HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Report 4106
City of Palo Alto (ID # 4106)
City Council Staff Report
Report Type: Consent Calendar Meeting Date: 10/21/2013
City of Palo Alto Page 1
Summary Title: Fire Safe Council Stewardship Agreement
Title: Approval of a Stewardship Agreement Between the City of Palo Alto
and the Santa Clara County Fire Safe Council (FSC) in the Amount of $50,000
from the Public Works CIP PO-12003 for the Initial Year of Services for
Treatment Work Indicated in the Foothill Fire Management Plan (FFMP)
From: City Manager
Lead Department: Fire
Recommendation
Staff recommends that Council approve the City’s agreement with the Fire Safe Council (FSC),
for stewardship services to fulfill the treatment work indicated in the Foothills Fire
Management Plan (FFMP), for a term of five years and approve the compensation of $50,000
from the Public Works Capital Improvement Program Project (CIP) PO-12003, Foothills Wildland
Fire Mitigation for year one of the agreement subject to annual appropriation of funds.
(Attachment A)
Executive Summary
On October 26, 2009, the City adopted the FFMP (CMR:09, Attachment B), which identified
several areas in the Palo Alto Foothills that require treatment to address life safety, structure
and infrastructure protection, ignition prevention, fire containment and natural resource
protection and enhancement. This is a recommendation to enter into a stewardship
agreement with the FSC for the aforementioned treatment work and emergency preparation
education in the Foothills. The FSC has demonstrated the ability to provide these services in
other areas of the County; therefore Staff recommends that we enter into a five-year
agreement with the FSC.
Background
When the Council adopted the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) and the FFMP,
City of Palo Alto Page 2
treatment work was identified and funds provided through a Public Works CIP. These
documents define a Fire Hazard Assessment and Fuel Management Plan/Projects for the
wildland/urban interface located in the foothills of Palo Alto. The Council gave direction to
staff to explore options to complete this work.
A committee was formed to evaluate best practices and to determine the most efficient and
effective way to address these plans. The committee consists of staff from the following
departments: Community Services, Public Works, Fire, Office of Emergency Services and
Utilities. Together this group determined that the non-profit organization the Santa Clara
County FSC would be an ideal partner to complete the treatment plans.
The FSC was created in 2001 through an initiative by CalFire. Local agencies came together with
a small group of community members to discuss wildfire risks and protection for communities
in Santa Clara County. The programs that the FSC provides protect thousands of residents and
homes and bring together individuals, public and private agencies and companies that share a
common, vested interest in preventing and reducing losses from wildfires.
Using the Stewardship Agreement with Acterra (CMR 199:97) as a model, the group pursued a
plan to initiate a relationship with the FSC with the intention of a long-term public/private
partnership. The attached agreement provides both parties an annual opportunity to review
progress, define a work plan for the upcoming year and settle on an appropriate financial
compensation. It also allows the FSC to do what they do best and that is to provide educational
opportunities to the citizens who reside in the affected areas. They have an established
“chipping program” that encourages private citizens to annually trim their vegetation and the
FSC provides a chipper and volunteers to clean up and dispose of the debris. Their goal would
be to expand this program into the north Santa Clara County area and Palo Alto thus enhancing
the treatment work for the private lands defined in the FFMP.
The first year of the agreement would commence immediately upon approval of the
agreement. The treatment area that the FSC would address first has been defined and
identified using the maps within the FFMP. The amount of $50,000 was determined to be an
appropriate compensation for the FSC to carry out their plan. Future dollar amounts will be
based on progress, continued needs and the FSC’s ability to provide the services.
Discussion
The FFMP committee has done the necessary research to recommend that we enter into this
agreement with the FSC who will in turn provide treatment work, education and a valuable
service to the City.
Resource Impact
An allocation of $50,000 for the first year of the five‐year stewardship agreement with the FSC,
City of Palo Alto Page 3
including basic treatment activities, is included in the Public Works CIP PO-12003 that was
established for the purposes of carrying out the FFMP. Future year costs, through FY 2018, will
be based on progress, continued needs, and the FSC’s ability to provide the services. The CIP
currently has $107,135 in available funding, so the cost of this contract should be funded
through FY 2015; however, additional funding for this contract will need to be allocated as part
of future budget processes.
Policy Implications
The proposal to have a nonprofit organization provide services to assist the City in the
accomplishment of the goals of the FFMP is consistent with the public/private partnership
policy.
Environmental Review
The Stewardship Agreement represents a continuation of the same use of existing facilities;
therefore, it carries a Class I facility exemption under Section 15301 of CEQA.
Attachments:
ATTACHMENT A - CIP PO-12003 (PDF)
ATTACHMENT B - Foothills Fire Management Plan (PDF)
ATTACHMENT C - Stewardship Agreement 092713 (PDF)
Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan
Update
WILDLAND FIRE RISK ASSESSMENT AND MITIGATION PROGRAM
DRAFT
Submitted to:
City of Palo Alto
Attention: Kelly Morariu
250 Hamilton Avenue
Palo Alto, CA 94301
Submitted by:
Wildland Resource Management, Inc.
Wildland Resource Management
134 Journeys End
Alamo, CA 94507
January 15, 2009
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Part A - FIRE HAZARD ASSESSMENT AND FUEL MANAGEMENT PLAN/ PROJECTS
1 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................................................. 8
2 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................ 12
2.1 Goals and Objectives .................................................................................................................................................... 13
2.2 Planning History ........................................................................................................................................................... 14
2.3 Scope of the Plan .......................................................................................................................................................... 17
2.4 Planning Process ........................................................................................................................................................... 17
3 Existing Conditions................................................................................................................................................................. 19
3.1 Fire Hazard ................................................................................................................................................................... 19
3.1.1 Vegetation and Fire Fuels ................................................................................................................................. 19
3.1.2 Fire Behavior .................................................................................................................................................... 21
3.1.2.1 Fire Behavior Modeling .......................................................................................................................... 21
3.1.2.2 Spatial Input Files ................................................................................................................................... 21
3.1.2.3 User-Defined Inputs ................................................................................................................................ 22
3.1.2.4 FlamMap Results .................................................................................................................................... 23
3.2 Fire Suppression Capabilities ........................................................................................................................................ 27
3.3 Access ........................................................................................................................................................................... 28
3.4 Sensitive Resources ...................................................................................................................................................... 28
3.4.1 Social and Cultural Features ............................................................................................................................. 31
3.4.2 Environmental Features .................................................................................................................................... 31
3.4.2.1 Species and Wildlife ............................................................................................................................... 32
3.4.2.2 Soils and Geology ................................................................................................................................... 37
4 Fuel Management in City Parks .............................................................................................................................................. 39
4.1 Identifying Potential Treatment Areas .......................................................................................................................... 39
4.2 Establishing Project Objectives .................................................................................................................................... 39
4.3 Current Fuel Management Program .............................................................................................................................. 41
4.4 Project Description........................................................................................................................................................ 46
4.4.1 Scope of Recommended Fuel Management Projects ........................................................................................ 46
4.4.2 Project Description Summary ........................................................................................................................... 46
4.4.3 Project Objectives ............................................................................................................................................. 46
4.4.4 Priority .............................................................................................................................................................. 47
4.4.5 Project Locations............................................................................................................................................... 47
4.4.6 Project Dimensions and Post-Treatment Standards ........................................................................................... 53
4.4.7 Roadside and Driveway Fuel Modification for Safe Access and Egress ........................................................... 54
4.4.7.1 Specific Goal of Action ........................................................................................................................... 54
4.4.7.2 Location and Description of Projects ...................................................................................................... 54
4.4.8 Fuel Modification for Firefighter Safety Projects ............................................................................................. 57
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 3
4.4.8.1 Specific Goal of Action ........................................................................................................................... 57
4.4.8.2 Location and Description of Projects ...................................................................................................... 57
4.4.9 Structure and Infrastructure Projects – Defensible Space ................................................................................. 57
4.4.9.1 Specific Goal of Action ........................................................................................................................... 57
4.4.9.2 Location and Description of Projects ...................................................................................................... 58
4.4.10 Ignition Prevention Fuel Management Projects ................................................................................................ 59
4.4.10.1 Specific Goal of Action ........................................................................................................................... 59
4.4.10.2 Location and Description of Projects ...................................................................................................... 59
4.4.11 Fuel Modification for Containment Ease .......................................................................................................... 59
4.4.11.1 Specific Goal of Action ........................................................................................................................... 59
4.4.11.2 Location and Description of Projects ...................................................................................................... 60
4.4.12 Fuel Modification for Ecosystem Health .......................................................................................................... 62
4.4.12.1 Specific Goal of Action ........................................................................................................................... 62
4.4.12.2 Location and Description of Projects ...................................................................................................... 62
4.4.13 Cooperative Fuel Management Projects for Offsite Fire Containment and Evacuation Ease ........................... 63
4.4.13.1 Specific Goal of Action ........................................................................................................................... 63
4.4.13.2 Location and Description of Projects ...................................................................................................... 63
5 Implementation Plan ............................................................................................................................................................... 64
5.1 Implementation Strategies ............................................................................................................................................. 64
5.2 Priorities ........................................................................................................................................................................ 65
5.3 Fuel Management Project Costs .................................................................................................................................... 66
5.3.1 Project Cost Estimates....................................................................................................................................... 67
5.4 Funding Strategies to Support Fuel Management ......................................................................................................... 71
5.5 Grant Opportunities ...................................................................................................................................................... 72
6 Treatment Standards and Methods .......................................................................................................................................... 74
6.1 Treatment Standards for Vegetation Types ................................................................................................................... 74
6.1.1 Prescription for Grasslands ............................................................................................................................... 74
6.1.2 Prescription for North Coastal Scrub and Chaparral ......................................................................................... 74
6.1.3 Prescription for Oak Woodlands ....................................................................................................................... 76
6.1.4 Prescription for Riparian Forest ........................................................................................................................ 76
6.1.5 Defensible Space Guidelines ............................................................................................................................. 77
6.2 Description of Treatment Methods ............................................................................................................................... 78
6.2.1 Summary ........................................................................................................................................................... 78
6.2.2 Timing of Treatments ........................................................................................................................................ 78
6.2.3 Hand Labor ....................................................................................................................................................... 79
6.2.4 Mechanical Treatments ..................................................................................................................................... 79
6.2.5 Grazing with Sheep and Goats .......................................................................................................................... 81
6.2.6 Broadcast Prescribed Burns .............................................................................................................................. 81
6.2.7 Eucalyptus Tree Removal ................................................................................................................................. 82
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 4
6.2.8 Herbicide Application to Control Invasive Plants ............................................................................................. 83
6.3 Best Management Practices .......................................................................................................................................... 84
6.3.1 Hand Labor ....................................................................................................................................................... 84
6.3.2 Mechanical Treatments ..................................................................................................................................... 85
6.3.3 Grazing with Sheep and Goats .......................................................................................................................... 86
6.3.4 Broadcast Prescribed Burns .............................................................................................................................. 86
6.3.5 Herbicide Application ....................................................................................................................................... 87
P ART B – POLICY REVIEW AND SUPPLEMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS
1 Evacuation and Refuge ........................................................................................................................................................... 89
1.1 Identification and Notification ...................................................................................................................................... 89
1.2 Regional Cooperation ................................................................................................................................................... 90
1.3 Temporary Refuge ........................................................................................................................................................ 90
2 Codes and Regulations ............................................................................................................................................................ 91
2.1 Existing Codes and Ordinances .................................................................................................................................... 91
2.1.1 Fire Code ........................................................................................................................................................... 91
2.1.2 Building Code ................................................................................................................................................... 93
2.2 Recommendations ......................................................................................................................................................... 93
2.3 Exterior Hazard Abatement .......................................................................................................................................... 95
2.3.1 For parcels of land one acre or less maintain parcel in complete abatement. .................................................... 95
2.3.2 For parcels larger than one acre in size ............................................................................................................. 96
3 Fire Protection – Station 8 ...................................................................................................................................................... 98
3.1 Description .................................................................................................................................................................... 98
3.2 Appraisal ....................................................................................................................................................................... 99
3.3 Recommendation ........................................................................................................................................................ 100
4 Trail Plan Update .................................................................................................................................................................. 101
4.1 Pearson-Arastradero Preserve Trails Management Plan (March 2001) ...................................................................... 101
4.1.1 Recommended Revisions ................................................................................................................................ 101
4.1.2 Existing Fire Mitigation and Fuel Management in the Arastradero Trails Management Plan ........................ 103
4.1.3 Vegetation Management ................................................................................................................................. 107
4.1.3.1 Brushing and Clearing Defined ............................................................................................................. 107
4.1.3.2 Techniques for Maintaining a Clear Passageway .................................................................................. 107
4.2 Foothills Park Trails Maintenance Plan (January 29, 2002) ....................................................................................... 109
4.2.1 Recommended Revisions ................................................................................................................................ 109
4.2.2 Existing Fire Mitigation and Fuel Management in the Foothills Park Trails Maintenance Plan ..................... 110
5 References ............................................................................................................................................................................ 113
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 5
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1: City of Palo Alto Overview. ............................................................................................................................................ 12
Figure 2: 1997 Fire Management Zones. ........................................................................................................................................ 16
Figure 3: Wildland Surface Fuels. .................................................................................................................................................. 20
Figure 4: Spatial Data Required for Fire Behavior Modeling. ........................................................................................................ 22
Figure 5: Comparison of Torching and Active Crown Fire. ........................................................................................................... 23
Figure 6: Crown Fire and Torching Potential. ................................................................................................................................ 24
Figure 7: Predicted Flame Length................................................................................................................................................... 25
Figure 8: Predicted Rate of Spread. ................................................................................................................................................ 26
Figure 9: Locations of Cultural and Environmental Sensitive Resources in Pearson-Arastradero Preserve. .................................. 29
Figure 10: Locations of Cultural and Environmental Sensitive Resources in Foothills Park. ........................................................ 30
Figure 11: Sensitive Species Known or Potentially Occurring in Foothills Park or Pearson-Arastradero Preserve. ...................... 37
Figure 12: Soil Types in Foothills Park and Pearson-Arastradero Preserve. .................................................................................. 38
Figure 13: Project Goals and Actions. ........................................................................................................................................... 40
Figure 14: Pearson-Arastradero Preserve Current Fuel Management Areas. .................................................................................. 42
Figure 15: Foothills Park Current Fuel Management Areas. .......................................................................................................... 43
Figure 16: Recent Treatments in Pearson-Arastradero Preserve. .................................................................................................... 44
Figure 17: Recent Treatments in Foothills Park. ............................................................................................................................ 45
Figure 18: Listing of Project Locations. ......................................................................................................................................... 50
Figure 19: Proposed Treatment Locations in Pearson-Arastradero Preserve. ................................................................................. 51
Figure 20: Proposed Treatment Locations in Foothills Park. .......................................................................................................... 52
Figure 21: Treatment Methods and Intervals. ................................................................................................................................. 53
Figure 22: Listing of Project Locations for Evacuation and Access. .............................................................................................. 55
Figure 23: Evacuation Routes External to Foothills Park and Pearson-Arastradero Preserve. ....................................................... 56
Figure 24: Listing of Project Locations for Fire Fighter Safety Fuel Modification. ....................................................................... 57
Figure 25: Listing of Project Locations for Defensible Space. ....................................................................................................... 59
Figure 26: Listing of Project Locations for Ignition Prevention. .................................................................................................... 59
Figure 27: Listing of Project Locations for Containment Ease. ...................................................................................................... 61
Figure 28: Listing of Project Locations for Ecosystem Health. ...................................................................................................... 62
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 6
Figure 29: Unit Costs for Fuel Reduction Treatment Methods. ...................................................................................................... 67
Figure 30: Funding Mechanisms. ................................................................................................................................................... 71
Figure 31: Initial Priority of Removal for Brush. ........................................................................................................................... 76
Figure 32: Pruning Example. .......................................................................................................................................................... 77
Figure 33: Pruning Example. .......................................................................................................................................................... 95
Figure 34: Shrub Spacing. .............................................................................................................................................................. 96
Figure 35: Fire Protection Resources. ............................................................................................................................................. 98
Figure 36: Emergency/Maintenance Access Points. ..................................................................................................................... 102
Figure 37: Vehicle Turn-around Design Summary. ...................................................................................................................... 109
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 7
PART A – FIRE HAZARD ASSESSMENT AND FUEL
MANAGEMENT PLAN/ PROJECTS
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 8
1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Fire Management Plan update process addresses a broad range of integrated activities and planning
documents to address and mitigate the impacts of fire hazards in the Palo Alto Foothills Area. The area of interest includes the areas west of Foothills Expressway to the city limits of Palo Alto. Fire mitigation project
areas include the boundaries of Foothills Park and Pearson-Arastradero Preserve within this area of interest.
The Fire Management Plan Update addresses the following key items:
• Fire Hazard Assessment
• Regional Evacuation Routes
• Review of Municipal Ordinances
• Staffing of Station 8
• Wildland Fire Management Recommendations and Mitigations
• Updates to Pearson-Arastradero Trails Master Plan and Foothills Trail Maintenance Plan
• CEQA Documentation
• Implementation Plan and Potential Funding
Community Participation. Community participation in the development of the plan began with the refinement of the scope of work and selection of the consultant team. Three community meetings were held at key points in the planning process to gather continued input from the community. A stakeholder group
made up of adjacent jurisdictions, neighborhood associations, special interest groups, volunteers etc. also
participated in the planning process. An environmental review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) was undertaken by City Staff in conjunction with the plan development.
Fire Hazard Assessment. There are many ways to assess fire hazard. Most utilize the three main factors of
fuels, weather, and topography, with possible inclusion of elevation or fire history. Fire behavior was chosen
as the means to assess fire hazard since it can identify locations where containment may be easiest, and where access may be precluded during the time of a fire. In addition, fire behavior outputs can identify locations where structures or natural resources may be unduly harmed by a wildfire, as well as locations where fire
effects may be inconsequential to natural resources.
Not every area identified as a potential fire hazard can be modified to produce low-intensity fires. Not only would this be too costly, but environmental impacts would also be unacceptable.
Results of Fire Behavior Analysis. Fire behavior was analyzed for the entirety of the Foothills Area,
including adjacent neighborhoods, property owned by Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District
(MROSD), and Stanford University. Flame length, rate of fire spread and potential for crown fire were three characteristics considered in the analysis. The following are generalities observed:
Flame lengths follow fuel types, with long flame lengths in chaparral and untreated grass, and short flame
lengths in woodlands and mowed grass. The largest areas of long flames are located in Foothill Park and
Monte Bello Open Space Preserve. Low fire spread rates were predicted in woodlands and forests, and fast
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 9
spread rates in untreated grass and chaparral. There is very little active crown fire predicted within the Foothills area, however, the potential for trees to torch is high throughout the treed portion of the Foothills area. Torching is caused by low-hanging limbs, or ladder fuels.
Wildland Fire Management Recommendations and Best Management Practices
Treatments were strategically placed to achieve the following goals:
• Life Safety
• Structure and Infrastructure Protection
• Ignition Prevention
• Fire Containment
• Resource Enhancement
Treatments were identified for 51 project areas. The most visible recommended set of projects will be to
conduct roadside treatments along Page Mill Road, Arastradero Road, Los Trancos Road, and Skyline Boulevard. Other projects entail the continuation of mowing along trails and some boundaries, grazing along the selected segments of the perimeter of both Parks/Preserves, treatments to install and maintain defensible
space around structures, treatments around barbeques to minimize the chance of ignitions, and treatments to
bolster the success of fires containment efforts within the parks. Fuel management treatments can also enhance natural resources, through targeting non-native invasive plants as part of biomass removal –
potentially with grazing animals, mechanical mowing and hand labor - and conducting prescribed fires in
selected areas under conditions consistent with fire control.
Best management practices are included for each treatment type, based on the sensitivity of the resource. These include practices that consider the timing intensity of the treatment, or selection of the type of treatment
methods (e.g., whether the project would entail mowing or grazing, hand labor or mechanical equipment), the
strata of treatment (e.g., whether the project would remove lower tree limbs, or instead involve grass mowing), and the scale of the treatment (e.g., to treat small or large patches).
Review Recommendations Regarding Pearson-Arastradero Trails Master Plan and Foothills Trail
Management Plan
• Addition of fuel management and fuel reduction zones
• Location of prescribed burns
• Modify fuel break width for performance standards
• Modify roadside treatment standards
• Include fire hazard in regulatory, warning and education signs (especially prescribed fires)
Regional Evacuation Routes
The Palo Alto Police Department has responsibility within City limits for evacuation operations under state
law. However, multiple jurisdictions will likely be involved in an event in the Foothills. Evacuation routes
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 10
should not be blocked anywhere, regardless of jurisdiction or ownership; this is especially important because most of the regional evacuation routes span multiple cities, ownership categories and protection jurisdictions. The following recommendations will help reach a reasonably safe condition along the regional evacuation
routes.
• Formalize agreements with adjacent landowners for ingress and egress routes (from parks) and offsite
refuge areas
• Develop partnerships to address regional evacuation routes from residential and public areas (Regional Evacuation Plan, Community Notification (multi-jurisdictional) and Unified Command)
Analysis and Recommendations Regarding Staffing of Station 8
An analysis of the staffing level of Station 8 was conducted that considered the distribution and concentration
of fire personnel and equipment in relation to the incidents. The recommendation was to maintain current staffing levels. Response times for incidents are significantly longer from other stations, even when
considering mutual aid offered by other jurisdictions. The fire behavior analysis indicates the potential for
fast-moving fires of high intensity, further justifying the current staffing levels.
Review of Municipal Ordinances
The existing code is comprehensive; only minor changes are recommended. These include:
• Expand Wildland Urban Interface Fire Area (between Foothill Blvd & Highway 280)
• Fire Protection Planning: Begin early in permitting process
• Expand Defensible Space Requirements: Maintain roof free of materials
• Expand Access Requirements: bridge load limits, parking restrictions
• Additional guidance for Maintenance of Defensible Space
• Ignition Source Control
• Fencing
• Signage
• Mechanical Equipment Ignition Prevention
• Restriction on Smoking at Pearson-Arastradero Preserve
Implementation Plan and Potential Funding for Fire Management Recommendations
Implementation of this plan will be managed by the City of Palo Alto staff, including the Fire Department, the
Police Department (evacuation, notification, neighborhood preparedness coordinators), and Open Space
(rangers). Volunteer groups, such as Acterra, Friends of Foothills, and other groups should continue to be involved and encouraged to help with the implementation. Further, the City should work with mutual aid
government agencies and other stakeholders on an ongoing basis.
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 11
Prioritization of Treatments
The following is the priority of treatment types:
1. Life Safety
2. Structure and Infrastructure Protection
3. Ignition Prevention
4. Fire Containment
5. Resource Enhancement
Cost Estimates
The total five-year cost to implement the recommended projects is estimated at slightly less than $700,000.
The largest cost, at slightly more than $400,000, is to manage 19 containment areas. The initial treatment for segments of major evacuation routes is estimated to cost almost $178,000. The use of California Youth
Authority Crews may offer a means to reduce costs for the hand labor-based treatments. Without volunteers
pre-treatment surveys and follow-up may cost $100,000 over the next five years.
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 12
2 INTRODUCTION
The Palo Alto Foothills consist of a mix of urban, semi-urban and open space lands on the eastern slope of the
Santa Cruz Mountains. Within the city limits of Palo Alto, the Palo Alto Foothills area west of the Foothills
Expressway and Junipero Serra Boulevard represents a Wildland Urban Interface area (WUI) with significant
impacts to public safety, cultural and economic activities, and environmental and natural resource management. The Palo Alto Foothills Area includes two city-managed areas: Foothills Park and the Pearson-
Arastradero Preserve. In an effort to implement an updated Fire Management program for the Foothills, the
City of Palo Alto conducted a review of the fire hazards, mitigation activities, and environmental considerations for the area to develop recommendations for wildland fuels and fire management.
Figure 1: City of Palo Alto Overview.
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 13
2.1 Goals and Objectives
The City of Palo Alto developed, maintains, and executes a Fire Management Plan focused on reducing losses
from wildland fire. In support of this long-term objective, the City of Palo Alto initiated an update process
for the Foothills Fire Management Plan to prepare recommendations for consideration and possible inclusion in future budgets.
This Foothills Fire Management Plan update process focused on the three primary goals:
• Develop recommendations for wildland fuels and fire management to reduce fire hazard in Palo Alto’s Wildland Urban Interface west of Foothill Expressway to an acceptable level of risk.
o Review and incorporate the 1982 Foothills Fire Management Plan and 1997 staff update.
o Identify appropriate management recommendations to reduce wildland fuel loads in the Pearson-Arastradero Preserve and Foothill Park.
• Maintain ecological and aesthetic values of Foothill Park and Pearson-Arastradero Preserve
consistent with fire reduction goals.
• Provide a fuel management plan for Foothills Park and Pearson-Arastradero Preserve that is cost
effective and sustainable for the City of Palo Alto.
The Fire Management Plan update process involved a combination of City staff personnel from a wide cross section of city operations, stakeholders from across the Palo Alto area, and members of the Palo Alto
community. In order to ensure that the fire management recommendations addressed environmental and
cultural conditions that can affect resource and priority decisions, the update process included a series of specific objectives.
• Assess fire hazards within the project area. Develop fuel classification, weather condition
assumptions, and other fire hazard inputs used to model the fire hazards for the project area.
• Develop wildland fire management recommendations. Identify both developed and sensitive natural
resources at risk and develop treatment and best management practices to protect those resources.
Prepare appropriate California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) document.
• Consider current refuge areas, ingress and egress routes and make recommendations for evacuation
from residential and public areas.
• Identify potential funding plans and external funding opportunities.
• Update the Foothills Fire Management Plan incorporating input from the community.
• Review and recommend appropriate revisions to existing City municipal ordinances pertaining to fire
prevention.
• Review and make appropriate recommendations to current levels of staffing, equipment and other response resources at Station 8 in Foothills Park.
