The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutStaff Report 10604 CITY OF PALO ALTO OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK August 21, 2019 The Honorable City Council Palo Alto, California Interviews of Candidates for an Unfinished Term on the Architectural Review Board On Monday, August 5, 2019, City Council selected to interview five applicants for a position on the Architectural Review Board (ARB) with an unfinished term ending December 15, 2020. The City Council will be scheduled to vote to appoint a candidate on Monday, September 9, 2019. Architectural Review Board The five ARB applicants to be interviewed are as follows: 10-minute interviews 1. Steven Eichler* 6:00 P.M. 2. Grace Lee 6:10 P.M. 3. Amie Neff* 6:20 P.M. 4. Curtis Smolar * 6:30 P.M. 5. Shri Chawla* 6:40 P.M. * These applicants are unconfirmed at the time of publication of this Staff Report. Copies of all applications are attached to this Staff Report. Some applications may be redacted at the request of the applicant. A full set of non - redacted applications will be provided to Council Members directly. Background Architectural Review Board 2.22.010 There is created an Architectural Review Board consisting of five persons appointed by the City Council, and at least three of whom shall be architects, landscape architects, building designers or other design professionals. (Ord. 5208 § 9, 2013: Ord. 4826 § 2 (Exh. 1 (part)), 2004) ATTACHMENTS: • Attachment A: Architectural Review Board (ARB) Applications (PDF) Page 2 Department Head: Beth Minor, City Clerk Page 3 Architectural Review Board Personal Information – Note: The ARB regularly meets the first and third Thursdays of the month at 8:30 a.m. Name: Address: Cell Phone: __ Home / __ Office Phone: E-mail: Are you a Palo Alto Resident? __ Yes __ No Do you have any relatives or members of your household who are employed by the City of Palo Alto, who are currently serving on the City Council, or who are Commissioners or Board Members? __ Yes __ No Are you available and committed to complete the term applied for? __ Yes __ No California state law requires appointed board and commission members to file a detailed disclosure of their financial interests, Fair Political Practices Commission, Conflict of Interest, Form 700. Do you or your spouse have an investment in, or do you or your spouse serve as an officer or director of, a company doing business in Palo Alto which you believe is likely to; 1) engage in business with the City, 2) provide products or services for City projects, or 3) be affected by decisions of the board or commission you are applying for? __ Yes __ No Excluding your principal residence, do you or your spouse own real property in Palo Alto? __ Yes __ No How did you learn about the vacancy on the Architectural Review Board? __ Community Group __ Email from City Clerk __ Palo Alto Weekly __ Daily Post __ City Website __ Flyer Other: ______________________________________________________________________________ List relevant education, training, experience, certificates of training, licenses, or professional registration: (621 characters) Employment Present or Last Employer: Occupation: Page 1 Architectural Review Board Extended deadline April 2, 2019 at 4:30pm Describe your involvement in community activities, volunteer and civic organizations: (1311 characters) 1.What is it about the Architectural Review Board that is compatible with your experience and of specific interest to you, and why? (1449 characters) Page 2 Architectural Review Board 2.Please describe an issue that recently came before the Board that is of particular interest to you and describe why you are interested in it. If you have never been to a Board meeting you can view an archived video from the Midpen Media Center: LINK (1449 characters) 3.If appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Architectural Review Board achieve, and why? How would you suggest accomplishing this? (1587 characters) Page 3 Architectural Review Board 4.Please identify a project or projects that you find to be examples of good architecture, and explain why. You may attach samples, identify project addresses, or provide links. If you attach samples, Staff may request that you bring hard copy print outs to the interviews. (1035 characters) 5.Architectural Review Board Members work with the documents listed below. If you have experience with any of these documents, please describe that experience. Experience with these documents is not required for selection. (1173 characters) Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan LINK Zoning Code LINK El Camino Real Design Guidelines LINK El Camino Real Master Plan Study LINK Area Plans such as the South of Forest Avenue (SOFA) I and