HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Report 2402-2635CITY OF PALO ALTO
CITY COUNCIL
Special Meeting
Monday, May 06, 2024
Council Chambers & Hybrid
5:30 PM
Agenda Item
12.Policy & Services Committee Recommendation Regarding State and Federal Legislative
and Budgetary Updates and Positions on Pending State Legislation
City Council
Staff Report
Report Type: CONSENT ITEMS
Lead Department: City Clerk
Meeting Date: May 6, 2024
Report #:2402-2635
TITLE
Policy & Services Committee Recommendation Regarding State and Federal Legislative and
Budgetary Updates and Positions on Pending State Legislation
RECOMMENDATION
The Policy & Services Committee recommends the City Council confirm support positions for AB
2485, SB 903, SB 915 and receive the attached reports for a state and federal legislative update.
BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS
The Policy & Services Committee received an update on state and federal legislative and
budgetary issues at the April 9, 2024 meeting (Staff Report 2403-2801)1. The Committee
unanimously recommended that the City Council confirm support positions for AB 2485, SB 903,
SB 915. All three bills fit within the City’s Legislative Guidelines and thus staff is only asking
Council to confirm the proposed positions.
AB 2485 will enhance transparency in the Housing and Community Development’s regional
housing needs calculation process. SB 903 will prohibit the manufacture, distribution, or sale of
“forever chemicals.” SB 915 will grant local governments regulatory authority of autonomous
vehicles operating in their jurisdictions.
The Committee asked staff for additional information about the funding that the City receives
from the State government. Staff researched this information within the 1-hours rule and found
the following information:
In FY 2024, as of 3/31/24, a total of $41.2M has been received from the state. Of this amount:
•$36.4M are for State Revolving Loan Fund reimbursements for two major capital
projects at the Regional Water Quality Control Plant
•$2.6M in grants, majority being the Local Housing Trust Fund
•$2M for the Newell Bridge Project, allocated under Priority Legislative Budget Projects
1 Item 1, Action Item, https://recordsportal.paloalto.gov/Weblink/DocView.aspx?id=52846
Included in this update is a memo from Townsend Public Affairs (TPA) (Attachment A) with the
status of state bills on which the City has adopted positions and bills TPA is monitoring for the
City. The memo details each bill’s summary and status, its Palo Alto-specific impact, and the City’s
position. The Committee also recommended some additional bills to be placed on the monitoring
list and Townsend will include those on future update lists if the bills are shown to have Palo Alto
impact and are moving forward this legislative session.
FISCAL/RESOURCE IMPACT
There is no additional funding needed for this update report. The City Council budgets annually
for legislative advocacy services and these efforts are led by staff in the City Clerk’s Office with
stakeholder support across departments on key issues.
STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT
Staff from multiple departments are involved in the legislative process. Staff help to review the
impacts of bills as well as discuss grant opportunities linked to state and federal programs.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The City’s legislative advocacy activities are not a project under section 15378(b)(25) of the
California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines (administrative activities that will not result in
direct or indirect physical changes in the environment).
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: Update Memo from Townsend Public Affairs
Attachment B: Bill Analysis on AB 2485
Attachment C: Bill Analysis on SB 903
Attachment D: Bill Analysis on SB 915
APPROVED BY:
Mahealani Ah Yun, City Clerk
1
M E M O R A N D U M
To: Council Members Kou, Lythcott-Haims, and Tanaka
(Policy and Services Committee)
cc:Ed Shikada, City Manager; Chantal Cotton Gaines, Deputy City Manager
From: Townsend Public Affairs
Niccolo De Luca, Vice President
Carlin Shelby, Associate
Date: March 22, 2024
Subject: State and Federal Legislative Updates
Townsend Public Affairs, Inc. (TPA) has prepared this report for the City of Palo Alto’s Policy and
Services Committee to provide a summary of State and Federal efforts, highlight the current
status of the legislative process, and identify various pieces of legislation that may be of interest
to the City.
State Legislative Updates
The State Legislature convened the second year of the 2023-2024 legislative session on January
3, 2024. Since then, the Legislature has introduced a total of 2,124 bills before the bill introduction
deadline of February 16. Of the total bills introduced, there were 619 Senate Bills and 1,505
Assembly bills. This total is comparable to previous legislative sessions, which typically hover
around 2,000- 2,200 bill introductions total.