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 14
• Recommend revisions to the Pearson-Arastradero Preserve Trail Master Plan and Foothills Park Trail Maintenance Plan pertaining to firefighting access or vegetation management for fire hazard
reduction along trail corridors.
2.2 Planning History
The City of Palo Alto developed a Foothills Fire Management Plan in 1982. The 1982 Plan provides the
planning framework for fire control activities for the City and the Palo Alto Foothills Area. The goal of the
1982 Fire Management Plan is “to reduce government costs and citizen losses from wildland fire by increasing initial attack success and/or protecting assets at risk through focused pre-fire management
activities.”
In 1997, the City of Palo Alto staff developed a draft update to this plan. Although the draft update was not formally adopted, the 1997 Draft Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan provides an updated framework
and interim objectives for fire management within the Foothills Area.
The 1997 Draft Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan identified four fire management objectives:
1. Identify fire pre-suppression, suppression and post-suppression activities to maintain or enhance the status quo, and prevent adverse impacts on people, structures and natural resources consistent with
Palo Alto Fire Department’s fire protection mission.
a. Prevent or reduce the threat of death or injury to foothills residents and visitors.
b. Prevent or reduce loss or damage to structures and natural resources.
2. Suppress fire in the Hazardous Fire Area before it gets out of control.
a. Perform effective initial attack, with Fire Station 8 staffed.
b. Develop pre-fire suppression plans (initial attack to 4-hour effort).
c. Incident Command System (ICS) training, focusing on multi-jurisdictional response and
enhancing Palo Alto Fire Department (PAFD) skills and abilities in specific ICS positions.
3. Review and update evacuation routes out of the Hazardous Fire Area.
4. When feasible and as part of a regional effort, establish optimal fire frequencies, use pre-suppression control measures (including controlled / prescribed burns) to restore optimal fire regimes and for
natural plant communities.
The 1997 draft plan identified several hazard mitigation categories to meet Palo Alto’s Fire Management goal and objectives.
• Fuel Management
o Roadside clearance – Page Mill Road, Arastradero Road, Los Trancos Road and Skyline Boulevard were identified as evacuation routes as well as firebreaks.
o Fuel Break/ Ignition Control system in Foothills Park and Pearson-Arastradero Preserve
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 15
o Prescribed burning to reduce fuel load, re-establish a normal fire regime and educate and inform the public. High fuel loads, limited burn windows and requirements for pre-burn preparations have limited opportunities to date.
• Pre-fire Actions
o Foothills Park/ Pearson-Arastradero Preserve practices including visitor safety islands and
evacuation plans, fire-safe park maintenance practices, daily weather taking (establish daily
Burn Index), annual pre-fire season staff briefing, interagency training, use restrictions
during critical fire weather.
o Cooperative efforts with Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District (MROSD), the
Woodside Fire Protection District, and other partner agencies regarding construction of fuel
breaks, identification of evacuation routes and interagency training, public information about evacuation pre-planning.
o Private Dwellings and Open Land including fire codes for new development and public
education and code enforcement.
• Suppression and Post Suppression
o Suppression capability including Foothills Fire Facility (Station 8); Mutual Threat Zone/
mutual aid/ automatic aid contracts; interagency/ ICS training.
o Suppression Plan including maintenance of response cards, basing response on nationally-recognized fire danger rating indices, use any and all mutual aid resources to confine fires at
initial attack, and to follow fire management zone pre-planning documents.
o Post Suppression Plans.
o Cultural Resources (no significant cultural resources exist in the City Limits, but potential
always exists for discovery of new sites).
The 1997 draft plan strategically divided the Hazardous Fire Area into eight fire management zones (FMZs)
to merge individual property and resource concerns with fire control challenges (Figure 2). Each zone has a map showing boundaries, existing control lines and text description of activities to be considered by the
Incident Commander, safety precautions and other tactical or site-specific information.
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 16
Figure 2: 1997 Fire Management Zones.
AP –Arastradero Preserve
LTW –Los Trancos Woods
FP/VH –Foothills Park Vista Hill
FP/WVS –Foothills Park Wildhorse Valley South
FP/WVN –Foothills Park Wildhorse Valley North
CPM –Center Page Mill
UPM –Upper Page Mill
MBE –Monte Bellow East
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 17
2.3 Scope of the Plan
The Fire Management Plan update process addresses a broad range of integrated activities and planning
documents to address and mitigate the impacts of fire hazards in the Palo Alto Foothills Area. The area of
interest includes the areas west of Foothills Expressway to the city limits of Palo Alto. The fire mitigation project areas include the boundaries of Foothills Park and Pearson-Arastradero Preserve within this area of
interest.
The Fire Management Plan Update addresses the following key items:
• Fire Hazard Assessment
• Regional Evacuation Routes
• Wildland Fire Management Recommendations and Mitigations
• Recommendations for the Foothills Park Trails Maintenance Plan and the Pearson-Arastradero Trails Management Plan
• Review of Municipal Ordinances
• Staffing of Station 8
• Implementation Plan and Identification of Potential Funding
2.4 Planning Process
The process used in developing the Update to the Foothills Fire Management Plan involved several
departments of the City and many stakeholders. The consultants and City held three meetings with the
stakeholders between April and September 2008.
Invited Stakeholders included:
• Acterra
• Arrillaga Property: 500 Los Trancos Road
• CAL FIRE
• Friends of Foothills Park
• Los Altos Hills Fire District
• Los Altos Hills: ARES/RACES
• Los Trancos Water District
• Los Trancos Woods Neighborhood
• Menlo Park Fire District
• Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District
• PA Protect Our Open Space
• Palo Alto Hills Neighborhood Assoc
• Pony Tracks Ranch
• Portola Pasture Stables
• San Mateo County FireSafe Council
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 18
• San Mateo County Sheriff
• Santa Clara County Fire Dept
• South Skyline Association
• Stanford Community Residential Leaseholders (SCRL)
• Stanford University
• Town of Los Altos Hills
• Vista Verde Community Association
• Woodside Fire Protection District
There were also three meetings with the community during the same time period. The meetings were held at the Interpretive Center at Foothills Park and at the Palo Alto Hills Golf and Country Club in Palo Alto.
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 19
3 EXISTING CONDITIONS
3.1 Fire Hazard
There are many ways to assess fire hazard. Most utilize the three main factors of fuels, weather, and
topography, with possible inclusion of elevation or fire history. Fire behavior was chosen as the means to assess fire hazard since it integrates the effects of fuels, weather, and topography. Hazard assessments
developed by the State and the California Fire Alliance were evaluated for potential use. However, the
assessments were larger scale than appropriate for the purposes of this plan. The decision was made to use a more detailed, site-specific hazard assessment.
Fire behavior predictions identify locations where containment may be easiest, and where access may be
precluded during the time of a fire. In addition, fire behavior outputs can identify locations where structures
or natural resources may be unduly harmed by a wildfire, as well as locations where fire effects may be inconsequential to natural resources.
3.1.1 Vegetation and Fire Fuels
The Palo Alto Foothills contains a mix of potential wildland fire fuel regimes that, combined with the
topography and weather for the regime, pose a potential risk for wildland fire (Figure 3).
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 20
Figure 3: Wildland Surface Fuels.
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 21
3.1.2 Fire Behavior
3.1.2.1 Fire Behavior Modeling
FlamMap is particularly well suited for the Foothill Fire Management Area fire assessment. FlamMap
generates a spatial depiction of simulated fire behavior that may be used to assess relative hazards throughout the area.
FlamMap is a computerized fire behavior prediction model developed by the USDA Forest Service at the
Intermountain Forest Fire Research Laboratory.1 FlamMap was developed to predict fire behavior characteristics across a landscape. The first such landscape analysis of fire behavior characteristics was performed for the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission Bay Area watersheds, then applied across the
East Bay Hills after the Oakland Hills Fire. FlamMap is currently in the public domain.
The heat transfer formulas in FlamMap are based on the software program, BEHAVE, which has been used in wildfire prediction since the 1970's. FlamMap uses the same heat transfer algorithms as BEHAVE along with
numerous other algorithms to predict crown fire potential, ember distribution, effects of terrain on wind,
direction and slope, and more.
FlamMap allows prediction of fire behavior on a spatial basis, by modeling the locations of flame length, heat release, and rate of spread along with type of fire (crown fire, surface fire, or a fire that torches individual
trees) throughout an entire area. FlamMap simulations assume the entire area is aflame under the same
conditions at the same time to determine spatial differences in fire behavior.
3.1.2.2 Spatial Input Files
The spatial data inputs to FlamMap characterize the terrain, weather, and fuels on the site with eleven
different data layers. The spatial input data files are described in Figure 4.
Figure 4: Spatial Data Required for Fire Behavior Modeling.
Level Purpose Source
Elevation (feet
above sea level) This is necessary for adiabatic adjustment of temperature
and humidity between elevations and for conversion of fire spread between horizontal and slope distances.
USGS digital elevation models
Slope (Percent of
inclination from the horizontal)
Slope is used to compute steepness effects on fire spread
and solar irradiance.
USGS digital elevation models
Aspect (Azimuth
values degree
clockwise from north)
Aspect is used to compute effects on fire spread and solar
irradiance.
USGS digital elevation models
Fuel Model Fuel models, organized and described according to the FRAP
1 (FlamMap is available from Systems for Environmental Management, PO Box 8868, Missoula, MT,
59807, or from www.fire.org/tools.)
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 22
Level Purpose Source
Fire Behavior Prediction System in terms of fuel volume, structure, and chemistry. The fuel models were mapped
by CalFire in the Forest Resource Assessment Program (FRAP).
Canopy Cover Canopy cover is necessary to compute shading and wind
reduction factors. Canopy cover was mapped for the LandFire Program.
LandFire Program
Tree Height Tree height is used to compute spotting distance and
crown fire characteristics. Decision rules regarding tree heights were applied to FRAP surface fuels.
Crosswalk from FRAP surface
fuels
Crown Base Height or Height to Live Canopy
Crown base height is an important parameter for determining the transition from surface fire to crown fire.
This value incorporates the effects of ladder fuels in increasing vertical continuity and assisting transition to
crown fire. Crown base height was mapped for the LandFire Program.
LandFire Program
Weather and Wind Weather is important to determine environmental
conditions during the simulation. The weather data theme describes the maximum and minimum
temperatures and relative humidity, and the time in which
the maximum and minimum temperature occurs in order to dry and moisten fuels accordingly. Weather data that
CalFire based fire-related policy decisions (defined as “average-bad” conditions) was used for this project.
CalFire-defined weather for
average bad fire danger
Figure 4: Spatial Data Required for Fire Behavior Modeling.
3.1.2.3 User-Defined Inputs
The model allows the user to customize fuel models or fuel moisture with special files2.
Custom Fuel Model Files - custom fuels can be used to more accurately describe the types of fuel models found on the site. Custom fuel models use a standard fuel model as a base. In cases where especially flammable vegetation are present (eucalyptus and pines), the heat content of the dead and live fuels could be
raised. In cases where the foliage are expected to be moister, the initial fuel moisture of the living material
can be raised. Fuel volumes and heights in grazed grasslands can also be reflected in a custom model. For the Palo Alto hazards assessment no custom fuel models were used.
Fuel Moisture Files - defines the initial fuel moisture for each size class of fuels, for each fuel model. The
moisture content of live woody fuels and live herbaceous fuels are similarly defined for each fuel model. This
file specifies the moisture in the fuels of various sizes, and specifies how much moisture is in leaves. Based on this information, the weather files either dry out or add moisture to fuels depending on ambient conditions.
The fuel moisture file used for the Palo Alto hazard assessment portrays the “average worst” fire danger as
defined by CalFire. The “average worst” generally applies to the conditions that exist fewer than 10 percent of the time. It is also known as the 90th percentile weather conditions.
2 User-defined inputs could capture the effects of Sudden Oak Death through development of a custom
fuel model and associated reduced fuel moisture.
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 23
3.1.2.4 FlamMap Results
Fire behavior was analyzed for the entirety of the Foothills area, including adjacent neighborhoods, property owned by Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District and Stanford University. Three factors
are especially pertinent for prioritizing locations of high fire hazard: crown fire activity, flame length and
rate of spread.
Crown Fire Potential - Crowning activity indicates locations where fire is expected to travel through and likely consume the crowns. When a fire burns through tree crowns, countless embers are produced and are
distributed, sometimes at long distances. These embers can start new fires, which can each grow and
confound the finest fire suppression forces. For management purposes, prediction of torching or crown fire is highly correlated with fire severity. Crown fire activity is of concern wherever it occurs because of its impacts and the containment challenges.
There is very little active crown fire predicted within the Foothills area, however, the potential for trees to
torch is high throughout the treed portion of the Foothills area. Torching is caused by low-hanging limbs, or ladder fuels (Figure 5). The Crown Fire Potential across the Palo Alto area of interest is depicted in Figure 6.
Figure 5: Comparison of Torching and Active Crown Fire.
Flame Length - Flame length closely corresponds to fire intensity, which can predict fire severity. This
factor most influences probability of house damage and ease of fire control. A flame length of eight feet is usually looked at as a cut-off point for decisions whether to attack the fire directly, or instead attempt control
through indirect methods.
Fire intensity was determined to be the most important factor in many studies of structural damage from fire. Flame lengths are often used as a proxy for fire intensity because they are highly correlated to fire intensity.
Long flame lengths may justify treatment where they occur near sensitive values-at-risk.
Flame lengths follow fuel types, with long flame lengths in chaparral and untreated grass, and short flame
lengths in woodlands and mowed grass. The largest areas of long flames are located in Foothill Park and Monte Bello Open Space Preserve. Predicted Flame Length is depicted in Figure 7.
Rate of Spread - The rate of spread is most closely associated with the ability to contain a fire. Rates of
spread analyses point to the needs for increased access, detection, reporting, and fuel management to slow fire spread in strategic locations.
Low fire spread rates were predicted in woodlands and forests, and fast spread rates in untreated grass and
chaparral. Predicted Rate of Spread is depicted in Figure 8.
Torching Active
Crown Fire
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 24
Figure 6: Crown Fire and Torching Potential.
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 25
Figure 7: Predicted Flame Length.
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 26
Figure 8: Predicted Rate of Spread.
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 27
3.2 Fire Suppression Capabilities
The Department's response area in the WUI Fire Area covers nearly 10 square miles, from Skyline Boulevard
in the Palo Alto foothills to Foothill Blvd and from Page Mill Road to Los Trancos Road. Approximately
200 residences and large business complexes (some of them exceeding a million square feet in area) are located in Palo Alto’s Wildland Urban Interface Fire Area. The City of Palo Alto Emergency Operations Plan
(June 2007) notes that 11 health care facilities, 10 schools and 25 government-owned buildings are located in
the wildland urban interface threat areas, along with 19 miles of roadway that are subject to high, very high or extreme wild fire threat.
The Fire Department has 122 personnel organized in four areas:
• Emergency Response (Operations)
• Environmental & Safety Management (Fire Prevention Bureau)
• Training & Personnel Management (Support)
• Office of Emergency Services
The Fire Department staffs seven full time stations located strategically throughout the City. To provide
coverage in the sparsely developed hillside areas, an additional fire station in the foothills is operated during summer months when fire danger is high.
The Fire Department facilities are located as follows:
Fire Administration 250 Hamilton Avenue, City Hall
Fire Station 1 301 Alma Street
Fire Station 2 2675 Hanover
Fire Station 3
799 Embarcadero Road
Fire Station 4
3600 Middlefield Road
Fire Station 5
600 Arastradero Road
Fire Station 6
711 Serra Street, Stanford
Fire Station 7
2575 Sand Hill Road, Menlo Park
Fire Station 8
Foothills Park
Rangers from the Open Space and Parks Division perform a vital service aiding fire suppression, providing
detection, notification and initial size-up of fires, along with evacuation or reconnaissance. The Rangers offer detailed local knowledge, and support the Station 8 firefighters. Currently ten staff are fully trained and
equipped for first response. There are four trucks with 150-200 gallons of water.
The City of Palo Alto has secured many agreements that augment fire suppression capabilities. They
participate in the California Master Mutual Aid Agreement and supporting separate agreements. During a
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 28
proclaimed emergency, inter-jurisdictional mutual aid will be coordinated at the County Operational Area (Santa Clara County OES, or EOC, if activated), or Mutual Aid Regional level whenever the available resources are:
• Subject to state or federal control.
• Subject to military control.
• Located outside the requesting jurisdiction.
• Allocated on a priority basis.
The current Insurance Service Organization rating for the City of Palo Alto is ISO Class 2.
3.3 Access
Regional access to the Foothills Area is provided by Highway 280, Foothill Expressway and Skyline
Boulevard. Page Mill Road serves as a major north-south connector from Highway 280 to Skyline Boulevard. Los Trancos Road provides access along the western boundary of the Palo Alto Foothills Area from Alpine Road south to Los Trancos Woods. Page Mill Road and Los Trancos Road have several long
sections that are steep, windy and narrow.
Circulation is limited within the Foothills Area. Arastradero Road links the western and eastern portions. Alpine Road and Los Trancos Road provide access to portions of the western part of the City. Moody Road
and Altamont Road are other important circulation routes in Los Altos Hills.
3.4 Sensitive Resources
The Palo Alto Foothills Area includes a mix of social and environmental attributes that may be adversely
affected by wildland fire or proposed fuel treatments and strategies. Areas that hold cultural or environmental
significance enhance the quality of life in the City of Palo Alto and provide habitat for a variety of plant and wildlife species. These sensitive resources are valuable to the Palo Alto community and to the ecosystem;
they should be protected and preserved. Actions are proposed that will reduce the risk of fire spreading to
sensitive resources and otherwise minimize the damage to those resources.
Social and cultural factors that may exist in the area affect fire management planning and include specific land uses such as agriculture and rangeland, the presence of public service utilities and structures, and the
presence of historical or cultural artifacts. Environmental concerns include vegetation communities, wildlife
habitat, soil and erosion conditions, and water and air quality. Figures 9 and 10 provide an overview of potential sensitive resource locations throughout the two parks.
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 29
Figure 9: Locations of Cultural and Environmental Sensitive Resources in Pearson-Arastradero Preserve.
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 30
Figure 10: Locations of Cultural and Environmental Sensitive Resources in Foothills Park.
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 31
3.4.1 Social and Cultural Features
Social and cultural features are areas and activities that have a special community attribute or contribution
ranging from the value of personal property to the functioning of public service and public safety operations. Foothills Park and Pearson-Arastradero Preserve are both open space areas dedicated for park, recreation and
conservation purposes. They are generally undeveloped except for park amenities, utilities, public service and
safety infrastructure, and roads and trails. The projects in this plan pertain directly to the lands within
Foothills Park and Pearson-Arastradero Preserve, and along the evacuation routes within the City limits of Palo Alto. The lands adjacent to the parks include residential and private property as well as public and
private open space, and are affected by fire management through code modification, fire department staffing,
and other non-project measures that reduce the risk of fire spreading to these resources along with minimizing potential damages. The residential and private property adjacent to the parks include:
• Open space owned and managed by the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District and Stanford
University
• Private residences in the Town of Los Altos Hills, Town of Portola Valley, City of Palo Alto, Santa
Clara County, and San Mateo County
• Neighborhoods/associations such as Altamont, Los Trancos Woods, Vista Verde, Blue Oaks, Portola
Valley Ranch, Palo Alto Hills, Montebello, South Skyline, and others
• Privately-held recreation facilities, such as equestrian centers and the Palo Alto Hills Golf and Country Club
• The site of what was a private research facility (the American Institute of Research)
Both Foothills Park and Pearson-Arastradero Preserve contain utility lines and access roads that are used and maintained by the City of Palo Alto. The Pearson-Arastradero Preserve contains overhead electrical utility
lines that enter the Preserve from Arastradero Road and extend along Arastradero Creek. South of Foothills
Park, transmission lines run east-to-west across the southern edge of the park near Page Mill Road and Montebello. The Arastradero and Foothills parks contain several reservoirs, booster stations, and water and
sewage lines. The external, aboveground portions of this infrastructure represent potential features that must
be taken into consideration either as values at risk to wildland fire or included in fire mitigation treatment
planning and execution.
The primary structures within the two parks include the Foothills Park interpretive center, Pearson-
Arastradero Gateway interpretive center, Fire Station 8, a maintenance complex, and three public restrooms.
No significant cultural or historical sites have been found within the park areas. However, the Foothills area is similar to other areas in the Santa Cruz Mountains that have provided hunting, fishing, and encampments for Native American tribes. A potential exists for discovery of cultural or historic sites.
3.4.2 Environmental Features
Environmentally sensitive areas are those that have specific characteristics which the community, State, or
nation has determined to be worthy of protection or preservation. These can include the maintenance of a
diverse plant and wildlife ecosystem or the protection of endangered or threatened species. The Palo Alto Foothills hold a specific environmental value within the City of Palo Alto as a conservation area as well as a
mixed-use area supporting private and public activities.
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 32
Foothills Park and Pearson-Arastradero Preserve consist of a mix of grassland, mixed evergreen, oak woodland, riparian areas (creek, lake), and chaparral. The two parks are located in the watershed of Los Trancos Creek and Arastradero Creek. Foothills Park contains the headwaters of Arastradero Creek and is
downstream of Los Trancos Creek and contains Boronda Lake. The Arastradero Creek, an unnamed tributary
to Arastradero Creek, and an unnamed tributary to Los Trancos Creek run through the Arastradero Preserve. The Pearson-Arastradero Preserve also contains a small lake, called Arastradero Lake, and John Sobey Pond.
The Palo Alto Foothills contain several environmental areas that deserve specific consideration in the Fire
Management Plan. These areas represent the combined contributions of unique wildland habitat capable of supporting a mix of wildlife, a diverse plant and wildlife population containing several protected and monitored species, and a mix of ecosystems ranging from riparian areas to serpentine soils.
3.4.2.1 Species and Wildlife
The variety of environmental conditions in Foothills Park and Pearson-Arastradero Preserve provide habitat
for a broad range of wildlife and plants – including some designated as protected or sensitive either by the State of California or the Federal government (Figure 11).
The parks provide known habitat for two protected species and potential habitat for several others –
particularly in the riparian zones and areas near Boronda Lake and Arastradero Lake. The California Red-Legged Frog and Steelhead Trout are known to inhabit Los Trancos Creek. In addition, the riparian areas,
grasslands, and oak woodlands above Los Trancos as well as Boronda Lake may provide additional foraging
and breeding habitat for the California Red-Legged Frog.
Several species of sensitive plants and animals have been locally identified within the parks. In addition, the parks provide potential habitat for a variety of bird and plant species of concern, ranging from plants such as
the Santa Clara Red Ribbon to mammals such as the San Francisco Dusky-footed Woodrat. The potential
habitats for these species include the riparian and wetland areas along Los Trancos, Boronda Lake, Arastradero Lake, and John Sobey Pond; the serpentine soil areas identified in Pearson-Arastradero Preserve; and the Oak Woodland and Chaparral zones. In addition to these sensitive species, there are also plant species
of local concern, such as Phacelia and bush poppies.
The following is a table highlighting sensitive species that may be present in the parks. It is possible that additional sensitive species or habitat areas may be discovered in the future.
Figure 11: Sensitive Species Known or Potentially Occurring in Foothills Park or Pearson-Arastradero Preserve.
Federal
Status
California
Status Asset Name Geographic Extent Mapping Location
Endangered Endangered San Francisco garter snake (Thamnophis
sirtalis tetrataenia)
POTENTIAL HABITAT - potential habitat in Boronda Lake;
suitable habitat in Arastradero Lake.
Boronda Lake, Arastradero Lake
N/A Protected Ringtail (Bassariscus astutus) POTENTIAL HABITAT - Forage habitat in riparian zone; possible
nesting in hollow trees in riparian zones. Los Trancos Creek
provides most likely habitat.
Los Trancos Creek
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 33
Federal Status California Status Asset Name Geographic Extent Mapping Location
N/A Endangered Point Reye’s meadowfoam
(Limnanthes douglasii sulphurea)
POTENTIAL HABITAT - freshwater marsh occurs in
Arastradero Lake; some wet areas in grassland near Arastradero
Creek may provide habitat.
Arastradero Lake, Arastradero Creek and tributary grasslands
Endangered CNPS: Rare, threatened, or endangered in
CA
Contra Costa goldfields (Lasthenia conjugens) NOT LIKELY - Could possibly occur in wet areas in grassland, although the likelihood is very
low.
Endangered Endangered San Mateo thorn-mint (Acanthomintha duttonii) UNKNOWN - Info pulled from CNDDB Palo Alto topo map - not
mapped.
Species of
concern
DFG: Species
of special concern
Western pond turtle
(Actinemys marmorata)
POTENTIAL HABITAT -
Potential habitat in Boronda Lake, Los Trancos Creek, and
Arastradero Creek; possible sighting in Arastradero Lake; habitat onsite includes Arastradero Creek, John Sobey Pond, Arastradero Lake, and the
unnamed tributary to Los Trancos Creek.
Boronda Lake, Los Trancos
Creek, Arastradero Creek, John Sobey Pond, Arastradero Lake,
Tributary for Los Trancos Creek
Threatened DFG: Species of special
concern
California red-legged frog (Rana aurora
draytonii)
KNOWN and POTENTIAL HABITAT - potential breeding
habitat at Boronda Lake, Los Trancos Creek and tributaries,
John Sobey pond, and Arastradero Lake; foraging habitat in riparian
zones, grassland, and oak woodland above Los Trancos Creek and tributaries; May occur
on Los Trancos Trail.
(1) Boronda Lake, Los Trancos Creek and tributaries, John
Sobey Pond, Arastradero Lake (2) Riparian Zones
(3) Grasslands, Oak Woodlands in vicinity of Los Trancos Creek
(4) Los Trancos Trail
Threatened DFG: Species of special
concern
California tiger salamander (Ambystoma
californiense)
POTENTIAL HABITAT - breeding habitat may occur in the
“bowl” near the top of the Pearson-Arastradero Preserve, which is in proximity to the
unnamed tributary to Los Trancos Creek
Unnamed tributary to Los Trancos Creek
Threatened DFG: Species of special concern
North Central Coast steelhead/sculpin stream KNOWN HABITAT - Los Trancos is a known steelhead stream.