II Plans LINK California Environmental Quality Act LINK Permit Streamline Act LINK Density Bonus Law LINK Secretary of the Interior’s Standards LINK Page 4 Architectural Review Board California Government Code Section 6254.21 states, in part, “No state or local agency shall post the home address or telephone number of any elected or appointed official on the Internet without first obtaining the written permission of that individual.” This consent form will not be redacted and will be attached to the Application and posted to the City’s website. The full code can be read here: LINK Read the code, and check only ONE option below: I give permission for the City of Palo Alto to post to the City’s website the attached Board and Commission Application intact. I have read and understand my rights under Government Code Section 6254.21. I may revoke this permission at any time by providing written notice to the Palo Alto City Clerk. OR I request that the City of Palo Alto redact my home address, phone numbers, and email address from the attached Board and Commission Application prior to posting to the City’s website. I am providing the following alternate information and request that they use the following contact information instead. Address: Cell Phone: __ Home / __ Office Phone: E-mail: Signature: ________________________________________________________ Date: _____________ Page 5 Architectural Review Board Consent to Publish Personal Information on the City of Palo Alto Website Architectural Review Board Personal Information – Note: The ARB regularly meets the first and third Thursdays of the month at 8:30 a.m. Name: Address: Cell Phone: __ Home / __ Office Phone: E-mail: Are you a Palo Alto Resident? __ Yes __ No Do you have any relatives or members of your household who are employed by the City of Palo Alto, who are currently serving on the City Council, or who are Commissioners or Board Members? __ Yes __ No Are you available and committed to complete the term applied for? __ Yes __ No California state law requires appointed board and commission members to file a detailed disclosure of their financial interests, Fair Political Practices Commission, Conflict of Interest, Form 700. Do you or your spouse have an investment in, or do you or your spouse serve as an officer or director of, a company doing business in Palo Alto which you believe is likely to; 1) engage in business with the City, 2) provide products or services for City projects, or 3) be affected by decisions of the board or commission you are applying for? __ Yes __ No Excluding your principal residence, do you or your spouse own real property in Palo Alto? __ Yes __ No How did you learn about the vacancy on the Architectural Review Board? __ Community Group __ Email from City Clerk __ Palo Alto Weekly __ Daily Post __ City Website __ Flyer Other: ______________________________________________________________________________ List relevant education, training, experience, certificates of training, licenses, or professional registration: (621 characters) Employment Present or Last Employer: Occupation: Page 1 Architectural Review Board Extended deadline April 2, 2019 at 4:30pm LEED AP Professional design experience in Bay Area architecture offices: Carrasco & Associates in Palo Alto, Field Paoli in San Francisco, Hood Design Studio in Oakland Adjunct Faculty at University of San Francisco, Lecturer at Stanford University, University of California, Berkeley Past ARB Member, City of Palo Alto Stanford University, Pre-Collegiate Studies 2349 Cornell Street 415-505-5713 jgracelee@gmail.com 4 Senior Associate Director of Academic Programs 650-497-0435 Grace Lee Grace Lee Describe your involvement in community activities, volunteer and civic organizations: (1311 characters) 1.What is it about the Architectural Review Board that is compatible with your experience and of specific interest to you, and why? (1449 characters) Page 2 Architectural Review Board I joined the City of Palo Alto's Architectural Review Board in 2005 and served as a member for almost 2 terms. I was relieved by a former member at the end of my second term for maternity leave. At my daughters' school, I co-chaired a 4-year masterplan effort for the planning of the physical campus, working with school administrators and the community. In recent years, I have been worked in development with a local non-profit organisation in affordable housing. For the past two years I have been assisting a non-profit with a cross cultural exchange of local middle school and high school students and visitng Japanese students from Tokyo, promoting STEAM. I enjoy serving as a Pre-Major Advisor/Newcomer Guide of ten undergraduate students, current freshmen and sophomores at Stanford