. c. Existing basements that are expanded by more than 50%. If the addition or alteration is only the basement, then only the basement is required to be protected by fire sprinklers. 4. An automatic fire sprinkler system is required when either the roof structure, exterior walls, or combination of both has been removed, altered and/or replaced in at least 50% of the existing structure. 5. An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed throughout when any change in use or occupancy creates a more hazardous fire/life safety condition, as determined by the Fire Chief. Item 6 Attachment A - Ordinance repealing PAMC Chapter 15.04 and adopting a new Chapter 15.04, incorporating California Fire Code (2025 Edition) and local amendments and related findings        Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 17  Packet Pg. 140 of 413  NOT YET APPROVED 15 20251017_ms29 6. All new covered trash enclosures regardless of size require installation of fire sprinklers (nonresidential only). Exception: A fire extinguishing system will not be required when all of the following conditions are met: a. The trash enclosure, including the door(s) and roof are constructed of noncombustible materials. b. The trash enclosure is stand-alone structure, be a minimum of 20- feet away from adjacent buildings and 10-feet away from property line(s); and c. The enclosure is used exclusively for waste garbage, recyclables, and organize waste/composting contained within the approved trash bins/containers. No outdoor storage is permitted within the trash enclosure. 7. Phone booths and pods when installed in a commercial building equipped with a fire sprinkler system. 8. Fume hoods when installed in a commercial building equipped with a fire sprinkler system. Exception: Spaces or areas in telecommunications buildings used exclusively for telecommunications equipment, associated electrical power distribution equipment, batteries and standby engines, provided that those spaces or areas are equipped throughout with an automatic smoke detection system in accordance with Section 907.2 and are separated from the remainder of the building by not less than 1-hour fire barriers constructed in accordance with Section 707 or not less than 2-hour horizontal assemblies constructed in accordance with Section 711, or both. [. . .] 15.04.290 Section 903.3.1.1 NFPA 13 sprinkler systems. Section 903.3.1.1 of the California Fire Code is amended to read as follows: 903.3.1.1. NFPA 13 sprinkler systems. Where the provisions of this code require that a building or portion thereof be equipped throughout with an automatic sprinkler system in accordance with this section, sprinklers shall be installed throughout in accordance with NFPA 13 and State and local requirements except as provided in Section 903.3.1.1.1. Item 6 Attachment A - Ordinance repealing PAMC Chapter 15.04 and adopting a new Chapter 15.04, incorporating California Fire Code (2025 Edition) and local amendments and related findings        Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 18  Packet Pg. 141 of 413  NOT YET APPROVED 16 20251017_ms29 15.04.295 903.3.1.1.5 Increase in fire sprinkler design criteria. Section 903.3.1.1.5 has been added to the California Fire Code to read as follows: 903.3.1.1.5 Increase in fire sprinkler design criteria. 1. For new buildings having no designated use or tenant, the minimum sprinkler design density shall be Ordinary Hazard Group II / 1500 square feet. 2. Where future use or tenant is determined to require a higher density, the sprinkler system shall be augmented to meet the higher density. 3. Light hazard shall be hydraulically designed to a 1500 square foot most remote area or as required by the fire code official. 4. Laboratory areas within buildings shall be hydraulically designed to Ordinary Hazard II density. 5. Parking areas where mechanical vehicle storage equipment is used the fire sprinkler system shall be hydraulically designed to Extra Hazard II density. 6. In multi-residential apartments, townhomes, and condominiums. 7. In new commercial buildings that will have electrical vehicle chargers, the fire sprinkler system shall be designed to Extra Hazard II density. 8. In new commercial buildings that will have power micromobility devices, the fire sprinkler system shall be designed to Ordinary Hazard II. 9. ESS in commercial buildings shall comply with one of the following: a. ESS units with a maximum stored energy capacity of 50 kWh, as described in Section 1207.5.1, shall be designed with a minimum density of 0.40 gpm/ft2 (1.14 L/min) based over the area of the room or 2,500 square-foot design area, whichever is smaller. b. ESS units (groups) exceeding 50 kWh shall use a density based on large-scale fire testing complying with Section 1207.1.7. [. . .] 15.04.300 Section 903.3.1.2 NFPA 13R sprinkler systems. Section 903.3.1.2 of the California Fire Code is amended to read as follows: 903.3.1.2 NFPA 13R sprinkler systems. Where allowed in buildings of Group R occupancies, automatic sprinkler systems shall be installed throughout in accordance Item 6 Attachment A - Ordinance repealing PAMC Chapter 15.04 and adopting a new Chapter 15.04, incorporating California Fire Code (2025 Edition) and local amendments and related findings        Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 19  Packet Pg. 142 of 413  NOT YET APPROVED 17 20251017_ms29 with NFPA 13 and State and local standards. [. . .] 15.04.310 Section 903.3.1.3 and 903.3.1.3.1 NFPA 13D sprinkler systems. Section 903.3.1.3 of the California Fire Code is amended and 903.3.1.3.1 is added to read as follows: 903.3.1.2 NFPA 13D sprinkler systems. Where allowed, automatic sprinkler systems installed in one-and two-family dwellings shall be installed throughout in accordance with NFPA 13D and State and local standards. Fire sprinkler protection shall be provided under rear covered patios extending over 4 ft perpendicular from the exterior of the structure. 903.3.1.3.1 Increase in fire sprinkler design criteria. Structures determined by the fire code official to have higher firefighting hazardous condition, or located in the Wildland- Urban Interface Fire Area, shall have an increase in fire sprinkler design criteria as determined by the fire code official. 15.04.320 Section 903.3.10 Floor control valves. Section 903.4.3 of the California Fire Code is amended to read as follows: 903.3.10 Floor control valves. Automatic sprinkler systems serving buildings two (2) or more stories in height shall have valves installed to control the system independently on each floor including basements. 15.04.330 Section 905.3.1 Height. Section 905.3.1 of the California Fire Code is amended to read as follows: 905.3.1 Height. A Class I Standpipe System shall be installed in new buildings or buildings being retrofitted with a fire sprinkler system where the roof edge/parapet is greater than 27 feet above the lowest level of Fire apparatus access roadway and in below grade levels. 15.04.340 Section 909.20.7 Maintenance and operational schedule. Section 909.20.7 is added to the California Fire Code to read as follows: 909.20.7 Maintenance and operational schedule. A routine maintenance and operational testing program shall be initiated immediately after the smoke control system has passed the acceptance tests. A written schedule for routine maintenance and operational testing shall be established and both shall occur at least annually. Item 6 Attachment A - Ordinance repealing PAMC Chapter 15.04 and adopting a new Chapter 15.04, incorporating California Fire Code (2025 Edition) and local amendments and related findings        Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 20  Packet Pg. 143 of 413  NOT YET APPROVED 18 20251017_ms29 15.04.350 Section 1008.3 Illumination required by an emergency electrical system. Section 1008.3 of the California Fire Code is amended to read as follows: Section 1008.3 Illumination required by an emergency electrical system. An emergency electrical system shall be provided to automatically illuminate the following areas in the event of a power supply failure: 1. In rooms or spaces that require two or more exits or access to exits: 1.1. Aisles. 1.2. Corridors. 1.3. Exit access stairways and ramps. 2. In buildings that require two or more exits or access to exits: 2.1. Interior exit access stairways and ramps. 2.2. Interior and exterior exit stairways and ramps. 2.3. Exit passageways. 2.4. Vestibules and areas on the level of discharge used for exit discharge in accordance with Section 1028.2. 2.5. Exterior landings as required by Section 1010.1.5 for exit doorways that lead directly to the exit discharge. 2.6 Group I-2 exit discharge stairways, ramps, aisles, walkways and escalators leading to a public way or to a safe dispersal area in accordance with Section 1028.5. 3. In other rooms and spaces: 3.1. Electrical equipment rooms. 3.2. Fire command centers. 3.3. Fire pump rooms. 3.4. Generator rooms. 3.5. Public restrooms. 15.04.360 Section 1031.2 Where required. Section 1031.2 of the California Fire Code is amended to read: 1031.2 Where required. In addition to the means of egress required by this chapter, emergency escape and rescue openings shall be provided in Group R occupancies: Basements and sleeping rooms below the fourth story above grade plane shall have not fewer than one emergency escape and rescue opening in accordance with this section. Where basements contain one or more sleeping rooms, an emergency escape and rescue opening shall be required in each sleeping room but shall not be required in adjoining areas of the basement. Such openings shall open directly into a public way or to a yard or court that opens to a public way or to an egress balcony that leads to a public way. Item 6 Attachment A - Ordinance repealing PAMC Chapter 15.04 and adopting a new Chapter 15.04, incorporating California Fire Code (2025 Edition) and local amendments and related findings        Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 21  Packet Pg. 144 of 413  NOT YET APPROVED 19 20251017_ms29 Exceptions: 1. In Groups R-1 and R-2 occupancies constructed of Type I, Type IIA, Type IIIA or Type IV construction equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1. 2. Group R-2.1 occupancies meeting the requirements for delayed egress in accordance with Section 1010.2.13 may have operable windows that are breakable in sleeping rooms permanently restricted to a maximum of 4-inch open position. 3. Emergency escape and rescue openings are not required from basements or sleeping rooms that have an exit door or exit access door that opens directly into a public way or to a yard, court or exterior egress balcony that leads to a public way. 4. Storm shelters and basements used only to house mechanical equipment not exceeding a total floor area of 200 square feet (18.58 m2) 15.04.370 Section 1207.1.5 Large-scale fire test. Section 1207.1.5 of the California Fire Code is amended to read: 1207.1.5 Large-scale fire test. Where required elsewhere in Section 1207, large-scale fire testing shall be conducted in accordance with NFPA 855 as amended, and UL 9540A. The testing shall be conducted or witnessed and reported by an approved testing laboratory and show that a fire involving one ESS will not propagate to an adjacent ESS, and where installed within buildings, enclosed areas and walk-in units will be contained within the room, enclosed area or walk-in unit for a duration equal to the fire-resistance rating of the room separation specified in Section 1207.7.4. The test report shall be provided to the fire code official for review and approval in accordance with Section 104.822. 15.04.375 Section 1207.5.2 Maximum allowable quantities. Section 1207.5.2 of the California Fire Code is amended to read as follows: 1207.5.2 Maximum allowable quantities. Fire areas within rooms, areas and walk-in units containing electrochemical ESS shall not exceed the maximum allowable quantities in Table 1207.5. The allowable number of fire areas, maximum allowable quantity, and fire-resistance rating of fire-barriers for commercial structures shall comply with Table 1207.5.1. Exceptions: Where approved by the fire code official, rooms, areas and walk-in units containing Item 6 Attachment A - Ordinance repealing PAMC Chapter 15.04 and adopting a new Chapter 15.04, incorporating California Fire Code (2025 Edition) and local amendments and related findings        Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 22  Packet Pg. 145 of 413  NOT YET APPROVED 20 20251017_ms29 electrochemical ESS that exceed the amounts in Table 1207.5 shall be permitted based on a hazardous mitigation analysis in accordance with Section 1207.1.6 and large-scale fire testing complying with Section 1207.1.7. 1. Lead-acid and nickel-cadmium battery systems installed in facilities under the exclusive control of communications utilities and operating at less than 50 VAC and 60 VDC in accordance with NFPA 76. 2. Dedicated-use buildings in compliance with Section 1207.7.1. TABLE 1207.5.1 DESIGN AND NUMBER OF ESS FIRE AREAS STORY PERCENTAGE OF MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE QUANTITY PER FIRE AREAS PER STORY FIRE-RESISTANCE RATING FOR FIRE BARRIERS IN HOURS 7-9 6 5 4 3 2 50 50 50 75 100 100 2 2 2 4 6 6 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 50 2 3 15.04.380 Section 1207.11.3 Location. Section 1207.11.3 of the California Fire Code is amended to read: 1207.11.3 Location. ESS shall be installed only in the following locations: 1. Detached garages and detached accessory structures. 2. Attached garages separated from the dwelling unit living space and sleeping units in accordance with Section R302.6. 3. Outdoors or on the exterior side of the exterior walls located not less than 3 feet (914 mm) from doors and windows directly entering the dwelling unit and shall not be located below or above any emergency escape and rescue openings. 4. Enclosed utility closets, basements and storage or utility spaces within dwelling Item 6 Attachment A - Ordinance repealing PAMC Chapter 15.04 and adopting a new Chapter 15.04, incorporating California Fire Code (2025 Edition) and local amendments and related findings        Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 23  Packet Pg. 146 of 413  NOT YET APPROVED 21 20251017_ms29 units and sleeping units with finished or noncombustible walls and ceilings. Walls and ceilings of unfinished wood-framed construction shall be provided with not less than 5/8-inch (15.9 mm) Type X gypsum wallboard. 5. ESS shall not be installed in sleeping rooms, or in closets, or spaces opening directly into sleeping rooms or in habitable spaces of dwelling units. 15.04.390 Section 3303.7 Fire walls. Section 3305.9 is added to the California Fire Code to read as follows: 3303.7 Fire walls. When firewalls are required in combustible construction, the wall construction shall be completed (with all openings protected) immediately after the building is sufficiently weather-protected at the location of the wall(s). 15.04.400 Section 3307.1.2, 3307.1.4. Section 3312.1 of the California Fire Code is amended to read as follows: 3307.1.2 Stairways required. Each level above the first story in new multi-story buildings be provided with at least two usable exit stairways after the floor decking is installed. The stairways shall be continuous and shall discharge to grade level. Stairways serving more than two floor levels shall be enclosed (with openings adequately protected) after exterior walls/windows are in place. Exit stairs in new and in existing, occupied buildings shall be lighted and maintained clear of debris and construction materials at all times. Exception: For new multi-story buildings, one of the required exit stairs may be obstructed on not more than two contiguous floor levels for the purposes of stairway construction (i.e., installation of gypsum board, painting, flooring, etc.). 3307.1.4 Required means of egress. All new buildings under construction shall have a least one unobstructed means of egress. All means of egress shall be identified in the written site safety plan as required by Section 3303.1. 15.04.410 Reserved 15.04.420 Reserved 15.04.430 Reserved 15.04.435 Section 4103.1 Portable unvented heaters. Section 4103.1 of the California Fire code is amended to read as follows: 4103.1 Portable unvented heaters. Portable unvented fuel-fired heating equipment Item 6 Attachment A - Ordinance repealing PAMC Chapter 15.04 and adopting a new Chapter 15.04, incorporating California Fire Code (2025 Edition) and local amendments and related findings        Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 24  Packet Pg. 147 of 413  NOT YET APPROVED 22 20251017_ms29 shall be prohibited in occupancies in Groups A, B, E, I, R-1, R-2, R-2.1, R-2.2, R-3, R-3.1 and R-4 and ambulatory care facilities. Exceptions: 1. Portable unvented fuel-fired heaters listed and labeled in accordance with UL 647 are permitted to be used in one- and two-family dwellings, where operated and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. 2. Portable outdoor gas-fired heating appliances in accordance with Section 4103.1.2. 15.04.440 Section 5001.2.2.2 Health Hazards. Section 5001.2.2.2 of the California Fire Code is amended to read as follows: 5001.2.2.2 Health Hazards. The material categories listed in this section are classified as health hazards. A material with a primary classification as a health hazard can also pose a physical hazard. 1. Highly toxic, toxic and moderately toxic. 2. Corrosive materials. 3. Moderately toxic gas. 4. Health hazards-Other. 15.04.450 Section 5001.7 Hazard materials management plan (HMMP) electronic submissions. Section 5001.7 is added to the California Fire Code to read as follows: 5001.7 HMMP electronic submissions. Each applicant for a permit, a renewed permit, or an amended permit pursuant to this title shall file an electronic submission of all hazardous materials through California Environmental Reporting System (CERS) for the fire chief's approval, to be known as a hazardous materials management plan (HMMP), which shall demonstrate the suitable storage of hazardous materials. The HMMP may be amended at any time with the consent of the fire chief. The HMMP shall be a public record except as otherwise specified. Section 18.23.100 in Title 18 identifies notification requirements of the availability of the HMMP. Approval of the HMMP shall mean that the HMMP has provided adequate information for the purposes of evaluating the permit approval. Such approval shall not be understood to mean that the city has made an independent determination of the adequacy of that which is described in the HMMP electronic submission. 15.04.460 Section 5003.1.3.1 Toxic, highly toxic, moderately toxic gases and similarly used Item 6 Attachment A - Ordinance repealing PAMC Chapter 15.04 and adopting a new Chapter 15.04, incorporating California Fire Code (2025 Edition) and local amendments and related findings        Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 25  Packet Pg. 148 of 413  NOT YET APPROVED 23 20251017_ms29 or handled materials. Section 5003.1.3.1 is added to the California Fire Code to read as follows: 5003.1.3.1 Toxic, highly toxic, moderately toxic gases and similarly used or handled materials. The storage, use, and handling of toxic, highly toxic and moderately toxic gases in amounts exceeding Table 6004.2 or 6004.3 shall be in accordance with this Chapter and Chapter 60. Any toxic, highly toxic or moderately toxic material that is used or handled as a gas or vapor shall be in accordance with the requirements for toxic, highly toxic or moderately toxic gases. 15.04.470 Section 5003.1.5 Other health hazards including carcinogens, irritants and sensitizers. Section 5003.1.5 is added to the California Fire Code to read as follows: 5003.1.5 Other health hazards including carcinogens, irritants and sensitizers. The storage, use, and handling of materials classified as other health hazards including carcinogens, irritants and sensitizers in amounts exceeding 810 cubic feet for gases, 55 gallons for liquids and 5,000 pounds for solids shall be in accordance with this Section 5003. 15.04.480 Section 5003.1.6 Additional secondary containment requirements. Section 5003.1.6 is added to the California Fire Code to read as follows: 5003.1.6 Additional secondary containment requirements. In addition to the requirements set forth in Section 5004.2, an approved containment system is required for any quantity of hazardous materials that are liquids or solids at normal temperature and pressure (NTP), where a spill is determined to be a plausible event and where such an event would endanger people, property or the environment. The approved containment system may be required to include a combination of spill control and secondary containment meeting the design and construction requirements set forth in section 5004.2. 15.04.490 Section 5003.2.2.1 Design and construction. Section 5003.2.2.1 of the California Fire Code is amended to read as follows: 5003.2.2.1 Design and construction. Piping, tubing, valves, fittings and related components used for hazardous materials shall be in accordance with the following: 1. Piping, tubing, valves, fittings and related components shall be designed and fabricated from materials compatible with the material to be contained and shall be of adequate strength and durability to withstand the pressure, structural and Item 6 Attachment A - Ordinance repealing PAMC Chapter 15.04 and adopting a new Chapter 15.04, incorporating California Fire Code (2025 Edition) and local amendments and related findings        Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 26  Packet Pg. 149 of 413  NOT YET APPROVED 24 20251017_ms29 seismic stress, and exposure to which they are subject. 2. Piping and tubing shall be identified in accordance with ASME A13.1 and the Santa Clara County Fire Chiefs Marking Requirements and Guidelines for Hazardous Materials and Hazardous Waste to indicate the material conveyed. 3. Manual valves or automatic remotely activated fail-safe emergency shutoff valves shall be installed on supply piping and tubing and provided with ready access at the following locations at the following locations: a. The point of use. b. The tank, cylinder or bulk use. 4. Manual emergency shutoff valves and controls for remotely activated emergency shutoff valves shall be clearly visible, provided with ready access and identified in an approved manner. 5. Backflow prevention or check valves shall be provided when the backflow of hazardous materials could create a hazardous condition or cause the unauthorized discharge of hazardous materials. 6. Where gases or liquids having a hazard ranking of: Health hazard Class 3 or 4 Flammability Class 4 Reactivity Class 4 In accordance with NFPA 704 are carried in pressurized piping above 15 pounds per square inch gauge (psig)(103 Kpa), an approved means of leak detection, emergency shutoff or excess flow control shall be provided. Where the piping originates from within a hazardous material storage room or area, the excess flow control shall be located within the storage room or area. Where the piping originates from a bulk source, the excess flow control shall be located as close to the bulk source as practical. Exceptions: a. Piping for inlet connections designed to prevent backflow. b. Piping for pressure relief devices. 7. Secondary containment or equivalent protection from spills or leaks shall be provided for piping for liquid hazardous materials and for highly toxic and toxic corrosive gases above threshold quantities listed in Tables 6004.2 and 6004.3. Secondary containment includes, but is not limited to, double- walled piping. Exceptions: a. Secondary containment is not required for toxic corrosive gases if the piping is Item 6 Attachment A - Ordinance repealing PAMC Chapter 15.04 and adopting a new Chapter 15.04, incorporating California Fire Code (2025 Edition) and local amendments and related findings        Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 27  Packet Pg. 150 of 413  NOT YET APPROVED 25 20251017_ms29 constructed of inert materials. b. Piping under sub-atmospheric conditions if the piping is equipped with an alarm and fail-safe-to-close valve activated by a loss of vacuum. 8. Expansion chambers shall be provided between valves whenever the regulated gas may be subjected to thermal expansion. Chambers shall be sized to provide protection for piping and instrumentation and to accommodate the expansion of regulated materials. 15.04.500 Section 5003.2.2.2 Additional regulations for supply piping for health hazard materials. Section 5003.2.2.2 of the California Fire Code is amended to read as follows: 5003.2.2.2 Additional regulations for supply piping for health hazard materials. Supply piping and tubing for gases and liquids having a health hazard ranking of 3 or 4 in accordance with ASME B31.3 and the following: 1. Piping and tubing utilized for the transmission of toxic, highly toxic, or highly volatile corrosive liquids and gases shall have welded or brazed connections throughout except for connections within an exhausted enclosure if the material is a gas, or an approved method of drainage or containment is provided for connections if the material is a liquid. 2. Piping and tubing shall not be located within corridors, within any portion of a means of egress required to be enclosed in fire-resistance-rated construction or in concealed spaces in areas not classified as Group H Occupancies. Exception: Piping and tubing within the space defined by the walls of corridors and the floor or roof above or in concealed space above other occupancies when installed in accordance with Section 415.11.7.4 of the California Building Code as required for Group H5 occupancies. 3. All primary piping for toxic, highly toxic and moderately toxic gases shall pass a helium leak test of 1x10-9 cubic centimeters/second where practical, or shall pass testing in accordance with an approved, nationally recognized standard. Tests shall be conducted by a qualified “third party” not involved with the construction of the piping and control systems. 15.04.510 Section 5003.3.1 Unauthorized discharges. Section 5003.3.1 of the California Fire Code is amended to read as follows: 5003.3.1 Unauthorized discharges. In the event hazardous materials are released in quantities reportable under state, federal or local regulations or when there is a threatened release that presents a threat to health, property or the environment, the fire Item 6 Attachment A - Ordinance repealing PAMC Chapter 15.04 and adopting a new Chapter 15.04, incorporating California Fire Code (2025 Edition) and local amendments and related findings        Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 28  Packet Pg. 151 of 413  NOT YET APPROVED 26 20251017_ms29 code official shall be notified immediately in an approved manner and the following procedures required in accordance with Sections 5003.3.1.1 through 5003.3.1.4. 15.04.520 Section 5003.5.2 Ventilation ducting. Section 5003.5.2 is added to the California Fire Code to read as follows: 5003.5.2 Ventilation ducting. Ducts venting hazardous materials operations shall be labeled with the hazard class of the material being vented and the direction of flow. 15.04.530 Section 5003.5.3 “H” Occupancies. Section 5003.5.4 is added to the California Fire Code to read as follows: 5003.5.3 “H” Occupancies. In “H” occupancies, all piping and tubing may be required to be identified when there is any possibility of confusion with hazardous materials transport tubing or piping. Flow direction indicators are required. 15.04.540 Section 5003.9.11 Fire extinguishing systems for workstations dispensing, handling or using hazardous materials. Section 5003.9.11 is added to the California Fire Code to read as follows: 5003.9.11 Fire extinguishing systems for workstations dispensing, handling or using hazardous materials. Combustible and non-combustible workstations which dispense, handle or use hazardous materials shall be protected by an approved automatic fire extinguishing system. Exception: Internal fire protection is not required for Biological Safety Cabinets that carry NSF/ANSI certification where quantities of flammable liquids in use or storage within the cabinet do not exceed 500 ml. 15.04.550 Section 5003.10.4 Elevators utilized to transport hazardous materials. Section 5003.10.4 of the California Fire Code is amended to read as follows: 5003.10.4 Elevators utilized to transport hazardous materials. 5003.10.4.1 When transporting hazardous materials, elevators shall have no other passengers other than in the individual(s) handling the chemical transport cart. 5003.10.4.1.1 When transporting cryogenic or liquefied compressed gases, there shall be no occupants in the elevator. 5003.10.4.2 Hazardous materials liquid containers shall have a maximum capacity of 20 liters (5.28 gal). 5003.10.4.3 Highly toxic, moderately toxic, and toxic gases shall be limited to a container Item 6 Attachment A - Ordinance repealing PAMC Chapter 15.04 and adopting a new Chapter 15.04, incorporating California Fire Code (2025 Edition) and local amendments and related findings        Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 29  Packet Pg. 152 of 413  NOT YET APPROVED 27 20251017_ms29 of a maximum water capacity of 1 lb. 5003.10.4.4 When transporting cryogenic or liquefied compressed gases means shall be provided to prevent the elevator from being summoned to other floors. 15.04.560 Section 5004.2.1 Spill control for hazardous material liquids. Section 5004.2.1 of the California Fire Code is amended to read as follows: 5004.2.1 Spill control for hazardous material liquids. Rooms, buildings or areas used for storage of hazardous material liquids shall be provided with spill control to prevent the flow of liquids to adjoining areas. Floors in indoor locations and similar surfaces in outdoor locations shall be constructed to contain a spill from the largest single vessel by one of the following methods: 1. Liquid-tight sloped or recessed floors in indoor locations or similar areas in outdoor locations. 2. Liquid-tight floors in indoor and outdoor locations or similar areas provided with liquid-tight raised or recessed sills or dikes. 3. Sumps and collection systems, including containment pallets in accordance with Section 5004.2.3. 4. Other approved engineered systems. Except for surfacing, the floors, sills, dikes, sumps and collection systems shall be constructed of noncombustible material, and the liquid-tight seal shall be compatible with the material stored. When liquid-tight sills or dikes are provided, they are not required at perimeter openings having an open-grate trench across the opening that connects to an approved collection system. 15.04.570 Sections 5004.2.2 and 5004.2.2.2 and Table 5004.2.2 Secondary containment for hazardous material liquids and solids. Sections 5004.2.2 and 5004.2.2.2 of the California Fire Code are amended to read as follows: 5004.2.2 Secondary containment for hazardous material liquids and solids. Buildings, rooms or areas used for the storage of hazardous materials liquids or solids shall be provided with secondary containment in accordance with this section. Table 5004.2.2 is deleted in its entirety. [. . .] 5004.2.2.2 Incompatible Materials. Incompatible materials shall be separated from each Item 6 Attachment A - Ordinance repealing PAMC Chapter 15.04 and adopting a new Chapter 15.04, incorporating California Fire Code (2025 Edition) and local amendments and related findings        Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 30  Packet Pg. 153 of 413  NOT YET APPROVED 28 20251017_ms29 other in independent secondary containment systems. 15.04.580 Section 5004.2.3 Containment pallets. Section 5004.2.3 of the California Fire Code is amended to read as follows: 5004.2.3 Containment pallets. Combustible containment pallets shall not be used inside buildings to comply with Section 5004.2 where the individual container capacity exceeds 55 gallons (208 L) or an aggregate capacity of multiple containers exceeds 1,000 gallons (3785 L) for liquids or where the individual container capacity exceeds 550 pounds (250 kg) or an aggregate of multiple containers exceeds 10,000 pounds (4540 kg) for solids. Where used as an alternative to spill control and secondary containment for outdoor storage in accordance with the exception in Section 5004.2, containment pallets shall comply with all of the following: 1. A liquid-tight sump accessible for visual inspection shall be provided; 2. The sump shall be designed to contain not less than 66 gallons (250L); 3. Exposed surfaces shall be compatible with material stored; Containment pallets shall be protected to prevent collection of rainwater within the sump of the containment pallet. 15.04.590 Section 5704.2.7.5.8 Overfill prevention. Section 5704.2.7.5.8 of the California Fire Code is amended to read as follows: 5704.2.7.5.8 Overfill prevention. An approved means or method in accordance with Section 5704.2.9.7.5 shall be provided to prevent overfill of all Class I, II and IIIA liquid storage tanks. Storage tanks in refineries, bulk plants or terminals regulated by Sections 5706.4 or 5706.7 shall have overfill protection in accordance with API 2350. An approved means or method in accordance with Section 5704.2.9.7.5 shall be provided to prevent the overfilling of Class IIIB liquid storage tanks connected to fuel-burning equipment inside buildings. Exception: Outside aboveground tanks with a capacity of 1320 gallons (5000 L) or less need only comply with Section 5704.2.9.7.5.1 (1.1) 15.04.600 Section 5704.2.7.5.9 Automatic and/or remote filling of tanks. Section 5704.2.7.5.9 is added to the California Fire Code to read as follows: 5704.2.7.5.9 Automatic and/or remote filling of tanks. Systems that remotely or automatically fill flammable or combustible liquid tanks shall be equipped with overfill Item 6 Attachment A - Ordinance repealing PAMC Chapter 15.04 and adopting a new Chapter 15.04, incorporating California Fire Code (2025 Edition) and local amendments and related findings        Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 31  Packet Pg. 154 of 413  NOT YET APPROVED 29 20251017_ms29 protection, as approved by the fire code official, that sends an alarm signal to a constantly attended location and immediately stops the filling of the tank. The alarm signal and automatic shutoff shall be tested on an annual basis. Records of such testing shall be maintained on-site, and available for review, for a period of five (5) years. 15.04.610 Reserved 15.04.620 Section 6001.1 Site scope. Section 6001.1 of the California Fire Code is amended to read as follows: 6001.1 Site scope. The storage and use of highly toxic, moderately toxic and/or toxic materials shall comply with this chapter. Compressed gases shall also comply with Chapter 53. Exceptions: 1. Display and storage in Group M and storage in Group S occupancies complying with Section 5003.1 1. 2. Conditions involving pesticides or agricultural products as follows: 2.1. Application and release of pesticide, agricultural products and materials intended for use in weed abatement, erosion control, soil amendment or similar applications when applied in accordance with the manufacturer’s instruction and label directions. 2.2. Transportation of pesticides in compliance with the Federal Hazardous Materials Transportation Act and regulations thereunder. 2.3. Storage in dwellings or private garages of pesticides registered by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to be utilized in and around the home, garden, pool, spa and patio. 15.04.630 Section 6002.1 Definitions. Section 6002.1 is amended to read as follows: 6002.1 Definitions. The following terms are defined in Chapter 2: CONTAINMENT SYSTEM. CONTAINMENT VESSEL. EXCESS FLOW VALVE. HIGHLY TOXIC. MODERATELY TOXIC GAS OZONE-GAS GENERATOR. Item 6 Attachment A - Ordinance repealing PAMC Chapter 15.04 and adopting a new Chapter 15.04, incorporating California Fire Code (2025 Edition) and local amendments and related findings        Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 32  Packet Pg. 155 of 413  NOT YET APPROVED 30 20251017_ms29 PHYSIOLOGICAL WARNING THRESHOLD. REDUCED FLOW VALVE. TOXIC. 15.04.640 Section 6004.1 Highly toxic, moderately toxic and toxic compressed gases. Section 6004.1 of the California Fire Code is amended to read as follows: 6004.1.1 The storage and use of highly toxic, moderately toxic, and toxic compressed gases shall comply with this section. 6004.1.1 Special limitations for indoor storage and use by occupancy. The indoor storage and use of highly toxic, moderately toxic, and toxic compressed gases in certain occupancies shall be subject to the limitations contained in Sections 6004.1.1.1 through 6004.1.1 .3. 6004.1.1.1 Group A, E, I or U occupancies. Toxic, moderately toxic and highly toxic compressed gases shall not be stored or used within Group A, E, I or U occupancies. Exception: Cylinders not exceeding 20 cubic feet (0.566 m3) at normal temperature and pressure (NTP) are allowed within gas cabinets or fume hoods. 6004.1.1.2 Group R occupancies. Toxic, moderately toxic, and highly toxic compressed gases shall not be stored or used in Group R occupancies. 6004.1.1.3 Offices, retail sales and classrooms. Toxic, moderately toxic and highly toxic compressed gases shall not be stored or used in offices, retail sales or classroom portions of Group B, F, M or S occupancies. Exception: In classrooms of Group B occupancies, cylinders with a capacity not exceeding 20 cubic feet (0.566 m3) at NTP are allowed in gas cabinets or fume hoods. 15.04.650 Sections 6004.2 and 6004.2.1 Indoor storage and use. Sections 6004.2 and 6004.2.1 of the California Fire Code are amended to read as follows: 6004.2 Indoor storage and use. The indoor storage and use of highly toxic, moderately toxic, and toxic compressed gases shall be in accordance with Sections 6004.2.1 through 6004.2.2.10.3. 6004.2.1 Applicability. The applicability of regulations governing the indoor storage and use of highly toxic, moderately toxic, and toxic compressed gases shall be as set forth in Sections 6004.2.1.1 through 6004.2.1.4. 15.04.660 Section 6004.2.1.1 and Table 6004.2.1.1 Quantities. Section 6004.2.1.4 and Table 6004.2.1.4 of the California Fire Code are added to read as follows: Item 6 Attachment A - Ordinance repealing PAMC Chapter 15.04 and adopting a new Chapter 15.04, incorporating California Fire Code (2025 Edition) and local amendments and related findings        Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 33  Packet Pg. 156 of 413  NOT YET APPROVED 31 20251017_ms29 6004.2.1.1 Quantities not exceeding the maximum allowable quantity per control area. The indoor storage or use of highly toxic, moderately toxic, and toxic gases in amounts exceeding the minimum threshold quantities per control area set forth in Table 6004.2.1.4 but not exceeding maximum allowable quantity per control area set forth in Table 5003.1.1(2) shall be in accordance with Sections 5001, 5003, 6001, 6004.1, and 6004.4. Table 6004.2.1.1 Minimum Threshold Quantities for Highly Toxic, Moderately Toxic and Toxic Gases for Indoor Storage and Use Highly Toxic 20 cubic feet Moderately Toxic 405 cubic feet Toxic 405 cubic feet 15.04.670 Section 6004.4 through 6004.4.8.2 General indoor requirements. Section 6004.4 through 6004.4.8.2 of the California Fire Code is added to read as follows: 6004.4. General indoor requirements. The general requirements applicable to the indoor storage and use of highly toxic, moderately toxic, and toxic compressed gases shall be in accordance with Sections 6004.4 through 6004.4.8.2 6004.4.1 Cylinder and tank location. Cylinders shall be located within gas cabinets, exhausted enclosures or gas rooms. Portable and stationary tanks shall be located within gas rooms or exhausted enclosures. Exception: 1. Where a gas detection system is provided in accordance with 6004.4.8 6004.4.2. Ventilated areas. The room or area in which gas cabinets or exhausted enclosures are located shall be provided with exhaust ventilation. Gas cabinets or exhausted enclosures shall not be used as the sole means of exhaust for any room or area. 6004.4.3. Piping and controls. In addition to the requirements of Section 5003.2.2, piping and controls on stationary tanks, portable tanks, and cylinders shall comply with the following requirements: 1. Stationary tanks, portable tanks, and cylinders in use shall be provided with a means of excess flow control on all tank and cylinder inlet or outlet connections. Exceptions: Item 6 Attachment A - Ordinance repealing PAMC Chapter 15.04 and adopting a new Chapter 15.04, incorporating California Fire Code (2025 Edition) and local amendments and related findings        Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 34  Packet Pg. 157 of 413  NOT YET APPROVED 32 20251017_ms29 1. Inlet connections designed to prevent backflow. 2. Pressure relief devices. 6004.4.4 Gas rooms. Gas rooms shall comply with Section 5003.8.4 and both of the following requirements: 1. The exhaust ventilation from gas rooms shall be directed to an exhaust system. 2. Gas rooms shall be equipped with an approved automatic sprinkler system. Alternative fire-extinguishing systems shall not be used. 6004.4.5 Treatment systems. The exhaust ventilation from gas cabinets, exhausted enclosures and gas rooms, required in Section 6004.4.1 shall be directed to a treatment system. The treatment system shall be utilized to handle the accidental release of gas and to process exhaust ventilation. The treatment system shall be designed in accordance with Sections 6004.2.2.7.1 through 6004.2.2.7.5 and Chapter 5 of the California Mechanical Code. Exceptions: 1. Highly toxic, moderately toxic, and toxic gases—storage. A treatment system is not required for cylinders, containers and tanks in storage where all of the following controls are provided: a. Valve outlets are equipped with gas-tight outlet plugs or caps. b. Hand wheel-operated valves have handles secured to prevent movement. c. Approved containment vessels or containment systems are provided in accordance with Section 6004.2.2.3. 2. Highly toxic, moderately toxic, and toxic gases —use. Treatment systems are not required for highly toxic, moderately toxic, and toxic gases supplied by stationary tanks, portable tanks, or cylinders where a gas detection system complying with Section 6004.4.8 and listed or approved automatic-closing fail-safe valves are provided. The gas detection system shall have a sensing interval not exceeding 5 minutes. Automatic- closing fail-safe valves shall be located immediately adjacent to cylinder valves and shall close when gas is detected at the permissible exposure limit (PEL) by a gas sensor monitoring the exhaust system at the point of discharge from the gas cabinet, exhausted enclosure, ventilated enclosure or gas room. 6004.4.5.1. Design. Treatment systems shall be capable of diluting, adsorbing, absorbing, containing, neutralizing, burning or otherwise processing the contents of the largest single vessel of compressed gas. Where a total containment system is used, the system shall be designed to handle the maximum anticipated pressure of release to the system when it reaches equilibrium. 6004.4.5.2. Performance. Treatment systems shall be designed to reduce the maximum Item 6 Attachment A - Ordinance repealing PAMC Chapter 15.04 and adopting a new Chapter 15.04, incorporating California Fire Code (2025 Edition) and local amendments and related findings        Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 35  Packet Pg. 158 of 413  NOT YET APPROVED 33 20251017_ms29 allowable discharge concentrations of the gas to one-half immediate by dangerous to life and health (IDLH) at the point of discharge to the atmosphere. Where more than one gas is emitted to the treatment system, the treatment system shall be designed to handle the worst-case release based on the release rate, the quantity and the IDLH for all compressed gases stored or used. 6004.4.5.3. Sizing. Treatment systems shall be sized to process the maximum worst- case release of gas based on the maximum flow rate of release from the largest vessel utilized. The entire contents of the largest compressed gas vessel shall be considered. 6004.4.5.4 Stationary tanks. Stationary tanks shall be labeled with the maximum rate of release for the compressed gas contained based on valves or fittings that are inserted directly into the tank. Where multiple valves or fittings are provided, the maximum flow rate of release for valves or fittings with the highest flow rate shall be indicated. Where liquefied compressed gases are in contact with valves or fittings, the liquid flow rate shall be utilized for computation purposes. Flow rates indicated on the label shall be converted to cubic feet per minute (cfm/min) (m3/s) of gas at normal temperature and pressure (NTP). 6004.4.5.5 Portable tanks and cylinders. The maximum flow rate of release for portable tanks and cylinders shall be calculated based on the total release from the cylinder or tank within the time specified in Table 6004.2.2.7.5. Where portable tanks or cylinders are equipped with approved excess flow or reduced flow valves, the worst- case release shall be determined by the maximum achievable flow from the valve as determined by the valve manufacturer or compressed gas supplier. Reduced flow and excess flow valves shall be permanently marked by the valve manufacturer to indicate the maximum design flow rate. Such markings shall indicate the flow rate for air under normal temperature and pressure. 6004.4.6. Emergency power. Emergency power shall be provided for the following systems in accordance with Section 604: 1. Exhaust ventilation system. 2. Treatment system. 3. Gas detection system. 4. Smoke detection system. 6004.4.6.1. Fail-safe systems. Emergency power shall not be required for mechanical exhaust ventilation and treatment systems where approved fail-safe systems are installed and designed to stop gas flow. 6004.4.7. Automatic fire detection system. An approved automatic fire detection system shall be installed in rooms or areas where highly toxic, toxic, and moderately toxic compressed gases are stored or used. Activation of the detection system shall sound a local alarm. The fire detection system shall comply with Section 907. Item 6 Attachment A - Ordinance repealing PAMC Chapter 15.04 and adopting a new Chapter 15.04, incorporating California Fire Code (2025 Edition) and local amendments and related findings        Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 36  Packet Pg. 159 of 413  NOT YET APPROVED 34 20251017_ms29 6004.4.8. Gas detection system. A gas detection system complying with Section 916 shall be provided to detect the presence of gas at or below the PEL or ceiling limit of the gas for which detection is provided. Exceptions: 1. A gas detection system is not required for toxic and moderately toxic gases when the physiological warning threshold level for the gas is at a level below the accepted PEL for the gas. 2. A gas detection system is not required for highly toxic, toxic, and moderately toxic gases where cylinders, portable tanks, and all non-continuously welded connects are within a gas cabinet or exhausted enclosures. 6004.4.8.1. Alarms. The gas detection system shall initiate a local alarm and transmit a signal to an approved location. 6004.4.8.2. Shut off of gas supply. The gas detection system shall automatically close the shut off valve at the source on gas supply piping and tubing related to the system being monitored for whichever gas is detected. Exception: Automatic shutdown is not required for highly toxic, moderately toxic, and toxic compressed gas systems where all of the following controls are provided: 1. Constantly attended / supervised. 2. Provided with emergency shutoff valves that have ready access. SECTION 2. The Council adopts the findings for local amendments to the California Fire Code, 2025 Edition, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 3. The Council finds that, with the exception of the changes codified at PAMC Sections 15.04.180, 260, 280, 295, 375, and 435, the changes or modifications to the California Fire Code adopted by this ordinance are substantially equivalent to changes or modifications that were previously filed by the governing body of the City and were in effect as of September 30, 2025, and are therefore exempt from the moratorium on new residential building standards imposed by Assembly Bill (AB) 130 (2025). To the extent that the changes codified at the PAMC sections listed in this finding are not substantially equivalent to changes or modifications previously filed and in effect as of September 30, 2025, they do not affect residential units and are therefore not subject to the AB 130 moratorium. SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion or sections of the Ordinance. The Council hereby declares that it would have adopted the Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid. Item 6 Attachment A - Ordinance repealing PAMC Chapter 15.04 and adopting a new Chapter 15.04, incorporating California Fire Code (2025 Edition) and local amendments and related findings        Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 37  Packet Pg. 160 of 413  NOT YET APPROVED 35 20251017_ms29 SECTION 5. The Council finds that this project is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), pursuant to Section 15061 of the California Guidelines, because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the amendments herein adopted will have a significant effect on the environment. SECTION 6. This Ordinance shall become effective on the commencement of the thirty-first day after the day of its adoption. INTRODUCED: PASSED: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTENTIONS: ATTEST: ____________________________ ____________________________ City Clerk Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED: ____________________________ ____________________________ City Attorney or Designee City Manager ____________________________ Director of Planning and Development Services ____________________________ Fire Chief Item 6 Attachment A - Ordinance repealing PAMC Chapter 15.04 and adopting a new Chapter 15.04, incorporating California Fire Code (2025 Edition) and local amendments and related findings        Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 38  Packet Pg. 161 of 413  NOT YET APPROVED 36 20251017_ms29 EXHIBIT A Findings for Local Amendments to the 2025 California Fire Code The following local amendments to the 2025 California Fire Code make modifications as authorized by the California Health and Safety Code. In accordance with Section 18941.5 of said Code, Findings are hereby made to show that such modifications or changes are reasonably necessary because of local climatic, geological or topographical conditions. I. PREAMBLE I. Findings of fact A. Pursuant to Section 17958.5 of the California Health and Safety Code, the report contained herein is submitted as the “Findings of Fact” document with regard to the adoption of the California Fire Code, 2025 Edition, and amendments. Under this adopting ordinance, specific amendments have been established which are more restrictive in nature than those adopted by the State of California (State Building Code Standards, State Housing and Community Development Codes) commonly referred to as California Code of Regulations, Titles 19, 24 and 25. B. These amendments to the California Fire Code, 2025 Edition, have been recognized by the City of Palo Alto (“City”) as tools for addressing the fire problems, concerns and future direction by which the authority can establish and maintain an environment which will afford a level of fire and life safety to all who live and work within the City’s boundaries. C. Under the provisions of Section 17958.5 of the Health and Safety Code, local amendments shall be based upon the following: climatic, geological/geographical, and topographical conditions. The findings of fact contained herein shall address each of these situations and shall present the local situation which, either singularly or in combination, caused the established amendments to be adopted. 1. Climactic Conditions: The City, on an average, experiences an annual rainfall of 16" - 18". This rainfall can be expected between October and April of each year. However, during the summer months there is little, if any, measurable precipitation. During this dry period the temperatures are usually between 70- 90 degrees with light to gusty westerly winds. These drying winds, combined with the natural vegetation which is dominant throughout the area, create a hazardous fuel condition which can cause, and has caused in the past, extensive grass and brush land fires. With more and more development encroaching into these wooded and grass covered areas, wind-driven fires could have severe consequences, as has been demonstrated on several occasions in Palo Alto and other Item 6 Attachment A - Ordinance repealing PAMC Chapter 15.04 and adopting a new Chapter 15.04, incorporating California Fire Code (2025 Edition) and local amendments and related findings        Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 39  Packet Pg. 162 of 413  NOT YET APPROVED 37 20251017_ms29 areas of the state. Fires in structures can easily spread to the wildland as well as a fire in the wildland into a structure. Because of the weather patterns, a normal rainfall cannot always be relied upon. This can result in water rationing and water allocation systems, as demonstrated by the drought years of 1986- 1991. Water shortages can also be expected in the future due to the current water storage capacities and increased consumption. The water supply for the Palo Alto fire department makes use of automatic fire sprinkler systems feasible as a means to reduce our dependency on large volumes of water for fire suppression. 2. Geological & Geographical Conditions: Geographical Location. Palo Alto is located at the northern most part of Santa Clara County. Palo Alto is a major focus of the “Silicon Valley,” the center for an expanding and changing electronics industry, as well as pharmaceutical, biomedical, and genetic research. Seismic Location. Palo Alto is situated on alluvial solids between San Francisco Bay and the San Andreas Fault zone. The City’s location makes it particularly vulnerable to damage to taller and older structures caused by seismic events. The relatively young geological processes that have created the San Francisco Bay Area are still active today. Seismically, the city sits between two active earthquake faults (San Andreas and the Hayward/Calaveras), and numerous potentially active faults. Approximately 55% of the City’s land surface is in the high-to-moderate seismic hazard zones. Seismic and Fire Hazards. Fire following an earthquake has the potential of causing greater loss of life and damage than the earthquake itself. The majority of the City’s high-rise structures are located in seismic risk zones. Should a significant seismic event occur, Public Safety resources would have to be prioritized to mitigate the greatest threat, and may not be available for every structural fire. In such event, individual structures, including high-rise buildings, should be equipped to help in mitigating the risk of damage. Other variables may tend to intensify the situation: a. The extent of damage to the water system; b. The extent of isolation due to bridge and/or freeway overpass collapse; c. The extent of roadway damage and/or amount of debris blocking the roadways; d. Climatical conditions (hot, dry weather with high winds); e. Time of day will influence the amount of traffic on roadways and could intensify the risk to life during normal business hours; f. The availability of timely mutual aid or military assistance; g. Many high-rise structures are located near areas of high fire danger necessitating special Item 6 Attachment A - Ordinance repealing PAMC Chapter 15.04 and adopting a new Chapter 15.04, incorporating California Fire Code (2025 Edition) and local amendments and related findings        Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 40  Packet Pg. 163 of 413  NOT YET APPROVED 38 20251017_ms29 precautions. Transportation. Palo Alto is dissected by a major state highway (El Camino Real) and two major freeways (I-280 and U.S. 101), which potentially could negatively affect response times of fire suppression equipment. Soil Conditions. Palo Alto lies at the southern end of San Francisco Bay and is built atop the alluvial deposits that surround the margins of the Bay. The alluvium was created by the flooding of many streams emptying into the San Francisco Bay depression, and from intermittent sea water inundation that has occurred over the last 2 or 3 million years. The areas closest to the Bay are overlain by unconsolidated fine silty clay, known as Bay Mud which varies in thickness from a few feet to as much as 30 feet. Generally, the older more stable alluvium is to the south and the younger less stable material is to the north. Bedrock lies beneath the area at depths of generally 300' or more. 3. Topographical Conditions: The findings of fact for the topographical element, as would be expected, are closely associated with the geological/geographical element. With the elevation changes within the district, development is of course following the path of least resistance, creating a meandering pattern. This then does not lend itself to a good systematic street and road layout, which would promote easy traffic flow. It has, in fact, resulted in few major crosstown thoroughfares which tend to be heavily congested, primarily during commute hours and seasonal periods of the year. This creates barriers which reduce the response time of fire equipment and other emergency services. The topography of the district is being burdened by major structures. Employment areas are throughout the district. The people who work in these complexes have added to the traffic congestion throughout the city, thereby reducing the fire department’s response time capabilities. Inherent delays caused by the traffic patterns to many of these types of projects, make it necessary to mitigate this problem by requiring additional built-in automatic fire protection systems to provide early detection and initial control until the arrival of the fire department. The topography of the district in much of the commercial and residential zones lies within or near a flood plane. Periodically, heavy rains and high tides cause region-wide flooding which not only delays response but also increases demands on fire personnel. The fire code amendments increase safeguards and initialize early response to help compensate for these physical delays. As a result of the findings of facts which identify the various climatic, geological/geographical and topographical elements, those additional requirements as specified in the amendments to adopting ordinance for the California Fire Code 2025 Edition, by the City of Palo Alto area are considered reasonable and necessary modifications. The experience of several disastrous fires Item 6 Attachment A - Ordinance repealing PAMC Chapter 15.04 and adopting a new Chapter 15.04, incorporating California Fire Code (2025 Edition) and local amendments and related findings        Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 41  Packet Pg. 164 of 413  NOT YET APPROVED 39 20251017_ms29 within the city in addition to Santa Clara, Monterey, San Mateo, Alameda and Contra Costa counties have demonstrated the need for other fire protection features, the most significant of which was located in the Oakland/Berkeley Hills in which over 3,000 homes were destroyed and 25 human lives were lost. While it is clearly understood that the adoption of such regulations may not prevent the incidence of fire, the implementation of these various amendments to the Code may reduce the severity and potential of loss of life and property. II. Specific Findings for Local Amendments The majority of local amendments (those not specifically listed below) are made strictly to conform to other parts of the Palo Alto Municipal Code (PAMC) and for similar administrative purposes. Based upon the findings of fact described in section I, the City Council also makes the following specific findings regarding local climatic, geological, and topographic conditions related to local amendments to the California and International Fire Codes found in Chapter 15.04 of Title 15 of the Palo Alto Municipal Code (“PAMC”): 1. The local amendments contained in PAMC sections 15.4.030, 15.04.040, 15.04.050, 15.04.110, 15.04.130, and 15.04.140 are administrative in nature and do not require local topographical, geographical, or climatic findings. 2. The local amendments contained in PAMC sections 15.04.060 through 15.04.090, 15.04.150, 15.04.170, 15.04.260, and 15.04.440 through 15.04.670 - relating to general conditions for hazardous materials are necessary modifications to the California Fire Code flammable and hazardous materials sections because they maintain consistency with the Hazardous Materials Storage Ordinance which has been adopted county-wide since 1983. Requirements include safeguards such as monitoring, secondary containment, separation of non-compatibles which prevent incidents should a seismic event, unauthorized release or accident occur. See Findings 2 and 3 above - Geological and Topographical. 3. The local amendment contained in PAMC section 15.04.260- Immersion Heaters- is necessary as a fire control measure because it requires additional controls on process heating devices which are often activated when unattended. See Finding 2 above - Geological. 4. The local amendments contained in PAMC 15.04.180 and 15.04.280 through 15.04.340 relating to fire sprinkler systems are necessary for faster control of fires in the dense populated area and areas in an extended response time of our community to confine a fire to the area of origin rather than spread to neighboring structures. The modifications contained in these amendments provide additional fire extinguishing systems in new construction, major remodels, additions, and occupancy classification changes to help Item 6 Attachment A - Ordinance repealing PAMC Chapter 15.04 and adopting a new Chapter 15.04, incorporating California Fire Code (2025 Edition) and local amendments and related findings        Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 42  Packet Pg. 165 of 413  NOT YET APPROVED 40 20251017_ms29 mitigate the problems identified in Findings 1, 2, and 3, above- Climatic, Geographical and Topographical. 5. The local amendment contained in PAMC section 15.04.320 - Floor control valves is necessary to provide fire extinguishing control devices that allow systems to remain partially in service while repairs or maintenance are ongoing. See Findings 1 and 2 above- Climatic and Geographical. 6. The local amendments contained in PAMC section 15.04.350 provides emergency lighting, where emergency lighting is required, in public restrooms regardless of size for public safety. See Findings 1, 2, and 3 – Climatic, Geographical and Topographical. 7. The local amendment contained in PAMC section 15.04.360 matches the requirements for exceptions for emergency escapes in basements/storm shelters in local amendment contained in section 16.04.360. See Findings 1 and 2 – Climatic and Geographical. 8. The local amendments contained in PAMC section 15.04.370 through 15.04.380 are recommendations from Santa Clara County Fire Marshals Association to decrease the fire hazard and risk of fire spread associated with commercial ESS installations and clarifying location for residential ESS to not interfere with emergency escapes or rescue openings. See Finding 3 above – Topographical. 9. The local amendments contained in PAMC sections 15.04.390 and 15.04.400 provide for additional fire and life safety measures during construction and demolition. See Findings 2 and 3, above- Geographical and Topographical. 10. The local amendments contained in PAMC sections 15.04.060 through 15.04.090, 15.04.150, 15.04.460, and 15.04.620 through 15.04.670 regarding toxic gases incorporate requirements initially established by the Model Toxic Gas Ordinance and California Fire Code. Administrative and restrictive measures include changes in definitions, quantities regulated, and utilizes County consensus guidelines established by other regional agencies which share similar climatic, geological/geographical, and topographical conditions. See Findings 1, 2 and 3, above- Climatic, Geographical and Topographical. 11. The local amendments added in PAMC section 15.04.160 - Roof guardrails at interior courts provides for additional fire and life safety measures for firefighters on buildings with unconventional lightwells. See Findings 2 and 3, above- Geographical and Topographical. 12. The local amendments contained in PAMC section 15.04.020 set forth construction and design provisions for residential property to mitigate the additional risk of fire. The modifications contained in this amendment provide for additional precautions against fire risks Item 6 Attachment A - Ordinance repealing PAMC Chapter 15.04 and adopting a new Chapter 15.04, incorporating California Fire Code (2025 Edition) and local amendments and related findings        Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 43  Packet Pg. 166 of 413  NOT YET APPROVED 41 20251017_ms29 necessitated by the conditions listed in Findings 1, 2, and 3, above- Climatic, Geographical and Topographical. 13. The local amendment contained in PAMC section 15.04.120 is necessary to identify who has the authority and to establish the frequency to inspect buildings and premises. The modifications contained in this amendment provide for additional precautions to mitigate the problems identified in Findings 1, 2, and 3, above- Climatic, Geographical and Topographical. 14. The local amendment contained in PAMC section 15.04.190 is necessary to set forth a limit of the maximum number of false alarms the city of Palo Alto Fire Department will respond to. This measure is necessary to prevent fire department resources from responding to non- emergency situations thereby being unavailable to respond to an actual emergency associated with Climatic, Geographical and Topographical conditions listed in Findings 1, 2 and 3 above. 15. The local amendments added in PAMC sections 15.04.200 through 15.04.250 – The Fire Access Roadways and Dimensions requirements are necessary to provide access for effective, efficient and safe firefighting operations. These measures are necessary to prevent a delay in fire department resources responding to and having access to an emergency situation associated with Climatic, Geographical and Topographical conditions listed in Findings 1, 2 and 3 above. 16. The local amendments added in PAMC section 15.04.270 – Prohibitive Locations and 15.04.435 - Portable Unvented Heaters are necessary to restrict the use of portable outdoor gas-fired heating appliances and portable unvented heaters in specific locations as these appliances can be a fire hazard that may also contribute to the uncontrolled spread of fire as a result of the Climatic, Geographical, and Topographical conditions described in Findings 1, 2, and 3 above. 17. The local amendment added in PAMC section 15.04.260 relating to the protection of energy storage systems is necessary to prevent potential damage and fire that may also contribute to the uncontrolled spread of fire as a result of the Climatic, Geographical, and Topographical conditions described in Findings 1, 2, and 3 above. Item 6 Attachment A - Ordinance repealing PAMC Chapter 15.04 and adopting a new Chapter 15.04, incorporating California Fire Code (2025 Edition) and local amendments and related findings        Item 6: Staff Report Pg. 44  Packet Pg. 167 of 413  City Council Staff Report From: City Manager Report Type: CONSENT CALENDAR Lead Department: Planning and Development Services Meeting Date: November 3, 2025 Report #:2509-5262 TITLE Approval of Budget Amendments in the Local Housing Trust Fund, Residential Housing In-Lieu Fund, Residential Housing Impact Fee Fund, and Commercial Housing Impact Fee Fund to Reflect Prior City Council Funding Commitments for the Development of 3001 El Camino Real 100% Affordable Multi-Family Housing Project; CEQA Status: Not a Project. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommend that City Council approve the following actions to reflect the prior $5,000,000 funding commitment to the 3001 El Camino Real 100% Affordable Multi-Family Housing Project: 1. Amend the Fiscal Year 2026 Budget Appropriation (Requires 2/3 Vote) for: a. The Local Housing Trust Fund (Fund 252) by: i. Increasing Grant Revenue by $1,900,000; and ii. Increase appropriation for Contract Services Expenses by $1,900,000; b. The Residential Housing In-Lieu Fund (Fund 233) by: i. Increasing appropriation for Contract Services expenses by $500,000; and ii. Decreasing the Fund Balance by $500,000; c. The Residential Housing Impact Fee Fund (Fund 293): i. Increasing appropriation for Contract Services expenses by $400,000; and ii. Decreasing the Fund Balance by $400,000; d. Commercial Housing Impact Fee Fund (Fund 234): i. Increasing appropriation for Contract Services Expenses by $2.2 million; and ii. Decreasing the Fund Balance by $2.2 million. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On January 21, 2025, City Council awarded a conditional funding commitment of $5 million to the 3001 El Camino Real 100% Affordable Multi-Family Housing Project, which was also found Item 7 Item 7 Staff Report        Item 7: Staff Report Pg. 1  Packet Pg. 168 of 413  to be a Local Housing Trust Fund qualifying project.1 The funding commitment sources were as follows: The remaining $1.9 million from the City’s 2022 Local Housing Trust Fund (LHTF) (Fund 252) program grant award from the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD); A corresponding $1.9 million in City Council designated Local Housing Trust Fund local matching funds from the Residential Housing In-Lieu Fund (Fund 233) ($500,000), Residential Housing Impact Fee Fund (Fund 293) ($400,000), and Commercial Housing Impact Fee Fund (Fund 234) ($1,000,000); and An additional $1.2 million from the Commercial Housing Impact Fee Fund (Fund 234). BACKGROUND Use a maximum of 70% of City and LHTF funds toward affordability levels at or below 60% of area median income (AMI); Use a minimum of 30% of City and LHTF funds toward affordability levels at or below 30% AMI; and Establish income and rent restrictions for no less than 55 years.2 3 The $1.5 million in grant funding, plus $1.5 million in local matching funds from Residential Housing In-Lieu Fund (Fund 233) were disseminated to the project.4 Therefore, there is a remaining balance of $1.9 million from the 1 City Council City Manager Report ID # 2409-3517; January 21, 2025: https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/viewer/preview?id=0&type=8&uid=2834b4e7-62e3-4bf4-b5a0- 76a52064282e 2 City Council City Manager Report ID # 14300; May 23, 2022: 3 City Council City Manager Report ID # 14281; May 23, 2022: 4 City Council City Manager Report ID # 2310-2167; November 27, 2023: https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/viewer/preview?id=0&type=8&uid=e6396253-ac8c-4d66-a41f- eaa569d4b79e. Item 7 Item 7 Staff Report        Item 7: Staff Report Pg. 2  Packet Pg. 169 of 413  City’s 2022 LHTF program grant award and a corresponding $1.9 million remaining balance in City Council designated Local Housing Trust Fund local matching funds in the Residential Housing In-Lieu Fund (Fund 233), Residential Housing Impact Fee Fund (Fund 293), and Commercial Housing Impact Fee Fund (Fund 234). ANALYSIS Item 7 Item 7 Staff Report        Item 7: Staff Report Pg. 3  Packet Pg. 170 of 413  Prevention System (HPS) units and 32 Rapid Rehousing (RHH) units. Subsequently, Charities Housing determined it would be unable to provide the 26 HPS units due to operational and financial constraints. However, the project is still able to provide at least 25% of the project units (32 units offered at 30% AMI) as Rapid Rehousing (RRH) units for transitionally homeless individuals, which would be allocated through the Countywide Rapid Rehousing program. c. Charities Housing needs to make minor adjustments in unit affordability levels based upon updated financials and the funding package prepared for the project across all project lenders. Table 1 summarizes these proposed adjustments. The maximum rent for each household remains at 30% of a household’s income. The average affordability for the project was 39.9% AMI when entitled in June 2023, went down to 38% AMI when City Council made its conditional funding award in January 2025, and the project currently proposes an average affordability of 40.39% AMI. Although 25 units would now be restricted at 60% AMI under the proposed affordability levels, City staff supports these minor affordability adjustments because the applicant has expressed that they are necessary for the purposes of funding the operation of the project and because more 2- bedroom and 3-bedroom units would now be restricted at 30% AMI than at entitlement and when City Council made its conditional funding award. Item 7 Item 7 Staff Report        Item 7: Staff Report Pg. 4  Packet Pg. 171 of 413  Item 7 Item 7 Staff Report        Item 7: Staff Report Pg. 5  Packet Pg. 172 of 413  Table 1: 3001 El Camino Real 100% Affordable Multi-Family Housing Project Unit Mix and Affordability Levels 15 22 12 25 20 12 12 15 20 10 15 20 0 2 6 0 5 6 0 7 4 0 7 4 5 0 4 15 7 7 23 7 4 22 7 4 0 0 2 0 8 15 0 3 4 0 3 4 0 1 1 2 1 1 Item 7 Item 7 Staff Report        Item 7: Staff Report Pg. 6  Packet Pg. 173 of 413  Item 7 Item 7 Staff Report        Item 7: Staff Report Pg. 7  Packet Pg. 174 of 413  The terms of the loan and other necessary documents for 3001 El Camino Real are still in the process of finalization, including review by HCD. However, according to the Affordable Housing Funding Guidelines, the typical loan terms included in the loan and other documents are a 3% interest rate, deferred, residual receipts, and a 55-year term loan. Underwriting and other LHTF-specific requirements are incorporated into the loan documents and the City’s regulatory agreements for the project. The promissory note contains the obligation to repay the $5 million with 3% interest per annum. POLICY IMPLICATIONS Program 2.1 Affordable Housing Development regarding partnering with a housing developer to provide housing for homeless, large families, and low-income persons; Program 6.2 Family Housing and Large Units due to the number of 3-bedroom units that City funding will assist; and Program 6.6 Fair Housing Impediments regarding the project being mixed-income project located in a high opportunity and resource rich area. FISCAL/RESOURCE IMPACT Item 7 Item 7 Staff Report        Item 7: Staff Report Pg. 8  Packet Pg. 175 of 413  The budget actions would also further reduce the Commercial Housing Impact Fee Fund (Fund 234) balance by $1.2 million to $2.4 million.9 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW APPROVED BY: 9 After City Council made its conditional funding award of $5 million to the 3001 El Camino Real project, the corresponding amounts in Fund 233, Fund 293, and Fund 234 were committed for the project. These amounts already specified for 3001 El Camino Real are not included in recent reporting to City Council in the October 22, 2025, City Manager Report #2505-4745 of available fund balances for potential affordable housing at Lot T. Item 7 Item 7 Staff Report        Item 7: Staff Report Pg. 9  Packet Pg. 176 of 413  City Council Staff Report From: City Manager Report Type: CONSENT CALENDAR Lead Department: Utilities Meeting Date: November 3, 2025 Report #:2506-4867 TITLE Approval of Professional Services Contract Number C26194191 with TJC and Associates, Inc. in the Amount Not-to-Exceed $242,483 for Dahl & Park Reservoirs Structural Evaluation and Condition Assessment. CEQA Status – Exempt Under CEQA Guidelines Sections 15061(b)(2) and (b)(3). RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that City Council approve and authorize the City Manager or their designee to execute Contract Number C26194191 (Attachment A) with TJC and Associates Inc. for Dahl & Park Reservoirs Structural Evaluation and Condition Assessment for a term of three years and a total, not-to-exceed amount of $242,483, including $232,483 for basic services and $10,000 for additional services. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The City of Palo Alto’s Water Tank Seismic Upgrade and Rehabilitation (WS-09000) projects provide proactive rehabilitation, seismic upgrades, and replacement of the City’s aging water storage tank infrastructure. Since 2010, five of the City’s seven drinking water storage reservoirs have been seismically retrofitted, rehabilitated, or newly constructed. The two remaining tanks, Dahl Reservoir and Park Reservoir, are currently included in the Water Tank Seismic Upgrade and Rehabilitation (WS-09000) budget for engineering inspections and seismic assessment, with potential replacements planned for FY 2029 and FY 2030. To support the upcoming design phase for the Dahl and Park Tank project and a pending grant application, staff seek to retain professional services to perform a condition assessment, which includes seismic assessment and conceptual level improvements with estimated construction costs. The contract with TJC and Associates, Inc. includes the necessary engineering seismic analysis to inform you of the full design and provide the information required by the state’s 2025 Hazard Mitigation Grant Program, which may provide up to $6,000,000 in grant funding for the project. BACKGROUND The City of Palo Alto (City) owns and maintains two welded steel, potable water storage tanks called Park Reservoir and Dahl Reservoir, located in the Palo Alto foothills area near Page Mill Item 8 Item 8 Staff Report        Item 8: Staff Report Pg. 1  Packet Pg. 177 of 413  Road. The tanks are 61 years old and require seismic retrofits, roof replacement, new coating, modifications to vents, and other miscellaneous improvements and repairs. Both reservoirs are one million gallon tanks, serving residential customers on Page Mill Road and in the Los Trancos area. The tank sites are located in the Palo Alto Foothills, approximately 4.5 miles south of Interstate 280 off Page Mill Road. While both tanks have been tentatively programmed for full replacement in FY 2029 and FY 2030, seismic retrofitting or other rehabilitation may be feasible, instead of a full tank replacement. ANALYSIS 1. The project consisted of three phases: 1) Condition Assessment; 2) Design; and 3) Engineering Services During Construction. The solicitation period was posted for 102 days. 47 proposal packages were downloaded however no proposals were received. Four potential proposers attended a pre-proposal meeting, some expressed concerns to deliver the complexity of the scope with their current staffing. The solicitation closed on February 16, 2024. 1 Public Link to Solicitation: https://procurement.opengov.com/portal/palo-alto-ca/projects/67117/ Item 8 Item 8 Staff Report        Item 8: Staff Report Pg. 2  Packet Pg. 178 of 413  FISCAL/RESOURCE IMPACT Funding for the contract is funded through the Fiscal Year 2026 Adopted Water Tank Seismic Upgrade and Rehabilitation (WS-09000) Capital Project. STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT The key stakeholders for this project include the Utilities Department, Fire Department, Office of Emergency Services, and Administrative Services. Engagement strategies include coordination meetings among various City departments and working groups involved with hazard mitigation, grant funding, and infrastructure planning. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Council action on this item is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review under sections 15061(b)(2) and (b)(3) because the proposed actions to assess conditions and prepare a seismic analysis have no potential to result in physical impacts on the environment and because the Dahl and Park Tanks project, which the proposed action relates to, was previously evaluated under CEQA prior to approval and was found to be categorically exempt under CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (repair, maintenance, or minor alteration of existing public facilities involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use) and Section 15302 (replacement or reconstruction of existing utility systems and/or facilities involving negligible or no expansion of capacity). ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: TJC and Associates, Contract C26194191 APPROVED BY: Alan Kurotori, Director Utilities Staff: Patrick LaBruzzo P.E., Principal Engineer, Water, Gas and Wastewater Engineering Item 8 Item 8 Staff Report        Item 8: Staff Report Pg. 3  Packet Pg. 179 of 413  Professional Services Rev. Oct 16,2024 Page 1 of 24 CITY OF PALO ALTO CONTRACT NO. C26194191 AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF PALO ALTO AND TJC AND ASSOCIATES, INC. This Agreement for Professional Services (this “Agreement”) is entered into as of the 20th day of October, 2025 (the “Effective Date”), by and between the CITY OF PALO ALTO, a California chartered municipal corporation (“CITY”), and TJC AND ASSOCIATES, INC., a corporation, located at 2300 Clayton Road, Suite 1450, Concord, CA 94520 (“CONSULTANT”). The following recitals are a substantive portion of this Agreement and are fully incorporated herein by this reference: RECITALS A. CITY intends to determine the condition of its water reservoir tanks (the “Project”) and desires to engage a consultant to provide structural engineering services for the condition assessment of Dahl and Park reservoirs in connection with the Project (the “Services”, as detailed more fully in Exhibit A). B. CONSULTANT represents that it, its employees and subconsultants, if any, possess the necessary professional expertise, qualifications, and capability, and all required licenses and/or certifications to provide the Services. C. CITY, in reliance on these representations, desires to engage CONSULTANT to provide the Services as more fully described in Exhibit A, entitled “SCOPE OF SERVICES”. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the recitals, covenants, terms, and conditions, in this Agreement, the parties agree as follows: SECTION 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES. CONSULTANT shall perform the Services described in Exhibit A in accordance with the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement. The performance of all Services shall be to the reasonable satisfaction of CITY. SECTION 2. TERM. The term of this Agreement shall be from the effective date of this agreement through October 19, 2028, unless terminated earlier pursuant to Section 19 (Termination) of this Agreement. SECTION 3. SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE. Time is of the essence in the performance of Services under this Agreement. CONSULTANT shall complete the Services within the term of this Agreement and in accordance with the schedule set forth in Exhibit B, entitled “SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE”. Any Services for which times for performance are not specified in this Agreement shall be commenced and completed by CONSULTANT in a reasonably prompt and timely manner based upon the circumstances and direction communicated to the CONSULTANT. CITY’s agreement to extend the term or the schedule for performance shall not preclude recovery of damages for delay if the extension is required due to the fault of CONSULTANT. Docusign Envelope ID: 7E87E5C7-8CFF-47DE-B310-B161FAC20910 Item 8 Attachment A - TJC and Associates, Contract C26194191        Item 8: Staff Report Pg. 4  Packet Pg. 180 of 413  Professional Services Rev. Oct 16,2024 Page 2 of 24 SECTION 4. NOT TO EXCEED COMPENSATION. The compensation to be paid to CONSULTANT for performance of the Services shall be based on the compensation structure detailed in Exhibit C, entitled “COMPENSATION,” including any reimbursable expenses specified therein, and the maximum total compensation shall not exceed Two Hundred Thirty- Two Thousand Four Hundred Eighty-Three Dollars ($234,483.00) . The hourly schedule of rates, if applicable, is set out in Exhibit C-1, entitled “SCHEDULE OF RATES.” Any work performed or expenses incurred for which payment would result in a total exceeding the maximum compensation set forth in this Section 4 shall be at no cost to the CITY. Optional Additional Services Provision (This provision applies only if checked and a not-to-exceed compensation amount for Additional Services is allocated below under this Section 4.) In addition to the not-to-exceed compensation specified above, CITY has set aside the not- to-exceed compensation amount of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00) for the performance of Additional Services (as defined below). The total compensation for performance of the Services, Additional Services and any reimbursable expenses specified in Exhibit C, shall not exceed Two Hundred Forty-Two Thousand Four Hundred Eighty-Three Dollars ($242,483.00), as detailed in Exhibit C. “Additional Services” means any work that is determined by CITY to be necessary for the proper completion of the Project, but which is not included within the Scope of Services described at Exhibit A. CITY may elect to, but is not required to, authorize Additional Services up to the maximum amount of compensation set forth for Additional Services in this Section 4. CONSULTANT shall provide Additional Services only by advanced, written authorization from CITY as detailed in this Section. Additional Services, if any, shall be authorized by CITY with a Task Order assigned and authorized by CITY’s Project Manager, as identified in Section 13 (Project Management). Each Task Order shall be in substantially the same form as Exhibit A-1, entitled “PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TASK ORDER”. Each Task Order shall contain a specific scope of services, schedule of performance and maximum compensation amount, in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement. Compensation for Additional Services shall be specified by CITY in the Task Order, based on whichever is lowest: the compensation structure set forth in Exhibit C, the hourly rates set forth in Exhibit C-1, or a negotiated lump sum. To accept a Task Order, CONSULTANT shall sign the Task Order and return it to CITY’s Project Manager within the time specified by the Project Manager, and upon authorization by CITY (defined as counter-signature by the CITY Project Manager), the fully executed Task Order shall become part of this Agreement. The cumulative total compensation to CONSULTANT for all Task Orders authorized under this Agreement shall not exceed the amount of compensation set forth for Additional Services in this Section 4. CONSULTANT shall only be compensated for Additional Services performed under an authorized Task Order and only up to the maximum amount of compensation set forth for Additional Services in this Section 4. Performance of and payment for any Additional Services are subject to all requirements and restrictions in this Agreement. SECTION 5. INVOICES. In order to request payment, CONSULTANT shall submit monthly Docusign Envelope ID: 7E87E5C7-8CFF-47DE-B310-B161FAC20910 Item 8 Attachment A - TJC and Associates, Contract C26194191        Item 8: Staff Report Pg. 5  Packet Pg. 181 of 413  Professional Services Rev. Oct 16,2024 Page 3 of 24 invoices to the CITY describing the Services performed and the applicable charges (including, if applicable, an identification of personnel who performed the Services, hours worked, hourly rates, and reimbursable expenses), based upon Exhibit C or, as applicable, CONSULTANT’s schedule of rates set forth in Exhibit C-1. If applicable, the invoice shall also describe the percentage of completion of each task. The information in CONSULTANT’s invoices shall be subject to verification by CITY. CONSULTANT shall send all invoices to CITY’s Project Manager at the address specified in Section 13 (Project Management) below. CITY will generally process and pay invoices within thirty (30) days of receipt of an acceptable invoice. SECTION 6. QUALIFICATIONS/STANDARD OF CARE. All Services shall be performed by CONSULTANT or under CONSULTANT’s supervision. CONSULTANT represents that it, its employees and subcontractors, if any, possess the professional and technical personnel necessary to perform the Services required by this Agreement and that the personnel have sufficient skill and experience to perform the Services assigned to them. CONSULTANT represents that it, its employees and subcontractors, if any, have and shall maintain during the term of this Agreement all licenses, permits, qualifications, insurance and approvals of whatever nature that are legally required to perform the Services. All Services to be furnished by CONSULTANT under this Agreement shall meet the professional standard and quality that prevail among professionals in the same discipline and of similar knowledge and skill engaged in related work throughout California under the same or similar circumstances. SECTION 7. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS. CONSULTANT shall keep itself informed of and in compliance with all federal, state and local laws, ordinances, regulations, and orders that may affect in any manner the Project or the performance of the Services or those engaged to perform Services under this Agreement, as amended from time to time. CONSULTANT shall procure all permits and licenses, pay all charges and fees, and give all notices required by law in the performance of the Services. SECTION 8. ERRORS/OMISSIONS. CONSULTANT is solely responsible for costs, including, but not limited to, increases in the cost of Services, arising from or caused by CONSULTANT’s errors and omissions, including, but not limited to, the costs of corrections such errors and omissions, any change order markup costs, or costs arising from delay caused by the errors and omissions or unreasonable delay in correcting the errors and omissions. SECTION 9. COST ESTIMATES. If this Agreement pertains to the design of a public works project, CONSULTANT shall submit estimates of probable construction costs at each phase of design submittal. If the total estimated construction cost at any submittal exceeds the CITY’s stated construction budget by ten percent (10%) or more, CONSULTANT shall make recommendations to CITY for aligning the Project design with the budget, incorporate CITY approved recommendations, and revise the design to meet the Project budget, at no additional cost to CITY. SECTION 10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. CONSULTANT acknowledges and agrees that CONSULTANT and any agent or employee of CONSULTANT will act as and shall be deemed at all times to be an independent contractor and shall be wholly responsible for the manner in which CONSULTANT performs the Services requested by CITY under this Agreement. CONSULTANT and any agent or employee of CONSULTANT will not have employee status with CITY, nor be entitled to participate in any plans, arrangements, or distributions by CITY Docusign Envelope ID: 7E87E5C7-8CFF-47DE-B310-B161FAC20910 Item 8 Attachment A - TJC and Associates, Contract C26194191        Item 8: Staff Report Pg. 6  Packet Pg. 182 of 413  Professional Services Rev. Oct 16,2024 Page 4 of 24 pertaining to or in connection with any retirement, health or other benefits that CITY may offer its employees. CONSULTANT will be responsible for all obligations and payments, whether imposed by federal, state or local law, including, but not limited to, FICA, income tax withholdings, workers’ compensation, unemployment compensation, insurance, and other similar responsibilities related to CONSULTANT’s performance of the Services, or any agent or employee of CONSULTANT providing same. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as creating an employment or agency relationship between CITY and CONSULTANT or any agent or employee of CONSULTANT. Any terms in this Agreement referring to direction from CITY shall be construed as providing for direction as to policy and the result of CONSULTANT’s provision of the Services only, and not as to the means by which such a result is obtained. SECTION 11. ASSIGNMENT. The parties agree that the expertise and experience of CONSULTANT are material considerations for this Agreement. CONSULTANT shall not assign or transfer any interest in this Agreement nor the performance of any of CONSULTANT’s obligations hereunder without the prior written approval of the City Manager. Any purported assignment made without the prior written approval of the City Manager will be void and without effect. Subject to the foregoing, the covenants, terms, conditions and provisions of this Agreement will apply to, and will bind, the heirs, successors, executors, administrators and assignees of the parties. SECTION 12. SUBCONTRACTING. Option A: No Subcontractor: CONSULTANT shall not subcontract any portion of the Services to be performed under this Agreement without the prior written authorization of the City Manager or designee. In the event CONSULTANT does subcontract any portion of the work to be performed under this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall be fully responsible for all acts and omissions of subcontractors. Option B: Subcontracts Authorized: Notwithstanding Section 11 (Assignment) above, CITY agrees that subcontractors may be used to complete the Services. The subcontractors authorized by CITY to perform work on this Project are: • Engeo, Joseph Seibold, (415)613-3382, jseibold@engeo.com • JDH Corrosion Consultants, Inc., Sean Carey, (925)927-6630, SCarey@JDHCorrosion.com • Bay Area Coating Consultants Inc., Ed Darrimon, (888)384-6839 edarrimon@bayareacoating.com CONSULTANT shall be responsible for directing the work of any subcontractors and for any compensation due to subcontractors. CITY assumes no responsibility whatsoever concerning compensation of subcontractors. CONSULTANT shall be fully responsible to CITY for all acts and omissions of subcontractors. CONSULTANT shall change or add subcontractors only with the prior written approval of the City Manager or designee. SECTION 13. PROJECT MANAGEMENT. CONSULTANT will assign Hernando Montoya as the CONSULTANT’s Project Manager, Email: hernando@tjcaa.com, Telephone: (925) 357- 2676 to have supervisory responsibility for the performance, progress, and execution of the Docusign Envelope ID: 7E87E5C7-8CFF-47DE-B310-B161FAC20910 Item 8 Attachment A - TJC and Associates, Contract C26194191        Item 8: Staff Report Pg. 7  Packet Pg. 183 of 413  Professional Services Rev. Oct 16,2024 Page 5 of 24 Services and represent CONSULTANT during the day-to-day performance of the Services. If circumstances cause the substitution of the CONSULTANT’s Project Manager or any other of CONSULTANT’s key personnel for any reason, the appointment of a substitute Project Manager and the assignment of any key new or replacement personnel will be subject to the prior written approval of the CITY’s Project Manager. CONSULTANT, at CITY’s request, shall promptly remove CONSULTANT personnel who CITY finds do not perform the Services in an acceptable manner, are uncooperative, or present a threat to the adequate or timely completion of the Services or a threat to the safety of persons or property. CITY’s Project Manager is Patrick LaBruzzo, Utilities Department, Water-Gas-Wastewater Engineering Division, 1007 Elwell Court, Palo Alto, CA, 94303, Email: patrick.labruzzo@PaloAlto.gov, Telephone: 650-566-4518. CITY’s Project Manager will be CONSULTANT’s point of contact with respect to performance, progress and execution of the Services. CITY may designate an alternate Project Manager from time to time. SECTION 14. OWNERSHIP OF MATERIALS. All work product, including without limitation, all writings, drawings, studies, sketches, photographs, plans, reports, specifications, computations, models, recordings, data, documents, and other materials and copyright interests developed under this Agreement, in any form or media, shall be and remain the exclusive property of CITY without restriction or limitation upon their use. CONSULTANT agrees that all copyrights which arise from creation of the work product pursuant to this Agreement are vested in CITY, and CONSULTANT hereby waives and relinquishes all claims to copyright or other intellectual property rights in favor of CITY. Neither CONSULTANT nor its subcontractors, if any, shall make any of such work product available to any individual or organization without the prior written approval of the City Manager or designee. CONSULTANT makes no representation of the suitability of the work product for use in or application to circumstances not contemplated by the Scope of Services. SECTION 15. AUDITS. CONSULTANT agrees to permit CITY and its authorized representatives to audit, at any reasonable time during the term of this Agreement and for four (4) years from the date of final payment, CONSULTANT’s records pertaining to matters covered by this Agreement, including without limitation records demonstrating compliance with the requirements of Section 10 (Independent Contractor). CONSULTANT further agrees to maintain and retain accurate books and records in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for at least four (4) years after the expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement or the completion of any audit hereunder, whichever is later. SECTION 16. INDEMNITY. 16.1. To the fullest extent permitted by law, CONSULTANT shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless CITY, its Council members, officers, employees and agents (each an “Indemnified Party”) from and against any and all third party demands, claims, or liability of any nature, including death or injury to any person, property damage or any other loss, including all costs and expenses of whatever nature including attorney’s fees, experts fees, court costs and disbursements (“Claims”) to the extent that such Claims arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of CONSULTANT, its officers, employees, agents or contractors under this Agreement, regardless of whether or not it is caused in part by an Indemnified Party. CITY will reimburse CONSULTANT for the proportionate percentage of Docusign Envelope ID: 7E87E5C7-8CFF-47DE-B310-B161FAC20910 Item 8 Attachment A - TJC and Associates, Contract C26194191        Item 8: Staff Report Pg. 8  Packet Pg. 184 of 413  Professional Services Rev. Oct 16,2024 Page 6 of 24 defense costs exceeding CONSULTANT’s proportionate percentage of fault as determined by the final judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction. 16.2. Notwithstanding the above, nothing in this Section 16 shall be construed to require CONSULTANT to indemnify an Indemnified Party from a Claim arising from the active negligence or willful misconduct of an Indemnified Party that is not contributed to by any act of, or by any omission to perform a duty imposed by law or agreement by, CONSULTANT, its officers, employees, agents or contractors under this Agreement. 16.3. The acceptance of CONSULTANT’s Services and duties by CITY shall not operate as a waiver of the right of indemnification. The provisions of this Section 16 shall survive the expiration or early termination of this Agreement. SECTION 17. WAIVERS. No waiver of a condition or nonperformance of an obligation under this Agreement is effective unless it is in writing in accordance with Section 29.4 of this Agreement. No delay or failure to require performance of any provision of this Agreement shall constitute a waiver of that provision as to that or any other instance. Any waiver granted shall apply solely to the specific instance expressly stated. No single or partial exercise of any right or remedy will preclude any other or further exercise of any right or remedy. SECTION 18. INSURANCE. 18.1. CONSULTANT, at its sole cost and expense, shall obtain and maintain, in full force and effect during the term of this Agreement, the insurance coverage described in Exhibit D, entitled “INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS”. CONSULTANT and its contractors, if any, shall obtain a policy endorsement naming CITY as an additional insured under any general liability or automobile policy or policies. 18.2. All insurance coverage required hereunder shall be provided through carriers with AM Best’s Key Rating Guide ratings of A-:VII or higher which are licensed or authorized to transact insurance business in the State of California. Any and all contractors of CONSULTANT retained to perform Services under this Agreement will obtain and maintain, in full force and effect during the term of this Agreement, identical insurance coverage, naming CITY as an additional insured under such policies as required above. 18.3. Certificates evidencing such insurance shall be filed with CITY concurrently with the execution of this Agreement. The certificates will be subject to the approval of CITY’s Risk Manager and will contain an endorsement stating that the insurance is primary coverage and will not be canceled, or materially reduced in coverage or limits, by the insurer except after filing with the Purchasing Manager thirty (30) days’ prior written notice of the cancellation or modification. If the insurer cancels or modifies the insurance and provides less than thirty (30) days’ notice to CONSULTANT, CONSULTANT shall provide the Purchasing Manager written notice of the cancellation or modification within two (2) business days of the CONSULTANT’s receipt of such notice. CONSULTANT shall be responsible for ensuring that current certificates evidencing the insurance are provided to CITY’s Chief Procurement Officer during the entire term of this Agreement. 18.4. The procuring of such required policy or policies of insurance will not be Docusign Envelope ID: 7E87E5C7-8CFF-47DE-B310-B161FAC20910 Item 8 Attachment A - TJC and Associates, Contract C26194191        Item 8: Staff Report Pg. 9  Packet Pg. 185 of 413  Professional Services Rev. Oct 16,2024 Page 7 of 24 construed to limit CONSULTANT’s liability hereunder nor to fulfill the indemnification provisions of this Agreement. Notwithstanding the policy or policies of insurance, CONSULTANT will be obligated for the full and total amount of any damage, injury, or loss caused by or directly arising as a result of the Services performed under this Agreement, including such damage, injury, or loss arising after the Agreement is terminated or the term has expired. SECTION 19. TERMINATION OR SUSPENSION OF AGREEMENT OR SERVICES. 19.1. The City Manager may suspend the performance of the Services, in whole or in part, or terminate this Agreement, with or without cause, by giving ten (10) days prior written notice thereof to CONSULTANT. If CONSULTANT fails to perform any of its material obligations under this Agreement, in addition to all other remedies provided under this Agreement or at law, the City Manager may terminate this Agreement sooner upon written notice of termination. Upon receipt of any notice of suspension or termination, CONSULTANT will discontinue its performance of the Services on the effective date in the notice of suspension or termination. 19.2. In event of suspension or termination, CONSULTANT will deliver to the City Manager on or before the effective date in the notice of suspension or termination, any and all work product, as detailed in Section 14 (Ownership of Materials), whether or not completed, prepared by CONSULTANT or its contractors, if any, in the performance of this Agreement. Such work product is the property of CITY, as detailed in Section 14 (Ownership of Materials). 19.3. In event of suspension or termination, CONSULTANT will be paid for the Services rendered and work products delivered to CITY in accordance with the Scope of Services up to the effective date in the notice of suspension or termination; provided, however, if this Agreement is suspended or terminated on account of a default by CONSULTANT, CITY will be obligated to compensate CONSULTANT only for that portion of CONSULTANT’s Services provided in material conformity with this Agreement as such determination is made by the City Manager acting in the reasonable exercise of his/her discretion. The following Sections will survive any expiration or termination of this Agreement: 14, 15, 16, 17, 19.2, 19.3, 19.4, 20, 25, 27, 28, 29 and 30. 19.4. No payment, partial payment, acceptance, or partial acceptance by CITY will operate as a waiver on the part of CITY of any of its rights under this Agreement, unless made in accordance with Section 17 (Waivers). SECTION 20. NOTICES. All notices hereunder will be given in writing and mailed, postage prepaid, by certified mail, addressed as follows: To CITY: Office of the City Clerk City of Palo Alto Post Office Box 10250 Palo Alto, CA 94303 With a copy to the Purchasing Manager Docusign Envelope ID: 7E87E5C7-8CFF-47DE-B310-B161FAC20910 Item 8 Attachment A - TJC and Associates, Contract C26194191        Item 8: Staff Report Pg. 10  Packet Pg. 186 of 413  Professional Services Rev. Oct 16,2024 Page 8 of 24 To CONSULTANT: Attention of the Project Manager at the address of CONSULTANT recited on the first page of this Agreement. CONSULTANT shall provide written notice to CITY of any change of address. SECTION 21. CONFLICT OF INTEREST. 21.1. In executing this Agreement, CONSULTANT covenants that it presently has no interest, and will not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, financial or otherwise, which would conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of the Services. 21.2. CONSULTANT further covenants that, in the performance of this Agreement, it will not employ subcontractors or other persons or parties having such an interest. CONSULTANT certifies that no person who has or will have any financial interest under this Agreement is an officer or employee of CITY; this provision will be interpreted in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Palo Alto Municipal Code and the Government Code of the State of California, as amended from time to time. CONSULTANT agrees to notify CITY if any conflict arises. 21.3. If the CONSULTANT meets the definition of a “Consultant” as defined by the Regulations of the Fair Political Practices Commission, CONSULTANT will file the appropriate financial disclosure documents required by the Palo Alto Municipal Code and the Political Reform Act of 1974, as amended from time to time. SECTION 22. NONDISCRIMINATION; COMPLIANCE WITH ADA. 22.1. As set forth in Palo Alto Municipal Code Section 2.30.510, as amended from time to time, CONSULTANT certifies that in the performance of this Agreement, it shall not discriminate in the employment of any person due to that person’s race, skin color, gender, gender identity, age, religion, disability, national origin, ancestry, sexual orientation, pregnancy, genetic information or condition, housing status, marital status, familial status, weight or height of such person. CONSULTANT acknowledges that it has read and understands the provisions of Section 2.30.510 of the Palo Alto Municipal Code relating to Nondiscrimination Requirements and the penalties for violation thereof, and agrees to meet all requirements of Section 2.30.510 pertaining to nondiscrimination in employment. 22.2. CONSULTANT understands and agrees that pursuant to the Americans Disabilities Act (“ADA”), programs, services and other activities provided by a public entity to the public, whether directly or through a contractor or subcontractor, are required to be accessible to the disabled public. CONSULTANT will provide the Services specified in this Agreement in a manner that complies with the ADA and any other applicable federal, state and local disability rights laws and regulations, as amended from time to time. CONSULTANT will not discriminate against persons with disabilities in the provision of services, benefits or activities provided under this Agreement. SECTION 23. ENVIRONMENTALLY PREFERRED PURCHASING AND ZERO WASTE REQUIREMENTS. CONSULTANT shall comply with the CITY’s Environmentally Docusign Envelope ID: 7E87E5C7-8CFF-47DE-B310-B161FAC20910 Item 8 Attachment A - TJC and Associates, Contract C26194191        Item 8: Staff Report Pg. 11  Packet Pg. 187 of 413  Professional Services Rev. Oct 16,2024 Page 9 of 24 Preferred Purchasing policies which are available at CITY’s Purchasing Department, hereby incorporated by reference and as amended from time to time. CONSULTANT shall comply with waste reduction, reuse, recycling and disposal requirements of CITY’s Zero Waste Program. Zero Waste best practices include, first, minimizing and reducing waste; second, reusing waste; and, third, recycling or composting waste. In particular, CONSULTANT shall comply with the following Zero Waste requirements: (a) All printed materials provided by CONSULTANT to CITY generated from a personal computer and printer including but not limited to, proposals, quotes, invoices, reports, and public education materials, shall be double-sided and printed on a minimum of 30% or greater post-consumer content paper, unless otherwise approved by CITY’s Project Manager. Any submitted materials printed by a professional printing company shall be a minimum of 30% or greater post-consumer material and printed with vegetable-based inks. (b) Goods purchased by CONSULTANT on behalf of CITY shall be purchased in accordance with CITY’s Environmental Purchasing Policy including but not limited to Extended Producer Responsibility requirements for products and packaging. A copy of this policy is on file at the Purchasing Department’s office. (c) Reusable/returnable pallets shall be taken back by CONSULTANT, at no additional cost to CITY, for reuse or recycling. CONSULTANT shall provide documentation from the facility accepting the pallets to verify that pallets are not being disposed. SECTION 24. COMPLIANCE WITH PALO ALTO MINIMUM WAGE ORDINANCE. CONSULTANT shall comply with all requirements of the Palo Alto Municipal Code Chapter 4.62 (Citywide Minimum Wage), as amended from time to time. In particular, for any employee otherwise entitled to the State minimum wage, who performs at least two (2) hours of work in a calendar week within the geographic boundaries of the City, CONSULTANT shall pay such employees no less than the minimum wage set forth in Palo Alto Municipal Code Section 4.62.030 for each hour worked within the geographic boundaries of the City of Palo Alto. In addition, CONSULTANT shall post notices regarding the Palo Alto Minimum Wage Ordinance in accordance with Palo Alto Municipal Code Section 4.62.060. SECTION 25. NON-APPROPRIATION. This Agreement is subject to the fiscal provisions of the Charter of the City of Palo Alto and the Palo Alto Municipal Code, as amended from time to time. This Agreement will terminate without any penalty (a) at the end of any fiscal year in the event that funds are not appropriated for the following fiscal year, or (b) at any time within a fiscal year in the event that funds are only appropriated for a portion of the fiscal year and funds for this Agreement are no longer available. This Section shall take precedence in the event of a conflict with any other covenant, term, condition, or provision of this Agreement. SECTION 26. PREVAILING WAGES AND DIR REGISTRATION FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTS. 26.1. This Project is not subject to prevailing wages and related requirements. CONSULTANT is not required to pay prevailing wages and meet related requirements under the California Labor Code and California Code of Regulations in the performance and implementation of the Project if the contract: (1) is not a public works contract; (2) is for a public works construction project of $25,000 or less, per California Labor Code Sections 1782(d)(1), 1725.5(f) and 1773.3(j); or Docusign Envelope ID: 7E87E5C7-8CFF-47DE-B310-B161FAC20910 Item 8 Attachment A - TJC and Associates, Contract C26194191        Item 8: Staff Report Pg. 12  Packet Pg. 188 of 413  Professional Services Rev. Oct 16,2024 Page 10 of 24 (3) is for a public works alteration, demolition, repair, or maintenance project of $15,000 or less, per California Labor Code Sections 1782(d)(1), 1725.5(f) and 1773.3(j). SECTION 27. CLAIMS PROCEDURE FOR “9204 PUBLIC WORKS PROJECTS”. For purposes of this Section 27, a “9204 Public Works Project” means the erection, construction, alteration, repair, or improvement of any public structure, building, road, or other public improvement of any kind. (Cal. Pub. Cont. Code § 9204.) Per California Public Contract Code Section 9204, for Public Works Projects, certain claims procedures shall apply, as set forth in Exhibit F, entitled “Claims for Public Contract Code Section 9204 Public Works Projects”. This Project is not a 9204 Public Works Project. SECTION 28. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION. 28.1. In the performance of this Agreement, CONSULTANT may have access to CITY’s Confidential Information (defined below). CONSULTANT will hold Confidential Information in strict confidence, not disclose it to any third party, and will use it only for the performance of its obligations to CITY under this Agreement and for no other purpose. CONSULTANT will maintain reasonable and appropriate administrative, technical and physical safeguards to ensure the security, confidentiality and integrity of the Confidential Information. Notwithstanding the foregoing, CONSULTANT may disclose Confidential Information to its employees, agents and subcontractors, if any, to the extent they have a need to know in order to perform CONSULTANT’s obligations to CITY under this Agreement and for no other purpose, provided that the CONSULTANT informs them of, and requires them to follow, the confidentiality and security obligations of this Agreement. 28.2. “Confidential Information” means all data, information (including without limitation “Personal Information” about a California resident as defined in Civil Code Section 1798 et seq., as amended from time to time) and materials, in any form or media, tangible or intangible, provided or otherwise made available to CONSULTANT by CITY, directly or indirectly, pursuant to this Agreement. Confidential Information excludes information that CONSULTANT can show by appropriate documentation: (i) was publicly known at the time it was provided or has subsequently become publicly known other than by a breach of this Agreement; (ii) was rightfully in CONSULTANT’s possession free of any obligation of confidence prior to receipt of Confidential Information; (iii) is rightfully obtained by CONSULTANT from a third party without breach of any confidentiality obligation; (iv) is independently developed by employees of CONSULTANT without any use of or access to the Confidential Information; or (v) CONSULTANT has written consent to disclose signed by an authorized representative of CITY. 28.3. Notwithstanding the foregoing, CONSULTANT may disclose Confidential Information to the extent required by order of a court of competent jurisdiction or governmental body, provided that CONSULTANT will notify CITY in writing of such order immediately upon receipt and prior to any such disclosure (unless CONSULTANT is prohibited by law from doing so), to give CITY an opportunity to oppose or otherwise respond to such order. 28.4. CONSULTANT will notify City promptly upon learning of any breach in Docusign Envelope ID: 7E87E5C7-8CFF-47DE-B310-B161FAC20910 Item 8 Attachment A - TJC and Associates, Contract C26194191        Item 8: Staff Report Pg. 13  Packet Pg. 189 of 413  Professional Services Rev. Oct 16,2024 Page 11 of 24 the security of its systems or unauthorized disclosure of, or access to, Confidential Information in its possession or control, and if such Confidential Information consists of Personal Information, CONSULTANT will provide information to CITY sufficient to meet the notice requirements of Civil Code Section 1798 et seq., as applicable, as amended from time to time. 28.5. Prior to or upon termination or expiration of this Agreement, CONSULTANT will honor any request from the CITY to return or securely destroy all copies of Confidential Information. All Confidential Information is and will remain the property of the CITY and nothing contained in this Agreement grants or confers any rights to such Confidential Information on CONSULTANT. 28.6. If selected in Section 30 (Exhibits), this Agreement is also subject to the terms and conditions of the Information Privacy Policy and Cybersecurity Terms and Conditions. SECTION 29. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS. 29.1. This Agreement will be governed by California law, without regard to its conflict of law provisions. 29.2. In the event that an action is brought, the parties agree that trial of such action will be vested exclusively in the state courts of California in the County of Santa Clara, State of California. 29.3. The prevailing party in any action brought to enforce the provisions of this Agreement may recover its reasonable costs and attorneys’ fees expended in connection with that action. The prevailing party shall be entitled to recover an amount equal to the fair market value of legal services provided by attorneys employed by it as well as any attorneys’ fees paid to third parties. 29.4. This Agreement, including all exhibits, constitutes the entire and integrated agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement, and supersedes all prior agreements, negotiations, representations, statements and undertakings, either oral or written. This Agreement may be amended only by a written instrument, which is signed by the authorized representatives of the parties and approved as required under Palo Alto Municipal Code, as amended from time to time. 29.5. If a court of competent jurisdiction finds or rules that any provision of this Agreement is void or unenforceable, the unaffected provisions of this Agreement will remain in full force and effect. 29.6. In the event of a conflict between the terms of this Agreement and the exhibits hereto (per Section 30) or CONSULTANT’s proposal (if any), the Agreement shall control. In the event of a conflict between the exhibits hereto and CONSULTANT’s proposal (if any), the exhibits shall control. 29.7. The provisions of all checked boxes in this Agreement shall apply to this Agreement; the provisions of any unchecked boxes shall not apply to this Agreement. Docusign Envelope ID: 7E87E5C7-8CFF-47DE-B310-B161FAC20910 Item 8 Attachment A - TJC and Associates, Contract C26194191        Item 8: Staff Report Pg. 14  Packet Pg. 190 of 413  Professional Services Rev. Oct 16,2024 Page 12 of 24 29.8. All section headings contained in this Agreement are for convenience and reference only and are not intended to define or limit the scope of any provision of this Agreement. 29.9. This Agreement may be signed in multiple counterparts, which, when executed by the authorized representatives of the parties, shall together constitute a single binding agreement. SECTION 30. EXHIBITS. Each of the following exhibits, if the check box for such exhibit is selected below, is hereby attached and incorporated into this Agreement by reference as though fully set forth herein: EXHIBIT A: SCOPE OF SERVICES EXHIBIT B: SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE EXHIBIT C: COMPENSATION EXHIBIT C-1: SCHEDULE OF RATES EXHIBIT D: INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS THIS AGREEMENT IS NOT COMPLETE UNLESS ALL SELECTED EXHIBITS ARE ATTACHED. Docusign Envelope ID: 7E87E5C7-8CFF-47DE-B310-B161FAC20910 Item 8 Attachment A - TJC and Associates, Contract C26194191        Item 8: Staff Report Pg. 15  Packet Pg. 191 of 413  Professional Services Rev. Oct 16,2024 Page 13 of 24 CONTRACT NO. C26194191 SIGNATURE PAGE IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have by their duly authorized representatives executed this Agreement as of the date first above written. CITY OF PALO ALTO ____________________________ City Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: __________________________ City Attorney or designee TJC AND ASSOCIATES, INC. By: ________________________________ Name: ______________________________ Title: _______________________________ By: ________________________________ Name: ______________________________ Title: _______________________________ Docusign Envelope ID: 7E87E5C7-8CFF-47DE-B310-B161FAC20910 Daisy Yu Vice President CFO Richard Cavanagh Item 8 Attachment A - TJC and Associates, Contract C26194191        Item 8: Staff Report Pg. 16  Packet Pg. 192 of 413  Professional Services Rev. Oct 16,2024 Page 14 of 24 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES CONSULTANT shall provide the Services detailed in this Exhibit A, entitled “SCOPE OF SERVICES”. Notwithstanding any provision herein to the contrary, CONSULTANT’s duties and services described in this Scope of Services shall not include preparing or assisting CITY with any portion of CITY’s preparation of a request for proposals, request for qualifications, or any other solicitation regarding a subsequent or additional contract with CITY. CITY shall at all times retain responsibility for public contracting, including with respect to any subsequent phase of this project. CONSULTANT’s participation in the planning, discussions, or drawing of project plans or specifications shall be limited to conceptual, preliminary, or initial plans or specifications. CONSULTANT shall cooperate with CITY to ensure that all bidders for a subsequent contract on any subsequent phase of this project have access to the same information, including all conceptual, preliminary, or initial plans or specifications prepared by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Scope of Services. CONSULTANT will provide the following: A. Applicable Codes and Standards The structural evaluation and seismic assessment will be performed in accordance with the following applicable standards: 1. American Water Works Association (“AWWA”) D100-21 Welded Carbon Steel Tanks for Water Storage. 2. American Society of Engineer (“ASCE”) 7-16 — Minimum Design Loads and Seismic Design Criteria. 3. 2022 California Building Code (CBC) including CITY-specific amendments effective January 1, 2023. Task 1: Data collection and Site Visit a) Review Existing Background information. 1) CONSULTANT will review the available documentation for the structures.This includes reservoir shop drawings, if available, previous inspection reports, and historical maintenance records that illustrate both the original construction and any upgrades. b) Site Visit 1) CONSULTANT engineers will conduct one site visit to each tank site to inspect the interior and exterior of each tank, evaluating structural components such as the floor, walls, roof plates, roof rafters, roof girders, and structural columns. Bay Area Coating Consultants Inc. will perform an assessment of internal and external coating conditions as part of a coordinated evaluation. JDH Corrosion Consultants, Inc. will perform field thickness measurements using ultrasonic testing. Docusign Envelope ID: 7E87E5C7-8CFF-47DE-B310-B161FAC20910 Item 8 Attachment A - TJC and Associates, Contract C26194191        Item 8: Staff Report Pg. 17  Packet Pg. 193 of 413  Professional Services Rev. Oct 16,2024 Page 15 of 24 2) Prior to mobilization, CONSULTANT will coordinate with CITY, through Microsoft (MS) Teams meeting, to review the site visit plan. Once on-site, an initial meeting will be held to discuss inspection activities for both reservoirs, providing for a comprehensive and systematic assessment. Task 1 Deliverables: No deliverable is anticipated for this task. A summary report of inspection findings will be included as an appendix in the final Evaluation Report; refer to Task 4. Task 2: Site Specific Response Spectrum Seismic Analysis a) Project Startup 1) Review available geotechnical and geological information for the two tank sites, including published geologic maps and supporting pamphlets/reports, hazard maps, historical geotechnical reports, tanks plans, and other relevant information. b) Field Exploration 1) Perform a subsurface investigation at each tank site to support the site-specific seismic hazard analysis and structural evaluation. One boring will be drilled and rock- cored, as needed, to obtain samples for laboratory testing and to collect down-hole shear-wave velocity data to a depth sufficient for seismic site response analysis. Drill/core holes will be observed and logged by a geotechnical engineer or geologist. 2) Boring observations, sampling, geophysical logging, backfilling, and proper cuttings disposal will be completed in accordance with local permit requirements. The resulting data and findings will be incorporated into the final geotechnical report, which will include recommendations to support the structural assessment. c) Laboratory Testing 1) Perform testing to determine representative soil and/or rock samples for geotechnical laboratory tests, including index tests and strength tests. d) Engineering Analysis 1) Perform a probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (“PSHA”) and a deterministic seismic hazard analysis (“DSHA”) to develop site-specific response spectra consistent with ASCE 7-16 and ASCE 41-17 requirements for seismic assessment of existing structures. Hazard levels will include the Basic Safety Earthquake (“BSE”)-2N Risk-Targeted Maximum Considered Earthquake (“MCER”), BSE- 1N, BSE-2E, and BSE-1E, as well as other return periods as needed to evaluate specific tank performance objectives. 2) The analysis will also provide geotechnical parameters for assessment of existing tank foundations and to support potential foundation retrofit design. Consultant will ensure consistency with the AWWA D100 standard for new welded steel tanks and any project-specific performance requirements for the existing structures. Docusign Envelope ID: 7E87E5C7-8CFF-47DE-B310-B161FAC20910 Item 8 Attachment A - TJC and Associates, Contract C26194191        Item 8: Staff Report Pg. 18  Packet Pg. 194 of 413  Professional Services Rev. Oct 16,2024 Page 16 of 24 3) Consultant will prepare a draft and final technical memorandum (TN) that documents the seismic hazard analysis being conducted will be included as part of this overall condition assessment, to assist the City in its application to the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (“HMGP”). The technical memorandum (“TM”) will include a site plan for each tank with a description of the seismic hazard analysis performed and results of the analysis. Task 2 Deliverables: Findings and recommendations of the seismic hazard analysis to meet HMGP submittal requirements will be included in a TM. An initial draft of the TM will be provided to the CITY to submitto the HMGP as evidence of project progress, followed by a final TM upon completion of the seismic hazard analysis. Because this deliverable is critical to the HMGP schedule, it will be the first task that will begin immediately after receiving Notice to Proceed. 1) ENGEO, Inc., under Consultant’s direction, will prepare a draft and final technical memorandum or letter report presenting the findings and recommendations of the seismic hazard analysis. The report will include a description of the analysis methods and references, as well as recommended geotechnical parameters for assessing the existing tank foundations and design parameters for any potential foundation retrofit that may be required. 2) ENGEO, Inc.’s letter report will be included as an appendix to the draft and final Evaluation Report under Task 4. Task 3: Condition Assessment a) Structural Evaluation for Each Reservoir 1) Based on the document review and site inspection, CONSULTANT will conduct a detailed structural and seismic analysis of the reservoirs to assess their integrity under code- level seismic loading. 2) This evaluation will Assess the structural integrity of each tank under seismic demands, considering a Seismic Importance Factor of 1.5, in accordance with ASCE 7-16 provisions for essential water infrastructure. 3) Determine hydrodynamic forces, including impulsive and convective components based on AWWA D100 methodology. 4) Calculate hydrodynamic sloshing heights and evaluate available freeboard. 5) Perform a structural analysis to determine the maximum safe water level at which the tanks can operate while maintaining structural stability. b) Document Existing Conditions and Develop Potential Remediation Strategies for Each Reservoir Using the findings from previous tasks, CONSULTANT will: 1) Document existing structural conditions. 2) Conduct a seismic risk assessment. Docusign Envelope ID: 7E87E5C7-8CFF-47DE-B310-B161FAC20910 Item 8 Attachment A - TJC and Associates, Contract C26194191        Item 8: Staff Report Pg. 19  Packet Pg. 195 of 413  Professional Services Rev. Oct 16,2024 Page 17 of 24 3) Identify corrosion-related concerns with input from BACC. 4) Develop conceptual remediation strategies for each tank for identified structuraland coating deficiencies. 5) Develop potential rehabilitation strategies that consider both structural and corrosion-related concerns. 6) Estimate both hard and soft costs using AACE Class 4 methodology. 7) CONSULTANT will meet with CITY via MS Teams to review findings and preliminary alternatives before finalizing recommendations. Task 3 Deliverables: Presentation of findings and proposed rehabilitation alternatives in a meeting with CITY,via Microsoft (“MS”) Teams meeting. Task 4: Technical Memorandum a) Based on the data collected, CONSULTANT will prepare a TM including calculations and summarizing: 1) Existing coating and corrosion-related condition of the assessed structures. 2) Findings from the structural evaluations. 3) Recommendations for remediation strategies. 4) Conceptual seismic rehabilitation measures, along with a rough order-of- magnitude construction cost estimate. 5) CONSULTANT will meet with CITY to review the draft TM report, gather feedback, and incorporate revisions before finalizing the document. Task 4 Deliverables: 1) Draft and final consolidated technical report covering both tanks. 2) Draft report will be delivered in PDF format. 3) The final report will be provided in PDF format and two (2) hard copies. Task 5: Project Administration a) CONSULTANT manages all projects using an Earned Value System (EVS) allowing for real-time tracking of project status, schedule, and budget. CONSULTANT’s Project Manager will oversee project execution, ensuring that all tasks are completed on schedule, within budget, and in accordance with CITY objectives. b) CONSULTANT’s invoices will be accompanied by narrative progress and cost reports. Docusign Envelope ID: 7E87E5C7-8CFF-47DE-B310-B161FAC20910 Item 8 Attachment A - TJC and Associates, Contract C26194191        Item 8: Staff Report Pg. 20  Packet Pg. 196 of 413  Professional Services Rev. Oct 16,2024 Page 18 of 24 These reports will include: 1) Work completed during the reporting period. 2) Planned activities for the next reporting period. 3) Current budget status, including period expenditures and cumulative costs to date. 4) These reports can be customized to align with CITY’s specific reporting requirements. CONSULTANT will also provide detailed cost breakdowns with each invoice, itemizing billed personnel, labor classifications, and task-specific expenditures for full transparency. Docusign Envelope ID: 7E87E5C7-8CFF-47DE-B310-B161FAC20910 Item 8 Attachment A - TJC and Associates, Contract C26194191        Item 8: Staff Report Pg. 21  Packet Pg. 197 of 413  Professional Services Rev. Oct 16,2024 Page 19 of 24 EXHIBIT A-1 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TASK ORDER CONSULTANT shall perform the Services detailed below in accordance with all the terms and conditions of the Agreement referenced in Item 1A below. All exhibits referenced in Item 8 are incorporated into this Task Order by this reference. CONSULTANT shall furnish the necessary facilities, professional, technical and supporting personnel required by this Task Order as described below. CONTRACT NO. OR PURCHASE ORDER REQUISITION NO. (AS APPLICABLE) 1A. MASTER AGREEMENT NO. (MAY BE SAME AS CONTRACT / P.O. NO. ABOVE): 1B. TASK ORDER NO.: 2. CONSULTANT NAME: 3. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: START: COMPLETION: 4 TOTAL TASK ORDER PRICE: $__________________ BALANCE REMAINING IN MASTER AGREEMENT/CONTRACT $_______________ 5. BUDGET CODE_______________ COST CENTER________________ COST ELEMENT______________ WBS/CIP__________ PHASE__________ 6. CITY PROJECT MANAGER’S NAME & DEPARTMENT:_____________________________________ 7. DESCRIPTION OF SCOPE OF SERVICES (Attachment A) MUST INCLUDE: SERVICES AND DELIVERABLES TO BE PROVIDED SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE MAXIMUM COMPENSATION AMOUNT AND RATE SCHEDULE (as applicable) REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES, if any (with “not to exceed” amount) 8. ATTACHMENTS: A: Task Order Scope of Services B (if any): _____________________________ I hereby authorize the performance of the work described in this Task Order. APPROVED: CITY OF PALO ALTO BY:____________________________________ Name __________________________________ Title___________________________________ Date ___________________________________ Task Order and warrant that I have authority to sign on behalf of Consultant. APPROVED: COMPANY NAME: ______________________ BY:____________________________________ Name __________________________________ Title___________________________________ Date ___________________________________ Docusign Envelope ID: 7E87E5C7-8CFF-47DE-B310-B161FAC20910 Item 8 Attachment A - TJC and Associates, Contract C26194191        Item 8: Staff Report Pg. 22  Packet Pg. 198 of 413  Professional Services Rev. Oct 16,2024 Page 20 of 24 EXHIBIT B SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE CONSULTANT shall perform the Services so as to complete each milestone within the number of days/weeks specified below. The time to complete each milestone may be increased or decreased by mutual written agreement of the Project Managers for CONSULTANT and CITY so long as all work is completed within the term of the Agreement. CONSULTANT shall provide a detailed schedule of work consistent with the schedule below within 2 weeks of receipt of the notice to proceed (“NTP”) from the CITY. Milestones Number of Days/Weeks (as specified below) 1. Task 1: Data collection and Site Visit 6 Weeks 2. Task 2: Subcontractor - ENGEO, Inc. – Site Specific Response Spectrum Seismic Analysis 12 Weeks 3. Task 3: Condition Assessment 24 Weeks 4. Task 4: Technical Memorandum 32 Weeks 5. Task 5: Project Administration Ongoing 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Schedule CONSULTANT has assumed that the project will begin in 2025 and is expected to be completed in early 2026. Optional Schedule of Performance Provision for On-Call or Additional Services Agreements. (This provision only applies if checked and only applies to on-call agreements per Section 1 or agreements with Additional Services per Section 4.) The schedule of performance shall be as provided in the approved Task Order, as detailed in Section 1 (Scope of Services) in the case of on-call Services, or as detailed in Section 4 in the case of Additional Services, provided in all cases that the schedule of performance shall fall within the term as provided in Section 2 (Term) of this Agreement. Docusign Envelope ID: 7E87E5C7-8CFF-47DE-B310-B161FAC20910 Item 8 Attachment A - TJC and Associates, Contract C26194191        Item 8: Staff Report Pg. 23  Packet Pg. 199 of 413  Professional Services Rev. Oct 16,2024 Page 21 of 24 EXHIBIT C COMPENSATION CITY agrees to compensate CONSULTANT for Services performed in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, and as set forth in the budget schedule below. Compensation shall be calculated based on the rate schedule attached as Exhibit C-1 up to the not to exceed budget amount for each task set forth below. CITY’s Project Manager may approve in writing the transfer of budget amounts between any of the tasks or categories listed below, provided that the total compensation for the Services, including any specified reimbursable expenses, and the total compensation for Additional Services (if any, per Section 4 of the Agreement) do not exceed the amounts set forth in Section 4 of this Agreement. CONSULTANT agrees to complete all Services, any specified reimbursable expenses, and Additional Services (if any, per Section 4), within this/these amount(s). Any work performed or expenses incurred for which payment would result in a total exceeding the maximum amount of compensation set forth in this Agreement shall be at no cost to the CITY. BUDGET SCHEDULE TASK NOT TO EXCEED AMOUNT 232,483.00 0 Total for Services and Reimbursable Expenses $232,483.00 Maximum Total Compensation $242,483.00 REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES CONSULTANT’S ordinary business expenses, such as administrative, overhead, administrative support time/overtime, information systems, software and hardware, photocopying, telecommunications (telephone, internet), in-house printing, insurance and other ordinary business expenses, are included within the scope of payment for Services and are not reimbursable expenses hereunder. Reimbursable expenses, if any are specified as reimbursable under this section, will be reimbursed at actual cost. The expenses (by type, e.g. travel) for which CONSULTANT will be reimbursed are: NONE up to the not-to-exceed amount of: $0.00. Docusign Envelope ID: 7E87E5C7-8CFF-47DE-B310-B161FAC20910 Item 8 Attachment A - TJC and Associates, Contract C26194191        Item 8: Staff Report Pg. 24  Packet Pg. 200 of 413  Professional Services Rev. Oct 16,2024 Page 22 of 24 A. Travel outside the San Francisco Bay Area, including transportation and meals, if specified as reimbursable, will be reimbursed at actual cost subject to the City of Palo Alto’s policy for reimbursement of travel and meal expenses. B. Long-distance telephone service charges, cellular phone service charges, facsimile transmission and postage charges, if specified as reimbursable, will be reimbursed at actual cost. All requests for reimbursement of expenses, if any are specified as reimbursable under this section, shall be accompanied by appropriate backup documentation and information. Docusign Envelope ID: 7E87E5C7-8CFF-47DE-B310-B161FAC20910 Item 8 Attachment A - TJC and Associates, Contract C26194191        Item 8: Staff Report Pg. 25  Packet Pg. 201 of 413  Professional Services Rev. Oct 16,2024 Page 23 of 24 EXHIBIT D INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS CONSULTANTS TO THE CITY OF PALO ALTO (CITY), AT THEIR SOLE EXPENSE, SHALL FOR THE TERM OF THE CONTRACT OBTAIN AND MAINTAIN INSURANCE IN THE AMOUNTS FOR THE COVERAGE SPECIFIED BELOW, AFFORDED BY COMPANIES WITH AM BEST’S KEY RATING OF A-:VII, OR HIGHER, LICENSED OR AUTHORIZED TO TRANSACT INSURANCE BUSINESS IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. AWARD IS CONTINGENT ON COMPLIANCE WITH CITY’S INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS AS SPECIFIED HEREIN. REQUIRED TYPE OF COVERAGE REQUIREMENT MINIMUM LIMITS EACH OCCURRENCE AGGREGATE YES YES WORKER’S COMPENSATION EMPLOYER’S LIABILITY STATUTORY STATUTORY STATUTORY STATUTORY YES GENERAL LIABILITY, INCLUDING PERSONAL INJURY, BROAD FORM PROPERTY DAMAGE BLANKET CONTRACTUAL, AND FIRE LEGAL LIABILITY BODILY INJURY PROPERTY DAMAGE BODILY INJURY & PROPERTY DAMAGE COMBINED. $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 YES AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY, INCLUDING ALL OWNED, HIRED, NON-OWNED BODILY INJURY - EACH PERSON - EACH OCCURRENCE PROPERTY DAMAGE BODILY INJURY AND PROPERTY DAMAGE, COMBINED $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 YES PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY, INCLUDING, ERRORS AND OMISSIONS, MALPRACTICE (WHEN APPLICABLE), AND NEGLIGENT PERFORMANCE ALL DAMAGES $1,000,000 YES THE CITY OF PALO ALTO IS TO BE NAMED AS AN ADDITIONAL INSURED: CONSULTANT, AT ITS SOLE COST AND EXPENSE, SHALL OBTAIN AND MAINTAIN, IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE TERM OF ANY RESULTANT AGREEMENT, THE INSURANCE COVERAGE HEREIN DESCRIBED, INSURING NOT ONLY CONSULTANT COMPENSATION, EMPLOYER’S LIABILITY AND PROFESSIONAL INSURANCE, NAMING AS ADDITIONAL INSUREDS CITY, ITS COUNCIL MEMBERS, OFFICERS, AGENTS, AND EMPLOYEES. I. INSURANCE COVERAGE MUST INCLUDE: A. A CONTRACTUAL LIABILITY ENDORSEMENT PROVIDING INSURANCE COVERAGE FOR CONSULTANT’S AGREEMENT TO INDEMNIFY CITY. II. THE CONSULTANT MUST SUBMIT CERTIFICATES(S) OF INSURANCE EVIDENCING REQUIRED COVERAGE AT THE FOLLOWING EMAIL: PURCHASINGSUPPORT@PALOALTO.GOV III. ENDORSEMENT PROVISIONS WITH RESPECT TO THE INSURANCE AFFORDED TO ADDITIONAL INSUREDS: A. PRIMARY COVERAGE WITH RESPECT TO CLAIMS ARISING OUT OF THE OPERATIONS OF THE NAMED INSURED, INSURANCE AS AFFORDED BY THIS POLICY IS PRIMARY AND IS NOT ADDITIONAL TO OR CONTRIBUTING WITH ANY OTHER INSURANCE CARRIED BY OR FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE ADDITIONAL INSUREDS. Docusign Envelope ID: 7E87E5C7-8CFF-47DE-B310-B161FAC20910 Item 8 Attachment A - TJC and Associates, Contract C26194191        Item 8: Staff Report Pg. 26  Packet Pg. 202 of 413  Professional Services Rev. Oct 16,2024 Page 24 of 24 B. CROSS LIABILITY THE NAMING OF MORE THAN ONE PERSON, FIRM, OR CORPORATION AS INSUREDS UNDER THE POLICY SHALL NOT, FOR THAT REASON ALONE, EXTINGUISH ANY RIGHTS OF THE INSURED AGAINST ANOTHER, BUT THIS ENDORSEMENT, AND THE NAMING OF MULTIPLE INSUREDS, SHALL NOT INCREASE THE TOTAL LIABILITY OF THE COMPANY UNDER THIS POLICY. C. NOTICE OF CANCELLATION 1. IF THE POLICY IS CANCELED BEFORE ITS EXPIRATION DATE FOR ANY REASON OTHER THAN THE NON-PAYMENT OF PREMIUM, THE CONSULTANT SHALL PROVIDE CITY AT LEAST A THIRTY (30) DAY WRITTEN NOTICE BEFORE THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF CANCELLATION. 2. IF THE POLICY IS CANCELED BEFORE ITS EXPIRATION DATE FOR THE NON-PAYMENT OF PREMIUM, THE CONSULTANT SHALL PROVIDE CITY AT LEAST A TEN (10) DAY WRITTEN NOTICE BEFORE THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF CANCELLATION. EVIDENCE OF INSURANCE AND OTHER RELATED NOTICES ARE REQUIRED TO BE FILED WITH THE CITY OF PALO ALTO SENT TO THE FOLLOWING EMAIL: PURCHASINGSUPPORT@PALOALTO.GOV Docusign Envelope ID: 7E87E5C7-8CFF-47DE-B310-B161FAC20910 Item 8 Attachment A - TJC and Associates, Contract C26194191        Item 8: Staff Report Pg. 27  Packet Pg. 203 of 413  City Council Staff Report From: City Manager Report Type: CONSENT CALENDAR Lead Department: Administrative Services Meeting Date: November 3, 2025 Report #:2510-5296 TITLE Adoption of a Resolution Approving The Palo Alto Museum‘s Facility Naming Plan for the Roth Building; CEQA status – not a project. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that Council adopt a Resolution approving the proposed Naming and Recognition Plan for the Roth Building as proposed by the Palo Alto Museum (Attachment A) informed by staff review for compliance with appropriate policies and procedures. BACKGROUND The City’s Policy and Procedure 1-15, Naming City-Owned Land and Facilities, Section 3, (Attachment B), authorizes naming recognition for significant donations to capital fundraising campaigns. Staff recommends that the Council adopt the attached Naming and Recognition Plan developed by the Palo Alto Museum to support the capital fundraising effort for the Palo Alto Museum at the City-owned Roth Building facility. In 2022 Council approved a lease with the Palo Alto Museum (Museum) for the Roth Building facility1. Under the terms of lease, the Museum completed a $13 million renovation of the Roth Building in February 2025 with funding coming from sources including the City’s General Fund (including sale proceeds from the transfer of development rights), impact fees, federal and county grants, museum generated private donations, and other museum funds. As a term of the lease the Museum is obligated to open to the public in February 2026. To support the buildout of the museum exhibits and spaces within the Roth Building, the Museum is proposing a naming plan to encourage fundraising. 