Following this bill introduction milestone, the months of March and April will continue to be focused
on policy committee hearings, which serve as the first filter for the consideration of the practical
impacts of proposed legislation. The first house policy committee process is a critical time to
suggest policy amendments to bills before they move on to their appropriations Committee for
consideration of their fiscal impact (if there is one) and the floor for consideration from the entire
legislative body. Notable trends that have emerged during the 2024 Legislative Session include
development impact fee transparency and delays, organized theft prevention, utility rate
affordability, and autonomous and active transportation reforms, among others.
Priority Legislation for the City of Palo Alto
1. Bills With City Positions
The following chart provides an overview of bills with pending positions taken as of March 22,
2024.
2
BILL SUMMARY/STATUS CITY IMPACT POSITION
SB 1193
(Menjivar)
Phases out the sale and use of leaded airplane
fuel at airports in California
Status: Pending consideration from the Senate
Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials
Committee
This bill is likely to result in
airplane emissions and
health impacts associated
with the flight paths over the
City, which aligns with the
City’s Legislative Guidelines.
City Position:
Support
2. Bills With Recommended Action
The following chart features four measures that TPA advocates have identified at this time with
recommendations for the City to take a formal position on. Based on the existing legislative
guidelines, the City could take these positions through Mayoral review pending Council
consideration and approval.
BILL SUMMARY / STATUS CITY IMPACT RECOMMENDATION
SB 1210
(Skinner)
Prohibits utility hook-up fees from exceeding 1%
of the reported building permit value of the unit
for new housing construction.
Status: Pending consideration from the Senate
Energy, Utilities, and Communications
Committee.
If passed, this bill could
negatively impact local utility
revenues and could impact
service quality long-term.
Recommendation:
Oppose
AB 2485
(Carrillo)
Enhances transparency in HCD’s regional
housing needs calculation process by creating an
advisory panel and requiring the publication of
methodologies used on HCD’s website.
Status: Pending consideration from the Assembly
Housing Committee.
For future RHNA cycles, this
bill would increase
transparency for how HCD
calculates its regional
housing needs numbers,
which could offer the City
more clarity moving forward.
Recommendation:
Support
SB 903
(Skinner)
Beginning 2030, prohibits the manufacture,
distribution, or sale of any product that contains
intentionally added PFAS. Requires the
Department of Toxic Substances Control to
include on its website products that meet criteria
for unavoidable use and requires them to be
reassessed regularly.
Status: Pending consideration from the Senate
Environmental Quality Committee.
If passed, this bill could work
to reduce the presence of
“forever chemicals” in public
water supplies, thus
increasing public health and
alleviating costs and
resources associated with its
remediation.
Recommendation:
Support
SB 915
(Cortese)
Grants local authority over the operations and
regulations for autonomous self-driving vehicles.
Status: Pending consideration from Senate Local
Government Committee.
Given the presence of self-
driving vehicles in the City
and the Bay Area, this bill
would offer the city more
local control over the
operations of these vehicles
to protect the public’s safety.
Recommendation:
Support
3
3. Notable bills with Recommendations to Monitor Progress
The following chart encompasses priority legislation TPA advocates are monitoring on behalf of
the City (in addition to the bills listed in the previous tables). Any positions shared beyond
“Monitoring” is as of this moment based on current TPA advocates recommendations and are
subject to change, pending a review of each bill’s impact on the City. Should the City Council or
staff note any additional pieces of legislation to incorporate into this chart, TPA advocates will
gladly accommodate.
BILL SUMMARY POSITION
Energy and Utilities
AB 2037
(Papan)
Grants county sealers jurisdiction over publicly-operated electric vehicle (EV)
charger to test all weight and measuring devices. Authorizes county sealers to
charge a "registration fee" to cities they service.
Monitoring
AB 2427
(McCarty)
Requires GO-Biz's Zero-Emission Vehicle Market Development Office to
develop a model permitting checklist, model zoning ordinances, and best
practices for permit costs and permit review timelines to help local
governments permit curbside charging stations as part of the office’s
development of the Electric Vehicle Charging Station Permitting Guidebook or
any subsequent updates. The bill would also require the office to consult with
local governments, electric vehicle service providers, and utilities while
developing the above-described materials.
Monitoring
AB 2601
(Ramos)
Requires that energy-efficient appliances provided pursuant to the Energy
Savings Assistance Program shall only replace natural gas appliances with
electric appliances.
Monitoring
AB 2619
(Connolly)
Repeals the CPUC net energy metering 3.0 (NEM 3.0) ruling that cut
incentives for customers to install solar and would restore the previous net
energy metering incentives/market.