University. I look forward to continuing in mentoring high school students via educational program design and management at Stanford Pre-Collegiate Studies and also via Project Invent as a design engineering Fellow in 2019-20. I first arrived in this area as an undergraduate student some 30 years ago. I have lived, worked her and now am raising my own family here in Palo Alto. It is a wonderful community. My teenage daughters and husband and I enjoy the neighborhoods,parks, and community spaces. I wish to be a part of preserving and planning for change, shaping the future of this place in a positive way. Grace Lee 2.Please describe an issue that recently came before the Board that is of particular interest to you and describe why you are interested in it. If you have never been to a Board meeting you can view an archived video from the Midpen Media Center: LINK (1449 characters) 3.If appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Architectural Review Board achieve, and why? How would you suggest accomplishing this? (1587 characters) Page 3 Architectural Review Board I am interested in many projects that have come before the Board over the years. During this past year, I recall reading about 1700 and 1730 Embarcadero, 2705 El Camino Real and 4115 El Camino Real. I am particularly interested in projects along and the potential of El Camino Real, Embarcadero, California and University Avenues and the program uses of commercial/retail, multi-family housing, and mixed use. My graduate training and professional experience is in Architecture, City and Regional Planning. I hope to contribute to promoting goals of sustainability, designing for appropriate program use that is also flexible for adaptive re-use and change in the future. I would like to serve as a Board member who listens carefully and works collaboratively with the rest of the Board, City representatives and staff. Grace Lee 4.Please identify a project or projects that you find to be examples of good architecture, and explain why. You may attach samples, identify project addresses, or provide links. If you attach samples, Staff may request that you bring hard copy print outs to the interviews. (1035 characters) 5.Architectural Review Board Members work with the documents listed below. If you have experience with any of these documents, please describe that experience. Experience with these documents is not required for selection. (1173 characters) Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan LINK Zoning Code LINK El Camino Real Design Guidelines LINK El Camino Real Master Plan Study LINK Area Plans such as the South of Forest Avenue (SOFA) I and II Plans LINK California Environmental Quality Act LINK Permit Streamline Act LINK Density Bonus Law LINK Secretary of the Interior’s Standards LINK Page 4 Architectural Review Board Lucie Stern Community Center Children's Library College Terrace Library Oak Court Apartments Pacific Art League Whole Foods Market Hana Haus, former Bookstore and Varsity Theater As a professional designer in architecture offices as well as a former ARB member, I have reviewed and consulted the above. Grace Lee California Government Code Section 6254.21 states, in part, “No state or local agency shall post the home address or telephone number of any elected or appointed official on the Internet without first obtaining the written permission of that individual.” This consent form will not be redacted and will be attached to the Application and posted to the City’s website. The full code can be read here: LINK Read the code, and check only ONE option below: I give permission for the City of Palo Alto to post to the City’s website the attached Board and Commission Application intact. I have read and understand my rights under Government Code Section 6254.21. I may revoke this permission at any time by providing written notice to the Palo Alto City Clerk. OR I request that the City of Palo Alto redact my home address, phone numbers, and email address from the attached Board and Commission Application prior to posting to the City’s website. I am providing the following alternate information and request that they use the following contact information instead. Address: Cell Phone: __ Home / __ Office Phone: E-mail: Signature: _______________________________________________________ Date: ______4/28/19_______ Page 5 Architectural Review Board Consent to Publish Personal Information on the City of Palo Alto Website 220 Panama Street, Stanford, CA 94305 jgrace@stanford.edu Grace Lee 650-497-0435 Grace Lee jgracelee@gmail.com mobile. 