Los Trancos Creek
Threatened DFG: Species of special
concern
Steelhead Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss
irideus)
KNOWN HABITAT - Los Trancos is a known steelhead
stream.
Los Trancos Creek
N/A CNPS: Rare, threatened, or endangered in
CA
Ben Lomond buckwheat (Eriogonum nudum var. decurrens)
POTENTIAL HABITAT - Habitat present in chaparral and woodland.
Chaparral, woodland
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 34
Federal Status California Status Asset Name Geographic Extent Mapping Location
N/A CNPS: Rare, threatened, or
endangered in CA
Big-scale balsamroot (Balsamorhiza
macrolepis)
POTENTIAL HABITAT - Habitat present in grassland and
oak woodland.
Grassland, Oak Woodland
N/A CNPS: Rare,
threatened, or endangered in CA
Delta tule pea (Lathyrus
jepsonii)
POTENTIAL HABITAT - fresh
water marsh occurs in Arastradero Lake, and may occur in Arastradero Creek and the
tributary to Arastradero Creek.
Arastradero Lake, Arastradero
Creek and tributary to Arastradero Creek
N/A CNPS: Rare, threatened, or
endangered in CA
Legenere (Legenere limosa) POTENTIAL HABITAT - Potential habitat along drainages,
Boronda Lake.
Boronda Lake
N/A CNPS: Rare, threatened, or
endangered in CA
Robust monardella or Round-headed coyote
mint (Monardella villosa ssp. globosa)
PRESENT/POTENTIAL HABITAT – Locally identified
habitat present in woodland and chaparral. Every trail has either woodland or chaparral, or both habitats.
Woodland and chaparral
N/A CNPS: Plant of limited
distribution
Santa Clara red ribbons (Clarkia concinna
automixa)
PRESENT (Foothills)/POTENTIAL
HABITAT - Habitat present in oak woodland areas along trails
Oak Woodland
N/A CNPS: Rare, threatened, or
endangered in CA
Santa Cruz manzanita (Arctostaphylos
andersonii)
POSSIBLE HABITAT/NOT LIKELY - Low possibility in oak
woodland and chaparral. Every trail has either woodland or
chaparral, or both habitats.
Oak woodland and chaparral
N/A CNPS: Rare,
threatened, or endangered in
CA
Serpentine-based plants KNOWN - two areas of
serpentine soil have been identified in Arastradero; one is in
grassland and the other is in chaparral. No occurrences in
Foothills although some soil/landcover data have noted potential areas.
Areas of Serpentine Soil in
Arastradero (Grassland, chaparral). Some potential areas
in Foothills
N/A CNPS: Rare,
threatened, or endangered in
CA
Dudley's lousewort
(Pedicularis dudleyi)
NOT LIKELY - Coniferous
forest, maritime chaparral. These habitats are not present in
Foothills Park.
Endangered CNPS: Rare,
threatened, or endangered in
CA
Showy Indian clover
(Trifolium amoenum)
NOT LIKELY
(Foothills)/POSSIBLE (Arastradero) - Info pulled from
CNDDB Palo Alto topo map, seeps in grassland.
Threatened N/A Bay checkerspot butterfly (Euphydryas editha
bayensis)
NOT LIKELY - serpentine grassland areas either too small or
not present
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 35
Federal Status California Status Asset Name Geographic Extent Mapping Location
N/A CNPS: Plant of limited
distribution
Gairdner’s yampah (Perideridia gairdneri) KNOWN - in grassland, riparian areas of Arastradero. Riparian, Grasslands
N/A CNPS: Plant of limited
distribution
Mexican mosquito fern (Azolla mexicana) POTENTIAL HABITAT - Potential habitat in Boronda Lake;
Arastradero Creek from John Sobey Pond to Arastradero Lake
Boronda Lake; Arastradero Creek from John Sobey Pond to
Arastradero Lake
N/A CNPS: Rare, threatened, or
endangered in CA
White-flowered rein orchid (Piperia candida) POSSIBLE HABITAT - Potential habitat along portions of Chamise,
Coyote, Fern Loop, Los Trancos, Panorama, Toyon and Woodrat
Trails.
Oak Woodland
N/A DFG: Species
of special concern
Long-eared owl (Asio
otus)
POTENTIAL HABITAT - May
use oak woodland and riparian corridors in Foothills Park.
Includes Chamise, Costanoan, Coyote, Fern Loop, Los Trancos, Panorama, Sunrise, Trappers, and Woodrat Trails.
Oak Woodland, Riparian Zones
N/A Species of special
concern
Big brown bat (Eptesicus fuscus) POTENTIAL HABITAT - Potential forage habitat. Oak Woodland, Riparian Zones
N/A Species of special concern
California myotis (Myotis californicus) POTENTIAL HABITAT - Potential forage habitat. Oak Woodland, Riparian Zones
N/A BLM:
Sensitive
Long-eared myotis
(Myotis evotis)
POTENTIAL HABITAT -
Potential forage habitat.
Oak Woodland, Riparian Zones
N/A IUCN: Species of concern
Long-legged myotis (Myotis volans) POTENTIAL HABITAT - Potential forage habitat. Oak Woodland, Riparian Zones
N/A Species of
special concern
Mexican free-tailed bat
(Tadarida brasiliensis)
POTENTIAL HABITAT -
Potential forage habitat.
Oak Woodland, Riparian Zones
N/A IUCN: Species of
concern
Silver haired bat (Lasionycteris
noctavigans)
POTENTIAL HABITAT - Potential forage habitat. Oak Woodland, Riparian Zones
N/A DFG: Species of special concern;
BLM: Sensitive;
IUCN: Species of
concern; USFS: Sensitive
Townsend’s western big-eared bat (Corynorhinus townsendii townsendii)
POTENTIAL HABITAT - Potential forage habitat. Oak Woodland, Riparian Zones
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 36
Federal Status California Status Asset Name Geographic Extent Mapping Location
N/A IUCN: Species of
concern; BLM:
Sensitive
Yuma myotis (Myotis yumanensis) POTENTIAL HABITAT - Potential forage habitat. Oak Woodland, Riparian Zones
N/A DFG: Species of special concern;
BLM: Sensitive;
IUCN: Species of
concern; USFS: Sensitive
Pallid bat (Antrozous pallidus) POTENTIAL HABITAT - throughout Pearson-Arastradero Preserve.
Oak Woodland, Riparian Zones
Species of
concern
DFG: Species
of special concern; BLM: Sensitive; IUCN:
Species of concern;
USFS: Sensitive
Foothill yellow-legged
frog (Rana boylei)
POTENTIAL HABITAT -
Potential habitat in Los Trancos Creek and tributaries. May occur on Los Trancos Trail; suitable habitat in Arastradero Creek and the unnamed tributary to Los
Trancos Creek.
Los Trancos Creek, Arastradero
Creek, Tributary
None Locally unusual BlueGrey Gnatcatcher
(Polioptila caerulea)
PRESENT – Locally identified in North Coastal Scrub, coyote
brush.
Arastradero Creek and Juan Bautista de Anza Trail
N/A CNPS: Rare, threatened, or endangered in
CA
Franciscan onion (Allium peninsulare var. franciscanum)
POTENTIAL HABITAT – Habitat present in oak and mixed evergreen woodland, and
grasslands.
Oak Woodland, Grasslands, Evergreen Woodlands
Species of concern DFG: Species of special
concern: IUCN: Species of
concern
Saltmarsh common yellowthroat (Geothlypis
trichas sinuosa)
POTENTIAL HABITAT – May use Boronda Lake. Riparian
habitat, John Sobey pond and Arastradero Lake.
Riparian Zones including Boronda Lake, John Sobey
pond, Arastradero Lake
N/A CNPS: Rare, threatened, or endangered in CA
San Francisco collinsia (Collinsia multicolor) POTENTIAL HABITAT – Habitat present in oak woodland. Oak Woodland
N/A DFG: Species of special
concern; IUCN: Species of
concern
San Francisco dusky-footed woodrat (Neotoma
fuscipes annectens)
PRESENT/POTENTIAL HABITAT – Known to occur
along Woodrat Trail. Nesting habitat in riparian vegetation and oak woodland, forage in all
habitats on site.
Woodrat Trail, restoration site near Arastradero Road, and
Arastradero Creek Trail
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 37
Federal Status California Status Asset Name Geographic Extent Mapping Location
N/A CNPS: Rare, threatened, or
endangered in CA
Western leatherwood (Dirca occidentalis) POTENTIAL HABITAT (Arastradero)/KNOWN
(Foothills) – Oak woodland and riparian; Foothill woodland,
mixed evergreen forest and riparian. Occurs on site along the
Los Trancos and Steep Hollow Trails.
Los Trancos and Steep Hollow Trails in Oak Woodlands and
Riparian areas
N/A CNPS: Plant of limited
distribution
Forget-me-not popcorn flower (Plagiobothrys
myosotoides)
POTENTIAL HABITAT (Foothills)/NOT LIKELY
(Arastradero) – Habitat present in chaparral.
Chaparral in Foothills
N/A CNPS: Rare, threatened, or
endangered in CA
Slender-leaved pondweed (Potamogeton filiformis) NOT LIKELY – Possibly in Arastradero Creek/Boronda Lake
and unnamed creeks in the Preserve, presumed extinct in
Santa Clara County; not known from San Mateo County.
N/A CNPS: Rare, threatened, or
endangered in CA
Congdon’s tarplant (Centromadia/Hemizonia
parryi ssp. Congdonii)
NOT LIKELY (Foothills)/POSSIBLE (Pearson-
Arastradero) – Info pulled from CNDDB Palo Alto topo map,
seeps in grassland.
N/A CNPS: Rare,
threatened, or endangered in
CA
Fragrant fritillary
(Fritillaria liliacea)
NOT LIKELY
(Foothills)/POSSIBLE (Pearson-Arastradero) – Info pulled from
CNDDB Palo Alto topo map, seeps in grassland.
Figure 11: Sensitive Species Known or Potentially Occurring in Foothills Park or Pearson-Arastradero Preserve.
3.4.2.2 Soils and Geology
Soil erosion occurs when soil materials are worn away and transported by wind or water. The soils that comprise Foothills Park and Pearson-Arastradero Preserve include some soil and slope combinations that
represent potential erosion hazards that could be accentuated by wildland fire events that remove significant
portions of vegetation or some forms of fuel treatments that disturb ground cover. Figure 12 lists the potential
erosion hazards posed by soil mapping units that comprise portions of the parks. Due to the presence of several highly and moderately erodible soil types, the areas that represent significant hazards from either fire
or treatment are those with slopes in excess of 15 %.
Soil Mapping Unit Soil Name Location Erosion Hazard
Los Gatos-Maymen
Complex (50-75% slope)
Los Gatos Gravelly Loam Foothills Park & Pearson-Arastradero Preserve Very High
Maymen Rocky Fine Sandy Loam Foothills Park Very High
Los Gatos Clay Loam
(15-30% slope)
Los Gatos Clay Loam Foothills Park Moderate
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 38
Soil Mapping Unit Soil Name Location Erosion Hazard
Los Osos Clay Loam (15-30% slope) Los Osos Clay Loam Pearson-Arastradero Preserve Moderate
Azule Clay Loam (15-30%) Azule Loam Pearson-Arastradero Preserve Slight to Moderate
Cropley Clay (2-9%
slope)
Cropley Clay Foothills Park Slight
Pacheco Clay Loam Pacheco Clay Loam Pearson-Arastradero Preserve Slight
Pleasanton Loam Pleasanton Loam Pearson-Arastradero Preserve Slight
Figure 12: Soil Types in Foothills Park and Pearson-Arastradero Preserve.
Derived from STATSGO2 data and research from City of Palo Alto Trail Management Plans.
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 39
4 FUEL MANAGEMENT IN CITY PARKS
Not every area identified as a potential fire hazard can be modified to produce low-intensity fires. Not only
would this be too costly, but environmental impacts would also be unacceptable. Fires that burn in un-treated
areas will not benefit from treatment elsewhere. The exception is that the fire may be contained in the treated
area, thereby never reaching the untreated area.
4.1 Identifying Potential Treatment Areas
Selection of pre-fire fuel treatment areas is based on the probability of the event and the potential damage of that event. Factors taken into consideration are:
• Need for enhanced access and egress: Actions to promote life safety and efficient emergency
response is of utmost importance. Roadside treatments that aid safer access and evacuation have a high likelihood and magnitude of benefit.
• Ignition locations: Treatments are located either where ignitions are likely to occur or could spread
into (e.g. a grassy spot near a road, or near a barbeque). Even where an area would burn with great ferocity, if there is only a remote chance of ignition, it has a lower treatment priority.
• Adjacency to improvements or other sensitive values at risk from wildfire: The closer the fuel
source is to a structure, heavily used area, or environmentally sensitive area, the higher the treatment priority. Therefore, an area in the interior of a Park/Preserve, well removed from other
vulnerabilities, should not be treated with the same priority as a hazardous situation near valuable
and/or vulnerable resources.
• Propensity of the treatment to aid containment: Treatments that facilitate access or create
locations where containment is likely to be successful have greater benefit because they improve fire
suppression success. Also, a fire that is easy to contain will be more likely to have fewer environmental impacts from the suppression action itself.
In the end, the most intense fire, and possibly the largest potential fire size, may not be highest on the
treatment priority list. This may be because the likelihood of the event coupled with the potential damage from the fire would not yield the highest risk.
4.2 Establishing Project Objectives
Projects are justified by various objectives, spanning the need to keep fires from crossing boundaries, minimizing damage to developed areas, and minimizing damage to natural resources. Others comply with
regulations, which themselves are intended to increase access, facilitate fire suppression and minimize
resource damage.
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 40
The following table (Figure 13) is an outline of project goals and actions:
Project Goal Actions
Maintain ability for safe
access and egress and refuge during
suppression activities
• Roadside and driveway fuel modification to reduce fire intensity to allow for firefighting vehicles access and ensure safe passage for staff and visitors to pre-
determined safety zones.
• Improve access to potential wildfire locations to increase effectiveness of firefighting
resources (road realignments, access upgrades)
• Identify areas for potential use for firefighter safety and refuge during a fire (safety
zones)
Minimizing damage to developed areas • Reduce potential for ember production,
• Manage fuels along borders with structures, anywhere around structures (within 100 feet)
• Retrofit structures to make them more ignition-resistant
• Enhance firefighting effectiveness
• Reduce fuels around other facilities at risk (e.g. communications equipment, high use recreation areas)
Reduce damage to
structures and developed areas from wildfire near
structures
• Manage fuels per Defensible Space Guidelines to reduce flame length to 2 feet within 30 feet of structures
Reduce potential for
ignitions • Roadside fuel treatments
• Reduce fuels around barbeque sites and selected electrical transmission lines
• Ensure mechanical equipment has features to minimize ignitions
• Conduct fuel management in a manner that prevents ignitions
Facilitate containment
and control of a fire • Strategically compartmentalize fuels in order to facilitate containment and control
• Modify fuels to reduce fire intensity and allow firefighters better access to the fire,
slow spread of fire and make firefighting actions more effective,
• Modify fuels to allow for backfires
Reduce the chance of
damage to life and property by keeping fire
from crossing boundaries – Participate in
cooperative projects with adjacent landowners
• Fuel management to compartmentalize the landscape
• Fuel management along the borders of the Park/Preserve
• Modification of the volume or structure of the fuels to reduce chance of ember
production
• Modification of the volume or structure of the fuels to enhance firefighting effectiveness
Minimize damage to natural resources • Conduct pre-treatment surveys for sensitive species
• Follow best management practices during fuel management
• Fuel management around fire-sensitive areas to reduce fire intensity
• Use of modified fire suppression in sensitive areas
Fuel modification for ecosystem health • Reduce invasive species
• Perform selected prescribed burns to promote fire-adapted native species
Figure 13: Project Goals and Actions.
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 41
4.3 Current Fuel Management Program
Fuel Management is not new in the two parks. The two parks have a long history of managing vegetation to
both promote fire safety and to enhance natural resources (Figures 14 and 15). In some cases, projects attain
both goals. Previous projects in Foothills Park encompass discing along park boundaries, grazing with goats in Las Trampas Valley, maintenance of a mowed fuel break along various locations, including a broad fuel
break sometimes 200-ft wide along Trappers Ridge, and more narrow fuel breaks along the Madrone Fire
Road, Shotgun Fire Road, Pony Tracks Fire Road, and around Station 8. Fuel management in Pearson-Arastradero includes discing along park boundaries, mowing 14 different broad areas within the park, and maintenance of vegetation along park roads. Figures 16 and 17 highlight specific mowing and grazing areas
for both parks from 2001 to 2008.
Grading (of the fire roads) has been a component of the contract between Van der Steen General Engineering
and Palo Alto for annual firebreak maintenance.
Grading has been performed as part of this contract only in the last three years; low annual rainfall and
erosion has not warranted grading. To minimize grading work, city employees from all departments are
strictly prohibited from driving the bare soil roadways that do not have asphalt or compacted rock. Grading, as a component of the contract, is specified as only when necessary.
Discing has been performed by City staff for the last 7+ years. After trials with several methods, the City found that a two discing cycles work best. The first cycle is performed when the threat of spring rains has
diminished, drainages or low areas are dry, and annual grasses are still green. The depth of discing is less
than 6-inches, and causes a disruption of the growth of the annual grasses (less biomass). The second cycle of discing is after the annual grasses have cured/dried but there is still some soil moisture. Discing is full depth
or up to 10-inches. Completely dry soil makes traction nearly non-existent, which is a safety hazard for the
equipment operator, and produces copious amounts of dust to the surrounding area during both discing and grading operations.
Mowing is routinely conducted during the early summer by City staff for resource enhancement. Figure 16 indicates the areas within Pearson-Arastradero Preserve that are mowed at least annually. Approximately 200
acres are routinely mowed. Outside of the areas mowed for resource enhancement, large areas are mowed
annually in Foothills Park as part of a fuel break. A fuel break is mowed on Trappers Trail, varying from 100-ft to 300-ft in width. Another area routinely mowed is along Pony Tracks Fire Road from the
intersection of Los Trancos Trail to Page Mill Road. Most areas are less than 100-ft but the area between
Pony Tracks and Los Trancos Trail can reach 300-ft in width.
Grazing with sheep and goats is a relatively new component of the fuel management program within the City of Palo Alto Parks. Approximately 5 acres were grazed in 2007 in Las Trampas Valley in Foothill Park, the picnic areas near the road.
Defensible Space is maintained near existing structures in Foothills Park and Pearson-Arastradero Preserve.
This employs the use of hand labor to limb trees and shrubs, cut grass, landscape with fire-resistant plants,
and irrigate selected plants.
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 42
Figure 14: Pearson-Arastradero Preserve Current Fuel Management Areas.
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 43
Figure 15: Foothills Park Current Fuel Management Areas.
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 44
Figure 16: Recent Treatments in Pearson-Arastradero Preserve.
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 45
Figure 17: Recent Treatments in Foothills Park.
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 46
4.4 Project Description
4.4.1 Scope of Recommended Fuel Management Projects
The scope of the projects encompasses the two parks in the foothills of Palo Alto: Foothills Park and Pearson-
Arastradero Preserve. In addition, treatments along four roads extend outside the parks themselves but are
confined to City boundaries or rights-of-ways: Page Mill Road, Arastradero Road, Los Trancos Road, and
Skyline Boulevard.
4.4.2 Project Description Summary
Fuel management is proposed on 330 acres of Foothills and Arastradero Parks to protect lives, enhance the safety of improvements in and around the parks and to enhance ecosystem health. Fuel management falls into
the following categories: roadside treatments along potential evacuation corridors, creation and maintenance
of firefighter safety zones, creation and maintenance of defensible space around structures in the parks, and treatments to aid containment of fires in and within the park.
Treatments are performed on a rotational basis with intervals of approximately every five years, with an
anticipated area of approximately 100 acres treated annually after the initial treatments are performed.
Vegetation types that will be treated include:
• Grasslands
• North Coastal Scrub
• Chaparral
• Oak Woodland
• Riparian Woodland (limited areas and limited treatment only)
4.4.3 Project Objectives
Projects are justified by various objectives, spanning the need to keep fires from crossing boundaries,
minimizing damage to developed areas and minimizing damage to natural resources. Others comply with regulations, which themselves are intended to increase access, or facilitate fire suppression.
A variety of projects reduce the chance of damage to life and property. There are projects that keep fire from
crossing boundaries, which could be in the form of fuel management to compartmentalize the landscape, or
fuel management along the borders of the parks, or modification of the volume or structure of the fuels to reduce chance of ember production or enhance firefighting effectiveness.
Other projects focus on minimizing damage to developed areas, and may be distinct from efforts to reduce fire
size, particularly where fire growth is in the wildland. Methods to minimize damage to structures would encompass the following actions: stop ember production, manage fuels along borders with structures, anywhere around structures (up to 100 feet), retrofit structures to make them more ignition-resistant, and
enhance firefighting effectiveness.
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 47
While fire is a natural force in the foothills of Palo Alto, fuel management also aims to minimize damage to natural resources within the City of Palo Alto. This may include fuel management around sensitive areas such as riparian corridors, or use of fire where needed for resource management. The skillful application of
controlled burning would be justified where fire exclusion is harmful, for example, where species require fire
for seed germination, or where native grasslands experience brush encroachment, or where an unnatural accumulation of understory fuels (both live and dead) develops. Enhancing firefighting effectiveness, so that
fire response can better apply or restrain fire’s impacts on sensitive natural resources may further justify
projects.
Finally, some projects are further justified by local regulations. For example, the City of Palo Alto regulations require installation and maintenance of 100-ft defensible space around structures, fuel
management for a minimum width of 10-ft along roads, and maintenance of 13.5-ft high vertical clearance
over roadbeds.
4.4.4 Priority
Fuel management is not possible, nor advisable, on every acre of the wildlands in the two City parks. Not even all the areas of high hazard can be treated with a reasonable level of funding, so prioritization needs to
occur. Finding the most effective location and scope is a challenge because of uncertainties around relative
fire hazard, erosion, potential, ignition potential, cost of implementation, environmental impacts of the management itself, and social values attached to the project location.
Selection of fuel treatment areas is based on several factors, including the probability of the event, the
potential damage of that event, ignition locations, adjacency to improvements or other sensitive values at risk
from wildfire, and the propensity of the treatment to aid containment.
4.4.5 Project Locations
The following table (Figure 18) and maps (Figures 19 and 20) summarize the project locations. Each treatment location was selected to achieve a specific objective. Many treatments are associated with
roadsides, structures and City Park/Preserve boundaries. Treatments for containment are strategically located
at ridgetops, in places that have access, are not too steep for mechanical treatments, avoid riparian areas, and are not prone to soil erosion. Sections 4.4.7 through 4.4.13 provide additional information regarding project treatments by project type.
Figure 18: Listing of Project Locations.
Designation Project Description
Life Safety
Foothills Park
F.F1 Firefighter Safety Zone 1 Trappers Ridge & Los Trancos Trail
F.F2 Firefighter Safety Zone 2 Trappers Ridge & Madrone Fire Road
F.F3 Firefighter Safety Zone 3 Trappers Ridge high point
F.F4 Firefighter Safety Zone 4 Trapper Ridge south end
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 48
Designation Project Description
F.E1 Evacuation Route - Page Mill Road Within PA City from Arastradero to southern Pony Tracks
F.E2 Evacuation Route - Park Road Entrance to Maintenance Yard Las Trampas Valley
F.E3 Evacuation Route - Park Northwest Interpretive Center to the 600-700 block of Los Trancos Road
F.E4 Evacuation Route - Park Northeast Boronda Lake to Alexis Drive
F.E5 Secondary Evacuation Route - Wildhorse Valley Wildhorse Valley from Towle Campground to Las Trampas Valley
Pearson-Arastradero
A.E1 Evacuation Route – Arastradero Road Arastradero Road
Off-site
PA.1 Evacuation Route Page Mill Road
PA.2 Evacuation Route Arastradero Road
PA.3 Evacuation on Los Trancos Road between Santa Clara County boundary and Oak Forest Court
PA.4 Evacuation Route Skyline Blvd.
Structure and Infrastructure Protection
Foothills Park
F.D1 Defensible Space Entry Gate and Restroom
F.D2 Defensible Space Station 8
F.D3 Defensible Space Restrooms at Orchard Glen
F.D4 Defensible Space Interpretive Center
F.D5 Defensible Space Maintenance Shop Complex
F.D6 Defensible Space Boronda Pump Station at Campground
F.D7 Defensible Space Park Tank
F.D8 Defensible Space Boranda Water Tank
F.D9 Defensible Space Dahl Water Tank
Pearson-Arastradero
A.D1 Defensible Space Gateway Building and Restrooms
A.D2 Defensible Space Pump Station
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 49
Designation Project Description
A.D3 Defensible Space Corte Madera Water Tank
Ignition Prevention
Foothills Park
F.I1 Ignition Prevention Lakeside Picnic Area
F.I2 Ignition Prevention Shady Cove Picnic Area
F.I3 Ignition Prevention Encinal and Pine Gulch Picnic Areas
F.I4 Ignition Prevention Orchard Glen Picnic Area
F.I5 Ignition Prevention Oak Grove Group Picnic Area
F.I6 Ignition Prevention Towle Camp
Containment
Foothills Park
F.C1 Containment Trappers Trail
F.C2 Containment Pony Tracks south of Trappers Ridge
F.C3 Containment Pony Tracks north of Trappers Ridge
F.C4 Containment Bobcat Point
F.C5 Containment North of Entry Gate
F.C6 Containment Valley View Fire Road
Pearson-Arastradero
A.C1 Containment Property boundary adjacent to Liddicoat
A.C2 Containment Property boundary adjacent to Stanford and Portola Pastures
A.C3 Containment Redtail Loop Area
A.C4 Containment Property boundary adjacent to Paso del Robles
A.C5 Containment Property boundary Laurel Glen - north
A.C6 Containment Property boundary Laurel Glen - south
A.C7 Containment Property boundary west of Meadow Lark Trail
A.C8 Containment
Property boundary adjacent to former private research
facility
A.C9 Containment Property boundary adjacent to John Marthens Lane
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 50
Designation Project Description
A.C10 Containment Arastradero Creek (to Juan Bautista trail)
A.C11 Containment Meadow Lark to Juan Bautista Trail
A.C12 Containment Meadow Lark south
A.C13 Containment Bowl Loop Trial
A.C14 Containment Arastradero to Rx fire area
A.C15 Containment Acorn Trail
A.Rx1 Containment Juan Bautista Prescribed fire north
A.Rx1 Containment Acorn Trail Prescribed fire south
Figure 18: Listing of Project Locations.