1 Staff Report 15017 12/12/2022 Approval of Lease and License of 300 Homer Ave. Roth Building between the City of Palo Alto and the Palo Alto Museum; https://recordsportal.paloalto.gov/Weblink/DocView.aspx?id=82171 Item 9 Item 9 Staff Report        Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 1  Packet Pg. 204 of 413  For reference and background, a naming plan was approved for the Jr. Museum and Zoo in 20173. ANALYSIS 3 Staff Report 7810, 3/6/2017, Adoption of a Resolution Approving a Facility Naming Plan for the Junior Museum and Zoo; http://www.cityofpaloalto.org/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?BlobID=56118 Item 9 Item 9 Staff Report        Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 2  Packet Pg. 205 of 413  This process aligns with the Jr. Museum and Zoo process, except for prior commitments as noted above. FISCAL/RESOURCE IMPACT There is no resource impact for approving the naming and recognition plan for the Roth Building and Palo Alto Museum. The naming and recognition plan is intended to support the financial needs of the Palo Alto Museum. STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT Staff has worked closely with leaders of the Palo Alto Museum to prepare for and bring this naming plan to Council. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The recommendation in this report does not constitute a project requiring review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: Resolution Naming and Recognition Plan for the Roth Building and Palo Alto Museum, including Naming Plan for the Palo Alto Museum at the Roth Building Attachment B: City Policy 1-15 Naming of City Owned Land and Facilities APPROVED BY: Lauren Lai, Administrative Services Director Item 9 Item 9 Staff Report        Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 3  Packet Pg. 206 of 413  NOT YET ADOPTED Attachment A 1 145_20251017_ts 24 Resolution No. Resolution of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Approving the Palo Alto Museum’s Donor Recognition and Naming Framework for the City’s Roth Building R E C I T A L S A. The City’s Roth Building is leased to the Palo Alto Museum (“Museum”). B. The City’s “Naming City-Owned Land and Facilities” policy (“Policy”) guides the naming of City facilities and portions of them. C. The City and the Museum wish to express appreciation and recognize donors who have made significant gifts to the Museum’s fundraising campaign as detailed in the attached Palo Alto Museum Donor Recognition and Naming Framework. NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Palo Alto RESOLVES as follows: SECTION 1. The attached Palo Alto Museum Donor Recognition and Naming Framework for the new Palo Alto Museum (Exhibit A) is approved, subject to Council action for any future approvals as may be required under the Policy. SECTION 2. CEQA. The Council finds that the adoption of this resolution does not meet the definition of a project under Public Resources Code Section 21065, thus, no environmental assessment under the California Environmental Quality Act is required. // // // // // // Item 9 Attachment A - Resolution Naming and Recognition Plan for the Roth Building and Palo Alto Museum, including Naming Plan for the Palo Alto Museum at the Roth Building        Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 4  Packet Pg. 207 of 413  NOT YET ADOPTED Attachment A 2 145_20251017_ts 24 SECTION 3. Effective Date. This resolution shall take effect immediately on its passage. INTRODUCED AND PASSED: November 3, 2025 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTENTIONS: ATTEST: __________________________ _____________________________ City Clerk Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED: __________________________ _____________________________ City Attorney or Designee City Manager _____________________________ Director of Administrative Services Item 9 Attachment A - Resolution Naming and Recognition Plan for the Roth Building and Palo Alto Museum, including Naming Plan for the Palo Alto Museum at the Roth Building        Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 5  Packet Pg. 208 of 413  To: Palo Alto City Council From: Palo Alto Museum CEO & President and Board of Directors Date: October 13, 2025 Subject: Request for Council Approval of the Palo Alto Museum Donor Recognition and Naming Framework The Palo Alto Museum (formerly the Palo Alto History Museum) is an independent nonprofit partner of the City of Palo Alto. It is scheduled to open in February 2026 in the fully restored Roth Building at 300 Homer Avenue, a City-owned landmark listed on the National Register of Historic Places. The rehabilitation of this historic structure and a new life as a museum establishes it as a cornerstone of Palo Alto’s cultural and civic life. The Museum is where history, community, and innovation meet—linking past legacies, today’s conversations, and future possibilities. It will celebrate the people and ideas that shaped Palo Alto, connecting local stories to global impact through exhibits, programs, education, and partnerships. Dedicated to preserving and sharing Palo Alto’s legacy of innovation, civic leadership, and creativity, the Museum will serve as a welcoming gathering place for residents, students, and visitors—a dynamic hub for connection, learning, and inspiration. Originally built in 1932 as the Palo Alto Medical Clinic and designed by noted architect Birge M. Clark, the Roth Building remains one of the City’s architectural treasures. After years of collaboration, the City and Museum completed a comprehensive restoration that preserved its historic character while upgrading the facility to meet modern seismic, accessibility, and sustainability standards. The reimagined interior now supports a range of community activities –discovery, learning, and gathering–within a flexible, energy-efficient space that honors the past and will serve the public in new and dynamic ways for generations to come. The Museum reflects a two-decade public–private partnership between the City and an independent nonprofit organization. That partnership has resulted in the rehabilitated Roth Building as a public asset, while the Museum’s board and supporters led private fundraising and program planning to bring it to life as a vibrant community institution. Unlike the Palo Alto Junior Museum & Zoo which is City operated, funded and staffed, the Palo Alto Museum operates independently under a 40-year renewable lease and is solely responsible for raising and managing all funds for exhibitions, programs, and operations. 1 Exhibit A Item 9 Attachment A - Resolution Naming and Recognition Plan for the Roth Building and Palo Alto Museum, including Naming Plan for the Palo Alto Museum at the Roth Building        Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 6  Packet Pg. 209 of 413  Fundraising for the Roth Building renovation and Museum build-out began in the early 2000s, well before the City adopted its updated 2008 Naming Policy and Procedures. From the outset, naming opportunities for rooms and features within the building were offered to encourage major contributions toward restoration. Throughout this process, the Museum Board has consistently committed to retaining the Roth Building name in accordance with the City’s policy. Although the City’s revised naming policy was adopted in 2008–requiring City Manager and Council approval for naming individual rooms or sub-sites– the new procedures were not communicated to the Museum until October 2024. By that time, naming commitments for 11 spaces or features, 2 trees, 7 benches, and numerous commemorative bricks had already been secured from donors whose generosity helped make the project possible. The following table summarizes the building spaces or features and donors as of October 2025: Palo Alto Museum Naming Framework to Date (As of October 2025) Named (Total $1.75M) Interior Spaces or Building Features First and Second Floors (11) Gloria Brown Beth Bunnenberg Birge Clark Family Chinese Community In honor of Gary Fazzino Pitch & Cathie Johnson Ralphy Libby Mario Family Nancy Mueller Deborah & Peter Wexler Lanie & Dave Wheeler Exterior Spaces 0 Exterior Trees Courtyard Trees (2) Deborah & Peter Wexler Exterior Benches 7 Exterior Bricks More than 100 The following maps show the Museum’s named and available spaces (as of October 2025): 2 Exhibit A Item 9 Attachment A - Resolution Naming and Recognition Plan for the Roth Building and Palo Alto Museum, including Naming Plan for the Palo Alto Museum at the Roth Building        Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 7  Packet Pg. 210 of 413  3 Exhibit A Item 9 Attachment A - Resolution Naming and Recognition Plan for the Roth Building and Palo Alto Museum, including Naming Plan for the Palo Alto Museum at the Roth Building        Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 8  Packet Pg. 211 of 413  The Museum remains committed to honoring all existing donor recognitions while maintaining the Roth Building name in full alignment with City policy. There are clear and practical reasons for continuing to recognize these early commitments and to preserve naming as a vital fundraising tool. The 2008 City naming policy was adopted after the Museum’s early naming opportunities had already been offered and secured. The Museum was not informed of the revised process until 2024, well after many of these commitments were in place. As a privately operated nonprofit that leases and manages the City-owned Roth Building, the Museum depends on private philanthropy rather than City funding. Naming opportunities were– and continue to be–an essential component of this public–private partnership, providing philanthropic resources needed to complete restoration, open the Museum, hire and support staff, and sustain operations. Upholding these commitments also protects donor trust and reinforces confidence in future fundraising. As the Museum prepares for its opening in February 2026, naming opportunities continue to play a key role in attracting major donors, meeting financial goals, and building a strong foundation for long-term success. Ongoing fundraising is essential to offset operating costs, protect and enhance the City’s investment in the historic Roth Building, hire and support staff, and provide public educational and cultural programming. Going forward, new naming and recognition opportunities will follow this proposed framework. All existing and future recognition will preserve the Roth Building name, fully consistent with City policy. Naming of building spaces and features will apply only to Museum-managed spaces and will be clearly defined as limited within the Museum’s lease period. Should the Museum ever relocate or cease operations, all donor naming commitments would conclude. This approach provides clarity and accountability, aligns with City policy, and continues a partnership model that leverages private philanthropy for public benefit. The following table provides a summary of current and prospective naming opportunities within the Museum. These spaces—representing more than $9 million in potential philanthropic support—reflect both the Museum’s fundraising priorities and its commitment to transparency and public stewardship. The list may evolve as design, programming, and donor interest further develop. Palo Alto Museum Naming Framework - Going Forward (As of October 2025) 4 Exhibit A Item 9 Attachment A - Resolution Naming and Recognition Plan for the Roth Building and Palo Alto Museum, including Naming Plan for the Palo Alto Museum at the Roth Building        Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 9  Packet Pg. 212 of 413  As the Museum’s opening approaches in Spring 2026, new recognition opportunities will play a vital role in fundraising for exhibitions, public and educational programs, staffing, and operations. Through this shared public-private effort, the Palo Alto Museum will preserve a treasured civic landmark, strengthen community, and celebrate the enduring spirit of innovation, creativity, and belonging that defines Palo Alto. The Museum deeply values its partnership with the City of Palo Alto and remains committed to honoring City policies while advancing a shared vision for a vibrant cultural center in the heart of our community. We look forward to continuing to work closely with the City Council and staff to ensure the Palo Alto Museum opens successfully and thrives as a lasting source of civic pride, community connection, discovery and learning, and inspiration for generations to come. 5 Exhibit A Item 9 Attachment A - Resolution Naming and Recognition Plan for the Roth Building and Palo Alto Museum, including Naming Plan for the Palo Alto Museum at the Roth Building        Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 10  Packet Pg. 213 of 413  POLICY AND PROCEDURES 1-15/MGR Revised: April 2008 Page 1 of 8 NAMING CITY-OWNED LAND AND FACILITIES POLICY STATEMENT The purpose of this policy is to ensure that City-owned land and facilities, when named for individuals, are persons who have made significant contributions or performed services deemed to have been of major importance to the community. This policy establishes uniform procedures for the naming of City-owned land and facilities as set forth by Council Resolution No. 6211, approved on December 12, 1983, and revised by Council on April 12, 2004. The policy is applicable to new and existing City-owned land and facilities. The policy provides a mechanism for citizens to suggest names which they believe should be considered for new City facilities or land acquisitions and for the renaming of existing facilities and lands. The policy also establishes criteria which will guide the Historical Association and the appropriate City Commission or Committee in recommending names to the Council for approval. Naming and renaming City-owned land and facilities shall be the responsibility of the City Council. However, places within City-owned land or facilities, such as a room or patio within a building or a trail or athletic field within a park, which do not require formal dedication by the City Council, may be named by the City Manager or his/her designee, subject to final approval by the City Council via the consent calendar. This process does not apply to the naming of streets which will continue to be processed through the Planning and Community Environment Department (Policy and Procedure 1-16: Naming of City Streets). The naming of a street may be considered an appropriate alternative means of honoring an individual. The City Council has determined that significant individual, family or foundation contributions to the construction/renovation of City facilities can be recognized through the naming of said facilities after these groups. This document outlines the procedure to be followed when a fund- raising group or board, with the approval of the City Council, embarks upon a capital campaign for the purpose of securing private funds for the acquisition of land, renovation/expansion of an existing building, or the construction of a new facility, and wishes to offer naming opportunities in recognition of significant donations of money or land. The City Council has determined that significant contributions from corporations or corporate foundations to capital campaigns will not be accepted in exchange for the ability to name entire facilities in recognition of these corporate entities. However, the City Council has agreed to allow naming recognition of corporate or commercial entities in facility interiors or on sub-facilities as described in this policy. Business logos associated with any benefactor seeking naming rights shall not be allowed on any City owned land, facility, building or sub-facility under this policy. Attachment B Item 9 Attachment B - City Policy 1- 15 Naming of City Owned Land and Facilities        Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 11  Packet Pg. 214 of 413  POLICY AND PROCEDURES 1-15/MGR Revised: April 2008 Page 2 of 8 The City may remove any business name from a City facility or property if the business declares bankruptcy and goes out of business. The City may remove any individual name from a City facility or property if the person is convicted of a felony or other crime of moral turpitude. If a name is removed under this provision, the City shall not be required to return the donation. SECTION 1: PROCEDURE FOR NAMING NEW FACILITIES OR CITY-OWNED LANDS In cases involving a major capital fundraising campaign, there will be a separate and different procedure from the one outlined below. Section 3 below on “Naming Recognition for Capital Campaigns” further outlines this process. A. Responsibility of the Project Manager Implementation of this policy is the responsibility of the department in which the project to be named is managed. In the instance of a new City-owned land or facility, the project manager should incorporate the process for naming into the project schedule so the naming is accomplished in a timely manner. 1. Requests concerning a name to be given to the City-owned land or facility shall be made in writing on an approved suggestion form to the City Clerk. a. The project manager should alert the City Clerk when to expect the submission of names and the anticipated time frame for the naming process. b. The project manager may submit suggested names on an approved suggestion form on behalf of staff or citizens who have been involved in the project development. c. In some instances, it may be appropriate to actively solicit suggestions and, in those cases, the project manager should specify a time frame for submissions and method of notification. d. All submittals, whether from an individual or an organization, must include the name and address of the submitter. No anonymous submittals will be accepted. e. All suggestions will be given the same consideration without regard to the nomination source. 2. The project manager is responsible for conveying the name suggestion forms from the City Clerk to the Palo Alto Historical Association and presenting the recommendations from the Historical Association to the appropriate commission or committee whose sphere of influence is most closely associated with the facility in question. The Parks and Recreation Commission shall review name suggestions for acquired land to be dedicated as a park, recreational facilities, community centers and interpretive centers. The Library Item 9 Attachment B - City Policy 1- 15 Naming of City Owned Land and Facilities        Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 12  Packet Pg. 215 of 413  POLICY AND PROCEDURES 1-15/MGR Revised: April 2008 Page 3 of 8 Advisory Commission shall review name suggestions for library facilities. The Public Art Commission shall review name suggestions for art facilities. The Policy and Services Committee shall review name suggestions for police, fire or utility facilities as well as major civic complexes. a. The Historical Association may also originate suggestions for names or provide suggestions for appropriate alternatives as part of its recommendations. b. The project manager shall assure that adequate time is allowed for the Historical Association and the appropriate commission or committee to evaluate the recommended names. c. The Historical Association shall determine if the suggested names meet the criteria of appropriate significance, and shall submit the recommendations to the appropriate commission or committee together with the rationale for the recommendations. The response from the Historical Association shall acknowledge all the names that are submitted, but recommend only those which it feels meet the criteria and warrant serious consideration. B. Responsibility of the Reviewing Commission Or Committee 1. The commission or committee shall conduct a public hearing, confirm that the recommended names meet the criteria of appropriate significance, select recommendation(s) provided by the Historical Association, and shall forward its recommendation to the City Council. The report from the commission or committee shall acknowledge all of the recommended names together with their evaluation, but present only the name(s) which it feels best meets the criteria and merits serious consideration by the City Council. 2. Once approved, a transmittal and resolution will be prepared by staff for consideration and approval by the City Council. The transmittal shall include a narrative of historic reference prepared by the Palo Alto Historical Association for the name, a copy of the name suggestion form, and minutes of the Commission meeting when the recommendation was discussed. C. Criteria The following criteria shall be used in selecting an appropriate name for City-owned land and facilities. 1. The name should, if possible, have or preserve the geographic, environmental (relating to natural or physical features), historic or landmark connotation of particular significance to the area in which the land or facility is located, or for the City as a whole. Either connotation is equally valid. Item 9 Attachment B - City Policy 1- 15 Naming of City Owned Land and Facilities        Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 13  Packet Pg. 216 of 413  POLICY AND PROCEDURES 1-15/MGR Revised: April 2008 Page 4 of 8 2. Acknowledgement of contributions: Consideration may be given to naming the City- owned land or facility after an individual when the land or facility, or the money for its purchase, has been donated by the individual, or when otherwise warranted by some contribution or service which is deemed to be of major and lasting significance to the acquisition of that piece of land, or planning, development, construction or renovation of that particular facility. Donation of land or resources shall not constitute an obligation by the City to name the land or facility or any portion thereof, after an individual, family, or individual/family foundation. City-owned lands, parks, or entire facilities shall not be named for benefactor organizations, groups or businesses, but in special cases, may be considered for sub-facilities such as rooms or playgrounds. In cases involving a major capital fundraising campaign, see Section 3 below – Naming Recognition for Capital Campaigns. 3. Names honoring individuals or families, other than those of recognized historic importance, must be supported by compelling reasons. 4. In the event the City-owned land or facility was formerly school property or had other ownership such that the name of the school, building or site has community significance or community recognition, consideration may be given to preserving that name. 5. The City encourages naming which reflects the City’s ethnic and cultural diversity. 6. No City-owned land or facility shall be named after a seated elected or appointed official. 7. No City-owned land or facility shall be named after a person whose contribution to the City of Palo Alto was or is a part of that individual’s normal duties as an employee of the City. An exception may be made for former such employees who have contributed volunteer services of an exceptional nature beyond their normal duties. 8. When naming sub-facilities or interior spaces, such as rooms or playgrounds, after corporate or commercial entities or foundations, these entities must abide by the City’s anti-discrimination policy. D. Council Action 1. The recommendations received from the Historical Association and the commission or committee shall be placed on the Council agenda for final approval. 2. Action by the Council shall be by Council Resolution. E. Follow-up to Selection of the Name 1. The above-described process for selecting an appropriate name should precede the preparation of a park dedication ordinance. Item 9 Attachment B - City Policy 1- 15 Naming of City Owned Land and Facilities        Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 14  Packet Pg. 217 of 413  POLICY AND PROCEDURES 1-15/MGR Revised: April 2008 Page 5 of 8 2. Subsequent to approval by the City Council, the name for the City-owned land or facility shall be conveyed to the Department of Public Works for incorporation in City official maps and plans, and to the Palo Alto Historical Association for its records. F. Naming Places Within City-owned Land or Facilities In the case of places within City-owned land or facilities, where the policy does not require a Council resolution, responsibility for requesting Council approval of the new name shall reside with the department head who manages the land or facility. Ideally, the naming of features within a park and specific trails or facilities within open space lands will occur during the master plan or site plan process. Names within parks should be appropriate to the park by reflecting the expression of the place (topography, geology, natural features), flora and fauna, or history of the area. In advance of the naming, the department head shall send a memorandum to the City Manager advising of the proposed action and requesting approval. The City Manager will then seek approval of the name from the City Council via the consent calendar. SECTION 2: PROCEDURE FOR RENAMING EXISTING FACILITIES OR CITY- OWNED LANDS Existing place names are deemed to have historic recognition. City policy is not to change the name of any existing facilities or City-owned land, particularly one whose name has City or regional significance, unless there are compelling reasons to do so. Further, the City will consider renaming to commemorate a person or persons only when the person or persons have made major, overriding contributions to the City and whose distinctions are as yet unrecognized. A. Renaming Suggestions 1. All requests concerning a new name to be given to the City-owned land or facility shall be made in writing on an approved suggestion form to the City Clerk. The suggestion must detail how the proposed name change is consistent with the criteria, the purpose of the name change, and how the new name is directly associated with the land or facility. 2. All submittals, whether from an individual, organization or City staff, must include the name and address or the submitter. No anonymous submittals will be accepted. 3. The City Council shall initiate the renaming process by referral of the public or staff request to the commission or committee whose sphere of influence is most closely associated with the facility in question. Council can also initiate the renaming of lands or a facility without a public request whenever deemed necessary or in the best interest of the City of Palo Alto, following established criteria. Once the referral is made by the City Item 9 Attachment B - City Policy 1- 15 Naming of City Owned Land and Facilities        Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 15  Packet Pg. 218 of 413  POLICY AND PROCEDURES 1-15/MGR Revised: April 2008 Page 6 of 8 Council to a specific commission or committee, the commission or committee will await comment and evaluation of the new name from the Palo Alto Historical Association. B. Responsibility of the Project Manager 1. The City Clerk is responsible for conveying the name suggestion form(s) received by the deadline to the Project Manager, who will be responsible for forwarding to the Palo Alto Historical Association and then transmitting the recommendation(s) from the Palo Alto Historical Association to the appropriate commission or committee as outlined in Section A above. 2. The recognized neighborhood association in the vicinity of the land or facility will be notified of the proposed name change at the time the reviewing commission or committee receives the report from the Historical Association. C. Responsibility of the Reviewing Commission Or Committee 1. The commission or committee shall conduct a public hearing, confirm that the suggested name(s) meet the criteria of appropriate significance, select recommendation(s) from the names provided by the Historical Association, and shall forward its recommendation to the City Council. The report from the commission or committee shall acknowledge any recommended names together with its evaluation, but present only the name or names which it feels best meets the criteria and merits serious consideration by the Council. 2. Once approved, a transmittal and resolution will be prepared by staff for consideration and approval by the City Council. The transmittal shall include a narrative of historic reference for the name or names, together with a copy of the name suggestion form. D. Criteria Each application for renaming a city park or facility must meet the criteria in this policy, but meeting all criteria does not ensure renaming. City-owned lands and facilities may be renamed for an individual(s) under the following conditions. Where the individual: 1. Has made lasting and significant contributions to the protection of natural or cultural resources of the City of Palo Alto, or 2. Has made substantial contributions to the betterment of a specific facility or park, consistent with the established standards for the facility, or 3. Has made substantial contributions to the advancement of commensurate types of recreational opportunities within the City of Palo Alto. Item 9 Attachment B - City Policy 1- 15 Naming of City Owned Land and Facilities        Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 16  Packet Pg. 219 of 413  POLICY AND PROCEDURES 1-15/MGR Revised: April 2008 Page 7 of 8 E. Council Action 1. The recommendations received from the Palo Alto Historical Association and commission or committee shall be submitted for Council approval. 2. Action by the Council shall be by Council Resolution. F. Follow-up to Selection of Name 1. Subsequent to approval by the City Council, the new name for the City-owned land or facility shall be conveyed to the Department of Public Works for incorporation in City official maps and plans, and to the Palo Alto Historical Association for its records. NOTE: Questions and/or clarification of this policy should be directed to the City Manager's Office. SECTION 3: PROCEDURE FOR OFFERING NAMING RECOGNITION FOR SIGNIFICANT DONATIONS TO CAPITAL FUNDRAISING CAMPAIGNS This section applies to any organized fundraising initiated by the City, a Board/Commission or other group whose sole purpose is to support City programs and operations in support of the renovation/expansion of an existing building, the construction of a new facility, the acquisition of a building/land, or the furnishings, fixtures and equipment in said facilities. A. Responsibility of the staff liaison to the Board, Commission, Task Force or group conducting the Capital Campaign Implementation of this policy is the responsibility of department in which the project to be acquired/constructed/renovated is managed. A staff liaison appointed to work with the board/committee will guide them through the process and manage appropriate contacts with other departments as necessary during the acquisition, design and construction process. This will ensure that appropriate information and materials are provided to the group and that opportunities and expectations are clear, understandable, and feasible within the framework of the project. B. When a Capital Campaign is initiated by the City, a Commission or other group whose sole purpose is to support City programs and operations, accommodations to the procedures outlined in Sections 1 and 2 shall be made as follows: a. The organizing body may meet and discuss preliminary plans with the City’s liaison, Department Head and the City Attorney’s office in order to facilitate any “silent” fundraising period. b. The organizing body shall request authorization from the City Council for a Naming Recognition Plan in support of a specific project. They shall provide the following information in their request: Item 9 Attachment B - City Policy 1- 15 Naming of City Owned Land and Facilities        Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 17  Packet Pg. 220 of 413  POLICY AND PROCEDURES 1-15/MGR Revised: April 2008 Page 8 of 8 i. Name of the organizing body; ii. Purpose of the campaign; iii. Monetary goal of the campaign; iv. Expected term of the campaign; v. Plan for naming recognition including a schedule of naming opportunities and associated gift levels vi. Maintenance/replacement of naming recognition items – City staff shall work with the organizing body to ensure that the plan includes acknowledgement of the maintenance responsibilities associated with any naming recognition items within the facility. c. Once the Naming Recognition Schedule has been approved by the City Council, the fund-raising body shall have the authority to proceed with making commitments for naming opportunities with potential donors subject to final Council review. d. The naming of a facility or sub-facility will not occur until the pledged donation is received. e. Consistent with the Gifts to the City policy, all gifts paid directly to the City shall be duly reported to the Administrative Services Department (ASD) Director and recognized appropriately in accordance with that policy (Policies and Procedures 1-18). If a donation was given anonymously, the donor’s identity shall be protected to the extent possible. f. Under this procedure, the organizing body must present a final report to the City Council for approval, detailing the funds received and any naming opportunities granted, along with a timeline for the completion of the recognition. The group may also come to the Council at any time during the capital campaign for approval of one or more naming recognition items. All naming recognition must be adopted by resolution of the City Council. The City Manager or designee can also request that any donations and associated naming recognitions be brought to the City Council at an earlier point in the capital campaign for approval. C. The one exception to this procedure shall be for the naming of an entire building as recognition for a significant monetary or land contribution. If a fund-raising group secures a donation significant enough to warrant naming the entire facility in recognition of that individual, family or foundation, this should be presented directly to the City Council for approval separately and as soon as possible after this type of donation is secured. As part of this approval process, the Council may solicit input from the Palo Alto Historical Association or the appropriate board/commission. Consistent with the policy statement, the City will not recognize significant corporate donations by naming an entire facility in honor of these entities. D. In cases of major building reconfigurations or disasters that destroy or damage portions of the building, the City reserves the right to remove and not replace naming recognitions. However, the City will consider the original donation intent in these instances and make accommodations as feasible. Item 9 Attachment B - City Policy 1- 15 Naming of City Owned Land and Facilities        Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 18  Packet Pg. 221 of 413  POLICY AND PROCEDURES 1-15/MGR Revised: April 2008 Page 1 of 3 APPLICATION FOR NAMING OR RENAMING CITY-OWNED LANDS OR FACILITIES Naming objectives: 1. Ensure that parks, recreational areas and facilities are easily identified and located. 2. Ensure that names designated for parks, recreational areas and facilities are consistent with the values and character of the area or neighborhood served. 3. Encourage public participation in the naming, renaming and dedication of parks, recreation areas and facilities. 4. Encourage the donation of land, funds for land acquisition or development by individuals and groups. Criteria for naming new facilities or parks: The following criteria shall be used in selecting an appropriate name for City-owned land and facilities. 1. The name shall have or preserve the geographic, environmental (relating to natural or physical features), historic or landmark connotation of particular significance to the area in which the land or facility is located, or for the City as a whole. Either connotation is equally valid. 2. Consideration may be given to naming the City-owned land or facility after an individual when the land or facility, or the money for its purchase, has been donated by the individual, or when otherwise warranted by some contribution or service which is deemed to be of major and lasting significance to the acquisition of that piece of land, or planning, development, construction or renovation of that particular facility. Donation of land or resources shall not constitute an obligation by the City to name the land or facility or any portion thereof, after an individual or family. City-owned lands or parks shall not be named for benefactor organizations, groups or businesses, but in special cases, may be considered for sub- facilities such as rooms or playgrounds. 3. Names honoring individuals or families, other than those of recognized historic importance, must be supported by compelling reasons. 4. In the event the City-owned land or facility was formerly school property or had other ownership such that the name of the school, building or site has community significance or community recognition, consideration may be given to preserving that name. 5. The City encourages naming which reflects the City’s ethnic and cultural diversity. 6. No City-owned land or facility shall be named after a seated elected or appointed official. 7. No City-owned land or facility shall be named after a person whose contribution to the City of Palo Alto was or is a part of that individual’s normal duties as an employee of the City. An exception may be made for former such employees who have contributed volunteer services of an exceptional nature beyond their normal duties. 8. When naming sub-facilities, such as rooms or playgrounds, after corporate or commercial entities or foundations, these entities must abide by the City’s anti-discrimination policy. Item 9 Attachment B - City Policy 1- 15 Naming of City Owned Land and Facilities        Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 19  Packet Pg. 222 of 413  POLICY AND PROCEDURES 1-15/MGR Revised: April 2008 Page 2 of 3 Criteria for renaming existing facilities of parks: Each application for renaming a city park or facility must meet the criteria listed above, but meeting all criteria does not ensure renaming. Existing place names are deemed to have historic recognition. City policy is not to change the name of any existing facilities or City-owned land, particularly one whose name has City or regional significance, unless there are compelling reasons to do so. Further, the City will consider renaming to commemorate a person or persons only when the person or persons have made major, overriding contributions to the City and whose distinctions are as yet unrecognized. City-owned lands and facilities may be renamed for an individual(s) under the following conditions. Where the individual: 1. Has made lasting and significant contributions to the protection of natural or cultural resources of the City of Palo Alto, or 2. Has made substantial contributions to the betterment of a specific facility or park, consistent with the established standards for the facility, or 3. Has made substantial contributions to the advancement of commensurate types of recreational opportunities within the City of Palo Alto. Suggestions for naming or renaming City-owned lands or facilities shall be evaluated on the basis of the above criteria and upon appropriate documentation. Person making the name suggestion (required): Address (required):_____________________________________________________________ Contact phone number (required):_________________________________________________ E-mail (not required):___________________________________________________________ Location of site or facility to be named:_____________________________________________ Suggested name (required):_______________________________________________________ Biographical information: (Explain) ________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ Civic involvement: (Explain) ______________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ Item 9 Attachment B - City Policy 1- 15 Naming of City Owned Land and Facilities        Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 20  Packet Pg. 223 of 413  POLICY AND PROCEDURES 1-15/MGR Revised: April 2008 Page 3 of 3 ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ Connection to the facility: (Please explain in depth) ____________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ Reason for Nomination (required): _________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ Additional Comments (additional information may be attached): _________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ Date Received by the City Clerk: ____________________________________ Submitted to Palo Alto Historical Association: _________________________ Date scheduled for review by commission: ____________________________ Item 9 Attachment B - City Policy 1- 15 Naming of City Owned Land and Facilities        Item 9: Staff Report Pg. 21  Packet Pg. 224 of 413  City Council Staff Report From: City Manager Report Type: CONSENT CALENDAR Lead Department: Utilities Meeting Date: November 3, 2025 Report #:2506-4906 TITLE Approval and Authorization for the City Manager or Designee to Execute Purchase Orders as Needed with the Okonite Company for Underground Cable for the Utility's Electric Underground System in an Annual Amount of $800,000 for a Total Not-to-Exceed Amount of $4,000,000 for a Period of Five (5) Years. CEQA Status: Not a Project. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that Council approve and authorize the City Manager or their designee to execute purchase orders as needed with the Okonite Company (Okonite) in an amount not-to- exceed $800,000 annually in each of the next five years, for a total not-to-exceed amount of $4,000,000 from January 1, 2026 through December 31, 2030 for new and replacement cable within the City’s electric underground system. BACKGROUND Palo Alto’s electric distribution system is comprised of overhead wires and underground cable throughout the City. These wires are necessary to provide power to residential and commercial customers. For the underground portion, CPAU’s underground cable technical specification covers the physical and electrical requirements for operation on the City’s medium voltage (4,000 and 12,000 Volts), 60 Hertz, 3-phase, and 3 or 4 wire systems. Cables used in CPAU operations must meet this cable specifications and industry standards. The City’s underground cable specification ensures a high-level performance and reliability. Over the past 20 years, utility staff have installed Okonite underground cable without a cable failure. Any exceptions to the underground cable specification by any cable manufacturer are always reviewed, but Okonite is the only cable manufacturer that fully meets the City’s specification for both cable insulation and a manufacturing process that ensures quality and reliability. The equipment standardization with Okonite for medium voltage underground cable for the utility’s electric underground system was approved pursuant to Section 2.30.900 of the Palo Alto Municipal Code by the City Manager or their designee to ensure continued reliability, cost- efficiency, and compatibility with existing electric infrastructure. Equipment standardization will Item 10 Item 10 Staff Report        Item 10: Staff Report Pg. 1  Packet Pg. 225 of 413  minimize material costs and spare parts while promoting efficient design, construction, and maintenance practices. As the City uses some of the same cable as PG&E, Okonite keeps stock on hand and can meet the City’s short lead time delivery requirements. Okonite maintains a minimum stock of the cables used by the City for emergency requests. Okonite offers the City the ability to order reels cut to length for specific projects to help manage inventory and reduce unusable cable segments. Okonite’s factory (Santa Maria, CA) is located relatively close to Palo Alto and can expedite delivery of cable if needed for emergencies. Palo Alto takes advantage of the bulk pricing discounts achieved when using the same cable as PG&E. Standardizing existing equipment facilitates efficient construction and maintenance practices by helping City employees to more consistently plan, design, identify, and work with existing utility infrastructure. By using a standard product CPAU staff can implement a consistent maintenance and replacement program. 1). Cable shipments have never been missed and there have been no quality issues associated with Okonite cable. In addition, Okonite has provided excellent customer service to engineering and operations staff with training and technical support. ANALYSIS 1 City Council, October 19, 2015; Staff Report 6131: https://www.paloalto.gov/files/assets/public/v/1/agendas- minutes-reports/reports/city-manager-reports-cmrs/year-archive/2015/final-staff-report-id-6131_purchase-of- medium-voltage-underground-cable-from-the-okonite-company-over-5-years.pdf Item 10 Item 10 Staff Report        Item 10: Staff Report Pg. 2  Packet Pg. 226 of 413  have standardized material and a supplier who has demonstrated the ability to ensure product quality, uniformity of manufacture, ready availability, timely delivery, and can accommodation CPAU requirements to maintain staff familiarity with the product and maintain electric system reliability and resiliency. Base Pricing & Purchase Order Authority: Okonite has provided the City with a base price for CPAU’s four standard cable sizes for the first 12 months. For each consecutive year, adjustments in metals may rise but cannot increase higher than the CPI-W index3. The price adjustments will be applied to the current base price of copper at $2.00/lb and aluminum at $1.00/lb with a maximum increase of 5% and minimum of 3%. Adjustments in metals may decrease and the City would receive that pricing benefit. New or adjusted tariffs will impact the price per foot of cable. Changes to Okonite’s material sourcing due to tariffs will be applied, up or down, and passed through to the City. To date, Okonite has absorbed cost increases due to new tariffs by limiting price increases to 1%. Future invoices will include a separately stated charge for any tariff-impacted components. FISCAL/RESOURCE IMPACT 3 Published by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics Item 10 Item 10 Staff Report        Item 10: Staff Report Pg. 3  Packet Pg. 227 of 413  The City’s purchase order template permits the City to terminate without cause or for convenience by providing written notice to the contractor. In the event the City finds itself facing a challenging budget situation, and it is determined that City resources need to be refocused elsewhere, the City can terminate for convenience. Other options include amending the purchase order to reduce the cost, for example, by reducing the quantity of items purchased. STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT This agreement for materials does not directly impact customers that would require community outreach. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW This purchase order authorization does not meet the definition of a project pursuant to Section 21065 of the California Public Resources Code and is otherwise categorically exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), under Section 15301 (repair or maintenance of existing facilities), and Section 15302 (replacement or reconstruction of existing structures and facilities) of the California Code of Regulations Title 14 (the “CEQA Guidelines”). APPROVED BY: Alan Kurotori, Director of Utilities Item 10 Item 10 Staff Report        Item 10: Staff Report Pg. 4  Packet Pg. 228 of 413  City Council Staff Report From: City Manager Report Type: CONSENT CALENDAR Lead Department: Public Works Meeting Date: November 3, 2025 Report #:2509-5193 TITLE Approval of Seven Items to Support the Automated Weather Observation System Project, AP- 19000, at Palo Alto Airport: 1) Approval of Construction Contract No. C26194026 with Vellutini Corporation DBA Royal Electric Company, in an Amount Not to Exceed $1,699,810; 2) Authorization for the City Manager or Designee to Negotiate Change Orders Up to a Not-to- Exceed Amount of $254,971; 3) Approval and Authorization for the City Manager or Designee to Execute Contract Amendment 3 to Contract No. C21178372C with C&S Engineers, Inc. for a Not-to-Exceed Amount of $464,613 and a Contract Extension Through December 31, 2026; 4) Authorization and Approval for the City Manager or Designee to Execute Contract Amendment 1 to Contract No. C21178372B with Burns & McDonnell for a Contract Extension Through December 31, 2026; 5) Approval and Authorization for the City Manager or Designee to Execute Contract Amendment 1 to Contract No. C211783782A with Centurion Planning & Design LLC to extend the contract term through December 31, 2027; 6) Adoption of a Resolution Authorizing the Submittal of Applications and Execution of Grant Agreements with the California Department of Transportation for Airport Improvement Program Matching Grants; and 7) Approval of a Budget Amendment in the Airport Enterprise Fund; CEQA Status - Exempt Under CEQA Guidelines Section 15302 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. Approve and authorize the City Manager or their designee to execute construction contract No. C26194026 with Vellutini Corporation DBA Royal Electric Company, in the amount not to exceed $1,699,810 for the Airport Automated Weather Observation Project (AP-19000); 2. Approve and authorize the City Manager or their designee to execute one or more change orders to the contract with Vellutini Corporation DBA Royal Electric Company for related, additional but unforeseen work that may develop during the project, the total value of which shall not exceed $254,971; Item 11 Item 11 Staff Report        Item 11: Staff Report Pg. 1  Packet Pg. 229 of 413  3. Approve and authorize the City Manager or their designee to execute Amendment 2 to Contract No. C21178372C with C&S Engineers Inc. to increase compensation by $464,613 and extend the contract term through December 31, 2027 to provide construction administration and management services related to the Airport Automated Weather Observation Project; 4. Approve and authorize the City Manager or their designee to execute Amendment 1 to Contract No. C21178372B with Burns & McDonnell to extend the contract term through December 31, 2027 to provide construction engineering services; 5. Approve and authorize the City Manager or their designee to execute Amendment 1 to Contract No. C211783782A with Centurion Planning & Design LLC to extend the contract term through December 31, 2027 to provide construction environmental services; 6. Adopt a Resolution authorizing the submittal of an application and execution of grant agreements with the California Department of Transportation, for Airport Improvement Program matching grants; and 7. Amend the Fiscal Year 2026 Budget Appropriation for the Airport Fund by (requires a 2/3 vote): a. Increasing the estimate for revenue from the Federal Government by $1,140,739; b. Increasing the estimate for revenue from the State of California by $70,239; c. Increasing the Advanced Weather Observation System Project (AP-19000) expenditure appropriation by $1,164,157; and d. Increasing the fund balance in the Airport Fund by $46,821 (reimbursement of expenses already incurred). EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Palo Alto Airport Automated Weather Observation System Project will install new weather monitoring equipment and replace aging navigational aids to enhance flight safety and operational reliability. The project includes constructing a 24/7 AWOS to provide continuous real-time weather data, as well as replacing the Precision Approach Path Indicators and Runway End Identifier Lights, both of which have reached the end of their useful life. The City has received three grants from the Federal Aviation Administration totaling $2,431,789 for the project. Staff recommends the City Council approve multiple contracts totaling $2,504,394, including the construction contract with Vellutini Corporation DBA Royal Electric Company1, consultant contract extensions, and a resolution allowing the City Manager to apply for California 1 Vellutini Corporation DBA Royal Electric Company Construction Contract Contract for AWOS C26194026; https://www.paloalto.gov/files/assets/public/v/1/public-works/palo-alto-airport/c26194026-awos-final-contract- revised-10.21.25.pdf Item 11 Item 11 Staff Report        Item 11: Staff Report Pg. 2  Packet Pg. 230 of 413  Department of Transportation matching grants in the amount of $70,239. With the FAA and CalTrans funding, the Airport Fund’s contribution to the project is $104,460. BACKGROUND ANALYSIS Item 11 Item 11 Staff Report        Item 11: Staff Report Pg. 3  Packet Pg. 231 of 413  eProcurement system. The City received two bids from qualified contractors on April 21, 2025, as listed on the attached Bid Summary (Attachment A). Bid Summary Table 1: Summary of invitation for Bids Project Bid Name/Number Automated Weather Observation System Installation IFB #194026 Proposed Length of Project 296 days Number of Bid Packages Downloaded by Contractors 21 Total Day to Respond to Bid 31 Pre-Bid Meeting (Non-mandatory) Yes ￿Number of Company Attendees at Pre-Bid Meeting ￿1 Number of Bids Received 2 Public Link to Solicitation https://procurement.opengov.com/portal/palo- alto-ca/projects/154303 Bid Range $1,699,810.00 - $1,979,900.00 ￿ The bid was $1,699,810, which is 20% above the engineer’s estimate of $1,416,264. Staff has reviewed the bid submitted and recommends acceptance of the base bid submitted by Vellutini Corporation DBA Royal Electric Company in the amount of $1,699,810, and that Vellutini Corporation DBA Royal Electric Company be declared the responsible lowest bidder. The construction contingency amount of $254,971, which equals 15% of the contract value, is requested for related, additional, but unforeseen work which may develop during the project, implemented via City-approved Change Order. A contingency amount of 15% is the maximum allowed contingency by the FAA, and is requested for this project to maximize eligible funding beyond the City’s standard 10% contingency. Consultant Services Consultant services are critical to the successful delivery of Airport Capital Improvement Program (ACIP) projects, providing on-call design services, construction administration, environmental studies, and planning support. On December 7, 2020, the City executed3 the original contracts with C&S Engineers, Burns & McDonnell, and Centurion Planning and Design. All of the contracts are set to expire on December 31, 2025 and require extensions to allow for the completion and closeout of the project with the FAA. The FAA permits contract extension beyond five years if the project was included in the ACIP at the time of the original Request for Qualifications; these projects were included. C&S Engineers, who have been closely involved in the project, will provide construction management and grant administration services. Contract Amendment 2 (Attachment B) to 3 City Council, December 7, 2020, Agenda Item #10; SR#11654; https://recordsportal.paloalto.gov/Weblink/DocView.aspx?id=80946 Item 11 Item 11 Staff Report        Item 11: Staff Report Pg. 4  Packet Pg. 232 of 413  Contract No #C21178372C will add additional funds to cover the costs and extend the contract to December 31, 2027 to allow time for closeout of the grant. FISCAL/RESOURCE IMPACT Contracts and Awarded Grants Recommended Total Amount Included in FY 2026 Adopted Budget Recommended Budget Adjustment Federal Grants $2,431,789 $1,291,050 $1,140,739 State Grants $70,239 $ - $70,239 Total Revenue $2,502,028 $1,291,050 $1,210,978 Recommended Contracts $2,504,394 $1,340,237 $1,164,157 Total Expenditure $2,504,394 $1,340,237 $1,164,157 Net Impact ($2,366)($49,187) $46,821 Item 11 Item 11 Staff Report        Item 11: Staff Report Pg. 5  Packet Pg. 233 of 413  The Airport Enterprise Fund previously pre-funded $241,357 for design, engineering, and environmental services due to limited federal funds at the time. These costs are eligible for reimbursement and are included in the FAA grant agreements. The total FAA grant funding for the project is $2,431,789 through three (3) grants: Airport Infrastructure Grant (AIG): $1,027,000 Airport Improvement Program (AIP) Grant #1: $677,822 Airport Improvement Program (AIP) Grant #2: $726,967 Caltrans Match Agreement for AIP Grant #1: $33,891 CalTrans Match Agreement for AIP Grant #2 $36,348 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Item 11 Item 11 Staff Report        Item 11: Staff Report Pg. 6  Packet Pg. 234 of 413  requirements for the AWOS Project. Since the project involves only the replacement of existing facilities, it qualifies as a Categorical Exclusion (CATEX) under FAA Order 1050.1: Environmental Impacts, Policies, and Procedures. California Environmental Quality Act The project is exempt from CEQA review per Guideline Section 15302 (Replacement or Reconstruction). ATTACHMENTS APPROVED BY: Item 11 Item 11 Staff Report        Item 11: Staff Report Pg. 7  Packet Pg. 235 of 413  Automated Weather Observation System (AWOS) Project IFB 194026 IFB Post Date: 3/10/2025 IFB Due Date: 4/21/2025 UNIT PRICE TOTAL ITEM PRICE UNIT PRICE TOTAL ITEM PRICE UNIT PRICE TOTAL ITEM PRICE 115-1 1-2”C or 1-4”C PVC CONDUIT, CONCRETE ENCASED IN DIRT OR NON-PAVED EARTH DESCRIPTION, WITH UNIT PRICE IN WORDS (EACH BID ITEM SHALL INCLUDE ALL APPLICABLE TAXES, PROFIT, INSURANCE, BONDS, AND OTHER OVERHEAD) ENGINEERS ESTIMATE Vellutini Corporation DBA Royal Electric Company BID ITEM APPRO X.QTY.UNIT LOWEST BIDDER Engineers Estimate Estate Design and Construction Vellutini Coorporation DBA Royal Electric Company Estate Design and Construction % above Engineers Estimate 40%20% Item 11 Attachment A - Bid Summary        Item 11: Staff Report Pg. 8  Packet Pg. 236 of 413  1 Revision July 20, 2016 AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO CONTRACT NO. C21178372C This Amendment No. Two to Contract No. C21178372C (“Contract”) is entered into [Date] by and between the CITY OF PALO ALTO, a California chartered municipal corporation (“CITY”), and C & S ENGINEEERS, INC., a New York corporation, located at 499 Col. Eileen Collins Boulevard, Syracuse, New York 13212 (“CONSULTANT”). A. The Contract was entered into between the parties for the provision of On-call engineering services including planning, design engineering, environmental analyses, grant management and construction management. B. The parties wish to amend the Contract to extend the term. C. The parties wish to amend the Contract to increase the compensation to cover additional anticipated task order for Phase III of the Airport Apron Reconstruction Capital Improvement Project; to increase the total not-to-exceed amount of the Contract by an amount not to exceed Four Hundred Sixty Four Thousand Six Hundred Thirteen Dollars ($464,613.00) from One Million Seven Hundred Fifteen Thousand Twenty Three Dollars ($1,715,023.00)to a new total not-to-exceed amount of Two Million One Hundred Seventy Nine Thousand Six Hundred Thirty Six Dollars (2,179,636.00); as detailed herein. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants, terms, conditions, and provisions of this Amendment, the parties agree: SECTION 1. Section 2. TERM is hereby amended to read as follows: “The term of this Agreement shall be from the date of its full execution through December 31, 2027.” SECTION 2. Section 4. NOT TO EXCEED COMPENSATION is hereby amended to read as follows: “The compensation to be paid to CONSULTANT for performance of services described in Exhibit “A” (“Basic Services”), and reimbursable expenses, shall not exceed Two Million One Hundred Seventy Nine Thousand Six Hundred Thirty Six Dollars (2,179,636.00) SECTION 2. Except as herein modified, all other provisions of the Contract, including any exhibits and subsequent amendments thereto, shall remain in full force and effect. Item 11 Attachment B - CS C211783782C Amendment 2        Item 11: Staff Report Pg. 9  Packet Pg. 237 of 413  2 Revision July 20, 2016 SIGNATURES OF THE PARTIES IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have by their duly authorized representatives executed this Amendment effective as of the date first above written. _________________________ City Manager or Designee APPROVED AS TO FORM: _________________________ City Attorney or Designee _________________________ Director of Public Works : By: Name: Title: By: Name: Title: Item 11 Attachment B - CS C211783782C Amendment 2        Item 11: Staff Report Pg. 10  Packet Pg. 238 of 413  1 Revision July 20, 2016 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO CONTRACT NO. C21178372B This Amendment No. One to Contract No. C21178372A (“Contract”) is entered into [Date] by and between the CITY OF PALO ALTO, a California chartered municipal corporation (“CITY”), and BURNS & MCDONNELL ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC, a Missouri corporation, located at 9400 Ward Parkway, Kansas City, MO 64114 (“CONSULTANT”). A. The Contract was entered into between the parties for the provision of On-call engineering services including planning, and design engineering. B. The parties wish to amend the Contract to extend the term. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants, terms, conditions, and provisions of this Amendment, the parties agree: SECTION 1. Section 2. TERM is hereby amended to read as follows: “The term of this Agreement shall be from the date of its full execution through December 31, 2027.” SECTION 2. Except as herein modified, all other provisions of the Contract, including any exhibits and subsequent amendments thereto, shall remain in full force and effect. Item 11 Attachment C - BM C21178372B Amendment 1        Item 11: Staff Report Pg. 11  Packet Pg. 239 of 413  2 Revision July 20, 2016 SIGNATURES OF THE PARTIES IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have by their duly authorized representatives executed this Amendment effective as of the date first above written. _________________________ City Manager or Designee APPROVED AS TO FORM: _________________________ City Attorney or Designee _________________________ Director of Public Works : By: Name: Title: By: Name: Title: Item 11 Attachment C - BM C21178372B Amendment 1        Item 11: Staff Report Pg. 12  Packet Pg. 240 of 413  1 Revision July 20, 2016 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO CONTRACT NO. C21178372A This Amendment No. One to Contract No. C21178372A (“Contract”) is entered into [Date] by and between the CITY OF PALO ALTO, a California chartered municipal corporation (“CITY”), and CENTURION PLANNING & DESIGN, LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company, located at 69 N. Chadbourne St, San Angelo, TX 76903 (“CONSULTANT”). A. The Contract was entered into between the parties for the provision of On-call engineering services including planning, and design engineering. B. The parties wish to amend the Contract to extend the term. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants, terms, conditions, and provisions of this Amendment, the parties agree: SECTION 1. Section 2. TERM is hereby amended to read as follows: “The term of this Agreement shall be from the date of its full execution through December 31, 2027.” SECTION 2. Except as herein modified, all other provisions of the Contract, including any exhibits and subsequent amendments thereto, shall remain in full force and effect. Item 11 Attachment D - Centurion C21178372A Amendment 1        Item 11: Staff Report Pg. 13  Packet Pg. 241 of 413  2 Revision July 20, 2016 SIGNATURES OF THE PARTIES IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have by their duly authorized representatives executed this Amendment effective as of the date first above written. _________________________ City Manager or Designee APPROVED AS TO FORM: _________________________ City Attorney or Designee _________________________ Director of Public Works : By: Name: Title: By: Name: Title: Item 11 Attachment D - Centurion C21178372A Amendment 1        Item 11: Staff Report Pg. 14  Packet Pg. 242 of 413  Page 1 Resolution No. Resolution of the City Council of the City of Palo Alto Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Grant Agreements Offered to the City of Palo Alto by the California Department of Transportation for Airport Improvement Program (AIP) Matching Grant Funds to be Used for Automated Weather Observation System (AWOS), for the Palo Alto Airport; and Authorizing the City Manager or his Designee to Execute, on Behalf of the City, any Other Documents Associated with the Application and Acceptance of Grant Funds from the California Department of Transportation; and Certifying that the Airport Enterprise Fund has Sufficient Local Matching Funds to Finance One Hundred Percent (100%) of the California Department of Transportation Grant Funded Projects R E C I T A L S A. The City of Palo Alto (“the City”) and the Federal Aviation Administration are parties to federal Airport Improvement Program (AIP) grants 3-06-0182-23-2025 & 3-06-0182-25-2025 for Apron Reconstruction, Phase II, at Palo Alto Airport. B. The California Department of Transportation (“DOT”), pursuant to Public Utilities Code Section 21683.1, is authorized to provide AIP matching grants of up to five percent (5%) of FAA grant amounts. C. The DOT requires a local agency, as a condition of receiving these AIP matching grant funds, to adopt a resolution authorizing the submittal of an application and the execution of grant agreements for the acceptance of said grant funds and to certify the availability of the local matching funds for AIP grants. D. The Council wishes to authorize the City to receive the maximum of available DOT grant funds for Apron Reconstruction, Phase II, for the Palo Alto Airport. E. The Council has recommended that grant agreements offered to the City by DOT for the Palo Alto Airport be executed by the City Manager or his designee on behalf of the City. F. This Council has considered the recommendation of the City Manager. NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Palo Alto does hereby RESOLVE, as follows: SECTION 1. Authorizes the City Manager to execute AIP Matching Grant agreements offered to the City by the California Department of Transportation to be used for Apron Reconstruction, Phase II, for Palo Alto Airport. SECTION 2. Authorizes the City Manager or his designee to execute on behalf of the City any other documents associated with the application and acceptance of the allocation of AIP Matching grant funds from the California Department of Transportation. Item 11 Attachment E - RESO DOT Grant Agreement        Item 11: Staff Report Pg. 15  Packet Pg. 243 of 413  Page 2 SECTION 3. Certifies that the Airport Enterprise Fund has sufficient local matching funds to finance one hundred percent (100%) of the California Department of Transportation grant funded projects. SECTION 4. The Council finds that the adoption of this resolution does not constitute a ‘project’ under Section 21065 of the California Public Resources Code and Sections 15378(b)(4) and 9b)(5) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines, and therefore, no environmental assessment is required. INTRODUCED AND PASSED: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTENTIONS: ATTEST: ___________________________ ___________________________ City Clerk Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED: ___________________________ ____________________________ Chief Assistant City Attorney City Manager ____________________________ Director of Public Works Item 11 Attachment E - RESO DOT Grant Agreement        Item 11: Staff Report Pg. 16  Packet Pg. 244 of 413  City Council Staff Report From: City Manager Report Type: CONSENT CALENDAR Lead Department: Transportation Meeting Date: November 3, 2025 Report #:2507-4945 TITLE Approve a Cost-Sharing Agreement with Stanford University Not-to-Exceed $878,200 for Design and Engineering Services for the Quarry Road Improvements and Transit Center Access Capital Project (PL-16000) and approve budget amendments in the General Fund, Capital Improvement Fund, and the Stanford University Medical Center (SUMC) Fund; CEQA status – statutorily exempt under Pub. Res. Code § 21080(b)(12). RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. Approve and authorize the City Manager or designee to execute a cost-sharing agreement with Stanford University not-to-exceed $878,200 for design and engineering services for the Quarry Road Improvements and Transit Center Access capital project (PL-16000); and 2. Amend the Fiscal Year 2026 Budget Appropriation (requires 2/3 approval) for the: a. Capital Improvement Fund by: i. Increasing the Transfer in from the Stanford University Medical Center (SUMC) Development Agreement Fund in the amount of $878,200; ii. Increasing the appropriation for the Quarry Road Improvements and Transit Center Access capital project (PL-16000) in the amount of $878,200; b. General Fund by: i. Increasing the Transfer in from the Stanford Universal Medical Center (SUMC) Development Agreement fund in the amount of $35,000; ii. Increasing the expense appropriation for other contract services in the Office of Transportation in the amount of $35,000; c. Stanford University Medical Center (SUMC) Development Agreement Fund by: i. Increasing the Transfer to the Capital Improvement Fund appropriation in the amount of $878,200; ii. Increasing the Transfer to the General Fund appropriation in the amount of $35,000; and Item 12 Item 12 Staff Report        Item 12: Staff Report Pg. 1  Packet Pg. 245 of 413  iii.Decreasing the Ending Fund Balance for Intermodal Transit in the amount of $913,200. BACKGROUND On November 13, 2017, Council adopted the City’s 2030 Comprehensive Plan including Policy T- 3.10 to participate in the design and implementation of comprehensive solutions to traffic problems near Stanford Shopping Center and Stanford Medical Center, and Program T3.10.4 to pursue extension of Quarry Road for transit, pedestrians and bicyclists to access the Palo Alto Transit Center from El Camino Real. In November 2024, Palo Alto voters passed Measure D, approving the use of a portion of El Camino Park to implement this Comprehensive Plan direction by undedicating a 0.33-acre portion of El Camino Park to create a new transit roadway linking the Palo Alto Transit Center with El Camino Real. The Quarry Road Transit Connection will allow buses that use the Palo Alto Transit Center to exit directly to El Camino Real at Quarry Road, rather than circling back via University Avenue. The project will therefore reduce bus travel times and accomplish bicycle and pedestrian safety improvements at the intersection of Quarry Road and El Camino Real. On June 10, 2024, Council approved a Letter of Intent (LOI) with Stanford University to support this project.1 The LOI outlined responsibilities and actions that each party plans to undertake, including: Funding, design, and construction of the roadway, with Stanford University contributing up to $4 million for completion of the project, as well as maintenance funding; Extension of the Stanford lease to the City for the playing fields at El Camino Park for an additional ten years through 2052; and, A longer-term visioning process for the Palo Alto Transit Center that addresses dynamic public spaces, multi-modal transit needs, and community engagement. The first phase of the project in the first bullet above is addressed by the attached cost-sharing agreement. To address the third bullet, this item also requests funds to support an initiative to begin longer-term visioning at the Transit Center. ANALYSIS The ballot measure approved by voters undedicated the parkland required for the project, so the project may now proceed. Due to current staffing resources, the City cannot support a project manager for the Transit Connection at this time, but Stanford has capacity to lead the design phase of the project. The City and Stanford have therefore collaboratively drafted a cost- 1 City Council, June 10, 2024; Agenda Item #12, SR # 2405-3041 https://recordsportal.paloalto.gov/Weblink/DocView.aspx?id=6487 Item 12 Item 12 Staff Report        Item 12: Staff Report Pg. 2  Packet Pg. 246 of 413  sharing agreement whereby Stanford provides project management services via a contractor through the design and environmental phase. This arrangement avoids project initiation delays and subsequent cost increases. City staff will be assigned to provide project oversight through the design phase. Table 1: Project Tasks and Tentative Schedule Task Timeline Item 12 Item 12 Staff Report        Item 12: Staff Report Pg. 3  Packet Pg. 247 of 413  FISCAL/RESOURCE IMPACT The preliminary cost estimate to design and build the Quarry Road Transit Connection is estimated to be roughly $5 million but is dependent on ultimate design. These costs will be updated as the design is advanced and construction documents are prepared. The project will be funded by multiple sources, including funding from the Stanford University Medical Center (SUMC) Development Agreement for SUMC Renewal and Replacement Project. Section 5 (d)(i) of the Development Agreement includes $2.25 million for linkages to the intermodal transit station that encourage the use of transit and active transportation modes. A portion of these funds were used previously in the Quarry Road Improvements and Transit Center Access capital project (PL-16000) to build a shared use path between the Transit Center and El Camino Real, resulting in a current fund balance of $1.3 million available for intermodal transit projects. This report recommends using $878,200 of this funding for work in PL-16000. The cost-sharing agreement that is the subject of this report allows the City to transfer the required funds to Stanford to pay for the environmental and advanced preliminary engineering phase of the project. In July, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission's (MTC's) Regional Network Management Committee approved negotiating and entering into a Master Funding Agreement Supplement with the City of Palo Alto for the Quarry Road Connection Project in an amount not to exceed $1.0 million dollars. Through this supplement, MTC will provide $1.0 million dollars in Regional Measure 2 (RM2) bridge toll revenues, subject to allocations, and with matching funds of $500,000, each provided by the City of Palo Alto and Stanford University to support the project through construction. The City‘s matching funds will be provided via the aforementioned SUMC Development Agreement funds. RM2 funding requires review of the project’s Complete Streets Checklist to ensure engagement by pedestrian and bicycle stakeholders, and this review was completed in August by the Pedestrian and Bicycle Advisory Committee. To cover the cost of the $878,200 design phase and contract for the Quarry Road Transit Connection, MTC in July approved the initial RM2 allocation of $250,000 for the environmental/advanced preliminary engineering phase. The City and Stanford will each provide $125K in matching funds (the City’s portion sourced from the SUMC Development Agreement Intermodal Fund), with the remaining approximately $400K coming from the SUMC Development Agreement Intermodal Fund. Staff will return to Council at a later date to approve the funding agreement with MTC and recognize and appropriate the funds in PL-16000. The transit connection project is exempt from competitive procurement per PAMC Section 2.30.360(b)(3). The effort with ULI has a total cost of $135,000, split between the three parties (Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority, Stanford University, and the City of Palo Alto). The City’s portion of the costs is $35,000, and this report recommends that this work be funded out of the SUMC Development Agreement Intermodal Fund noted above and transferred to Item 12 Item 12 Staff Report        Item 12: Staff Report Pg. 4  Packet Pg. 248 of 413  Transportation Planning and Studies, Other Contract Services, within the Office of Transportation operating budget. STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW 3 ATTACHMENTS APPROVED BY: 3 CEQA Guidelines 15061(b)(3) Item 12 Item 12 Staff Report        Item 12: Staff Report Pg. 5  Packet Pg. 249 of 413  PURCHASING GUIDE – APPENDIX L Short Form Agreement for Revenue Contracts Cost-Sharing Agreement between the City of Palo Alto and Stanford for Quarr Road Pro ect En ineerin Contract #: C26195932 BY THIS AGREEMENT DATED FOR CONVENIENCE ON OCTOBER 6, 2025 BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF PALO ALTO (“CITY”) AND THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY (“STANFORD”), Land, Buildings and Real Estate Finance and Administration – Stanford Transportation, 560 Fremont Road, Stanford, CA 94305, llowe@stanford.edu. IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS, THE PARTIES HERETO AGREE AS FOLLOWS: STANFORD SHALL ARRANGE FOR AND OVERSEE THE PROVISION OF THE SERVICES OF TYLIN INTERNATIONAL (“TYLin”) AS SPECIFIED IN THE EXHIBIT A – SCOPE OF SERVICES ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN BY THIS REFERENCE. EXHIBITS THE FOLLOWING ATTACHED EXHIBITS HEREBY ARE MADE PART OF THIS AGREEMENT: CONTRACT IS NOT COMPLETE UNLESS ALL EXHIBITS ARE ATTACHED Exhibit A - Scope of Services and Payment Details Exhibt B- TYLin International Scope of Work including Schedule Exhibit C- TYLin International Insurance Requirements TERM THE SERVICES AND/OR MATERIALS FURNISHED UNDER THIS AGREEMENT SHALL COMMENCE ON SEPTEMBER 1, 2025 AND SHALL BE COMPLETED BEFORE DECEMBER 31, 2027. COMPENSATION FOR THE FULL PERFORMANCE OF THIS AGREEMENT: CITY SHALL PAY STANFORD AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $878,200 IN ACCORDANCE WITH EXHIBIT A. INVOICING SEND ALL INVOICES TO THE CITY, ATTN: PROJECT MANAGER CITY ACCOUNT NUMBER: COST CENTER GL ACCT PROJECT /INTERNAL ORDER PHASE NO. DOLLAR AMOUNT GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS ARE INCLUDED ON ALL PAGES OF THIS AGREEMENT. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This agreement and the terms and conditions on the following pages, including attached exhibits, represent the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the purchase and sale of the goods, equipment, materials or supplies or payment for services which may be the subject of this agreement. All prior agreements, representations, statements, negotiations and undertakings whether oral or written are superseded hereby. // // // // // Page 1 of 21 Item 12 Attachment A - Cost-sharing Agreement with Stanford University (including Palo Alto Transit Center Quarry Road Extension Scope of Work)        Item 12: Staff Report Pg. 6  Packet Pg. 250 of 413  Item 12 Attachment A - Cost-sharing Agreement with Stanford University (including Palo Alto Transit Center Quarry Road Extension Scope of Work)        Item 12: Staff Report Pg. 7  Packet Pg. 251 of 413  PURCHASING GUIDE – APPENDIX L CITY OF PALO ALTO GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS A. ACCEPTANCE. This agreement is limited to the terms and conditions on pages 1 through 3 inclusive and any exhibits referenced. B. GOVERNING LAW AND VENUE. This agreement shall be governed by the laws of the state of California. The courts of the State of California in the County of Santa Clara and the federal court for the Northern District of California have sole jurisdiction over any disputes that arise over this agreement. C. NO EMPLOYMENT; CONFLICTS. It is understood and agreed that this agreement is not a contract of employment in the sense that the relation of master and servant exists between the CITY and undersigned. At all times CITY shall be deemed to be an independent contractor and STANFORD is not authorized to bind CITY to any contracts or other obligations. In executing this agreement, STANFORD certifies that no one who has or will have any financial interest under this agreement is an officer or employee of CITY. D. INSURANCE. STANFORD agrees to require in the written Engineering Agreement with TYLin that TYLin provide at a minimum the insurance specified in the “Insurance Requirements” form attached hereto as Exhibit C or self-insure to equivalent standards. Each such policy provided by TYLin shall contain an endorsement requiring thirty (30) days' written notice from the insurer to STANFORD and CITY before cancellation or reduction in the coverage or limits of such policy. STANFORD shall provide certificates of TYLin’s policies or other evidence of coverage satisfactory to City's Risk Manager, together with evidence of payment of premiums, to CITY at the commencement of this agreement, and on renewal of the policy, or policies, not later than twenty (20) days before expiration of the terms of any such policy. E. TERMINATION. This agreement may be terminated by either party upon thirty (30) days written notice to the other party if the underlying agreement with TYLin is terminated or suspended. Monies then owing based upon work satisfactorily accomplished shall be paid by CITY. F. CHANGES. This agreement shall not be assigned or transferred without the written consent of either party. No changes or variations of any kind are authorized without the written consent of both parties. G. Reserved. H. NO IMPLIED WAIVER. No payment, partial payment, acceptance, or partial acceptance by either party shall operate as a waiver on the part of such party of any of its rights under this agreement. I. Reserved. J. Reserved. K. Reserved. L. Reserved. M. PRICE TERMS. Extra charges, invoices and payment. No extra charges of any kind will be allowed unless specifically agreed to in writing by CITY. All state and federal excise, sales and use taxes shall be stated separately on the invoices. In the event TYLin reduces its price for such materials or services during the term of this agreement, STANFORD agrees to reduce the prices or rates hereof correspondingly. N. Reserved. O. Reserved. P. NO THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES. Nothing in this Agreement shall give any rights to any person other than the Parties to this Agreement. Page 3 of 21 Item 12 Attachment A - Cost-sharing Agreement with Stanford University (including Palo Alto Transit Center Quarry Road Extension Scope of Work)        Item 12: Staff Report Pg. 8  Packet Pg. 252 of 413  APPENDIX L – SHORT FORM AGREEMENTS FOR REVENUE CONTRACTS Exhibit A – Scope of Services and Payment Details 1.Retention of TY Lin International: Stanford will retain the engineering firm TY Lin International (“TYLin”) to perform services necessary to prepare the Design Engineering Evaluation Report, the Final Design Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (“PS&E”), and a comprehensive Caltrans Encroachment Permit application package. The current draft of TYLin’s scope of work is contained in its July 31, 2025 Palo Alto Transit Center Quarry Road Extension Proposal (“Proposal”), which is attached to this Agreement as Exhibit B. The budget for TYLin’s draft scope of work is $878,200, which may be adjusted as the scope of work is finalized and the Project progresses. Stanford will negotiate with TYLin regarding mutually acceptable commercial terms and enter into a formal agreement for engineering services incorporating both the commercial terms and the Proposal’s scope of work (“Engineering Agreement”). Stanford will manage TYLin’s performance of the Engineering Agreement from the Project owner’s perspective until such time as its performance is completed, terminated, or Stanford’s rights in the Engineering Agreement are assigned or otherwise transferred to another entity such as the City. 2.Schedule: TYLin will commence its services upon issuance of a Notice to Proceed by Stanford. Stanford anticipates TYLin will complete the PS&E and Caltrans Encroachment Permit application package within approximately 17 months of issuance of the Notice to Proceed. A schedule showing the sequence and anticipated durations of TYLin’s activities under the Engineering Agreement is attached within Exhibit B. The specific start and finish dates shown on Exhibit B should be adjusted commensurately to reflect the date the Notice to Proceed is actually issued. 3.Project Management and Communications: TYLin will hold bi-weekly progress meetings with representatives of Stanford and the City throughout the performance of the Engineering Agreement. TYLin also will conduct interviews and workshops that will require participation by representatives of Stanford and the City. Stanford and the City commit to make one or more representatives with authority to represent their respective interests available to participate in the progress meetings, interviews, and workshops for the duration of the Engineering Agreement. Should an authorized representative of the City be unavailable to attend a scheduled bi-monthly progress meeting, the City will notify Stanford in advance of the meeting to allow for rescheduling, if necessary. The following are designated as the lead representatives, who may arrange for others with appropriate authority to attend meetings in their place: For Stanford: For City of Palo Alto: Lesley Lowe Sylvia Star-Lack llowe@stanford.edu sylvia.star-lack@paloalto.gov Communications from TYLin about the Project outside of the progress meetings, interviews, and workshops will generally be with or coordinated by Stanford. 4.Cooperation with TYLin: The Engineering Agreement will require that TYLin collect data from the City to assist in performing certain analyses and preparing reports. The City will make appropriate staff available to provide the requested data to TYLin within timeframes that will allow TYLin to proceed with its work in an orderly fashion in accordance with the schedule contained in Exhibit B. 5.Review of TYLin Submissions: The Engineering Agreement will require that TYLin prepare reports, plans, specifications, estimates and permit application packages for the City’s review and comment before TYLin finalizes them. When TYLin submits draft documents to the City, the City will make appropriate staff members available to review and comment upon them within ten business days of receiving the draft document from TYLin. For reviews designated by TYLin or Stanford as particularly time-sensitive, the City’s representatives will complete their review and submit comments to TYLin and Stanford within no more than five business days after receiving the draft document. If the City has not returned comments within the ten or five business day timeframe, as applicable, the City will be deemed to have no comments and to approve the draft document. 6.The City as CEQA Lead Agency: The Engineering Agreement will require that TYLin prepare a California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) Notice of Exemption (“NOE”) package for submission to the State Clearinghouse and the Santa Clara County Clerk-Recorder. The City agrees to sign the NOE as the CEQA lead agency, provided the City, in the exercise of its independent judgment, determines that the NOE complies with the requirements of CEQA. 7.Payment to TYLin: Each month, TYLin will submit an invoice via email to both Stanford and the City for services performed and reimbursable expenses incurred. Each invoice will include a description of the services performed along with the names, positions, hours spent, and dates worked of those performing services, as well as receipts for reimbursable expenses. The City and Stanford will each review the invoice and supporting documents. The City will notify Stanford in writing within five business days of receiving an invoice if it objects to any portion of the invoice and the basis for the objection. Stanford will pay TYLin the undisputed amount of an invoice within thirty days of receiving a proper, complete invoice. 8.Reimbursement for TYLin’s Services: Stanford will notify the City of the date and amount of each payment Stanford makes to TYLin. Within thirty days of receiving this notice, the City will reimburse Stanford for the payment Stanford made to TYLin. The City may make the reimbursements from one of the following sources: (a) funds provided to the City under Section 5(d)(i) of the Stanford University Medical Center Development Agreement Page 4 of 21 Item 12 Attachment A - Cost-sharing Agreement with Stanford University (including Palo Alto Transit Center Quarry Road Extension Scope of Work)        Item 12: Staff Report Pg. 9  Packet Pg. 253 of 413  PURCHASING GUIDE – APPENDIX L (“Development Agreement”); (b) grants obtained from the Metropolitan Transportation Commission or other source; and (c) funds budgeted by Stanford, up to a maximum of $4 million, to make up any shortfall between the total Project costs (including costs of the ballot measure, all soft costs, and construction costs), on the one hand, and the sum of the unspent Development Agreement funds and available grant funds, on the other hand. For the avoidance of doubt, funds provided by Stanford for the ballot measure shall be counted toward the $4 million cap on funding from Stanford, and Stanford shall not be obligated to contribute additional money beyond funds already provided until funds from the Development Agreement and grants have been exhausted; provided, however, that if any TYLin invoice causes the total amount of its billings under the Engineering Agreement to exceed the current budget of $878,200, then payment of any such excess amount shall be made first from funds provided by Stanford and shall count towards the capped amount of funding from Stanford. 9.Delivery and Ownership of Final Design Plans, Specifications & Estimates: Under the Engineering Agreement, TYLin will deliver to Stanford and the City a Final 100% set of PS&E (“Final Set”), approved by Caltrans, and ready to be advertised for bid to the construction contracting community. The Final Set will be accompanied by a stamped report of an independent reviewer who is a Registered Professional Engineer certifying that it is constructable and biddable. The Engineering Agreement will grant to Stanford all ownership rights in the Final Set, reports, drawings, and other technical data generated by TYLin for the Project (“TYLin Work Product”), as well as rights to transfer ownership of the TYLin Work Product to the City or other entity (through an assignment or otherwise) for purposes of construction of the Project. 10.Termination of Engineering Agreement: Stanford will have the right to terminate the Engineering Agreement, in whole or in part, for cause or for Stanford’s own convenience and without cause. Prior to termination, Stanford will meet-and-confer with the City and will collaborate with the City on identifying alternate arrangements for completion of a Final Set, approved by Caltrans, and certified as constructable and biddable by an independent reviewer, should that still be an appropriate course of action under the circumstances. If Stanford unilaterally early terminates the Engineering Agreement, Stanford shall reimburse the City for any actual costs, penalties, or loss of grant funds incurred or imposed from any third party grants used to fund this Agreement. Page 5 of 21 Item 12 Attachment A - Cost-sharing Agreement with Stanford University (including Palo Alto Transit Center Quarry Road Extension Scope of Work)        Item 12: Staff Report Pg. 10  Packet Pg. 254 of 413  APPENDIX L – SHORT FORM AGREEMENTS FOR REVENUE CONTRACTS Exhibit B - TYLin Scope of Work (including Schedule) (see following pages) Page 6 of 21 Item 12 Attachment A - Cost-sharing Agreement with Stanford University (including Palo Alto Transit Center Quarry Road Extension Scope of Work)        Item 12: Staff Report Pg. 11  Packet Pg. 255 of 413  Scope of Work Overall Scope Assumptions: Design Engineering Evaluation Report (DEER) Eligibility The DEER integrates the engineering review of permit proposals into the standard encroachment permit application process through the Caltrans Project Delivery Quality Management Assessment Process, eliminating the need for PID or PR processing. The DEER is a short-form project document that replaces the Permit Engineering Evaluation Report (PEER), with the previous $3 million construction cost threshold no longer serving as the primary determinant for the appropriate Caltrans review process. The DEER aims to streamline the processing of projects funded by others by reducing steps in the project development process, provided the following conditions are met:  Project has approved environmental document (CE, ND, EIR, EIS, etc.) or project is CE by CEQA and/or NEPA and has completed studies or public outreach  Project only has a Single-Build Alternative  Project does not require CTC action  Project does not involve any right-of-way conveyances from Caltrans to local agencies (dedications, relinquishments, modifications to State right-of-way limits, etc.)  Project doesn’t require FHWA approval for Relinquishments or New Public Road Connections  Project doesn’t involve construction of new structures or bridge widenings Under the single-build transit road extension, the project will meet all six conditions for eligibility in the DEER process once the environmental documents and technical studies are complete. The Palo Alto Transit Center Quarry Road Extension Project (Project) aims to enhance safety, access, and circulation for transit vehicles, bicyclists, and pedestrians by providing direct access to El Camino Real via a Quarry Road extension. The submission of the approved environmental document, DEER, and Final Design Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (PS&E) will form a comprehensive Caltrans Encroachment Permit application package, facilitating streamlined construction approval. Project Scope Assumptions:  The project is assumed to qualify for the Caltrans DEER process.  As requested by Stanford in an email in June 2025, TYLin will work with Stanford and the City of Palo Alto (“City”) on an initial coordination phase with Caltrans prior to the approval of this scope of work using the remaining budget of Phase 1. The focus of this preliminary coordination phase will be to start the DEER eligibility determination process. o As part of this phase, it is assumed that Stanford and the City, in their role of project sponsors, will initiate a conversation with Caltrans and schedule a meeting with them. In coordination with Stanford and prior to the meeting with Caltrans, the TYLin team will Page 7 of 21 Item 12 Attachment A - Cost-sharing Agreement with Stanford University (including Palo Alto Transit Center Quarry Road Extension Scope of Work)        Item 12: Staff Report Pg. 12  Packet Pg. 256 of 413  prepare a slide deck summarizing the technical and outreach work performed during Phase 1 and the work to be performed during Phase 2. TYLin will also prepare a memorandum explaining why we anticipate the project to qualify for the Caltrans DEER process. No conform surveys are included. It is assumed that the conform surveys collected during Phase 1will be provided by Stanford and used for Phase 2. Supplemental surveys, if required, will beprovided at an additional cost and a cost estimate will be provided to Stanford and Palo Alto forreview prior to collecting any new data. Pavement section design will be in accordance with the Palo Alto Transit Center Standards. It is assumed that no standard design features are associated with the build alternative, andtherefore no design exception document will be required. It is assumed that the right-of-way needed for the Quarry Road extension has already beenallocated and no additional right-of-way is required. TYLin shall only prepare a “No-Right-of-WayData Sheet.” It is assumed a Cooperative Agreement will be required between the City and Caltrans. It is assumed that a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) already exists between Stanford and the City. Plan preparation shall be in accordance with the Caltrans Standards. Assume four (4) utility potholes. Potholing costs are estimated at approximately $5,000 per hole.The final number and locations will be confirmed during design. If additional potholes are required,they will be provided at an additional cost, and a cost estimate will be provided to Stanford and Palo Alto for review prior to collecting any new data. No Phase II Site Investigation work is included in this scope of work (assumed not needed at thistime). Task 1: Project Management Project Management will be conducted to coordinate between Project Development Team (PDT) members, coordinate among the project TYLin team members, develop and manage the project schedule, and attend project-related meetings. TYLin will coordinate up to 30 progress meetings with Stanford and the City for the duration of the project (bi-weekly for the most part of the project), and schedule coordination meetings with Caltrans as needed. A comprehensive Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) plan will also be implemented. Management tasks include: TYLin will prepare and distribute agenda, meeting minutes, presentation materials and actionitem/outstanding issue logs for all meetings. Conduct a kick-off meeting to discuss and prioritize Project objectives and outline an approach tosuccessfully meet those objectives. Coordinate with Stanford’s Project Manager and City staff for the duration of the Project. Proactively schedule and lead project coordination meetings with City, Caltrans and other agenciesas necessary. Develop and maintain a Risk Management Plan, Quality Management Plan, Project CommunicationPlan, Cost Estimate, and a monthly updated Project Delivery Schedule. Page 8 of 21 Item 12 Attachment A - Cost-sharing Agreement with Stanford University (including Palo Alto Transit Center Quarry Road Extension Scope of Work)        Item 12: Staff Report Pg. 13  Packet Pg. 257 of 413  The Project Delivery Schedule will indicate milestones, major activities, and deliverables, and will beprovided to the project TYLin team and Caltrans for review and comment. Maintain Project files in accordance with Caltrans Uniform Filing System. Ensure adherence to federal, state and local regulations, guidelines, and other requirements. Prepare and submit monthly invoices and progress reports. Provide technical and report writing services (i.e., conducting research, completing studies inspecific areas, and developing work plans). Task 1 Deliverables: Project schedule. Meeting agendas, minutes, and presentation materials. Risk Management, Quality Management, and Project Communication plans. Monthly invoices and progress reports. DEER Eligibility Memorandum Task 2: Preliminary Engineering & Stakeholder Outreach Task 2.1 Data Review, Verification, and Field Visit in Support of Preliminary Engineering TYLin will collect data, review previous materials and reports provided by Stanford and the City, and conduct a field visit to inform the preliminary engineering phase of this project building on existing engineering work performed to date. In particular, TYLin will: Prepare and submit a Caltrans encroachment permit prior to performing the field investigations. Collect additional as-builts in the study area. Perform a utility and right-of-way verification. Update the preliminary layout. Task 2.2 Bicycle and Pedestrian Operations Stakeholder Workshop TYLin will also engage with key stakeholders to ensure the preliminary designs consider operational needs related to bicycle and pedestrian movements in and around the Transit Center. A stakeholder workshop will be held around the 30% design milestone. The goal of the workshop will be to ensure all operational concerns are considered and build consensus around bicycle and pedestrian design, routing and wayfinding for users navigating the new intersection and Transit Center connections and amenities. Working with City and Stanford staff, TYLin will reach out to critical stakeholders to participate in the workshop. If key individuals are unable to attend, their input and feedback will be gathered and shared with workshop participants to ensure as many voices contribute to the ultimate analysis. TYLin will develop charts and graphics detailing existing pedestrian and bicycle flows, and options for improvement. Short interviews with key stakeholders identified by Stanford and the City will also precede the workshop, to ensure a complete understanding of existing challenges and potential areas for improvement. The stakeholder workshop will be scheduled for up to three hours and will take place in person, if possible, to solicit the best feedback and Page 9 of 21 Item 12 Attachment A - Cost-sharing Agreement with Stanford University (including Palo Alto Transit Center Quarry Road Extension Scope of Work)        Item 12: Staff Report Pg. 14  Packet Pg. 258 of 413  group discussion. The TYLin team will facilitate the discussion, assisting the group in identifying a single solution or limited range of design solutions once the Quarry Road extension is operational. Task 2.2 Deliverables: Workshop meeting notes and presentation materials. Technical memorandum or slide deck summarizing the concerns and recommendations of the workshop participants, as well as any proposed changes or enhancements. Task 3: Transit Service and Operations Study The proposed study will evaluate existing bus service and schedules, estimate travel time savings resulting from the project, and recommend strategies to improve operational efficiency. The study will analyze up to three (3) future scenarios that integrate additional transit lines into the Palo Alto Transit Center alongside existing services. The scenario yielding the greatest travel time savings, selected with input from transit operators, will guide the future conditions traffic analysis described in Task 4. The Palo Alto Transit Center is currently served by the following operators: Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (Lines 21, 22, 522) SamTrans (Lines 280,281, ECR, 296 Owl, 397 Owl) Dumbarton Express/AC Transit (Route DB) Stanford Marguerite and Stanford Health Care Shuttles (P, RP, S, SE, X, Y, MC) The study will assume that these four operators continue to serve the Palo Alto Transit Center and any future changes, expansion or adjustments, will not include the introduction of new operators. Task 3.1 Existing Conditions Review TYLin will review relevant data, including route maps, schedules, and General Transit Feed Specification (GTFS) feeds, to establish a comprehensive profile of current transit operations at the Palo Alto Transit Center. The existing conditions profile will include: Routing for approaches and departures Scheduled arrivals and departures by route and operator Layovers and breaks that can be determined through posted schedules Scheduled travel times by route and operator This draft profile will be shared with representatives from each transit operator to verify the findings and identify any planned changes or adjustments. Task 3.1 Deliverable: Existing Conditions technical memorandum. Page 10 of 21 Item 12 Attachment A - Cost-sharing Agreement with Stanford University (including Palo Alto Transit Center Quarry Road Extension Scope of Work)        Item 12: Staff Report Pg. 15  Packet Pg. 259 of 413  Task 3.2 Routing Optimization and Travel Time Analysis TYLin will analyze current routing and propose adjustments where significant travel time and operational efficiencies can be achieved. The analysis will include travel times from the future project conditions, incorporating potential impacts on automobile traffic along El Camino Real. Proposed routing changes will be summarized in a matrix comparing existing and proposed transit alignments, with specific recommendations for utilizing the proposed extension. The study will analyze up to three (3) future scenarios that integrate additional transit lines into the Palo Alto Transit Center alongside existing services. For each route recommended for realignment to Quarry Road, the matrix will include existing versus proposed travel times and will highlight upstream and downstream schedule adjustments for routes where travel time savings exceed 3-4 minutes. Special attention will be given to the routing of Marguerite Shuttle services through the Palo Alto Transit Center and onto Quarry Road to assess the introduction of new vehicle traffic into the facility. Once a draft matrix is prepared, it will be shared with operator representatives for feedback, allowing for refinement based on their input. Operators will also be invited to consider future enhancements or modifications that may be feasible with the travel time improvements resulting from the proposed extension. The final deliverable for this task will be a matrix summarizing proposed routing changes, conceptual travel time savings, and any related schedule adjustments. It should be noted that the travel time savings will be focused on transit vehicles, as the analysis will compare existing transit operations for the buses and shuttles that currently use the transit center with the anticipated improved operations resulting from the project. If desired, in-vehicle travel time savings for riders using representative origin-destination pairs will also be estimated. Task 3.2 Deliverables:  Routing and travel time matrix. Task 3.3 Bus and Shuttle Operations Stakeholder Workshop TYLin will host a workshop with the transit agencies to discuss operational logistics with the proposed Quarry Road extension at the beginning of the project. The goal of the workshop will be to develop a conceptual routing plan, understood and acceptable by all transit agencies that can form the basis of future Quarry Road Extension-enabled bus and Marguerite Shuttle operations. Working with City and Stanford staff, TYLin will reach out to critical transit agency staff members to participate in the workshop. If key individuals are unable to attend, their input and feedback will be gathered and shared with workshop participants to ensure as many voices contribute to the ultimate analysis. TYLin will develop charts and graphics detailing existing service characteristics and possible options for improvement. Short interviews with key stakeholders in SCTA, SamTrans, A/C Transit, and Marguerite operations will also precede the workshop, to ensure a complete understanding of existing challenges and potential areas for improvement. Page 11 of 21 Item 12 Attachment A - Cost-sharing Agreement with Stanford University (including Palo Alto Transit Center Quarry Road Extension Scope of Work)        Item 12: Staff Report Pg. 16  Packet Pg. 260 of 413  The workshop will be scheduled for up to three hours and will take place in person, if possible, to solicit the best feedback and group discussion. The TYLin team will facilitate the discussion, assisting the group in identifying a single solution or limited range of solutions for new routing once the Quarry Road extension is operational. Task 3.3 Deliverables:  Workshop meeting notes and presentation materials.  Technical memorandum or slide deck summarizing the concerns and recommendations of the workshop participants, as well as supporting rationale for service routing changes. Task 4: Traffic Operations Analysis TYLin will prepare an analysis of traffic operations in the study area. While the study locations will be selected in consultation with the Project team, it is expected that the following four (4) existing intersections will be included in the Traffic Operations Analysis Report:  El Camino Real & Quarry Road  El Camino Real Northbound Ramps & University Avenue/Palm Drive  El Camino Real Southbound Ramps & Palm Drive  El Camino Real & Sand Hill Road It is assumed that the traffic analysis will be prepared for the weekday morning (AM) and weekday evening (PM) peak periods to quantitatively assess intersection operations for the following scenarios:  Existing Conditions  Future Conditions without Project  Future Conditions with Project (Pedestrian Only Phasing)  Future Conditions with Project (Leading Pedestrian Interval Phasing) If Caltrans requires a different number of study intersections and/or peak hours (e.g., a Saturday peak hour) than assumed above, a change order may need to be provided to increase or decrease our fee for this task accordingly. Task 4.1 Data Collection To provide a foundation for the traffic operations analysis and build on existing data, TYLin’s data collection efforts will include collecting additional traffic counts and conducting a site visit. TYLin will visit the study area for the purposes of observing traffic operation and recording existing roadway geometry, speed limits, and intersection control. Existing characteristics will also be documented at University Circle to confirm the status of the pedestrian and bicycle facilities in place. Traffic signal timings will be obtained from the City and/or Caltrans for the signalized intersections and confirmed in the field. Page 12 of 21 Item 12 Attachment A - Cost-sharing Agreement with Stanford University (including Palo Alto Transit Center Quarry Road Extension Scope of Work)        Item 12: Staff Report Pg. 17  Packet Pg. 261 of 413  TYLin will use existing intersection turning movement counts collected in April 2024 at the three (3) original study intersections for the AM and PM peak periods. In coordination with Caltrans District 4, new traffic, pedestrian, and bicycle turning movement counts will be collected at the El Camino Real & Sand Hill Road intersection during the AM and PM peak periods, as this intersection was not included in the previously collected traffic counts. Additionally, TYLin will use the data collected in Task 3.1 to establish peak hour bus volumes during the AM and PM peak periods. Task 4.1 Deliverables:  Turning movement counts, including bicycles and pedestrians, at the El Camino Real & Sand Hill Road intersection.  Existing peak hour bus volumes.  Field visit notes and photos. Task 4.2 Traffic Analysis TYLin will analyze the four existing study intersections under AM and PM peak hour conditions using Synchro 12. The traffic analysis will evaluate measures such as volume-to-capacity (v/c) ratio, delay (vehicle and person), queues, and level of service (LOS). As part of the analysis, TYLin will analyze four scenarios: existing conditions, future without project conditions, and future with project conditions for two alternative signal designs at El Camino Real/Quarry Road. The future condition scenarios will be analyzed for one future horizon year (to be determined). The future without project traffic volumes will be estimated by considering a background growth rate (to be determined in coordination with the City) plus traffic generated by up to two proposed site-specific developments in the vicinity of the project. It is assumed that traffic impact studies can be provided for the proposed developments and that the City can provide guidance for an appropriate background growth rate. However, if TYLin needs to develop trip generation estimates on our own and/or perform analyses to determine a background growth rate, a change order can be provided for that effort. The future with project traffic volumes will account for diverted traffic associated with the proposed improvements and intersection modifications. The future conditions capacity results will be compared, and potential impacts to the operation of the roadway network will be identified. This will include a detailed review of operations within the Transit Center to identify potential congestion issues that could arise from introducing additional services with modified routing and changes to the signal phasing at the Quarry Road intersection. If needed, modifications to the proposed lane configuration and/or signal timings/phasing will be considered and incorporated based on the results of the initial analysis and to promote safety and efficient traffic operations within the study area. Page 13 of 21 Item 12 Attachment A - Cost-sharing Agreement with Stanford University (including Palo Alto Transit Center Quarry Road Extension Scope of Work)        Item 12: Staff Report Pg. 18  Packet Pg. 262 of 413  The analysis assumptions, methodology, and results will be summarized in the Traffic Operations Analysis Report (TOAR). This task includes the effort to create technical appendices and report graphics such as location maps, volume diagrams, and LOS tables. As part of the agency review and comment process, it is recommended that the project team set up a focused traffic study meeting with Caltrans District 4 staff to present responses to comments and discuss and resolve any outstanding issues in the draft report before proceeding with the next report version. Prior to sending the draft report to Caltrans, the project team will coordinate a round of review with Stanford and the City to incorporate their feedback into the draft. Upon approval of responses to comments from Caltrans District 4, Stanford, and the City, TYLin will make the appropriate revisions and submit the final TOAR document. Task 4.2 Deliverables: Draft Traffic Operations Analysis Report. Final Traffic Operations Analysis Report. Task 4.3 Transit Signal Priority Technical Memorandum (Optional) If after the completion of Task 3 (Transit Service and Operations Analysis), it is found that Transit Signal Priority (TSP) improvements are recommended to improve transit operations, a technical memorandum will be prepared in collaboration with the transit operators, Caltrans District 4, and the TYLin design team prior to the traffic analysis to define what type(s) of improvement(s) would be feasible and the most beneficial, and how these improvements could either be incorporated in the Synchro models developed for Task 4.2 (or analyzed using a different software (e.g., Vissim)) to quantify the effect of the proposed transit improvements on traffic operations. If TSP improvements are ultimately recommended, these improvements will need to be incorporated into the plans developed in Task 7. Task 4.3 Deliverable: Technical memorandum. Note: Due to the unknown nature of this task, the fee for Task 4.3 is not included in the fee estimate and will be additional (an addendum will be prepared) if the task is deemed necessary after the completion of Task 3 and required by Stanford and the City. Alternatively, a portion of the contingency budget included in Task 9 could be used to perform this analysis. Task 5: Environmental Studies and Clearance Task 5 Scope Assumptions: The Project is being built with all local funds. No federal transportation funds that would triggerNEPA are being used. If federal funds are applied to the project, a change order may be required to include NEPA requirements. No encroachment on a designated U.S. Route would occur. TYLin assumes that no CEQA Notice of Exemption has been filed with the State Clearinghouse orSanta Clara County Clerk-Recorder. Page 14 of 21 Item 12 Attachment A - Cost-sharing Agreement with Stanford University (including Palo Alto Transit Center Quarry Road Extension Scope of Work)        Item 12: Staff Report Pg. 19  Packet Pg. 263 of 413  A site visit will not be conducted. No additional technical studies or documentation regarding NEPA is needed. Information used to complete the PEAR, if needed (see optional Task 5.2), would include existing project documentation and readily available public information, documents, databases, andmapping. Task 5.1 California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Notice of Exemption (NOE) TYLin will prepare and submit a CEQA NOE package for the proposed Project. Prepare CEQA NOE using the City of Palo Alto Council Resolution No. 10167 and City Staff Report as the basis. This will need to be signed by the City of Palo Alto as the CEQA lead agency. Submit the NOE package to the State Clearinghouse using the “CEQA Submit” system. Submit the NOE package for filing with the Santa Clara County Clerk-Recorded using the requiredCEQA Filing Cover Sheet. Task 5.1 Deliverable: Notice of Exemption package. Task 5.2 Preliminary Environmental Analysis Report (PEAR) (Optional) This task would only become necessary if Federal transportation funds that would trigger NEPA were used or if Caltrans otherwise determines that evaluation of the project under NEPA is required. TYLin would prepare and submit a PEAR to Caltrans to provide information to support programming of the proposed project. The PEAR would also determine the need for additional technical studies and the appropriate level of NEPA documentation. Task 5.2 Deliverable: Preliminary Environmental Analysis Report. Task 6: Design Engineering Evaluation Report (DEER) The Project is expected to be approved through the Caltrans Design Engineering Evaluation Report (DEER) process. TYLin will work with Stanford and City to produce and obtain approval of the Draft and Final DEER in accordance with Caltrans PDPM. Task 6.1 Draft DEER TYLin will prepare a draft DEER that documents the need for the Project, summarizes key points from the environmental studies, and summarizes scope, cost, schedule and overall impacts to enable an informed Page 15 of 21 Item 12 Attachment A - Cost-sharing Agreement with Stanford University (including Palo Alto Transit Center Quarry Road Extension Scope of Work)        Item 12: Staff Report Pg. 20  Packet Pg. 264 of 413  decision to be made to proceed toward the Draft CE/CE for the Project, and obtaining an Encroachment Permit. The DEER will be submitted along with the design submittals in Task 7. Task 6.1 Deliverable: Draft Design Engineering Evaluation Report. Task 6.2 Final DEER Following review of the Draft DEER and the draft CE/CE by Caltrans and other agencies. TYLin will revise the draft DEER and submit the final DEER to Caltrans for Project approval after the Final CE is approved. Task 6.2 Deliverable: Final Design Engineering Evaluation Report. Task 7: Plans, Specifications, and Estimates (PS&E) Note: In the Task 7 subtasks below, deliverables are not listed separately, as the plans, documents, and calculations described within each subtask serve as the deliverables. Task 7.1 Roadway Plans (60/95%/Final) TYLin will prepare the Roadway Plans, Specifications, and Estimates (PS&E) plans set for the project following the Caltrans Highway Design Manual and Caltrans Standard Plans as appropriate. Preparation of the roadway plans will be consistent with Caltrans design standards to the greatest extent feasible. The following drawings are anticipated, and an initial 60% submittal of the PS&E will be made to the City, Stanford, and relevant stakeholders for discussions prior to the 95% PS&E. 1 Title Sheet 2 Index, Abbreviations, General Notes and Legend 3 Project Control 4 Demolition Plan 5 Roadway Plan 6 Site Grading Plan 7 Construction Details: Paving, Typical Cross -sections, Signing and Pavement Marking 8 Temporary Water Pollution Control Plan 9 Erosion Control Plan 10 Drainage Plans, details, and Quantities 11 Page 16 of 21 Item 12 Attachment A - Cost-sharing Agreement with Stanford University (including Palo Alto Transit Center Quarry Road Extension Scope of Work)        Item 12: Staff Report Pg. 21  Packet Pg. 265 of 413  14 Traffic Control Plan 15 Summary of Quantities 16 Specifications and Special Provisions Task 7.2 Draft Special Provisions (60%/95%/Final) TYLin will prepare the Specifications and Special Provisions and PS&E Quantities for the project following the Caltrans Standard Specifications. TYLin will notify Stanford and the City if TYLin is seeking any exceptions to this requirement. Task 7.3 Quantities and Estimates (60%/95%/Final) TYLin will prepare project quantity sheets and Basic Engineering Estimate System (BEES) estimates for District PS&E draft circulation. A list of roadway contract items with item descriptions, item numbers, and units of pay, item pay codes, quantities, and estimated unit costs will be prepared. Task 7.4 Transportation Management Plan (TMP) (60%/95%/Final) TYLin will establish TMP strategies and estimate their respective costs. This includes determining the feasibility of using surface streets for traffic diversion, developing traffic handling concept plans and detours, and preparing lane closure chart requests with the project stakeholders. TYLin will coordinate with Caltrans and will prepare the TMP Data Sheet. Task 7.5 Storm Water Data Report (SWDR) (60%/95%/Final) For the portions of the project within State Right-of-Way, TYLin will update the SWDR to confirm that the programmed project includes sufficient right-of-way and budget for required storm water controls and identify project-specific permanent and temporary BMPs that may be required to mitigate impacts. Drainage areas and total disturbed areas will be defined, as will climatic conditions, existing drainage site conditions, site permeability, soil texture, existing vegetation and groundwater. It is anticipated that a “Short Form” SWDR will be prepared for the build alternative. Task 7.6 Hydrology/Hydraulics Report (60%/95%/Final) TYLin will prepare a Hydrology and Hydraulics Report including drainage plan, profile and detail sheets. Task 7.7 Hazards Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Phase I ISA) (60%/95%/Final) TYLin, in collaboration with Baseline Environmental Consulting, will prepare an Initial Site Assessment (ISA) to identify and rank the level of risk associated with potential hazardous materials, hazardous waste, and contamination within the project limits that could potentially affect proposed construction activities and/or operations in accordance with the environmental site assessment guidelines presented in ASTM E1527-05 and Chapter 10 of the Caltrans Environmental Handbook. The assessment will include a review of physical Page 17 of 21 Item 12 Attachment A - Cost-sharing Agreement with Stanford University (including Palo Alto Transit Center Quarry Road Extension Scope of Work)        Item 12: Staff Report Pg. 22  Packet Pg. 266 of 413  setting sources, historical land use information, and regulatory agency records, as well as site reconnaissance of current land use conditions and interviews with property owners. Task 7.8 Internal QC (60%/95%/Final) TYLin will perform an internal QA/QC of the plans and submit copies to Stanford, the City, and other relevant stakeholders for peer review prior to submittal to Caltrans. QA/QC will be performed in accordance with the approved project quality management plan. Task 7.9 Final PS&E Package (Final) This task includes the distribution of the draft final combined PS&E package for final review by Stanford, the City, Caltrans and other relevant stakeholders. TYLin will address comments received and incorporate changes as appropriate in the final combined PS&E package. Under this task, TYLin will perform internal QA/QC plans check and review and will submit the final combined PS&E package to an independent reviewer, which will be provided by TYLin. The independent reviewer will be a registered Professional Engineer in the State of California and will certify the quality of the package and that the plans are constructible. The independent reviewer will submit a stamped report to the City summarizing its review and certifying the constructability of the plans and that the final combined PS&E package is biddable. TYLin will be responsible for completion of the final draft combined PS&E package in a manner where there is sufficient time to address comments during the independent review and finalize the PS&E package within the project schedule. TYLin will be responsible for the constructability of the project. Task 7.10 Constructability Review (95%) & Resident Engineer File and Supplemental Materials (Final) This includes an overall review of the PS&E package to identify any constructability issues. The constructability review will be completed after the 95% PS&E submittal. During the final phase of the PS&E, TYLin will prepare a Resident Engineer File. The file will include the list of Project contacts, memos to the Resident Engineer, Quantity Calculations, cut sheets and relevant reports. Task 8: Advertising and Bid Support (Optional) Upon completion of the Final 100% Bid-Ready PS&E, TYLin will assist the City during the Advertising and Bidding of the Project, including but not limited to: a.Updating the Final Advertise/Bid Ready PS&E Contract Documents b.Submitting all permits, Resident Engineer and Survey File information items to Stanford or City andtheir designated Resident Engineer and/or Construction Management team for final reviewc.Providing updates requested by Stanford during the advertisement period d.Answering any specific bidder inquiries from contractorse.Conduct pre-bid meeting and site visit with potential contractorsf.Review and evaluate bids Page 18 of 21 Item 12 Attachment A - Cost-sharing Agreement with Stanford University (including Palo Alto Transit Center Quarry Road Extension Scope of Work)        Item 12: Staff Report Pg. 23  Packet Pg. 267 of 413  Note: The fee for Task 8.0 is not included in the fee estimate and will be additional (an addendum will be prepared) if the task is required by Stanford and the City. Task 9: Contingency and Other Supporting Tasks (Optional) If needed and requested by Stanford, optional Task 9 may be activated as a contingency fund to support the tasks outlined in this scope of services or to cover additional services not currently defined (e.g., bid support, design support during construction). Page 19 of 21 Item 12 Attachment A - Cost-sharing Agreement with Stanford University (including Palo Alto Transit Center Quarry Road Extension Scope of Work)        Item 12: Staff Report Pg. 24  Packet Pg. 268 of 413  Project Tasks and Tentative Schedule Task Timeline Page 20 of 21 Item 12 Attachment A - Cost-sharing Agreement with Stanford University (including Palo Alto Transit Center Quarry Road Extension Scope of Work)        Item 12: Staff Report Pg. 25  Packet Pg. 269 of 413  PURCHASING GUIDE – APPENDIX L Exhibit C – Insurance Requirements STANFORD WARRANTS THAT IT WILL REQUIRE IN THE WRITTEN ENGINEERING AGREEMENT WITH TYLIN THAT TYLIN OBTAIN INSURANCE TO SUPPORT THIS AGREEMENT AND THAT TYLIN WILL MAINTAIN COVERAGE FOR THE DURATION OF THIS AGREEMENT AS PROVIDED BELOW. CONTRACT IS CONTINGENT ON COMPLIANCE WITH CITY’S INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS AS SPECIFIED HEREIN. REQUIRED TYPE OF COVERAGE REQUIREMENT MINIMUM LIMITS EACH OCCURRENCE AGGREGATE YES YES WORKER’S COMPENSATION EMPLOYER’S LIABILITY STATUTORY STATUTORY STATUTORY STATUTORY YES GENERAL LIABILITY, INCLUDING PERSONAL INJURY, BROAD FORM PROPERTY DAMAGE BLANKET CONTRACTUAL, AND FIRE LEGAL LIABILITY BODILY INJURY PROPERTY DAMAGE BODILY INJURY & PROPERTY DAMAGE COMBINED. $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 YES AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY, INCLUDING ALL OWNED, HIRED, NON-OWNED BODILY INJURY -EACH PERSON -EACH OCCURRENCE PROPERTY DAMAGE $250,000 $500,000 $100,000 $250,000 $500,000 $100,000 YES PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY, INCLUDING, ERRORS AND OMISSIONS, MALPRACTICE (WHEN APPLICABLE), AND NEGLIGENT PERFORMANCE ALL DAMAGES $1,000,000 Page 21 of 21 Item 12 Attachment A - Cost-sharing Agreement with Stanford University (including Palo Alto Transit Center Quarry Road Extension Scope of Work)        Item 12: Staff Report Pg. 26  Packet Pg. 270 of 413  City Council Staff Report From: City Manager Report Type: CONSENT CALENDAR Lead Department: Police Meeting Date: November 3, 2025 Report #:2509-5265 TITLE Approval of the Acceptance of State of California Citizens Options for Public Safety (COPS) Funds of $211,715 and a Budget Amendment in the Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund for municipal police service expenses; CEQA status – not a project. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. Approve the acceptance of annual Citizens Options for Public Safety (COPS) funds from State of California, totaling $211,715; and 2. Amend the Fiscal Year 2026 Budget Appropriation for the Supplemental Law Enforcement Services (SLES) Fund by (requires 2/3 approval): a. Increasing the estimate for revenue from the State of California by $211,715; b. Increasing Police Department expense appropriation for Capitalized Equipment by $42,000; for Facilities and Equipment by $80,000; for Contract Services by $95,000; for Supplies and Materials by $67,000; for Rents and Leases by $75,000; and c. Decreasing fund balance by $147,285 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Staff recommends that the City Council approve the acceptance of the annual State of California COPS FY 2026 funds, totaling $211,715 and amend the budget appropriation in the SLES Fund to spend this revenue and appropriating unspent funding from previous years, totaling $147,285. This funding went into the fund balance at the close of the previous fiscal years to be used for other eligible expenses. In total, $359,000 is recommended for Public Safety Building (PSB) fixtures and installation services, low-speed vehicle, noncapitalized tools, equipment, and supplies related to municipal police service expenses. BACKGROUND Every year since 1997, the State of California, by statute, allocates designated funds to counties, which pass funding through to cities, through a Citizens Options for Public Safety (COPS) Item 13 Item 13 Staff Report        Item 13: Staff Report Pg. 1  Packet Pg. 271 of 413  program. This ongoing program is apportioned by a State statute and the level of funding is relative to the population as determined by the California Department of Finance. This funding is not related to the Federal Government Department of Justice “COPS” program with the same acronym. ANALYSIS 1. Further, the Growth Fund portion (distribution B above) was reported and funded $106,5822. Staff recommends use of this year’s expected COPS funds, along with a portion of the existing fund balance, for a total amount of $359,000 ($211,715 in revenue and $147,285 in existing fund balance), in the following manner(s) which are compliant with the law. All expenses below are estimated. 1 State of California Department of Finance September 9, 2025 pg. 13 https://www.sco.ca.gov/Files-ARD-Payments/copsdofletter_2526.pdf 2 State of California Citizens Option for Public Safety Growth Allocation Report For COPS and Juvenile Justice (FY2024-2025) Spreadsheet, sheet “Front Line City Breakdown”, row 500, column F https://www.sco.ca.gov/ard_payments_cops_growth.html Item 13 Item 13 Staff Report        Item 13: Staff Report Pg. 2  Packet Pg. 272 of 413  Public Safety Building Equipment ($152,000) A number of items will need to be purchased by the department to outfit the building for police operations or to upgrade old, beyond life, equipment that is not suitable for the new facility. Some of those items include hardware and software for new forensic workspaces that did not exist on 275 Forest, fixtures common to police departments such as fortified cabinets and lockers for equipment and supplies, drug scales, hardware and software for access-alarm- systems (beyond the designed burglar and panic alarms), dispatcher console configuration to include network cable testing, rack installation, and monitor installation. Item 13 Item 13 Staff Report        Item 13: Staff Report Pg. 3  Packet Pg. 273 of 413  Field Based Audio/Video ($75,000) POLICY IMPLICATIONS Palo Alto Municipal Code 2.28.080 requires a two-thirds vote by Council to accept the funds and amend the budget. The California Government Code would limit how SLES funds are redistributed. As with the acquisition of any goods or services by the City, the purchasing process will be subject to City purchasing policy manual as established in the municipal code under the direction of the Chief Procurement Officer. Any purchase that is surveillance technology is subject to provisions of the Municipal Code during the purchase process. Some of the proposed uses here are considered surveillance technology and will require a surveillance use policy approval by City Council, in accordance with the Palo Alto Municipal Code, prior to purchase, which will be brought forward separately. None of the proposed uses here are considered military equipment and subject to reporting according to AB 481. FISCAL/RESOURCE IMPACT 5). Of this existing fund balance, $147,285 will be moved from the fund balance to revenues to bridge the gap between this year’s COPS revenue and expenses. There will be no impact to the General Fund as ongoing maintenance costs, if any, for the items purchased by the SLES Fund will be absorbed in the Department's existing budget, otherwise, the activities will stop when the SLES funds are spent in full. 5 City of Palo Alto FY 2023-2024 Annual Comprehensive Financial Reporting beginning on page 122 https://www.paloalto.gov/files/assets/public/v/1/administrative-services/financial-reporting/annual- comprehensive-financial-reports-acfr/current-2011-acfrs/city-of-palo-alto-acfr-single-audit-fy2024-final- unsercured.pdf Item 13 Item 13 Staff Report        Item 13: Staff Report Pg. 4  Packet Pg. 274 of 413  STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW APPROVED BY: Item 13 Item 13 Staff Report        Item 13: Staff Report Pg. 5  Packet Pg. 275 of 413  City Council Staff Report From: City Clerk Report Type: STUDY SESSION Lead Department: City Clerk Meeting Date: November 3, 2025 Report #:2510-5328 TITLE Establishing the City Council Annual Calendar of Meetings, Recesses, and City Council Events for the Calendar Year 2026; CEQA status – not a project RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council provide direction on the preferred Annual Retreat/Priority Setting Meeting date and on Option 1 vs. Option 2 for special City Council meetings, and establish its calendar of meetings, recesses, and City Council events for calendar year 2026. BACKGROUND The City Council annually adopts a schedule of meetings and recesses for the upcoming calendar year. Following Council direction tonight, staff will agendize a resolution establishing its calendar on consent for Council consideration. This year is the second iteration of a calendar setting process that implements Item 1.3 of the City’s Equity Action Plan (Create a process that includes the Human Relations Commission (HRC) for annual calendar setting related to holidays and heritage months)1. The goal of this process is to create an inclusive City Council calendar that considers cultural observances that could prevent the public from participating in meetings and provide an opportunity for input from the public, City Council, and HRC. This process will continue to evolve in response to community and City Council feedback. Palo Alto’s Municipal Code sets the City Council’s regular meeting time as 5:30pm on the first three Mondays of the month2. Staff, in consultation with the Mayor and Vice Mayor, may reschedule regular meetings and schedule additional special meetings, should they be necessary to conduct City Council business. 1 2024 and 2025 Equity Action Plan: https://www.paloalto.gov/files/assets/public/v/1/city-manager/wellness-and- belonging/equity-workplan-2024.pdf 2 Palo Alto Municipal Code Section 2.04.010 https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/paloalto/latest/paloalto_ca/0- 0-0-60060 Item 14 Item 14 Staff Report        Item 14: Staff Report Pg. 1  Packet Pg. 276 of 413  Staff has developed a list of dates to avoid scheduling City Council meetings based on feedback from the public, City Council, and HRC. These dates fall into two categories: Days on which City administrative offices are closed Certain cultural dates of significance that could fall on a Monday and whose main celebrations begin in the evening, which would prevent observants from participating in City Council meetings. New Year’s Day Martin Luther King, Jr. Day Lunar New Year Presidents’ Day Eid al-Fitr Passover Memorial Day Eid al-Adha Juneteenth Fourth of July Labor Day Rosh Hashanah Yom Kippur Indigenous Peoples’ Day Veterans Day Thanksgiving Day after Thanksgiving Christmas ANALYSIS Attachment A. Observance Date Option 1 rd Wednesday) Option 2 th Monday) Item 14 Item 14 Staff Report        Item 14: Staff Report Pg. 2  Packet Pg. 277 of 413  employees and public schools and community colleges may choose to take off. Upon further research, staff found that unlike other holidays on the list, Diwali’s primary observance is not tied to an evening celebration. HRC also suggested additions to the dates of significance list, which staff have incorporated into Attachment B. Attachment B list of dates of significance. FISCAL/RESOURCE IMPACT STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ATTACHMENTS APPROVED BY: Item 14 Item 14 Staff Report        Item 14: Staff Report Pg. 3  Packet Pg. 278 of 413  City Council Calendar 2026 Date Meeting Body Mon, January 5 City Council – City Council Reorganization Mon, January 12 City Council Wed, January 21 Option 1: City Council (special) Mon, January 26 Option 2: City Council (special) Sat, January 24 or Sat, January 31 City Council (special) – Annual Retreat/Priority Setting Meeting Mon, February 2 City Council Tues, February 3 Finance Committee Mon, February 9 City Council Tues, February 10 Policy & Services Committee Tues, February 17 Finance Committee Wed, February 18 Option 1: City Council (special) Thurs, February 19 City/Schools Liaison Committee Mon, February 23 Option 2: City Council (special) Mon, March 2 City Council Tues, March 3 Finance Committee Mon, March 9 City Council Tues, March 10 Policy & Services Committee Mon, March 16 City Council Tues, March 17 Finance Committee Thurs, March 19 City/Schools Liaison Committee Mon, April 6 City Council Tues, April 7 Finance Committee Mon, April 13 City Council Tues, April 14 Policy & Services Committee Thurs, April 16 City/Schools Liaison Committee Mon, April 20 City Council Tues, April 21 Finance Committee Mon, May 4 City Council Tues, May 5 Finance Committee Wed, May 6 Finance Committee (special) Mon, May 11 City Council Tues, May 12 Policy & Services Committee Mon, May 18 City Council Tues, May 19 Finance Committee Thurs, May 21 City/Schools Liaison Committee Mon, June 1 City Council Tues, June 2 Finance Committee Mon, June 8 City Council Tues, June 9 Policy & Services Committee Mon, June 15 City Council Item 14 Attachment A - Proposed 2026 City Council Meeting Schedule        Item 14: Staff Report Pg. 4  Packet Pg. 279 of 413  Tues, June 16 Finance Committee Wed, June 17 City Council (special additional standby meeting) Thurs, June 18 City/Schools Liaison Committee Fri, June 19 – Fri, July 31 Summer Recess Mon, August 3 City Council Tues, August 4 Finance Committee Mon, August 10 City Council Tues, August 11 Policy & Services Committee Mon, August 17 City Council Tues, August 18 Finance Committee Thurs, August 20 City/School Liaison Committee Tues, September 8 City Council (special) Mon, September 14 City Council Tues, September 15 Policy & Services Committee Wed, September 16 Option 1: City Council (special) Thurs, September 17 City/Schools Liaison Committee Tues, September 22 Finance Committee Mon, September 28 Option 2: City Council (special) Mon, October 5 City Council Tues, October 5 Finance Committee Tues, October 13 Policy & Services Committee Thurs, October 15 City/Schools Liaison Committee Mon, October 19 City Council Tues, October 20 Finance Committee Wed, October 21 Option 1: City Council (special) Mon, October 26 Option 2: City Council (special) Mon, November 2 City Council Wed, November 4 Finance Committee (special) Mon, November 9 City Council Tues, November 10 Policy & Services Committee Mon, November 16 City Council Tues, November 17 Finance Committee Thurs, November 19 City/Schools Liaison Committee Tues, December 1 Finance Committee Mon, December 7 City Council Tues, December 8 Policy & Services Committee Mon, December 14 City Council Tues, December 15 Finance Committee (canceled if Council chooses Option 1) Option 1: Tues, December 15 City Council (special) Option 2: Wed, December 16 City Council (special) Thurs, December 17 City/School Liaison Option 3: Mon, December 21 City Council Tues, December 22 – Fri, January 1 Winter Recess Item 14 Attachment A - Proposed 2026 City Council Meeting Schedule        Item 14: Staff Report Pg. 5  Packet Pg. 280 of 413  City Council Events 2026 Date Event Item 14 Attachment A - Proposed 2026 City Council Meeting Schedule        Item 14: Staff Report Pg. 6  Packet Pg. 281 of 413  Dec 2025 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 JANUARY 2026 Feb 2026 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY 28 29 30 31 1 2 3 City Council – Reorganization City Council 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Martin Luther King, Jr. Day Option 1: City Council City Council (special) – Annual Retreat 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Option 2: City Council City Council (special) – Annual Retreat Item 14 Attachment A - Proposed 2026 City Council Meeting Schedule        Item 14: Staff Report Pg. 7  Packet Pg. 282 of 413  Jan 2026 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 FEBRUARY 2026 Mar 2026 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 City Council Finance City Council Policy & Services Presidents’ Day Finance Option 1: City Council City/Schools Liaison 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Option 2: City Council Item 14 Attachment A - Proposed 2026 City Council Meeting Schedule        Item 14: Staff Report Pg. 8  Packet Pg. 283 of 413  Feb 2026 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MARCH 2026 Apr 2026 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 City Council Finance City Council Policy & Services City Council Finance City/Schools Liaison 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 1 2 3 4 Item 14 Attachment A - Proposed 2026 City Council Meeting Schedule        Item 14: Staff Report Pg. 9  Packet Pg. 284 of 413  Mar 2026 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 APRIL 2026 May 2026 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY 29 30 31 1 2 3 4 City Council Finance City Council Policy & Services City/Schools Liaison 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 City Council Finance 26 27 28 29 30 1 2 Item 14 Attachment A - Proposed 2026 City Council Meeting Schedule        Item 14: Staff Report Pg. 10  Packet Pg. 285 of 413  Apr 2026 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 MAY 2026 Jun 2026 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY 26 27 28 29 30 1 2 City Council Finance City Council 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 City Council Finance City/Schools Liaison 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Memorial Day 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 Item 14 Attachment A - Proposed 2026 City Council Meeting Schedule        Item 14: Staff Report Pg. 11  Packet Pg. 286 of 413  May 2026 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 JUNE 2026 Jul 2026 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 City Council Finance City Council Policy & Services City Council Finance City Council (Special additional standby meeting) City/Schools Liaison Summer Recess Starts 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 1 2 3 4 Item 14 Attachment A - Proposed 2026 City Council Meeting Schedule        Item 14: Staff Report Pg. 12  Packet Pg. 287 of 413  Jun 2026 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 JULY 2026 Aug 2026 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY 28 29 30 1 2 3 4 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 1 Item 14 Attachment A - Proposed 2026 City Council Meeting Schedule        Item 14: Staff Report Pg. 13  Packet Pg. 288 of 413  Jul 2026 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 AUGUST 2026 Sep 2026 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY 26 27 28 29 30 31 1 Summer Recess Ends City Council Finance City Council Services 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 City Council Finance City/Schools Liaison 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 1 2 3 4 5 Item 14 Attachment A - Proposed 2026 City Council Meeting Schedule        Item 14: Staff Report Pg. 14  Packet Pg. 289 of 413  Aug 2026 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 SEPTEMBER 2026 Oct 2026 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY 30 31 1 2 3 4 5 Labor Day CC) City Council City Council Policy & Services Option 1: City Council City/Schools Liaison 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Yom Kippur Yom Kippur Finance 27 28 29 30 1 2 3 Option 2: City Council Item 14 Attachment A - Proposed 2026 City Council Meeting Schedule        Item 14: Staff Report Pg. 15  Packet Pg. 290 of 413  Sep 2026 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 OCTOBER 2026 Nov 2026 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY 27 28 29 30 1 2 3 City Council Finance Indigenous Peoples’ Day Policy & Services City/Schools Liaison 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 City Council Finance Option 1: City Council 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Option 2: City Council Item 14 Attachment A - Proposed 2026 City Council Meeting Schedule        Item 14: Staff Report Pg. 16  Packet Pg. 291 of 413  Oct 2026 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 NOVEMBER 2026 Dec 2026 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 City Council Election Day Finance (special) City Council Policy & Services City Council Finance City/Schools Liaison 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 1 2 3 4 5 Item 14 Attachment A - Proposed 2026 City Council Meeting Schedule        Item 14: Staff Report Pg. 17  Packet Pg. 292 of 413  Nov 2026 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 DECEMBER 2026 Jan 2027 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY 29 30 1 2 3 4 5 Finance City Council Policy & Services City Council Finance (Cancel for CC) Option 1: City Council (special) Option 2: City Council (special) City/Schools Liaison 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Option 3: City Council Start of Winter Recess 27 28 29 30 31 1 2 End of Winter Recess Item 14 Attachment A - Proposed 2026 City Council Meeting Schedule        Item 14: Staff Report Pg. 18  Packet Pg. 293 of 413  1 Citywide Dates of Significance Please Note: The curation of this list is an iterative process. It is not exhaustive and will evolve over time based on input from the City Council, Human Relations Commission, and community members. New Year’s Day Martin Luther King, Jr. Day Holocaust Remembrance Day Lunar New Year Black History Month President’s Day Ramadan Women’s History Month American Red Cross Month International Women’s Day Eid al-Fitr International Transgender Day of Visibility Cesar Chavez Day Autism Awareness Month Palo Alto Day Dolores Huerta Day National Day of Silence (LGBTQI+) Passover Easter National Animal Control Officer Appreciation Week National Public Safety Telecommunicator’s Week Earth Day Armenian Genocide Remembrance Day Arbor Day Asian American Pacific Islander Heritage Month Older Americans Month Affordable Housing Month Mental Health Awareness Month National Public Service Recognition Week Cinco de Mayo National Police Week and National Peace Officers’ Memorial Day Shavout Vesak Memorial Day Pride Month Immigrant Heritage Month Juneteenth Item 14 Attachment B - Citywide Dates of Significance        Item 14: Staff Report Pg. 19  Packet Pg. 294 of 413  2 Eid al-Adha Juneteenth Independence Day Labor Day Emergency Preparedness Month Hispanic Heritage Month Rosh Hashanah Yom Kippur Sukkot Indigenous Peoples' Day Dia De Los Muertos Diwali National Native American Heritage Month Law Enforcement Records and Support Personnel Week Veterans Day Transgender Day of Remembrance Thanksgiving Day after Thanksgiving Hanukkah Las Posadas Christmas Kwanzaa Item 14 Attachment B - Citywide Dates of Significance        Item 14: Staff Report Pg. 20  Packet Pg. 295 of 413  City Council Staff Report From: City Manager Report Type: INFORMATION REPORTS Lead Department: Public Works Meeting Date: November 3, 2025 Report #:2505-4672 TITLE Information Report on Sustainability and Climate Action Plan (S/CAP) Implementation; CEQA Status - Not a Project RECOMMENDATION No Council action is required. This is an update on Sustainability and Climate Action Plan workplan implementation progress in quarters one and two of calendar year 2025. It is provided to give the City Council and public an overview of workplan items status since adopted by Council in June 2023. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The City is implementing the Sustainability and Climate Action Plan (S/CAP) to help meet its sustainability goals, including its goals of reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions 80% below 1990 levels by 2030 (the “80 x 30” goal) and achieving carbon neutrality by 2030. Since the S/CAP was adopted in June 2023, staff has provided implementation updates covering progress from Q3 2023 through Q4 2024. This update covers progress through the first two quarters of 2025. Highlights of Q1 and Q2 2025 progress include: Climate Action As of Q2, five multi-family properties representing 168 housing units have installed EV charging ports through City programs. Of all multi-family housing units in Palo Alto, 9.2% (982 units) now have access to charging ports at 22 properties. 13 residents utilized the Residential Energy Assistance Program (REAP) to receive energy and water efficiency upgrades in the first half of 2025. Filling two vacant positions enabled accelerated progress on the Safe Routes to Schools program and facility electrification. Item A Item A Staff Report        Item A: Staff Report Pg. 1  Packet Pg. 296 of 413  In fiscal year 2025, the City’s commercial and industrial partnerships for emissions reduction have resulted in saving 2,000,000 kWh and reducing GHG emissions by 155 Metric Tons of Carbon Dioxide Equivalent (MTCO2e). Sustainability The Local Advanced Water Purification System Project at the Regional Water Quality Control Plant began construction. The City, with assistance from external experts, developed a tool that enables City engineers and project managers to consider future sea level rise conditions as they design projects. The City awarded a contract for Newell Road Bridge Project construction, with pre- construction activities commencing in summer 2025. As part of an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) grant-funded project, 20 staff received National Green Infrastructure Program training for Green Stormwater Infrastructure (GSI) maintenance, and the City released a request for proposals for a proposed GSI project in a City park. BACKGROUND Item A Item A Staff Report        Item A: Staff Report Pg. 2  Packet Pg. 297 of 413  In April 2016, the City Council adopted the goal of reducing GHG emissions 80% below 1990 levels by 2030 (the “80 x 30” goal),5 and in October 2022 the City Council adopted the ambitious goal of achieving carbon neutrality by 2030.6 Staff, with community and City Council input, referred to the 2016 Sustainability and Climate Action Plan (S/CAP) Framework and 2018- 2020 Sustainability Implementation Plan to create a comprehensive S/CAP and Three-Year S/CAP workplan. In June 2023, Council adopted the 2022 Sustainability and Climate Action Plan, certified the Comprehensive Plan Environmental Impact Report Addendum: Update to the Sustainability and Climate Action Plan, and accepted the 2023-2025 S/CAP Workplan.7 The S/CAP is an ambitious plan to reduce the City and community’s GHG emissions, while also guiding how Palo Alto uses land and natural resources in ways that ensure quality of life for future generations. The S/CAP aligns with several goals of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan Implementation Plan. All previous S/CAP Implementation updates can be found in the Sustainability and Climate Action Plan (S/CAP) Program Reports section of the Sustainability Actions and Accomplishments page of the City website.8 The 2022 S/CAP and 2023-2025 S/CAP Work Plan align closely with one of the four Council Priorities for CY 2025: “Climate Action and Adaptation, and Natural Environment Protection”. In addition, there are several overlapping Council Priority Objectives, the status of which can be found in the 2025 Council Priority Objectives Q2 Report. This report references the Council Priority Objectives in parentheses where applicable. ANALYSIS The City is committed to a sustainable future. The City owns, operates, and maintains a full- service utilities portfolio that provides electric, natural gas, fiber, water, refuse, and wastewater services to residents and businesses in Palo Alto. Palo Alto’s continued leadership in advancing sustainability commitments has succeeded mainly because of the continued collaboration of community stakeholders, City departments, and the leadership of the City Council. The S/CAP Goals and Key Actions are divided into eight areas, four of which are climate-focused and include actions to achieve the City’s 80 x 30 and carbon neutrality by 2030 goals (Climate Action, Energy, Electric Vehicles, and Mobility) and four of which are focused on actions that create a sustainable natural environment and adapting to a warming climate (Water, Climate Adaptation and Sea Level Rise, Natural Environment, and Zero Waste). The Work Plan is similarly divided between climate-focused and sustainability-focused priorities. 5 City Council, April 18, 2016; Agenda Item #10; SR #6754, https://recordsportal.paloalto.gov/Weblink/DocView.aspx?id=79086 6 City Council, October 3, 2022; Agenda Item #9; SR #14720, https://recordsportal.paloalto.gov/Weblink/DocView.aspx?id=82036 7 City Council, June 5, 2023; Agenda Item #14; SR #2303-1133, https://recordsportal.paloalto.gov/Weblink/DocView.aspx?id=82334 8 Sustainability and Climate Action Plan (S/CAP) Progress Reports; https://www.paloalto.gov/City- Hall/Sustainability/Emissions-Reduction-Goals-and-Progress/Sustainability-Actions-and-Accomplishments Item A Item A Staff Report        Item A: Staff Report Pg. 3  Packet Pg. 298 of 413  There are 23 Council Priority Objectives in the 2025 Council Priority Area Climate Action and Adaptation, & Natural Environment Protection (CA).9 This report addresses 18 of those Council Priority Objectives, as well as one in Council Priority Area Economic Development & Retail Vibrancy (ED), three in Implementing Housing Strategies for Social & Economic Balance (IHS), and one in Public Safety, Wellness & Belonging (PS), as shown in Table 1. One CA Council Priority, "Implement plan for phaseout of leaded fuel at Palo Alto Airport,” was not addressed in the 2023-2025 S/CAP Implementation Work Plan. Table 1: 2025 Council Priority Objectives Addressed in the S/CAP Informational Report Number Council Priority Objective Climate Action and Adaptation, & Natural Environment Protection (CA) 9 City Council, August 18, 2025; Agenda Item #A; SR #2508-5034, https://recordsportal.paloalto.gov/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=83560&dbid=0&repo=PaloAlto Item A Item A Staff Report Item A: Staff Report Pg. 4 Packet Pg. 299 of 413  CA 5 Complete deployment of 65,000 residential Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) meters by end of FY 2025 and begin deployment of commercial AMI meters. CA 6 Council approval for Phase 2 (full service program) of the Advanced Whole Home Electrification Pilot Program and begin implementation. CA 8 Begin development of a Regional Shoreline Adaptation Plan meeting new standards approved by BCDC. CA 11 Advocate for the San Francisquito Creek Flood Protection capital project (Reach 2) through Council’s JPA representation and any Council approvals involved. CA 12 Initiate Preliminary Engineering and Environmental Clearance Work for Quarry Road Extension in Partnership with Stanford University, Caltrans, & VTA. CA 14 Council Adoption of the Safe Streets for All (SS4A) Safety Action Plan. CA 15 Council Adoption of the 2025 Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Plan (BPTP). CA 16 Refine Grade Separation Design Alternatives per Council Direction and Conduct Outreach to Support Rail Committee Review of Locally Preferred Alternatives. CA 17 Identify locations and design concepts for additional east-west bicycle and pedestrian crossings of the Caltrain railroad tracks in the southern part of the city. CA 18 Complete E-Mobility Strategic Plan for Council acceptance. CA 19 Propose an updated multi-family EV charger program (EV 2.0) for Council approval. CA 20 Develop and begin implementing a City Facility Electrification Plan. CA 22 Share preliminary analysis of strategies for a physical and financial transition of the gas utility to relevant policymakers and stakeholders. CA 24 Develop an Advanced Commercial Rooftop HVAC Pilot Program proposal and review with the Climate Action and Sustainability Ad Hoc Committee for Economic Development & Retail Vibrancy (ED) ED 31 Council approval of funding to continue Downtown cleanliness enhancements and other medium-term investments such as a Mobility Hub. Implementing Housing Strategies for Social & Economic Balance (IHS) IHS 40 Initiate the San Antonio Road Area Plan. IHS 44 Advance affordable housing project on Downtown surface parking lot (Lot T). IHS 53 Present to Council the Downtown Housing Plan Community Assessment report and receive Council direction on draft housing plan scenarios. Public Safety, Wellness & Belonging (PS) PS 58 Council to adopt the updated Foothills Fire Management Plan and Community Wildfire Protection Plan. Climate Action Covering the S/CAP Areas of Climate Action, Energy, Electric Vehicles, and Mobility, this section reports on progress based on the Work Plan Climate Action Priority areas. This includes five Item A Item A Staff Report        Item A: Staff Report Pg. 5  Packet Pg. 300 of 413  priorities with various work items under each priority. This report notes where these work items have been designated as Council Priority Objectives. P1. Grid Modernization P2. Launch Programs P2.1 Residential Emissions Reduction P2.2 Non-Residential Emissions Reduction P2.3 Citywide Mobility P2.4 Municipal Electrification P2.5 Electric Vehicle (EV) Strategic Plan P3. Build Awareness and Confidence P4. Additional Emissions Reductions P5. Funding Needs and Sources P1. Grid Modernization Electric grid reliability and resilience will be important to inspire confidence in electrified homes and vehicles. The focus of Priority 1 is to preserve and enhance reliability, modernize the electric grid and replace aging infrastructure, increase electric grid capacity to accommodate electrification, and explore ways to enhance resiliency. Grid Modernization (Work Plan Item 1A; Council Priority Objective CA 1): The grid modernization capital program will replace aging infrastructure and install a modern network infrastructure to meet future home electrification needs. Changes to the equipment on the network will include replacing/installing transformers, installing new protective devices to improve reliability, and the installation of system controls to allow for the import and export of energy from homes on the network. A pilot project to replace and upgrade aging infrastructure serving approximately 1000 residents was completed in May 2025. The City is evaluating results from this pilot before moving to the rest of Phase 1 of the project. Reliability & Resiliency Strategic Plan (Work Plan Items 1B, 1C; Council Priority Objective CA 4): In April 2024, the City Council accepted the Reliability and Resiliency Strategic Plan (RRSP).11 In September 2024 the Utilities Advisory Commission (UAC) reviewed the scope for a consultant study to implement Strategy 4 (Evaluate the benefits of flexible energy and resiliency technologies and efficient electrification strategies to the utility and community) and Strategy 5 (Evaluate the resource needs to promote the adoption of various flexible demand reduction and resiliency solutions and efficient electrification strategies) of the RRSP.12 In February 2025 11 City Council, April 15, 2024; Agenda Item #4; SR #2401--2496, https://recordsportal.paloalto.gov/Weblink/DocView.aspx?id=82776 12 Utilities Advisory Commission, September 4, 2024; Agenda Item #4; SR #2405-2984, https://recordsportal.paloalto.gov/Weblink/DocView.aspx?id=11680 Item A Item A Staff Report        Item A: Staff Report Pg. 6  Packet Pg. 301 of 413  the UAC provided feedback on some preliminary insights and results from the study.15 After further work on the studies incorporating UAC feedback, on July 9, 2025, the UAC discussed more developed preliminary study results and provided additional policy feedback to support development of a final report.16 Few technologies analyzed showed a positive cost-benefit result that would merit incentives, but the City and the UAC identified some potential areas for further follow-up and discussed regular updates to the analysis in case the costs and benefits changed. The same topics will be discussed by the Climate Action and Sustainability Committee (CASC) on August 22, 2025. After that meeting, a final report with the results of the cost-benefit analyses and potential reliability and resiliency programs, incorporating feedback from both bodies, will be developed for UAC, CASC, and Council consideration by the end of the year. The July 13, 2025 UAC report also included a status update summarizing progress on various other RRSP strategies, including City efforts to improve reliability and resiliency, including utility workforce planning, tree trimming, undergrounding in the Foothills, and grid modernization. Utility Rates and Fees (Work Plan Item 1D; Council Priority Objective CA 5): The City is on track to complete the advanced metering infrastructure project by the end of 2025. On June 4, 2025 the UAC recommended approval of time of use rates that customers could use to achieve savings by moving electric consumption to times of lower cost electricity.17 A staff report will be presented to Council in the fall with modifications to its transformer upgrade fees to avoid situations where the resident who triggers a transformer upgrade would pay the entire cost of that upgrade. P2. Launch Programs The focus of Priority 2 is to launch effective programs for emissions reductions with the highest impact and lowest cost such as single-family electrification, strategic promotion of EVs, commercial rooftop HVAC (heating, ventilation, and air conditioning), and expanded transportation alternatives. P2.1. Residential Emissions Reduction: The goals for residential emissions reduction embodied in the Work Plan include encouraging electric vehicle (EV) adoption for all residents, helping multi-family residents access EV charging, and facilitating building electrification of single-family homes and multi-family affordable housing. 15 Utilities Advisory Commission, February 5, 2025; Agenda Item #2, SR #2501-4058, https://recordsportal.paloalto.gov/Weblink/DocView.aspx?id=61746 16 Utilities Advisory Commission, July 9, 2025; Agenda Item #5; SR #2505-4687, https://recordsportal.paloalto.gov/Weblink/DocView.aspx?id=61774 17 Utilities Advisory Commission, June 4, 2025; Agenda Item #4; SR #2503-4361; https://recordsportal.paloalto.gov/Weblink/DocView.aspx?id=61770 Item A Item A Staff Report        Item A: Staff Report Pg. 7  Packet Pg. 302 of 413  Advanced Heat Pump Water Heater Pilot (Work Plan Items 2.1D, 2.1E): The City launched the Advanced Heat Pump Water Heater Pilot Program in March 2023. The goal is to install 1,000 heat pump water heaters (HPWH) through the pilot program. The program includes both a full- service option (where residents can use the City’s prescreened contractor to complete the install at a discount) and a rebate option (where residents can hire their own contractor and receive a rebate). The City launched a new Emergency Water Heater Replacement program in September 2024. As of June 30, 2025, 609 residents had either completed installations or signed contracts to get a heat pump water heater installed through the City’s programs, with 91 of these projects applying for on-bill financing. Based on participation in the first six months of 2025, the City is on a pace to complete around 200 water heater conversions per year through the Advanced HPWH Pilot Program, equivalent to about 17% of the water heaters estimated to be replaced each year. In addition, the City and State Energy Reach Codes encourage new construction and major renovations to be built all-electric, which adds another 100-200 new heat pump water heaters each year.21 The rate of HPWH retrofits has slowed in the first half of 2025 compared to the previous year. The pilot has moved past the early adopters after the first 18 months. Because the next wave of customers tends to be more cost-conscious and/or have more complex projects, they will need additional incentives or support to make the switch. The City is continuing to pursue various efforts to promote HPWH adoption among single-family households. In the first half of 2025, the City worked on the following initiatives: Innovative marketing: launched a HPWH Giveaway campaign with the prize of a free HPWH installation to encourage residents to install a HPWH. Facilitate rebate applications: launched a Rebate Hub that allows customers to get quotes from contractors and apply for the HPWH rebate. Contractors that are onboarded to the Rebate Hub can submit the HPWH rebate on behalf of customers. Expert consultation: launched free expert consultation to help residents with complex installations. Customer outreach: the City attended community events to promote HPWHs and hosted a public webinar on Home Electrification. Ongoing outreach includes promotions through City’s social media channels as well as Google ad campaigns. Whole Home Electrification (Work Plan Items 2.1G, 2.1H; Council Priority Objective CA 34): The City is launching its whole home electrification program in two phases. The first phase, launched in January 2025, offers new rebates and a contractor directory through the Rebate Hub, an online home electrification assessment tool, free phone consultation with an electrification expert, and financing through the state’s GoGreen program.22 As of June 30, 2025, the City had processed rebates for 15 heat pump HVAC projects, six electric panel 21 City Council, June 3, 2024: Agenda Item #17; SR #2405-3073, https://recordsportal.paloalto.gov/Weblink/DocView.aspx?id=82875 22 California GoGreen Home Energy Financing; https://www.treasurer.ca.gov/caeatfa/cheef/reel/index.asp Item A Item A Staff Report        Item A: Staff Report Pg. 8  Packet Pg. 303 of 413  upgrades, and two gas meter removal incentives. Additionally, 42 customers have completed the online home electrification assessment. For phase two, the City has contracted with Franklin Energy to provide a full-service, turnkey program to help people with home electrification upgrades.25 Rebates will continue to be available for customers who choose to work with their own contractor. The City expects to soft launch phase two in fall 2025, with a full launch planned in January 2026. Electric Vehicles and Charging (Work Plan Items 2.1A, 2.1C, 2.1J; Council Priority Objective CA 19): The City’s promotion of EV adoption and expansion of multi-family EV infrastructure continued. To promote the benefits of clean driving, the City offered six free EV activities to the public. In Q1 2025 over 275 people attended two online webinars about EVs and incentives, and an in-person EV and e-bike showcase at Mitchell Park. In Q2 approximately 150 people joined two additional webinars, a special pre-owned EV savings campaign, and another in- person EV workshop and showcase. The City plans to continue offering additional EV showcases, free workshops, webinars, and discount programs throughout the remainder of 2025. In Q2 2025, the City modified the EV Rebate Program to focus exclusively on multi-family EV charging due to changing state regulations, eliminating the non-profit nonresidential category from rebate program eligibility. In the first half of 2025, five multi-family properties representing 168 housing units installed EV chargers through City programs. These installations resulted in a total of 22 multi-family properties representing 982 housing units (about 9.2% of all multi-family units in Palo Alto) that have installed a total of 259 EV charging ports and 48 EV- ready spaces (i.e. infrastructure to support additional charger installation at a later date) facilitated through the City's EV programs. Another 11 multi-family projects are in the permitting and installation phases and an additional 24 are in the project design phase (representing an additional 3,165 residential units). The City is continuing to evaluate designs for an expanded version of the City’s multi-family EV program, aiming for Climate Action and Sustainability Committee review in Q3 2025 and City Council review tentatively in Q4 2025. Affordable Housing Electrification (Work Plan Item 2.1I; Council Priority Objective CA 19): The City continues to engage with multi-family affordable housing providers in Palo Alto on building electrification and EV charging. On June 17, 2025, the City Council directed staff to develop a program to provide incentives for electrification of dedicated affordable multi-family housing central and in-unit gas equipment.26 The City is working to design the program for launch later this year. As part of this effort, the City is coordinating with the State’s Low-Income Weatherization Program (LIWP) to align program enrollment processes and eligibility 25 City Council, May 27, 2025; Agenda Item #3; SR #2501-4040; https://recordsportal.paloalto.gov/Weblink/DocView.aspx?id=83416 26 City Council, June 17, 2025; Agenda Item #3; SR #2506-4785; https://recordsportal.paloalto.gov/Weblink/DocView.aspx?id=83507 Item A Item A Staff Report        Item A: Staff Report Pg. 9  Packet Pg. 304 of 413  requirements and allow projects to leverage program technical assistance and LIWP incentives for energy efficiency and electrification alongside the City’s incentives planned to the greatest extent possible. P2.2. Non-Residential Emissions Reduction: The goals for non-residential emissions reduction embodied in the Work Plan include encouraging electrification of rooftop packaged HVAC units in commercial buildings, developing custom partnerships with major employers, and developing strategies to promote lower emissions commuting. Rooftop Packaged HVAC (Work Plan Items 2.2A, 2.2B; Council Priority Objective CA 24): In September 2024 the City launched an update to the commercial heat pump HVAC pilot with the goal of collecting additional data to inform the design of an advanced pilot program. To achieve this goal, the City is offering enhanced incentives to a limited group of 10 customers. In return, these customers are required to gather and provide detailed cost and project information to the City. Businesses that prefer not to share this data can still participate in the program at the original incentive level. Major Employer Partnerships (Work Plan Item 2.2C): This work plan item involves developing customer partnerships for emissions reduction with major employers, including assistance for City facility projects and the Palo Alto Unified School District (PAUSD). The recent set of electrification and energy efficiency projects demonstrates the significant impact the CIEEP (Commercial and Industrial Energy Efficiency Program) program has had across schools, healthcare facilities, and key commercial sites over the last year. The Fletcher and Greene Middle Schools' Heat Pump HVAC projects stood out for their impressive energy savings, with over 253,000 and 165,000 kWh-equivalent (kWh-e) saved. Staff is also working closely with Item A Item A Staff Report        Item A: Staff Report Pg. 10  Packet Pg. 305 of 413  PAUSD to complete construction on Hoover Elementary School – which will become the City’s first all-electric school. Stanford Health Care’s LED upgrade project also delivered strong results, with nearly 188,000 kWh saved. At the Westin Hotel, installation of an ozone laundry system reduced the need for hot water and shortened wash cycles, resulting in annual electricity savings of 7,400 kWh, gas savings of 16,400 therms (87 MTCO2e - metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent) and water savings of 1.6 million gallons which translates to a 55% reduction in water use. Altogether, in the past year commercial and industrial projects have demonstrated a reduction of over 2,000,000 kWh and 68,000 therms as well as a reduction of greenhouse gas emissions by about 155 MTCO2e (600,000 kWh-e) due to electrification. Projects that increased electricity use but transitioned away from gas still received incentives due to the value of electrification. For the past three years, CPAU has supported small and medium-sized businesses with energy efficiency, water conservation services, and electrification technical assistance through the Business Energy Advisor and Business Electrification Technical Assistance programs. In Q1 and Q2 of 2025, program staff visited over 200 small businesses in-person, conducted 10 on-site assessments, and provided tailored energy efficiency education and project support, including access to rebates. One electrification project was completed in Q2 this year, and there are over 10 projects in the pipeline expected to be completed by the end of this calendar year. Commuter/Visitor Emissions Reduction (Work Plan Items 2.2D, 2.2E): These work plan items have been lower priority pending completion of the Electric Vehicle Strategic Plan (renamed “E- Mobility Strategic Roadmap” - see Priority 2.5, below). P2.3. Citywide Mobility: The goals for citywide mobility embodied in the Work Plan include both transportation-focused and land-use focused actions. Transportation and Land Use Policies and Programs (Work Plan Item 2.3A; Council Priority Objectives IHS 40, IHS 53): The Safe Routes to School (SRTS) program continues to grow, with the Spring 2025 addition of a youth-focused coordinator for programs at middle and high schools. This year marks the 30th anniversary of the SRTS program, which was acknowledged at the Park to Park Ride on May 10, 2025 and via the concurrent endorsements by the City, Board of Education, and PTA Council of the National SRTS Consensus Statement and City/School Transportation Safety Committee Bylaws.29 The City made significant progress on two plans that are expected to reduce greenhouse gas emissions while also implementing the Housing Element. In Q1 2025, staff initiated the San Antonio Road Area Plan, which would guide redevelopment of a portion of the Bayshore Alma 29 Resolution No. 10224, April 29, 2025; https://recordsportal.paloalto.gov/Weblink/DocView.aspx?id=62118 Item A Item A Staff Report        Item A: Staff Report Pg. 11  Packet Pg. 306 of 413  San Antonio Priority Development Area (BASA PDA). The San Antonio Road Area Plan envisions creating cohesive mixed-use neighborhoods with improved mobility and interconnectivity when compared with existing conditions. The resulting integrated transportation network in the plan area is anticipated to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and the use of single-occupancy motor vehicles. In Q2 the City Council reviewed the completed Downtown Housing Plan Community Assessment Report.31 The Downtown Housing Plan implements Housing Element programs by establishing policies, development standards, and a plan for the public infrastructure necessary to support increased housing in the area. The report advances the objectives of the City’s S/CAP by analyzing components such as climate change and resilience, as well as land use, housing, and transportation by focusing on housing production near the downtown Palo Alto Caltrain station. Community engagement in Q1 and Q2 of 2025 included a community workshop, pop up events, service and essential worker outreach, and a community advisory group meeting to gather feedback on important topics that shape the plan. Housing Element Adoption and Implementation (Work Plan Items 2.3B, 2.3C; Council Priority Objective IHS 44): Following August 20, 2024 California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) certification of the City’s Housing Element, the City has made considerable progress in implementing the 110 program objectives in the 2023-2031 Housing Element.32 Implementation activities in Q1 2025 and Q2 2025 include: In Q1 the City Council adopted an ordinance amending the City’s Housing Incentive Program (HIP) and Affordable Housing Incentive Program (AHIP) to increase housing development potential and expand provisions to multi-family zoning and other commercial districts.33 The modifications are intended to address the jobs/housing imbalance and may also increase transit-oriented development; the changes were in effect as of Q2. In Q2 the City Council adopted an ordinance expanding the housing focus area along El Camino Real to increase development potential; the changes are effective as of July 2025.34 This project promotes increased housing development on a key transit corridor and is also intended address the jobs/housing imbalance. 31 City Council, June 16, 2025; Agenda Item #B; SR #2505-4725, https://recordsportal.paloalto.gov/Weblink/DocView.aspx?id=83474 32 City of Palo Alto, 6th Cycle 2023-2030 Housing Element, 2024; https://paloaltohousingelement.com/wp- content/uploads/2024/08/Palo-Alto-Housing-Element.pdf 33 City Council, March 3, 2025; Agenda Item #9; SR #2412-3948, https://recordsportal.paloalto.gov/Weblink/DocView.aspx?id=83277 34 City Council, May 27, 2025; Agenda Item #7; SR #2503-4305, https://recordsportal.paloalto.gov/Weblink/DocView.aspx?id=83418 Item A Item A Staff Report        Item A: Staff Report Pg. 12  Packet Pg. 307 of 413  The City Council selected Alta Housing as the development partner for the Lot T affordable housing project on January 21, 2025.39 The City Council approved an exclusive negotiation agreement with Alta Housing on June 17, 2025.40 The proposed fully affordable housing project would develop a surface parking lot within one-half mile of the downtown Palo Alto Caltrain station. Last Mile Solutions (Work Plan Items 2.3D, 2.3E; Council Priority Objectives CA 15, CA 18): The Office of Transportation continues to conduct the Shared Micromobility Feasibility study to understand local demand for micromobility and to identify if a micromobility program would be financially sustainable for the City. The City recruited an on-call transportation planning firm to conduct data analysis, and City staff conducted research and met with established programs to learn best practices for micromobility.41 The study is scheduled to be completed in fall of 2025, after which staff recommends initiating a year-long pilot program based on the study’s findings.42 Council has previously approved a one-year micromobility pilot program, but the program was not implemented at the time due to the COVID-19 pandemic and staffing limitations.43 Bicycling Improvements (Work Plan Items 2.3A, 2.3F, 2.3G; Council Priority Objectives CA 13, CA 15, CA 16, CA 17): The Policy and Services Committee reviewed the final draft of the Palo Alto Safety Action Plan in May 2025 and recommended that Council approve it. On June 2, Council approved the Plan.44 This comprehensive roadway safety plan is critical to reaching S/CAP goals because improving safety for vulnerable road users will reduce vehicle miles traveled and encourage walking and cycling. For the Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Plan Update, the project team developed a strategy for public engagement to present and get feedback on system development and network priorities. This includes the project's draft recommendations for the updated bicycle network and draft list of projects, as well as the draft project prioritization framework and performance measures. Public engagement activities occurred in winter and spring 2025 and included meetings with the City's Pedestrian and Bicycle Advisory Committee, Planning and Transportation Commission, Parks and Recreation Commission, focus groups, a joint 39 City Council, January 21, 2025; Agenda Item #4; SR #2409-3517, https://recordsportal.paloalto.gov/Weblink/DocView.aspx?id=83209 40 City Council, June 17, 2025; Agenda Item #10; SR #2504-4489, https://recordsportal.paloalto.gov/Weblink/DocView.aspx?id=83495 41 City Council, February 3, 2025; Agenda Item #6; SR #2409-3440, https://recordsportal.paloalto.gov/Weblink/DocView.aspx?id=83225 42 Planning and Transportation Commission, October 30, 2024; Agenda Item #3; SR #2410-3586, https://recordsportal.paloalto.gov/Weblink/DocView.aspx?id=7610 43 City Council, March 2, 2020; Agenda Item #5; SR #11075; https://recordsportal.paloalto.gov/Weblink/DocView.aspx?id=80712 44 City Council, June 2, 2025; Agenda Item 6; SR #2503-4455, https://recordsportal.paloalto.gov/Weblink/DocView.aspx?id=83431 Item A Item A Staff Report        Item A: Staff Report Pg. 13  Packet Pg. 308 of 413  community workshop with the South Palo Alto Bike/Ped Connectivity project, pop-up events, tabling, and online engagement that collected over 1,000 individual comments. At their June 2, 2025 meeting, the City Council reviewed the draft recommendations and a revised project prioritization framework informed by the recent public engagement activities. In the same meeting, the City Council provided feedback on the draft ranked prioritized project lists.51 The feedback will help shape the draft and final plan. The City anticipates releasing the draft plan in fall 2025. On December 16, 2024, the City Council approved the grant agreement with the Federal Highway Administration for the South Palo Alto Bikeways Demonstration Project.52 The $888,000 federal funds and $222,000 matching City funds will use quick-build infrastructure to improve bikeways and crossings on East Meadow Drive and Fabian Way. The City will begin procurement for a transportation planning firm to finalize the street design when a project manager is available, tentatively by the end of calendar year 2025. The City began the South Palo Alto Bike/Ped Connectivity project in September 2024. The City is currently engaging with the community to select two preferred bike/pedestrian rail crossing locations in south Palo Alto, develop conceptual plans (15% designs), and identify bike/pedestrian network improvements in surrounding neighborhoods. Creating a path above or below the tracks will improve bicycle and pedestrian connectivity in support of the mobility and sustainability goals of the City. Phase 1 of engagement in spring 2025 introduced the project to the community and gained input on goals and priorities for grade-separated bike/pedestrian rail crossings. The City considered input and feedback from the community while establishing design priorities and evaluation criteria for rail crossing alternatives. Transportation Demand Management (Work Plan Item 2.3H): The Palo Alto Transportation Management Association (PATMA) is conducting essential outreach to businesses on El Camino Real regarding available transit, bike, and parking programs to support businesses following the parking changes to the corridor as part of the Caltrans repaving project, as funded by a $25,000 Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) Transit Oriented Communities Grant. The PATMA administered a commute survey for 2024 and received 885 completed responses. The PATMA distributed 22 free transit passes to workers at businesses along El Camino Real and to 38 at the Stanford Mall in Q1 and Q2, encouraging sustainable commutes. Work on the City’s Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Ordinance is on hold until staff capacity is available. 51 City Council, June 2, 2025; Agenda Item #3; SR #2503-4341, https://recordsportal.paloalto.gov/Weblink/DocView.aspx?id=83426 52 City Council, December 16, 2024; Agenda Item #9; SR #2411-3763, https://recordsportal.paloalto.gov/Weblink/DocView.aspx?id=83162 Item A Item A Staff Report        Item A: Staff Report Pg. 14  Packet Pg. 309 of 413  Parking (Work Plan Items 2.3I, 2.3J): The City and contractors continued installing Automated Parking Guidance Systems in downtown garages, which seek to limit the time that drivers spend circulating to find parking. Installation in the Civic Center Garage began in January 2025. The City is planning to continue community engagement efforts and develop options for proposed enhancements to parking facilities. The Planning and Transportation Commission reviewed a report on downtown parking trends on May 28, 2025.55 Traffic Signals (Work Plan Item 2.3K): The City continually monitors, maintains, and optimizes traffic signal operations, and addresses concerns from the community daily. As funding and staffing allow, the City also works on a variety of capital improvement program projects to update and upgrade the current traffic signal network and keep up with changing standards, modernization, and intelligent transportation systems (ITS) technologies. These improvements are a key component to optimizing operations to reduce delays and GHG emissions from idling. In Q1 and Q2 of 2025, the City has made substantial progress on several projects and is nearing completion of modifications at the intersection of Alma Road/Churchill Avenue. The City also made significant updates to its centralized traffic signal management systems and is currently in progress of a capital project to upgrade systems at four intersections along Quarry Road. Included with the traffic signal program, the City programmed and plans to add or upgrade several pedestrian-activated beacon crossings, completing installation of the newest crossing at University Avenue and East Crescent Drive in early 2025 and a major update to an existing crossing on Hillview Avenue. These pedestrian crossing improvements are essential in encouraging walking and alternative modes of transportation. Mobility Hub (Work Plan Item 2.3D; Council Priority Objectives CA 12, ED 31): The City is working with Stanford University to initiate the design phase of the Quarry Road Transit Connection project that would reduce travel time to access the Palo Alto Transit Center. A cost-sharing agreement between Stanford and the City, grant funding from the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, and coordination with Caltrans are being pursued to enable project design kick-off of the extension of Quarry Road between El Camino Real and the Transit Center. Separately, VTA has convened the Palo Alto University Avenue Mobility Hub Ad Hoc Committee to explore short- and long-term active transportation and other improvements to the Palo Alto Transit Center to activate the space. In Q2 staff submitted a funding application for $126,000 to the Bay Area Air District’s Charge! Program. If funded, the project would support the installation of EV charging infrastructure in the City-owned Midtown parking lot in advance of a potential future small-scale neighborhood 55 Planning and Transportation Commission, May 28, 2025; Agenda Item #2; SR #2408-3394, https://recordsportal.paloalto.gov/Weblink/DocView.aspx?id=7653 Item A Item A Staff Report        Item A: Staff Report Pg. 15  Packet Pg. 310 of 413  mobility hub. This site is envisioned to support EV charging and future micromobility services for adjacent multi-family housing and commercial uses. P2.4. Municipal Electrification: The City’s municipal electrification efforts include both facility and fleet electrification and are intended to show the community that the City will participate in the same electrification efforts it is encouraging the community to undertake. Facility Electrification (Work Plan Items 2.4A, 2.4B, 2.4C; Council Priority Objective CA 20): The City is evaluating the feasibility of electrifying equipment at City facilities each time aging equipment requires replacement. The City has also filled the vacant staff position dedicated to this effort, allowing this task to move forward. The City is currently analyzing the Facility Electrification Assessment report and associated data to confirm priority facilities for initial electrification efforts. This evaluation will guide the upcoming design phase and ensure alignment with the City’s Sustainability and Climate Action Plan goals. Meanwhile, preparations are underway to issue a Request for Proposal (RFP) to select a design consultant. Fleet Electrification (Work Plan Items 2.4D, 2.4E): In Q2 the City replaced one internal combustion engine fleet vehicle with one electric vehicle (a Ford e-transit van). There are now 36 electric vehicles (EVs) in the City fleet, or about 15% of the passenger vehicles and light duty trucks and vans. Publicly Owned Charger Planning (Work Plan Item 2.4F): There are currently 119 City-owned EV chargers, with a total of 154 charging ports, an increase of eight EV chargers and eight charging ports from Q4 of 2024. Twenty-nine of those chargers are dedicated to City vehicles, while the rest are primarily for public use. The City will develop a plan for additional publicly owned charging following completion of the E-Mobility Strategic Roadmap (see Priority 2.5, below). P2.5. E-Mobility Strategic Plan (CA 18): The Climate Action and Sustainability Committee recommended the E-Mobility Strategic Roadmap, formerly the EV Strategic Plan, for Council approval on June 13, 2025.57 Staff will take the Roadmap for Council acceptance in Q3 2025. This roadmap will guide the promotion of e-mobility citywide and the integration of e-mobility into other City efforts, such as active transportation efforts. It was informed by the EV Charger Needs Assessment. A review of e-mobility electric grid impacts, EV charging benefits, mitigation strategies, and opportunities has been incorporated into the Reliability and Resiliency Strategic Plan (see Priority 1, Work Plan Items 1B/1C, above). P3. Build Awareness and Confidence 57 Climate Action and Sustainability Committee, June 13, 2025; Agenda Item #3; Staff Report #2505-4670, https://recordsportal.paloalto.gov/Weblink/DocView.aspx?id=46237 Item A Item A Staff Report        Item A: Staff Report Pg. 16  Packet Pg. 311 of 413  The focus of Priority 3 is to build community awareness and confidence in electrification through engagement, addressing concerns, and program results. Building Awareness of the Need for and Benefits of Climate Action (Work Plan Item 3.1A): The City continues to publish a monthly Climate Action Blog and Quarterly Sustainability Newsletter. In Q1 and Q2 2025, the City published Climate Blogs in February, March, April, May, and June, and Sustainability Newsletters in February and April. Historically, the Sustainability Newsletters have an average 52% open rate, which is the percentage of readers that open the e-mail you send them. The average open rate for government e-newsletters is 19.4%.59 S/CAP Reporting and Surveys (Work Plan Items 3.1C, 3.1D): The City continues to calculate an annual GHG emissions inventory and reports on sustainability and climate action progress to the CDP, an international non-profit that helps companies, cities, states, regions, and public authorities disclose their environmental impact. In June, the City was recognized on the CDP’s A List for Climate Leadership. Earning a spot on CDP’s A List is a significant achievement that reflects the highest standard of local climate leadership and is indicative of many of the City’s sustainability and climate action accomplishments last year, including launching an emergency 59 Campaign Monitor, 2022; https://www.campaignmonitor.com/resources/guides/email-marketing-benchmarks/ Item A Item A Staff Report        Item A: Staff Report Pg. 17  Packet Pg. 312 of 413  water heater replacement program, the Canopy Tree Plotter, and the Youth Climate Advisory Board. Only 112 cities worldwide, or 15% of scored cities, earned CDP’s top status.61 P4. Additional Emissions Reductions The focus of Priority 4 is to identify an additional 9% in emissions reduction opportunities to achieve 80 x 30, primarily through a focus on studying multi-family and commercial building equipment. The City is finalizing studies of the multi-family and commercial sectors in conjunction with the S/CAP Funding Study but is already making use of the insights delivered by the consultant in S/CAP strategic planning and program design. These studies include review of publicly available data sources and on-site surveys of building equipment at multi-family and commercial buildings. P5. Funding Needs and Sources (CA 22) The focus of Priority 5 is to identify, by 2024, funding needed and potential funding sources for full scale implementation of the highest impact emissions reductions. The City Council approved a contract with E3/Willdan in January 2024 to complete a study of funding needs and sources.62 This S/CAP Funding Study is being finalized as are its companion studies (an EV Charger Needs Assessment, Building Sector Study, and Funding Source Survey). All studies are being completed by the same group of consultants. Staff and consultants presented preliminary results from the S/CAP Funding Study to the CASC in April 2025.63 Staff intend to present the study results and potential strategies for future adoption in Q3 and Q4, aiming for City Council acceptance in late 2025. Sustainability Water: Further Water Conservation Maximize Water Conservation and Efficiency (Work Plan Item 8.A): The City has offered an online water management tool, WaterSmart, to customers since 2022. The tool provides information on water consumption and personalized water conservation recommendations. As of June 9, 2025, 33% of all single-family customers have accessed the portal – an increase from 29% as of December 2024. On a monthly basis, all single-family customers receive home water reports via email or regular mail if an email is not on file. The average open rate of home water report emails is 70%. Home water reports result in water savings of approximately 26.2 MG (3% savings). 61 CDP Scores and A Lists, https://www.cdp.net/en/data/scores 62 City Council, January 16, 2024; Agenda Item 4; SR #2308-1939, https://recordsportal.paloalto.gov/Weblink/DocView.aspx?id=82633 63 Climate Action and Sustainability Committee, April 4, 2025; Agenda Item #1; SR #2503-4409, https://recordsportal.paloalto.gov/Weblink/DocView.aspx?id=90 Item A Item A Staff Report        Item A: Staff Report Pg. 18  Packet Pg. 313 of 413  Design and build a salt removal facility for the Regional Water Quality Control Plant (Work Plan Item 8.B): As of June 2025, the City has completed planning and funding agreements for the Local Advanced Water Purification System Project at the Regional Water Quality Control Plant (RWQCP). The City Council approved the construction contract in May, and the Project is starting construction.67 Once construction is complete, the Project will improve recycled water quality by blending reverse osmosis permeate to encourage expanded use of recycled water for non-potable uses such as irrigation. Develop a “One Water” Portfolio for Palo Alto (Work Plan Item 8.C) and develop a tool for dynamic water planning in the future (Work Plan Item 8.D): The City has completed both of these items. Staff developed an Excel-based tool for water planning as part of One Water Plan development. The Utilities Advisory Commission reviewed the One Water Plan during their January 7, 2025 meeting.68 The results of these efforts, including feedback from the Utilities Advisory Commission will be presented to CASC in late summer 2025. Climate Adaptation and Sea Level Rise: Prepare for Climate Change Foothills Fire Management Plan and Collaboration on Reducing Wildfire Hazards (Work Plan Items 8.K, 8.L, 8.M, 8.N; Council Priority Objective PS 58): The City launched a series of public engagement and public meetings to raise awareness of local wildfire risks and the importance of wildfire preparedness in April 2025. Engagement efforts included a public comment period for the State Fire Hazard Maps. Additionally, staff presented the City of Palo Alto Utilities 2025 Wildfire Mitigation Plan to the Utilities Advisory Commission on June 4, 2025.69 The City continues to refine the Foothills Fire Management Plan and participate in Santa Clara County Community Wildfire Protection planning efforts and anticipates those documents will be finalized in summer 2025. The City worked with Woodside Fire Protection District, Stanford University, Department of Homeland Security, and Santa Clara County Fire Safe Council to install 50 N5 Wildfire sensors in the three jurisdictions.70 This program is a trial for the sensors and parties meet monthly to discuss alerts and ongoing maintenance. Develop a Sea Level Rise Adaptation Plan (Work Plan Item 8.F; Council Priority Objective 8): The City has been working on sea level rise adaptation efforts for several years as discussed in previous Council updates. Accomplishments to date include a completed Sea Level Rise Vulnerability Assessment, online mapping tools that help City engineers design to future sea 67 City Council, May 19, 2025; Agenda Item #10; SR #2503-4327, https://recordsportal.paloalto.gov/Weblink/DocView.aspx?id=83405 68 Utilities Advisory Commission, January 7, 2025; Agenda Item #4; SR #2407-3234, https://recordsportal.paloalto.gov/Weblink/DocView.aspx?id=61727 69 Utilities Advisory Commission, June 4, 2025; Agenda Item #2; SR #2501-4077, https://recordsportal.paloalto.gov/Weblink/DocView.aspx?id=61768 70 County of Santa Clara Press Release, May 20, 2025; https://d3.santaclaracounty.gov/pr-AI-Wildfire-Sensors- 052025 Item A Item A Staff Report        Item A: Staff Report Pg. 19  Packet Pg. 314 of 413  level rise conditions, and the inclusion of sea level rise in Long Range Facility Plan update drafts for the Regional Water Quality Control Plant.75 76 The San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC) administers these requirements for local governments in the Bay Area.77 The City is collaborating with Santa Clara County Office of Sustainability and other cities in Santa Clara County to submit a grant proposal for the development of a vulnerability assessment for shoreline communities in Santa Clara County, and to then develop a regional shoreline adaptation plan that aligns with State requirements. The regional vulnerability assessment would complement Palo Alto’s similar assessment by determining the cost of inaction if Palo Alto does not pursue additional sea level rise adaptations and would ensure social equity considerations have been properly vetted. Grant approval will be determined by fall 2025. Begin Design Process for Levee Projects (Work Plan Item 8.G): Construction of the Palo Alto Horizontal Levee Pilot Project (PAHLPP) is slated to begin in summer of 2025 and conclude in early 2026. Horizontal levees are nature-based sea level rise adaptations with multiple benefits over traditional flood- control levees such as habitat enhancement, sea level rise adaptation, and additional wastewater treatment. The PAHLPP will be the first horizontal levee to be built in the Bay Area to be both irrigated with treated wastewater and hydrologically connected to San Francisco Bay. The project will provide much-needed data to inform the design of future horizontal levees around the greater San Francisco Bay Area. The City is also developing interpretive signage in partnership with the Association of Ramaytush Ohlone and securing required monitoring services and permit requirements for the levee project. Identify Protection Strategies from Significant Flood Events at Newell Road Bridge (Work Plan Item 8.H; Council Priority Objective CA 2): Caltrans approved the Authorization to Proceed for construction phase with Advance Construction on April 14, 2025, after which the City solicited construction bids. The City received five bids from responsible bidders, and Council approved 75 Palo Alto Sea Level Rise Vulnerability Assessment, 2022; 76 California Senate Bill 272, 2023-2024; https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billHistoryClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240SB272 77 San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission Bay Adapt Initiative, https://www.bayadapt.org/regional-shoreline-adaptation-plan/ Item A Item A Staff Report        Item A: Staff Report Pg. 20  Packet Pg. 315 of 413  awarding the contract on June 16.81 The Newell Road Bridge Replacement Project pre- construction activities are expected to begin in summer 2025, with construction taking 1.5 years to complete. Identify Protection Strategies from Significant Flood Events (Work Plan Item 8.I, 8.J; Council Priority Objective CA 3, CA 11): The San Francisquito Creek Joint Powers Authority (SFCJPA) is the project lead. The City, along with the four other partner agencies, provides recommendations and financial contributions to SFCJPA. Following the December 31, 2022 (NYE) storm event, Valley Water and the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) concluded that the model that was used to predict flows with the San Francisquito Creek had over-estimated creek capacity. The SFCJPA and their consultants are developing an alternatives report with recommendations to achieve the flood protection that was previously associated with Pope Chaucer Bridge Replacement and San Francisquito Creek widening improvements, considering the updated creek capacity estimate. The aim of the recommendations is to propose improvements that, when constructed, would manage up to a 70-year storm event between an area from upstream of Middlefield Road to upstream of West Bayshore Road. SFCJPA published the Alternatives Evaluation Technical Report draft for public review and comment on May 22, 2025.82 SFCJPA intends to take comments to shape the alternatives to advance in fall 2025. The City will continue to provide assistance through review and Councilmember participation in Board discussions. Hamilton Avenue Storm Drain Capacity Upgrades (CA 16): While the S/CAP work plan focuses on Pope Chaucer Bridge and San Francisquito Creek through the partnership with SFJPA, a storm drain improvement project that also serves to mitigate Creek flooding is underway at Hamilton Avenue. Following surveys and additional data collection in 2024 to prevent utility conflicts, staff began developing plans and specifications for Hamilton Avenue Storm Drain Capacity Upgrades. The plans and specifications are 95% complete. The City will solicit bids during the summer with the intent to award the construction contract in the fall 2025. The project is expected to be completed within approximately one year. This project also includes pipe upgrades along Alester Avenue between Hamilton Avenue and Dana Avenue to reduce the flooding that was observed after the December 31, 2022 storm event. Natural Environment: Enhance Biodiversity 81 City Council, June 16, 2025; Agenda Item #24; SR #2504-4491, https://recordsportal.paloalto.gov/Weblink/DocView.aspx?id=83464 82 San Francisquito Creek Joint Powers Authority Urban Reach 2 - Upstream Project: Alternatives Evaluation Technical Report; https://www.sfcjpa.org/reach-2-upstream-project Item A Item A Staff Report        Item A: Staff Report Pg. 21  Packet Pg. 316 of 413  Increase Palo Alto’s Tree Canopy and Ensure No Net Tree Canopy Loss (Work Plan Items 8.O, 8.P): The City is working on an update of the Tree and Landscape Technical Manual. In addition, the Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance process is currently under review and should be completed soon. Coordinate Implementation of City Natural Environment-Related Plans (Work Plan Item 8.R): S/CAP has the goal of restoring and enhancing resilience and biodiversity of our natural environment throughout the City. Coordinating implementation and updates of City plans allows for achieving multiple benefits. Recent examples of this coordination include: Incorporation of Green Stormwater Infrastructure (GSI) concepts into the draft Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Plan Update and the Safe Streets for All Safety Action Plan, which Council approved on June 2, 2025.85 Plans to use recent analyses like the City’s S/CAP, 2022 Sea Level Rise Vulnerability Assessment,86 and South San Francisco Bay Shoreline Phase II Feasibility Study in anticipated reports regarding the San Antonio Road Area Plan.87 The City also worked to refine the draft Ordinance containing Stream/Creek Corridor Setback requirements, draft Bird-Friendly Design Ordinance, and draft Lighting Ordinance with direction from the City Council and Planning and Transportation Commission.88, 89, 90 While these ordinances are not directly referenced in the S/CAP work plan, they relate to Council Priority Objectives 17 and 18, may result in benefits for sustainability and adaptation to climate change, and may interact with other environment-related plans. Support the Green Stormwater Infrastructure (GSI) Plan and incorporate GSI in Municipal Projects (Work Plan Item 8.S): Twenty staff in the Public Works and Community Services Departments attended trainings through the National GSI Maintenance Certification Program. 85 City Council, June 2, 2025; Agenda Item 6; SR #2503-4455, https://recordsportal.paloalto.gov/Weblink/DocView.aspx?id=83431 86 Palo Alto Sea Level Rise Vulnerability Assessment, 2022; https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/v/1/public-works/environmental-compliance/sea-level- rise/palo-alto-sea-level-rise-vulnerability-assessment-june-2022-062822-linked-final.pdf 87 South San Francisco Bay Shoreline Phase II Feasibility Study Area, 2024; https://www.paloalto.gov/files/assets/public/v/1/sustainability/2024-05-13_south-san-francisco-bay-shoreline- project-phase-two_ls_v10.pdf 88 City Council, June 2, 2025; Agenda Item 6; SR #2503-4455, https://recordsportal.paloalto.gov/Weblink/DocView.aspx?id=83431 89 Planning & Transportation Commission, October 30, 2024; Agenda Item #2; SR #2409-3472, https://recordsportal.paloalto.gov/Weblink/DocView.aspx?id=7610 90 City Council, April 7, 2025; Agenda Item #18; SR #2411-3741, https://recordsportal.paloalto.gov/Weblink/DocView.aspx?id=83323 Item A Item A Staff Report        Item A: Staff Report Pg. 22  Packet Pg. 317 of 413  The trainings, which were funded by an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) grant,97 strengthen the City’s ability to design highly effective and easy to maintain GSI features, and to continue to maintain GSI sites for optimal benefits. Additionally, on June 3, 2025 the City released a request for proposals for a proposed GSI project in a City park. Zero Waste: Support Waste Reduction Encourage Commercial Food Waste Prevention and Provide Technical Assistance (Work Plan Items 8.T, 8.W): In Q1 and Q2 2025 the City continued outreach on food waste prevention and the requirements for edible food recovery from commercial food generators through collaboration with Santa Clara County, other jurisdictions and Joint Venture Silicon Valley. The technical assistance, outreach, assessments of compliance with Senate Bill 1383, the State’s Short-Lived Climate Pollutant legislation, and inspections are on-going and continue to be provided by Joint Venture Silicon Valley through the City’s memorandum of understanding with the County.98 Promote Residential Food Waste Reduction (Work Plan Item 8.U): The Zero Waste outreach community campaigned to promote food waste reduction and connect it to GHGs and climate change with a call to action launched in late 2024 and continued in Q1 and Q2 of 2025. The messaging themes - Strategize, Organize, Prioritize - were effectively integrated across multiple outreach channels, including the utility bill inserts and announcements, advertisements featured in local newspapers, newsletters, and content distributed through the various City social media platforms. The outreach approach was designed to ensure broad community awareness and encourage proactive participation. Champion Waste Prevention, Reduction, Reusables, and the Sharing Economy (Work Plan Item 8.V): As part of the new Zero Waste Living outreach campaign, the City published 25 Zero Waste Minute weekly e-newsletters in Q1 and Q2 2025, providing the community with reduce, reuse, repair tips, and essential tools to tackle the complex waste challenges our community is dedicated to solving. The weekly e-newsletter open rate averages 52 to 54%. Staff also updated the Zero Waste webpage with a new design and restructure of resources to enhance user experience for outreach, comprehensive waste prevention information, and other valuable resources specific to the type of webpage visitor (i.e., a resident or a business) instead of general outreach. The update also included adding a search tool with a link to StopWaste’s search engine called RE:Source. The tool enables the Palo Alto community to search for repair, reuse, and recycle alternatives to their household items. Additionally, the City continued to make compost available at the Compost Giveaway Station located at Eleanor Pardee 97 City Council, October 17, 2022; Agenda Item #5; SR #14463, https://recordsportal.paloalto.gov/Weblink/DocView.aspx?id=81947 98 City Council June 18, 2024; Agenda Item #8; SR #2404-2911, https://recordsportal.paloalto.gov/Weblink/DocView.aspx?id=82938 Item A Item A Staff Report        Item A: Staff Report Pg. 23  Packet Pg. 318 of 413  Community Garden and to hold compost workshops for residents to learn how easy it is to make their own compost at home. Prioritize Domestic Processing of Recyclable Materials (Work Plan Item 8.X): Domestic processing for mixed paper and mixed rigid plastics began in April 2022. The City continues to review processing efforts. Eliminate Single-Use Disposable Containers (Work Plan Item 8.Y): The City is reviewing the strategy and timeline for expanding the Disposable Foodware Ordinance and preparing to evaluate the compliance of food services establishments with existing requirements. Expand the Deconstruction and Construction Materials Management Ordinance (Work Plan Item 8.Z): The City continues to conduct outreach and educate homeowners, general contractors, and architects on the deconstruction ordinance requirements when building permit applications are submitted and when permits are issued. During deconstruction, the City inspects each project site multiple times to document progress, reiterates requirements for source separation and hauling of single stream materials, and addresses any concerns observed. In Fiscal Year 2024, 58 projects completed required documentation and had the whole structures removed. The salvaged materials recovered for reuse (lumber, cabinets, doors and windows) accounted for about 4% of the materials from the 58 complete projects, 31% of material was recycled (clean wood debris, dry wall and concrete), and only 7% of the materials were landfilled. Examples of materials landfilled included insulation and painted wood. FISCAL/RESOURCE IMPACT STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT Item A Item A Staff Report        Item A: Staff Report Pg. 24  Packet Pg. 319 of 413  ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW This report is for informational purposes only with no action required by the Council and therefore it is not a project subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). APPROVED BY: Brad Eggleston, Director Public Works/City Engineer Item A Item A Staff Report        Item A: Staff Report Pg. 25  Packet Pg. 320 of 413  City Council Staff Report From: City Manager Report Type: INFORMATION REPORTS Lead Department: Public Works Meeting Date: November 3, 2025 Report #: 2505-4678 TITLE Informational Report on the 2023 and 2024 GreenWaste of Palo Alto Certificate of End Use and Traceability Reports; CEQA Status – Not a Project RECOMMENDATION This is an Informational Report and action by Council is not required. BACKGROUND GreenWaste of Palo Alto (GWPA) is the City’s contracted refuse hauler for the collection of recyclable, compostable, and landfill materials. Palo Alto’s recyclables are processed at the GreenWaste Materials Recovery Facility (GreenWaste MRF) in San Jose, where they are combined with recyclables from other communities, sorted by type, baled, and marketed. As part of its contract, GWPA is required to submit a Certificate of End Use and Traceability Report detailing the final disposition of materials and their environmental and social impacts associated with the further offsite marketing and processing of Palo Alto’s recyclables. GWPA has previously submitted the Initial Review of Certificate of End Use & Traceability Data for Fiscal Years 20191, 20202, 20213, 20224, and 2023 (Attachment A). On May 24, 20215 City Council adopted five directives focused on enhancing transparency and oversight regarding international shipments of Palo Alto’s recyclable materials. Staff addressed all five directives. In 2022, the Cities of Palo Alto and San Jose co-hosted virtual forums with 1 Fiscal Year 2019 Initial Review of Certificate of End Use & Traceability Data, 2019 - https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/zero-waste/fy-2019-traceability-report_gwpa.pdf%20 2 Fiscal Year 2020 Initial Review of Certificate of End Use & Traceability Data, 2020 - https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/zero-waste/fy-2020-traceability-report_gwpa.pdf 3 City Council, January 24, 2022; Agenda item #14; CMR #13535; https://recordsportal.paloalto.gov/Weblink/DocView.aspx?id=81686 4 City Council, December 19, 2022; Agenda item #22; CMR #14835; https://recordsportal.paloalto.gov/Weblink/DocView.aspx?id=82085 5 City Council, May 24, 2021; Agenda item #7; CMR #11632 https://recordsportal.paloalto.gov/Weblink/DocView.aspx?id=81415 Item B Item B Staff Report        Item B: Staff Report Pg. 1  Packet Pg. 321 of 413  other jurisdictions, industry stakeholders, and recycling processors to explore interest in legislative advocacy to improve traceability in global recycling markets. However, insufficient regional support was identified for such legislative efforts. Despite increased requirements, GWPA reported challenges in providing detailed data on international shipments due to vendor confidentiality restrictions. To further assess global recycling logistics, the City contracted Edgar & Associates, Inc. (EAI) in August 2022, to research and summarized the current recycling market structures and logistics to enhance oversight and transparency in the marketing, handling, and processing of recyclable materials collected from the City’s collections. EAI's findings concluded that recyclable materials can be tracked to the port of entry in a foreign country, but not to specific processing facilities. EAI found limited documentation on the handling and recycling of materials once they leave U.S. ports. EAI confirmed GWPA’s findings, concluding that there is currently no way to track recyclable materials beyond their initial sale, making the secondary markets untraceable. These findings reinforced the City’s current policy focus on expanding domestic recycling options and pursue long-term domestic recycling for cardboard and PET thermoformed plastics. On December 12, 202211, Council approved a long- term contract amendment requiring GWPA to process Palo Alto’s recyclable materials, specifically mixed paper and mixed rigid plastics, through domestic markets. As a result, approximately 60 percent of Palo Alto’s recyclable materials are now handled domestically, significantly reducing the reliance on international markets to only 40 percent. Staff has addressed Council’s 2021 directives, including efforts to enhance transparency and oversight of recyclable materials. As part of these ongoing efforts, this informational report makes the latest GWPA traceability reports available to both Council and the public. ANALYSIS GWPA’s reports, titled “Initial Review of Certificate of End Use & Traceability Data” for Fiscal Year 2023 (Attachment A) and 2024 (Attachment B), summarize the traceability data and online review of information relative to recycling international markets. The reports include the supplementary marketing, processing, and disposal information from GreenWaste’s primary purchasers and summarize the recyclable materials tonnages by commodity types, the spread of domestic compared to the export markets, and the location of secondary processing. In Fiscal Year 2023: Approximately 15,700 tons of recyclable materials was processed from Palo Alto. Of this total approximately 68 percent remained in the United States while approximately 32 percent was exported internationally. The report highlights the extended program for domestic processing of mixed paper and mixed rigid plastics and GreenWaste’s pursuit of advanced processing technologies at their facilities. In Fiscal Year 2024: 11 City Council, December 12, 2022; Agenda item #4; CMR #14834 https://recordsportal.paloalto.gov/Weblink/DocView.aspx?id=82083 Item B Item B Staff Report        Item B: Staff Report Pg. 2  Packet Pg. 322 of 413  Approximately 15,600 tons of recyclable materials was processed from Palo Alto with approximately 58 percent remaining in the United States and 42 percent exported internationally. The report highlights the continuous effort to process recyclable domestically primarily mixed paper and mixed rigid plastics. The decrease in overall domestic recycling was due to the limited and volatile domestic market for cardboard. GreenWaste is working on securing a more permanent market. These trends reflect progress toward Council's directives and demonstrate the City’s commitment to promoting responsible and transparent recycling practices FISCAL/RESOURCE IMPACT There is no direct fiscal impact associated with this informational report. STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT This report provides a routine update for City Council and the public. No additional stakeholder engagement was required ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW This item is informational in nature and does not constitute a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: GWPA Traceability Report – 2023 Attachment B: GWPA Traceability Report – 2024 APPROVED BY: Brad Eggleston, Director Public Works/City Engineer Item B Item B Staff Report        Item B: Staff Report Pg. 3  Packet Pg. 323 of 413  1 GreenWaste of Palo Alto Initial Review of Certificate of End Use & Traceability Data, 2023 February 1, 2024 Contact: Eric Cissna eric.cissna@greenwaste.com 650-798-5994 2765 Lafayette St. Santa Clara, CA 95050 Item B Attachment A - GWPA Traceability Report - 2023        Item B: Staff Report Pg. 4  Packet Pg. 324 of 413  Initial Review of Certificate of End Use & Traceability Data, 2023 Table of Contents Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................................................... 