HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001-10-16 City Council (3)TO:
ATTN:
City of Palo Alto
City Manager’s Report
HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL
POLICY AND SERVICES COMMITTEE
FROM:
DATE:
CITY MANAGER
OCTOBER 16, 2001
DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS
CMR:384:01
SUBJECT:APPROVAL OF SCOPE OF SERVICES FOR MAIN LIBRARY/ART
CENTER CONCEPTUAL DESIGNS
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Policy and Services Committee review and approve the
attached consultant contract scope of services for the Main Library/Art Center expansion
conceptual designs and authorize staff to issue the request for proposal (RFP) for this
project.
BACKGROUND
Policy and Procedure 1-10 stipulates that scopes of service for consultant contracts larger
than $25,000 may be reviewed by the appropriate Council committee. CIP Project No.
10204, Library Master Plan, includes $125,000 to enter into a consultant contract with an
architectural firm to provide conceptual design services for the expansion of the Main
Library. On September 19, 2001, Council approved a Budget Amendment Ordinance for
the Library Master Plan which included $125,000 to enter into a consultant contract with
an architectural firm to provide conceptual design services for the expansion of the Art
Center.
DISCUSSION
Staff has discussed the advantages and disadvantages of selecting one or separate
architectural firms to provide the conceptual designs for the Main Library expansion and
the Art Center expansion projects. Staff feels there is an overall benefit in hiring one
consultant for the following reasons:
¯Although separate consultants could design the separate buildings, staff felt it was
important to have one consultant design the site, including parking, landscape and
community gardens.
¯There will be better coordination of the separate building projects if designed by
one firm, particularly with any potentially shared spaces.
CMR:384:01 Page 1 of 3
¯There will be a potential cost savings in hiring one consultant versus two as the
larger the project, the smaller the percentage of the estimated construction cost is
used to determine the architect’s fee.
¯There will be significant savings in staff time by having one consultant solicitation
instead of two.
¯One consultant can present both projects to stafg the community, the Boards and
Commissions, and to Council each time those groups meet. This will require
considerably less staff time to coordinate and staff those meetings than would be
the case if the projects had to be presented at separate times by separate consultants
to the above groups.
In order to ensure that the architect has experience with both library and art center
projects, the request for qualifications (RFQ) & RFP will suggest that architecture firms
with experience in libraries or art centers only partner with another architect or firm that
has experience in the other building type.
Staff has discussed the process for selecting an architect to provide conceptual design
services for the Main Library expansion and the Art Center expansion. Recently, staff
~onducted a two step selection process for the Mitchell Park Library/Community Center
feasibility study that worked very well. Staff would like to use the same process for this
project..
The first step in the selection process is to issue a RFQ. RFQ’s were sent out on
October 3, 2001. Interested firms will submit statements of qualification (SOQ) on
October 19, 2001. The SOQ consists of a letter of interest with general information about
the firm’s qualifications and experience. The SOQ’s will be reviewed by staff and the
leading candidates will be sent a more detailed request for proposal by the end of
October. Firms submitting a proposal will be interviewed in December. The Main
Library/Art Center Project Site Committee, consisting of representatives from the
community gardens, the Art Center Foundation, the Library Advisory Commission,
Friends of the Palo Alto Library, Libraries Now!, and City staff, will conduct the
selection process, participate at the interviews, and select the consultant.
RESOURCE IMPACT
Funds are budgeted Capital Improvement Program Project 10204, Library Master Plan.
POLICY IMPLICATIONS
This recommendation is consistent with existing City policies.
TIMELINE
Staff anticipates selecting a consultant by the beginning of December 2001.
will then be prepared and presented to Council for approval in February 2002.
A contract
CMR:384:01 Page 2 of 3
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Approval of the scope of services and selection of the consultant does not require
environmental review. The Main Library and Art Center projects will both be subject to
the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA
process will start during the conceptual design process.
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: Draft Scope of Services for Main Library/Art Center Expansion RFP
PREPARED BY:
DEPARTMENT HEAD:
BOB MORRIS
Senior Project Manager
GLENN S. ROBERT~
Director of Public Works
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:
EMILY HARRISON
Assistant City Manager
CMR:384:01 Page 3 of 3
PART 1T[ - SCOPE OF SERVICES
ATTACHMENT A
B=
Main Library & Art Center
Conceptual Design Services
Description of Proiect
The City of Palo Alto is requesting proposals~from firms and individuals interested in
providing architectural conceptual design services for the City’s Main Library and the
City’s Art Center.