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 51
Figure 19: Proposed Treatment Locations in Pearson-Arastradero Preserve.
January 2009
AD2
AD3
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 52
Figure 20: Proposed Treatment Locations in Foothills Park.
FI1 FI2
January 2009
FD8
FD1000
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 53
4.4.6 Project Dimensions and Post-Treatment Standards
The dimensions of the treatments follow in the table below (Figure 21). The treatments that will occur within
the project area depend on the vegetation type and treatment method. The post-treatment standards for each treatment type and a description of the treatment methods are also included.
Project Types Dimension Treatment Frequency Comments
Roadside Treatments
Major evacuation
routes
30 feet on both sides of pavement edge Rotate 3-5+ years depending
on fuel type
Annual for first 10 feet with
grass fuels
Secondary evacuation routes 15 feet on both sides of pavement edge Rotate 3-5+ years depending on fuel type
Defensible Space 100-ft from structure Annual Follow-up treatments may not
be required annually
Ignition Prevention 10-ft from barbeque Annual
Firefighter Safety Zones 100-ft radius Annual
Containment Fuel Breaks
Area treatment Within 300-ft of ridgetop of Trappers Ridge Rotate 3-5+ years
Areas designated goat grazing within park Rotate 3-5+ years
Two designated potential prescribed burn units per map Rotate 3-5+ years
Perimeter treatment
Brush/understory In designated areas within 300 feet of park boundary Rotate 3-5+ years
Grass Discing or mowing 15-45 feet from park boundary, as practical Annual
Eucalyptus Removal Individual tree removal One time Follow up to ensure no stump
sprouts
Figure 21: Treatment Methods and Intervals.
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 54
4.4.7 Roadside and Driveway Fuel Modification for Safe Access and Egress
4.4.7.1 Specific Goal of Action
The most important goal for this set of projects is to reduce fire intensity near roads to allow firefighting
vehicles to pass and ensure safe passage for staff and visitors to pre-determined safety zones, or safe locations out of the parks. In addition, the projects outside of the City parks/preserves are aimed at facilitating access
and egress between different portions of Palo Alto’s wildland urban interface.
4.4.7.2 Location and Description of Projects
Projects would be located along roads and driveways of varying width, depending on whether the road is a major or secondary evacuation route.
• 10 feet where flames are predicted to be less than eight feet in length (generally in grassy locations
and in oak woodlands), such as along Wildhorse Valley in Foothills Park.
• 30 feet from pavement edge along major evacuation routes that are Page Mill Road, Los Trancos
Road, Arastradero Road, Skyline Boulevard, and the road from the Foothills Park Entry Gate to the
Maintenance Shop.
Palo Alto should work cooperatively with Los Alto Hills, the Town of Portola Valley, CalTrans, San Mateo
County, Santa Clara County, and other agencies to ensure vegetation along Page Mill Road, Arastradero
Road, Los Trancos Road, and Skyline Blvd. are mowed, trees are maintained, and other treatments are implemented and sustained.
Figure 22 lists the location and description of proposed safe access and egress projects. Figure 23 provides a
graphical representation of major evacuation routes that are external to the two preserves.
Designation Project Description Distance Treatment Method
Foothills
F.E1 Page Mill Road Within PA City from Arastradero to southern
Pony Tracks
13,855 ft mowing, grazing, hand
labor
F.E2 Evacuation Route - Park Road
Entrance to Maintenance Yard Las
Trampas Valley
7,211 ft mowing, grazing, hand labor
F.E3 Evacuation Route -
Park North west
Interpretive Center to
the 600-700 block of Los Trancos Road 1,263 ft mowing, grazing, hand
labor
F.E4 Evacuation Route - Park North east Boronda Lake to Alexis Drive 2,618 ft mowing, grazing, hand labor
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 55
F.E5 Secondary Evac Route Towle Campground to
Las Trampas Valley 2,818 ft mowing, grazing, hand
labor
Pearson-Arastradero
A.E1 Evacuation Route Arastradero Road 6,337 ft mowing, grazing, hand labor
Off-site
PA.1 Page Mill Road From Foothill Park South to Skyline Blvd. 11,980 ft mowing, grazing, hand labor
PA.2 Arastradero Road
From Page Mill to Arastradero Pk, and
from Arastradero Pk to Los Trancos
940 ft mowing, grazing, hand
labor
PA.3 Evacuation Route -
Los Trancos
Los Trancos Road between Santa Clara
County boundary and
Oak Forest Court
4,406 ft mowing, grazing, hand
labor
PA.4 Skyline Blvd. Skyline Blvd.3 7,907 ft mowing, grazing, hand labor
Figure 22: Listing of Project Locations for Evacuation and Access.
3 CalTrans is responsible for treatments within the designated right-of-wa,y which is variable in width (generally 2-
30-ft). Regardless the City of Palo Alto is committed to conduct treatments on City lands adjacent to the road.
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 56
Figure 23: Evacuation Routes External to Foothills Park and Pearson-Arastradero Preserve.
Vegetation
maintenance on
Highway 35 is the
responsibility of
CalTrans
PA3
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 57
4.4.8 Fuel Modification for Firefighter Safety Projects
4.4.8.1 Specific Goal of Action
This project goal is specific to the safety of firefighters during emergency response. In times of emergency, a
safe refuge comprised of low fuels is vital.
4.4.8.2 Location and Description of Projects
These projects would install and maintain four firefighter safety zones within Foothills Park. Specifically,
they are located on the Trappers Trail fuel break, at Los Trancos Trail, Madrone Fire Road, at the high point
on Trappers Ridge and the south end of Trappers Ridge.
Designation Project Description Acreage Treatment Method
Foothills
F.F1 Firefighter Safety
Zone 1
Trappers Ridge & Los
Trancos Trail > 1 acre mow, graze
F.F2 Firefighter Safety
Zone 2
Trappers Ridge &
Madrone Fire Road > 1 acre mow, graze
F.F3 Firefighter Safety
Zone 3
Trappers Ridge high
point > 1 acre mow, graze
F.F4
Firefighter Safety Zone
4 Trapper Ridge south end > 1 acre mow, graze
Figure 24: Listing of Project Locations for Fire Fighter Safety Fuel Modification.
4.4.9 Structure and Infrastructure Projects – Defensible Space
4.4.9.1 Specific Goal of Action
• Reduce damage to structures, developed areas and critical infrastructure from wildfire by reducing
flame length to two feet within 30 feet of structures by managing fuels per Defensible Space
Guidelines in Section 1.6.8. In some cases, treatment will need to extend to 100 feet in order to reduce flames to two feet within thirty feet of a structure.
• Minimize negative effects of fuel manipulation on wildlands
• Reduce damage to wildlands from wildfire
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 58
4.4.9.2 Location and Description of Projects
This vital suite of projects is located generally within 100 feet from structures that are currently in use, which includes entry gates, interpretive centers, restrooms, and maintenance or infrastructure facilities. Some of the
projects are to protect the water and electrical services provided to the park. In addition, fire-resistant features
should be installed when these structures are remodeled or repaired. The structures in the Parks/ Preserve can
serve as a demonstration of the types of actions that should occur in private yards as part of compliance with local codes and ordinances. The following lists specify which structures need defensible space established and
maintained annually:
The area around structures is currently treated, however the actions recommended will bolster survivability of structures.
Designation Project Description Acreage Treatment Method
Foothills
F.D1 Defensible Space Entry Gate and
Restrooms > 1 acre hand labor
F.D2 Defensible Space Boranda Water Tank > 1 acre hand labor
F.D3 Defensible Space Restrooms at Orchard Glen > 1/2 acre hand labor
F.D4 Defensible Space Interpretive Center > 1 acre hand labor
F.D5 Defensible Space Maintenance Complex > 1 acre hand labor
F.D6 Defensible Space Boronda Pump Station at
Campground > 1 acre hand labor
F.D7 Defensible Space Park Tank > 1/2 acre hand labor, grazing
F.D8 Defensible Space Station 8 > 1/2 acre hand labor, grazing
F.D9 Defensible Space Dahl Water Tank > 1/2 acre hand labor, grazing
F.D10 Defensible Space Oak Grove Restrooms > 1/2 acre hand labor, grazing
Pearson-Arastradero
A.D1 Defensible Space and
Restrooms Gateway Building > 1 acre hand labor, mowing
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 59
A.D2 Defensible Space Corte Madera Pump Station > 1 acre hand labor, mowing
A.D3 Defensible Space Water Tank > 1 acre hand labor, mowing
Figure 25: Listing of Project Locations for Defensible Space.
4.4.10 Ignition Prevention Fuel Management Projects
4.4.10.1 Specific Goal of Action
Ignitions from barbeques may occur in Foothills Park. Ignition prevention relies upon fuel management,
coupled with education, signage, and enforcement of park rules regarding fire safety. Under extreme fire
weather conditions, the parks may be closed to the public. The fuel management will consist of the following:
• Follow standards for defensible space for a 30-ft radius from the barbeque site.
• Remove vegetation to create a non-combustible zone for a 10-ft radius from the barbeque site.
4.4.10.2 Location and Description of Projects
Designation Project Description Acreage Treatment Method
Foothills
F.I1 Ignition Prevention Shady Cove Picnic Area > 1/4 ac hand labor
F.I2 Ignition Prevention Encinal Picnic Area > 1/4 ac hand labor
F.I3 Ignition Prevention Pine Gulch Picnic Area > 1/4 ac hand labor
F.I4 Ignition Prevention Orchard Glen > 1/4 ac hand labor
F.I5 Ignition Prevention Oak Grove Group Picnic Area > 1/4 ac hand labor
F.I6 Ignition Prevention Towle Camp > 1/4 ac hand labor
Figure 26: Listing of Project Locations for Ignition Prevention.
4.4.11 Fuel Modification for Containment Ease
4.4.11.1 Specific Goal of Action
The specific goal of modifying fuels in the two parks is to compartmentalize fuels in order to facilitate the containment and control of a fire. The treatment areas are positioned in strategic locations, usually on a
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 60
ridgetop, with access, avoiding areas that would preclude the use of mechanical equipment such as steep slopes or riparian areas. Fuels are modified to reduce fire intensity and thus allow firefighters better access to the fire, making firefighting actions more effective. Fuel modification also creates more opportunities to
backfire, which occurs during wildfires where fire suppression crews create large firebreaks in advance of the
fire front. Fuel modification can also slow the spread of a fire, further enhancing fire control efforts. Where trees abut grasslands in the new fuel breaks, it is especially important to limb trees and remove shrubby
understory from trees along the edge of the forest canopy in order to break vertical continuity between grass
and tree canopy. This action will remove the “ladder fuels” that promote crown fires and hinder fire containment.
4.4.11.2 Location and Description of Projects
In Pearson-Arastradero, the projects entail discing and mowing along the grassy perimeter of the preserve,
and grazing in the shrubby areas that abut residences. Grazing of shrubby areas near residences need not
occur every year, but rather on an approximate three-year rotation. Strips of grass along selected trails are likewise recommended for mowing to enhance containment and access. Two prescribed fires are
recommended in the interior of the preserve as another means to remove fuels to reduce wildfire intensity and
aid containment during a wildfire.
In Foothills Park, a series of fuel breaks are recommended in shrubby fuels. In the fuel breaks, a rotation of
treatments is recommended. The fire roads would be graded annually, and grass mowed within 10-30 feet of
the road. Additional mowing/brush cutting would extend to the break in topographic slope, which could be
located as far away from the road as 200-ft. This type of mowing would occur in any one location approximately every 3 years; the intent is to maintain the area in a mixture of grass with less than 30 percent
canopy cover of shrubs. While treatments may vary over time, the recommended rotation is between rest,
mowing/brush cutting and grazing.
Designation Project Description Acreage or Distance Treatment Method
Foothills
F.C1 Containment Trappers Trail 72.51 acres mowing, grazing
F.C2 Containment Pony Tracks south of
Trappers Ridge 2,975 ft
mow annually 10-ft on
either size of road, use a brush hog (or grazing
animals) to mow areas to the break in slope both
under wooded canopy and in grasslands with cover of
coyote brush greater than
30%
F.C3 Containment Pony Tracks north of
Trappers Ridge 2,461 ft mowing, grazing
F.C4 Containment Bobcat point 5.28 acres graze with goats
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 61
F.C5 Containment North of entry Gate 3.47 acres graze with goats
F.C6 Containment Valley View Fire Trail 1,459 ft mowing
Pearson-Arastradero
A.C1 Containment Property boundary
adjacent to Liddicoat 5.39 acres grazing, mowing
A.C2 Containment
Property boundary
adjacent to Stanford and Portola Pastures 5,371 ft grazing, mowing
A.C3 Containment Within Redtail Loop Trail, to entire eastern
boundary of Preserve
48.72 acres grazing
A.C4 Containment
Property boundary
adjacent to Paso del Robles 7.71 acres grazing
A.C5 Containment Property boundary
Laurel Glen - north 11.22 acres grazing
A.C6 Containment Property boundary
Laurel Glen - south 4.05 acres grazing
A.C7 Containment Property boundary west
of Meadow Lark Trail 9.71 acres grazing, mowing
A.C8 Containment
Property boundary
adjacent to 1791 Arastradero Rd. 8.08 acres grazing (mowing is not
possible)
A.C9 Containment Property boundary adjacent to John
Marthens
1,726 ft mowing
A.C10 Containment Arastradero Creek to Arastradero Road 10,222 ft mowing, hand labor near riparian zone
A.C11 Containment Meadow Lark to Juan Bautista Trail 8,893 ft mowing
A.C12 Containment Meadow Lark 1,569 ft mowing
A.C13 Containment Bowl Loop 1,388 ft mowing
A.C14 Containment Arastradero to extended split RX1 and RX2 1,830 ft mowing
A.C15 Containment Acorn Trail 1,218 ft mowing
Figure 27: Listing of Project Locations for Containment Ease.
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 62
4.4.12 Fuel Modification for Ecosystem Health
4.4.12.1 Specific Goal of Action
Only a few projects that benefit ecosystem health as their primary justification have been identified in this
phase; however, many of the other projects enhance natural resources while achieving other management goals. In all cases, the goal of the action is to restore a species distribution and volume of biomass to a
condition of effective fire suppression through grazing and prescribed fire.
The City should conduct fuel modification to reduce the invasion of coyote bush into grasslands and thus reduce expected heat output. The project located along Trappers Trail consists of mowing chaparral on a rotational basis every two-to three years. This will release native grasses, produce more food for wildlife and
provide diversity of age and vegetation structure. Another project is to re-introduce fire in the grasslands of
Pearson-Arastradero through prescribed burning a selected interior area on a rotational basis. In both cases, the objectives are to maintain grasslands and restore the native pattern of vegetation on the landscape. A third
project to enhance ecosystem health is to graze, with sheep or goats, broad areas that are currently being
mowed for grass and invasive weed management.
Other fuel management projects also enhance ecosystem health. Reducing the amount and height of understory shrubs creates a vegetative structure that is more open at the forest floor, with less biomass and is
vertically discontinuous; this mimics the pre-fire-suppression era. This would be done either with goat herds
or with hand labor forces.
4.4.12.2 Location and Description of Projects
Designation Project Description Acreage Treatment Method
Foothills
F.C1 Containment Trappers Trail 72.51 acres mowing, grazing
Pearson-Arastradero
A.Rx1 Containment Juan Bautista Prescribe
fire north 18.25 acres Rx fire, grazing
A.Rx2 Containment Acorn Trail Prescribed
fire south 24,45 acres Rx fire, grazing
A.C3 Containment Within Redtail Loop Trail, to entire eastern boundary of Preserve 48.72 acres grazing, mowing
Figure 28: Listing of Project Locations for Ecosystem Health.
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 63
4.4.13 Cooperative Fuel Management Projects for Offsite Fire Containment
and Evacuation Ease
4.4.13.1 Specific Goal of Action
The goal of this project is to prevent a wildfire from spreading into the parks. The City should work with
adjacent landowners to institute and maintain the vegetation in a condition that would facilitate containment
and ease evacuation operations.
Another cooperative project would be to work to reduce the frequency and impact of sudden oak death,
particularly on the western edge of Palo Alto.
4.4.13.2 Location and Description of Projects
Cooperation with neighbors is important in the installation and maintenance of fire-safe conditions on lands adjacent to or near the City parks. Most importantly, the enhancement of roadside treatments along Page Mill
Road requires cooperation with several other landowners and agencies, as enumerated previously.
Cooperative projects also include the formalization of agreements for passage through properties during time of emergency evacuation with public and private land owners and managers. The City should develop partnerships to address regional evacuation routes from residential and public areas, as detailed in the
following section. Cooperative projects also include fuel management on City-owned open space adjacent to
private structures. In some cases, such as on the western edge of Foothill Park east of Carmel and Ramona Road in Los Trancos Woods, access through private parcels would enable fuel management on City lands that
would benefit both parties involved.
Sudden Oak Death has been observed in many locations within the Foothills area. At this time the areas are
small and consist of one or two trees. The urgency for treatment of these affected areas is related to its location. Dead trees near structures, City property boundaries and along roads should be treated first. For
example, dead trees along evacuation routes would get higher priority than those in the middle of remote
woodland. However, if entire stands die, or sudden oak death changes the fuel characteristics of the stand, the priority and potential treatments would change. The location and extent of stands affected by Sudden Oak
Death should be monitored.
Treatment should be consistent with the City policy regarding Sudden Oak Death. Treatments generally
entail removal of dead material smaller than six inches in diameter. The trunks of the trees may remain if needed for wildlife habitat, however it is often difficult to retain just the larger material. The proximity of
California bay to the foliage of oaks has been linked with the spread of Sudden Oak Death. Removal or
trimming of bay trees to separate the foliage is another strategy to prevent further spread.
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 64
5 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
However valuable and imperative the plan may be, implementation is the key to achieving the goals set forth
by the plan. There are several recommendations that can facilitate implementation of the fire management
plan.
5.1 Implementation Strategies
The creation of an Implementation Team within the City staff will support implementation. The team would
benefit from representatives that could help with project design, cost estimation and budgeting, evacuation planning, and community outreach. The team would include in its mission development of educational
material for the community. Implementation Team should include staff from the City Manager's Office, the
Fire Department (Chief, Operations, Fire Marshal, CERT), the Police Department (Chief, Homeland Security,
Communications/Dispatch, PIO), the Planning Department, Open Space/Parks, Public Works, and Utilities.
The City should support the formation of a Midpeninsula Foothills Emergency Forum (MFEF). The MFEF
would collaborate on resource management issues. The scope would include pursuit of grants, equipment and
resource sharing (such as mechanical equipment and expertise) and joint design of projects especially on City boundaries, or along co-owned/managed roads. The City should work with stakeholder/ partners on common issues. For example, Los Altos Hills, Stanford, Los Trancos Woods, Los Trancos Water Department,
MROSD, and private neighbors all have concerns and potentially partial solutions for access and egress
constraints. Each partner may have a particular asset to contribute, whether it is available funds or ready volunteers, or expertise in the subject of need. Collaboration creates a stronger base from which fruition of
the plan can more readily occur.
This interagency organization would be separate from the existing FireSafe Councils; participation would include CEO-level discussions and staff liaisons from each participating agency.
The City should participate in local FireSafe Councils, in both Santa Clara County and San Mateo County4.
FireSafe Councils can help in obtaining federal funds because the local FireSafe Councils have an already-
written Community Wildfire Protection Plan, which is a prerequisite for national funding. Interagency collaboration is also fostered by FireSafe Councils. The local San Mateo FireSafe Council also facilitates
access to the use of subsidized California-youth authority hand labor crews. These crews have a long track
record of successful fuel management projects at surprisingly low costs. The San Mateo FireSafe Council
also has a chipping program to alleviate the burden of disposing of biomass from fuel management projects.
The City should also implement projects in City park/preserves through its regular budget process. The City
has a history of fuel management that should be continued. Fuel management will continue to be funded
through the normal budget process, to encompass continued mowing, occasional grazing, maintenance of defensible space around structures and resource enhancement projects.
Funding specific prescribed burns is also expected through the budget process if not funded by grants or
conditions tied to this project. For example, a prescribed burn in Alameda County was required as a
mitigation measure for a necessary project to expand a facility near a creekbed. Similarly, projects that
4 Participation in the San Mateo County FireSafe Council would be as an interested party but not to take
official action or receive any financial benefit.
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 65
enhance natural resources can be used as mitigation measures for worthwhile projects that may have negative impacts.
While it is not expected that the City would make a profit from natural resources, the value of its grasslands as
feed could be used to offset the cost of using livestock as a resource management tool. Similarly, the City
should make an effort to obtain value from wood recovered from dead tree removal, potentially though innovative wood-based art projects.
The City has a rich bank of volunteer groups; projects could be implemented with the help of volunteer
groups. Relationships with stakeholders such as Acterra, Friends of Foothills, 4-H, and other should be fostered. Roles for these groups could include the performance of pre-treatment surveys, construction and placement of raptor perches, support of grazing operations (movement of portable livestock fences or water
sources), or distribution of educational and evacuation directional signs. Corporate volunteerism can be
directed to fuel management projects.
The adoption of new codes may be less obvious than the implementation of specific projects. Regardless, the
adoption of recommended changes in the City code may have more long-lasting and far-reaching effects
throughout the City. These recommendations should be pursued.
Similarly, the continuation of Station 8 staffing should be viewed as a part of the implementation of this plan.
5.2 Priorities
The priority of the projects has been emphasized earlier in this report. Life safety concerns – those focusing on egress and emergency response access – are the highest priority. The projects that address this objective
should be immediately pursued. The maintenance of firefighter safety zones is similarly high in priority.
Fuel management projects that prevent the ignition of structures are of the next highest priority. This would
include the maintenance of defensible space around City structures and vital infrastructure facilities. These projects are mandated by law. Fuel management to prevent the spread of fires to off-site structures from City
property are within a level of reasonable care expected from a City; these projects are also considered a type
of containment project.
Fuel management that promotes containment of fires within City property is next in priority. These projects support the response to infrequent, yet potentially catastrophic fires. In addition, these fuel management
projects prevent the more ordinary events from becoming catastrophic.
Projects that enhance natural resources are difficult to fund. However, fuel management offers occasions to both enhance natural resources and fire safety. Every fuel management project should be viewed as an
opportunity to simultaneously enhance natural resources and promote fire safety.
The following criteria (not ordered by importance) can help determine the schedule of recommended fuel treatment project:
• Benefit of project in minimizing structure damage or chance of damaging wildfire.
• Probability of damaging wildfire (based on fuel loading and vegetation structure).
• Potential for ecological benefit (or damage without fire).
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 66
• Divergence of fuel loading and vegetation structure from natural conditions (i.e. deviation from natural fire regime).
• A window of opportunity, based on funding timelines, availability of personnel or equipment, or other factors.
• If using prescribed fire, some areas may need to be burned in a particular sequence to minimize the
potential for escape.
5.3 Fuel Management Project Costs
Costs are variable, depending on the project design, site features, access, requirements for insurance, traffic
and fencing control, staging, move-in costs, bonding, administration, wage reporting and other city requirements, such as governing regulations, or resource restrictions (i.e. species of concern).
Considering only the direct project-related costs, the unit costs of various treatment methods can vary
dramatically between the types of treatment methods, but within the treatment methods as well. Similarly, the site conditions, weather, and other external factors that affect unit costs of some treatment methods are:
• Height, density, species, and arrangement of existing vegetation;
• Desired vegetation conversion and management objectives;
• Size, accessibility, slope, soil stability, and vegetation types onsite;
• Need for multiple treatment types at a site over a short period of time (cumulative costs); and
• Planning and monitoring to develop follow-up treatment prescription.
The following table describes unit costs associated with the treatment methods.
Treatment Method Estimated Unit Cost ($ per Acre) Notes/Other Considerations
Hand Labor Treatments
Weed Whipping 1,500
Chaparral Brush Removal 2,140 a
Hand-Pulling 2,000
Vista Pruning $1/linear ft / 50-250 b Roadside treatments – no shrubs
Mosaic/Drip-Line Thinning $2/linear ft / 3,500 a Roadside treatments with shrubs
Organic Mulch 575-1,600 b,c Same as chipping/mulching
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 67
Treatment Method Estimated Unit Cost ($ per Acre) Notes/Other Considerations
Mechanical Treatment
Grading 500-600 b,c
Mowing 500-600 b,c
Chipping/Mulching 575-1,600 b
Roadside Mowing with Shrubs $1/linear ft
Prescribed Burning
Broadcast Burning 60-400 b Fixed costs are high, should use $25,000 per burn rather than per-
acre costs
Grazing
Sheep 200 b
Goats 500
Chemical Treatment
Stump Application 200
Foliar Application 500
Figure 29: Unit Costs for Fuel Reduction Treatment Methods.
a The Sea Ranch Association Fuels Management Implementation, 2002 confirmed 2008.
b Applegate, Oregon Fire Plan. http://www.wildfireprograms.com/search.html?displayId=237
c Fire Plan, http://www.wildfireprograms.com/search.html?displayId=237
5.3.1 Project Cost Estimates
The following is a compilation of cost estimates for the 51 recommended treatment areas in Pearson-
Arastradero Preserve and Foothills Park, and along selected segments of major evacuation routes in the City
of Palo Alto. The total five-year cost amounts to approximately $700,000.