415.505.5713 1 HIGHER EDUCATION Stanford University Senior Associate Director of Academic Programs 2016 to present Stanford Pre-Collegiate Studies (SPCS) Lead academic recruitment, training and supervision of instructional staff Develop and manage program instruction, outreach and communications Instructor, Summer Institutes, Arts Institute 2015 to 2017 Stanford Pre-Collegiate Studies (SPCS) Instruction of architectural design summer courses and workshops Seasonal Reader 2014 to 2015 Stanford University, Office of Undergraduate Admission Evaluation of undergraduate applications for freshman admission Lecturer 2009 to 2010 Stanford University, Civil and Environmental Engineering Instruction of architecture courses to undergraduates University of San Francisco Adjunct Professor 2007 to 2015 University of San Francisco, Department of Art + Architecture Instruction of architecture courses to undergraduates University of California, Berkeley Lecturer 2004 to 2005, 1997 to 2000 University of California, Berkeley, Architecture, Landscape Architecture Instruction of graduate and undergraduate design courses EDUCATION Master of Architecture and Master of City and Regional Planning 1997 University of California, Berkeley Graduate Student Instructor, 1992-1996 John K. Branner Traveling Fellowship, 1994-1995 Bachelor of Arts in Art History and French Literature, Honors 1991 Stanford University, Stanford, CA Universite de Paris, Sorbonne and Jussieu 1990 Grace Lee jgracelee@gmail.com mobile. 415.505.5713 2 PROFESSIONAL DESIGN Vice President, Senior Project Manager 2006 to 2011 Carrasco & Associates, Palo Alto, CA Management of urban design, commercial and housing projects Carrasco & Associates and the Office of John Barton, Palo Alto, CA 2009 American Institute of Architects California Council Honor Award, Urban Design Leadership in Energy & Environmental Design (LEED) 2007 Accredited Professional (AP) Project Designer 2004 to 2005 Field Paoli, San Francisco, CA Community master plan for a historic neighborhood in Long Beach, CA Associate Designer, Researcher 1994 to 2000 Hood Design, Oakland, CA Master plan for a boulevard in Macon, GA and a historic square in Oakland, CA COMMUNITY Fellow 2019 Project Invent Design mentor of high school students Program Coordinator 2018-2019 SkyLabo, STEAM Design Thinking Coordinator of student cross-cultural exchange Development Associate 2015-2016 Palo Alto Housing Affordable housing advocate Buildings and Grounds/Green School Task Force 2008 to 2014 Co-Chair, Master Plan Update 2011 to 2014 The Nueva School, Hillsborough, CA Management of a 15-year planning vision for the independent school campus Board Member 2005 to 2011 Architectural Review Board, Palo Alto, CA INTERESTS Education, Architecture and Design, Planning, Community Building Architectural Review Board Application 1 of 5 Personal Information Name: Address: Cell Phone: ____ Home / ____ Office Phone: E-mail: Are you a Palo Alto Resident? ____ Yes ____ No Do you have any relatives or members of your household who are employed by the City of Palo Alto, who are currently serving on the City Council, or who are Commissioners or Board Members? ____ Yes ____ No Are you available and committed to complete the term applied for? ____ Yes ____ No lict of Interest Code require appointed board and commission members to file a detailed disclosure of their financial interests, Fair Political Practices Commission, Conflict of Interest, Form 700. Do you have an investment in, or do you serve as an officer or director of, a company doing business in Palo Alto which you believe is likely to; 1) engage in business with the City, 2) provide products or services for City projects, or 3) be affected by decisions of the board or commission you are applying for? ____ Yes ____ No Excluding your principal residence, do you own real property in Palo Alto? ____ Yes ____ No How did you learn about this vacancy? ____ Community Group ____ Email from City Clerk ____ Palo Alto Weekly ____ Daily Post ____ City Website ____ Flyer Other: List relevant education, training, experience, certificates of training, licenses, or professional registration: DocuSign Envelope ID: 95C26E2A-B3A4-423C-BD9E-06F32A2F9D10 Architectural Review Board Application 2 of 5 Employment Present or Last Employer: Occupation: Describe your involvement in community activities, volunteer and civic organizations: 1. What is it about the Architectural Review Board that is compatible with your experience and of specific interest to you, and why? DocuSign Envelope ID: 95C26E2A-B3A4-423C-BD9E-06F32A2F9D10 Architectural Review Board Application 3 of 5 2. Please describe an issue that recently came before the Board that is of particular interest to you and describe why you are interested in it. If you have never been to a Board meeting you can view an archived video from the Midpen Media Center: 3. If appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Architectural Review Board achieve, and why? How would you suggest accomplishing this? DocuSign Envelope ID: 95C26E2A-B3A4-423C-BD9E-06F32A2F9D10 Architectural Review Board Application 4 of 5 4. Please identify a project or projects that you find to be examples of good architecture, and explain why. You may attach samples, identify project addresses, or provide links. If you attach samples, Staff may request that you bring hard copy print outs to the interviews. 