The City’s Intent Is To:
Complete the current Main Library/Art Center feasibility study and have City
Council approve a site option recommendation in February, 2002.
Enter into a contract with a consultant to have architectural conceptual
designs prepared for the City’s Main Library and the City’S Art Center utilizing
the City Council-approved feasibility study site option.
Have the consultant present the conceptual designs to the community, City
staff, various boards and commissions, and the City Council.
Have the consultant prep&re cost estimates of the conceptual designs.
Upon the City successfully obtaining funding for the Main Library and/or the
Art Center project, amend the consultant contract to include complete
architectural design services.
Ideal Qualifications
The City is inviting submissions from consultants with expertise and experience in
the following areas:
¯Architectural design of libraries and art centers. Consultants may consider
forming partnerships to provide this experience.
¯Green building and sustainable design
¯Soliciting design input from the community and incorporating this input into the
architectural design
¯The ability to work closely with City staff, boards and commissions and the
buildings’ users
¯Preparation of accurate construction cost estimates for building projects
¯The ability to complete work on-time and on-budget
¯Working collaboratively with artist(s) to incorporate public art elements into the
overall design
PART III - SCOPE OF SERVICES
D. Backgroun~
The City of Palo Alto owns and operates two separate facilities, the Main Library and
the Art Center, located on contiguous sites at the corner of Embarcadero and Newell
Streets.
In 2000, the City of Palo Alto’s Library Advisory Commission produced the New
Library Plan, which was conceptually approved by the City Council. The Plan calls
for a substantial expansion of the Main Library. In 2001, a program was produced
for the Main Library, also recommending a substantial expansion of the facility.
In 1999, the City Council voted in favor of a public/private partnership with the Palo
Alto Art Center Foundation to explore the feasibility of expanding and renovating the
Art Center. In 2001, the Art Center Foundation hired architect David Robinson to
prepare a program that called for a substantial expansion of the Art Center.
In 2001, the Art Center Foundation contracted with Mark Cavagnero Associates to
prepare a feasibility study to determine the site options for expanding both the Main
Library and the Art Center. The feasibility study is ongoing, with an expected
completion in January, 2002.
A Main Library/Art Center Joint Project Site Committee (Site Committee) is in place
to: review the feasibility study work; select a consultant for the architectural
conceptual design work; and meet with that consultant regularly to coordinate and
review the conceptual design work.
In February, 2002, the City intends to have the City Council select a site option that
will identify the approximate size, location and height for both the Main Library and
the Art Center, as well as the approximate location, size and type of parking
facilities, landscape, hardscape and the community gardens.
E=Elements
~Task 1. Preparation work
City will provide consultant with the Guiding Principles of the Joint Site Stud~ the
feasibility study and the Council-recommended site option.
City will provide consultant with the current programs and all existing plans,
specifications, structural calculations, geotechnical reports, engineering and
architectural assessments, etc. for the Main Library and the Art Center.
Site Committee and consultant will meet to develop the process and schedule for
the work.
PART IH - SCOPE OF SERVICES
Task 2. Community outreach
¯ City will arrange a community meeting in order for the consultant to receive input
regarding the community’s concerns, goals and desires for the Main Library and
the Art Center projects.
¯Site Committee and consultant shall meet to discuss the input from the
community meeting and to discuss and prepare for the preparation of initial
conceptual designs.
Task 3. Initial conceptual designs
¯ Consultant shall prepare approximately three initial conceptual designs for both
the Main Library and the Art Center, utilizing and developing the feasibility study
site option recommended by City Council, the programs and the community
input. The designs will consist of presentation-quality site plans, elevations and
perspective sketches.
¯Site Committee and consultant shall meet to preview the initial conceptual
designs and to discuss and prepare for the presentation of the initial conceptual
designs.