Costs of Firefighter Safety Zones = $800 annually
The costs of each firefighter safety zone was estimated as $200 per zone, based on the cost to mow a grassy
area of approximately one acre in size. Mowing costs of unobstructed grass are approximately $200/hr,
which includes the cost of the machinery and operator, and a spotter. The production rate of area mowing is approximately one acre per hour. This cost does not include move-in costs, because it assumes the mowing
for firefighter safety is part of a larger mowing contract.
Because the safety zones need to be treated annually, the cost of treating all the firefighter safety zones is $800 per year.
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 68
Costs of Initial Treatment along Evacuation Routes = $192,960 initial treatment, $86,400 total for the
subsequent 4 years56
The treatment along roads identified as evacuation routes would include a mixture of machinery-based mowing (including mowing with an articulated brush-cutting head that cuts brush) and the use of hand labor.
In circumstances where wider areas can be treated, grazing animals, principally goats, can be used to perform
initial treatments along evacuation routes.
The total length of evacuation routes is slightly more than 12 miles, or 63,740 linear feet, which encompasses
those areas highlighted in blue on Figures 17 and 18 and in Section 4.4.7.2.
The estimate of costs for this type of treatment assumes an operation that would use the machinery wherever
possible as a cost containment measure. One can assume one-half of the length can be treated with machinery for the first 10-ft off the roadside. The remainder of the area would need to be treated by hand.
Estimates are based on treating both sides of the road for 30-ft, or a 60-ft wide strip, or almost 24 miles of
linear treatment. Treatment recommendations state that areas of oak woodland need be treated for only 10-ft in width because expected fire behavior is relatively calm; however, for cost estimates, every length of the roads were estimated being treated for 30-ft width.
The most inexpensive treatment is roadside mowing of grassy areas with few shrubs or trees. This is expected
to occur on approximately ¼ of the length of the roadside, for the first 10-ft off the road. Roadside mowing of grass expected to cost approximately $200/hour for the machinery, operator and spotter; production rates
generally run around 300 linear feet per hour, or a little less than 18 hours to treat a mile. Production is
reduced by the need to pick up the cutting head to move to a new site, and the need to avoid areas of trees.
Using this production rate, mowing of approximately 108 hours, or for a cost of $21,600.
The next most cost-effective treatment is use machinery to cut roadside shrubs within the first 10-ft of the road. Shrubs near the roads are more common, occurring on approximately ½ of the length of the roads. A
cost of $200/hr for the machinery, operator and spotter is used. Production is reduced to 200 linear feet per
hour, requiring 26.4 hours to cut brush for a mile. A little more than 316 hours would be required to treat the
estimated 12 miles of shrubs, for a cost of $63,360.
Machinery has the potential to start fires from causing sparks in dry vegetation. A dedicated fire watch for
the operation during fire season is recommended, at an additional cost of $15,000, based on 214 hours of
operation during fire season, assuming one-half of the machinery-based work is performed during fire season.
The remainder of the treatments will require hand labor to remove shrubs, limb the lower branches of trees smaller than three inches in diameter. This would be required on ¼ of the first 10-ft of the roads, and the
entirety of the remaining 20 feet off main evacuation routes.
Hand labor crews with a supervisor typically cost $1200/day. The production rate for this type of tree
limbing and shrub removal is one-tenth of an acre each day, or $10,000 per acre. Subtracting the areas treated with mechanical equipment, approximately 93 acres will need to be treated using hand labor crews, at a cost
of $93,000.
5 Personal communication with J. Squadroni, of Environtech, January 2009, regarding roadside treatment costs. These cost were confirmed,
based on worked performed by Environtech, including roadside treatments on Los Trancos Road in early 2000’s and in Carmel Valley more
recently.
6 Personal Communication with Mike Philbin, Central Coast Land Clearing, October, 2008. Cost estimates based on work performed in 2008 on
roadside treatments in Carmel Valley and in Santa Cruz County.
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 69
Government-subsidized hand crews that utilize people in the California Youth Authority system can result in dramatic cost reductions. Costs of hand labor crews can be reduced by a factor of ten.
Maintenance would consist of mowing the first 10-ft from the pavement edge yearly, at an annual cost over
the next four years of $21,000 per year.
Costs of Maintaining Defensible Space around Park/Preserve Structures and Infrastructure = $17,800
Treatments to maintain defensible space around each of the structures and infrastructure facilities in the City Park/Preserve entail the use of hand labor to limb trees, remove shrubs under trees, and to mow grass. Some
of the structures, such as the Gateway interpretive Center in Pearson-Arastradero Preserve, have little tree
cover so mowing would comprise the treatment. Others, such as the pumping station in Pearson-Arastradero will require a higher level of effort because of a greater volume of shrubs and trees within 100 feet of the
structure. Limbing and shrub removal need to only be done on a five-year interval, however mowing is
required annually.
The treatments encompass the red solid circles on Figures 17 and 18 and those described in Section 4.4.9.2.
Generally the area of treatments ranges from ¼ acre to 1 acre. Mowing of the area around the structures is
estimated as $100/structure, performed annually. Using hand labor to remove shrubs under trees and to
remove lower branches of trees is estimated as $1,500/acre, performed every five years. There are nine structures identified in Foothills Park, with a total estimated cost of $14,100 over the next five years; Pearson-
Arastradero Preserve has four such structures, with an accompanying $3,700 cost for treatment during the
next five years.
Costs of Creating/Maintaining Containment Areas $403,486
Containment Areas in Foothills Park
Treatments to enhance the actions to contain fires span two different shapes and sizes of treatments. Area treatments are recommended in Foothills Park for Trappers Trail, the Pony Tracks South of Trappers Ridge,
the Bobcat Point Containment Zone and the area north of the Foothills Park Entry Gate. Shrubs and lower
tree branches should be trimmed within the containment areas on a three-year interval of time. The grass in Trappers Trail and Pony Tracks South of Trappers Ridge will be mowed every three years, with the exception
of a width of 30 feet on both sides of the graded trail. Shrubs in the Bobcat Point Containment Zone and the
North of Entry Gate Containment Zone are recommended to be treated every five years. Grass in the other
containment zones is to be mowed annually in order to bolster containment efforts during fire suppression.
Trappers Trail Containment Zone – 72.5 acs. The cost estimate of treatment is based on a rotation of
treatments on a three-year cycle, and an annual treatment of mowing of a band of grass for a 30-ft width on
both sides of the graded trail. One third of the area would be mowed in any year. One-third grazed, and one-third left to re-grow. This rotational treatment will allow more forage and cover for wildlife, and provide greater diversity of plants and vegetation structure. The cost of grazing one-third of the area, or roughly 25
acres, is estimated at $500/acre, or a total annual cost of $12,500. Costs of grazing are estimated to be lower
than other areas because grassy nature of the area will facilitate fencing. Mowing is similarly lower in cost, at $500/acre, or an annual cost of $12,500, also because of previous treatments on the site. The total annual
treatment cost for this area would be $25,000, or $125,000 combined for the next five years.
Pony Tracks South of Trappers Ridge Containment Zone – 7 ac. The cost estimate of treatment is also based
on a rotation of treatments on a three-year cycle, and an annual treatment of mowing of a band of grass for a 30-ft width on both sides of the graded trail (if the area is not grazed). Because of the small size of the
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 70
treatment area, the entire area can be mowed one year, grazed another, and left to rest a third. Using mowing
and grazing costs of $500/acre, the five-year cost of treatment would be $14,000.
Pony Tracks North of Trappers Ridge Containment Zone – 2460 ft. The treatment cost is based on annual
mowing along both sides of the graded trail. Using the production rate of 300 feet per hour and an hourly cost
of $200/hr for an equipment operator and spotter, the cost of this treatment is estimated at $1640, or $8,200
for the next five years.
Bobcat Point Containment Zone – 5.5 acs. Costs for grazing this treatment area with goats are estimated at $700/acre because the area has not been previously treated and fencing may be challenging. This would
result in a cost of $3850. The treatment interval is recommended to be 5-years, so the 5-year cost of treatment
would total $3,850.
North of Entry Gate Containment Zone - 3.5 acs. This area is similar in its treatment recommendation to the Bobcat Point Containment Zone. Grazing costs are estimated at $700/acre, with a 5-year interval between
treatments. The one-time treatment cost is $2,450, as is the 5-year treatment cost.
Valley View Fire Trail Containment Zone – 1460 ft. The treatment cost is based on annual mowing along
both sides of the graded trail. Using the production rate of 300 feet per hour and an hourly cost of $200/hr for
an equipment operator and spotter, the cost of this treatment is estimated at $1,000, or $5,000 for the next five years.
Containment Areas in Pearson-Arastradero Preserve
In Pearson-Arastradero Preserve, fifteen areas are recommended for treatments to facilitate containment
during fire suppression. Of these, seven are areas where grazing is recommended, with a total acreage of
almost 95 acres. The size of the areas to be grazed ranges from slightly more than four acres to almost 50 acres. Of the area to be grazed, 54 acres is comprised of grass, with few fencing challenges. However,
smaller areas that amount to 41 acres to the south and west on the Preserve border are shrubby and have not
been previously treated. Given the variability of the condition, the cost for grazing is estimated at $500/acre, or a total initial cost of $47,500. The grassy areas should be grazed annually, at a cost of $135,000. The
shrubby areas need by treated only once every five years, at a cost of $20,500. The five-year cost thus totals
$155,500.
Mowing the grass on both sides of graded trails is a recommended annual treatment. The linear length of this treatment is 26,846 feet, or slightly more than 5 miles. Using the production rate of 300 feet per hour and an hourly cost of $200/hr for an equipment operator and spotter, the cost of this treatment is estimated at
$17,897, or $89,486 for the next five years.
Two areas are recommended as suitable for a prescribed burn to facilitate containment and enhance natural
resources. The costs for this treatment method are especially difficult to estimate because some of the operation serves as training. Often, adjacent agencies provide additional equipment and resources at no cost.
A large portion of the costs associated with prescribed burning is involved in planning and obtaining the
necessary permits, notification of appropriate agencies and the public and reporting of the results of the burn. Because of the uncertainty regarding the cost, an estimated cost of $25,000 per burn is set. An interval of 5 years is recommended, so a five-year cost for the two treatment areas would total $50,000.
Costs of Conducting Pre-Treatment Surveys = $100,000
Pre-treatment surveys and post-treatment follow-up are part of the best management practices associated with
the recommended treatments. The cost for the pre-treatment surveys and post-treatment follow-up is
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 71
estimated at $20,000/yr, or $100,000 for the total 5-year cost. This cost can be reduced if knowledgeable
volunteers are involved in the survey or monitoring efforts. Estimates for the survey costs assume the City identifies treatments planned for the year and contracts with a biological consulting firm to perform targeted
surveys in the treatment areas.
5.4 Funding Strategies to Support Fuel Management
Multiple funding sources provide greater stability, more funds, increased continuity, more stakeholders, the
potential to expand the scope of work. Each funding mechanism has unique requirements, strengths and
weaknesses. Some are best suited for one-time expenditures such as capital improvements while others are aimed at ongoing maintenance activities. The “strings” attached to each mechanism should be considered. It is advisable to match funding mechanisms with priority projects.
Figure 30: Funding Mechanisms.
A key to expanding funding mechanisms is to demonstrate the value of the projects. Highlighting the value
of fuel management is effectively done at a grass-roots level, through collaboration with stakeholders. This is especially important for mechanisms that require community-wide support through votes or donations of
money or in-kind services.
The discussion under Section 8.1 Implementation Strategies discusses the importance of partnering with other
agencies, the use of volunteers to leverage City funds, and the funding of fuel reduction work through the normal budgeting process. This is the most common locally-controlled source of funds, often covering
education, code adoption, and capital improvements. While this seems to be the most reliable long-term
source of funds, even self-funding projects are vulnerable to a shift in priorities (because these projects need to compete with other community public service needs) or a downturn in economic markets.
Funding projects with grants requires that the City match projects with funding sources. Creativity can yield
surprising avenues for funding. For example, funds from Homeland Security may be justified to purchase
equipment that washes off weed seeds from vehicles because of concerns about decontamination. In this case the same equipment can be used as a solution to disparate concerns.
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 72
Bonds may be used for capital improvement projects, especially related to evacuation. These are typically used for very expensive capital improvements such as water supply and distribution or development/ enhancement of improved access. Last, assessment districts can fund specific fuel projects that address
specific geographic regions for a specific period of time. For example, assessment districts may co-fund
utilities and water improvements.
Funding strategies should consider the total amount required, the schedule and duration of funds required, the
focus of spending – whether it is capital or maintenance-related projects – the geographic area and the project
types. Funding strategies also need to consider the effort required to obtain and administer the funds. Grants may require matching funds in the form of hard cash or in-kind services that can range from relatively simple to complex forms and justification. The National Database of State and Local Wildfire Hazard Mitigation
Programs (www.wildfireprograms.usda.gov) presents how other communities have obtained funds and what
they have done with those funds.
Regardless of funding mechanism, several common challenges need to be considered. When raising money
for long-term projects, it is critical to build in factors for inflation and cost-escalation. Raising funds for
ongoing maintenance is more difficult than raising seed money for one-time demonstrations.
5.5 Grant Opportunities
In the past ten years, an unprecedented amount of federal and state aid has been available for fire hazard
reduction. Most federal aid is linked to proximity to federal lands, which may pose a disadvantage for the City of Palo Alto. One exception to this linkage is funding through the Department of Homeland Security.
The California FireSafe Council website hosts a “one-stop-shopping” application process where an applicant
can obtain an e-grant concept paper. However even this website does not cover all programs.
The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has a funding program that provides assistance to fire departments through its Assistance to Firefighters Grant (AFG) and the Fire Prevention and Safety Grant
Program. AFG is limited to fire departments, while the Fire Prevention and Safety Grants are open to a wider
range of organizations. FEMA has two disaster mitigation programs: the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) and the Pre-Disaster Mitigation Program (PDM). HMGP funds are available to states after a disaster has been declared to mitigate future risk from any type of disaster. Amounts are linked to the total emergency
funds. Funds from the PDM facilitate cooperation between state and local authorities with funds awarded
competitively for both planning and project implementation activities at the state and local levels as a sub-grantee. This program addresses the more traditional agency focus of earthquakes and floods; the extent of
funding for wildfire-related projects is yet to be determined.
The State Fire Assistance includes supplemental appropriate allocation through the National Fire Plan, in addition to a regular appropriation distributed by formula to state foresters through the USDA Forest Service. These funds can be used to plan and implement hazard mitigation projects, including fuel management,
prevention and mitigation education, and community hazard reduction. The process for obtaining funds is
competitive and available nationwide, with 35 percent distributed among the states to meet firefighting preparedness and safety needs.
Obtaining funds through grants often involve intricate application process or include administrative burdens
associated with monitoring how funds are spent and complex reporting requirements. Using funds for
ongoing projects is a concern because the sustainability of grant funding is sometimes questionable.
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 73
Grant opportunities often become available for a short period of time. Requirements and levels of funding change annually. For example, the federal Department of Homeland Security and the Federal Emergency Management Agency recently announced a new policy for funding wildfire mitigation. On September 8,
FEMA Mitigation Chief David Maurstad issued a policy that describes how the post-disaster Hazard
Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) and the Pre-Disaster Mitigation grant program (PDM) can be used for wildfire mitigation activities by eligible grant applicants.
Activities eligible for funding under these grants include creation of defensible space through removing or
reducing vegetation; the application of non-combustible building envelope assemblies, use of ignition-resistant materials, and proper retrofit techniques for structures; and hazardous fuels reduction vegetation management or thinning within two miles of at-risk structures. Check with your state Emergency
Management Office or FEMA Regional Mitigation staff (http://www.fema.gov/about/regions/index.shtm) for
more information about HMGP and PDM grants.
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 74
6 TREATMENT STANDARDS AND METHODS
6.1 Treatment Standards for Vegetation Types
For each vegetation type group, the resulting fuel bed characteristics after treatment are described7.
Following the vegetation prescriptions, a set of guidelines for creation and maintenance of a fire safe area (defensible space) around residences and other improvements are recommended. In all vegetation types,
preference for removal should be given to non-native invasive species.
6.1.1 Prescription for Grasslands
• Mow or graze to no longer than 4 inches in height, or disc
• Native grasses should be mowed to a height no shorter than 4 inches and may be mowed later in the
year to accommodate seed ripening and seed distribution 8
• Maintain brush cover less than 30%
o less than 20% where slope steepness is greater than 20%
o Requires annual treatment, usually requiring treatment of all grass near structures within 2
weeks of starting to mow.
• Alternatively, prescribed burn in late spring or early fall with a resulting cover of not less than 20%
6.1.2 Prescription for North Coastal Scrub and Chaparral
• Mow/grind to cut and mulch shrub tops within treatment area; alternatively,
• Create islands of less than 12 feet in diameter or 2 times the height of tallest shrub (whichever is
smaller) can remain. Clumps should be natural in appearance including specimens of variable age
classes
7 These standards/prescriptions were initially developed by Amphion, Inc. for use by the FEMA-funded East
Bay Hills Vegetation Management Consortium (VMC). These standards/prescriptions have been reviewed
and adopted by the following agencies in the consortium: Cities of Berkeley, Oakland, and Piedmont; East Bay Municipal Utility District; East Bay Regional Park District; University of California; Lawrence Berkeley
Laboratory; and PG&E. As part of the review process, a Citizen’s Advisory Committee and a Technical
Advisory Committee, which were comprised by a cross-section of members of the public, reviewed and commented on the standards. The reference is Amphion Environmental, Inc. 1995. Fire Hazard Mitigation
Program and Fuel Management Plan for the East Bay Hills, prepared for the East Bay Hills Vegetation
Management Consortium, Oakland, California.
8 Acterra is available to advise on the timing of native grass seed cycles, especially in relation to invasive
weed seed cycles.
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 75
• Distance between islands shall be greater than 2 times the height of tallest shrub or a minimum of 8 feet, whichever is greater
• Retain between 20-30 percent of brush areas in brush crown cover
• The removal of brush should be based on criteria which are listed in approximate order of importance
to fuel management objectives:
o Relative flammability - remove the most flammable species first.
o Plant vigor - remove shrubs of low vigor, dying or dead shrubs.
o Sprouting capability - remove species with sprouting capacity first.
o Effects of plant species on soils - i.e. retain shrubs with slope-holding capacity, that increase
soil nutrients (ceanothus).
o Value for wildlife food and cover.
o Aesthetic values.
o The order of priority will change according to local conditions such as the relative abundance of each species. For example, where coffeeberry is not abundant, it may be placed high in
priority to retain. Attempts should be made to maintain diversity of species.
• Maintain a crown cover of less than 30%
• Can convert to grass, especially in fuel breaks
• Maintain less than 20% dead material in the shrub canopy
• Protect oak, madrone, buckeye and trees shorter than 6 feet in height. Cut out shrubs below drip lines
and within 6 feet from edge of tree canopy
• Anticipate 3-5 year treatment cycle
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 76
Priority For Removal Follows: Remove Only If Necessary
chamise coffeeberry
coyote bush buckeye
poison oak ceanothus
Himalaya blackberry wild currant
northern sticky monkey flower California blackberry
coastal sage brush bush lupine
scrub oak madrone
manzanita toyon
oaks
Figure 31: Initial Priority of Removal for Brush.
6.1.3 Prescription for Oak Woodlands
• Prune branches up to 3 inches in diameter for a height of 8 feet. Prune up to a maximum of 1/3 the
height of trees that are less than 24 feet tall.
• Maintain under 5 tons/acre of duff no deeper than 3 inches.
• Leave all trees bigger than 8 inches diameter. Leave 1/3 of the trees under 8 inches to retain a range
of size categories and species. Maintain a stand density of less than 50 trees per acre as long as
canopy is still closed.
• Can mulch site to a maximum depth of 2 inches to prevent invasion of noxious weeds.
o Treatment cycle is from 7-10 years.
6.1.4 Prescription for Riparian Forest
Avoid treatment. Where necessary:
• Create or maintain an 8 feet vertical clearance between live needles and understory fuel. Remove all
dead material. Prune branches up to 3 inches in diameter. Prune up to a maximum of 1/3 the height
for trees less than 24 feet in height.
• Maintain less than 10 ton/ac. Depth of duff no greater than 5 inches.
• Mulch to between 2 and 5 inches in depth.
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 77
o Treatment cycle is between 10-15 years.
6.1.5 Defensible Space Guidelines
Palo Alto staff will be responsible for maintaining a 100 feet wide defensible space on all sides of any structure in the two parks. All dead plants and combustible materials shall be removed within 100 feet of
each structure to establish and maintain a defensible space. Removal of combustible materials includes, but is
not limited to, the following actions:
• Cut grass and weeds to less than 4 inches. Cutting of native grass and wildflowers may be delayed
until after seed set unless they form a means of rapidly spreading fire to any structures.
• Remove all dead plant material from within 100 feet of each structure. This includes keeping the ground, roofs, decking, and balconies free of dead leaves, needles or other plant debris. This also
includes removing from trees loose papery bark, and dead branches smaller than 3 inches in diameter,
to 8 feet above ground. Remove all dead branches from within live ground covers, vines, and shrubs. Refer to Figure 1 explaining pruning.
• All live vines and live branches smaller than 3 inches in diameter shall be cut up to a height of 8 feet
above ground. Figure 32 provides a description of pruning best practices.
Figure 32: Pruning Example.
Prune branches to a height of 8 feet above the ground. In young trees, prune branches on the lower one-third of the height of the tree. Do not disturb or thin the tree canopy, as this promotes growth in the understory, which is more easily ignited.
• Remove plants as necessary to break vertical continuity between ground covers, shrubs, trees, and
decks or overhangs on buildings. Vertical separation is the distance from the top of shrubs or ground cover to adjacent trees, designed to minimize the spread of fire to the crown of trees or structure
roofs. Vertical spacing should be a minimum of 8 feet or 2 times the height of the understory plants
to the leaves or needles of adjacent overstory trees, decks or overhangs, whichever provides greater separation. For overstory trees under 24 feet in height, the minimum clearance can be reduced to 1/3
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 78
of the overall height of the overstory tree provided this reduced clearance does not form a means of rapid transmission of fire.
• In areas without a tree overstory, create shrub islands per the standard for north coastal scrub. Within
100 feet of improvements, grass between shrub islands should be mowed when cured (dry).
• Remove all branches within 10 feet of any chimney or stovepipe including chimneys on adjacent
properties.
• Chipped materials can remain on the site provided the chipped mulch layer is no greater than 2 inches
in depth.
6.2 Description of Treatment Methods
6.2.1 Summary
Fuels can be removed on a large scale by prescribed burns, grazing animals, and mechanical treatment. In small open space areas and around structures, hand labor is effective in reducing the fuel load. Eucalyptus
tree removal may be effective in specific locations of high risk. Fuels can be redistributed on a large or small
scale through mechanical treatments, such as mowing, discing, or grading.
In all the following treatments except hand labor, economies of scale are dramatic; the larger the project, the
greater the efficiency.
6.2.2 Timing of Treatments
The timing of the initial or follow-up treatments is important to achieve the desired fuel management
performance standards and resource management objectives. Given the variable nature of fuels through changes in weather and season over time, the schedule of the treatment may often be just as important as the type of treatment selected. For example, treatments in grasslands typically take place when grass cures or
dries out. Cutting grass too early will be ineffective, as the grass will usually grow back, negating the
treatment. Conversely, cutting grass too late will leave the grass in a hazardous condition during periods of high fire danger. Fuel treatments also need to be conducted when the weather is not too dry or windy, as some
treatment types - especially mechanical treatments - may inadvertently start fires.
Timing the treatment methods appropriately can reduce potential impacts to special-status species or sensitive
wildlife species. It is likely that there will be some months of the year when particular practices need to be implemented (e.g., pre-treatment nesting surveys or avoidance of breeding habitat) to avoid adverse affects to
special-status species.
Timing treatments to either control or avoid the spread of invasive plant species or insect pests is also critical. For example, treatments performed when plants have set or are setting seed will spread the seed whether it is a
native plant or invasive weed. Treatments should therefore take advantage of differences in the timing of
seeding of native plant species and avoid periods when invasive species are in seed. Pruning of pines and
eucalyptus should be done when insect pests are not flying to minimize the associated spread and damage from these insects. Pruning should take place from November to April to minimize the susceptibility to bark
beetles or red turpentine beetles. In most cases, the timing and method of treatment can be modified to
accommodate local habitat needs and still reduce fire hazard to an acceptable level.
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 79
6.2.3 Hand Labor
Hand labor involves pruning, cutting or removal of weeds or shrubs either by hand or with hand-held
equipment. This process is slow and expensive, but most selective and has little impact beyond the removal of the target plants. This technique generates considerable debris when pulling, pruning, and cutting
vegetation. The debris is not always removed from the site due to the high cost of doing both the clearance
and removal by hand. Not removing the debris, however, leaves a significant hazard, possibly greater than
pre-treatment because the debris may be voluminous, dry, well aerated, and quite flammable. This method is most commonly used by residents to reduce fuel volume on private lands, or by hand crews on short-term
contract with the City of Palo Alto to reduce hazard adjacent to improvements. Some expertise is required to
work with trouble species such as poison oak, to prune oaks and control shrubs, and to identify new fuel hazards as they arise. Hand labor encompasses the operations of pruning and weed-whipping, tree removal, pruning, bark pulling, removal of dead wood within the tree/shrub canopy, litter removal and mulching, and
establishing new plant material. Hand labor allows use of a wide variety of methods to reduce fuel load,
including both chemical and mechanical treatments.
Hand Labor - Pruning Trees and shrubs must be hand-pruned to vertically separate fuels. Pruning lower branches of trees is usually done with a hand-held pole saw (with or without a motorized chain saw attached).
Lower branches on shorter trees can be pruned with loppers.