2 Background & Expectations ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Progress and Action Plan ............................................................................................................................................. 6 Summary ....................................................................................................................................................................... 10 CellMark Inc. (Novato, CA) ..................................................................................................................................... 15 Berg Mill Supply/Classic Fibres (Los Angeles, CA)............................................................................................ 18 Fibre Trade Inc. (Burlingame, CA) ......................................................................................................................... 20 Newport CH International (Orange, CA) ............................................................................................................... 21 Direct Pack Recycling (Azusa, CA) ....................................................................................................................... 23 Envision Plastics (Chino, CA) ................................................................................................................................. 25 Item B Attachment A - GWPA Traceability Report - 2023        Item B: Staff Report Pg. 5  Packet Pg. 325 of 413  Initial Review of Certificate of End Use & Traceability Data, 2023 Background & Expectations GreenWaste of Palo Alto, LLC and GreenWaste Recovery, LLC GreenWaste of Palo Alto, LLC (GWPA) is the City of Palo Alto’s (City) contracted solid waste, recyclable materials, and compostable materials collection and processing contractor. The Agreement between GWPA and the City (GWPA Agreement) commenced in October 2008, and has since been amended and restated in June 2015, and again amended and restated in January 2019, with the term extended through June 30, 2026. Under the GWPA Agreement, GWPA collects recyclable materials, compostable materials, and solid waste from City residents and commercial businesses. Recyclable materials are transported to the GreenWaste San Jose Material Recovery Facility (MRF), where they are processed for recovery. At the MRF, comingled recyclables are processed to remove contamination and separated by material type (e.g., paper, cardboard, plastic, metal, etc.). The MRF then sells the separated recovered materials to brokers and/or secondary processors for further recycling. Compostable materials are transported to the GreenWaste Renewable Energy Digestion Facility, where they undergo anaerobic digestion to produce renewable energy and a feedstock for compost. Effective January 1, 2022, following a City procurement process, GWPA began transporting municipal solid waste (MSW) to the MRF for processing under the Solid Waste Processing and Disposal Services Agreement (MSW Processing Agreement). This material is processed at the MRF to recover both compostable materials and recyclables. The materials managed by the GWPA Agreement and the MSW Processing Agreement are disparate. GWPA collects approximately 16,000 tons of recyclable material annually for processing at the MRF. Additionally, per monthly reporting required by the MSW Processing Agreement, approximately 852 tons of recyclables were recovered from the City’s solid waste stream in Fiscal Year 2023, representing 5.5% of the overall solid waste stream. GreenWaste Recovery, LLC (GWR) is a recyclables processor and markets its own recyclable commodities. Over the last five years, the recycling industry has gotten more complex due to the changing landscape of new international guidelines and restrictions on shipments of recyclables. CalRecycle succinctly summarizes some of the recent changes that have had significant impacts on the recycling industry: “The export of recyclable materials is a key component of California’s recycling infrastructure. Changes to international policies restricting imports of recyclable materials, the declining global market for plastic and paper scrap, and the impending Basel Convention plastic waste amendments that will make exporting plastic scrap more challenging continue to pose a significant challenge to the solid waste and recycling industry, local governments, and Californians.” (https://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/markets/nationalsword) GWR has witnessed firsthand the impacts of these changes. In 2017, a paper mill in Santa Clara closed due to high production costs and fluctuating Old Corrugated Cardboard (OCC) prices (2022 Traceability Item B Attachment A - GWPA Traceability Report - 2023        Item B: Staff Report Pg. 6  Packet Pg. 326 of 413  Initial Review of Certificate of End Use & Traceability Data, 2023 Report). Material previously sent to this local facility was forced to be sent out of state to mills in the Midwest, Louisiana, and Georgia. As the marketers of their own recyclable commodities, GWR has borne witness to how unstructured commodities markets can be. GWR sells its recycled materials to brokers and/or secondary processors. Once the material is sold, it may change hands many times or undergo further processing before reaching its ultimate destination. Brokers may have incomplete information regarding the final destination of the materials or they may be unwilling to share the information they do possess due to confidentiality concerns. Once at port, materials are sent to various plants, making the full life cycle of commodities extremely difficult to track. Furthermore, recyclables brokers are not in a position to place requirements on customers. Information on commodity markets, pricing, buyers, and other information pertaining to commodity sales transactions constitute confidential and proprietary corporate Trade Secrets. This information is not of public knowledge or general knowledge in the trade or business and has an intrinsic value preserved by being safeguarded from disclosure. GWR and its brokers stand to be harmed by the disclosure of Trade Secrets as follows: • Losing markets for specific materials (e.g., plastic clamshells or film plastics), • Losing local markets and only having available domestic or international markets, • Losing domestic markets and only having available international markets, or • Jeopardizing relationships with buyers, with the potential to lose business. For the reasons detailed above, it has continued to be a challenge to ascertain additional information regarding the final disposition of recovered recyclables. GWR and GWPA are not alone in this challenge to gather a complete data set. The World Wildlife Fund (WWF) established Resource: Plastic in cooperation with five Principal Members (Keurig Dr Pepper, McDonald’s Corporation, Procter & Gamble, Starbucks, and The Coca-Cola Company) in 2020 and released its inaugural Transparent 2020 report. The report identified the significant data gaps: “The lack of data on waste management globally is a shared challenge—no one institution can address it alone…” (https://resource-plastic.com/pdf/Transparent2020.pdf). An updated report was released in December 2021, and further calls for filling critical data gaps and improving data confidence: “Filling critical data gaps and actively sharing information will improve the quality and precision of our understanding of the plastic waste system. There is a clear need for better waste management and fate data at the national level, international coordination on plastic data collection efforts, and agreement on common terminology and best practices.” (https://resource- plastic.com/backend/sites/default/files/2021-12/Transparent%202021%2012-1-21.pdf) A third report in December 2022 continues to appeal for improving data confidence and transparency: “ReSource has called for collaboration to fill key data gaps and improve data confidence levels. As the list of stakeholders interested in understanding the state of the plastic waste crisis expands to include investors, financial institutions, and policy makers, this call to action is more relevant than ever.” The report continues with a promising development: “The Global Treaty on Plastic Pollution, which the United Nations began negotiations on in late 2022, has the potential to set an important high-level framework for information, especially for country-level reporting and disclosures. Furthermore, a collaborative effort to create a standardized plastic disclosure framework for the private sector was announced in fall 2022 by CDP, The Pew Charitable Trusts, Minderoo Foundation, and the Ellen MacArthur Foundation. Both developments are exciting Item B Attachment A - GWPA Traceability Report - 2023        Item B: Staff Report Pg. 7  Packet Pg. 327 of 413  Initial Review of Certificate of End Use & Traceability Data, 2023 steps toward the consistent and standardized reporting process that ReSource has long called for.” (https://files.worldwildlife.org/wwfcmsprod/files/Publication/file/9dsv7winop_WWF_Transparent_2022_FINAL_12.5.22.pdf?_ga =2.226735320.473129063.1689098649-1688916787.1689098648) At the end of 2018, while City staff was updating their Zero Waste Plan and wrapping up negotiations with GWPA on an Agreement Amendment and extension, City Council gave City staff direction to report on the intermediate and final disposition of Palo Alto’s recovered paper and plastic. City staff and GWPA agreed that as a goal, GWPA would attempt to gather information on the environmental and social implications associated with the full life cycle of Palo Alto Recyclable Materials. The expectation of the new Attachment to the Agreement, “Environmental and Social Impacts of Processing Recyclable Materials”, was that GWPA would request information from the “primary purchasers” of Palo Alto’s recyclable materials and then conduct a desk study based on the provided information. Item B Attachment A - GWPA Traceability Report - 2023        Item B: Staff Report Pg. 8  Packet Pg. 328 of 413  Initial Review of Certificate of End Use & Traceability Data, 2023 Progress and Action Plan Domestic Processing Availability Recycling operations across North America are adding processing capacity to accommodate the growing amount of material displaced by export market upheavals. Domestic innovation is growing but continues to be far from providing sufficient capacity for all recycled materials generated domestically. This is especially true in California, where inefficient permitting processes and bureaucratic delays can make permitting new recycling facilities, such as pulp and paper plants, lengthy and challenging. The permitting process for building in-state recycling infrastructure will need to be streamlined and consolidated in order to meet the increasing demand for these facilities. GWPA has worked with GWR to identify and secure space with existing domestic processors of cardboard, paper, and plastic to provide greater assurances regarding the ultimate disposition of the City’s material and to ensure that the processing adheres to the United States’ environmental standards. Domestic markets are generally more expensive and competitive than international markets and securing space with these processors can be a challenge due to limited capacity. To confront this market challenge, City staff and GWPA developed a three-month pilot program which took place between April and June 2022 to take 100% of Palo Alto’s mixed paper and mixed rigid plastics to processing facilities within the United States. Mixed paper is comprised of various types of paper that is collected from residents and businesses in Palo Alto such as colored paper, magazines, junk mail, envelopes, and paper bags. Mixed rigid plastic is primarily comprised of plastic items including buckets, toys, and milk crates. During the pilot, mixed paper was sent to a pulp and paper mill in northern Louisiana, while mixed rigid plastic was sent to a processing facility in southern California. In June 2022, City Council approved this program to continue in Fiscal Year 2023 with the goal to keep 59% of the recyclable materials in the United States to be processed, reducing the amount to be exported to about 41% with only cardboard and PET plastic clamshells being processed internationally. Cardboard was not selected as a material to be kept domestically since it is high quality, contains low contaminants, is desired by processing facilities, and has consistent market demand to be recycled. Additionally, the added cost of recycling cardboard domestically has proven to be prohibitive in the current market environment. However, the domestic market that GWR identified and presented to the City remains available at this time. PET plastic clamshells were not selected to be kept domestically because there are not currently viable domestic markets available for this material. While PET plastic clamshells are processed internationally, they are still being processed within North America at a recycling facility in Mexico. In Fiscal Year 2023, approximately 3,507 tons of Palo Alto’s mixed paper were processed and recycled within the United States at the same northern Louisiana facility utilized during the pilot program. Additionally, approximately 151 tons of mixed rigid plastic were processed and recycled at a domestic facility in St. Louis, Missouri. To ensure that the largest percentage of materials processed at the MRF are in proper condition to be recycled, GWR focuses on ensuring commodities are clean and contamination-free. In May 2019, the MRF completed an upgrade to its single stream recyclables line, the line on which Palo Alto’s materials are processed. This upgrade included the installation of six optical sorters to reduce contamination and produce cleaner, higher quality recovered recyclables. These optical sorters improve the quality of mixed Item B Attachment A - GWPA Traceability Report - 2023        Item B: Staff Report Pg. 9  Packet Pg. 329 of 413  Initial Review of Certificate of End Use & Traceability Data, 2023 paper and newsprint by repelling plastic away from paper using infrared lasers. These lasers identify the various types of plastic that, in the past, inadvertently ended up mixed in the paper stream and recover them based on their unique resin type. Both the paper and plastics are then separated, sorted, and bailed for marketing. In February 2020, the MRF was upgraded again with two MAX-AI autonomous quality control systems (one of which featured two sorting units), which were programmed to identify specific material types and extract anything that does not belong in its respective stream. The first unit removes non-HPDE contamination, and the second unit selects HPDE-natural. By ensuring a clean product, GWR gains a strong position in the market, and reduces the risk of downstream issues. The MRF is currently working on further upgrades with the addition of another optical sorter. This optical sorter will be calibrated to sort #2 - #7 plastics out of the residue stream, which are typically destined for disposal. With this additional optical sorter, more plastics will be diverted from disposal and be recycled, increasing the overall diversion of these materials. Together with the GreenWaste Z-Best Composting Facility (Z-Best), GWR conducted a pilot project in 2021 for the City to determine the effectiveness and associated costs relative to composting mixed paper recovered from the single stream recyclables line. The methodology for this pilot can be referenced in GWPA’s 2022 Traceability Report. Ultimately there was insufficient capacity at Z-Best for this mixed paper stream in 2021. With California’s implementation of Senate Bill 1383, organics capacity across the state is in high demand. However, the Z- Best composting facility will be undergoing significant expansion over the next 2 years, which will allow it to accept additional material for composting. Once the expansion is complete, low quality mixed paper recovered from Palo Alto’s solid waste and recyclables streams could be directed to the facility for composting, creating more opportunities for increased diversion and local outlets for these material types. ByFusion In January 2022, GWPA presented the City with an opportunity to pilot a new plastics recycling technology through ByFusion. ByFusion has developed a steam-based technology that can recycle discarded plastic into 22-pound blocks that can be used as a building material for sheds, retaining walls, benches, furniture, micro homes, and more. ByFusion can take multiple types of post-consumer, low-grade plastics such as grocery bags, contaminated food containers, and miscellaneous mixed plastics #1-#7. Because the plastic is super-heated using steam, these plastics can be processed mixed, clean, or contaminated. This technology could offer another avenue for recycling otherwise low-grade, contaminated plastics recovered from Palo Alto’s solid waste stream at the GWR MRF. In May 2022, Tucson, AZ, approved a 4-year contract with ByFusion to construct a production facility and install a ByFusion machine. Tucson plans to use the block-making machine on a small-scale basis to create building materials for park benches, waste enclosures, murals, and small buildings. While the ByFusion technology is promising, Palo Alto is not currently considering the use for the plastic blocks at scale. However, GWR remains committed to exploring this emerging technology and research on long term feasibility study and environmental impacts if requested. Item B Attachment A - GWPA Traceability Report - 2023        Item B: Staff Report Pg. 10  Packet Pg. 330 of 413  Initial Review of Certificate of End Use & Traceability Data, 2023 The California Legislature passed several recycling-related bills in 2021 and 2022 that target plastic pollution and aim to spur domestic or in-state recycling while also modernizing the state’s recycling infrastructure. These bills are designed to assist and guide generators, waste haulers, municipalities, processors, and recyclers on various aspects of California’s recycling system. As a waste hauler and waste processor, GWPA and GWR are looking forward to seeing how these laws progress and improve California’s recycling system. The following is a summary of the most notable bills. • SB 54: Requires all packaging in California to be recyclable or compostable by 2032 and shifts the burden of collecting, processing, and recycling from consumers and municipalities to manufacturers who produce and sell plastic packaging and products. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201720180SB54) • AB 881: Reclassifies low value plastic waste exports to other countries as “disposal” instead of “recycling”. The law is designed to help the state and CalRecycle more accurately measure how much plastic is getting recycled. (https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220AB881) • SB 343: Prohibits plastic manufacturers from using the “chasing arrows” recycling symbol on items that aren’t recyclable. Creates a CalRecycle-approved list of items that are commonly recyclable in California. (https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220SB343) • AB 1276: Reduces plastic waste by prohibiting restaurants from offering single-use food ware to customers unless requested. (https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220AB1276) • AB 793: In 2023, CalRecycle began enforcement of this law, which mandates recycled content in plastic beverage bottles. As of January 1st, beverage manufacturers will now face penalties and fines if they do not have at least 15% recycled content in plastic bottles. This mandate increases to 25% recycled content in 2025 and 50% in 2030, with the overall goal to increase the available markets and outlets for post-consumer recycled plastics. In 2019, the California Legislature and Governor created the Statewide Commission on Recycling Markets and Curbside Recycling to provide guidance and recommendations to CalRecycle regarding California’s ambitious recycling goals. The purpose is to provide insight into the complex recycling industry as well as an industry perspective when CalRecycle and the State Legislature are crafting policies and legislation. Many of the recommendations are designed to reconfigure recycling market development efforts to improve effectiveness and take steps to ensure that materials separated for recovery will not be processed in a manner that contradicts the environmental and social intent of recovery efforts. The report specifies that some of the work “involves reconciling the conflicts between ambitious recovery goals and the realities of markets and permitting processes.”. Item B Attachment A - GWPA Traceability Report - 2023        Item B: Staff Report Pg. 11  Packet Pg. 331 of 413  Initial Review of Certificate of End Use & Traceability Data, 2023 The report identifies the following priorities for statewide recycling market development: • “Approximately 10,000,000 tons of paper fibers are exported annually from California ports, with about 80% generated in California. Recycled paper pulping is an emerging industry trend, avoiding bale contamination issues by creating market grade pulp for paper making. A successful market development effort focused on paper pulping would overcome reliance on bale exports, create local jobs and business opportunities, and strengthen California’s recycling infrastructure. This effort could include siting assistance, local and state permitting coordination, feedstock identification and acquisition, financing options. • Existing tax incentive programs such as CAEFTA could be focused on prioritizing end use markets for recovered materials. • California’s economy offers potential to expand existing business use of recycled materials by working to identify manufacturers who could substitute virgin materials for recycled feedstock. Business development tools can mine databases to identify those manufacturers, and market development professionals could work with those manufacturers to convert to recycled feedstock. • Myriad opportunities exist to work with existing small reuse and repair businesses. Statewide source reduction can be enhanced by identifying and responding to their needs, especially expansion and business start-up potential to replace single-use items.” (https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/Docs/Web/121911) As this report demonstrates, there is work being done by CalRecycle and other state agencies to stimulate market demand for post-consumer recyclables and spur the development of statewide recycling infrastructure within California. Item B Attachment A - GWPA Traceability Report - 2023        Item B: Staff Report Pg. 12  Packet Pg. 332 of 413  Initial Review of Certificate of End Use & Traceability Data, 2023 Summary GWR and GWPA staff worked in coordination to obtain supplementary marketing, processing, and disposal information from GWR’s primary purchasers. The following tables summarize materials sorted by commodity types, the spread of domestic vs. export markets, and the location of secondary processing (if applicable) as reported by GWR’s primary purchasers. The information contained in Table 1 summarizes the facility-wide materials and markets for the MRF as a whole. Palo Alto’s portion is estimated and summarized in Table 2. Table 3 summarizes the primary purchasers of Palo Alto’s recyclable materials. Item B Attachment A - GWPA Traceability Report - 2023        Item B: Staff Report Pg. 13  Packet Pg. 333 of 413  Initial Review of Certificate of End Use & Traceability Data, 2023 Aluminum Cans 1,694.99 1.26% 100% 0% Aluminum Foil/Scrap 367.02 0.27% 100% 0% Ferrous/Tin 3,379.58 2.52% 100% 0% Glass, Commingled 30,486.93 22.73% 100% 0% Plastic, HDPE Color 1,811.41 1.35% 87% 13% Plastic, HDPE Natural 1,453.16 1.08% 87% 13% Plastic, PET Bottles 4,695.26 3.50% 97% 3% Plastic, PET 1,084.04 0.81% 0% 100% Plastic, Mixed Rigid 2,212.75 1.65% 46% 54% Plastic, #2 - #7 2,369.63 1.77% 46% 54% Film Plastics 261.10 0.19% 100% 0% Mixed Paper 15,926.14 11.87% 20% 80% Cardboard 59,902.93 44.66% 7% 93% Scrap Metal 8,376.48 6.25% 100% 0% E-Waste 106.70 0.08% 100% 0% 1 Weighted Average Item B Attachment A - GWPA Traceability Report - 2023        Item B: Staff Report Pg. 14  Packet Pg. 334 of 413  Initial Review of Certificate of End Use & Traceability Data, 2023 Determining Palo Alto’s tonnage for each recyclable material category presents a challenge because once Palo Alto’s recyclables are delivered to the MRF, they are combined with recyclables from other communities. In previous reports, Table 2 has been used to estimate Palo Alto’s share of the total recyclable material processed by the MRF. In Fiscal Year 2023, Palo Alto’s recyclables made up 11.74% of the MRF’s total material, or 15,976 tons. This percentage was used in Table 2 to estimate Palo Alto’s tonnage for each material type, based on the facility-wide data from the MRF. Item B Attachment A - GWPA Traceability Report - 2023        Item B: Staff Report Pg. 15  Packet Pg. 335 of 413  Initial Review of Certificate of End Use & Traceability Data, 2023 Aluminum Cans 198.99 100% 0% Aluminum Foil/Scrap 43.09 100% 0% Ferrous/Tin 396.76 100% 0% Glass, Commingled 3,579.17 100% 0% Plastic HDPE Color 212.66 100% 0% Plastic, HDPE Natural 170.60 100% 0% Plastic, PET Bottles 551.22 100% 0% Plastic, PET Clamshells 127.27 0% 100% Plastic, Mixed Rigid 259.78 100% 0% Plastic, #2 - # 7 278.19 100% 0% Film Plastic 30.65 100% 0% Mixed Paper 1,869.73 100% 0% Cardboard 7,032.61 30% 70% Scrap Metal 983.40 100% 0% E-Waste 12.53 100% 0% 1 Weighted Average Item B Attachment A - GWPA Traceability Report - 2023        Item B: Staff Report Pg. 16  Packet Pg. 336 of 413  Initial Review of Certificate of End Use & Traceability Data, 2023 (for material types covered in this report) Plastic, PET Bottles CellMark: Domestic Plastic, PET Clamshells Direct Pack: International Film Plastic CellMark: Domestic Cardboard CellMark: Domestic Berg Mill: International & Domestic Fibre Trade: International & Domestic Item B Attachment A - GWPA Traceability Report - 2023        Item B: Staff Report Pg. 17  Packet Pg. 337 of 413  Initial Review of Certificate of End Use & Traceability Data, 2023 CellMark Inc. (Novato, CA) In Fiscal Year 2023, CellMark became the primary purchaser of Palo Alto’s cardboard, paper, and plastics because it predominantly utilizes domestic markets for these material types. CellMark submitted partial traceability data for the cardboard, mixed paper, PET, mixed plastics, and film plastics it purchased from GWR. CellMark is both a brokerage and a secondary processor, and its purchasers are secondary processors. For plastic, the secondary processing includes chipping, washing, and pelletizing. For cardboard and paper, the secondary processing includes pulpifying. Per the CellMark website,CellMark participates in initiatives to ensure sustainability. CellMark comments on its sustainability via its CSR webpages (https://www.cellmark.com/ideas-values/sustainability-csr/): “CellMark is proud to conduct our services and business activities with a high degree of ethics and awareness of sustainability. We adhere to defined common standards for our performance, participate in multiple initiatives in support of sustainability and continually look for ways to improve our performance.” “We respect and comply with local legislation and environmental regulations in all of our global operations. We enable our employees to participate in charitable initiatives, and we invite our business partners to join us in our support of different non-profit organizations locally and globally.” “CellMark supports and works actively to comply with international guidelines regarding environment, human rights, and business ethics, including the following: • The UN Global Compact Initiative. • Internationally proclaimed human rights standards and conventions (in particular the International Bill of Human Rights, the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, the eight core conventions of the International Labour Organization, and Article 32 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child). • The OECD Convention on combating bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions. • The OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises.” “We do not ship any restricted material, for example dual-use goods, without proper permit… Each employee is encouraged to share the Code of Conduct with our business partners. We expect them to acknowledge and respect it in the context of their own particular culture.” (https://www.cellmark.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/CellMark-Code-of-Conduct.pdf) CellMark’s 2022 Annual Sustainability Report, published in May 2023, stated the company maintained its Silver status in the EcoVadis supply chain audit. The audit investigates four core areas: Labor & Human Rights, Environment, Ethics, and Sustainable Procurement (https://ecovadis.com/ratings/). Item B Attachment A - GWPA Traceability Report - 2023        Item B: Staff Report Pg. 18  Packet Pg. 338 of 413  Initial Review of Certificate of End Use & Traceability Data, 2023 The following is a diagram showing which U.S. cities and states the cardboard, paper, and plastics purchased by CellMark are sent to. CellMark’s 2022 Sustainability Report provided an update on its Total Fiber Recovery facility: “CellMark entered into a partnership with Total Fiber Recovery to build an 80 million USD recycled pulp production facility in the city of Chesapeake, Virginia, USA. The new facility and joint venture are both called Total Fiber Recovery @ Chesapeake (or TFRC) and should be operational in Q4, 2023. CellMark Recycling will supply 300 000 tons of mixed paper and old corrugated containers, annually, as feedstock to the facility. The recycled brown pulp produced by the facility will be sold exclusively by CellMark Pulp.” (https://www.cellmark.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/CellMark-Sustainability-Report-2022.pdf) An internet search resulted in a pertinent article posted on July 6, 2022: “Chesapeake, Virginia-based Total Fiber Recovery of Chesapeake (TFRC) says it has started construction of its $80 million recycled pulp production facility in that city. TFRC is a joint venture between Oregon-based Total Fiber Recovery (TFR) and Swedish company CellMark Inc. Material consumed by the facility will be supplied by CellMark’s Recycled Fiber Division, and the pulp produced will be marketed by CellMark’s Pulp Division. TFR plans to begin operations in Chesapeake in the fourth quarter of 2023 and annually process up to 300,000 tons of mixed paper and old corrugated containers (OCC).” https://www.recyclingtoday.com/article/total-fiber-paper-recycling-investment-chesapeak-virginia-cellmark-bhs/ A June 21, 2021, press release published in Utah Business provided more insight into CellMark’s Crossroads Paper Plant: Cardboard Shafter, CA Mixed Paper Shreveport, LA PET Rome, GA Mixed Rigid Plastic St. Louis, MO Mixed Plastic #2 -#7 Jurupa Valley, CA & Ironton, OH Film Plastic Modesto, CA Item B Attachment A - GWPA Traceability Report - 2023        Item B: Staff Report Pg. 19  Packet Pg. 339 of 413  Initial Review of Certificate of End Use & Traceability Data, 2023 “Peterson Real Assets, a subsidiary of Peterson Partners, Inc. has made a growth equity investment in Crossroads Paper, a 100 percent recycled paper mill to be built in the Mountain West to serve for the growing demand for e-commerce, agriculture, and industrial packaging in the Western United States. The Crossroads Paper site selection process is underway, with a final determination expected by year end.” https://www.utahbusiness.com/peterson-real-assets-makes-growth-equity-investment-in-crossroads paper/#:~:text=Salt%20Lake%20City%20%E2%80%94%20Peterson%20Real,in%20the%20Western%20United%20States An internet search resulted in a pertinent article posted on May 3, 2021: “The Norwalk, Connecticut-based North American recycling business unit of CellMark has acquired Paper Tube & Core Corp. (PT&C). That Paterson, New Jersey-based firm specializes in collecting, repurposing and recycling large paper cores and tubes on a global scale.” https://www.recyclingtoday.com/article/cellmark-paper-tube-new-jersey-recycling-acquisition/ An internet search resulted in a pertinent article posted on July 22, 2019: “In mid-July, Crossroads Paper held a press conference to announce its plans to build a paper mill in the Salt Lake City area that will recycle old corrugated containers (OCC) and residential mixed paper into new paper that will then be used to make boxes for manufacturers, farmers and e-commerce companies. The Sasine brothers’ partners include […]Sweden-based Cellmark, which specializes in international trade and distribution of raw materials related to the global pulp and paper industry.” https://www.recyclingtoday.com/article/crossroads-paper-recycled-containerboard-salt-lake-valley/ Item B Attachment A - GWPA Traceability Report - 2023        Item B: Staff Report Pg. 20  Packet Pg. 340 of 413  Initial Review of Certificate of End Use & Traceability Data, 2023 Berg Mill Supply/Classic Fibres (Los Angeles, CA) Berg Mill did not submit any traceability data but did provide basic information about the company. In Fiscal Year 2023, Berg Mill purchased a portion of Palo Alto’s cardboard from GWR. Berg Mill Supply is a brokerage. Berg Mill elected not to complete the traceability form as to not provide proprietary data. Berg Mill provides general data on its website about the destination of its exports. Per the Berg Mill Supply website: (https://bergmill.com/about/where-berg-mill-ships/) “Our mission statement and vision is our belief in contributing to a sustainable planet, leading us on our path of environmental management for future generations. Berg Mill’s purpose is to create value by offering green solutions to those generating waste and to consumers looking to recycle.” “Berg Mill Supply Co., Inc. redirects waste from material recovery facilities (MRF) in the United States to end users in international locations, where the material is processed and a new material is produced.” “We sell material suitable for many different countries abroad such as China Indonesia Korea Vietnam Thailand India Myanmar Malaysia Pakistan Laos Costa Rica Brazil USA.” The following is a diagram showing which countries the cardboard purchased by Berg Mill is sent to. A blog posted by Berg Mill on December 2, 2019, stated the following: “But it isn’t just China’s import restrictions that have caused a downswing in mixed paper value. The market started taking a dive after the U.S. economic downturn in 2010, nearly a decade ago. The good news is that new international markets are opening for U.S. mixed paper, for example India, where a box manufacturer that uses recovered fiber, is opening a plant in the coming months.” (https://bergmill.com/2019/12/02/turning-over-a-new-leaf-in-paper-recycling-with-ai-technology/) Cardboard Did not provide Item B Attachment A - GWPA Traceability Report - 2023        Item B: Staff Report Pg. 21  Packet Pg. 341 of 413  Initial Review of Certificate of End Use & Traceability Data, 2023 A blog posted by Berg Mill on August 12, 2019, stated the following: “With no global regulations against these exports, it is poor and developing nations that will end up paying the price for cleaning up after the U.S.… For recycling to flourish to its full potential, we must process our recyclables in domestic, modern factories that are designed to properly shelter toxins from workers and the environment.” (https://bergmill.com/2019/08/12/your-recycling-may-not-be-going-where-you-think/) A blog posted by Berg Mill on June 10, 2019, stated the following: “While recent news in recycling has been discouraging due to China’s National Sword and other foreign imported scrap bans, Berg Mill is ever committed to keeping your recyclables moving… Ultimately, domestic recycling has the potential to become superior to importing scrap both economically and environmentally." (https://bergmill.com/2019/06/10/recycling-challenges-bring-opportunities-for-growth/) An internet search resulted in a pertinent article posted on June 3, 2018: “According to leading US recycling firm Berg Mill Supply, “all grades of plastic have seen a major shift to secondary markets” from 2016 to 2017, when China’s import restrictions came to light. In that period, Malaysia took in five times more polyvinyl chloride (PVC), while Vietnam more than doubled imports of polyethylene terephthalate (PET).” (https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/china-bans-plastic-waste-whats-next-for-recycling-in-singapore-10281026) Item B Attachment A - GWPA Traceability Report - 2023        Item B: Staff Report Pg. 22  Packet Pg. 342 of 413  Initial Review of Certificate of End Use & Traceability Data, 2023 Fibre Trade Inc. (Burlingame, CA) Fibre Trade submitted partial traceability data for the portion of Palo Alto’s cardboard it purchased from GWR in Fiscal Year 2023. Fibre Trade is a brokerage. Per its website, Fibre Trade is a direct exporter of primarily recovered paper, pulp, and mineral products from the USA, Europe, Australia, New Zealand, and Japan to affiliated paper mills all over the world. (https://www.fibretrade.net/) The following is a diagram showing which countries the cardboard purchased by Fibre Trade is sent to. Cardboard USA, Mexico, Southeast Asia (per 2021) Item B Attachment A - GWPA Traceability Report - 2023        Item B: Staff Report Pg. 23  Packet Pg. 343 of 413  Initial Review of Certificate of End Use & Traceability Data, 2023 Newport CH International (Orange, CA) Newport CH International did not submit traceability data but did provide basic information about the company. Newport purchased a portion of Palo Alto’s cardboard from GWR in Fiscal Year 2023. Newport both manufactures products and is a brokerage. Per its website, Newport focuses on the purchase and direct export sale of recyclable paper, plastics, as well as agricultural products. The following statement is made on the Newport CH International website. “Our expertise is sourcing recyclable paper and plastics throughout North America. We are direct export shippers for the recycling industry, supplying numerous mills in China, as well as many other Asian countries. We provide quality raw material for their state of the art mills and manufacturing facilities. Our overseas customers have the assurance of consistent supply and quality. Newport CH handles all logistics in-house, including shipping line rate negotiations, bookings and local drayage assistance. We take care of all required export documentation and banking transactions from our corporate office in Orange, California. To facilitate our exports to China we are AQSIQ certified and are an approved CCIC self-inspection company. In addition, we hold ISO 9001 and ISO 14001 certifications for our global quality management system, demonstrating our organizations continued commitment to quality. Newport CH strives to encourage growth in the recycling industry by being supportive and involved with numerous state and local government agencies. Through our office in Shanghai, China we are able to work directly with the mill buyers in order to meet their requirements. We are in constant communication with our Shanghai office to stay apprised of any market changes or concerns with material arriving into China.” (http://newportch.com/) The following is a diagram showing which countries the cardboard purchased by Newport CH International is sent to. An internet search resulted in a pertinent article posted on March 25, 2021: “Governments are beginning to react to recent warnings issued by the Basel Action Network (BAN) of likely illegal exports of plastic waste from the US. Due to recent amendments adopted by the 188 Parties to the Basel Convention, as of January 1, 2021, parties will be unable to import US plastic wastes unless they are very pure and unmixed. In its announcement, BAN highlighted recent data showing the US exports have not diminished despite the new rules and flagged three active shipments moving to Indonesia, Malaysia, and India. In Indonesia, the government appears to be uncertain as to what to do about the two containers of plastic waste that have already arrived at the port of Belwan on board a Mediterranean Shipping Company (MSC) vessel from California, USA. Three more from the same exporter — Newport CH International, are also on their way to Indonesia.” (https://www.recycling-magazine.com/2021/03/25/malaysia-declares-reported-shipments-of-us-plastic-wastes-to- asia-are-illegal/) Cardboard Did not provide Item B Attachment A - GWPA Traceability Report - 2023        Item B: Staff Report Pg. 24  Packet Pg. 344 of 413  Initial Review of Certificate of End Use & Traceability Data, 2023 An internet search resulted in a pertinent article posted on December 3, 2019: Signals point to all-out recycled fiber ban in China “We’re diversifying, we’re going to try to maximize our sales to other countries,” said Jimmy Yang, CEO of Newport Beach, Calif.-based Newport CH International, a major broker of recovered fiber to China. “We’re expecting volume to drop, that’s just reality – we enjoyed great markets for the past 20 years, and maybe things are going to change now.” “At the meeting, officials told the companies to anticipate lower import license volumes during the fourth quarter of this year, said Yang, whose business has at times moved up to 90% of its fiber to China. He noted Chinese officials said a ban is coming in 2021 for all paper grades except newsprint, which could continue to enter the country for newspaper production.” (https://resource-recycling.com/recycling/2019/12/03/signals-point-to-all-out-recycled-fiber-ban-in-china/) An internet search resulted in a pertinent article posted on April 3, 2019: China's recyclers look at Latin America, Caribbean “Hamilton Wen, director of the plastics division at trading firm Newport CH International LLC in Orange, Calif., said in a panel at the conference that recyclers face complex questions as they analyze where it makes business sense to recycle and also react to governments worldwide limiting imports of scrap.” "It's definitely cheaper in these other countries, but how long are they going to let you do it," he said. ‘I think eventually, end game, it probably will come back here [to the United States]. Whatever we're creating probably we should recycle it here’… added that the business case can make it too expensive to do some types of recycling in higher-cost countries.” (https://www.plasticsnews.com/article/20190403/NEWS/190409967/china-s-recyclers-look-at-latin-america- caribbean) An internet search resulted in a pertinent article posted on February 28, 2018: Exporters talk Chinese ban’s operational and financial impacts “Newport CH International, like many exporters, has made dramatic operational changes since the ban impact started to spread. The company acts as a broker, so it tries to find markets offering the best price and stable demand. For the past 20 years, that has consistently been China, Wen said. The only variation was where inside China the company would send the material.” “Now, that’s completely off the table as far as scrap, so we’ve had to completely reshift, and look for new markets basically anywhere in the world,” Wen said. “Places we’ve never looked for previously, but now we’re having to travel to look for processors, look for end users. It’s pretty much a complete upheaval of our entire plastic brokerage business.” “Wen said there are not enough end users to handle all the material on the market, so they are able to demand higher quality, whereas it used to be a seller’s market. Wen predicts markets will develop for low-grade plastics, although they will take time to develop. He said there is already a little more demand coming back for the materials as a result of market development that’s taken place since the ban, and that further development is currently underway.” (https://resource-recycling.com/plastics/2018/02/28/exporters-talk-chinese-bans-operational-financial-impacts/) Item B Attachment A - GWPA Traceability Report - 2023        Item B: Staff Report Pg. 25  Packet Pg. 345 of 413  Initial Review of Certificate of End Use & Traceability Data, 2023 Direct Pack Recycling (Azusa, CA) Direct Pack Recycling is the primary purchaser of Palo Alto’s PET clamshells. PET Clamshells are thermoformed plastic packaging, typically used for food packaging. Examples include plastic salad containers, take out containers, and fruit containers. Per its website, Direct Pack is a leader in sustainable and innovative thermoformed food packaging recycling and manufacturing. “We operate our own recycling and reclaiming facility. With capacity to recycle 20,000 tons of PET plastic per year, it allows us to move closer to a full circle manufacturing process.” “In our full circle process, we use post-consumer recycled PET bottles and thermoformed packaging to make new food containers. At Direct Pack Recycling we sort, wash and flake recycled PET material that then goes to one of our thermoforming facilities to be turned into new strawberry, lettuce, salad or take-out containers. After use, our containers can be recycled again – they are not garbage, but a valuable infinite resource. “Since 2020, Direct Pack Recycling has recycled over 74.4 million pounds of plastics – not only bottles but also mixed thermoformed PET containers – and repurposed them back into new packaging.” (https://www.directpackinc.com/about-us/) The following is a diagram showing which countries the PET clamshells purchased by Direct Pack Recycling are sent to. A blog posted by Direct Pack on December 5, 2022, stated the following about its PET recycling efforts: “In less than three years, Direct Pack has purchased 50 million lbs. of recycled PET bales from different Material Recovery Facilities (MRFs) in the US. These bales consist of post-consumer recycled #1 PET bottles as well as thermoformed packaging, and we take the bales to Direct Pack Recycling, our own reclaiming and recycling facility. There we turn the recycled materials into “new” raw material again in a full circle process. We are very grateful for the mutually beneficial collaboration with our MRF partners in California, Arizona, Washington, Nevada and Texas. As the MRFs collect more and more thermoformed #1 PET packaging from their local communities, we can include more of that material in our manufacturing of new packaging containers. Thereby we create a true, fully circular business model, where PET is an infinite resource that is recycled and reused again and again.” (https://www.directpackinc.com/50m-lbs-milestone-of-recycled-pet/) A blog posted by Direct Pack on January 31, 2021, stated the following: In 2021, Direct Pack, Inc. and its BOTTLEBOX® brand had another record year in using post-consumer recycled PET material: saving 46.9 million pounds of plastic from ending up in landfills and the ocean and making its way into our products. That is equivalent to using over 2 billion recycled beverage bottles in just one year… Since 2011 when we started measuring our rPET usage, we have used the equivalent of 9.8 billion recycled bottles, which is the same as saving 305 million pounds of CO2 from Item B Attachment A - GWPA Traceability Report - 2023        Item B: Staff Report Pg. 26  Packet Pg. 346 of 413  Initial Review of Certificate of End Use & Traceability Data, 2023 the atmosphere. In other terms, it means saving energy enough to power 24,114 households or taking 29,357 cars off the road for a year. (https://www.directpackinc.com/2021-another-record-year-of-recycled-pet/) A blog posted by Direct Pack on October 26, 2020, stated the following about its manufacturing facility in Mexico: “In its second official American Institute of Baking (AIB) Audit, Direct Pack’s manufacturing facility in Guadalajara scored an outstanding 905 points. The Guadalajara Team’s success is reflective of our outstanding team work…” (https://www.directpackinc.com/direct-pack-mexico-receives-an-outstanding-2020-aib-audit-performance/) Item B Attachment A - GWPA Traceability Report - 2023        Item B: Staff Report Pg. 27  Packet Pg. 347 of 413  Initial Review of Certificate of End Use & Traceability Data, 2023 Envision Plastics (Chino, CA) Envision Plastics is a leading recycler of HDPE plastics and supplier of Post-Consumer Resin (PCR). Envision purchases HDPE from GWR and washes, chips, and pelletizes the material. Envision lists six different products that it creates from recovered plastic: Ecoprime®, Natural Color, Mixed Color, Oceanbound Plastic, Prisma®, and Deodorized. The following is a diagram showing which U.S. states the HDPE purchased by Envision Plastics is sent to. Envision Plastics is headquartered in Reidsville, North Carolina and has a West Coast plant in Chino, California. Envision’s parent company, Altium Packaging (previously Consolidated Container Company) includes “Act with Integrity and in Compliance” as one of its core values. (https://altiumpkg.com/why-altium/our- guiding-principles/) An internet search resulted in a pertinent article posted on June 27, 2023: Envision adding second line for recycled HDPE, PP Envision Plastics is leaning into demand for PCR and putting millions of dollars into adding another recycled food-grade HDPE and PP processing line at an existing facility. The expansion at Envision’s Reidsville, N.C. plant gives the company flexibility to switch between producing its HDPE, dubbed “EcoPrime,” and post-consumer PP. The additional production line will increase Envision’s capacity to produce EcoPrime by 50%... There is another facility in Chino, Calif., that produces EcoPrime. Envision’s current combined capacity is about 55 million pounds of EcoPrime annually. The second line in North Carolina will add another between 25 million and 30 million pounds annually... EcoPrime is FDA-authorized, curbside collected, recycled HDPE resin that, even in 100% PCR containers, is fit for direct contact with food and beverages, a press release noted. It has earned letters of no-objection from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and Health Canada, so it can be used in a wide range of applications including rigid bottles, caps and closures, and blown film, for industries such as dairy, water, cosmetics and nutraceuticals. (https://resource-recycling.com/plastics/2023/06/27/envision-adding-second-line-for-recycled-hdpe-pp/) A March 6, 2023 article detailed Envision Plastic’s recent EcoVadis award: Envision Plastics Receives EcoVadis Silver Award for Sustainability Envision Plastics, a leading producer of mechanically recycled High Density Polyethylene and Polypropylene Post-Consumer Resin (HDPE and PP PCR) products in North America, announced today that it earned a silver recognition medal from EcoVadis for its sustainability efforts. Envision’s ranking puts them within the top 20% of those participating in the assessment and indicates their ongoing commitment to sustainability, with an emphasis on environmental policies, carbon footprint, labor, and safety laws. It also shows an increase in the company’s rating from last year. (https://www.prweb.com/releases/2023/03/prweb19202224.htm) HDPE Chino, CA & Reidsville, NC Item B Attachment A - GWPA Traceability Report - 2023        Item B: Staff Report Pg. 28  Packet Pg. 348 of 413  Initial Review of Certificate of End Use & Traceability Data, 2023 Finally, Envison Plastics OceanBound Plastic recycling program aims to remove 10 million pounds of plastic before it enters the ocean at “At Risk Zones” defined by areas within 50km of coastline, with a focus on communities lacking formal waste collection. According to their FAQ webpage on the program, Envision Plastics works with partners “to professionalize the collection stream, collect this plastic, and manufacture it into usable products.” (https://envisionplastics.com/oceanbound-plastic/) Item B Attachment A - GWPA Traceability Report - 2023        Item B: Staff Report Pg. 29  Packet Pg. 349 of 413  1 Initial Review of Certificate of End Use & Traceability Data, 2024 Initial Review of Certificate of End Use & Traceability Data, 2024 February 1, 2025 Contact: Eric Cissna, General Manager eric.cissna@greenwaste.com 650-798-5994 2765 Lafayette St. Santa Clara, CA 95050 Item B Attachment B - GWPA Traceability Report - 2024        Item B: Staff Report Pg. 30  Packet Pg. 350 of 413  Initial Review of Certificate of End Use & Traceability Data, 2024 Table of Contents Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................... 2 Background & Expectations ....................................................................................................... 3 Barriers and Challenges ............................................................................................................ 4 Domestic Markets ...................................................................................................................... 5 Summary ................................................................................................................................... 7 CellMark Inc. (Novato, CA) ................................................................................................... 12 Berg Mill Supply/Classic Fibres (Los Angeles, CA) .............................................................. 16 Fibre Trade Inc. (Burlingame, CA) ........................................................................................ 17 Newport CH International (Orange, CA) ............................................................................... 18 Direct Pack Recycling (Azusa, CA) ...................................................................................... 19 Envision Plastics (Chino, CA) ............................................................................................... 21 Item B Attachment B - GWPA Traceability Report - 2024        Item B: Staff Report Pg. 31  Packet Pg. 351 of 413  Initial Review of Certificate of End Use & Traceability Data, 2024 Background & Expectations GreenWaste of Palo Alto, LLC and GreenWaste Recovery, LLC GreenWaste of Palo Alto, LLC (GWPA) is the City of Palo Alto’s (City) contracted solid waste, recyclable materials, and compostable materials collection and processing contractor. The agreement between GWPA and the City (GWPA Agreement) commenced in October 2008, was amended and restated in June 2015, and again amended and restated in January 2019, with the term extended through June 30, 2026. Under the GWPA Agreement, GWPA collects recyclable materials, compostable materials, and solid waste from City residents and commercial businesses. Recyclable materials are transported to the GreenWaste San Jose Material Recovery Facility (MRF), where they are processed for recovery. At the MRF, comingled recyclables are processed to remove contamination and separated by material type (e.g., paper, cardboard, plastic, metal, etc.). The MRF then sells the separated recovered materials to brokers and/or secondary processors for further recycling. Compostable materials are transported to the GreenWaste Renewable Energy Digestion Facility, where they undergo anaerobic digestion to produce renewable energy and a feedstock for compost. Effective January 1, 2022, following a City procurement process, GWPA began transporting municipal solid waste (MSW) to the MRF for processing under the Solid Waste Processing and Disposal Services Agreement (MSW Processing Agreement). This material is processed at the MRF to recover both compostable and recyclable materials. The materials managed by the GWPA Agreement and the MSW Processing Agreement are disparate. GWPA collects approximately 15,600 tons of recyclable material annually for processing at the MRF. Additionally, approximately 828 tons of recyclables were recovered from the City’s MSW stream in Fiscal Year 2024, representing 5.5% of the overall solid waste stream. Goals of Report to City At the end of 2018, Palo Alto City Council gave City staff direction to report on the intermediate and final disposition of Palo Alto’s recovered paper and plastic. City staff and GWPA agreed that as a goal, GWPA would attempt to gather information on the environmental and social implications associated with the full life cycle of Palo Alto Recyclable Materials. The expectation of the new Attachment to the Agreement, “Environmental and Social Impacts of Processing Recyclable Materials”, was that GWPA would request information from the “primary purchasers” of Palo Alto’s recyclable materials and then conduct a desk study based on the provided information. According to the City of Palo Alto’s May 24, 2021 report to City Council (Staff Report #11632), the ultimate goal of this analysis is to add transparency and greater accounting of the recycling markets that GreenWaste uses for Palo Alto’s recyclables. Additionally, this information is to be used to guide City staff in utilizing domestic markets for Palo Alto’s recyclables, where feasible. The first GWPA Traceability Report under this new agreement was published in 2019. Subsequent reports have been published annually since then. Targeted Recyclables for Traceability GWPA collects an assortment of recyclables, including cardboard, paper, plastics, metal, and glass from Palo Alto residents and businesses via their blue recycling containers. Some of these materials, such as Item B Attachment B - GWPA Traceability Report - 2024        Item B: Staff Report Pg. 32  Packet Pg. 352 of 413  Initial Review of Certificate of End Use & Traceability Data, 2024 metal, have historically maintained strong domestic recycling markets, whereas others, such as mixed paper and plastics, have historically had very limited domestic recycling options. For that reason, the materials targeted for traceability in this report include plastics #1 - #7, which include PET, HPDE, rigid plastics, and film plastics, mixed paper, and cardboard. Barriers and Challenges Market Upheaval In 2017, the Chinese government implemented a program called “National Sword”, which banned the import of 24 recyclable materials, including cardboard, mixed paper, and low grade plastics into the country to reduce pollution associated with these materials (https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/Docs/Web/113400). At the time, the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) summarized the ramifications of this ban on California’s recycling system: “The export of baled recyclable materials has been a key component of California's recycling infrastructure. Currently, CalRecycle estimates that California exports a third of all recyclable material generated in the state annually to foreign markets; of that, 62 percent goes to China. This movement of materials has been critical in assisting the state and local jurisdictions in reaching their recycling and diversion goals. However, recent changes to China's policies on imported recyclable materials, which set strict new limits and contamination standards, are impacting cities and counties in California” This ban led cities and states across the U.S. to search for and utilize alternative recycling markets, including in Malaysia, India, South Korea, Thailand, Taiwan, Indonesia, and Vietnam. Commodities Markets & Trade Secrets GreenWaste Recovery, LLC (GWR) is the City’s recyclables processor and markets its recyclable commodities to brokers and/or secondary processors. As the marketers of their own recyclable commodities, GWR has borne witness to how inconsistent and unpredictable commodities markets can be. Once the material is sold, it may change hands many times or undergo further processing before reaching its ultimate destination, making the full life cycle of commodities extremely difficult to track. Brokers may have incomplete information regarding the final destination of materials, may be unwilling to share information due to confidentiality concerns, or may be unable to place requirements on their customers. Information on commodity markets, pricing, buyers, and other information pertaining to commodity sales transactions constitute confidential and proprietary corporate Trade Secrets. This information is not public knowledge or general knowledge and maintains intrinsic value by being safeguarded from disclosure. GWR and its brokers stand to be harmed by the disclosure of Trade Secrets as follows: • Losing markets for specific materials (e.g., plastic clamshells or film plastics), • Losing in-state markets and only having available domestic or international markets, • Losing domestic markets and only having available international markets, or • Jeopardizing relationships with buyers, with the potential to lose business. Item B Attachment B - GWPA Traceability Report - 2024        Item B: Staff Report Pg. 33  Packet Pg. 353 of 413  Initial Review of Certificate of End Use & Traceability Data, 2024 Limited Domestic Markets While recycling operations across North America have been adding processing capacity, domestic innovation continues to be far from providing sufficient capacity for all recycled materials generated in the U.S. This is especially true in California, where inefficient permitting processes and bureaucratic delays can make permitting new recycling facilities, such as pulp and paper plants, lengthy and challenging. The permitting process for building in-state recycling infrastructure will need to be streamlined and consolidated to meet the increasing demand for these facilities. Cost The domestic recycling markets that do exist come at a significant increase in cost for certain material types, such as mixed paper. For example, while international markets and brokers buy mixed paper from GWR, GWR must pay domestic markets to recycle that same mixed paper, which is being done for Palo Alto. As domestic recycling capacity increases, the cost of recycling materials within the U.S. may decrease, however, the demand for domestic recycling markets may continue to outpace the available capacity, continuing to escalate cost. Domestic Markets GWPA worked with GWR to identify and secure capacity with existing domestic processors of cardboard, mixed paper, and plastic to provide greater assurances regarding the traceability of the City’s recyclable materials and to ensure that processing adheres to U.S. environmental standards. Domestic markets are generally more expensive and competitive than international markets and securing space with these processors can be a challenge due to limited capacity. To confront this challenge, City staff and GWPA developed a three-month pilot program between April and June 2022 to take 100% of Palo Alto’s mixed paper and mixed rigid plastics to processing facilities within the United States. Mixed paper is comprised of various types of clean and dry paper that is collected from residents and businesses in Palo Alto such as colored paper, magazines, junk mail, envelopes, and paper bags. Mixed rigid plastic is primarily comprised of plastic items including buckets, toys, and milk crates. During the pilot, mixed paper was sent to a pulp and paper mill in northern Louisiana, while mixed rigid plastic was sent to a processing facility in southern California. In June 2022, City Council approved this program to continue in Fiscal Year 2023 and onward with the goal to keep roughly 60% of the recyclable materials in the United States to be processed, reducing the amount to be exported to about 40% with only cardboard and PET plastic clamshells being processed internationally. Cardboard was not originally selected as a material to be kept domestically since it is high quality, contains low contaminants, was desired by processing facilities, and had consistent market demand to be recycled. Additionally, the added cost of recycling cardboard domestically had historically proven to be prohibitive. PET plastic clamshells were not selected to be kept domestically because there were no viable domestic markets available for this material. While PET plastic clamshells are processed internationally, they are still being processed within North America at a recycling facility in Mexico. In early summer 2024, GWR identified and presented a domestic cardboard market located in Washington state to the City. The City approved the use of this domestic market for approximately 313 tons of cardboard in June 2024 and at the time of this report, GWR is currently utilizing this market for Palo Alto’s cardboard. In Fiscal Year 2024, approximately 3,201 tons of Palo Alto’s mixed paper were processed and recycled within the United States at the same northern Louisiana facility utilized during the pilot program. Item B Attachment B - GWPA Traceability Report - 2024        Item B: Staff Report Pg. 34  Packet Pg. 354 of 413  Initial Review of Certificate of End Use & Traceability Data, 2024 Additionally, approximately 136 tons of mixed rigid plastic were processed and recycled at a domestic facility in St. Louis, Missouri. Explored the Hefty® ReNew™ Program In July 2024, GWPA presented the City with an opportunity to participate in Hefty® ReNew™ Program. The program “establishes a way to collect otherwise hard-to-recycle plastics at curbside and uses them as valued resources.” (https://www.hefty.com/products/hefty-renew). These hard-to-recycle plastics include common items like snack and candy wrappers and foam packaging materials. Hefty® utilizes 100% domestic recycling markets for these materials and recycles them into such items as building and drainage materials and composite wood products. There are currently 9 major U.S. cities enrolled in this program including Tucson, AZ, Boise, ID, and Atlanta, GA. In the Bay Area, there are currently 3 cities in GreenWaste service areas enrolled in this program, which are Atherton, Woodside, and Los Altos Hills. This program would require interested residents and businesses in Palo Alto to voluntarily purchase the orange Hefty® ReNew™ bags, sort their hard-to-recycle plastics to fill the orange bags, and place them inside the regular City-issued blue recycling containers. Then, the GWR MRF would extract these bags and send them to Hefty® for recycling domestically. City staff determined that this new program is not feasible for the community at this time. This program would require participants to separate their waste into a fourth sort, increase the generation and usage of plastic bags, incur increased costs for the participants to purchase additional plastic trash bags, and increase the chances of these hard-to-recycled plastics to contaminate the existing remarkably clean recyclables from Palo Alto. GWR remains committed to exploring new recycling opportunities and technologies to further divert material from the landfill and decrease environmental and social impacts, in furtherance of Palo Alto’s goal of zero waste. Item B Attachment B - GWPA Traceability Report - 2024        Item B: Staff Report Pg. 35  Packet Pg. 355 of 413  Initial Review of Certificate of End Use & Traceability Data, 2024 Summary GWR and GWPA staff worked in coordination to obtain supplementary marketing, processing, and disposal information from GWR’s primary recyclable commodity purchasers. The following tables summarize all the recyclable materials collected at the MRF and their end market destinations. Table 1 summarizes the recyclable materials collected at the MRF from Palo Alto and other cities, materials sorted by commodity types, and the percentage of domestic vs. international markets utilized. The same analysis for Palo Alto’s portion is estimated and summarized in Table 2. Table 3 summarizes the list of GWR’s primary purchasers for plastics and fiber (paper and cardboard) and the locations of secondary processing (if applicable) or final destinations of the materials. Item B Attachment B - GWPA Traceability Report - 2024        Item B: Staff Report Pg. 36  Packet Pg. 356 of 413  Initial Review of Certificate of End Use & Traceability Data, 2024 Table 1: GreenWaste Recovery San Jose Material Recovery Facility Tonnage Summary - Facility Wide Material Type FY 2024 Actual Percentage of Total Domestic International Aluminum Cans 1,815.98 1.17% 100% 0% Aluminum Foil/Scrap 639.99 0.41% 92% 8% Ferrous/Tin 3,817.94 2.45% 100% 0% Glass, Commingled 36,089.17 23.16% 100% 0% Plastic, HDPE Color 1,951.25 1.25% 86% 14% Plastic, 1,560.75 1.00% 86% 14% Plastic, PET Bottles 4,545.92 2.92% 69% 31% Plastic, PET 1,085.28 0.70% 0% 100% Plastic, Mixed Rigid 2,725.09 1.75% 11% 89% Plastic, #2 - #7 1,517.09 0.97% 11% 89% Film Plastics 361.49 0.23% 93% 7% Mixed Paper 19,060.84 12.23% 19% 81% Cardboard 71,491.25 45.88% 3% 97% Scrap Metal 9,027.32 5.79% 100% 0% E-Waste 129.90 0.08% 100% 0% Total 155,819.26 100% 41%1 59%1 1 Weighted Average Item B Attachment B - GWPA Traceability Report - 2024        Item B: Staff Report Pg. 37  Packet Pg. 357 of 413  Initial Review of Certificate of End Use & Traceability Data, 2024 Palo Alto Only Tonnage Estimated Summary Determining Palo Alto’s tonnage for each recyclable material category presents a challenge because once Palo Alto’s recyclables are delivered to the MRF, they are combined with recyclables from other communities. Table 2 below provides an estimate of Palo Alto’s share of the total recyclable material processed by the MRF. In Fiscal Year 2024, Palo Alto’s recyclables made up 10% of the MRF’s total material, or 15,575.64 tons. This percentage was used in Table 2 to estimate Palo Alto’s tonnage for each material type, based on the facility-wide data from the MRF. Item B Attachment B - GWPA Traceability Report - 2024        Item B: Staff Report Pg. 38  Packet Pg. 358 of 413  Initial Review of Certificate of End Use & Traceability Data, 2024 Table 2: Palo Alto’s Estimated Tonnage as a Percentage of MRF’s Total Material Type FY 2024 Palo Alto Estimated Tonnage (est. 10% of MRF) Domestic Export Aluminum Cans 181.52 100% 0% Aluminum Foil/Scrap 63.97 100% 0% Ferrous/Tin 381.64 100% 0% Glass, Commingled 3,607.46 100% 0% Plastic HDPE Color 195.05 100% 0% Plastic, HDPE Natural 156.01 100% 0% Plastic, PET Bottles 454.41 100% 0% Plastic, PET Clamshells1 108.48 0% 100%1 Plastic, Mixed Rigid 272.40 100% 0% Plastic, #2 - # 7 151.65 100% 0% Film Plastic 36.13 100% 0% Mixed Paper 1,905.32 100% 0% Cardboard 7,146.24 10% 90% Scrap Metal 902.37 100% 0% E-Waste 12.98 100% 0% Total 15,575.64 58%2 42%2 1 The market for plastic PET clamshells is in North America (Mexicali, Mexico). 