Task 4. Presentation of initial conceptual desiqns
¯ City will arrange meetings with the following groups in order for consultant to
present the initial conceptual designs:
¯City staff
¯Architectural Review Board (ARB)
¯Historical Resources Board (HRB)
¯Planning and Transportation Commission (P&TC)
¯Parks and Recreation Commission (P&RC)
¯Library Advisory Commission (LAC)
¯PublicArt Commission (PAC)
¯ City anticipates there will be four meetings total: one with City staff; one joint
meeting with ARB/HRB/PAC; one joint meeting with P&RC/LAC; and one with
P&TC.
-"l’ask 5. Final conceptual desi.qn
¯ Site Committee and consultant shall meet to discuss the initial conceptual design
presentations and to discuss the preparation .of one final conceptual design for
each facility.
¯Consultant shall prepare one final conceptual design each for the Main Library
and the Art Center incorporating the input, recommendations and direction
received in the meetings in Task 4, and consisting of, at a minimum,
presentation-quality site plan, elevations and perspective sketches.
¯Consultant shall prepare and deliver a construction cost estimate for each of the
final conceptual designs.
PART III - SCOPE OF SERVICES
Task 6. Presentation of final conceptual desiqns
¯ Site Committee and consultant shall meet to discuss and plan for the
presentation of the final conceptual designs to City Council.
¯City shall arrange a meeting with the City Council for consultant to present the
final conceptual designs and estimates.
Consultant Selection
The consultant will be selected based upon qualifications, experience, work
schedule and references from similar projects. For further selection criteria, see
Section 100, "Proposal Instructions and Special Conditions."
G.Proposed Timeline (all dates tentative)
October 29, 2001
November 15, 2001
November 27, 2001
December 6, 2001
Dec ’01 -Jan ’02
February 11, 2002
February 18, 2002
End of February 2002
March 2002
April 2002
June 2002
RFP issued
Pre-proposal Conference
Deadline for receipt of Proposals
Interviews, consultant selected
Contract negotiated, prepared, reviewed, signed
Contract approved by City Council
City issues Notice to Proceed
Consultant meets with Site Committee to plan work
Community outreach meeting
Cofisultant prepares and presents initial conceptual
designs to Boards and Commissions
Consultant prepares and presents final conceptual
designs to Council
H.Questions Regarding This RFP
If you~have any questions regarding this RFP, please contact Laura Pearce, Purchasing
Department, at (650) 329-2162 or via e-mail at laura_pearce@city.palo-alto.ca.us.
!.-- "-Rights of the City of Palo Alto
This RFP does not commit the City of Palo Alto to enter into a Contract, nor does it
obligate the City to pay for any costs incurred in preparation and submission of
proposals or in anticipation of a contract.
PART III - SCOPE OF SERVICES
The City may investigate the qualifications of any Proposer under consideration, require
confirmation of information furnished by the Proposer, and require additional evidence or
qualifications to perform the Services described in this RFP. The City reserves the right to:
1.Reject any or all proposals.
2.Issue subsequent Requests for Proposals.
3.Postpone opening for its own convenience.
4.Remedy technical errors in the Request for Proposals process.
5.Approve or disapprove the use of particular subcontractors.
6.Negotiate with any, all, or none of the Proposers.
7.Solicit best and final offers from all or some of the Proposers.
8.Award a contract to one or more Proposers.
9.Waive informalities and irregularities in proposals.
Guiding Principles for the Joint Development of the Main Library and the Art Center
1)
3)
4)
5)
7)
9)
The library and art center facilities should enable the two institutions to fulfill their
respective missions
The building/buildings should create a unified, complementary appearance
They should create a presence and have a clear identity
The entrance should be obvious for both pedestrians and drivers
Site design should encourage the use of both facilities
Space should be used efficiently and creatively
Provision should be made for new ideas, new programs, and new synergies
The library and art center should seek ways to coordinate and integrate services and
programs
Exhibits
Reception area / ilfformation desk
Technology .
Auditorium
Gift shop
Meeting room
Cafe
Kitchen
Patios
Outdoor program spaces
Technology
Reception and information area
The site design should provide for the easy flow of foot, car, and bicycle traffic as
well as ample parking
The building/buildings should be environmentally sensitive
"~’~-en buildings"
trees and landscaping
outdoor spaces
indoor - outdoor circulation
Both capital costs and operating expenses of the new buildings are important
The library and the art center want to be good neighbors
Community gardens
Neighborhood
Feb 24,2001