Hand Labor - Weed-whipping Like mowing, weed whipping reduces fire hazard by reducing the fuel
height. However, it is done by hand to avoid harming rock outcrops and desired small plants (such as oak regeneration and landscape material). This treatment is generally limited to small material such as grass or
short herbs. Weed whipping may be accomplished any time of the year, and regardless of whether the
material has cured.
Weed whipping is performed with a hand-held, gas powered tool that cuts grasses and very thin woody material with a fast-spinning fishing-line type of cutter. Because this method is performed manually, it can be
used to selectively remove certain vegetation. Most large woody stems are not cut by the treatment, however
seedlings (such as oak seedlings) can be severely damaged. Treatments can be completed with greater care than the others (however the height to which plants are cut may be difficult to control if the operator is not experienced) and minimize soil disturbance and erosion. It is also often the only type of treatment possible on
steep slopes and in wooded areas. The average weed whipping rate is 750 square feet/hour.
The schedule for a skilled laborer should be tailored to the timing of their tasks. For example, selective weed whipping of annual grasses before they set seed while leaving native bunch grasses until after these plants set
seed can shift the proportion of vegetative cover over time to more bunch grasses. This shift in type of
grasses can shorten the length of time the landscape is prone to ignition. Similarly, thistle reproduction can be minimized by cutting while they are growing, but before they set seed. Pruning should be done from November to April; this schedule avoids spreading destructive bark beetles and/or other pathogens.
The cost varies from $10,000 per acre to approximately $1,500 per acre, depending on the time of year, extent
of project, and level of detail required.
6.2.4 Mechanical Treatments
Mechanical treatments, including mowing, weed whipping, discing, and grading, rearrange rather than reduce the actual fuel load. Heavy machinery is usually used in flat areas where terrain and the presence of rocks or
numerous trees do not prohibit travel. This type of machinery should not be used on slopes over 30% because
of concerns for worker safety as well as erosion control and slope stability issues.
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 80
Heavy machinery: attachments to tractors (brush hogs, flail, mowers, tiger mowers)
Roadside mowing is a prime example of the use of heavy machinery with attachments. A variety of attachments serve numerous purposes. For example, a brush hog attachment cuts and breaks brush plants off
and produces a mulch of the brush debris. Mowers that cut or flail grass and small woody plants are also
attached to tractors. Attachments (such as mowers) with articulated arms that reach as far as 20 feet away
from the tractor reduce the area over which the tracks must travel, and offer more maneuverability. These articulated arms also cut and/or break off material. Heavy machinery is a moderately fast, and a relatively
inexpensive treatment. There is little control over which plants are cut, but machines can travel around
isolated areas of concern.
Heavy machinery should not be used when the ground is soft in order to prevent ruts and bared soil. Soil
movement can be caused by all users on foot, bicycle, equestrian and vehicles (patrol vehicles and fire
apparatus). Soil movement can be ruts or minor depressions, which will lead to large ruts or voids. This
technique can be used at almost any other time of year, but is faster when done in the summer or fall when brush is brittle and grass has cured. It must not be used during times of high fire danger because the machines
can start fires. The under-carriage of the machine and attachments should be washed off after use in areas of
weed infestations.
Grading and Discing involves stripping a swath of land bare of vegetation with a tractor and blade. It is very effective in producing fire trails 8 to 12 feet across and as a maintenance tool for access routes. Generally,
grading is done mid-spring, by a contractor when there is still residual moisture in the soil, but after the threat
of spring rains has diminished9. Costs are reasonable, (from $100 to $300 per acre) and relate to the size of
the project and condition of trail surface.
However, there are several disadvantages to this treatment. By removing all competing vegetation, grading
creates an excellent establishment site for weedy species, which may be serious fire hazards. Untimely
grading, for example, in mid-summer, can help sow seeds of weedy exotics, such as yellow star thistle, mustard and Italian thistle. In addition, annual grading causes soil disturbance and alters drainage patterns.
Runoff, blocked from cross-drainage by the banks on either side of a graded fire trail, is redirected down the
trail. This situation favors coyote bush and exotic grasses, leading to a shift in the grassland species
composition. Grading spoils will need to be feathered into the sides or smoothed back into grading area annually.
Discing involves cultivating or turning over the upper 10" of soil, and produces an uneven surface with a
discontinuous fuel distribution and is appropriate only if mowing or grazing is not applicable that year or in a specific location. Rate of production is quite high; normally the operator can disc land parcels of two acres or less within one day. Discing is normally performed annually once grass has cured (so the grass will not grow
back that season). A tractor with discer attachment can typically cultivate a swatch 15 feet wide in a single
pass. While this is an effective barrier to surface fire spread, it is also an ideal disturbed area with prime growing conditions for weeds and distribution of their seeds. Surface erosion can be significant in areas
prone to this process.
9 Residual soil moisture makes the soil pliable or workable, and allows the soil to compact. When
grading is performed when the soil is completely dry, the soil is very difficult to work. Pearson-Arastradero has high clay content soils and causes premature soil movement unless the contractor
supplements soil moisture with a water truck, which is an additional expense.
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 81
6.2.5 Grazing with Sheep and Goats
This method includes the intentional use of sheep and goats to consume vegetation thus reducing the amount
or density of fuel. These types of livestock are not recommended to create a fuel break, but can be used to maintain this type of pre-suppression feature. Similarly, livestock can prevent grasslands from shrub
encroachment, and an oak woodland free of significant understory. The option is effective where the plants
are palatable to the animals selected. Control of the livestock and prevention of the impacts of overgrazing is
critical to successful use of this technique. As a fuel management technique, livestock need not graze every year.
Grazing can reduce or encourage weedy pest plants depending on the timing and intensity of grazing. A
range management plan and a grazing monitoring program needs to be established to identify the impacts and ensure that the animals are removed once fuel management goals are met. Perennial grasses may require modifications from management of annual grasses using grazing animals. Because presence of healthy
perennial grass stands has many benefits, these modifications are generally recommended. The benefits of
perennial grasses are that they cure later in the season, which limits the opportunity for ignition. Mowing typically can be scheduled over a longer time period. Rotation of grazing animals is preferred over greater
grazing pressure. Typically, perennial grasses react best when grazing is applied after seed maturation - from
late spring through the fall. Goats may import seeds from another weedy site. The herd can be quarantined at goat herd’s ranch for three days where they will be fed alfalfa to clear out their systems. The herder can also use short-haired goats that will carry fewer seeds in their fur.
The herding instinct of sheep and goats allows professional herders to range in very mobile bands without the
installation and maintenance of permanent fences. Portable electric fences are commonly used to help control the herd and the outcome of their grazing. Goats will browse materials up to 6 feet above the ground creating
a desirable vertical separation between the canopy and ground cover. However, measures must be taken to
prevent girdling of trees by goats browsing on bark. Herd movement has the advantage of breaking off dead
material in a stand as well as punching a humus layer into the soil (if the ground is somewhat moist) and thereby removing available fuel. Grazing treatments need to be repeated, however, following up or alternating
with a different, complementary technique can extend its effectiveness.
If work is needed to be done during May-July, scheduling can present a challenge because many clients in the greater area desire the service at that time. To minimize the negative effects of grazing on a specific plant,
goats should graze after seed set of that particular plant. During initial fuel reduction treatments, goats may be
most cost-effective in the late fall or early spring when demand for their services, and possibly price are
reduced. Multi-year contracts, and contracts for larger areas typically lower the costs per acre. Providing a place where the herd can stay during the winter also lowers costs for treatment. Providing a water source for
livestock is another way to reduce costs. Water sources can be as rudimentary as a plastic wading pool or a
portable trough.
A herd of 200-300 goats can generally treat one acre per day. Costs can vary from $300 to $1000 per acre with an average of $700 per acre, depending on fencing requirements as well as type and density of vegetation
present. The cost includes transportation, the shepherd’s salary, supplements and healthcare for the goats,
fencing and insurance.
6.2.6 Broadcast Prescribed Burns
Prescribed burning reintroduces fire into the ecosystem as a "natural treatment" and can promote native flora and aid containment of fires by reducing fuel volumes.
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 82
Prescribed burns are usually performed by the local fire protection district. CalFire may be willing to participate in a limited prescribed burning program as part of their hazard reduction efforts within the Vegetation Management Program, even though the project area would be outside the State Responsibility
Area. If burns were conducted by CalFire, the State would not only assume liability, but also share costs.
Regardless, it is likely that CalFire and other nearby fire protection districts and departments would offer mutual cooperation and/or assistance.
Several precautions, such as installing firebreaks and notifying various agencies, must be taken before
performing a prescribed burn. Treatment boundaries are often road and trail crossings, which reduces the number of fire breaks that need to be created by fire personnel, thereby reducing labor costs and time needed to prepare for the burn as well as minimizing the amount of surface soil disturbance and potential for soil
erosion.
Prescribed burning requires the development and approval of a prescription or burn plan, which is typically developed by the local fire protection district in consideration of fuel reduction requirements, local weather
conditions, and available resources for fire management. The soot and smoke generated, as well as the chance
of escape, make prescribed burns a public safety concern. Planning and coordination with interested parties
must be an integral part of the program.
Broadcast burning may occur throughout the year; however, it is usually conducted during late spring when
the ground is still wet or during fall or winter after plants have completed their yearly growth cycle and their
moisture content has declined. Spring burns are preferred by some fire staff to ensure a greater measure of public safety, however, there may be impacts to animal and plant reproduction activities. Fall burns are more
closely aligned with the natural fire cycle found in California. If a prescribed burn were to be conducted in
the fall, the period before leaves or new herbaceous material covers the slopes will be short (possibly a month
or two).
Prescribed burning can enhance the local grasslands and promote the abundance of wildflowers. Any small
oaks or shrubs to be retained will need to be protected during the burn to prevent their mortality. While the
abundance of wildflowers the subsequent years is an appealing sight, the burned area will be temporarily blackened.
6.2.7 Eucalyptus Tree Removal
By removing eucalyptus trees their canopy no longer contributes to a fire in the form of a crown fire or ember
production. Additionally the production of surface fuels is reduced since biomass production (branches,
leaves, duff etc.) is decreased. This technique has positive impact on reducing spotting potential, heat output,
spread rate and, potentially, ignitability depending upon what replaces the overstory.
Tree removal varies from cutting of individual trees, to removal of entire overstory canopy. This process can
be slow and expensive, but can be selective with limited impact beyond the removal of the target plants
(depending upon scale of removal). Sometimes harvesting techniques can be quite rapid. If the whole tree is not harvested, the technique generates considerable debris (from tree branches) that should be removed using
machinery to haul. The boles of trees hauled away and other debris should be either hauled away or may be
burned later as a part of a prescribed burn (pile or broadcast). A portion of debris may be left as a sort of
erosion control measure and to cover bare spots.
And bats may use eucalyptus trees as perches and nesting sites. Replacement perches and nesting platforms
for raptors can be constructed, located, and installed prior to removal of the trees to minimize displacement of
raptors. If the tree harbors a maternal bat roost, removal should be coordinated with the appropriate wildlife
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 83
agencies, including the California Department of Fish and Game and possibly the US Fish and Wildlife Service. Volunteers can locate and construct the raptor perches and nesting platforms, with guidance from suitable experts (e.g. Audubon Society or the Point Reyes Bird Observatory).
Tree removal creates patches of disturbance by the removal operation. Subsequent treatment of the area is
dependent upon the species that encroach into these patches. Removal of exotics or weed species on an annual basis should be anticipated until an acceptable stable vegetation type is re-established.
Sprout removal is often required as a follow up treatment, involving the application of herbicides and/or other
techniques such as grinding the stump or placing plastic over the stump.
6.2.8 Herbicide Application to Control Invasive Plants
Using herbicides to control invasive plant species that exacerbate wildfire risk is used as part of an Integrated Pest Management10 program and in combination with other treatment measures (e.g., mowing, burning and
hand removal). Application following another treatment method in which plants are trimmed or shortened can
increase the effectiveness of the chemical treatment. Herbicides can also be used to kill herbaceous plants in
exposed areas, such as roadside grass and weeds, and are typically applied while the grasses and weeds are still actively growing. Foliar treatments are generally not applied within seven days of significant rain because
the herbicide may be washed off before it is effective, and not on windy days because of concerns for spray
drift.
The use of Garlon 4 Ultra herbicide can be used to treat areas of eucalyptus resprouting, removing the need to completely uproot or grind down the eucalyptus stump. Foliar application of Roundup to eucalyptus re-
sprouts is another typical, successful chemical treatment, and can be used to eliminate small-diameter fuels in
areas of high ignition risk. The use of a thistle-specific herbicide, Transline, is effective in controlling the spread of yellow star thistle, artichoke thistle, and bull thistle.
Herbicides do not remove any vegetation from an area’s fuel load; the dead plant matter continues to exist at
the site and could continue to be a fire hazard if not collected and disposed. Health, safety and environmental
concerns have limited the widespread use of chemicals over the past 20 years, and repeated use of chemicals is not preferred due to the prevalence of unwanted species building resistance to herbicides. Additionally,
concerns regarding water quality and other potential environmental impacts that may occur with prolonged
use of and exposure to herbicides and other chemical applications further limit their frequent or widespread use as a treatment.
Application of herbicides is typically performed by hand, and can include sponging, spraying, or dusting
chemicals onto unwanted plants. Hand application provides flexibility in application and is ideally suited for
small treatment areas. Roadside application of herbicides may employ a boom affixed to or towed behind a vehicle.
Herbicide application requires specific storage, training and licensing to ensure proper and safe use, handling,
and storage. Only personnel with the appropriate license are allowed to use chemicals to treat vegetation. Herbicide application is also only applied per a prescription prepared by a Pesticide Advisor licensed in that
county. Personal protection equipment is essential to limit personnel exposure to chemicals.
10 Integrated Pest Management is a strategy that uses an array of biological, mechanical, cultural, and
hand labor, to control pests, with the use of herbicides as a least-preferred method of control.
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 84
6.3 Best Management Practices
The protection and preservation of culturally and environmentally sensitive areas is one of the primary drivers
for development of an updated Fire Management Plan. The development of a comprehensive plan not only
protects these features from the affects of fire, but ensures that vegetation treatment, fuel management, or fire mitigation efforts are planned and executed in a manner that prevents potential additional adverse impact.
The following steps are considered best management practices for the continued protection of environmental
areas. These steps are ideally suited to on-going fire management planning and the execution of specific fire management actions described within this plan.
• Detailed site inventory prior to treatment to determine the location of sensitive sites. Exploration into
the use of knowledgeable volunteers to conduct a more detailed, site-wide survey is warranted.
• Site planning and design to determine specific vegetation treatment actions based on fire management
benefits, environmental impact, and required mitigation activities.
• Protection during vegetation treatment using best management practices tailored to impacted
sensitive resources.
• Protection of disturbed environmentally sensitive areas following either specific fire management actions.
The above vegetation treatment actions have been commonly used throughout the State of California.
Through their implementation, a series of best practices has emerged to limit their adverse impact on the
environment and to assist in the selection and planning of their application.
6.3.1 Hand Labor
Due to the direct relationship of personnel to the environment in which they operate, hand labor can represent an approach that provides the least adverse impact to environmentally sensitive areas. However, specific fire
management goals and the characteristics of the sensitive area or resource must be assessed to develop an
actual work plan and associated activities. The following management practices and considerations should be implemented during site planning and project execution.
• Provide or confirm adequate training, experience, and oversight to ensure that personnel are familiar
with hand labor operations and planning, site conditions, potential and identified sensitive resources, and the identification of specific environmental features or conditions that must be avoided.
• Avoid treatment actions during conditions that may affect water or run-off including during storms or
severe weather or immediately following severe weather.
• Avoid excessive foot or vehicle traffic on slopes, unimproved or non-designated trails, or outside of
preexisting roads or access points.
• Inspect areas for nesting birds to determine if activity should be postponed or adjusted by the
establishment of a buffer area.
• Clean all tools and equipment following actions and prior to movement into new environmental areas to prevent the spread of invasive or non-native plants.
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 85
6.3.2 Mechanical Treatments
Due to the potential for large equipment use, rapid action, and large-scale area operations, mechanical
treatments can have significant adverse impacts on sensitive areas. As a result, pre-planning and site supervision are extremely important for any planned mechanical treatment actions. The following
management practices and considerations should be implemented during site planning and project execution.
• Provide or confirm adequate training, experience, and oversight to ensure that personnel are familiar with mechanical treatment operations and planning, site conditions, potential and identified sensitive
resources, and the identification of specific environmental features or conditions that must be
avoided.
• Avoid treatment actions during conditions that may affect water or run-off including during storms,
periods of precipitation, or immediately following severe weather. In addition, avoid scheduling any
treatment actions during seasons with significant predicted precipitation. Cease operations or postpone planned operations including movement of vehicles or equipment during precipitation conditions that may combine with vehicle activity to cause damage to roads, trails, or adjacent land
areas.
• Plan treatment actions and equipment selection to minimize damage or alterations to existing soils.
Determine locations of potentially erosive soils prior to treatment. Restrict operations that may
adversely affect sensitive soil systems such as serpentine soil areas, erosion prone soils, or riparian
zones. Restriction may include using road-based operations only, and avoiding riparian set-backs established by regulatory agencies.
• Maintain a buffer of 25-50 feet between operations and water bodies or designated riparian areas. Avoid crossing drainage channels, run-off areas, or dry streambeds. Install and manage run-off barriers for rainwater in all treatment and operating areas. Restrict mechanical removal of trees to
areas further than 50 feet from drainage channels.
• Restrict vehicle traffic to preexisting roads or pre-planned access points based on equipment size and
operations. Limit transport and support equipment to existing roads. Limit heavy equipment use to
slopes less than 30%. Install erosion control measures on all vehicle roads and traffic areas.
• Maintain strict monitoring and control of fueling and maintenance operations. All maintenance
actions that may produce spills should be executed in areas with secondary containment protection,
away from any water bodies or drainage areas. Clean up of all spills should be done on-site, with
materials ready for use. Inspection of equipment for new leaks and mechanical problems should be performed daily, prior to operations.
• Inspect areas for nesting birds to determine if activity should be postponed or adjusted by the establishment of a buffer area.
• Clean equipment following actions and prior to movement into new environmental areas to prevent
the spread of invasive or non-native plants.
• Plan operations around expected seeding conditions of targeted species (either prior to or sufficiently
afterwards) to ensure efficiency of treatment action.
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 86
• Cease actions during periods of high fire danger or during red flag conditions. Ensure that all mechanical equipment have approved spark arrestors and comply with California Public Resources
Code (PRC) sections 4431, 4435, 4442, and 4437 to limit potential for ignition of incidental fires.
• Maintain on-site fire suppression resources to include shovel, water pump, fire extinguisher, and two-way radio or communications for fire reporting.
6.3.3 Grazing with Sheep and Goats
• One of the primary adverse impacts of grazing is over-grazing and the resulting exposure of bare
ground. Over-grazing can increase the potential for soil erosion, water run-off and drainage, elimination of native plant species, and spread of non-native plants and weeds. Prepare a grazing
management plan by a certified range specialist that specifies goals, stocking levels, grazing periods,
installation of range improvements (such as water sources) to evenly distribute utilization of feed, and monitoring and performance criteria.
• Develop a site-specific annual grazing plan that includes project-level plans for stocking, timing, and
resource management goals.
• Prior to introduction, all animals should be quarantined and fed weed-free forage to limit spread of
invasive or unwanted plant species as well as prevent spread of livestock diseases.
• Limit grazing to non-riparian areas.
6.3.4 Broadcast Prescribed Burns
Prescribed burns can have significant impacts on sensitive areas both from environmental and cultural
standpoint. The planning and execution of a prescribed burn must be carefully developed. A prescribed burn
can adversely affect the duff layer, generate large and unpredicted amounts of smoke, and transition from a
controlled event to one that is uncontrolled and dangerous.
• Provide or confirm adequate training, experience, and oversight to ensure that personnel are familiar
with broadcast prescribed burn operations and planning, site conditions, potential and identified sensitive resources, and the identification of specific environmental features or conditions that must be avoided.
• Develop a smoke management plan describing desired outcomes and specific actions for onsite personnel including a test burn, continual evaluation of smoke dispersal, monitoring of wind patterns,
and monitoring of potential visibility impacts to primary roads and highways.
• Develop public safety plans to be executed throughout the prescribed burn cycle including press and information releases, signs and notifications, patrols on roads and access points, and development of
a fire contingency plan.
• Maintain a buffer between the prescribed burn area and water bodies or drainage into riparian zones. Buffers should be a minimum of 25 feet for 5% slopes, 75 feet for 5-10% slopes, and 250 feet for
10% or greater slopes. No prescribed fires should be ignited near streams or in riparian zones.
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 87
• Plan the prescribed burn to minimize post-fire erosion into water bodies and drainages through natural barriers, proper construction of fire lines along contours, and proper erosion control barrier
deployment. Minimize prescribed burning in areas with highly erodible soils.
• Cultural and social sites and structures shall be excluded from burn area through planning, hand-lines, or other fire protection operations. On-site personnel will be briefed on locations and features
of cultural or social sites to include incident command or response personnel. Avoid prescribed
burns in areas with utility infrastructure, existing property or structures, or archeological sites.
• Manage fuel moisture through pre-fire assessment and potential fuel modification. Prior to prescribed
burn, remove ladder fuels into the tree canopy to increase safety and reduce torching.
• Conduct prescribed burns only on designated burn days as authorized by BAAQMD.
• Inspect areas for nesting birds to determine if activity should be postponed or adjusted.
6.3.5 Herbicide Application
The application of herbicides for vegetation treatment should focus on the goal of applying the least amount of chemical required to achieve a desired outcome, consistent with the City of Palo Alto’s Integrated Pest Management policy. Best management practices for herbicide application are centered on limiting adverse or
unintended impacts of herbicides due to run-off, wind-spread, or post-treatment exposure.
• Provide or confirm adequate training, experience, and oversight to ensure that personnel are familiar
with herbicide operations and planning, site conditions, potential and identified sensitive resources,
and the identification of specific environmental features or conditions that must be avoided.
Herbicide application is only applied per a prescription prepared by a Pesticide Control Advisor licensed in that county, and applied by a licensed Pesticide Control Applicator.
• Develop public safety plans to be executed throughout the treatment cycle including press and
information releases, signs and notifications, and fencing or area restrictions.
• Develop a spill contingency plan and maintain strict monitoring and control of operations. Clean up
of all spills should be done on-site, with materials ready for use.
• Chemical treatments within habitat of California Red-legged Frog should be conducted according to
U.S. District Court injunction and order covering 66 pesticides (Oct 2006) and subsequent EPA
effects determinations.
• Clean equipment following actions and prior to movement into new environmental areas.
• Avoid treating areas adjacent to water bodies, riparian areas, and primary drainage access. Follow all herbicide labels and directions in determining applications near water resources or riparian habitats.
Limit aerial application to greater than 100 feet from water resources. Limit ground and hand
application to greater than 50 feet.
• Avoid treating areas used for livestock operations or intended as grazing areas.
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 88
PART B – POLICY REVIEW AND SUPPLEMENTAL
RECOMMENDATIONS
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 89
1 EVACUATION AND REFUGE
1.1 Identification and Notification
The complexity of jurisdictional boundaries and responsibilities necessitates that the City of Palo Alto
participate in 1) a standing forum that includes all stakeholders and 2) creating of coordinated, regional plans.
Emergency Public Information (EPI) is generally disseminated via broadcast radio (the Emergency Alert
System and KZSU 90.1 FM), telephone and e-mail, two-way radio contact with neighborhood leaders and
Disaster Service Workers Volunteers (via ARES/RACES ham radio and other systems), and via public address systems such as speakers on first responder vehicles.
New mass-communication systems for telephone and e-mail have recently been deployed in local
jurisdictions:
• Palo Alto: Community Alerting Notification System (CANS)
• Los Altos Hills: a similar systems to CANS
• Stanford: also CANS
• San Mateo County: a county-wide system, www.smcalert.info <http://www.smcalert.info/>
• Santa Clara County: a county-wide system is pending
These systems are currently not coordinated, An incident that starts in Palo Alto and spreads to Woodside
could cause 1) a failure to notify all involved or affected and 2) inconsistent or conflicting information. The
National Incident Management System (NIMS) provides that events where multiple jurisdictions are involved may establish a Joint Information Center (JIC) to coordinate the efforts of all Public Information Officers
(PIOs). In addition, Open Space and Park Division radios lack adequate channels (especially tactical
channels) for the growing need. This will be more crucial as affected agencies switch to digital communication systems. We recommend that a pre-plan for a Foothills JIC be created which would include
notification procedures for all potentially-involved dispatch centers, and that the Open Space and Park
Division radios be updated.
A regional evacuation plan for the Foothills should also be created: "Foothills Regional Emergency Response and Evacuation Plan (FREREP)". This plan would provide for standardized signage and evacuation route
nomenclature and protocols. The Palo Alto Police Department has developed a draft plan that could be an
initial model.
Furthermore, locked gates on evacuation routes must be properly labeled and signed and first responders
(including, in some cases, authorized local residents) must have keys or other access methods. For example,
the Los Trancos Road gate to the back of Foothills Park is not labeled. In another example: A Los Trancos
Neighborhood Preparedness Coordinator could be issued a key and given an assignment to open that gate in the event of an emergency.
Existing evacuation plans should be reviewed, updated as needed, and integrated into the FREREP. For
example, the Los Trancos/Vista Verde Neighborhood evacuation plans are posted at the following location:
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 90
http://www.vistaverdeca.org/emergency_response_info.html
The (private) Pony Tracks Ranch provides emergency vehicle egress (into Palo Alto via the "stub" of Alpine
Rd. on to Page Mill) as well as a safe refuge area:
http://www.vistaverdeca.org/about9.html
1.2 Regional Cooperation
After the tragic Oakland Hills Fire of 1991, several local jurisdictions came together to form the East Bay Foothills Forum. The same underlying conditions and principles support the formation of a similar group in the Palo Alto area, which could perhaps be called "The Midpeninsula Foothills Emergency Forum (MFEF)".