Monitoring
AB 3011 (Bains)
Provides that any electrical rate schedule that imposes rates on vulnerable
customers (senior citizens, medically or economically vulnerable, etc.) above
baseline rates during any hour where the temperature is above 90 degrees
Fahrenheit for the duration of the hour is considered an unreasonable
hardship.
Monitoring
Environmental Quality
AB 2346 (Lee)
Authorizes local jurisdictions to be credited for the procurement of recovered
organic waste products through an agreement with a direct service provider
and would allow the direct service provider agreement to include the
procurement of recovered organic waste products on a prospective or
retrospective basis as long as the purchase of those products occurs during
the year for which the local jurisdiction seeks credit. The bill also allows local
governments to count investments made for the expansion of capacity of
compostable materials into their procurement targets.
Monitoring
4
BILL SUMMARY POSITION
Governance and Transparency
AB 2032 (Addis)
Existing law establishes Brown Act remote teleconferencing allowances for
local agency officials and limits them to no more than 3 consecutive months or
20% of the regular meetings for the local agency within a calendar year, or
more than 2 meetings if the legislative body regularly meets fewer than 10
times per calendar year. This bill would revise those limits, instead prohibiting
such participation for more than a specified number of meetings per year,
based on how frequently the legislative body regularly meets.
Monitoring
SB 1032
(Seyarto)
Allows local agencies additional time to respond to PRA requests during a
state of emergency.Monitoring
Homelessness
AB 2338
(Jones-Sawyer)
Requires the Governor to appoint a Statewide Homelessness Coordinator to
serve as the lead person for ending homelessness in California. The
Coordinator would be tasked with identifying a local leader in eeach local
government throughout the state to collaborate on homeless solutions.
Monitoring
SB 1011
(Jones)
Prohibits unhoused individuals from loitering on public property, so long as
peace officers provide them with 72 hours of notice and resources related to
available services and housing.
Monitoring
Housing and Land Use
AB 1889
(Friedman)
Requires local governments to incorporate a wildlife connectivity plan into the
next update or amendment to its general plan beginning after January 1, 2025 Monitoring
AB 1886
(Alvarez)
Clarifies that the builder’s remedy is applicable to cities and counties that have
not received official certification of housing element compliance from HCD.
Additionally creates a rebuttable presumption of the validity of HCD’s findings
as to whether an adopted element or amendment complies with housing law.
Monitoring
AB 2243
(Wicks)
Makes various changes to the objective standards and affordability and site
criteria applicable to an affordable housing development or mixed-income
housing development subject to the streamlined, ministerial review process
under AB 2011 (Statutes of 2023)
Monitoring
AB 2430
(Alvarez)
Prohibits local governments from charging monitoring fees on developments
that include a 100% affordability component for lower income households and
have received a density bonus. Additionally, the bill phases out all monitoring
fees on existing properties that meet these standards beginning 2025.
Monitoring
AB 2553
(Friedman)
Revises zoning standards by which a local government may impose a
vehicular traffic impact fee from a “transit station” to a “major transit stop,” thus
narrowing the applicability of sites eligible for the imposition of those fees. The
bill further modifies the definition of what constitutes a major transit stop to
increase the frequency of service intervals from 15 to 20 minutes.
Monitoring
AB 2584 (Lee) Prevents institutional investors that own more than 1,000 single-family homes
from purchasing additional properties and converting them into rentals. Monitoring
AB 3057
(Wilson)
exempts from CEQA the adoption of an ordinance by a city or county to
provide for the creation of junior accessory dwelling units in single-family
residential zones.
Monitoring
5
BILL SUMMARY POSITION
SB 1211
(Skinner)
Streamlines the development of ADUs on properties with multifamily housing.
(In spot form, lacks substantive language) Monitoring
SB 1212
(Skinner)
Bars hedge funds and other corporate investment entities from buying single-
family homes in California.Monitoring
Labor Relations and Retirement
AB 2561
(McKinnor)
Requires each public agency with bargaining unit vacancy rates exceeding
10% for more than 90 days within the past 180 days to meet and confer with a
representative of the recognized employee organization to produce, publish,
and implement a plan consisting of specified components to fill all vacant
positions within the subsequent 180 days.
Monitoring
SB 1116
(Portantino)
Allows striking workers to collect unemployment insurance benefits after two
weeks. Monitoring
Public Safety
AB 2309
(Muratsuchi)
Authorizes the city attorney of any general law city or chartered city to
prosecute any misdemeanor committed within the city arising out of violation
of state law without the consent of the district attorney.
