Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000-08-07 City Council (15)TO: City of Palo Alto Manager’s Report HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL ~l~ FROM:CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT:ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DATE: SUBJECT: AUGUST 7, 2000 CMR:346:00 NOMINATION OF SIX INDIVIDUALS TO THE BOARD SILICON VALLEY COMMUNITY COMMUNICATIONS, INC. OF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that Council approve and authorize the Mayor to nominate six individuals to the Silicon Valley Community Communications, Inc. (SVCC) board of directors, three of whom will represent the Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) jurisdictions and three of whom will represent the Mid-Peninsula Access Corporation (MPAC). BACKGROUND In 1983, a JPA was entered into by Palo Alto, Menlo Park, East Palo Alto, Atherton, and portions of San Mateo and Santa Clara Counties for the purposes of obtaining cable television service within these jurisdictions. The JPA gives the City of Palo Alto sole authority to grant and administer the cable television franchise on behalf of all the JPA member communities. In 1986, a cable television franchise agreement was executed with Cable Co-op, which was later amended in 1991. On July 24, 2000, the Council approved a transfer of the cable television system from Cable Co-op to AT&T and a new franchise agreement with AT&T. The Council also approved an agreement with Silicon Valley Community Communications, Inc. (SVCC) for the provision of facilities and equipment for MPAC, the City’s community access organization. The agreement with SVCC requires that, within six months, SVCC establish a new board of directors composed of three individuals designated by SVCC and six designated by the City (three representing the JPA and three representing MPAC). This new board will replace the existing three-member board of SVCC. Within six months, the new board of directors must develop new bylaws, which will include information regarding term limits and the selection of future board members. CMR:346:00 Page 1 of 3 DISCUSSION ~ recommending that the Council proceed to authorize the Mayor to nominate six individuals to the new SVCC board of directors. It is important that the new board be established quickly because there are significant deadlines facing SVCC. In addition to the six month deadlines related to the new board of directors and the new bylaws, AT&T is providing SVCC (and thus MPAC) office and studio space for only 18 months. After that time, both will have to relocate to another facility. Because of these impending deadlines, the new board needs to begin making decisions immediately regarding the future of SVCC and MPAC. On July 25, 2000, the MPAC board of directors convened a special meeting to select its three representatives to the new SVCC board. The MPAC board of directors recommends Christine Shambora, Sally Kiester, and Annie Niehaus as its three representatives. Staff recommends that the Council endorse these recommendations. In addition, staff recommends that Council authorize the Mayor to select three Palo Alto City Council Members as the three JPA representatives. Since 1986, the City of Palo Alto has been the local franchising authority for the JPA, with responsibility for granting and administering the franchise. This responsibility has given Palo Alto City Council Members an in-depth understanding of community needs and interests related to cable communications, local programming, and Public, Education, and Government (PEG) access services. This makes Palo Alto City Council Members strong candidates for the SVCC board. Further, this approach would allow the Mayor to make the nominations swiftly so SVCC can promptly begin conducting its affairs. ALTERNATIVE TO STAFF RECOMMENDATION Another approach for selecting the three JPA representatives for the SVCC board would be to nominate members from several of the cities involved in the JPA. As of December 1999, 53 percent of the subscribers resided in Palo Alto, 25 percent in Menlo Park, 10 percent in East Palo Alto, seven percent in Atherton, three percent in San Mateo County, and two percent in Santa Clara County (Stanford). Under this approach, the Council could ensure the communities with the highest percentage of subscribers were represented on the new SVCC board. The disadvantage of this alternative is the time it would take to conduct outreach with the other JPA cities. This would result in a delay before the new SVCC board could begin to address its deadlines. RESOURCE IMPACT The new board of SVCC will be responsible for overseeing the charitable donation of $17 million and will make decisions regarding the allocation of the funds to meet the existing and future needs of MPAC. POLICY IMPLICATIONS This report does not represent any change to existing City policies. CMR:346:00 Page 2 of 3 TIMELINE Within 30 days after the nomination by the City, SVCC will hold a meeting of its existing board to appoint the six individuals to the new board of SVCC. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW This is not a project under the Califomia Environmental Quality Act. PREPARED BY: Melissa Cavallo, Assistant Director, Administrative Services REVIEWED BY: Grant Kolling, Senior Assistant City Attorney DEPARTMENT HEAD APPROVAL: CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: ~MILY HARRISON Assistant City Manager Mid-Peninsula Access Corporation (MPAC) Silicon Valley Community Communications, Inc. (SVCC) CMR:346:00 Page 3 of 3