1.3 Temporary Refuge
Places of temporary refuge are located in areas of low hazard, in places that are regularly maintained (at least
annually) in a low-fuel volume condition. Los Trampas Valley is the best example of a suitable location,
however this site may also be used as by incident management teams during longer duration fires.
To enhance the effectiveness of these temporary refuges, the park staff should perform an evacuation drill. The firefighters safety zones on Trappers Ridge are NOT temporary refuge areas for anyone but firefighters
with proper training and equipment.
There are opportunities for off-site refuge; private properties in the area could provide temporary refuge, but agreements between the City and property owners would need to be formalized.
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 91
2 CODES AND REGULATIONS
The 2007 California Building Standards Code became effective statewide on January 1, 2008. Included in the
new code are the 2007 versions of the California Building Code (based on the 2006 International Building
Code), and California Fire Code (based on the 2006 International Fire Code). With Ordinance 4975 and
4976, the City of Palo Alto adopted these codes and local amendments to the State model codes with supportive Findings of Fact, which were filed with the State Building Standards Commission. These codes
became effective in Palo Alto on January 1, 2008. The codes are comprehensive and have included the key
elements recommended by the model codes.
2.1 Existing Codes and Ordinances
Codes related to wildland urban interface fires can be found in both the building code and fire code.
2.1.1 Fire Code
Title 15 of the Palo Alto Municipal Code adopted the California Fire Code, 2007 Edition, including
Appendices B and C, and Chapters 3, 4, 5 and 25 and Chapter 1 Appendix of the International Fire Code. Sections 15.04.520 – 15.04.587 address wildland urban interface fires.
Key components of the fire code include:
• Definition of the Wildland Urban Interface Fire Area: “…all areas west of Highway 280 and all other areas recommended as “Very High fire Hazard Severity Zone” by the director of CDF.”
(Section 15.04.520).
• Requirement for Preparation of Fire Protection Plan: Addition of section 4703.1 through 4703.4
requires a site specific wildfire risk assessment be prepared by an applicant when required by the fire
code official. (Section 15.04.530)
• Requirements for Defensible Space: Addition of section 4707.1 – 4707.2 define the requirements for
an effective defensible space within 30 feet of buildings, with an additional defensible space 100 feet
when required by fire code official due to site conditions. This section also defines corrective actions and the ability of the executive body to correct conditions and make the associated expense of such
correction a lien upon the property. (Chapter 15.04.530). In addition, Section 15.04.130 adds Section
304.1.2.1 that provides authorization for the fire chief to cause removal of weed or combustible
materials.
• Access Requirements: Addition of sections 4714 through 4714.3 establishes access requirements for
all driveways and fire apparatus roads. (Section 15.04.550)
o Driveways require clearances of 12 feet wide and 13.5 feet high. The code requires turnarounds for driveways greater than 150 feet in length and turnouts and turnarounds for
those greater than 200 feet in length and 20 feet wide. It requires that vehicle speed limits be
posted on entrances to bridges, on driveways and private roads.
o Fire apparatus roads require clearances of 20 feet width and 13.5 feet height. Dead end roads
greater than 150 feet in length are required to have turnarounds.
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 92
• In addition, Section 15.04.170 amends Section 504.4 to require that access control devices (including bars, grates, gates, electric or magnetic locks or similar devises that could inhibit rapid fire
department emergency access) be approved by the fire code official and be provided with an
approved means for deactivation or unlocking by the fire department.
• Water Supply: Addition of sections 4715 through 47159 defines water supply requirements
including water sources, hydrants, adequate water supply, obstructions, identification, testing and
maintenance, clearance of fuel and standby power. (Section 15.04.560)
• Automatic Fire Sprinklers: Addition of Sections 4716 through 467716.3 adds the requirement for
new buildings to be provided with an approved automatic fire sprinkler. Existing buildings are
required to provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler when modifications are made that increase the building area. (Section 15.04.570)
• Requirements for Suppression and Control: Addition of Sections 4717 through 4717.3.5 add general
requirements applicable to new and existing properties to provide necessary fire protection measures. These include vegetation control, maintenance of defensible space with measures that increase the
requirements of Section 4707 (Section 15.04.530). These measures address (Section 15.04.580):
o Trees: Maintain horizontal clearance of 10 feet from any structure. Pruning to remove limbs
located less than 6 feet. Regularly remove deadwood and litter from trees.
o Roadway Clearance: Clear brush or vegetative growth within 10 feet on each side of
portions of fire apparatus access roads and driveways.
o Electrical Transmission and Distribution Lines: Clearance requirements provided for the various line voltages between electrical lines and vegetation.
o Access Restrictions: Provides the authorization for the fire code official to close WUI areas
to entry (exceptions made for residents, and authorized police or fire personnel.)
• Ignition Source Control: Additions of Sections 4717.4 through 4717.4.10 provide regulations to
prevent the occurrence of wildfires. These sections address clearance from ignitions sources;
smoking; equipment generating heat, sparks or open flames; fireworks; outdoor fires, outdoor
fireplaces, permanent barbecues and grills; reckless behavior. (Section 15.04.584)
• Control of Storage: Addition of Section 4717.7 provides additional requirements for storage of
hazardous materials; liquefied petroleum gas installations; explosives and combustible materials.
(Section 15.04.585).
• Dumping: Additions of Section 4717.6 provides regulations related to dumping of waste material and
ashes or coal. (Section 15.04.586)
• Protection of Pumps and Water Storage Facilities: Addition of Section 4717.7 added regulations to
increase the reliability of water storage and pumping facilities and protect such systems from
intrusion by fire. (Section 15.04.587)
• Land Use Limitations: Addition of Section 4717.8 places limits on land use to reduce the potential
threat to life safety by requiring permits for temporary fairs, carnivals, public exhibitions and similar uses.
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 93
• Emergency Communications: Section 15.04.190 requires, by the addition of Section 5.11.1, that new buildings or buildings expanding by more than 20%, or that change occupancy classification must
provide an approved system or equipment that will allow for adequate emergency radio coverage.
2.1.2 Building Code
Title 16 of the Palo Alto Municipal Code adopted the California Building Code, 2007 Edition. In general
these sections support the adopted Title 15 Fire Code. Key components of the building code that address wildland urban interface fire include:
• Wildland Urban Interface (WUI) Fire Area: The same definition as in Title 15 applies and amends
Section 702A of the California Building Code. (Section 16.04.140)
• Sprinkler System: Section 903.2 is amended to provide an automatic sprinkler system throughout all
buildings designated in the WUI Fire Areas (except any non-habitable structures accessory to a single family residence that have a gross floor area of 500 square feet or less). It also includes the requirement for modifications to existing structures that expand the gross floor area as listed in the
Fire Code. (Section 16.04.150)
• Roofing Requirements: Section 1505.14 amends the roofing requirements in the WUI Fire Area. A
Class A fire retardant roof covering is required where more than 50% of the total roof area is replaced
within any one year period, for new structures and in the alteration, repair or replacement of the roof
of existing structures. Roofing requirements shall also comply with Section 704A.1. (Section 16.04.170)
Chapter 7A of the California Building Code provides additional requirements for materials and construction
methods for exterior wildfire exposure. It expands the roofing and attic ventilation requirements that came into effect for new buildings applying for a building permit after December 1, 2005. This portion of the code addresses:
• Roofing assemblies, coverings, roof valleys and roof gutters.
• Attic ventilation, eave or cornice vents and eave protection.
• Exterior wall coverings, openings, vents, exterior glazing and window walls and exterior door assemblies.
• Decking, floors and underfloor protection.
• Ancillary buildings and structures.
2.2 Recommendations
There are several areas that could be expanded to further improve safety in the Palo Alto WUI Fire Area. These could be done as code revisions to further enhance the code or as guidelines that are used in
enforcement of existing codes. Other best practice measures may be incorporated into City contracts and used
in public education:
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 94
• Expand Section 15.04.520, the Area Defined as Wildland Urban Interface (WUI) Fire Area, to include the lands between Foothill Expressway / Junipero Serra Boulevard and Highway 280.
• Expand Section 15.04.530 General Requirements for WUI Fire Areas (4703.1 Fire Protection Plan Preparation) to require that Fire Protection Planning begin early in the planning/ permitting process so the location of access roads, driveways and structures can be influenced to increase fire safety and
emergency response. Require the plan to also address implementation and funding of defensible
space vegetation management (especially important for commonly held private open space).
• Expand Section 15.04.540 Defensible Space (4707.1 General Item 5.) to include all ground, decking
and balconies in addition to the specified “maintain roof of a structure free of leaves, needles or other dead vegetative growth.”
• Expand Section 15.04.550 Access Requirements (4714.2 Driveways and 4714.3 Fire Apparatus
Roads) to add standards related to gradient and horizontal and vertical curvature, bridge load limits, parking restrictions during high fire danger weather and requirements for emergency vehicle access.
• Expand Section 15.04.580 General Requirements for WUI Fire Areas (section 4717.2 Vegetation Control) to provide additional guidance for Maintenance of Defensible Space (see following guidelines).
• Expand Section 15.04.584 Ignition Source Control (section 4717.4.7 Outdoor Fires) to identify that
abatement by burning is unlawful unless by permit and unless all other applicable permits are obtained from appropriate governing jurisdictions. Burn permits are only issued to working
agricultural properties.
• Fencing: Add a section requiring fences be constructed of either noncombustible material or of timbers with a minimum of one-inch nominal thickness. For example a typical fencing might consist
of open wire mesh with four-inch posts and stringers that have a minimum one-inch nominal
thickness. Fences should be designed with removal panels or gates so during a wildfire they do not convey fire to adjacent structures.
• Signage: Add a section requiring street, road and building address signs to have a minimum letter
height of 4 inches, be 1/2 inches thick, reflectorized, painted a color contrasting with the background color of the sign, mounted on non-combustible poles and visible within 100 feet traveling from both
directions.
• Mechanical Equipment Ignition Prevention: Requirements should be included in all City contracts for construction or maintenance work in the WUI Fire Area that address ignition prevention such as
equipment (spark arrestor, overheating protection etc.), refueling, clearance of work area, cessation of
work during periods of high fire danger weather and requirements for fire suppression equipment. This is becoming more critical for new diesel-powered vehicles because clean air/emission require exhaust particulate burning systems can more easily start fires if the vehicles are taken off-road.
• Smoking: More stringent rules regarding smoking in Pearson-Arastradero Park are recommended. Restrictions should be similar to those in place at Foothills Park.
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 95
2.3 Exterior Hazard Abatement
The following information is provided as a set of guidelines that can be developed into educational material to
facilitate compliance with existing codes. The code currently addresses treatments for exterior hazard
abatement in a general way; this section provides more specificity regarding the spacing of vegetative fuels.
2.3.1 For parcels of land one acre or less maintain parcel in complete
abatement.
• For a distance of 30 feet a structure on slope steepness less than 30 percent grade, or 70 feet on slopes greater than 30 percent grade, from all property boundaries cut dry grass and non-woody vegetation
to less than 3 inches yearly, no later than June 1.
o This may require re-mowing if late season rains promote grass growth after the first cutting.
o With prior approval of the Fire Department cutting of native grass and wildflowers may be delayed until after seed set provided they do not form a means of rapidly transmitting fire to
any structures.
• Leaves and humus may not exceed two inches in depth anywhere in a landscaped area; however, bare
earth should not be exposed in over 50% of the site and no one bare patch should be larger than 15
square feet.
• All dead vegetation (i.e. dry grass, leaves and humus) must be removed under trees and within
shrubs, vines and semi-woody plants every year by June 1.
• Dead branches must be removed from mature trees and all vines, to 8 feet above ground.
Figure 33: Pruning Example.
Prune branches to a height of 8 feet above the ground. In young trees, prune branches on the lower one-third of the height of the tree. Do not disturb or thin the tree canopy. This
promotes growth in the understory, which is more easily ignited.
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 96
• Limbs of trees and large-form shrubs that are smaller than three inches in diameter shall be pruned to provide clearance of three times the height of the understory plant material or 8 feet, whichever is
higher. Trees shorter than 24 feet in height shall be pruned of the lower one-third branches (Figure
33).
• The vertical distance between the ground and the lowest tree branches should be 3 times the height of
any shrubs planted beneath the trees or 6 feet whichever is higher. Plants under trees should
generally be shorter than 18 inches in height. Taller shrubs, including vines, semi-woody species and all chaparral species, may be near (six horizontal feet from tree crown) but not under trees.
• Remove all dead trees deemed a fire hazard by the Fire Department.
• Individual plants or shrub masses will be separated so that groupings/shrub masses will be no wider
than two times the grouping height, or 120 square feet in area. Distinct groupings of shrubs (which
includes vines, semi-woody species, all types of brush, and all chaparral species) will be designed to dampen the spread of fire. Alternatively, shrubs can be cut and maintained to a height of two feet.
*
Figure 34: Shrub Spacing.
Design groups of plants small enough to provide horizontal separation between groups. This
allows proper maintenance and helps slow the spread of fire. Each shrub or group of plants should measure no wider than two times its height, or less than 120 sq.ft. (or 6 ft x 20 ft). The space between groups should be greater than three times the height of the shrubs, or at least a
12 ft. distance
• A vertical clearance of 5 feet shall be maintained between roof surface and portions of trees or other vegetation overhanging any building or structure.
• Wood piles must be enclosed in a non-combustible storage unit.
2.3.2 For parcels larger than one acre in size
• Maintain the area (space) within 100 feet of any structure on the parcel per the specific requirements for lots less than one acre in size.
• Maintain the area (space) within 100 – 250 feet from any structure on the parcel per the following
specific requirements:
o Shrub masses will be separated so that groupings will be no wider than two times the
grouping height, or 120 square feet in area. Distinct groupings of shrubs (which include
vines, semi-woody species, all types of brush, and all chaparral species) will be designed to dampen the spread of fire. Alternatively, shrubs can be cut and maintained to a height of two feet.
o All dead vegetation (i.e. dry grass, leaves and humus) must be removed under trees and
within shrubs, vines and semi-woody plants every year by June 1.
o Dead branches must be removed from mature trees and all vines, to 8 feet above ground.
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 97
o Trees, and large tree-form shrubs, shall be pruned to provide clearance of three times the height of the understory plant material or 8 feet, whichever is higher. Limbs that are smaller than three inches in diameter are to be pruned up to eight feet off the ground, and in trees
shorter than 18 feet, the lower one-third of the height of the tree. See Figure 33.
o The vertical distance between the ground and the lowest tree branches should be 3 times the height of any shrubs planted beneath the trees or 6 feet whichever is higher. Plants under
trees should generally be shorter than 18 inches in height. Taller shrubs, including vines,
semi-woody species and all chaparral species, may be near (six horizontal feet from tree crown) but not under trees.
• If a structure is within 100 feet of property boundary on adjacent lot, provide 30-foot firebreaks
following as closely as possible to the property line and along one side of all fence lines. Fire breaks are a continuous strip of ground that is mowed to three-inch height, or disced, or dozed.
• Remove all dead trees deemed a fire hazard by the Fire Department.
• Trees on the top of ridges shall be maintained to limit torching, through pruning to provide clearance
of three times the height of the understory plant material or 8 feet, whichever is higher. Limbs that
are smaller than three inches in diameter are to be pruned up to eight feet off the ground, and in trees
shorter than 18 feet, the lower one-third of the height of the tree as in Figure 33.
• Within 15-feet of all public or private roadways or driveways, all grass must be mowed, disced or
sprayed to 3 inches height.
• In grasslands, 30-foot firebreaks and crossbreaks that divide the parcel into approximately 5-acre
sections. Firebreaks and crossbreaks are a continuous strip of ground that is mowed to three-inch
height, or disced, or dozed, following as closely as possible to the property line and along one side of all fence lines, ditches, and on top of all ridges. When terrain is too steep or rugged for a tractor, a hand-mowed firebreak may be required.
• Active Pastureland: 15-foot wide firebreaks and crossbreaks are required if a sufficient number of animals are present to steadily reduce height of grass during the summer months to 3 inches or less
by the end of August. If not active, 30-foot width is required.
• Active Cropland: 15-foot wide firebreaks and crossbreaks required if crop is to be harvested by mid-June. If later, 30-foot width is required.
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 98
3 FIRE PROTECTION – STATION 8
The following is a description, appraisal and recommendation regarding staffing of, equipment for and other
response resources related to Station 8 in Foothills Park.
Figure 35: Fire Protection Resources.
3.1 Description
Fire Station number 8 of the Palo Alto Fire Department is located at 3300 Page Mill Road in Palo Alto, CA. It is a seasonal fire station that is only staffed during the daylight hours. This amounts to 12 hours per day. The
period of time it is staffed is usually from July 1st to November 1st of each year. This is essentially the fire
season for the area being protected and involves about 120 days of coverage. Whenever there is a declared
high fire danger day or the burn index indicates an ignition threat the station may be staffed beyond the 12-hour period and outside of the fire season when appropriate.
The staffing of the station currently includes 1 Captain, 1 Apparatus Operator/Engineer and 1 Firefighter.
These positions are filled through overtime allocations rather than being post positions. Initially a fire response unit located at Foothill Park was staffed with only 2 persons. It was upgraded to 3 persons following the Arastradero Fire of 1985 in the lower foothills to be consistent with contemporary fire staffing practices
and when Station #8 was constructed.
Station 8
8
Mutual Aid Stations
Plus: CalFire Saratoga Gap
Station at Skyline and Big
Basin Way
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 99
The apparatus that responds from this station is a Type III Engine Company. This is an apparatus that is primarily designed to respond to wildland fires instead of structure fires. This is similar to the types of companies used by major wildland agencies.
The station provides an initial attack capability to an area that involves about 25 square miles of urban-
wildland interface area. There are approximately 150 dwellings in the area, but that is not the primary risk. The fire history of this specific area is relatively free of major events in the past decades. The last reported
major fire in the vicinity of the upper foothills was in 1912. Significant fires in the lower foothills (primarily
light fuels) occurred in 1985, 1992, 2000 and 2007.
However, that one factor creates an impact upon existing fuel loads. The lack of major fires in the past has resulted in fuel densities that may be ready to support a wide area fire. It has been estimated that the medium
and high density fuels are about three times their normal density.
The secondary response units into this area are deployed from the “El Monte” fire station of Santa Clara County Fire located to the north and the Palo Alto Stations #2 and #5. The County Fire Station is equipped
with Type I and Type IV engines. Currently there is no direct link to this station in the dispatching of
equipment. Depending upon who reports an emergency in the area the call could go directly to the City of
Palo Alto or it could be routed through the Santa Clara County Communication Center and Palo Alto would then be notified.
The standard response into this area varies upon the level of dispatch. On medium or high dispatch days the
Palo Alto Fire Department responds Engine 8 to reports of wildland fires and supports it with another Type III (3 personnel) that is cross staffed by the truck company from Station #6 on the Stanford Campus, one Type I
from Station #2 (3 personnel), 2 Type IV cross-staffed patrol units from Stations #2 and #6 (6 personnel), one
Paramedic ambulance from Station #2 (2 personnel) and one Battalion Chief from Station #6.
Furthermore, the dispatch system provides a brush unit from the Santa Clara County El Monte Fire Station in Los Altos Hills at Foothill Community College (4 personnel from 1000-1900 hours) and can respond an
additional 4 Type I’s (12 personnel) and 3 Type IV Brush units (9 personnel). Lastly, the system has the depth
to provide additional resources from other mutual aid entities in the same area (e.g. Cal Fire Ranger Unit resources located in Cupertino and San Martin). These include additional Type III units (3 or more), air assets, hand crew resources, bulldozers and command staff to complete an overhead requirement in the event
of a major fire. Other Type 1, Type III and Type IV resources may be made available through the Santa Clara
County Mutual Aid System.
The City of Palo Alto does currently not have an adopted Standards of Cover document, but operates with an
informal response goal of 5 to 6 minutes for attendance of at least 90% of its calls for service. The department
also provides paramedic (advanced life support – ALS) response to the basic built out portion of the city within 8 minutes for at least 90% of those types of calls (these response goal benchmarks are exclusive of the foothills area). Station 8 has not normally been considered an ALS resource. In the past 2 years a priority has
been established to staff Engine 8 with an ALS resource whenever possible.
The staffing for the station is provided in the overtime budget. Last year the amount set aside to provide coverage was $200,000.
3.2 Appraisal
The primary purpose of placing a wildland unit into this area is to prevent any ignitions from spreading beyond a reasonable fire perimeter before an adequate full fire alarm assignment and an effective response
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 100
force can be placed on the scene. The first 10 minutes of a wildland fire are critical to restricting the size of the ultimate fire. Depending upon the fuel type and density, the slope and aspect and the effects of wind upon a flame front, the period of time that it takes to get initial control of an incipient fire is very important. This is
especially true in light fuels, when a fuel is running uphill and/or when fire conditions that consist of high
temperatures, low humidity and wind conditions exist. The fire behavior assessment of the Foothills Area indicates a high potential for fast-moving fires.
The secondary purpose of having the unit in place is to establish a point of control for the development of an
incident command system in place to address the escalation of the fire, if it is not controlled in the first 10 minutes.
The first purpose addresses the need for “distribution”. In the language of response coverage the distribution
of resources is the placement of companies, based upon risk factors to be readily available to handle the first
few minutes of fire or emergency control.
The second purpose addresses the need for “concentration”. This terminology is used to describe the
deployment of an adequate amount of resources to deal with the ultimate size of the fire. These two concepts
are inter-related in that fires that are controlled early do not need as many resources to be eventually
deployed. Therefore, early intervention is a form of cost avoidance.
This is the basic operating assumption of all seasonal fire resources. Major wildland agencies such as Cal-
Fire, the U.S. Forest Service and other wildland agencies use the concept of seasonal and part time staffing
configurations to minimize fire size to as small an area as possible.
3.3 Recommendation
The staffing of this station by utilization of overtime fire personnel is a reasonable method of addressing the
risk and hazards in the area. It is a cost effective way of reducing the impact of potential wildland fires in the study area. The elimination of this company places the responsibility for initial attack upon fire companies
that are more remote and therefore are more likely to have lengthy response times into the area.
The staffing pattern of 3 fire fighters is the minimum for the safe and effective operation of an initial attack unit for a wildland fire. This station and its current staffing configuration should be retained in the future. In addition, staffing a police officer and maintaining a ranger staff presence in the Foothills Area during high fire
risk days should be considered. This type of personnel offers extra fire detection capability and is available to
assist with evacuation should an incident require that particular action.
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 101
4 TRAIL PLAN UPDATE
4.1 Pearson-Arastradero Preserve Trails Management Plan (March
2001)
The Trails Master Plan for Pearson-Arastradero Preserve recognizes that the preserve is located in the
Hazardous Fire Area (Section 3.3). The plan identifies management objectives, strategies and recommended
actions to meet Fire Department objectives. It recognizes the need to coordinate with the Fire Department to develop and implement a fire suppression plan that will maximize the safety of the users and the adjacent
properties, without adversely impacting the natural environment. It includes fire prevention methods for
firelines on the perimeter, as well as fuel reduction zones to compartmentalize the preserve for fire
suppression in the event of a fire.
4.1.1 Recommended Revisions
Since the Trails Master Plan was adopted in 2001, there have been new facilities developed at the Gateway Interpretive Center and a new access to Foothills Park. Fuel management recommendations take into account
these new facilities, as well as recommend the following additions and modifications to the 2001 Trails Plan:
• Addition of fuel management along the evacuation route (Arastradero Road) and management of defensible space around the Gateway Interpretive Center, parking lot and staging area to include
projects A.E1 and A.D1, A.D2, A.D3 and A.D4.
• Addition of fuel reduction zones within the interior of the preserve along existing trails for
containment including projects A.C9, A.C10, A.C11 and A.C12.
• The Master Plan identifies an option for the Fire Department to use controlled burns as a part of their wildland fire prevention plan. Two potential areas are recommended: Juan Bautista Prescribed Fire
North (A.Rx1) and Acorn Trail Prescribed Fire South (A.Rx2).
• Modify firebreak width and performance standards.
• Addition of roadside treatment standards to Clearing and Brushing for those trails that also serve as
emergency vehicle access for clearances of 13.5 feet vertical clearance and 10 feet horizontal clearance.
• Addition to Regulatory, Warning and Educational Signs regarding fire hazard signs, education
information on fuel management and prescribe fire.
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 102
Figure 36: Emergency/Maintenance Access Points.
Map depicts the emergency/maintenance access points of entry, trail travel routes to be maintained for use by the
Fire Department and Utilities Department when servicing the Preserve. This map also shows disc lines and indicates those sensitive resource areas in the Preserve that should not be accessed by heavy vehicles. The map has been modified to incorporate the new facilities and associated modifications to fire control treatment areas.
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 103
4.1.2 Existing Fire Mitigation and Fuel Management in the Arastradero
Trails Management Plan
Hazardous Fire Area: The Preserve is identified in the Hazardous Fire Area. (Section 3.3)
Utilities: Access for maintenance and repair of existing utilities facilities is by all-weather surface roads that
can accommodate heavy vehicles for repairs. Primary entrance is Gate B. Clearance of fuels for 10’ radius around poles having operable devises. Tree trimming is generally done every 2 to 3 years with ground
clearing done annually. (Section 3.4)
Management Objectives, Strategies and Recommended Actions. Objective is to coordinate with Fire
Department to develop and implement a fire suppression plan that will maximize the safety of the users and the adjacent properties, without adversely affecting the natural environment (Section 4.5 and Map 4):
• Access: Provide adequate access for Type 3 and 4 vehicles.
• Fire Prevention Techniques: Use least environmentally intrusive prevention methods
• Firebreak and Control Strategies: Prevent fires from spreading on adjacent properties as well as coming into the preserve. Firebreaks/disc lines should be implemented only where they serve their intended function in fire prevention and suppression.
• Temporary Closures: Provide an option for park staff to close the Preserve when conditions such as high fire danger could pose a threat to the public.
Access (Section 4.5 pg 4-9 and Section 7-2 pp 7-7-7-9).
