HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Report 2409-3487CITY OF PALO ALTO
CITY COUNCIL
Special Meeting
Monday, February 10, 2025
Council Chambers & Hybrid
5:30 PM
Agenda Item
9.Approval of Professional Services Contract Number C25189597 with Rutherford &
Chekene in an Amount Not to Exceed $207,812 for Development of a Seismic Hazard
Identification and Mitigation Program for a Period of Three Years. CEQA Status: Exempt
under CEQA Guidelines 15262.
City Council
Staff Report
From: City Manager
Report Type: CONSENT CALENDAR
Lead Department: Planning and Development Services
Meeting Date: February 10, 2025
Report #:2409-3487
TITLE
Approval of Professional Services Contract Number C25189597 with Rutherford & Chekene in an
Amount Not to Exceed $207,812 for Development of a Seismic Hazard Identification and
Mitigation Program for a Period of Three Years. CEQA Status: Exempt under CEQA Guidelines
15262.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that Council approve and authorize the City Manager or designee to execute
Contract No. C25189597 (Attachment A), with Rutherford & Chekene, to update and advance the
Seismic Hazards Identification and Mitigation Program for a term of three years and a total
amount not-to-exceed $207,812, including $188,920 for basic services and $18,892 for additional
services.
BACKGROUND
The City’s efforts to mitigate seismic risks in vulnerable buildings date back to the 1986 adoption
of the Seismic Hazards Identification Program, codified in Chapter 16.42 of the Palo Alto
Municipal Code.1 This ordinance required mandatory evaluations and encouraged voluntary
retrofits, successfully addressing unreinforced masonry structures. However, advancements in
seismic science and lessons from recent seismic events in California highlight the need for more
comprehensive measures.
In April 2017, a comprehensive Seismic Risk Assessment Study by Rutherford & Chekene
identified five additional vulnerable building types and estimated potential seismic losses if no
action were to be taken. Recommendations included mandatory retrofits for certain building
categories, incentives for property owners, and updates to disclosure measures. These findings
laid the groundwork for future policy enhancements.
1 Palo Alto Municipal Code, Chapter 16.42: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/paloalto/latest/paloalto_ca/0-
0-0-74168
In October 2017, the City Council directed staff to refine the seismic inventory, assess community
impacts, and explore program options, disclosures, and incentives.2 This marked an important
step toward expanding the seismic retrofit program, with a focus on addressing soft-story wood-
frame buildings, tilt-up construction, and other high-risk structures. The project was later
deprioritized to advance other work including the City’s pandemic response.
In August 2023 the Policy & Services Committee received a status update and reviewed initial
policy considerations from the 2016 Seismic Risk Assessment Study by Rutherford & Chekene
report.3 Concepts included consideration of mandatory seismic evaluations for an expanded list
of vulnerable building types, alignment with modern best practices, and lessons learned from
other jurisdictions. The risk assessment reflected years of study, community engagement, and
policy refinement that reflected the City’s interest in reducing seismic risks and improving the
safety and resilience of Palo Alto’s built environment. The Committee expressed support for the
recommendations and was in alignment with staff’s proposed next steps as outlined by staff. The
subject contract has not been reviewed by the Policy & Services Committee but reflects its prior
discussion and is being presented to the City Council for action.
ANALYSIS
In May 2024, staff advanced work toward seeking proposals from qualified firms to provide
services to customize a seismic hazard identification and risk mitigation program for seismically
vulnerable buildings. A request for proposals (RFP) for the project was posted on OpenGov, the
City’s eProcurement platform, and 3,119 vendors were notified. The solicitation period was
posted for 58 days and two proposals were received. The solicitation closed on June 27, 2024.
Table 1: Summary of Request for Proposal
Proposal Description RFP 189597 Seismic Hazard Identification & Risk
Mitigation Program
Proposed Length of Project Three Years
Number of Vendors Notified 3,119
Number of Proposal Packages Downloaded 37
Total Days to Respond to Proposal 58
Pre-Proposal Meeting N/A
Pre-Proposal Meeting Date N/A
Number of Proposals Received 2
Proposal Price Range $332,000 - $379,470
Public Link to Solicitation https://procurement.opengov.com/portal/palo-
alto-ca/projects/94858/document
2 City Council, October 16, 2017; Agenda Item #12, SR #8207,
https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/v/1/agendas-minutes-reports/reports/city-manager-reports-
cmrs/year-archive/2017/id-8207-seismic.pdf
3 Policy & Services Committee, August 8, 2023; Agenda Item #2,
https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/Portal/viewer?id=2677&type=0
The proposals were evaluated and determined to be responsive to the criteria identified in the
RFP. Rutherford & Chekene was selected because of the quality and effectiveness of their
services, the experience of their field staff, prior record of performance with the City, and their
ability to provide future services.