Monitoring
AB 2574
(Alvarez)
Codifies existing case law from 2019, which determined that unlicensed
recovery homes operating as part of a licensed treatment facility located
elsewhere may be considered unlawful business use within a residential zone.
Monitoring
SB 22 (Umberg)
Proposes Proposition 47 reforms including aggregating theft amounts to
amount to grant theft felony, adding enhancements for organized theft crimes,
includes enhancements for the trafficking and furnishing of fentanyl, among
other provisions.
Monitoring
SB 905 (Wiener)
Removes hurdles to prosecutors holding auto burglars accountable by
removing the requirement that a victim prove a vehicle was locked in order to
establish a crime.
Monitoring
Revenue and Taxation
AB 2488 (Ting)
Authorizes a local government to designate one or more downtown
revitalization and economic recovery financing districts for the purpose of
financing office-to-residential conversion projects with incremental tax
revenues generated by office-to-residential conversion projects within the
district.
Monitoring
AB 2813
(Aguiar-Curry)
Makes statutory changes to ACA 1 which will appear on the November 2024
ballot to lower the voter threshold for the passage of general obligation bonds
from 2/3 to 55%. This bill modifies the allowable uses of funds generated via
bonds to include affordable housing programs. Further, the bill specifies that
special taxes are limited to a useful life of at least 15 years or 5 years if the
funds are used for public safety purposes. The bill also specifies that a local
government may commit revenues to projects or programs administered by
nonprofit organizations for affordable or permanent supportive housing
programs.
Monitoring
6
BILL SUMMARY POSITION
SB 955
(Seyarto)
Requires the Office of Planning and Research, upon appropriation by the
Legislature, to establish the Infrastructure Gap-Fund Program to provide
grants to assist local agencies in developing and constructing infrastructure
projects.
Monitoring
Transportation
AB 2744
(McCarty)
Beginning on January 1, 2025, prohibits the addition of a right-turn or travel
lane within 20 feet of a marked or unmarked crosswalk where there is not
already a dedicated and marked right-turn or travel lane, and prohibits
vehicles from using this 20-foot area for right turns unless the area is already
marked as a dedicated right-turn lane before January 1, 2025.
Monitoring
SB 1031
(Wiener)
Authorizes Bay Area voters to consider a measure to fund climate-friendly
transportation investments in the San Francisco Bay Area as early as 2026.
requires a minimum of $750 million in revenues from a future Bay Area
transportation measure to be annually allocated to public transportation
operations and regional transit coordination initiatives directly related to
operations spending,
Monitoring
State Budget Update
State lawmakers this year are focused on mediating the issues associated with an anticipated
budget deficit. Following the release of the Governor’s January Budget Proposal which outlined
a spending plan to absorb the impacts of a $38 billion deficit, the nonpartisan Legislative Analyst’s
Office (LAO) did its own update to State Revenues and projected deficit. The LAO reports a
revised budget shortfall of $73 billion which is $15 billion more than was previously forecasted in
December. These numbers contrast significantly with the Governor’s budget proposal, mostly due
to anticipations surrounding revenue returns.
The LAO said that the actual budget shortfall will depend on a variety of factors, such as
mandatory Proposition 98 spending on schools and community colleges. To mitigate the impacts
of this anticipated shortfall, the LAO suggests that lawmakers find “new budget solutions” to
ensure a balanced budget for the 2024-25 fiscal year. The LAO said solutions could include
increasing revenue, reducing either – or both – one-time and ongoing spending, and exploring
the possibility of cost shifts or dipping into reserves.
Lawmakers are exploring a number of proposed avenues to temporarily cut one-time spending to
manage the issue, totaling $16 billion. Categories of cuts include business and labor, criminal
justice, education, health and human services, housing and homelessness, resources and
environment, and transportation.
Looking forward, the budget process will continue to unfold with the introduction of April tax
receipts, which could change the deficit picture. The Department of Finance emphasizes that the
State is still forecasted to see more than $51 billion in income and corporate tax receipts. The
State’s progressive taxing structure oftentimes leads to a boom and bust cycle with most revenues
tied to the performance of high-income earners. This creates volatile budget cycles, which can
change within a matter of months depending on revenue returns.
7
The Legislature is in the process of creating a counter-budget proposal which will kick off
negotiations between both houses and the Governor’s office. The next few weeks will feature
budget committee hearings and additional insights into the Legislature’s spending and saving
priorities.