5. Architectural Review Board Members work with the documents listed below. If you have experience with any of these documents, please describe that experience. Experience with these documents is not required for selection. Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan Zoning Code El Camino Real Design Guidelines El Camino Real Master Plan Study and Appendices Area Plans such as the South of Forest Avenue (SOFA) I and II Plans California Environmental Quality Act Permit Streamline Act Density Bonus Law Secretary of the Standards DocuSign Envelope ID: 95C26E2A-B3A4-423C-BD9E-06F32A2F9D10 Architectural Review Board Application 5 of 5 Consent to Publish Personal Information on the City of Palo Alto Website California Government Code Section 6254.21 states, in part, This consent form will not be redacted and will be attached The full code can be read here: Read the code, and check only ONE option below: _ Commission Application intact. I have read and understand my rights under Government Code Section 6254.21. I may revoke this permission at any time by providing written notice to the Palo Alto City Clerk. OR I request that the City of Palo Alto redact my home address, phone numbers, and email address providing the following alternate information and request that they use the following contact information instead. Address: Cell Phone: ____ Home / ____ Office Phone: ___________________________________________________ E-mail: ____________________________________________ The phone number / address can be non-public and different than the address collected on page one. Signature: Date: (Optional) Additional Attachment(s) If you would like to submit a resume, work sample, etc. along with your DocuSign Envelope ID: 95C26E2A-B3A4-423C-BD9E-06F32A2F9D10 1 Brettle, Jessica From:Amie Neff <amie.neff@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, April 30, 2019 3:42 PM To:Lunt, Kimberly Cc:Brettle, Jessica Subject:Re: FW: Architectural Review Board Application All Correct. Please resubmit the previous application with the following updates: I would add the following more relevant information for question #2‐‐"Please describe an issue that recently came before the Board that is of particular interest to you and describe why you are interested in it." ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ I realize these are two areas that have not been within the purview of the Architectural Review Board, but these cases will have an enormous impact on our aesthetic world. Many of the questions that come up when grappling with the right way to decide on an ARB case must surely be part of these following city issues: 1) The recently completed study for and adoption of Design Guidelines for Palo Alto's Eichler neighborhoods was something I followed very closely. While only one neighborhood in Palo Alto has an official 'Historic' designation, there are a number of our neighborhoods that were developed by Joseph Eichler throughout the 50's, 60's and 70's which have had a collective design impact on Palo Alto. Many community members feel that history is worth preserving, and others feel like the 'ticky‐tack' house was cheap, inefficient and small. As someone who both believes in 'regional flavor', and as a professional whose job has been to help people transform their spaces to fit their own needs, I felt there were some solutions available to the city to address both ends of the spectrum. The city treated this as an information gathering exercise alone which led to no regulatory adoption or enforcement. They failed to recognize that the majority of community members who were opting to demolish their Eichler homes in order to re‐build weren't doing so for lack of information, but for a disinterest in the City's history. A simple list prioritizing items requiring enforcement for example; massing, materials, & fenestration, or no regulation; fixtures, hardware, & interior space, would have gone a long way to help preserve the distinctive flavor of the city, while allowing for growth and change. 