2 Weighted Average Item B Attachment B - GWPA Traceability Report - 2024        Item B: Staff Report Pg. 39  Packet Pg. 359 of 413  11 Initial Review of Certificate of End Use & Traceability Data, 2024 Table 3: Primary Purchaser Summary – Palo Alto’s Plastics & Fiber Material Company Domestic? International? Export Status Market Location Mixed Paper CellMark Yes No Domestic: 100% Cardboard CellMark, Berg Mill, Fibre Trade, Newport CH International Yes Yes Domestic: 10% International: 90% Longview, Washington; Mexico; Southeast Asia Direct Pack No Yes International: 100% Mexicali, Mexico HDPE Yes No Domestic: 100% CellMark Yes No Domestic: 100% St. Louis, Missouri CellMark Yes No Domestic: 100% Chino Hills, California Item B Attachment B - GWPA Traceability Report - 2024        Item B: Staff Report Pg. 40  Packet Pg. 360 of 413  12 Initial Review of Certificate of End Use & Traceability Data, 2024 CellMark Inc. (Novato, CA) In Fiscal Year 2024, CellMark purchased 90% of Palo Alto’s cardboard, paper, and plastics because it primarily utilizes domestic markets for these recyclables. CellMark submitted partial traceability data for the cardboard, mixed paper, PET, mixed plastics, and film plastics it purchased from GWR. CellMark is both a brokerage and a secondary processor, and its purchasers are secondary processors. For plastic, the secondary processing includes chipping, washing, and pelletizing. For cardboard and paper, the secondary processing includes pulpifying. Per the CellMark website, CellMark participates in initiatives to ensure sustainability. CellMark comments on its sustainability via its CSR webpages (https://www.cellmark.com/ideas-values/sustainability-csr/): “CellMark is proud to conduct our services and business activities with a high degree of ethics and awareness of sustainability. We adhere to defined common standards for our performance, participate in multiple initiatives in support of sustainability and continually look for ways to improve our performance.” “We respect and comply with local legislation and environmental regulations in all of our global operations. We enable our employees to participate in charitable initiatives, and we invite our business partners to join us in our support of different non-profit organizations locally and globally.” “CellMark is a member of the National Association of Chemical Distributors (NACD) and as such is committed to product stewardship and responsible distribution in every phase of chemical storage, handling, transportation and disposal.” CellMark’s 2023 Sustainability Report, published in May 2024, states that: “CellMark supports and works actively to comply with international guidelines regarding environment, human rights, and business ethics, including • The UN Global Compact Initiative. • Internationally proclaimed human rights standards and conventions (in particular the International Bill of Human Rights, the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, the eight core conventions of the International Labour Organization, and Article 32 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child). • The OECD Convention on combating bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions. • The OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises.” Item B Attachment B - GWPA Traceability Report - 2024        Item B: Staff Report Pg. 41  Packet Pg. 361 of 413  Initial Review of Certificate of End Use & Traceability Data, 2024 In 2023 and in response to Canadian Bill S-211 Forced Labour and Child Labour in Supply Chains Act, CellMark provided the following statements on their human rights and environmental due diligence efforts (https://www.cellmark.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/CellMark-AB-2023-Canada-Forced-labor-and- child-labor-in-supply-chains-statement.pdf): “CellMark’s main commitments can be summarized as follows: • As a principle, we comply with the laws and regulations that apply in the countries in which we operate. • We care about our business partners. Our success relies on long-term relationships with our customers, suppliers, and service providers, founded on trust. • We care about our employees. As CellMark's success relies also on the unique knowledge and experience of its employees, the Group strives to preserve good working conditions for all. • We apply "precautionary principles". We take precautions when there are reasons to believe that a potential action may negatively impact a person's health or safety, the society, or the environment. • We are committed to respecting and promoting human rights as well as protecting children's rights. We condemn modern slavery and forced labor. • We encourage employees to express their views and opinions, and raise their concerns regarding unacceptable behavior and actions, without fear of retaliation. In relation to potential environmental and social impacts of CellMark’s business partners, CellMark detailed the following in the same statement: “CellMark’s Code of Conduct for Business Partners sets out CellMark's expectations toward its business partners in the fields of business ethics, environment, and human rights & working conditions. The Code of Conduct for Business Partners builds on, and reiterates, CellMark's commitment to comply and work actively with the above mentioned international guidelines regarding environment, human rights and business ethics (see section on the Code of Conduct).” CellMark also outlined its Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Policy: “In addition to its Code of Conduct, the Group has implemented a Corporate Social Responsibility Policy that includes a set of principles for procurement activities so as to assess and consider potential human rights risks across the supply chain. This includes that the sourcing of new commodity suppliers should include: • due diligence efforts to ensure that the products sourced in relation to their business with CellMark do not contribute, or is not directly linked, to human rights abuses. • Written undertaking from the supplier that it will comply with CellMark' s Code of Conduct for Business Partners which prohibits forced or child labor and promotes decent working conditions. The Corporate Social Responsibility Policy further sets out that a supplier may be terminated if: • it refuses to perform an audit or refuses to provide a letter of assurance or any other type of integrity undertaking • the monitoring of the business partner reveals non-compliance with applicable laws or with the Code of Conduct for Business Partners.” The following is a diagram showing which U.S. cities and states the cardboard, paper, and plastics purchased by CellMark are sent to. Item B Attachment B - GWPA Traceability Report - 2024        Item B: Staff Report Pg. 42  Packet Pg. 362 of 413  Initial Review of Certificate of End Use & Traceability Data, 2024 A May 6, 2024 article detailed CellMark’s recent EcoVadis award: CellMark awarded EcoVadis Gold Rating for 2024 “CellMark has received a Gold Rating for our sustainability performance from the independent rating organization EcoVadis. This means we rank among the top 5% of companies assessed in our business category by EcoVadis in the past 12 months.” (https://www.cellmark.com/2024/05/06/cellmark-awarded-ecovadis-gold-rating-for-2024) CellMark’s 2023 Sustainability Report confirmed that the Total Fiber Recovery facility is almost operational: Cardboard Longview, WA Mixed Paper Shreveport, LA PET Riverside, CA Mixed Rigid Plastic St. Louis, MO Mixed Plastic #2 -#7 Chino Hills, CA Film Plastic Chino Hills, CA Item B Attachment B - GWPA Traceability Report - 2024        Item B: Staff Report Pg. 43  Packet Pg. 363 of 413  Initial Review of Certificate of End Use & Traceability Data, 2024 CellMark: Significant events in 2023 “In line with the partnership agreement signed with Total Fiber Recovery in 2022, the Group focused on the building of an 80 million USD recycled pulp production facility in the city of Chesapeake, Virginia, USA. The new facility and joint venture (of which CellMark owns 50 percent percent) are both called Total Fiber Recovery @ Chesapeake. Initially planned to be operational in Q4, 2023, the facility is now planned to open in 2024. CellMark Recycling will supply 300 000 tons of mixed paper and old corrugated containers, annually, as feedstock to the facility. The recycled brown pulp produced by the facility will be sold exclusively by CellMark Pulp.” (https://www.cellmark.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/CellMark-Sustainability-Report-2023.pdf) CellMark’s 2022 Sustainability Report provided an update on its Total Fiber Recovery facility: CellMark: Significant events in 2022 “CellMark entered into a partnership with Total Fiber Recovery to build an 80 million USD recycled pulp production facility in the city of Chesapeake, Virginia, USA. The new facility and joint venture are both called Total Fiber Recovery @ Chesapeake (or TFRC) and should be operational in Q4, 2023. CellMark Recycling will supply 300 000 tons of mixed paper and old corrugated containers, annually, as feedstock to the facility. The recycled brown pulp produced by the facility will be sold exclusively by CellMark Pulp.” (https://www.cellmark.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/CellMark-Sustainability-Report-2022.pdf) Item B Attachment B - GWPA Traceability Report - 2024        Item B: Staff Report Pg. 44  Packet Pg. 364 of 413  Initial Review of Certificate of End Use & Traceability Data, 2024 Berg Mill Supply/Classic Fibres (Los Angeles, CA) Berg Mill submitted partial traceability data for a portion of Palo Alto’s cardboard, PET, and HDPE it purchased from GWR in Fiscal Year 2024. Berg Mill Supply is a brokerage and provides general data on its website about the destination of its exports. Per the Berg Mill Supply website: (https://bergmill.com/about/where-berg-mill-ships/) “Our mission statement and vision is our belief in contributing to a sustainable planet, leading us on our path of environmental management for future generations. Berg Mill’s purpose is to create value by offering green solutions to those generating waste and to consumers looking to recycle.” “Berg Mill Supply Co., Inc. redirects waste from material recovery facilities (MRF) in the United States to end users in international locations, where the material is processed and a new material is produced.” “We sell material suitable for many different countries abroad such as China, Indonesia, Korea, Vietnam, Thailand, India, Myanmar, Malaysi,a Pakistan, Laos, Costa Rica, Brazil, and USA.” The following is a diagram showing the locations of where cardboard and plastics purchased by Berg Mill are sent to. The following is a diagram showing which countries the cardboard purchased by Berg Mill is sent to. Both the PET and HDPE Berg Mill purchases from GWR are sent to recycling facilities within the U.S. that adhere to local, state, and federal environmental standards. Cardboard Did not provide PET California HDPE Alabama Item B Attachment B - GWPA Traceability Report - 2024        Item B: Staff Report Pg. 45  Packet Pg. 365 of 413  Initial Review of Certificate of End Use & Traceability Data, 2024 Fibre Trade Inc. (Burlingame, CA) Fibre Trade did not provide any information on the small portion of cardboard it purchased from GWR in Fiscal Year 2024. The latest report was from 2021 indicating its end markets for cardboard were in the United States, Mexico, and Southeast Asia. Fibre Trade is a brokerage. Per its website, Fibre Trade is a direct exporter of primarily recovered paper, pulp, and mineral products from the USA, Europe, Australia, New Zealand, and Japan to affiliated paper mills all over the world. (https://www.fibretrade.net/) Item B Attachment B - GWPA Traceability Report - 2024        Item B: Staff Report Pg. 46  Packet Pg. 366 of 413  Initial Review of Certificate of End Use & Traceability Data, 2024 Newport CH International (Orange, CA) Newport CH International did not submit traceability data but did provide basic information about the company. Newport purchased a small portion of Palo Alto’s cardboard from GWR in Fiscal Year 2024. Newport manufactures products and is a brokerage. Per its website, Newport focuses on the purchase and direct export of recyclable paper and plastics. Newport maintains ISO14001 certification, which is the international standard that specifies requirements for an effective environmental management system (EMS). In 2023, the company was ranked by the Journal of Commerce as the #13 top U.S. recyclables exporters. (https://www.joc.com/article/top-100-importerexporter-rankings-biggest-shippers-rise-down- year_20240520.html) The following statements are made on the Newport CH International website. “Our expertise is sourcing recyclable paper and plastics throughout North America. We are direct export shippers for the recycling industry, supplying numerous mills in China, as well as many other Asian countries. We provide quality raw material for their state of the art mills and manufacturing facilities. Our overseas customers have the assurance of consistent supply and quality. Newport CH handles all logistics in-house, including shipping line rate negotiations, bookings and local drayage assistance. We take care of all required export documentation and banking transactions from our corporate office in Orange, California. To facilitate our exports to China we are AQSIQ certified and are an approved CCIC self-inspection company. In addition, we hold ISO 9001 and ISO 14001 certifications for our global quality management system, demonstrating our organizations continued commitment to quality. Newport CH strives to encourage growth in the recycling industry by being supportive and involved with numerous state and local government agencies. Through our office in Shanghai, China we are able to work directly with the mill buyers in order to meet their requirements. We are in constant communication with our Shanghai office to stay apprised of any market changes or concerns with material arriving into China.” (http://newportch.com/) Item B Attachment B - GWPA Traceability Report - 2024        Item B: Staff Report Pg. 47  Packet Pg. 367 of 413  Initial Review of Certificate of End Use & Traceability Data, 2024 Direct Pack Recycling (Azusa, CA) Direct Pack Recycling is the primary purchaser of Palo Alto’s PET clamshells. PET Clamshells are thermoformed plastic packaging, typically used for food packaging. Examples include plastic salad containers, take out containers, and fruit containers. Per its website, Direct Pack is a leader in sustainable and innovative thermoformed food packaging recycling and manufacturing. “We operate our own recycling and reclaiming facility. With capacity to recycle 20,000 tons of PET plastic per year, it allows us to move closer to a full circle manufacturing process.” “In our full circle process, we use post-consumer recycled PET bottles and thermoformed packaging to make new food containers. At Direct Pack Recycling we sort, wash and flake recycled PET material that then goes to one of our thermoforming facilities to be turned into new strawberry, lettuce, salad or take-out containers. After use, our containers can be recycled again – they are not garbage, but a valuable infinite resource. “Since 2020, Direct Pack Recycling has recycled over 74.4 million pounds of plastics – not only bottles but also mixed thermoformed PET containers – and repurposed them back into new packaging.” (https://www.directpackinc.com/about-us/) The following is a diagram showing which countries the PET clamshells purchased by Direct Pack Recycling are sent to. An article posted on November 5, 2024, stated the following: Direct Pack Plants Achieve BRCGS Certification “Recently, we achieved a new milestone: both our manufacturing plants in Mexico—Direct Pack de México (DPM) and Direct Pack Baja (DPB)—have been awarded the BRCGS Packaging Materials Certification. This recognition highlights our commitment to producing safe, high-quality packaging that meets the highest global standards, benefitting both our customers and the environment. The BRCGS Packaging Materials Certification is a globally recognized standard for safety, quality, and compliance across the packaging supply chain, developed by the British Retail Consortium Global Standards. It provides a framework for packaging manufacturers to produce safe, reliable materials and meet customers’ expectations for quality and regulatory compliance. Both facilities received an ‘A’ grade under the standard criteria developed by BRCGS.” Item B Attachment B - GWPA Traceability Report - 2024        Item B: Staff Report Pg. 48  Packet Pg. 368 of 413  Initial Review of Certificate of End Use & Traceability Data, 2024 An internet search resulted in a pertinent article published in WasteDive on February 10, 2023: Direct Pack gets Recycling Partnership grant for PET thermoform recycling in Mexico “The Recycling Partnership recently awarded Direct Pack, a manufacturer and recycler of thermoformed PET packaging, a grant supporting construction of a PET reclamation operation in Mexicali, Mexico, that will source material from U.S. MRFs to produce recycled content for new packaging. Direct Pack’s project in Mexicali is its second PET reclamation facility in the area, which the company expects will produce an additional 15,000 tons of recycled content for new packaging. A spokesperson said this second facility will have ‘significant added space for PET bale storage,’ as well as new equipment on the wash line that was developed by the company and will be used in its other facilities. Construction of the new facility is said to be ‘near complete’ and testing is underway. Snedden added in Direct Pack’s press release that the grant money allows the company ‘to scale our recycling operations more quickly, and take in even more PET plastic from MRFs, keeping it out of landfills.’” (https://www.wastedive.com/news/pet-recycling-direct-pack-phoenix/642246/) Item B Attachment B - GWPA Traceability Report - 2024        Item B: Staff Report Pg. 49  Packet Pg. 369 of 413  Initial Review of Certificate of End Use & Traceability Data, 2024 Envision Plastics (Chino, CA) Envision Plastics is a leading recycler of HDPE plastics and supplier of Post-Consumer Resin (PCR). Envision purchases HDPE from GWR and washes, chips, and pelletizes the material. Envision lists six different products that it creates from recovered plastic: Ecoprime®, Natural Color, Mixed Color, Oceanbound Plastic, Prisma®, and Deodorized. The following is a diagram showing the destination of HDPE purchased by Envision Plastics. Envision Plastics is headquartered in Reidsville, North Carolina and has a west coast plant in Chino, California. Envision’s parent company, Altium Packaging (previously Consolidated Container Company) includes “Act with Integrity and in Compliance” as one of its core values. (https://altiumpkg.com/why- altium/our-guiding-principles/) An internet search resulted in a pertinent article posted on June 27, 2023: Envision adding second line for recycled HDPE, PP Envision Plastics is leaning into demand for PCR and putting millions of dollars into adding another recycled food-grade HDPE and PP processing line at an existing facility. The expansion at Envision’s Reidsville, N.C. plant gives the company flexibility to switch between producing its HDPE, dubbed “EcoPrime,” and post-consumer PP. The additional production line will increase Envision’s capacity to produce EcoPrime by 50%... There is another facility in Chino, Calif., that produces EcoPrime. Envision’s current combined capacity is about 55 million pounds of EcoPrime annually. The second line in North Carolina will add another between 25 million and 30 million pounds annually... EcoPrime is FDA-authorized, curbside collected, recycled HDPE resin that, even in 100% PCR containers, is fit for direct contact with food and beverages, a press release noted. It has earned letters of no-objection from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and Health Canada, so it can be used in a wide range of applications including rigid bottles, caps and closures, and blown film, for industries such as dairy, water, cosmetics and nutraceuticals. (https://resource-recycling.com/plastics/2023/06/27/envision-adding-second-line-for-recycled- hdpe-pp/) A March 6, 2023, article detailed Envision Plastic’s recent EcoVadis award: Envision Plastics Receives EcoVadis Silver Award for Sustainability Envision Plastics, a leading producer of mechanically recycled High Density Polyethylene and Polypropylene Post-Consumer Resin (HDPE and PP PCR) products in North America, announced today that it earned a silver recognition medal from EcoVadis for its sustainability efforts. Envision’s ranking puts them within the top 20% of those participating in the assessment and indicates their ongoing commitment to sustainability, with an emphasis on environmental policies, carbon footprint, labor, and safety laws. It also shows an increase in the company’s rating from last year. HDPE Chino, CA Item B Attachment B - GWPA Traceability Report - 2024        Item B: Staff Report Pg. 50  Packet Pg. 370 of 413  Initial Review of Certificate of End Use & Traceability Data, 2024 (https://www.prweb.com/releases/2023/03/prweb19202224.htm) Finally, Envison Plastic’s OceanBound Plastic recycling program aims to remove 10 million pounds of plastic before it enters the ocean at “At Risk Zones” defined by areas within 50km of coastline, with a focus on communities lacking formal waste collection. According to their FAQ webpage on the program, Envision Plastics works with partners “to professionalize the collection stream, collect this plastic, and manufacture it into usable products.” (https://envisionplastics.com/oceanbound-plastic/) Item B Attachment B - GWPA Traceability Report - 2024        Item B: Staff Report Pg. 51  Packet Pg. 371 of 413  City Council Staff Report From: City Manager Report Type: INFORMATION REPORTS Lead Department: City Manager Meeting Date: November 3, 2025 Report #:2510-5310 TITLE 2025 Council Priorities and Objectives Q3 Report RECOMMENDATION This is an informational report that provides progress updates on the 2025 Council Priorities and Objectives approved by the City Council on May 5, 2025. No action is needed. BACKGROUND On January 25, 2025, the Council held its annual retreat to approve the 2025 Council Priorities.1 The Priority Setting Guidelines define a priority as a topic that will receive unusual and significant attention during the year. At the conclusion of the retreat, the City Council approved the following priorities: Climate Action and Adaptation, & Natural Environment Protection Economic Development & Retail Vibrancy Implementing Housing Strategies for Social & Economic Balance Public Safety, Wellness & Belonging Over a series of meetings, the Council reviewed the proposed Objectives and on May 5, 2025, Council approved all the 70 Objectives meant to reflect potential Council actions, be measurable and time-bound to make real progress in advancing Council Priorities2. These are summarized in Attachment A of the report. ANALYSIS 1 January 25, 2025 City Council Annual Retreat: https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/Portal/Meeting?meetingTemplateId=15926 2 City Council Meeting, May 5, 2025: https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/Portal/Meeting?meetingTemplateId=16065 Item C Item C Staff Report        Item C: Staff Report Pg. 1  Packet Pg. 372 of 413  Progress on Council Priorities is measured by the accomplishments of its subset objectives and reported on a calendar quarterly basis. Calendar Q3 spans the months July through September 2025. A summary table of all 70 objectives is listed in Attachment A, including an estimated completion date, which is also measured in calendar quarters. A narrative on each objective update is found in Attachment B, it includes: 2025 Milestone- Describes activities and outcomes planned for the calendar year as some projects are multi-year in length and are broken up into phases. Completed - Project as described in the 2025 milestone is overall complete, though some minor/non-substantive follow-up may still be needed. On-Track- Project is expected to be completed as specified. Any changes in project scope or timing due to Council direction or action will remain labeled On Track with the new estimated timeframe. Behind - The project estimated completion date may be delayed due to operational issues, capacity constraints (such as vacancies in staffing), or project has not started by the estimated completion date. Hold/Dropped - Project is not actively in progress or will no longer move forward in the current year. Reasons may include the issue is no longer relevant, operational constraints, or is stalled/dropped due to council direction. Estimated Completion - The calendar quarter in which the objective is expected to be completed. Department Lead - Identifies the lead department and project manager responsible for coordinating progress. Quarterly Update - a brief progress update on the project describes work reflected in the respective calendar quarter. Any delays or project issues will be reflected in this section. Council Priority Completed On Track Behind On Hold/ Dropped Total Climate Action and Adaptation, & Natural Environment Protection 24 Item C Item C Staff Report        Item C: Staff Report Pg. 2  Packet Pg. 373 of 413  Economic Development & Retail Vibrancy 3 4 4 1 12 Implementing Housing Strategies for Social & Economic Balance 6 12 2 0 20 Public Safety, Wellness & Belonging 3 9 2 0 14 Total 18 43 8 1 70 FISCAL/RESOURCE IMPACT Resource impacts for the objectives’ 2025 milestones have mostly been identified and resourced through the FY 2025 and FY 2026 budget processes; however, any changes to scope may result in additional resources needed. Staff will assess any scope changes and bring forward recommendations for additional resources if needed as part of the FY 2026 Mid-Year Budget Review. STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT On May 2025, Council approved the community engagement strategies associated with the 2025 Priorities and Objectives. There are various levels of community engagement and communication strategies to support each project, including internal coordination among City departments. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Council informational report on this item is not a project as defined by CEQA because the Council review of 2025 Priority Objectives is continuing administrative or maintenance activity. CEQA Guidelines section 15378 (b)(2). ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: 2025 Council Priorities and Objectives Q3 Summary Table Attachment B: 2025 Council Priorities and Objectives Q3 Update APPROVED BY: Ed Shikada, City Manager Item C Item C Staff Report        Item C: Staff Report Pg. 3  Packet Pg. 374 of 413  ATTACHMENT A #ED CA IH S PS 1 X Complete construction of initial pilot area of electric grid modernization. Project will increase electrical capacity and reliability in initial pilot area bounded by  Louis, Amarillo, 101, & Embarcadero about 1,200 homes; once completed, staff will continue the grid upgrades to the "Phase 1" area which impacts approx 6,000  homes. (16) X 2 X X Begin construction of the Newell Road Bridge Replacement project. Award of a construction contract for the replacement of Newell Road Bridge in time to begin  construction taking advantage of the 2025 in‐channel construction season. (32) X 3 X X Begin construction of Hamilton Avenue storm drain system capacity upgrades project. Prioritization of the Hamilton Avenue project from the list of 2017 ballot  measure priority projects will increase the ability of the storm drain system to convey water in the event of a San Francisquito Creek overflow. (31) X 4 X Complete implementation of the Reliability and Resiliency Strategic Plan, including Strategy 4 – conducting a cost/benefit analysis of flexible energy resources  such as battery storage and microgrids (including evaluation of the airport microgrid), and Strategy 5 – recommending potential programs for Council  consideration. X 5 X Complete deployment of 65,000 residential Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) meters by end of FY 2025 and begin deployment of commercial AMI  meters. (13) X 6 X Council approval for Phase 2 (full service program) of the Advanced Whole Home Electrification Pilot Program and begin implementation. (19)X 7 X Develop and obtain Council approval for strategies and a 2026/2027 work plan for the next phase of S/CAP implementation of climate and sustainability  goals. X 8 X X Begin development of a Regional Shoreline Adaptation Plan meeting new standards approved by BCDC. Engage with neighboring cities for potential  partnership and review status with the City Council. (33) X 9 X Council consideration of an ordinance implementing updated Stream/Creek Corridor Setback requirements. (34)X ** 10 X Council consideration of an ordinance implementing Bird Safe Glass & Wildlife Light Pollution Protections standards. (35)X * 11 X X Advocate for the San Francisquito Creek Flood Protection capital project (Reach 2) through Council’s JPA representation and any Council approvals involved.  (31) X 12 X Initiate Preliminary Engineering and Environmental Clearance Work for Quarry Road Extension in Partnership with Stanford University, Caltrans, & VTA.X 13 X Develop an updated Regional Water Quality Control Plant Biosolids Facility Plan. Complete initial work to develop plan, including consideration of PFAS  pollutants and the Measure E site, and review with a Council committee in advance of Council acceptance of the plan in late 2025 or early 2026. X 14 X X Council Adoption of the Safe Streets for All (SS4A) Safety Action Plan. Informed by feedback from the Policy & Services Committee, bring forward a Safety Action  Plan providing a roadmap for eliminating traffic deaths and severe injuries through the reduction of vehicle miles traveled enabling staff to seek grant funding for  im lementation. (14 X 15 X X Council Adoption of the 2025 Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Plan (BPTP). Consideration of the Draft BPTP Update, informed by public feedback for City  Council adoption. (15) X 16 X X Refine Grade Separation Design Alternatives per Council Direction and Conduct Outreach to Support Rail Committee Review of Locally Preferred Alternatives.  Review advanced alternatives to minimize right of way impacts and improve traffic circulation, conduct outreach, and develop conceptual plans (15% design) for  each of the three crossings. (30) X 2025 CITY COUNCIL PRIORITIES AND OBJECTIVES Council Priority OBJECTIVES (70 in total) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Climate Action and Adaptation, & Natural Environment Protection (CA) Modernize critical infrastructure for climate resilience Advance citywide and regional climate adaptation and environmental protection strategies Advance active and sustainable transportation Page 1 of 5 Item CAttachment A - 2025Council Priorities andObjectives Q3 SummaryTable       Item C: Staff Report Pg. 4  Packet Pg. 375 of 413  ATTACHMENT A #ED CA IH S PS 2025 CITY COUNCIL PRIORITIES AND OBJECTIVES Council Priority OBJECTIVES (70 in total) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 17 X X Identify locations and design concepts for additional east‐west bicycle and pedestrian crossings of the Caltrain railroad tracks in the southern part of the city. X 18 X Complete E‐Mobility Strategic Plan for Council acceptance. Develop, approve and implement the Plan which reflects feedback on strategies reviewed by the  Council Ad Hoc Climate Protection Committee and its Working Group. (21) X 19 X Propose an updated multifamily EV charger program (EV 2.0) for Council approval. X 20 X Develop and begin implementing a City Facility Electrification Plan. Building on the citywide Facilities Assessment, create a multi‐year plan to begin replacing  fossil fuel use in City buildings in alignment with S/CAP goals, and begin implementing through the Capital Improvement Program. (19) X 21 X X Implement plan for phaseout of leaded fuel at Palo Alto Airport.  With unleaded fuel now available at the airport, implement plan to conduct lead monitoring,  encourage and track use of the fuel, explore potentially subsidizing the cost of unleaded fuel, and develop updated lease requirements to promote unleaded fuel .  (77 X 22 X Share preliminary analysis of strategies for a physical and financial transition of the gas utility to relevant policymakers and stakeholders. Utilize initial subject  matter expert work that developed a minimum future gas grid need for system retirement to analyze alternatives for scaling down the gas distribution system.  (17) X 23 X Present an ordinance to Council enacting the 2026 California Building Standards Code update, including the California Green Building Standards Code; submit  to the California Building Standards Commission for approval. X 24 X Develop an Advanced Commercial Rooftop HVAC Pilot Program proposal and review with the Climate Action and Sustainability Ad Hoc Committee for  recommendation to Council. (20) X 25 X X Council approval of outdoor activation guidelines for California Avenue. Council approval of outdoor activity guidelines informed by continued engagement with  stakeholders on a refined priorities and recommendations and Initiate implementation. (2) X * 26 X Council approval of a final signage plan for California Avenue and funding appropriations. Review the signage plan for California Avenue with the Architectural  Review Board (ARB), incorporate feedback, and seek Council approval to implement the plan. (2) X * 27 X Council approval of a design option for California Ave. Engage stakeholders to refine alternative street designs for California Avenue and present them to Council  for discussion and action, including funding appropriations to pursue a street design. (3) X * 28 X X Propose and implement outdoor activation guidelines for Car‐Free Ramona Street. Initiate implementation of Council approved outdoor activity guidelines  informed by continued engagement with stakeholders on a refined priorities and recommendations. X ** 29 X Council approval of Ramona Street design and funding appropriations. Engage stakeholders to develop design proposals for Car‐Free Ramona Street and  present to Council for necessary funding appropriations to implement initial phase(s). (4) X * 30 X Resume work on new parking structure in Downtown core (Lot D).  Staff will present parking garage design options to City Council for selection. (8)X 31 X X Council approval of funding to continue Downtown cleanliness enhancements and other medium‐term investments. Include necessary proposals and budget  appropriations as part of the development of the FY 2026 Operating Budget to continue enhanced Downtown Cleanliness enhancements and other medium‐term  investments such as a Mobility Hub. X 32 X X Begin feasibility analysis of Assessment District for University Avenue Streetscape. Conduct analysis to determine practicality of an assessment district or  similarly funding strategy as a funding mechanism for capital enhancements to University Avenue Streetscape.  X Activate and enhance key commercial districts Support economic development and retail vibrancy Economic Development & Retail Vibrancy (ED) Promote clean energy and reduce fossil fuel dependence Page 2 of 5 Item CAttachment A - 2025Council Priorities andObjectives Q3 SummaryTable       Item C: Staff Report Pg. 5  Packet Pg. 376 of 413  ATTACHMENT A #ED CA IH S PS 2025 CITY COUNCIL PRIORITIES AND OBJECTIVES Council Priority OBJECTIVES (70 in total) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 33 X Complete build‐out of fiber‐to‐the‐premises (FTTP) pilot Phase 1 with grid modernization. Complete building out of a reliable and high‐speed municipal fiber  service in a pilot area and work to establish internet service provider operations including necessary business tools such rate setting,  billing and operations  so tware to roll out services in the initial build. (9 X ** 34 X Council consideration of an ordinance that expands retail opportunities and promotes retail resiliency. Consider further refinement to retail and retail‐like  definition and explore changes to retail preservation ordinance. (12) ** 35 X Council consideration of an ordinance restoring subjective wireless communication facility regulations. Hold a public hearing on a draft ordinance  implementing the City Council's direction from late 2024 to eliminate objective standards for the placement of wireless antennas within the public right of way on  street li ht or utilit  poles.  X 36 X Refine destination marketing efforts and enhance Palo Alto’s international reputation. Meet with hospitality partners and incubator/accelerators  to assess  willingness to partner with the City on destination marketing efforts and propose next steps, including necessary appropriation actions, to City Council. X 37 X Prepare an ordinance for Council review expanding the housing focus area. Increase housing development potential along El Camino Real and consideration of  an exemption from payment of development impact fees for inclusionary units under certain circumstances, consistent with Housing Element Program 3.4 E. (41) X 38 X Present to Council an ordinance updating the City’s housing incentive program. Increase housing development potential and expand provisions to multi‐family  zoning and other commercial districts in accordance with Housing Element Program 3.4 D. (46) X 39 X Prepare an update to the City's accessory dwelling unit ordinance. Update local implementation regulations to respond to changes in State Law, consistency  with the State Housing and Community Department's 2025 ADU Handbook and address applicable deficiencies identified in HCD's comment letter.   X 40 X X X X Initiate the San Antonio Road Area Plan. Begin data gathering, document review, implementing a community outreach and engagement strategy, check‐in  meetings with appointed and elected officials, and review by the City Council of a community assessment report and receive updated project direction, consistent  with Housin  Element Pro ram 6.6 C. (40   X 41 X Partner with Santa Clara County Housing Authority to achieve construction timeline milestones for the Palo Alto Homekey project (which will provide  transitional housing and services for unhoused residents). (51) X ** 42 X Identify different housing typology options for the one‐acre site near Matadero Creek. Use grant funded technical analysis to consider housing options for a  future affordable housing development on land to be dedicated to the City from the 2023 Sobrato/City Development  Agreement; present findings and receive  direction from Council. X 43 X Prepare the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) 5‐Year Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plan. The Quinquennial update helps jurisdictions to  assess  affordable housing and community development needs and market conditions to make data‐driven, place‐based investment decisions when distributing  federal CDBG grant funds.  X 44 X X Advance affordable housing project on Downtown surface parking lot (Lot T). Enter into an exclusive negotiating agreement with Alta Housing; receive an  updated project concept design & prescreening application for Council review; receive formal planning entitlement application, consistent with Housing Element  Pro ram 1.4 A. (8   X 45 X X Work with the Santa Clara County Housing Authority to determine next steps to maintain affordability and improve conditions at Buena Vista Mobile Park.  (56) Meet with Housing Authority regularly to identify feasible next steps. Review financing approach and options. Update Council on identified, proposed next  steps and approach. X Enable housing production through zoning and regulatory reform Advance affordable housing developments Implementing Housing Strategies for Social & Economic Balance (IHS) Page 3 of 5 Item CAttachment A - 2025Council Priorities andObjectives Q3 SummaryTable       Item C: Staff Report Pg. 6  Packet Pg. 377 of 413  ATTACHMENT A #ED CA IH S PS 2025 CITY COUNCIL PRIORITIES AND OBJECTIVES Council Priority OBJECTIVES (70 in total) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 46 X Organize an initial review of sources and methods to raise funding to support new affordable housing production for future evaluation. Conduct research to  identify and evaluate sources and methods. Work with Finance Committee to develop recommendations for City Council. X 47 X Present a renter protection fair chance ordinance to Council. Present findings of an analysis and policy recommendations in the form of a draft ordinance to  reduce barriers to housing by individuals with criminal records, consistent with Housing Element Program 6.6 I. (54) X 48 X Report out on initial data from the rental registry program and project implementation; receive feedback and recommendations for next steps. (57)X * 49 X Present to Council an analysis related to anti‐rent gouging. Consistent with prior Council direction, examine implications of a possible ordinance from a legal,  policy and anticipated resource demand perspectives; receive direction on next steps. (55) X 50 X X Present options to address homelessness impacts, particularly relating to individuals living in vehicles, to Policy & Services Committee for prioritization.  Identify feasible (1) regulatory approaches to manage the use of public space and (2) policy solutions to expand RV safe parking. Present options to P&S for  consideration and prioritization.X 51 X Extend for one year or codify R1/SB 9 interim ordinance. Establish objective development standards and increases the maximum floor area for SB 9 units from  800 to 1200 square feet consistent with Housing Element Program 6.3A; consider implications of similar objective standards for R1 and SB 9 projects relative to  the Cit ’s Individual Review Pro ram. (45 X 52 X Initiate evaluation of South of Forest Area Coordinated Area Plan (SOFA) development standards. Review and explore options to amend the coordinated area  plan with the intent to replace subjective development standards with objective standards consistent with Housing Element Program 3.7.  X 53 X Present to Council the Downtown Housing Plan Community Assessment report and receive Council direction on draft housing plan scenarios. Continue  advancin  the plan develo ment and public en a ement strate  to pre are dra t housin  plan and environmental review. (36   X 54 X Present an ordinance to Council that supports innovative housing structures. Creates zoning incentives or update development standards to support various  housing typologies, including micro‐units, intergenerational housing, aging adults, students and lower‐income units, consistent with Housing Element Program  6.5. (48 X 55 X X Present findings to Council on a study that explores code amendments reducing commercial floor area and possible extension of Downtown in‐lieu parking  program to residential development: Evaluate opportunities that make multi‐family housing an attractive alternative to commercial office development,  consistent with Housin  Element Pro ram 3.9. (50 X 56 X X X X Update development impact fees for public safety, government facilities, housing, transportation, parks, and community services. Conduct a nexus and  feasibility study to ensure housing remains viable. Consider potential policy to waive impact fees associated with for low‐income inclusionary units with when 20%  of the units are deed restricted. (Housing Element Programs 2.1B; 3.1 B&C) (Housing Element Programs 2.1B; 3.1 B&C) X 57 X Open the new Public Safety Building for daily Police, OES, and Fire services. Complete construction, move‐in of departments, and a ribbon‐cutting event to  commemorate the official availability of public safety services from the facility for all. (72) X * 58 X Council to adopt the updated Foothills Fire Management Plan and Community Wildfire Protection Plan. Plan to reflect alignment with Santa Clara County and  other agencies and entities to address early warning technology, planning and procedural elements and risk mitigation. (71) X 59 X Council approval of construction contract for Fire Station No. 4 Replacement project and initiation of construction. (73)X * 60 X Activate a fire engine at Fire Station 4. Augment staffing at Fire Station 4 to deploy either ambulance or fire engine response.X Public Safety, Wellness & Belonging (PS) Improve citywide housing policy and planning  Modernize public safety infrastrucutre Support tenant protections and housing equity Page 4 of 5 Item CAttachment A - 2025Council Priorities andObjectives Q3 SummaryTable       Item C: Staff Report Pg. 7  Packet Pg. 378 of 413  ATTACHMENT A #ED CA IH S PS 2025 CITY COUNCIL PRIORITIES AND OBJECTIVES Council Priority OBJECTIVES (70 in total) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 61 X Initiate an update to the City’s seismic hazards ordinance. Conduct an assessment of previous study, update potentially eligible buildings, and begin work on  seismic hazard identify and mitigation ordinance. (75) X 62 X Develop Master Plan for Cubberley site. Complete a master plan by December 2025 for 15 acres anticipated to be purchased from PAUSD pending a successful  bond measure in November 2026 and begin community polling to inform the development of a ballot measure for voter consideration. (61) X 63 X Implement the 2024‐2025 Wellness & Belonging Action Plan. Complete the 28 action items in the action plan in collaboration with partners. X 64 X Open 445 Bryant Street Community Center. Complete construction and any necessary partnership agreements to begin La Comida Senior Lunch Program at the  facility by end of July, 2025; plan further work for general community center operations concurrently. (64) X ** 65 X Enhance and Expand Inclusive Programs and Services. Enhance services to support individuals with disabilities seeking accommodation support, expand  community partnerships that serve the disability community, and implement new therapeutic recreation programs . X 66 X Implement New Expanded CSD Recreation Special Events Workplan. Approve and implement the Workplan which expands Community Special Events that foster  togetherness, belonging and celebrate the rich diversity of our community  (60) X 67 X Support Community Mental Health. Provide support for all ages through community partnerships, programs, and initiatives. (65)X 68 X Continue engagement with San Francisco Airport on SFO's Ground Based Augmentation System (GBAS) project and other potential opportunities to decrease  SFO noise impacts on Palo Alto. (79) X 69 X Council Approval of Quiet Zone Concept Plans at Churchill Ave, Meadow Drive, and Charleston Rd Rail Crossings. (76)X 70 X X Enhance safety and improve quality of life in commercial areas by reducing criminal activity through business engagement and the deployment of officers and  technology.  Establish a Business Watch program to enhance  collaboration with businesses and assign two officers at a minimum to patrol high traffic  commercial areas. X *Revised estimated completion date  **Revised estimated completion date in 2026 Expand wellness and community serving facilities and services Promote environmental and transportation safety Page 5 of 5 Item CAttachment A - 2025Council Priorities andObjectives Q3 SummaryTable       Item C: Staff Report Pg. 8  Packet Pg. 379 of 413  1  2025 Council Priorities & Objectives   Q3  Update  July ‐September  2025  Overall Progress  To date, of the 70 Council objectives supporting Council priorities, in the third quarter, a total of 60  (86%) have been completed or are on track with new Council direction, 9 are behind schedule (13%),  and 1 (1%) is on hold.  Climate Action and Adaptation, & Natural Environment Protection (CA)  Mo dernize  critical  infrastructure  for  climate resilience   CA 1. Complete initial pilot area of electric grid modernization (16)  Project Manager: Jimmy Pachikara Lead Dept: UTL  Estimated Completion: Q2 Status: Completed  Project Description:  The project will increase electrical capacity and reliability in initial pilot area bounded by Louis,  Amarillo, 101, & Embarcadero about 1,000 homes; once completed, staff will continue the grid  upgrades to the "Phase 1" area which impacts approximately 6,000 homes.   The City’s planned project includes the modernization of the systematic grid and incorporates the  goals and key actions from the Grid Modernization Study to prepare for widespread electrification in  ATTACHMENT BItem C Attachment B - 2025 Council Priorities and Objectives Q3 Update        Item C: Staff Report Pg. 9  Packet Pg. 380 of 413    2    support of the S/CAP goal of an 80 percent carbon reduction by 2030. This project is coordinated with  the Fiber to the Home pilot.   2025 Project Milestones:   By the end of FY2025 staff intends to complete the pilot area of Phase 1.  Quarterly Update:   A total of 908 homes have been served with upgraded facilities that included the replacement of 70  wood utility poles, 106 new transformers, 22,650 feet of new low‐voltage wire, 46,743 feet of new  fiber messenger. The cost to complete the pilot area was just over $10 million with contracted labor  being the largest cost.    CA 2. Begin construction of the Newell Road Bridge Replacement project (32)  Project Manager: Holly Boyd Lead Dept: PW  Estimated Completion: Q2 Status: Completed  Project Description:  Award of a construction contract for the replacement of Newell Road Bridge in time to begin  construction taking advantage of the 2025 in‐channel construction season.   2025 Project Milestones:  Complete design and right‐of‐way acquisition, obtain regulatory permits, and seek programming of  construction funding by Caltrans, through Council advocacy as needed, and award a construction  contract, subject to property owner, permitting agencies, and Caltrans approvals.   Initiate and complete construction.     Quarterly Update:   Staff received authorization from Caltrans to advertise the project in April. After successfully bidding  the project, Council approved a construction contract on June 16. Staff issued the notice to proceed  on August 1, with pre‐construction activities to start on September 1. Construction will last for a year  and a half and will be completed in Spring 2027.    CA 3. Begin construction of Hamilton Avenue storm drain system capacity upgrades project (31)  Project Manager: Holly Boyd Lead Dept: PW  Estimated Completion: Q3 Status: Completed  Project Description:  Advance the San Francisquito Creek (SFC) Flood Protection capital project (Reach 2) through Council’s  JPA representation and any Council approvals involved.  Prioritization of the Hamilton Avenue project  from the list of 2017 ballot measure priority projects will increase the ability of the storm drain  system to convey water in the event of a San Francisquito Creek overflow.  2025 Project Milestones:  Begin construction of Hamilton Avenue storm drain system capacity upgrades project.  Quarterly Update:   The storm drain system design was completed in June, and the project was advertised for bid in late  July.  A construction contract is anticipated to be awarded in October.    CA 4. Complete implementation of the Reliability and Resiliency Strategic Plan (RRSP), including  Strategy 4 – conducting a cost/benefit analysis of flexible energy resources such as battery storage  and microgrids (including evaluation of the airport microgrid), and Strategy 5 – recommending  potential programs for Council consideration.  Project Manager: Jonathan Abendschein Lead Dept: PW  ATTACHMENT BItem C Attachment B - 2025 Council Priorities and Objectives Q3 Update        Item C: Staff Report Pg. 10  Packet Pg. 381 of 413    3    Estimated Completion: Q4 Status: On Track  Project Description:    The RRSP includes several long‐term and ongoing efforts that extend beyond this year, primarily in  Strategies 1, 2, and 3. But Strategies 4 and 5 focus on a cost‐benefit analysis and program options for  use of flexible technologies and efficient electrification strategies to provide various types of  community value. This goal involves completion of Strategies 4 and 5 of the RRSP.  2025 Project Milestones:   In 2025, the Climate Action and Sustainability Committee (CASC) and the Utilities Advisory  Commission (UAC) will review the cost‐benefit analysis and potential program options to complete  Strategies 4 and 5 of the Resilient Resource and Sustainability Plan (RRSP). Following these reviews,  the City Council will consider the recommendations and provide direction on any subsequent  program implementation.  Quarterly Update:   A cost‐benefit analysis and program development are currently underway. A status update was  provided to the Utilities Advisory Commission (UAC) in February 2025. A review of the preliminary  analysis results was presented at the July UAC meeting and the August Climate Action and  Sustainability Committee (CASC) meeting. Staff gathered policy feedback from the UAC and CASC to  inform the final report recommendations, which will be presented to the UAC, CASC, and City Council  in the fourth quarter of 2025.    CA 5. Complete deployment of 65,000 residential Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) meters  by end of FY 2025 and begin deployment of commercial AMI meters. (13)  Project Manager: Dave Yuan Lead Dept: UTL  Estimated Completion: Q4 Status: On Track  Project Description:  The City of Palo Alto Utilities (CPAU) is upgrading the City’s utility metering system with electronic  meters to utilize grid technology called Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI). AMI is becoming a  standard in the utilities industry, enabling interval utility usage data and time‐of‐use rates for homes  and businesses to the benefit of electric, natural gas, and water utility customers. CPAU will replace  old legacy electric meters with new advanced electric meters and retrofit existing water and gas  meters with AMI radios, starting with residential meters.  2025 Project Milestones:   A continuation from 2024 to deploy all 65,000 residential AMI meters, this work continues, as well as  to deploy 10,300 commercial AMI meters by Q3 2025 assuming no supply chain delays.  Quarterly Update:    In May 2025, the City’s AMI installation contractor concluded their services with the City.  They  converted 63,000 meters and were unable to complete the remaining 12,000 meters due to supply  chain issues, accessibility, obstruction, and meter conditions.  Since then, City staff has installed 4,000  meters with 8,000 meters remaining. For electric, 1,500 meters are still on back order and the electric  meter shop has two vacancies. If the meters arrive by November and positions get filled, staff’s goal is  99% completion of electric meters by the end of 2025. The remaining 1% of electric and 10% of gas  and water meters are expected to be completed by the end of 2026.     Advance citywide and  regional  climate  adaptation and  environmental  protection   strategies   CA 6. Council approval for Phase 2 (full‐service program) of the Advanced Whole Home  Electrification Pilot Program and begin implementation. (19)  ATTACHMENT BItem C Attachment B - 2025 Council Priorities and Objectives Q3 Update        Item C: Staff Report Pg. 11  Packet Pg. 382 of 413    4    Project Manager: Jonathan Abendschein Lead Dept: PW  Estimated Completion: Q4 Status: Completed  Project Description:    Add turnkey services to the City’s Advanced Whole Home Electrification Pilot Program to provide  direct installation of space heating to complement existing turnkey services for direct installation of  water heating.  2025 Project Milestones:   City Council approval of the contract and budget for the program, followed by the commencement of  program implementation.  Quarterly Update:   A contract with Franklin Energy to operate turnkey services for the Advanced Whole Home  Electrification Pilot Program, along with a program budget, was approved by the City Council on June  9, 2025. Implementation has begun.    Advance citywide and  regional  climate  adaptation and  environmental  protection   strategies   CA 7. Develop and obtain Council approval for strategies and a 2026/2027 work plan for the next  phase of S/CAP implementation of climate and sustainability goals  Project Manager: Christine Luong Lead Dept: PW   Estimated Completion: Q4 Status: On Track  Project Description:  Develop and approve an S/CAP Implementation Plan for 2026‐2027 which reflects feedback on  strategies reviewed by the Council Climate Action and Sustainability Committee and the Climate  Action Working Group.  2025 Project Milestones:   Work with the Council Climate Action and Sustainability Committee and the Climate Action Working  Group to prioritize focus areas and strategies for future implementation.  Quarterly Update:   Staff is developing strategies for a 2026 –2027 work plan for the next phase of Sustainability and  Climate Action Plan (S/CAP) implementation. Proposed Sustainability priorities for the 2026‐2027  Sustainability and Climate Action Plan Work Plan are complete and were presented to the Climate  Action and Sustainability Committee in August. The key areas of focus for the Sustainability priorities  are water, sea level rise, wildfire protection, natural environment, green stormwater infrastructure,  and zero waste. The Climate Action section of the S/CAP Work Plan is under development and reflects  Climate Action and Sustainability Committee (CASC) and Climate Action Working Group discussion of  and feedback on potential areas of focus in the areas of transportation, buildings (including  resiliency), and carbon neutrality. The completed 2026 ‐2027 S/CAP Work Plan will be brought to  CASC for their review in November 2025, before going to City Council for review and approval.     CA 8. Begin development of a Regional Shoreline Adaptation Plan meeting new standards approved  by BCDC (33)  Project Manager: Julie Weiss Lead Dept: PW  Estimated Completion: Q4  Status: On Track  Project Description:  Public Works–Watershed Protection is collaborating with Santa Clara County Office of Sustainability  and other County cities to submit an SB1 grant proposal for the development of a Regional Shoreline  ATTACHMENT BItem C Attachment B - 2025 Council Priorities and Objectives Q3 Update        Item C: Staff Report Pg. 12  Packet Pg. 383 of 413    5    Adaptation Plan (RSAP). The RSAP would include a regional vulnerability assessment for Santa Clara  County shoreline communities and a subsequent shoreline adaptation plan that aligns with State sea  level rise adaptation requirements that are administered by the Bay Conservation and Development  Commission. This regional vulnerability assessment would complement Palo Alto’s similar assessment  by providing an adaptation funding strategy, would determine the cost of inaction should Palo Alto  not pursue additional sea level rise adaptations, and would expand social equity considerations.   2025 Project Milestones:  Engage with neighboring cities for potential partnership and review status with the City Council.   SB1 grant submittal: July, 2025   Confirmation of grant award: Fall, 2025  Quarterly Update:  The SB1 grant proposal was submitted by the Santa Clara County Office of Sustainability in July 2025  and grant funding was approved on September 30, 2025.  Next steps include initiating an RFP process  with the County for consultant services to lead the technical portion of the work.  The three‐year  project will also propose sea level rise adaptation options for Palo Alto.    CA 9. Council consideration of an ordinance implementing updated Stream/Creek Corridor Setback  requirements. (34)  Project Manager: Kelly Cha Lead Dept: PDS  Estimated Completion: Q3* Status: On Track  Project Description:  Conduct research and present an ordinance that implements the City’s Comprehensive Plan polices  related to stream corridor setbacks for Planning and Transportation Commission (PTC) review and  recommendation to the City Council.   2025 Project Milestones:  Hold a community meeting Q1, Planning and Transportation Commission (PTC) consideration of next  steps in Q3 for Council consideration thereafter.  Quarterly Update:   Staff presented a revised draft ordinance to the PTC on August 27, 2025. The PTC provided direction  to further amend the ordinance to address concerns about potential impacts to properties outside of  the Foothills and Baylands and continued the item. This item is anticipated to return to the PTC in Q1  2026.    *The objective is on track with the updates scope and will be returning for PTC consideration in Q1 of  2026.    CA 10. Council consideration of an ordinance implementing Bird Safe Glass & Wildlife Light  Pollution Protections standards. (35)  Project Manager: Kelly Cha Lead Dept: PDS  Estimated Completion: Q3* Status: Behind   Project Description:   Prepare ordinance updates to the City’s zoning code to require new building design and lighting  standards with the aim to reduce bird strikes and nighttime light pollution for new or substantially  remodeled buildings/structures.   2025 Project Milestones:   Initially scoped as one project, the bird safe glass and wildlife light pollution protection standards are  now two projects coming before Council at different times.  ATTACHMENT BItem C Attachment B - 2025 Council Priorities and Objectives Q3 Update        Item C: Staff Report Pg. 13  Packet Pg. 384 of 413    6     Lighting pollution standards was reviewed by the City Council in Q2 to return in Q3 for  reconsideration.   Bird friendly design standards will be going to the Planning and Transportation Commission  (PTC) for reconsideration in Q3 and City Council consideration in Q4.  Quarterly Update:   Lighting pollution standards: City Council consideration of a revised ordinance is anticipated in  November 2025.    Bird friendly design standards: Staff will return to the PTC with a revised ordinance for consideration  in Q4, 2025 prior to City Council consideration in 2026.    *The lighting pollution standards milestone is now estimated to be completed in Q4.    CA 11. Advocate for the San Francisquito Creek Flood Protection capital project (Reach 2) through  Council’s JPA representation and any Council approvals involved (31)  Project Manager: Holly Boyd Lead Dept: PW  Estimated Completion: Q4 Status: On Track  Project Description:  Advance the San Francisquito Creek (SFC) Flood Protection capital project (Reach 2) through Council’s  JPA representation and any Council approvals involved.  2025 Project Milestones:  Support JPA’s efforts to make decisions through staff discussions and the City’s representation on the  JPA Board.  Quarterly Update:   Staff reviewed JPA’s project documents and attended meetings to discuss Reach 2 progress. The JPA  had a study session with Council to discuss the Reach 2 project on September 8, 2025.    CA 12. Initiate Preliminary Engineering and Environmental Clearance Work for Quarry Road  Extension in Partnership with Stanford University, Caltrans, & VTA.  Project Manager: Holly Boyd/Sylvia Star‐Lack Lead Dept: PW/OOT  Estimated Completion: Q4 Status: On Track  Project Description:    The Quarry Road Connection Project will allow the extension of Palo Alto’s Quarry Road to create a  direct connection between the Palo Alto Transit Center (PATC) and El Camino Real for use by public  buses and shuttles (the Quarry Road Connection Project). This project enables transformation of a  currently congested PATC by enhancing public transit efficiency, reducing traffic congestion, and  improving safety and convenience for cyclists and pedestrians.  2025 Project Milestones:   Develop an agreement with Stanford to initiate a preliminary engineering and environmental  clearance work for Quarry Rd Extension.  Quarterly Update:   Staff is working to generate an agreement between the City and Stanford to initiate design and  environmental work which will be brought to Council in Fall of 2025.    CA 13. Develop an updated Regional Water Quality Control Plant Biosolids Facility Plan.  Project Manager: Karin North Lead Dept: PW  ATTACHMENT BItem C Attachment B - 2025 Council Priorities and Objectives Q3 Update        Item C: Staff Report Pg. 14  Packet Pg. 385 of 413    7    Estimated Completion: Q4 Status:  On Track   Project Description:    Complete initial work to develop plan, including consideration of PFAS pollutants and the Measure E  site, and review with a Council committee in advance of Council acceptance of the plan in late 2025 or  early 2026.  2025 Project Milestones:   Development of biosolids treatment alternatives and screening to eliminate non‐viable alternatives.  Finalize evaluation criteria, including weighting, based on community and stakeholder input. Begin  detailed evaluation of the screened alternatives. Review findings and draft recommendations with  SCAP or the Policy and Services Committees. Initiate development of a draft report summarizing the  alternatives analysis and preliminary recommendations.  Quarterly Update:   Staff identified potential treatment alternatives, developed evaluation criteria, and completed an  initial screening of the alternatives. Public input meetings were held in spring 2025. Based on the  feedback received, the descriptions and weighting of the evaluation criteria have been adjusted to  align more closely with community priorities. The next steps include developing lifecycle cost  estimates, and continuation of the detailed evaluation of the six remaining biosolids treatment  alternatives. This task is taking longer since the Long‐Range Facility Plan update is planning out the  space requirements for the liquids side of the treatment process over the next 50 years, in addition to  the biosolids space planning.      Advance active  and  sustainable  transportation    CA 14. Council Adoption of the Safe Streets for All (SS4A) Safety Action Plan (14)  Project Manager: Sylvia Star‐Lack Lead Dept: OOT  Estimated Completion:  Q2 Status: Completed  Project Description:  Informed by feedback from the Policy & Services Committee, bring forward a Safety Action Plan  providing a roadmap for eliminating traffic deaths and severe injuries through the reduction of vehicle  miles traveled enabling staff to seek grant funding for implementation. (14)    The Safe Streets for All (SS4A) Safety Action Plan aims to eliminate traffic deaths and life‐changing  injuries on local streets. The Palo Alto Safety Action Plan is a roadmap for eliminating traffic deaths  and severe injuries on local streets and achieving the city’s Sustainability and Climate Action Plan  goals through the reduction of vehicle miles traveled.    2025 Project Milestones:  Finalize and adopt Safety Action Plan.  Begin seeking grant funds for implementation.  Quarterly Update:   Council adopted the SS4A Safety Action Plan on June 2, 2025.     CA 15. Council Adoption of the 2026 Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Plan (BPTP) (15)  Project Manager: Ozzy Arce Lead Dept: OOT  Estimated Completion: Q4 Status: On Track  Project Description:   The 2026 Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Plan (BPTP) represents a system of interconnected  bicycle and pedestrian corridors, facilities, and programs that make biking and walking a more  convenient form of day‐to‐day travel. The 2026 BPTP Update is an update to the 2012 BPTP, adjusting  ATTACHMENT BItem C Attachment B - 2025 Council Priorities and Objectives Q3 Update        Item C: Staff Report Pg. 15  Packet Pg. 386 of 413    8    the bicycle network to reflect land use changes, roadway designs to improve comfort and safety, and  policies that support active transportation and climate action plan goals.   2025 Project Milestones:  Complete community engagement work and circulate the draft BPTP Update to the public for City  Council adoption.   Quarterly Update:   On June 2, 2025, the City Council provided input on the revised Prioritization Framework and the  related priority project lists. Over the summer, the project team developed the Draft 2026 Bicycle and  Pedestrian Transportation Plan Update document and released the Draft Plan for public review on  October 3, 2025. The public review period will extend through November 14, 2025, and staff plans to  present the Draft Plan to the City Council at a December 2025 meeting.    CA 16.  Refine Grade Separation Design Alternatives per Council Direction and Conduct Outreach to  Support Rail Committee Review of Locally Preferred Alternatives (24)  Project Manager: Ripon Bhatia Lead Dept: OOT  Estimated Completion: Q4  Status: On Track  Project Description:   Review advanced alternatives to minimize right of way impacts and improve traffic circulation,  conduct outreach, and develop conceptual plans (15% design) for each of the three crossings.    Identify grade separated project alternatives for grade separation at Churchill Avenue, Meadow Drive,  and Charleston Road crossings.   2025 Project Milestones:  Collaborate with Caltrain to procure the services of the consultant to review advanced alternatives to  minimize right of way impacts and improve traffic circulation. Conduct outreach and develop  conceptual plans (15% design) for each of the three crossings based on the guidance and direction  provided by the Rail Committee and the City Council   Quarterly Update:   Staff is collaborating with Caltrain to refine the project alternative in preparation for public outreach  and feedback. Initial review of the refined concepts was presented at the September 16, 2025, Rail  Committee meeting. Staff conducted public outreach meetings to seek feedback from community  members and plans to present the update to the Rail Committee at its November meeting for  recommendation to the City Council.     CA 17. Identify locations and design concepts for additional east‐west bicycle and pedestrian  crossings of the Caltrain railroad tracks in the southern part of the city.  Project Manager: Sylvia Star‐lack/Charlie Coles Lead Dept: OOT  Estimated Completion: Q4 Status: On Track  Project Description:    This Project is referred to as the “South Palo Alto Bike/Ped Connectivity” Project. Project will engage  with the community to select two preferred crossing locations, develop conceptual plans (15%  designs), and identify bike/pedestrian network improvements, and develop an implementation plan  and funding strategy for future construction.  2025 Project Milestones:   By Q4 2025, community engagement efforts will focus on identifying preferred crossing locations,  design options, and related network improvements for east‐west bicycle and pedestrian grade  ATTACHMENT BItem C Attachment B - 2025 Council Priorities and Objectives Q3 Update        Item C: Staff Report Pg. 16  Packet Pg. 387 of 413    9    crossings. A formal report summarizing these recommendations will be publicly circulated and  presented to the City Council for adoption in 2026. Subsequent steps will include pursuing grant  funding for final design and construction.  By the end of Q4 2025, the public and committees will provide feedback on preferred crossing  locations and design concepts.  