• Provide a 40 to 45 foot “drive” between Arastradero Road and Access Gates A and B to provide a safe place for Fire Department staff to safely park their Type 3 and 4 vehicles when opening the
Preserve entry gates.
o Ensure that all six access points can accommodate fire vehicles at all times. These access
points include:
The parking lot
The access gate on Arastradero Road adjacent to the west of the parking lot
Gate A (access limited to the existing turn-around on the west side of the first concrete bridge spanning Arastradero Creek)
Gate B, which serves as the primary Utilities Department access
Gate C, which is located off John Marthens Lane
Gate D - Vista Hill Gate in Foothills Park (one-way uphill, except in emergency situations)
o Close, restore and annually mow designated emergency access routes within the Preserve as
needed to create a circulation route for Type 3 and 4 vehicles in the case of emergency.
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 104
• Provide emergency turn-around capability where access roads dead-end (hammer-head configuration needed for vehicle turn-around).
o To minimize potential impacts to the natural resources, these designated vehicle 'turn-
arounds' will be the only acceptable turning points for motor vehicles within the Preserve. The final siting of new 'turn-arounds' (#2, 5 and 9) should be flagged prior to construction
and the Open Space and Parks Division Manager should be advised of pending construction.
Each turn-around should be clearly delineated and mapped to prevent removal of or impact
to sensitive biological resources. Refer to Table 9 – Vehicle Turn-around Design Summary.
o Recognizing that these turn-arounds are to be used for routine maintenance, construction and
patrol. In special circumstances where larger fire trucks and over sized utility vehicles must
access the Preserve, these vehicles may not be able to use the turn-arounds and will have to travel through the Preserve in a one way direction. In this case, it is recommended that the
vehicles enter and leave through Gates B and D. In the case of a wildfire, public safety will
override resource protection. In this case, the Fire Department may be required to override
these vehicle guidelines to be able to suppress a fire.
Refer to Map 36 Fire Protection & Emergency & Maintenance Access for:
• Emergency/maintenance access points of entry.
• Trail travel routes to be maintained for use by the Fire Department and Utilities Department when
servicing the Preserve.
• Disc lines.
• Sensitive resource areas in the Preserve that should not be accessed by heavy vehicles.
• Use a uniform maintenance gate at all major entry points with a universal locking device to facilitate routine and emergency access into the Preserve by multiple department staff.
Fire prevention methods (Section 4.5 pg 4-9 and Section 7.5 Vegetation Management pg 7-39)
• Fire prevention methods to be used at the Preserve include:
o Establishing fire lines on the perimeters of open space lands, leaving the interior areas in
their natural condition. These cover many of the recommended containment projects
including: A.C1, A.C2, A.C3, A.C4, A.C5, A.C6, A.C7 and A.C8.
o Posting signs indicating the severity of the fire danger (low, moderate, high, very high, and
extreme) during the fire season.
o Posting signs “No Fireworks” June 20 to July 10.
o Use herbicides as approved by the Open Space and Parks Division Manager, where appropriate in implementing the wildland fire prevention plan.
Refer to Map 4 Fire Protection & Emergency Access of the Trail Master Plan for disc lines and areas that are
to be mowed annually to maintain emergency vehicle access through the Preserve. This map also indicates those sensitive resource areas in the Preserve that should not be accessed by heavy vehicles.
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 105
Firebreak and Control (Section 4.5 pg 4-10 and Section 7.5 Vegetation Management pg 7-39)
• Firebreaks should be disced 24 feet wide or 1 ½ times the fuel height adjacent to the road, structures
and where they can compartmentalize an area to reduce the risk of a fire igniting and/or spreading.
• Firebreaks should be eliminated where they are not providing any benefit to fire prevention or suppression.
• Ideally discing should be performed twice a year, first in late spring and then when the disc lines
have “cured.”
• If new activities/developments occur inside or adjacent to the Preserve perimeters, then the location
of the disc lines should be reevaluated and expanded as appropriate.
In addition, though not currently used, maintain an option for the Fire Department to perform controlled burns in the future as part of their overall fire prevention plan.
Temporary Closures (Section 4.5 pg 4-10) of the Trail Master Plan
The City Fire Department in consultation with Open Space staff may close the Preserve when there is a threat to public safety. When such emergencies occur, the Fire Department is to notify the Police Department and
the Open Space and Parks Division staff of emergency closures so they can notify the public. Emergency
closures may occur when:
• Weather conditions create a critical fire danger;
• Arsonists are known to be present in the area;
• Staff resources have been pulled away for other emergencies; and/or
• Other threats to public safety are present or suspected.
High Maintenance Trails - Clearing and Brushing (Section 6.2 Trails Maintenance System & Section 7.5 Vegetation Management)
The trail clearing limits for down logs and tree limbing should be 10 feet high and 3 feet wide on each side of
the trail. (Refer to Section 7, Figure 16 of the Trail Master Plan for trail clearing and brushing limits). Trail brushing limits for shrubby and herbaceous plant species extending into the trail should be 10 feet high and 3
feet wide on each side of the trail. These plants should be cleared to ground level. Clearing widths should be
directed to providing clear passage and providing an average sight line of 100-feet. Low growing and slow
growing shrubs and ground cover less than two feet in height should be left undisturbed.
Specific Trail Recommendations for Trails (Section 6.4)
• Acorn Trail - Segment 1 (Ac1): Maintain existing vehicle turn-around at booster pump station. Refer to Map 4 of the Trail Master Plan- Fire Protection & Emergency & Maintenance Access - Turn-around Point 3.
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 106
• Arastradero Creek Trail - Segment 2 (ArC2): Providing a new vehicle turn-around in a hammerhead configuration near intersection of former Acorn Trail (now Route F) to accommodate Type 3 and 4
emergency fire vehicles. The turn-around area should be defined using the following: grading a level
area and landscaping. Such vegetation should consist of native species, similar to nearby, existing vegetation and should be placed in a natural configuration to prevent the vegetation from creating an
unsafe condition or adverse visual impact. The final siting of the turn-around should be completed
under the advisement of the Open Space and Parks Division Manager. Refer to Map 4 of the Trail
Master Plan - Fire Protection & Emergency & Maintenance Access – Turn-around Point 5.
• Arastradero Creek Trail - Segment 3 (ArC3): Locate an emergency/maintenance vehicle turn-around
in a hammerhead configuration at the existing gate on the east side of the trail. Move the gate back to accommodate Type 3 and 4 emergency fire vehicles. Improvements to the turn-around area should be confined to the existing, flat graded pad. Minimize annual pruning to area necessary to provide for
vehicle access. Refer to Map 4 of the Trail Master Plan- Fire Protection & Emergency &
Maintenance Access - Turn-around Point 6.
• Corte Madera Trail - Segment 2(CM2): Mow the area at junction with Bay View Trail to provide
room for Type 3 and 4 emergency vehicles to perform a hammerhead vehicle turn-around following
procedures outlined in Section 7.2. Maintain a minimum cover of 2 inches to minimize potential erosion impacts. Refer to Figure 36 Fire Protection & Emergency & Maintenance Access - Turn-
around Point 4.
• Gateway Trail - Segment 1 (Ga1): Providing a 40 to 45 foot “driveway” between Arastradero Road and Access Gate A to allow a safe pull out for maintenance and emergency vehicles accessing the
Preserve11. Design of maintenance drive must take into account the existing 10-foot wide crossing
over a concrete culvert. The culvert is located approximately 28 feet from the edge of pavement.
• Juan Bautista de Anza National Historic Trail - Segment 2 (JB2): Develop turn-around in a
hammerhead configuration to accommodate Type 3 and 4 emergency fire vehicles. Locate on west
side of bridge in the area that is nearly flat and already contains hardened surfaces and non-native grassland. Avoid nearby riparian habitat and serpentine soils. Refer to Map 36 Fire Protection &
Emergency & Maintenance Access - Turn-around Point 2.
• Juan Bautista de Anza National Historic Trail - Segment 4 (JB4): Mow an area near the junction of the Portola Pastures Trail to provide room for Type 3 and 4 emergency fire vehicles to turn-around
following procedures outlined in Section 7.2. Maintain a minimum cover of 2 inches to minimize
potential erosion impacts. Refer to Figure 36 Fire Protection & Emergency & Maintenance Access - Turn-around Point 10.
• Juan Bautista de Anza National Historic Trail - Segment 5 (JB5): Developing an emergency Type 3
and 4 vehicle hammerhead turn-around at the junction with Segment 4 of the Juan Bautista de Anza Trail. Improvements to the area should be confined, to the greatest extend possible, to the existing
graded area at the trail junction. Refer to Map 4 - Fire Protection & Emergency & Maintenance
Access – Turn-around Point 9.
11 Like many of the recommendations, this has already been accomplished.
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 107
• Juan Bautista de Anza National Historic Trail - Segment 5 (JB5): Providing a 40 to 45 foot “driveway” between Arastradero Road and Access Gate B to allow a safe pull out for maintenance
and emergency vehicles accessing the Preserve.
• Stanford Pastures Trail (SP): One year after the trail tread has been established mow an area near the boundary of the Preserve to provide room for Type 3 and 4 emergency fire vehicles to turn-around
following procedures outlined in section 7.2. Maintain a minimum cover of 2 inches to minimize
potential erosion impacts. Refer to Map 33 Fire Protection & Emergency & Maintenance Access - Turn-around Point 1.
• Meadowlark Trail (MeL1): Develop a hammerhead vehicle turn-around for Type 3 and 4 emergency
vehicles to turn-around near the old barn site. Improvements to the turn-around should be confined to the existing graded pad that formerly served as the driveway for the old barn. Refer to Map 33 Fire
Protection & Emergency & Maintenance Access – Turn-around Point 7.
• Woodland Trail Segment 1(Wo1): Maintain existing, paved vehicular turn-around that encircles the water tank for utility vehicles. Note that this turn-around is not suitable for Type 3 and 4 fire vehicles
due to the tight turning radius around the tank. Refer to Map 4 - Fire Protection & Emergency &
Maintenance Access – Turn-around Point 8.
4.1.3 Vegetation Management
4.1.3.1 Brushing and Clearing Defined
Brushing and clearing constitutes the removal of vegetative materials as required to provide adequate vertical and horizontal clearance for safe passage along a trail.
4.1.3.2 Techniques for Maintaining a Clear Passageway
Vegetation on the south sides of the trail should be pruned to allow passage, but should be preserved, as much
as possible, to protect the aesthetic quality of the trail. Typically, vegetation is cleared to a height of 10 feet and 2 to 3 feet to either side of the trail edge to accommodate equestrian use. A minimum sight distance of
100 feet should be maintained, where feasible to facilitate safe shared use of the trail system.
Good pruning practices should be followed, including cutting branches almost flush with the limb, and cutting stumps at ground level or below. Large limbs should be pruned almost flush with the trunk. Dead and dying
limbs and snags, which may fall on the trail, should be removed. Typically, ground cover plants and low
shrubs should not be removed except on the actual trail tread.
Where specific trail segments (Refer to Section 6) recommend controlling invasive, non-native plants, the Arastradero Preserve Management Plan management strategies should be used. This means that vegetation
management adjacent to the trails should be performed in a way that maximizes the safety of the users and
minimizes adverse environmental impacts. Appropriate management techniques include in order of preference, control with “beneficial insects”, where they have been determined through study not to have detrimental environmental impacts, removal by hand pulling, or pruning with weed whips or (as a last choice)
with chemicals. When weed whips are employed, a 2-inch minimum cover should be retained to minimize
exposure of bare earth and resulting impacts from splash erosion and gullying. Herbicides should only be used as approved by the Open Space and Parks Division Manager. In addition, the chemicals must be applied
in accordance with California State law and must adhere to the conditions set forth in the City’s “Integrated
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 108
Pest Management Plan” to ensure the safety of staff, visitors and wildlife and to reduce or eliminate the possibility of chemicals entering the creek.
Where a trail is located on a side slope, the vegetation on the uphill side will be more intrusive and should be
cut back more severely than on the downhill side.
Low growing vegetation should be allowed to return to cut slopes to increase soil stability. Replant areas with vegetation indigenous to those areas or compatible with plantings already in place.
Overhanging limbs should be cut back flush with the tree trunk, brush should be grubbed out and disposed of
out of sight of the trail and scattered not stacked. Excess rock should be disposed of in the same manner as brush and limbs. All loose roots protruding over one inch above the trail tread should be cut out to at least 4 inches beyond the margins of the tread and to a depth of 4 inches below tread level and removed. Holes
resulting from root removal should be filled and compacted with mineral soil and or rock, not exceeding 2
inches in diameter.
Advance warning of all vegetation management activities in the Preserve shall be given to the Open Space
and Parks Division Manager at least one week in advance of the work.
Turn-around Existing Conditions Recommended Actions
#1
Trail: SP
Mowed grassland dominated by non-native
plants
Mow area near boundary of the Preserve for Type 3 & 4 emergency fire vehicles to turn-around. Maintain 2” min. grass
cover.
#2
Trail:JB2
Area is nearly flat &
already contains hardened surfaces and non-native
grassland
Perform minor grading to develop hammerhead turn-around for
Type 3 & 4 emergency fire vehicles on west side of bridge in the area that is nearly flat. Avoid nearby riparian habitat and
serpentine soils.
#3
Trail: Jct. ArC
& Ac
Existing hardened surface
adjacent to lake & utility booster station.
Maintain the existing vehicle turn-around at booster pump
station. No grading or vegetation removal required.
#4
Trail: CM2
Mowed grassland
dominated by non-native plants
Mow area at junction of Bay View Trail for Type 3 & 4
emergency fire vehicles to turn-around. Maintain 2” min. grass cover.
#5
Trail:ArC2
Grassland dominated by
non-native plants on opposite side of utility road
from creek & does not
affect creek zone
Perform minor grading to develop hammerhead turnaround in
area that is nearly flat near junction of Route F (now scheduled for closure) for Type 3 & 4 emergency fire vehicles. Define area
with native vegetation in a natural configuration. Avoid nearby
riparian habitat.
#6
Trail: ArC3
Existing dirt driveway. No
grading or vegetation removal required
Locate at existing gate on the east side of the trail. Move gate
back to accommodate Type 3 & 4 emergency fire vehicles. Confine turn-around area to existing graded pad. Minimize
annual pruning to area necessary for vehicle access.
#7 Existing drive to old barn site. No grading or Confine turn-around to existing graded pad that formerly served
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 109
Trail: MeL1 vegetation removal req. as the driveway for the old barn.
#8
Trail: Wo1
Existing road around the water tank. Tight radius
will not accommodate Type 3 & 4 vehicles
Maintain existing, paved vehicular turn-around that encircles water tank for utility vehicles.
#9
Trail: Jct. JB 4 & 5
Flat grassland area at junction of two trails.
Minor grading may be
necessary
Perform minor grading to develop hammerhead turnaround at the junction Juan Bautista de Anza Trail Segs. 4 & 5. Confined work
(to the greatest extend possible) to existing graded area at the trail
junction.
#10
Trail: JB 4
Mowed grassland Mow an area near junction with Portola Pastures Trail to provide room for Type 3 & 4 emergency fire vehicles to turn-around.
Maintain 2” min. grass cover.
Figure 37: Vehicle Turn-around Design Summary.
Final siting of all turn–around to be approved by Open Space and Parks Division Manager prior to initiating any grading.
4.2 Foothills Park Trails Maintenance Plan (January 29, 2002)
The Trails Master Plan for Foothills Park recognizes that the preserve is located in the Hazardous Fire Area
(HFA) and Mutual Threat Zone (MTZ). The plan identifies the existing fuel break system but focuses on maintenance of the existing trails.
4.2.1 Recommended Revisions
The following are recommended additions and modifications to the 2002 Trails Maintenance Plan:
• Addition of fuel management along the additional evacuation routes to northwest (Interpretive Center to The 600-700 block of Los Trancos Road), northeast (Boronda Lake to Alexis Drive), and from Towle Campground along Wildhorse Valley to Las Trampas Valley.
• Addition of four Firefighter Safety Zones along Trappers Ridge Trail at Los Trancos Trail, Madrone Fire Road and two highpoints (high point and south end); projects # F.F1, through F.F4.
• Addition of annual maintenance of defensible space around the Interpretive Center, parking lot and
staging area, campgrounds, pumping stations to include projects F.D1 through F.D8.
• Addition of annual maintenance ignition reduction projects at picnic sites and campgrounds to
include projects F.I1 through F.I7.
• Addition of fuel reduction zones along existing trails for containment including projects F.C1
(Trappers Trail), F.C2 (Pony Tracks south of Trappers Ridge), F.C3 (Pony Tracks north of Trappers
Ridge), F.C4 (Bobcat Point) and F.C5 (north of entry gate).
• Modify tables for managing trails within specific vegetation types to accommodate fuel modification
performance standards for the containment projects.
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 110
• Addition to Regulatory, Warning and Educational Signs regarding fire hazard signs, education information on fuel management and prescribed fire.
4.2.2 Existing Fire Mitigation and Fuel Management in the Foothills Park
Trails Maintenance Plan
Staff Responsibilities (Executive Summary, page 104)
The foothills parks are staffed by rangers that are based out of the Foothills Park office. Park rangers are
responsible for patrolling, monitoring and maintaining Foothills Park. They oversee the fieldwork of the
California Conservation Corps (CCC) work program, as well as other volunteer work programs at the Park. Rangers also lead guided nature walks and give nature slide shows. In addition, while the primary
responsibility for fire and medical emergencies lies with the City Fire Department, rangers will typically be
the first response team for fire and medical emergencies within the park.
Park Maintenance/Utility/Emergency (e.g. fire) (Section 2.4 pg 2-5)
There are three other entry points off Page Mill Road that maintenance and emergency vehicles use to provide
access from Page Mill Road. These are labeled as Gates 2, 3 and 4. Gate 2 provides access to the Charlie
Brown firebreak and Toyon Trail. Gate 3 provides access to the Park Reservoir, a 1.5 million gallon city water reservoir. Gate 4 provides access to the Trapper’s Fire Trail and to the southern portion of the Los
Trancos Trail. In addition, utility vehicles and park maintenance/patrol vehicles wanting to access the
Arastradero Creek Trail (Segment 3) within Arastradero Preserve enter Foothills Park and access this trail from Gate D. Gate D is located on the one-way road that leads from the Interpretive Center to Vista Hill in Foothills Park. There is also an access easement from Los Trancos Road in Portola Valley connecting to the
service yard at the north end of the park. This easement is only accessible by park staff.
Hazardous Fire Area (Section 2.4 pg 2-6): The Park is identified in the Hazardous Fire Area because of the tremendous vegetation fuel load and the potential for extended response times in the event of a fire due to
limited access/egress into the park. The area has also been designated as a Mutual Threat Zone (MTZ) by
agreement with the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. This means that a fire within the
City’s jurisdiction is a threat to the State’s jurisdiction and vice versa.
Firebreaks (Section 2.4 page 2-6 – 2-8): To meet the City’s objective of “reducing government costs and
citizen losses from wildland fire by increasing initial attack success and or protecting assets at risk through focused prefire management objectives” a fuel break system has been designed and implemented for Foothills Park. The main firebreak (by distance and location) is the Trapper’s Firebreak Trail. It is two miles long,
essentially running along the spine of the park. There are also several smaller breaks that are maintained as
access roads for fire response. These branching firebreaks, which are located throughout the park, and the
Trappers Firebreak Trail, are graded and compacted to a width of 10 feet or greater to accommodate the City Fire Department’s Type 3 and 4 vehicles. These firebreak trails have the potential to be reduced in width, or
substituted with shaded fuel breaks if environmentally desirable. (A shaded fuel break allows annual grasses
to return to the land, but not medium or heavy fuels.)
Evacuation (Section 2.4 Page 2–8): In addition to the firebreak trail network, “safety islands” have been
identified in the park and an evacuation plan has been developed for the park. The primary evacuation route
(as identified in the Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan) is Page Mill Road. The main road through the park
connects to an access easement that provides an alternate evacuation route between Page Mill Road and Los Trancos Road.
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 111
Natural Resources Management Objectives Adjacent to the Trail (Section 3.4 pg 304). Retaining native vegetation except in areas where City personnel determine that plants are creating a fire or safety hazard, or where vegetation is located within the tread of routinely maintained roads, trails and designated firebreaks
Noxious Plants and Pathogens (Page 4-17 – 4-24): Control and prevention of non-native invasive plant
species is recognized as quite important. Infestations of non-native invasive plant species have been found to alter ecosystem functions such as nutrient cycles, hydrology, and wildfire frequency. Non-native invasive
plant species pose a complex problem, but the management of the spread is a key factor in preventing long-
lasting and negative effects on the native ecosystem. The plan recognizes that trail maintenance activities need to address the fact that most of these species gain a foothold by invading soil that has been disturbed, such as through re-grading or vegetation clearing that results in the removal of ground cover plants adjacent to the
trail tread. The plan includes a table of the non-native invasive plants of greatest ecological concern. (Table
4-6 page 4-18 – 4-24.)
Sudden Oak Death (SOD) (page 4-24 – 4-25): Sudden Oak Death is caused by the pathogen Phytophthora
ramorum that kills oaks and several other California woodland species found in Foothills Park. The pathogen
appears to kill trees and shrubs swiftly and has greatly affected the visual integrity and diversity of the
California Oak woodland as it is defined today. First discovered in California on Tan Oaks in 1995, it has now been confirmed in ten California counties, including Santa Clara County. Note: Information available on this SOD has expanded since the maintenance plan was developed in 2002.
Trails Maintenance Program Development (Section 5.2 pg 5-2): Trail inspections are integral to all trail
maintenance operations. Inspections should occur on a regularly scheduled basis, the frequency of which will depend on the amount of trail use, the location, age, and the types of structures and the types of soil/terrain. At
a minimum, all trail and trail structures/features should be inspected at least once a year at the close of the
winter “wet season”. All trail inspections should be documented in writing in a field log. Conditions that
have the potential to be the most hazardous to the public, which should be watched for during field inspections, include:
• Heavy fuel loads which could create a high or critical danger fire hazard in the park.
Other Staff Duties Related to Park Protection & Trail Activities (Section 5.3 pg 5-9): While the primary responsibility for fire and medical emergencies lies with the City Fire Department, Park Rangers will typically
be the first response team for fire and medical emergencies within the Park. Foothills Park Rangers have
received various limited levels of fire fighting training and are dispatched as a resource to fires and other emergency calls. They are a valuable resource as they provide enhanced local knowledge of the area, and can
be used to augment Engine Eight or to perform other tasks, such as evacuation or reconnaissance. The Palo
Alto Fire Department has rated the Rangers control of public areas and Park maintenance practices, which
augment the City’s fuel management system as outstanding (Palo Alto Draft Fire Management Plan, April 1997).
Trail Maintenance Guidelines (Section 6 pages 6-1 – 6-81): Section 6.3 provides an overview in table format
of the existing trail characteristics (Table 6-1 page 6-4 through 6-8). The tables currently do not include information regarding whether the trail segments are a part of the firebreak system.
Section 6.5 (pages 6-10 through 6-21) includes management strategies for maintaining hiking trails. A series
of tables provides a summary of managing trails within grasslands/ oak savanna (Table 6-2), chaparral (Table
6-3), mixed woodlands (Table 6-4) and bay woodlands (Table 6-5). These tables include treatments of the vegetation ground plan, middle plane and overhead canopy. They do not specifically address management
practices to be used if the trail is a part of a fire containment area. Section 6-8 includes Vegetation
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 112
Management Recommendations text that expands upon the summary tables with additional descriptions and standards (pages 6-56 – 6-63).
Trail Communication Tools (Section 6.11 pg 6-77 through 6-81): Trail signs include temporary/ permanent
closures for hazards associated with critical fire danger (page 6-80). Interpretive trail guides and programs
offer the opportunity to educate visitors about the biological diversity of Foothills Park and the importance of staying on trails to avoid damaging this unique resource (page 6-81).
City of Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan Update
Draft (15 January 2009) 113
5 REFERENCES
Acterra - Action for a sustainable earth, www.acterra.org, 3291 East Bayshore Rd., Palo Alto, CA 94303,
meetings September 2008.
Anderson, H.E. 1983. Aids to determining fuel models for estimating fire behavior. USDA Forest Service
General Technical Report. INT-122.
California Department of Parks and Recreation, Initial Study Mitigated Negative Declaration – Andrew
Molera State Park / Pt Sur State Historic Park Water System Improvements, April 2006.
California Native Plant Society, Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants of California, August 2001
City of Palo Alto, Final Arastradero Preserve Trails Management Program, 2001
City of Palo Alto, Final Foothills Park Preserve Trails Management Program, 2002
City of Palo Alto, Geospatial Information System Data, provided May 2008
Environmental Protection Agency, Frogs and Pesticide Hazards, December 2006
Finney, M.A. 2006. An overview of FlamMap modeling capabilities. USDA Forest Service Proceedings.
RMRS-P-41. 213p.
Grijalva, Ruben, Fire Chief, Martin, Bruce, Project Manager, Palo Alto Fire Department, Palo Alto Foothills Fire Management Plan, April 1997
Ministry of Water, land, and Air Protection, British Columbia, Environmental Best Management Practices for
Urban and Rural Land Development, June 2004
Natural Diversity Database, California Department of Fish and Game, Special Vascular Plants, Bryophytes, and Lichens List, July 2008
Natural Diversity Database, California Department of Fish and Game, Endangered, Threatened and Rare
Plants List, July 2008
Natural Diversity Database, California Department of Fish and Game, Special Animals List, Feb 2008
Natural Diversity Database, California Department of Fish and Game, Endangered and Threatened Animals
List, May 2008
Rothermel, Richard. 1983. How to Predict the Spread and Intensity of Forest and Range Fires, USDA Forest Service Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, General Technical Report INT-143.
Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. U.S.
General Soil Map (STATSGO2) for California.
United States Geological Survey, United States Department of Interior. The National Map LANDFIRE: LANDFIRE National Existing Vegetation Type (2006 September – 2008, May).