FEDERAL UPDATES
Update on Congressionally Directed Spending Submittal
Federal Budget Update
•Defense
•Homeland Security
•State
•Treasury
•Labor
•Health and Human Services
•Education
8
reduced by six percent from Fiscal Year 2023 levels; other agencies, such as the Education
Department, would also be cut. The bill also includes funding for the construction of a new FBI
headquarters.
State Capitol Office ▪ 925 L Street • Suite 1404 • Sacramento, CA 95814 • Phone (916) 447-4086 • Fax (916) 444-0383
Federal Office ▪ 600 Pennsylvania SE • Suite 207 • Washington, DC 20003 • Phone (202) 546-8696 • Fax (202) 546-4555
Southern California Office ▪ 1401 Dove Street • Suite 330 • Newport Beach, CA 92660 • Phone (949) 399-9050 • Fax (949) 476-8215
Central California Office ▪ 744 P Street • Suite 308 • Fresno, CA 93721 • Phone (949) 399-9050 • Fax (949) 476-8215
Northern California Office ▪ 300 Frank Ogawa Plaza • Suite 204 • Oakland, CA 94612 • Phone (510) 835-9050 • Fax (510) 835-9030
MEMO
City of Palo Alto
Townsend Public Affairs
March 22, 2024
The official text of AB 2485 can be found here.
Summary
AB 2485 (Carrillo) seeks to enhance transparency in the Department of Housing and Community
Development’s (HCD) regional housing needs calculation process by creating an advisory panel
and requiring the publication of methodologies used on HCD’s website. Specifically, AB 2485:
•Requires, for the 7th and subsequent revision cycles of the housing element, the assembly
and convening of an advisory panel that includes, among others, an expert on the data
assumptions by each council of governments to advise HCD on the assumptions and
methodology it will use to determine each region housing need.
•Requires the advisory panel to be comprised of the following:
o A United States Census Bureau-affiliated practitioner.
o An expert on population projections and transportation needs, and
o A representative from the council of governments.
•Requires HCD to publish on its Internet website the data sources, analyses, and
methodology, including the assumptions and factors used in and applied to the
Department of Finance projections and engagement process with the council of
governments, prior to finalization of the regional determination.
Status
AB 2485 was amended into its current form on March 19 and is pending policy committee
scheduling.
Author’s Statement
“In March 2022, the State Auditor conducted an emergency audit to examine the RHNA process
and identified several errors in HCD’s housing projections, resulting in a decrease in the housing
2
amounts. Specifically, Sacramento COG fell short by 2,484 housing units and Santa Barbara
COG by 1,338 units.
Support and Opposition
AB 2485 is officially sponsored by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG).
There are no officially recorded entities registered in support or opposition as of March 22. The
release of the measure’s first policy committee analysis will reveal more.
Recommended Position
Support
This bill will increase local government stakeholder engagement on the RHNA allocations for
future cycles of the housing element revision process. This in turn will increase transparency and
ensure that HCD is responsible for its methodologies in assessing regional housing needs
allocations.
State Capitol Office ▪ 925 L Street • Suite 1404 • Sacramento, CA 95814 • Phone (916) 447-4086 • Fax (916) 444-0383
Federal Office ▪ 600 Pennsylvania SE • Suite 207 • Washington, DC 20003 • Phone (202) 546-8696 • Fax (202) 546-4555
Southern California Office ▪ 1401 Dove Street • Suite 330 • Newport Beach, CA 92660 • Phone (949) 399-9050 • Fax (949) 476-8215
Central California Office ▪ 744 P Street • Suite 308 • Fresno, CA 93721 • Phone (949) 399-9050 • Fax (949) 476-8215
Northern California Office ▪ 300 Frank Ogawa Plaza • Suite 204 • Oakland, CA 94612 • Phone (510) 835-9050 • Fax (510) 835-9030
MEMO
City of Palo Alto
Townsend Public Affairs
March 22, 2024
The official text of SB 903 can be found here.
Summary
SB 903 prevents the sale and use of products containing per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances —
commonly known as “PFAS” — unless the use of PFAS in the product is necessary and there is
not a safer alternative available. Specifically, SB 903:
•Prohibits a person from distributing, selling, or offering for sale a product that contains
intentionally added PFAS by 2030
•Provides a narrow exemption if the Department of Toxic Substances Control has made a
determination that the use of PFAS in the product is currently unavoidable, the prohibition
is preempted by federal law, or the product is used.
•Requires the Department of Toxic Substances Control to maintain on its internet website
a list of each determination of currently unavoidable use, when each determination
expires, and the products and uses that are exempt from the prohibition.