The proposed contract, totaling $207,812 including optional additional services of $18,892,
reflects the scope of services necessary to advance the City’s seismic hazard identification and
mitigation efforts. Funding in the amount of $216,000 has been reappropriated from prior City
Council funding allocated in the FY 2024 budget.
The proposed work builds upon the findings of the 2016 Seismic Risk Assessment Study by
refining and updating the inventory of potentially vulnerable buildings. While the previous study
provided a broad assessment of at-risk structures, this phase will focus on validating and
expanding that data to ensure accuracy in identifying buildings that may require retrofitting.
Rutherford & Chekene will also develop a seismic hazard identification and mitigation ordinance,
transitioning from risk assessment to regulatory action. This ordinance will outline potential
retrofit requirements and establish a structured framework for improving seismic resilience.
In addition to technical analysis, this phase will include an in-depth evaluation of retrofit
techniques, financing options, and tenant displacement policies to determine which measures
should be mandatory versus voluntary. This ensures that policy recommendations balance public
safety with economic feasibility for property owners. Community stakeholders, including building
owners, tenants, and industry professionals, will be engaged throughout the process to refine
and tailor policy recommendations to Palo Alto’s specific needs. This collaborative approach
supports a final ordinance that is practical and effective in enhancing the city’s seismic
preparedness.
While the Planning and Development Services Department has expertise in managing seismic-
related projects, the complexity of this effort—particularly in technical policy development,
stakeholder engagement, and detailed engineering analysis—requires specialized expertise that
exceeds current in-house capacity. This approach allows City staff to focus on leveraging
strengths in project management and community engagement while gaining access to advanced
technical analysis through the consultant.
Rutherford & Chekene will work closely with City staff to integrate local knowledge into the
project. Regular check-ins and coordination meetings will ensure that the consultant remains
informed of Palo Alto’s unique needs and conditions. This collaboration will be documented
through updates provided to the City Council.
City staff will support the project by conducting preliminary data collection, coordinating
stakeholder engagement, and managing community outreach, allowing the consultant to focus
on technical and policy aspects of the program. Finally, Rutherford & Chekene will implement
program management tools and establish a long-term framework for seismic hazard mitigation
that ensures long-term effectiveness.
To clarify the deliverables, the work produced by Rutherford & Chekene will include an updated
inventory of vulnerable buildings, a draft seismic hazard identification and mitigation ordinance,
and an analysis of retrofit techniques, financing options, and tenant displacement policies. These
deliverables will provide the foundation for staff recommendations to the Council, guiding
decisions on mandatory versus voluntary retrofit measures and policy implementation strategies.
Staff will critically evaluate these deliverables to ensure they align with Council priorities,
community needs, and feasibility considerations. If discrepancies arise or further refinements are
needed, staff will collaborate with the consultant and key stakeholders to adjust
recommendations before presenting them to the Council for consideration.
These efforts serve to mitigate seismic risks in vulnerable buildings by reducing seismic risks for
both the short- and long-term. By proactively addressing building vulnerabilities and refining
policies around retrofitting, tenant displacement, and financial feasibility, the City will enhance
public safety, protect property, and ensure that any necessary retrofitting is conducted in a
financially viable and equitable manner. This project will enhance protections against seismic
events while establishing a structured and sustainable approach to long-term resilience.
FISCAL/RESOURCE IMPACT
Funding of $216,000 has been reappropriated from prior City Council funding in the Fiscal Year
2024 budget. Staff will monitor expenditures closely and will report any significant changes to
the budget as part of the quarterly budget review process.
STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT
Professional planners and managers in the Planning and Development Services Department
participated in the development of this recommendation. Previous discussions and
recommendations from the Policy & Services Committee informed this process. The project will
actively involve diverse community stakeholders through advisory group meetings, public
presentations, and stakeholder workshops. Specific efforts will focus on engaging property
owners of vulnerable building types, tenants impacted by potential retrofits, and local experts in
seismic resilience. Feedback from these groups will be considered in policy recommendations.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Approval of this contract is exempt from environmental review under California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15262, because it authorizes only a feasibility or planning
study for possible future actions that have not yet been approved or adopted.
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: Contract No. C25189597 with Rutherford & Chekene
APPROVED BY:
Jonathan Lait, Planning and Development Services Director