2) The ongoing issue confronting our city with respect to the train corridor bifurcating our residential single family neighborhoods and the eventual grade separation we must choose is another issue I have been dedicated to following. Again, this issue will have visual, aural, and 'flow' impacts that will direct the growth of the neighborhood for many years to come. My particular interest in this issue started because of my home's proximity to the tracks, and the experiences of delays, noise, visibility and the more critical issue of safety. We have lived here long enough to decipher which noises are which, some of them are devastating. We are being asked as a city to address current issues the train poses; crossing from East to West and back in our city is difficult, our school system sends kids back and forth over the tracks all day long, unlike many other municipalities along the corridor our tracks are straddled by single family homes, especially in the south part of the city and contend with the horns, the increased traffic cutting through neighborhoods to avoid the long back‐ups, the bells, the lights, the rumble of the train. We are being asked to imagine just how terrible it will become with the increased service‐something we are trying to put numbers to in order to anticipate reactions to possible crossing closures, or maybe decreased drivers as train service becomes more available, or more bike lanes are added and encouraged, and finally we are being to asked to imagine a future that may not yet exist: is a uni‐directional train really the future? The quick and dirty response to build something fast and cheap is as bad as defaulting to no choice at all because nothing is perfect. My hope is that the city is guided by its citizens to make a choice that everyone can live with, not one that everyone hates equally. ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Thank You for the opportunity, Best Regards, Amie Neff Not ready to submit 1. Click OTHER ACTIONS Your Application? 2. Click FINISH LATER Extended deadline April 2, 2019 at 4:30pm Architectural Review Board Application 1 of 5 Personal Information Note: The ARB regularly meets the first and third Thursdays of the month at 8:30 a.m. Name: Address: Cell Phone: ____ Home / ____ Office Phone: E-mail: Are you a Palo Alto Resident? ____ Yes ____ No Do you have any relatives or members of your household who are employed by the City of Palo Alto, who are currently serving on the City Council, or who are Commissioners or Board Members? ____ Yes ____ No Are you available and committed to complete the term applied for? ____ Yes ____ No lict of Interest Code require appointed board and commission members to file a detailed disclosure of their financial interests, Fair Political Practices Commission, Conflict of Interest, Form 700. Do you or your spouse have an investment in, or do you or your spouse serve as an officer or director of, a company doing business in Palo Alto which you believe is likely to; 1) engage in business with the City, 2) provide products or services for City projects, or 3) be affected by decisions of the board or commission you are applying for? ____ Yes ____ No Excluding your principal residence, do you or your spouse own real property in Palo Alto? ___Yes ___ No How did you learn about this vacancy? ____ Community Group ____ Email from City Clerk ____ Palo Alto Weekly ____ Daily Post ____City Website ____ Flyer Other: List relevant education, training, experience, certificates of training, licenses, or professional registration: (621 characters) DocuSign Envelope ID: 7D70E499-C829-4AC8-85B7-763DD240290C 'YVXMW)7QSPEV ;EZIVPI]7XVIIX &EGLIPSVSJ7GMIRGI7]VEGYWI9RMZIVWMX]2I[LSYWI7GLSSPSJ4YFPMG 'SQQYRMGEXMSRW,SRSVW4VSKVEQ .YVMW(SGXSVEXI7SYXLIVR1IXLSHMWX9RMZIVWMX]7GLSSPSJPE[ 0MGIRWIHXSTVEGXMGIPE[MR'EPMJSVRMEWMRGI0MGIRWIHXSTVEGXMGI PE[MR;EWLMRKXSR('WMRGI GWQSPEV$KQEMPGSQ Not ready to submit 1. Click OTHER ACTIONS Your Application? 2. Click FINISH LATER Extended deadline April 2, 2019 at 4:30pm Architectural Review Board Application 2 of 5 Employment Present or Last Employer: Occupation: Describe your involvement in community activities, volunteer and civic organizations: (1311 characters) 1. What is it about the Architectural Review Board that is compatible with your experience and of specific interest to you, and why? (1449 characters) DocuSign Envelope ID: 7D70E499-C829-4AC8-85B7-763DD240290C *SVQIVFSEVHQIQFIVSJXLI4EPS%PXS0MXXPI0IEKYI -IRXIVIH7]VEGYWI9RMZIVWMX]MRXLILSRSVWTVSKVEQJSGYWMRKSRE GSYVWISJWXYH]MRXIKVEXMRKEVXMRXSGMZMGJSVYQW 7MRGIFIGSQMRKEREXXSVRI]-LEZII\XIRWMZII\TIVMIRGIQIHMEXMRK PMXMKEXMRKERHEHZMWMRKGPMIRXWJVSQMRHMZMHYEPWXSGSPPIKIWSR EVGLMXIGXYVEPWXVYGXYVIW-LEZIVIWSPZIHHS^IRWSJGEWIWVIKEVHMRK MWWYIWVIPEXMRKXSWM^IJMXERHGLEVEGXIVSJERIMKLFSVLSSH 0IKEPMWX-RG +IRIVEP'SYRWIP Not ready to submit 1. Click OTHER ACTIONS Your Application? 