•Imposes a civil penalty for a violation of the prohibition. Additionally establishes the PFAS
Penalty Account and requires all civil penalties received to be deposited into that account
and, upon appropriation by the Legislature, to be used for the administration and
enforcement of the provisions.
•Requires the Department of Toxic Substances Control to adopt regulations to implement
the provisions of the bill by 2027.
Status
SB 903 has been referred to the Senate Environmental Committee with a hearing date set for
April 3.
2
Author’s Statement
“PFAS are used in a wide range of products because of their stain- and water-resistant and
nonstick properties. Forever chemicals are used in clothing, packaging, plastic food ware,
cleaning products, ski waxes, menstrual products, metal products, paints, propellants, coatings,
and much more.
According to a new data report by the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), PFAS has
been found in water systems serving at least 25.4 million Californians. A study commissioned by
the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention identified PFAS in the breast milk, umbilical cord
blood, or bloodstreams of 98% of participants. A 2023 report by the U.S. Geological Survey
estimated that nearly half of the nation's tap water is contaminated with forever chemicals. In
addition to being associated to higher rates of kidney and testicular cancer, exposure to PFAS
has been linked to high cholesterol and harmful impacts on the liver, kidneys, and immune,
nervous, and reproductive systems.
Toxic PFAS chemicals have contaminated our water, air, food, and even our bodies. PFAS can
cause harm at vanishingly low levels — and yet we continue to pump out vast new quantities of
them into the worl. This bill is a sensible and comprehensive approach to phase out unnecessary
uses of PFAS so that we stop adding to an already enormous problem.”
State Capitol Office ▪ 925 L Street • Suite 1404 • Sacramento, CA 95814 • Phone (916) 447-4086 • Fax (916) 444-0383
Federal Office ▪ 600 Pennsylvania SE • Suite 207 • Washington, DC 20003 • Phone (202) 546-8696 • Fax (202) 546-4555
Southern California Office ▪ 1401 Dove Street • Suite 330 • Newport Beach, CA 92660 • Phone (949) 399-9050 • Fax (949) 476-8215
Central California Office ▪ 744 P Street • Suite 308 • Fresno, CA 93721 • Phone (949) 399-9050 • Fax (949) 476-8215
Northern California Office ▪ 300 Frank Ogawa Plaza • Suite 204 • Oakland, CA 94612 • Phone (510) 835-9050 • Fax (510) 835-9030
MEMO
City of Palo Alto
Townsend Public Affairs
March 22, 2024
The official text of SB 915 can be found here.
Summary
SB 915 grants local governments control over the rules and regulations self-driving autonomous
vehicles must follow before being deployed within communities. Specifically, SB 915:
•Prohibits an autonomous vehicle service from operating within a jurisdiction unless
authorized by a local government ordinance.
•Authorizes each city, county, or city and county in which an autonomous vehicle has
received authorization to operate, to protect the public health, safety, and welfare by
adopting an ordinance or resolution in regard to autonomous vehicle services within that
jurisdiction.
•Requires local governments that adopt an ordinance or resolution to include certain
provisions within that ordinance or resolution. These would include a policy for entry into
the business of providing autonomous vehicle services including a permitting program, the
establishment of reasonable vehicle caps and hours of service restrictions, and the
establishment of an interoperability or override system accessible by first responders in
case of an emergency.
•Authorizes local governments to levy service charges, fees, or assessments in the amount
sufficient to pay for the costs of carrying out an ordinance or resolution adopted in regard
to autonomous vehicle services.
•Makes it unlawful to operate an autonomous vehicle service without a valid permit to
operate issued by the local jurisdiction in which the service is substantially located, with
violations subject to administrative fines.
•Authorizes a local government to enter into an agreement with another local government
to form a joint powers authority or into an agreement with a transit agency for the purpose
2
of regulating or administering autonomous vehicle services within jurisdictional
boundaries.
Status
SB 915 has been referred to the Senate Local Government Committee with a hearing date
scheduled for April 3.
Author’s Statement
None available at this time
Support and Opposition
SB 915 is sponsored by the League of California Cities and has received support from other Bay
Area jurisdictions with autonomous vehicle operating agreements in place. The official committee
analysis will reveal a more comprehensive list of supporters and opponents.
Recommended Position
Support
This bill provides for additional local control over the operations and licensing of autonomous
vehicle services. Given Palo Alto’s location in the Bay Area and proximity to tech sectors, this bill
could provide additional guardrails for future agreements with autonomous vehicle companies,
providing for the safety and well-being of residents.