Quarterly Update:   Phase 1 engagement, conducted in Q2 2025, introduced the project to the community and gathered  input on goals, priorities, and opportunities for grade‐separated bicycle and pedestrian crossings.  Considering feedback from the community, design priorities were established and eight rail crossing  alternatives were designed for review and feedback during Phase 2 engagement happening in Q3/Q4  2025. The goal of Phase 2 is to select two alternatives to progress to 15 percent design (conceptual  design), during which the selected alternatives will be further evaluated and refined.     CA 18. Complete E‐Mobility Strategic Plan for Council acceptance (21)  Project Manager: Jonathan Abendschein Lead Dept: PWD  Estimated Completion: Q3  Status: Completed  Project Description:  The goal of this effort is to develop a strategic roadmap for the promotion of E‐mobility (which  includes electric vehicles of all sizes from e‐scooters up to e‐trucks) and provision of supportive  infrastructure.   2025 Project Milestones:   In 2024 staff developed an EV Charger Needs Assessment and draft strategies and actions for an  E‐Mobility Strategic Plan and reviewed them with the Council Climate Action and Sustainability  Committee (CASC) and its Working Group. In 2025 staff will finish writing the plan, seek Council  acceptance, and begin implementation.  Quarterly Update:   On August 18, 2025, Council approved the E‐Mobility Strategic Roadmap as recommended by the  CASC at its June meeting. The Roadmap’s major strategies focus on: (1) raising public awareness and  education around electric transportation; (2) expanding access to e‐mobility options and charging  infrastructure for underserved groups (such as renters, low‐income households, and non‐profits); (3)  developing public and shared charging infrastructure and mobility hubs; (4) coordinating e‐mobility  efforts with broader transportation efforts; and (5) encouraging electric‐grid‐friendly charging and  infrastructure practices.    CA 19. Propose an updated multifamily EV charger program (EV 2.0) for Council approval  Project Manager: Rachel DiFranco Lead Dept: UTL  Estimated Completion: Q4 Status: On Track  Project Description:  The City’s first generation multifamily electric vehicle program has resulted in the installation of  chargers in buildings representing 9.2% of the multi‐family units in Palo Alto. The State’s Advanced  Clean Cars II regulations are driving rapid adoption of electric vehicles, however, and more charging  will be needed for multifamily residents to support them. This program is meant to build on the  successes of the first‐generation program and create an even better program that can extend to even  more multi‐family buildings.  2025 Project Milestones:  Develop program business model for Council approval.  Quarterly Update:   ATTACHMENT BItem C Attachment B - 2025 Council Priorities and Objectives Q3 Update        Item C: Staff Report Pg. 17  Packet Pg. 388 of 413    10    On September 19, 2025, staff presented design guidelines for the successor to the current multi‐ family EV charger program (EV 2.0) to the Climate Action and Sustainability Committee (CASC). These  guidelines include financial models (namely, charging‐as‐a‐service) aimed at scaling installations  community‐wide and implementation strategies to serve different types of multi‐family buildings with  different levels of EV adoption utilizing a variety of EV charging technologies. The CASC unanimously  recommended that City Council adopt the design guidelines, which are scheduled to go to Council in  Q4 2025 for approval.     Promote  clean  energy  and  reduce fossil  fuel  dependence   CA 20. Develop and begin implementing a City Facility Electrification Plan (19)  Project Manager: Gloria Yu Lead Dept: PWD  Estimated Completion: Q4 Status: On Track  Project Description:  Building on the citywide Facilities Assessment, this project will design and implement the  electrification of fossil fuel‐consuming systems in City buildings through the Capital Improvement  Program. In alignment with the S/CAP, the project aims to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by  transitioning gas‐fired equipment to electric alternatives, with upgrades to electrical service as  needed.  2025 Project Milestones:   Issue a Request for Proposals (RFP), select a qualified design firm, and execute a contract to begin  design and planning work for the electrification of fossil fuel‐consuming systems at City facilities.  Quarterly Update:   The Facility Assessment report and associated data are currently being analyzed to confirm priority  facilities for initial electrification efforts. This evaluation will guide the upcoming design phase and  ensure alignment with the City’s Sustainability and Climate Action Plan goals. Meanwhile,  preparations are underway to issue the RFP (Request for Proposal) for selecting a design consultant. A  review of the City Facility Electrification Plan with the CASC is tentatively planned for December 2025.    CA 21. Implement plan for phaseout of leaded fuel at Palo Alto Airport. (77)  Project Manager: Andy Swanson Lead Dept: PW  Estimated Completion: Q4 Status: On Track  Project Description:  With unleaded fuel now available at the airport, implement plan to conduct lead monitoring,  encourage and track use of the fuel, explore potentially subsidizing the cost of unleaded fuel, and  develop updated lease requirements to promote unleaded fuel.  2025 Project Milestones:    Develop and begin implementing a multi‐phase plan to phase out the use of leaded fuel.  Quarterly Update:   The Airport has entered into new fixed base operator (FBO) leases that eliminate the fuel flowage fee  of unleaded and sustainable aviation fuels at the airport, helping to reduce the cost differential  between leaded and unleaded fuel. Staff continues to work with unleaded fuel providers to educate  airport tenants and users and encourage the use of the fuel. Staff is working with procurement to  enter into a contract for a three‐year lead monitoring program.     ATTACHMENT BItem C Attachment B - 2025 Council Priorities and Objectives Q3 Update        Item C: Staff Report Pg. 18  Packet Pg. 389 of 413    11    CA 22. Share preliminary analysis of strategies for a physical and financial transition of the gas  utility to relevant policymakers and stakeholders (17)  Project Manager: Aaron Perkins Lead Dept: UTL  Estimated Completion: Q3 Status: On Track  Project Description:   This study evaluates the infrastructure needs and financial implications of operating the gas utility in  the context of declining gas sales due to widespread electrification. The first phase, completed in late  2024, involved developing a gas system model that simulates changing flow patterns as electrification  progresses. This model helps identify which sections of the gas system can be decommissioned first  and assesses the potential impacts on the remaining infrastructure.  A complementary financial analysis is currently underway to simulate various levels of community  electrification and evaluate the resulting effects on the gas utility’s operations and finances. The  physical model will support this analysis by identifying areas that, while theoretically eligible for  abandonment, must remain in service to ensure system functionality. The simulations aim to estimate  decommissioning costs, impacts on gas utility operating expenses, rate changes, indirect financial  effects on other utilities, and implications for General Fund revenues. The results will inform policy  options to help mitigate the financial burden on customers who have not yet electrified.  2025 Project Milestones:   A consultant completed development of a balanced gas system model in 2024. Initial results of the  staff analyses are anticipated in Q3 of 2025, with completion and documentation of the study results  by Q2 2026.  Quarterly Update:   Staff reviewed the methodology for the study with the Climate Action and Sustainability Committee  (CASC) in June 2025 and the Utilities Advisory Commission (UAC) on July 9, 2025. Staff has retained  consultants to simulate various levels of electrification and model the operational and rate impacts,  with a substantial portion of the analysis to be performed in‐house. The analysis is in progress with  preliminary, partial results to be presented to the UAC and CASC in October 2025 and analysis  continuing into 2026, with completion likely Q2 2026.    CA 23. Present an ordinance to Council enacting the 2026 California Building Standards Code  update, including the California Green Building Standards Code; submit to the California Building  Standards Commission for approval. (28)  Project Manager: Julia Knight Lead Dept: PDS  Estimated Completion: Q4 Status: On Track  Project Description:  Adopt the California Building Standards Commission’s model technical building, mechanical,  plumbing, electrical, existing buildings, fire, energy, residential building, historic building, and green  building codes, with local amendments as appropriate, including standards to advance the City’s  carbon reduction and electrification initiatives, in compliance with federal regulations.   2025 Project Milestones:  Continue research and analysis and engage stakeholders on anticipated amendments; collaborate  with City service departments, including fire, public works and utilities. Prepare an ordinance for  review by the Policy and Services Committee as applicable and forward a recommendation to the City  Council for final action.  Quarterly Update:   Staff presented potential local amendments to the 2025 California Energy Code to the Climate Action  and Sustainability Action Committee on September 5, 2025. Council reviewed and adopted these  energy code amendments on September 8, 2025 in advance of the AB 130 deadline for new local  ATTACHMENT BItem C Attachment B - 2025 Council Priorities and Objectives Q3 Update        Item C: Staff Report Pg. 19  Packet Pg. 390 of 413    12    amendments to codes that impact residential units. On October 6, 2025, Council will review renewed  local amendments and new local amendments that do not impact residential units for all other parts  of the California Building Standards Code, except for amendments to the Fire Code which will be  considered on consent in November and select green building and reach code amendments, which  will be considered in the first half of 2026, once the corresponding cost studies have been prepared  by the statewide working group.    CA 24. Develop an Advanced Commercial Rooftop HVAC Pilot Program proposal and review with  the Climate Action and Sustainability Ad Hoc Committee for recommendation to Council. (20)  Project Manager: Shelby Sinkler Lead Dept: UTL  Estimated Completion: Q4  Status: On Track  Project Description:  In 2024, staff launched an HVAC pilot program to offer enhanced incentives for replacing a limited  number of aging rooftop gas‐pack units with heat pump heating, ventilation, and air conditioning  (HVAC) systems in commercial buildings. The goal is to gain hands‐on experience with these types of  replacements. The 10‐customer pilot is on track to reach capacity, with more than 10 applicants  currently pursuing rebate reservations (which are not confirmed until a building permit is issued).  Lessons learned from this pilot will inform the design of an advanced heat pump HVAC program  aimed at demonstrating a scalable, high‐participation business model.  2025 Project Milestones:   Staff will monitor the progress of projects from the 2024 pilot program and use the lessons learned  from these projects to design an Advanced Pilot Program and review the proposal with the Climate  Action and Sustainability Committee by Q4 2025 with the goal of launching it in early 2026.  Quarterly Update:   Data from the pilot program is steadily accumulating and will be used to inform the design of the  advanced pilot program. Of the 14 participating customers, three have completed their projects, and  three more are currently in the permitting or construction phase. Pricing and other valuable  information are available for most of the projects. This data is providing a sufficient foundation to  begin shaping design guidelines for an advanced pilot program, which is scheduled to be presented to  the Climate Action and Sustainability Committee in October 2025.        ATTACHMENT BItem C Attachment B - 2025 Council Priorities and Objectives Q3 Update        Item C: Staff Report Pg. 20  Packet Pg. 391 of 413    13    Economic Development & Retail Vibrancy    Activate  and  enhance  key commercial  districts   ED 25. Council approval of outdoor activation guidelines for California Avenue (2)  Project Manager: Bruce Fukuji Lead Dept: CMO  Estimated Completion: Q2*  Status: On Track  Project Description:   Council approval of California Ave outdoor activation guidelines, which includes dining, informed by  continued engagement with stakeholders on a refined priorities and recommendations and initiate  implementation.  2025 Project Milestones:  Council approval of outdoor activation guidelines.   Quarterly Update:  An Activation program was brought to the Retail Committee and City Council for review in May and  June 2025. Based on feedback, staff and the ARB ad hoc subcommittee are updating standards and  guidance for outdoor activation to support all year, all weather outdoor dining and enable equivalent  area to existing dining. This includes updating design standards and guidance for parklets responsive  to the Cal Ave context and defining a process for custom parklet designs.      *The revised project scope will now place an estimated completion to Q4.    ED 26. Council approval of a final signage plan for California Avenue and funding appropriations (2)  Project Manager:  Valerie Tam Lead Dept:  PW  Estimated Completion: Q2* Status: Behind  Project Description:    Review the signage plan for California Avenue with the Architectural Review Board (ARB), incorporate  feedback, and seek Council approval to implement the plan.  2025 Project Milestones:   The near‐term signage improvements for California Avenue include replacement of El Camino Real  (ECR) and Oregon Expressway signs to be completed by calendar year Q3. Longer‐term improvements  will include formulating a comprehensive sign program, with a proposal to be developed and  reviewed by Q3, and built into Fiscal Year 2027 CIP budget cycle, for implementation in Q3 of 2026.  Quarterly Update:   ATTACHMENT BItem C Attachment B - 2025 Council Priorities and Objectives Q3 Update        Item C: Staff Report Pg. 21  Packet Pg. 392 of 413    14    The concept design for the Oregon Expressway sign has been completed. The project was transitioned  from CMO to PW management in Q3. Staff is currently coordinating with potential fabricators to  define the scope, schedule, and estimated costs for procuring the signage. Staff is preparing a signage  application for ARB review for the El Camino Real and Oregon Expressway signs.     *The revised estimated completion date is now Q4.    ED 27. Council approval of a design option for California Ave. (3)  Project Manager: Bruce Fukuji Lead Dept: CMO  Estimated Completion: Q2* Status: Behind  Project Description:  Develop a feasible, achievable community and business supported street design concept to modify  and permanently designate California Avenue as a car‐free, bicycle friendly, outdoor dining, shopping  and public space environment, including guidelines for outdoor dining, signage and wayfinding.  Engage stakeholders to refine alternative street designs for California Avenue and present them to  Council for discussion and action, including funding appropriations to pursue a street design.  2025 Project Milestones:  Develop two street design alternatives with slow, two‐way bicycle facilities; ensure all‐weather all‐ year outdoor dining and public spaces for community use.   Quarterly Update:  Staff is developing an outdoor activation improvement plan which includes bicycle and pedestrian  accessibility and other improvements to support the commercial use of the street for outdoor dining,  music and events. Alternatives will be updated based on ARB input on outdoor dining and parklets.   Staff is continuing to meet regularly with merchants and conduct outreach for input and feedback.  This project will follow priority ED 25 as the results of outdoor dining will be a key input to this work.     *The estimated completion date is now in 2026.    ED 28. Propose and implement outdoor activation guidelines for Car‐Free Ramona Street  Project Manager: Ashwini Kantak Lead Dept: CMO  Estimated Completion: Q3* Status: On Track  Project Description:    Initiate implementation of Council approved outdoor activation standards informed by continued  engagement with stakeholders on a refined priorities and recommendations.  2025 Project Milestones:   Council approval of outdoor activation standards in August and implementation of outdoor dining and  retail areas in accordance with adopted standards estimated to be completed by December.  Quarterly Update:   Outdoor activation standards were presented to the Retail Committee on June 18, 2025. The  Committee requested that staff engage the Historic Review Board and the Architectural Review  Board, and explore the feasibility of roofed structures and electrical connectivity. This expanded  scope will require a longer implementation timeline.   *Based on the proposed revised scope, the estimated completion date may extend beyond Q4.    ED 29. Council approval of Ramona Street design and funding appropriations (4)  ATTACHMENT BItem C Attachment B - 2025 Council Priorities and Objectives Q3 Update        Item C: Staff Report Pg. 22  Packet Pg. 393 of 413    15     Project Manager: Ashwini Kantak Lead Dept: CMO  Estimated Completion: Q2* Status: On Track  Project Description:   Engage stakeholders to develop design proposals and outdoor activation standards for Car‐Free  Ramona Street and present to Council for necessary funding appropriations to implement Phase I.  2025 Project Milestones:   Council approval on March 10 of pedestrian only Ramona Street; Council approval of funding for  Phase I near‐term streetscape improvements as part of adopted FY 25‐26 budget. Council approval of  near‐term improvements was planned for summer, with implementation to follow in fall/winter.  Quarterly Update:  Proposed streetscape improvements included in Phase I project scope were presented to the Retail  Committee on June 18, 2025. The Retail Committee asked staff to engage the Historical Review Board  and Architectural Review Board and to explore longer term streetscape improvements. This change in  project scope will require a longer implementation timeline and need additional CIP funding. In the  interim, Staff has been working on implementing near‐term improvements related to parking,  signage, and street barriers.     *Based on the revised near‐term narrowed scope is now on track to be completed by Q4 or early  2026.    ED 30. Resume work on new parking structure in downtown core (Lot D) (8)  Project Manager: Holly Boyd Lead Dept: PW  Estimated Completion: Q2 Status: Completed   Project Description:   Resume work on a new parking structure in the Downtown core on a City surface parking lot to help  attract visitors downtown. Pursue refined proposals for potential affordable housing development on  the Lytton / Kipling Lot T at 450 Lytton Avenue, or elsewhere, with parking for residents and the public.   2025 Project Milestones:  Develop and present parking garage design options for City Council review and selection.  Quarterly Update:  In April, the Council approved proceeding with the preliminary design and environmental review for a  274‐space parking garage, featuring six levels of above‐ground parking and a reserved area to allow  for the future construction of affordable housing on the site, with separate access on Waverley  Street. The design team has been working on schematic design and is planning to submit for ARB  review in October.    In June, the Council approved an exclusive negotiating agreement with Alta Housing for the  development of affordable housing on Lot T.    ED 31. Council approval of funding to continue Downtown cleanliness enhancements and other  medium‐term investments.  Project Manager: Brad Eggleston Lead Dept: PW  Estimated Completion: Q2 Status: Completed  Project Description:    ATTACHMENT BItem C Attachment B - 2025 Council Priorities and Objectives Q3 Update        Item C: Staff Report Pg. 23  Packet Pg. 394 of 413    16    Include necessary proposals and budget appropriations as part of the development of the FY 2026  Operating Budget to continue enhanced Downtown Cleanliness enhancements and other medium‐ term investments such as a Mobility Hub.  2025 Project Milestones:   Include funding proposals for Council approval in the FY 2025 mid‐year budget and FY 2026 budget  for cleaning enhancements, including increased sidewalk and parking garage pressure washing,  contract services to replace existing staff overtime, and some ongoing overtime staffing. Identify  existing or propose new funding to improve University undercrossing and tunnels, provide a mid‐ block crosswalk connecting Centennial Alley and King Plaza, and evaluate and implement alternative  tree grate solutions.  Quarterly Update:   The FY 2026 budget approved by Council in June included appropriations for enhanced cleaning as  described in the project milestones. The capital budget included new funding for tree grate  alternatives and existing funding to support the University undercrossing and mid‐block crosswalk  projects. In June, Council approved the construction project for repainting and providing new lighting  in the University undercrossing and tunnels, and work is expected to begin in August.    Staff is working with VTA and Stanford on the Mobility Hub and Transit Center. The VTA Ad Hoc  Committee meets regularly to discuss this. The agencies and the City are partnering with the Urban  Land Institute to conduct additional analysis to help inform further discussions.     ED 32. Begin feasibility analysis of Assessment District for University Avenue Streetscape  Project Manager: Ashwini Kantak Lead Dept: CMO  Estimated Completion: Q3 Status: On Hold  Project Description:    Conduct analysis to determine practicality of an assessment district or similarly funding strategy as a  funding mechanism for capital enhancements to University Avenue Streetscape.  2025 Project Milestones:   Award of contract to a consultant to determine the feasibility of an assessment district and initiate  stakeholder engagement.  Quarterly Update:   A Request for Proposals was released and the selection process for a consultant initiated. However,  given the concerns about funding for the streetscape project, this project is currently on hold.     Support  economic  development and  retail vibrancy    ED 33. Complete build‐out of fiber‐to‐the‐premises (FTTP) pilot Phase 1 with grid modernization (9)  Project Manager: Alex Harris Lead Dept: UTL  Estimated Completion:  Q3* Status: Behind  Project Description:  Complete building out of a reliable and high‐speed municipal fiber service in a pilot area and work to  establish internet service provider operations including necessary business tools such rate setting,  billing and operations software to roll out services in the initial build.    The City is advancing a pilot phase 1 of fiber with grid modernization to bring reliable and faster  broadband, high‐speed internet services directly to companies and homes, supporting business and  remote workers. The City recently completed the pilot design for the Palo Alto Fiber project and  ATTACHMENT BItem C Attachment B - 2025 Council Priorities and Objectives Q3 Update        Item C: Staff Report Pg. 24  Packet Pg. 395 of 413    17    aligned with the electric grid modernization to capitalize on economies of scale and reduce  neighborhood disruptions.  2025 Project Milestones:   Complete buildout of a reliable and high‐speed municipal fiber and grid modernization pilot.  Issue a  Request for Proposal (RFP) for Operating Support Systems/Business Support Systems (OSS/BSS) and  invitation for construction bids for phase 1 implementation.  Quarterly Update:   FTTP project is advancing following the approval of the building permit for the fiber hut at the  Colorado substation. Construction began in October and the City’s contractor, MP Nexlevel has  initiated pre‐construction work including vegetation clearing and securing a temporary access road.  Additionally, the perimeter fencing of the substation will be extended to accommodate this new  facility.      *The estimated completion date is now Q1 2026.    ED 34. Council consideration of an ordinance that expands retail opportunities and promotes retail  resiliency (12)  Project Manager: Jennifer Armer Lead Dept: PDS  Estimated Completion: Q4* Status: Behind   Project Description:  Consider further refinement to the retail and retail‐like definition and explore changes to retail  preservation ordinance.  2025 Project Milestones:   Prepare recommendations on retail approaches in response to City Council direction. Conduct a  Planning and Transportation Commission (PTC) study session to explore alternative ordinance revision  strategies. Prepare a draft ordinance for review by the PTC and recommendation to the City Council.  Quarterly Update:   A recommendation memo and ordinance outline are under review. A Study Session with the PTC is  scheduled to occur in Q4, followed by Council review in 2026.    *The estimated completion date is now Q1 2026.    ED 35. Council consideration of an ordinance restoring subjective wireless communication facility  regulations.  Project Manager: Jennifer Armer Lead Dept: PDS  Estimated Completion: Q4 Status: Completed  Project Description:    Hold a public hearing on a draft ordinance implementing the City Council's direction from late 2024 to  eliminate objective standards for the placement of wireless antennas within the public right of way on  streetlight or utility poles.  2025 Project Milestones:   Adopt a temporary ordinance.   Quarterly Update:   The City Council held a public hearing on a draft ordinance on May 19, 2025. The temporary  ordinance was adopted, with a second reading on June 9, 2025. Direction on future work was  provided and will proceed once funding and staff resources are available.     ATTACHMENT BItem C Attachment B - 2025 Council Priorities and Objectives Q3 Update        Item C: Staff Report Pg. 25  Packet Pg. 396 of 413    18    ED 36. Refine destination marketing efforts and enhance Palo Alto’s international reputation.  Project Manager: Steve Guagliardo Lead Dept: CMO  Estimated Completion: Q3 Status: On Track  Project Description:    Meet with hospitality partners and incubator/accelerators to assess willingness to partner with the  City on destination marketing efforts and propose next steps, including necessary appropriation  actions, to City Council.  2025 Project Milestones:   Collaborate with local hotels and incubator/accelerators to partner with the City.  Quarterly Update:   In May 2025, staff met with local hoteliers to discuss destination marketing for Palo Alto. The  hoteliers expressed support for marketing efforts but emphasized the need for measurable outcomes  to share with their executive teams. Staff is also continuing to explore partnership opportunities with  incubators and accelerators. However, due to limited staffing, progress has been slower than  anticipated.        ATTACHMENT BItem C Attachment B - 2025 Council Priorities and Objectives Q3 Update        Item C: Staff Report Pg. 26  Packet Pg. 397 of 413    19    Implementing Housing Strategies for Social & Economic Balance (IHS)    Enable  housing  production through  zoning  and  regulatory reform   IHS 37. Prepare an ordinance for Council review expanding the housing focus area (41)   Project Manager: Coleman Frick Lead Dept: PDS  Estimated Completion: Q2 Status: Completed  Project Description:  Increase housing development potential along El Camino Real and consideration of an exemption  from payment of development impact fees for inclusionary units under certain circumstances,  consistent with Housing Element Program 3.4 E.  2025 Project Milestones:   Present draft ordinance for PTC consideration and recommendation to City Council.  Quarterly Update:   The Planning Commission considered a draft ordinance amending and expanding the El Camino Real  Focus Area on March 26, 2025 and recommended City Council approval. The City Council adopted an  ordinance amending the regulations on May 27, 2025 (June 16 second reading).    IHS 38. Present to Council an ordinance updating the City’s housing incentive program (46)  Project Manager: Coleman Frick Lead Dept: PDS  Estimated Completion: Q2 Status: Completed  Project Description:  Increase housing development potential and expand provisions to multi‐family zoning and other  commercial districts in accordance with Housing Element Program 3.4 D.  2025 Project Milestones:   City Council consideration of a draft ordinance.  Quarterly Update:   The City Council adopted an ordinance amending the Housing Incentive Program and Affordable  Housing Incentive Program on March 3, 2025 (April 7 second reading).    IHS 39. Prepare an update to the City's accessory dwelling unit ordinance  Project Manager: Garrett Sauls Lead Dept: PDS  Estimated Completion: Q2 Status: Completed  Project Description:    ATTACHMENT BItem C Attachment B - 2025 Council Priorities and Objectives Q3 Update        Item C: Staff Report Pg. 27  Packet Pg. 398 of 413    20    Update local implementation regulations to respond to changes in State Law, consistency with the  State Housing and Community Department's 2025 ADU Handbook and address applicable deficiencies  identified in HCD's comment letter.    2025 Project Milestones:   Adopt an ordinance updating the City’s accessory dwelling units  Quarterly Update:   Council reviewed and approved a draft ordinance on May 12, 2025, with a second reading on June 16,  2025.    HCD recognized on 10/2/25 over email that the City’s adopted ADU Ordinance (5656) is substantially  compliant with State Law.    IHS 40. Initiate the San Antonio Road Area Plan (40)  Project Manager: Coleman Frick Lead Dept: PDS  Estimated Completion: Q4 Status: On Track  Project Description:  Begin data gathering, document review, implementing a community outreach and engagement  strategy, check‐in meetings with appointed and elected officials, and review by the City Council of a  community assessment report and receive updated project direction, consistent with Housing  Element Program 6.6 C.  2025 Project Milestones:  Secure professional services to conduct community outreach and as part of that engagement, form a  community advisory committee by Q2. Community outreach will commence in Q3 and a draft Existing  Conditions Report (Q3).  Quarterly Update:   Meetings were conducted with the Community Advisory Group (CAG) and Technical Advisory Group  (TAG) in August, 2025 to report on preliminary findings. An Existing Conditions summary report was  completed in September, 2025. Project updates were provided to, and feedback gathered at,  meetings with the PABAC, PTC, ARB, and CSTSC in September, 2025. A study session is scheduled with  the City Council on October 6, 2025. A project survey and workshop will occur in Q4 and will help  inform development of draft project alternatives.    Advance affordable  housing  developments   IHS 41. Partner with Santa Clara County Housing Authority to achieve construction timeline  milestones for the Palo Alto Homekey project (which will provide transitional housing and services  for unhoused residents) (51)  Project Manager: Melissa McDonough Lead Dept: CMO  Estimated Completion: Q3* Status: Behind  Project Description:  Palo Alto Homekey construction is scheduled to take place throughout calendar year 2024 with  completion in early 2025. City staff attends regular project management meetings and owner‐ architect‐contractor (OAC) meetings and conducts site visits. The Housing Authority assists the City  with overall review of construction financing, budget and schedule, as well as construction  monitoring, including conducting site visits, informing the City whether work is being completed on  time and according to design intent, and reviewing the project schedule on a regular basis, providing  input to mitigate potential delays.  2025 Project Milestones:  ATTACHMENT BItem C Attachment B - 2025 Council Priorities and Objectives Q3 Update        Item C: Staff Report Pg. 28  Packet Pg. 399 of 413    21    Monitor the timely completion of updated milestones relating to concrete work, fabrication of  modular units, setting of modular units, backfill and grading, decking and stairs, completion of site‐ built items, and switchgear installation and energization.  Quarterly Update:   The Homekey project continues to move forward. Crews are working on the “belly band” exterior  finish, painting, and interior connection points between modular units. Overall completion is still on  track for early 2026.   *The project team is estimating construction completion by early 2026 after impacts of construction  delays.    IHS 42. Identify different housing typology options for the one‐acre site near Matadero Creek  Project Manager: Claire Raybould Lead Dept: PDS  Estimated Completion: Q4 Status: On Track  Project Description:    Use grant funded technical analysis to consider housing options for a future affordable housing  development on land to be dedicated to the City from the 2023 Sobrato/City Development  Agreement; present findings and receive direction from Council.  2025 Project Milestones:   Present massing options, financial analysis, and request for proposal considerations for City Council  feedback and direction on next steps.   Quarterly Update:   Grant funded technical analysis is largely complete. City Council consideration anticipated in  November 2025.    IHS 43. Prepare the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) 5‐Year Consolidated Plan and  Annual Action Plan.  Project Manager: Coleman Frick Lead Dept: PDS  Estimated Completion: Q4 Status: Completed  Project Description:    The Quinquennial update helps jurisdictions to assess affordable housing and community  development needs and market conditions to make data‐driven, place‐based investment decisions  when distributing federal CDBG grant funds.  2025 Project Milestones:   City Council adoption of the CDBG Consolidated Plan (Con Plan) and Annual Action Plan (AAP) by Q2.  Quarterly Update:   The City met the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) timeliness test on May 2,  2025. The Human Resources Commission considered the draft CDBG Con Plan and AAP on May 8 and  provided recommendations for City Council consideration. The City Council adopted the CDBG Con  Plan and AAP on June 9, 2025.    IHS 44. Advance affordable housing project on Downtown surface parking lot (Lot T).   Project Manager: Julia Knight Lead Dept: PDS  Estimated Completion: Q4 Status: On Track  Project Description:    ATTACHMENT BItem C Attachment B - 2025 Council Priorities and Objectives Q3 Update        Item C: Staff Report Pg. 29  Packet Pg. 400 of 413    22    Enter into an exclusive negotiating agreement with Alta Housing; receive an updated project concept  design & prescreening application for Council review; receive formal planning entitlement application,  consistent with Housing Element Program 1.4 A.  2025 Project Milestones:   Staff anticipates that Alta Housing will hold a community meeting to gather general ideas and input  for this project in August 2025 and will present an updated design concept to Council in September  2025. The Alta Housing team is currently targeting an October project application submission and a  December design review hearing with the Architecture Review Board.  Quarterly Update:   City Council selected Alta Housing as their development partner for the Lot T project on January 21,  2025 and approved an exclusive negotiation agreement with Alta Housing on June 17, 2025. City  Council will have an opportunity to provide informal feedback on the development of Alta Housing’s  project proposal during a study session on October 22, 2025. Alta Housing plans to host a community  meeting to gather further project input after this study session and to submit a formal project  application based on Council and the community’s feedback in early 2026.    IHS 45. Work with the Santa Clara County Housing Authority to determine next steps to maintain  affordability and improve conditions at Buena Vista Mobile Park (56)  Project Manager: Melissa McDonough Lead Dept: CMO  Estimated Completion: Q4 Status: On Track  Project Description:  Meet with Housing Authority regularly to identify feasible next steps. Review financing approach and  options. Update Council on identified, proposed next steps and approach.  2025 Project Milestones:  Staff plans to meet with Housing Authority regularly to identify feasible next steps. Including  reviewing financing approach and maintaining Council abreast of identified options and approach.  Work on this project will be reported quarterly and as necessary, with activities concluding in Q4.  Quarterly Update:   The Housing Authority Board approved in September advancing $28 million in utility upgrades to the  property. Staff is coordinating NEPA (National Environmental Protection Act) impact assessment  revisions ahead of work beginning on the upgrades.    IHS 46. Organize an initial review of sources and methods to raise funding to support new  affordable housing production for future evaluation.  Project Manager: Melissa McDonough Lead Dept: CMO  Estimated Completion: Q4 Status: On Track  Project Description:    Conduct research to identify and evaluate sources and methods. Work with Finance Committee to  develop recommendations for City Council.  2025 Project Milestones:   Conduct research and evaluate sources and methods to raise funding to support new affordable  housing production. Present findings to the Finance Committee for feedback and development into  recommendations for City Council.  Quarterly Update:   The project will be initiated once staff resources are redirected following the completion of the Policy  and Services Committee recommendation on oversized vehicles related to IHS 50.    ATTACHMENT BItem C Attachment B - 2025 Council Priorities and Objectives Q3 Update        Item C: Staff Report Pg. 30  Packet Pg. 401 of 413    23    Support  tenant  protections  and  housing  equity   IHS 47. Present a renter protection fair chance ordinance to Council (54)  Project Manager: Coleman Frick Lead Dept: PDS  Estimated Completion: Q3 Status: Completed  Project Description:  Present findings of an analysis and policy recommendations in the form of a draft ordinance to reduce  barriers to housing by individuals with criminal records, consistent with Housing Element Program 6.6  I.  Consistent with the City Council’s renter protection policy direction, staff will research the policy  implications of a fair chance renter policy from a legal, policy, and anticipated resource demand  perspective.   2025 Project Milestones:   Present ordinance for City Council consideration.  Quarterly Update:   Staff presented an ordinance for City Council consideration on April 14, 2025. The Council directed  staff to further analyze specific provisions and return to the City Council Policy and Services  Committee for further consideration and next steps.    IHS 48. Report out on initial data from the rental registry program and project implementation;  receive feedback and recommendations for next steps. (57)  Project Manager: Coleman Frick Lead Dept: PDS  Estimated Completion: Q3* Status: Behind  Project Description:  The Rental Registry Program registration period ran between fall 2024 and spring 2025. The data  collected in the first year of the program will be provided to the City Council including key insights and  next steps.  2025 Project Milestones:  Reporting to Council on first year of registration period in Q3. Open second year registration period  on October 1, 2025.  Quarterly Update:   Analysis of data collected through Program Year 1 of the rental registry program was completed in  Q2. The second year of the program opened for registration on October 1, 2025. An informational  report will be provided to the City Council in November 3, 2025 summarizing data collected from  Program Year 1.    *The estimated completion date is now Q4.    IHS 49. Present to Council an analysis related to anti‐rent gouging (55)   Project Manager: Julia Knight Lead Dept: PDS  Estimated Completion: Q4 Status: On Track  Project Description:  Consistent with prior Council direction, examine implications of a possible ordinance from legal, policy  and anticipated resource demand perspectives; receive direction on next steps.  2025 Project Milestones:   September 30, 2025 will mark the end of the first year of required real‐time rent increase reporting  for all properties subject to the rental registry program as it is currently implemented. Staff will  ATTACHMENT BItem C Attachment B - 2025 Council Priorities and Objectives Q3 Update        Item C: Staff Report Pg. 31  Packet Pg. 402 of 413    24    analyze this data alongside annual rent reporting trends from the 2024‐2025 program year to inform  a Q4 Council discussion on the costs and benefits of a potential rent stabilization program in Palo Alto.   Quarterly Update:   Staff presented initial policy analysis findings to Housing Ad Hoc Committee in Q4 2024 and received  direction to present analysis alongside Palo Alto specific rental housing data from the Rental Registry  Program in 2025. Staff will review and analyze available data and share findings with the Policy &  Services committee in November 2025.     IHS 50. Present options to address homelessness impacts, particularly relating to individuals living  in vehicles, to Policy & Services Committee for prioritization.  Project Manager: Chantal Cotton Gaines Lead Dept: CMO  Estimated Completion: Q3 Status: Completed  Project Description:    Identify feasible (1) regulatory approaches to manage the use of public space and (2) policy solutions  to expand RV safe parking. Present options to the Policy & Services Committee (P&S) for  consideration and prioritization.  2025 Project Milestones:   Identify options for P&S, including implementation considerations and resources needs.   Present options to P&S for consideration and prioritization.  Quarterly Update:   Staff presented options to P&S on August 25, 2025 at a special meeting. P&S recommended a phased  approach to Council which will be considered at the October 20 Council meeting.    Improve citywide  housing  policy  and  planning   IHS 51. Extend for one year or codify R1/SB 9 interim ordinance (45)  Project Manager: Jennifer Armer Lead Dept: PDS  Estimated Completion: Q4 Status: On Track  Project Description:  Establish objective development standards and increases the maximum floor area for SB 9 units from  800 to 1200 square feet consistent with Housing Element Program 6.3A; consider implications of  similar objective standards for R1 and SB 9 projects relative to the City’s Individual Review Program.  2025 Project Milestones:   Discuss and receive feedback from the Planning and Transportation Commission on a permanent  ordinance in Q3 for Council consideration in Q4.  Quarterly Update:   Work on permanent ordinance was delayed due to other priorities and staffing reductions. Extension  of the temporary ordinance is scheduled for Q4.    IHS 52. Initiate evaluation of South of Forest Area Coordinated Area Plan (SOFA) development  standards.  Project Manager: Coleman Frick Lead Dept: PDS  Estimated Completion: Q4 Status: On Track  Project Description:    Review and explore options to amend the coordinated area plan with the intent to replace subjective  development standards with objective standards to accommodate future residential development at  higher densities consistent with Housing Element Program 3.7.  ATTACHMENT BItem C Attachment B - 2025 Council Priorities and Objectives Q3 Update        Item C: Staff Report Pg. 32  Packet Pg. 403 of 413    25    2025 Project Milestones:   Develop options for amending the South of Forest Area Coordinated Area Plan (SOFA)   Quarterly Update:   Project scoping planned for Q4 and will incorporate consideration of potential impacts associated  with SB 79, as applicable.    IHS 53. Present to Council the Downtown Housing Plan Community Assessment report and receive  Council direction on draft housing plan scenarios (36)  Project Manager: Coleman Frick Lead Dept: PDS  Estimated Completion: Q4 Status: On Track  Project Description:    Continue advancing the plan development and public engagement strategy to prepare draft housing  plan and environmental analysis.  2025 Project Milestones:   Provide the City Council with the Community Assessment in Q2 and receive direction on alternative  approaches to housing distribution in the plan area and hold a community workshop (Q4). Policy  development and community engagement efforts will continue through Q4 of 2025.  Quarterly Update:   A community survey was released in September, 2025 to gather additional feedback on possible areas  for increased housing density downtown, to supplement feedback received at the July community  workshop. Staff is scheduled to present information to the City Council about approaches for the plan  area and next steps in Q4.    IHS 54. Present an ordinance to Council that supports innovative housing structures.  Project Manager: Coleman Frick Lead Dept: PDS  Estimated Completion: Q4 Status: On Track  Project Description:  Create zoning incentives or update development standards to support various housing typologies,  including micro‐units, intergenerational housing, aging adults, students and lower‐income units,  consistent with Housing Element Program 6.5.  2025 Project Milestones:  Complete stakeholder outreach in Q2 2025. Complete an analysis of opportunities and challenges in  Q3, followed by the development of alternative approaches and a study session with the Architectural  Review Board in Q4.   Beyond this year, a draft ordinance will be prepared in 2026 for recommendation by the Planning and  Transportation Commission and consideration by the City Council.  Quarterly Update:   The project team evaluated approaches in Q3 and is developing alternatives for accommodating  various alternative housing types in the zoning ordinance based on identified opportunities and  challenges. The alternative approaches will be considered by the ARB and PTC for discussion in Q1,  2026.     IHS 55. Present findings to Council on a study that explores code amendments reducing commercial  floor area and possible extension of Downtown in‐lieu parking program to residential development  (50)  Project Manager: Coleman Frick Lead Dept: PDS  ATTACHMENT BItem C Attachment B - 2025 Council Priorities and Objectives Q3 Update        Item C: Staff Report Pg. 33  Packet Pg. 404 of 413    26    Estimated Completion: Q4 Status: On Track  Project Description:  Evaluate opportunities that make multi‐family housing an attractive alternative to commercial office  development, consistent with Housing Element Program 3.9.  2025 Project Milestones:  Present findings to the PTC and ordinance recommendation to the City Council.  Quarterly Update:   The project team is simulating development scenarios for test sites to evaluate different commercial  and multi‐family residential typologies; anticipated for completion in October, 2025. Stakeholder  meetings for the parking program component were completed in August, 2025. In Q4, the project  team will develop policy proposals to present to the PTC. Council consideration is anticipated to occur  in Q1, 2026.    IHS 56. Update development impact fees for public safety, government facilities, housing,  transportation, parks, and community services.  Project Manager: Julia Knight Lead Dept: PDS  Estimated Completion: Q4 Status: On Track  Project Description:    Conduct a nexus and feasibility study to ensure housing remains viable. Consider potential policy to  waive impact fees associated with for low‐income inclusionary units with when 20% of the units are  deed restricted. (Housing Element Programs 2.1B; 3.1 B&C)  2025 Project Milestones:   A RFP was issued in May 2025, with responses due by July 11, 2025. An interdepartmental panel will  conduct respondent interviews at the end of August. Staff is targeting consultant selection, contract  execution and project kick‐off in the fall. Fee updates based on consultant studies and staff  community needs analyses are anticipated in 2026 and 2027.  Quarterly Update:   Staff published the RFP in May 2025 following interdepartmental review and responded to questions  received on the RFP in June 2025. The City received four complete responses in July 2025 and staff  interviewed three respondent teams in August 2025. In September 2025, the City notified Keyser  Marston Associates (KMA) of their intent to award the project to their team. Staff is currently working  with the KMA team to refine the project scope and budget. Staff intends to bring a contract for work  with KMA to Council on consent in November 2025.        ATTACHMENT BItem C Attachment B - 2025 Council Priorities and Objectives Q3 Update        Item C: Staff Report Pg. 34  Packet Pg. 405 of 413    27    Public Safety, Wellness & Belonging (PS)    Modernize  public safety  infrastructure   PS 57. Open the new Public Safety Building for daily Police, OES, and Fire services (72)  Project Manager: Holly Boyd Lead Dept: PW  Estimated Completion: Q3* Status: Behind  Project Description:  Complete construction, move‐in of departments, and a ribbon‐cutting event to commemorate the  official availability of public safety services from the facility for all.    Complete construction of the new Public Safety Building followed by furniture and equipment  installation, communication testing and set‐up.  2025 Project Milestones:  Complete construction of the project and move public safety departments into the fully operational  building.  Quarterly Update:  Staff obtained the certificate of temporary occupancy in August. The first phase of move‐in was  completed in early September. A ribbon cutting ceremony and open house is scheduled for November  16, 2025.    *The estimated completion date is Q4    PS 58. Council to adopt the updated Foothills Fire Management Plan and Community Wildfire  Protection Plan (71)  Project Manager: Ken Dueker Lead Dept: OES  Estimated Completion: Q2 Completed   Project Description:  Plan to reflect alignment with Santa Clara County and other agencies and entities to address early  warning technology, planning and procedural elements and risk mitigation.    Staff is working on various efforts related to improving the City’s planning in collaboration with Santa  Clara County and other allied agencies and entities. Efforts include not only emergency planning, but  also early warning technology, and updating operational and procedural elements within the City  organization to mitigate the risks associated with a fire in the foothills.     ATTACHMENT BItem C Attachment B - 2025 Council Priorities and Objectives Q3 Update        Item C: Staff Report Pg. 35  Packet Pg. 406 of 413    28    NOTE: The Foothills Fire Management Plan/Community Wildfire Protection Plan (FFMP/CWPP) is a  multi‐year plan with OES, Fire Department, Public Works, Utilities Wildfire Mitigation Plan,  Community Services Department coordinated via the Foothills Fire Management Team (aka Foothills  Wildfire Coordination Team).    2025 Project Milestones:  Staff is also pursuing a service agreement with the Santa Clara County Firesafe Council to perform the  schedule of required treatments each year in conjunction with some support from the City.     The Fire Department and OES are in the process of evaluating certain remote fire detection  equipment in cooperation with the Fire Safe Council and local partner agencies.  In partnership with  the Santa Clara County Fire Safe Council, Palo Alto, Stanford, and the Woodside Fire Protection  District deployed a distributed wildland fire sensor network (known and “N5”) via a Homeland  Security grant in the Fall of 2024 and will work through 2025 to optimize the system’s configuration.  Quarterly Update:    Public engagement was held in April through May, 2025 to seek public comment on the update of the  two plans followed by Council awareness in Q2.  Formal adoption is not a requirement of the Plans.     PS 59.  Council approval of construction contract for Fire Station No. 4 Replacement project and  initiation of construction. (73)  Project Manager: Holly Boyd Lead Dept: PW  Estimated Completion: Q2* Status: Completed  Project Description:   Complete design and award a construction contract to re‐build Fire Station No. 4.  2025 Project Milestones:  Complete design, construct temporary facility, and award a construction contract in the Fall 2025.  Quarterly Update:   The project was advertised for bids in late June, and a construction contract is anticipated to be  awarded in October. The temporary fire station construction was completed in June and staff  relocated in July.    *The objective is now estimated to be completed by Q3.    PS 60. Activate a fire engine at Fire Station 4  Project Manager: Stephen Lindsey Lead Dept: Fire  Estimated Completion: Q2 Status: Completed  Project Description:    The Palo Alto Fire Department (PAFD) provides fire protection and emergency medical transport  throughout the City and Stanford. Following pandemic budget reductions that impacted all City  departments and services, the Council has reinvested in fire services to rebuild operations. Additional  investment in emergency medical and fire response supports the whole community and a near‐term  proposal to add a fire engine to the current ambulance staffing at Fire Station 4 will be considered.  2025 Project Milestones:   Augment staffing at Fire Station 4 to deploy either ambulance or fire engine response.  Quarterly Update:   Engine 64 was officially upstaffed at Fire Station 4 on May 5, 2025. It is now cross staffed daily with  Medic 64, with a crew consisting of a captain, apparatus operator, and firefighter who are assigned to  deploy either the fire engine or the ambulance, depending on the nature of the emergency.  ATTACHMENT BItem C Attachment B - 2025 Council Priorities and Objectives Q3 Update        Item C: Staff Report Pg. 36  Packet Pg. 407 of 413    29      As of July 8, 2025, both Engine 64 and Medic 64, along with their assigned personnel, have been  relocated to the Temporary Fire Station 4 at 4000 Middlefield Road at Cubberley, in preparation for  the upcoming Fire Station 4 construction project. Units continue to operate under a cross‐staffed  response model.    PS 61. Initiate an update to the City’s seismic hazards ordinance (75)  Project Manager: Julia Knight Lead Dept: PDS  Estimated Completion: Q3 Status: On Track  Project Description:  Conduct an assessment of previous study, update potentially eligible buildings, and begin work on  seismic hazard identify and mitigation ordinance.   2025 Project Milestones:  Establish a community advisory group to support the project with a first meeting targeted for August  2025, with 2‐3 additional meetings to follow. Staff intends to present findings from Task A (an  updated of the eligible buildings list) to the Policy and Services Committee in November or December  2025. Work will continue into 2026 with an aim to adopt an updated ordinance by the end of the  2026 calendar year.  Quarterly Update:    City Council awarded the project contract to Rutherford & Chekene on February 10, 2025. Staff  issued the consultant a notice to proceed with Task A on May 7, 2025. Staff began work to establish  the community advisory group in June 2025. The first advisory group meeting was held on August 20,  2025 and the second is set for October 14, 2025. Staff intends to present project progress and next  steps to the Policy and Services Committee in December 2025.    Expand  wellness  and  community  saving facilities  and  services   PS 62. Develop Master Plan for Cubberley site  Project Manager: Kristen O’Kane Lead Dept: CSD  Estimated Completion: Q4 Status: On Track  Project Description:    The City has hired consultant, Concordia, to lead the Master Planning process for the anticipated 15  acres of the Cubberly site. Currently the City owns eight acres and plans to purchase an additional  seven acres from PAUSD pending a successful bond measure in November 2026. Concordia will lead  the community engagement and master planning process with anticipated completion by December  2025.     Master planning will be in cooperation with The Friends of the Palo Alto Recreation Wellness Center,  whose objective is to create space for a 3‐court gymnasium and wellness center in the first phase of  construction. The master planning process will occur concurrently with the City’s efforts to pass the  bond measure in November 2026, which in 2025 will include working with a polling consultant (FM3)  and ballot strategy consultant (Lew Edwards Group).  2025 Project Milestones:   The project will be kicked off by a Council Visioning Session in February, 2025, followed by community  engagement meetings in March, June and September.  Staff will analyze the feedback and return to  Council in December to present the Final Master Plan draft for consideration.  Quarterly Update:   ATTACHMENT BItem C Attachment B - 2025 Council Priorities and Objectives Q3 Update        Item C: Staff Report Pg. 37  Packet Pg. 408 of 413    30    Extensive community engagement took place through co‐design meetings, City Council updates,  Board and Commission presentations, and various outreach efforts. Three design concepts—focused  on building spacing and layout, outdoor space, and site circulation—were presented at the June 12  community meeting, which were refined to one concept presented at the September 17 meeting. The  concept highlights the need for phasing the project, recognizing that available funding may be a  limiting factor. Additionally, the first community poll conducted by FM3 indicated positive support for  a potential future bond or tax measure.    PS 63. Implement the 2024‐2025 Wellness & Belonging Action Plan  Project Manager: Chantal Cotton Gaines Lead Dept: CMO  Estimated Completion: Q4 Status: On Track  Project Description:    Complete the 26 action items in the action plan in collaboration with partners as well as completing a  training on Islamophobia and Antisemitism.   2025 Project Milestones:   Each item in the action plan has a different deadline with a variety of milestones. The action plan can  be found here: https://www.paloalto.gov/files/assets/public/v/2/city‐manager/wellness‐and‐ belonging/wellness‐and‐belonging‐workplan‐2025.pdf     Quarterly Update:   The most recent progress on the City’s wellness and belonging work is in the report to be presented  to the Policy and Services Committee on August 12, 2025. Agenda link (it is item #4):  https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/Portal/Meeting?meetingTemplateId=16179. The progress on  action plan items is included as Attachment A to that report.      PS 64. Open 445 Bryant Street Community Center  Project Manager: Kristen O’Kane Lead Dept: CSD  Estimated Completion: Q3* Status: Behind  Project Description:    The project at 445 Bryant Street will transform the facility into a two‐level community center  designed to host community programs, classes, events, and dedicated teen space. The first‐floor  multi‐purpose room will serve as the primary location for La Comida’s Senior Lunch Program. Phase I  includes the structural improvements necessary to make the building safe for occupancy and to open  the community center to the public. Completion of Phase I will allow for the official opening of the  community center and the launch of La Comida’s lunch program. Phase II will focus on building out  the second‐floor space to serve as a teen center and additional community events and classes.  2025 Project Milestones:   Phase I‐ hire an architect to design structural updates, with priority given to the first‐floor to serve as  a senior lunch program and community event space.  Structural improvements will include ADA  improvements, sound mitigation, plumbing and HVAC system upgrades among others.  Quarterly Update:   Multi‐department coordination has continued with the primary goal of completing renovations to the  downstairs space for La Comida’s senior lunch program now planned for January 2026 (previously Q3  of 2025).  Some building improvements to the upstairs spaces will allow CSD to do some  programming, including opening a teen center in early 2026.    *The estimated completion date is now Q1 2026*  ATTACHMENT BItem C Attachment B - 2025 Council Priorities and Objectives Q3 Update        Item C: Staff Report Pg. 38  Packet Pg. 409 of 413    31      PS 65. Enhance and Expand Inclusive Programs and Services  Project Manager: Amanda Deml Lead Dept: CSD  Estimated Completion: Q4 Status: On Track  Project Description:    Enhance services to support individuals with disabilities seeking accommodation support, expand  community partnerships that serve the disability community, and implement new therapeutic  recreation programs.    CSD will continue to expand and enhance inclusive and accessible practices, programs, classes, and  events. The new Therapeutic Recreation and Accessibility Coordinated role was hired in August 2024  and began providing dedicated support to the department in handling all accommodation requests  for participation, leading quarterly all‐staff training on inclusive practices, and facilitating inclusive  and adaptive recreation programs, classes and events with our community partner organizations.  2025 Project Milestones:   The Community Services Department will hire a new full‐time coordinator to support inclusion efforts  across programs. The department will enhance the accommodation request process to better serve  individuals with diverse needs and will create and support new inclusive programs in collaboration  with community partners. Additionally, new therapeutic recreation programs will be launched to  provide tailored opportunities for participation. To strengthen internal capacity, quarterly inclusion  trainings will be implemented for all CSD staff.  Quarterly Update:   City Council approved the coordinator position to be expanded from 0.75 FTE to full‐time in the FY26  budget process and allocated budget for program supplies and accommodation support which will  enhance our ability to serve the community. A full‐time staff member will allow us to provide  consistent accommodation support for participants, implement all‐ staff inclusion trainings within  CSD, and launch therapeutic recreation programs. The incumbent resigned in February and the search  for a full‐time staff member began in August and yielded a very competitive applicant pool. An offer  has been made, and the new coordinator will begin as soon as possible. In the meantime,  accommodation requests continue to be supported by existing staff, and we are supporting  community partners such as Magical Bridge and AbilityPath to offer existing programs as well as offer  new programs and services in Palo Alto.    PS 66. Implement New Expanded CSD Recreation Special Events Workplan. (60)  Project Manager: Kristen O’Kane Lead Dept: CSD  Estimated Completion: Q4 Status: On Track  Project Description:    Create special events that foster togetherness, belonging, and a strong sense of community.  Continuing cherished traditions and introducing new gatherings helps combat the loneliness epidemic  and celebrate the rich diversity of the community. Longstanding events such as the May Fete Parade  and Festival, Fourth of July Chili Cook‐Off, Moonlight Run, and Holiday Tree Lighting remain  cornerstones of community connection. New events are also planned for this year, pending City  Council approval of the workplan. In addition, the Community Services Department (CSD) offers a  wide range of special events throughout the year and actively partners with other City departments  and local organizations to enhance community engagement.  2025 Project Milestones:   Approve the 2025 CSD Recreation Special Events workplan.  Include the following new events:  ATTACHMENT BItem C Attachment B - 2025 Council Priorities and Objectives Q3 Update        Item C: Staff Report Pg. 39  Packet Pg. 410 of 413    32    Heart and Harmony Dance; Around the World in One Day Cultural Event; Fun and Games at July Third  Thursday; Pancakes in the Park; and a Pet Costume Parade.  Quarterly Update:   On February 24, the City Council approved the CSD Recreation Special Events Workplan Special, and  implementation has been successfully implemented for quarters 1,2, and 3.  New events in Q3  included a Corn Hole tournament on California Avenue (August), Pancakes in the Park (September),  and a pet costume parade (October).    67. Support Community Mental Health (65)  Project Manager: Kristen O’Kane Lead Dept: CSD  Estimated Completion: Q4 Status: On Track  Project Description:    The Community Services Department (CSD) continues to promote mental health for all ages through a  range of programs, partnerships, and initiatives. In FY25, the City Council allocated $100,000 to  support youth and teen mental health efforts. Ongoing programs from 2024 include free Link rides for  teens ($10,000) to access mental health‐supportive locations such as community centers, parks,  libraries, and allcove, as well as the Beyond the Books event ($4,000). New initiatives in FY25 include  a $45,500 contract with Palo Alto University to host mental health workshops for teens and parents,  and a new Career Fair event ($10,000) focused on post‐high school pathways that do not involve  traditional university enrollment. Additional trainings, programs, and partnerships are also under  development.  2025 Project Milestones:   In the spring, teen mental health workshops will launch in partnership with Palo Alto University, along  with a career fair focused on non‐traditional post‐high school pathways. Fall activities will include  hosting the Beyond the Books event. By Q4, the City of Palo Alto and the Palo Alto Unified School  District will work with stakeholders to further refine the scope of collaboration for City Council  discussion, potential direction, and continued partnership with the School District.  Quarterly Update:   CSD staff worked with the County of Santa Clara’s Q Corner and allcove to host Wednesday afternoon  Gen Z hangouts to provide a safe, caring space for teens to gather in September and October. Council  approved a new agreement with Project Safety Net and an agreement with the JED Foundation for  youth mental health and suicide prevention support.    Promote  environmental  and  transportation  safety   PS 68. Continue engagement with San Francisco Airport on SFO's Ground Based Augmentation  System (GBAS) project and other potential opportunities to decrease SFO noise impacts on Palo  Alto. (79)  Project Manager: Andy Swanson Lead Dept: PW  Estimated Completion: Q4 Status: On Track  Project Description:   Palo Alto is impacted by three arrival routes into San Francisco International Airport (SFO). These  routes have had an ongoing negative health impact on our community and intensified due to the  implementation of the Federal Aviation Administration’s NextGEN Initiative. The City remains  committed to collaborating with residents, the FAA, SFO, SFO’s Community Roundtable, elected  officials, regional agencies, and noise advocacy groups to identify solutions that restore quality of life.  ATTACHMENT BItem C Attachment B - 2025 Council Priorities and Objectives Q3 Update        Item C: Staff Report Pg. 40  Packet Pg. 411 of 413    33    Staff and community members continue to evaluate the potential noise impacts of SFO’s proposed  Ground Based Augmentation System (GBAS) on Palo Alto.  2025 Project Milestones:   Issue a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) to solicit proposals for two key initiatives:  1. Ground‐Based Augmentation System (GBAS): To evaluate the feasibility and potential benefits  of implementing GBAS technology to reduce aircraft noise impacts in our region.  2. San Francisco International Airport (SFO) Noise Data Analysis: To obtain detailed data and  technical expertise for analyzing noise impacts from SFO operations on our community.  The RFQ process will ensure we identify qualified consultants or firms with the appropriate  experience to support these efforts.  Quarterly Update:  Due to staff turnover at the airport, the RFQ has been delayed and is now expected to go out in fall  2025.     Councilmember Stone and City staff met with SFO staff on September 12, 2025, with the meeting  serving as an introduction to new SFO Director Mike Nakornkhet and including discussion of  continuing collaboration between the City and SFO on noise issues. The next meeting is expected in  late November or early December.    PS 69.  Council Approval of Quiet Zone Concept Plans at Churchill Ave, Meadow Drive, and  Charleston Rd Rail Crossings. (76)  Project Manager: Ripon Bhatia Lead Dept: OOT  Estimated Completion: Q3 Status: On Track  Project Description:   Quiet zone implementation is desired by neighborhood to reduce noise impact of locomotive horn  sound off in advance of crossings.  The city must mitigate the increased risk caused by the absence of  the horn.  Safety improvements meeting Federal Rail Authority technical requirements must be  identified and implemented in order to establish a quiet zone.    2025 Project Milestones:    A draft conceptual improvement plan was developed in 2024.   Conduct public outreach and review by the Rail Committee by June 2025.   Quarterly Update:  The final report for the Quiet Zone Study for Churchill Ave, Meadow Drive, and Charleston Road  crossing was presented to the Rail Committee on September 16, 2025. Rail committee unanimously  recommended proceeding with four quadrant gate systems to implement quiet zone at these  crossings. Staff plans to take Rail Committee recommendation for the Council Review and direction in  November 2025.     PS 70. Enhance safety and improve quality of life in commercial areas by reducing criminal activity  through business engagement and the deployment of officers and technology.  Project Manager: Andrew Binder Lead Dept: PD  Estimated Completion: Q4 Status: On Track  Project Description:    Establish a Business Watch program to enhance collaboration with businesses and assign two officers  at a minimum to patrol high traffic commercial areas.    ATTACHMENT BItem C Attachment B - 2025 Council Priorities and Objectives Q3 Update        Item C: Staff Report Pg. 41  Packet Pg. 412 of 413    34    Deploy technology and officers in commercial areas in order to deter criminal activity and support a  safe environment for the public.  Engage with local businesses to facilitate information sharing,  identify problems and develop collaborative solutions. Work with other city departments to abate  nuisances and connect offenders with appropriate social services.  2025 Project Milestones:   Assign at least 2 officers daily to, exclusively, patrol high traffic commercial areas. Complete  deployment of 10 additional Automatic License Plate Reader (ALPR) cameras approved by the Council  in December for a total of 30 cameras throughout. Establish a “Business Watch” program to enhance  collaboration with businesses.   Quarterly Update:   Two or more officers are being deployed daily to, exclusively, patrol high traffic commercial areas.  All  30 Council‐authorized ALPR cameras have been deployed.  In lieu of a formal program, PD staff has  coordinated with the Chamber to establish channels for better dissemination of relevant and timely  crime trend information and will continue working with the Chamber to further improve collaboration  in a way that suits their needs    ATTACHMENT BItem C Attachment B - 2025 Council Priorities and Objectives Q3 Update        Item C: Staff Report Pg. 42  Packet Pg. 413 of 413