2. Click FINISH LATER Extended deadline April 2, 2019 at 4:30pm Architectural Review Board Application 3 of 5 2. Please describe an issue that recently came before the Board that is of particular interest to you and describe why you are interested in it. If you have never been to a Board meeting you can view an archived video from the Midpen Media Center: (1449 characters) 3. If appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Architectural Review Board achieve, and why? How would you suggest accomplishing this? (1587 characters) DocuSign Envelope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ot ready to submit 1. Click OTHER ACTIONS Your Application? 2. Click FINISH LATER Extended deadline April 2, 2019 at 4:30pm Architectural Review Board Application 4 of 5 4. Please identify a project or projects that you find to be examples of good architecture, and explain why. You may attach samples, identify project addresses, or provide links. If you attach samples, Staff may request that you bring hard copy print outs to the interviews. (1035 characters) 5. Architectural Review Board Members work with the documents listed below. If you have experience with any of these documents, please describe that experience. Experience with these documents is not required for selection. (1173 characters) Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan Zoning Code El Camino Real Design Guidelines El Camino Real Master Plan Study Area Plans such as the South of Forest Avenue (SOFA) I and II Plans California Environmental Quality Act Permit Streamline Act Density Bonus Law Secretary of the Standards DocuSign Envelope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ot ready to submit 1. Click OTHER ACTIONS Your Application? 2. Click FINISH LATER Extended deadline April 2, 2019 at 4:30pm Architectural Review Board Application 5 of 5 Consent to Publish Personal Information on the City of Palo Alto Website California Government Code Section 6254.21 states, in part, This consent form will not be redacted and will be attached The full code can be read here: Read the code, and check only ONE option below: _ Commission Application intact. I have read and understand my rights under Government Code Section 6254.21. I may revoke this permission at any time by providing written notice to the Palo Alto City Clerk. OR I request that the City of Palo Alto redact my home address, phone numbers, and email address providing the following alternate information and request that they use the following contact information instead. Address: Cell Phone: ____ Home / ____ Office Phone: ___________________________________________________ Email: ____________________________________________ (Optional) Additional Attachment(s) If you would like to submit a resume, work sample, etc. along with your DocuSign Envelope ID: 7D70E499-C829-4AC8-85B7-763DD240290C DocuSign Envelope ID: 53F82E14-A1CC-494D-B7BE-1DD67604E4B4 DocuSign Envelope ID: 53F82E14-A1CC-494D-B7BE-1DD67604E4B4 DocuSign Envelope ID: 53F82E14-A1CC-494D-B7BE-1DD67604E4B4 DocuSign Envelope ID: 53F82E14-A1CC-494D-B7BE-1DD67604E4B4 DocuSign Envelope ID: 53F82E14-A1CC-494D-B7BE-1DD67604E4B4 Certificate Of Completion Envelope Id: 53F82E14A1CC494DB7BE1DD67604E4B4 Status: Completed Subject: Please DocuSign: ARB Application Source Envelope: Document Pages: 5 Signatures: 1 Envelope Originator: Certificate Pages: 1 Initials: 0 Jessica Brettle AutoNav: Enabled EnvelopeId Stamping: Enabled Time Zone: (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada) 250 Hamilton Ave Palo Alto , CA 94301 jessica.brettle@cityofpaloalto.org IP Address: 12.220.157.20 Record Tracking Status: Original 5/14/2019 4:45:23 PM Holder: Jessica Brettle jessica.brettle@cityofpaloalto.org Location: DocuSign Security Appliance Status: Connected Pool: StateLocal Storage Appliance Status: Connected Pool: City of Palo Alto Location: DocuSign Signer Events Signature Timestamp Shri Chawla shrichawla@icloud.com Security Level: Email, Account Authentication (None) Signature Adoption: Pre-selected Style Using IP Address: 47.154.203.164 Signed using mobile Sent: 5/14/2019 4:53:04 PM Viewed: 5/14/2019 6:28:27 PM Signed: 5/14/2019 6:29:05 PM Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure: Not Offered via DocuSign In Person Signer Events Signature Timestamp Editor Delivery Events Status Timestamp Agent Delivery Events Status Timestamp Intermediary Delivery Events Status Timestamp Certified Delivery Events Status Timestamp Carbon Copy Events Status Timestamp Witness Events Signature Timestamp Notary Events Signature Timestamp Envelope Summary Events Status Timestamps Envelope Sent Hashed/Encrypted 5/14/2019 4:53:04 PM Certified Delivered Security Checked 5/14/2019 6:28:28 PM Signing Complete Security Checked 5/14/2019 6:29:05 PM Completed Security Checked 5/14/2019 6:29:05 PM Payment Events Status Timestamps