Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Report 4013 City of Palo Alto (ID # 4013) City Council Staff Report Report Type: Consent Calendar Meeting Date: 10/7/2013 City of Palo Alto Page 1 Summary Title: Reject Bids: Electrical Systems Upgrade at the Administration Building of the RWQCP Title: Rejections of Bids for the Administration Building Electrical Systems Upgrade Project at Regional Water Quality Control Plant - Capital Improvement Program Project WQ-80021 From: City Manager Lead Department: Public Works Recommendation Staff recommends that Council reject all bids for the construction of the Administration Building Electrical Systems Upgrade Project at the Regional Water Quality Control Plant (CIP WQ-80021). Executive Summary The Electrical Systems Upgrade project, which would provide emergency power and new electrical equipment for the Administration Building at the Regional Water Quality Control Plant (RWQCP), was issued for bid, and two excessively high bids were received. The bids for the project should be rejected as the bid price of the project is not justifiable. The project will be evaluated for possible repackaging to attract more competitive bidding and to be more cost effective. Background On May 21, 2012, Council awarded a contract to DTN Engineers, Inc. (Staff Report #2761) to provide engineering services to design an electrical system to replace the existing system in the Administration Building of the RWQCP. The design has been completed. The plans and specifications were issued for bid on July 16, City of Palo Alto Page 2 2013. Discussion The project requires installation of high voltage electrical equipment. Industrial electrical contracting firms are most qualified to handle the project. A limited number of general contractors who have in-house electrical workers can also construct the project effectively. The bid documents attempted to attract the electrical contractors. However, none of the electrical contractors responded to the invitation for bid and only two general contractors submitted bids for the project. Staff contacted several electrical contractors who did not respond to the bid. All of the electrical contractors that staff contacted stated that the timing of the project was the reason for their decision not to respond. They explained that they were already committed to similar projects and did not have additional resources. The engineer’s estimate for the project is $1.5 million and is based on actual quotes from equipment manufacturers as well as historical labor cost for similar projects. The estimation method is traditional and widely used. The two bids are significantly higher than the engineer’s estimate. Staff believes that two major factors contributed to the cost difference. First, the lack of competition disadvantaged the project. Staff contacted other wastewater treatment facilities that have similar projects on-going and a comparison of the project costs confirmed that the bids on our project were high. The failure of the project to attract qualified electrical contractors is a major concern. If this project is to move forward, the RWQCP needs to find ways to attract more qualified bidders. It is possible that issuing the project for bid at a later date, when the electrical contractors are not as busy, would gain some potential bidders. Staff would need to maintain contact and communication with potential bidders to elicit interest in the project. Secondly, another factor of concern is related to specific requirements in the equipment specification and method of execution. In estimating the material costs, the consultant relied on manufacturers’ quotes. It appears that the quotes City of Palo Alto Page 3 did not account for the costs for certain specific requirements, which contributed to discrepancies in the material costs. The RWQCP would need to evaluate the cost benefits of some of the features and requirements. Normally, value engineering will not be performed on projects of this size. However, in this case, the project may benefit from value engineering in order to reduce cost. Project Description The work to be performed under the project is to relocate and install an existing generator, furnish and construct an electrical building above the flood level, furnish and install a new electrical load center, step-down transformer, motor control center (MCC), and provide a control system. Summary of Bid Process Bid Name/Number RWQCP Administration Building Systems Upgrade Project IFB #151059 Proposed Length of Project 13 months Number of Bids Mailed to Contractors 21 Number of Bids Mailed to Builder’s Exchanges 2 Total Days to Respond to Bid 35 Pre-Bid Meeting Yes Number of Company Attendees at Pre-Bid Meeting 11 Number of *Bids Received: 2 Base Bid Price Range From a low of $2,578,000 to a high of $2,814,000. *Bid summary provided in Attachment A. Staff has reviewed all bids submitted in accordance with the award criteria in the Invitation for Bid (IFB), and recommends that Council reject all bids. Staff will City of Palo Alto Page 4 evaluate how to repackage the project to attract more bidders and perform value engineering to reduce costs. If the project can be constructed in a cost effective manner, staff will return to Council for funding to redesign/repackage the project for rebid. Resource Impact Funds for the project are budgeted in the Wastewater Treatment Fund, Capital Improvement Program Project WQ-80021. Policy Implications Recommendation on this project does not represent a change in existing City policies. Environmental Review The recommended action is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15303, (a Class 3 exemption) which involves construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures. Attachments:  Attachment A: Bid Summary (PDF) Attachment A Bid Summary Administration Building Systems Upgrade Project IFB 151059 Engineer’s Estimate Anderson Pacific Engr. Blocka Construction Mobilization $35,000 $100,000 $100,000 Demobilization $20,000 $10,000 $20,000 Furnish & install MCC L $355,000 $500,000 $600,000 Furnish & install prefab building $170,000 $480,000 $500,000 Furnish & install LC 10 $170,000 $280,000 $300,000 Furnish & install 15 KV system $116,000 $300,000 $300,000 Furnish & install control system $96,000 $300,000 $300,000 Switch over operation $21,000 $70,000 $50,000 Differing site conditions $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 Transport & install existing generator $5,000 $8,000 $5,000 All other work $470,000 $480,000 $589,000 Total $1,508,000 $2,578,000 $2,814,000